Loading...
CC - Minutes - 06-10-2025 - SpecialMINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL & HOUSING DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION SPECIAL & REGULAR JOINT MEETING JUNE 10, 2025 The special meeting of the Rosemead City Council was called to order by Mayor Clark at 6:05 p.m., in the Rosemead City Council Chamber, located at 8838 East Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California. PRESENT: Mayor Clark, Mayor Pro Tem Armenta, Council Members Dang and Low ABSENT: Council Member Ly (on Military Leave) 1. CLOSED SESSION A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 AGENCY DESIGNATED ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVES: City Manager Kim, Assistant City Manager/Finance Director Chua, City Attorney Rachel Richman and Donald Le from Burke, Williams and Sorensen, LLP EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION: Rosemead Employee Association The City Council recessed to Closed Session. The Regular City Council Meeting convened at 7:14 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Mayor Pro Tem Armenta INVOCATION — Council Member Dang City Attorney Richman stated that the City Council went into Closed Session and will continue Closed Session at the end of the regular meeting. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT Mayor Clark opened the Public Comment period. Sue Yamamoto, Rosemead Librarian, highlighted the Library's summer programs. Stated our Summer Discovery Reading Program, began on June 151, is free and easy to sign up for; noting participants win incentives and monthly drawings. During the summer we're going to have a lot of fun programs, especially for our kids, such as a story time, magic, arts and crafts, music for 11 through 13 years old can learn how to play a keyboard or drums or the guitar for a six-week session where the kids will be able to take the instruments home to practice on and then bring them back to learn how to play. Also, our Summer Stars, a semi -private 30 -minute tutoring session in reading for grades Pt through 6u', starts on June 17th. We are continuing with the Department of Mental Health workshops, shared the Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page I of25 next one is "Preserving your Memory" on July 22nd. Ms. Yamamoto encouraged the community to come into the library and ask us about these programs Council Member Dang expressed it's really great to see a lot of these programs being implemented and thanked Ms. Yamamoto for championing that effort. Corrine Martinez, Resident, stated I've been a resident of Rosemead for 40 years, expressed concern for all the fireworks that go off every year; asked why the city can't stop bringing in safe and sane fireworks, and just have a parade, a carnival and a fireworks show. Opined the city allowing safe and sane fireworks gives everybody the motive to light illegal ones and then, switch back to safe and sane and when the Police or Code Enforcement Officers; emphasized they're not going to know the difference, and we don't have enough staff to go around and catch everybody. What does it take to get a spark on somebody's lawn and start a fire in Rosemead? I was told by the Sheriffs Department that those children make money off of these programs by having the fireworks come in, but there's other ways they can make money. I think safe and sane fireworks should not be allowed in the city anymore. Pointed out there is an evacuation fire in Burbank in Apple Valley. We've already gone through the fires in Pasadena and the other locations back in January. Noted there was one just yesterday in Santa Clarita. I don't want to see go down, so can we think about it and stop it maybe this year? Indicated that San Bernardino County just announced no more fireworks because they know how it was for the fires. Inquired why Rosemead can't do the same? Asked Council to make all fireworks illegal in the city. There being no further comments, Mayor Clark closed the Public Comment period. 3. PRESENTATIONS A. Presentation of Rosemead Recipients of the Republic Services 2025 Annual Essay Writing Scholarship Program Janelle Bustamante, Sustainability Advisor, and Pilar Mejia, Municipal Relations Manager, Republic Services, presented checks to the recipients for sharing innovative ideas on sustainability and environmental awareness. The City Council presented Certificates of Recognition to the following Rosemead High School students: Alissa Lai, Vanessa Quach, Jenny Wu, Diego Garcia, and Lana Kayla Kang. B. Anti -Hate Recognition of the 2025 Poetry Contest Winners for the City's Anti -Hate Campaign The City Council presented certificates to the winners of the 2025 Poetry Contest for the City's Anti -Hate Campaign: 1. Allen Zhong, Yd Grade, George Sanchez Elementary, poem titled "The Battle of Hate and Love" for Group B — ages 8 to 10 years old; 2. Efren Lin, 8th Grade, Richard Garvey Intermediate, poem titled "Hating is Bad" for Group C — ages 11 to 13 years old; and 3. Kitty Chao, 10' Grade, San Gabriel High School, poem titled "Why?" for Group D — ages 14 to 17 years old. C. Proclamation Declaring June 2025 as "Pride Month" in the City of Rosemead Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 2 of 25 The City Council presented a Proclamation declaring June 2025 as "Pride Month" in the City of Rosemead. Pride Month is recognized each June as a time to honor the LGBTQ plus community and reflect on the history, contributions and ongoing efforts towards equality and inclusion. It serves as an opportunity to promote awareness, celebrate diversity and support the rights of all individuals without discrimination. City Clerk Hernandez stated we are happy to promote the proclamation declaring the month of June as Pride Month in the City of Rosemead and on social media. Mayor Pro Tem Armenta stated what a great segue into proclaiming June as Pride Month because here we are having kids write poetry about acceptance and making sure that we're seen as a safe haven here in the City of Rosemead, so it's just great how all this is intertwined with each other. Council Member Low opined there's no better time for us to show what anti -hate means, what love means, and why we support Pride Month. Council Member Dang expressed the same sentiment. I think Pride Month is a good recognition and a really reflection of the theme of inclusiveness, how we should love one another regardless of any boundaries. This is a great segue to our prior presentation from the kids; stating it's amazing to see that this theme of love starts so young and that we are recognizing Pride Month. 4. PUBLIC HEARING A. Public Hearing on Application for Modification 25-01 — 8855 Valley Boulevard On March 22, 2022, the City Council upheld the Planning Commission's approval for Modification 21-08 to renovate the building fagade of an existing commercial building into the Myriad Public Market food hall. The applicant, DC Universal, LLC, is now requesting an addition on the rooftop level with additional changes through Modification 25-01. The subject site is located at 8855 Valley Boulevard in the Central Business District with a Design Overlay (CBD/D-O) zone. Recommendation: That the City Council take the following actions: 1. Conduct a public hearing and receive public testimony; 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-28, entitled; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MODIFICATION 25-01, A SECOND MODIFICATION TO DESIGN REVIEW 03-110 FOR AN ADDITION ON THE ROOFTOP LEVEL OF THE BUILDING, RECONFIGURATION OF VARIOUS OUTDOOR DINING AREAS ON BOTH THE GROUND AND ROOFTOP LEVELS, IMPLEMENTATION OF A NEW EXTERIOR COLOR SCHEME, AND A SLIGHT INCREASE IN THE BUILDING'S Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 3 of25 OVERALL HEIGHT. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT 8855 VALLEY BOULEVARD (APN: 5391-009-002), IN THE RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN OVERLAY (CBD/RC-MUDO/D-O) ZONE; and 3. Determine that Modification 25-01 is exempt from Class 1 of Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. Senior Planner Annie Lao provided an overview of the presentation; stated the applicant DC Universal, LLC has submitted a second modification to the facade renovation of the Myriad Public Market. The request includes in addition to the rooftop level, reconfiguration of outdoor dining areas, a new color scheme, and an increase to the height of the building by three feet. As depicted, the original elevation was approved in 2022; the revised elevations proposed before you today include a brighter color scheme which will enhance and liven the corner in which the existing building is located. Currently the building is under construction and is expected to be completed by summer of 2026. During the notice period, we received emails from the adjacent property owner of the Valley Gateway and their attorney in regard to the shared access and parking agreements and concerns over parking. It was conveyed to them that the shared access and parking agreement is more of a civil matter and that additional parking is not required per Assembly Bill 2097 which prohibits a public agency imposing additional parking requirements for developments that are located within half a mile of public transit. Based on the analysis contained in the staff report, it is recommended that the City Council: conduct a public hearing and receive public testimony; adopt City Council Resolution No. 2025-28; and determine that Modification No. 2501 is exempt from Class 1 of Section 15301 of CEQA guidelines. Mayor Pro Tem Armenta shared she was there for the groundbreaking and saw the renditions, so she is really excited for this project because it is going to beautify that area. Expressed it's a little disheartening to hear the adjacent property owner complaining about parking but then they're use utilizing parking that they shouldn't be utilizing since that building has been vacant. Opined it's a shame because we want positivity and I just hope that we move forward as this is a much-needed amenity for the City of Rosemead, especially when PCC's satellite school is going to be just half a block away. It's going to bring a lot of business to our city so thank you so much. Council Member Low stated that she talked to our Director of Community Development before the meeting, and she was able to answer the questions she had, so she is comfortable with this modification. Mayor Clark opened the Public Hearing. Peter Ta shared that his family owns a property adjacent to the property located at 8855 Valley Boulevard. In March of 2022, we appeared in front of you with respect to the then requested modification of DC Universal with respect to their expansion as to the use of their rooftop to create public market food hall. I am now in front of you in order to raise issues with respect to the requested change. With respect to the Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 4 of 25 construction of the project, you have not implemented any condition as to pedestrian safety not only of the people that are coming to our shopping center but as to young kids that are going to the school behind the center. From past experiences, the visibility at the intersection of Ivar Avenue and the egress driveway has created serious potential conflicts and as such any large construction vehicles or trucks servicing the construction site should be limited in size. The applicant should provide a flag person to protect pedestrians. While I understand that AB 2097 does not require the applicant to provide any more parking at their site, what will happen in reality is that the applicant's customers will continue to park on our parking lot, thus creating an impact for our tenants in their ability to service their customers. I would ask that you would impose a requirement that the applicant needs to provide a parking attendant to direct the applicant's parkers to first park on their property and then If there is any overflow, that the parking can be on our adjacent parking lot. In addition, all construction workers should be required to park off-site so that they do not take up much needed parking spaces. In addition to the above, another condition that requires attention is that the employees of the food hall should park off-site in order to accommodate much-needed customer parking. While I understand that your staff has recommended that this applicant has met the development standards just because the development standards can be made, they still allow you to implement conditions that would not impose hardship on the surrounding tenants or create substantial safety conflicts. While we encourage businesses to improve their business plans, it should not be to the detriment of others, so they suffer potential impact as to the properties. I would hope that the City would further implement a process to make sure that all construction and trash is properly stored and removed on a timely basis as to not to create debris that will not only hinder the ability to access our adjacent site but create an unsightly construction site. It should be the City's obligation to make sure that where businesses share common sites, all property owners are protected and not burning. In addition to the construction trash, after the food hall is open, the applicant or its tenant shall do a site inspection every two hours to make sure that there is no tenant trash within the common parking. At this time, I'd like to talk about this presentation board that I have brought to you, but before that, I did talk to some school members. City Manager Kim interjected to inform Mr. Ta that his three minutes for Public Comment ended. There being no further speakers, Mayor Clark closed the Public Hearing. Council Member Dang indicated he knows both gentlemen, identifying Eric who owns the Universal building and then Peter is the other property owner to the back. What I believe is fair and I'll mention some of the findings, but it actually applies to both. So whether Eric decides to go bigger, Peter, you also have the right to go bigger. Expressed I'm always supportive of you guys going bigger. I think it helps create the downtown feel that I personally would like to see in my vision. So, the fact that Eric could go bigger, you could go bigger. The fact that if Eric goes bigger, he doesn't have to provide parking because of Assembly Bill 2097; emphasizing that the city and our local authority cannot override state. In terms of the overall design, I know you commented that they're actually adding another "floor" to this; noting the original Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 5 of25 building was a five -story above ground. This building, in its original approval and parking space, was granted a five -story building. In other words, the building would have been a lot bigger if it weren't for just funding issues, so they actually reduced it. The fact that if we are revisiting it today and saying that there is a parking element. Even with this roof addition, it would have been smaller than what it would have been approved in 1950 or so. That's why I don't think the impact is there, even aside from the state exemption. center was already vested with the same amount of parking with actually a bigger building. In terms of the overall design, I like it. Opined when this is done, we are probably going to be the only one in San Gabriel Valley that's going to have a rooftop dining, so it's going to be great. Further accenting the fact that it will sort of create a Downtown Rosemead because it is going to be the center of attention. I also want to point out the Olympics is coming in 2028, so this will absolutely be a destination for everyone to come to. Echoed Mayor Pro Tem Armenta's comments that this is also going to gravitate all the students and professors going to PCC to have a place nearby to come to. Emphasized it will be a great addition to the city. Council Member Low stated she agrees with Council Member Dang's comments; expressed she is very happy as the City of Rosemead needs a landmark and I'm looking forward to having that food hall as our landmark. We as a community want to share our success. We look forward to Eric's project being successful; commented by this project being successful, it's going to make that whole plaza successful. I look forward to both parties working together and having very successful projects. Mayor Clark stated since it's within walking distance of PCC, when they developed that, would hope they would walk, so that might help too. Mayor Pro Tem Armenta said she is just throwing it out there, not even sure it's doable, but many cities allow parking in alley ways. Stated she believes there's an alleyway right behind some of the properties. Inquired if it is possible to look into having parking