CC - General Plan Amendment 95-02 - To Meet State Requirements for 1989-1998 - Box 066V
0
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR
AND MEMBERS OF
ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL
FROM: y FRANK G. TRIPEPI, CITY MANAGER
DATE: JUNE 25, 1996
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 95 -02
Amend the Housing Element of the Rosemead General Plan to meet the State
Requirement for 1989 -1998 Planning Period.
A. BACKGROUND
Local jurisdictions are required by State law to complete a housing element every five (5) years.
The end of the current "planning period" has been extended from 1994 to 1998. Rosemead's
existing housing element was adopted prior to the start of this period (1987). Therefore,
Rosemead does not have a State certified housing element for this planning period. Staff finds
that Rosemead needs an adopted/certified Housing Element in order to:
Apply for outside housing funds (e.g. HOME),
Develop low- moderate income housing, or
Issue building permits.
This item was presented at a public hearing with the Planning Commission on November 6, 1995.
Staff noted that this update was initially prepared for the planning period from July 1, 1989 to
June 30, 1994 which was extended to June 30, 1996. In October 1995, HCD informed staff that
they anticipated and are supporting another two year extension. A first draft of the extension was
vetoed by the Governor in December 1995.
Staff held off processing a housing element that would be valid for only a couple of months.
Instead, we began planning to prepare an update for the next planning period (1996- 2001). Then
in May 1996, staff received notice that the Governor signed legislation to extend the planning
period to June 30, 1998. The draft element before the Council is designed to complete the process
4 and meet the State housing element requirements for the planning cycle that started in 1989.
COUNCIL AGENDA
JUN 2 5 1996
ITEM No. J�Z: '4•
D
General Plan Amendment 95 -02
City Council, 6 -25 -96
Page 2 of 3
B. ANALYSIS
Staff finds that draft housing element update addresses the State's issues and meets the regional
housing numbers set by SCAG. This housing element amendment notes that future housing
development would be through infill and recycling of lots. The amendment neither proposes to
change the current development standards, nor change the zoning of any parcels within the City.
The objectives will be met using the development standards that are currently in place.
The intent with this housing element is to address Rosemead's housing goals and to comply with
these findings and the requirements of Article 10.6 of the California Government Code. State law
sets specific direction of local housing elements. They limit the types of analysis used to assess
existing and projected housing needs. In addition, laws specify the nature of the community
housing goals and the detail required in their objectives and policies. Finally, the State specifies
the content and effect of programs that are identified to implement the element.
Staff received tentative State (Housing & Community Development, HCD) approval of a draft
housing element in September 1993. This tentative approval was subject to a few minor
amendments which have been incorporated into the current draft element. Staff sent the current
draft to the State earlier this month (June 1996) for reconfirmation that the element meets the State
requirements. We received verbal confirmation that the element would meet State standards if it
is passed by the City Council.
Analysis of existing demographic and housing characteristics in the City of Rosemead identified
the following trends in 1991:
Increase of Young Adults (20 -29 years) which are in the family formation age.
Ethnic Composition change; Increase in the Asian population and decreases in Hispanic
and White populations.
Increase in Elderly households (over 65). In addition, there is a continued predominance
of family households, including large families.
For -Sale and Rental Housing Costs in Rosemead are one of the lowest in the region.
However, Household Incomes are also low in comparison to the region.
Approximately 19% of the Housing Stock is in need of Repair or Replacement.
Low Vacancy Rate... particularly for rental units.
This review is required to evaluate the appropriateness, effectiveness and progress in
implementation of the previous element (1987) pursuant to Section 65588. The development of
housing relates directly to the standards contained within the land use element as to density,
location, and development standards. Projected housing developments must be achieved within
the limitations set forth by both land use and housing elements. Therefore, the two elements
V
General Plan Amendment 95 -02
City Council, 6 -25 -96
Page 3 of 3
support one another in the common goal of achieving quality development. Similar relationships
exist between all elements of the general plan.
C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
An initial study was completed on September 25, 1995. This study was prepared in accordance
with state and local environmental regulations to analyze the potential environmental impacts that
could be created from the proposed project.
General Plan Amendment 95 -02 has been drafted to evaluate and revise existing goals and policies
and set new policies for the development of housing for all income levels. The planning period
for this housing element is July, 1989 through June, 1998. No areas were found to have a
potential negative impact on the environment. Therefore, a Negative Declaration has been
prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The study was sent to all responsible agencies, and noticed in 10 public locations, soliciting
comments for more than a 21 -day period prior to the Planning Commission hearing. Notices of
availability of this study were sent out to agencies on September 28, 1995. No comments were
received. A copy of this Negative Declaration is attached for the City Council to review.
D. RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 96 -23, approving General Plan
Amendment 95 -02 with a finding of a Negative Declaration.
Attachments:
1. Letter from HCD, dated September 14, 1993
2. Letter to HCD, dated June 5, 1996
3. draft Housing Element
4. Environmental Analysis /Initial Study
S. PC Resolution 95-45
6. draft CC Resolution 96 -23
U
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS TRANS, ORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY PETE WILSON. Governor
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �*" ".�
DIVISION OF HOUSING POLICY DEVELOPMENT
1800 THIRD STREET, Room 430
P.O BOX 952053 $
SACRAMEATO. CA 94252 -2053
(916) 323 -3176 FAX (916) 323-6625
P 1 1493
Mr. Frank Tripepi
City Manager
City of Rosemead
8638 East 'valley Boulevard
Rosemead, California 91770
Dear Mr. Tripepi:
RE: Review of the City of Rosemead's Revised Draft Housing
Element
Thank you for submitting Rosemead's revised draft housing
element, comprised of the initial response to our December 17,
1992 review letter, received on August 5, 1993, and additional
information received by facsimile transmission on September 2,
and 13, 1993. As you know, we are required to review draft
housing elements and report our findings to the locality
(Government Code Section 65585(b)). At the City's request, we
have expedited the review of the revised draft element in order
to facilitate the element's adoption by the City Council and the
City's planned application for HOME funds.
Identified concerns were reviewed with Mr. Tim Elliott, the
City's consultant, in telephone conversations during August and
September 1993.
As you know, our December 17, 1992 housing element review
letter described revisions needed to bring the adopted element
into compliance with State housing element law (Article 10.6 of
the Government Code). Rosemead's draft revisions to the housing
element now adequately address the remaining statutory
requirements. For example, the element now identifies sites to
accommodate the identified housing need for all income groups,
includes quantified objectives for units to be constructed,
rehabilitated, and conserved by income category during the
current planning period, and demonstrates that there are no
subsidized units in the City at risk of converting to non -low-
income uses as required by Chapter 1451, Statutes of 1989. It is
our understanding that the City will incorporate the description
of the ongoing efforts to facilitate the recycling of
underutilized, occupied residential parcels to higher density
V
Mr. Frank Tripepi
Page 2
residential use into the housing policy and program section of
the element. We are therefore pleased to find that when these
revisions are incorporated into the original element, adopted by
the City Council, and sent to this - Department for our review, the
element will comply with State housing element law (Article 10.6
of the Government Code).
To ensure final compliance with State ho
the City should submit the adopted element as
pursuant to Government Code Section 65585(g).
draft element now addresses all the statutory
element must be adopted and submitted to this
full compliance with the law.
ising element law,
soon as possible,
While the revised
requirements, the
Department to be in
As you know, this Department's HOME program regulations
include housing element status as a rating factor in the
competitive application process for HOME funds. Jurisdictions
with an adopted housing element in compliance with State housing
element law, as determined by this Department, will receive
significant extra points if their application has met the
threshold criteria. Points will be awarded to jurisdictions with
an adopted housing element in compliance before October 1, 1993,
the date HOME applications are due to the State. To ensure
eligibility for the extra points, we encourage Rosemead to adopt
the element and submit it to this Department as soon as possible.
For further information on the HOME program the City should
contact Ms. Chris Webb - Curtis of this Department at (916)
322 -0479.
We appreciate the cooperation of Mr. Elliott during our
review. If you have any questions about our comments or would
like assistance in implementing your housing program, please
contact Robert Maus, of our staff, at (916) 327 -2640.
In accordance with their requests pursuant to the Public
Records Act, we are forwarding a copy of this letter to the
organizations and individuals listed below.
Sincerely
i
Thomas B. Cook
Deputy Director
Mr. Frank Tripepi
Page 3
CC: Peter Lyons, Planning Director, City of Rosemead
Tim Elliott, Willdan Associates
Carlyle W. Hall, Hall & Phillips Law Firm
Jonathan Lehrer - Graiwer, Attorney at Law
Western Center on Law & Poverty
Fair Housing Council of the San Fernando Valley
Mark Johnson, Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles
Ana Marie Whitaker, California State University Pomona
Dennis Rockway, Legal Aid Foundation of Long Beach
David Booher, California Housing Council
Josephine Alido, David Evans and Associates
Stephanie Knapik, Westside Fair Housing Council
Karen Warner, Cotton /Beland /Associates
Joe Carreras, Southern California Association of Governments
Kathleen Mikkelson, Deputy Attorney General
Bob Cervantes, Governor's Office of Planning and Research
Dwight Hanson, California Building Industry Association
Kerry Harrington Morrison, California Association of
Realtors
Marc Brown, California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
Rob Wiener, California Coalition for Rural Housing
Susan DeSantis, The Planning Center
Dara Schur, Western Center on Law Poverty
MAYOR:
M gOAFE ='_4RY;
MAYOR PRO TEM:
JAY T. IMPERIAL
COUNCILMEMBERS:
JOE VASO'JE?
ROBERT W. ERUESCH
GARY A. TAY, OR
June 5, 1996
P osemead
8838 E. VALLEY BOULEVARD - P.O. BOX 399
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA 91770
TELEPHONE (818) 288 -6671
TELECOPIER 8183079218
Department of Housing and Community Development
Division of Housing Policy Development
Attn: Robert Maus
1800 Third Street, Room 430
Post Office Box 95205'
CA 94252 -2053
SUBJECT: ROSEMEAD HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE
Planning Cycle ending June 30, 1998
Dear Mr. Maus:
We received a response from HCD back in September 1993 with a few items to address in our
draft Housing Element. I discussed this letter and the potential of extending the planning period
with you in a phone conversation around August, 1995. I then addressed HCD's comments and
started through the hearing process anticipating an extension of the planning period. Then in
December, the legislation to extend the period was not approved.
With the recent events to now extend the planning period for the SCAG region until June 1998,
we have reinstated the review /hearing process. At this time, the Planning Commission has held
two hearings and are recommending City Council approval. Prior to presenting the element to the
Council, we would like a more current review from HCD to determine where our element stands.
We have enclosed a copy of the draft element. Please review and comment on this document. If
you have any questions, please feel free call either myself or the Director of Planning, Mr. Peter
Lyons, at (818) 288 -6671.
Since
lM
Carl P. Holm
Associate Planner
cc: File GPA 95 -02
ENVIRONNIHNTAL CHECKLIST FORM
City of Rosemead '
I. PROTECT INFORMATION
1. Project Title: Rosemead Housing Element Update
2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rosemead Planning Department - -
8838 E. Valley Boulevard
Rosemead, California 91770
- 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Carl P. Holm, Administrative Aide
(818) 288 -6671
4. Project Location: City of Rosemead, citywide
County of Los Angeles, State of Califomia
Assessor Parcel Number(s): n/a ..
5. Applicant's Name and Address: Rosemead Planning Department
8838 E. Valley Boulevard
Rosemead, CA 91770
6. General Plan Designation: citywide 7. Zoning Designation: citywide
8. Description of Project (describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases
of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features for its implementation. Attach additional
sheets if necessary): See Attachment A(1) for more derail.
Update the Rosemead Housing Element of the General Plan for the 1989 -1994 planning period. This planning period
has been extended until June, 1996. The Element reviews previous goals and policies and sets new goals and policies
to address Rosemead's housing needs pursuant to Section 65580 et sec of the California Government Code.
9. Surrounding Iand Uses and Setting (Briefly describe the project's surroundings):
The Element sets housing policies citywide.
10. Other Public Agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation
agreement):
The State Housing and Community Development Department (HCD) has issued preliminary approval subject to final
adoption by the City Council.
H. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project , involving at least one impact
that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages:
Land Use/Planning _ Transportation/Circulation _ Public Services
Population and Housing Biological Resources _ Utilities and Service Systems
Geologic Problems _ Energy and Mineral Resources _ Aesthetics
Water _ Hazards _ Cultural Resources
Air Quality _ Noise _ Recreation
Mandatory Findings of Significance
Initial Environmental Study Page 1 of 12
Case No. GPA 95 -02
III. DETERMINATION
(To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation (check statement that best applies):
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and ..
a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the MITIGATION MEASURES described
on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least
one effect; 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal
standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described
on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless
mitigated ". AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the
effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment,
there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects;
1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have
been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures
that are imposed upon the project. X
�
Signature
Carl P. Holm Administrative Aide
Printed Name
September 25 1995
Date
City of Rosemead
For
Initial Environmental study
Case No. GPA 95 -02
Page 2 of 12
-� Potentially
... -
significant
-
Potentially
Uoless
Less Th.
Significant
Mitigation
significant No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact Impact
IV. ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCE
-
A. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation
_ X -
or zoning? (source #(s) )
b) Conflict with applicable environmental
X -
plans or policies adopted by agencies
with jurisdiction over the project?
(source #(s) )
,-
c) Be incompatible with existing land use
_ X
in the vicinity? (source #(s) )
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations
X -
(e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or
impacts from incompatible land uses)?
(source #(s) )
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement _
_
_ X
of an established community (including a
low- income or minority community)?
(source #(s) )
B. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
..
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional _
_
_ X -
or local population projections?
-.
(source #(s) )
b) Induce substantial growth in an area
X
either directly or indirectly (e.g. through
_
projects in an undeveloped area or extension
-
of major infrastructure)? (source #(s) )
C) Displace existing housing, especially
affordable housing? (source #(s) )
C. GEOLOGICAL PROBLEMS. Would the proposal
result in, or expose people to potential
impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture?
