Loading...
CC - Item 4A - Minutes of June 10, 2025MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL & HOUSING DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION SPECIAL & REGULAR JOINT MEETING JUNE 10, 2025 The special meeting of the Rosemead City Council was called to order by Mayor Clark at 6:05 p.m., in the Rosemead City Council Chamber, located at 8838 East Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California. PRESENT: Mayor Clark, Mayor Pro Tern Armenta, Council Members Dang and Low ABSENT: Council Member Ly (on Military Leave) 1. CLOSED SESSION A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEC Section 54957.6 AGENCY DESIGNATED C City Manager Kim, Assistant City N Rachel Richman and Donald Le from EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION: Ro: The City Council recesse PLEDGE OF. ALLEGIANI INVOCATION — Council I City Attorney Richman stat Closed Session. ache end of 2. PUBLIC COMMEP Mayor Clark opened' wo Tern TIATORS - Pursuant to Government Code GANIZATION REPRESENTATIVES: Lager/Finance Director Chua, City Attorney zrke, Williams and Sorensen, LLP aead Ernblovee Association at 7:14 p.m. Council went into Closed Session and will continue Comment period. Sue Yamamoto Rosemead Librarian, highlighted the Library's summer programs. Stated our Summer Discovery Reading Program, began on June Pt, is free and easy to sign up for; noting participants win incentives and monthly drawings. During the summer we're going to have a lot of fun programs, especially for our kids, such as a story time, magic, arts and crafts, music for 11 through 13 years old can learn how to play a keyboard or drums or the guitar for a six -week session where the kids will be able to take the instruments home to practice on and then bring them back to learn how to play. Also, our Summer Stars, a semi -private 30-minute tutoring session in reading for grades 1" through 6th, starts on June 17th. We are continuing with the Department of Mental Health workshops, shared the Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page I of 25 AGENDA ITEM 4.A next one is "Preserving your Memory" on July 22nd. Ms. Yamamoto encouraged the community to come into the library and ask us about these programs Council Member Dang expressed it's really great to see a lot of these programs being implemented and thanked Ms. Yamamoto for championing that effort. Corrine Martinez, Resident, stated I've been a resident of Rosemead for 40 years, expressed concern for all the fireworks that go off every year; asked why the city can't stop bringing in safe and sane fireworks, and just have a parade, a carnival and a fireworks show. Opined the city allowing safe and sane fireworks gives everybody the motive to light illegal ones and then, switch back to safe and sane and when the Police -,or Code Enforcement Officers; emphasized they're not going to know the difference, and we don't have enough staff to go around and catch everybody. What does it take to get'a spark on somebody's lawn and start a fire in Rosemead? I was told by the Sheriffs Department,that those children make money off of these programs by having the fireworks come in, but there's other ways they can make money. I think safe and sane fireworks should not be allowed in the city anymore. Pointed out there is an evacuation fire in Burbank. it fires in Pasadena and the other locations bac in Santa Clarita. I don't want to see go dowr year? Indicated that San Bernardino County know how it was for the fires. Inquired why make all fireworks illegal in the city. There being no 3. PRESENT Apple Valley. We've already gone through the in January. Noted there was one just yesterday so can we think about it and,stop it maybe this ust announced no more fireworks because they 2osemead can't do the same? Asked Council to Comment period. A. Presentation of Rosemead Recipients of the Republic Services 2025 Annual Essay Janelle Bustamante, Sustainability Advisor, and Pilar Mejia, Municipal Relations Manager, Republic Services, presented checks to the recipients for sharing innovative ideas on sustainability and environmental awareness. The City Council presented Certificates of Recognition to the following Rosemead High School students: Alissa Lai, Vanessa Quach,,Jenny Wu, Diego Garcia, and Lana Kayla Kang. B. Anti -Hate Recognition of the 2025 Poetry Contest Winners for the City's Anti -Hate Campaign The City Council presented certificates to the winners of the 2025 Poetry Contest for the City's Anti -Hate Campaign: 1. Allen Zhong, 3rd Grade, George Sanchez Elementary, poem titled "The Battle of Hate and Love" for Group B — ages 8 to 10 years old; 2. Efren Lin, 8th Grade, Richard Garvey Intermediate, poem titled "Hating is Bad" for Group C — ages 11 to 13 years old; and 3. Kitty Chao, loth Grade, San Gabriel High School, poem titled "Why?" for Group D — ages 14 to 17 years old. C. Proclamation Declaring June 2025 as "Pride Month" in the City of Rosemead Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 2 of 25 The City Council presented a Proclamation declaring June 2025 as "Pride Month" in the City of Rosemead. Pride Month is recognized each June as a time to honor the LGBTQ plus community and reflect on the history, contributions and ongoing efforts towards equality and inclusion. It serves as an opportunity to promote awareness, celebrate diversity and support the rights of all individuals without discrimination. City Clerk Hernandez stated we are happy to promote the proclamation declaring the month of June as Pride Month in the City of Rosemead and on social media. Mayor Pro Tem Armenta stated what a great segue into proclaiming June as Pride Month because here we are having kids write poetry about acceptance and making sure that we're seen as a safe haven here in the City of Rosemead, so it's just great how all this is intertwined with each other. Council Member Low opined there's means, what love means, and why we Council Member Dang recognition and a really one another regardless presentation from the ki young and that we are,r 4. PUBLIC HEARING A. Public Hearing on On March 22, 202 for Modification 2 building into the M is now requesting Modification 25-0' 3 Central Business. E Recommendation: 1. Conduct a pub] 2. Adopt Resoluti of any bou s; stating it's no better time for us to show what anti -hate support Pride Month. same sentiment. I this Pride Month is a good Ze theme of inclusiveness, how we should love idaries. This is a great segue to our prior amazing to see that this theme of love starts so Pride 8855 Valley Boulevard City Council upheld the Planning Commission's approval o renovate the building fagade of an existing commercial ?ublic Market food hall. The applicant, DC Universal, LLC, ition on;the rooftop level with additional changes through subject site is located at 8855 Valley Boulevard in the with a Design Overlay (CBD/D-O) zone. the City Council take the following actions: hearing and receive public testimony; No. 2025-28, entitled; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SECOND MODIFICATION TO AN ADDITION ON THE LOS ANGELES, STATE OF MODIFICATION 25-01, A DESIGN REVIEW 03-110 FOR ZOOFTOP LEVEL OF THE BUILDING, RECONFIGURATION OF VARIOUS OUTDOOR DINING AREAS ON BOTH THE GROUND AND ROOFTOP LEVELS, IMPLEMENTATION OF A NEW EXTERIOR COLOR SCHEME, AND A SLIGHT INCREASE IN THE BUILDING'S Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 3 of 25 OVERALL HEIGHT. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT 8855 VALLEY BOULEVARD (APN: 5391-009-002), IN THE RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN OVERLAY (CBD/RC-MUDO/D-O) ZONE; and 3. Determine that Modification 25-01 is exempt from Class 1 of Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. Senior Planner Annie Lao provided an overview of the presentation; stated the applicant DC Universal, LLC has submitted a second modification to the facade renovation of the Myriad Public Market. The request includes in addition to the rooftop level, reconfiguration of outdoor dining areas, a new color scheme, and an increase to the height of the building by three feet. As depicted, the original elevation was approved in 2022; the revised elevations proposed before you today include a brighter color scheme which will enhance and liven the corner in which the existing building is located. Currently the building is under constru+ completed by summer of 2026. During the notice period, the adjacent property owner of the Valley ( shared access and parking agreements and them that the shared access and parking a additional parking is not required per Ass agency imposing within half a mile it is recommend -.7 No. area. be utilizing since positivity and I j' the City, of Rose: a block: away. It' of public tr ;d, ;that the adopt City the Class 1 of and their over par and is expected to be eceived emails from )rney in regard to the g. If Was conveyed to 1t is more of a civil matter and that Bill 2097 which prohibits a public >;for developments that are located ialysis contained in the staff report, luct a public hearing and receive i No. 2025-28; and determine that Section 15301 of CEQA guidelines. :ita shared she was there for the groundbreaking and saw the illy excited for this project because it is going to beautify that .little disheartening to hear the adjacent property owner king but then they're use utilizing parking that they shouldn't uilding has been vacant. Opined it's a shame because we want )e that we move forward as this is a much -needed amenity for especially when PCC's satellite school is going to be just half g to bring a lot of business to our city so thank you so much. Council Member Low stated that she talked to our Director of Community Development before the meeting, and she was able to answer the questions she had, so she is comfortable with this modification. Mayor Clark opened the Public Hearing. Peter Ta shared that his family owns a property adjacent to the property located at 8855 Valley Boulevard. In March of 2022, we appeared in front of you with respect to the then requested modification of DC Universal with respect to their expansion as to the use of their rooftop to create public market food hall. I am now in front of you in order to raise issues with respect to the requested change. With respect to the Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 4 of 25 construction of the project, you have not implemented any condition as to pedestrian safety not only of the people that are coming to our shopping center but as to young kids that are going to the school behind the center. From past experiences, the visibility at the intersection of Ivar Avenue and the egress driveway has created serious potential conflicts and as such any large construction vehicles or trucks servicing the construction site should be limited in size. The applicant should provide a flag person to protect pedestrians. While I understand that AB 2097 does not require the applicant to provide any more parking at their site, what will happen in reality is that the applicant's customers will continue to park on our parking lot, thus creating an impact for our tenants in their ability to service their customers. I would ask that you would impose a requirement that the applicant needs to provide a parking attendant to direct the applicant's parkers to first park on their property and then If there is any overflow, that the parking can be on our adjacent parking lot. In addition, all construction workers should be required to park off -site so that they do not take up much needed parking spaces. In addition to the' above, another condition that requires attention is that the employees of the food hall should park off -site in order to accommodate much -needed customer parking. While I understand that your staff has recommended that this applicarithas met the development'standards just because the development standards can be made,,they still allow you to implement conditions that would not impose hardship on the surrounding tenants or create substantial safety conflicts. While we encourage businesses to improve their business plans, it should not be to the detriment of others, so they suffer potential impact as to the properties. I would hope that the City would' further implement a process to make sure that all construction and_ trash is properly stored and removed on a timely basis as to not to create debris that will not only hinder the ability to access our adjacent site but create an unsightly construction site: It should be the City's obligation to make sure that where businesses share common sites, all property owners are protected and not burning. In addition to the construction trash, after the food hall is open, the applicant of its I tenant shall do a site inspection every two hours to make sure that there is no tenant trash within the common parking. At this time, I'd like to talk about this presentation board thafl,have brought to you, but before that, I did talk to some school members..'' ,.. Manager Kim interjected to inform Mr. Ta that his three minutes for There being no further speakers, Mayor Clark closed the Public Hearing. Council Member Dang indicated he knows both gentlemen, identifying Eric who owns the Universal building and then Peter is the other property owner to the back. What I believe is fair and I'll mention some of the findings, but it actually applies to both. So whether Eric decides to go bigger, Peter, you also have the right to go bigger. Expressed I'm always supportive of you guys going bigger. I think it helps create the downtown feel that I personally would like to see in my vision. So, the fact that Eric could go bigger, you could go bigger. The fact that if Eric goes bigger, he doesn't have to provide parking because of Assembly Bill 2097; emphasizing that the city and our local authority cannot override state. In terms of the overall design, I know you commented that they're actually adding another "floor" to this; noting the original Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 5 of 25 building was a five -story above ground. This building, in its original approval and parking space, was granted a five -story building. In other words, the building would have been a lot bigger if it weren't for just funding issues, so they actually reduced it. The fact that if we are revisiting it today and saying that there is a parking element. Even with this roof addition, it would have been smaller than what it would have been approved in 1950 or so. That's why I don't think the impact is there, even aside from the state exemption. center was already vested with the same amount of parking with actually a bigger building. In terms of the overall design, I like it. Opined when this is done, we are probably going to be the only one in San Gabriel Valley that's going to have a rooftop dining, so it's going to be great. Further accenting the fact that it will sort of create a Downtown Rosemead because it is going to be the center of attention. I also want to point out the Olympics is coming in 2028, so this will absolutely be a destination for everyone to come to. Echoed Mayor Pro Tem Armenta's comments that this is also going to gravitate all the students and professors going to PCC to have a place nearby to come to. Emphasized it will be a great addition to the city. Council Member Low stated she expressed she is ve: looking forward to r to share our success. by this project being forward to both part it's that, as the t food Member Dang's comments; needs a -landmark and I'm iil'as our landmark. We as a community want to Eric's project being successful; commented ng to make that whole plaza successful. I look successful projects. calking distance of PCC, when they developed that might help too. Mayor Pro Teri Armenta said she is just throwing it out there, not even sure it's doable, but, many cities allow parking in' alley ways. Stated she believes there's an alleyway right,behind'some of the properties. Inquired if it is possible to look into having parking 'in the alley, to expand the parking situation. City Manager Kim'responded that majority of our alley in the city is about 20-foot wide and the 20-fo6t width is a minimum requirement for thoroughfare; mainly because it's usually a two-way access, noting fire and public safety vehicles