CC - Item 5D - Bridge Repairs and Preventive Maintenance Work at Garvey Avenue Bridge Over Rio Hondo River - Bridge No. 53C2201 (4045) and Adopt Resolution No. 2025-43ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: BEN KIM, CITY MANAGER
DATE: AUGUST 12, 2025
SUBJECT: BRIDGE REPAIRS AND PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE WORK AT
GARVEY AVENUE BRIDGE OVER RIO HONDO RIVER — BRIDGE
NO. 53C2201 (4045) AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2025-43
SUMMARY
Approval of repairs and preventive maintenance along the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio
Hondo River, which sustained structural damage from a fire. The total cost for the project is
estimated at $98,200, including a 25% contingency for labor, materials, services, and equipment.
Staff requests City Council approval for the proposed improvements and adoption of Resolution
No. 2025-43 to amend the FY 2025-26 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and appropriate
$98,200 in Measure M funds to fully fund the project.
BACKGROUND
In July 2024, a fire broke out at a homeless encampment under the Garvey Avenue Bridge over
the Rio Hondo River, causing damage to the city -owned bridge. After the fire was contained, the
Army Corps of Engineers and the Public Works Department cleared the debris and the City
submitted a City Service Request (CSR) to LA County for damage assessment. In August 2024,
LA County conducted a fire inspection and load rating analysis, submitting a Fire Damage
Inspection Report to the City in October 2024. The report identified structural deficiencies in the
bridge due to fire damage and included recommendations for repairs and preventive maintenance
measures to address the deficiencies and extend the bridge's service life. The City then requested
a cost proposal from the County to perform the recommended repair work. In May 2025, the
County provided the City with an estimated cost of $98,200.00 for the repairs, which includes a
25% contingency to cover labor, materials, services, and equipment.
DISCUSSION
In August 2024, an Emergency Fire Inspection was performed by the Los Aangeles County
Public Works Department at the City's request to assess Bridge No. 53C2201 (4045) and
provide a cost estimate for the proposed recommendations. The repair work would be done by
the County under the General Services Agreement with the City. Due to the observed fire
AGENDA ITEM 5.1)
City Council Meeting
August 12, 2025
Page 2 of 3
damage, spalling on girders, burned Styrofoam filler, black fire soot at east side abutment, the
inspection report identified the bridge as Structurally Deficient (SD).
The total project cost for repairing the deficiencies of the bridge is estimated to be $98,200.00,
which includes a 25% contingency. Although the project was not included in the approved Fiscal
Year 2025-26 Capital Improvement Program Budget, the extent of the fire damage to the girders
has caused the bridge to be structurally deficient, making the repairs a high priority. Staff
recommend amending the Fiscal Year 2025-26 CIP budget to include the project with a new
appropriation in the amount of $98,200.00 in Measure M funding to cover the repair costs. There
is sufficient Measure M funding available to appropriate the desired budget increase. If
approved, staff will coordinate with LA County to commence the repair work. The estimated
completion date is seven (7) to eight (8) months after City approval.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council
1. Approve the cost of the proposed recommendations for bridge repairs at Garvey Avenue
over Rio Hondo Wash (Bridge 53C2201 (4045)) for a total project cost estimated to be
$98,200.00 (including 25% contingency).
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-43, entitled: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of
Rosemead, California, to Amend the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Capital Improvement Program
Budget and Appropriate New Funds for the Bridge Repairs and Preventive Maintenance
— Garvey Avenue Over Rio Hondo River, Bridge No. 53C2201 (4045)).
FISCAL IMPACT
This project was not included as a part of the City's Fiscal Year 2025-26 Capital Improvement
Program. Due to the damage caused by the fire and since the bridge has been identified as
Structurally Deficient (SD), staff recommend a new appropriation in the amount of $98,200 in
Measure M funds for this repair. Staff have determined that there are sufficient Measure M funds
available to be allocated for the repair.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
pursuant to Section 15301 (a) of the CEQA Implementing Guidelines.
STRATEGIC PLAN IMPACT — None
PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS
This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process.
