Loading...
CC - 10-08-91• • APPROVED CITY OF ROSEMEAD MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING DATA' 11 1-2- 9/ ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL (OCTOBER 8, 1991 BY -mil f The Regular Meeting of the Rosemead city council was called to order by Mayor Imperial at 8:12 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 8838 E. Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California. The Pledge to the Flag was led by Councilman Taylor. The Invocation was delivered by Pastor Charlie Corum of the Olive Branch Outreach. ROLL CALL OF OFFICERS: Present: Councilmen Bruesch, McDonald, Taylor, Mayor Pro Tem. Clark, and Mayor Imperial Absent: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES: SEPTEMBER 17, 1991 - ADJOURNED MEETING MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN BRUESCH that the Minutes of the Adjourned Meeting of September 17, 1991, be approved as submitted. Vote resulted: Yes: Bruesch, Taylor, Imperial, Clark, McDonald No: None Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 - REGULAR MEETING Councilman Taylor requested clarification as follows: Page #6.1, 6.2 and 7 renumbered to Page #7, 8 & 9 and on Page 6, Item B, a sentence added to read "Pages 7 and 8 of the Minutes of this meeting of September 24, 1991, are verbatim minutes for the March 12, 1991 meeting." MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN BRUESCH that the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of September 24, 1991, be approved as amended. Vote resulted: Yes: Bruesch, Taylor, Imperial, Clark, No: None Absent: None Abstain: McDonald The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. Councilman Taylor requested that the Minutes for March 12, 1991, be returned for approval at the next meeting to allow verbatim inclusion of a portion of that meeting. . - None I. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE A. Juan Nunez, 2702 Del Mar Avenue, asked when the housing issue had been authorized for placement on the November ballot and questioned the details of how the project would be administered. B. Frank Delia, Temple City Boulevard, asked for public support of the Sheriff's Department and was upset with a water company assessment. VERBATIM DIALOGUE FOLLOWS: C. AUDIENCE: My name is Robert Angles. I live at 9147 Valley Boulevard in Rosemead. I have a question about the minutes. Are the cc 10-8-91 Page #1 ANGLES CONTINUES: minutes that are approved a verbatim typed copy of the tapes? Or are there merely segments taken out? FRANK G. TRIPEPI, CITY MANAGER: Mr. Angles, they would be what you refer to as action minutes unless it's requested and approved by the Council to be done verbatim. The minutes here that we take are what's called action minutes. They show an introductory statement as to what the item is and then the motion and the second and how the vote resulted. ANGLES: In other words they would be condensed. I see. Then I'd have to ask the City Attorney, is that legal? ROBERT KRESS, CITY ATTORNEY: Yes. ANGLES: I see. Then you have ...you approve the minutes that are condensed to where all of the information isn't put out. TRIPEPI: That's correct. ANGLES: All right. TAYLOR: Mr. Mayor if I may to Mr. Angles. The only reason if some of the issues that if a councilmember thinks that it's an important issue they can request staff to put that item in verbatim but 90% of the items on the agenda are just routine approvals whether it be the claims and demands, the billings, so many of those are strictly just routine matters. Some of the cases like I say if they're what any member considers an important issue then they can be put in verbatim. ANGLES: I see, Mr. Taylor. Who makes that decision? TAYLOR: If one of, if anyone here feels that it's an important issue then anyone of them'can do it. ANGLES: I see. So, if something is said from the audience pro or con then the Council can decide on what will be in the minutes. TAYLOR: No. Because every time when you get up and speak your name will be listed on the minutes as far as what you spoke about in general and every resident or person that speaks is listed. So, there is always that record. ANGLES: I see. Well, that's good but you got about nine pages of just one person talking. Yet there were others that ...what I'm trying to say to you is I don't see a balance here. TAYLOR: No. That was the topic issue on the-that's the Immigration Department? ANGLES: Yes, Mrs. Taliaferro. TAYLOR: I mean that is something that is so, major that has an impact on and I have to say millions of people because one of those speakers that spoke in those Minutes referred to it affects 1.5 million people in southern California. And the fact that they want Rosemead to kind of be somewhat of an information giver for the Immigration Service that's something that's very important. The other cities should be