need to be able to travel through them, but we'll look into it and see if it's possible. Council Member Dang commented I recall there might not be an alley. Suggested looking at rearranging some of the stalls, configurations, and flow to possibly gain some additional stalls. Stated if that's something worth exploring, staff could share that with you to help you create additional parking space. Mayor Pro Tem Armenta noted there's already parking back there, so that answers my question. ACTION: Motion by Council Member Low, seconded by Council Member Dang to take the following actions: Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 6 of 25 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-28, entitled; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MODIFICATION 25-01, A SECOND MODIFICATION TO DESIGN REVIEW 03-110 FOR AN ADDITION ON THE ROOFTOP LEVEL OF THE BUILDING, RECONFIGURATION OF VARIOUS OUTDOOR DINING AREAS ON BOTH THE GROUND AND ROOFTOP LEVELS, IMPLEMENTATION OF A NEW EXTERIOR COLOR SCHEME, AND A SLIGHT INCREASE IN THE BUILDING'S OVERALL HEIGHT. THE SUBJECT,,ISITE IS LOCATED AT 8855 VALLEY BOULEVARD (APN: 5391-009-002), IN THE RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN OVERLAY (CBD/RC-MUDO/D-O) ZONE; and 2. Determine that Modification 25=01 is exempt from Class i., of Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. Motion was carried out by the following votes: AYES: ARMENTA, CLARK, DANG, AND LOW; NOES: NONE; ABSENT: LY 5. CONSENT CALENDAR ACTION: Motion by Mayor Pro Te"m Armer ta, seconded by Council Member Dang to approve Consent 'Calendar Calendaritems A-E� G, I, and K-O. Consent Calendar Items 4F (pulled by Council Member Low), 4H and 4J (pulled by Council Member Dang), for separate discussion. Motion was carried out by the following votes: AYES: ARMENTA, CLARK," DANG, AND LOW; NOES: NONE; ABSENT: LY Claims solution No. 2025- A, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF' ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS IN THE SUM OF $1,099,492.10 CHECKS NUMBERED 119240 THROUGH NUMBER 119343, DRAFTS NUMBERED 8102 THROUGH NUMBER 8146 AND EFT NUMBERED 53273 THROUGH NUMBER 53316 INCLUSIVELY Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2025-27. • Resolution No. 2025-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 7 of 25 AND DEMANDS IN THE SUM OF $2,246,383.89 CHECKS NUMBERED 119344 THROUGH NUMBER 119437, DRAFTS NUMBERED 8120 THROUGH NUMBER 8176 AND EFT NUMBERED 53317 THROUGH NUMBER 53345 INCLUSIVELY Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2025-31. B. Minutes Recommendation: That the City Council July 25, 2023 and April 22, 2025. C. Second Reading and Adoption of Hazard Severity Zones Map as Implementing Regulations for Fir Code Sections 51178, 51179 & 51 regular meeting minutes of e No. 1029 - Adopting the Updated Fire .ended by,.the State Fire Marshal and Severity Zones Pursuant to Government On May 13, 2025, the City Council of the City, of Rosemead conducted a public hearing and introduced for first reading, by title only, Ordinance No 1029, adopting the updated fire hazard severity zones map as recommended by the state fire marshal and implementing regulations for fire hazard severity zones pursuant to Government Code Sections 51178, 51179 & 51182. The updated map identifies areas within Rosemead's city limits as Moderate, High, and Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones. the City Council approve the second reading and adopt title only; entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE UPDATED FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES MAP AS RECOMMENDED BY THE",STATE (FIRE MARSHAL AND IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS FOR FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 51178, 51179 & 51182 D. Report on Status. of Council Member Ly's Active Military Duty This report provides a status update on Council Member Steven Ly's military service tour. Council Member Ly remains on active duty and has not yet been discharged. In communication with City staff, he anticipates that his military service to wind down by mid -to -late summer. Pursuant to California Military and Veterans Code Section 395.8 during his absence, his council seat is not considered vacated, which ensures the rights of public officials who are on leave for military service are protected. Although the Council has been excusing him under Government Code Section 36513, that excuse is not required. Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 8 of 25 E. C91 Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file this report and provide direction, if any. Accept Completed Improvements and Authorize Filing of Notice of Completion for City Project No. 24013 - Mission Drive Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon System On March 12, 2024, the City Council awarded a construction contract with Calpromax Engineering, Inc. for the Mission Drive Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon System Project (Project No. 24013). The project scope included furnishing and installing a pedestrian hybrid beacon system, which encompassed the installation of traffic signal poles, communication conduits, a controller cabinet, the removal and replacement of roadway pavement, and the signing and striping of the crosswalk spanning Mission Drive at Newby Avenue. The final stages of the project have silice' been ' implemented and completed. The crosswalk signal was activated on April 15, 2025, marring the completion of all project components. The total construction budget, inclusive of a 10% construction contingency, amounted to $357,691,50. Recommendation: That the City 1. Accept project completion for the Mission Drive Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon System Project — Project No. 2401,3 as performed by Calpromax Engineering, Inc., with the final contract amount of $332,031.82; and 2. Authorize the recordation of Notice of Completion with the Los Angeles County Recorder and the release of retention funds 35 days thereafter. National League of Cities - Constituency Groups Summer Convening — July 17-18, 2025 Columbus, Ohio The City Council will consider authorizing the attendance of any Council Member who wishes to attend the 2025 National League of Cities Constituency Groups Summer Convening from July 17 —18, 2025 in Columbus, Ohio. Recommendation: That the City Council authorize any Council Member to attend the National League' of Cities Constituency Groups to be held on July 17 —18, 2025 in Columbus, Ohio. Consideration to Cancel the June 24, 2025, City Council Meeting The City Council will consider the cancellation of its regularly scheduled meeting of June 24, 2025, due to a projected lack of quorum. Should the June 24 meeting be cancelled, the next regular meeting of the City Council will be held as scheduled on Tuesday, July 8, 2025, at 7:00 p.m. Recommendation: That the City Council cancel the regular City Council meeting of June 24, 2025. Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 9 of 25 K. Senior Nutrition Meals Provider - Award of Contract to TRIO Community Meals The City Council will consider approving an agreement with TRIO Community Meals an Elior Company, for an amount not -to -exceed $281,876 for a three-year term beginning July 1, 2025. The TRIO Community Meals is selected for City Council recommendation through a competitive Request for Proposal process to provide meals for the senior nutrition lunch program at the Garvey Community Center. Recommendation: That the City Council approve an Agreement with TRIO Community Meals an Elior Company to provide meal services at the senior nutrition lunch program and authorize the City Manager to execute an Agreement for a term of 3 years beginning on July 1, 2025, for a total not -to -exceed contract amount of $281,876. L. First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement. with Knorr Systems Int'l for Purchase & Delivery of Swimming Pool' Chemicals The City Council will consider approving a one-year extension to the agreement with Knorr Systems Int'l, for an amount not -to -exceed, $87,000 beginning July 1, 2025. The Knorr Systems Int'1 Company is the current vendor for the purchase and delivery of swimming pool chemicals at Rosemead Parts and Splash Zone of Garvey Park. Recommendation: That the City Council approve the first amendment of a proposed one-year extension agreement with Knorr Systemsjnt'l. from July 1, 2025, to June 30, 2026 anti ,authorize the City Manager to execute the contract on behalf of the.City. M. Annual Crossing Guard Cost Sharing Agreements with Rosemead and Garvey On June 27; ,,2023,City Council approved an award of contract to All City Management Services, Inc, for a three-year Agreement. The proposed Agreements with Rosemead and Garvey School Districts are for cost sharing (one-half between the City and each District) for crossing guard services. The total cost for providing crossing guard services for both school districts is approximately $332,539.20. Rosemead jSchool District's portion is approximately $72,742.95 and Garvey School District's portion is'approximately $93,526.65. The City's portion is approximately $166,269.60 and is included in the City's proposed FY 2025-26 Budget. Recommendation: That the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the cost sharing agreements with Rosemead and Garvey School Districts for Fiscal Year 2025-26 crossing guard services. N. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-23 - Approving SB1 Project List for Fiscal Year 2025-26 Under the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 Senate Bill (SB) 1, also known as the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, was enacted to address California's substantial backlog of road maintenance Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 10 of 25 and infrastructure needs. This legislation provides the City of Rosemead with access to funds for essential road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety improvements. For the upcoming FY 25-26 year, the City is projected to receive $1,335,861 in SB1 funding. To remain eligible for these funds, the City must adopt a list of proposed street projects by resolution and file it with the California Transportation Commission. Resolution No. 2025-23, presented for Council's consideration, would adopt the City's project list for FY 2025-26 and authorize staff to submit to the California Transportation Commission by July 1, 2025, to be eligible to receive the funds. Recommendation: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-23, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY= COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL.�YEAR',. 2025-26 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017 O. Approval of a Joint Use Agreement with the Garvey School District The City Council will. and the Garvey School Academy and Garvey I owned by both the City lot at Duff Lanauaae N F. Amendment No. 1. for County Metropolitan Corridor Project )roving a Joint Use Agreement between the City shared use of property at Duff Language Magnet reement outlines the joint use of designated areas rict, Its purpose is to facilitate the use of a parking emy and to, maintain the existing softball field at City Council authorize the City Mayor to execute the arvev School District. FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION of Time to Funding Agreement with Los Angeles ion Authority for the 1 st-Riggin-Potrero Grande On November 8, 2022, the City Council approved entering into a joint Funding Agreement with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for the 1st-Riggin-Portrero Grande Corridor Project. Due to unforeseen delays, Amendment No. 1 is proposed to amend the three-year funding program from FY 2021-2024 to FY 2023-2026. The proposed amendment reflects the changes in the Project schedule and programming of funds. Recommendation: That the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Funding Agreement No. 9200000000MATC1103 with Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for the 1st-Riggin- Portrero Grande Corridor Project. Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 11 of 25 Council Member Low stated I understand the City of Monterey Park is the lead agency on this project. Since the request is to move the project to close out to June 2026 instead of December 2025, will we get any report on Monterey Park's progress? Director of Public Works Gutierrez responded absolutely, we will receive reports on the progress as we work very closely with the City of Monterey Park and the third agency which is LA County. Noted the overall project is about a $6.3 million project, so our portion is about $395,000 so it's a very small portion compared to the overall proj ect. Council Member Low inquired if it is pos by June 2026? Director of Public Works Gut what I've been discussing with into construction this fall or schedule will be met. Council Member Low asked to in order to not lose the broiect. Director of Public Works G,11 these funds, they take the fun Shared in July 2024,.Metro j Explained Metro does,that to have to get'the project done e on the project,, r. this funding if they don't finish Bred that is ra possibility; however, from Monterey Park, they're on schedule to go r. Ascertained from what I've seen, the to havethis completed by affirmed that, is correct. Metro, who manages Co their board,every year to renew the timeline. proved these funds and extended the timeline. know that there is a looming timeline that we ask us to come to the board to provide updates ACTION: ,Motion by Council Member_ Low, seconded by Council Member Dang to authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Funding Agreement No. 9200000000MATC1'103 with Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for the'1st-Riggiii-portrero Grande Corridor Project. Motion was carried out, by the following votes: AYES: ARMENTA, CLARK, DANG, AND LOW; NOES:, NONE; ABSENT: LY H. Approval of the'City of Rosemead's FY 2025-26 Statement of Investment Policy The approval of this item approves the Annual Investment Policy and delegation of investment authority to the Finance Director/City Treasurer for FY 2025-26. There are no substantive changes to the Investment Policy from the version adopted by the City Council in the prior year. Recommendation: That the City Council approve the annual Investment Policy and delegation of investment authority to the Finance Director/City Treasurer. Council Member Dang asked for a quick executive summary of how the investment policy is structured and if there is any change. Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 12 of 25 Assistant City Manager/Director of Finance Chua stated essentially, this investment policy is the same as last year. There are no updates to the investment policy. The objectives of the investment policy is safety first; liquidity meaning the ability to convert investments quickly into cash to be able to use by the city; and thirdly is the yield which refers to interest rates. The safety making that we are investing wisely in safe assets a majority of our assets are CDs the reason being is because CDs are FDIC insured; we have limitations to the amount of CDs we can purchase — we purchase up to $250,000 because that's the FDIC limit. Secondly, we purchase U.S. Treasuries, which is a very safe asset class. Lastly, we purchase corporate bonds. We haven't been buying too many corporate bonds since I became the Finance Director as I think there's a little bit more risk to it. That's why we stuck towards mainly purchasing CDs and U.S. agency notes. As you know, these are very safe asset classes. So, in turn, the investment yield is not as high as what you might see in the regular stock market, and that is because we are limited to the investments because of government code. Council Member Dang asserted that I wanted to give you an opportunity to toot your own horn; inquired how much did we gain. Director of Finance Chua responded.I think over the last two years since I've been here, I believe overall for the portfolio we've gained about $4.7 million. Council Member Dang asked if Director of Finance Chua ansv were allowed to invest in. I thin and I had;the opportunity to rel higher yield for a longer