in the alley to expand the parking situation. City Manager Kim responded that majority of our alley in the city is about 20 -foot wide and the 20 -foot width is a minimum requirement for thoroughfare; mainly because it's usually a two-way access, noting fire and public safety vehicles need to be able to travel through them, but we'll look into it and see if it's possible. Council Member Dang commented I recall there might not be an alley. Suggested looking at rearranging some of the stalls, configurations, and flow to possibly gain some additional stalls. Stated if that's something worth exploring, staff could share that with you to help you create additional parking space. Mayor Pro Tem Armenta noted there's already parking back there, so that answers my question. ACTION: Motion by Council Member Low, seconded by Council Member Dang to take the following actions: Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 6 of 25 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-28, entitled; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MODIFICATION 25-01, A SECOND MODIFICATION TO DESIGN REVIEW 03-110 FOR AN ADDITION ON THE ROOFTOP LEVEL OF THE BUILDING, RECONFIGURATION OF VARIOUS OUTDOOR DINING AREAS ON BOTH THE GROUND AND ROOFTOP LEVELS, IMPLEMENTATION OF A NEW EXTERIOR COLOR SCHEME, AND A SLIGHT INCREASE IN THE BUILDING'S OVERALL HEIGHT. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT 8855 VALLEY BOULEVARD (APN: 5391-009-002), IN THE RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN OVERLAY (CBD/RC-MUDO/D-O) ZONE; and 2. Determine that Modification 25-01 is exempt from Class 1 of Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. Motion was carried out by the following votes: AYES: ARMENTA, CLARK, DANG, AND LOW; NOES: NONE; ABSENT: LY 5. CONSENT CALENDAR ACTION: Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Armenta, seconded by Council Member Dang to approve Consent Calendar items A-E, G, I, and K -O. Consent Calendar Items 4F (pulled by Council Member Low), 4H and 4J (pulled by Council Member Dang), for separate discussion. Motion was carried out by the following votes: AYES: ARMENTA, CLARK, DANG, AND LOW; NOES: NONE; ABSENT: LY A. Claims and Demands • Resolution No. 2025-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS IN THE SUM OF $1,099,492.10 CHECKS NUMBERED 119240 THROUGH NUMBER 119343, DRAFTS NUMBERED 8102 THROUGH NUMBER 8146 AND EFT NUMBERED 53273 THROUGH NUMBER 53316 INCLUSIVELY Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2025-27. • Resolution No. 2025-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 7 of 25 AND DEMANDS IN THE SUM OF $2,246,383.89 CHECKS NUMBERED 119344 THROUGH NUMBER 119437, DRAFTS NUMBERED 8120 THROUGH NUMBER 8176 AND EFT NUMBERED 53317 THROUGH NUMBER 53345 INCLUSIVELY Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2025-31. B. Minutes Recommendation: That the City Council approve the regular meeting minutes of July 25, 2023 and April 22, 2025. C. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 1029 - Adopting the Updated Fire Hazard Severity Zones Map as Recommended by the State Fire Marshal and Implementing Regulations for Fire Hazard Severity Zones Pursuant to Government Code Sections 51178, 51179 & 51182 On May 13, 2025, the City Council of the City of Rosemead conducted a public hearing and introduced for first reading, by title only, Ordinance No. 1029, adopting the updated fire hazard severity zones map as recommended by the state fire marshal and implementing regulations for fire hazard severity zones pursuant to Government Code Sections 51178, 51179 & 51182. The updated map identifies areas within Rosemead's city limits as Moderate, High, and Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Recommendation: That the City Council approve the second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1029, by title only, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE UPDATED FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES MAP AS RECOMMENDED BY THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL AND IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS FOR FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 51178, 51179 & 51182 D. Report on Status of Council Member Ly's Active Military Duty This report provides a status update on Council Member Steven Ly's military service tour. Council Member Ly remains on active duty and has not yet been discharged. In communication with City staff, he anticipates that his military service to wind down by mid-to-late summer. Pursuant to California Military and Veterans Code Section 395.8 during his absence, his council seat is not considered vacated, which ensures the rights of public officials who are on leave for military service are protected. Although the Council has been excusing him under Government Code Section 36513, that excuse is not required. Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 8 of 25 Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file this report and provide direction, if any. E. Accept Completed Improvements and Authorize Filing of Notice of Completion for City Project No. 24013 - Mission Drive Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon System On March 12, 2024, the City Council awarded a construction contract with Calpromax Engineering, Inc. for the Mission Drive Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon System Project (Project No. 24013). The project scope included furnishing and installing a pedestrian hybrid beacon system, which encompassed the installation of traffic signal poles, communication conduits, a controller cabinet, the removal and replacement of roadway pavement, and the signing and striping of the crosswalk spanning Mission Drive at Newby Avenue. The final stages of the project have since been implemented and completed. The crosswalk signal was activated on April 15, 2025, marking the completion of all project components. The total construction budget, inclusive of a 10% construction contingency, amounted to $357,692.50. Recommendation: That the City Council take the following actions: 1. Accept project completion for the Mission Drive Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon System Project — Project No. 24013 as performed by Calpromax Engineering, Inc., with the final contract amount of $332,031.82; and 2. Authorize the recordation of Notice of Completion with the Los Angeles County Recorder and the release of retention funds 35 days thereafter. G. National League of Cities - Constituency Groups Summer Convening — July 17-18, 2025 — Columbus, Ohio The City Council will consider authorizing the attendance of any Council Member who wishes to attend the 2025 National League of Cities Constituency Groups Summer Convening from July 17 — 18, 2025 in Columbus, Ohio. Recommendation: That the City Council authorize any Council Member to attend the National League of Cities Constituency Groups to be held on July 17 — 18, 2025 in Columbus, Ohio. I. Consideration to Cancel the June 24, 2025, City Council Meeting The City Council will consider the cancellation of its regularly scheduled meeting of June 24, 2025, due to a projected lack of quorum. Should the June 24 meeting be cancelled, the next regular meeting of the City Council will be held as scheduled on Tuesday, July 8, 2025, at 7:00 p.m. Recommendation: That the City Council cancel the regular City Council meeting of June 24, 2025. Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 9 of 25 K. Senior Nutrition Meals Provider - Award of Contract to TRIO Community Meals The City Council will consider approving an agreement with TRIO Community Meals an Elior Company, for an amount not -to -exceed $281,876 for a three-year term beginning July 1, 2025. The TRIO Community Meals is selected for City Council recommendation through a competitive Request for Proposal process to provide meals for the senior nutrition lunch program at the Garvey Community Center. Recommendation: That the City Council approve an Agreement with TRIO Community Meals an Elior Company to provide meal services at the senior nutrition lunch program and authorize the City Manager to execute an Agreement for a term of 3 years beginning on July 1, 2025, for a total not -to -exceed contract amount of $281,876. L. First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement with Knorr Systems Int'l for Purchase & Delivery of Swimming Pool Chemicals The City Council will consider approving a one-year extension to the agreement with Knorr Systems Int'l, for an amount not -to -exceed $87,000 beginning July 1, 2025. The Knorr Systems Int'1 Company is the current vendor for the purchase and delivery of swimming pool chemicals at Rosemead Park and Splash Zone at Garvey Park. Recommendation: That the City Council approve the first amendment of a proposed one-year extension agreement with Knorr Systems Int'l. from July 1, 2025, to June 30, 2026, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract on behalf of the City. M. Annual Crossing Guard Cost Sharing Agreements with Rosemead and Garvey School Districts On June 27, 2023, City Council approved an award of contract to All City Management Services, Inc. for a three-year Agreement. The proposed Agreements with Rosemead and Garvey School Districts are for cost sharing (one-half between the City and each District) for crossing guard services. The total cost for providing crossing guard services for both school districts is approximately $332,539.20. Rosemead School District's portion is approximately $72,742.95 and Garvey School District's portion is approximately $93,526.65. The City's portion is approximately $166,269.60 and is included in the City's proposed FY 2025-26 Budget. Recommendation: That the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the cost sharing agreements with Rosemead and Garvey School Districts for Fiscal Year 2025-26 crossing guard services. N. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-23 - Approving SBI Project List for Fiscal Year 2025-26 Under the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 Senate Bill (SB) 1, also known as the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, was enacted to address California's substantial backlog of road maintenance Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 10 of 25 and infrastructure needs. This legislation provides the City of Rosemead with access to funds for essential road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety improvements. For the upcoming FY 25-26 year, the City is projected to receive $1,335,861 in SBI funding. To remain eligible for these funds, the City must adopt a list of proposed street projects by resolution and file it with the California Transportation Commission. Resolution No. 2025-23, presented for Council's consideration, would adopt the City's project list for FY 2025-26 and authorize staff to submit to the California Transportation Commission by July 1, 2025, to be eligible to receive the funds. Recommendation: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-23, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017 O. Approval of a Joint Use Agreement with the Garvey School District The City Council will consider approving a Joint Use Agreement between the City and the Garvey School District for shared use of property at Duff Language Magnet Academy and Garvey Park. The agreement outlines the joint use of designated areas owned by both the City and the District. Its purpose is to facilitate the use of a parking lot at Duff Language Magnet Academy and to maintain the existing softball field at Garvey Park. Recommendation: That the City Council authorize the City Mayor to execute the Joint Use Agreement with Garvey School District. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS PULLED FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION F. Amendment No. 1 for Extension of Time to Funding Agreement with Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for the 1 st-Riggin-Potrero Grande Corridor Project On November 8, 2022, the City Council approved entering into a joint Funding Agreement with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for the 1st-Riggin-Portrero Grande Corridor Project. Due to unforeseen delays, Amendment No. 1 is proposed to amend the three-year funding program from FY 2021-2024 to FY 2023-2026. The proposed amendment reflects the changes in the Project schedule and programming of funds. Recommendation: That the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Funding Agreement No. 9200000000MATC1103 with Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for the 1st-Riggin- Portrero Grande Corridor Project. Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes ofJune 10, 2025 Page 11 of25 Council Member Low stated I understand the City of Monterey Park is the lead agency on this project. Since the request is to move the project to close out to June 2026 instead of December 2025, will we get any report on Monterey Park's progress? Director of Public Works Gutierrez responded absolutely, we will receive reports on the progress as we work very closely with the City of Monterey Park and the third agency which is LA County. Noted the overall project is about a $6.3 million project, so our portion is about $395,000 so it's a very small portion compared to the overall project. Council Member Low inquired if it is possible to lose this funding if they don't finish by June 2026? Director of Public Works Gutierrez answered that is a possibility; however, from what I've been discussing with the City of Monterey Park, they're on schedule to go into construction this fall or early winter. Ascertained from what I've seen, the schedule will be met. Council Member Low asked to confirm if that's deadline to have this completed by in order to not lose the project. Director of Public Works Gutierrez affirmed that is correct. Metro, who manages these funds, they take the funds back to their board every year to renew the timeline. Shared in July 2024, Metro just reapproved these funds and extended the timeline. Explained Metro does that to let cities know that there is a looming timeline that we have to get the project done and they ask us to come to the board to provide updates on the project. ACTION: Motion by Council Member Low, seconded by Council Member Dang to authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Funding Agreement No. 9200000000MATC1103 with Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for the 1st-Riggin-Portrero Grande Corridor Project. Motion was carried out by the following votes: AYES: ARMENTA, CLARK, DANG, AND LOW; NOES: NONE; ABSENT: LY H. Approval of the City of Rosemead's FY 2025-26 Statement of Investment Policy The approval of this item approves the Annual Investment Policy and delegation of investment authority to the Finance Director/City Treasurer for FY 2025-26. There are no substantive changes to the Investment Policy from the version adopted by the City Council in the prior year. Recommendation: That the City Council approve the annual Investment Policy and delegation of investment authority to the Finance Director/City Treasurer. Council Member Dang asked for a quick executive summary of how the investment policy is structured and if there is any change. Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes ofdune 10, 2025 Page 12 of25 Assistant City Manager/Director of Finance Chua stated essentially, this investment policy is the same as last year. There are no updates to the investment policy. The objectives of the investment policy is safety first; liquidity meaning the ability to convert investments quickly into cash to be able to use by the city; and thirdly is the yield which refers to interest rates. The safety making that we are investing wisely in safe assets a majority of our assets are CDs the reason being is because CDs are FDIC insured; we have limitations to the amount of CDs we can purchase — we purchase up to $250,000 because that's the FDIC limit. Secondly, we purchase U.S. Treasuries, which is a very safe asset class. Lastly, we purchase corporate bonds. We haven't been buying too many corporate bonds since I became the Finance Director as I think there's a little bit more risk to it. That's why we stuck towards mainly purchasing CDs and U.S. agency notes. As you know, these are very safe asset classes. So, in turn, the investment yield is not as high as what you might see in the regular stock market, and that is because we are limited to the investments because of government code. Council Member Dang asserted that I wanted to give you an opportunity to toot your own horn; inquired how much did we gain. Director of Finance Chua responded I think over the last two years since I've been here, I believe overall for the portfolio we've gained about $4.7 million. Council Member Dang