Loading...
CC - 1980-66 - Denying a Variance for Property at 8220 and 8216 DorothyRESOLUTION NO. 80-66 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY.COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD DENYING A VARIANCE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8220 AND 8216 DOROTHY STREET IN THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD. (ZONE VARIANCE CASE NO. 80-91) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD RESOLVES as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City.of Rosemead does hereby in and determine that an application was filed by David Crawford to request a Zone Variance to Section 9105.6, Minimum Lot Size Requirements for R-2 Zones for property located at: 8220 and 8216 Dorothy Street, Rosemead, California; and that a public hearing was duly held in the Council Chambers of Rosemead City Hall, 8838 Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California, and that notice of the time, date, place and purpose of the afore- said 'hearing was duly given. SECTION 2. The City Council further finds that the facts do not exist as required by Section 9171, et. seq.., of the Rosemead Zoning Code justifying the granting of a zone variance. SECTION 3. The City Council further finds: 1. That the granting of the application for variance would constitute a granting of a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations-upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the property is situated. 2. That the granting of such variance will be materially detrimental to the public health or welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or vicinity in which the property is located. 3. There are no special circumstances applicable to subject property including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings which would justify a variance from the strict application of the zoning ordinance. 4. That the granting of such application would adversely effect the comprehensive General Plan. SECTION 4. Based on the aforementioned findings, the City Council-E-ereby denies the zone variance and the appeal from the Planning Commission decision, with respect to the property described in Section 1. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Reso utution and cause this Resolution and this certification to be entered in the Book of Resolutions of the City of Rosemead. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of October, 1980. ATTEST: MAYOR OF THE CITY O~EMEAD City Clerk ell ~ S STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) ss. CITY OF ROSEMEAD ) I, Ellen Poochigian, City Clerk of the City of Rosemead, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 80-66 was duly approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rosemead at the regular meeting of the City Council on the 14th day of October,.1980, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen Hunter, Cichy, Imperial, Taylor & Tury NAYES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None City Clerk o t e City o Rosemea