X
(source #(s) )
b) Seismic ground shaki e? _
_
X
(source #(s) )
C) Seismic ground failure including liquefaction? _
_
_ X -
(source #(s) )
d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? _
_
_ X
(source #(s) )
Initial Environmental study
Page 3 of 12
Case No. GPA 95 -02
-
Potentially
— — _
significant
Potentially
Unless Less Than
Significant
Mitigation significant No
Impact
Incorporated Impact Impact
e)
Landslides or mudflows?
— — _
(source #(s) )
f)
Erosion, changes in topography or unstable
soil conditions from excavation, grading,
or fill? (source #(s) )
g)
Subsidence of the land?
(source #(s) )
h)
Expansive soils?
(source #(s) )
i)
Unique geologic or physical features?
(source #(s) )
D. WATER.
Would the proposal result in:
a)
Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns, or the rate and amount of
surface runoffl(source #(s) )
b)
Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding?
(source #(s) )
C)
Discharge into surface waters or other
alteration of surface water quality
(e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity)? (source #(s) )
d)
Changes in the amount of surface water
in any water body? (source #(s) )
e)
Changes in currents, or the course or
direction of water movements?
(source #(s) )
f)
Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or withdrawals,
or through interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations or through substantial loss
of groundwater recharge capability?
(source #(s) )
g)
Altered direction or rate of flow of
groundwater (source #(s) )
h)
Impacts to groundwater quality?
(source #(s) )
i)
Substantial reduction in the amount of
groundwater otherwise available for
public water supplies? (source #(s) )
X
X
X
X
X
_ X
— — _
X
— _ —
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Initial Environmental Study
Case No. GPA 95 -02
Page 4 of 12
1
E. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a)
Violate any air quality standard or contribute
..
to an existing or projected air quality
violation? (source #(s) )
b)
Expose sensitive receptors'to pollutants?
Impact '
(source #(s) )'
c)
Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature,
— —
or cause any change in climate?
(source #(s) )
d)
Create objectionable odors?
(source #(s) )
F. TRANSPORTATION /CIRCULATION. Would the
proposal result in:
a)
Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
(source #(s) )
b)
Hazards to safety from design features
(e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections,
or incompatible uses like farm equipment?
(source #(s) )
C)
Inadequate emergency access or access to
nearby uses? (source #(s) )
d)
Insufficient parking capacity on -site or
off -site? (source #(s) )
e)
Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or
bicyclists? (source #(s) )
f)
Conflicts with adopted policies supporting
alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)? (source #(s) )
g)
Rail, waterbome or air traffic impacts?
(source #(s) )
G. BIOLOGICAL
RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result
in impacts to:
a)
Endangered, threatened or tare species, or
their habits (including but not limited to
plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds?
(source #(s) )
b)
Locally designated species (e.g. heritage
trees)? (source #(s) )
Potentially
..
sigoifcant
..
Potentially Unless Less Than
significant Mitigation significant
No
Impact Incorporated Impact
Impact '
- - -
X
— —
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Initial Environmental Study
Case No. GPA 95 -02
Page 5 of 12
Potentially
significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
significant Mitigetim significant
Impact Incorporated Impact
C)
Locally designated natural communities
(e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)?
(source #(s) )
d)
Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and
vernal pool)? (source #(s) )
e)
Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
(source #(s) )
H. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES.
Would
the proposal:
a)
Conflict with adopted energy conservation
plans? (source #(s) )
b)
Use non - renewable resources in a wasteful
and insufficient manner? (source #(s) )
C)
Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of future
value to the region and the residents of
the State? (source #(s) )
I. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a)
A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation)? (source #(s) )
b)
Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
(source #(s) )
C)
The creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard? (source #(s) )
d)
Exposure of people to existing sources of
potential health hazard? (source #(s) )
e)
Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable
brush, grass, or trees? (source #(s) )
J. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a)
Increases in existing noise levels?
(source #(s) )
b)
Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
(source #(s) )
X
X
X
X
X
Initial Environmental study Pag b of 12
Case No. GPA 95 -02 g
Potentially
significant
Impact
Potentially
significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
significant No
Impact Impact
K. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered government services in any of the
following areas?
a) Fire Protection? (source #(s) )
b) Police Protection? (source #(s) )
C) Schools? (source #(s) )
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads? (source #(s) )
e) Other governmental services?
(source #(s) )
L. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would
the proposal result in a need for new systems or
supplies, or substantial alterations to the following
utilities:
a) Power of natural gas? (source #(s) )
b) Communication Systems? (source #(s) )
c) Local or regional water treatment or
distribution facilities? (source #(s) )
d) Sewer or septic tanks? (source #(s) )
e) Storm water drainage? (source #(s) )
f) Solid Waste disposal? (source #(s) )
g) Local or regional water supplies?
(source #(s) )
M. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
(source #(s) )
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic
effect? (source #(s) )
C) Create light or glare? (source #(s) )
N. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources?
(source #(s) )
b) Disturb archaeological resources?
(source #(s) )
Initial Environmental study
Case No. CPA 95 -02
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Page 7 of 12
r
X
_
X
X
X
X
Page 7 of 12
r
Initial Environmental Smdy Page 8 of 12
Case No. GPA 95 -02
\ Potentially
Significant "
Potentially Unle" Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No -
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact '
C)
Affect historical resources?
_ X
(source #(s) )
_
d)
Have the potential to cause a physical
X -
change which would affect unique ethnic
-.
cultural values? (source #(s) )
e)
Restrict existing religious or sacred uses
_ _ X
within the potential impact area?
(source #(s) )
O. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
_
a)
Increase the demand for neighborhood or
_ _ X
regional parks or other recreational facilities?
_
-
(source #(s) )
b)
Affect existing recreational opportunities?
_ X
(source #(s) )
_
V. MANDATORY FINDINGS
OF SIGNIFICANCE
a)
Does the project have the potential to
_ X -
degrade the quality of the environment,
_
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self - sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
b)
Does the project have the potential to
_ X
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of
_
long -term, environmental goals?
C)
Does the project have impacts that are
_ _ X
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects)
d)
Does the project have environmental effects
_ X
which will cause substantial adverse effects
_
on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Initial Environmental Smdy Page 8 of 12
Case No. GPA 95 -02
VI. EARLIER ANALYSIS
'- Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more
effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration, Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case
a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets:
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for
review.
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were
within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis.
C) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "less than Significant with Mitigation
Incorporated ", describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from
the earlier document and the extent to which they address site - specific conditions for the
project.
Initial Environmental Study Page 9 of 12
Case No. GPA 95 -02
ATTACHMENT A
Environmental Evaluation
General Plan Amendment 95 -02
I.
A. SCOPE ANA INTENT: Rosemead's General Plan was adopted in 1987. An environmental impact report
(EIR) was prepared for that document which included a housing element. This environmental analysis will use the
genera] plan EIR for a basis of evaluating potential impacts. Environmental review for the draft element will be based -
from the EIR prepared for the general plan, and not be as detailed as a specific project since future development is
uncertain.
B. SITE DESCRIPTION: Rosemead is an urban suburb located in the San Gabriel Valley, 10 miles east of the
City of Los Angeles. It is bounded on the north by the cities of Temple City and San Gabriel, on the west by
Monterey Park, on the south by Montebello, plus by El Monte and South El Monte on the east. The City is 5.5
square miles or 2,344 acres in size. Rosemead is home to a resident population of approximately 53,800 people and
is about 90% built out.
Rosemead is relatively flat and is located approximately 400 -500 feet above sea level. Two major freeways provide
east/west circulation to and from the City. Route 60 is located at the southern border, and Interstate 10 bisects the
City.
Commercial and industrial land uses line major streets with most lot depths of less than 200 feet. Residential uses
are located immediately adjacent to the commercial and industrial uses. North of the 10 Freeway is predominately
low density residential land use. The southern half of the city is designated for multiple family residential uses.
C. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Under State mandate, Rosemead has updated its housing element of the general
plan for the 1989 -1994 planning period. This planning period has been extended until June, 1996. Rosemead has
received tentative approval from the California Department of Housing and Community Development.
A Housing Element must be consistent with the goals and objectives of all other elements of the adopted general plan.
After adoption, the Housing Element creates general guidelines for housing development. General Plan Amendment
95 -02 reviews previous goals and policies and sets new goals and policies to address Rosemead's housing needs
pursuant to Section 65580 et sec of the California Government Code. There is no physical construction proposed
under this project.
This document reviews the goals and policies set forth in the 1987 Housing Element. It evaluates housing and
population trends that contribute to the housing industry. New housing goals and policies are established for all
income levels based on regional needs projections.
H. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
A. Land Use and Planning. The general plan designates sites for residential land uses. Zoning designations and
land use are predominately low and medium density residential. Residential development is also allowed in planned
development and the professional office zones. There is sufficient land designated for residential development to
support Rosemead's regional needs. Sites would be able to develop under current development standards as infill
development. No changes in land use or zoning would be necessary. Therefore, there would be no impact to the
existing land use or planning.
There are no new impacts that would be create from the draft housing element. The Mitigation Measures identified
in the general plan EIR are sufficient to reduce and land use and planning impacts to a level of insignificance.
B. Population and Housing. The Rosemead General Plan allows for additional housing growth before meeting or
exceeding the regional or local population projection. Growth in housing will be accomplished through infill
development by lot consolidation and recycling under - utilized lots. Development would result in an increase in the
number of housing units with a corresponding increase in population.
Initial Environmental study Page 10 of 12
Ca No. GPA 95 -02
There are no new impacts that would be create from the draft housing element. The Mitigation Measures identified
in the general plan EIR are sufficient to reduce and land use and planning impacts to a level of insignificance.
C. Geological Problems. Two major fault zones are located near Rosemead. There is one Alquist- Priolo Special
Study Zone in the very southern tip of the City. Some ground shaking would be experienced during seismic activity. -
However, the implementation of the goals and policies of the housing element will have no effect on increasing the -
probability of an earthquake occurring.
D. Rater. Rosemead is relatively flat located at the 400 -500 foot elevation level. There is no floodplain located - -
within the city and the entire city has been designated a flood zone "C'" per the Federal Emergency Management
Agency. Development of housing would increase the amount of impervious surface. However, existing improvements
are in place to control local flooding. Implementation of the housing element would not result in the alteration of any _
existing flood control improvements or require any additional improvements to be constructed.
E. Air Quality. The adoption of the housing element will not immediately affect the air quality in the area.
Implementation of specific projects would result in incremental impacts to air quality. Pollutants would occur from
temporary dust during development, traffic - related pollutants and other new stationary sources generated from the
increase in population.
It is difficult to evaluate potential air quality impacts because of the wide range of possible development scenarios.
The 1987 general plan EIR evaluates potential air quality impacts from the maximum development potential of
residential land uses under existing zoning. No changes are proposed for the existing zoning /land use in the draft
housing element. Therefore, the mitigation measures outlined in the general plan EIR are sufficient to address any
potential air quality impacts.
F. Transportation/Circulation. Rosemead is almost completely built out. The circulation system for the city has
developed over the years along with the growth of the city and surrounding San Gabriel Valley. Therefore, major
modifications to the overall system are not required. The existing system is compatible with he land use pattern and
intensity in most areas of the city.
The circulation element of the general plan provides guidelines for maintaining a satisfactory circulation system to
serve future land use. There are no changes to the land use proposed through the housing element. Therefore, the
existing policies would be sufficient to address additional development. However, the city should continue to monitor
and address changing demands and evaluate potential impacts of individual projects as they are brought forward.
G. Biological Resources. Plant species in the area are typical of what is found to exist within the City of Rosemead.
There are non - native trees that have been planted throughout the city as part of the landscaping plans. There are a
few oak trees located in the city. They are protected by a city ordinance. Any new development is required to work
around these trees or locate them within the city following strict guidelines. There is very limited agricultural uses
remaining in the city. No farms are located within the land use designations where housing would be developed under
the housing element.
There are no known rare or endangered species of animal that have been found to exist within the City of Rosemead.
No water bodies are located on or near the site that could create sensitive habitat for any rare or endangered species.
This city is mostly developed which would have disturbed and removed any native habitats.
H. Energy and Mineral Resources. The 1987 general plan EIR addresses potential impacts based on the land use
designations. Increases in the use of resources may result over time as development occurs. Potential water
consumption and sewage generation is outlined in the 1987 EIR. All new homes are required to be developed with
conservation devices such as low flush toilets and energy conserving appliances. There are no known mineral
resources located within the City of Rosemead. The mitigation measures noted in the EIR are sufficient to address
potential impacts.
I. Hazards. The site is located in an urban area. Residential uses are not related to having hazardous materials.
The fire department has set a minimum fire flow for development and reviews projects on a case -by -case basis. If
the nearby fire hydrants do not meet the minimum flow, the developer is required to upgrade the hydrant to the
satisfaction of the fire department.
J. Noise: The noise element of the general plan addresses noise as the city develops. This housing element does
not change any land use or density. Potential impacts of noise are addressed in the EIR for the general plan.
Therefore, the only potential noise impact will occur during construction. Construction activities are limited under
Section 4310 of the Rosemead Municipal Code.
Initial Environmental Study Page 11 of 12
Casc No. GPA 95 -02
K. Public Services. Public services ;;'' adequate to support the existing anc oposed development. No potential
impacts will occur to public services.
L. Utilities and Service Systems. All utilities are existing. These utilities have been upgraded over time to support
development. Existing facilities are sufficient to support the existing and proposed development. All utilities for new
development will be placed underground.
M. Aesthetics. The city is relatively flat. There are no significant physical features that could be impacted. Most
of the development would be recycling or infill type of development. The housing element will have no impact to
any significant views or features.
N. Cultural Resources. There are no cultural or historical resources on or new this site which could be impacted
by this development. Previous development around the city have disturbed any such resources. There are no potential
impacts.
O. Recreation. Rosemead is an urban area. Park land has been developed for the residents of Rosemead. There
is a need for open space on a citywide basis. Increases in population will increase the demand for park area.
