Loading...
CC - 01-12-93APPROVED CITY OF ROSEMEAD MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING DATE h ' 9-3 ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 12, 1993 BEY The Regular Meeting of the Rosemead City Council was called to order by Mayor Pro Tem Bruesch at 8:02 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 8838 E. Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California. The Pledge to the Flag was led by Councilman Taylor. The Invocation was delivered by City Treasurer Foutz. ROLL CALL OF OFFICERS: Present: Councilmen Taylor, Vasquez, Mayor Pro Tem Bruesch, and Mayor Clark Absent: Councilman McDonald - Excused Mayor Pro Tem Bruesch announced that he would be chairing the meeting because Mayor Clark had a bad case of laryngitis. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: NOVEMBER 24, 1992 - REGULAR MEETING MOTION BY COUNCILMAN VASQUEZ, SECOND BY MAYOR CLARK that the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 24, 1992, be approved as submitted. Vote resulted: Yes: Clark, Bruesch, Vasquez No: None Absent: McDonald Abstain: Taylor The Mayor Pro Tem declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: DECEMBER 7, 1992 - ADJOURNED MEETING . MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN VASQUEZ that the Minutes of the Adjourned Meeting of December 7, 1992, be approved as submitted. Vote resulted: Yes: Clark, Taylor, Bruesch, Vasquez No: None Absent: McDonald Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: DECEMBER 8, 1992 - REGULAR MEETING MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN VASQUEZ that the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 8, 1992, be approved as submitted. Vote resulted: Yes: Clark, Taylor, Bruesch, Vasquez No: None Absent: McDonald Abstain: None The Mayor Pro Tem declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: DECEMBER 15, 1992 - ADJOURNED MEETING MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN VASQUEZ that the Minutes of the Adjourned Meeting of December 15, 1992, be approved as clarified. Vote resulted: Yes: Clark, Taylor, Bruesch, Vasquez No: None Absent: McDonald Abstain: None The Mayor Pro Tem declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. CC 1-12-93 Page #i - None I. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE A. Frank Delia, Temple City Boulevard, presented a letter stating that vicious dogs were being kept locked in a parked truck or tied near the sidewalk. Councilman Taylor requested a report on the property at 3751 Temple City Boulevard and its Rehab status. B. Juan Nunez, 2702 Del Mar Avenue, spoke on the proposed trash surcharge. II. PUBLIC HEARINGS An explanation of the procedures for the conduct of public hearings was presented by the City Attorney. A. A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER IMPLEMENTATION OF A STATE-MANDATED PROGRAM REQUIRING ADOPTION OF A WATER EFFICIENCY LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE FOR CERTAIN LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD The Mayor Pro Tem opened the public hearing. Juan Nunez, 2702 Del Mar Avenue, asked if the purpose of this was for conservation and reported a leaking water main on Del Mar Avenue near the,Kingdom Hall. There being no one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed. The following ordinance was presented to the Council for introduction: ORDINANCE NO. 723 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ADOPTING A STATE MANDATED ORDINANCE REQUIRING WATER IRRIGATION FOR CERTAIN LANDSCAPING PROJECTS IN THE CITY MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN VASQUEZ that Ordinance No. 723 be•introduced on its first reading and that reading in full be waived. Vote resulted: Yes: Clark, Taylor, Bruesch, Vasquez No: None Absent: McDonald Abstain: None The Mayor Pro Tem declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. III.LEGISLATIVE A. RESOLUTION NO. 93-01 - CLAIMS & DEMANDS The following resolution was presented to the Council for adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 93-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS IN THE SUM OF $914,985.61 NUMBERED 4633 THROUGH 4861 MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN VASQUEZ that Resolution No. 93-01 be adopted. Vote resulted: CC 1-12-93 Page #2 0 0 Yes: Clark, Taylor, Bruesch, Vasquez No: None Absent: McDonald Abstain: None The Mayor Pro Tem declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. B. RESOLUTION NO. 93-02 - DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE The following resolution was presented to the Council for adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 93-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ESTABLISHING A DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE AND IMPOSING PROCEDURES TO IMPLEMENT SAME MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN VASQUEZ that Resolution No. 93-02 be adopted. Vote resulted: Yes: Clark, Taylor, Bruesch, Vasquez No: None Absent: McDonald Abstain: None The Mayor Pro Tem declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. Mayor Pro Tem Bruesch asked if termination or rehabilitation was the intent of this resolution and it was determined that this decision would be left to the discretion of the City Manager. C. RESOLUTION NO. 93-03 - APPROVING EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY TAX RESULTING FROM "ANNEXATION 18" TO CITY OF SAN GABRIEL FROM CITY OF ROSE4FAD The following resolution was presented to the Council for adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 93-03 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN GABRIEL AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD APPROVING AND ACCEPTING NEGOTIATED EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE RESULTING FROM "ANNEXATION 18" TO THE CITY OF SAN GABRIEL (DETACHMENT FROM THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD AND FROM CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY) MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN VASQUEZ that Resolution No. 93-03 be adopted. Vote resulted: Yes: Clark, Taylor, Bruesch, Vasquez No: None Absent: McDonald Abstain: None The Mayor Pro Tem declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. D. RESOLUTION NO. 93-04 - CASTING ITS VOTES FOR MAYOR CLARK TO REPRESENT CITIES WITHOUT PUMPING RIGHTS ON THE BOARD OF THE SAN GABRIEL BASIN WATER QUALITY AUTHORITY The following resolution_ was presented to the Council for adoption: CC 1-12-93 Page #3 RESOLUTION NO. 93-04 10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, CASTING ITS VOTES FOR MAYOR CLARK TO REPRESENT CITIES WITHOUT PUMPING RIGHTS ON THE BOARD OF THE SAN GABRIEL BASIN WATER QUALITY AUTHORITY MOTION BY COUNCILMAN VASQUEZ, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR that Resolution No. 93-04 be adopted. Vote resulted: Yes: Clark, Taylor, Bruesch, Vasquez No: None Absent: McDonald Abstain: None The Mayor Pro Tem declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. E. ORDINANCE NO. 715 - ALLOWING A CHANGE IN THE UNDERLYING ZONING DESIGNATION TO M-1 (MANUFACTURING AND INDUSTRIAL) FROM R-1 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2714 STINGLE AVENUE, ROSEMEAD - ADOPT , The following ordinance was presented to the Council for adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 715 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD APPROVING A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-1 TO M-1 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2714 STINGLE AVENUE (ZC 92-189) MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN VASQUEZ that Ordinance No. 715 be adopted. Vote resulted: Yes: Clark, Taylor, Bruesch, Vasquez No: None Absent: McDonald Abstain: None The Mayor Pro Tem declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. F. ORDINANCE NO. 719 - AMENDING THE RMC REGARDING PLANNING AND ENGINEERING FEES - ADOPT The following ordinance was presented to the Council for adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 719 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD AMENDING THE ROSEMEAD MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PLANNING AND ENGINEERING FEES MOTION BY COUNCILMAN VASQUEZ, SECOND BY MAYOR CLARK that ordinance No. 719 be adopted. Vote resulted: Yes: Clark, Bruesch, Vasquez No: Taylor Absent: McDonald Abstain: None The Mayor Pro Tem declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. Councilman Taylor stated that these fees are too excessive. CC 1-12-93 Page #4 0 G. ORDINANCE NO. 720 - INCREASING THE TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX AND AMENDING THE RMC - ADOPT The following ordinance was presented to the Council for adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 720 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD INCREASING THE TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX AND AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN VASQUEZ that ordinance No. 720 be adopted. Vote resulted: Yes: Clark, Taylor, Bruesch, Vasquez No: None Absent: McDonald Abstain: None The Mayor Pro Tem declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. H. ORDINANCE NO. 721 - AMENDING THE RMC REGARDING PARR AND RECREATION