Loading...
CC - 1981-52 - Consenting to Establishment of System and Highways0 9 RESOLUTION NO. 81-52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO ESTABLISHMENT OF A PORTION OF VALLEY BOULEVARD WITHIN SAID CITY AS A PART OF THE SYSTEM OF HIGHWAYS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors did on August 4, 1981, duly adopt a Resolution declaring that portion of Valley Boulevard from Rubio Wash to Strang Avenue, within the City of Rosemead, to be a part of the System of Highways of the County of Los Angeles, all as provided in Sections 1700 to 1704 inclusive of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, said Board of Supervirors by said Resolution requested this Council to give its consent to allow the County to perform pavement treatment and appurtenant work on said street in the City of Rosemead described above; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15101, Class 1 (c) of the State Guidelines, the Secretary of Resources designated this type of project as categorically exempt. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rosemead does resolve as follows: SECTION 1. Consent to Inclusion in County Highways System. This City Council does hereby consent to the establishment of a portion of Valley Boulevard from Rubio Wash to Strang Avenue, within the City of Rosemead, as a part of the System of Highways of the County of Los Angeles as provided in Sections 1700 to 1704 inclusive of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Said consent is for the purpose of and limited to the aforementioned treatment of pavement and performance of appurtenant work as may be necessary by the County of Los Angeles. SECTION 2. Finding of Categorical Exemption. This City Council does hereby find that: The project is categorically exempt from the requirement for an Environmental Impact Report pursuant to Class 1 (c) of the State of California's Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environ- mental Quality Act of 1970. SECTION 3. Finding of a Minor Nature. Should the City Council find that pursuant to Government Code, Section 65402 (b), the aforesaid improvement is for street improvements of a minor nature, include the following: This City Council does hereby find that pursuant to Government Code, Section 65402 (b), the aforesaid improvement is for street improvements of a minor nature and that, therefore, the provisions of said Section requiring the submission to and report upon said project by the City Planning Agency do not apply. APPROVED AND ADOPTED th ATTEST: CITY CL K li~yl