Rosemead has implemented the Quimby Act which allows the city to receive development fees for park expansion and
improvements. Therefore, the potential impact is mitigated as it occurs through these fees.
M. CONCLUSION
General Plan Amendment 95 -02 is a State mandatory update of the city's housing element. The housing element has
been drafted to address the State planning period from 1989 -1996. In 1987, the city updated the entire generla plan
and prepared an environmental impact report (EIR) to address potential impacts. No changes are proposed to land
use or density through this amendment. Therefore, the potential impacts that would result from new housing
development have been adequately mitigated through the adopted EIR. No new impacts are found to occur as a result
of General Plan Amendment 95 -02. Therefore, a Negative Declaration shall be adopted.
IV. SOURCE LIST
1. Rosemead Municipal Code Adopted 1959, as amended.
2. Rosemead General Plan Cotton /Beland /Associates, Inc., 1987.
3. Rosemead General Plan; Final Environmental Impact Report Cotton /Beland /Associates, Inc., 1987.
4. California Environmental Quality Act Statute and Guidelines Governor's Office of Planning and
Research, 1992 (with amendments through July, 1994).
Inival Eoviroumeatal Study Page 12 of 12
Case No. GPA 95 -02
PC RESOLUTION 95 -45
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN -
AMENDMENT 95 -02, AMENDING THE HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE
ROSEMEAD GENERAL PLAN FOR THE 1989 -1996 PLANNING PERIOD.
WHEREAS, the Rosemead Planning Department has completed a draft housing element
to meet the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) for the 1989 -1996 planning period;
and
WHEREAS, the proposed draft uses vacant and underutilized properties with existing
land use densities to meet the housing needs for all income levels; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to promote adequate housing for various income
levels; and
WHEREAS, on September 25, 1995, an initial study for General Plan Amendment 95 -02
was completed; and
WHEREAS, on September 28, 1995, ten (10) notices were posted in public areas plus
on October 2, 1995, a notice was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune noticing the
public comment period and the time and place for a public hearing pursuant to California
Government Code Section 65091(a)(3); and
WHEREAS, on November 6, 1995, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to
receive testimony relative to General Plan Amendment 95 -02; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has sufficiently considered all testimony presented
to make the following determination.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City
of Rosemead as follows:
Sec tion 1. The Planning Commission HEREBY DETERMINES that a Negative
Declaration shall be adopted. An initial study was completed to analyze potential environmental
impacts pursuant to the California - Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This study found that
there would be no potential environmental impacts. The initial study for General plan
Amendment 95 -02 are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
S ection 2. The Planning Commission HEREBY FINDS that the proposed amendment
is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City. Section 65588(e) requires local
governments within the regional jurisdiction of the Southern California Association of
Governments to revise their elements by June 30, 1989. The next cycle is scheduled to begin
July 1, 1996, but HCD has stated their intent to extend this deadline to 1997. Therefore, this
element is designed to complete the process and meet the requirement of Section 65588 for the
planning period starting July 1, 1989.
This review evaluates the appropriateness, effectiveness and progress in implementation of the
previous element (1987) pursuant to Section 65588. The development of housing relates directly
to the standards contained within the land use element as to density, location, and development
standards. Projected housing developments must be achieved within the limitations set forth by
both land use and housing elements. Therefore, the two elements support one another in the
common goal of achieving quality development. Similar relationships exist between all elements
of the general plan.
The Element provides analysis to meet the Regional Housing Needs Assessment as set by the
regional council of governments. This analysis finds that Rosemead is able to meet its share of
the regional needs through the infill and recycling of lots and using existing densities.
J �
Resolution No. 95 -45
General Plan Amendment 95 -02 ..
Page 2 of 3
Sect ion 3. The Planning Commission HEREBY RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of
General Plan Amendment No. 95 -02, amending the housing element of the Rosemead General
Plan for the 1989 -1996 planning period.
S ection 4. This action shall become final and effective ten (10) days after this decision
by the Planning Commission, unless within such time a written appeal is filed with the City
Clerk for consideration by the Rosemead City Council as provided in the Zoning Ordinance. - -
Sect ion 5. This resolution is the result of an action taken by the Planning Commission
on November 6, 1995, by the following vote:
YES: LOI, LOWREY, RUIZ, BREEN, ORTIZ
NO: NONE -
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
Section 6 . The secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall
transmit copies of same to the applicant and Rosemead City Clerk.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this 20th day of November, 1995. -
RUIZ, IRMAN _
s.
Resolution No. 95 -45
General Plan Amendment 95 -02
Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a resolution adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rosemead at its regular meeting, held on the 20th day of November,
1995, by the following vote:
YES: LOI, LOWREY, RUIZ, BREEN, ORTIZ
NO: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
N
DON LD . WA R, SECRETARY
1,
Housing Element
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1.0 Introduction
1.1
Purpose and Intent
H -1
1.2
Organization of the Element
H -1
1.3
Relationship to Other General Plan Elements
H -2
1.4
Public Participation
H -2
1.5
Summary of Issues and Opportunities
H -3
2.0 Proposals
2.1 Summary of Housing Need
2.1.1
Regional Housing
H -5
2.1.2
Substandard Housing
H -6
2.1.3
Affordable Housing
H -6
2.1.4
Special Housing
H -6
2.2 Constraints to Housing Production
2.2.1
Market Constraints
H -7
2.2.2
Government Constraints
H -9
2.2.3
Infrastructure Constraints
H -10
2.2.4
Environmental Constraints
H -11
2.3 Housing
Opportunities
2.3.1
Identification of Adequate Sites
H -11
2.3.2
Development Strategies
H -13
2.3.3
Public Services and Facilities
H -14
2.3.4
At -Risk Units
H -17
2.3.5
Development Potential Summary
H -17
2.4 Housing
Program
2.4.1
Preservation and Enhancement of Existing Housing Stock
H -18
2.4.2
Production of Affordable Housing
H -20
2.4.3
Rental Assistance
H -23
2.4.4
Increased Home - Ownership Opportunities
H -24
2.4.5
Equal Housing Opportunity
H -26
3.0 Goals and Policies
H -27
Appendices-
Appendix A Residential Site Inventory (Exhibit II)
Appendix B At -Risk Unit Checklist (Exhibit III)
Appendix C Citizen Comments
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE
BETWEEN PAGES
H -1
State Requirements for Housing Elements
H -1 & H -2
H -2
Housing Need Summary
H -5 & H -6
H -3
Fees for Residential Construction
H -10 & H -11
H -4
Development Processing Time
H -11 & H -12
H -5
Site Inventory for Residential Development
H -12 & H -13
H -6
Monthly Rental Rates
H -13
H -7
Quantified Objectives by Income Category
H -18
H -8
Housing Programs Summary
H -18 & H -19
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE BETWEEN PAGES
H -1 Potential Residential Sites H -12 & H -13
H -2 Illustration of Flag Lot Subdivision H -13 & H -14
Rosemead General Plan Ho"°ng Dement
1.0
1.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT
Local government is required under State law to create and maintain a housing element. The
purpose of such an element is to: 1) provide a framework for responding to locally identified
housing needs, and 2) fulfill the statutory and regulatory requirements of the State of California.
Section 65583 of the California Government Code defines a housing element as follows:
"The housing element shall consist of an identification and analysis of existing and
projected housing needs and a statement of goals, policies, quantified objectives,
and scheduled programs for the preservation, improvement, and development of
housing. The housing element shall identify adequate sites for housing and mobile
homes, and shall make adequate provisions for the existing and projected needs of
all economic segments of the community."
Further defining this element, the Legislature has found and declared:
Available housing and a suitable living environment for every California family is
a vital statewide priority of highest importance.
Reaching the State's housing goals requires cooperative participation between
government and the private sector in an effort to expand housing opportunities to
all economic levels.
Each local government has the responsibility to consider economic, environmental
and fiscal impacts along with the community's goals and to cooperate with other
local governments and the State to address regional housing needs.
Providing affordable housing is the responsibility of State and local government
which requires the cooperation of all levels of government.
The intent with this housing element is to address Rosemead's housing goals and to comply with
these findings and the requirements of Article 10.6 of the California Government Code. Specific
State requirements concerning the preparation and content of housing elements are summarized
in Table H -1. The sections of Rosemead's element that contain this information are also
indicated.
1.2 ORGANIZATION OF THE ELEMENT
State law sets specific direction of local housing elements. They limit the types of analysis used
to assess existing and projected housing needs. In addition, laws specify the nature of the
community housing goals and the detail required in their objectives and policies. Finally, the
State specifies the content and effect of programs that are identified to implement the element.
Rosemead's Housing Element has been completed in the following format:
H -1 June, 1996
S�
ON
TABLE H -1
STATE REQUIREMENTS FOR HOUSING ELEMENTS
HOUSING ELEMENT COMP ONENT I REFERENCE
A. HoucinL Nee Assessment
1. Analysis of population trends in Rosemead I Background Report
Section II
2. Analysis of employment trends in Rosemead I Background Report
Section VII
3. Projection and quantification of Rosemead's existing and Housing Element
projected housing needs for all income groups
4. Analysis and documentation of Rosemead's housing
characteristics including the following:
a. level of housing cost compared to ability to pay; I Background Report
Section II
b. overcrowding; I Background Report
Section II
c. housing stock condition. I Background Report
Section II
5. An inventory of land suitable for residential development Land Use Element
including vacant sites and sites having redevelopment potential Housing Element
and an analysis of the relationship of zoning, public facilities
and services to these sites
6. Analysis of existing and potential governmental constraints I Housing Element
upon the maintenance, improvement, or development of housing
for all income levels
T Analysis of existing and potential non - governmental (private I Housing Element'
sector) constraints upon maintenance, improvement, or
development of housing for all income levels
8. Analysis of special housing needs (handicapped, elderly, large Background Report
families, farmworkers, and female - beaded households Section II
TABLE H -1
(Continued)
REQUIRED HOUSING ELEMENT COMPONENT
REFERENCE
9. Analysis concerning the number of homeless persons in
Background Report
Rosemead
Section II
Housing Element
10. Analysis of opportunities for energy conservation with
respect to residential development
B. Goals. Objectives. and Polici s
1. Identification of the City of Rosemead's community goals
Housing Element
relative to maintenance, improvement, and development of
Goals and Policies
housing
2. Quantified objectives and policies relative to the maintenance,
Housing Element
improvement, and development of housing in Rosemead
Goals and Policies
C. Implementation Program
An implementation program should do the following:
1. Idem adequate sites which will be made available through
Housing Element
appropriate action with required public services and facilities
for a variety of housing types for all income levels
2. Program to assist in the development of adequate housing to
Housing Element
meet the needs of low and moderate income households
3. Identify and, when appropriate and possible, remove
Housing Element
governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and
development of housing in Rosemead
Housing Element
4. Conserve and improve the condition of the existing affordable
housing stock in Rosemead
Rosemead General Plan Hoasing Element
1. Assessment of existing conditions and future needs. Review of the existing
housing stock condition, it characteristics, the population and employment
projections.
2. Inventory of available resources and development constraints (eg. land supply,
zoning, public services and facilities, local procedures, housing costs, etc).
3. Programs for implementation during the planning period of 1989 -1994, extended
to 1998. Set forth a schedule of actions which the City of Rosemead intends to
undertake in order to meet their goals.
4. Statement of community goals, objectives and policies. Set the priorities and
criteria for housing development, maintenance and improvement.
1.3 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER GENERAL PLAN ELEMENTS
The Rosemead General Plan is comprised of seven (7) elements, including a housing element.
State law requires all of the elements to be internally consistent. A comprehensive revision of the
entire general plan was completed in 1987.
A housing element was completed with the 1987 revision and is now being updated for the 1989-
1994 (extended to 1998) planning period. Rosemead's Housing Element had received preliminary
approval from the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).
However, the final comments were not incorporated and the element was never adopted by the
City Council.
Section 65588(e) required local governments within the regional jurisdiction of the Southern
California Association of Governments to revise their housing elements by June 30, 1989. The
next cycle was scheduled to begin July 1, 1994, but the State extended this deadline to 1998.
Therefore, this element is designed to complete the process and meet the requirement of Section
65588 for the planning period starting July 1, 1989.
This review shall evaluate the appropriateness, effectiveness and progress in implementation of
the previous element (1987) pursuant to Section 65588. The development of housing relates
directly to the standards contained within the land use element as to density, location, and
development standards. Projected housing developments must be achieved within the limitations
set forth by both land use and housing elements. Therefore, the two elements support one another
in the common goal of achieving quality development. Similar relationships exist between all
elements of the general plan.
1.4 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Rosemead completed a comprehensive general plan update, including the housing element, in
1987. This housing element update builds upon the issues, goals and policies developed as part
of the 1987 plan. Section 65583 requires local governments to make a diligent effort to achieve
H -2 June,1996
Rosemead General Plan Housing Element
public participation from all economic segments of the community in the development of the
housing element. The element is required to describe this effort.
Rosemead will follow the following participation process for the housing element update:
All public hearings are advertised in the local newspaper, with notices mailed to
interested citizens and local community groups. A summary of the housing
element will be published on in one or more local general circulation newspaper(s).
This summary will include; the purpose of the housing element, goals and actions,
and the location(s) of the full document.
Notices are also posted in ten public places around the City including post offices,
community centers, library, Chamber of Commerce, plus major supermarkets and
banks. Copies of the housing element will be made available for review at
appropriate public places, including the library and the Planning Department.
Citizens will have at least 30 days to review the draft housing element. A
summary of all citizen comments will be incorporated into the element as Appendix
C.
Large type and sign language services will be provided at the public hearing if
requested. Translation services for spanish and asian languages are available at all
meetings.
Reasonable efforts will be made to directly notify homeless advocates and housing
related non - profit groups, neighborhood organizations, and other interested parties.
