CC - 1982-21 - Aproving Tract Map 42132 at 3853 Muscatel Ave•
L J
RESOLUTION NO. 82-21
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD COnMTTIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT
NO. 42132 (3853 MUSCATEL AVENUE1
THE CITY COU"CIL OF TILE CITY OF ROSEMEAT? DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find and determine
that an ao_ nlication was duly filed by u?inifred Saunders requesting
a one-lot subdivision into seven separate narcels on property
located at 3853 Muscatel Avenue; or more specifically known as:
Lots 6 and 7, Tract No. 3360, 3M.B. 73-1, except the
northerly 50 reet of the easterly 150 feet of Lot 6;
and. that a public hearing was scheduled for January 26, 1982, and
subsenuently continued to March 23, 1982, at 8:00 p.m., in the
Council Chambers of Rosemead City Hall, 8838 Valley Boulevard,
Rosemead, California; and that notice of the time, date, place and
purpose of the aforesaid hearing was given according to law; and
that a public hearing was duly conducted at the aforementioned time
and p].ace.
SECTION 2. The City Council further finds that this sub-
division is in conformance with the Land Use Element of the General
?Ian;
a. The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan of
th.e City of Rosemead. There is no specific elan.
b. The design of the proposed subdivision and improvements
are consistent with the applicable General Plan. There is no specific
clan.
C. The site is physically suitable for the type of develop-
tnent.
d.. The desiq_n of the subdivision will not conflict with
public easements.
e. The design and proposed improvements of the subdivision
will have no adverse effect on fish, wildlife or their habitat, or
cause anv public health problems. A Negative Declaration has
been prepared in compliance with Rosemead Resolution 79-77, CEQA,
and the guidelines for the implementation of CEQA.
f. Discharge of wastes from the proposed subdivision will
not result in violation of existing requirements as prescribed by
the California Regional T4ater Board.
SECTION 3. Tentative Tract 42132 is hereby approved subject
to the conditions listed on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 4. The Citv Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 27th day of April, 1982
MAYOR
•
Resolution 82-21
Page Two
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) ss.
CITY OF ROSEMEAD )
•
I, Ellen Poochigian, City Clerk of the City of Rosemead, California,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 82-21, was
duly adopted by the Rosemead City Council and approved by the
Mayor at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 27th day of April,
1982, and was adopted by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Councilmen Cichy,Cleveland,Imperial,Taylor & Mayor Tury
NAPES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
City Clerk of th City of Rosemead
0 0
EXHIBIT "A"
Resolution No. 82-21
1. That the applicant shall comply with all the conditions as set
forth in the City Engineer's report dated September 4, 1981,
and to include the requirements as set forth by the Fire Depart-
ment.
2. That the street shall be constructed in accordance with the
approved tentative tract , and shall include curb and gutter,
within one (1) year from the final tract auoroval.
3. That a covenant shall be prepared by the applicant for review
and approval of the City Attorney, assurinq that the drainage
easement shall be continually maintained and that cost associated
with such maintenance shall be equally shared by all future
property owners within the division so effected, and to in-
clude the following provision:
a. The City shall have the right to cause such repair to be
accomplished and to place liens on the involved properties
if, in the estimation of the City Engineer, the subject
drainage device has reached a state of disrepair which
renders it a hazard, unsightly, or a public nusiance.
4. One (1) street light shall be added and. comply with City of
Rosemead lighting standards.
5. That a six foot (61) block wall, as measured from adjacent
property, shall be constructed around the property peripheral
boundaries, except for those portions which abut the public
right-of-way where a four foot (4') decorative wall/fence
shall be constructed, utilizing steel supports set in concrete.
Said improvements shall occur within one (1) year from final
tract map approval.
6. The drainage of Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 shall drain to Muscatel
by utilization of a drainage device, (i.e., swale constructed
as part of the block wall footing), and shall be required to
be installed per the City Engineer's direction and ultimate
approval, prior to acceptance of the final tract map.
7. All improvements proposed within the subdivision shall be
installed prior to recordation of the final map or estimated
improvement cost shall be established by the City Engineer,
and such improvements bonded for. If bonds are accepted, such
work shall commence within one (1) year from recordation of the
final map. Failure to do so shall cause the City to authorize
installation of said improvements utilizing the bonds posted
by the applicant.
Q. The note on the original tract map proposing natural drainage
for Lots 1 through 4 shall be erased or permanently removed
on the original tract map.
The proposed modified cul-de-sac design, Figure "C shall
be used for Guess Street, in and adjacent to Lot 5.
10. The developer of Tract No. 42132 be required to prepare the
necessary legal documents for the dedication and recordation
of the cul-de-sac street to the City, in a form acceptable to
the City Attorney and the City Engineer.
11. The developer of Tract No. 42132 be required to prepare
improvement plans for the construction of said cul-de-sac,
including driveways.
0 0
Exhibit "A"
Resolution No. 82-21
Page Two
12. The developer of Tract No. 42132 be required to construct the
necessary improvements for said modified cul-de-sac, including
driveways.
13. Since sidewalks do not presently exist on Guess Street, the
sidewalk improvements for the modified cul-de-sac shall not
be installed at this time.
14. Drainage to be approved by the City Engineer.
Exhibit "A"
Resolution No.-82-21
Page Three
U
1 ~ ~1
I
I 510' 1
5 25'1 1: 1
1 12
I IF011 15' 15 10-
m
C
M.
M-
C7
t
I +