Prepared by:
City Council Meeting
August 12, 2025
Page 3 of 3
Submitted by:
Samu Gutierre i5ii-rector000fic
Works
Attachment A: Cost Estimate - Bridge No. 53C2201 (4045)
Attachment B: Bridge Fire Inspection Report - Bridge No. 53C2201 (4045)
Attachment C: Resolution 2025-43
Attachment A
Cost Estimate - Bridge No. 53C2201
(4045)
Y
O
3
U �
w
J LU
CO F
a y
LL
O H
Z
H Q
Z W d
W i W
LLI
Qy
y
Z LU
{L Z W
a e
W O
W
Y
�.
0
nz3
Uuj
Z
L M
W Q
W
0
Z
Q
O
J
0)
C
Z
C
O
U)
L
OL
a�
L
C
L
C 3
C a)
f0 �
a1
o
w
u a)
m L
p_
(uL
L _0
-0 C
C: :3
ro
a) 4-J
raa
Ln
-0 v
(U U
ro
U aiY
c
C
O L
Z Y
u
o 3
O
f0
Ln Ln
D O
O a,
L �
rp
O L �
CL _
u O_
W � 3
(] a)
o N cn 4,
J N ra
W N 4
CK N f0
Y K Z Ofu
6
3U w z E
w
M
LK�
3
>e
u
0U
Y
ui
0
yi
=
m
H U
t
0
3
5
8
O
U
z
o
o
Z
O
x
Y
m
N
d
W
�
Z
u
>
>
y
O
Q
w
C7
�O
of
U
J
O
O
a
s
m
m
�
O
z
3
N
c
p
O
n
m
o
Q
[a
a
m
LL'
3
!v
i
O
G
z°
l
m
°
a
m
`v
'u E
'�
n
m a
.D
a
(D
w
x
w
m
E
°
f
0
U
L
3
F-
0)
C
Z
C
O
U)
L
OL
a�
L
C
L
C 3
C a)
f0 �
a1
o
w
u a)
m L
p_
(uL
L _0
-0 C
C: :3
ro
a) 4-J
raa
Ln
-0 v
(U U
ro
U aiY
c
C
O L
Z Y
u
o 3
O
f0
Ln Ln
D O
O a,
L �
rp
O L �
CL _
u O_
W � 3
(] a)
o N cn 4,
J N ra
W N 4
CK N f0
Y K Z Ofu
6
3U w z E
w
M
�
�
0
3
u 2
-J UJ
M Ln
a>-
0
uj)Lu
LU
�
�zUJ
Lu
U�
0w
§
z
«
L2
z
<
0
-i
2
yl
N
N
O
3
u
0
ti
O
6
cc
Y
O
3
U
w i
J W
CO �
a }
LL
O H
Z
Z W a
W W
`J
Q y
Z LU
D
Q 0
W
Y
0?3
U Z
L M
LU a
W
0
Z
Q
O
J
L
Y
C
O o 0 0
0 0 o'
m O m
rn w;
O: O.
o: o:
LLi LL: I
q
:l
M
N
o
N
o m
v
o
o
o
ca
O
o v
v
o
N
Ln
m
n
n
w ar
m
er
yt
m
f
v
m
�
w
q
:l
M
Attachment B
Bridge Fire Inspection Report - Bridge No. 53C2201
(4045)
Los Angsles Courty Public Works
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
xa� Fire Damage Inspection
--
BRIDGE NO.: STRUCTURE NAME:
53C2201 (4045) RIO HONDO RIV
INSPECTION DATE:
August 16, 2024
BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION
(9) LOCATION 0.3MI W/O ROSEMEAD BLVD (7) FACILITY CARRIED
GARVEY AVE
(11) POSTMILE
0 (6) FEATURE INTERSECTED
RIO HONDO RIV
(16) LATITUDE
34°03'45.27" (5) INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER)
ON 150000000
(17) LONGITUDE
118°04'09.32" (104) ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM
NOT ON NHS
STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION
SUMMARY INFORMATION
(58)DECK
5FAIR DECKAREA(M)z
4,108
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE
4 POOR SUFFICIENCY RATING
65.1
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE
7 GOOD PAINT CONDITION
N/A
(62) CULVERT
N N/A (NBI) STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT
(SD) STATUS SD
(67) STRUCTURE EVALUATION
4 MINIMUM TOLERABLE (113) SCOUR
8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING
PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION
Routine -Elevation View (08/14/2024)
Routine -Underside View (03/20/2021)
TEAM LEADER Richard Dergazarian
REPORT AUTHOR Richard Dergazarian
INSPECTED BY
Routine -Map View (06/23/2021)
Shaoli Xu (Registered Civil Engineer) Date
Shaoli
Xu
No. 54749
p. 12/31/2025
CIVIL
Printed on: Wednesday 10/02/2024 05:35 PM Page 1 of 13 53C2201/AAAC/139874
AGENCY INFORMATION
(1) STATE NAME
(2) HIGHWAY DISTRICT
(3) COUNTY CODE