Public participation on the update is provided in the form of public hearings. Rosemead's
Planning Commission will hold a hearing on the element following its preparation by staff and
initial review by the California Department of Housing and Community Development. A
recommendation of the Planning Commission will then be forwarded to the City Council for
consideration at another public hearing. The City Council will formally adopt the final draft of
the element once the public hearings and related reviews are completed.
1.5 SUMMARY OF ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES
Analysis of existing demographic and housing characteristics in the City of Rosemead identified
the following trends:
Increase of Young Adults (20 -29 years) which are in the family formation age.
Ethnic Composition change; Increase in the Asian population and decreases in
Hispanic and White populations.
H -3 June,1996
Rosemead General Plan Housing Dement
Increase in Elderly households (over 65). In addition, there is a continued
predominance of family households, including large families.
For -Sale and Rental Housing Costs in Rosemead are one of the lowest in the
region. However, Household Incomes are also low in comparison to the region.
Increase of Multi- Family Units. However, single family housing accounts for
three- quarters of the total housing stock.
Approximately 19% of the Housing Stock is in need of Repair or Replacement.
Low Vacancy Rate... particularly for rental units.
H4 June,'1996
Rosemead General Plan Haismg Dement
2.1 SUMMARY OF HOUSING NEEDS
Rosemead has a goal to ensure that all social and economic segments of the community have
adequate housing to meet present and future needs. Therefore, the City targets its housing and
assistance programs towards those households with the greatest need. There are four major
categories defined by Federal and State law which determine housing needs that result from:
- Regional Housing; increased population growth,
- Substandard Housing; deterioration of existing units,
- Affordable Housing; households paying more than they can afford for housing, and
- Special Housing; special needs such as large families or female- headed households.
2.1.1 Re¢ianal Hnnsing; Rosemead's resident population has increased 12- percent since 1980.
This growth can be attributed to an increase in the average household size and the addition of new
housing units to the housing stock. The City has also experienced a net increase of 634 housing
units since the 1980 Census.
Population growth during the planning period will be attributed to two primary factors: 1) in-
migration attracted to the City by new housing opportunities; and 2) increased household size due
to natural increases in the population and demographic trends. These trends favor younger
families with greater numbers of dependant children. Rosemead expects population growth from
an increase in household size rather than number of housing units because the City is largely built -
out.
The average household size in Rosemead increased about 0.23 persons per household since 1980
(from 3.191 in 1980 to an estimated 3.409 in 1989). This increase is significant because it
represents a departure from nationwide trends of a decreasing household size. Demographic data
for Hispanic and Asian communities in Los Angeles County, such as Rosemead, indicate that
household sizes will continue to increase as greater numbers of immigrants settle in the
metropolitan Los Angeles area.
Rosemead will continue to provide additional single and multiple family housing units for all
income groups to fulfill its share of the growing demand for housing in the Southern California
Association of Government (SCAG) region. SCAG's 1988 Regional Housing Needs Assessment
(RHNA) sets forth 1989 -1994 housing needs for the City of Rosemead. It estimates that 773
units will need to be added to the City's share of regional housing needs. Table H -2 shows how
these units should be distributed among various income groups.
H -5 June, 1996
is
I
TABLE H -2
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
HOUSING NEEDS SUMMARY
SCAG Regional Housing Needs Assessment
1981 Housing Conditions Survey
Note: Special needs figures cannot be totaled because categories are not exclusive of one
another.
INCOME LEVEL
HOUSING NEED
TOTAL
VERY LOW
INCOME
LOW
INCOME
MODERATE
INCOME
UPPER
INCOME
Household Growth:
1989 -1994
773
(100.0%)
138
(17.9%)
182
(235%)
160
(20.7%)
293
(37.9%x)
Substandard (1959)
Total
1626
(18.4 %x)
Suitable for
2,369
Rehabilitation
(16.6 %)
Overpaying (1988)
Total
2,940
2,009
931
Renters
2,243
1,549
695
Owner
698
461
237
Special Needs (1989)
Elderly
2,523
Handicapped
1,874
Large Households
2,123
Overcrowded
2,400
Female Head
1,861
Farmworkers
316
(1980)
SCAG Regional Housing Needs Assessment
1981 Housing Conditions Survey
Note: Special needs figures cannot be totaled because categories are not exclusive of one
another.
Rosemead General Plan lim4ngFl rl
2.1.2 Substandard Hnnsing: A housing condition survey was conducted by the Rosemead
Planning Department in 1981. This survey identified 16.6 - percent of the housing stock as being
in "poor" condition (i.e., units showing signs of deterioration). In addition, 1.8- percent of the
housing stock was identified as "blighted" (i.e., units requiring substantial investment of $12,000
or more to make the necessary repairs). The proportion of deteriorating units is greatest in the
southwest quadrant of the City (Planning Area 5), with over 35- percent of the housing identified
as being in "poor" condition.
Nearly 70- percent of the housing in Rosemead was constructed prior to 1960. Since 1980, 1822
new housing units have been constructed. This accounts for approximately 13- percent of the total
housing stock in the City. The population grew by 16.4 - percent during the same 19 -year period.
This indicates that the housing supply is falling short of the City's population gains.
An increasing household size helps to confirm this point. This increase in population, compared
to new housing, would appear to indicate that the number of overcrowded households is
increasing. The City notes that overcrowding can result in accelerated rates of deterioration in
the affected units. However, extended families with larger unit sizes have become more common
in the Asian and Hispanic cultures. This would more likely account for this difference.
2.1.3 Affnrdahle Hosing: A national standard was adopted by the Federal Government to
identify households with housing costs greater than the household can afford. This standard states
that a household paying more than 30- percent of its gross monthly income for housing may be
paying more than it can afford. It assumes that any additional funds used for housing will result
in less money available for other necessities such as food, clothing and health care.
The 1988 SCAG -RHNA indicates that 48- percent (2,940) of lower income households are paying
more than 30- percent of their gross monthly income for housing. Renters comprise 76- percent
(2,243) of these lower income households. Low income renters are particularly vulnerable to the
effects of rising housing costs. This is because low income wages generally do not increase in
proportion to increases in the cost of living.
2.1.4 Special Housing; Housing element legislation requires a housing element to include an
analysis of special housing needs. This includes groups such as disabled, large families and
overcrowded households and farm workers. Additionally, discussion of persons and families in
need of emergency shelter must be included.
Disabled; The housing needs analysis contained in the Background Report (Section II) estimates
that there were 1,874 handicapped persons in Rosemead in 1989. There were also 2,523
households where the head of household was 65 -years of age or older. Many of these households
fall into both categories.
Overcrowded An estimated 15- percent (2,123) of the City's total households had five or more
family members in 1989. In addition, the 1980 Census reported that 18- percent (2,400) were
overcrowded households. An overcrowded household is defined as having more than 1.01 persons
per room.
H -6 June, 1996
Rosemead General Plan Housing Dement
Rosemead has a high population ratio of minority groups, primarily Asian and Hispanic. These
groups have been argued to have high numbers of undocumented laborers. Rising housing costs
and low incomes are typical of undocumented residents. This, along with varying cultural
traditions, has been found to result in several families or large extended families sharing individual
units. Therefore, the overcrowding figures may not be accurate since the U.S. Census did not
address the demographic impact resulting from illegal immigration.
Homeless Los Angeles County Sheriff Department supplies the law enforcement service for the
City of Rosemead. The Sheriff s Department estimates that there are 15 homeless persons within
Rosemead's jurisdiction. These homeless consist predominately of single, males, 40 -years of age
and older, often with alcohol and /or drug dependencies. This population generally congregates
in the areas of Zapopan Park, and to a lesser degree, Garvey Park.
Fmergency Shelters There are no overnight homeless shelters in the immediate Rosemead
vicinity. However, several shelters that provide overnight lodging are located in Pasadena. These
shelters include Union Station, Rosemary Cottage, Haven House, and Door of Hope. A technical
description of these shelters can be found in Table 13 of the Technical Data Report. Housing
element policy requires cities to provide a Zoning Ordinance that allows the development of
emergency shelters in locations close to services.
Farm Workers Less than 2- percent (316) of the employed labor force works in "farm worker"
occupations (farming, forestry, or fishing). Housing demand generated by these farm workers
is extremely low, if not non- existent. Therefore, housing needs for farm workers can be
addressed through overall programs aimed at affordable housing.
2.2 CONSTRAINTS TO HOUSING PRODUCTION
Actual or potential constraints on the provision and cost of housing can affect the development of
new housing and the maintenance of existing units for all income levels. Four potential areas of
constraints to housing development (market, governmental, infrastructure and environmental) are
discussed in the following sections.
2.2.1 Market Constraints: Increasing construction costs, labor costs, land costs plus market
financing constraints all contribute to decreasing availability of affordable housing. These market
constraints create increasingly higher costs for renting or buying a home in the City of Rosemead.
Construction Co= The cost of building materials is the single largest cost associated with
building a new house. This cost comprises between 40- and 50- percent of the sale price of a
home. Construction costs rose over 30- percent between 1980 and 1988. The rising cost of energy
was a significant factor in this increase.
Market prices of wood fluctuate throughout the year depending on availability. A wood frame,
single family residence of average to good quality will range from $40 to $55 per square foot.
Custom homes, and units with extra amenities, average a somewhat higher cost. Costs for a wood
H -7 June, 1996
Rosemead General Plan Hoavng Bement
frame, multi - family development averages around $42 per square foot. This cost does not
including the cost for developing the parking area.
Sales prices can be reduced by providing fewer amenities and /or reducing the quality of building
materials. In addition, pre - fabricated, factory built housing has been improving in quality. These
structures reduce costs by reducing construction and labor costs.
Construction costs can also be reduced by increasing the number of units built at the same time.
This is because the capital improvement costs are spread out over the entire project. Therefore,
allowing density bonuses can reduce housing costs when developing affordable housing.
Land; Land costs include costs for the raw land, off -site improvements, and all of the costs
associated with obtaining government approvals. Rosemead is located in an urbanized area with
a limited supply of land that can be developed. Therefore, this cost can include the demolition
costs to remove old structures. This has accounted for a steady increase in raw land costs.
A local developer in Rosemead noted that residential land costs average;
$12 -$16 per square foot for a Low Density Residential designation, and
$30 -$40 per square foot for Medium to High Density Residential designations.
The escalating market price of land will tend to encourage more higher priced development if left
alone. Changing the zoning to a higher density will help to reduce the cost per unit of land.
However, land zoned for higher densities will demand a higher market price. Therefore, density
bonuses may be a more effective vehicle for reducing land costs.
Iahnr _Costs- Labor is the third most expensive component in building a house. It constitutes an
estimated 17- percent of the cost of building a single family dwelling. Union labor costs in the
construction industry has increased steadily since April, 1974. Non -union labor has not
experienced such significant increases during this same period. Therefore, more non -union
employees are hired as construction activity increases. This means that the labor costs are reduced
as construction activity increases.
Financing; Interest rates have fallen more than 10- percent from nearly a 20- percent high in the
early 1980's. However, they still have a substantial impact on housing costs that is felt by renters,
purchasers and developers. The most conventional type of financing now available is a variable
rate. This situation will cause many existing households to become overextended financially if
the lending institution raises its rates. We will return to a situation where high financing costs
substantially constrain the housing market if this occurs.
First -time home buyers face an additional obstacle with a high down payment. Lending
institutions require between 10- and 20- percent as a down payment. The median sale price of a
2- bedroom, single family home in Rosemead was $177,993 in 1989. This equates to a buyer
needing at least $18,000 in cash to enter into a purchase.
H -8 June, 1996
Rosemead General Plan Housing Element
In addition, the level of monthly house payments eliminates Rosemead's very-low, low and
moderate income households from purchasing housing. A $160,193 mortgage, amortized over
30 years at a rate of 10.5- percent, would result in a monthly mortgage payment of $1,465. This
does not even include property taxes and insurance costs that are also required.
Condominiums can offer more affordable home ownership opportunities for moderate income
households. However, they are in much shorter supply than single family homes in Rosemead.
Local government has little control over interest rates. Rates are determined by national policies
and economic conditions. However, there are a couple types of programs that can assist a home
buyer. First, jurisdictions can offer interest rate write -downs to extend home purchase
opportunities to lower income households. Also, government insured loan programs may be
available to reduce mortgage down payment requirements.
Residential financing appears to be generally available in Rosemead, and interest rates do not vary
significantly from surrounding areas. This is based on the evidence of construction activity
throughout the City. 'In addition, there is no evidence of any mortgage deficient areas for new
construction or rehabilitation loans.
2.2.2 Government Constraints: Housing affordability can be affected by factors in both the
private and public sectors. Actions by the City can have an impact on the price and availability
of housing. Land use controls, site improvement requirements, building codes, fees and other
local programs intended to improve the quality of housing, may serve as a constraint to housing
development.
land ilse Controls There is a full range of types of residential land use designations dispersed
throughout the City. Densities range from Low Density Residential (0 -7 units per acre) to High
Density Residential allowing up to 30 units per acre. A Residential /Commercial mixed use
designation is designed to encourage residential infill of up to 14 units per acre along some of
Rosemead's lesser intense commercial areas. The City helps to facilitate the development of
affordable, single family housing by allowing flag lot subdivisions.
Much of the land designated for residential development is already built out. Additional
residential development can be accommodated through several means, including development of
vacant /underutilized land, redevelopment areas, and in areas designated for residential/
commercial mixed use. Up to 795 dwelling units could be developed based on the potential
development from these sources. SCAG has estimated a future housing need in Rosemead of 773
new units through the year 1996.
This plan provides adequate development capacity to meet this future housing demand. Therefore,
it cannot be considered a constraint to providing affordable housing. In addition, areas, have been
designated for higher density and senior citizen housing above 25 units per acre. This would
allow up to 514 units that can be priced to meet the needs of various income households.
H -9 June, 1996
Rosemead General Plan Housing Element
Fees and improvements; Table H -3 lists the types of fees that the City levies for new residential
development or improvements to existing units. The greatest expense results from plan check and
building permit fees. For example, a developer with a project having an assessed valuation of
$100,000 is required to pay a plan check fee of $583.20 and a building permit fee of $729.00.