period. is investments with the state tre; 01 strictly on'CDs and bonds. on the investments that we )semead at a very good time the portfolio in a way so that we can have a initially had a very high LEIF balance, which Ld their program, and their maturities are only D.the longer -term maturities, five-year notes, City Manager Kim stated since Mr. Chua is being modest, let me toot his horn for him. Before Mr. Chua came here, I think our investment yield was about $100,000 to $200,000 a year. Since Mr. Chua came to the City of Rosemead, he looked at our investment opportunities and readjusted, our annual investment yield went up to well over a million or two million. Director of Finance Chua commented that over the longer term I think we're still going to continue to see those good investment yields coming into the city because of that rebalancing of that portfolio. So even if the state LEIF funds, even if those yields come down, we'll still have a little bit of a higher yield than what they're bringing in. ACTION: Motion by Council Member Dang, seconded by Council Member Low to approve the annual Investment Policy and delegation of investment authority to the Finance Director/City Treasurer. Motion was carried out by the following votes: AYES: ARMENTA, CLARK, DANG, AND LOW; NOES: NONE; ABSENT: LY Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 13 of 25 J. First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement for a One -Year Extension for Building and Safety Services — Transtech Engineers, Inc. On July 1, 2022, the City Council approved a three-year Professional Services Agreement with Transtech for building and safety services, that is scheduled to expire on June 30, 2025. The scope of services includes serving and protecting the public by ensuring that building construction complies with the California Building Standards Code (Title 28, California Code of Regulations) as well as State safety laws, disabled access, and City Ordinances. The terms of the Agreement allow for two one-year extensions, and staff is recommending approval of the first one-year extension to a new expiration date of June 30, 2026., Recommendation: That the City Council approve the First Amendment authorizing a one-year extension and the increase in hourly compensation in accordance with the CPI-U. Director of Community Developmen Council approved a three-year contra and Safety services. Currently, they' permit tech position. During the last completed a lot of tasks and one of the in addition we've also" retained , a bi streamline a lot of brocesses. Toni[ approve a asked Director Valenzuela stated. in, July of 2022, the City t with Transtech Engineers for our Building julfilling all of our staffing except for one ree years it's been very successful as they've iggest is digitizing all of the Building records, [ding software called "OpenGov" that will we're 'recommending that the City Council n'to an increase based on CPI. of Valenzuela responded it's about 12%. Council Member Dang invited the Transtech Engineers staff to the podium to recognize..them; stated I wanted to, acknowledge the fact that I talked to a lot of contractors; homeowners; developers, and they tell me that the City of Rosemead is doing something good. They_ tell me that our Planning and Building Department is awesome as we streamline everything. Prior to Transtech coming on board, ADUs were taking six to eight months; emphasized with you guys coming on board, you streamlined the process so it now takes one or two months. Pointed out that the City of Rosemead is number two in ADU production, second to the County. Noted the County, has,thousands of engineers, but we have Transtech who does a lot of heavy lifting with a lot more efficiency. Council Member Dang reiterated he is supporting this contract extension without any doubt and thanks Transtech Engineers for all that they do for Rosemead. Council Member Low echoed Council Member Dang's compliments to Transtech. Stated I too have heard from the community, businesses and residents, that they are very happy with your services provided. Commented since Transtech came on board you have really helped us smooth things out and get very efficient. Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 14 of 25 Mayor Pro Tern Armenta stated she also echoes the sentiments of my colleagues here on the Council. I know all of you work really hard for the City; gave a kudos to John Tufan, Building Division Supervisor, who represents Transtech every day in the office as he has been very visible out there and is highly regarded. Thanked Transtech for their due diligence in making sure that the plan checks are in line and all the codes are being adhered to. Opined it puts us at ease knowing that we have professionals looking at our city making sure that our city is taken care of when it comes to engineering and all the different aspects of your contract. Mayor Clark echoed everything that has been said by her colleagues. We really appreciate all you're doing. ACTION: Motion by Mayor Clark, seconded, by Mayor Pro Tern Armenta to approve the First Amendment authorizing a one-year extension and the increase in hourly compensation in accordance with the CPI-U. Motion was carried out by the following votes: AYES: ARMENTA, CLARK, DANG, AND LOW; NOES: NONE; ABSENT: LY 6. MATTERS FROM CITY MANAGER & STAFF A. Approval of Ninth Amendment to City Clerk Employment Agreement and Approval of Salary Schedule Resolution No..2025-25 The City and the City Clerk entered into an Employ 'merit Agreement ("Agreement") on April 10, 2018. Section 3 of the Agreement permits the City Council to conduct performance evaluations and grant increases in salary. Pursuant to Section 3(A)(2) of the Agreement, the City Council conducted the City Clerk's performance evaluation on April 22, 2025. The City Clerk received a "substantially exceeds expectations" review.with a 5'rating. Thereafter, oiivMay 13, 2025 the City Council conducted a Closed Session to,negotiate compensation. At that Closed Session the Council directed a contract, amendment be presented to the Council providing for a 7% increase; bringing the, City Clerk's total annual base salary from $164,604 to. $176,124. As required by Government Code 54953(c)(3) prior to final action on the City Clerk's salary ©r�compensatlon and benefits there must be an oral report of the change. The City Attorney Will orally report the changes as required. That the City Council take the following actions: 1. Approve the granting of a 7% increase for a "substantially exceeds expectations" performance evaluation effective May 13, 2025, and authorize the Mayor to execute the Ninth Amendment on behalf of the City Council to reflect the increase; and 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-25, entitled: Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 15 of 25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE SALARY SCHEDULE TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS TITLE 2, SECTIONS 570.5 AND 571 TO REFLECT APPROVED RATES FROM MAY 13, 2025 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2025 City Attorney Richman presented the Ninth Amendment to the City Clerk's Employment Agreement. Following a performance evaluation on April 22, where the City Clerk received a "Substantially Exceeds Expectations" rating, and a subsequent closed session on May 13 to discuss compensation, staff recommended a 7% salary increase from $164,604 to $176,124, with related benefit adjustments totaling approximately $15,900. The report complies with Government Code requirements. Staff recommended approval of the amendment and'adoption of the corresponding salary schedule resolution. ACTION: Motion by Cour approve Ninth Amendment expectations" performance e was carried out by the folio NOES: None, ABSENT: Ly, B. Approval of Thir, Approval of Salary The City and tl ("Agreement") on Council, to conduc to Section 6(c) of! performance' evah "substantially 'exc( conducted a dose 'Agreement be prof increase effective I As required Manager's 's change. The it"Mdmber Dang and seconded by Mayor Clark to and the , 7% increase for a "substantially exceeds aluatiori