(4) PLACE CODE
(21) MAINTAIN
(22) OWNER
(98) BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE
CALIFORNIA 069
07
(53)LOS ANGELES
(62896) ROSEMEAD
04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
N/A % SHARE N/A
(99) BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER N/A
CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
(27) YEAR BUILT 2008
(106) YEAR MODIFIED N/A
(34) SKEW 44
(49) LENGTH (M) 128
(112) NBIS BR LENGTH Y
Los
INSPECTION INFORMATION
Works
(90)INSPECTION DATE 03/23 (91) FREQUENCY 24 MO
(92)CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE
A) NSTM INSP N -NO MO A) N/A
B) UNDERWATER INSP N -NO MO B) N/A
C) OTHER SPECIAL INSP N -NO MO C) N/A
% Ownership Owner/Anencv
100% City of Rosemead
(45) MAIN SPANS
4
(43a) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN
(46) APPR SPANS
0
(43b) DESIGN TYPE MAIN
(48) MAX SPAN (M)
35.6
(44a) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR
(35) STIR FLARE
0 -NO
(441b) DESIGN TYPE APPR
JOINTS
4
NO. OF HINGES
1: CONCRETE
03: GIRDER & FLOORBEAM S
0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE
00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION
Reinforced Concrete Deck, Prestressed open concrete girders onreinforced concrete abutments supported all on CIDH piles
SPAN CONFIGURATION
(W)1@93ft, 2@117fl, 1@93ft(E)
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
LOAD CAPACITY
(31) DESIGN LOAD
(66) INVENTORY RATING
(64) OPERATING RATING
(41)STRUCTURE STATUS
OVERLAY THICKNESS
POSTING LOADS
5 MS 18 (HS 20) (65) CALC METHOD
RF=1.20 =>38.9 metric tons (63) CALC METHOD
RF=1.47 =>47.6 metric tons (70) BRIDGE POSTING
A -OPEN, NO RESTRICTION PERMIT RATING
inches
Existing
Safe
Loads
Type 3
Legal
Type 3S2
Legal
Type 3-3
Legal
Speed
35
5 MS 18 (HS 20) (65) CALC METHOD
RF=1.20 =>38.9 metric tons (63) CALC METHOD
RF=1.47 =>47.6 metric tons (70) BRIDGE POSTING
A -OPEN, NO RESTRICTION PERMIT RATING
inches
Existing
Posting
Ordinance/Order
Signs
N/A
N/A
U.S. Tons
N/A
N/A
U.S. Tons
N/A
N/A
U.S. Tons
N/A
N/A
MPH
Posting Date N/A
Load Rating Summary Date 08/22/22
Load Rating Type Calculated
Load Rating Tool - Date LEAP Bridge Concrete CONNECT Edition
1 LF LOAD FACTOR
1 LF LOAD FACTOR
5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS
PPPPP
Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements
NONE
Additional Signs
NONE
08/22/22
MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE
(53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY Unimpaired (55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF N -NOT H/RR 0.0 M
(54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF N -NOT H/RR 0.00 M (56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M
Printed on: Wednesday 10/02/2024 05:35 PM Page 2 of 13 53C2201/AAAC/139874
Los Angeles County Public Works
CONDITION INFORMATION
INSPECTION COMMENTARY
SCOPE AND ACCESS
A Emergency Fire Inspection was performed on 8/16/2024 at the request of the City of Rosemead. Span # 4 (East Abutment) was
accessed from Bike Path. Bike path was closed during Inspection and Clean up. Flash Light was used to aid in Inspection.
