Loading...
CC - Item 7B – Discussion Regarding Letter of Opposition of Assembly Bill 52 (Aguiar-Curry) Native American ResourcesROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BEN KIM, CITY MANAGER DATE: APRIL 22, 2025 SUBJECT: DISCUSSION REGARDING LETTER OF OPPOSITION OF ASSEMBLY BILL 52 (AGUTAR-CURRY) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCES SUMMARY This item is presented to the City Council at the request of Mayor Margaret Clark to discuss the opposition of Assembly Bill ("AB") 52 (Aguiar-Curry) Native American Resources. The proposed amendments to AB 52 pose a direct threat to the sovereignty, cultural integrity, and participation rights of non -federally recognized California Native American Tribes. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the City Council discuss and provide direction to City staff. FISCAL IMPACT - None PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process. Prepared by: A�(� b�V -- Amanda Moreno, Administrative Services Manager Submitted by: _ B an Chua, Assistant City Manager/Finance Director Attachment A: Draft AB 52 Letter of Opposition AGENDA ITEM 7.11 Attachment A Draft Letter AB 52 Letter of Opposition MAYOR: MARGARET CLARK MAYOR PRO TEM: SANDRA ARI WA COUNCIL MEMBERS: SEAN DANG POLLYLOw STEVEN Ly April 22, 2025 City of 1 Psemead 8838 E. VALLEY BOULEVARD ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA 91770 TELEPHONE (626) 569-2100 FAX (626) 569-2303 The Honorable Juan Alanis California State Assembly - Natural Resources Committee 1020 N Street, Room 164 Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: Collective Opposition to Proposed Amendments to AB 52 – Threats to Tribal Sovereignty and Cultural Resource Protection Dear California Natural Resource Committee and Assemblymember Juan Alanis, As California Native American Tribal Nations, organizations, and the City of Rosemead, we collectively write to express our strong opposition to the proposed amendments to Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52). These amendments pose a direct threat to the sovereignty, cultural integrity, and participation rights of non -federally recognized California Native American Tribes. Undermining Consultation Rights of Non -Federally Recognized Tribes The proposed revisions to AB 52 would redefine the term "California Native American tribe" to prioritize only federally recognized tribes, effectively excluding non -federally recognized tribes from meaningful consultation. This action would be deeply unjust and would erase the presence, contributions, and cultural rights of numerous Tribal Nations with deep ancestral roots in California. Non -federally recognized tribes have been historically excluded from federal recognition due to structural inequities. Despite this, we continue to protect sacred lands, burial sites, and cultural resources that define our identities and responsibilities. The proposed amendments betray the spirit of AB 52, which was created in 2014 to ensure tribal voices are included in environmental decision- making through the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Furthermore, this effort undermines the directives of Executive Orders B-10-11 and N-15-19, both of which affirm inclusive consultation with all California Native American tribes, regardless of federal status. Exclusion from these processes is tantamount to erasure of our role as original caretakers of the land. In Conflict with International Standards and California's Equity Goals The proposed amendments are in conflict with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), which guarantees Indigenous Peoples the right to maintain their cultural practices, govern their resources, and protect their lands. California is home to over 70 non - federally recognized tribes—many of whom have lived on and stewarded their territories since time immemorial. To silence our communities by eliminating consultation rights is to strip away the voice of Indigenous Peoples who have never stopped protecting and preserving their traditions and lands. This represents a serious setback in California's ongoing efforts to address environmental justice, equity, and tribal self-determination. A Call for Respect and Inclusion We do not need federally recognized tribes to manage our resources or speak on our behalf. We are fully capable of governing ourselves, safeguarding our sacred places, and making decisions rooted in the wisdom of our ancestors, as we have done for thousands of years. We collectively urge you to oppose the proposed amendments to AB 52 and to uphold legislation that honors the sovereignty, dignity, and voices of all California tribes. Recognizing only federally recognized tribes undermines the inclusive spirit of AB 52 and marginalizes Tribal Nations who have been carrying forward their identities and responsibilities without federal acknowledgment. We stand together in defense of tribal sovereignty, cultural resource protection, and equitable representation in environmental and governmental processes. Thank you for your time and commitment to fair and inclusive policy. We welcome the opportunity to discuss this matter further and provide testimony as needed. Sincerely, Margaret Clark Mayor City of Rosemead