IMPACT FEES - ADOPT Juan Nunez, 2702 Del Mar Avenue, asked for clarification of who pays these fees. The following ordinance was presented to the Council for adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 721 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD AMENDING THE ROSEMEAD MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PARK AND RECREATION IMPACT FEES MOTION BY COUNCILMAN VASQUEZ, SECOND BY MAYOR CLARK that ordinance No. 721 be adopted. Vote resulted: Yes: Clark, Bruesch, Vasquez No: Taylor Absent: McDonald Abstain: None The Mayor Pro Tem declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. Councilman Taylor stated that the fees were excessive. I. ORDINANCE NO. 722 - ADOPTING BUILDING, GRADING, REHABILITATION, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, AND MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES AND'AMENDING THE RMC - ADOPT The following ordinance was presented to the Council for adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 722 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, ADOPTING BUILDING, GRADING, REHABILITATION, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, AND MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES AND AMENDING THE ROSEMEAD MUNICIPAL CODE MOTION BY COUNCILMAN VASQUEZ, SECOND BY MAYOR CLARK that Ordinance No. 722 be adopted. Vote resulted: CC 1-12-93 Page #5 Yes: Clark, Bruesch, Vasquez No: Taylor Absent: McDonald Abstain: None The Mayor Pro Tem declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. J. ORDINANCE NO. 724 - CHANGING THE OFFICE HOURS OF CITY HALL - INTRODUCE The following ordinance was presented to the Council for introduction: ORDINANCE NO. 724 ,AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE•CITY OF ROSEMEAD CHANGING THE OFFICE HOURS OF CITY HALL AND AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE VERBATIM DIALOGUE FOLLOWS TAYLOR: Mr. Mayor. I can't vote for this particular item. I'd like some clarification as far as what is the City policy or what do we have for sick days for employees or personal day offs? How many do they get a year? FRANK G. TRIPEPI, CITY MANAGER: They accumulate one day a month in sick leave, Mr. Taylor and vacation is ten days up to I believe it's five years and then it changes to I believe fifteen. If you want all this, I'll put this in writing for you. TAYLOR: So, we have one day a month roughly,12 days, that includes sick days and personal days off if they need something? TRIPEPI: They can use vacation days or it they're non-management, they have compensatory time that they can use. TAYLOR: So, roughly we have 12 days plus 10 days vacation is 22 days, then you have... TRIPEPI: The holidays, I think nine. TAYLOR: Ok. Good point. Holidays is another ...I noticed in the report, isn't Martin Luther King a holiday now? TRIPEPI: We don't observe that holiday, sir. City Council never said that. TAYLOR: We did have Labor Day. Isn't that a holiday? I don't think that was in here. I could be mistaken. Labor Day and then the day after Thanksgiving was a holiday and is it listed in there? I didn't think it was. TRIPEPI: That's correct. We gave up the...we no longer close on the local election day. We used to close on Election day and that was traded away for the Friday after Thanksgiving, sir. TAYLOR: But then we do have Labor Day? TRIPEPI: Yes. TAYLOR: So, that's what? Nine days? TRIPEPI: Yes. TAYLOR: So, we have roughly 24 days which is equivalent to six weeks on average. Six weeks out of the year. Fifty-two weeks during the year if we take the Fridays off, that leaves roughly, take off the holidays, that's 250 at 52 weeks, what does that leave CC 1-12-93 Page #6 • 0 TAYLOR CONTINUES: us for actual working days? Be 20 a month times 10 is 200. Roughly 250 days a year, 250 work days a year. Take the 10 holidays off or vacations, roughly 250 days a year. By taking the 52 weeks, taking one day off of that, that's 52 additional holiday, excuse me, 52 additional days out of the year which breaks down to almost 3 months of service that we're not going to provide to the residents of this community. That's almost 2 1/2 to 3 months of service days that we could be providing to the residents and I can't justify voting for this on that basis. It's just too much time to close City Hall. TRIPEPI: Okay. That's in response to that is, we're going to maintain days off. fine. Mr. Mayor, the only thing I would say we're talking about 40 hours a week and the same 40 hours. We haven't added any TAYLOR: Okay. In reality, most businesses work from 8 to 5 p.m. I'm going to say 80% to 90% of them. And that's