HISTORY
A Fire occured in July of 2024 at a Homeless encampment in Span #4. Albert Leung(Principal Engineer) for the City of Rosemead
notified us on July 29th 2024 about the Fire. Clean up was completed on 8-16-2024 by BjD services a contractor for the Army Corps of
Engineers. John Lu (LACDPW Structure Engineer) and Richard Dergazarian (LACDPW Bridge Inspector) inspected the Structure on 8-
16-2024. The City was notified on 3-9-2023 about the P.E.H.(People Experiencing Homelessness living under the structure. Main
Damages were to Girders #4,#5,#6,#7 and #8 in Span #4. All Girders, Diaphragms,Soffit and abutment have black fire soot in Span #4.
z1=01,-11610
Item # 59 Superstructure was changed from 8 to 4 due to Fire Damages in Span #4.
SAFE LOAD CAPACITY
A new Load Rating evaluation is currently in progress due to the section loss on the Concrete Girders and will be added to this report
when completed.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Repair all areas of spalling on Prestressed Concrete Girders and Backwall at abutment in span #4
Replace damaged Styrofoam Filler that was burned at East Abutment
Routinely Inspect underneath to reduce the risk of future potential fires to the structure
INSPECTIONSPECIAL • ' •
STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS -NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.
UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.
Printed on: Wednesday 10!02/2024 05:35 PM Page 3 of 13 53C2201/AAAC/139874
Los Angeles County Public Works
I 1111i .0 11 O•. 1rr.•
DECK CROSS SECTION
(S) 1 ft 1 10 8 It sw, 75 8 It (4 lanes), 10 8 sw, 1 ft br, (N)
DECK GEOMETRY DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
(49) LENGTH
128.0 M
(51) NET WIDTH
23.1 M
(52) TOTAL WIDTH
29.3 M
(50) CURB OR SIDEWALK
LEFT 3.3 M RIGHT 3.3 M
(32) APPROACH RDWY WIDTH
23.2 M
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN
2 CLOSED MED W/O BARRIER
DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION
(107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE
1-CIP CONCRETE
(108) WEARING SURFACE/ PROTECTIVE SYSTEM
A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE
1 -CONCRETE
B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE
3-EPDXY
C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION
1-EPDXY CT REINF
OVERLAY THICKNESS (inches)
inches
(29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
23520
(30) YEAR OF ADT 2017
If 09) TRUCK ADT % 4%
(19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH
3 KM
(114) FUTURE ADT
28224
If 15) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT
2041
(37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP
DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Elem Defect/ Element Description
No. Prot Defect
(42a) TYPE OF SERVICE 5 -HIGHWAY -PEDESTRIAN
(12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 0 -NOT ON NET
(13) LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE
(104) NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM 0 -NOT ON NHS
(26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS 16 -MINOR ARTERIAL URBAN
(100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY 0 -NOT STRAHNET
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE N -NONE EXISTS
(102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC 2-2 WAY
(10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M
(47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 23.1 M
(68) DECK GEOMETRY 9 ABOVE DESIRABLE CRIT
(72) APPR ROADWAY ALIGN 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRIT
(105) FEDERAL LANDS HWY 0 -NOT APPLICABLE
(110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK 0 -NOT ON NET
(20) TOLL 3 -ON FREE ROAD
(28a) LANES 4
SPEED 35
(103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE N/A
(58) DECK RATING= 5
Env Total Units Ory in each Condition State
Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
12 Deck -RC 2 7094 sq.m 0 6383 711 0
1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 1 0 0 1 0
1130 Cracking (RC and Other) 2 7093 0 6383 710 0
(12-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
The West bound # 2 lane has a deck spall measuring 24 inches in lenth by 1 inch in depth.
(12-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
There are many cracks measuring from 0.012 - 0.05 inches in width on all four lanes and center median. Many cracks are travelling
in a transverse direction with map cracking in multiple areas. Several cracks are measuring slightly greater then 0.05 inches in width
that are in a transverse direction. Cracking appears to space about a couple feet apart from one another.
