CC - 12-05-89 - Special Meeting1r 1
u
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING
ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL
AND
ROSEMEAD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DECEMBER 5, 1989
ANPROV EllJ
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
DATA 90 _
BY c. -a
A Special Meeting of the Rosemead City Council and the Rosemead
Redevelopment Agency was called to order by Mayor McDonald at 7:00
p.m. in the Conference Room of City Hall, 8838 E. Valley Boulevard,
Rosemead, California.
ROLL CALL OF OFFICERS:
Present: Councilmen Bruesch, DeCocker, Taylor, Mayor Pro Tem
Imperial, and Mayor McDonald
Absent: None
1. RRA RESOLUTION NO. 89-50 - CLAIMS & DEMANDS - ADMINISTRATION
The following resolution was presented to. the Agency for adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 89-50
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS IN THE SUM OF
$150.00 AND DEMANDS NO. 2563 THROUGH NO. 2567
MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM IMPERIAL, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN BRUESCH
that Resolution No. 89-50 be adopted.. Vote resulted:
Aye: DeCocker, Taylor, McDonald, Bruesch, Imperial
No: None
Absent: None
Abstain: None
The Chairman declared said motion duly carried and so ordered.
2. MODERN SERVICE TRASH AUDIT
Frank G. Tripepi, City Manager, presented the background on this
item, explaining that there is a difference between the trucks used
for commercial pickups and the trucks used for residential pickups,
thus minimizing any mix of these two types of trash collections.
It was noted that this type of audit was unique and was being
conducted in Rosemead for the first time during the twenty-year
contract.
Councilman Bruesch requested that the form be amended to add a
column showing weight-in and weight-out to verify the net tonnage
reports.
Jim Knutsen, representing McGladrey & Pullen, agreed with this
request.
Mr. Bruesch was also concerned with the differentiation between
the routes, ascertaining that none of the commercial routes were
combined with South E1 Monte trash.
Councilman Taylor reiterated the importance of the audit-drivers
being familiar with the map that will be provided so that no overlap
of pickup from non-Rosemead areas will occur.
It was noted that the independent weigh station on valley
Boulevard would be used to weigh the trucks before returning to the
yard if the trucks are partially full.
Councilman Taylor stated a preference for a full audit rather than
an informal audit.
Mr. Knutsen stated that a full audit would be substantially more
expensive.
SPECIAL CC/RRA 12-5-89
Page 41
Frank G. Tripepi, City Manager, summarized the Council's concerns
that McGladrey & Pullen would spend the necessary hours with Modern
Service's accountants to audit their books, take that information and
supplement it with the audit being conducted on the trucks, and
present those findings to the Council. Mr. Tripepi stated that this
would require another letter of agreement from Mr. Barzen.
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN BRUESCH, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM IMPERIAL
that the council approve the auditing procedures as outlined and
amended. Vote resulted:
Aye: DeCocker, Taylor, McDonald, Bruesch, Imperial
No: None
Absent: None
Abstain: None
The mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered
Staff was directed to place on the next city council agenda a
supplemental agreement with McGladrey & Pullen directing the
performance of an audit similar to the one conducted in 1983,
including a copy of the agreement used at that time.
4. COMPLETE COUNT FOR 1990 CENSUS
This item was taken out of order at the request of Mayor Pro Tem
Imperial.
Mayor McDonald reported on the importance of this census count and
the importance of informing the public. Mr. McDonald suggested that
the Council consider including an informational brochure in the City
Calendar explaining the procedure in several languages, thus making
the Rosemead residents more comfortable with the process.
Mayor McDonald suggested that the City coordinate with any similar
efforts that would be made by Los Angeles County.
The council was in agreement on the importance of the Census and
the need for an accurate count.
No vote was required on this item.
3. CITY ENGINEER POSITION
Frank G. Tripepi, City Manager, noted that this subject had been
raised at a previous Council Meeting. Mr. Tripepi summarized the
duties of the position and the methodology of payment for services
rendered.