Rosemead has not increased its development fees in over three (3) years. These fees are generally
lower than other Southern California jurisdictions. However, development fees do contribute to
the cost of housing and may constrain the ability to develop lower priced units. Rosemead could
waive or subsidize certain fees for the provision of lower income and /or senior housing.
Building Codes and Enforcement Rosemead adopted the Los Angeles County version of the
Uniform Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Fire Codes. However, the City has not adopted
a fire sprinkler ordinance. These codes are considered to be the minimum necessary to protect
the public health, safety and welfare.
Local enforcement of these codes does not add significantly to the cost of housing. Different
standards are required for single family versus multi - family developments. For example, single
family uses require two (2) garage spaces per unit. A multi- family use requires two (2) spaces
per unit, plus one (1) guest space for every two (2) units. In addition, all residential developments
are required to landscape front and street side yards with predominately plant materials except the
area(s) necessary for allowable driveways, walkways and fences.
i oral Proreccing and Permit Procedures; Developer's costs of holding property are ultimately
added into the selling price of housing units. Evaluation and review processes required by the
City can contribute to these costs.
Rosemead is governed by two (2) decision - making bodies, the Planning Commission and the City
Council. There are no separate boards such as design review to review development proposals.
This helps to minimize a project's review time. Table H-4 outlines approximate processing times.
Rosemead's processing times have been found to compare favorably with neighboring
jurisdictions.
2.2.3 Infrastntcture Constraints: Water and sewer services are the major infrastructure
constraints to housing production in Rosemead.
Water. Water services are provided by six (6) purveyors in the City of Rosemead. These
agencies have varying abilities to maintain and upgrade their systems to meet current and projected
demands. Large portions of western and central Rosemead are deficient in water and /or fire flow
capacity. In addition, major capital expenditures will be required to replace deteriorating or
substandard water mains in portions of the City.
Suer. The existing system is considered to be adequate with minimal growth and a stable land
use policy. However, this system is incapable of handling significant increases in development
without major capital improvements to upgrade the system.
H -10 June, 1996
TABLE H -3
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
FEES FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION
FEE
CHARGE
COMMENTS
1. Conditional Use Permit
Additional charges for radius map
$ 875.00
preparation and projects requiring initial
studies and negative declaration.
2. Variance
Additional charges for radius map
$ 975.00
preparation and projects requiring initial
studies and negative declaration.
3. Zone Change
Additional charges for radius map
$1,050.0
preparation and projects requiring initial
studies and negative declaration.
4. Radius Map Preparation
Developer
Responsible
5. Initial Study and
$ 300.00
Negative Declaration
6. Environmental Impact
$2,900.00
Various - EIR preparation is subcontracted.
Review
7. Relocations
$1,500.00
Mobile Home Parks.
8. Design Review
$ 390.00
9. Appeal to City Council
$ 337.501
$300 .Hearing + $37.50 Filing
10. Tentative Parcel Map
.$1,385 - 0
One parcel only + $100 /Parcel
11. Building Permit Fee
10 percent more than plan check fee.
12. Plan Check Fee
Based on square footage.
13. Issuance Fee
$ 25.65
Source: City 01 Rosemead Flannmg Department.
Rosemead General Plan Ho nang Element
There is one deficient sewer line located in the southwestern portion of the City. The line begins
at the intersection of Emerson Place and Del Mar Avenue and extends east approximately 1,000
feet on Emerson Place. A 12 -inch line will need to be replaced with a 15 -inch line to remedy this
deficiency.
2.2.4 Environmental Constraints: Rosemead is a city that is entirely built out. There are no
environmentally sensitive areas remaining. The local topography generally does not represent a
constraint to housing production. Other environmental factors that will be discussed include
flooding and seismic hazards plus noise.
Flooding Hazards A flood insurance study conducted in 1978 concluded that flooding from a 10-
year storm would be limited to street rights -of -way. This flooding was not mappable as a special
flood hazard as defined by the Federal Insurance Administration.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) declared Rosemead to be entirely in a
"Zone C ", meaning flood insurance is not mandatory, on April 15, 1979. Therefore, FEMA has
rescinded the community panel flood map. In addition, no flooding is expected due to dam or
levee failure, and Rosemead's inland location eliminates the possibility of a tsunami or seiche.
The Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD) identified 22 acres within the City
that are deficient in storm drain capacity. No programs currently exist at either the LACFCD or
the City to remedy this situation.
Seismic Hamrdc; A small area of the southern portion of the City is located in an Alquist- Priolo
Special Studies Zone. The City has mapped and notifies potential developers in this area of this
situation. Property located in this area are susceptible to additional costs for soils reports and
increased seismic reinforcement.
Liquefaction may be a problem in the extreme southern portion of the City adjacent to Whittier
Narrows Recreation Area. In addition, older structures that have not been constructed or
reinforced to meet earthquake standards could experience damage.
Nnis .• Residential land uses are considered the most sensitive to loud noise. Development near
major noise generators requires special considerations concerning noise blocking, diversion, and
reduction which could add to the cost of development. Major noise generators located in
Rosemead are the railroads, the I -10 Freeway, and vehicle traffic on local roadways.
2.3 HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES
2.3.1 Identification of Adequate Sites- A community's sites are considered adequate if they
provide realistic development capacity at appropriate densities to accommodate projected
construction needs for all income levels. The projected construction need is defined by the
regional share. Table H -5 provides a summary of Rosemead's residential dwelling unit potential.
H -11 June, 1996
TABLE H4
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING TIME
TYPE OF PROCESS
TIME
REVIE)VING BODY
Design Review
2 months
Planning Staff & Commission
Plan Check /Building Permits
6 weeks
Planning Staff & Building
Conditional Use Permit
2 months
Planning Commission
Variance
2 months
Planing Commission
Tentative Parcels
4 months
Planning Commission
EIRs
6 months
Planning Commission & Council
General Plan Amendment with EIR
6 -12 months
Planning Commission & Council
Zone Change with EIR
6 -12 months
Planning Commission & Council
Source: Rosemead Planning Department;
Cotton /Beland /Associates, Inc.
Rosemead General Plan Haimg Dement
ITnden,tilized Sites; Rosemead is an older community with its residential neighborhoods virtually
all built out. There are no large, vacant tracts of land remaining, but there are 36 individual
vacant lots plus various underutilized lots scattered throughout the City. Figure H -1 generally
depicts the location of these lots.
Rosemead is required to accommodate 342 (182 -low and 160- moderate income) units. There is
not sufficient vacant land to accommodate this need based on current zoning densities. However,
additional development is available on sites which are currently developed at densities lower than
what is allowed.
Appendix A (Exhibit 11) provides a detailed residential site inventory by zoning designation. This
inventory shows the number of potential additional dwelling units for underutilized sites.
Low and Moderate Income Households: There are seven sites in the R -3 or PO
zones where there are contiguous lots that are developed at less than half of their
permitted density. These lots range from 1 to 3.8 acres in size with an allowable
30 dwelling units per acre. The total development potential is 242 new units.
There are also 17 smaller sites with a development potential for up to 115
additional units. This would bring the total development potential up to 357 units.
Therefore, sufficient sites are available to meet the City's housing needs for the
various income groups.
Since July 1989, new multi- family developments have been the result of recycling.
All of these projects were built at or near the maximum allowed density. Almost
half (48- percent) were developed on lots in the PO zone with the balance on R -3
zoned lots.
A rental survey was completed for these new developments. The Survey found
that monthly rental rates for 2- bedroom and 3- bedroom units are below the Fair
Market Rent set by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
(HUD). A summary of this survey (Table H -6) indicates that it is possible to
produce new units that are affordable to low and moderate income households using
existing densities.
TABLE H -6
MONTHLY RENTAL RATES
I ►1 MONTHLY . ► u
2-Bedroom $750-$800 $ 804
•• $850-$895 11
Very Low Income Households: Rosemead has formed a Housing Development
Corporation (Authority). The City obtained voter approval for Article 34
H -12 June, 1996
Cl)
(D
z
CL
CL
0
-j
Li
ui
W -J
v) 2 :5
LU F-
( n Z
C) LU
LL Cl)
C) Lu
cr
0
U-
CC
0
F-
z
LLJ
Z
W
C o
CL
�E
0
o
to
'o
LO
O
E. 4
m
CL
(D 'I
r, - o
N
C' ,
'0
=3
M
pe
=3 0
0
0
C)
co
CO
cr)
co
-0 a
C\l
CD
0
Ln
Lo
Cl)
0
0
0
co
C\l
0
N
r..
cc
L)
cc
>
o
0
V)
Cl)
O Cl)
a)
0
0 ..
, U')
LO
a) co
0
z L) iz:
N
C,
0
0
U-
0-
co
(D
o
0
0
0
C\j
a)
iz E 65
co
m
co
0
CO
0
1
Lo
0)
0
cr)
n
CL m
>
O 0
co
cli
0
co
Cf)
Z
N
m
co
m
C\l
N
0)
E CL
0
-j
<
0
0
. vz
F-
0
0
C o
CL
�E
R -I single - family rni0ential
R -2 two - femily residential
R -3 medium density residential
R -4 high density residential
C -I light commercial
PS mIdiom commercial
CBD central business district
POD professional office district
P parking
P -D planned development
rl-1 light manufacturing
A -1 light agricultural
D -S open space
0 design overlay
Subdividable R -1 and R -2 Parcels
Subdividable R -3 Parcels
Residential /Commercial Mixed Use
Proposed Senior Housing
0 2700
rC� i�`f` North scale in eet
Figure H -1
Potential Residential Sites
SOURCE: City of Rosemead Zoning Map, October 1990, City of Rosemead Planning Department, October 1990.
Rosemead General Plan
authorization in November, 1991. This authorization will allow the Authority to
undertake the production of 200 units for senior housing. These units would be
developed on two sites owned by the Redevelopment Agency and leased to the
Authority.
Phase 1 consisted of a 50 -unit project located on Angelus Avenue that has been
completed and occupied. Phase 2 of the project will develop 150 units on Garvey
Avenue. This Phase will be in conjunction with a senior recreation center.
Planning of this project is scheduled to begin in 1997. These two projects will
more than accommodate the City's regional needs for 138 units of very low income
housing.
High Income Households: Rosemead's regional share of the need for high income
housing is 293 units. There have been a net increase of 65 new single family
homes built since July of 1989. Most of this construction has been in small "flag
lot" subdivisions. The flag lot configuration permits a greater number of units to
be accommodate on deep (220 -250 foot), R -1 and R -2 zoned lots. Figure H -2
illustrates the manner in which flag lots are allowed to develop.
Lots in these subdivisions typically have four bedrooms and are valued at up to
$380,000. The zoning code allows reduced interior lot sizes to help facilitate this
type of development. There are still sufficient vacant and underutilized lots zoned
R -1 and R -2 that would allow up to 130 additional homes as this trend continues.
Recent town house projects have demonstrated a market for very high quality
attached housing. Sufficient underutilized R -3 and PO zoned sites are available to
accommodate such town home development to meet the remaining 98 -unit regional
need.
Bement
2.3.2 Development Strategies; This housing element has demonstrated a lack of vacant land that
is available. The City is dependant on recycling lots for infill development. Therefore, the City
has developed various strategies to help increase the residential development capacity.
Minimum Den-it Rosemead's existing zoning code encourages efficient reuse of the land.
Permitted uses in the R -3 zone include multiple - family dwellings, apartment /condominium
complexes (defined as three or more units), boarding houses, and accessory structures. In
addition, nonconforming structures must be removed or modified so as to be incorporated as an
integral part of one harmonious and coordinated multi - family development.
Plan Approval* oval: Development of multiple dwellings in the R -3 and PO zones is permitted "by
right ". Developers are required to submit development plans showing conformity with the code.
These plans are reviewed by the Planning Department at no cost, and no special permits (ie.
conditional use permit) are required.
H -13 June, 1996
i
r
TWO LOT SUBDIVISION
65'
2
FLAG LOT
r
5000 SOFT. r
NET
15
LAIN.
- 1 I
CONVENTIONAL O
SOT N
.,i 6000 SO FT
NET
r - so V IN N1
STRE
T R/W
THREE LOT SUBDIVISION
6 8'
3
FLAG LOT v
r
5000 SO FT
NET
15 M.I�
3' MIN
=CCESS LEG
v 2
I
0
I
N
w`
FLAG LOT
o
NET
MIN.
v t
5000 SO FT,
L'l
W
W W
01
NET
u�
LX a
< w
<1
<1 w
15 M.I�
3' MIN
=CCESS LEG
e, EASEMENT
I
0
CCNVENTIONAL
N
LOT
6000 SO FT
NET
MIN.
STRFFT
R/W
sz
L'. W
L'A i
wi w
V L1
U <
<I w
FOUR LOT SUBDIVISION
76• 1
4
FLAG LOT m
5000 SOFT. �
NET
I ACCESS
EASEMENT
3
F L A G L OT 0
j 5000 SOFT. —
I NET
ACCESS
I EASEMENT
2 0
FLAG LOT o
5000 SO Fi.
i NET
ACCESS LE
9 EaSEMEN
I
-
CONVENTIONAL 0 1
?O 'AIN LOT
6000 SO FT
NET
3' MIN
50 MIN
ST REET
R/ W
SOURCE: Rosemead Municipal Code
(C I
Figure H -2
Illustration of Flag Lot Subdivision
Rosemead General Plan Housing Eement
Planned Development Zone; Single and Multiple family dwellings are permitted in the PD
overlay zone. Projects developed in the PD zone are designed to be approved in a similar manner
to a specific plan. Such plans may permit lot areas and yard areas that are less than required for
the residential zones under the zoning code.
Mancioni7minn Ordinance- Properties in the R -1 and R -2 zones are subject to an ordinance that
restricts the size of a home. Any dwelling that exceeds 2,500 square feet of developed living area
requires approval of a conditional use permit. This ordinance is intended to control the
development of extra large dwellings. The conditional use permit process provides an avenue for
construction of large upper income homes, but also creates a restriction that encourages low and
moderate income development.