asked if that's strictly on CDs and bonds. Director of Finance Chua answered yes, that's strictly on the investments that we were allowed to invest in. I think I came to the City of Rosemead at a very good time and I had the opportunity to rebalance the portfolio in a way so that we can have a higher yield for a longer period. So, we initially had a very high LEIF balance, which is investments with the state treasury and their program, and their maturities are only about a year. I converted a lot of that to the longer-term maturities, five-year notes, picking up CDs and US Treasuries. City Manager Kim stated since Mr. Chua is being modest, let me toot his horn for him. Before Mr. Chua came here, I think our investment yield was about $100,000 to $200,000 a year. Since Mr. Chua came to the City of Rosemead, he looked at our investment opportunities and readjusted, our annual investment yield went up to well over a million or two million. Director of Finance Chua commented that over the longer term I think we're still going to continue to see those good investment yields coming into the city because of that rebalancing of that portfolio. So even if the state LEIF funds, even if those yields come down, we'll still have a little bit of a higher yield than what they're bringing in. ACTION: Motion by Council Member Dang, seconded by Council Member Low to approve the annual Investment Policy and delegation of investment authority to the Finance Director/City Treasurer. Motion was carried out by the following votes: AYES: ARMENTA, CLARK, DANG, AND LOW; NOES: NONE; ABSENT: LY Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes ofJune 10, 2025 Page 13 of25 J. First Amendment to Professional Services Agreement for a One -Year Extension for Building and Safety Services — Transtech Engineers, Inc. On July 1, 2022, the City Council approved a three-year Professional Services Agreement with Transtech for building and safety services, that is scheduled to expire on June 30, 2025. The scope of services includes serving and protecting the public by ensuring that building construction complies with the California Building Standards Code (Title 28, California Code of Regulations) as well as State safety laws, disabled access, and City Ordinances. The terms of the Agreement allow for two one-year extensions, and staff is recommending approval of the first one-year extension to a new expiration date of June 30, 2026. Recommendation: That the City Council approve the First Amendment authorizing a one-year extension and the increase in hourly compensation in accordance with the CPI -U. Director of Community Development Valenzuela stated in July of 2022, the City Council approved a three-year contract with Transtech Engineers for our Building and Safety services. Currently, they're fulfilling all of our staffing except for one permit tech position. During the last three years it's been very successful as they've completed a lot of tasks and one of the biggest is digitizing all of the Building records, in addition we've also retained a building software called "OpenGov" that will streamline a lot of processes. Tonight, we're recommending that the City Council approve a one-year extension in addition to an increase based on CPI. Council Member Dang asked how much of an increase? Director of Community Development Valenzuela responded it's about 12%. Council Member Dang invited the Transtech Engineers staff to the podium to recognize them; stated I wanted to acknowledge the fact that I talked to a lot of contractors, homeowners, developers, and they tell me that the City of Rosemead is doing something good. They tell me that our Planning and Building Department is awesome as we streamline everything. Prior to Transtech coming on board, ADUs were taking six to eight months; emphasized with you guys coming on board, you streamlined the process so it now takes one or two months. Pointed out that the City of Rosemead is number two in ADU production, second to the County. Noted the County has thousands of engineers, but we have Transtech who does a lot of heavy lifting with a lot more efficiency. Council Member Dang reiterated he is supporting this contract extension without any doubt and thanks Transtech Engineers for all that they do for Rosemead. Council Member Low echoed Council Member Dang's compliments to Transtech. Stated I too have heard from the community, businesses and residents, that they are very happy with your services provided. Commented since Transtech came on board you have really helped us smooth things out and get very efficient. Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 14 of25 Mayor Pro Tem Armenta stated she also echoes the sentiments of my colleagues here on the Council. I know all of you work really hard for the City; gave a kudos to John Tufan, Building Division Supervisor, who represents Transtech every day in the office as he has been very visible out there and is highly regarded. Thanked Transtech for their due diligence in making sure that the plan checks are in line and all the codes are being adhered to. Opined it puts us at ease knowing that we have professionals looking at our city making sure that our city is taken care of when it comes to engineering and all the different aspects of your contract. Mayor Clark echoed everything that has been said by her colleagues. We really appreciate all you're doing. ACTION: Motion by Mayor Clark, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Armenta to approve the First Amendment authorizing a one-year extension and the increase in hourly compensation in accordance with the CPI -U. Motion was carried out by the following votes: AYES: ARMENTA, CLARK, DANG, AND LOW; NOES: NONE; ABSENT: LY 6. MATTERS FROM CITY MANAGER & STAFF A. Approval of Ninth Amendment to City Clerk Employment Agreement and Approval of Salary Schedule Resolution No. 2025-25 The City and the City Clerk entered into an Employment Agreement ("Agreement") on April 10, 2018. Section 3 of the Agreement permits the City Council to conduct performance evaluations and grant increases in salary. Pursuant to Section 3(A)(2) of the Agreement, the City Council conducted the City Clerk's performance evaluation on April 22, 2025. The City Clerk received a "substantially exceeds expectations" review with a 5 rating. Thereafter, on May 13, 2025 the City Council conducted a Closed Session to negotiate compensation. At that Closed Session the Council directed a contract amendment be presented to the Council providing for a 7% increase, bringing the City Clerk's total annual base salary from $164,604 to $176,124. As required by Government Code 54953(c)(3) prior to final action on the City Clerk's salary or compensation and benefits there must be an oral report of the change. The City Attorney will orally report the changes as required. Recommendation: That the City Council take the following actions: 1. Approve the granting of a 7% increase for a "substantially exceeds expectations" performance evaluation effective May 13, 2025, and authorize the Mayor to execute the Ninth Amendment on behalf of the City Council to reflect the increase; and 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-25, entitled: Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 15 of25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE SALARY SCHEDULE TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS TITLE 2, SECTIONS 570.5 AND 571 TO REFLECT APPROVED RATES FROM MAY 13, 2025 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2025 City Attorney Richman presented the Ninth Amendment to the City Clerk's Employment Agreement. Following a performance evaluation on April 22, where the City Clerk received a "Substantially Exceeds Expectations" rating, and a subsequent closed session on May 13 to discuss compensation, staff recommended a 7% salary increase from $164,604 to $176,124, with related benefit adjustments totaling approximately $15,900. The report complies with Government Code requirements. Staff recommended approval of the amendment and adoption of the corresponding salary schedule resolution. ACTION: Motion by Council Member Dang and seconded by Mayor Clark to approve Ninth Amendment and the 7% increase for a "substantially exceeds expectations" performance evaluation and adopt Resolution No. 2025-25. Motion was carried out by the following votes: AYES: Armenta, Clark, Dang, and Low; NOES: None, ABSENT: Ly B. Approval of Third Amendment to City Manager Employment Agreement and Approval of Salary Schedule Resolution No. 2025-26 The City and the City Manager entered into an Employment Agreement ("Agreement") on April 26, 2022. Section 6 of the Agreement permits the City Council to conduct performance evaluations and grant increases in salary. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Agreement, the City Council conducted the City Manager's performance evaluation on April 23, 2025, and the City Manager received a "substantially exceeds expectations" rating. On May 13, 2025, the City Council conducted a Closed Session on compensation and directed that an amendment to the Agreement be provided to the Council for consideration of approval for a 12% salary increase effective May 13, 2025, from $256,992 to the amount of $287,832. As required by Government Code 54953(c)(3) prior to final action on the City Manager's salary or compensation and benefits there must be an oral report of the change. The City Attorney will orally report the changes as required. Recommendation: That the City Council take the following actions: 1. Authorize the Mayor to execute the Third Amendment to City Manager Agreement with Ben Kim on behalf of the City Council; and 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-26, entitled: Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 16 of 25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE SALARY SCHEDULE TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS TITLE 2, SECTIONS 570.5 AND 571 TO REFLECT APPROVED RATES FROM MAY 13, 2025 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2025 City Attorney Richman presented the Third Amendment to the City Manager's Employment Agreement. Following a performance evaluation on April 23, 2025, where the City Manager received a "Substantially Exceeds Expectations" rating, and a closed session on May 13 to discuss compensation, staff recommended a 12% salary increase from $256,992 to $287,832, with related benefit adjustments of approximately $34,900 to be absorbed in the current fiscal year budget. The report was made in compliance with Government Code requirements. ACTION: Motion by Council Member Dang and seconded by Mayor Clark to approve the Third Amendment and adopt Resolution No. 2025-26. Motion was carried out by the following votes: AYES: Armenta, Clark, Dang, and Low; NOES: None, ABSENT: Ly C. Professional Services Agreement for Public Works Department City Engineering, Traffic Engineering, and Inspection Services The City's existing agreement with Transtech Engineers, Inc., for engineering services is set to expire on June 30, 2025. To continue providing critical engineering support for the City's Capital Improvement Program and day-to-day operations, a Request for Proposals (RFP) was issued on April 24, 2025. Five proposals were received and evaluated based on qualifications, experience, staffing, and cost. Transtech Engineers, Inc. received the highest overall score and was determined to be the most qualified and cost-effective firm. Recommendation: That the City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Transtech Engineers, Inc., to provide General Engineering, Traffic Engineering, and Inspection Services in an amount not -to - exceed $482,000 per year, for a term of three (3) years with the option to extend for up to two (2) one-year extensions. City Engineer Basilyous presented the staff recommendation regarding Engineering and Inspection Services for the Department of Public Works. Transtech Engineers, has been under contract since 2020, has had multiple renewals and amendments, with the current term set to expire on June 30, 2025. In preparation, staff issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) on April 24, 2025, through P1anetBids, with a submission deadline of May 20, 2025. The RFP sought services for Capital Improvement Program management, permits and inspections, contract administration, commission support, and daily engineering functions. Five proposals were received from Pullman Consulting Group, Infrastructure Architects, Kevin Ko, Ladayu, and Transtech Engineers. He reported that proposals were evaluated by the Director of Public Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 17 of 25 Works, City Engineer, and Associate Engineer based on experience, qualifications, approach, staffing, references, and cost. Transtech Engineers ranked highest with 91 points, followed by Pullman Consulting Group and Kevin Ko. Staff recommended Transtech due to their years of experience with the City, familiarity with ongoing projects, flexible staffing capacity, strong knowledge of City standards, reduced hourly rates, and active community engagement. Mr. Basilyous reported that Transtech Engineers offered competitive pricing, ranking second lowest overall among five proposals, with the lowest hourly rates for Traffic Engineer and Public Works Inspector positions. He noted that the new cost represents a reduction of approximately $150,000 per year compared to the previous contract, resulting in an estimated savings of about $450,000 over the agreement term. Council Member Dang expressed his appreciation and commended the presentation for clearly addressing cost, cost savings, and the reliability of the recommendation. He acknowledged the additional cost savings achieved by the Public Works Director and stated his full support for the recommendation. Council Member Low stated that she has full confidence in Transtech Engineers' ability, noting their proven performance over the past several years. ACTION: Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Armenta, seconded by Council Member Low to authorize the City Manager to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Transtech Engineers, Inc., to provide General Engineering, Traffic Engineering, and Inspection Services in an amount not -to -exceed $482,000 per year, for a term of three (3) years with the option to extend for up to two (2) one-year extensions. Motion was carried out by the following votes: AYES: Armenta, Clark, Dang and Low, NOES: None, ABSENT: LY D. Public Safety Center Upgrades Project No. 31028 — Request for Additional Appropriation of Funds for Construction On October 8, 2024, the City Council awarded the Public Safety Center Upgrade project to Royal Construction Corp in the amount of $2,626,800 ($2,388,000 construction and $238,800 10% contingency). The construction is currently underway, but the project has faced several challenges from unforeseen conditions that require additional work outside of the original scope. Such work includes termite mitigation, a new fire alarm system, reconfiguration of office space for the new Public Safety Director, and others. The estimated cost of the additional work is $374,650, of which, $135,850 exceeds the project's contingency. Additionally, staff is requesting Council approval to increase the project's contingency by $120,000 to complete the Public Safety Center Upgrade project. Recommendation: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-30 amending the City's Fiscal Year 2024-25 CIP budget to appropriate additional funds in the amount of $255,850 in Public Facilities funding to cover change order costs and provide additional contingency funds, entitled: Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 18 of 25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET AND APPROPRIATE NEW FUNDS FOR THE PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER UPGRADES PROJECT NO. 31028 City Engineer Basilyous provided an update on the Public Safety Center upgrade project. The contract, awarded to Royal Construction Corporation on October 8, 2024, was for approximately $2.38 million, with a $238,000 contingency, totaling $2.6 million, funded by ARPA. Construction began January 6, 2025. The project scope included roof and HVAC upgrades, parking improvements, lockers and restroom renovations, a new public lobby, animal holding area enhancements, and office -meeting room improvements. During construction, unforeseen issues such as termite damage, fire alarm upgrades, code compliance, and structural revisions required additional work, including CAT6 cabling, flooring upgrades, and copper pipe modifications. These adjustments were necessary to ensure project completion to current standards. He noted that the currently approved contingency was $23 8,000, which represents