RAIL INFORMATION
(36a) Rail Code 1 (36b) Transition 0 (36c) Appr Guardrail
0 (36d) Appr Guardrail End 0 Roadway Speed 35 MPH
JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Dry in each Condition State
No, Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3
300 Joint -Strip Seal Exp
(300) Joint -Strip Seal Exp ,
No significant issues were observed.
308 Joint -Steel Sliding Plates
(308) Joint -Steel Sliding Plates
No sionifcant issues were observed.
2 62 m 62 0 0 0
2 17 m 17 0 0 0
Printed on: Wednesday 10/02/2024 05:35 PM Page 4 of 13 53C2201/AAAC/139874
Los Anqeles Couniv, Public Works
JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State
iw. , wa vmcca •-o liJ 1 l.J L l.J J liJ 9
321 Approach Slab -RC 2 148 sq.m 148 0 0 0
(321) Approach Slab -RC
No significant issues were observed.
330 Railing -Metal 2 279 m 279 0 0 0
(330) Railing -Metal
No significant issues were observed.
SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (59) SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING = 4
Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State
No. Prot Defect Qty CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
109 Girder/Beam-PS Conc. 2 1251 m 1201 0 30 20
1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 1251 1201 0 30 20
(109) Girder/Beam-PS Conc.
Yes
(109-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Girder #4 has 2 meters of spelling on the lower flange of the Prestressed girder with exposed rebar. Approximately 2 inches in depth
of section loss along the two meters of lower flange. Also G-4 has 16 feet of web spelling by 1/2 to 3/4 inch in depth.
Girder #6,
Girder #5, Spelling has occurred at girder end that measures 10 inches by 10 inches by 1/2 in depth with No exposed rebar. G-5 has
Lower Flange spalling about 16 feet in length from abutment with exposed rebar visible. Spalling ranges between 1 to 3 inches in
depth.
Girder #6, There is a spall at girder end near abutment that measures 2 feet by 20 inches by 1/2 in depth with No exposed rebar.
Spalling is visible on web and lower flange that measures about 15 feet in length ranging from 5 inches on down to 1 inch with
exposed rebar.G-6 has approximately 17 feet of Upper Flange spelling in Bay #6 about 1/2 in depth.
Girder #7, has 14 feet of lower flange spalling with exposed rebar measuring from 1-3 inches in depth. Delamination is visible on
bottom side of girderas well by about 15 feet.G-7 there is 20 feet by 1/2 in depth of web spelling with no exposed rebar on G #7.
Girder #8, 12 feet of web spelling by 1/2 depth on G-8. The entire span is covered with Black Fire Soot on Girders, Diaphragms and
Soffit areas.
Printedon: Wednesday 10/021202405:35PM Page 5 of 13 53C2201/AAAC/139874
Los Angeles County Public Works
SUPERSTRUCTURE PHOTOGRAPHS
G-5 Exposed Rebar
f3d� .i
'r
Photo 3f
G-5 Spell Lower Flange
Y
Photo 3
Girder #5
Photo 4
G-5 Exposed Rebar
Photo 4
G-5 Web Spall
Photo 5
Girder #5
Printed on: Wednesday 10/02/2024 05:35 PM Page 6 of 13 53C2201/AAAC/139674
Los Angeles County Public Works
SUPERSTRUCTURE
BIIPFRSTRIICTIIRF PHnTOGRAPHS
Girder #5 Spall
G-5 Spall Lower Flange
G-6 Upper Flange Spelling
G-7 Spalling
G-5 Web Spall
G-6 Upper Flange Spelling
Printed on: Wednesday 10/02/2024 05:35 PM Page 7 of 13 53C2201/AAAC/139874
Los Angeles County Public Works
Photo 8
Lower Flange G-7
Lower Section of G-7
G-7 Spalling
Girder 7 Span 4
G-7 Web Spalling
G-7 Web Spelling Photo
Printed on: Wednesday 10/02/2024 05:35 PM Page 8 of 13 53C2201/AAAC/139874
Los Angeles County Public Works
Lower Section of G-7
Photo 12
G-8 Spall
Lower Flange G-7
Girders #4,5,6,7 and #8 Damages due to Fire
Photo 13
Girder #7 (Span #4)
Photo 14
G-8 Spall
Printed on: Wednesday 10/02/2024 05:35 PM Page 9 of 13 53C2201/AAAC/139874
Los Angeles County Public Works
Girders #4, #5, #6, #7 and #8 Damages due to Fire
DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
(42b) TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER
5 -WATERWAY
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL N: NOT APPLICABLE
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES V - H
N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI)
(111) PIER PROTECTION
N/A
(71) WATER ADEQUACY
8 EQUAL DESIRABLE
(39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE
0.0 M
(61) CHANNEL PROTECTION
9 NO DEFICIENCIES
(116) VERT -LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR
0.0 M
(113) SCOUR
8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING
(40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE
0.0 M
SCOUR POA DATE
N/A
CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
trapezodial channel
SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (60) SUBSTRUCTURE RATING= 7
Elem Defect/ Element Description Env Total Units Qty in each Condition State
215 Abutment -RC 2 148 m 147 0 1 0
1080 Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 2 147 146 0 1 0
(215) Abutment -RC
No significant issues were observed.