Residential Mixed Ilse- The 1987 General Plan establishes a "Residential /Commercial Mixed
Use" in order to provide increased housing opportunities and to revitalize some of Rosemead's
lower intensity commercial corridors. This overlay district provides for Medium Density
Residential infill up to 14 units per acre along the commercial corridors where lots are not deep
enough to support major commercial development. There are 72 acres designated for
Residential /Commercial Mixed Use as identified in Figure H -1. Approximately 200 dwellings
can be achieved if residential infill projects are developed on 20- percent of this acreage.
Professional Office (PO) Zone; Rosemead's Zoning Code allows multi - family residential
development in areas designated for Professional Office (PO). This PO zone permits a density
of up to 30 units per acre. As a result, most of the recent development in the PO zone has been
for apartment construction.
City staff conducted an inventory of PO zoned properties with available development potential.
Appendix A lists 17 PO zoned sites that have development potential. These sites could produce
up to 135 additional dwelling units. Assuming a conservative 75- percent of these parcels are
developed with residential uses, approximately 100 units could be developed in the PO zone.
Development Incentives; Rosemead will notify the owners of underutilized parcels (Appendix A)
about incentives that are available. This should help to encourage recycling of these lots.
Such incentives include density bonus laws and below market -rate financing. Financing may be
available through the HOME program and multi - family mortgage revenue bond programs in the
future. Rosemead is an entitlement recipient of Community Development Block Grant funds since
the 1994 -95 Fiscal Year. In addition, it may be designated as a Participating Jurisdiction under
the HOME program. Housing production goals have been further defined in the Consolidated
Plan, adopted in August, 1995.
2.3.3 Ptthlir Services Facilities: Rosemead is a highly urbanized community. Public facilities
are available throughout the City to facilitate development. All of the land designated for
residential development is served by sewer lines, water lines, streets, storm drains, telephones,
electrical and gas lines. There are programs that are available through the agencies that service
the City which help to promote development.
H -14 June,1996
Rosemead General Plan liming Eke rjt
Energy Conservati= Section 65583(a)(7) states that housing elements shall include an analysis
of opportunities for energy conservation with respect to residential development. Residential
energy costs continue to rise in Rosemead. Increasing utility costs can reduce the affordability
of housing. The result is a negative impact to the City's current shortage of affordable units.
Rosemead has many opportunities to affect energy use within its jurisdiction. First of all there
is the required compliance with the Building Code and Title 24 of the California Administrative
Code relating to energy. Second, Rosemead's General Plan sets forth goals and policies which
encourage the conservation of non - renewable resources in concert with the use of alternative
energy sources to increase energy self - sufficiency.
Energy savings and utility bill reductions can be largely realized through the following energy
design standards:
Glazing; Glazing on the south facing exterior walls allows for winter sun rays to
warm the structure. One should avoid this technique on west facing walls to
prevent afternoon sun from overheating the unit.
Landscaping; Strategically placed vegetation can reduce the amount of direct
sunlight on the windows. Incorporating deciduous trees along the southern walls
reduces summer sun while allowing winter sun to warm the house.
Building Design; Roof overhangs above south facing windows shield the structure
from the summer sun.
Cooling /Heating Systems; Attic ventilation systems reduce attic temperatures
during the summer months. Solar heating systems for swimming pool facilities
saves on energy costs. Natural gas can be conserved by using flow restricting
devices on all hot water faucets and shower heads.
Weathetization Techniques; Weatherization techniques such as insulation, caulking,
and weatherstripping can reduce energy use for air - conditioning up to 55- percent
and for heating as much as 40- percent. Weatherization measures seal a dwelling unit to
guard against heat gain in the summer and prevent heat loss in the winter.
Efficient Use of Appliances; Each household contains a different mixture of
appliances. Appliances can be used in ways that increase their energy efficiency.
Unnecessary appliances can be eliminated. Proper maintenance and use of the
other appliances (stove, washer /dryer, dishwasher, etc.) can also reduce energy
consumption. The State prepares an energy efficiency rating list of air -
conditioning and refrigeration units that are on the market.
Efficient Use of Lighting; Costs of lighting a home can be reduced through
purchase of light bulbs which produce the most lumens per watt. Multi -bulb
H -15 June, 1996
Rosemead General Plan Haidng Element
fixtures and the use of long life bulbs or clock timers on security buildings should be
avoided.
Load Management; The time of day when power is used can be as important as
how much power is used. Power plants must have enough generating capacity to
meet the highest level of consumer demand for electricity. Peak demands for
electricity occur on summer afternoons. Therefore, reducing use of appliances
during these peak load hours can reduce the need for new power plants just to meet
unusually high power demands.
Customer Assistance Program; Southern California Edison (SCE) offers a variety of energy
conservation services under its Customer Assistance Programs (CAP). The 1989 budget allocated
for these programs was approximately $4.5 million. These services are designed to help low -
income citizens, senior citizens, permanently handicapped, and non - English speaking customers
control their energy use.
All CAP participants must meet the federally - established income guidelines. Unless otherwise
indicated, all services are available free -of- charge. An overview of available services follows:
No -cost Measures/Increased Rebates; Customers can receive evaporative coolers,
clock thermostats, and /or weatherization services based on Home Energy Survey
recommendations.
Relamping - Fluorescent Bulbs; County representatives install up to four low
energy, fluorescent bulbs to help customers lower the cost of meeting their basic
lighting needs.
Home Energy Survey; These are surveys performed by community based
organizations to identify personalized, cost - effective measures for the home.
Energy Practice Survey (EPS); EPS is offered in conjunction with the Home
Energy Survey and relamping services. It is for those who want to learn how
various household behaviors affect their energy costs. The EPS provides
personalized prescriptions (in several languages) on how tho use energy wisely and
safely.
Residential Utility Conservation Advisory Committee (RUCAQ; RUCAC is a
fifteen member committee made up of community leaders from various interest
groups to advise SCE on effective ways of communicating with special -needs
customers.
- Targeted Outreach; This is a variety of efforts to address specific customer groups
in order to increase their awareness of energy efficiency and to promote customer
service programs.
H -16 June, 1996
Rosemead General Plan Houang Dement
Multi- Ethnic Pilot; Outreach workers distribute translated materials to specific
customer groups (Cambodian, Hispanic, Vietnamese) providing basic information
about SCE's programs and services.
Air (,finality Management Plan_ SCAG's 1989 Air Quality Management Plan establishes
transportation, land use, and energy conservation control measures targeted at improving air
quality. This Plan sets goals, for implementation by local governments, to decrease energy use
in residential structures.
2.3.4 At -Risk Units; Section 56683(a)(8) and (c)(6) requires a housing element to include an
analysis of existing assisted housing developments that are at risk of losing affordability controls
within 10 years of its statutory adoption date. This analysis coincides with this extended housing
element period from July 1, 1989 to July 1, 1999.
Multi- family rental units assisted under federal, state or local programs is included in this analysis.
Projects funded by HUD, multi- family revenue bond programs, redevelopment projects, CDBG
programs, and local density bonus or inclusionary zoning programs must be analyzed for
preservation purposes.
Information about HUD assisted projects is contained in the Inventory of Federally Subsidized
Low Income Rental Units At Risk of Conversion. This list is prepared for the California Housing
Partnership Corporation by the California Coalition for Rural Housing. No projects listed in this
inventory are located in the City of Rosemead.
Bond- funded projects eligible to terminate affordability controls within the 10 -year analysis period
are reported in the Annual Summary of the Use of Housing Revenue Bond Proceeds published by
the California Debt Advisory Commission. No local projects are included in this survey.
No CDBG or redevelopment funds have been used for multi- family housing. In addition,
Rosemead has not incorporated an inclusionary zoning program nor granted any density bonuses
pursuant to Government Code Section 65916. Therefore, there are no assisted housing
developments in Rosemead that are at risk of losing affordability controls by July 1, 1999.
Appendix B is a checklist that was completed to confirm the lack of at -risk units.
2.3.5 Develnnment Potential Summary; SCAG has identified that Rosemead has a future
housing need of 773 units according to the Regional Housing Needs Assessment for the 1989 -1998
planning period (Table H -2). Table H -5 identifies a development potential of 795 units over the
same period. In addition, there were 52 units developed in 1989, resulting in a total of 847 units
during this 1989 -1998 period. This indicates that the general plan and zoning provide adequate
capacity for residential development in order to accommodate the housing needs set by SCAG.
Section 65583(b) of the California Government Code requires a statement of Rosemead's goals,
quantified objectives and policies relative to the maintenance, preservation, improvement and
development of housing. This statute recognizes that the total housing needs may exceed the
H -17 June, 1996
Rosemead General Plan Hoaxing Dement
available resources and the community's ability to satisfy this need. Therefore, the quantified
objectives may not be identical to the tolal housing need.
Table H -7 summarizes Rosemead's quantified objectives by income category that can be
constructed, rehabilitated, or conserved over the five year planning period. Rehabilitation is
funded through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, which is restricted
to serving very-low and low income households. There are no at -risk units that require
conservation (Appendix B- Exhibit III); however, the City will obtain vouchers and use utility
programs to maintain affordability.
TABLE H -7
QUANTIFIED OBJECTIVES BY INCOME CATEGORY
Income New
Category Construction Rehabilitation Conservation
Very -Low 138 131 25
Low 187 44 30
Moderate 160 0 0
Upper 310 0
TOTALS 795 175 55
2.4 HOUSING PROGRAMS
A comprehensive program strategy has been developed that consists of both programs currently
in use and additional programs to adequately address Rosemead's regional housing needs. Five
program strategies have been defined for the City of Rosemead as follows;
- Preservation and Enhancement of Existing Housing Stock
- Production of Affordable Housing
- Rental Assistance
- Increased Home - Ownership Opportunities
- Equal Housing Opportunity
This section identifies specific programs to implement each program strategy. It reviews the
previous program accomplishments and suggested program revision in order to set future program
goals. Table H -8 summarizes the past accomplishments (1987 -1990) and future goals (1989-
1994), funding source, responsible agency, and the time frame for implementation of each
program. These goals have been extended to 1998 to coincide with the extended planing period.
2.4.1 STRATEGY- Preservntinn and Enhancement of Existing Housing Stork: Housing
preservation is intended to avoid a degree of physical decline that will require a larger
H -18 June, 1996
TABLE H- 8
HOUSING PROGRAMS SUMMARY
Housing
Program
Responsible
Agency
Funding
Source
Accomplishments
(1987 -1990)
Future Goals
(1969 -1990)
Time
Frame
1. Preservation and
Enhancement of
Existing Housing
Stock
a. Low Intcrost
Community
CDBG, redevelop-
6 loans
Provide
Ongoing
Loan Program
Development
ment funds
rehabilitation loans
to LS households
b. Deferred Loan
Community
CDBG, redevelop-
12 loans
Provide
Ongoing
Program
Development
ment funds
rehabilitation loans
to 25 households
c. Rebate Program
Community
CDBG
16 rebates
Provide 30 rebates
Ongoing
Development
d. Handyman
Community
CDBG
216 grants
Provide 300 grants
Ongoing
Program
Development
C. Code
Community
City
Reduce
Improve housing
Ongoing
Enforcement
Development
General Fund
Substandard Units
conditions and over-
-
crowding
2. Production of
Affordable
Housing
a. Direct Housing
Community Dev./
Redevelopment
-
200 Senior Units
..50 units -1996
Construction
Redev. Agency
Funds
150 units -1996
b. Land
Community Dev./
- Redevelopment
Facilitate new
Ongoing
assemblage
Redev. Agency
Funds
construction of
affordable housing
c. Density Bonus
Community
City General Fund
-
Encourage use by
Ongoing
Development
as necessary
informing resi-
dential applicants of
density bonus
options
-
d. Non -Profit
Community
Redevelopment -
-
Support the
-
Consiruction
Development
Funds for
formation of a non-
onyelny
. seed money
profit corporation
_
- -
by providing
technical assistance
-
and seed monies
TABLE H -8 (continued)
Housing
Program
Responsible
Agency
Funding
Source
Accomplishments
(1987 -1990)
Future Goals
(1989 -1998)
Time
Frame
c. Sites for
Community
City
Work towards
Homeless
Development
General Fund
development of a
Onyoiny
Shelters/
transitional housing
Transitional
facility /emergency
Housing
shelter through
outreach to social
service providers
and through
revisions to the
Zoning Ordinance
3. Rental
Assistance
a. Section 8
Community
HUD /L4 Co.
Subsidy to 156
Subsidy to a
Ongoing
.Assistance
Development
Housing
households
additional 20
Payments/
Authority
households
Housing
Vouchers
4. Increased Home -
Ownership
Opportunities
a. Mobilehome
Community
General Fund
New program
Develop mechanism
Within One Year
Park Program
Development
to provide
notification and
-
relocation assistance
to park residents.
-
Provide program
outreach
b. Mobilehome
Community
General Fund
New program
Advertise program
One Year
Park .Assistance
Development
availability and
serve as co-
applirant for State
funding
c. Shared Equity
Community
Housing Authority,
New program
Work with local
Two Years
Development
Non -Profit
housing authority/
Corporation
non -profit groups to
'
provide equity
partnerships
d. Single- Family
Community
Revenue Bonds
Market availability
Ongoing
Mortgage
Development
of bond financing
Revenue Bonds
TABLE H- 8(continued)
Housing
Program
Responsible
Agency
Funding
Source
Accomplishments
(1987 -1990)
Future Goals
(1969 -1992.)
Time
Framc
C. Rcvcrse
Community
None Nccersary
Ncw program
Coordinate with
Two Years
Mortgage
Development
social service u
g+o Ps
Program
and lending institu-
tions to facilitale
initiation of a
reverse mortgage
Program and
Provide educational
outrach to seniors
5. Equal Housing
Opportunity
a. Equal Housing
Community
CDBG
Ongoing fair
Provide tenant/
Ongoing
Opportunity
Development
housing services
landlord counseling,
Sery ce
housing discrimina-
tion response
housing related
services
TOT.t,L UNTIS TO BE CONSTRUCTED: '7y57
TOTAL U \TiS TO BE REHABILITATED: I
TOT..kL U\TIS TO BE CONSERVED: jr5
Rosemead General Plan Housing Element
rehabilitation effort to restore quality and value in housing stock. Rosemead's rehabilitation
programs assist in providing affordable housing by maintaining existing housing stock within
established building safety standards.
