Loading...
PC - 2009-14 - Approving Design Review 00-86 - At 888 Montebello BlvdPC RESOLUTION 09-14 A'RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW 00-86 (MODIFICATION) FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A NEW 17- FOOT TALL MONUMENT SIGN AT THE DOUBLE TREE HOTEL, LOCATED AT 888 MONTEBELLO BOULEVARD IN THE C3-D (MEDIUM COMMERCIAL WITH A DESIGN OVERLAY) ZONE (APNS: 5271-002-061 & 063). WHEREAS, on June 4, 2009, AKC Service Inc., filed an application for removal of an existing 17'-5"-foot tall freestanding sign and installation of a new 17-foot tall monument sign for the Double Tree Hotel, located at 888 Montebello Boulevard; and WHEREAS, 888 Montebello Boulevard is located in the C-31D (Medium Commercial with a Design Overlay) zoning district; and WHEREAS, Section 17.72.050 of the Rosemead Municipal Code (RMC) provides the purpose and criteria for a design review; and WHEREAS, Sections 65800 & 65900 of the California Government Code and Section 17.72.050 of the Rosemead Municipal Code authorize the Planning Commission to approve, conditionally approve or deny design review applications; and WHEREAS, on June 25, 2009, fifty-four (54) notices were sent to property owners within a 300-foot radius from the subject property, in addition to notices posted in six (6) public locations and on-site, specifying the availability of the application, plus the date, time and location of the public hearing for Design Review 00-86 (Modification); and WHEREAS, on July 6, 2009, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed and advertised public hearing to receive oral and written testimony relative to Design Review 00-86 (Modification and WHEREAS, the Rosemead Planning Commission has sufficiently considered all testimony presented to them in order to make the following determination. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemead as follows: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission HEREBY DETERMINES that Design Review 00-86 (Modification) is classified as a Class 11 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15311(a) of CEQA guidelines. Section 15311(a) of the California Environmental Quality Act exempts projects that consist of the construction or replacement of minor structures accessory to (appurtenant to) existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities, including but not limited to on-premise signs. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES that facts do exist to justify approving Design Review 00-86 (Modification) in accordance with Section 17.72.030 et seq., of the Rosemead Municipal Code as follows: A. The plans indicate proper consideration for the relationship between the proposed building and site developments that exist or have been approved for the general neighborhood; FINDING: The proposed sign has been developed to reflect uniform design elements of the property and to ensure a harmonized and attractive environment. The proposed new sign will be designed to meet current industry standard materials. The overall sign design will improve the general visual appearance of the site. B. The plan for the proposed building and site development indicates the manner in which the proposed development and surrounding properties are protected against noise, vibrations and other factors which may have an adverse effect on the environment, and the manner of screening mechanical equipment, trash, storage and loading areas. FINDING: The new free-standing sign has been determined to be appropriate to the subject site and complementary to the existing hotel. Once the new sign is installed and operational, the signage will be silent in nature and will not adversely affect surrounding properties. C. The proposed building or site development is not, in its exterior design and appearance, so at variance with the appearance of other existing buildings or site developments in the neighborhood as to cause the nature of the local environment to materially depreciate in appearance and value; FINDING: The proposed sign improvement is in line with contemporary designs found in other commercial sites in the San Gabriel Valley region. The new sign incorporates a modernist design, with clean and simple lines, which will enhance the appearance of the hotel entrance. For night time visibility, only the logo and sign lettering will be illuminated. D. The proposed building or structure is in harmony with the proposed developments on land in the general area, especially in those instances where buildings are within or adjacent to land shown on the General Plan as being part of the Civic Center or in public or educational use, or are within or immediately e adjacent to land included within any precise plan which indicates building shape, size or style. FINDING: The proposed sign will create a development that is aesthetically pleasing and will enhance land values in the general area. The proposed sign will upgrade the existing signage onsite with higher quality building materials. The proposed signage will also provide an attractive cohesive architectural style and color scheme that will substantially improve the visual appearance of the site. Lastly, the property is not part of a civic center plan, precise plan, or land reserved for public or educational use. E. The proposed development is in conformity with the standards of this code and other applicable ordinances in so far as the location and appearance of the buildings and structures are involved. FINDING: This proposed development meets all of the minimum code requirements for the C-31D (Medium Commercial with a Design Overlay) zone, and all standards for signage in Section 17.104 of the Rosemead Municipal Code. The Municipal Code limits the height of free-standing signs to 35-feet and to sign area to 200 square feet. The proposed sign measures 17' tall and has an approximately sign area of 145 square feet. F. The site plan and the design of the buildings, parking areas, signs, landscaping, luminaries, and other site feature indicates that proper consideration has been given to both the functional aspects of the site development, such as automobile and pedestrian circulation, and the visual effect of the development from the view of public streets. FINDING: The proposed new sign will not affect automobile and pedestrian circulation. The sign will replace an existing larger sign which is located approximately 26'-8" from the main hotel entrance located on Montebello Boulevard. The sign will be set back 7 feet from the edge of curb. The new sign will improve the visual effect of the site from the view of the public streets, primarily on Montebello Boulevard and Town Center Drive. SECTION 3. The Planning Commission HEREBY APPROVES Design Review 00-86 (MODIFICATION) for removal of an existing 17-foot freestanding sign and construction of a new 17-foot freestanding sign for Double Tree Hotel, located at 888 Montebello Boulevard, subject to conditions listed in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 4. This action shall become final and effective ten (10) days after this decision by the Planning Commission, unless within such time a written appeal is filed with the City Clerk for consideration by the Rosemead City Council as provided in Article IX - Planning and Zoning of the Rosemead Municipal Code. i SECTION 5. This resolution is the result of an action taken by the Planning Commission on July 6, 2009, by the following vote: YES: ALARCON, ENG, HERRERA, HUNTER, RUIZ NO: NONE ABSENT:NONE ABSTAIN: NONE SECTION 6. The secretary shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall transmit copies of same to the applicant and the Rosemead City Clerk. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 6th day of July, 2009. w Tana Herrera, h irwoman CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a resolution adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemead at its regular meeting, held on the 6th day of July, 2009 by the following vote: YES: ALARCON, ENG, HERRERA, HUNTER, RUIZ NO: NONE ABSENT:NONE ABSTAIN: NONE Sheri Bermejo, Secretary EXHIBIT "B" DESIGN REVIEW 00-86 (MODIFICATION) 888 MONTEBELLO BOULEVARD (APNs: APN: 5271-002-061, & 063 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL JULY 6, 2009 1. Design Review 00-86 (Modification) is approved for removal of an existing 17'-5"-foot tall monument sign and installation of a new 17- foot tall monument sign for the existing Double Tree Hotel to be developed in accordance with the plans marked Exhibit "C", dated June 4, 2009. Any revisions to the approved plans must be resubmitted for the review and approval of the Planning Division. 2. The conditions listed on this exhibit shall be copied directly onto any development plans subsequently submitted to the Planning and Building Divisions for review. 3. Design Review 00-86 (Modification) is approved for one (1) year from the Planning Commission approval date. The applicant shall make progress towards initiation of proposed sign, or request an extension from the Planning Division within 30-calender days prior to expiration date. Otherwise Design Review 00-86 (Modification) shall become null and void. 4. The Planning Commission hereby authorizes the Planning Division to make and/or approve minor modifications. 5. All conditions must be complied with to the satisfaction of the Planning Division prior to final approval of the associated plans, building permits, occupancy permits, or any other appropriate request. 6. Design Review 00-86 (Modification) is granted or approved with the City and its Planning Commission and City Council retaining and reserving the right and jurisdiction to review and to modify the permit, including the conditions of approval based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of the use, a change in scope, emphasis, size, or nature of the use, or the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration, or change of use. This reservation of right to review is in addition to, and not in lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Commission, and City Council to review and revoke or modify any permit granted or approved under the Rosemead Municipal Code for any violations of the conditions imposed on Design Review 00-86 (Modification). 7. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Rosemead or its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Rosemead or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set side, void, or annul, an approval of the Planning Commission and/or City Council concerning the project, which action is brought within the time period provided by law. 8. Approval of Design Review 00-86 (Modification) shall not take effect for any purpose until the applicant has filed with the City of Rosemead an affidavit stating that they are aware of and accept all of the conditions set forth in the letter of approval and this list of conditions. 9. The applicant shall comply with all Federal, State and local laws relative to the approved use including the requirements of the Planning, Building, Fire, Sheriff and Health Departments. 10. The onsite public hearing notice posting shall be removed within 30 calendar days from the end of the 10-day appeal period of Design Review 00-86 (Modification). 11. Building permits will not be issued in connection with this project until such time as all plan check fees, and all other applicable fees are paid in full. 12. The numbers of the address signs shall be at least 6" tall with a minimum character width of 1/4", contrasting in color and easily visible at driver's level from the street. Materials, colors, location and size of such address numbers shall be approved by the Principal Planner, or his or her designee, prior to installation. 13. All requirements of the Building and Safety Division and the Planning Division shall be complied with prior to the final approval of the proposed construction. 14. All other existing signage on site (exterior wall signs) shall continue to be subject to the conditions of approval of Design Review 00-86. 15. Prior to issuance of building permits, all school fees shall be paid. The applicant shall provide the City with-written verification of compliance from the School District. 16. The hours of construction shall be limited from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday to Saturday. No construction shall take place on Sundays or on any federal holidays without prior approval by the City. 17. The Planning staff shall have access to the subject property at any time during construction to monitor progress. 18. Applicant shall obtain a public works permit for all work in or adjacent to the public right-of-way. 19. The site shall be maintained in a graffiti-free state. Any new graffiti shall be removed within twenty-four (24) hours. A 24-hour, Graffiti Hotline can be called at (626) 569-2345 for assistance. 20. The site shall be maintained in a clean, weed and litter free state in accordance with Sections 8.32.010-8.32.040 of the Rosemead Municipal Code, which pertains to the storage, accumulation, collection, and disposal of garbage, rubbish, trash, and debris. All trash containers shall be stored in the appropriate trash enclosure at all times. All trash, rubbish, and garbage receptacles shall be regularly cleaned, inspected, and maintained in a clean, safe, and sanitary condition. 21. The parking area, including handicapped spaces, shall be paved and re-painted periodically to City standards to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. In accordance with Chapter 17.84 of the Rosemead Municipal Code, all designated parking stalls shall be double striped. Such striping shall be maintained in a clear, visible, and orderly manner. 22. All open area not covered by concrete, asphalt, or structures shall be landscaped and maintained on a regular basis. All landscaped areas shall be maintained with adequate landscaping on a regular basis, including the removal of trash and litter. 23. Signs shall comply with Chapter 17.104 of the Rosemead Municipal Code. Window signs shall not cover more than 15% of window and glass door areas. 24. Any disturbed landscaping surrounding the monument sign shall be re-established to the satisfaction of the Planning Division prior to final inspection. 25. Violations of the conditions of approval may result in citation and/or initiation of revocation proceedings.