(215-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
There is a spall 20 X 20 inches by 1 inch in depth at Shear key at abutment #5. No rebar is exposed. The spall is located below G-5
and G-6. The spall was due to fire reoort on Julv 29th 2024 at P.E.H. encampment.
227 Pile -RC 2 1 ea. 1 0 0 0
(227) Pile -RC
The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No
indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element.
SUBSTRUCTURE PHOTOGRAPHS
Printed on: Wednesday 10/02/2024 05:35 PM Page 10 of 13 53C2201/AAAC/139874
Los Angeles County Public Works
SUBSTRUCTURE PHOTOGRAPHS
Photo 14
Spall at Shear Key at Abutment #5
Span #4 Clean up on 8-16-2024
Spall at Shear Key at Abutment #5
Printed on: Wednesday 10/02/2024 05:35 PM Page 11 of 13 53C2201/AAAC/139874
OVA
r :-
t
VMM
r :-
t
Los Anoeles County Public'JVorks
DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Red Date 3/09/2023 Work By LOCAL AGENCY
Est Cost
Dist Target
Status PROPOSED Action Deck -Patch spalls
Str Target ROUTINE
EA
''. Repair spall on sidewalk and spall on deck at Lane # 2
Ree Date - 03/24/2021 Work By LOCAL AGENCY
Est Cost
Dist Target '..
Status PROPOSED Action Deck -Methacrylate
Str Target 4 YEARS
EA
j Perform Deck Seal on Roadway surface.
JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS -NONE
SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Rec Date 08/16/2024 Work By LOCAL AGENCY
Est Cost
Dist Target
Status PROPOSED Action Super -Patch spalls
Str Target ROUTINE
EA
Repair all spalls on Prestressed Open Concrete Girders in Span #4 due to the Fire that occurred in July
of 2024.
SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS -NONE
OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS -NONE
Printed on: Wednesday 10/02/2024 05.35 PM Page 13 of 13 53C2201/AAACi139874
LOAD RATING SUMMARY SHEET/ LOAD RATING DATA SHEET
LRFR (FOR ARCHIVING IN BIRIS)
BRIDGE NO: 53C2101 LA County Br. No: 4045
Facility Carried: GARVEY AVE
Location: D3M1 V/O ROSEMEAD BLVD
BRIDGE NAME: RIO HONDO RIV
Structural Elements Rated:
Multi-Spnn PCPSTT Conerele Bulb Tee
DESIGN LOADING
Raline
Fallen
HL -93 Invcnmry 092
HL 93 Operating 1.19
Pnc
LEGAL RATING US sn n.n.