Councilman Bruesch reiterated that he had no criticism of the
quality of service being provided but was trying to find an
alternative to the supplemental requests currently being utilized.
Mr. Bruesch suggested an increase in the number of hours covered in
the retainer to reduce the amount of supplemental hours being charged.
Councilman Taylor noted that the City was at a minimum retainer
charge and that the rate would be the same if presented on a 40-hour
basis.
Mr. Bruesch felt that the supplemental engineering charges being
shown on the warrant register were misleading to the public.
It was ascertained that the rate charged on the retainer was less
than the rates charged as supplemental.
Councilman Bruesch requested that the exact figures comparing the
costs between using a retainer and using supplemental engineering be
presented to the Council for review.
SPECIAL CC/RRA 12-5-89
Page #2
0
Alfonso Rodriguez, City Engineer, explained that the increase in
supplemental charges was to cover the increase in counter activity and
phone calls.
Frank G. Tripepi, City Manger, pointed out that an increase in the
retainer hours could become excessive if the work load in the City
should decrease.
Mr. Bruesch pointed out that the contract with Willdan's was
budgeted each year.
Mayor Pro Tem Imperial stated that Willdan gave excellent service
compared to past consultants and was not interested in changing the
current contract.
Mr. Bruesch reiterated his conviction that the services being
provided by Willdan's were more than adequate. Mr. Bruesch was merely
investigating the possibility of more hours at the lesser rate of pay.
Tom Brohard, representing Willdan's, stated that the low retainer
is tied to the level of service required by the city, allowing the
City to be billed only for those items that are needed. Mr. Brohard
suggested caution in raising the level of the retainer beyond the
City's needs.
Mayor McDonald noted that the amount of development in the City
had increased dramatically since the original contract with Willdan's
in 1981.
Councilman Taylor requested a summary of the costs to Willdan over
the past several years.
Frank G. Tripepi, City Manager, stressed that the retainer fee
does not cover any individual street project. The retainer only
covers those activities that are connected to the position of City
Engineer, such as attending Council Meetings, signing maps as City
Engineer, or meeting with developers to explain the Subdivision Map
Act. The retainer does not cover such things as working on the Del
Mar Avenue street project, the Landis View or Walnut Grove widening.
Those items would still be billed as supplemental engineering.
Councilman DeCocker suggested that the City consider having its
own City Engineer instead of contracting for one.
Mayor Pro Tem Imperial preferred that the City contract for
Engineering services, citing satisfaction with the current system.
Councilman Bruesch requested a survey of activities to determine
if a savings would occur if the amount of hours covered under the
retainer were increased.
Dan Heil, Willdan's, stated that an estimate could be prepared.
Mr. Heil added that the city has a good agreement at this time.
Mr. Tripepi stated that a survey would be conducted of the
surrounding cities regarding their City Engineer budgets.
Mr. Bruesch requested this information be provided before the next
budget discussions begin.
Councilman Taylor questioned the claims and demands, asking how
this meeting had tied into the Redevelopment Agency.
Mr. Tripepi stated that the majority of work being done by the
City Engineer was for projects in the Redevelopment area.
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM IMPERIAL that
the Council reconsider Item No. 1, RRA RESOLUTION NO. 89-50.
SPECIAL CC/RRA 12-5-89
Page #3
Councilman Taylor stated that he was uncomfortable with this item,
citing the requirements necessary to meet as the Redevelopment Agency.
Mayor Pro Tem Imperial concurred with Mr. Taylor.
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN DeCOCKER that
Resolution No. 89-50 be rescinded. Vote resulted:
Aye: DeCocker, Taylor, McDonald, Bruesch, Imperial
No, None
Absent: None
Abstain: None
The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered.
It was noted that the checks would be voided.
There being no further action to be taken at this time, the
meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. The next regular meeting is
scheduled for December 12, 1989, at 8:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
C' y Clerk
SPECIAL CC/RRA 12-5-89
Page #4
T 11n11 Fv+ .