approximately 48% of the total change order costs. The project is currently over budget by $135,000, or roughly 27%, which is required to cover all necessary change orders to complete the project. He explained that the proposed new contingency of $120,000, representing about 24%, to ensure sufficient funds are available to cover any additional change orders from this point until project completion. Council Member Dang asked for clarification on the total cost of the project, noting that the approved contingency was $238,000 and was it being doubled. City Engineer Basilyous clarified that the proposed $120,000 new contingency does not imply that the funds will necessarily be spent. He explained that the contingency is intended to cover unforeseen costs without requiring a new staff report or additional City Council action. Any unused contingency funds at the completion of the project will be returned to the original account. Council Member Dang noted that if the full new contingency were utilized, the total project contingency would amount to approximately $480,000, representing roughly 20% of the total project cost. If contingency is 10% of project costs, based on the total contingency cost of $500,000, let's the project cost would actually be $5 million, it's not $2.3 million anymore. City Engineer Basilyous explained that with the addition of the new contingency, the total project cost would be approximately $3 million. He stated that the original contract amount was $2.38 million, with a previously approved contingency of $238,000 (10%), bringing the total to $2.6 million. Adding the requested additional appropriation of $255,000 would increase the total project cost to approximately $2.8 to $2.9 million. Council Member Dang asked if a 20% contingency was normal on a project. Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 19 of25 City Engineer Basilyous replied that the typical contingency is approximately 10% of the project cost. However, due to the nature of the project, which involves numerous unforeseen conditions encountered during underground work, a higher contingency was warranted. Council Member Dang stated that the discovery phase was complete and that no additional unforeseen issues were expected. He clarified that, rather than requesting an increase to the original project budget of $2.38 million, staff is proposing to address the additional costs by increasing the project contingency. City Engineer Basilyous replied correct to Mr. Dang's comments. ACTION: Motion by Council Member Dang, seconded by Council Member Low to adopt Resolution No. 2025-30 amending the City's Fiscal Year 2024-25 CIP budget to appropriate additional funds in the amount of $255,850 in Public Facilities funding to cover change order costs and provide additional contingency funds E. Adoption of Resolutions Approving the City of Rosemead's FY 2025-26 Operating Budget, Capital Improvement Program Budget, Establishing the FY 2025-26 Appropriations Limit, Approving the Rosemead Housing Development Corporation FY 2025-26 Annual Budget, and Amending the City of Rosemead's FY 2024-25 Budget The City Council will consider the adoption of the City's Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 Operating and Capital Improvement Budget, which provides for total appropriations of $49,346,480. The General Fund operating budget is $32,123,280. The Capital Improvement Program budget is $7,153,200 and includes funding for one new project, additional funding for existing projects, and funding for annual projects. The proposed budget for the Rosemead Housing Development Corporation (RHDC) is $1,042,300. Recommendation: That the City Council take the following actions: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-32 and Resolution No. 2025-33, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ADOPTING THE CITY'S OPERATING BUDGET, AUTHORIZED STAFFING, AND FINANCIAL POLICIES FOR THE 2025-26 FISCAL YEAR AND UPDATING THE LISTING OF SALARY AND JOB CLASSIFICATIONS FOR FULL-TIME POSITIONS; and A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ADOPTING THE CITY'S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET FOR THE 2025-26 FISCAL YEAR Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 20 of25 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-34, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 3. Adopt RHDC Resolution No. 2025-01, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE ROSEMEAD HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 Assistant City Manager/Finance Director Chua presented the FY 2025-26 budget covering the General Fund, revenue and expenditure assumptions, budget methodology, significant highlights, staffing changes, vacant positions, new capital projects, the Housing Development Corporation budget, and recommended Council actions. The General Fund is projected to see a 2% increase in revenue, with recurring expenditures slightly higher, resulting in a $1,115,420 surplus before one-time expenses and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects, indicating that recurring revenues can support recurring expenses. One-time expenditures include carryover projects from FY 2024-25, such as the Zoning Code Update, Garvey Avenue Specific Plan Update, and Parking In -Lieu Fee Study. The proposed budget is balanced, with a projected bottom-line surplus of $5,420. The City's FY 2025-26 budget projects a 3.5% increase in property taxes, a slight decline in sales taxes, flat transient occupancy and development permit revenues, rising recreation revenues, and increased interest earnings. Expenditures include salary adjustments, a rise in PERS unfunded liability from $837,000 to $982,000, a 4% increase in the Sheriff s contract ($435,000), and $50,000 higher water costs for parks and facilities. Significant General Fund requests include $350,000 to update the City's General Plan, $30,000 for a Fall Fiesta drone show, $100,000 for holiday decorations, and $100,000 to refurbish the Aquatic Center slide. Staffing recommendations include deleting six vacant building positions, relying on third - party service providers. General Fund reserves are projected to increase from $28.6 million in FY 2021-22 to $35.8 million, with nearly $13 million exceeding the Council's 40% fund balance policy. Total revenues are projected at $48.8 million against $42.2 million in expenses, resulting in a $6.6 million surplus before CIP projects, which total $7.15 million and create a $517,000 deficit covered by special revenue fund reserves. The CIP includes a new $2.8 million Citywide Traffic Signal Improvement Project funded primarily by grants, $150,000 for a Chamber Remodel, $4.1 million for four annual project additions, and continuation of 31 ongoing projects totaling $45.4 million. Council Member Dang asked if the Citywide Traffic Signal Improvement Project included Rosemead Boulevard? Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 21 of25 Director of Public Works Gutierrez stated that, at this time, there are no additional synergies identified, but staff will work with Caltrans to explore potential opportunities. He noted that the project is funded through a Highway Safety Improvement Grant, which was applied for on the City's behalf He indicated that staff is still becoming familiar with the grant requirements and confirmed that the project will include upgrades at 40 intersections in close coordination with Caltrans. He noted that Caltrans is currently making improvements at some of the intersections. He explained that once the City moves forward with the project and finalizes the grant guidelines and agreement, staff will coordinate with Caltrans at that time. Council Member Dang noted that South El Monte is in the process of taking over the Rosemead portion of their site, which may involve signal light adjustments. He suggested the City consider placing an agenda item to discuss potential City funding to support CalTrans improvements affecting Rosemead. Mayor Clark asked for clarification if the project involved signal synchronization? Council Member Dang noted he was talking about the upcoming traffic improvements in South El Monte and the KB Homes Big Development Area. He recommended extending traffic studies and signal improvements from the 60 Freeway to the underpass near Mission Road to enhance traffic flow. Mayor Clark expressed concerns with taking over Rosemead Boulevard. Mayor Pro