Loading...
CC - Budget Calendar - Internal File 022TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL FROM: FRANK G. TRIPEPI, CITY MANAGER DATE: FEBRUARY 8, 1996 RE: 1996-97 BUDGET CALENDAR Attached for your review is the Budget Calendar for the Preparation of the Annual Budget for Fiscal Year 1996-97., If it is agreeable with the Council, we are purposing to hold the budget study session on Tuesday, June 4, 1996, at 6:00 p.m.. This date is not in conflict with the regular City Council Meetings. We intend to work diligently to complete the budget as soon as possible for complete Council review. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council approve the 1996-97 Budget Calendar. COUNCIL AGENDA FEB 131996 I ITEM No. -1-r- . M Attachment klo:wp60\budcalen.doc:pl CITY OF ROSEMEAD 1996-97 BUDGET CALENDAR Date Department Action Required February 13, 1996 City Council Approve Budget Calendar March 12, 1996 Finance Issue Budget Work Sheets April 9, 1996 Department Head Submit Budget Work Sheets to Finance Department April 9, 1996 Administration Submit Budget Information Packet to Finance April 16, 1996 Finance Completion of Revenue and Expenditure Projections April 18, 1996 Finance/Auditor Review Preliminary Budget April 29, 1996 Finance Submit Preliminary Budget for Printing and Binding May 14, 1996 Finance/City Manager Review Preliminary Budget May 14, 1996 City Council Approval of Tuesday, June 4, 1996 as Budget Study Session May 30, 1996 Finance/City Manager Distribute 1996-97 Preliminary Budget Document and Agenda for Budget Study Session June 4, 1996 City Council/Staff Tuesday Budget Study Session (6:00 p.m.) June 10, 1996 Finance Formal Budget Document Submitted for Printing and Binding June 20, 1996 City Manager Distribute Formal Budget Document to City Council June 25, 1996 City Council Resolution Adopting Appropriation Limit and Resolution Adopting 1996-97 Budget June 25, 1996 City Clerk Submit Notice of Availability of Adopted Budget Councilmember Taylor requested information on Check No. 15491, $2000.00 to Brown, Winfield and Canzoneri. Frank Tripepi, City Manager, responded that this was payment for legal services for the 011 lawsuit. Councilmember Taylor questioned why Country Village Car Wash is invoicing the City in February with charges dating back to June through November, 1995. Mr. Tripepi responded that that is their method of billing and will provide Council with a copy of the carwash sign-in sheet that City employees sign listing the date, license plate number, and unit number when washing the vehicles. MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER BRUESCH, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER IMPERIAL that Resolution No. 96-05 be adopted. Vote resulted: Yes: Taylor, Vasquez, Bruesch, Imperial No: None Absent: Clark Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR (ITEM CC-D REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION) CC-A AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES LEGISLATIVE DELEGATE AND LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE, FEBRUARY 22-23, 1996, SACRAMENTO CC-B 1996-97 BUDGET CALENDAR CC-C COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT MID-YEAR BUDGET REALLOCATION (CDBG) i CC-E ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED FOR STREET PURPOSES - 3133 SAN GABRIEL t BOULEVARD MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER BRUESCH, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER IMPERIAL that the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar be approved. Vote resulted: Yes: Taylor, Vasquez, Bruesch, Imperial No: None Absent: Clark Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. CC-D APPROVAL OF REVISED SECTION 3 PLAN VERBATIM DIALOGUE BEGINS: COUNCILMEMBER TAYLOR: Mr. Mayor.. This particular item, I know we're caught over a barrel with it...$2 million, as far as this business about "no strings attached" or following federal regulations. This to me is a primary example of what the federal government is trying to do when it says they are going to return local control, as far as the money that is collected by Washington. Since they can't manage it, and as far as I'm concerned, they've really fouled up the process. They are saying return the money to local control. Well, let them. They know best how to spend the money. But, on page 4 of this particular Section 3 plan, I want to read the statement here, second paragraph from the bottom... "facilitating the training and employment of Section 3 residents and the award of contracts to Section 3 business concerns. The City of Rosemead has established as a reasonable numerical goal for the training and employment of Section 3 residents to be ten (10) percent of the aggregate number of hires for each year over the duration of the Section 3 project." And then the example, correct me if I'm wrong here, but it's 10% for fiscal year 1995, then goes to 20% for fiscal year 1996, and then it goes to 30% for fiscal year 1997. The examples that were CC 2-13-96 Page tit