involved. That's why that was verbatim. ANGLES: Are all motions that are made by the Council or seconds made are they either put in the Minutes or left out? TAYLOR: They're all listed, every one of them. ANGLES: Oh,' they are. Well, then I would call to your attention in the September 10, 1991 minutes on Page #15, oh excuse me, on Page # I've got a lot of things here, I am, I am, what I'm getting at is where excuse me on Page #16, about in the middle of the page, I'm quoting Mr. McDonald where he says well I kind of made a motion to CC 10-8-91 Page #2 ANGLES CONTINUES: begin with. If you just second it we will take all that into consideration and once we move and second it I'd like to say a word. Mayor Imperial stated there's been a motion and a second. Mr. Nunez we have a vote on. Okay. We have a vote on Mr. Nunez. We're right in the middle of it. All right Mr. Nunez. Mr. McDonald has something to say. It goes on if you will read that yourselves, Mr. Imperial, Mayor Imperial called for the question. Please vote. There was a vote taken. I say to you that there was according to what I have read there is no was no motion, according to what I have read and I can only go by what I can afford to buy you understand there was no second in fact made to no motion. Now, you go to... is Resolution No. 91-52 has that been made like at the last meeting or is it going to me made at this meeting? KRESS: It's on this agenda. TRIPEPI: It's on this agenda tonight for consideration. ANGLES: I see. So, then what was the vote for at the last meeting where there was no motion made and no second to no motion. TAYLOR: There wouldn't he a vote if they didn't have a second to it and we don't have those minutes in front of us so whatever you're saying I have to rely on what you're reading. ANGLES: I'm reading'that that I paid $.15 a sheet for. CLARK: Mr. Mayor. I have the minutes in front of me and it says the yes vote was five to zero at the bottom of Page #16. ANGLES: Yes, that's correct. It says yes and the Council voted yes. There no none votes, none absent and none abstain. I ask again. What did you vote on? TAYLOR: What's the heading on the very first page there? It's usually listed. n ANGLES: Well this came after Mrs. Taliaferro had her say. TAYLOR: Well, there would be a recommendation on the very first page what the item is for discussion. Maybe Mrs. Clark might have it there. BRUESCH: Mr. Mayor. The recommendation as we talked along on that issue, the recommendation was and I believe Mr. McDonald recommended it that we propose a resolution of this Council to ask the Federal government to set up some type of immigration office in the San Gabriel valley. That was what we were voting on. It says it right there, a couple of paragraphs before... ANGLES: I have read this and reread this and I'm saying to you I see nothing that you gentlemen and lady voted on because there's no motion. BRUESCH: The idea was brought up by Mr. a couple of paragraphs before there, Mr. McDonald brought up an idea about asking the Congressmen to get an INS office here. ANGLES: I remember a discussion on it. BRUESCH: And that what you read was asking him to make that into.the form of a motion which he did. CLARK: Mr. Mayor. ANGLES: Okay. My point that I'm evidently I don't know what to do $15 for a tape of what goes on, I citizen stands up in front of you information. And if I'm quoting getting at is and I'll say it unless I state now and start paying am interested in this, yet when a he's supposed to have some kind - of from your own minutes and I can't cc 10-8-91 Page #3 • e ANGLES CONTINUES: find out that which has happened so that I can study and answer whatever it may be...I mean study the situation then again I'm saying that I feel that information is being withheld from me and I think the citizens absolutely should hold the Council accountable for this. On the one hand we're asked for our information yet on the other hand most of us don't know where to get that information and that's the reason I'm calling this to your attention. I want to participate in my City government. I want the City council to represent the people. I as an individual people, I can't speak for the rest of the people, I have to I want you to represent me. I'm not going to represent you. And there's some one, some man wrote about we the people. This is the way I feel. And I get just piece meal information. Now I'm not as smart as all of you people. I rely on my information. And you are the citizens a disservice by not giving them... it's not a question of whether they agree or not but give them something to say hey good or uh oh, bad. Thank you, that's all I have to say. TAYLOR: Mr. Angles, I have to take exception because those minutes are verbatim. ANGLES: No, they're not. IMPERIAL: We'll be glad to answer any questions, Mr. Angles might have, Gary. Staff... Don, I