Rehabilitation assistance is provided to very-low and low income households through Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. These funds are disbursed in the form of low interest
loans, deferred loans, or direct rebates. Rosemead also has a Handyman Program that provides
grants to lower- income, senior citizen households.
Income for these programs is based on the income of all persons living in the unit to be
rehabilitated. Owner - occupied units are qualified on the owner's household income. Rental
properties qualify on the tenant's household income. Discussion of Rosemead's programs are as
follows:
T nw Interest Loans This Low Interest Loan Program is available to anyone who meets the income
requirements for eligibility. It offers low interest loans by subsidizing market rate interest for
owner /applicants. These funds may be used for rehabilitation improvements and for room
additions if overcrowding conditions exist. The maximum loan amount is $35,000 with an 8-
percent annual interest rate. Loans under $15,000 are available at a rate of 6- percent.
Rosemead identifies applicants by soliciting homeowner participation. In addition, the City
utilizes code enforcement to identify units in need of repair. Once households are identified, then
a CDBG representative provides assistance and guidance.
A total of 18 households have participated in the Low Interest Loan Program since its inception
in 1982. Eleven of these loans were made during the 1984 -1989 housing element cycle which
meets the goal of funding two low interest loans annually. The new goal during this period is to
achieve 3 loans per year by enhancing the program with additional redevelopment funds.
Deferred I cans The Deferred Loan Program provides loans up to $35,000 for owner - occupied
units who are: 1) 62 -years of age or older; 2) disabled or handicapped and qualify as low income;
or 3) members of a very -low income family (according to Section 8 guidelines). Loans can be
used for minor repairs or major home improvements including room additions if overcrowding
conditions exist.
Deferred loans are designed to maintenance assistance to special needs households. As a result,
the City reduces the cost of providing housing for these special needs groups. Code enforcement
and planning staff efforts will continue to encourage participation in this program. Funding is
provided through the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG).
The Deferred Loan Program began in 1982. Since that time, 20 households have been assisted.
Twelve households have participated since adopting the 1987 Housing Element. During the 1984-
1989 planning period, a total of 14 loans were issued. Therefore, the City exceeded its prior goal
of assisting two households per year. Rosemead plans to achieve 5 deferred loans per year during
the planning period of this housing element by adding redevelopment funds to the CDBG funds.
H -19 June,1996
Rosemead General Plan Hau9ng Dement
Rebate Program The Rebate Program permits homeowners and property owners to receive a 50-
percent rebate on a maximum of $5,000 in building materials that are used for exterior home
improvements. Rebates are also provided for low income households up to a maximum of
$2,500.
This program has been very successful. During the 1984 -1989 planning period, there were 19
rebates issued. Rosemead will continue to advertise the program's availability. The City will
strive to achieve 6 rebates per year during this planning period.
Handyman Program The objective of the Handyman Program is to provide grants to senior
citizens for minor repairs on owner - occupied units. A homeowner must be 62 -years or older and
meet eligible income eligibility to qualify.
The maximum grant amount is $1,500. However, in a case involving code enforcement, the
owner can receive up to $3,500. Two grants may be received within any 24 -month period. The
program is operated with CDBG funds.
There have been 216 grants made since adopting the 1987 housing element. In addition, there
were 238 grants awarded during the 1984 -1989 planning period. This program well exceeded the
annual program goal of 30 grants.
The Handyman Program has been a particular benefit to mobilehome occupants. Many of the
mobilehome owners are low income seniors. The program goal is to provide 60 rehabilitation
grants per year.
Code Enforcement Code enforcement is used to help bring substandard housing units into
compliance with City codes. Potential violations are identified primarily through citizen
complaints. however, substandard conditions are also noted with exterior windshield surveys.
Rosemead's Code Enforcement Officer works with the housing staff and property owners to
identify homes in need of assistance. Property owners are informed of the steps necessary to bring
their properties into compliance with City codes. Information about the housing programs is
provided to property owners that are cited for code violations.
2.4.2 STRATEGY- Prodnrtion of Affordable Housing; New construction is a major source
of housing for prospective homeowners and renters. Rosemead's Redevelopment Agency is
beginning to play an active role in providing new housing units for low and moderate income
households. The Agency's role in providing affordable units is particularly important where land
available for residential development is scarce.
Rosemead's Redevelopment Agency has deferred payment of monies into its Low and Moderate
Income Housing Fund. However, they have recently issued long term debt with these funds.
After issuing this debt, the Agency immediately started funding all deferred loan and moderate
income housing funds.
H -20 June, 1996
Rosemead General Plan Hsiang Element
The housing element programs outlined below are new programs for the City. They all work
together to implement the City's housing production goals.
Dir x Housing Construction The Redevelopment Agency owns two sites that it intends to
develop with affordable senior citizen housing. Phase 1 is approximately one acre located on
Angeles Avenue. This site has been developed with approximately 50 senior citizen apartment
units. Phase 2 is over three acres in size located on Garvey Avenue. This site will house
approximately 150 affordable units plus a senior recreation center.
A contractor will be hired to develop the site according to the City's specifications. The City will
create a Housing Authority to take possession of the completed projects. The Authority will lease
the sites from the Agency for $1 per year. Rental rates will be approximately $250 per month
which is affordable for very -low income seniors. The Agency will then pay the Authority the
difference between the actual rent ($250) and the fair market rent established by HUD.
The City obtained voter approval for Article 34 authorization in November, 1991. This
authorization allows the Authority to undertake the production of 200 units for senior housing.
Phase 1 located on Angelus Avenue is to break ground in September 1993. Planning of Phase 2
is scheduled to begin in 1995.
land Assemblage and Write - Downs Rosemead will use both CDBG and Redevelopment funds
to write -down the cost of land for development of low and moderate income housing. The intent
of this program is to reduce land costs so that it becomes economically feasible for a private
(usually non - profit) developer to build units that are affordable to low and moderate income
households. Rosemead will make every effort to provide land write -downs for residential projects
which set aside at least 20- percent of the units for low and moderate income households. The
City, through the Redevelopment Agency, can assist in acquiring and assembling property, or
subsidizing on -site and off -site improvements as part of this program.
Density Bonus State law requires a City to either grant a density bonus of 25- percent over the
maximum site density, along with one additional regulatory concession, or provide other
incentives of equivalent financial value based on the land cost per dwelling unit if a developer
dedicated housing for:
20- percent dedicated to lower income households,
10- percent dedicated to very -low income households, or
50- percent dedicated to "qualifying residents" (e.g., elderly).
This is intended to ensure that the hosing development can be produced at a reduced cost.
Developers seeking a density bonus must enter into an affordable housing agreement with the City
to ensure continued affordability for a minimum of 30 years. The City will negotiate "Special
Density Bonuses" through development agreements to permit development at a density of 59 units
per acre. This is an increase of 57% above the State mandated denisty bonus and shall be applied
to the R -3 zone.
H -21 June.1996
Rosemead General Plan Haimig Element
Rents for affordable units can not exceed 30- percent of the gross monthly income. This limit is
subject to annual rent adjustments based on the tenants income. Rosemead will inform residential
development applicants of density bonus opportunities in order to encourage development of
privately sponsored affordable housing.
Non -Profit Construction Non -profit housing corporations work to develop, conserve, and
promote affordable housing. These groups are often religious organizations interested in
developing affordable housing, particularly for seniors (such as HUD Section 202 projects).
A non - profit is often involved with "assisted housing ", where some type of government assistance
is provided to the individual households to keep rents affordable (e.g., Section 8). Housing
corporations can work with assisted housing in several ways, including;
Assemble Development Package and Sell It To Profit- Motivated Developer; Then
the non - profit is able to get affordable housing built while ending its involvement
early. Then it can move on to other projects. However, the non - profit can lose
control over the development at the time of sale unless a contractual agreement is
negotiated.
Participate in Joint Venture With Profit- Motivated Developer; This usually
performs the same as the fist method. However, the non - profit can retain more
control over the development and gain hands -on experience while benefiting from
the financial resources of the for - profit developer. In this option, the non - profit
has a longer involvement and will have to negotiate to rights and responsibilities
of the two partners.
Non- Profit As Developer; In this option, the group must employ staff with
necessary expertise or retain consultants. This option requires more risk, money,
time effort, and capability on the part of the non - profit. However, the group has
more control over the development.
A non - profit can help meet the goals for additional housing by implementing or assisting with the
implementation of programs described in this element. In Rosemead, a non - profit can own and
operate Agency- assisted projects. The City will support the formation of a non - profit housing
corporation to facilitate the development and improvement of both senior citizen and low cost
housing. This will be done by providing technical assistance and seed monies to interested
organizations. The City will waive Planning and Zoning fees for these types of qualifying low -
income housing developments. In addition, plans for such projects will receive expedited review
inlcuding payment of fees for overtime plan checking if necessary.
Sites for Homeless Shelters /Transitional Housing Rosemead has an estimated homeless population
of 15 persons. These persons are mostly (80 %) substance abusers or mentally ill, and are
predominately single males with a few couples and single women occasionally present. No
families have been identified as homeless in the City.
H -22 June,1996
Rosemead General Plan Housing Dement
There are no emergency shelters within the City of Rosemead, or within the immediate vicinity.
The closest assistance is People for People, a non - profit social service provider, located in the City
of San Gabriel. They provide food, clothing, and shelter referrals.
There are several churches in Rosemead, including Church of the Open Bible and Church of the
Nazarene, that contribute food and money to People for People and direct persons to their facility.
There is a high occupancy rate at the nearest shelters located in Pasadena due to the lack of local
shelters. Pasadena is located 4 -5 miles to the northwest of Rosemead. There is definitely an
unmet need for emergency overnight shelter closer to the Rosemead area.
Rosemead's housing element establishes a program for the City to coordinate with local social
service providers to address the homeless needs. In addition, the City may amend its Zoning
Ordinance to permit the development of transitional housing in multi - family residential zones.
Such services should be located close to services,a nd to permit emergency shelters in commercial
and industrial zones, subject to a conditional use permit.
2.4.3 STRATEGY: Rental Assistance: Rental assistance is aimed at ensuring that lower
income tenants do not pay more than 30- percent of their gross income on rent. Rosemead
participates in HUD sponsored programs which provide direct rental subsidies to lower income
households.
Section 9 Rental Assistance Payments /Housing Vouchers This program extends rental subsidies
to low income families and elderly that spend more than 30- percent of their income on rent. The
assistance represents the difference between the excess of 30- percent of the monthly income and
the actual rent.
There are two programs using "vouchers" and "certificates ". Vouchers permit a tenant to locate
their own housing. They permit participants to rent units which exceed the federally determined
fair market rent, provided the tenant pays the extra rent increment above the fair market rent.
Certificates are more restrictive and require a family to accomplish specific goals. Rosemead
contracts with the Los Angeles County Housing Authority to administer this program.
The goal for the 1987 housing element was to continue subsidy to 65 households, and extend
assistance to two additional households. There are currently 156 lower income households
receiving HUD - sponsored rent subsidies as follows:
17 Senior Citizen households
45 Small- Family households, and
94 Large- Family households.
Rosemead estimates that it will secure an additional 30 rental vouchers /certificates over the
planning period.
H -23 June, 1996
Rosemead General Plan Hon %ng Element
2.4.4 4TRATF(TY: Increased Home- Ownership Oppnrtunities: Owning a home is usually
not an option for lower income households. Although for -sale housing costs in Rosemead are
some of the lowest in the region, the incomes are also low. This creates a situation where buying
a home is beyond the financial means of most of the City's prospective home buyers. Therefore,
the City will pursue the following programs to help facilitate home ownership opportunities:
Mobile Home Park Program There are currently 17 mobilehome parks in Rosemead. Most of
the parks are older, located on major arterial roadways, and are in adequate to marginal condition.
Several park owners have requested to convert the parks into other uses. Rosemead finds that
mobilehome parks are an important part of low income housing. Therefore, the City will develop
a mechanism to ensure that tenants receive adequate noticing of a public hearing by the owners
and notices of available programs.
Mobilehome park owners shall be required to file a report on the impact(s) of park closure upon
the displaced residents, to identify replacement housing, and to determine relocation costs. Copies
of the report will be given to mobilehome park residents at least 15 days prior to the hearing on
the park closure.
The legislative body will also review the report and may require a condition to mitigate any
adverse impacts of the conversion. Mitigation measures may include any of the following:
A reasonable complete and current list of vacant and available mobilehome park
spaces within a 20 -mile radius.
Full or partial payment by the property owner for relocation of mobilehomes to
another park.
Right of first refusal by the residents to purchase the park and all improvements.
Option of long -term lease on the land and purchase of the improvements.
Purchase of the mobilehome by the property owner for tenants that cannot be
relocated to parks in the area at a price mutually agreed upon by tenant and
property owner.
City staff will inform the applicant of these provisions in writing at least 30 days prior to acting
on the application. Staff will also meet with park tenants to provide outreach regarding the
availability of housing assistance programs. Applicable programs include low cost senior citizen
housing, rent subsidies, and the mobilehome park assistance program.
Mobile Home Park Assistance Program PAP) This program is offered by the State Department
of Housing and Community Development. It provides financial and technical assistance to
H -24 June, 1996
Rosemead General Plan Housing Element
mobilehome park residents who wish to purchase their mobilehome parks and convert the parks
to resident ownership.
Loans are made to low income mobilehome park residents, or to organizations formed by the park
residents, to own and /or operate their mobilehome parks. Then the residents control their own
housing costs. Loans are limited to 50- percent of the purchase price plus the conversion costs.
They are awarded by the State on a competitive basis. Applications must be completed by the
residents and a local public entity as co- applicants.