the time that they come in and I take it it's only fair that in perspective, work four days and keep in mind that some of these days, three or four of them, are on a Monday, which is a holiday. Then, the ordinance as it's presented, if it falls on Friday then they get Thursday off and this is no reflection on staff at all, it's just a policy decision that I can't support closing that many days as far as the service to the residents of the City. So; even though it's going to be a 10-hour day, realistically, and I have to deal with different cities, with building permits and other functions, and most of the time it is between 8 and 5 p.m. They close their businesses and they're gone. So, I just think it's appropriate to leave it as is. BRUESCH: I would just like to speak in favor of the item because not only does it help,us meet the air quality management plan and also the trip reduction plan that we have to have in place this year... TAYLOR: Excuse me. Why do we have to have it place this year? Didn't it say 50 employees? BRUESCH: Well, it is as it says that it will be amended. It already is being amended down to 25. TAYLOR: It is or will be? BRUESCH: That's the last I've heard. TAYLOR: It is or will be? BRUESCH: Al, have you heard anything different on that? AL RODRIGUEZ, CITY ENGINEER: I'm familiar with the congestion management plan and we will be adopting an ordinance the end of April because Council must adopt a TDM ordinance by the end of April. BRUESCH: So, this will help us with that. But besides that it's also going to be a,cost savings even though it might be small, $20,000, $25,000, maybe even more. I have heard the comments,from people in the City, well gee I have to leave my house before 8 a.m. and I don't get back until after 5 p.m. When can I go to City Council other than taking a day off from work or half a day off of work? How can I get my services? I can't do it all over the phone. So, this is an added incentive to make this change. VASQUEZ: Mr. Mayor. I have to...you know, I wrestled with this quite a bit because working for private industry, I work for Pacific Bell. We were on the 4-10 work week at one time but we had a lot of problems with companies that were open on Friday so we went back to five days a week but what you mentioned, Mr. Mayor, about people that are working and cannot come to City Hall, this provides them with time to come in to the office to take care of business, whatever it might be. I do feel a little reluctant but I'm willing to give it a chance to see what happens. If it doesn't work out we go back to five days a week. CC 1-12-93 Page #7 • • TAYLOR: Mr. Mayor. Realistically, this is a luxury in one sense. When you stop and think that we started out and I'm going to use the average of six weeks with vacation time, sick time, paid holidays and such, that's six weeks. When you take this additional 52 weeks and that's 52 working days to the general public, that's three months of work days. But you... BRUESCH: But not a second of less of hours. TAYLOR: Realistically, though. As I said, it's a luxury. You take these 52 additional work days and add it on to the 24 that we already had and I'm referring to again just time off so to speak and it's great when you can get it but this is a public agency that provides a public service and Mr. Vasquez is correct in what he was saying, this is what I was referring to as far as having to deal with public agencies, most corporations and private structures have to work the five days and when you take a day off of what they can use as far as their business day, it does have am impact. And being in construction it is a very impactable item with us as far as the private sector goes but anyway you take the additional 52 days and the 24 days, that adds up to 76 leisure days, so to speak and I just don't think that's proportionate. We've got 10% unemployment here in California and this is again it's a real bonus package and if it was rich times, good times, and such, might be fair but I just can't go along with this 20-25% reduction in service days to the community. BRUESCH: Two things. One is the comment about industries have to work five days a week. Part of both the AQMP and the Trip Reduction Plan, both of them have as one of the primary goals, flex timing. Flex timing states that a large corporation now a days can use their giving of hours to the employees as part of their approach to getting to the ends of the AQMP and Trip Management Plan. I think it's we're changing our looking at travel patterns and work hours and the second thing is,.of course, is this is a reflection of our City looking at the hours that families have at home nowadays. It used to be that it would be easy for a person to come in at 8 a.m. and do City business, then go to work after that. But the fact of the matter is, many of our constituents both members of the family leave before 8 a.m. and because of the commute time, don't get back until after 5 p.m. And one final thing I want to look at our staff. I've been here at 7 p.m. and there are people here working on City business on their own time. We have the type of staff that is going to be here working until the job is done. I'm proud of it. And I don't think.this is a give me or a chance for our staff to do any freeloading and I really resent the implication in any type of statement that would say that. TAYLOR: Mr. Mayor. That is your implication of that, however you interpret it. I have also been over to the library picking up my children and dropping them off at 5 p.m. and if this City Hall closes 5 p.m. I can't get a phone call through and as far I've come over at 5 p.m. and I'm not saying that anybody has to work overtime, when I say overtime and I'm not disputing that occasionally, somebody stays, that's fine, that's their choice but that's not a daily occurrence of all the staff that we have because they're entitled to go at 5 p.m. And they do go at 5 p.m. So, that's fine. I've not any bone to pick with that. The other thing as far as the employees themselves, this isn't the issue, it's a policy statement of what we're going to do and provide for the community and it's too excessive. Your point about other agencies and the air quality management district, for God's sake, it's on the news, it's one of the intentions were terrific when they started but they are driving so many companies out of the State of California, creating unemployment with their unrealistic standards that they've had, the Governor's down their throat and such because they are too stringent. Some of their requirements are ridiculous. As I stated, the intentions was good, 75% of their functions may be good, but the other 25% is overkill. So, as far as how many businesses and thousands upon thousands of people are losing their jobs because people leaving this State, AQMD has gotten out of hand. It's a good CC 1-12-93 Page #8 • • TAYLOR CONTINUES: agency with the concept but it's out of control. So, with all these requirements that they put on different businesses and such they're so far out of touch of reality of what the average working person has to do by being a quasi-bureaucratic agency, they don't realize. This is what happens with so many of the government agencies. I heard a comment by the LA City Council that they cannot trust their Chief Executive Officer the figures that they've been giving them, because they don't know what's true . anymore. They don't what money is coming in. The LA City Schools, there's a big discrepancy going on right now of $73 million shortfall. Senator, I believe it's, is it Roberti? TRIPEPI: David Roberti. TAYLOR: David Roberti, he's trying to find out how can you miss, , even though it's a paper trail, you're missing $73 million. There was a comment with the Clinton campaign committee last night on the news, they're stating it is so big that they don't know what's happened to the money. The deficit as far as this country is concerned right now is going up $2 billion every single day. Since the election the deficit has increased $160 billion. That's just money going down a drain hole: So, there's a certain amount of reality of what's service is to a community and the public agency's understanding what the average citizen has to do. BRUESCH: I think we could continue talking this will be beating a dead horse. CLARK: Mr. Mayor. I just would like to comment that if we're talking about serving the community I think the extra hours are going to be more convenient for the average family. If we're talking about just developers or the businesses then that's a separate issue but I understand that some of the developers are glad to get in here at 7 a.m. so they can get their work done and get going for the day on their projects. So, I think we're actually helping them, too. As long as there's proper monitoring that the employees are actually coming in at 7 a.m., starting work and leaving at 6 p.m., then we're having the equivalent hours. If there is in fact a problem where people are leaving before 5 p.m. right now, that's a separate problem. If people aren't fulfilling their jobs right now then we should look into that. I don't have any evidence of that but I think that's a separate issue but I don't think we're giving anybody anything as long as they put in all those hours. BRUESCH: You know and one thing we have to remember if the logistics aren't there, if the savings aren't there, and if the public doesn't like this, this is not set in granite, it can go back to what we call normal working days. TAYLOR: What savings are you referring to? BRUESCH: It's utility savings. TAYLOR: What savings are you talking about? BRUESCH: Utility savings. TAYLOR: For the City Hall? What is that dollar value? You asked for a report back on that. What is that dollar value? BRUESCH: It has been proven in cities our size that... TAYLOR:' Wait a minute. You asked for a cost survey to be done. What is it? BRUESCH: The figures that they are getting are from figures that are extrapolated from other cities of our size. TAYLOR: What other cities have done that of our size that are on this schedule? CC 1-12-93 Page #9 BRUESCH: I don't have that list at my disposal. TAYLOR: I know you don't have it because there aren't that many other cities. E1 Monte has a population of 100,000. There's four cities listed on this item. Four cities out of the San Gabriel Valley that have done this. Is four or five? So, you don't have those figures. And as far as the comment, it states that it's been reported. We don't have-any cost savings listed for the actual for the City of Rosemead. It just states, anyway the statement was $20,000 or $30,000 to $50,000 a year. I don't believe that's a true figure. The way it's worded in there it's not true. So, anyway... BRUESCH: I think we're beating a dead horse. TAYLOR: So, anyway, it appears you have the votes for it and I'd like this conversation in the Minutes verbatim. BRUESCH: Do I hear a motion to...? VASQUEZ: I so move that it be approved. BRUESCH: Is there a second? CLARK: Second. Yes: Clark, Bruesch, Vasquez No: Taylor Absent: McDonald Abstain: None BRUESCH: Motion carried. END VERBATIM DIALOGUE IV. CONSENT CALENDAR (CC-D WAS DEFERRED AND CC-I WAS DELETED) CC-A -AUTHORIZATION TO REJECT CLAIM FILED AGAINST THS CITY BY SIMON MENDOZA CC-B RECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR THE ROSEMEAD RESIDENTTAT• REHABILITATION PROGRAM 46th HANDYMAN BID PACKAGE LA VERNE CONSTRUCTION, $23,700.00 CC-C PARKING RESTRICTION CHANGES AT SHUEY AND ENCINITA SCHOOLS CC-E AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES EMPLOYEE RELATIONS INSTITUTE IN SAN FRANCISCO, FEBRUARY 24-25, 1993 CC-F REQUEST FROM ROSEMEAD HIGH SCHOOL FOR PURCHASE OF T-SHIRTS USED DURING 5th ANNUAL RUN/WALK AGAINST DRUGS CC-G AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOCIATION LEGISLATIVE TOUR IN SACRAMENTO, JANUARY 19-21, 1993 CC-H ACCEPTANCE OF SIDEWALK EASEMENT DEDICATION AND APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP 21311 CC-J APPROVAL OF KARAOKE E 9008 E. GARVEY AVENUE PERMIT FOR CAFE GIVRAL, MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN VASQUEZ that the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar be approved. Vote resulted: Yes: Clark, Taylor, Bruesch, Vasquez No: None Absent: McDonald Abstain: None The Mayor Pro Tem declared the said motion duly carried and so ordered. CC 1-12-93 Page #10 0 Councilman Taylor requested a report on CC-A, the claim filed by Simon Mendoza. CC-D RENEWAL OF MEMBERSHIP IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER This item was deferred for further information. CC-I SCHEDULING OF COMMUNITY FORUM TO DISCUSS ADDITIONAL REVENUE ENHANCEMENT PROPOSALS This item was deleted because it will be taken up at a regular City Council meeting. V. MATTERS FOR DISCUSSION & ACTION - None VI. STATUS REPORTS - None VII. MATTERS FROM OFFICIALS A. MAYOR PRO TEM BRUESCH 1. Asked for information showing any cost savings that would be achieved by consolidating the City election with a County election. VIII. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE - None IX. CLOSED SESSION TO DISCUSS LITIGATION A. TRANSPORTATION LEASING vs. CITY OF ROSEMEAD B. M. GRBAVAC vs. CITY OF ROSEMEAD C. MODERN SERVICE vs. CITY OF ROSEMEAD The Council recessed to a Closed Session at 9:03 p.m. and reconvened at 9:22 p.m. The Council met in a Closed Session for the purposes stated on the agenda. They received a report from the litigation counsel on the matters stated and no action was taken. There being no further action to be taken at this time, the meeting was adjourned at 9:24 p.m. The next regular meeting is scheduled for January 26, 1993, at 8:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted: APPROVED: ~~i ~~"t~-i✓ / / //7~I/7i .ilnLir 1 ty Clerk MAYOR CC 1-12-93 Page #11