Trpe3(25T) 182 Legal
T,, -,S2(36T) 1 75 Legal
Type 3-3 (IOT) 170 Legal
NRL(40T) 1,45 Legal
SHV SUS(1)T, 2.12 Legal
SHV-SU51iITl 1.87 Legal
SHV-SU6134.75TI 167 Legal
SHV-SL170N.75Ti151 Legal
FAST -EV22815T) 222 Legal
FAST -EV3(43T) ISO Legal
CRITICALLOCATION
Structure Control Element Load Action LoaRon Raise Method
Spar Li GNer Warrant (Surged) NM: Loop, of Sp 3, GI In, Girder 9LRFR Rutin€Facer
Span l-4 Girder Momenn(Strureth) IIID I.Wpt of Sp 3. G3 -Int Girder 8 LRFR Rating Fetor
Span 13
Coder
All mmisnt(Stenbnhl
Nd: 1.0pt of Sp 3. 03,]inGirder
8 LRFR Rating Lear
Span l-4
Girder
Mo..,(Stengthl
Nht: IJOpt of Sp 3, G3IntGirder
8 LRFR Rating Factor
Span 14
Girder
murnnr f5ttcngthl
NM: I,Wpt nr Sp 3. G3In,Gu r
8 LRFR Rating Far,
Span 1-4
Girder
Momem (Strength)
VAI: L" of Sp 3. G3 In(Gude,
8 LRFR Rating Factor
Span 1-4
Ginder
Momem (Strength)
NM: LW pt of Sp i, G3 -Int Draw,
8 LRFR Raring Rarr
Span 1-4
Girder
Mori Strength)
NM:l0(Ipt of Sp 3. G3 -int Glider
8 LRFR Reh, Factor
Span 1-4
Guar
Moment (Strzogm)
W. I-Wpl of Sp 3, G3 -Int Glider
8 LRFR Rating Faaor,
Span 14
Glider
Momem (Snored)
NM: I(Ept of Sp 3. 33 -Int Ginner
S LRFR Raw, Fncmr
Span 14
Grader
So wood Strength)
NM{ InWint of Sp 3. G3 -Int Girder
8 LRFR R.tio, Rotor
Spain4
Greater
Menem Striondr,
NM: I Odor of Sp 3. G3- let Giri
8 LRFR Earn, Factor
RELEVANT LOAD RATING INFORMATION
Reason jor New Raung Analyse; Rauan vorv, s using LRFR eadhoal and condition change dee,, fi,rlama€sin lay"_024
8 LRFR Rating Factor
8 LRFR Rating Factor,
8 LRFR Rare, Furan
8 LRFR Raung Fnaar
8 LRFR Raring Freer
8 LRFR Ruling Factor
%LRFR Rating Fran,
8 LRFR Rating Fore,
8 LRFR Rating Factor
Penn..Rmiup Faclrn Famd on Per, Von," al JO,'i9'nM-197.19'- 195.1.95. 131 and hatl Ng mm
-Moeare 096. I R0. 1,26.: 10,1.03, 1 01102 0 72 and
M1ssetl ran Sh n, lie 137,-9, 1Ni. 1 ]1 1721.72.: 72. 1.36 for Ps Annual. P5-PI5 Split and PI5 Dnol-peiie,h.
Tui+ lead r rug a baua on the ,sura, holds, erometry and madwny confignounin and nn the fin, clam... ob>eaed doing field inspemion on 8/142023.
Mtdifieetion In the stmmrc(such as laid, nul ..AiEunionor w id,ra,lun, Pennine. no, load rating.
Oreda., Uscd In Rain__ 3 Inch AC I(uwrd
Assigned A711Cululed Culwl.ted
Ra1ng Date: 011,1111, 8.2024
Retail By
Dune Its-OranuJrn
Penni)
PERMIT RATING
Analva, Leal'.