This program will be facilitated by advertising its availability to mobilehome park residents. In
addition, the City will serve as co- applicant for any resident organizations applying to the State
for funding. This is an important program to allow tenants to maintain control over housing costs
since there are 17 parks in Rosemead. An outreach program will be conducted within one year
of the housing element's adoption to advertise the availability of this program.
Shared Equity Program Equity sharing allows lower income households to purchase a home by
sharing the costs of home ownership with a sponsor such as a local housing authority. The
sponsor and the buyer together would provide a down - payment and purchase cost to buy a home.
When the house is sold, the equity earned is split between the occupant and the sponsor according
to an agreement made prior to the purchase.
The design of this program depends on the co- investors, the source of funds, and the community
needs. A program can be as simple as a partnership where the occupant and sponsor share
proceeds in the same ratio that the purchase costs were shared.
This program serves as a financing tool to provide home ownership opportunities to low and
moderate income households. Shared equity doses occur in the private market, but the purchase
terms are not in the best interest of the occupant. Rosemead will work with the Housing Authority
or a non - profit housing group to offer shared equity as a home ownership option to low and
moderate income households. The City will establish such a program within two years.
Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds Mortgage revenue bonds are issued by the County to
support the development of single family housing for low and moderate income households.
Single family mortgage revenue bonds are used to finance the purchase of owner - occupied homes.
Proceeds from the bond sales are used to make mortgage loans to qualified low and moderate
income buyers. The bonds are serviced and repaid from the mortgage payments made by the
property owners.
Rosemead will continue to market the availability of these funds through its planning department.
Reverse Mortgage program The most substantial asset of most elderly home owners is their
home. This asset usually increases significantly in value with inflation. Although this provides
a rich asset base, many elderly home owners become income poor upon retirement and a fixed
income. This constraint is amplified when one adds increased home maintenance repairs with the
H -25 June, 1996
Rosemead General Plan Housmg Semera
houses age, rising utility costs, insurance and taxes. The result is that these costs are deferred
creating an unsafe and often depressing living environment.
One alternative is for elderly home owners to draw needed funds from the accumulated equity in
their homes through a reverse mortgage. A reverse mortgage is a deferred payment loan or a
series of such loans with the home pledged as security. Most reverse mortgage programs permit
home owners to borrow up to 80- percent of the assessed value of their property. They can receive
needed principle of up to 25- percent of the loan, and then receive monthly annuity payments for
the life of the loan.
Qualification for the loan is based primarily on property value. This allows an elderly home
owner on a fixed income to receive a loan for which they would not otherwise qualify. The City
will work with existing social service groups on establishing a reverse mortgage program for
seniors.
Social service groups could facilitate the initiation of the loans as follows:
Provide education and counseling services to senior interested in pursuing a reverse
mortgage.
Work with local lending institutions which currently provide these loans to gain a
thorough understanding of the application process. The institutions known to
provide this program in Southern California are; 1) Security Pacific National Bank
(Downey), 2) Capital Holding, 3) Providential Home Income Plan, and 4)
American Homestead.
Work with the seniors to complete the loan applications and assist in providing any
other necessary information to the bank.
2.4.5 STRATRGYc Equal Housing Opportunity; Rosemead desires to make adequate
provision for the housing needs of all economic segments of the community. Therefore, the
housing program will promote housing opportunities for all persons regardless of race, religion,
sex, family size, marital status, ancestry, national origin, color, age, or physical disability. This
component entails ways and means to promote more equal housing opportunity.
Fnunl Housing Opportunity Services Rosemead contributes funds from the CDBG program for,
and cooperates with, the San Gabriel Fair Housing Council. Their services include enforcing fair
housing laws, discrimination response, landlord- tenant relations, housing information and
counseling, and community education programs.
The City refers tenants to the Fair Housing Council that are displaced as a result of code
enforcement of illegal conversions. They also periodically advertise the services they offer.
Rosemead will continue to support and promote the Fair Housing Council to assure unrestricted
access to housing in the community.
H -26 June, 1996
Rosemead General Plan Housing Eement
V 10 ff go WEI :►1 't
3.1 GOAL: PROTECT EXISTING STABLE, SINGLE FAMILY
NEIGHBORHOODS THROUGHOUT THE CITY.
3.1.1 Palley Encourage the rehabilitation of existing substandard units to bring them up
to code and extend their useful live.
3.1.2 Pnlicy. Encourage the construction of new single family attached and detached
dwellings using zoning and other mechanisms.
3.1.3 Policy Preserve existing residential areas by using design measures to buffer these
sensitive land uses from adjacent dissimilar uses.
3.1.4 Pnlicw Existing single family units that require demolition must be replaced with
residential units that will be compatible in character to the surrounding
neighborhood.
3.1.5 Policy Conserve existing mobilehome parks which are economically and
physically sound, and establish relocation assistance guidelines for parks which are
converted.
3.2 GOAL: ENCOURAGE THE DEVELOPMENT OF A RANGE OF HOUSING
TYPES IN A RANGE OF PRICES AFFORDABLE TO ALL ROSEMEAD
RESIDENTS.
3.2.1 P : There shall be a variety of housing types and prices to accommodate a wide
range of housing needs and tastes.
3.2.2 Policy Encourage the maintenance of existing housing opportunities while
promoting the development of new housing opportunities for the City's elderly.
3.2.3 Policy Discourage the conversion of apartments to condominiums by requiring
that converted buildings be brought into full compliance with the existing codes.
3.3.4 Policy Amend the Rosemead Zoning Ordinance to permit the development of
emergency shelters in commercial and industrial zones, subject to a conditional use
permit.
H -27 June, 1996
Rosemead General Plan Hm%ng Dement
3.3 ENCOURAGE THE MAINTENANCE AND UPGRADING OF EXISTING
HOUSING STOCK TO ENSURE A DECENT, SAFE, AND SANITARY
HOME FOR ALL ROSEMEAD RESIDENTS.
3.3.1 P : A range of housing opportunities shall be provided to existing and future
residents of the City of Rosemead to ensure that housing is available to all socio-
economic segments of the community.
3.3.2 P : Low and moderate income housing shall be of equal design, construction,
and maintenance as that of more expensive housing in the City of Rosemead.
3.3.3 Polic b v. : Housing developed for low and moderate income households shall not be
concentrated in any single location or planning area.
3.3.4 I'n h4 : The provision for low and moderate income housing shall be coordinated
with the Los Angeles County Housing Assistance Program (HAP).
3.4 SUPPORT FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS WHICH PROHIBIT
DISCRIMINATION IN HOUSING ON THE BASIS OF AGE, SEX, OR
RACE.
3.4.1 P : Continue to cooperate and support San Gabriel Valley Fair Housing
Council to provide information and counseling pertaining to fair housing and
landlord - tenant issues.
3.4.2 P : The City of Rosemead will continue to support and assist in enforcing the
provisions of the Federal Fair Housing Act.
H -28 June. 1996
Appendix A
Residential Site Inventory
|
v
EXHIBIT 11
'
RESIDENTIAL SITE INVENTORY
/ VNDERUT|L|ZED PARCELS DEVELOPED AT LESS THAN HALF DENSITY
Zone
Address
Sq. Ft.
Potential
Additional
Dwelling Units
ota
R-3
7419 Heilman
9,000
4
R-3
7423 Hellman
8,000
2
R-3
7427 Hellman
10,000
3
R-3
7435 Heilman
9,000
5
R-3
7437 Hellman
9
2
45,000
16�
R-3
7611 Hellman
5,152
2
R-3
7617 Hellman
18,400
8
R-3
7623 Hellman
8,600
2
R-3
7631 Hellman
8,500
4
R-3
7635 Hellman
8,530
1
R-3
7637 Hellman
8,530
1
R-3
7701 Hellman
18,000
7
75,712
25A
R-3
7723 Heilman
13,500
5
R-3
7625 Hellman
13,500
1
R-3
7627 Hellman
13,500
7
R-3
7633 Heilman
7,000
4
R-3
7641 Heilman
8,000
3
R-3
7645 Hellman
8.000
4
63,500
24
R-3
3830 Rosemead
11,745
6
R-3
3824 Rosemead
17,212
10
R-3
3816 Rosemead
9,686
5
R-3
3808 Rosemead
9.686
4
48,329
25
R-3
2626 Walnut Grove
81,840
22*
R-3
2730 New Avenue
6,982
3
R-3
2728 New Avenue
6,982
3
R-3
2712 New Avenue
6,982
3
R-3
2706 New Avenue
6,982
2
R-3
2702 New Avenue
6,982
3
34,910
14
I
t"
Potential
Zone
Address
Sq. Ft.
Additional
Dwelling Units
}
Site,'
Tota
f R -3
7535 Hellman
12,000
7
R -3
7543 Hellman
6,750
3
• R -3
7545 Hellman
11,250
1
R -3
7551 Hellman
9
5
39,000
16
R -3
4324 Muscatel
34,390
10
R -3
3862 Rosemead
14,083
6
3848 Rosemead
77, 540
2
21,623
8
R -3
2642 New Avenue
6,522
4
R -3
2640 New Avenue
5,897
2
R -3
2634 New Avenue
5,897
2
18,316
8
R -3
3859 Rosemead
18,730
11
R -3
2622 New Avenue
6,139
2
R -3
2614 New Avenue
6
2
12,293
4
R -3
7565 Hellman
10,000
5
R -3
7569 Hellman
6
2
16,000
7
R -3
2530 New Avenue
6,150
3
R -3
2536 New Avenue
6,150
3
12,300
6
R -3
2522 New Avenue
9,450
5
R -3
2516 New Avenue
9, 450
4
18,900
9
R -3
3416 Jackson
5,940
2
R -3
3412 Jackson
5,940
2
11,880
4
R -3
3415 Jackson
5,400
2
R -3
3419 Jackson
. 00
2
10,800
4
°
�
`
`
^
Zone A
Address S
Sq. Ft. D
Potential
Additional
R-3 2
2147 Angeles 6
6,166 2
2
R-3 2
2143 Angeles 6
6,158 2
2
12,324 4
4
R-3 3
3817 Rosemead 6
6,300 3
3
R-3 3
3809 Rosemead 7
7.013 2
2
13,313 5
5
P-O-D 9
9211 Ramona 1
16,470 8
8
P-O-D 9
9217 Ramona 1
16,552 9
9
P-O-D 9
9223 Ramona 1
17,146 9
9
50,168 2
26
P-O-D 9
9253 Ramona 7
7,900 3
3
P-0-D 9
9259 Ramona 7
7,072 3
3
P-0-D 9
9303 Ramona 1
11,025 6
6
P-O-D 9
9317 Ramona 3
38,780 1
13
P-O-D 9
9335 Ramona 3
33,000 1
19
P-O-D 9
9343 Ramona 3
33,950 2
21
P-O-D 9
9349 Ramona 1
13,300 7
7
P-0-D 9
9355 Ramona 6
6,370 3
3
P-O-D 3
3511 Rio Hondo 8
8,780 4
4
P-O-D 3
3515 Rio Hondo 5
5.527 2
2
165,704 8
81
P-0-D 8
8920 Marshall 1
15,454 8
8
P-O-D 8
8926 Marshall 1
13,970 8
8
29,424 1
16
P-0-D 8
8909 Glendon 1
15,454 8
8
P-O-D 3
3500 Hart 7
7,360 4
4
Grouping 0f Addresses Denotes CnndunuuParcels.
Appendix B
At -Risk Unit Checklist
f
t
EXHIBIT III
f CHECKLIST TO CONFIRM LACK OF AT -RISK UNITS
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65583(A)(8)
{
Jurisdiction City of Rosemead Date 6/ 24/93
}
i
1. HUD Programs:
Section 8 Lower- Income Rental Assistance project -based programs:
New Construction
Substantial or Moderate Rehabilitation
Property Disposition
Loan Management Set -Aside
Section 101 Rent Supplements
Section 213 Cooperative Housing Insurance
Section 221(d)(3) Below- Market - Interest -Rate Mortgage Insurance Program
Section 236 Interest Reduction Payment Program
Section 202 Direct Loans for Elderly or Handicapped
x there are no such units for our jurisdiction listed in the Inventory of Federally
Subsidized Rental Units At Risk of Conversion. 1890 or subsequent updated
Information made available by HPD.
_ units for our jurisdiction in the above inventory are not at risk during the ten -year
analysis period; no units are at risk until (year).
2. Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG)
jurisdiction has not used CDBG funds
X jurisdiction has not used CDBG funds for multifamily rental units
although CDBG funds have been used for multifamily rental rehabilitation, staff
responsible for this program indicate there are no affected units because
3. Redevelopment programs
jurisdiction does not have a redevelopment agency
X redevelopment funds have not been used on multifamily rental units; or
1
i-
Page Two
although redevelopment funds have been used for multifamily rental units, staff
responsible for this program indicate there are no affected units because
_a) income- restrictions for occupancy were not required for existing units or
_b) other reasons:
4. FmHA Section 515 Rural Rental Housing loans
X jurisdiction has not been located in a qualifying rural FmHA area
_ according to Information made available by HPD, there are no such eligible
Projects reported by FmHA within the community or unincorporated area
FmHA staff checked the status of (name) development(s) and
reported that it is not eligible for prepayment or not eligible for prepayment
within the ten -year analysis period.
5. State and local multifamily revenue bond programs
x no bond - financed units eligible to terminate affordability controls within the next ten
years were reported in the following, publication: 1990 Annual Summary: The
Use of Housing Revenue Bond Proceeds California Debt Advisory Commission,
and
R local housing authority staff indicate there are no such units within the community.
6. Local in -lieu fee programs or inclusionary programs
X jurisdiction has not had an in -lieu fee or inclusionary program
_ staff responsible for these programs indicate no affected units
2
t
i
Page Three
i
i
? 7. Developments which obtained a density bonus and direct government assistance
pursuant to Government Code Section 65916.
t
X jurisdiction has no projects approved pursuant to this law
staff responsible for this program Indicate no affected units
S. Additional comments related to any of the above
Imwb:preserve.he
3
Appendix C
Citizen Comments