want you to get those minutes and go over them with him. If he's got a question we can take that up at the end of the meeting. ANGLES: I think the public should know about it. That's.why I'm speaking now. TAYLOR: Mr. Angles. This tape recorder... I've recorded every meeting for 20 years straight and I go over those minutes because in the past, nothing to do with the present City Clerk and such, because my votes have been recorded wrong and for 20 years I've recorded every meeting. So, when those...I say 99% certain that I feel confident about those minutes and staff can review it. You may have missed something but I believe it's there. IMPERIAL: If you've got any questions we'll have staff get together with you. You'll be allowed to speak on this a little later after you read that item. I can guarantee you Mr. Angles that this Council has nothing to hide and has not. ANGLES: Okay. IMPERIAL: It's all a matter of record on tapes. ANGLES: All right. Now, let me say one thing and I'll sit down. Mr. McDonald pointed something out to me and that is on Page #14. Now I haven't read it but I will read it and I say this and I want everybody to know that I say it. I may have jumped the gun here. It says here that he'd like'to start a partial ...he says I would make the motion that you as the and he goes on about this. I have to read it. But I want you to know that if I make a mistake I will apologize for it and I want anybody here to know that but I had read that but I didn't think it was a motion. Okay. IMPERIAL: I want you to know that we will accept your apology, Mr. Angles. ANGLES: Well, I hope other people can apologize, too, Mr. Mayor. TAYLOR: Mr. Mayor. Mr. Angles. ANGLES: Yes, sir. TAYLOR: Would you object to putting your comments in the minutes verbatim tonight? CC 10-8-91 Page #4 • ANGLES: Would I object? Of course not. TAYLOR: Thank you. I'd ask that they be in there verbatim. IMPERIAL: Staff is so ordered. END VERBATIM DIALOGUE II. PUBLIC HEARINGS An explanation of the procedures for the conduct of public hearings was presented by the City Attorney. The City Clerk then administered the oath to all those persons wishing to address the Council on any public hearing item. A. A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN APPEAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION REGARDING A REQUEST FROM INTERTRUST DEVELOPMENT TO PAVE A LOT AT 9203 STEELE STREET IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT IN ORDER TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL CUSTOMER PARKING (CUP 91-529) The Mayor opened the public hearing. Ming-Nang Chen, 404 E. Las Tunas, San Gabriel, representing the applicant Intertrust Development, explained that all zoning criteria had been met; that impact on the surrounding area would be minimal; that a block wall and landscaping was planned as buffering agents; that the southern parking spaces for be for staff only; that there would be adequate lighting in the parking lot with a closed television service for security; that the project would be an asset to the surrounding area; that the traffic summary showed no increase and a possible decrease in traffic; that the property had been purchased to use as additional parking to allow expansion of restaurants in the Hart Plaza location; that denial would cause an undue financial hardship on the owner; and asked the Council to uphold this appeal and overturn the decision of the Planning Commission. A. Catalina Gallegos, 9235 E. Graves Avenue, Rosemead, was opposed to a good residential home being demolished for parking purposes. B. Robert Angles, 9147 Valley Blvd., Rosemead, was opposed to the conversion of homes to a parking lot for the purpose of opening a Chinese restaurant. Mr. Angles stated that the center had adequate parking. now and the planned parking was too inconvenient to the contemplated restaurants. C. Tom Olivares, 3928 N. Hart Street, Rosemead, lives across the street and was opposed, disagreeing with the findings of the traffic study. D. Alice Vasquez, 3920 N. Hart Street, Rosemead, was opposed stating that the City needs more homes not more restaurants. E. Mary Ankele, 3928 N. Hart Street, Rosemead, lives across the street from the project and was opposed if the proposed restaurants would be selling alcoholic beverages. F. Ted Chu, 401 W. Las Tunas Drive, San Gabriel, agreed that this was a very emotional subject but that a balance is needed between residential and commercial interests based on laws and facts and not on personal opinions. Mr. Chen rebutted that this request in within the spirit of the law and asked approval. There being no one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed. CC 10-8-91 Page #5 • • Councilman McDonald suggested that the owner work with the neighbors and get approval for a re-design of the project. Mayor pro tem Clark stated