Tem Armenta stated that in her experience overseeing transportation policy for the Senator, she highlighted that the issues in South El Monte represent only a portion of broader transportation concerns. She explained that when South El Monte considered relinquishment, the funding offered was $2.5 million, whereas they requested $7 million, indicating a significant funding gap. She shared this context to provide additional insight. Mayor Clark addressed the Council regarding signal synchronization, referencing prior budget discussions with the City Manager and Assistant City Manager/Finance Director. She suggested the installation of sensors to improve traffic flow, noting frustration when waiting at signals with no cross traffic, which results in wasted time and increased pollution. Mrs. Clark provided an example on Jackson Avenue, where a sensor system installed detects approaching vehicles and adjusts signals accordingly, improving efficiency. Assistant City Manager/Finance Director addressed the Council regarding the Housing Development Corporation budget. He noted that there were no significant changes compared to the prior year. The proposed 2026 budget reflects a decrease from 2025, primarily due to the $400,000 in capital improvements included in the 2025 budget. Bryan indicated that the budget pertains to the two senior housing facilities located at Garvey Avenue and Angeles Avenue. He requested Council approval of the Housing Development Corporation budget for Fiscal Year 2025-26. Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 22 a(25 Council Member Dang asked about the $30,000, cost for drones compare to a fireworks in terms of the pricing. Director of Parks and Recreation Boecking explained the $30,000 is going to be going towards a drone show at the Fall Fiesta event. He noted that a drone show is slightly more expensive than a traditional fireworks display but is becoming increasingly popular among other cities. He explained that drone shows can feature 100 to 250 drones creating various figures and colors, providing an engaging visual experience. He also stated that a drone show would add a valuable and entertaining element to the Fall Fiesta. He stated that the drone show lasts approximately 20 to 25 minutes, and is comparable in length to a fireworks show, and is synchronized to music. Council Member Dang noted that the drone show has no environmental impact, requires no cleanup, and poses no fire hazards. He expressed support for the idea and offered commendation. Mayor Clark asked for staff to look ingo the safety component. She had hear about a little boy who got hurt by a drone. Director of Parks and Recreation Boecking reported that no safety concerns or injuries have been reported from other cities hosting drone shows. He explained that drones are typically launched from flat areas away from crowds and proposed using the field at Rosemead High School for the launch. ACTION: Motion by Mayor Clark, seconded by Council Member Dang to adopt the following resolutions: • Resolution No. 2025-32 and Resolution No. 2025-33, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ADOPTING THE CITY'S OPERATING BUDGET, AUTHORIZED STAFFING, AND FINANCIAL POLICIES FOR THE 2025-26 FISCAL YEAR AND UPDATING THE LISTING OF SALARY AND JOB CLASSIFICATIONS FOR FULL-TIME POSITIONS; and A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ADOPTING THE CITY'S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET FOR THE 2025-26 FISCAL YEAR • Adopt Resolution No. 2025-34, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 23 of25 • Adopt RHDC Resolution No. 2025-01, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE ROSEMEAD HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 7. MATTERS FROM MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL A. Council Comments Council Member Dang talked about the recent developments in the City of Los Angeles and surrounding areas, noting reports of protests in Santa Ana. He emphasized the City's commitment to supporting public assembly while stressing the importance of peaceful demonstrations. He expressed concern over violent incidents reported in the media and noted his hope that the City of Rosemead would not face similar issues. He recognized and thanked the Sheriffs Department for their dedication, noting the diversion of resources to assist in Los Angeles and the long hours spent away from family to manage the situation. He also acknowledged Chief of Police Lieutenant Tiwari and Director of Public Safety Murakami for providing updates and explanations regarding operations, the City Manager for coordinating Rosemead staff support, and code enforcement officers for assisting in patrol efforts. Mayor Pro Tem Armenta addressed the Council regarding public safety and recent events affecting communities in Los Angeles County. She emphasized the importance of understanding the dynamics of the City and the Sheriff s Department. She also thanked the City Manager, Director of Public Safety Murakami, and Chief of Police Lieutenant Tiwari for ensuring that residents are informed. She clarified that neither the City nor the Sheriffs Department participates in or assists with ICE raids but acknowledged that the Sheriffs Department must perform its duties to maintain public safety during protests. She expressed concern over attacks on law enforcement officers and noted their ongoing commitment to serve and protect all residents, regardless of immigration status. She stressed the importance of community cooperation and peaceful protest as the appropriate means to express concerns. Council Member Low agreed with prior comments from Council Member Dang and Mayor Pro Temp Armenta. She thanked the City Manager, Public Safety Director Murakami, Chief of Police Lieutenant Tiwari, and the Sheriffs Department for keeping the Council informed and for their work in maintaining public safety. She affirmed her support for peaceful protests as a constitutional right but expressed concern regarding unlawful activities and property damage, citing the Chinese American Museum in downtown Los Angeles as an example. She emphasized the importance of preventing similar incidents in Rosemead and expressed confidence that the Sheriff s Department and City staff would respond promptly to any unlawful Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 24 of 25 activities. She concluded by thanking law enforcement for their dedication and stressing the importance of safety. Mayor Clark expressed appreciation for the Sheriff's Department and all personnel involved in protecting the community. She noted concerns shared by friends and family of law enforcement officers regarding safety in Los Angeles. She commended the Parks and Recreation Department for their efforts in organizing the City's Fourth of July celebration, highlighting the importance of maintaining the holiday on July 4th and preserving its patriotic significance. Mayor Pro Tem Armenta requested that the Council Meeting be adjourned in memory of Jaime Francisco Brenes, a long-time Rosemead resident and dedicated volunteer who passed away on May 31, 2025. Born in Costa Rica in 1954, Jaime moved to Rosemead with his family in 1962, graduated from San Gabriel High School, and pursued a career as an electrician. He married Cecilia in 1979, and they raised three children in Rosemead. Jaime was deeply involved in the community, volunteering with the Parks and Recreation Boys and Girls Clubs, youth sports leagues, and mentoring young people, including encouraging careers in his trade. He also participated in union activities and advocated for the city through attendance at Council meetings and local events, earning recognition as a "Rosemead Brand Ambassador." Remembered for his humility, generosity, and lifelong commitment to helping others, Jaime had a lasting positive impact on countless residents. The City expressed its condolences to his family and honored his contributions, noting that he embodied the City's values of hard work, family, and education. Mayor Clark recessed to Closed Session at 9:21 p.m. 8. ADJOURNMENT There being no reportable action taken in Closed Session, Mayor Clark adjourned the meeting in memory of Jaime Francisco Brenes at 10:30 p.m. Ericka ern � APPROVED: Margaret Clark, May Rosemead City Council & Housing Development Corporation Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of June 10, 2025 Page 25 of 25