and adopt' Resolution No. 2025-25. Motion ling votes: AYES: Armenta, Clark, Dang, and Low; t 5- ployment Agreement and ',ity Manager entered into an Employment Agreement it 26, 2022. Section 6 of the Agreement permits the City Formance evaluations and grant increases in salary. Pursuant kgreement, ,the City Council conducted the City Manager's n on April 23, 2025, and the City Manager received a expectations" rating. On May 13, 2025, the City Council Sion Ion compensation and directed that an amendment to the to the Council for consideration of approval for a 12% salary 13, 2025, from $256,992 to the amount of $287,832. iovernment Code 54953(c)(3) prior to final action on the City or compensation and benefits there must be an oral report of the Attorney will orally report the changes as required. Recommendation: That the City Council take the following actions: 1. Authorize the Mayor to execute the Third Amendment to City Manager Agreement with Ben Kim on behalf of the City Council; and 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-26, entitled: Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 16 of 25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE SALARY SCHEDULE TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS TITLE 2, SECTIONS 570.5 AND 571 TO REFLECT APPROVED RATES FROM MAY 13, 2025 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2025 City Attorney Richman presented the Third Amendment to the City Manager's Employment Agreement. Following a performance evaluation on April 23, 2025, where the City Manager received a "Substantially Exceeds Expectations" rating, and a closed session on May 13 to discuss compensation, staff recommended a 12% salary increase from $256,992 to $287,832, with related benefit adjustments of approximately $34,900 to be absorbed in the- current fiscal year budget. The report was made in compliance with Government Code requirements. ACTION: Motion by Council Member Dang and seconded by Mayor Clark to approve the Third Amendment arid. adopt Resolution No. 2025-26. Motion was carried out by the following votes: AYES: Armenia, Clark, Dang; and Low; NOES: None, ABSENT: Ly C. Professional Services A Traffic Engineering, and The City's existing, agreement, w services', is set to expire on June 30, support -foil the City's Capital Imp Request for Proposals (RFP) was received and :evaluated based I on Transtech Engineers,, Inc. received be the most dualified and cost-effec Public works Department City Engineering, Franstech Engineers, Inc., for engineering >. To continue providing critical engineering nent Program and day-to-day operations, a ;d on April 24, 2025. Five proposals were lifications, experience, staffing, and cost. ighest overall score and was determined to firm. Recommendation'. ,That the City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Transtech Engineers, Inc., to provide General Engineering, Traffic, Engineering, and Inspection Services in an amount not -to - exceed $482,000 per year, for a term of three (3) years with the option to extend for up to two ,(2) ,one year extensions. City Engineer `Basilyous presented the staff recommendation regarding Engineering and Inspection Services for the Department of Public Works. Transtech Engineers, has been under contract since 2020, has had multiple renewals and amendments, with the current term set to expire on June 30, 2025. In preparation, staff issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) on April 24, 2025, through PlanetBids, with a submission deadline of May 20, 2025. The RFP sought services for Capital Improvement Program management, permits and inspections, contract administration, commission support, and daily engineering functions. Five proposals were received from Pullman Consulting Group, Infrastructure Architects, Kevin Ko, Ladayu, and Transtech Engineers. He reported that proposals were evaluated by the Director of Public Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 17 of 25 Works, City Engineer, and Associate Engineer based on experience, qualifications, approach, staffing, references, and cost. Transtech Engineers ranked highest with 91 points, followed by Pullman Consulting Group and Kevin Ko. Staff recommended Transtech due to their years of experience with the City, familiarity with ongoing projects, flexible staffing capacity, strong knowledge of City standards, reduced hourly rates, and active community engagement. Mr. Basilyous reported that Transtech Engineers offered competitive pricing, ranking second lowest overall among five proposals, with the lowest hourly rates for Traffic Engineer and Public Works Inspector positions. He noted that the new cost represents a reduction of approximately $150,000 per year compared to the previous contract, resulting in an estimated savings of about $450,000 over the agreement term. Council Member Dang expressed his appreciation and commended the presentation for clearly addressing cost, cost'savings, and the reliability of the recommendation. He acknowledged the additional cost savings achieved by the Public Works Director and stated his full support for the recommendation. Council Member Low stated that ability, noting their proven perfon several Engineers' ACTION: Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Armenta, seconded by Council Member Low to authorize the City Manager to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Transtech Engineers, Inc., to provide General Engineering, Traffic Engineering, and Inspection Services in an amount not -to -exceed $482Oo0 per year, for a term of three (3) years with the option to extend for up to two (2)one-year extensions. Motion was carried out by the following votes: AYES: Armenta, Clark, Dang and Low, NOES: None, ABSENT: LY No. 31028 — Request for Additional fi On October 8 2024, the City Council awarded the Public Safety Center Upgrade project to Royal Construction Corp in the amount of $2,626,800 ($2,388,000 construction and $238,800 10% contingency). The construction is currently underway, but the project has faced several challenges from unforeseen conditions that require additional work outside of the original scope. Such work includes termite mitigation, a new fire alarm system, reconfiguration of office space for the new Public Safety "Director, and others. The estimated cost of the additional work is $374,650, of which, $135,850 exceeds the project's contingency. Additionally, staff is requesting Council approval to increase the project's contingency by $120,000 to complete the Public Safety Center Upgrade project. Recommendation: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-30 amending the City's Fiscal Year 2024-25 CIP budget to appropriate additional funds in the amount of $255,850 in Public Facilities funding to cover change order costs and provide additional contingency funds, entitled: Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 18 of 25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET AND APPROPRIATE NEW FUNDS FOR THE PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER UPGRADES PROJECT NO. 31028 City Engineer Basilyous provided an update on the Public Safety Center upgrade project. The contract, awarded to Royal Construction Corporation on October 8, 2024, was for approximately $2.38 million, with a $238,000 contingency, totaling $2.6 million, funded by ARPA. Construction began January 6, 2025. The project scope included roof and HVAC upgrades, parking improvements, lockers and restroom renovations, a new public lobby, animal holding area enhancements, and office -meeting room improvements. During construction, unforeseen issues such as termite damage, fire alarm upgrades, code compliance, and structural revisions required additional work, including CAT6 cabling, flooring upgrades, and copper pipe modifications. These adjustments were necessary to.ensure project completion to current standards. He noted that ;the currently approved contingency was $238,000, which represents approximately, 48%, of the total change order costs. The project is currently over budget by $135,000; .or roughly 2` 1%, which is required to cover all necessary change orders to complete the project. He explained that the proposed new contingency of $120,000, representing about''24%, to ensure sufficient funds are available to cover any additional change orders from this point until project completion. Council Member Dang asked for clarification on the total cost of the project, noting that the approved contingency was $238,000 and was it being doubled. City Engineer'Basilyous clarified thatthe proposed $120,000 new contingency does not imply that the funds will necessarily,be spent. He explained that the contingency is intended to cover unforeseen costs` without requiring a new staff report or additional. City Council,action. Any unused contingency funds at the completion of the project Will "'be returned to the original account. Council Member D4ng noted that if the full new contingency were utilized, the total project,contingeney would amount to approximately $480,000, representing roughly 20%'of the total project cost. If contingency is 10% of project costs, based on the ency cost of $500,000, let's the project cost would actually be $5 million, total conting it's not $2.3 million anymore. City Engineer Basilyous explained that with the addition of the new contingency, the total project cost would be approximately $3 million. He stated that the original contract amount was $2.38 million, with a previously approved contingency of $238,000 (10%), bringing the total to $2.6 million. Adding the requested additional appropriation of $255,000 would increase the total project cost to approximately $2.8 to $2.9 million. Council Member Dang asked if a 20% contingency was normal on a project. Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 19 of 25 City Engineer Basilyous replied that the typical contingency is approximately 10% of the project cost. However, due to the nature of the project, which involves numerous unforeseen conditions encountered during underground work, a higher contingency was warranted. Council Member Dang stated that the discovery phase was complete and that no additional unforeseen issues were expected. He clarified that, rather than requesting an increase to the original project budget of $2.38 million, staff is proposing to address the additional costs by increasing the project contingency. City Engineer Basilyous replied correct to Mr. Dang's comments. ACTION: Motion by Council Member Dang, seconded by Council Member Low to adopt Resolution No. 2025-30 amending the City's Fiscal Year 2024-25 CIP budget to appropriate additional funds in the amount;,of $255,850 in Public Facilities funding to cover change order costs and provide additional contingency funds E. Adoption of Resolutions Approving the City of Rosemead's FY 2025-26 Operating Budget, Capital Improvement Program' Budget, Establishing the FY 2025-26 Appropriations Limit; Approving the Rosemead Housing Development Corporation FY 2025-26 Annual Budget, and,Amending the City of Rosemead's FY 2024-25 Budget The City Council will consider the adoption of the City's Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 Operating, and Capital,Improvement Budget, which provides for total appropriations of $491346;480. The General Fund operating budget is $32,123,280. The Capital Improvement"Program budget is $7,153,200 and includes funding for one new project, additional funding for existing projects, and funding for annual projects. The proposed budget for,the Rosemead Housing Development Corporation (RHDC) is $1,042,300. That the, City Council take the following actions: L Adopt Resolution No. 2025-32 and Resolution No. 2025-33, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ADOPTING THE CITY' S OPERATING BUDGET, AUTHORIZED STAFFING, AND FINANCIAL POLICIES FOR THE 2025-26 FISCAL YEAR AND UPDATING THE LISTING OF SALARY AND JOB CLASSIFICATIONS FOR FULL-TIME POSITIONS; and A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ADOPTING THE CITY' S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET FOR THE 2025-26 FISCAL YEAR Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 20 of 25 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-34, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 3. Adopt RHDC Resolution No. 2025-01, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE ROSEMEAD HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2025=26 Assistant City Manager/Finance Director Chua presented the FY 2025-26 budget covering the General Fund, revenue and expenditure assumptions, budget methodology, significant highlights, staffing changes, vacant positions, new capital projects, the Housing Development Corporation budget, and recommended Council actions. The General Fund is proj ected to see a 2% increase in Irevenue, with recurring expenditures slightly higher, resultingin a $1,115,420 surplus before one-time expenses and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects, indicating that recurring revenues can support recurring expenses. One-time expenditures include carryover projects from FY 2024-25; such as the Zoning Code Update, Garvey Avenue Specific Plan Update; and Parking In -Lieu Fee Study. The proppsed budget is balanced, with a projected bottom -line surplus of $5;420: The City's FY 2025-26 budget projects a 3.5% increase in property taxes, a slight decline in sales taxes, °flat transient occupancy and development permit revenues, rising recreation revenues, and increased interest earnings. Expenditures include salary adjustments, arise in PERS unfunded liability from $837,000 to $982,000, a 4% increase in the Sheriff's contract- ($435,000), and $50,000 higher water costs for parks and facilities. Significant General Fund requests include $350,000 to update the. City's General"Plan, $30,000 for a Fall Fiesta drone show, $100,000 for holiday decorations, and $100,000 to refurbish the Aquatic Center slide. Staffing recommendations include deleting six vacant building positions, relying on third - party service. providers. General Fund reserves are projected to increase from $28.6 million in TY 2021-22 to $35.8 million, with nearly $13 million exceeding the Council's 40%' fund balance policy. Total revenues are projected at $48.8 million against $42.2 million in expenses, resulting in a $6.6 million surplus before CIP projects, which total $7.15 million and create a $517,000 deficit covered by special revenue fund reserves. The CIP includes a new $2.8 million Citywide Traffic Signal Improvement Project funded primarily by grants, $150,000 for a Chamber Remodel, $4.1 million for four annual project additions, and continuation of 31 ongoing projects totaling $45.4 million. Council Member Dang asked if the Citywide Traffic Signal Improvement Project included Rosemead Boulevard? Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 21 of 25 Director of Public Works Gutierrez stated that, at this time, there are no additional synergies identified, but staff will work with Caltrans to explore potential opportunities. He noted that the project is funded through a Highway Safety Improvement Grant, which was applied for on the City's behalf. He indicated that staff is still becoming familiar with the grant requirements and confirmed that the project will include upgrades at 40 intersections in close coordination with Caltrans. He noted that Caltrans is currently making improvements at some of the intersections. He explained that once the City moves forward with the project and finalizes the grant guidelines and agreement, staff will coordinate with Caltrans at that time. Council Member Dang noted that South El Monte is,;in the process of taking over the Rosemead portion of their site, which may involve signal light adjustments. He suggested the City consider placing an agenda item to discuss potential City funding to support CalTrans improvements affecting'Rosemead. Mayor Clark asked for clarification if the project involved.,.signal synchronization? Council Member Dang noted he was talking about the upcoming traffic improvements in South El Monte and the KB Homes Big Development Area. He recommended extending traffic studies" -and signal improvements from the 60 Freeway to the underpass near. Mission Road to enhance traffic flow. Mayor Clark expressed Boulevard. Mayor Pro,,Tem Atmenta stated that in, her experience overseeing transportation policy for the Senator;=; she highlighted that the, issues in South El Monte represent only a portion,of broader transportation concerns. She explained that when South El Monte considered relinquishment,`the, funding offered was $2.5 million, whereas they requested $7 million, indicating a significant funding gap. She shared this Mayor Clark addressed the, Council regarding signal synchronization, referencing prior budget discussions with the City Manager and Assistant City Manager/Finance Director. She suggested the installation of sensors to improve traffic flow, noting frustration when waning at signals with no cross traffic, which results in wasted time and increased pollution. Mrs. Clark provided an example on Jackson Avenue, where a sensor system installed detects approaching vehicles and adjusts signals accordingly, improving efficiency. Assistant City Manager/Finance Director addressed the Council regarding the Housing Development Corporation budget. He noted that there were no significant changes compared to the prior year. The proposed 2026 budget reflects a decrease from 2025, primarily due to the $400,000 in capital improvements included in the 2025 budget. Bryan indicated that the budget pertains to the two senior housing facilities located at Garvey Avenue and Angeles Avenue. He requested Council approval of the Housing Development Corporation budget for Fiscal Year 2025-26. Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 22 of 25 Council Member Dang asked about the $30,000, cost for drones compare to a fireworks in terms of the pricing. Director of Parks and Recreation Boecking explained the $30,000 is going to be going towards a drone show at the Fall Fiesta event. He noted that a drone show is slightly more expensive than a traditional fireworks display but is becoming increasingly popular among other cities. He explained that drone shows can feature 100 to 250 drones creating various figures and colors, providing an engaging visual experience. He also stated that a drone show would add a valuable and entertaining element to the Fall Fiesta. He stated that the drone show lasts approximately 20 to 25 minutes, and is comparable in length to a fireworks show, and is synchronized to music. Council Member Dang noted that requires no cleanup, and poses no fi offered commendation. Mayor Clark asked for staff to look little boy who got hurt by a, drone. Director of Parks and',Re( injuries have been reported drones are typically launch the field; at Rosemead High the show has no environmental impact, He expressed support for the idea and hear about a Boecking ;reported that no safety concerns or Ler cities hosting drone shows. He explained that lat areas away from crowds and proposed using by Council Member Dang to adopt No. 2025-33, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE "CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ADOPTING THE CITY'S OPERATING BUDGET, AUTHORISED STAFFING, AND FINANCIAL POLICIES FOR THE 2025-26 FISCAL YEAR AND UPDATING THE LISTING OF SALARY AND JOB CLASSIFICATIONS FOR FULL-TIME POSITIONS; and A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ADOPTING THE CITY'S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET FOR THE 2025-26 FISCAL YEAR • Adopt Resolution No. 2025-34, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 23 of 25 • Adopt RHDC Resolution No. 2025-01, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE ROSEMEAD HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 7. MATTERS FROM MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL A. Council Comments Council Member Dang talked about the recent developments in the City of Los Angeles and surrounding areas, noting reports of protests in Santa Ana. He emphasized the City's commitment to supporting public assembly while stressing the importance of peaceful demonstrations. He expressed concern over violent incidents reported in the media and noted his hope that the City of Rosemead would not face similar issues. He recognized and thanked the Sheriff Department for their dedication, noting the diversion of resources to assist in Los' Angeles and the long hours spent away from family to manage the situation. He also acknowledged Chief of Police Lieutenant Tiwari and Director of Public Safety Murakami for providing updates and explanations regarding operations, the City Manager for coordinating Rosemead staff support; and code enforcement officers for assisting in patrol efforts. Mayor Pro Tern Armenta addressed the Council regarding public safety and recent events affecting, communities to Los Angeles County. She emphasized the importance of understanding the dynamics of the City and the Sheriff s Department. She also thanked the City Manager, Director of Public Safety Murakami, and Chief of Police Lieutenant Tiwari for ensuring that residents are informed. She clarified that neither, the City nor :the Sheriff's Department participates in or assists with ICE at but acknowledged that the Sheriff's Department must perform its duties to maintain public'safety during protests. She expressed concern over attacks I n law enforcement officersand noted their ongoing commitment to serve and protect all residents, regardless of immigration status. She stressed the importance of community cooperation and peaceful protest as the appropriate means to express Council Member Low agreed with prior comments from Council Member Dang and Mayor Pro Temp Armenta. She thanked the City Manager, Public Safety Director Murakami, Chief of Police Lieutenant Tiwari, and the Sheriff's Department for keeping the Council informed and for their work in maintaining public safety. She affirmed her support for peaceful protests as a constitutional right but expressed concern regarding unlawful activities and property damage, citing the Chinese American Museum in downtown Los Angeles as an example. She emphasized the importance of preventing similar incidents in Rosemead and expressed confidence that the Sheriff's Department and City staff would respond promptly to any unlawful Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 24 of 25 activities. She concluded by thanking law enforcement for their dedication and stressing the importance of safety. Mayor Clark expressed appreciation for the Sheriff's Department and all personnel involved in protecting the community. She noted concerns shared by friends and family of law enforcement officers regarding safety in Los Angeles. She commended the Parks and Recreation Department for their efforts in organizing the City's Fourth of July celebration, highlighting the importance of maintaining the holiday on July 4th and preserving its patriotic significance. Mayor Pro Tem Armenta requested that the Council Meeting be adjourned in memory of Jaime Francisco Brenes, a long-time Rosemead resident and dedicated volunteer who passed away on May 31, 2025. Born in Costa Rica in 1954, Jaime ................:......... moved to Rosemead with his family in 1962, graduated from San Gabriel High School, and pursued a career as an electrician. He married Cecilia in 1979, and they raised three children in Rosemead. Jaime was deeply involved in the community, volunteering, with the Parks and Recreation Boys and Girls Clubs, youth sports leagues, and mentorling young people, including encouraging careers in his trade, He also participated in ,,union activities and advocated for the city through attendance at Council meetings and local events, earning recognition as a""Rosemead Brand Ambassador." Remembered for his humility; generosity, and lifelong commitment to helping others, Jaime had a lasting,positive' iihpact on countless residents. The City expressed its condolences to his family and honored his contributions, noting that he embodied the City's values, of hard work, family, and education. Sessionlat 9:21 p.m. 8. ;n in Closed Session, Mayor Clark adjourned the Brenes at 10:30 p.m. Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk Margaret Clark, Mayor Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 25 of 25