that staff has looked at the issues; did not agree that denial would cause a financial hardship to the owner; and disagreed with the developer's engineering report of the traffic count. Councilman Bruesch upon ascertaining from staff that the proposed parking would permit up to three restaurants in the development was opposed to more than one restaurant in a mini-mall. Mayor Imperial stated that any good restaurant would cause increased traffic in the area. A five-minute recess was called at 9:40 p.m. and the meeting was reconvened accordingly. MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM CLARK, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN BRUESCH that the Council deny the appeal and uphold the decision of the Planning Commission. City Attorney Kress noted that a yes vote would be to deny. Vote resulted: Yes: Bruesch, Taylor, Imperial, Clark, McDonald No: None Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. B. A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A CITY-INITIATED REQUEST TO AMEND THE ROSEMEAD MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING REGULATIONS TO ESTABLISH A FLOOR AREA TO LOT AREA RATIO TO LIMIT THE SIZE OF RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES (PC RES. 91-21) - CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 24, 1991 The Mayor opened the public hearing. Mike Pearson, 9312 Valley Boulevard, Janstar Development, presented information regarding flag lot subdivisions, alternatives and suggestions for this ordinance including the use of the design review process for second stories, and that this ordinance would eliminate 5-bedroom homes on flag lots. Mike Mangana, Owen Development, 301 S. Myrtle in Monrovia, concurred with Mr. Pearson's presentation, adding that historically Rosemead has preferred owner-occupied projects. There being no one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed. Councilman Bruesch stated that his main concern was to prevent the impact of large homes on the neighbors. Councilman Taylor disagreed that 5-bedroom homes would be eliminated stating that the City has no obligation to allow large homes on small lots or flag lots. Mr. Taylor added that a large home should have more back yard area than a smaller home. Mayor Imperial objected to large homes on small lots with no place for children to play. Mayor pro tem Clark suggested exempting the access leg on flag lots from the calculations. The public hearing was reopened and continued to November 12, 1991, at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers for staff revision, including room definitions, the use of the design review or the conditional use permit process, the side and rear-yard setback ratios to the number of bedrooms, that calculations be made on the gross area of flag lots instead of the net area, and limited size of the homes. CC 10-8-91 Page #6 III.LEGISLATIVE A. RESOLUTION NO. 91-51 - CLAIMS & DEMANDS The following resolution was presented to the Council for adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 91-51 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS IN THE SUM OF $634,390.23 NUMBERED 37677-37699 AND 34616 THROUGH 34722 MOTION BY COUNCILMAN BRUESCH, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN McDONALD that Resolution No. 91-51 be adopted. Vote resulted: Yes: Bruesch, Taylor, Imperial, Clark, McDonald No: .None Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. Councilman Bruesch asked for a memo to explain Check No. 34629 on Page No. 2. B. RESOLUTION NO. 91-52 - SUPPORTING LOCAL SAN GABRIEL VALLEY IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION OFFICE Linda Taliaferro, 7510 Whitmore Street, asked that the resolution be sent to the area mayors, also. The following resolution was presented to the Council for adoption: ' RESOLUTION NO. 91-52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD SUPPORTING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE OFFICE IN THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MOTION BY COUNCILMAN McDONALD, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN BRUESCH that Resolution No. 91-52 be adopted and sent to all elected officials in the San Gabriel Valley, asking their support of this proposal. Vote resulted: Yes: Bruesch, Taylor, Imperial, Clark, McDonald No: None Absent: None Abstain: None The.Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. C. ORDINANCE NO. 690 - REZONING A PARCEL OF LAND FROM R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO PO-D (PROFESSIONAL OFFICE WITH A DESIGN OVERLAY) LOCATED AT 9223-9225 GLENDON WAY (ZC '91-183) - ADOPT The following ordinance was presented to the Council for adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 690 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD APPROVING A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-1 TO PO-D AND A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9223-25 GLENDON WAY MOTION BY COUNCILMAN BRUESCH, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN McDONALD that ordinance No..690 be adopted. Vote resulted: CC 10-8-91 Page #7 Yes: Bruesch, Imperial, Clark, McDonald No: Taylor Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. D. ORDINANCE NO. 691 - REZONING A PARCEL OF LAND FROM R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO PO-D (PROFESSIONAL OFFICE WITH A DESIGN OVERLAY) FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9215-9217 GLENDON WAY (ZC 91-184) - ADOPT The following ordinance was presented to the Council for adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 691 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD APPROVING A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-1 TO PO-D AND A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9215-17 GLENDON WAY MOTION BY COUNCILMAN BRUESCH, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN McDONALD that ordinance No. 691 be adopted. Vote resulted: Yes: Bruesch, Imperial, Clark, McDonald No: Taylor Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. Councilman Taylor stated that his no votes are not against the applicants and that his reasons for opposition had been stated at the last meeting. E. RESOLUTION NO. 91-53 - APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-3 FOR ZC 91-183 AND ZC 91-184 The following resolution was presented to the Council for adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 91-53 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9215-17 AND 9223-25 GLENDON WAY, ROSEMEAD MOTION BY COUNCILMAN BRUESCH, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN McDONALD that Resolution No. 91-53 be adopted. Vote resulted: Yes: Bruesch, Imperial, Clark, McDonald No: Taylor Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. F. RESOLUTION NO. 91-54 - ALLOWING REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PAYMENT FOR CONCRETE REPAIRS TO VARIOUS STREETS The following resolution was presented to the Council for adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 91-54 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS WITH RESPECT TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PAYMENT FOR THE REPAIR OF CURBS, GUTTERS, AND SIDEWALKS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE CITY CC 10-8-91 Page #8 MOTION BY COUNCILMAN BRUESCH, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN McDONALD that Resolution No. 91-54 be adopted. Vote resulted: Yes: Bruesch, Imperial, Clark, McDonald No: Taylor Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. Councilman Taylor stated that he was in favor of the project but that City funds should be used for the money. G. ORDINANCE NO. 692 - ANTI-SCAVENGING - INTRODUCE The following ordinance was presented to the Council for introduction: ORDINANCE NO. 692 Juan Nunez, 2702 Del Mar Avenue, stated that cardboard is not currently recyclable by the City of Rosemead. Councilman Bruesch was concerned that this ordinance would harm the non-profit organizations that earn funds from recycling items. Mayor Imperial noted that it was now 11:00 p.m. and asked for a motion to allow the meeting to continue. MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN BRUESCH that the meeting be extended past the hour of 11:00 p.m. Vote resulted: Yes: Bruesch, Taylor, Imperial, Clark, McDonald No: None Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. After some discussion, Item 4 and Item 5 , referring to items not currently being recycled by the City, were removed from the ordinance and Item 6 was renumbered as Item 4. MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN BRUESCH that ordinance No. 692 be introduced, deleting Items 4 and 5 as presently numbered and renumbering Item 6 as Item 4. Vote resulted: Yes: Bruesch, Taylor, Imperial, Clark, McDonald No: None Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR (CC-H and CC-I were deferred and CC-D, CC-J and CC-K were removed for discussion) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD PROHIBITING THE COLLECTION OF CURBSIDE RECYCLABLE MATERIALS BY UNAUTHORIZED PERSONS CC-A AUTHORIZATION TO REJECT CLAIM FILED AGAINST THE CITY BY B.G. KIM CONSTRUCTION, INC. CC-B PACKAGE TO SOLICIT BIDS FOR THE 41st HANDYMAN BID CC-C EXTENSION OF WITH EVANS TREE SERVICE CC 10-8-91 Page #9 • • IV. CONSENT CALENDAR - CONTINUED CC-E AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND U.S. CONFERENCE OF MAYORS SMALL BUSINESS CONFERENCE IN KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, NOVEMBER 17-20, 1991 CC-F AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND SISTER CITY CONFERENCE IN TULSA, OKLAHOMA, JULY 6-11, 1992 CC-G RECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR 40th HANDYMAN BID PACKAGE TO LA VERNE CONSTRUCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,000 MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN McDONALD that the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar be approved. Vote resulted: Yes: Bruesch, Taylor, Imperial, Clark, McDonald No: None Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. CC-H APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZATION TO SEEKS BIDS FOR STREET AND LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS IN VALLEY BOULEVARD (MUSCATEL/LAMA) AND CONCRETE REPAIRS TO VARIOUS STREETS CC-I COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY AND AGENCY FOR STREET AND LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS IN VALLEY BOULEVARD (MUSCATEL/LAMA) AND CONCRETE REPAIRS TO VARIOUS STREETS These items were deferred for further information. CC-D APPROVAL OF ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT FOR DIAMOND RESTAURANT, 9016 MISSION DRIVE Mayor pro tem Clark asked that the applicant be given a copy of the City's noise ordinance. MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MCDONALD, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR that the Council grant an entertainment permit to Diamond Restaurant. Vote resulted: Yes: Bruesch, Taylor, Clark, McDonald No: Imperial Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. Mayor Imperial stated that the City does not have a good handle on this and until it does, he is concerned with Karaoke places. CC-J COMBINATION OF NEWSLETTER AND RECREATION SCHEDULE FOR DECEMBER MAILING Councilman Taylor asked for a review of the original contract price and the inclusion of the recreation schedule. This item was deferred for further information. CC-K APPROVAL OF ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT FOR CHARMING, KTV, 7940 E. GARVEY AVENUE, SUITE 106 Councilman Bruesch asked about the Sheriff's report, asked for a better map showing the surrounding area, and asked'that the City noise ordinance be provided at the time entertainment applications are requested. CC 10-8-91 Page #10 • • Councilman McDonald suggested a six-month review process be incorporated into the permit process. Sam Chen, 401 E. Valley Boulevard, San Gabriel, representing the applicant stated that KTV is not the same as Karaoke and that the noise level should be no different that a television set. Mayor pro tem Clark was opposed because of monitoring problems and objected to the small rooms with low visibility. Mayor Imperial was opposed to the windows being blocked out and only one door for egress and ingress. Mr. Imperial stated that he couldn't vote for this type of entertainment until there was more control over noise both inside and outside the establishment. Juan Nunez, 2702 Del Mar Avenue, questioned the size of the rooms. MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN McDONALD that the Council grant an entertainment permit to Charming KTV. Vote resulted: Yes: Bruesch, Taylor, McDonald No: Imperial, Clark Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. V. MATTERS FOR & ACTION A. PROPOSED SITE FOR EAST VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER There being no objection, this item was deferred to the next meeting for further information. B. VALLEY BOULEVARD PEAK PERIOD PARKING There being no objection, this item was deferred for further information. C. COST PROPOSAL FOR BULK MAILING ADDRESS LABELS MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM CLARK, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN McDONALD that the Council utilize the services provided by Ferris Addressing and Mailing, Inc..and appropriate the necessary expenditures. Vote resulted: Yes: Bruesch,•Taylor, Imperial, Clark, McDonald No: None Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. VI. STATUS REPORTS - None VII. MATTERS FROM OFFICIALS A. REQUEST FROM COMMISSIONER TIRRE FOR REAPPOINTMENT TO THE ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSION MOTION BY COUNCILMAN McDONALD, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN BRUESCH that Mr. Tirre be reappointed to the Traffic Commission. Vote resulted: Yes: Bruesch, Taylor, Imperial, Clark, McDonald No: None Absent: None Abstain: None The-Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. CC 10-8-91 Page #11 B. REQUEST FROM CON ROSEMEAO TRAFFIC • KNAPP FOR REAPPOINTMENT TO THE MOTION BY COUNCILMAN McDONALD, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN BRUESCH that Mrs. Knapp be reappointed to the Traffic Commission. Vote resulted: Yes: Bruesch, Taylor, Imperial, Clark, McDonald No: None Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. There being no further action to be taken at this time, the meeting was adjourned at 11:32 p.m. The next regular meeting is scheduled for October 22, 1991 at 8:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted: APPROVED: Ffil y Clerk MAYOR CC 10-8-91 Page #12