Ratern,
P5 Annual
0.96
G Spar 1-4 Glider Moment (Strengtl0 NAI: I-00pl of p 3, G3 -In
P5 Split
1.60
P Spar 1-3 Girder Slowem(Saen€Ili) NM: LOOpt of Sp 3. G3 -In
P7 Split
126
P Span 1-0 Girder Moment(Strcnnh) NM: LWpt of Sp 3. G 31n
P9 Split
1-10
P Span 14 Crime, Mommn (SlnnmM1) N11: I Wind of Sp 3. G3 It
PI Split
103
P Span 14 Gtrdnr Mnmcnt(So-cneth) NM: I.Wprof Sp 3. G3 -In
P13 Split
102
P San. 14 Girder Sit win lSmneth) Net, LWwof Sp 3, G}In
P15 Split
102
P Span 1-4 Girder Ad ran, Sna."i NM: I.Wpt of Sp 3. G, In
PI5Dun]
0.72
O Sps.1-4 Girder Afout(Arengnhl NM: I. Won of Sp 3. G31n
PIS Drennan
0.65
X so. 14 Girder motor (Strength, NAI: I. Won of So 3. 03 In
RELEVANT LOAD RATING INFORMATION
Reason jor New Raung Analyse; Rauan vorv, s using LRFR eadhoal and condition change dee,, fi,rlama€sin lay"_024
8 LRFR Rating Factor
8 LRFR Rating Factor,
8 LRFR Rare, Furan
8 LRFR Raung Fnaar
8 LRFR Raring Freer
8 LRFR Ruling Factor
%LRFR Rating Fran,
8 LRFR Rating Fore,
8 LRFR Rating Factor
Penn..Rmiup Faclrn Famd on Per, Von," al JO,'i9'nM-197.19'- 195.1.95. 131 and hatl Ng mm
-Moeare 096. I R0. 1,26.: 10,1.03, 1 01102 0 72 and
M1ssetl ran Sh n, lie 137,-9, 1Ni. 1 ]1 1721.72.: 72. 1.36 for Ps Annual. P5-PI5 Split and PI5 Dnol-peiie,h.
Tui+ lead r rug a baua on the ,sura, holds, erometry and madwny confignounin and nn the fin, clam... ob>eaed doing field inspemion on 8/142023.
Mtdifieetion In the stmmrc(such as laid, nul ..AiEunionor w id,ra,lun, Pennine. no, load rating.
Oreda., Uscd In Rain__ 3 Inch AC I(uwrd
Assigned A711Cululed Culwl.ted
Ra1ng Date: 011,1111, 8.2024
Retail By
Dune Its-OranuJrn
Checked By
],,he Lo
Analva, Leal'.
BIR 7.4.1 AASHTO
Bonn' Mahod'.
8 LRFR Rating Factor for Insenton' Rating
8 LRFR Rating Factor for Operating Rating
Rana -File Laeatian:
Lae Anncic Count, Public Rork, De,icn Frisker
® Calculations bare been Included w'nh the mmm.n'sheet for CdiIL in Brd-e RCCON,
FICalculations ham NOT heen included hul ars mallards in SMI. Rmin, Sarinn
Dante Rivera
Granadus
No 93138
Exp, 03/31/1_026
OIAL ,
10/08/2024
Dante Rivera Granados- Registered Engineer (Date)
Page'_ of 2
4k
Attachment C
Resolution No. 2025-43
1:7 �I*9JR0t1110 0I KIn77n]
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET AND APPROPRIATE
NEW FUNDS FOR THE BRIDGE REPAIRS AND PREVENTATIVE
MAINTENANCE — GARVEY AVENUE OVER RIO HONDO RIVER
(BRIDGE NO. 53C2201 (4045))
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Operating and Capital
Improvement Program budgets on June 11, 2025; and
WHEREAS, amendments must periodically be made to the budget to conform to changed
circumstances following adoption of the budget; and
WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 2025-26 budget did not include the Garvey Avenue Over Rio
Hondo River (Bridge No. 53C2201 (4045)) Project; and
WHEREAS, funding was not allocated for the project in the City's approved 2025-26
Budget thus requiring an amendment to appropriate new funds in the amount of $98,200 to cover
the cost of the project; and
WHEREAS, the new appropriation constitutes an update to the 2025-26 Budget approved
pursuant to Resolution No. 2025-32.
THE ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby approves an appropriation in the amount of Ninety -
Eight Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($98,200.00) in Measure M Funds for the Project.
SECTION 2: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12`h day of August, 2025.
ATTEST:
Margaret Clark, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Rachel H. Richman, City Attorney Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) §
CITY OF ROSEMEAD )
I, Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Rosemead, California,
do hereby certify that the foregoing City Council Resolution No. 2025-43 was duly adopted
by the City Council of the City of Rosemead, California, at a regular meeting thereof held
on the 12th day of August, 2025, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk