The URL can be used to link to this page

PC - Item 4B - General Plan Amendment 09-01ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TO: THE HONORABLE CHAIRWOMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE ROSEMEAD PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DIVISION DATE: MARCH 1, 2010 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 09 -01 SUMMARY The City of Rosemead proposes to amend the General Plan Land Use Element to designate four key areas (nodes) in the City for mixed -use development with limitations on both residential density and building height. The current General Plan allows for mixed -use development along all major commercial corridors in the City. General Plan Amendment 09 -01 also proposes the creation of a new commercial Specific Plan land use designation over two commercial areas of the City. The Specific Plan land use designation would affect the following properties: 3900 and 3910 Walnut Grove Avenue, 8614 Valley Boulevard, 7867, 7907, 7913, 7919, 7931, 7951, and 8001 Garvey Avenue, 3011 and 3033 Denton Avenue, and 7938 Virginia Street. Lastly, General Plan Amendment 09 -01 also includes amending the Circulation Element, the Resource Management Element, and the Public Safety Element to address the proposed land use changes and to comply with Assembly Bill 162 (AB 162). Attached is a map (Exhibit A), which highlights the properties that will be affected by this General Plan Amendment. The Draft General Plan document has been attached as Exhibit B. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution No. 10 -03 (Exhibit C), a resolution directing staff to prepare an Addendum to the Program Environmental Impact Report (Program EIR) which was certified by the City Council on October 14, 2008, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164. Staff further recommends that the Planning Commission RECOMMEND that the City Council consider the environmental determination and APPROVE General Plan Amendment 09 -01. BACKGROUND On April 14, 2009, the City Council appointed a Subcommittee consisting of Mayor Margaret Clark, Council Member Polly Low, and staff to discuss the future of mixed -use development Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 Paae 2 of 7 in the City of Rosemead. The Subcommittee was to analyze the current 2008 General Plan and make recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council as to whether the Land Use Element should be amended. Between May and September of 2009, the Subcommittee analyzed the current land use policy regarding mixed -use development. In addition, Hogle- Ireland, a professional land use planning firm, was consulted for technical analysis. The analysis and studies included completing property surveys to document current land usage where mixed -use is proposed and evaluating the realistic potential of achieving lower mixed -use densities with stringent mixed -use development standards. In summary, the careful comprehensive assessment and study of several land use scenarios guided the Subcommittee to a determination of an appropriate framework for mixed -use development in the City. On September 22, 2009, a joint Planning Commission and City Council meeting was held to review the Subcommittee's recommendation. At that meeting, staff received direction to embark on a comprehensive General Plan Work Revision Program. This program included, amending the General Plan to designate four key areas (nodes) in the City for mixed -use development with limitations on both residential density and building height, preparing mixed -use development standards, and processing a comprehensive Zoning Map update. Staff has been making progress on completing the General Plan Work Revision Program. However, the recent sale of two large properties in the City, the "Auto Auction" and "Barr Lumber' sites (8001 Garvey Avenue, 8614 Valley Boulevard, and 3900 and 3910 Walnut Grove Avenue), prompted staff to reorganize the General Plan Work Revision Program. The "Barr Lumber' and "Auto Auction" sites total approximately 19 acres of land and have the potential of providing opportunity for a variety of tax generating commercial uses. For this reason, the General Plan Amendment now also proposes the incorporation of a specific plan land use designation on these properties. The specific plan land use designation will function as land use tool to control development on these sites with the objective of augmenting the City's economic base. ANALYSIS The following section will cover all the aspects of the General Plan Amendment in greater detail. Land Use Element As mentioned earlier in this report, General Plan Amendment 09 -01 proposes to amend the Land Use Element to designate four key areas (nodes) in the City for mixed -use development with limitations on both residential density and building height, as well as create a new commercial Specific Plan land use designation over two important commercial areas of the City. Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 Pace 3 of 7 The following is a description of the proposed mixed -use nodes. Exhibit A illustrates their locations. Mixed -Use Area One would include a portion of the City's downtown, consisting of several parcels on the north and south side of Valley Boulevard, between Muscatel Avenue and Rosemead Boulevard. Several parcels on the south side of Bentel Avenue, near Ivar Avenue, would also be included in this area. This district would limit development to 25 730 residential units per acre and building height to three stories. Mixed -Use Area Two would be located at the northeast end of the City, at the intersection of Valley Boulevard and Temple City Boulevard, and would include all parcels on north side of Valley Boulevard to Abilene Street. This district would limit development to 40 -60 residential units per acre and building height to four stories. Mixed -Use Area Three would be located along the north and south side Garvey Avenue between Charlotte Avenue and Willard Avenue. This district would limit development to 25- 30 residential units per acre and building height to three stories. . Mixed -Use Area Four would be located on the east end of Garvey Avenue, and include parcels between Stingle Avenue and the Rio Hondo River. This district would limit development to 40 -60 residential units per acre and building height to four stories. Specific Plan /Commercial Land Use Designation General Plan Amendment 09 -01 further proposes to create a new commercial Specific Plan land use designation over two important commercial areas of the City, the "Auto Auction" and "Barr Lumber" sites (8001 Garvey Avenue, 8614 Valley Boulevard, and 3900 and 3910 Walnut Grove Avenue). The Los Angeles County Assessor Parcel Map(s) (Exhibit D) have been attached to further identify the location of the subject properties. A specific plan is an instrument for guiding, coordinating and regulating the development of property within a defined area. It is a special set of development standards, guidelines, and implementation procedures applicable to a particular geographical area within the City. The Rosemead Specific Plan /Commercial land use designation provides up to 269,000 square feet of commercial retail and restaurant - related uses and consists of approximately 19.2 acres within the following two project areas: Project Area 1 "Auto Auction Site ": This area consists of 11 parcels of land totaling approximately 15.8 acres, located on the north side Garvey Avenue between Del Mar Avenue and San Gabriel Avenue. This site is bounded by Garvey Avenue to the south, Strathmore Avenue to the west, single- family residential land uses to the north, and Paradise Trailer Park and Apartments to the east. Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 Paae 4 of 7 Project Area 2 "Barr Lumber Site ": This area is located on the southeast corner of Valley Boulevard and Walnut Grove Avenue, includes three parcels totaling approximately 3.4 acres. Rubio Wash is located just south of site and a combination of commercial and single - family residential land uses are located to the east. It is envisioned that the Specific Plan /Commercial designation will assist in the renovation, recycling, and redevelopment of these two areas. The goal of this designation is to promote redevelopment of these sites into cohesively planned sub - regional commercial centers that provide goods and services in a larger retail form with ancillary smaller retail uses supporting the sub - regional commercial uses. To accomplish this, the land use designation will require minimum site areas, as well as specify the permitted land uses and building sizes for each of the project areas. These requirements are defined in the draft General Plan (Exhibit B) on pages 12 -15. Change in Land Use Designation of Existing Mixed- UseAreas The majority of all existing portions of the City that are currently designated for mixed -use development would change to their prior General Plan designation as stated in the 1987 General Plan. The reduction of land area designated for mixed -use development to four smaller areas and the creation of a Specific Plan /Commercial land use designation will affect the land use categories within the City the following way: • Mixed -Use Residential /Commercial land will decrease by 212 acres • Low Density Residential land will increase by 10 acres • Medium Density Residential land will increase by 15 acres • High Density Residential land will increase by 19 acres • Commercial designated land will increase by 181 acres • Mixed -Use Industrial /Commercial land will increase by 52 acres • Public Facilities land will decrease by 4 acres The following table provides a comparison between the existing General Plan and the proposed alternative with respect to estimated population and number of dwelling units at the year 2025. Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 Pace 5 of 7 Only minor changes are proposed to the existing land use designations' goals and policies defined in the General Plan, with the exception of the Commercial designation. To attract signature, tax generating hotels, the Commercial land use designation will be modified to allow such uses to develop up to maximum permitted FAR of 1.0:1 if their projects include higher design standards. If hotel projects do not meet the amenities outlined in the General Plan, such projects will only be allotted a 0.35:1 FAR. Circulation, Resource Management, and Public Safety Elements General Plan Amendment 09 -01 also proposes to amend the Circulation, Resource Management, and Public Safety Elements to address the proposed land use changes and to comply with Assembly Bill 162. Circulation Element General Plan Amendment 09 -01 proposes to amend the Circulation Element to address the proposed land use changes. The Circulation Element addresses issues related to vehicular circulation, parking management, public transit, walking, biking, and trails. In order to adequately update the Circulation Element a traffic study (Exhibit E) was completed by KOA Corporation on February 19, 2010. This study documents the methods and results of the analysis of existing and future circulation conditions in the City of Rosemead, assesses the potential impacts of growth under the Circulation Element update, and provides recommendations regarding improvements that may be needed to accommodate the anticipated growth levels. Based on these recommendations, the Circulation Element was amended to refine the goals, policies, and actions to address anticipated mobility needs, and the ability of the roadway network and the various transportation modes to meet future travel demands through the buildout year of the Land Use Element (2025). General Plan Modifications to Comply with Assembly Bill 162 General Plan Amendment 09 -01 also proposes to amend the Land Use, Resource Management, and Public Safety Elements to comply with Assembly Bill 162 (AB 162). AB 162 requires that the City identify and annually review the areas covered by the General Plan that are subject to flooding as identified by floodplain mapping by either the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or the Department of Water Resources (DWR). mta t �� g. 008 Gener�allPlanan�� "{Development and Po � i General Pan A nd en 09 01 Dwelling Units Population 2008 General Plan Land Use Polic 2o,�a3 80,386 General Ptan Amendment 09 -01 Land Use Policy 5,939 61,531 Only minor changes are proposed to the existing land use designations' goals and policies defined in the General Plan, with the exception of the Commercial designation. To attract signature, tax generating hotels, the Commercial land use designation will be modified to allow such uses to develop up to maximum permitted FAR of 1.0:1 if their projects include higher design standards. If hotel projects do not meet the amenities outlined in the General Plan, such projects will only be allotted a 0.35:1 FAR. Circulation, Resource Management, and Public Safety Elements General Plan Amendment 09 -01 also proposes to amend the Circulation, Resource Management, and Public Safety Elements to address the proposed land use changes and to comply with Assembly Bill 162. Circulation Element General Plan Amendment 09 -01 proposes to amend the Circulation Element to address the proposed land use changes. The Circulation Element addresses issues related to vehicular circulation, parking management, public transit, walking, biking, and trails. In order to adequately update the Circulation Element a traffic study (Exhibit E) was completed by KOA Corporation on February 19, 2010. This study documents the methods and results of the analysis of existing and future circulation conditions in the City of Rosemead, assesses the potential impacts of growth under the Circulation Element update, and provides recommendations regarding improvements that may be needed to accommodate the anticipated growth levels. Based on these recommendations, the Circulation Element was amended to refine the goals, policies, and actions to address anticipated mobility needs, and the ability of the roadway network and the various transportation modes to meet future travel demands through the buildout year of the Land Use Element (2025). General Plan Modifications to Comply with Assembly Bill 162 General Plan Amendment 09 -01 also proposes to amend the Land Use, Resource Management, and Public Safety Elements to comply with Assembly Bill 162 (AB 162). AB 162 requires that the City identify and annually review the areas covered by the General Plan that are subject to flooding as identified by floodplain mapping by either the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or the Department of Water Resources (DWR). Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 Page 6 of 7 This is accomplished by reference to the Public Safety Element, where flooding is discussed in further detail. Conclusion The programs, goals, and policies identified in this General Plan Amendment will promote stronger and enhanced commercial business districts, as well as stimulate and revitalize commercial corridors with both needed housing and commercial retail services. If General Plan Amendment 09 -01 is adopted by the City Council, the municipal code amendments for mixed -use development standards and specific plan implementation criteria, mixed - use guidelines, and zoning map revisions will be brought to the Planning Commission for review in early spring. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS According Section 15164 of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act, the lead agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. The conditions detailed in Section 15162 relate to substantial changes in the project, which would require major revisions to the previous EIR. The Rosemead City Council adopted General Plan update and certified an accompanying Program Environmental Impact Report (Program EIR) on October 14, 2008. The certified Program EIR provided a program -level assessment of the environmental impacts resulting from development pursuant to land use policy and implementation of the goals and policies set forth in all chapters of the updated General Plan, as well as long -term implementation of the General Plan through a revised Zoning Code. Upon the Commission's review of General Plan Amendment 09 -01, an Addendum EIR will be proposed based on the 2008 Program EIR. It is anticipated that the environmental impacts associated with the proposed General Plan amendment would be less than those associated with the 2008 General Plan. Should the Commission require staff to make changes to the amendment proposed in this report, then an Addendum EIR may not be appropriate and further review may be required. Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 Paae 7 of 7 STATE LAW REQUIREMENTS Section 65300 et seq of the California Government Code sets standards for each city to prepare, adopt, and amend a comprehensive general plan. This plan coordinates the long- term physical development goals and objectives of the City. Government Code Sections 65860, 66473.5 and 66474 require that day -to -day development decisions, such as zoning and land subdivisions should be consistent with the General Plan. PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65091, this public hearing notice has been mailed to all real property owners subject to General Plan Amendment 09 -01. In addition, this notice has been published in at least one newspaper of general circulation within the local agency, as the number of owners of real property within 300 feet of the project site is greater than 1,000. Lastly, this notice is also posted in six (6) public locations, specifying the availability of the application, plus the date, time and location of the public hearing. Prepared by: S Sheri Bermejo Principal Planner Exhibits ubmitted by: n o Pg Community Development Director A. Land Use Map B. Draft General Plan C. Resolution No. 10 -03 D. Los Angeles County Assessor Parcel Maps E. Traffic Analysis, prepared by KOA Corporation, February 19, 2010 Existing General Plan Land Use to Proposed General Plan Land Use Low Density to Commercial - Mixed Use: Residential /Commercial (3145 du /ac) to Commercial - Mixed Use: Residential /Commercial (0 -30 du /ac) to Commercial 0 Mixed Use: Residential /Commercial (31-45 du /ac) to High Density - Mixed Use: Residential /Commercial (0 -30 du /ac) to High Density V °jo °p R General Pan ® Mixed Use: Residential /Commercial (31-45 du /ac) to Mixed Use: Industrial /Commercial - Mixed Use: Residential /Commercial (0 -30 du /ac) to Mixed Use: Industrial /Commercial 0 Medium Density to Mixed Use: Residential /Commercial (30 du /ac) Mixed Use: Residential /Commercial (31 -45 du /ac) to Mixed Use: Residential /Commercial (30 du /ac) ® Public Facility to Mixed Use: Residential /Commercial (30 du /ac) Mixed Use: Residential /Commercial (31-45 du /ac) to Low Density Mixed Use: Residential /Commercial (3145 du /ac) to Mixed Use: Residential /Commercial (60 du /ac) Mixed Use: Residential /Commercial (0 -30 du /ac) to Low Density Mixed Use: Residential /Commercial (3145 du /ac) to Mixed Use: Residential /Commercial (30 du /ac) 0 Mixed Use: Residential /Commercial (31-45 du /ac) to Medium Density Mixed Use: Residential /Commercial (31-45 du /ac) to Specific Plan /Commercial Mixed Use: Residential /Commercial (0 -30 du /ac) to Medium Density Source: City of Rosemead and DMP, Inc. 0 Feet EXHIBIT A 2,000 4,000 proposed Land Use Changes City of Rosemead February 23, 2010 Planning Commission Resolution 10 -03 Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT "C" PC RESOLUTION 10 -3 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING PLANNING DIVISION STAFF TO PREPARE AN ADDENDUM TO THE PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (PROGRAM EIR) WHICH WAS CERTIFIED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON OCTOBER 14, 2008, PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15164 AND RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 09 -01. WHEREAS, the City of Rosemead ( "City ") embarked on a comprehensive amendment of its General Plan in 2009 to address the appropriate location for mixed -use development and to create a new commercial Specific Plan land use designation to assist in the renovation, recycling, and redevelopment of two areas along commercial corridors in the City; and WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65091, public hearing notices were mailed to all real property owners whose properties are directly and specifically affected by General Plan Amendment 09 -01. In addition, a notice was been published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune on February 19, 2010, as the number of owners of real property within 300 feet of the project site was greater 1,000. Lastly, this notice is also posted in six (6) public locations, specifying the availability of the application, plus the date, time and location of the public hearing; and WHEREAS, on March 1, 2010, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed and advertised public hearing to receive oral and written testimony relative to General Plan Amendment 09 -01; and WHEREAS, the Rosemead Planning Commission has sufficiently considered all testimony presented to them in order to make the following determination; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD HEREBY FINDS, DECLARES, AND RECOMMENDS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission finds that General Plan Amendment 09 -01, as proposed, is consistent with the requirements of state law Planning Commission Resolution 10 -03 Page 2 of 3 governing general plans, including but not limited to Government Code Section 65300 and following. SECTION 2. Based on the entire administrative record before the Planning Commission on the Project, including all written and oral evidence presented to the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City of Rosemead Planning Division prepare an Addendum to the Program Environmental Impact Report (Program EIR) which was certified by the City Council on October 14, 2008, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164. SECTION 3. Based on the entire administrative record before the Planning Commission on the Project, including all written and oral evidence presented to the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council consider the environmental determination and approve General Plan Amendment 09 -01. SECTION 4. The Chair of the Commission shall sign this resolution and the Commission's Administrative Secretary shall attest to the adoption thereof. SECTION 5. This resolution is the result of an action taken by the Planning Commission on March 1, 2010, by the following vote: YES: NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SECTION 6. The secretary shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall transmit copies of same to the applicant and the Rosemead City Clerk. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 15t day of March, 2010. Diana Herrera. Chairwoman Planning Commission Resolution 10 -03 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a resolution adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemead at a special meeting, held on the 15t day of March, 2010 by the following vote: YES: NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Stan Wong, Secretary 5287 ' 36 iao 5287 37 O GARVEY AVE. �nnr z 0 i < 28 54 . w c i z z< < TRACT N0.4141 M.8.50.52 PARCEL MAP P.M.157.41-42 d �:rtrJr �;GS 1aLC 5.!a Ir EXHIBIT D 5390 j I j ran scef 1- 100 - 100- 1 /1 I e 1 'P.c:ln 2aor _�� >, J ro up q A. ;h { I LL J 9 Y Parr 1tu'ASRW'.ti lul 0 WE. -!- RW M1:1 :CERNERT em 316 «•n�:+ ',. . ) ti 13 /J��` 1 , 6• (4 .p p'Ng./ E' �,4i C Ae� 0PP3 =mom b n 1' >y alai CI 2 , Y vt;r OI Q ^a 16f.1 {i.Al I 1 C .I I (� OTI If ProjectiAr 2 a ,.rcm I. I J m Bar Lumbe _�� r Sits I n n.. Z WALNUT CitOYE i WE.2 J aN 5271 N ;a 16 =E ROSEMCA) 4.6.21.11 4•115 9566 TRAC NO.5213 M.8 97-26 -30 DET'A'IL TRACT NO. 12549 M.9.236 -36 -37 NC WALE TRACT NO. 26273 M.B. 672 -3 -4 F^r 10 45w. 3L PARCEL MAP P. M, 239 • 6 ---- -_ —_ -- —__ — — __QbuYtt OF toy A17IES 0AL'f. -- oLoz £Z Aienjga-A peawasou 10 (l!D soGueyo osn pue� posodoad b ilOIHXD 4":1 4 a�'Z ♦/ 'oul'dW0 pue peeve soa to Allo :aoinog 4�i ' i Tsai ' I IIj'� S m O a a V N 6 n\ .00,• ivNOUV3a�3a � .W.3 euowad or a/ 0 f I I • L". (li L�'�� .� i .D • 11� F- It 1S ueuua6u6)4 1 ny Saelq l'I11S 1PIay6!H I I I •z •' a l V mle e9' F n ny xJ eumsary o. ° ntl 6a1631 �n � m Iu ❑II— IplSa?q±tl- tifNiR �_,� 1 I S �liil -M'+FI rte•• ••�!• ••��1'�•Y peogJea apJaed umu0 a �anRll Ill�ffill[rtiy,`�`dalp ®YNg u�11ID1'• jjjj 1( VI l Illill��illl{ u>1ut,f � • \ V�!I'3111I Ip 7S IIe4veW.� m T11][111 III 'o I1ffil. �1 III yl ��\ ppi LL �illll111�1�u • 1S 4dlea ljl�l[��llql �� 6 D I� L e u3J� jp III 4�...�r .a d I I U VAM a f4puaO wn!papy of (oe /np 06-0) le!oJawwoO/le!luap!saa :asp pax!yy — !e!oJewwoO /ueld o8loeds of (oe /np gYLe) le!oJawwopge!luap!saa :ash pax!py r/l/1® 6l!sua4 wn!payy of (oe /np go-LC) lenJawwo e! ua !sa O/I 1 P b :esn pax!yy 0 (oe /np O6) lemewwoope!lusp!seH :asn pem.M of (oe /np W L6) le!oJewwoo /le!luap!saa :asn pax!W 6l!sueO moi of (oe/np o6 -o) IepJawwo e! ua !sa as O/I 1 P a : n Pax!yy (oe /np og) le!oJawwoo /leuuep!seH :asn pex!py of (os /np gYL6) le!aawwoO /leguap!saa :esn pax!yy ApsuaO mo-! of (oe /np gh-L6) lemewwo el ua Ise O/I .3 P. a :asn pax!yy (oe /np 06) !e!oJawwOO/!epuep!saa :esn pex!py of R811oej oilgnd 6l!suaO OH of (oe /np 06-0) le!oJawwoO/le!luaplsaa :asn pax!py — (oe /np 06)!e!oJawwoo/leguop!saa :asn pox!py of (oe /np gq-Le) Ie!oJawwoo /le!luep!saa :asO pax!yy ® 4sua B! oe n O 4 H o l ( / P gt LE) le!oJawwoOgelluap!saa :es0 pex!yy (oe /np 06) Imiewwoope!luep!saa :asn pax!yy o! /g!suaO wn!peyy le!oJewwoo of (oe/np 06-0) le!oJewwo e! ua !se as — OA 1 P a :asn Pax!yy le!wewwoo /leulsnpul :asn paxiW of (oe /np o6-0) !amiewwoollequap!sea :asn pex!yy � e!oJewwo ae n ! o 0 l ( / P g4-L6) le!oJewwoOgepuap!saa :es0 pex!yy — leloJawwoo /leulsnpul :asn pax!ly of (oe /np WL6) le!oJawwoo/!eguep!seH :asn pax!yy lelwawwo0 of 6ysuaO mod F- asn pue-1 ueld leJeue•O PosodoJd o7 asn pue-1 ueld leJaue•O Bullslx3 4�i ' i Tsai ' I IIj'� S m O a a V N 6 n\ .00,• ivNOUV3a�3a � .W.3 euowad or a/ 0 f I I • L". (li L�'�� .� i .D • 11� F- It 1S ueuua6u6)4 1 ny Saelq l'I11S 1PIay6!H I I I •z •' a l V mle e9' F n ny xJ eumsary o. ° ntl 6a1631 �n � m Iu ❑II— IplSa?q±tl- tifNiR �_,� 1 I S �liil -M'+FI rte•• ••�!• ••��1'�•Y peogJea apJaed umu0 a �anRll Ill�ffill[rtiy,`�`dalp ®YNg u�11ID1'• jjjj 1( VI l Illill��illl{ u>1ut,f � • \ V�!I'3111I Ip 7S IIe4veW.� m T11][111 III 'o I1ffil. �1 III yl ��\ ppi LL �illll111�1�u • 1S 4dlea ljl�l[��llql �� 6 D I� L e u3J� jp III 4�...�r .a d I I U VAM a • City of Rosemead GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Adopted by Rosemead City Council on XXX via Resolution XXX is City of Rosemead 8838 East Valley Boulevard Rosemead, CA 91170 626.288.6671 • 0 C� • • ter 1 INTRODUCTION Envision Rosemead as a city where people have many options for housing, employment, shopping, and recreation. Envision a city where businesses create a strong economic foundation for high - quality municipal services, and where parks and recreational facilities offer opportunities for a diverse population to exercise and interact. Envision a city where schools and teachers educate and inspire youth, and where the natural environment is protected and enhanced. This is the vision for Rosemead; the General Plan will help the City realize this vision. I N '1' R 1 1 D U C '1' I O N ROSE.MEAD GENERAL PLAN Drawing by Caryn Sip, Muscatel Intermediate School student Since its incorporation in 1959, Rosemead has become an increasingly racially and ethnically diverse community. According to the z000 U.S. Census, the City's population was approximately 49 percent Asian and 41 percent Hispanic, which is significantly higher than the State population percentage for both groups. An important component of this General Plan will be to address specific issues to meet the needs of Rosemead's diverse population. P A G P, t- s P li R R LI A R y s, 2 0 1 0 I N T R o u u C T I u N • General Plan Visions With this General Plan, the City seeks to: • Enhance the commercial areas along key corridors, and most specifically Garvey Avenue and Valley Boulevard; Create an economically viable downtown that blends retail, office, and residential uses in a walkable, attractive setting; • Enhance parks and recreational space in underserved neighborhoods; • Accommodate the demand for quality mixed -use development that can contribute to commercial growth and enhance opportunities for higher- density residential development; • Protect homeowner investments and the availability of well- maintained, relatively affordable housing units; Minimize the impact of traffic associated with growth within the San Gabriel Valley and broader region. Adopted by City Council on October 14, 2008, the General Plan establishes the framework for moving from the Rosemead of today toward the desired community of the future. This General Plan guides the City to the year 2025 by establishing goals and policies that address land use, circulation, safety, and • open space. Each of these issues affects quality of life in Rosemead and the economic health of the community. Incorporating input from community leaders and businesses into the General Plan works to retain the qualities that make the City unique, responds to the dynamics of growth in the Los Angeles region, and meets the changing needs of residents. Implementation of the General Plan will ensure that future development projects in the City are consistent with the community's goals, and that adequate urban services are available to meet the needs of all new development. As Rosemead moves towards 2025, the City, its residents, and the business community are committed to implementing a long - range plan that enhances the physical, economic, and human resources of this diverse and community- oriented City. P A G E 1- s F E n R U A R Y , 6 • • • I N T R G n G C 'r I O W Rosemead's Planning Area The Citv of Rosemead is 5.2 square miles in size and located in the San Gabriel Valley, approximately a miles east of downtown Los Angeles. Rosemead has easy accessibility to several freeways that connect it to the City to City Angeles and the larger Los Angeles metropolitan region. The San Bernardino Freeway (Interstate to) runs cast -west through the City, and the Pomona Freewav (State Route 6o) runs through the southern portion (see Figure t -t and Figure 1-2). Interstate Ito to the west provides direct access to Long Beach, and Interstate 6o5 to the east connects to Huntington Beach. Interstate zto to the north provides east -west connection to the San Fernando Valley and the Inland Empire. History of Rosemead The Rosemead area was settled by Gabrieleno Native Americans prior to the arrival of the Spanish, who established Wyckoff, BUh and Joan WA-b, The C'tv of 99=gad An ir•t I Sketchbook 196, Pages P A G E I- 3 P P B R G A R Y fi z n L o I N '1 n 11 I) U C 'I' 1 o N • • P A G E )- q • This page intentionally left blank. 0 0 • Sources: City of Rosemead, DMP Inc. Feet 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 Figure 1 -1 Regional Location Map City of Rosemead June 2008 General Plan Update I N I' It 0 11 Il C 'I' I o N E This page intentionally left blank. • P A G E 1- 6 L L B n U A E Y 1 6 • • • l I j I\ J f -c.A.n- j -,Genera Plan L I V-1 ------ J J ELI 7- ill f VallerB 51 % 4 1h II— t Ji, 1 77- LW' We L Av m.l t A J ON `I sue. rc sr .i\ \3 �' �Li: %r".— !._._ l_.. % Av A� S Tr Av I I G 11* H. h1fiffS, Er IJ j 4 `icy L4 Y — Rosemead City Boundary ......• Sphere of Influence Boundary Major Roads Railroad River/Wash Source: City of Rosemead, DMP Inc. Figure 1-2 Feet 0 1,200 2,400 3,600 4,800 Planning Area City of Rosemead June 2008 General Plan Update I N 'P 8 0 1) U C '1 1 1) N • This page intentionally left blank. • P A G E )- 8 E L B R U A R Y ) 6 • • • • ,estimated uopu la tion of s7.144? General Plan Purpose and Scope Every jurisdiction in California is requires] to adopt a general plan and update this plan at regular intervals. The purpose of the general plan is to anticipate and plan for "the physical development of the county or city, and any land outside its boundaries which bears relation to its planning" (California Government Code §65300). Rosemead's General Plan might be compared to a roadmap, in that this plan sets a course for the future. This "map" first describes the issues facing Rosemead today, and then sets the course, expressed through goals, policies, and implementation programs, to achieve the desired Rosemead of the future. The primary benefit of long -range planning is that such planning enhances the City's ability to control how Rosemead will look and function as time passes. Many of the goals and policies contained in this plan will improve and sustain neighborhoods, foster a better business climate, and enhance the natural environment. The links forged within the plan between land uses and the transportation, infrastructure, and public services networks will provide the flexibility needed to accommodate growth and change over the life of the plan. The General Plan also focuses on the connections between residential neighborhoods and adjacent commercial centers that may lead to a healthier lifestyle for residents by creating opportunities to walk within the City that did not exist before. I N 'I' R 0 11 U C '1' 1 0 N Memorial near City flat] To be considered comprehensive, this General Plan must address many issues that are related to and influence land use decisions. Specifically, in addition to land use, State law requires that the General Plan address circulation, housing, the conservation of natural resources, the preservation of open space, the noise environment, and the protection of public safety (Government Code §65302). Jurisdictions may prepare and adopt any other General Plan element or address any other topics of particular relevance or interest to that community, with the understanding that these optional elements must be California Department of Finance, 2006 Fstimate PA G E s -9 ~+ F E B R U A R Y 1 6 a 1110 Deleted: the Sala roan Ranch, which v, Located an the current Savunozh Schnal site. leonad.l. and Amanda Rose were other earlv.culers, who established Rose, Meadow (Rosemead Ranch) as a winery, as wallas a hreeding and training area for horses. The Rosemead area included these two mnches, as well as Potrero lunch, which was owned by Richard Garvey. The urea waa known for small farms, as well as chicken and rabbit ranches. The City was incorporated in 1959 wish a populationof15.476. PodY -seven years after incerporation, the city of Rosemead had an estimated I N T x o o U C'1'1 o N • implemented with the same vigor — and are subject to the same legal scrutiny — as the mandatory elements or topics. The Rosemead Gcneral flan discusses these issues in five chapters, called elements. 'these elements are: The Land Use Element, which focuses on the built environment and pulls together issues and goals from the other elements, laying out the framework for balancing development with broader community aims. The Circulation Element, which addresses issues related to vehicular circulation, parking management, public transit, walking, biking, and trails. The Resource Management Element, which examines both the natural and human -made environments, and establishes policies to protect those resources that distinguish and define Rosemead. Topics addressed in this element include parks, recreation, open space, community facilities, air quality, water resources and conservation, and energy conservation. walkable Rosemead aonlm,d • The Public Safety Element, which identifies hazards • present in the community and defines ways for proper planning and emergency response services to mitigate the hazards including flooding. • The Noise Element identifies community noise concerns and includes policies and programs to minimize noise impacts in Rosemead. The Housing Element identifies current and future housing. Rosemead's Housing Element is updated every five years as required by State law. The City currently has an adopted and certified Housing Element dated z000. This element is due to be revised in2oto._ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - -i Deleted: zoos Table a -i shows the relationship between the six elements of the Rosemead General Plan and the State - mandated elements. P A G E i- i o • • Table t -i Relationship between Rosemead General Plan and State Mandated Elements The General Plan also includes Implementation Actions, located within each element, identif},ing the specific actions the City will undertake to implement goals and policies. Ongoing review of these Implementation Programs allows the City to adjust programs and planned actions to respond to new or • refocused priorities, to address annual budget constraints and /or opportunities, and to account for changes in the physical conditions or economic circumstances of the community (for example, occurrence of a natural disaster). Element Structure Each of the five elements is organized according to the following format: • Introduction • Issues, Goals, and Policies • Policy Map and Plan The Introduction of each element describes the focus and the purpose of the element. The relationship of the element to other General Plan elements is also specified. \ ~BJ • I N '1' R O 1) 11 C T 1 U N P A G E r- 1 1 F E 13 R U .4 R Y , 1: . x o 1 n State Mandated General Plan Elements G � o u u u Rosemead General Plan G o 'o Elements ru, o a Land Use Circulation _ Community Resources Safety Noise Housing'.• The General Plan also includes Implementation Actions, located within each element, identif},ing the specific actions the City will undertake to implement goals and policies. Ongoing review of these Implementation Programs allows the City to adjust programs and planned actions to respond to new or • refocused priorities, to address annual budget constraints and /or opportunities, and to account for changes in the physical conditions or economic circumstances of the community (for example, occurrence of a natural disaster). Element Structure Each of the five elements is organized according to the following format: • Introduction • Issues, Goals, and Policies • Policy Map and Plan The Introduction of each element describes the focus and the purpose of the element. The relationship of the element to other General Plan elements is also specified. \ ~BJ • I N '1' R O 1) 11 C T 1 U N P A G E r- 1 1 F E 13 R U .4 R Y , 1: . x o 1 n I N '1' R a n if C '1' 1 0 N • The Issues, Goals, and Policies section is based on input received from the community, members of the City Council and Planning Commission, and City staff. Issues represent the needs or concerns important to the community. Goals are overall statements of community desires and consist of broad statements of purpose or direction. Policies serve as guides to the Citv Council and City staff in reviewing development proposals and making other decisions that affects future growth and development in Rosemead. The Policy Map and Plan section provides an overview of the City's course of action to implement identified goals and policies. This section also includes Implementation Actions, which identifies specific actions to achieve the goals and plans identified in each General Plan element. • • Community Participation During the General Plan update process that began in 2003, the City created a four -page survey that asked residents and business owners in Rosemead what they think is special about Rosemead, and what changes they would like to see in the next 15 to 20 years. The survey was also available for downloading on the City's website. Respondents were asked to complete the survey and email or mail it to the City of Rosemead, or drop it off at City Hall. The City received qg completed surveys. In addition, the Mayor and City Council members were interviewed to provide direction for the Plan, and to identify the issues and opportunities that will enhance the quality of life in Rosemead. Their responses were used to draft goals and policies for each General Plan element. Example of Rosemead's single family residential areas Public meetings were conducted before the Planning Commission and City Council during the spring and summer of 2007, with many residents attending to share their ideas and comments. P e G e r- a Y IF C R R a A R Y , 6 • endorsed a concept and directed the Planning staff to modifi- the General flan in accordance kith the concept The modifications were then presented to the public Planning Commission. and City Council on =)LX". Related Plans and Programs State law places the General Plan at the top of the land use planning regulation hierarchy. Several local ordinances and other City plans must conform to General Plan policy and work to implement the Plan. Also, regional governmental agencies, such as the Southern California Association of Governments (SLAG) and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), have been established to address regional planning issues such as air quality, transportation, affordable housing, and habitat conservation. These regional government agencies have prepared a number of regional policy documents and plans that effect Rosemead. The following section describes ordinances, plans, and programs that must be consulted in association with the General Plan in development and planning decisions. Rosemead Zoning Ordinance The Zoning Ordinance, the primary tool used to implement the General Plan, regulates development type and intensity citywide. Development regulations imposed include those setting limits on building height, requiring setbacks, and specifying the percentage of a site that must be landscaped. 191 California Environmental Quality Act The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) was adopted by the State legislature in response to a public mandate for thorough environmental analysis of projects impacting the environment. The provisions of the law and environmental review procedure are described in the CEQA Law and Guidelines. CEQA is the instrument for ensuring that environmental impacts of local development projects are appropriately assessed and mitigated. SCAG Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) undertakes regional planning for the six-county SCAG region of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, Imperial and Ventura counties. SCAG's efforts focus on developing regional strategies to minimize traffic congestion, protect environmental quality, and provide adequate housing. The Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide sets forth broad goals intended P� L I I N E O o uc'rt 0 P A G E I- r a I N'r R U 11 U C '1 I O N • to be implemented by participating local and regional jurisdictions and the SCAQMD. SLAG has adopted companion documents to the Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide, most notably the Regional Transportation Plan. California Clean Air Act In 1988, the California Legislature enacted the California Clean Air Act that requires the SCAQMD to prepare a plan to attain state ambient air quality standards in the South Coast Air Basin. State air standards are generally more stringent than their federal equivalents, and attaining them will require encompassing and effective plan measures. The Clean Air Act requires reductions from all sources of pollution: large and small industry, mobile sources, household use of polluting products, and the transportation sector. The Act also requires the Basin Plan to be revised and updated every three years. The Clean Air Act grants new authority to the State's local air pollution control districts to adopt and enforce transportation control measures. In accordance with the Clean Air Act, areas with "severe" air pollution, which are defined as those that cannot reach State standards by 1999 and include the South Coast Air Basin, are required to include transportation control measures to achieve an average vehicle ridership of 1.5 persons or more during weekday commute hours (Refer to the Circulation Element for discussion of the City policy with respect to average vehicle ridership.). Similarly, the Clean Air Act calls for no net increases in vehicle emissions after 1997 and requires the SCAQMD to develop programs to control emissions from indirect sources or traffic • attractors such as housing developments, office parks, and shopping centers. The mitigation of traffic - generated air pollution from these sources will need to be closely linked with land use decisions. Congestion Management Plan The Congestion Management Plan (CMP) is a program adopted by the State Legislature and approved by the State voters in 1990 through Proposition u1. The CMP was created for the following purposes: To link land use, transportation, and air quality decisions; To develop a partnership among transportation decision -makers that devises appropriate transportation solutions including all modes of travel; and To propose transportation projects that are eligible to compete for state gas tax funds. P A G E 1- 1 q F E R R U A R Y 1 6 2 „ i„ • The Ims Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) is responsible for preparing the County's CMP. The MTA is required by Slate law to monitor local implementation of all CMP elements. Local jurisdictions are required to Monitor arterial congestion levels, monitor transit services along certain corridors, and implement an adopted trip reduction ordinance and land use analysis program. In addition, jurisdictions are required to track and report all new development activity. Regional Transportation Plan The Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) is a component of the Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide prepared by SCAG to address regional issues, goals, objectives, and policies for the Southern California region into the early part of the twenty-first century. 'rhe RTP, which SCAG periodically updates to address changing conditions in the Southland, has been developed with active participation from local agencies throughout the region, elected officials, the business community, community groups, private institutions, and private citizens. The RTP sets broad goals for the region and provides strategies to reduce problems related to congestion and mobility. In recognition of the close relationship between the traffic and air quality issues, the assumptions, goals, and programs contained in the RTP parallel those used to prepare the Air Quality Management Plan. Air Quality Management Plan The South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) is a comprehensive program designed to bring the South Coast Air • Basin, of which Rosemead is a part, into compliance with all federal and state air quality standards. The AQMP was prepared and adopted by the SCAG and SCAQMD. Since motor vehicles are a major source of air pollution, the AQMP places substantial emphasis on reducing motor vehicle miles traveled. The AQMP foresees cities taking an increasing role in solving air pollution problems through adoption of trip reduction ordinances at the local level. The cities can take an increasing role through the adoption and implementation of Air Quality Elements and the implementation of land use policies that reduce individual vehicle use. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System As part of a multi - pronged effort to improve the quality of water resources nationwide, the federal government authorized the State Regional Water Quality Control Board and its regional offices, such as the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board, to set up programs to implement National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) goals. Under the } • I N T R U U U C 'r 1 o N P A G P.i -1 g F E B R U A R Y , 6 I N 'I' K (l n Il C 'I' 1 o N • NPDES Stormwater Permit issued to the County of Los Angeles and Rosemead as co- permiltees, most new development projects in the City are required to incorporate measures to minimize pollutant levels in stormwater runoff. Compliance is required at the time that construction permits are issued, as %sell as over the long term through periodic inspections. NPDES requirements are adopted as part of the Rosemead Municipal Code, and are enforced by Los Angeles County, the Slate Water Resource Control Board, and the City's Public Works Department. • P A G E l - ( 6 F E n K U A R Y l 6. ¢ u l u • • 11 L A N D U S E ROSEMEAD GENERAL PLAN Introduction osemead accommodates a diversity of land uses to maintain a balanced community with vibrant Rresidential neighborhoods, a healthy economic base, and quality services for residents and visitors. The Land Use Element establishes policies for the types and location of land uses citywide. The Zoning Ordinance implements these policies by establishing detailed use regulations and development standards for all properties. State planning law requires that the Land Use Element designate "the proposed general distribution and general location and extent of the uses of the land" for a variety of purposes (Government Code Section 65302[al). Through maps and tent, this Element defines the distribution and intensity of development for residential, commercial, industrial, parks /open space, and public facility land uses within Rosemead and its sphere of influence areas. Finally, the Element describes the relationship between General Plan land use policy, zoning, and other plans. v14. ��k ..."'.„� FEBRUARY lo, 2o, o L A N D U S E Relationship to Other Elements and Plans The Land Use Element provides the framework for all other General Plan elements, as the manner in which land is used in Rosemead affects: • The location and design of roadways, bicycle paths, and pedestrian walkways; The location, type, and design of new housing development (Housing Element); and • Park location and use, and environmental resource protection and use (Resources Management Element). Although the Land Use Element is often the most referred element in the General Plan, it represents only one part of the General Plan. Coordination between and among all of the General Plan Elements is required to comprehensively address long -range community goals. Zoning Ordinance The City's zoning ordinance, which is part of the Municipal Code, divides the City into areas called zoning districts. The zoning ordinance establishes regulations for each district with respect to permitted uses, allowable density, building height, development character, etc. The zoning ordinance consists of a map that delineates the district boundaries, plus text that explains each district's purpose, specifies permitted and conditional uses, and establishes development, maintenance, and performance standards. The zoning ordinance serves as the primary implementation tool for the Land Use Element. Under California law, the zoning ordinance must be consistent with the General Plan. P A G E 2- 2 F E B R U A R Y 12, 2 0 1 0 L A N D U S E Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide The Southem California Association of Governments (SCAG) undertakes regional planning efforts for the six - county SCAG region consisting of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura, and Imperial counties. SCAG's planning efforts focus on developing strategies to minimize traffic congestion, protect environmental quality, and provide adequate housing throughout the region. The Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide — developed with active participation from local agencies, elected officials, the business community, community groups, private institutions, and private citizens — sets forth broad goals and objectives intended to be implemented by participating jurisdictions and agencies such the South Coast Air Quality Management District and Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Rosemead Downtown Vision Plan The City is currently considering a Rosemead Downtown Vision Plan. This plan focuses on urban design opportunities on Valley Boulevard. The Plan calls for: • Enhancing existing resources — add landscaping and streetscape along Valley Boulevard and encouraging "focal point" buildings at opportunity sites or parcels. • Creating potential districts — identify opportunity parcels along Valley Boulevard near Walnut Grove Avenue and Temple City Boulevard to create image - making public spaces and focal point buildings. • Emphasizing public space — expand the use of public space including the use of courtyards, plazas, outdoor dining, and pedestrian friendly retail. • Enhance Wayfinding — improve signage and placemaking images to encourage the feel of separate districts and distinct places along Valley Boulevard. Specific Plan As provided in the City's Zoning Ordinance ('Title 17 Rosemead's Municipal Code), a specific plan is an instrument for guiding, coordinating and regulating the development of propertv within a defined area. It is a special set of development standards guidelines, and implementation procedures applicable to a particular geozraphical area within P A G E 2- 3 l� 4..a.kr FEBRUARY 1 0 z o 1 o L A N D U S E the City. Specific plans are authorized in Article 8, Chapter 4 of the State Planning and Zoning Law. The law grants the adopted specific plan priority over the City's Zoning Ordinance, but it must remain consistent with the General Plan as a tool for implementation of provisions and policies. Measuring Density and Intensity While people generally understand land use terms like "residential," "commercial," and "industrial," State law requires a clear and concise description of these categories. In addition, population and intensity standards must be specified. To describe the intensity of use — how much development exists on a property — land use planners have developed the quantitative measures of density and intensity. The term density describes the development capacity of residential land. The General Plan describes density in terms of dwelling units per net acre of land (du /ac), exclusive of present or planned streets and other public rights -of -way. Density is also used to describe population density in terms of the number of persons per net acre. Development intensity refers to the extent of development on a parcel of land or lot. Intensity may be calculated using several measures, such as the total building floor area, building height, floor -area ratio, or the percent of lot coverage. The General Plan uses floor -area ratio, or FAR, as a measure of non- residential intensity. The floor -area ratio is the ratio between the total gross floor area of all buildings on a lot and the total land area of that lot. This measure does not include area within parking structures. P A G E 2- q F E B R U A R Y 12, 2 U 1 0 1.5 1,AND USE This diagram illustrates how FAR controls the intensity of use on a lot. FAR is determined by dividing th gross floor area of all buildings on lot by the land area of that lot. For example, a 20,000 square foot building on a 40,000 square foot lot yields an FAR of 0.5:1. A 0.5❑ FAR allows a single -story building which covers half the lot, or a two -story 'Iding with reduced lot coverage. C}�...� Land Use Plan This Land Use Element addresses how properties will be developed over time and the extent to which private and public redevelopment efforts will change, intensify, or otherwise modify uses of property citywide. This section describes the planned distribution and development intensities of all land uses, and identifies specific goals the City will pursue relative to each designated use. Land Use Policy Map To maintain the desired balance of uses in the community and achieve goals regarding housing, economic development, parks, and education, the City will make land use decisions in conformance with the Land Use Policy Map, illustrated in Figure 2 -1. The Land Use Policy Map provides a two - dimensional description of land use policy, indicating the preferred location and types of permitted uses throughout the City. Land Use Categories This Land Use Element designates five major categories of land use: (t) residential, (2) commercial, (3) office /light industrial, (4) mixed -use, and (5) public facilities. The residential designation is further subdivided into three density ranges: P A G E 2 -g FEBRUARY 1 o, 2 o 1 o L A N D U S E Low, Medium, and High. To provide for a diversity of mixed- use approaches, the Mixed -Use designation includes three subcategories: Residential /Commercial, High Density Residential/ Commercial, and Industrial /Commercial. Table 2 -1 summarizes the density and intensity associated with each land use category and the aggregate acreage for each. The table indicates a maximum density or intensity for each category, which indicates the maximum development potential of any individual parcel. However, not every parcel in Rosemead will be developed to the maximum density or intensity due to physical and other constraints such as public right -of -way needs, placement of buildings, zoning requirements, market desires, and other factors. Also, many residential neighborhoods in Rosemead are fully developed and not expected to experience any significant new development or "recycling" where an existing structure is removed and a new structure is built in its place. Thus, Table 2 -1 also indicates typical densities and intensities that can be expected over the life of this General Plan. Altogether, these factors are used to estimate the possible buildout capacity of the City in terms of population, housing units, and square feet of commercial, industrial, and other nonresidential uses. The typical densities and intensities are for planning purposes only. Any development proposal involving a density /intensity in excess of the minimum but equal to or below the maximum should not require a General Plan Amendment. P A G E 2- 6 F E B R U A R Y 12, 2 0 1 0 L A N D U S E This page intentionally left blank. P A G E z- 8 F E B R U A R Y 1 2 , 2 0 1 0 Table z -t Land Use Categories and Buildout Potential Maximum Typical Land Use Categories DUs /AC (a) I DUs /AC L A N D U S E Typical Population LDR Low Density Residential 7 DU /AC 7 DU /AC 28 Persons /AC MDR Medium Density Residential 1 12 DU /AC 8.5 DU /AC 34 Persons /AC HDR High Density Residential I 3o DU /AC _ i9.8 DU /AC 179 Persons /AC Mined -1 ice Cntepnry MRC Mixed -Use 25-3o DU /AC ,3_o DU[Acre and _ N/A N/A Residential /Commercial i.Cya FAR 1.6:1 FAR -Peo -nstA - MHRC Mixed -Use High Density ao bo DU /AC _ fAcre and .a8 DU r jampersons AC /- a) Residential /Commercial- z.o:i FAR 2o:r FAR - -- -- -- MIC Mixed -Use Industrial /Commercial 2,5 :1 FAR i.o:t FAR N/A PF 1 _ - - Deleted:] OS Ivpc „opnw11.a1u, u' Resources I N/A N/A N/A CEM Cemetery I N/A N/A N/A Notes: a) DUs /AC: Dwelling Units Per Net Acre (net acres does not include public streets or right -of -Hays) b) FAR: Floor -Area Ratio S,)_ _ Population Densitl_is estimated based on an axTrage household size of 3Q31p_e_sons�er household and a_____ lawny rate of 3.o2% according to thc2j CaHfomia Department of Finance, Demographic Unit. I) Maximum of 1.o 1 FAR allowed f hotel ItscE that meet the requirement in Tablc z -2 Mixed -Usc Residential /Commercial assumes a&% residential 33,% commercial land use mixes_ _ • Mixed-use High Density Residential/Commercial assurnes ate% residential commercial land use------ ... mix, Residential Categories Three land use categories are established to accommodate a range of housing types and densities. Preservation and enhancement of single- family residential neighborhoods is a key goal. New development must be compatible with and complement established residential neighborhoods. In residential areas, in addition to the primary residential use, r a P A G E 2- 9 F E B R U A R Y 10, 2 0 1 0 L A N D U S E accessory structures, group homes, religious and charitable organizations are permitted consistent with State law and zoning ordinance requirements. Low Density Residential The Low Density Residential (LDR) land use category is characterized by low- density residential neighborhoods consisting primarily of detached single- family dwellings on individual lots. The minimum permitted density is o dwelling units per acre. The maximum permitted density is To dwelling units per acre. The typical population density is approximately 28 persons per acre. Medium Density Residential The Medium Density Residential (MDR) land use category allows for densities of up to 12 units per acre with a minimum of o dwelling units per acre. Housing types within this density range include single - family detached homes on smaller lots, duplexes, and attached units. The typical population density is approximately Low Density Single Family Residential Development 34 persons per acre. High Density Residential The High Density Residential (HDR) category accommodates many forms of attached housing — triplexes, fourplexes, apartments, and condominiums/ townhouses — and small -lot or clustered detached units. The maximum permitted density is 30 units per acre with a minimum of o dwelling units per acre, and the typical population density is 79 persons per acre. Commercial Categories Businesses in Rosemead's commercial districts provide important services to residents and contribute substantially to the City's tax revenue base. The -three Commercial categories are intended to support business activity and to provide incentives to property owners to improve areas that function below their economic potential. Commercial The Commercial designation applies to retail and service commercial centers located alone major arterials in the City: (i) Vallev Boulevard west of P A G E 2- r o IF E B R U A R Y 12, 2 o 1 o Southern Wi(omia Edison building commercial properties Deleted: two L A N D U S E Muscatel, (2) Valley Boulevard near and east of Rosemead Boulevard. _ ('i) Garvey Avenue between New Avenue and -- Charlotte Avenue. (a) San Gabriel Boulevard between Park Street and Newark Avenue (S) just west of the Walnut Grove and Garvey Avenue intersection, (6) along Rosemead Boulevard from Mission Drive to Valley Boulevard, and (7) Del Mar from the I -to freeway interchange to Garvev Avenue. , Permitted uses include a broad range of retail, office, and service uses that serve local and regional needs. Prohibited uses include warehousing, manufacturing, industrial uses, and ' similar uses. The maximum permitted FAR is o.45:3 ' Overnight accommodations, such as hotels, may developed up to maximum permitted FAR of t.o:i if their projects include Sher design standards, the "required hotel amenities" and a minimum of two "additional hotel amenities" as &ntified in_________________;' Table 2 -2 If a hotel project does not meet the _amenities _in ------ _---------------- I Table 2 -2 they can only build up to o.45:i FAR. Deleted: walnut Grove Avenue /Rush Street Deleted: and the commercial areas south of the Pomona Freeway. The maximum permitted FAR is 0.35:1. Deleted: , except for overnight accommodations as follows Deleted: may have a maximum permitted FAR of 1.o:1. Such design characteristics and design amenities must include in order to obtain a FAR higher than 0.35:1: Formatted: Font: Bold Deleted: <s>Beblsitting9 Formatted: Bullets and Numbering Formatted: Left Formatted Table Deleted: Room Deleted: <*>Concimue Desk9 Table z -z Formatted: Left Required Hotel Amenities (a) ii" Deleted: Store Delated: /Valet Senice 4 Required Hotel Amenities Additional Hotel Amenities ,�� ; Deleted: center Deleted: Seri ices • Concierge desk ......... �l Florist- and -gift shoo-- - - - - -- Deleted:<s >Parkingswcture9 • Ball oom onvemence tore -'1 ' ------- - - - - -- `T`�- - -- -- �---•'--- • Business Fenterse rYices snack shop — - Deleted: lounge Meeting rootryA ________ I Daycare services - . Deleted: Restaurant, bar, and lounge _baysp_ —pool or a! euzxt -•- -Valet srki --- -�`� Deletetl:) Fitness center_ ___ - - w - - — Deleted: R Note: I I I " " -: D Deleted: Jacuzzi a) To obtain higher FAR standard (maximum permitted 1.w1 FART protects must provide all of the < <� , ° F Formatted: Left amenities listed tinder the Reglgr�H�tefAmenSties column and a minilnl�m of Jlsmemtle= listed _ _ _ , ° under the Additional Hotel Amenities column - '',q'`, D Deleted: Spa Deleted: < »Snack Shopi 0 0 p1 F Formatted: Left, Right: 0.05 ", approaches for Commercial designations include _ ',','0' + Bulleted + Level: 1 + Aligned at 0" ,Development a „ of 0 + Tab after: 0.25" + Went at: Where commercial development abuts residential ' ' D Deleted: Parkin neighborhoods, new projects must be designed with ` ` sensitivities to the residential uses in terms of massing, siting of ` Deleted` c parking and loading facilities, and lighting. , ,', D Deleted: I <a> Florist 9 Gift Shop '. F Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.01 ", l H Hanging: 0.19 ", Space Before: 6 pt, 0 After: 6 It ' D Deleted: up to Deleted: <sp> P A G Ez - 11 F E R U A R Y r o, 2 o• o L A N D U S E Specific Plan /Commercial Plan /Commercial areas will be redeveloped into cohesively finned sub - regional commercial centers that provide goods and services in a larger retail form with ancillary smaller retail uses supporting the sub - regional commercial uses. The Specific Plan /Commercial areas will also result in a higher level of site design including architectural character and urban design, vehicular access parking. landscaping, and pedestrian amenities. The Specific Plan /Commercial designation allows for a collection of signature commercial retail anchors general retail outlets and casual to upscale restaurants. Any development project within this designation mill require a specific plan. The objectives of Specific Plan /Commercial designation are to: • Establish a well - balanced and carefully planned collection of signature commercial retail anchors; zeneral retail outlets, and casual to upscale restaurants which can take advantage of the site's accessibility to major roadway corridors; • Allow for the development of site in a manner which will provide a productive use of commercial opportunities: • Expand commercial retail and restaurant options for local customers by roviding daytime and nighttime shopping and dining opportunities in a safe and secure environment • Augment the City's economic base by providing a variety of tax generating Uses: • Create employment generating opportunities for the residents of Rosemead and surrounding communities: PA G E z- 1 2 FEBRUARY 1 2, 2 0 t o Require consistent and rational development of the site(s) in accordance with established and functional aesthetic standards and Minimize impacts ou surrounding residential neighborhoods by providing adequate mitigation measures that address project access, loading and unloading activities parking development scale and massing screening, noise, lighting, and architectural design. The specific plan will guide and regulate all future development within each of the project areas and suareas and supporting improvements include: Distribution of land uses; Preliminary siting and configurations of primary specific plan components; Location and design of supporting infrastructure, including but not limited to vehicle travel, pedestrian circulation water, wastewater, utilities, and other necessary infrastructure components; Establishment of development standards • Establishing standards and criteria for high qualih architecture site planning, and landscape design; • A detailed statement of the relationship of the specific plan to the General Plan and how it implements the policies of the General Plan: • Administration, implementation procedures, and processing of the Specific Plan; and • All other requirements set forth in Section 6.,451 of the Government Code. The Specific Plan /Commercial designation consists of approximately 19 .2 acres within the following two project areas: The Project Area 1. This area consists of a parcels of land totaling approximately is 8 acres located on the north side Garvey Avenue between Del Mar Avenue and San Gabriel Avenue. This site is bounded by Garvey Avenue to the south Strathmore Avenue to the west, single - family residential land uses to the L A N D U S E P A G E 2- a 3 F E B R U A R Y 1 o, 2 O. o - - - Formatted: Bullets and Numbering L A N D U S E north. and Paradise Trailer Park and Apartments to the east. Project Area 2. This area is located on the southeast comer of Valley Boulevard and Walnut Grove Avenue, includes three parcels totaling approximately 4.4 acres. Rubio Wash is located just south of site and a combination of commercial and single - family residential land uses are located to the east. The Rosemead Specific Plan /Commercial provides up to 260 000 square feet of commercial retail and restaurant .......................... - - peietea: so related uses The plan envisions complimentary mix of land - Format . Not Highlight uses and building sizes as identified in Table z -g and Table 2 -d. The minimum specific plan site area requirement within Proiect Area t shall be is acres The minimum specific plan site area requirement within Project Area z shall be ,� acres The mix of land uses and building sizes for each of the project areas are outlined in Table 2 -4 and Table 2-4. Table z -3 Specific Plan /Commercial Designation Land Use and Building Size Requirements For Project Area 1 The primary use of the site shall have a major anchor tenant (7s,000- 14o.000 square feet) and /or an overnight accommodation use Allowed 1— 1d Uses Allowable Building Pad Sizes Large Retail Center with Anchor Tenmlts 7.5.000 - 140.000 square feet Consumer electronics and appliances retail, department store discount and variety retail, home improvement, and hardware store General Retail Cutlets Home furnishing and housewares retail: music, video. rs.000 square feet book and entertainment retail; office products retail; snorting and recreational equipment retaiP hobby and craft retail; and other specialty retail Restaurant- Related Uses Casual dining restaurants specialh• eateries, and 5,000 — 10.000 square feet upscale dining Overnight Accommodations: Overnight loo guest rooms (minimum) accommodations, such as hotels, shall have the following minimum amenities: a P A G E 2- 1 4 F E B R U A R Y 1 2, 2 0 1 0 Table z -T Specific Plan /Commercial Designation Land Use and Building Size Requirements For Project Area 1 The primary use of the site shall have a major anchor tenant (7..000- 14o,000 square feet) and /or an overnight Allowed Land Uses Allowable Building Pad Sizes Large Retail Center with Anchor Tenants Consumer electronics and appliances retail 75.000- 140.000 department store discount and variety retail home square feet improvement and hardlvare store Table z -a Specific Plan /Commercial Designation Land Use and Building Size Requirements For Project Area z The primary use of the site shall have a minimum of one general aril ....rlor �r..l /nr a aht arrnm mndatinn e L A N D U S E P A G E z- t 5 F E B R U A R Y 10. 2 0 1 0 Allowable Allowed Land Uses Building Pad Sizes General Retail Outlets Home furnishing and housewares retail; music, video. ts.000 — 3s.000 square feet book and entertainment retail; office roducts retaiP sporting and recreational equipment retail hobby and graft retail and other specialty retail Restaurant- Related Uses Casual dining restaurants specialty eateries and 5.000-10,000 square feet upscale dining Overnight Accommodations: Overnight too guest rooms (minimum) accommodations, such as hotels, shall have the following minimum amenities: a restaurant. bar, lounge, meeting room(s), and business center. e L A N D U S E P A G E z- t 5 F E B R U A R Y 10. 2 0 1 0 L A N D U S E Office /Light Industrial The Office /Light Industrial (O /LI) designation applies to properties generally located at the north and south edges of the City. This category provides suitable locations for manufacturing, assembly, and limited food processing uses, as well as office buildings and business parks. Zoning regulations specify the uses permitted and performance standards for industrial uses. The maximum permitted FAR is 0.5a. 'Mixed use Categories Rosemead has established three Mixed -Use categories to provide options for innovative approaches to land use and development. These categories allow for a mix of land uses in the same building, on the same parcel of land, or side by side within the same area. Such complementary use stimulates business activity, encourages pedestrian patronage, and provides a broader range of options to property owners to facilitate the preservation, re -use and redevelopment of structures. Industrial Use Mixed -Use Residential /Commercial Generally mixed -use development performs best when it is located near other mixed -use development. This configuration gives the residents more retail and office choices located and designed for pedestrian activity. Similarly, business may prefer to locate near each other to gain the synergistic benefits of serving the same clientele. As such, the mixed -use designations are located in such a manner to maximize or capitalize on that synergy. The Mixed-Use—Residential /Commercial category allows vertically or horizontally mixed commercial, office, and residential uses, with an emphasis on retail uses along the ground floor. Pedestrian connections among the uses, and as appropriate to surrounding neighborhoods, should be provided. The Mixed -Use designation will allow for mixed use and commercial infill development. Further, parcels may be assembled and consolidated to create lareer, integrated development sites. All mixed -use projects are also subject to review and compliance with the City's adopted mixed -use design guidelines. This designation applies to areas of Rosemead with historically less intensive commercial and office development. The Mixed- P A G E 2- 1 6 F E B R U A R Y 12, 2 0 1 0 Office Development L A N D U S E Use Residential /Commercial cateeory is located on Valley Boulevard between Muscatel Avenue and Valley. Boulevard and on Garvev Avenue between Charlotte Avenue -and Walnut Grove Avenue. Residential densities are limited to a maximum _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Of 25 to 30 units per acre. For stand -alone commercial use and integrated mixed -use projects, the maximum permitted FAR is 1.6a. The typical population density is approximately tiq.......................... persons per acre. _______________________________________________________________________ Mixed -Use High Density Residential /Commercial Similar to the Mixed -Use Residential /Commercial category, the Mixed-Use—High Density Residential /Commercial category permits vertically or horizontally mixed use commercial, office, and residential uses, but greater residential densities are permitted and encouraged. Retail uses shall be emphasized along the ground floor of street frontages, and pedestrian connections among the uses and surrounding neighborhoods should be provided. This designation applies to the eastern end of Valley Boulevard and south of Garvey Avenue, just west of the eastern boundary. Residential densities are limited to a maximum of 36 to 6o units per acre. For stand -alone commercial use and integrated mixed -use projects, the maximum permitted FAR is 2:1. The typical population density is approximately 191 persons per acre. Mixed-Use-Industrial/Commercial The Mixed -Use industrial /Commercial category accommodates 1 light industry, research and development, and office uses. The emphasis is on businesses that provide career - oriented and trade jobs. Commercial uses should be limited to those that support the primary industrial and office uses. Areas designated for Mixed-Use Industrial/Commercial are limited to properties along San Gabriel Boulevard south of d�y ,liellnian Avenue to Park Street alone San Gabriel Avenue south of the SCE easement to Rush Street, and on Garvey Avenue fEom Los Angeles County Pubhc Library Walnut Grove to Muscatel Avenue (south side of Garvey -- RoaemeadBranch -- Avenue) or City limit (north side of Garvey Avenue). The maximum FAR is 2.5:1. Site design shall take into , consideration any adjacent residential neighborhoods with regard to parking lot entrances, location of parking and loading facilities, building massing, and lighting. Rosemead City Hall FEBRUARY 10, 2010 Deleted: along Rosemead Boulevard, Hart street at Marshall street, Del Mar Avenue betwxen Hellman and Garvey Avenues, and along San Gabriel and Gladys Avenues. Parcels in these areas generally are not large enough to support major commercial development. Thus Deleted: iiq Deleted: , the Mixed Use designation will allow for residential and office infUl development. Altematively, parcels may be assembled and consolidated to create larger, integrated development sites. I I . - Deleted: Newmark Deleted: F L A N D U S E Public Facilities Category The Public Facilities designation applies to those land uses that are operated and maintained for public benefit. Public facilities include educational facilities, parks, utilities, and buildings or areas that support government activities. This land use category also includes quasi - public uses such as private utilities easements, private schools, and institutional activities. Open Space Categories Open Space /Natural Resources This category applies to public properties set aside for diverse recreational interests, including parks„ baseball /soccer fields, and picnicking areas, as well as open lands required for resource protection. Cemetery This category applies to the Savannah Memorial Park Cemetery (aka El Monte Cemetery) property located along Valley Boulevard. Permitted uses are limited to those ordinarily associated with a cemetery, as defined specifically in the zoning ordinance. Goals and Policies These Land Use Element goals and policies address four citywide issues that include: (t) enhancing and maintaining existing single- family neighborhoods; (z) providing housing opportunities for all segments of the population; (3) preserving and encouraging a variety of commercial and industrial activities; and (4) revitalizing underperforming commercial corridors. Single - Family Neighborhoods In some neighborhoods, apartments and townhomes have replaced older single - family residences. This transition has generally improved neighborhoods with the introduction of higher - quality housing. However, it has also created neighborhoods where single- family residences are directly adjacent to apartments and condominiums, and residents have PA G E 2- r 8 F E B R U A R Y 12, 2 0 1 0 Anen space Deleted: Rosemead City ball expressed concern regarding privacy and the change in neighborhood character. Maintaining housing conditions and protecting the privacy of single -story homes are key challenges in established single- family residential neighborhoods. House sizes and heights have increased over time, leading to inconsistency within neighborhoods when newer homes are constructed adjacent to or between older homes. Many of the larger, multi -story homes have a line of sight into an adjacent home or back yard. The City is committed to preserving established single- family neighborhoods by regulating development and encouraging both property maintenance and rehabilitation. The City has adopted Ordinance No. 551, commonly known as the anti - mansionization ordinance, which amended the zoning code to limit FAR and include design standards to eliminate the looks of excessive density. The City has also adopted and will promote guidelines for new development that encourages high quality site and building design compatibility with surrounding uses. L A N D U S E Goal t: Maintain stable and attractive single - family residential neighborhoods. Policy 1.1: Discourage the entitlement and construction of multiple - family units in neighborhoods that are predominately single - family. Policy 1.2: Provide guidelines and standards to ensure adequate buffering and screening between lower density residential uses and adjacent higher density residential or non - residential uses to mitigate potential land use conflicts. Policy 1.3: Actively promote the maintenance of properties and buildings through code enforcement. Policy 1.4: Through the Conditional Use Permit process, Design Review process, residential design guidelines, or zoning enforcement, regulate new and large residential structures that compromise neighborhood quality. Policy 1.5: Require that new single- family residential construction, additions, and renovations be designed to protect the privacy of adjacent residential properties and the quality of established neighborhoods. P A G E 2 - 1 9 Amt\ � FEBRUARY i o, 201 o L A N D U s E Policy 1.6: Where the housing stock and neighborhood design are of high quality, maintain and provide the foundation for strong neighborhood interaction, and ensure that the bulk and mass of new single - family residential buildings or additions be of the same scale as surrounding units within established residential neighborhoods. Policy 1.7: Foster housing stock and neighborhood revitalization, renovation, and good site /architectural design. Policy 1.8: Require that new single - family units utilize detailed architectural articulations to promote the visual character of neighborhoods and comply with the adopted single family design guidelines. Commercial and Industrial Districts Commercial and industrial districts in Rosemead and the jobs and tax revenues they provide contribute significantly to the City's financial well - being. Economically viable commercial and industrial businesses generate tax revenue, provide a variety of shopping and commercial activities, and ensure the long -term fiscal health of the City. Preserving, retaining, and building the City's sales tax base through diverse and successful commercial and industrial uses allow Rosemead to continue to provide high level of public services, and to construct public improvements that enhance the community. The Land Use Element and Plan will maintain, enhance, and invigorate commercial development by: Concentrating commercial and industrial businesses in established commercial, office, and industrial districts; Minimizing the "commercial sprawl" of strip commercial development; and Enhancing high quality commercial building and site design while allowing for increased intensities of use. With regard to industrial uses, limited areas in Rosemead are designated for such businesses, and the City's focus is on P A G E 2- 2 o F E B R U A R Y 12, 2 0 1 0 Deleted: Policy r.7:. Strengthen neighborhood character by promoting use of high quality architectural design and materials and encouraging new development to be architecturally compatible with surrounding structures. I ,Commercial development - - - - - - - - - - - - - Deleted: Newer c L A N D U S E retaining and attracting clean industrial uses that have minimal impact on surrounding residential neighborhoods, that provide quality jobs, and that contribute to the tax base. Goal 2: Expanded opportunities for concentrated commercial and industrial uses that contribute jobs and tax revenues to the community Policy 2.1: Revitalize commercial strip corridors by creating attractive and dynamic pedestrian - friendly activity nodes and commercial centers. Policy 2.1: Encourage continued development of self sustaining commercial uses within centers located at strategic intersections. Policy 2.2: Discourage further strip commercial development along major arterials. Policy 2.3: Discourage the rezoning of commercial and industrial districts to residential uses. Policy 2.4 Rigorously enforce property maintenance standards for commercial and industrial properties. Policy 2.5: Establish and apply architectural design review to additions, remodel of existing buildings and new commercial and industrial development. 2.6: Encourage the reconfiguration and development of neighborhood shopping centers by offering modified development standards, more intense floor -area ratios, and other tools. Mixed -Use The City of Rosemead encourages mixed uses at key locations The Mixed Usn,land use designations will promote stronger and enhanced commercial business districts _ Enhanced _ Ji features should include a livelier streetscape, pedestrian friendly street frontages for new buildings, revitalization of building fagades, creation of active and attractive public spaces, street furDiture, and other improvements. {.,Z,' P A G E 2 -2 1 A.L FEBRUARY 1 0 , 20 1 0 LAND US F. A key opportunity exists to revitalize commercial corridors with _ yxed�e developments that provide both needed housing_and _ _ - - Deleted: M commercial retail services. Mixed -use development has several J Deleted: U tangible benefits, most importantly: • attracting private investment that can help revitalize older commercial uses; • increasing patronage within the area, which translates to economic benefits to businesses and the community; • bringing residential and commercial uses within walking distance to each other; and • promoting pedestrian- friendly mixed -use projects with public spaces and lively street fronts where people can meet and interact. For residential and commercial mixed -use projects, tax - generating restaurants, retail uses, and services are required on the ground floor street frontages to create a lively street front. Mixed -use projects often revitalize older commercial districts, but it is important that the design of new mixed -use developments reflect the established character of Rosemead. New mixed -use buildings should be compatible with the scale and massing of adjacent buildings and respect a site's context within the overall community. The City has adopted design guidelines for mixed -use development that provide design criteria to assist developers and City staff on the review of such projects, and to ensure that development is of high quality and reflective of Rosemead's goals. Goal g: Creation of vibrant, attractive mixed -use development Policy 3-1: Encourage mixed -use development as a means of upgrading established uses and developing vacant parcels along arterials and providing new commercial, residential, and employment opportunities. Policy 3.2: Use the Mixed- UseHigh Density Residential /Commercial land use designation as a vehicle to help strengthen and revitalize Rosemead's central business district. Policy 3.3: Provide adequate buffering between existing residential and commercial or light industrial P A C E 2- 2 2 F E B R U A R Y 12, 2 0 1 0 L A N D U S E uses within designated Mixed -Use areas, as well as in adjacent areas. Policy 3.4: Encourage pedestrian friendly commercial and residential planned developments wherever possible. Policy 3.5: Promote lively and attractive ground -floor retail uses that will create public revenues needed to provide for City services and the City's tax base. Economic Development and Revitalization Creating business and employment opportunities will strengthen the City's economic health and provide funds necessary to provide desired public facilities and services. Spending money locally increases the success of local businesses and employers, and improves private investment in the community. Proactive economic development strategies will facilitate and encourage the revitalization of the City's commercial and industrial corridors. Economic development activities include facilitating mixed -use development along commercial corridors to increase the quality of commercial offerings for residents, retaining important industrial districts, ,and focusing regional commercial activity at key locations-that f ----- - - - - -- ----------------------------- are easily accessible. Goal 4: A financially healthy City that can meet residents' desires for public services and facilities Policy 4.1: Retain and attract commercial and industrial businesses that contribute positively to the overall tax base. Policy 4.2: Continue to attract industrial businesses that provide quality jobs for skilled workers. Policy 4.3: Exclude commercial and industrial activities that adversely impact the City and its residents without providing corresponding benefits. P A G E z- z 3 ��.•.�D% FEBRUARY 10, 2010 - - Deleted: can L A N D U S E Goal 5: Targeted land use changes that improve housing and economic opportunities for residents and businesses and achieve City fiscal and environmental objectives. Policy 5.1: Encourage revitalization of Garvey Avenue, east _ _ Deietea: , aosemeaa a�we�aw, and of the SCE easement by promoting mixed -use _ xonn Det Mar Avenae development that integrates commercial uses ' - Deleted: corridors with higher - density multiple- family residential uses. Policy 5.2: Encourage revitalization of the San Gabriel Boulevard corridor south of Hellman Avenue to Park Street and then again south of$he SCE ,_ -- Deleted: Garvey easement to Rush Street by promoting mixed - use development that integrates light industrial and officelbusiness park uses. Policy 5-3: Preserve the established Central Business District along Valley Boulevard, and establish opportunities for large commercial and residential mixed -use developments. Policy 5.4: Establish a specific plan to create a "downtown" Rosemead between Walnut Grove Avenue and Rosemead Boulevard. Policy 5-5: Continue to support development of Rosemead Place as a commercial center, placing emphasis on improved freeway access and visibility and high quality landscaping design. Policy 5.¢: Require that future commercial projects adjacent to the San Bernardino Freeway, south of Marshall Street, be developed in a manner that: • complements established commercial uses; • capitalizes on the high visibility provided by the adjacent freeway through high quality design and signage; and • incorporates the highest construction standards possible. Policy 5.Z: Encourage development of high quality commercial or mixed-use center in the vicinity of the intersection of Valley Boulevard and Temple City Boulevard. P A G E 2- 2 4 F E B R U A R Y 12, 2 0 1 0 L A N D U S E c______________ __ ____ ___- __-------- ______________I Zoning and Land Use Policy The City's zoning ordinance serves as the primary tool to implement General Plan land use policies. Under California law, the zoning ordinance must be consistent with the General Plan, meaning that each land use category must have one or more corresponding zone districts, and development standards and land use regulations in the zoning ordinance must reflect the policies in the General Plan. While General Plan discussion of permitted land uses and development intensities is by nature somewhat general, the zoning ordinance provides the specificity property owners and developers seek in identifying how particular properties can be used and developed. Table 2- 5 identifies the relationships between land use categories and zone districts in Rosemead. The Zoning Ordinance will be amended to include the mixed-use land use categories. Table z -5 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Consistency Policy 5T T. Require that future projects in Mined -Use designated areas east of Rosemead Place incorporate the highest quality design and mnstruction standards to assure use, function, and circulation uses.1 _ _ _ _ _ _ - Formatted: Not Highlight — - - - - - - Deleted: RC -M Deleted: V -M P A G E 2 - 2 5 6kL \'' FEBRUARY i o, 2 o i o Corresponding Zone General Plan Land Use Category (a) Districts (b) LDR Low Density Residential R -1 P -D MDR Medium Density Residential R -2 P -D R -3 HDR High Density Residential P -O D -O C -1 P -D C Commercial C -3 P CBD D -O SP /C Specific Plan /Commercial C__1 DD =O CBD SP CBD P MRC Mixed -Use Residential /Commercial RC -MUDO D -O P -D C-3 Mixed-Use CBD P MHRC High Density RC -MUDO, D -O Residential Commercial _ _ _ _ P -D - ________ c__1 P-D D -O MIC Mixed -Use Industrial /Commercial P M -1 C -3 P -D OLI Office /Light Industrial P-0 D -O M -1 Policy 5T T. Require that future projects in Mined -Use designated areas east of Rosemead Place incorporate the highest quality design and mnstruction standards to assure use, function, and circulation uses.1 _ _ _ _ _ _ - Formatted: Not Highlight — - - - - - - Deleted: RC -M Deleted: V -M P A G E 2 - 2 5 6kL \'' FEBRUARY i o, 2 o i o L A N D U S E Notcs: a) This table compares the General Plan land use categories eith the zoning districts and overlay districts. It is anticipated that the Zoning Ordinance will be updated and these zoning districts, shone here, maybe changed. b) Zone Districts: Ra: Single Family Residential R -2: Medium Multi - Density Residential _R -3: Medium Multiple Residential _C -v Neighborhood Commercial _C -3: Medium Commercial _C13D: Central Business District _F -O: Professional Office _Ma: Light Manufacturing RC -M_UM: Residential /Commercial MixedL Development 0%ci la\' SP: Snecific Plan- CI -M: Commercial /Industrial Mixed OS: Open Space P -D: Planned Development D -O: Design Overlay Development Capacity Table 2 -6 identifies the planned distribution of land uses resulting from implementation of the Land Use Plan. Over time, as properties transition from one use to another or property owners rebuild, land uses and intensities will gradually shift to align with the intent of this Land Use Element. Table 2 -6 summarizes the land use distribution, typical level of development anticipated, and the resultant residential and nonresidential levels of development that can be expected from full implementation of land use policies established by this General Plan. Given the almost built -out character of Rosemead, significant redevelopment activities may not occur over the life of this General Plan. Average development densities and potential presented in Table 2 -3 reflect primarily established densities, with limited opportunities for recycling to more intensified development. As shown in the Table 2 -5, the estimated population for Rosemead is approximately t t iq approximately,r5 Q,,tS housing units._ F A G E 2- 2 G FEBRUARY 1z, 2 0 r o Deleted:, A -i - leted: Bo,390 Deleted: 20,740 L A N D U S E Table a -6 Land Use and Population Estimates for General Plan Build Out General Plan Land Use Net Estimated Density/ Estimated Estimated Estimated Formatted: Font: 10 pt, Bold h) Population is estimated based on an average household size of & 81 Demons per household and a lacang rate of D Dwelling Population Potential Category Acres Intensity Units (b) Square Feet (a) d) Mixed-Use High Density Residential/ Commercial category assumesg5 %residential and %commercial mix. F LDR Low Density Residential y¢Z_ _ _ _7.0 DU /AC _ _ AZ68 _ _�6.t31 0 MDR Medium Density g1 8, DU AC 4,99_ 1 0 0 Residential Formatted: Font: 10 pt, Bold Plan will yield at build out. + +\ D Deleted; 14,350,000 HDR High Density Residential 116 1q.8 DU[AC 2z 8 86 0 C Commercial 0.33 FAR o O ,e- _soy000 SP /C Specific Plan /Commercial.- _....__._o 44 FAR o....._........_. ... 0--- 000 OLI Office /Light Industrial 2 0.42 FAR o o _2,_400,000 _ Mixed-Use o o DU AC; MRC Residential /Commercial �°5___t.6o- .�- _.___J_ FAR--- ?------ -t.§7S ------ _ ___ -800q (c) MHR Mixed-Use-High Density o DU AC; '- /--- C Residential Commercial /--- -- - 2:oo FAR ---- t 2 �-- -- 8 - - - -- .S;.4-._L -8 -Ooo - - - -- (d) MIC Mixed -Use Industrial/Commercial k- -- oo FR .... o ----------------- o _ 60 PF Public Facilities g7_q N/A o 0 0 OS Open Space /Natural 83 N/A o 0 0 Resources CEM Cemetery q 1 N/A o 0 0 Total ga(ist J31S 0 260 000 _?5,.,138_ _61 _ _ � Deleted: 957.., Deleted: 566... Deleted: 97... Deleted: 62 Formatted: Font: 10 Deleted: 88o,000 Deleted: 49...0 Formatted: Font: 10 Deleted: 20 Deleted: 8o Formatted: Not Hi9t Deleted: 132 Deleted; 25 Deleted: 142 Deleted: 1,769_. Deleted: 36 � Deleted: zzo Deleted: 5,546 } I ` Deleted: 9... .,� P A G E2 -27 FEBRUARY 1 o, z o 1 o Deleted: 383 Notes: D Formatted: Font: 10 pt, Bold h) Population is estimated based on an average household size of & 81 Demons per household and a lacang rate of D Deleted: 654 3.o2% according to the 2oogCalifomia Department of Finance Demographic Unit. 0 0.;t'. Cpl\ Deleted: o Q _ Mixed -Use R d) Mixed-Use High Density Residential/ Commercial category assumesg5 %residential and %commercial mix. F Formatted Deleted: 20,738 Table 2 -7 summarizes the projected dwelling units, estimated n n' F Formatted: Font: 10 pt population, and estimated square footage for existing 1 11 " D Deleted: 80,385 conditions in2o0- 9, and what the Land Use Plan of the General ------------------------- I I� F Formatted: Font: 10 pt, Bold Plan will yield at build out. + +\ D Deleted; 14,350,000 I D Deleted: b...997...7 Deleted: x..50...50 70...30 ` D Deleted: 2006 Deleted: 8 P A G E2 -27 FEBRUARY 1 o, z o 1 o L A N D U S E Table a -7 Development and Population - a009 Conditions and General Plan Dwelling Population. Square Feet of Units Nonresidential Existing tow Development (al 14.7,5$ — b5-Z9 - - _-- 2,2!U2_W _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ' - - Formatted: Keep with next -- residential neighborhoods. �� deleted: a,as7 - - -. - - -.. Deleted: 8 Deleted; 7 provide consistency between the map and the Deleted: ato � 0.260.000 a f Deleted: 648 ,t , ++ Formatted: Not Highlight General Plan Land $ 1 1 �� -- Use Policy - - - - -- Deleted: oz J Estimated +, i °� J Deleted: 56,578 Increase in Aa80 _____ 3,;zrio 000 , ` Development p +` Formatted: Not Highlight Deleted: 422 Notm ,velline units and population estimates are from the 2009 California i�r +` Deleted: 6 Department of Finance. Demoemphic Unit Sanare Feet of Nonresidential is it + ++ Deleted: 940 based on GIS data. 0" " p 1' +„+� Deleted: Baseline (2oo6) i rpn Deleted; 20,738 Implementation p' Formatted: Not Highlight +; �'o Deleted: 80,385 Actions Deleted: 779 Deleted: 14,350,000 The following actions will implement Land Use Element ��.,,, Formatted: Not Highlight policies and provide guidance to City decision makers, staff, b,.", Format[etl: Not Highlight and the public. Each action relates directly to one or more Deleted: 6,090 policies., Formatted: Not Highlight Goal 1: Action 1.1 Action 1.2 Enhance code enforcement program to require property owners to maintain their homes and property. Action 1.3 Use zoning regulations, and design guidelines, and design review to require new residential development use detailed architectural articulations and to provide adequate buffering P A G E 2- 2 8 F E B R U A R Y 1 2 , 2 0 1 0 po. Deleted: 236 Stable and attractive single - family �+ Deleted: x3,807 a residential neighborhoods. �� deleted: a,as7 ^ Formatted: Not Highlight Revise the Zoning Map and zoning ordinance to Deleted; 7 provide consistency between the map and the Deleted: ato General Plan. Enhance code enforcement program to require property owners to maintain their homes and property. Action 1.3 Use zoning regulations, and design guidelines, and design review to require new residential development use detailed architectural articulations and to provide adequate buffering P A G E 2- 2 8 F E B R U A R Y 1 2 , 2 0 1 0 LAND USE between lower density residential uses and non- residential uses. Action 1.4 Conduct a housing and neighborhood survey to determine those areas that: Are strong and should be maintained as they exist today. Typically in these areas the housing is well maintained and has good architectural design and site design; the neighborhood has sidewalks, landscaping, and is pedestrian friendly and safe. These neighborhoods should be maintained through continued code enforcement; new development should be designed to respect existing setbacks, neighborhood character, architectural style and materials, etc. Are encouraged to revitalize through the introduction of new or renovated housing stock that is designed to promote a higher quality of architectural and site design. This may include improving housing materials, architectural design, site orientation, parking and garage location, setbacks, landscape requirements, etc. Action 1.5 Develop a series of design guidelines and standards to facilitate strong housing and neighborhood maintenance for the appropriate neighborhoods as determined by Action 1.4. Action 1.6 Develop housing and neighborhood design guidelines and standards for those areas (as determined by Action 1.4) that should be encouraged to be revitalized, renovated, and remodeled. In addition, establish new design guidelines that restrict mansionization. Deleted: Action t.7 Establish __________________________________ _______________________________ . Action L7 Consult with the AQMD when siting new ordinance ceCritaintheheMu facilities with dust, odor emissions to avoid Code) new esidethe Municipal Code) for new residential siting those facilities near sensitive receptors development, remodeling, and /or and avoiding siting sensitive receptors near additions so that all new residential sours of air pollution. surrounding structures. I Goal z: Expanded opportunity for concentrated commercial and industrial uses that contribute jobs and tax revenues to the community P A G E 2 -29 ' $ : . L � F E B R U A R Y 10, 2 0 1 0 L A N D U S E Action 2.1 Create incentive programs to encourage the renovation and rehabilitation of older commercial areas. Action 2.2 Prepare a specific plan to outline future development in the Mixed -Use zone located on, _ _ Deleted: a) the intersection of Valley Boulevard between Walnut Grove and Garvey Avenue and San Gabriel Rosemead Boulevard. Boulevard, and b) for the intersection of Action 2.3 Implement the Rosemead Downtown Vision Plan or other urban design plans, if adopted by the City Council, for new projects and the rehabilitation and revitalization of existing development on Valley Boulevard. Action 2.4 Prepare development standards encouraging the inclusion of public plazas and spaces in new and existing commercial areas. Action 2.5 Develop a marketing program that identifies needed commercial goods and services; actively pursue such businesses to locate within existing commercial and new mixed use areas. Goal 3 Creation of vibrant, attractive mixed -use development Action 3.1 Encourage, whenever appropriate, land use conversion from marginal commercial, industrial or residential uses to mixed -use development along major arterials in areas of the City designated for Mixed -Use Residential /Commercial. Mixed -use development of this type should be encouraged when a proposal will result in the following: • The assembling of existing lots; • A reduction of the number of access points or "curb cuts" along an arterial; • No negative impact on surrounding land uses. Criteria for evaluating a proposal within these guidelines could include: • Conformance to Residential /Commercial ,Mixed-Use_ development_ standards _ _and ------------------ adopted Mixed -Use Design Guidelines. P A G E 2- 3 0 F E B R U A R Y 12, 2 0 1 0 Deleted: <# >A minimum lot sme of one acre (43.560 square feet);9 ,#>Two curb cuts per development with minimum driveway width or -- Deleted: planned development standards for height, setback, and noise or to standards established under a specific plan I. A N D U S E Action 3.2 Require an integrally - colored decorative six foot tall CMU block wall, landscaped buffers with mature landscaping, and /or a vine- covered wall, on those sides abutting a residentially zoned area. Agreements between property owners should be encouraged whereby the applicant installs the wall and /or landscaping and the adjacent property owner maintains it because the wall is on their property. The landscaped buffer strip will have a minimum width of three feet between the property line wall and adjacent property. Action 3.3 Encourage land use conversions to commercial uses, particularly along major arterials, only when a proposal: • Assembles contiguous lots; • Limits the number of curb cuts along major arterials; • Provides adequate on -site parking and on- site circulation; • Operates in conformance with the City's Noise Ordinance and other applicable environmental regulations; and • Will not negatively impact surrounding land uses. Action 3.4 Whenever and wherever possible, encourage the grouping of certain types of commercial activities that would benefit from this type of a development. Action 3.5 To maximize commercial synergy and to minimize the development of small, stand alone commercial buildings, such as mini - malls, direct new commercial development smaller than 5,000 square feet of gross floor area to shopping centers with a combined floor area of at least 15,000 square feet. This implementation action shall not preclude the development of or discriminate against small businesses in established commercial areas. Action 3.6 Require owners to maintain their property according to current codes and ordinances. Action 3.7 Apply design standards for industrial and commercial uses Citywide. qn P A U E z- 3 t t 3 °.�'" FEBRUARY to, zo l o L A N D U S E Action 3.8 During the site development review process, require attractive and revenue generating ground -floor retail uses for all mixed use projects. Goal 4: A financially healthy City that can meet residents' desires for public services and facilities Action 4.1 Inventory structures and parcels in industrial areas available for redevelopment, and incorporate this information into a guide or book to be distributed to industrial real estate brokers and developers. Action 4.2 The City will restrict industrial activities that may result in significant and detrimental environmental impacts to the City and its residents. The significance will be determined through the preparation of a CEQA Initial Study (IS) and any subsequent environmental analysis. Goal 5: Targeted land use changes that improve housing and economic opportunities for residents and businesses and achieve City fiscal and environmental objectives. Action 5.1 Develop design standards for the Rosemead Square site that enhance freeway visibility and access. Action 5.2 Underground utilities in commercial areas and require developers to contribute. Action 5.3 Promote art in public places and require developers to contribute. Action 5.4 Ensure that new developments incorporate both local and regional transit measures into project design that promote the use of alternative modes of transportation and /or construct, contribute or dedicate land for the provision of on -site bicycle trails linking the facility to designated bicycle commuting routes. Action 5.5 Ensure that new developments construct buildings that exceed minimum statewide energy construction requirements beyond Title 24 energy requirements. P A G E 2- 3 2 F E B R U A R Y 12, 2 0 1 o L A N D U S E Action 5.6 In new residential developments, promote and /or provide incentives for the use of Energy - Star rated appliances. Action 5.7 Promote the use of shade producing trees, particularly those that shade paved surfaces such as streets and parking lots and buildings. These strategies will minimize the heat island effect and thereby reduce the amount of air conditioning required. Action 5.8 Encourage new development to employ passive heating and cooling design strategies to the extent feasible. Strategies to be considered include orientation; natural ventilation, including cross - ventilation in residential units; high insulation values, energy efficient windows including: high performance glass; light - colored or high - albedo (reflective) roofing and exterior walls; window shading; and landscaping that provides shading during appropriate seasons. Action 5.9 Encourage new developments to implement U.S. EPA Certified WaterSense labeled or equivalent faucets and high - efficiency toilets (HETs) in residential uses, and implement water conserving shower heads to the extent feasible. Action 5.10 Consider targeting local funds, including redevelopment_ Community Development Block Grant and HOME Investment Partnerships funds . to assist affordable housing developers in , -- Deleted: resources incorporating energy - efficient designs and features. Action 5.11 Strengthen local building codes for new construction and renovation to require a higher level of energy efficiency. Action 5.12 Encourage all new government buildings, and all major renovations and additions, meet identified green building standards. Action 5.13 Consider adopting a "Green Building Program' requiring or encouraging green building practices and materials. The program could be implemented through, e.g., a set of green building ordinances. P A G E z- 3 3 FEBRUARY i o, zo i o L A N D U S E Action 5.14 Encourage the orientation of buildings to maximize passive solar heating during cool seasons, avoid solar heat gain during hot periods, enhance natural ventilation, and promote effective use of daylight. Orientation should optimize opportunities for on -site solar generation. Action 5.15 Consider to provide permitting - related and other incentives for energy efficient building projects, e.g., by giving green projects priority in plan review, processing and field inspection services. Action 5.16 Consider adopting a "heat island" mitigation plan that requires cool roofs, cool pavements, and strategically placed shade trees. Action 5.17 Consider expanding building permit enforcement to include re- roofing thereby ensuring compliance with existing state building requirements for cool roofs on non- residential buildings. Action 5.18 Strengthen local building codes for new construction and implement a program to renovate existing buildings to require a higher level of water efficiency. Action 5.19 Consider adopting energy and water efficiency retrofit ordinances that require upgrades as a condition of issuing permits for renovations or additions, and on the sale of residences and buildings. Action 5.2o Discourage projects that impede bicycle and walking access, e.g., large parking areas that cannot be crossed by non - motorized vehicles, and new residential communities that block through access on existing or potential bicycle and pedestrian routes. P A G E z- 3 4 FEBRUARY 1z, z o i o 0 0 0 • • • CI- 3 TION C I R C U 1, A '1'1 U N ROSE.MEAn GENERAL PLAN he Circulation Element addresses anticipated mobility needs, and the ability of the roadway network and the various transportation modes to meet future travel demands through the buildout year of the Land Use Element (2025). Incremental increases in development intensity increase the use of local and regional roadways by passenger vehicles and trucks. The plan and policies presented in this Element identify strategies that the City will pursue to maintain good service levels wherever possible. As local roadway facilities are linked to regional roadways, the policies within this Element highlight Rosemead's continued need to work within the region and with neighboring jurisdictions to alleviate traffic congestion. Reduced dependency on the automobile for typical trips supports these objectives and improves overall environmental quality in terms of noise and air quality. As there are alternatives to the passenger vehicle, this Element examines the transportation options available to Rosemead residents and establishes appropriate policies to promote diverse trip modes. California State law requires that each city undertake a periodic review of its General Plan. The law also requires an update of the Circulation Element as part of the overall process. The specific code sections and the related requirements are as follows: r° P A G E S- I 1_E 11 R U A R V C1 RCU 1,A r 1 0 N • • Government Code Section 6,5go2 (b): (The general plan shall include) a circulation clement consisting of the geneml location and extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares, transportation routes, terminals, and other local public utilities and facilities, all correlated with the land use element of the plan. • Government Code Section ygfog: The general plan may address any other subjects, which, in the judgment of the legislative body, relate to the physical development of the county or city. Relationship to Other Elements According to California planning law, the Circulation Element must be independent but consistent with other elements. The Circulation Element is most closely related to the Land Use Element, as changes in trip patterns and increases in local trip generation are caused by increases in land use intensity over time. The planned development areas identified in the Land Use Element served as the basis for the analysis of future traffic levels, and then needed roadway improvements were identified. Implementation of the Circulation Element ensures that existing transportation facilities will be improved to adequately • serve traffic generated by future development, where the improvements are both warranted and feasible. Additionally, projected noise contours from transportation sources are included in the Noise Element. Other Plans Regional Transportation Plan The Regional Transportation Plan is a component of the Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide prepared by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) to address regional issues, goals, objectives, and policies into the middle of the 21st century. The Plan, which SCAG periodically updates to address changing conditions, has been developed with active participation from local agencies throughout the region, elected officials, the business community, community P A G E a- z F E n R U A R Y • groups, private institutions, and private citizens. The Plan sets broad goals for the region and provides strategies to reduee problems related to congestion and mobility. Congestion Management Plan The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA or officially known as "Metro') is responsible for planning and operating regional transit facilities and services in Los Angeles County. As required by State law, Metro prepares a Congestion Management Plan (CMP) for Los Angeles County. The CMP identifies the future regional transportation network, establishes acceptable service levels for network routes, and identifies strategies to reduce congestion. Local jurisdictions within the County are responsible for implementing the CMP. The CMP roadway network includes the following roadways that serve Rosemead: • San Bernardino Freeway (Interstate 1o) • Pomona Freeway (State Route 6o) • Rosemead Boulevard (State Route 19) In addition, the intersection of Rosemead Boulevard at Valley Boulevard is classified as a CMP arterial monitoring station. The performance of this intersection is regularly tracked for CMP report updates. Air Quality Management Plan • The federal Clean Air Act requires preparation of plans to improve air quality in any region designated as a non - attainment area (A non - attainment area is a geographic area identified by the Environmental Protection Agency and /or California Air Resources Board as not meeting State or federal standards for a given pollutant). The plan must outline specific programs, strategies, and timelines for bringing the area into compliance with air quality standards. The Air Quality Management Plan prepared by the South Coast Air Quality Management District, first adopted in 1994 and updated on a three -year cycle, contains policies and measures designed to achieve federal and State standards for healthier air quality in the South Coast Air Basin. Many of the programs address circulation improvements, since fossil -fuel- powered vehicles account for more than to percent of the nitrogen oxide emissions and 70 percent of the carbon monoxide emissions within the Basin. "'4%i C I C I R C U L A r l o N P A G E 3- 3 F E H R U A R Y n 1 u i C I K C U 1. A '1' 1 0 N I• Roadway Classifications Roadways within Rosemead, as in any typical urbanized area, are defined using a hierarchical classification system. Fach type of roadway is generally described by purpose and capacity. Rosemead's circulation system is defined by five types of roadway facilities, for which the general standards are described below. Freeways Freeways are controlled access, high -speed roadways with grade- separated interchanges. They are intended to carry high volumes of traffic from region to region. The planning, design, construction, and maintenance of freeways in California are the responsibility of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Interstate to — The San Bernardino Freeway is a six -lane freeway with high - occupancy vehicle lanes in both directions. The facility bisects the commercial /retail areas of the city. Interstate to provides a full - access interchange with Interstate 910 (Long Beach Freeway) approximately four miles to the west, and also with Interstate 605 (San Gabriel River Freeway) approximately four miles to the east. Via Interstate to, direct access is provided to Los Angeles on the west and San Bernardino County on the east. State Route 6o — The Pomona Freeway traverses the southern end of Rosemead, with an interchange at San Gabriel Boulevard. The facility generally parallels the San Bernardino • Freeway and has nearby interchanges with the Interstate Ito and Interstate 6o5 freeways. Major Arterials The function of a Major Arterial is to connect traffic from minor arterials and collectors to other parts of the city, freeway interchanges, and adjacent major land uses. They are the principal urban thoroughfares and provide a linkage between activity centers in the City and to adjacent communities. Major Arterials are designed to move large volumes of traffic, typically in the range of 40,000 to 6o,000 vehicles per day. They are generally served by regional transit routes and are the primary truck routes in the community. There are currently four Major Arterials within the City of Rosemead: Valley Boulevard, Garvey Avenue, San Gabriel Boulevard, and Rosemead Boulevard. P A G E 3- 4 IF L' B R U A R Y • • Minor Arterials The primary purpose of Minor Arterials is to serve as an intermediate route carrving traffic between local streets and major arterials. They are designed to carry moderate levels of traffic, generally in the range of 15,000 to"-15,000 vehicles per day. Within Rosemead, these roadwav facilities were previously referred to as Secondary Arterials. The roadwav plan within this Element introduces the Minor Arterial designation, as it is a more descriptive name for the function of these facilities. Minor Arterials within the City include Del Mar Avenue, Graves Avenue, New Avenue, Rush Street, Temple City Boulevard, Lower Azusa Road, Mission Drive, and Walnut Grove Avenue. These Nell- placed streets complete the well - balanced arterial circulation system, which the City has constructed to provide an efficient flow of traffic to places of importance while protecting residential neighborhoods. Collector Roads The primary function of a collector street is to connect a neighborhood area with nearby arterials. Collector roads are intended to move traffic between local streets and arterials and commonly carry less than 15,000 vehicles per day. Roadways classified as collector streets include Encinita Avenue, Grand Avenue, Hellman Avenue, Ivar Avenue, Loftus Drive, Marshall Street, Muscatel Avenue, Ramona Boulevard, Rio Hondo Avenue, and Rosemead Place. Local Streets • Local streets are designed to principally provide vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle access to individual parcels throughout the City. They are intended to carry low volumes of traffic, and are typically two -lane roadways. The established hierarchy of roadway facilities within Rosemead is illustrated within Figure 3 -1. • C1 R C U L A '1' 1 11 N P A G E 3- S F F R R 11 \ R V n � 0 0 • Legen 717 r 1� IF IV, 7 ,, Ilan rreeway MajorArterial Minor Arterial ......... Collector (D City of Rosemead General Plan Update Note: Road daaadnaliona are shown within City boundary only, M o0er roads within the City are Local Roads Figure 3 -1 Existing Roadway Classifications June 2008 • Measurement of Traffic Flow The traffic studv for this element was primarily based on two traffic engineering concepts — Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) values and Level of Service (LOS) values. Both of these are used to measure the adequacy of roadway facilities, but the ICU methodology was specifically developed to gauge the operations at signalized roadway intersections. The ICU methodology is based on specific calculations that include the number of approach lanes and approach volumes by turning movement. The ICU output value correlates directly with a more common term in traffic engineering, the volume to capacity (V /C) ratio. Tmffic volumes for existing conditions at the analyzed locations are defined by traffic counts, conducted manually at roadway intersections or by automatic tube counters at mid -block roadway segments. Traffic volumes for future or forecast conditions are defined by annual increases in ambient /area traffic and specific traffic increases calculated for planned land use intensity/use changes under the Land Use Element. Capacity refers to the maximum vehicle carrying ability of a roadway, and is a critical component of roadway design. A roadway that carries 16,000 vehicles per day, with the capacity to accommodate 20,000 vehicles within the same timeframe, has a V/C value of o.80 for the analyzed time period. • The V/C value is used in turn to establish Level of SeRice (LOS) categories describing the performance of roadways and intersections throughout the community. Six categories of LOS — the letter designations A to F — are used to identify traffic conditions, with LOS A representing excellent conditions and LOS F representing extreme congestion. For roadways, the LOS designations are based on V/C ratios calculated based on the roadway's capacity at the LOS E /LOS F threshold of Loo. Table 3 -1 provides V/C ranges, the corresponding LOS, and a description of expected traffic conditions for roadway segments. For intersections, LOS is based on Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) ratios, which take into account the volume-to- capacity ratios of all of the critical turning movements that take place at an intersection. Table 3-2 provides ranges of ICU values (equivalent to V/C values), the corresponding LOS, and a description of expected traffic conditions for intersections. • C I R C U L A r[ O N P A G E a- 7 F E B R U A R Y z. 1; 1 R C Il 1. A '1' 1 11 N • 'Table 3 -1 Level of Service Descriptions for Roadways • • Level Volume of to Servic Capacity e Flow Conditions Ratio A LOS A describes primarily free -flow operations at average travel speeds, 0 -0.60 usually abut go percent of the free -flow speed for the arterial classification. Vehicles art: completely unimpeded in their ability to maneuver within the trafficstream. Stopped delays at signalized intersections are minimal. B LOS If represents reasonably unimpeded operations at average tmv.1 o.61 -0.70 speedo, usually abut 70 percent of file free -Iluw speed for the arterial classification, The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly restricted and stopped delays are not bothersome. Drivers are not generally subjected to appreciable tension. C LOS C represents stable operations; however, ability to maneuver and 0.71 -0.80 change lanes in midblock locations may be more restricted than at LOS B, and longer queues, adverse signal coordination, or both may contribute to lower average speeds of about 50 percent of the average Gee -flow speed for the arterial classification. Motorists will experience appreciable tension while driving. D LOS D borders on a range in which small increases in flow may cause a o.81 -o.qo substantial increase in delay and hence decreases in arterial speed. LOS D may be due to adverse signal progrvion, inappropriate signal timing, high volumes, or some combination of these factors. Average travel speeds are about 40 percent of free -flow speed. E LOS E is characterized by significant delays and average travel speeds of o.qt -1.00 one -third the free -Flow speed or less. Such operations are caused by some combination of adverse progression, high signal density, high volumes, extensive delays at critical intersections, and inappropriate signal timing. F LOS F chamcierizes arterial flow at extremely low speeds below one -third to Over 1.00 one - fourth of the free -flow speed. Intersection congestion is likely at critical signalized locations, with high delays and extensive queuing. Adverse progression is frequently a contributor to this condition. P A G R 3- 8 P 1: 8 R U A R Y C I R C U I. A T I 0 N • Table 3 -2 FormanedTable Level of Service Descriptions for Signalized Intersections B Intersection o.61 -0.70 Capacity Level of Utilization (ICU) Service Description Ratio A Excellent operation. All approaches to the intersection appear o -0.60 quite open, turning movements are easily made, and nearly all drivers find freedom of operation. Good operation. Occasionally drivers may have to wait more B Very goal operation. Many drivers begin to feel somewhat o.61 -0.70 restricted within platoons of vehicles. This represents stable flow. An approach to an intersection may occasionally he fully utilized and traffic queues start to form. C Good operation. Occasionally drivers may have to wait more 0.71 -0.80 than 6o seconds, and back -ups may develop behind turning vehicles. Most drivers feel somewhat restricted. D Fair operation. Cars are sometimes required to wait more than 0.81 -0.90 6o seconds during short peaks. There are no long- standing traffic queues. This level is typically associated with design practice for peak periods. E Poor operation. Some long- standing vehicular queues develop 0.91 -1.00 on critical approaches to intersections. Delays may be up to several minutes. F Forced Bow. Represents jammed conditions. Backups form Over 1.00 locations downstream or on the cross street may restrict or • prevent movement of vehicles out of the intersection approach lanes therefore, volumes carried are not predictable. Potential for stop and go type traffic Bow. Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1985 and Interim Materials on Highway Capacitv, NCHRP Circular 212, 1982. tiy� PA G B 3 9 flGl\ F E B R V A R Y 22. 0 1 0 Formatted: Left C I RC 111. A'1' 1 U N Future Circulation Issues The local circulation system within Rosemead has evolved over time to provide travel routes for both local and regional trips. Major roadways provide access to the I -10 freewav and the State Route (SR) 60 freeway. The I -to and SR -6o freeways are both east -west trending facilities within the city that have access ramps at major north -south roadways. 'These freeways link Rosemead residents and businesses to destinations throughout the Los Angeles area and the Southern California region. Rosemead Boulevard, Walnut Grove Avenue, San Gabriel Boulevard, and Del Mar Avenue are the major north -south roadways within the City. All four major north -south roads provide connections to Interstate to. In addition, San Gabriel Boulevard connects to SR -6o within the southern area of the city. Valley Boulevard, Garvey Avenue, Graves Avenue, and Rush Street are the major east -west roadways within the City. Although these arterials often act as relief valves to the freeways during peak commute periods, they also provide good alternative travel routes to destinations throughout the San Gabriel Valley. A safe and convenient circulation system is needed to support the variety of land uses in Rosemead and to manage through traffic that originates in and is destined for locations outside • the City. Four major issues are addressed by the goals, policies, and implementation actions of the Circulation Element: (t) Efficient movement of vehicles and pedestrians throughout the city; (2) Promoting alternative modes of travel; (3) Separating traffic associated with commercial and industrial uses from residential neighborhoods; and (q) Ensuring that adequate parking exists for all commercial and industrial development. P A G E a- r o IF E 8 R U A R Y E • • CI R C U L A '1' I O N Future Land Use Intensification Development outside of the Cily limits will generate additional increases in area traffic volumes. Stich development has been incorporated into the ambient annual growth rate within the Circulation Element traffic analysis, added to existing volumes and compounded over the period between existing (year 20OW -------- and future buildout (year 202.9) conditions. 'Traffic generated - from developments envisioned under the updated Land Use Element was added to the analysis after the creation of future ambient growth volumes. Relationship of Trip Generation to Land Use Makeup All development creates vehicle trips of some measurable total per unit of intensity (floor area increment or residential unit). The trip generation methodology used within the traffic study, and the assumptions utilized for trip reductions, are discussed below. The potential for increased use of transit, bicycles, or other trip modes was not included in the analysis in order to provide a conservative estimate of impacts. Conservative Nature of Development Analysis The trip generation totals used within the traffic analysis prepared for the Circulation Element update were conservative, both by design and by necessity. The traffic analysis methodology was designed to plan for a conservative level of trip generation from each area of intensified development that would be allowed under the updated Land Use Element. It is also necessary to provide this conservative analysis, as additional trip generation reductions, beyond those taken for mixed -use developments (discussed below) cannot be substantiated without intense transit service levels or established and active trip reduction programs. With increasing land use densities that commonly occur during the maturation of an urban -area city, there is an increasing potential for higher transit use or an increasing potential for higher percentage shares of walking trips and bicycle trips. Infrastructure and programs must support these changes in trip patterns, however. As Rosemead is entering a new phase of urbanization through establishment of major mixed -use centers within the updated Land Use Element and the current predominant makeup of the City is lower density, single -use developments, credits were P A c R a - „ r e R R u A R v n , o neletM: 7 1; 1 H C U 1. A '1' 1 U N • only taken for internal trip capture between uses within mixed - use projects and for pass -by or linked trips. These deductions, typical to traffic studies, are based on national standards for related trip reductions and characteristics. Pass -by reductions were taken for commercial retail trips during the p.m. peak hour only. These reductions were based on typical percentages of these occurrences (unplanned side trips that take place between a planned or regular daily origin and destination). 'these primary trips alreadv exist on the area roadways, and the pass -by trips would become an additional linked trip along the route of the overall primary trip, so these are not included in the impact calculations. Additional reductions were taken for internal trip capture within mixed -use developments. There are multiple mixed -use project zones envisioned within the updated land Use Element. These mixed -use developments — most typically consisting of retail and residential uses in one building — capture some residential -to- commercial trip demand internally and such trips are therefore not generated on area roadways. Further trip reductions were not taken. A methodology that established trip reduction estimates for developments along transit corridors are provided within the CMP document. However, existing transit levels within Rosemead, and transit levels envisioned for the near future, would not support the use of these additional trip reductions in the analysis. Potential Trip Generation Intensity Reductions • The synergy that is possible between multiple mixed -use and higher- density development projects has not been factored into the trip generation calculations. When this synergy occurs, more walking trips occur between different nearby developments and more non -auto trips can be generated. These aspects, however, are difficult to estimate at the level of analysis undertaken for the city-wide traffic study conducted for this Element. In addition, estimates for such reductions can only be defined through surveys at similar uses which were not conducted for this macro -level analysis. As trip reductions for these types of trips were not taken, the analysis provides a conservative (or worst -case) estimate of potential traffic impacts. Traffic Circulation Analysis According to the Circulation Element Update traffic impact study report, completed by KOA Corporation on Yebruary .t9, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ ... _ _ ...... _ - Deleted: Ma y P A G E a- r z IF E D R U A n Y z z z u. o • C I R C U 1, A T 1 G N • 209,_ mu It iple_ roadway segments and majgr intersections - Deleted: oa _—`- - — - ----- — ------ -------- would operate at LOS values of E or F in the year 2025 with implementation of land use intensification 'that would be allowed by the updated land Use Element of the General Plan. • • 'fable 3 -3 provides a summary of future conditions with the projected General Plan land use development, without the proposed circulation roadwav network improvements, as analvzed within the traffic strtdv. Within the table headings, the term "V /C" refers to the calculated volume -to- capacity ratio provided by the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) analysis methodology. Values of t.000 or greater define at- capacity operations. The term "LOS" refers to the related level of service values, ranging from A to F. The following degradations in intersection peak -hour LOS values would occur with full implementation of the updated Land Use Element: • Valley Blvd at Rio liondo Ave. - Operations would worsen from LOS D to E within the p.m. ueak hour. • Walnut Grove Ave at Marshall St - Operations would worsen from LOS E to F within the a.m. peak hour. • Rosemead Blvd at Marshall St - Operations would worsen from LOS E to F within the a.m. peak hour. • Rosemead Blvd. at Glendon Wy. - Operations would worsen from LOS E to F within the a.m. peak hour. • San Gabriel Blvd. at Hellman Ave. - Operations would worsen from LOS E to F within the a.m. peak hour and from LOS D to E in the p.m. peak hour. • Walnut Grove Ave. at Hellman Ave. /Ramona Ave. - Onerations would worsen from LOS D to E within the a.m. peak hour. • Rosemead Blvd. at Telstar Ave. - Operations would worsen from LOS D to E within the a.m peak hour. • New Ave. at Gamey Ave. - Operations would worsen from LOS D to E within the a.m. peak hour and from LOS E to F within the pm, peak hour. • Del Mar Ave at Garvey Ave. - Operations would worsen from LOS D to E within the a.m, peak hour, • Walnut Grove Ave. at Garvey Ave. - Operations would worsen from LOS E to F within the a.m. peak hour. • Walnut Grove Ave. at San Gabriel Blvd. - Operations would worsen from LOS D to E within the a.m. peak hour. • San Gabriel Blvd at SR -6o westbound ramps - ODerations would worsen from LOS D to E within the m. peak hour P A G E S- 1 3 F E B R U A R Y - z. s „ i u C 1 R C U 1. A '1' 1 U N • 'Fable 3-3 Future (year 2025) Area Intersection Levels of Service • Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour V/C LOS V/C LOS I Walnut Grove Ave at Mission Dr. 0832 D 0.822 D 2 Rosemead Blvd. at Lower Azusa Rd. 0.876 D 0.920 E 3 Rosemead Blvd. at Mission Dr. 1.179 F 1.072 F 4 Walnut Grove Ave, at Valley Blvd. 1.072 F 1.078 F 5 Rosemead Blvd. at Valley Blvd. 1.110 F 1.040 F 6 Valley Blvd. at Mission Dr. 0.587 A 0.574 A 7 Valley Blvd. at Rio Hondo Ave. 0.595 A 0.866 D 8 Valley Blvd. at Temple City Blvd. 1,061 F 0.907 E 9 Walnut Grove Ave. at Marshall St 0.984 E 1.034 F 10 Rosemead Blvd. at Marshall St. 0.999 E 1.019 F I I Rosemead Blvd, at Glendon Way 0.952 E 0.853 D 12 Temple City Blvd. at Loftus Dr. 0.782 C 0.928 E 13 Del Mar Ave, at Hellman Ave. 0.932 E 0.870 D 14 San Gabriel Bhd. at Hellman Ave. 0.985 E 0.892 D 15 Walnut Grove Ave. at HellmaNRamona 0.895 D ].108 F 16 Rosemead Blvd. at Telstar Ave. 0.877 D 1.025 F 17 Rosemead Blvd. at Whitmore St 0.692 B 0.769 C 18 New Ave. at Garvey Ave. 0.879 D 0.922 E 19 Del Mar Ave. at Garvey Ave. 0.893 D 1.006 F 20 San Gabriel Blvd. at Garvey Ave. 1.049 F 1.110 F 21 Walnut Grave Ave. at Garvey Ave. 0.911 E 1.035 F 22 San Gabriel Blvd. at Rush St /Pouero Grande 0.594 A 0.785 C 23 Walnut Grove Ave. at Rush St 0.609 B 0.718 C 24 Walnut Grove Ave. at Landis View Ln. 0.470 A 0.471 A 25 Walnut Grove Ave. at San Gabriel Blvd. 0.832 D 1,003 F 26 San Gabriel Blvd. at SR -60 WB Ramps 0.910 E 0.871 D 27 Town Center Dr. at SR -60 EB Ramps 0.603 B 0.616 B 28 San Gabriel Blvd. at Town Center Dr. 0.720 C 0.729 C Projected General Plan land wee development without General Plan circulation roadway network improvements. P A G E 3- 1 4 F E B R U A R Y ... . u t o DtletM: Intersection 1 Walnut Grove Ave 2 Rosemead Blvd. at '.. 3 Rosemead Blvd. at 4 Walnut Grove Ave 5 Rosemead Blvd. at 6 Valley Blvd. at Miss 7 Valley Blvd, at Rio I 8 Valley Blvd. at Teml 9 Walnut Grove Ave 10 Rosemead Blvd. at I 1 Rosemead Blvd. at 12 Temple City Blvd.: 13 Del Mar Ave. at He 14 San Gabriel Blvd. al 15 Walnut Grove Ave 16 Rosemead Blvd. at 17 Rosemead Blvd. at 18 New Ave. at Garve 19 Del Mar Ave. at Ga 20 San Gabriel Blvd. ai 21 Walnut Grove Ave 22 San Gabriel Blvd. al 23 Walnut Grove Ave 24 lWalnut Grove Ave 25 Walnut Grove Ave 26 San Gabriel Blvd. al 27 Town Center Dr. a 2B San Gabriel Bhd. at C I R C U 1. A 'r 1 o N • Figure :3-z ilhistrates_I he level of sen, ice_va [tic s at_the study_ _ _ _ _ am ._ -_ �. intersections during the .. and p.m. peak hour for the future wilh General Plan development scenario without roadway Inaprovelllents. -rable 3-4 provides the results of the level of service calculations for each of the study roadway segments, based on this analysis scenario. LOS values of E or F are displayed in bold text on the right side of the table. L • "Fable 3-4 Future (year 2025) Area Roadway Segment Levels of Service " Primary Street NIE End of Segment SIW End of Segment Roadway Class No. of Lanes Roadway Capacity Future (2025) Without Developments Conditions Volumes VIC LOS I Walnut Grove Av Grand Ave Mission Drive Secondary 4 30,0(10 15,040 0.501 A 2 Walnut Grove Av WellclEdmond Valley Bhd Secondary 4 30,000 21,233 0.708 C 3 Walnut Grove Ar Valley Blvd Marshall St Secondary 4 30.000 27.511 0.917 E 4 Walnut Grove Av Hellman Ave Garvey Ave Secondary 4 30,000 25,411 0.847 D 5 Walnut Grove Av Fern Ave Klingtoran St Secondary 4 30,000 21.542 0JI8 C 6 Walnut Grove Av Rush St Landis View lane Secondary 4 30,000 19,024 0.634 8 7 San Gabiel Blvd I Hellman Ave Emerson Race Major 4 40.000 37.412 0,935 E 8 San Gabiel Blvd Garvey Ave Klmgerman St Major 4 40,000 27.845 0.696 B 9 San Gabriel Blvd Delta Ave Walnut Grove Ave Major 4 40,000 20,302 0.508 A 10 Del Mar Ave Hellman Ave Emerson Face Secondary 4 30.000 27,578 0.919 E I I Del Mar Ave Garvey Ave Newmark Ave Collecmr 2 15,000 20,530 1,369 F 12 New Ave Newmark Ave Gnvo Ave Collector 2 15,000 9.366 0.624 B 13 Valley Blvd Muscatel Ave Ivar Ave Major 4 40,000 30.910 0.773 C 14 Valley Blvd Hart Ave Mission Drive Major 4 40,000 20,262 0.507 A 15 Valley Blvd Rio Hondo Ave Temple City Blvd Major 4 40,000 29,575 0139 C 16 Temple City Blvd Valley Blvd Marshall St Secondary 4 X000 j 19,960 0.665 B 17 Garvey Ave New Ave Del Mar Ave Major 4 40.000 30.853 0371 C 18 Garvey Ave Del Mar An San Gabriel Blvd Major 4 40.000 31,850 0.796 C 19 Garvey Ave San Gabriel Blvd Walnut Grove Ave Major 4 40,000 34,435 0.861 D 20 Garvey Ave Walnut Grove Ave Rosemead Blvd Major 4 40,000 31.567 0.789 C 21 Rosemed Blvd Lower Aaua Road Mission Drive Major 5 50000 55,167 1.103 F 22 Rosemead Blvd Valley Blvd Marshall St Major 4 40.000 57.632 L441 F 23 Rosemead Blvd Tehor Ave Whionore St Major 6 60000 65,59] 093 F a 1 wccrcu yore, to -tun smut use ueoesopmenr unrnour oenerm Yon Clrctalanon roadway nenoork improvements. PA G E -s 5 F E B R U A R Y z z. A n t n Deleted: Walnut Grove, \ve vest Minslou Hro, Operatiosswould vnnen from LOS D to K within I he a.m. lank period and from LOS 1'. to F within the p.m. peak period. t <a>Rosemcad Boulevard of Lower Azosa Road) - Operations would worsen from LOS 1) to R within the a.m. peak period and from LOS E In F within the p.m. peak period. 1 u>Walnnt Grove Avenue tVILL t t •v - open tmio, would worsen from LOS E to 1: within the a.m. peak period. t <r>Va11ev Boulevard at Rio I hindn Amts- Operationswouldwo l Formatted: Right: 0 ", Keep with next Formatted: Keep with neat Deleted: Primary Street I Walnut Grove Av G 2 W.I. Grove Ar N 3 Walnut Grove Ar V. 4 Walnut Grove Av H 5 Walnut Grove Av Fs 6 Walnut Grove aw Ri 7 San Gabiel Blvd H 8 San Gabiel Blvd G 9 San Gabiel BIN D 10 Del Mar Ave H I I Del Mar Ave G 12 New Ave N 13 Valley Blvd M 14 Valley Blvd H 15 Valley Blvd Ri 16 Temple Cory Blvd V. 17 Garvey An N 18 Garvey Ave D 19 Garvey Ave Sa 20 Garvey Ave N 21 Rosemead Blvd U 22 Roserne�d BIN V. Ro mead BIN T. C 1 R C U 1- A '1' 1 0 N • This page intentionally left blank. • P A G E 3- 1 6 F E B R U A R Y z z z o I n • • • a a General Plan Mir :. i -,oaRx E a —v _ -- Grand �r Ave. o 'c D/� 2 �/E ._Low ` c m F/F I�i _ i_ UPRR io N 3: F/F .B /E HEM wa �� Valle Blva. ! o IT - 10 x i Marshall St. F'�I F/D —I °- C E ' 9 wy 1 �. 12 r.l I -- to am e. -� San Bernardino Fw)j Ilm n Ave. 4 F E S V�E/ Telstar Ave. I I Em r5on PI. I Whitmore St. �i 17 C/Dr' E/ l F G � 19 0 ve. F I F/F I i v IILJII v w T Z z Graves Ave. � U _ _ V \ 1 / 2 A R sh SC B /Ci .= E 22 23 1 o v 01 _.i o !� Landis View Ln(':r�' I _ 1 EUF soGsac Q [/ 6 :'Pomona Fwy. use f O / E ..'r Fo :C28 B/B 7 tlo A/ 7. L F ...... City Boundary • Study Intersection - - - -- Railroad X/X AM /PM Peak Intersection Levels of Service X Intersection Reference Number Figure 3-2 • Level of Service Values - NOT TO SCALE Study Intersections, suurce:ICOACorporotion,2010. Future with General Plan Development City of Rosemead February 2010 General Plan Update C I S C U 1. A "r 1 G N E This page intentionally left blank. is P A G E 3- 1 8 • • E u The following degradations in roadway segment daily LOS values would occur with full implementation of the updated land Use Element: • Walnut Grove Ave. behveen Vallev Blvd. and Marshall St. — LOS would worsen from F, to F • Walnut Grove Ace behveen Hellman Ave. and Gan'ey Ave. — LOS would worsen from 1) to E • Gan'ev Ave between New AYe. and Del Mar Ave. -LOS would worsen from C to E. • Gan'ey Ave., between San Gabriel Blvd. and Walnut Grove Ave -LOS would worsen from DIG E ..________________ ________________________ ____ Figure 3 -3 illustrates the levels of service based on the analyzed daily volumes at the study roadway segments, for the future with General Plan development scenario. Traffic Incursion onto Residential Roadways In residential neighborhoods, there is a growing trend to design and implement traffic control measures to enhance the livability for residents that live along local streets. Some of the control measures include speed humps, speed cushions, curb extensions, traffic diverlers, chokers, and traffic circles. The intent of such measures is to slow traffic or prevent through traffic, which should remain on collector or arterial streets and not infiltrate residential neighborhoods. This Element acknowledges the potential for significant traffic increases on residential roadways due to nearby intensification of corridor commercial or industrial development. i� 4 mo[:atommmmmm) j P A G E 3- r 9 F E E I R L I A R Y a2. z o r o - -' formatted: Bullets and Numbering Deleted: Walma Greve Avenel tretween Well,/Edmund and Valley Iloulevant: LOS would worsen from D Ip B.1 San Gabriel Boulevard, belweei I lelle an Avenue and Emerson Place: LOS would worsen from E to F.1 Now Avenue, between Newmark Avenue and Gravel Avenue: LOS would worsen from D to F. t valley Boulevard, between Rio Hondo Avenue and Temple City Boulevard: LOS would worsen from C to F7 Temple City Boulevard between Valley Boulevard and Marshall Street: LAS would worsen from D to F.1 Garvey Avenue between New Avenue and Del Mar Avenue: LAS would worsen from B to E.' 7 Garvev Avenue, between Del Mar Avenue and San Gabriel Boulevard: LOS would worsen from E to P: 1 Garv_ ev Avenue; between San Gabriel Boulevard and walnut Grove Avenue: LOS would worsen from E to F. 1 formatted: Highlight • • Hellman Ave. l T1 v m P. ,J },CFM v! ` I I w v General Plan Mica; n I � _Qngn v `mil... -moo � '� I Emerson PI. Grand Ave. - o c ` of Azusa lid. L �. w c [eB _ j G�E Ave. D D / \ —> 1 LL i I Marshall St. Ji 9 Ldhusl. �owv �LIII Hellman Ave. l Telstar Ave. I I w T I Emerson PI. Whitmore St. _ j G�E Ave. D D / i m Z I � ;Graves Ave. � U — — — i v o > m \ - 1 f 0 O V R sh St. / o v E o a c Ni //Q I Landis View Ln.- 17 cdeof Via 0 ,p omona Fwy. ief° E s a / C ,r ce^ea d � 6 �1 N/ B� ...... City Boundary - - - -- Railroad X Roadway Level of Service Figure 3 -3 • Level of Service Values - NOT TO SCALE Study Roadway Segment, Source: KOA Corpurvtion, 7010. Future with General Plan Development City of Rosemead February 2010 General Plan Update Cl R C n LA T 1 G N Circulation Plan The goals and policies in this Element emphasize the need for a circulation system capable of serving the travel traffic needs within Rosemead. These needs are discussed within this section. General Plan Roadway System The updated roadway plan for the city is illustrated on Figure 3 -4. The updates to the roadway plan are based on needs for increased roadway corridor capacity in the future analysis period with General Plan development, as identified by the Circulation Element update traffic study. Roadway improvements, outside of those required as mitigation for individual development projects, are prioritized, funded, and completed using the City's Capital Improvement Plan process. Many of the recommended mitigations for significant impacts of the Circulation Element update would need to be provided by individual developments as they trigger impacts, or otherwise would need to be funded through the Capital Improvement Plan or another source. The Circulation Policy Plan for Rosemead is illustrated in Figure 3 -4. This Plan includes the following roadway classification updates, for certain segments of these roadways, based on the recommended addition of lanes within this • section: is Walnut Grove Avenue from the I fo freewa north to Val _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ley Boulevard Reclassified from Minor Arterial to -------- r Artena. -- ----- ----- --- - -- ---- For some roadways, an increase in the number of lanes does not translate to a change in classification (for example, a four - lane major arterial upgraded to a six -lane major arterial stays at the same classification). $r y+�y } PA G E3-2 s f4- F E E R o A R Y z z o r n • Not Deleted: Deleted; <e>TcmDle Ciw RO1 d fatal the ]-to freescay,orth to VII j onlevatd - RerlassJed from Minor Arterial to Major erteriaf1 7 <•>Ikl Mar Asemie soutM1 of th 1- free s - Reclassified from Minor C I R C U 1. A '1' 1 U N • io me Circulation Plan n for for Major Rosemead Roadways Forthcomine • P A G E 3- z z IE E R R U A R Y z z z o i o • • Addressing Traffic Congestion Although many of the policies within this Element concentrate on reducing trips and promoting alternate modes of travel within Rosemead, the base of any urban circulation system is a roadway network that provides enough capacity to avoid peak - period gridlock and allow for economic functions, resident /visitor and commercial customer access, and emergency access to continue in as efficient a manner as possible. The land area within Rosemead has not been developed within a vacuum. The city has grown up and urbanized along with the surrounding communities and the Southern California region as a whole. Traffic volumes will continue to increase on Rosemead roadways whether local development is intensified or not. Capacity enhancements will be necessary to accommodate both regional trips that traverse Rosemead and for trips generated by new development within the city. Traffic congestion continues to be a key issue affecting the quality of life in Rosemead. Although Rosemead will experience limited growth outside of planned mined -use project areas, regional influences will continue to contribute to traffic congestion. Over time, the City will pursue two primary courses of action to improve congestion: (i) Focused physical improvements that enhance the capacity of roadways and intersections; and • (z) Creative programmatic solutions to manage trip generation and congestion. These two sets of actions are discussed further within the remainder of this section. Physical Capacity Improvements The first set of physical capacity improvements that were evaluated for the Circulation Element update were aimed at reducing traffic congestion at major intersection approaches. Identified capacity improvements at major intersections, for implementation through the buildout analysis year of zozg, are listed within Table 3 -5 below. x • C I R C U 1. A r 1 o N P A G E 3- 2 3 F E B R U A R Y o � o C I R C 11 1. A '1' 1 11 N • Table 3-5 Identified Intersection Approach Improvements Inan.otion Recommended Inten.ction Impre —m.nt 3 R..mnd BNd. at Musson Dr. NB 8 SB 111 4. 6 Walnut Grove Ave. n Vale, Blvd. EB B WE thro b- 5 Rosemead Blvd. at Valley Blvd. NB 8 SB thm one 9 Walnut Grove Ave. at Marshall St. EB A WE left turn lane: NB right torn lane 10 Rosemead Blvd. at Marshall St. NB b SB thru lane II Rosemead Blvd. at Glemm Way SB shred Inutueght lane(near I -lo on M—In) la San Gabriel Blvd at Hellman Ave. Resanpe SB ,hared thnenghe 41e to reve t)vu lane W nee. tutu lase 15 Wal. Grove Ave at HtlhmNRamona Reetripe n& turn arc to EB slurred left-m, O ln, aryl exclusive left tutu 16 Rosemead Blvd. at Telsar Are. NB tM1ru Ive 10 New Ave. at Garvey Ave. WE thru are 19 Del Mar Ave. at Garvey Ave. Resula trun, providing an additional EB B WE tan line 20 San Gabriel Blvd. at Garvey Ave EB B WE the ana 21 Walnut Grove Ave a[ Gamey Ave. WE tNU lane 25 W.I. Grove Ave. at San Gabriel Blvd. SB dl -way Into drualgM turn Ore: new recall left turn Also included in the analysis was the configuration of mid - block segments of major roadways. 'these also represent • capacity increases for the reduction of congestion. The identified physical improvements to major roadway corridors, for implementation through the buildout analysis year of 2025, are listed within Table 3-6 below. Table 3 -6 Identified Roadway Segment Improvements P A G E 3- 2 4 IMmustial aiti'i 17 • Deleted: Intersection 1 Walnut Grove Ave IMPROVEMENT Rosemead Blvd. at 1 ME End of SIW End of Roadway Nu of 5 No. A Primary Stw.t Valley Blvd. at Rio F 8 Valley Blvd. at Tema 9 Walnut Grove Ave. Se gmen t Se gr n t C4„ W., Temple City Blvd. ai 13 Del May Ave. at Hel 14 San Gabriel Blvd. at 15 Doaripdon Lane, I Walnut Grove Av Valley Blvd Mnlnll St Secondary a Oosareu pael, re.wvl weld uaen, M re9uned 6 Walnut Grove Ave. 25 Walnut Grove Ave. 26 San Gabriel Blvd. at Deleted: On -„Qt wrrina re v1 on --own -,uld akeb on Primary So..t 21 Rammnd Blvd Lower Aauo Road Ma.on Drive Mjor 5 Hell 6 W.I. Grow Av Fen r San Gabriel Blvd Hell 10 new Hell 12 New Ave Nev 13 Valley Blvd Mm widen, and —sleet win, mewo., —W wady tr Valley Blvd 22 0.oaemod BM Valky BM Mntoll St Major a Del g Ga-, Ave San 20 Gamey Ave wal 21 watered, Low IJ Ro,emnd Bad Tenor Ave Whrtmcr a St Major 6 widen, would Laey M reoured. R P A G E 3- 2 4 IMmustial aiti'i 17 • Deleted: Intersection 1 Walnut Grove Ave 2 Rosemead Blvd. at 1 3 Rosemead Blvd. at t 6 Walnut Grove Ave. 5 Rosemead Blvd. at 7 Valley Blvd. at Rio F 8 Valley Blvd. at Tema 9 Walnut Grove Ave. 10 Rosemead Blvd. at t I I Rosemead Blvd. at 12 Temple City Blvd. ai 13 Del May Ave. at Hel 14 San Gabriel Blvd. at 15 Walnut Grove Ave. 16 Rosemead Blvd. at I 18 New Ave. at Game) 19 Del Mar Ave. at Gal 20 San Gabriel Blvd. at 21 Walnut Grove Ave. 25 Walnut Grove Ave. 26 San Gabriel Blvd. at Deleted: Primary So..t 3 Walnut Grove Av VA. 4 Walnut Grove Av Hell 5 W.I. Grow Av Fen r San Gabriel Blvd Hell 10 Del Mar Ave Hell 12 New Ave Nev 13 Valley Blvd Mm IS Valley Blvd Rio 16 Tempo Ciry, Bad Vat. IB Garvey Ave Del 19 Ga-, Ave San 20 Gamey Ave wal 21 Rasemnd Blvd Low 22 Rwemnd Blvd Vail. D Rosemead Blvd Tel, • Alternative Capacity Enhancements An alternate strategy for traffic improvement is the implementation of corridor traffic signal synchronization with adaptive control technology. Adaptive signal control technologies have the goals of reducing travel times, vehicle delav, and overall congestion. According to studies conducted by the ON of Los Angeles Department of Transportation (IADOT), increases in roadway capacity by as much as ten percent can be achieved through the implementation of these signal system technologies. This gain appears in the form of less congestion, delays, and stops at the included roadway intersections. Corridor synchronization improvements, however, can only he effective in implementation where there are multiple traffic signals along a corridor that can facilitate movements of platoons of vehicles while minimizing delay on the major street. Figure 3 -5 provides an illustration of the corridors recommended for traffic signal coordination and centralized control within the traffic study for this Element. The post - improvement operations at the study intersection are provided within Table 3 -7 (a.m. peak) and Table 3 -8 (p.m. peak). The analyzed improvements include operational benefits for those intersections within the recommended synchronization corridors, and approach capacity improvements for locations outside of those corridors. With the implementation of signal synchronization and adaptive control within the recommended corridors, the • following intersections within the corridors would continue to have significant impacts and would require traditional widening improvements: • Walnut Grove Ave at Marshall St —a.m. peak and o peak hours • Walnut Grove Ave. at San Gabriel Blvd — o m peak h ur Implementation of a centralized and adaptive traffic signal control system, while not eliminating the need for physical capacity increases at all major area intersections, will provide alternative remedy for traffic impacts of the Land Use Element update at many local intersections. f tE i • CI RC U 1. A I 0 P A G E 3- 2 5 F E B R U A R Y P z - z n , o C 1 R C U 1. A '1 1 0 N • This page intentionally left blank. • P A C E 3- 2 6 F E R R U A R Y z e. x 4) 1 0 • • • • - - -- Ciry Boundary • Study Intersection - - - -- Railroad X/X AM/PM Peak Intersection Levels of Service % Intersection Reference Number Figure 3 -5 NOT TO SCALE Corridors Recommended Source: KOACorpomfion, 2010. for Signal Synchronization City of Rosemead February 2010 General Plan Update 41i, < ,R General Plan _ a Grand Ave. �` o a w Lower Azus a Rd. � C/Q 2 C> 1 C ¢' m I l 3 u J F /F / yeRR v 3 "F /F F� ' 4 /A/C .,`. FjD Valle Blvd. O — c l - 0t^gF— /F� —T� —�= iMarhaISt.`49/ 'U o CE !I c i wy 1 112 r. b. 10 1 A amona i.d. San Bernardino Fw a II-.n j 3 F - E D Telstar Ave. EmLL Pl. � �d 1 3 I Whitmore St rn D��...,! ( ' ^U D/E .I�..GarveyAve -� y 1 ". E/.� .i w Z I Graves Ave. U $ 0 _ — m 3 o > m ¢ R sh St. B /C/ v v 22 23 I E w I � 1 7 !! Landis View Lr: m —L / .a Gsac Fc Pomona Fwy. O /E G Qo'oo �J /C 7 28.� B/B C n a U0 o �a d =x $ m - - -- Ciry Boundary • Study Intersection - - - -- Railroad X/X AM/PM Peak Intersection Levels of Service % Intersection Reference Number Figure 3 -5 NOT TO SCALE Corridors Recommended Source: KOACorpomfion, 2010. for Signal Synchronization City of Rosemead February 2010 General Plan Update C1 R C U LA '1' T O N • • P A C E 3- 2 8 IF E R R U A R Y u This page intentionally left blank. C I R C U 1. A T I u N • Table 3 -7 Post- Synchronization and Roadway Improvement Operations at Study Intersections - AM Peak • Im.n¢UOn R.romm.nd.d Mieiga ian Mealur. Fumrw Wit], Miti'dio, Condition. V.ar (2021) DiR. Vic Impact? vle LOB I Walnut Grove Ave .1 Medan Dc Corridor &gnal Synchrolendon and AdapOw Contra) 0.258 C -0.071 No 2 Rosemead BM. at Lower Arun Rd. Comdor Slgml SyrcNanellonaM Adapdw Control 0)09 C -0.082 No 3 Roumead BNE. at Mission Dr. Comdar &gml Syrcbronaitem aM AdaptM Control 1.120 F 0059 No 1 Walmc Grave Ave, at Valley Blvd Corridor &gml SICIver n aM Adapteve Control 1.032 IF -0.010 No S Rosemead BM. at Valley Blvd. Corridor &gnat Spclronlntlon ed Adaptam Control 1 055 F 4,055 No 6 Valley Bbd at Mellon Dr. Comdor &goal S not manindon aM AiI Control 0.515 A 23 No 2 Valley Blvd. at Rio Hands, Am Corridor Signal Syrchmnintaon and Adapov. Control 0331 A • No 8 Valley Blvd. at Temple City Blvd. Corridor ill SynCNonlntlon and AdI Control 0.929 E .0081 No 9 Walnut Grave Are. at Marshall Se Comdor &gm1 Synclronintlon am Adapow, Control 1.332 F 0.318 Vu 10 Rosemead Blvd. at Me.ldl Se Comdor &grin Synchroniavdon and Adapt ve Control 0.951 E -0.018 No I I Rosemead BIN. as Glarel Way Corridor Sgna1 Syn fe.nintion and Adapsm Gmml 0.905 E 4012 No 12 Temple Oty BNd. a[ Lollar, Dr. N/A 0J99 C •• No 13 Del year Am at Hellman Am Comdor SIgm1 SyahmnlntIon are Adaptive Control 0.858 D 4.021 No 11 San Gabriel Blvd. at Heiman Aw, Comdor Signal Syndvmentbn and! Adi elve Control 0.911 E 0.021 No IS Wain. Grove Ave. at HellmaNRanoru Comdor Signal Syoolronindon and AdI Control 0889 D -0006 No 16 Rosemead Bhd. at Tesor Am Comdor 51gna1 Synctim ndneon anal Adaptive Control 0,831 D -0.016 No V Rosemead Bhd, at Wetmore St. Corridor Slpal SynCWaention aM Adaptive Comml 01612 C No 18 New Am at Garrey Ave. Comdor &gml SynCevNndon and Adaptive Control 0,816 D -0063 No 19 Del Mar Ave. at Garvey Ave Comdor &gnat SyleNOrdnOOn aid Ada,di Co.[ O Bb D 4.015 No 20 San Gabriel Bed. at Garvey Ave Comdor&gnal SynCWoleel and Atepem Control 0.928 E 4WI No 21 Walnut Grove Aver at Garvey Asa. Comdor Signal Symhroommon and AdiptM Control 0.909 E -0.002 No 32 San GaM1e1 Blvd. at Ruph SUF.trero Grand. N/A 0.582 A ° No 23 W.Inm Grove Avut Ranh 5, NIA 0,641 B ° No 21 Walnut Grove Ave at L.rWb View. In N/A 0.190 A ° No 25 Walnut Grove Ave at San Gabriel BIN. No Natalie. mi0garbo 0.921 E 0.091 No 26 San Gahtel BN& at SR40 WB Ramp. NIA 0.915 E ° No 22 Town Center Dr. at SR -60 EB Ra, N/A 0.628 B •• No 28 San Grtrie Bl d n Town Center Dr. N/A 0)50 D ° No •rim,.mmrmeaYwallortynAmieMrawars Asaemme•uYeva•W!nWow,viaway. N'weW amnarroar. a Iner•weanswereNm.a mpnm w u.w rneww mw mµe.wemn ••ow.wanew -adwa 'mq.om mavm,w,eem.evuu nesrww .rw. w,.amm..a.arrtWrea owe. pA�fjr PA G E3-29 F E B R U A R Y 2 2 2 n t o •To.. Deleted: Intersection 1 Walnut Grove Ave at Mia 2 Rosemead BM. at Lower 3 Rosemead Blvd. at Miasio 1 Winln Grove Am, at Va 5 Rosemead Said, at Valley 6 Valley BM, at Mlsfbn Dr 2 Valley BM. at Rio Hondo 8 Valley Blvd, at Temple Co 9 Walnln Grove Ave. at Ma 10 Rosemead Blvd, a Marsk I I Rosemead BLd. a Glenda 12 Temple Ciry, BM. at LoPo 13 Del Ma Ave. a Hellman H San Gabiel Blvd. at Heller 15 Walnut Grove Ave. a Ha 16 Rosemead Blvd. it Telstai 17 Rosemead Blvd, as Whitn 18 New Ave. at Garvey Ave 19 Del Mar Ave, a Garvey < 20 San Gabriel Bhd. a Garvi 21 Walmd Grove Ave. at Ga 22 San Gabriel MA. at Rush 23 Walnut Grove Am. as Ru 21 Walren Grove Ave. at Lai Ave. as Sa d. as SR4( r, at SR-6 M d, it Tom n now --to. e.. nai Aeer u 4 to lrnen "pza C 1 R C U 1. A 'r (() N • 'rable 3 -8 Post - Synchronization and Roadway Improvement Operations at Study Intersections - PM Peak • • Intanactlon R.00mm.u.d Midg.tien M.esun Future With Miti atlon Conditlona Year (2025) DW. Vic impe,t Vic LOS I Walnut Grovebeat Mmlon Dr. Cerddor Slgml Syrchedndenau Arbon ConvW 0.771 C -0.0SI No 2 Rosemead BIM. at Lower Aauaa Rd. Corridor SlSml Synthromation and Ads twe Control 0"2 D -0.078 No 3 Rosemead Blvd. at Mlsalon Or Corridor Slgnai SymIrronlntlon and AdapWe Control 1.055 F -0.017 No 4 Walnut Grove Ave. at Valley BIM. Corridor Silted[ SywMonnOon au Adagin Conrad 15 F 0.007 No 5 Rommel Blvd. at Valley Blad Corridor Slgvl syxhoMndon au Adaptive Cornball New Ave. at Garvey Ave F A017 No 6 Valley Blvd. at Mission Dr. Corridor Signal Symhmaramm and Ad,mm Control 22 B • No 7 Valley Blvd. a Rio Hondo Ave. Corral., Signal Synehmmaylu n and Adaptive Control do'ZQ D • No B Valley Blvd. at Temple City Blvd. Candor Slltedl SywhoNndon and ReasWe Control mram,a °r6.a. D -0.065 Ne 9 Walnut Grove Ave. at Marshall St. Corridor Signal Synchronous. au Adaptive Control F 0452 Yx 10 Rosemead Blvd. as Marshall St. Corridor Siltal Synalaenmdon au AdapWe Control F -0.012 No I I Rosemead Blvd. at Glendon Way Corridor S]gml Synohronbdon and Adaptive Control 0 .798 C -0055 No 12 Temple Clry, Bbd at Lomas Cu. SB L ft turn lm 0,952 E ° No 13 Del Mar Are. at Hellman Are. Condor Silted[ Sme;;; don and Adaptive Convd Q798 C -0072 No 14 San GaMel Bhd. at Hellman Ave. Corridor Signal SyrchoNntlon and Ada" Convel 0806 D 446 No 15 Wain[ Grove Ave at HellmaNRamona Corridor Slgnal Symbronlndon and Adapum Con" 1.107 F -owl No 16 Rosemead Blvd. at Telanr Ave. Corridor Slltal SyncbrONndon and Adasam Control 0956 E -0.069 No 17 Rosemead BlM. at W NIm,e SL Corrdor Signal Syrclvonmdon au AdapWe Conrad 0331 D • No 18 New Ave. at Garvey Ave Corri Sill Smchmmoz on and Adapmm Control 0.913 E -0.009 No 19 Del Mar Are. at Garvey Are. Corridor Silted[ Synchronlndon and Adaptive Control 0.984 E -0022 No 20 San GabH.1 Blvd. n Garvey Are. Corridor Signal Sywironinden and Ad.pdve Control 1,023 F -0.087 No 21 Walnn Greve Are. at Garvey Are. C.,rldor SIlte1 Synchon[ntlon and AdapMe Conrad 1.043 F 0.008 No 22 San Gabriel Bvd. at Rush SUPovero Grande NIA 0776 C No 23 W.I. Grove Ave at Rush SL N/A 0341 C ^ No 24 Walnut Grove Ave. at Louis View Ln N/A 0,507 A ^ No 25 Walnut Grave Ave. as San Gabriel Blvd No house na.,m n 1.069 F 0066 Yon 26 San Gabdel Blvd. at Slk O WS Ramq N7A 0.921 E ^ No 27 Town Cent, Or at SR -W EB Rumq NIA 0.649 B ° No 28 San Gabriel Blvd. at Town Center Dr. N/A 0378 C ^ No sT.w ton. wVaa ew 4m,.mYwrasamnul.m.MSaJ V'a", w. 1 er. — rw. —vu—is �• Iww. s e... saa. at. v,ol.,rvm^, •• rw. awn. vv. wvid —I^ n.— m avw•aidrw w. aide. rl.,w.m.IWgE.evmn'wn- P A G E 3- 3 0 F E H R U A R Y •Taear Delertacl• Intermakin Walnut Grove Ave at Mi. 2 Rosemead Blvd. at Lowe, 3 Rosemead BIM, a Missic 4 Walnut Grove Ave. at V: 5 Rosemead Bhd, a Valley 6 Valley Blvd. at Mission D, 7 Valley Bled. at Rio Hondr 8 W Iley Blvd. at Temple Ci 9 Walnut Grove Ave. at n 10 Rosemead Bad. at Marsh I I Rosemead Bhd. at Gieu 12 Te.npk City Blvd. as Loh Del Mar Ave. at Hellman 14 San Gabriel Blvd. at Hour 15 Walnut Grove Ave. a H. 16 Rosemead Bhd, a Tel. U Rosemead Bhd, at Whbr 18 New Ave. at Garvey Ave 19 Del Mar Ave. at Garvey , 20 San Gabriel Blvd. at Gare 21 Walnut Grove Ave. at Q 22 San Gabriel Blvd. at Rush 23 Wale Grove Ave, at Rs 24 Walnast Grove Ave, a U 25 Walnut Grove Ave. at Sa 26 JU. Gabriel Blvd. a SR -6 27 Tovm Center Dr, at SR -t 28 ISar Gabriel Bhd, at Tom mram,a °r6.a. mer—own eoaidiim mar, 1. or m ma..ar.tunpxu m�w.awm.o„a n...... LI • 40 implemented as an extension of the Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) projects currently being planned and implemented by the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works. Rosemead will become part of the San Gabriel Valley ITS system, and would potentially have the ability (with additional funding sources) to build upon the initial sub - regional system set up by the County. Demand and Alternative Mode Enhancements As an alternative to physical roadway improvements, Rosemead must begin actively promoting a diversity of trip modes to and from local developments, the use of transit for a higher proportion of local and commuter trips, and encouragement of trip management programs at the individual development level. Such actions have been included in the list of implementation goals and policies within this Element. The potential for the reduction of vehicle trip generation from commercial developments is described below for each of these categories: 3- °. Promoting a diversity of trip modes: All potential trip modes including passenger vehicles, walking, bicycling, and transit must be considered in the evaluation of major development projects within Rosemead. As major roadway projects are considered in the fixture, the provision of bicycle lanes should be considered where additional lanes or on- street parking would normally be provided. Provision of these facilities must be balanced, however, with the management of congestion and the parking needs of adjacent land uses. Promoting higher use of transit: Rosemead is served by a basic network of regional transit lines and the local shuttle lines operated by the City. A movement of transit's role within Rosemead into a viable mode of local and commuter travel must occur. The City should develop a centralized transit center that includes a bus transfer center that links local routes with commuter routes to downtown Los Angeles and other major job centers. A park- and -ride facility could also be a part of the larger transit center development. In -lieu mitigation measures should be considered for major developments, where contributions would be made toward the establishment or frequency increase of transit service to and from those developments, providing support to transit development as new development occurs. C I R C U 1, A T 1 o N P A G E 3- 3 1 F E B R U A R Y s e. z o s n Deleted: Rosemead in evrda Mission Drive - p.m. pcuki <s>N'alnut Gmve Avenue al Ville Ito •v - a.m. and p.m. peaki . >Rnsemead Boulevard at Valley Buldevar - a.m. jxak and p.m. pcakl <s>vallev jka levard at R'pjjopyly , can .- p.m peakl u> Walnut Grove Avenue al Marshall street - a.m, peak and p.m. peakl u>Ros m ad Boul vrztat AHrskdl Street- P.m. peaki <s> Rosemead Boulevard at Glendon Way - a.m. peak and p.m. peaki <rn Del Mar Avenue al I lg)lmap c n t - a.m. peak and p.m. peaki <I >San (•ahriel Boulevard at I fellman Avenue - p.m. Iwakl <s> Walnut Grove Avenue at pellman /Ramona - a.m. peak and p.m. peaki <s>New Avenue Is Gznev Avenue - a.m. peak and p.m. feudal u> Del Mar Avenue at Carvev Avenue -p.m. peaki <s> San Gabriel Boulevard at Carve Avenue - p.m. peaki <s> Walnut Grove Avenueat G.arvvv 1i Avenu - a.m. peak and p.m. peaki <s> Walnut Grove Avenue at San Gabriel Boulevard - p.m. peaki <1>San Gabriel Boulevard at SR -bo Westbound Ramos- a.m.peakand p.m. peaki Deleted: i Implementation of a eentraliud and adaptive traffic signal control system, while not eliminating the need for physical capacity increases at all major area intersections, will provide alternative remedy for traffic impacts of the Land Use Element update at many local imersectim s. 7 1 Local implementation of such a system in Rosemead can be implemented as an extension ofthe Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) projects currently being planned and implemented by the County of Los Angeles Department of Publie Works. Rosemead will become part of the San Cabriel Valley ITS system, and would potentially have the ability (with additional funding sources) to build upon the initial sub - regional system set up by the County. Deleted: 1 1 C i R C u 1. A T 1 o N • Promoting the use of trio management programs* Trip generation can often only be effectively managed at the source. 'rransportation Demand Management (TDM) programs have been used for many years in local jurisdictions as an avenue to provide in -lieu mitigation measures for commercial developments. Resources are allocated by the developer to subsidization of transit passes, the promotion of carpooling and alternate trip modes, and the infusion of transit awareness into the workplace. The City should begin requiring TDM programs where physical traffic mitigation measures are infeasible or where roadway widening at the associated loss of parking or sidewalk areas would he undesirable. Post - implementation monitoring of trip reduction targets must be tied to development approvals when TDM plans are involved. Trips by bicycle can be encouraged by both on- street and off - street facilities. On- street facilities would include striped and signed (Class II) bicycles lanes on cross -town routes that overlap with major roadways and bicycle loops /sensors at traffic lights. Off - street facilities can include bicycle racks and kiosks with bicycle route maps at small public facilities or private developments, up to bicycle enclosures, showers/lockers, and bicycle rentals at large facilities. - The existing bicycle route network within Rosemead, and the potential future bicycle network, is illustrated within Figure 3- 6. This potential bicycle lane network is for illustrative purposes only, but provides an example of how a bicycle network can be spaced across the city while providing access to is most residential neighborhoods and commercial districts. Ideally, bicycle lanes would be placed on low - volume roadways that traverse the City. The potential routes would need further study, to determine if parking or travel lanes can be removed or adjusted to provide for the bicycle facilities, or if future roadway widening and improvements can include such facilities in the approved cross - sections. The study would examine whether arterials or continuous but lower- volume collector roadways would be appropriate for the provision of bicycle facilities. P A G E 3- 3 2 F E B R U A R Y 2 z 2 0 i o L 0 0 T\ -A -i A s s s � Legend — —- City Boundary - -- -- Railroad Existing Class I Bike Trail Potential New Bike Lanes City of Rosemead General Plan Update Ilan Figure 3 -6 Existing Bicycle Routes and Potential Future Routes June 2008 C I R C 11 1. A T I U N • This page intentionally left blank. • P A G E 3- 3 4 F E B R 11 A R Y 2 2 - 2 o i o • Controlling Truck Traffic Through Routes The existing truck route network within Rosemead provides for truck access to local businesses, and to some extent, provides routes for trucks to travel through the City to other destinations. Where truck traffic is intruding on areas where walking trips and other modes are being promoted, it should be prohibited. Where truck traffic is impeding resident access to neighborhoods, other roadway facilities, or the freeways, access routes should be reconsidered. Truck route locations and the potential adverse traffic impacts that would result from a consolidation of routes on specific corridors should be examined in more detail in a special study, which on completion would serve as an update to the Circulation Element. Truck route signage should also be studied and updated as necessary as par of the special study. J C J Goals and Policies Based on the issues and potential solutions presented within this Circulation Element update document, the following goals and policies were developed to guide implementation of the identified solutions. Goal is Maintain efficient vehicular and pedestrian movements throughout the City. Policy 1.1: Annually monitor and review the function of Rosemead's primary roadway system to identify any major capacity bottlenecks. Policy t.z: Annually review and update, via special study, truck route designations within the City. Policy 1.3: Assure that traffic studies for individual developments, and traffic studies conducted for sectors of the community and specific plans by the City, make every effort to provide LOS D operations or better on arterial roadways and collector roadways if a nexus to the project exists. POlicy i.q: Preparation of a tmffic impact report shall be required for major development projects located Cu RCU U. A r u oN P A G E 3' 3 5 P E n R U A R Y 2 2 2 o i n n1C ;a;111L111;t1:1 • in designated mixed -use areas, which generate trips that would meet a predetermined trip threshold. Policy 1,5: Fricourage the development of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) programs for all major office and commercial developments. Policy 1.6: Cooperate with neighboringjurisdiclions to craft resolutions to regional traffic problems. Special emphasis should be devoted to Rosemead Boulevard, Valley Boulevard, Garvey Avenue, and San Gabriel Boulevard. Goal 2: Development of infrastructure and service to support alternatives modes of travel. Policy 2,1: To identify areas of traffic spillover as new developments occur, monitor traffic patterns in residential neighborhoods that are adjacent to commercial or industrial corridors. Policy 2.2: The provision of Class 11 (striped and signed) bicycle lanes along minor arterial or collector roadway corridors during roadway re- construction projects should be evaluated and implemented if feasible. Policy 2-3: • Formal transit improvements should be considered when bus stops are adjacent to development projects and within roadway re- construction corridors. Amenities such as shelters, lighting, bus schedule kiosks, and similar amenities should be considered and implemented as feasible. Policy 2.4: Transportation Demand Management (TDM) programs should be actively promoted for major projects as in -lieu mitigation measures, where physical traffic mitigations are either infeasible or undesirable to the City. P A G E 3- 3 6 • - - - - _ - - Deleted: PMim'7: Identify appropriate improvements to the Del Mar Avenue at Garvey Avenue intersection for the relief of ingestion, while supporting transit use and walking, as individual area mixed -use developments are reviewed. t POI icy 2.8 Include safe and convenient bicycle and pedestrian access in all transportation improvement projects. Ensure that non - motorized transportation systems are connected and not interrupted by impassable barriers, such as freeways and include amenities such as secure bicycle parking. Goal 3: Vehicular traffic associated with commercial and industrial uses should • not intrude upon adjacent residential neighborhoods. Policy 3.1: Develop neighborhood traffic control plans for those neighborhoods experiencing spillover traffic impacts that may result from intensification of commercial or industrial areas. 3.2: Annually review on- street parking in neighborhoods adjacent to the downtown area and mixed -use districts, and develop parking and control plans for those areas adversely affected by spillover traffic and parking. Policy 3.3: Require that traffic studies for individual developments along commercial corridors examine the potential impacts on nearby residential roadway segments. Consider residential parking permit programs if necessary to mitigate potential area parking impacts. J C I R C U L A 'r I U N P A G E 3- 3 7 F E R R U A R Y x z. x o � o • Policy 2.5: All site plans for new commercial or industrial development shall be reviewed for the provision of pedestrian connectivity to sidewalks and nearby bus stops, and the provision of bicycle and racks and transit information for larger projects. Policy 2.6: Walkable areas of the city, such as in the downtown area or the proposed mixed -use districts, should be reviewed for ways to improve pedestrian access (driveway access point reductions, buffers between roadways and sidewalks, crosswalks, etc.). Policy 2-7: Promote the linking of local public transit routes with that of adjacent jurisdictions and other transit agencies. POI icy 2.8 Include safe and convenient bicycle and pedestrian access in all transportation improvement projects. Ensure that non - motorized transportation systems are connected and not interrupted by impassable barriers, such as freeways and include amenities such as secure bicycle parking. Goal 3: Vehicular traffic associated with commercial and industrial uses should • not intrude upon adjacent residential neighborhoods. Policy 3.1: Develop neighborhood traffic control plans for those neighborhoods experiencing spillover traffic impacts that may result from intensification of commercial or industrial areas. 3.2: Annually review on- street parking in neighborhoods adjacent to the downtown area and mixed -use districts, and develop parking and control plans for those areas adversely affected by spillover traffic and parking. Policy 3.3: Require that traffic studies for individual developments along commercial corridors examine the potential impacts on nearby residential roadway segments. Consider residential parking permit programs if necessary to mitigate potential area parking impacts. J C I R C U L A 'r I U N P A G E 3- 3 7 F E R R U A R Y x z. x o � o C I N C tl 1. A '1' 1 0 N • POI icy 3.4: Develop standards for significant impacts to residential roadways, and Include these standards within the adopted traffic study guidelines for the City. POI icY 3.5: Discourage the use of local residential roadways as through routes. This type of traffic movement shall be discouraged through traffic calming planning that involves the local residents. Goal q: Provide quality commercial and industrial development with adequate parking for employees and visitors. Policy 4.1: Private and public parking shall be provided in sufficient amount to adequately meet local needs and to minimize congestion on arterial streets. Policy 4.2: Conduct periodic reviews of parking code standards and evaluate the standards for adequacy and applicability to changing development trends within the city. Policy 4.3: Require projects in revitalization /redevelopment areas to provide adequate off - street parking, even in re-use projects. Policy 4.4: Establish in -lieu parking fees for downtown areas. The City could utilize these fees to build • parking lots or structures as needed, or to create a designated parking district. Implementation Actions The following implementation actions put the Circulation Element policies and plans into practice for City elected officials, staff and the public. Each action relates directly to one or more policies established within the Circulation Element update. P A G E 3- 3 8 IMM- Mm- Mm ti'i 71ti1 E • E C I R C G 1, A T I 0 N Goal t: Maintain efficient vehicular and pedestrian movements throughout the city. Action 1.1 Adopt an ordinance establishing the street classification changes as described within the Circulation Element. Action 1.2 Identify feasible near -term roadwav improvements that fulfill identified Circulation Element measures, and incorporate those improvements into the next update to the five - year Capital Improvements Program (CIP). Action 1.3 Make every feasible effort to provide LOS D operations or better on arterial roadways and collector roadways. Action 1.4 Require TDM plans as a mitigation strategy component within the City traffic impact study guidelines. Action 1.5 Prohibit truck traffic on local and collector streets unless such streets provide the only access to a site. Action 1.6 Conduct a citywide study of truck routes to determine if truck routes can be consolidated without creating adverse impacts due to concentrations of truck traffic. Action 1.7 Evaluate the appropriateness of identification signage on truck routes, including truck route turn signs at major intersections. Action 1.8 Study alternatives for improving circulation in the vicinity of Rosemead Square including the addition of travel lanes on Rosemead Boulevard through prohibition of parking and a possible redesign of the adjacent ramp approaches at the I -Io /Rosemead Boulevard interchange. .,, P G E 3-39 «D rEUltunEV s2 ,.- C I E C U 1. A r t U N L J I1 Goal 2: Development of infrastructure and services to support alternative modes of travel. Action 2.1 Develop neighborhood traffic control plans for those neighborhoods experiencing spillover traffic impacts that may result from intensification of commercial or industrial areas. Action 2.2 Conduct a study of the potential for the inclusion of bicycle lanes along major roadway corridors. If such facilities cannot be included along commercial thoroughfares, bicycle lanes on adjacent parallel but minor roadways should be considered. Action 2.3 Develop a Long -Range Transportation Plan for transit service within Rosemead, which evaluates potential locations for a centralized transit center and park- and -ride facility. The center should tie in regional local and commuter transit lines and the City transit shuttle. Action 2.4 Require Transportation Demand Management (TDM) programs for major projects as in -lieu mitigation measures, where physical traffic mitigations are either infeasible or undesirable to the City. • Action 2.5 Design guidelines and roadway improvement policies within the downtown area and the planned mixed -use district should promote the reduction of driveway access points, the provision of buffer space or objects between roadways and sidewalks, and provide for safe mid -point crosswalks, as needed and as feasible within available right -of -way and within existing roadway /control configurations. Action 2.6 Collaborate with local transit agencies to: • Develop programs and educate employers about employee rideshare (carpooling) and transit. • Establish mass transit mechanisms for the reduction of worker - related and nonwork related vehicle trips. P A G E 3- 4 0 F n a R U A K Y z 2. z 0 i o • Action 2.7 Work with AQMD and other agencies to receive grants for alternative modes of transportation and improved traffic flow. Action 2.8 In conjunction with measures that encourage public transit, ride sharing, bicycling and walking, implement circulation improvements that reduce vehicle idling. For example, coordinate controlled intersections so that traffic passes more efficiently through congested areas. Action 2.9 Create an interconnected transportation system that allows a shift in travel from private passenger vehicles to alternative modes, including public transit, ride sharing, car sharing, bicycling and walking. Before funding transportation improvements that increase vehicle miles traveled, consider alternatives such as increasing public transit or improving bicycle or pedestrian travel routes. Action 2.10 Consider giving funding preference to investment in public transit over investment in infrastructure for private automobile traffic. Action 2.11 Consider providing public transit incentives, including free and reduced fare areas. Action 2.12 Consider adopting a comprehensive parking policy that discourages private vehicle use and encourages the use of alternative transporlation. For example, reduce parking for private vehicles • while increasing options for alternative transportation; eliminate minimum parking requirements for new buildings; "unbundle" parking (require that parking is paid for separately and is not included in rent for residential or commercial space); and set appropriate pricing for parking. Goal 3: Vehicular traffic associated with commercial and industrial uses should not intrude upon adjacent residential neighborhoods. Action 3.1 Require evaluation of potential parking overflow onto adjacent residential roadways for traffic and parking studies for new commercial and industrial developments. [[��.rte. OQC • C I R C U L A '1'1 O N P A G E 3- 4 1 P L n R U A R Y 2 2. 2 o 1 o CI K C U LA '1'1 o N Action 3.2 Consider programs to prohibit on- street parking • for demand generated by commercial and industrial activities, using permit programs and related signage for affected local streets. Action 3.3 Periodically review on- street parking in neighborhoods adjacent to revitalization /redevelopment districts and develop parking and control plans for those areas adversely affected by spillover traffic and parking. Goal 4: Provide quality commercial and industrial development with adequate parldng for employees and visitors. Action 4.1 Require that any re-use of commercial or industrial redevelopment or reuse project must demonstrate that adequate on -site parking and loading will be provided for the proposed use. Action 4.2 Examine potential- on- street parking demand within the immediate vicinity of proposed projects as part of the parking analyses conducted for projects in the mixed -use and downtown districts. • P A G E 3- 4 2 P P R R U A R Y z z z o 1 o • 0 0 • K 1: S 11 U R C 1: M A N A G 1: M E N T Chapter 4 RCE MANAGEMENT ROSEM EAU GENERAL PLAN tate law requires every general plan to have an open space element (Section 653o2[e]) and a S conservation element (Section 653o2[d]). The • open space and conservation elements complement one another due to the overlap in State requirements and the interrelationship of issues within each element. This is particularly true in Rosemead, which no longer has abundant open space and undeveloped natural resources. This circumstance emphasizes the importance of treating with care the City's remaining resources and open spaces. For these reasons, the Open Space and Conservation Elements have been combined into the Resource Management Element. The Resources Management Element open space component's purpose is to guide and set a policy framework for existing and future open space uses for use by residents. The conservation component focuses on protecting and maintaining available natural resources and discouraging wasteful consumption practices. The conservation components include greenspace water resources. air quality. and mineral resources } • P A G E 4 -, F 11 N R U R E S O U R C li M A N A G li M li N 'r • Important Regional Plans Natural resources such as water and air represent regional resources that are not contained within political jurisdictional boundaries. 'Thus, regional agencies have established regional programs and approaches to protect and conserve resources shared by many cities and large geographic areas. Air Quality Management Plan 'file federal Clean Air Act requires preparation of plans to improve air quality in any region designated as a non - attainment area. (A non - attainment area is a geographic area identified by the Environmental Protection Agency and /or California Air Resources Board as not meeting State or federal standards for a given pollutant.) The plan must outline specific programs, strategies, and timelines for bringing the area into compliance with air quality standards. 'file Air Quality Management Plan prepared by the South Coast Air Quality ':Management District, first adopted in 1994 and updated on a three -year cycle, contains policies and measures designed to achieve federal and State standards for healthier air quality in the South Coast Air Basin. Many of the programs address circulation improvements, since fossil- fuel - powered vehicles account -for more than 6o percent of the nitrogen oxide emissions and 70 percent of the carbon monoxide emissions within the Basin. Businesses in Rosemead are required to comply with regulations of the South Coast Air Quality Management District, the agency charged with the authority to improve air quality in the region. • National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) As part of a comprehensive effort to improve the quality of the nation's water resources, the federal government authorizes the State Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region to set up programs to implement National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) goals. Under the NPDES Stormwater Permit issued to the County of Los Angeles and Rosemead as co- permittees, most new development projects in the City are required to incorporate measures that minimize pollutant levels within stormwater runoff. Compliance is required at the time construction permits are issued, as well as over the long term through periodic inspections. The Water Resources and Quality section of this Element discusses the NPDES program. P A G E 4- 2 11 No Dumping Sign along the Rio Hondo Flood Control Channel P E B R o A R Y t 2 n 1 n K E S U U K C It M A N A G E M K N 'r • Relationship to Other Elements The Resource Management Element works in concert with the land Use Element to promote City goals. The Iand Use Element designates areas for open space and recreation. Parks, Open Space, Greenbelt, and Public Art Issues, Goal, and Policies Parks and Open Space As a largely built -out community, Rosemead recognizes the critical importance of enhancing and protecting resources for residents' physical health and the businesses' economic health. Thus, these goals and policies emphasize: (t) preserving and maintaining established open space and recreational resources; (z) making provisions for additional open space; (3) assisting in the conservation and protection of water resources; and (4) contributing to regional efforts to improve air quality and energy conservation. • Parks One of the issues facing Rosemead is the availability of open space and parkland to residents for passive and active recreation. The Resource Management Element serves as a plan for parkland and recreational open space in Rosemead. Parks serve a variety of needs; a classification is appropriate to understand the function of individual parks. In addition to providing a classification for parklands within the City, this Element provides standards that will be applied to the development of new parks. Standards are important to clearly defining the function, characteristics, and facilities associated with a particular type of park. These same standards should also be flexible to allow for variability in parks that is characteristic of most communities. The following park standards are specific to the City of Rosemead and apply to both existing and future parkland. • P A G E 4- 3 R li S 0 U R C li M A N A G li M E N r • Regional Park This category includes parks that are generally operated by large cities, a county, or a park district. Regional parks typically exceed 200 acres and have a variety of facilities for a wide range of interests. The Whittier Narrows Recreation Area, located adjacent to the eastern City border and one mile south of Rosemead, is an example of this type of park. This park has in excess of t,000 acres and will continue to provide Rosemead residents and the surrounding region numerous recreational opportunities. The park offers fishing, skeet, pistol and trap shooting ranges, picnicking areas, a nature center, an equestrian facility, trails, numerous types of play fields and courts, playgrounds, and an extensive tmil network. Community Park A community park is broadly defined as a park that is over to acres in area and, because of the nature of facilities provided, serves between to,000 and 30,000 residents. A community park's service ama is from one -half to one mile. Garvey Park and Rosemead Park are in this park category. E C Garvey Park Neighborhood Park A neighborhood park's service area generally corresponds to an elementary school's senice area. A neighborhood park should be large enough and have adequate facilities for active recreation, including playgrounds and limited athletic facilities. Parks in this category are primarily designed to serve children and adolescents. Neighborhood parks range in size from two to ten acres and have a senice area from one - quarter to one -half mile. Rosemead's neighborhood parks include 7apopan Park and Sally Tanner Park. P A G E q- q P E R R U A R Y 2 o r n R 1: S 0 U R C li M A N A G li M E N 'r • Mini-parks a Mini-parks are small parks under one acre in size and generally designed to serve preschool -aged children. These parks or tot lots have a very small service area. Klingerman Park is an example of a mini -park. Special Park /Facility The City maintains the 3.5 -acre Jess Gonzalez Sports Complex park, which cannot be easily classified according to the above criteria. Certain types of recreational uses are so distinct that typical standards may not apply. Other specialty facilities include the pedestrian and bicycle trails planned within the electric power transmission easement and along the Alhambra Wash. Greenbelt Greenbelt parks are small areas 0.75 acres or less that include designated open space, landscaping, and /or recreation. Rosemead has four Greenbelt parks: Angelus Park, Guess Park, Olney Park, and Triangle Park. Whittier Narrows Golf Course The Whittier Narrows Golf Course is a 27 -hole golf course located on 260 acres of the Whittier Narrows Park. The golf course includes amenities such as a grass driving range, practice greens, banquet facility, and a restaurant. Open Space Resources Open space contributes to the economic, social, and physical health, safety, and welfare of residents. Private lawns, • landscaping, and public open space in parks, playgrounds, and civic facilities make up the bulk of the City's open space. In addition to the parks described above, significant open space areas that benefit residents are: 1) the Southern California Edison easement, and z) the Whittier Narrows Recreational Area, located east of the City limits in unincorporated Los Angeles County. Open space also can facilitate uroundwater recharge and stormwater management. Figure 4-1. Resource Mana ey ment Policy Map, identifies the local waterways in and near Rosemead. The City is Substantially built out and contains little natural habitat. Riparian habitat is limited due to the channelization of local stems. There are no wildlife corridors in the City due to urbanization Rosemead has not established any flood corridors. defined here as areas where annual flooding takes place The areas of the City where there is flooding potential especially as due to dam inundation, are identified in the Public Safety Element. .04gg ,yi�^rl�r3 PAGE q - 5 F r x R u n x y z n 1 0 11 • • • R li s It U R C E M A N A G E M 1: N '1' Whittier Narrows Recreational Area (source: Ins Angeles County Regional Parks tt�ca• laeol nlcPv's or •l Park Facility Standards Standards for recommended park space vary. The National Parks and Recreation Association (NPRA) recommends a minimum of 2.5 acres of park space per 1,000 persons. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) recommends for a minimum of 4 acres per 1,000 persons. Based on the City's -1008 estimated population of 57022 persons (California Department of Finance), the City should provide a minimum of.,t44 acres of park land to meet the NRPA standards, and z3o acres per SCAG guidelines. Table 4 -1 lists Rosemead's park and open space, and includes the Whittier Narrows Recreational Area, a 1,092 -acre regional park immediately southeast of the City. Whittier Narrows Recreation Area offers significant recreational opportunities, such as fishing, shooting ranges, and trails. Approximately 25 percent of City residents live within a one -mile radius of Whittier Narrows Dam Recreation Area , and approximately So percent live within a two -mile radius. Excluding Whittier Narrows, the City has approximately 43.25 acres of parkland. According to NRPA and SCAG recommendations, the City lacks a pproximatelyjoi and }g7 acres of parkland, respectively. P A G E 4- 6 ... -' Deleted: xon6 Deleted: 144 ------------------------ Deleted: 143 - - -1 Deleted: 229 E E It R U A R V L O t O Deleted: mo Deleted: 186 • • • K 17 S O G K C E M A N A C C M E N T 'rable q -t Park and Recreation Facilities Name Park'ry a Acres Angelus Park Greenbelt 0.2 Gamw Park Community A. Ganev Recreation Center Facilit Cucss Park Greenbelt 0.2 Klin erman Park Mini o. Olnev Park Greenbelt 0.2 Rosemead Center Facili o. Rosemead Park Cuntmuni tg Sall Tanner Park Nai hburhond 12 Jess Cntmalez Sports Complex Park S tialty Facility Triangle Park Crcenhclt 0. 7a an Park Neighborhood 6 TOTAL(a) 43.25 Whittier Narrows(••n) Regional >1,000 a) imai does not mcame wminer Narrows. b) I.Ied outside Rosemead city limits in uninwrpomted Los Angeles County. Other Available Recreation Resources As the few remaining vacant parcels in Rosemead develop, parks and open space will become increasingly difficult to acquire and fund. Rosemead's public school facilities offer opportunities to expand active recreational options. The City and the local school districts have established joint -use agreements to maximize use of limited local open space and recreational facilities. The State recognizes the relationship between school sites and their potential. for recreational use. Education Code Section 35275 requires that school boards meet with park and recreation officials to coordinate the design of new parks. Education Code Section 39363.5 requires that in cases where surplus school sites are disposed of, first priority must be given to park recreational purposes. The policies contained in this Element encourage the continuation of the shared use of school sites for recreational purposes, as well as availability of City facilities for special school functions. Rosemead's schools provide recreational facilities including ball fields, soccer fields, and playgrounds. Many of these school facilities are underutilized and gated to prevent or restrict public use during non - school hours. Working collaboratively with the Rosemead, Garvey, Alhambra, El Monte, and Montebello school districts, Rosemead will seek out opportunities to allow for recreational use of school facilities by residents. PA G E p -7 F E K K G A K r a x 2 o t n R E S G rl K C li M A N A G E M 1 +. N 'r • Public Art Public arts projects can help create strong connections between residents of Rosemead and places in the City. Along with fagade and streetscape improvements, public art projects can help redevelop and reinvigorate underutilized corridors in the City. Public art projects also have the potential to enliven civic spaces and strengthen a sense of community identity. Public art in Rosemead can provide opportunities to observe the City's rich history and celebrate its unique and diverse population. Parks. Open Space. Greenbelt and Public Art Goal and Policies Goal 1: Provide high- quality parks, recreation, and open space facilities to meet the needs of all Rosemead residents. Policy 1.1: Maintain current parks within the City to ensure they continue to provide Rosemead residents the best possible recreational opportunities. Policy 1.2: Develop pedestrian /bicycle trail systems in the City. Policy 1.3: Look for opportunities to establish public parks and other useable open space areas in those parts of Rosemead underserved by such facilities • (Figure 4 -1). Policv 1.4: Establish parkland and /or recreation fees payment program for new residential development as provided by developer fees. Policy 1.5: Incorporate public art projects in civic commercial, and mixed uses areas Ensure that the Public art correspond to the surroundings, and highlight Rosemead's unique community and character. Y A G E 4- a is I • • Park Names CSally Tanner Park CGuess Park O/;� Rosemead Park U Community Center Park CGarvey Park (6 Zopopan Park (J• Jess Gonzales Sports Park CKlingerman Park CWhittier Narrows Golf Course 6J Triangle Park (iJ Whittier Narrows Park • • Rosemead City Boundary ......• Sphere of Influence Boundary Major Roads rt++++t Railroad — — River/Wash Im I�" G Hera P Rn I 3 Park Edison Easement Whittier Narrows Goff Course /Recreational Parks Bike Route Community Center Source: City of Rosemead, DMP Inc. Figure 4-1 Feet 0 1,100 2,900 4,200 5,600 Resource Management Policy Map City of Rosemead March 2007 General Plan Update N 1 °. S o G E C F M A N A G 11 M P, N 7 • • P A G E q- 1 0 • This page intentionally left blank. F E n E U A E Y 1 2 z n 1 0 R R SG U R C R M A N A G R M li N T Greenspace Issues, Goal, and Policies In addition to the City's parks and open space facilities, commercial, industrial, and residential districts can provide greenspace in the form of landscaping and street trees. Increasing the amount and quality of greenspace promotes a positive physical image, creates identity for all types of development, and provides shade and cooling benefits. As part of the overall City aim of enhancing the visual quality of the urban environment and encouraging pedestrian activity, City policies, programs, and standards will provide for commercial and industrial property owners to landscape properties with turf, trees, and shrubs. Of particular importance are setback areas and parking lots open to public view. In commercial areas, improved greenspace creates a landscape aesthetic inviting to pedestrians. Neighborhoods near industrial areas benefit from greenspace as it softens views toward parking lots, loading areas, trash enclosures, etc. Well - designed greenspace also improves the quality of single and multi- family neighborhoods and is considered a necessity rather than an amenity. Southern California communities continue to place increased demands on existing water supplies; consequently, there is a greater focus on water conservation, not just in times of drought, but in anticipation of future population growth. Many private landowners and public authorities are adopting alternative forms of landscaping as an environmentally responsible alternative to conventional, water- intensive horticultural landscaping. %eriscape is the philosophy of water conservation through creative landscaping. %eriscape is a landscape that uses plants with low water requirements, making them able to withstand extended periods of drought. Properly maintained, a xeriscape can easily use less than one - half the water of a traditional landscape. Once established, a xeriscape should require less maintenance than turf landscape. Goal 2: Increase greenspace throughout Rosemead to improve community aesthetics, encourage pedestrian activity, and provide passive cooling benefits Policy 2.1: Increase landscaping and tree plantings along all major arterials, including Valley Boulevard, P A G E 4 - �`4I P n R R U A R Y I z_ z n L o • K i! ti U U K C E M A N A G 1! M 1'. N '1' • Gan,ev Avenue, San Gabriel Boulevard, and Del Mar, vcnue. Pot icy 2.2: Continue to require all commercial and industrial property owners to maintain landseapingon their property. • • Policy 2.3: Require new developments to incorporate creative and effective landscaping into the overall site plan of proposed projects. Policy 2.q: Maintain a coordinated Oh, street tree program for all areas of Rosemead. Policy 2.5: Pursue landscaped street medians and parkways construction where adequate right -of -way is available. Policy 2.6: Enhance the on -and off -ramp areas at Interstate 6o, Interstate to, and State Route tq. Policy 2.7: Encourage public art projects through the development of impact fees, in -lieu fees, and policies. P A G E q- 1 g Example of parking lot landscaping P E E R U A R Y I z g.o 1 0 R F ti 0 I) R C F. M A N A G li M I: N T Water Consumption and Quality Issues, Goal, and Policies Rosemead, like the entire greater I.os Angeles basin, is semi- arid, with relatively limited annual rainfall. Earlv settlers drew local groundwater resources for agricultural and domestic water needs. As the region grew, increasingly more wells lapped into groundwater basins. In many areas, groundwater levels have declined as water use continues to exceed natural recharge through rainfall and stream flow. Much of Southern California now relies upon imported water to greatly supplement local resources, both to meet volume demands and to ensure water quality meets state and federal drinking water standards. The City's location in and Southern California underscores the importance of continued education regarding wise water use and water conservation technologies. The City remains committed to water conservation strategies that ensure a healthy, clean, and reliable supply of water remains available for residents. The City encourages the use of simple water conservation measures in homes and in the workplace. Water resources are limited to the groundwater basins that provide a local source of water to the City and the surrounding region. Rosemead is located above the San Gabriel Basin, a • groundwater basin drained by the San Gabriel River and the Rio Hondo. The groundwater basin is bounded by the San Gabriel Mountains to the north, San Jose Hills to the east, Puente Hills to the south, and Raymond Fault to the west. local groundwater accounts for a major portion of the area's water supply. Three of the groundwater purveyors in the City are: the Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District, the South San Gabriel System (serves half of Rosemead), and the California Water Service Company. Due to past San Gabriel Valley industrial practices, the basin has been contaminated with a variety of pollutants ranging from pesticides to industrial chemicals and solvents. According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), over 30 square miles of San Gabriel Valley groundwater may be contaminated. The contaminated sites underlie Rosemead and other San Gabriel Valley communities. Although the federal government is responsible for cleanup of the area and initiated a comprehensive remediation program in 1994, Rosemead is committed to reducing the further contamination of (0{ • Cemented Rio Hondo tlad control channel P A G E 4- 1 3 F 11 R R it A R Y , 2 2 0 1 0 R P. S 0 U R C li M A N A G E M E N "r • underground water. The City participates in Los Angeles County's NPDES program to reduce the amount of water polluted by pesticides, engine oil, and household chemicals that run into the storm drain system and pollute groundwater. As part of this effort, the City must comply with the County's Slormwater Quality Management Program and implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) in several areas including public outreach, planning and construction, public agency activities, business inspections, and illicit connection and flow. Goal 3: Manage the use of and protect water resources that provide supplies to Rosemead residents and businesses. • • Policy 3. t: Work with water suppliers to ensure that adequate water resources continue to be available to meet the needs of residents and business. Policv 3.2: Promote water conservation measures, reduce urban runoff, and prevent groundwater pollution associated with development projects, property maintenance, City operations, and all activities requiring City approval. Policy 3.3: Work with local, regional, and State agencies to maintain and improve the quality of local groundwater and to provide a cost - effective and equitable means of reducing urban runoff. Policy 3.4: Adopt and enforce regulations and engage in educational efforts to eliminate groundwater and urban runoff pollution. Policy 3.5: 'Fake steps to use reclaimed water whenever and wherever possible in both public and private facilities. Air Quality and Energy Conservation Issues, Goal, and Policies Every day, the average person breathes thousands of gallons of air, yet our air is contaminated by smog emanating from automobiles, industrial processes, and daily activities. These P A G E 4- 1 4 P E R R U A R Y x. R E S O U R C E M A N A G E M E N T • pollutants are responsible for a range of respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, reduced tolerance for exercise, impairment of mental functions, and reduced plant growth. Although air quality has localized impacts, it is a regional problem created throughout the Los Angeles metropolitan area. Every city must accept a portion of responsibility for addressing air quality problems. Rosemead is located within the South Coast Air Basin, a geographic area that extends from the Pacific Ocean north to the San Gabriel Mountains and east to the San Bernardino and San Jacinto Mountains. Due to topography, climate, and daily pollutant emissions, the basin is a non - attainment area for ambient air quality standards for ozone, carbon monoxide, and fine particulate matter. Although the air is much cleaner today than it was 40 years ago and continued reductions in pollutant concentrations are expected, the basin is not expected to meet air quality standards in the foreseeable future. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) works to improve regional air quality and to achieve federal and state standards for various air pollutants. According to SCAQMD, air quality has improved since the latter decades of the last century due to lower energy consumption, improved auto emission standards, and use of alternative modes of transportation. Due to Rosemead's location adjacent to two freeways, local air quality is affected most by vehicle emissions, railway transportation, and industrial uses in adjacent communities. Although the City has no direct ability to manage programs for • emissions control, Rosemead supports the regional Air Quality Management Plan measures to help reduce air pollution. Energy conservation is another important strategy to improve air quality and preserve natural resources. Pollutants are generated by the burning of fossil fuels and natural gas to produce electricity. Conserving energy contributes to improvements in air quality. Buildings are one of the major contributors to electricity demand. Energy requirements and pollutants associated with energy generation can be reduced through architectural designs, building construction, and landscaping. The City promotes energy conservation through the implementation of State of California Title 24 energy performance requirements in building codes. Title 24 establishes standards for minimum ceiling, wall, and raised floor insulation; minimum heating, ventilating, air conditioning and water heating equipment efficiencies; and other requirements that help reduce energy use. a,. '�s1' PAGE 4 -is P E R R U A R Y z n 1 o • • I R 1: ti 4) U R C P. M A N A G 1: M 1: N '1' Goal 4: Effective contributions to regional efforts to improve air quality and conserve energy. Policy 4.1: 1ntegmte air quality planning with City land use, economic development, and transportation planning efforts. Policy 4.2: Support programs that reduce air quality emissions related to vehicular travel. Policy 4.3: Support alternative transportation modes and technologies, and develop bike- and pedestrian- . friendly neighborhoods and districts to reduce emissions associated with automobile use. Policy 4.4: Encourage energy conservation efforts and the incorporation of energy- saving designs and features into new and refurbished buildings. Policy 4.5: Encourage public employees to follow energy conservation procedures. Policy 4.6: 4d,._ opt a Climate Action Pla or Policy to address Deleted: Co.,ta�l �aoPU�g greenhouse n se gas mitigation. - _ -- - - - -- Mineral Resources Issues, Goal, and Policies The California Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 ( SMARA) requires that all cites consider mapped mineral resources designations (as defined by the State Mining and Geology Board) in long -term planning efforts. SMARA was enacted to promote the conservation and sensitive use of significant mineral deposits. The law ensures that significant aggregate resources are recognized and considered before land use decisions are made that may compromise the long -term availability of these resources. The State Mining and Geology Board classifies lands in California based on availability of mineral resources. Four Mineral Resources Zone (MRZ) designations have been P A G E 4- 1 6 F E B R U A R Y 1 a. a o 1 0 It li S O U R C E M A N A 1: E M 1'. N 'r • established for the classification of sand, gravel, and crushed r(wk resources: MRZ -t — Adequate information indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present or likely to be present. MRZz — Adequate information indicates that significant mineral deposits are present or there is a high likelihood for their presence, and development should be controlled. MRZ-g — The significance of mineral deposits cannot be determined from the available data. MRZ-4 — There is insufficient data to assign any other MRZ designation. According to the State Mining and Geology Board, land within Rosemead is classified as MR7-t, MRZ -3, and MRZ -4'. Figure 4 -2 identifies the extent of these classifications. As Rosemead is completely urbanized and the State has not identified any significant recoverable mineral resources, no mineral extraction activities are permitted within the City limits. Policy Map and Plan The goals and policies in this Element emphasize maintenance and preservation of existing open space and recreation resources, and making provisions for additional open space in areas of the City considered deficient. The more difficult • policies to implement regard the provision of additional open space due to the scarcity and cost of available land. Figure 4 -1 identifies areas where the City can look to provide new or enhance existing park and recreation facilities, which may include working with school district officials to improve joint - use field space. Implementation of certain policies will result in the addition of public and private greenspace in the City. Street tree plantings will occur in particular along portions of Valley Boulevard, Garvey Avenue, San Gabriel Boulevard, and Del Mar Avenue. Other corridor treatments will be considered for Rosemead Boulevard as funds allow. With regard to landscaping on private properties, the City will establish new standards in the zoning ordinance to ensure new development integrates well - planned, functional, and attractive plantings that enhance the adjacent public realm. I Update oJMineral Land Qassifiention ofPardand Cement Conerste Aggregate in Ventura, Los Angeles, and Orange Counties -Part It, Los Angeles County. Department of Conservsllon, Division of Mines and Geology, 1994 P A G E 4 F E R R U \ R Y 2_a r R P. S U II R C P. M A N A G E M 1'. N T • This page intentionally left blank. E P A G P, q- 1 B • F E B R U A R Y 1 z 0 1 0 • 0 I I _ 1 lc��ln_37F i t 1 �.."L'� e I MRZ - 11 i I L I:.� ` �G` Jefieiaml Plan - \ 4 1 1 /tlK I,C- ITf -1 i.. .. 1��_J 1v.1lerlBINd or ! iii j -•�� E MRZ - -1 Bl '''�jjII�� f �• \''¢ Ma�Nall St al j la' % /r tMRZ- 3 S 4 4anryj� _ 1 DTI El _ Ber i:9rro Fwr `J•��..1�.j��,� l� a veaAfnzil I� man t F L11 s q 3 mlt 1{ r Vfil F6M1St j J 1 ..rl • \ 1._J _ n vl I \ \� s 9 III I– M ,nl 1 C I- a — �i JE91 Z•G.rvMl M I 3 4 rflMv�_ I eGnresAv e rrs _ , '2 n> a — G 1 � _ 3i 1 r Lr G „oA ✓- ,. rle,l — J .ome -.F %J s r � =” MRZ- 3(--.' ��ii /f MemfD lL Bl tlf�� •:\ \�\ /•� F�°kl��!✓! �I - - Rosemead City Boundary O Mineral Resource Areas ......• Sphere of Influence Boundary MRZ -1: lveas where adequate information indicates -- Major Roads that no significant mineral deposits are present, or I +I+� Railroad where it is judged that little likelihood exists for their presence. - -- -••^ River/Wash MRZ -3: Areas containing mineral deposits the significance of which cannot be evaluated from available data. • Source: City Rosemead, Areas where available Z is inadequate Mr for of T— Inc. zonnafion assignment assignment to any other MRZ zone. Figure 4 -2 Feet 0 1,200 2,400 3,600 4,800 Mineral Resources Map City of Rosemead June 2008 General Plan Update R P. S O U R C P. M A N A G E M F. N 'F E This page intentionally left blank. • P A G E q- z o I F li R R U A R Y s R E S G U K C li M A N A G E M E N T • Water conservation measures will be considered in all new development. With regard to water quality, the City will enforce BMPs for development activities and ask developers to use creative approaches for cleaning and managing stormwater runoff. u Implementation Actions Goal t: Availability of quality park, recreation, and open space facilities to meet the needs of all Rosemead residents. Action i.r Create a Parks, Recreation, and General Facilities Master Plan to evaluate current and future community needs interests and preferences regarding parks facilities and programs and to identify Priorities and develop recommendations for future development and management of the Parks and recreation system for the next 15 years ______ _____________ ______ Action 1.2 Maintain joint -use agreements between the City and local school districts for facilities and field use. Action 1.3 Establish an "Adopt-a -Park' program to involve civic organizations, businesses, and private citizens in park maintenance and upkeep. Action 1.4 Work closely with the Los Angeles Sheriff Department in park design and management to minimize crime and vandalism on and around park facilities. Action 1.5 Emphasize the need for citizen participation in reducing vandalism in City parks through the City's Neighborhood Watch programs. Action 1.6 Seek opportunities to establish joint -use and regional joint - powers agreements to increase available recreational resources. Such efforts should be coordinated between the City of Rosemead and: • school districts; • adjacent jurisdictions; P A G E 4 - z a '-' E E B R U A K Y r 2 z n t o Deleted: Establish a Parks and Recreation Commission In develop and recommend policies to the City Co eril.t It E S O U R C Ii M A N A G 1! M E N T P A G E q- 2 2 • F E B R U A R Y , x 2 o i o - • California Department of 'Transportation • (Caltrans); utilitycompanies; • the San Gabriel and fewer f.os Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy; and • County of Los Angeles Department of Parks and Recreation. Action 1.7 Continue to collect Quimby fees for park land. Consider including park land and park equipment acquisition in future CIPs. Action 1.8 Establish an "Art in Public Places" fee program to fund public art projects. Goal 2: Increased greenspace throughout Rosemead to improve community aesthetics, encourage pedestrian activity, and provide passive cooling benefits. Action 2.1 Prepare an inventory and database of all street trees in the City. Action 2.2 Create a Street Tree Master Plan to guide the planting and maintenance of street trees in the City. Action 2.3 Design and implement a comprehensive program to improve the quality of landscaping and tree plantings along portions of Valley Boulevard, Rosemead Boulevard, Garvey • Avenue, San Gabriel Boulevard, and Del Mar Avenue. Work with the visual images contained within the Valley Vision Plan. The street tree program must consider a mixture of tree types so that disease or blight will not affect the Citv's entire tree stock. Action 2.4 Consider adopting a tree protection and replacement ordinance, e.g., requiring that trees larger than a specified diameter that are removed to accommodate development must be replaced at a set ratio. Action 2.5 Continue to require all commercial, industrial, and multi - family residential property owners to maintain landscaping on their property. Encourage property owners to gradually install landscaping that complies with the City plant palette. P A G E q- 2 2 • F E B R U A R Y , x 2 o i o - R ES0U EC 1: MA N A G EM 1: N • Action 2.6 Develop a City plant palette, and require that at Goal 3: Managed use and protection of water least 40 percent of new landscaping projects in resources that provide supplies to the City consist of low -water native or seriscape Action 3.1 Actively support and partner with other agencies species drawn from the palette. Evaluate this regarding the development and implementation percentage annually and increase the percentage enhance water supply reliability. as feasible. Require the posting of covenants to Enforce regulations and guidelines and update ensure that the landscaping is well maintained. planning area to manage stormwater flows. This ... ... _ -. - Deletetl: Acl�nn -M1 I'he street Irce Action 2.7.. As part of a comprehensive of the _ . .. . ..... .... _ .. _.. _ . _.. ... .. _ program will include a hsungof program, enhance groundwater recharge, zoning ordinance, establish property landscape appropriate trees along city arterials standards that provide for enhanced and :and collector streets, and wall co.bhr..bn.rcoftrertyr,essn Adopt a water pollution control ordinance or functional landscape treatments and That disease or blight will entanect maintenance. the citv's entire tree stock.l let ion 2.8 Connect parks and publicly accessible open space through shared pedestrian /bike paths and Action 3.5 Consider adopting a comprehensive water conservation strategy. The strategy may include, • PA G E 4- 23 Ir E n R U A E Y r 2 2 o r n trails to encourage walking and bicycling. Goal 3: Managed use and protection of water resources that provide supplies to Rosemead residents and businesses. Action 3.1 Actively support and partner with other agencies regarding the development and implementation of viable water management programs to enhance water supply reliability. Action 3.2 Enforce regulations and guidelines and update them as needed to meet the specific needs in the planning area to manage stormwater flows. This • may include requirements for on -site detention or retention that implement the NPDES program, enhance groundwater recharge, complement regional flood control facilities, and address applicable community design policies. Action 3.3 Adopt a water pollution control ordinance or policy to regulate urban runoff discharges to the storm drain system in coordination with regional efforts. Action 3.4 Participate in developing and implementing a public information program regarding the appropriate use of herbicides and fertilizers to limit pollutants entering the storm drain system. Action 3.5 Consider adopting a comprehensive water conservation strategy. The strategy may include, • PA G E 4- 23 Ir E n R U A E Y r 2 2 o r n K 1'. S l l U K C 1: M A N A 1: 1+. M E N'r • but not be limited to, imposing restrictions on the lime of watering, requiring water- efficient irrigation equipment, and requiring new construction to offset demand so that there is no net increase in water use. Action 3.6 Consider adopting water - efficient landscape ordinances. Goal 4: Effective contributions to regional efforts to improve air quality and conserve energy. Action 4.1 For all development applications that have the potential to adversely affect air quality, the City shall, as appropriate and pursuant to CEQA, require detailed air quality analysis for all applications that have the potential to adversely affect air quality. All development proposals brought before the City will be reviewed for potential adverse effects on air quality and will be required to mitigate any significant impacts in accordance with CEQA. Action 4.2 Implement Transportation SYStems Management (TSM) techniques such as synchronized traffic signals and Develop 'fransportation Demand Management (TDM) programs that work towards eliminating vehicle trips. Support the development of transit and ridesharing facilities to achieve air quality goals • and reduce traffic congestion within the City. Action 4.3 Develop and implement site design guidelines to facilitate pedestrian and biking activity and the use of transit. Action 4.4 Develop pedestrian and bike pathway design standards that buffer pedestrian /bike and vehicular activities. Action 4.5 Encourage the regional transit authority to maintain comprehensive bus routes throughout Rosemead. Action 4.6 Consider replacing existing City fleet vehicles in with the cleanest vehicles commercially available. P A G E 4- s 4 • F F: E K U A K Y z o � o R E S 0 U R C 1: M A N A G E M 1: N T • :lotion 4.7 Where fugitive dust is causing a chronic public nuisance or air quality is in exceedance of PMIo standards, consider adopting a dust control Policy that requires preparation and approval of a dust control plan. Action 4.8 Consider preparing and enforcing a dust reduction ordinance that addresses mobile and stationary sources. Action 4.9 The Climate Action Plan or policy should: • require a baseline inventory of greenhouse gas emissions from all sources by a date certain, establish greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets and deadlines, and enforceable greenhouse gas emissions reduction measures. • include mechanisms to ensure regular review of progress toward the emission reduction targets established by the Climate Action Plan, report progress to the public and responsible officials, and revise the plan as appropriate, using principles of adaptive management. Action 4.10 Conduct energy efficiency audits of existing buildings by checking, repairing, and readjusting heating, ventilation, air conditioning, lighting, water heating equipment, insulation and weatherization. Action 4.11 Partner with community services agencies to fund energy efficiency projects, including heating, ventilation, air conditioning, lighting, water heating equipment, insulation and weatherization, for low income residents. Action 4.12 In governmental construction, require or give preference to products that reduce or eliminate indirect greenhouse gas emissions, e.g., by giving preference to recycled products over those made from virgin materials. Action 4.13 Consider requiring government contractors to take action to minimize greenhouse gas emissions, e.g., by using low or zero-emission vehicles and equipment. Action 4.14 Consider providing public education and information about options for reducing greenhouse gas emissions through reduced P A G E a- z s y l F E B R U A R Y z 9-0-L-0- 11 R 1: S G U E G li M A N A G li M E N T • autonlubile usage (including trip reduction /linkage biking and talking vehicle performance and clliciencv low or rero- cnlission vehicles, car /ride sharing) responsible purchasing, consen-ation, and recycling. Action 4.15 Consider entering into partnerships to create and expand polluting vehicle buy -back programs to include vehicles with high greenhouse gas emissions. • P A G E q- z 6 • Deleted; Action 4.16 Consider providing public edurariun and information about options for reducing motor vehicle related greenhouse gas emissions. Include information on trip reduction; trip linking; public transit; hiking and performance and walking; vehicle efficiency (e.g., keeping tires inflated); low or wro- emission vehicles; and car and ride sharing. E 0 I SAFETY P U It 1. 1 (; S A P Ii 'r Y RosEMEAo GEN EaAL PLAN 1 he Public Safety Element identifies and addresses the natural and human - caused hazards that may influence the development, redevelopment, and utilization of properties in Rosemead. Foremost, this Element identifies the ways to reduce the risk of property damage, injuries, or loss of life in the event of a natural or human - caused disaster. • According to the Governor's Office of Planning and Research, the Safety Element works to "reduce the potential risk of death, injuries, property damage, and economic and social dislocation resulting from fires, floods, earthquakes, landslides, and other hazards." This Public Safety Element sets forth policies designed to minimize threats from natural and human - caused hazards. By implementing the directives of the Public Safety Element, the City intends to use available planning methods in order to: r) minimize risk exposure, 2) provide timely emergency service delivery to all residents and businesses when the need arises, and 3) maintain an optimal environment for personal security. While population growth and changing needs within the community will continue to place demand on resources, Rosemead is committed to enhancing the safety of neighborhoods, business districts, and public places. The Public Safety Element is one of the required General Plan elements. The City emphasizes a proactive approach to planning, which involves identifying and avoiding or mitigating PAGES -t P E B B U A Ft Y ti z no • P u 11 1. I C V A P E T Y • hazards present in the environment that may adversely affect Property and threaten lives. Government Code Sections 65:;o2(g) and 65302(() identify several issues to consider in such planning efforts, as does California Health and Safety Code Section 56050.1. In Rosemead, safety issues of concern include: • Geologic hazards, including (non - seismic) slope failures; collapsible, compressible or expansive soils subsidence due to groundwater pumping; and shallow ground water. • Seismic (earthquake) hazards, including surface fault rupture, ground shaking, liquefaction effects, and earthquake- induced slope instabilitv's; • Flooding (inundation) from seismically induced dam failure; • Urban fires; and • Presence of hazardous materials. Geologic, Seismic, and Flooding Conditions Introduction and General Setting The information on the geologic, seismic, and flooding conditions within and around the City are summarized briefly • in this section. Information is derived from readily available technical documents that can be referred to for more details as necessary to evaluate and analyze individual projects; additional technical background information is presented in Appendix A. Issues due to hazards arising from the geologic, seismic, and dam failure - induced flooding conditions in the City are discussed in a following section. A geologic, seismic, or dam failure - induced flooding event that would impact a portion of the City has the potential to affect persons and property in the City. These issues and their potential impacts are the basis for establishing the goals and policies to protect lives and property. Discussion is also provided regarding the buildings and infrastructure most important to the citizens and City personnel in the event earthquake effects are particularly severe in the City. The technical issues summarized in Appendix A must be taken into account as the City of Rosemead expands, fills in, and re- develops. Existing building codes and land use planning requirements can address most of the hazards inherent in the P A G E g- 2 F 17 R R 11 A R Y , 6 _ • • geologic setting of the City. As newer, more accurate geologic, soils, and seismic information has been developed since the last Genenl Plan update, it is now possible to identify many of the areas in the City vulnerable to natural hazards, and account for the hazards in future development. Sources for this information range from generalized regional reports and maps (including the previous General Plan Seismic Element) to project- specificgeotechnical and engineering geology reports. Geology and Soils Geologic units at and near the ground surface in Rosemead are presented by Yerkes and Campbell (2005; Figure 5 -1). The southernmost portion of the City abuts the Montebello !tills, which consist of sandstone, siltstone and conglomerate of the Fernando formation (map symbol Tf). The remainder of the City, north of the hills, is underlain by older alluvium (Qof, Qofi, and Qoa) and younger alluvial fan deposits (Qyf) shed from the surrounding hills, various young stream wash deposits (Qw, Qyw), landslide deposits (Qls) associated with the Fernando Formation, and artificial fill (Qaf) along the freeways and in at least one large tract development. These geologic units have physical characteristics that can produce hazards such as landslides, mudslides, collapsible or expansive soils, subsidence, or shallow groundwater. Appendix A provides more detailed descriptions of the geologic units (Table 5 -1) and the hazards associated with the unit characteristics of these geologic units. Seismicity/Earthquake Ground shaking, and Faults • Figure 5 -2 (Shaw et al., 2002; California Geological Survey [CGS, formerly the California Division of Mines and Geology - CDMG], 2005) shows the regional faults that would impact the City should a moderate to large earthquake be generated on any of these seismic sources within about 25 miles of Rosemead. Earthquakes resulting in ground shaking characterized by greater than 20 percent the acceleration of gravity (g) can be expected on the Whittier (magnitude [M] 6.8), Puente Hills (M 7.1), Upper Elysian Park (M 6.4), Raymond (M 6.5), Sierra Madre (M 7.2), Verdugo (M 6.9), San Jose (M 6.4), Hollywood (M 6.4), and Clamshell- Sawpit (M 6.5) faults. The only known active fault at the surface within the City (Figure 5-3; CDMG, iggt) is the Alhambra Wash fault (zoned as an Alquist- Pt'iolo Earthquake Fault Zone [APEFZ]). However, there are several other unnamed fault segments or suspected faults of unknown age of last movement mapped across the City (Figure 5 -4; Treiman, tggr Yeats, 2004). Potential seismic /earthquake hazards include surface fault rupture, ground • P U It 1. 1 C S A P P. 'I Y P A G E 5- 3 E E B R IT A R Y ti 2 o I o P 11 1. 1 C S A FF.TY • • P A G E g- q • This page intentionally left blank. • • al+reae i.lry rerer TO 10010 A- I.. Qaf Q Qof Q Qyf 0 QY"'s ® Reservoir Q EM QI .., u »KIe Qofl Qls Qof2 Q Qyfg Qy, ,v:[ :TS77 - M F - -. Rosemead City Boundary ••..... - Qlsi I Qw - te:;r ® / �— Sphere of Influence Boundary tit ate, • Qoa twrs:rsy. 0 �'a Source: Yerkes and Campbell, 2005; art �N?rSF ,� ,General' Plan - Tiof Major Roads 4, Railroad — oaf'- Figure 5 -1 0 1,000 2,000 7,000 4,000 City Area Geology Map City at Rosemead June 2008 General Plan Update art _ _ — �� by • � _ ,a =��— _ 1 i • a (Q47f � \ c s a • � ' ' ' -Oel Wlk B a �" 91w 91 G. St a at { •a a MinMll 91 a ..;,.: '.U.:.. S $ ' ,a" unron Ri' Gals I�r:� Qywd:' t ayf #QwaY: - • : Dn iM 1 m z ] F — z 8 E ayw•y ' get �O1 Girw A i ., Gi yAV arf QYf • a.A vTIIF' � < A;jti <' n QYI� r r ` 3 • rn�i ort r � �. i � .yt��i ,• • .i i •av Fo vtrls•'%% -� of tebliif al, off OI kr: ,.f`�iti: ''xSfis ••• L IAF. art -I �j4rn '�. t ..3' 'All NEW Vuc al+reae i.lry rerer TO 10010 A- I.. Qaf Q Qof Q Qyf 0 QY"'s ® Reservoir Q EM QI .., u »KIe Qofl Qls Qof2 Q Qyfg Qy, ,v:[ :TS77 Tfl Tfu -. Rosemead City Boundary ••..... Qlsi I Qw Qywa te:;r ® uc Tf Sphere of Influence Boundary tit ate, • Qoa twrs:rsy. 0 �'a Source: Yerkes and Campbell, 2005; Qyw9 »7+_.nrne Tiof Major Roads 4, Railroad CDMG, 1998, SHZR 024, Plate 2.1. Feet Figure 5 -1 0 1,000 2,000 7,000 4,000 City Area Geology Map City at Rosemead June 2008 General Plan Update P 11 1. 1 U SA 1 +1:TY • • P A G E S- 6 P E R R U A R Y , 6. x o • This page intentionally left blank. • • \1 GL�S4: • T Yr 4 �e� 3�i F�` .r.rd .F t ^r l.t 5. c r ., e efC+yy faT;s .4 ,ya',M.Y.t..e�lli`r' =v ie',Y' 'xirr \ SdP f '. is ]i 1f >b �S-#�R r-Y.r�� r' t _Wyss �,rn .r+YO$ Jai t r�y�r �rP� ��.- ♦ 1 +! 1 4t 'S✓ 1Yr'' •* s_a. 1 4f)`y,r .•'�% sb,•,r b(�,I,� ! <•,.5 i o r r• r r� RR- �,�{'rdr 1�. tF, '%t„ '-•- o; § -,j`. �1 bs�,7"d Y£� A 'fs f _Y`"4r'_ t �Il'4 !C! NMI .5,.YSaaiv L i ^�.rCS4 if; K�c pSa� sr �\p �O'r ,,xr, a ".ra - r r{ r :� v r.- NIATIONA L' r 3r Y_ f` x'84' t' '" Sye d p s A s PP .c " Alt r i ,�;, °� ,�^F�,ct /�.3 °L�.F t'• ° u�',e -Xa j w.^'i "D-)s' d 1' J�',fl d``'e _ +5 l S.dl}..s- tl `s`. r'+�"' -, --`....w ..m,• y se_ le -,. \ fs Lea. Clensgaa�t +o /'��L'�o'7'pngelea Is^T`a~'• srj�W #�s�`'9.i..... "^P" r m _Fsq ult;'kY b \� #1 IS ?�gmenNi i• tau /tr �. ' ��'3- r-iar+^iv�'tda y dy tOkm t � rn�e \ i fr } 70 •yF �f <7 SA aymond Ic Ile S'.�!'.N r w. 9 aN0 5km x -�, { �y �A+i.,. j-2aa at m 9 ^. ° 15km�,,• `,i' ¢n t, f f F mow.. JJ u'A:i {{ f OPPeer EIYSiam m t / I 1"# "?;s 1 e(9 <�s'cv3Ss;w. ry r# `Par Faull� xa •u '�a�''al � �' 'n a,v,,��.. r o�y eult'lr?` s 43 •oi +s _Coyote Hills, i10km I r'. • 10kma /�„I''v�5.= 1 i £ s D rT H'A U S,T'�/}� it c• _ 'r xt. o._ '.. - �... J Santa Fe Springs 3* r "€,� 7 ':� r t f 1I'•,t^ � * �' � � $`gment ar m_fT � %at�slir° '2Y° t� o I s aY a i ? r^ th ttl x o 3 �o: b �.� s,(I��sf�� ' � -,�'+ 't" t jYij.,+�'�,p °4' },x�z,,. � T"' 1 �}6 � , r x +y � Ji y'� ,�.€..r" 'i`�� '•. s ,)^° r#, +�tis3q ;w Ti .v-4. ,✓P+yS �#- `' s a��yyZ:il [t L a.ri �N j .t r e4 +3 ° d e �.�ff.. Y F z ?r_ F k a � r e d vF' Perk Fa ulf�ari' � `x � s Odi "�4'�.T y t } m r �' S 'cvu IX+ Yui Si$ �' t r C k 2fF a1 k3_J xk i rrr „yxsk. -W �11 #' f4. .oJ YI�i w v si \ •. c�'� � �. is}. -/tYrZ k Y .7..tE" ♦ ' '`'. ^a 3 r E r 7^'7 -\'-* Yi.h' 77, ii Ys: ��->' •�`�S m.I+� o a %� �'-+ ? ' rf'�>; ? ttFf'� � M1 r-r 1" ?ter y ��.+ t .s. ,. .fi',. a rzw�. � .4. i1'.. " T,c -rrr .• ,a I Rosemead City Boundary Blind Thrust Faults - n n n Surface Faults - — - - - - --- Primary Road Faults are buried below the surface; Faults exposed at the ground surface; — Potential Earthquake Faults small triangles indicated fault dip solid where well located, dashed where ILA.il. (See Table 5 -2) - Could cause direction (north) and thin gray lines approximate, and dotted where strong ground shaking in indicate the depth contours (e.g., concealed (Bryant, 2005) • Rosemead. 5 km = 5 kilometers deep) on the fault surface (Shaw el all 2002). r� V V Sources: Shaw et al. 2002, and Bryant, 2005. Figure 5 -1 Feel 0 18,000 36,000 54,000 Earthquake Faults June 2008 P U B 1. 1 C ti A F It '1' V • This page intentionally left blank. • P A G E 5- R F E R R U A R V I 6 z o, o • I� • \ :I_ I I - '1\ �(+�••�q /� T1 tl I xN"N'� -H- '` anti fi I ♦ ...i r,'"# 4'. 8 r S' �-d 7 9 I General Plan i .. I a I J \ I i 1 — I5 a I � Mi � s�L I at h w. • J+ s � roe � /: I I,;L\ II •__r r I I I j IIAA{ ;� I I '� -1. I ` al _I� �,� .. �_ -L- .4—sr J t \ 3 I I I I —J I I I �� i \!4II _ml I al sl I I = al L... c • sl { \fie L� P sr mf _ III a Ac I I E ICI 1.rd r M N119t RII. 1 E��a. i l I \ j • u a PACMkF nmM I l ��r' r l a s Y\ a ial Ia HII v I I oemtn sn . c� -� ____AW .. Y! VA, bn St c � -Wh MOry S(L I Enn nP G IA - \ I I a }E 9 II I Aal a _a A: v3 �a1 al al �I•� - _f 3 Y M .rxA + - • 2 - zl" I . - -. IHgn<rrc sd A Gra t V • E N SL I <. (C` IS Mn_I_WI191 ri • • Rosemead City Boundary Active Faults »:a!ta Alquist- Priolo ......• Sphere of Influence Boundary Well Located Earthquake Fault Zone Major Roads - -• Approximate Located Hi+l+r Railroad •••• -• Inferred Location 0 Turning Point —• —••• River/Wash —?— Query indicates additional uncertainty. • Figure rc /�nVl Soues: California Division of Mines 8 Geology (CDMG), November 7, 1997. QIgUISt- Pri oto rilo Feet 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Earthquake Fault Zone City of Rosemead June 2008 General Plan Update P U B L I C 1 A P P: 'P Y • P A G E 5- I o E P B R II A R V 6 • This page intentionally left blank. �J • F M F_ >?�1 k A� <General Plan • 1 \ 1 IfI �. y i Will, —el llsL_rst,i r�.. - r--I • r -- u '-"1 �,91 al' ml Ralph St L. nt,nhall st J s al / 11 11:, Fey fl L U bn P,cMC R,IITaa — H.. i � p P / y �r 1 Ivm,tmon ��® 5`L �\ � I: I I IGarvry_ •\ ; �� Garv,Y -- a' \i >a� -a Nar,mark4 l= �ram AY iI Mlgnclie 3l ��Gn A a�ki .�� 1Mrm, Bthl 1 '• � — .��1� —_ 4� X10 . �Ij j � vim•_ � .3�� I I -- �' �'.` ' % I � � F s'AAAVVIIIY//rrr�1 j ar. ©` Poem, FgY'!I�j,� Ptxh,o. Fwy ___.! %- %� %i/ ��is' I Wlb ehO �'/ �\ •l . .\� �..� `�I� .F./; �. \\ \ \� \ • t/ ice` <'� labs f __! /...__ -,/ "tea �� _.\ —' �...�• Fault Hazard Management 000 Approximate location of escarpment Photolineaments defining Zone (FHMZ) for Important of Bullard and Lettis (1992) Probable or Possible fault Facilities 000 Inferred faults from California — Well- defined Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Department of Water Resources ....... Less well- defined Fault Zone (1966) J.u.tY Indicate downside of scarp • Sources: CDMG, 1991, Treiman, FER -222; Figure 5-4 Bullard and Leltis, 1992; CDWR, 1966. Fault Hazard Feet 0 1,000 2,000 9,000 4,000 Management Zones (FHMZ) City of Rosemead June 2008 General Plan Update P U It 1. l C S A F E '1' V • • P A G E 5- 1 z P P B R U 1 R Y This page intentionally left blank. . shaking, eart hquake- induced liquefaction (including lateral spreading and ground failure) and landslides (shown on Figure 5 -5; CDMG, 1999). The City is also underlain by two buried thrust faults that, although they do not reach the ground surface, have the potential to cause strong ground shaking in Rosemead. These hazards and the local earthquake faults (Table 5 -z) are discussed further in Appendix A. • • Flooding 162 While general flooding from storm cnents is not common in Rosemead's history, several dams, which continually or sometimes impound water, have the potential to fail during a large earthquake and flood portions of the City. These are the Whittier Narrows Dam, Santa Fe Dam /Reservoir, and Garvev Dam /Reservoir. Failure of any of these dams during a time when significant water is impounded could cause inundation of residences, businesses, and infrastructure. Figure 5 -7 (California Office of Emergency Services, Zoo9;_ ational ___ Geographic Society, 2004) shows the potential flood areas associated with this potential hazard, which is discussed further in Appendix A. `hY P U It 1. I C S A F li '1' Y Inunaal Deleted: inn —Dam Failure _________________ DUe[ed: aoo7 Deleted: USGS, 2007 P A G E 5- 1 3 F F. R R It A R Y , fi 2 0 1 0 P U 11 L 1 C S A P R T V 10 Hazards Due to Human Activities Businesses and residents in Rosemead are subject to potential hazards associated with earthquakes, hazardous materials incidents, fires, and other conditions, that may impact infrastructure and impede emergency response. Each type of disaster requires focused planning to minimize the risks to life and property when a disaster occurs. The period following a disaster is often very difficult for communities and can be, at limes, as devastating as the disaster itself. Cities that prepare ahead of time can reduce the fear, confusion, and loss resulting from catastrophic incidents. Planning efforts need to ensure access to critical facilities such as police and fire, hospitals and emergency care facilities, schools, utilities, roadways, and freeways. Rosemead participates in the Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) that provides a statewide framework for coordinating multi - agency responses to emergencies and disasters. The City's SEMS incorporates mutual aid agreements with other jurisdictions, establishes lines of communication during emergencies, and standardizes incident command structures. The City has also complied with the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) requirements to prepare a disaster mitigation plan in accordance with the Disaster Mitigation Act of z000. The plan • represents Rosemead's commitment to reducing the risk from natural hazards and serves as a guide for the use of available City resources. This plan also helps the State provide technical assistance and prioritize project funding. Rosemead contracts with the Los Angeles County Sheriff and the Los Angeles County Fire Department for provision of emergency response and law enforcement services. This arrangement allows the City to more readily adjust staffing to meet the changing needs of businesses and residents. Also, County agencies can easily provide supplemental responses from any other Sheriff or Fire Department stations. P A G E 5 -, q 11 • sources: CDMG, 1998, Sonia, Hazard E.oluatlon of the El Monte 2.5 min n. quadrangle, Los Angeles County, California: California Dwision of Mines and Geology, Open -File Repon 9e -15, hftp: / /gmw.cons .,. gar /skimp /download/ evolrpVelmo e.ol. pdf. CDMG, 1999, Seismic Hazard Lone. Map of the El Monte 2.5- minute Quadrangle, Las Angeles County, California, March 25, 1999, hldf /o n- eimonsrv.m.g daskimp /download/ pol /azn elma.pol; GIS data hap:// wwr ,.conservation.co.gor /cgs/shzp/ Pages/Indea.asp+. F N14 F An General Plan Zones of Required Investigation: —30— Historically Highest `• Liquefaction Groundwater Contours Areas where historic occurrence of liquefaction, or local geological, (Depth in Feet) geoNchnical and groundwater conditions indicate a potential for permanent ground displocemenh such that mitigation as defined in Public Resources Code section 2693(c) would M required. •' Rosemead City Boundary f; y Earthquake - Induced Landslides "e "" Sphere of Influence Boundary Pomona Fwy Major Roads \ Ff M4+F Railroad condihom indicate o potential for permanent ground dirplocemen s j F N14 F An General Plan Zones of Required Investigation: —30— Historically Highest `• Liquefaction Groundwater Contours Areas where historic occurrence of liquefaction, or local geological, (Depth in Feet) geoNchnical and groundwater conditions indicate a potential for permanent ground displocemenh such that mitigation as defined in Public Resources Code section 2693(c) would M required. •' Rosemead City Boundary f; y Earthquake - Induced Landslides "e "" Sphere of Influence Boundary Arens where presiour occurrence of landslide movement, ce local Major Roads topcamphic, geological, geatecMical and subsurface water Ff M4+F Railroad condihom indicate o potential for permanent ground dirplocemen s ® nod, that mgigmiam as defined in Public Resources Code section 2693(c) would b. regoired. - -' —'•• River/Wash Figure 5 -5 Areas Susceptible to Earthquake - Fee 0 1,000 7,000 3,000 4,000 p Induced Liquefaction ° Landslides City of Rosemead General Plan Update June 2008 P Gu1.i c S PF.ry • • P A G E 5 - . 6 • This page intentionally left blank. 0 — -- Rosemead City Boundary FEMA Flood Zones ....... Sphere of Influence Boundary ,y rN<,. A -Areas subject to inundation by a 100 -year flood Major Roads ll%7 AE -Areas subject to inundation by 100-year flood Railroad ® 0 - Unstudied areas, flood hazards are undetermined but flooding is possible — ••• —••• River/Wash = X - Areas of moderate or minimal hazard from flooding • V V Feet 0 1,100 2,200 3,300 4,400 City of Rosemead General Plan Update Figure 5 -6 FEMA Flood Hazard Zones December P U 11 1, I C S A F E T Y • P A G E 5 - . 8 F F. R R G A R Y j 6 • This page intentionally left blank. 0 E •• Rosemead City Boundary Flood Inundation Areas- ' •••••• Sphere of Influence Boundary Due to Catastrophic Dam Failure Major Roads Ir Whittier Narrows Dam "++ Railroad ® Garvey Reservoir ° -- River /Wash '�`?:wx Santa Fe Dam • Feet 0 1,100 2,200 3,300 4,400 City of Rosemead General Plan Update Figure 5 -7 Dam Failure Inundation Areas 2009 P U R I, 1 C S A f 1 +. '1' Y This page intentionally left blank. • P A G F, 5- 2 0 F n R RV U A K Y 1 6 2 0 1 0 is - - (F.. d: Heading 2 • Fire Hazards Structural fires represent the primary fire hazard in Rosemead. Structural fires are generally caused by faulty equipment or lack of knowledge of fire prevention precautions. The potential for fire hazards increases when flanunable and explosive materials are improperly stored, handled, or used. Planning for adequate fire protection and suppression in a densely built community like Rosemead becomes increasingly important due to aging buildings, and proximity of residences to commercial and industrial uses. The County of Los Angeles Fire Department has two fire stations in Rosemead: • Station 4, located at 2644 N. San Gabriel Boulevard Station 42, located at 9319 E. Valley Boulevard .As noted above, any County fire unit may respond to incidents in Rosemead, depending on need and availability. In particular, special hazardous materials response units from the stations are available. The City will coordinate with the County Fire Department to implement fire hazard education and fire protection programs. In addition, the City will coordinate with local water districts to ensure water pressure is adequate for fire fighting purposes. Adequate water Flow and pressure is determined through the • application of Regulation No. 8 of the Fire Code. This code sets standards for new development and existing development. Hazardous Materials Commercial and industrial businesses in Rosemead and adjacent communities use hazardous materials. These businesses include dry cleaners, film processors, auto service providers, landscape contractors, and paint shops. Larger businesses can generate, use, and /or store large quantities of hazardous products. The current regulatory environment provides a high level of protection from the hazardous materials manufactured, transported to businesses, and stored within Rosemead. Federal, State, and County agencies enforce regulations for hazardous waste generators and users. According to the California Environmental Protection Agency, as of 2oo6, approximately 49 hazardous waste generators are located within the City of Rosemead. • P n 1,1C S FF:TY P A G E 5- 2 1 P E R R r1 A R Y I ti z 0 1 0 P U It 1, 1 C S A F n T V • Rosemead's land use pattern genemlly separates industry from residential uses. However, commercial freight carriers transporting hazardous substances along the 1 -Io and SR -6o freeways, along major truck routes such as Rosemead Boulevard, or along railways present potential hazards. All motor carriers and drivers involved in the transportation of hazardous materials must comply with the requirements of federal and State regulations, and must apply for and obtain a hazardous materials transportation license from the California Highway Patrol. When transporting explosives, inhalation hazards, and highway route - controlled quantities of radioactive materials, safe routing, and safe stopping places are required. The City has established truck routes, these roadways that must be used by larger trucks and any vehicle specifically carrying hazardous wastes and materials. The Los Angeles County Fire Department, Health Hazardous Materials Division tracks hazardous materials handlers to ensure appropriate reporting and compliance. The Division inspects businesses that generate hazardous waste, conducts criminal investigations, provides site mitigation oversight, and undertakes emergency response operations. Such inspections reduce risks associated with exposure to hazardous materials and adverse environmental effects. The County Fire Department's Emergency Operations Section provides 24-hour emergency response services to hazardous materials incidents. Emergency responders identify unknown substances, monitor spills and releases for safe and immediate mitigation, and identify responsible parties for payment of cleanup costs. The Inspection Division of the Fire Department's Emergency • Operations section inspects hazardous material handling and hazardous waste- generating businesses to assure compliance with applicable laws. Additionally, Inspection Division staff responds to medical waste emergencies, assists law enforcement agencies with response to illegal drug labs, and investigates resident and business complaints. The City hosts "Household Hazardous Waste Roundup" events sponsored by the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County and the Los Angeles County of Public Works. The County's Household Hazardous Waste Collection Program collection events allow residents to dispose of hazardous materials safely and at no cost to them. P A G E 5- 'l z IMMUNAKWIM 1� u 40 Statutes and Plans of Other Agencies The federal and State governments — in recognition of safety issues affecting broad geographic areas — have adopted programs with their public safety planning efforts. California Building Code Beginning in 2007, rather than using the Uniform Building Code, California instead adopted the 2006 International Building Code (IBC) with substantial local amendments. The IBC is developed and published by the International Code Council (ICC), which was formed in 1994 by a merger of the three national building code publishers. During January and February 2007, the California Building Standards Commission (http: //N wry .bsc.ca.gov) adopted, in sections, the 2007 International Building Code (IBC). The new California Building Code (CBC) became effective Julv 1, 20o6, and local codes were adopted 18o days later. Effective January 1, 2008, all new construction in Rosemead must be done in accordance with the 2007 CBC. The 2007 California Building Code (CBC) is a fully integrated code based on the 2oo6 International Building Code. Part 2 now also includes Title 24, Part 8 (California Historical Building Code) and Title 24, Part 10 (California Existing • Building Code). The California Building Standards Code is comprised of twelve parts that incorporate public health and safety standards used in the design and construction of buildings in California. The codes also include standards for energy efficiency and access compliance for persons with disabilities. Structures such as dams and freeways fall under criteria developed by various State and Federal agencies. Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act The 1972 Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act seeks to mitigate the hazard of fault rupture by prohibiting the placement of structures for human occupancy across the trace of an active fault. The State Geologist is required to compile maps that delineate earthquake fault zones (AP zones) along faults that are "sufficiently active' and "well defined." Cities and counties are responsible before issuing building permits for • P U 13 1, 1 C S A P is T V P A G E S- z 3 V U It 1. 1 C S A F It 'r \' • a Project to assure that a geologic investigation is performed to demonstrate that proposed buildings will not be constructed across active faults. The (null evaluation and written report for the specific site must be prepared by a geologist registered in the State of California. If an active fault is found, a structure for human occupancy cannot be placed over the trace of the fault and must be set back a safe distance from the fault. A Project is carefully defined, but generally includes all land divisions and most structures for human occupancy, although some exceptions are allowed and local agencies can be more restrictive than state law requires. An AP zone map has been compiled by the State Geologist for the City of Rosemead area (CDMG, El Monte Quadrangle, 1991; Figure 5-3) and defines an AP zone for the Alhambra Wash fault within the Citv. Seismic Hazards Mapping Act California's 1990 Seismic Hazards Mapping Act (http: / /www.consrv.m.gov /cgs /shzp) requires the State Geologist (CGS) to compile maps identifying and describing seismic hazard zones in California, with emphasis given to the urbanized areas in Los Angeles, Ventura and Orange counties in southern California, and Alameda, San Francisco, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties in northern California. Seismic hazards considered include amplified shaking due to local geological or geotechnical conditions, liquefaction, and earthquake- induced landslides. Guidelines prepared by the State Mining and Geology Board identify the responsibilities of State and local agencies in the review of development within • seismic hazard zones. Development on a site that has been designated as a seismic hazard zone requires a geotechnical report and local agency consideration of the policies and criteria established by the Mining and Geology Board. A seismic hazard zones map (Figure 5 -5) delineates the areas within or near Rosemead that may be susceptible to liquefaction and earthquake- induced landslides. Unreinforced Masonry Building Law In 1986, California enacted a law that required local governments in Seismic Zone q to inventory unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings, to establish a URM loss- reduction program and report progress to the state by 19go. Each local government can tailor its program to its own specifications to allow for each jurisdiction to take political, economic, and social priorities into account. This law requires 366 local governments in the highest Seismic Zone q to: P A G E 5- z q F E R R It A R V t 6. e • Inventory URM buildings within each jurisdiction. Establish loss reduction programs for URM buildings by logo. Report progress to the California Seismic Safety Commission. In addition, the law recommends that local governments; • Adopt mandatory strengthening programs by ordinance. • Establish seismic retrofit standards. • Enact measures to reduce the number of occupants in URM buildings. California's Seismic Safety Commission (2oo6) monitors local government efforts to comply with this law and reports to the state's Legislature. The City of Rosemead had seven URMs; five have been strengthened and two were demolished. The City is in compliance with mitigation requirements. National Flood Insurance Program The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) administers the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Participating jurisdictions must exercise land use controls and purchase flood insurance as a prerequisite for receiving funds to purchase or build a structure in a flood hazard area. Rosemead has participated in the program since 1979 and as of 2007, no special flood hazard areas have been identified in the City. The NFIP provides federal flood insurance subsidies and • federally financed loans for eligible property owners in flood - prone areas. Rosemead is identified on the National Flood Insurance Program's Flood Insurance Rate Maps as being within Zone X, an area outside the too- and goo -year flood zones, and thus subject to minimal flooding. Nevertheless, nearly 25 percent of the flood claims received by FEMA on an annual basis occurred in areas outside the too- and Soo -year flood zones. Associated hazards in hillside areas and at the base of hills or bluffs can include severe erosion, mudflows and debris flows. Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) All cities in California are required to adopt a SEMS plan to establish procedures and responsibilities of various City staff in the event of an emergency. A SEMS Plan allows cities to • P U It 1, 1 C s A P I'. 'r Y • P A C E S- 2 5 F li R R U A R Y 1 6 2 0 1 0 P O I{ 1, 1 C S A P li T V • quickly respond to any large -scale disaster that requires a multi- agency and multi - jurisdictional response. National Incident Management System (NIMS) NIMS is the federal equivalent to the SEMS response plan. The Governor's Office of Emergency Services (DES) is the lead agency for the adoption, promotion, and implementation of NIMS. Federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 provided a new set of mitigation plan requirements that emphasize State and local jurisdictions to coordinate disaster mitigation planning and implementation. States are encouraged to complete a "Standard" or an "Enhanced" Natural Mitigation Plan. "Enhanced" plans demonstrate increased coordination of mitigation activities at the State level, and if completed and approved, will increase the amount of funding through the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program. California recently updated its State Hazard Mitigation Plan which will require approval by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) by October 8, 2007. The State of California Plan was adopted on • October 7, 2007 and approved by FEMA Region IX on December 17, 2007. USA PATRIOT Act Signed into law on October 26, toot, the USA PATRIOT Act expanded the authority of U.S. law enforcement. The Act included the identification of federal crimes for attacks on public transportation and the use of biological weapons, and increased government surveillance powers to track activities related to homeland security and terrorism. Relationship to Other General Plan Elements The Public Safety Element relates most closely to the Land Use Element. Policies and plans in the Public Safety Element are P A G E 5- 2 6 • designed to protect existing and planned land uses from specific types of hazards. Issues, Goals, and Policies Certain human activities and natural conditions discussed in the Public Safety Element create hazards in Rosemead. These hazards in turn pose risks to individuals and properties that affect how we may develop and use property. Risk from such hazards can be reduced or avoided by recognizing the hazards and adopting and implementing land use and emergency response policies that provide the degree of protection the community desires. These goals, policies, and implementation actions focus on: (1) reducing risks from natural hazards; (z) preparing for emergency situations; and (3) reducing risks from hazards associated with hazardous materials. Natural Hazards This section presents information on hazards related to geologic and soil units, active and potentially active faults, earthquakes, secondary seismic effects (e.g., liquefaction and dam inundation flooding) that affect policy and long -range • planning in the City of Rosemead. Geology and Soil Hazards Geotechnical and engineering geology reports prepared for development and re- development projects in the City are required to identify geologic and soil hazards, as well as routine geologic and soils conditions important to the design and construction of the project (Figure 5-1). These reports are required to undergo review by qualified professional engineers and geologists to assure that the information, results, conclusions, and recommendations meet the state of the professional practice. Primary hazards considered are landslides, mudflows, general slope instability, unstable soils due to expansion or consolidation, subsidence, and shallow groundwater. Where these hazards are present, damage to structures and potentially serious injuries to individuals can occur. Proper mitigation of these hazards is required to prevent or reduce the potential damage to structures, injuries, and the loss of life. The City Planning, Building and Safety, and Public Works Departments shall continue to collectively assure 2= ,t. Po n1,1c sAPE r P A G E S- 2 7 F E B R U A R Y 1 6 2 0 1 0 P n it 1. 1 e s A F 1: '1' Y • that proper reports are prepared, reviewed, and approved in accordance with City, County, State, and Federal guidelines, as applicable. Seismic /Earthquake Ground Shaking Hazards As discussed above, there are eleven known faults within about ;to miles of Rosemead (shown on Figure .S- -) that pose an earthquake ground shaking hazard to the City of Rosemead. Standard constriction (e.g., residential, commercial, industrial) is governed by lire California Building Code (currently the 2007 version) and the City must adopt measures necessary to assure that these codes are followed. Knowledge of the sedimentary basin depth and geometry beneath the City of Rosemead are important for the proper estimation of earthquake ground motions. The expected moment magnitudes and median peak horizontal ground accelerations shown in'rable g -r (Appendix A) are for planning purposes; individual projects require site - specific design earthquake determinations depending upon the uses associated with the project and whether the project is considered an essential services facility or other type of important structure. Projects in the City may fall within the jurisdiction of County, State, or Federal agencies (e.g., Caltrans, Division of the State Architect, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency) with more or less stringent earthquake design criteria. It is the responsibility of the City to protect the lives and property of the citizens of Rosemead by submitting input to these agencies to assure, to the maximum degree possible, their consideration for the application of the proper earthquake design factors. • Active and Potentially Active Surface Fault Rupture Hazard Total damage /collapse of structures and severe injury can result if surface rupture occurs beneath or in the immediate vicinity of a building. Based on the geologic, seismic, groundwater, and tectonic /fault studies that have been conducted to date within and adjacent to the City of Rosemead. it is concluded that: (1) the Alhambra Wash fault (a trace of Whittier fault as is the East Montebello fault) is the only known active surface fault crossing the City and studies required by the APEFZ Act (Figure 5 -3) are necessary; (2) the northwest - trending escarpment of Bullard and Lettis (1993), and various aerial photograph lineaments described by Treiman (1991; Figure g -q), should be considered as potentially active faults with zoo -foot wide "fault hazard management zones" (FHMZs) requiring special investigation on a case -by -case basis for new or significantly modified "important" facilities (defined below), and (3) the northwest trending groundwater barrier (CDWR, P A G E 5- 1 8 I1.E15RUARI • P U B 1, 1 C S A F F. T Y • 1966) in cast - central Rosemead is not considered to be active and is not included with a niMz. Secondary Seismic Hazards Local geological conditions may create additional hazards associated with seismic activity. Large and moderate earthquakes produce ground - shaking effects that may result in ground failure. Figure 5 -5 shows areas susceptible to seismically induced liquefaction. In locations where shallow groundwater levels and loose, unconsolidated soils occur together, a condition called liquefaction can occur, when the area is subjected to strong ground shaking. Soils that liquefy . lose the ability to support structures; buildings may sink or tilt, with the potential for extensive structural damage. Liquefaction presents the most prominent secondary earthquake ground failure issue in Rosemead. Seismically induced landslides have the potential to occur in a limited area in the south of Rosemead, but proper geotechnical investigation and mitigation will minimize these secondary seismic hazards. Liquefaction - related lateral spreads can occur adjacent to stream channels and deep washes that provide a free face toward which the liquefied mass of soil fails. lateral spreads can cause extensive damage to pipelines, utilities, bridges, roads and other structures. California law (Seismic Hazard Mapping Act) requires identification of liquefaction - susceptible zones, where the dvnamic (under seismic conditions) stability of the foundation soils must be investigated, and seismically- induced landslide zones, where the stability of hill slopes must be evaluated. Within these areas, geologic studies must be completed and • countermeasures undertaken in the design and construction of important infrastructure and buildings for human occupancy. California law also requires disclosure of these hazards as a part of all real estate transactions within the identified areas. The City shall continue to (t) apply the State seismic hazard zoning regulations at the earliest possible stage in the development process, (z) identify these hazards at the project development permit stage to assure proper design measures are implemented, and (3) inform at an early stage applicants planning to develop heavy structures or structures over two - stories that the areas with historic high groundwater less than 3o -feet deep are most susceptible to liquefaction and lateral spread landslides where adjacent to channel -type slopes. Dam Inundation Flooding Hazards Rosemead does not have natural floodplain areas, although it is bordered by the Rio Hondo in its eastern and southeastern extremes. Dam failure can be caused by strong earthquake ground shaking or a seiche event, erosion, improper siting and /or design, and rapidly rising floodwaters during heavy -4i ft PA G ES-�9 y, FEB RU 1 R 6 z n 1 o u 1 L I • P U 13 1, 1 C S A r 1: 'r Y stones. Such a dam failure can be insta nta"cons or gradual, depending on many factors (e.g., the cause and dams building materials). Resulting release of water can also be instantaneous or gradual, with either situation potentially causing injuries, loss of life, property damage, displacement of persons residing within the inundation path, and damage to infrastructure. Portions of the City are located within dam inundation areas for the Whittier Narrows Dam, Santa Fe Dam /Reservoir, and Gamey Dam /Reservoir (Figure 5 -6). Given the City's distance from the Pacific Ocean, it's exposure to tsunami hazards resulting from offshore earthquakes is nil. Natural Hazard - Related Goals and Policies The overarching natural hazard related goal is stated below to provide the basic purpose and strategy adopted by the City of Rosemead to address safety concerns posed by natural hazards. Goal t has several policies that are more specific guidelines and tactics that will be used to meet Goal t. Finally, implementation actions, the specific steps to be taken to satisfy the goal and policies, are presented in a subsequent section. Underlying Goal t is the precept that all buildings and structures in the City of Rosemead should conform to the appropriate building standards in order to protect every citizen to the degree practical. In consideration of certain hazard zones referred to in the Safety Element, the City has defined the category "Important" building or structure in considering new or substantially refurbished existing facilities that should receive increased consideration for geologic, soil, seismic /earthquake, and flood hazard avoidance. An important facility, which would not apply to existing buildings of the types described below unless substantial refurbishment were proposed, would be defined by the City Planning Director, the City Engineer, and the City Building Official for each case, as appropriate. In general "Important" would include, but not necessarily be limited to: (t) One whose function is judged as essential following a severe natural hazard such as an earthquake, e.g., police, fire, Citv communications center, and hospitals, in order to provide for the safety and well- being of the citizens of Rosemead; (z) A structure that is critical to the City's recovery following a severe earthquake, i.e., kev transportation /evacuation routes, bridges, over /underpasses, electrical substations and towers, natural gas /fuel pipelines; (3) Structures that may be sensitive to earthquake hazards (e.g., liquefaction and ground shaking), e.g., buildings greater than z- stories, pre-1971 lilt -ups, non - retrofitted buildings, soft -story construction, P A G E 5- a o F E IS R L% R y • runu.ue sAFETv F A G E S- a 1 non- ductile reinforced concrete, and parking • garages; and (q) Buildings That may have significant populations, and /or high- population densities, i.e., schools /pre- schools, nursing homes, and locations with limited mobility populations. Goal is The City of Rosemead will act in cooperation with federal, State, and County agencies responsible for the enforcement of planning statutes, environmental laws, and building codes to minimize, to the extent practical, risks to people and property damage, risks related economic and social disruption, and other impacts resulting from i) geologic and soil hazards, 2) seismic hazards including primary and secondary effects of seismic shaking, fault rupture, and other earthquake - induced ground deformation in Rosemead, and 3) dam failure- induced flood and inundation hazards, while reducing the disaster recovery time due to hazard incidents in Rosemead. 'rhe City of Rosemead will consider undertaking a HAZUS -based loss estimation analysis to more fully quantify potential physical damage, economic loss, and social impacts from these events. • Policy t.t: Geology and Soil Hazards a) Encourage development in low hazards areas and implement actions that minimize changes to the natural topography and drainages, while protecting public safety and reducing potential property damage due to geologic and soil hazards through the use of proper design and construction techniques. b) Assure that all aspects of the geotechnical and engineering geology evaluation process (planning, investigation, analysis, reporting, review, construction, and operations) for new development and redevelopment are conducted, and independently reviewed, by qualified professionals. Policy 1.2: Earthquake and Fault Hazards a) Minimize the exposure of people and property to primary and secondary earthquake- • runu.ue sAFETv F A G E S- a 1 P U It 1, 1 C ti A P E T Y • related hazards. while allowing properly designed projects to be developed in appropriate locations. b) Assure that all aspects of the earthquake, fault rupture, liquefaction, and related seismic hazard evaluation process (planning, investigation, analysis, reporting, review, construction, and operations) for new development and redevelopment are conducted, and independently reviewed, by qualified professionals. • • Policy 1.3 J -1ood Hazard s--------_ --------- --- ---------- ----- "" Deleted: Dam Inundation a) Minimize development of Important Facilities in areas with potential for Flood-- --------- - - -- -- ---------------------------- Deleted: flood -Prone inundation to the extent possible in order to protect public safety and reduce potential property damage due to dam failure- induced flooding. Maintain the structural and operational integrity of essential public facilities during flooding. b) Assure that all aspects of the dam failure flood /inundation evaluation process (planning, investigation, analysis, reporting, review, construction, and operations) for new development and redevelopment are conducted, and independently reviewed, by qualified professionals. ct Minimize the risks of flooding to ne% development Carefully evaluate whether new development should be located in a flood prone area or potential dam inundation area and identifv construction methods or other methods to minimize damage if new development is located in these areas. d) Establish cooperative working relationships among public agencies with responsibility for flood protection Po1icv 1.4 Disaster Preparedness and Communication a) Create and maintain emergency preparedness and evacuation plans; create public information /education programs to help assure coordinated response, recovery, and mitigation efforts carried out by the City and other governmental agencies. b) Foster cooperation with neighboring cities and agencies to enhance mutual aid opportunities following natural hazard events. P A G E 5- 3 2 E E B R U A R Y t 6 z n t o • Hazards Due to Human Activities Gout a: unsure safety of all City residents and local workers from hazardous wastes and the hazards associated with the transport of such wastes. Policy 2.1: Work with the Los Angeles County Fire Department to identify and maintain an up -to- date database of all producers, users, and transporters of hazardous materials and wastes. Policy 2.2: Strictly enforce the use of designated truck routes for vehicles transporting hazardous materials (Figure 5 -8). Policy 2.3: Support, develop and participates in safety hazard awareness programs that provide for the safe and efficient collection and disposal of household hazardous wastes. Policy 2.q: Review in detail any industrial development proposed to be located adjacent to a residential use to ensure that necessary safeguards are included to minimize the risk to residential uses. Safeguards may include, for example, appropriate siting of buildings and loading areas, on -site emergency response equipment or supplies, and barrier walls. • .IY • ru a t.1 C S rE'ry P A G E 5- 3 3 F E a R G A R v , 6. 2-0-L-0- P 11 It 1, 1 C S A F F. '1' Y 0 'fbis page intentionally left blank. • P A G E 5- 3 4 F F It R G A R Y , 6 e o i o • • �J - I I _ •,,� b ., `General Plan mn LB I R 1 ll E V. He =Y J mss• - e \g T —q sbRN sr s 8 \ — J 2 a j M.."11 St �� F _ Y E _clll— ��' Unbn. Mb Re _ _ ii �� _ YF'.. � _ rM1O :. . _�' . —^.•e+ /rAl!twKru+airVUf _ _ _ H. lm ,A ft tE tlMOn 9t 'r t iM o SIR -..•. A t • Y F. E i It . T A. : I • `_ • J I 4j ICJ j \• ICC rip I � WN/IrIER N Yc�e�T' QoO. /O �, �•I. j •BROWS @•• B i / Fom <. IREaR EA IIO NAL Gom • FW, impononr raoiunes: For more information on Important Facilities see site number and refer to Table 5 -3. Evacuation Routes Truck and Evacuation Routes may Hospital /Nursing Home a School overlap in some areas. ® Public Facility (3 Place of Worship Truck/Hazardous Materials Emergency Shelters Transport Routes All Emergency Shelters are Important Facilities. The colon are Evacuation Routes associated to the categories listed above under Important Facilities. ® Medical Facilities ® Potential Emergency Center F Station \\ \ire • /// Source: City Rosemead, of DMP Inc. Figure 5 -8 `VI IV, Feet 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Important Facilities City of Rosemead June 2008 General Plan Update P U B 1. 1 C S A F n '1' V • E P A G a 5- 3 6 • This page intentionally left blank. • Fire Protection and Law Enforcement The I.os Angeles County Fire Department provides service from two stations in Rosemead. The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department serves the City of Rosemead from the nearby Temple Station. In addition to providing patrol and investigative services, the Sheriff offers a broad range of support services, including Neighborhood Watch coordination, community education programs, drug prevention education for school children, and homeland security. A key crime prevention program the Department runs is the Community /Law Enforcement Partnership Program, or CLEPP. Sheriffs Department staff shall help communities mobilize and organize against gangs, drugs, and violence by working through schools, community -based organizations, local businesses, churches, residents, and local governments. Goal 3: Provide high levels of public safety, emergency response, and law enforcement services. Policy 3. t: Ensure that current applicable building codes and fire codes are maintained and implemented. Policy 3.2: Include the Fire Department in the review • process of proposed projects to ensure that fire prevention and suppression features have been considered in the overall design. Policy 3.3: Require that any structures identified as deficient in fire protection or lacking adequate suppression devices make recommended improvements in a time frame established by the Fire Department. Policy 3.4: Work with local water service providers to ensure that private water distribution and supply facilities have adequate capacity to meet both the water supply needs of the community and required fire Flows. Service planning should include methods to address earth quake induced damage to water storage and distribution facilities. • I'll It 1. I C S A P I'. '1' V P A G E S- 3 7 P E K K U A R Y P 11 It 1, 1 C S A P li '1 Y • Policy 3.5: Provide for all street signs and property address signs to be clearly marked and visible to emergency personnel. Policv 3.6: Annually assess the level and quality of services provided by the Countv Sheriff and County lire Department, and adjust the service levels as needed to meet changing community needs. Policv3.7: 'fake full advantage of community policing, education, and crime prevention programs available through the County Sheriffs Department. Policy 3.8: .Incorporate crime prevention considerations into the development project review process, where applicable. Policy 3.9: Develop and implement a periodic inspection program for multi - family units over three units and mixed -use projects. Policv 3.10: Consider the adoption of a citywide emergency evacuation plan and emergency shelter plan. Policy Map and Plan Rosemead's approach to mitigating public safety hazards and reducing loss of life, injury, and property damage in the City • focuses on emergency preparedness. The policies contained in this element include requirements that the City maintain an up -to -date regional emergency response system, procedures for educating the public about the importance of emergency preparedness, and programs to ensure that emergency equipment and supplies are maintained to adequately meet the needs of the City in an emergency situation. Implementation of the goals and policies in this Element will have the beneficial effect of reducing potential fire hazards in the City. The replacement of older, deteriorating structures and the requirement that owners maintain their properties and incorporate of up -to -date fire- suppression devices in structures will reduce the occurrence of structural fires in the City. Figure 5 -8 identifies designated hazardous materials transport routes and evacuation routes, as well as fire stations, medical facilities, and potential emergency centers. The City has identified local schools as potential sites for emergency PA G P. 5-3 8 P E 11 R U A R Y , 6. x 40 • centers. Having recommended sites will expedite the time necessary to set up emergency centers such as shelters. • • Implementation Actions Natural Hazard Safety Goal 1: 'rhe City of Rosemead will act in cooperation with federal, State, and County agencies responsible for the enforcement of planning statutes, environmental laws, and building codes to minimize, to the extent practical, risks to people and property damage, risks related to economic and social disruption, and other impacts resulting from t) geologic and soil hazards, 2) seismic hazards, including primary and secondary effects of seismic shaking, fault rupture, and other earthquake- induced ground deformation in Rosemead, and 3) dam failure - induced flood and inundation hazards, while reducing the disaster recovery time due to hazard incidents in Rosemead. The City of Rosemead will consider undertaking a RAZUS -based loss estimation analysis to more fully quantify potential physical damage, economic loss, and social impacts from these events. Action 1.1 Review County and special district capital improvement plans for consistency with the seismic safety policies governing the location of critical public facilities. Action 1.2 Inspect critical public facilities for structural integrity, and require correction as necessary. Action 1.3 Require all private roads to conform to the existing City standards concerning safety and the movement of emergency vehicles. r�.! y. P U It 1. I C S A F F. r Y P A G E 5' 3 9 F E B R U A R Y 1 6 x n 1 n P U B 1. 1 C S A P li T y • Action 1.4 Develop a public information program on, hazard prevention and disaster response and disseminate information on public safely to all residents and businesses in the City on a regular basis. Action 1.5 Create a website or link on the City of Rosemead website that includes links to readily available published geologic, soil, and earthquake hazard maps covering the City, and links to the City statutes, plans, and codes governing development and re- development projects. Use the site to communicate to the public information about geologic and soil, seismic, and dam inundation flood hazards and City requirements, including but not limited to a) specify sources to identify licensed professionals such as California Registered Geotechnical Engineers and Certified Engineering Geologists, b) seismic design and construction requirements for individuals and developers applicable to new and existing property improvements, c) City emergency preparedness plans, and d) home- or business -based emergency preparedness procedures and resources. Action 1.6 Identify evacuation routes and update on a regular basis the Emergency Preparedness and Evacuation Plan (as required by Government Code Section 6,5302) that addresses structural hazards, landslides and slope stability, • liquefaction, inundation from dam failure, seismic activity, and other natural disasters. Action 1.7 Encourage only the minimum grading necessary to create suitably sized and safe building areas. Action 1.8 Avoid grading and development that requires filling natural drainages or changing natural surface water flow patterns. Action 1.9 As required by law and statute, the City shall implement applicable federal, State, and County regulations related to geologic and soils investigations, analyses, designs, and construction, including but not limited to implementing the most up -to -date California Building Code (CBC) provisions regarding lateral forces (Chapter 23) and grading (Chapter 70), and incorporate and adopt Los Angeles County amendments to the CBC. P A G E 5- 4 0 P E B R U A R y 1 6. .z 0 � • P ll It 1, 1 C S A P 1: '1' Y • :lction t.to Require proper geotechnical and engineering geological investigations and reports that address and evaluate necessary analyses of (for example) soil foundation conditions (i.e., expansivity, collapse, seismic settlement), slope stability, surface and subsurface water, and provide necessary design recommendations for grading and site stability, such as excavation, fill placement, and stabilization or remediation measures. Action 1.11 Require routine inspection of grading operations by properly qualified City representatives to assure site safety and compatibility with approved plans and specifications. Action 1.12 Regularly review the technical data on public safety, seismic safety and Ilooding safetk for use _ _ _ Deleted: ,,,d in the planning process and undertake revisions - ----- - - - --- or updates to the Public Safety Element as needed. Action 1.13 Enact ordinances for the evaluation and abatement of structural hazards (i.e., parapet ordinance and hazardous building ordinance requiring repair, rehabilitation, or demolition of hazardous structures following structural evaluation). As appropriate, prepare multi- lingual materials that discuss hazardous structures and provide suggestions for the • mitigation of structural hazards. Action 1.14 Required geological studies shall be conducted by California Certified Engineering Geologists following the guidelines published by the California Geological Survey and the State Mining and Geology Board, and geotechnical studies shall be conducted by California Registered Geotechniml Engineers. Action 1.1$ Required liquefaction assessment studies shall be conducted in accordance with (a) the California Geological Survey's Special Publication 117: Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California, (b) the Southern California Earthquake Center's (1999 or subsequent document, as amended) procedures to implement Special Publication 117 — Liquefaction Hazards, and (c) the Earthquake Engineering Research Center's Report No. P A G B r�1�f�I: 5 - 4 t "K R R 11 A R V fi • T n 1 c • P 11 It 1. I C S A 1' i'. 'r Y . EERC- 2oo:; -6; Recent Advances in Soil Liquefaction Engineering: A Unified and Consistent Framework. Required slope slability analyses shall be conducted in accordance with California Geological Survey's Special Publication 117: Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California, and the Southern California Earthquake Center's (2002 or subsequent document, as amended) guidelines for evaluating and mitigating landslide hazards. Action 1.16 As required by law and statute, the City shall implement applicable federal, State, and County regulations related to earthquake hazard investigations, analyses, designs, and construction, including but not limited to the adoption of applicable sections of the current California Building Code and the County of Los Angeles Geotechnical Guidelines, and compliance with the State Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act and the Seismic Hazards Mapping Act requirements. Action 1.17 Ensure that no structure for human occupancy, other than single - family wood -frame and steel- frame dwellings that are less than three stories and am not part of a development of four units or more, shall be permitted within fifty feet of an active fault trace as defined by geologic investigations conducted in accordance with the • intent of the Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault "Zoning Act, and the guidelines contained in the California geological survey notes 48 and 49. Action 1.18 Encourage most new construction in areas with a minimum of identified earthquake- related and flood- related hazards. Action 1.19 Minimize to the maximum extent practical the construction of important structures (e.g., critical, essential, sensitive, and high - occupancy buildings and critical infrastructure) within known, or suspected earthquake - related hazard zones. Action 1.2o The City shall require geologic and seismic studies as part of Important Facilities development proposals within established 2oo- foot wide Fault Hazard Management Zones (FHMZ) along possible or suspected fault- P A G E 5- 4 2 FE11 R U A R 1' , b. 2 o i o u related features (loo -feet on either side) identified in the State Fault Evaluation Report =_ (1'reiman, xpyr as shown on Figure 8 -3), in other peer - reviewed reports (e.g., Bullard and Lettis, 1993), and in future City fault hazard management zone study reports (as applicable). Within the FE1MZ along the escarpment of Bullard and Lettis (1993) investigations shall be conducted for facilities as required under the Alquist -Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act (APEFZ) only if new data are developed for an Important Facility investigation in this FHMZ or from some outside study (e.g., California Geological Survey, U. S. Geological Survey, or the Southern California Earthquake Center) that indicates this escarpment is sufficiently active to require such APEFZ -level investigations. Investigation and reporting requirements for FEIMZs shall mirror those for Alquist -Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones and California Geological Survey Notes 48 and 49. FHMZs shall be updated periodically based on the results of studies conducted in the City, which may cause the FHMZs to the expanded, reduced, or removed. Action 1.21 Where construction of important structures (e.g., critical, essential, sensitive, and high - occupancy buildings and critical infrastructure) within known, or suspected earthquake- related hazard zones is proposed, require proper • gcotechnical and engineering geology investigations and reports that include necessary analyses of (for example) strong ground shaking, fault rupture, liquefaction, lateral spreading, ground subsidence and slope instability, and that provide necessary design recommendations for grading and site stability, such as building setbacks, special foundation considerations, dewatering, ground improvement, and other stabilization or remediation measures. Action 1.22 Require routine and special inspection of investigation sites (e.g., fault exploration trenches) and grading operations by properly qualified City representatives to assure scientifically adequate methods, site safety, and compatibility with approved plans and specifications. • P U B L I C 5 A F 1'. '1' Y P A C E 5- 4 3 F E n K n A K Y r 6 z n r o P U. R L I C S A F E T Y • Action t.2;; The City shall monitor engineering and scientific studies affecting development or re- development in areas of known or suspected earthquake - related hazards that may impact the City, and shall ensure that site - specific data, up- to- date geologic knowledge, and expert peer - (independent third party) review am incorporated into the planning, design, construction, and inspection stages of important project structures (e.g., critical, essential, sensitive, and high- occupancy buildings and critical infrastructure). Action 1.24 As required by law and statute, the City shall implement, where applicable, federal, State, and County regulations related to hydrology and flood investigations, analyses, designs, and construction, including but not limited to continued participation in the National Flood Insurance Program. Action 1.25 Minimize to the maximum extent practical the construction of Important Facilities (e.g., critical, essential, sensitive, and high - occupancy buildings and critical infrastructure) within potential dam failure- induced Flood /inundation areas. Action 1.26 Require proper hydrology and flooding investigations and reports that include necessary analyses of (for example) pre- and post- development flow characteristics, changes to surface drainage network, potential environmental impacts on existing development down - gradient from new construction in upstream areas, and adequacy of current and proposed culverts, debris basins, and storm drain systems. Action 1.27 As appropriate require new develonment to be designed to provide protection from potential impacts of floodinv resulting from dam inundation. consistent with evolving State and federal guidelines and the City's flood plain management ordinance, and as directed by the City Engineer. Action 1.28 Assess the level of impact on existing public facilities if flooding was to occur. Develop strategies to minimize impacts and provide continued operation of essential public facilities P A G E S- 4 4 F E n R U A B y . e • :Action 1:.) Consult with public agencies that have rcc wnsihility for flood protection including but not limited to the Federal finergency Manaemnent Agencv. the Armv Corps of Fugi[ICCM. the California Department of \\'titer Resources. the California Office vf Huffer ee nee• Senices, the l.os Angeles Flood Control District and the Moor 1)olilan Water District of Southern California regarding data, flood hazard zones best pmetices, and emergency response Action t "ao Consistent wilh (' v ernment Code S6s•102(a) annually review those areas covered by the General Plan that are subject to flooding identified by flood plain mapping prepared by the Federal Hnnereency Management Agency or t he California Department of Water Resources Action 1.31 Establish procedures for reviewing subdivisions and other development permit applications to ensure safety from seismic and geologic hazards, including liquefaction areas, slope stability, and ground shaking zones. The City shall retain a California certified engineering geologist(s) and it California registered geotechnical engineer(s), either on staff or on a contract basis, to review all engineering geologic and geotechnical studies and grading operations for new development or redevelopment, including but not limited to geotechnical evaluations, liquefaction studies, • and fault rupture evaluations. Each reviewer shall have a minimum of 10 years of practical experience in their respective fields, shall be independent of development work being conducted in the City within 12 months before or after the subject reviews, and shall otherwise not have a conflict -of- interest regarding the project or the project participants. Action 1.32 The City recognizes the need to consider the latest state -of- knowledge related to the earthquake analysis and considerations for the design of structures and facilities pursuant to the current version of the California Building Code. Knowledge of the sedimentary basin depth and geometry beneath the City of Rosemead are important for the proper estimation of earthquake ground motions. In addition to the amplifications and resonances caused by shallow softer alluvium, there are complex interactions 4.«:a • P U 11 1, 1 C S A P F. '1' Y P A p e 5- 4 5 P n It 1. 1 C 5 A F F. 'r Y • between the three dimensional geometry of the basin and the seismic waves that have been shown to increase the amplitude and duration of shaking during an earthquake. Interactions may. focus the Leave energy to a surface location from the bottom of the basin leading to a concentration of intensity of shaking in small regions. Likewise, the edges of basins appear to imp incoming seismic eaves, thereby increasing the duration of shaking in the basin. Basin depth and geometry can be estimated using tools available through the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCF.C) website, which will assist developers and City building officials in ensuring Lx mpliance with the 2- percent in 50- years event requirements in the 2007 CBC. Other information important to proper code compliance includes consideration of (a) distant large duration /large magnitude earthquakes, (b) recently developed Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) relationships, (c) ongoing updates to U. S. Geological Survey and California Geological Survey databases. The City is committed to assist in providing access to these tools and databases to enhance the public safely in Rosemead. • P A G E 5- 4 6 f6A 11•t�ll�tti'��If 1' 11 u 0 Human Activities Hazard Safety Goal P: unsure the safety of all City residents and workers from hazardous wastes and the hazards associated with the transport of such wastes. Action zt Coordinate with the Los Angeles County Fire Department's Health Hazardous Materials Division to identify and mitigate hazardous materials dangers. Action 2.2 Enforce the use of designated routes for truck Iravel with signage, information provided to businesses and coordination with Sheriffs Department staff. Action 2.3 Require that producers, users, and transporters of hazardous materials comply with State and federal regulations requiring identification of these materials on signs posted on the exterior of buildings or storage facilities containing such materials, and on trucks or vehicles transporting hazardous substances through the City. Action 2.4 Coordinate with the Los Angeles County • Department of Public Works to increase outreach and participation in the County's Household Hazardous Waste Collection events within the City. Increase visibility of the County's program through newspapers, the Citv's website, and posted information at public facilities and City- sponsored events. Action 2.5 Prohibit new businesses that produce or transport hazardous wastes from locating in or adjacent to residential neighborhoods. Update the City's zoning ordinance to limit these businesses to industrial zones not adjacent to residential areas, and limit the permitted uses for business in or adjacent to residential areas. 3 Zy- • P 11 It I. 1 L' ti A P P. '1' Y P A G 8 5- 4 u • • P U It 1, I C S A P F. '1 y Goal;;: Provide high levels of public safety, emergency response, and law enforcement services. Action;l.t Cooperate with the Los Angeles County Fire Department in the preparation of a Fire Prevention Program to reduce the extent of damage resulting from fire. Action 3.2 Meet annually, if not more frequently, with County Fire Department officials to assess how services are provided and whether any changes are required in response to City and /or County needs. Action 3.3 Use public education activities to inform residents, businesses, and City staff about community policing and crime prevention Action 3.4 Implement Crime prevention through L'nvironmental Design (CITED) features with the establishment of specific design criteria, and apply those criteria to proposed projects through the development project review process. Action 3.5 Continually address expected effects of climate change that may impact public safety, including increased risk of wildfires, Flooding and sea level rise, salt water intrusion; and health effects of increased heat and ozone, through appropriate policies and programs. Action 3.6 Consider adopting programs for the purchase, transfer or extinguishment of development rights in high -risk areas. Action 3.7 Monitor the impacts of climate change. Use adaptive management to develop new strategies, and modify existing strategies, to respond to the impacts of climate change. P A G E 5- 4 8 F E n R U A R y fi 0 E 0 _J A C K N O W I. E D T P: M E N T S a Aa<, OWLEDGEMENTS City Council • Margaret Clark, Mayor Gary Taylor Sandra Armenta Polly Low Steven Ly R O S E M E A D GENERAL PLAN Planning Commission Traffic Commission Diana Herrera, Chair William Alarcon Nancy Eng Joan Hunter Victor Ruiz City Staff Howard Masuda, Chair Joanne Russell Keno Deary, Sr. Brian Lewin Jean Hall Jeff Allred, City Manager Joseph Montes, City Attorney Matt Hawkesworth, Assistant City Manager Stan Wong, Community Development Director Sheri Bermejo, Principal Planner Paul Garry, Senior Planner Lily Trinh, Assistant Planner Jim Donovan, Building Official Lou LeBlanc, City Engineer Midhelle Ramirez, Economic Development Administrator Aileen Flores, Public Affairs Manager • �1l PAGE 7 -1 F E B R U A R Y 1 6, 2 0 1 0 • • • A C K N O W 1. P. 1) G 1, M 1i N T S P A G E 7- 2 OCTOBER 2 o o 8 Consultants to the City 1-logle- Ireland, Inc. 201 South Lake Avenue, Suite 3o8 Pasadena, California 9tto1 626.356.446o KOA 1055 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 300 Monterey Park, California 91754 323.26o.4703 Wilson Geosciences Igto Pinecrest Drive Altadena, CA 91oo1 626.791.1589 Urban Crossroads 41 Corporate Park, Suite 300 Irvine, CA 92606 949.66o.19oo Traffic Analysis for The City of Rosemead Circulation Element Update and Environmental Impact Report February 19, 2010 Prepared For Hogle - Ireland 201 South Lake Avenue, Suite 308 Pasadena, CA 91 101 p (626) 356 -4460 f (626) 356 -4464 Prepared by.- PF KOA CORPORATION 1055 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 300 Monterey Park. California 91754 p (323) 260 -4703 f (323) 260 -4705 JA91127 Table of Contents I. STUDY OVERVIEW .................................................................................................. ............................... I LEGALFRAMEWORK .................................. .. ............................ ................................... .................................................................. ANALYSISMETHODOLOGY ..........................................................................................................._................ ............................... 1 2. LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES .............................................. ............................... ............. 7 MOTORIZEDVEHICLE SYSTEM .. ................................................................................ _.............................._... ............................... 7 STUDYAREA DEFINITION.._.._ ..................................................................................................................... ............................... 14 NON - MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION ....................................................................................................... ............................... 19 PUBLICTRANSPORTATION ....................... _ .................................................. ... _......................................................................... 22 RAILROADS..........................................................................................................................._...................... .........._.........._......... 26 AIRTRANSPORTATION ..............................................................................................._.........._.................... ............................... 26 3. EXISTING (2009) CONDITIONS .......................................................................... ............................... 27 A. PEAK -HOUR INTERSECTION ANALYSIS ................................................................................................... ............................... 27 B. ROADWAY SEGMENT ANALYSIS................. .. ............... _.......................................................................................................... 33 4. FUTURE (2025) CONDITIONS WITHOUT GENERAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT ......................... 37 A. BACKGROUND GROWTH ASSUMPTIONS ............................................................................................... ............................... 37 B. PEAK -HOUR INTERSECTION ANALYSIS ............. .............................................................................................................. _...... 37 C. ROADWAY SEGMENT ANALYSIS .............................................................................................................. ............................... 44 S. FUTURE (202S) CONDITIONS WITH GENERAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT .. .......................»....... 48 A. ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY ...................... _ ........................................................ :.................................................................... 48 B. PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES ...................................................... » ....................... _.............................................................. 51 C. STUDY INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS ..................................................................................... ............................... 58 D. STUDY ROADWAY SEGMENT OPERATIONS ........................................................................................... ............................... 63 6. SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC IMPACTS OF GENERAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT . ............................... 67 A. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT AND MINIMUM PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ..................................................... ............................... 67 B. SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC IMPACTS AT STUDY INTERSECTIONS .................................................................... .............................68 C. SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC IMPACTS AT STUDY ROADWAY SEGMENTS ...................................................... ............................... 74 D. ADDITIONALiALTERNATIVE MITIGATION — CORRIDOR SYNCHRONIZATION ..................................... ............................. 77 E. OVERVIEW OF POTENTIAL MITIGATION MEASURES ............................................................................... ............................... 78 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................. ............................... 85 A. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................................................................. ............................... 85 B. INTERSECTION CAPACITY ENHANCEMENTS .............................................................. _ ............... _......................................... 85 C. ROADWAY SEGMENT CAPACITY ENHANCEMENTS ............................................................................... ............................... 87 D. CORRIDOR CAPACITY ENHANCEMENTS — SYNCHRONIZATION ......................................................... ............................... 87 E. UNAVOIDABLEADVERSE IMPACTS ........................................................................................................... ............................... 88 8. CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ANALYSIS ................................. ............................... 89 Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis PLANNING a ENGINEERING February 19, 2010 — Page i List of FIGURE 2 — ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS FIGURE 3A — LOCATION OF STUDY AREA INTERSECTIONS AND ROADWAY SEGMENTS FIGURE 3B —STUDY INTERSECTION CONFIGURATIONS FIGURE 3C — STUDY ROADWAY SEGMENT CONFIGURATIONS FIGURE 4 — LOCAL TRUCK ROUTES FIGURE 5 — LOCAL BICYCLE ROUTES FIGURE 6 — TRANSIT ROUTES — REGIONAL BUS LINES FIGURE 7 — TRANSIT ROUTES — ROSEMEAD EXPLORER FIGURE 8 — EXISTING (2009) AM PEAK -HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS FIGURE 9 — EXISTING (2009) PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS FIGURE 10 — EXISTING (2009) STUDY INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) FIGURE I I — EXISTING (2009) ROADWAY SEGMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) FIGURE 12 — EXISTING (2009) ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) FIGURE 13 — FUTURE (2025) WITHOUT DEVELOPMENT AM PEAK HOUR — INTERSECTION VOLUMES FIGURE 14 — FUTURE (2025) WITHOUT DEVELOPMENT PM PEAK HOUR — INTERSECTION VOLUMES FIGURE 15 — FUTURE (2025) WITHOUT DEVELOPMENT —AM /PM INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE FIGURE 16 — FUTURE (2025) WITHOUT DEVELOPMENT — DAILY ROADWAY SEGMENT VOLUMES FIGURE 17 — FUTURE (2025) WITHOUT DEVELOPMENT — ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE FIGURE 18— TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONES FIGURE 19 — FUTURE (2025) WITH DEVELOPMENT AM PEAK PERIOD — INTERSECTION VOLUMES FIGURE 20 — FUTURE (2025) WITH DEVELOPMENT PM PEAK PERIOD — INTERSECTION VOLUMES FIGURE 21 — FUTURE (2025) WITH DEVELOPMENT —AM /PM INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE FIGURE 22 — FUTURE (2025) WITH DEVELOPMENT — DAILY ROADWAY SEGMENT VOLUMES FIGURE 23 — FUTURE (2025) WITH DEVELOPMENT — ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE FIGURE 24A — RECOMMENDED INTERSECTION MITIGATION MEASURES FIGURE 24B — POTENTIAL SYNCHRONIZATION CORRIDORS 13 16 17 18 20 '1 24 25 30 31 32 35 36 41 42 43 46 47 50 60 61 62 65 66 79 80 Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis n E''"" `R " February 19, 2010 — Page ii List of Tables TABLE I — DAILY VOLUME CAPACITIES OF ROADWAY SEGMENTS 3 TABLE 2 — ROADWAY FACILITY LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS 4 TABLE 3 — LEVEL OF SERVICE INTERPRETATION AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 5 TABLE 4- ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION 9 TABLE 5 - LOCAL TRANSIT ROUTES 22 TABLE 6 — PEAK -HOUR INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE — EXISTING CONDITIONS (YEAR 2009) 28 TABLE 7 — ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE FOR EXISTING CONDITIONS (YEAR 2009) 34 TABLE 8 — STUDY INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE — FUTURE (2025) CONDITIONS WITHOUT GENERAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT— WEEKDAY PEAK 38 TABLE 9 — ROADWAY SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE — FUTURE (2025) CONDITIONS WITHOUT GENERAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT 45 TABLE 10 — INCREMENTAL LAND USE INTENSITY BASED ON LAND USE ELEMENT UPDATE 53 TABLE I I A — FUTURE TRIP GENERATION BY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONE (TAZ) — RESIDENTIAL AM 54 TABLE I I B — FUTURE TRIP GENERATION BY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONE (TAZ) — RESIDENTIAL PM 55 TABLE I I C — FUTURE TRIP GENERATION BY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONE (TAZ) — NON - RESIDENTIAL AM56 TABLE I I D — FUTURE TRIP GENERATION BY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONE (TAZ) — NON - RESIDENTIAL PM57 TABLE 12 —STUDY INTERSECTION OPERATIONS— FUTURE (2025) WITH GENERAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT 58 TABLE 13 — STUDY ROADWAY SEGMENT OPERATIONS — FUTURE (2025) WITH GENERAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT 64 TABLE 14— SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS TO STUDY INTERSECTIONS — FUTURE (2025) WITH GENERAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT — AM PEAK 69 TABLE 15 — SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS TO STUDY INTERSECTIONS — FUTURE (2025) WITH GENERAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT — PM PEAK 70 TABLE 16 — RECOMMENDED STUDY INTERSECTION MITIGATION MEASURES AND EFFECTS — AM PEAK HOUR 72 TABLE 17 — RECOMMENDED STUDY INTERSECTION MITIGATION MEASURES AND EFFECTS — PM PEAK HOUR 73 TABLE 18 — SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS TO STUDY ROADWAY SEGMENTS — FUTURE (2025) WITH GENERAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT — WEEKDAY DAILY 75 TABLE 19 — RECOMMENDED ROADWAY SEGMENT MITIGATION MEASURES— FUTURE (2025) WITH GENERAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT — WEEKDAY DAILY 76 TABLE 20 —STUDY INTERSECTION OPERATIONS WITH SYNCHRONIZATION AND PHYSICAL MEASURES —AM PEAK HOUR 82 TABLE 21 — STUDY INTERSECTION OPERATIONS WITH SYNCHRONIZATION AND PHYSICAL MEASURES— PM PEAK HOUR 83 Appendices APPENDIX A— REGIONAL BICYCLE ROUTE MAP APPENDIX BI — STUDY INTERSECTION TRAFFIC COUNTS APPENDIX B2 — STUDY ROADWAY SEGMENT TRAFFIC COUNTS APPENDIX C — EXISTING (YEAR 2009) CONDITIONS - INTERSECTION LOS CALCULATION WORKSHEETS APPENDIX D — FUTURE (YEAR 2025) WITHOUT GENERAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - INTERSECTION LOS CALCULATION WORKSHEETS APPENDIX E — FUTURE (YEAR 2025) WITH GENERAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS - INTERSECTION LOS CALCULATION WORKSHEETS Rosemead Circulation Element Update FF KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis a "'` E' "'° February 19, 2010 —Page iii I. Study Overview Legal Framework The purpose of this traffic impact study is to provide analysis input to the Circulation Element Update and Environmental Impact Report This study report documents the methods and results of the analysis of existing and future circulation conditions in the City of Rosemead, assesses the potential impacts of growth under the Circulation Element Update and provides recommendations regarding improvements that may be needed to accommodate the anticipated growth levels. State law requires that each city undertake a periodic review of its General Plan. The law also requires an update of the Circulation Element as part of the overall process. The specific code sections and the related requirements are as follows: Govemment Code Section 65302 (b): (The general plan shall include) a circulation element consisting of the general location and extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares, transportation routes, terminals, and other local public utilities and facilities, all correlated with the land use element of the plan. Government Code Section 95303: The general plan may... address any other subjects, which, in the judgment of the legislative body, relate to the physical development of the county or city. Analysis Methodology This section documents the level of service methodologies used to evaluate traffic circulation on the roadways within the City of Rosemead. During initial coordination between KOA Corporation and the City of Rosemead, a finite study area was chosen that focuses on the key roadway segments and roadway intersections within the City. KOA conducted this analysis while under contract with Hogle- Ireland. Figure I illustrates the City limits of Rosemead and the area roadway network Level of service (LOS) values, as utilized in most traffic impact studies, range from LOS A to LOS F. Level of Service A indicates excellent operating conditions with little delay to motorists, whereas LOS F represents congested conditions with excessive vehicle delay. LOS D is considered the lowest "adequate" operating condition on a roadway facility, according to the County of Los Angeles Congestion Management Program (CMP). Level of service concepts utilized for the designated study intersections and study roadway segments within this report are discussed below. Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis 1. ^'" s [ February 19, 2010 — Page I c � m 3 m � > m M1ssiiM�l Ave ' w w ? r Azusa in c ' Lowe e a > c c Q m o E K � N tO ` c • V11 Id. c d II SL r. 10 an emardmo Ny. k^ In Telstar Ave. , • IWhitmore SL , • Av . s Av . I • 9 � ••� ' N y sh SL E v m J � E Lti Af I Landis Vlaw Ln. �cry°a m2 L ..o �� • O Pomona Fwy. po'a° m a y LEGEND s ... City Boundary - - - - -- Railroad N KOA CORPORATION City of Rosemead, CA- Circulation Element Figure 1 • PLANNING 8 ENGINEERING City Boundary Study Overview The significant traffic impact standards within the City of Rosemead Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines document apply to facilities operating at LOS E or F. In the case of the analysis within this report, the base scenario is future year (2025) traffic conditions without development allowed by the updated Land Use Plan. The guidelines sate that the City "has a LOS 'D' standard for its roadway system." Caltrans endeavors to maintain a target level of service for traffic operations on Sate highway mainline segments at the transition between LOS C and LOS D. If an existing highway facility is operating at less than the appropriate target LOS, the existing LOS should be maintained and is considered the base standard. Roadway Level of Service Concept Definition The concept of roadway LOS is typically defined in terms of average travel speed of all vehicles on the facility. Average travel speed is strongly influenced by the density of signalized intersections per mile, average intersection delay, the number of driveways per segment and the presence of on- street parking. The daily number of vehicles traveling on a roadway facility, divided by the designed capacity of that roadway segment, is also an accepted method for the calculation of roadway LOS. Measurements for operations are based on a ratio of average daily volume on a roadway segment, versus the volume that is calculated to be the design capacity. Table I lists the estimated roadway capacities by type of roadway and number of lanes used for this study, which have been extrapolated from roadway analysis concepts within the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (published by the Transportation Research Board). These capacity numbers are also similar to the numbers utilized by many local jurisdictions for roadway analysis. Table I — Daily Volume Capacities of Roadway Segments Roadway Type Estimated Daily Capacity 6 -Lane Major 60,000 5- Lane Major 50,000 4 -Lane Major 40,000 4 -Lane Secondary 30,000 2 -Lane Local 15,000 Table 2 provides the arterial level of service concept for each LOS letter value. Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis 2 "," " February 19, 2010 — Page 3 Study Overview Table 2 — Roadway Facility Level of Service Definitions Intersection Analysis Methodologies The Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method for intersection analysis was conducted per guidelines acceptable to the City of Rosemead. ICU calculations used to determine the intersection volume -to- capacity ratio (V /C) and corresponding LOS were based on the turning movements and intersection characteristics at the signalized intersections. The methodology calculates the volume/capacity ratio based on a default capacity [C] per lane, usually 1,600 vehicles per hour (vph) per lane and 2,280 vph for dual turn lanes. The intersection V/C or critical movement total can be calculated by the summation of the critical flow ratios during a given signal phase when concurrent signal phasing is provided. V/C values can also be calculated by adding the critical V/C values of the worst -case combination of opposing movements, such as a left turn movement V/C plus the opposing through movement V /C. The formula for calculating an intersection ICU is as follows: Rosemead Circulation Element Update PF KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis tea" ` ° ' ;" ^ ` � February 19, 2010 — Page 4 Volume to Level of Capacity Service Flow Conditions Ratio A LOS A describes primarily free -flow operations at average travel speeds, usually 0.00 -0.60 about 90 percent of the free -flow speed for the arterial classification. Vehicles are completely unimpeded in their ability to maneuver within the traffic stream. Stopped delay at signalized intersections is minimal. B LOS B represents reasonably unimpeded operations at average travel speeds, 0.61 -0.70 usually about 70 percent of the free -flow sped for the arterial classification. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly restricted and stopped delays are not bothersome. Drivers are not generally subjected to appreciable tension. C LOS C represents stable operations; however, ability to maneuver and change 0.71 -0.80 lanes in mid -block locations may be more restricted than at LOS B, and longer queues, adverse signal coordination, or both may contribute to lower average speeds of about 50 percent of the average free -flow speed for the arterial classification. Motorists will experience appreciable tension while driving. D LOS D borders on a range in which small increases in flow may cause a 0.81 -0.90 substantial increase in delay and hence decreases in arterial speed. LOS D may be due to adverse signal progression, inappropriate signal timing, high volumes, or some combination of these factors. Average travel speeds are about 40 percent of free -flow speed. E LOS E is characterized by significant delays and average travel speeds of one - 0.91 -1.00 third the free -flow speed of less. Such operations are caused by some combination of adverse progression, high signal density, high volumes, extensive delays at critical intersections, and inappropriate signal timing. F LOS F characterizes arterial flow at extremely low speeds below one -third to Over 1.00 one -fourth of the free -flow speed. Intersection congestion is likely at critical signalized locations, with high delays and extensive queuing. Adverse progression is frequently a contributor to this condition. Intersection Analysis Methodologies The Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method for intersection analysis was conducted per guidelines acceptable to the City of Rosemead. ICU calculations used to determine the intersection volume -to- capacity ratio (V /C) and corresponding LOS were based on the turning movements and intersection characteristics at the signalized intersections. The methodology calculates the volume/capacity ratio based on a default capacity [C] per lane, usually 1,600 vehicles per hour (vph) per lane and 2,280 vph for dual turn lanes. The intersection V/C or critical movement total can be calculated by the summation of the critical flow ratios during a given signal phase when concurrent signal phasing is provided. V/C values can also be calculated by adding the critical V/C values of the worst -case combination of opposing movements, such as a left turn movement V/C plus the opposing through movement V /C. The formula for calculating an intersection ICU is as follows: Rosemead Circulation Element Update PF KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis tea" ` ° ' ;" ^ ` � February 19, 2010 — Page 4 Study Overview ICU =V /C +LOSS /CYCLE Where: V/C = sum of critical movement volume/capacity ratios (critical east - west and critical north -south volume/capacity ratios) CYCLE = cycle length in seconds (typically 100 seconds) LOSS = total intersection loss time in seconds (typically 10 seconds) A capacity value of 1,600 vehicles per hour per lane was used with a loss time factor of 0.10. The V/C for the intersection corresponds to a LOS value, which describes the intersection operations. The LOS values range from A to F, with A representing near free -flow conditions, and LOS F representing forced flow conditions. Generally, LOS D or better is considered acceptable in urban areas. The ranges of volume -to- capacity ratios summarized within Table 3 were used to determine the LOS values for the signalized study intersections. Table 3 — Level of Service Interpretation at Signalized Intersections Level Of Description Volume Service to Capacity Ratio A Excellent operation. All approaches to the intersection appear quite open, 0 -0.60 turning movements are easily made, and nearly all drivers find freedom of operation. B Very, good operation. Many drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted within 0.61 -0.70 platoons of vehicles. This represents stable flow. An approach to an intersection may occasionally be fully utilized and traffic queues stare to form. C Good operation. Occasionally drivers may have to wait more than 60 0.71 -0.80 seconds, and back -ups may develop behind turning vehicles. Most drivers feel somewhat restricted. D Fair operation. Cars are sometimes required to wait more than 60 seconds 0.81 -0.90 during short peaks. There are no long - standing traffic queues. This level of operations is typically targeted in roadway design practice. E Poor operation. Some long- standing vehicular queues develop on critical 0.91 -1.00 approaches to intersections. Delays may be up to several minutes. F Forced flow. Represents jammed conditions. Backups form locations Over 1.00 downstream or on the cross street may restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the intersection approach lanes; therefore, volumes carried are not predictable. Potential for stop and go type traffic flow. Source Highway Capacity Manual, special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. 1985 and Interim Materials on Highway Capacity, NCHRP Circular 212, 1982 Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis Pik 'IN INf s `9" "`F""° February 19, 2010 — Page 5 Study Overview Calculations for the traffic analysis were conducted within the Traffix software program (Dowling Associates). The program was utilized to calculate existing and future volumes at the study intersections and study roadway segments, and to forecast trips from General Plan developments within the study roadway network The program allows LOS to be calculated for existing, future baseline, and future with General Plan development scenarios at signalized and unsignalized intersections, and also calculates link volumes for the study roadway segments. The outputs were crosschecked with the ICU worksheets provided by the City of Rosemead for consistency purposes, and are located in Appendix C through E. FIX Rosemead Circulation Element Update T KOA CORPORATION TraffiicImpact Analysis February 19, 2010 — Page 6 2. Local Transportation Facilities Motorized Vehicle System The City of Rosemead designates roadways as one of five street classifications according to function. The five classifications include: • Freeways • Major Arterials • Secondary Arterials • Collector Streets • Local Streets The operating characteristics of these facilities are described below. Freeways Freeways are controlled access, high -speed roadways with grade - separated interchanges. They are intended to carry high volumes of traffic from region to region. The planning, design, construction, and maintenance of freeways in California are the responsibility of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The City is served by two major freeway systems. These freeways provide access to Rosemead and all other areas of the Southern California region. The two freeways are the Interstate 10 Freeway (San Bernardino Freeway), which bisects the commercial /retail portions of the City, and the State Highway 60 (Pomona Freeway), which cuts through the southern tip of the City. Interstate 10 — The San Bernardino Freeway is a major east -west freeway in the greater Los Angeles Metropolitan area. The San Bernardino Freeway is a six -lane freeway with heavy occupancy vehicle lanes in both directions. Interstate 10 provides a full interchange with Interstate 710 approximately four miles to the west, and Interstate 605 approximately four miles to the east It travels through the central portion of the City and provides residents and businesses with excellent access to Los Angeles and San Bernardino counties. State Route 60 — Pomona Freeway is a six -lane freeway, without HOV lanes, traveling east -west connecting Los Angeles and San Bernardino counties. State Route 60 runs through the southern tip of the City of Rosemead to intersect San Gabriel Boulevard. The Pomona Freeway generally parallels the San Bernardino Freeway and thus also intersects with the Interstate 710 roughly four miles to the west and Interstate 605 roughly four miles to the east Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis ai" ' " ". 1 "N "E F a February 19, 2010 —Page 7 Local Transportation Facilities Major Arterials The function of a Major Arterial is to connect traffic from secondary arterials and collectors to other parts of the city, freeway interchanges, and adjacent major land uses. They are the principal urban thoroughfares and provide a linkage between activity centers in the City and to adjacent communities. Major Arterials generally have right -of -way widths of approximately 100 feet and are designed to move large volumes of traffic, typically in the range of 40.000 to 60,000 vehicles per day. They are generally serviced by regional transit routes and are the primary truck routes in the community. Traffic control typically consists of signalization at major intersections, often with protected left-turn phasing. At high volume intersections, exclusive right -turn lanes may be present, as may dual left turn lanes. Additional traffic control consists of medians or continuous two- way -left -turn lanes for access to adjacent land uses. The allowance of parking varies from complete exclusion to limited periods, typically during midday and weekends. As a design rule, access to adjacent land uses and the presence of parking should be minimal or prohibited completely. There are currently four Major Arterials serving the City of Rosemead: Valley Boulevard, Garvey Avenue, San Gabriel Boulevard, and Rosemead Boulevard. Secondary Arterials The primary purpose of Secondary Arterials is to serve as an intermediate route carrying traffic between local streets and major arterials. They are intended to provide access to all types of land uses and generally have no limitations on access. Parking is generally allowed during most of the day. Traffic controls typically consist of stop signs and signalization at intersections with arterials; however, left -turn lanes and/or left -turn signalization are generally not provided. They are designed to carry moderate levels of traffic, generally in the range of 15,000 to 25,000 vehicles per day. They typically have an average right -of -way width of 80 feet. Secondary Arterials within the City include Del Mar Avenue, Graves Avenue, New Avenue, Rush Street, Temple City Boulevard, Lower Azusa Road, Mission Drive, and Walnut Grove Avenue. These well - placed streets complete the well - balanced arterial circulation system, which the City has constructed to provide an efficient flow of traffic to places of importance while protecting residential neighborhoods. Collector Roads The primary function of a collector street is to connect a defined geographic area of the city with arterials and freeways. Collector roads are intended to move traffic between local streets and arterials. On- street parking is generally acceptable, although it might be restricted or prohibited during certain hours. Access to adjacent land uses is generally unrestricted. The right -of -way width of this roadway type is variable but generally averages 60 feet, and carries less than 15,000 vehicles per day. Roadways classified as collector streets include Encinita Avenue, Grand Avenue, Hellman Avenue, Ivar Avenue, Loftus Drive, Marshall Street, Muscatel Avenue, Ramona Boulevard, Rio Hondo Avenue, and Rosemead Place. Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis . r. c•:aV Alvyyer:.ry: February 19, 2010 —Page 8 Local Transportation Facilities Local Streets Local streets are designed to principally provide vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle access to individual parcels throughout the City. They are intended to carry low volumes of traffic, and allow unrestricted parking. Local streets are typically two lane roadways with narrower 50 -foot rights -of -way. In residential neighborhoods, there is a growing trend to design and implement traffic control measures to enhance the livability for residents that live along local streets. Some of the control measures include speed humps, speed cushions, curb extensions, traffic diverters, chokers, and traffic circles, to name a few. The intent of such measures is to slow traffic or prevent through traffic, which belongs on collector or arterial streets from infiltrating residential neighborhoods. The current classification for each City roadway and area freeway facility, based on the City's adopted General Plan Circulation Element is illustrated within Figure 2. Table 4 provides information on specific study roadway characteristics including number of lanes, median types, parking restrictions (permitted /prohibited), and speed limits within the City of Rosemead. Table 4- Roadway Classification Segment # Lanes Median Type Parldng Restrictions Posted 5 Pew Limit (mph) NR/EB SB/WB North Side / ti Side Side I Wert Side WALNUT GROVE AVENUE North of Grand Avenue 2 2 Sniped Permitted Permitted 40 Grand Avenue to Halkett Avenue 2 Z Striped per metl permdted 40 Halkett Avenue to Mission Drive 2 2 Svi ed Permitted Permitted 40 South of Mission Drive 2 2 Striped Permitted Permitted 40 North of Wells Street/Edmand Drive 2 2 Scalped Prohibited Prohibited 40 Wells Sweet/Edoi.d Dnve to Abilene Street 2 2 Stn ed Prohibited Prohibited 40 Abilene Street to Scott Street 2 2 Stn ed Permitted Permitted 40 Scott Street to Valley Boulevutl 2 2 Swiped Permined Permitted 40 valley aoulewrd to Guess Street 2 1 2 Svi permitted Pem,n[ed 40 Guess Sweet to Ralph Street 2 1 2 Striped Permitted Permitted 40 Ra h Street to Shea Pace 2 2 Swiped Permlaed pertniaed 40 Shea Place to De Adalem Street 2 2 Scalped Permitted Permitted 40 De Aldalena Street to Norwood Place 2 2 Suited Permitted Permitted 40 Norwood Place to Marshall Street 2 2 Striped perrnined Permitted 40 Saath of M.r Nll Sweet 2 2 Ratted MedardSun ed Pe,,oea Permmed 40 NorN of Hellman Avenue 2 2 Raised Median Prohibited Prohibited 40 Hellman Avenue to Dorothy Sweet 2 2 Sniped I Permitted Permitted 40 )orothy Sweet to Garvey Avenue 2 2 striped Permitted Permitted 25/40 3a,,,ey Avenue to Fem Avenue 2 2 Sui ed Permiaed Permitted 40 Fem Avenue to Khngerman Street 2 2 Sniped Permitted Permioed 40 JWVmun Sweet to Edison Way 2 2 Raised Medan Prohibited Prohbicetl 45 Etlisan Way m Rush Street 2 2 Raised Median Prohibited Prohibited 45 Rush Sweet to Dryer Lane 2 2 Raised MedhnSm Prohibited Prohibrted 45 Dryer Lane m V Madnna DrNe 2 2 Striped Prohibited Prohibited 45 La Madrlrn Drive to Vil Lane 2 2 Stn ed Prohibited Prohibited 45 Villa Lane to Landis View Lam 2 2 Striped Permitted Permittetl 45 South of Laths View Lane 2 2 Striped Prohibited Prohibited 45 KOA CORPORATION Rosemead Circulation Element Update Traffic Impact Analysis a F ^dG:rvifCIrv; February 19, 2010 —Page 9 Local Transportation Facilities Table 4 - Roadway Classification (continued) Segment Lanes Median Trye Parking Restrictions Posted Speed Limit (mph) [NIVRE B SBIWB North Side / East Side South Side I West Side SAN GABRIEL BOULHrABD— North of Hellman Avenue 2 2 Striped Prohibited Prohibited 40 Hellman Avenue to Emerson Place 2 2 Swiped Permitted Permitted 40 Emerson Place to Garwey Avenue 2 2 Striped Permitted Permitted 40 Garvey Avenue to Newmark Avenue 2 2 Striped Permitted Permitted 40 Newmark Avenueto Fern Avenue 2 2 Swiped Permitted Permitted 40 Fem Avenueto Garvdlp Avenue 2 2 Striped Permitted Permitted 40 Garvalo Avenue to Baruch Street 2 2 Sniped Permitted Permitted 40 Baruch Street to Kingerman Sum 2 2 Striped Permitted Permitted 40 North of Rush StreedPotero Grande 2 2 Raised Median Permitted Permitted 40 South of Rush Sveet/Patero Grande 2 2 Raised Medan Permitted Permitted 40 West of Delta Avenue 2 2 Striped Permitted Permitted 25140 Della Avenue to Rose Glen Avenue 2 2 Raised Medan Permitted Permeated 40 Rose Glen Avenue to Wal ut Grove Avenue 2 2 Raised Medan Permeated Permitted 25140 Walnut Grove Avenue to SR-60 Freeway 2 2 Raised Medan Prohibited Prohibited 40 Fast of SR -60 Freeway 2 2 Striped Prohibited Prohibited Not Posted North of Town Center Drive 3 2 Raised Medan Prohibited Prohibited Not Posted South of Town Center Drive 2 2 Raised Medan Prohibited Prohibited Not Posted DEL MAR AVENUE North of Hellman Avenue 2 2 Raised Medan Prohibited Prohibned 40 Hellman Avenue m Emerson Place 2 2 Striped Prohibited Prohibited 40 Emerson Place to Garvey Avenue 2 2 Swiped Prohibited Prohibited 40 Garvey Avenue to Newmark Avenue I I Striped Permitted Permitted 35 South of Newmark Avenue I I Striped Permitted Permitted 35 NEW AVENUE North of Grove Avenue 2 2 Striped Permitted Permitted 35 W Avenue to Avenue I I Striped Permitted Permitted 35 Egiey Avenut to Newmark Avenue I 1 Striped Permitted Permitted 35 Newmark Avenue to Fern Avenue I I Swiped Permitted Permitted 35 Fern Avenue to Garvzla Avenue I I Stated Permitted Permitted 35 Garvalm Avenue to Graves Avenue I I Striped Permitted Permitted 35 South of Graves Avenue I i Striped Permitted Permitted 35 ROSEMEAD.BOULEVARD North of Lower Azusa Road 2 2 Raised Medan Prohibited Prohibited 40 Lower Atusa Road to Mission Drive 3 2 Raised Medan Permitted Prohibited 40 South of Mission Drive 2 2 Raised Medan Prohibited Permitted 25 Noah of Valley Boulevard 2 2 Raised Medan Permitted Prohibited 40 Valley Boulevard to Steele Street 2 2 Raised Medan Permitted Permitted 40 Steele Street to Nevada Avenue 2 2 Raised Medan Permitted Permitted 40 Nevada Avenue to Guess Street 2 2 Raised Medan Permitted Permitted 40 Guess Street no Ralph Sweet 2 2 Raised Medan Permitted Permitted 40 Ralph Street to Adal. Street 2 2 Raised Medan I Permitted Permitted 40 Adalwa Sweet to Marshall Street 2 2 Raised Medan Permitted Permitted 40 Marshall Street to Glendon Way 2 2 Raised Medan Prohibited Prohibited 40 South of Glendon Way 2 2 Raised Medan Prohibited Prohibited 40/45 North of Telstar Avenue 3 3 Raised Medan Prohibited Prohibited 45 Telstar Avenue to Whitmore Street 3 3 Raised Medan Prohibited! Prohibited 45 South of Wnionore Street 3 3 Raised Medan Prohibited Prohibned 45 TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD Norch of Valley Boulevard 2 2 Striped Prohibited Prohibned 40 Valley Boulevard to Elie lace 2 2 Swiped Prohibned Prohibited 40 Ellis Lane to Guess Swett 2 2 Striped Permitted Permitted 40 Guess Sweet to Marshall Street 2 2 Striped Permitted Permitted 40 Marshall Swett to Loftus on" 2 2 Striped Prohibned Prohibited 40 South of Loftus Drive 2 2 Striped Prohibited Prohibited 40 Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis 4 111`1 "•0 S l'a " ' ` "' February 19, 2010 — Page 10 Local Transportation Facilities Table 4 - Roadway Classification (continued) Segment NBI "s5f5wB Median Type Parking Resoictions Posted Speed Limit (mph) North Side / East Side 5outh Side / West Side GARVEY AVENUE — "—�- -'- Wert of New Avenue 2 2 Rased Medan Permitted Permitted 3S New Avenue to Dequave Avenue 2 2 Raised Medan Pernrtted Permitted 3S Dequine Avenue to L' Avenue 2 2 Raised Medan Pertained Permitted 35 Lindy Avenue or Prospect Avenue 2 2 Swiped Pertained Pertained 35 Prospect Avenue to Jackson Avenue 2 2 Striped Patrmined Permitted 25 Jackson Avenue to Evelyn Avenue 2 2 Med=ped Permnned Permitted 25 Eve n Avenue w Del Mar Avenue 2 2 Swiped Pentland Pennsted 35 Del Mar Avenue to Brighton Sweet 1/2 2 Striped Permitted Pennsted 35 Brlghron Sven w Strathmore Avenue 2 2 Raised MedaNStri ed Permitted Permitted 35 Smthtaore Aviv. to Demon Avenue 2 2 Swiped Perturbed Permitted 35 Dal Avenue to Kelbum Avenue 2 2 Raised Meadian/Svi ed Permitted Permitted 35 Kelbum Avenue to Falling Leaf Avenue 2 2 Raised Median Permitted Permitted 35 Failing Leaf Avenue to Pine Street 2 2 Rased Medan Permitted Permitted 3S Pine Sweet to San Gabriel Boulevard 2 2 Striped Permitted Permmed 35 San Gabriel Boulevard to Gladys Avenue 2 2 Striped Permitted I Permitted 35 Gladys Avenue to Charlotte Avenue 2 2 Striped Pefmitted Perenmad 35 Charlene Avenue to Delta Avenue 2 2 Raised Med.n/Striped Perri Pertained 35 Delta Avenue to Largord Pace 2 2 Striped Pertained Permitted 35 Langford Race to Earle Avenue 2 2 Striped Permitted Permitted 35 Eark Avenue to Willard Avenue 2 2 Rased Medan Permuted Permitted 35 Willard Avenue to Walnut Grove Avenue 2 2 Striped Penmined Permit2d 35 Walmn Grove Avenue to Burton Avenue 2 2 Striped Permitted Pertained 35 Burton Avenue to Bartlett Avenue 2 2 MedRaised ed Permitted Permitted 35 Bartlett Avenue w Muscatel Avenue 2 2 Striped Partnmed Pertained 35 Muscatel Avenue to Ivar Avenue 2 2 Surped Permitted Pertained 35 Isar Avenue to Stitt Ie Avenue 2 2 Striped Permitted Permitted 35 Staingle Avenue to River Avenue 2 2 Striped Permitted Permitted 3S River Avenue to Sullivan Avenue 2 2 Striped Permitted Penntted 35 Sullivan Avenue to Gorey Community Center 2 2 Striped Permitted Permitted 35 Garey Commumry Center to Lee Avenue 2 2 Swiped Permitted Permitted 35 Lee Avenue to Rosemead Boulevard 2 2 Striped Permitted Permitted 35 GLENDON WAY West of Rosemead Boulevard I Raised MeduN$viped Prohibitetl Prohibited Nov Posted HELLMAN AVENUE West of Del Mar Avenue I I Striped Prohibited Prohibited 30 East of Del Mar Avenue Stnped Prohibited Permitted 30 West of San Gabriel Boulevard 1 Stnped Prohibited Prohibited 30 Ean of San Gabriel Boulevard I I Stnped Prohibited Prohibited 30 West of Walnut Grove I Striped Prohibited Prohibited 30 LANDIS VIEW LANE Fast of Walnut Grove Avenue I Striped Permitted Permitted Not Pored LOFTUS DRIVE East of Temple City Boulevard 2 2 Striped Prohibited Permitted 35 LOWER AZUSA ROAD East of Rosemead Boulevard 2 Striped Permitted Prohibited 25 MARSHALL STREET West of Walnut Grove Avenue I Striped Permitted Permitted 35 East of Walnut Grove Avenue I Swiped Permitted Permitted 25 West of Rosemead Boulevard I Rased Medan Pertalaed Prohibited 30 Elan of Rosemead Boulevard 2 2 Raised Medan Prohibited Prohibited 35 Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis • PLANNING S ENG - February 19, 2010 — Page I I Local Transportation Facilities Table 4 - Roadway Classification (continued) Segment # Parking Restrictions Median Type North Side I East South Side I West Side Side Posted Speed Limit (mph) NB/EB "SBWB DRIVE Wes, of Walnut Grove Avenue 11 2 1 2 1 Sniped Prohibited Prohibited 40 East of Walnut Grove Avenue 2 2 Striped Prohibited Prohibited 40 Wert of Rosemead Boulevard 2 2 striped Prohibited Prohibited 40 East of Rosemead Boulevard 2 2 striped Prohi ked Prohibited 25 North of Valley Boulevard 2 2 Ra led NiediaNS ed ned Pmrt, Prohibited 40 MONTEBELLO BOULEVARD North of Town Center Drive 1 2 2 1 Raised Median Prohibited N/A No, Posted South of Town Center Drive 2 2 Raised Median Prohibited NIA No, Posted RIO NONDO AVENUE North of Valley Boulevard 1 1 Striped Permitted Prohibited No, Posted South of Valley Boulevard I I Striped Prohibied Prohibited Not Posted RUSH STREET West of San Gabriel Boulevard 11 2 2 1 Raised Median Permitted Permitted 40 Em of San Gabriel Boulevard 2 2 Raised Median Prohibited Permitted 40 West of Walnut Grove Avenue 11 2 2 Raised Median Permitted Permitted 40 TEISTAR AVENUE East of Rosemead Boulevard I I K- RailBmip rig Prohibited Prohibited 35 TOWN CENTER DRIVE East of Montebello Boulevard 2 2 Raised Medan Prohibired Prohibited Not Posed Wen of Montebello Boulevard 2 2 Raised Medan Prohibited Prohibited Not Posted ALLEY BOULEVARD West of Walnut Grove Avenue 2 2 Striped Permitted Permitted 35 East of Walnut Grove 2 2 Swiped Prohibited Permitted 3S West of Muscatel Avenue 2 2 Swiped Permitted Permitted 35 M,aatal Avenue to Ivar Avenue 2 2 Swiped Permitted Permitted 35 East of Ivar Avenue 2 2 Swiped Permitted Permitted 35 West of Rosemead Boulevard 2 2 Swiped Permitted Prohibited 35 East of Rosemead Boulevard 2 2 Striped Prohibited Pertnitted 35 Wen of Hart Avenue 2 2 Striped Permitted Permitted 35 Hart Avenue to Misaa n Drive 2 2 Striped Permitted Permitted 35 Minion Drive to Rio Hondo Avenue 2 2 Sniped Permitted Permkred 35 Rm Hondo Avenue to Temple City Boulevard 2 2 Striped Permitted Permitted 35 East of Temple City Boulevard 2 2 Swiped Permined Permitted 35 VINIT14ORE STREET East of Rosemead Boule.erd I Striped permitted Permitted Not Posted Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis PLANNING 6 ENGINEERING February 19, 2010 — Page 12 P KOA CORPORATION City of Rosemead, CA- Circulation Element Figure 2 Roadway Classifications Local Transportation Facilities The existing average daily traffic volumes (ADT) on key city'roadways are illustrated within Figure 3. The number of lanes on each major roadway within the study area is provided within Figure 4. Study Area Definition During scoping efforts with the City of Rosemead. KOA proposed a list of study intersections and study roadway segments, along with other assumptions such as level of service methodology, Buildout year, and the future ambient annual growth rate. The list of study intersections that was chosen during this process included the following locations. Level of service at these intersections was conducted for the weekday a.m. peak and p.m. peak periods: I. Walnut Grove Ave at Mission Dr. 2. Rosemead Blvd. at Lower Azusa Rd. 3. Rosemead Blvd. at Mission Dr. 4. Walnut Grove Ave, at Valley Blvd. S. Rosemead Blvd. at Valley Blvd. 6. Valley Blvd. at Mission Dr. 7. Valley Blvd. at Rio Hondo Ave. 8. Valley Blvd. at Temple City Blvd. 9. Walnut Grove Ave. at Marshall Sr 10. Rosemead Blvd. at Marshall St IL Rosemead Blvd. at Glendon Way 12. Temple City Blvd. at Loftus Dr. 13. Del Mar Ave. at Hellman Ave. 14. San Gabriel Blvd. at Hellman Ave. 15. Walnut Grove Ave. at Hellman /Ramona 16. Rosemead Blvd. at Telstar Ave. 17. Rosemead Blvd. at Whitmore St 18. New Ave. at Garvey Ave. 19. Del Mar Ave. at Garvey Ave. 20. San Gabriel Blvd. at Garvey Ave. 21. Walnut Grove Ave. at Garvey Ave. 22. San Gabriel Blvd. at Rush St /Potrero Grande 23. Walnut Grove Ave. at Rush St 24. Walnut Grove Ave. at Landis View Ln. 25. Walnut Grove Ave. at San Gabriel Blvd. 26. San Gabriel Blvd. at SR -60 WB Ramps 27. Town Center Dr. at SR -60 EB Ramps 28. San Gabriel Blvd. at Town Center Dr. Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis e 1� °`" & """ ` "'1�q February 19, 2010 — Page 14 Local Transportation Facilities The list of study roadway segments that was chosen during this process included the following locations. Level of service on these roadways was conducted for weekday daily period using ADT volumes: to Mission Dr. 2. Walnut Grove Ave., from Wells- Edmond to Valley Blvd. 3. Walnut Grove Ave., from Valley Blvd. to Marshall St- 4. Walnut Grove Ave., from Hellman Ave. to Garvey Ave. S. Walnut Grove Ave., from Fern Ave. to Klingerman St 6. Walnut Grove Ave., from Rush St to Landis View Ln. 7. San Gabriel Blvd., from Hellman Ave. to Emerson PI. B. San Gabriel Blvd., Garvey Ave. to Klingerman St 9. San Gabriel Blvd., from Delta Ave. to Walnut Grove Ave. 10. Del Mar Ave., from Hellman Ave. to Emerson PI. 11. Del Mar Ave., from Garvey Ave. to Newmark Ave. 12. New Ave., from Newmark Ave. to Graves Ave. to Ivar Ave. 14. Valley Blvd., from Hart Ave. to Mission Dr. I5. Valley Blvd., from Rio Hondo Ave. to Temple City Blvd. 16. Temple City Blvd., from Valley Blvd. to Marshall St 17. Garvey Ave., from New Ave. to Del Mar Ave. I B. Garvey Ave., from Del Mar Ave. to San Gabriel Blvd. 19. Garvey Ave., from San Gabriel Blvd. to Walnut Grove Ave. 20. Garvey Ave., from Walnut Grove Ave. to Rosemead Blvd. 21. Rosemead Blvd., from Lower Azusa Rd. to Mission Dr. 22. Rosemead Blvd., from Valley Blvd. to Marshall St- 23. Rosemead Blvd., from Telstar Ave. to Whitmore St- The study area defined for this traffic analysis, including study intersections and study roadway segments, is illustrated on Figure 3A. The existing intersection approach lane geometry is provided on Figure 3B, and the existing study roadway segment travel lane geometry is provided in Figure 3C. Rosemead Circulation Element Update FF KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis "ENGINNR "G February 19,2010 —Page 15 m > s itfission Or Ave. nd d er w Azusa i% i 1 `' `Low e m rb i m O E � z � I 2 m'0 3 m 8 3 4 Valle Blv i i � c I S � i a 11 SL 1i 2 t}fl r I wv - fp San Bernardino Fvvy. Ilm n Ave. 1 Telstar Ave. 1 i E e o P Whitmore SL 17 18 Garve Ave. 1 2b 2 m � i Q 3 � m Z i rav A i � m m ush St. 23 € u o � r !� Landis View Ln. oae�i 2 0 Gte Pomona Fwy. Qov'gt 2 28 ,w 27 � LEGEND m - - - City Boundary - - - -- Railroad N • Study Intersection X Intersection Reference Number ' Study Roadway Segment KOA CORPORATION City of Rosemead, CA- Circulation Element Figure 3A ' r :.l<., . � P. , ,r_F •a Location of Study Intersections and Roadway Segments North/South: Walnut East/West: Mission Grove Ave. Dr. NorOVSwth Temple City Blvd. East/West Valley Blvd. North/South: Walnut East(West: Hellman/Ramons Grove Ave North/SoutN San Gabriel Blvd. East/West: Rah sLfdrem Gwa N h htt• z . North/South: Rosemead Blvd. EasWyest: Lower Azusa Rd. North/South: Walnut East/West: Marshall Grove Ave. SL NortNSouth: Rosemead Blvd. A". North/South : Walnut Grove Av East/West: Rush St. East*est: Telater �- hit+ r ftte D�a htfP Ex. h1f• North/South: Rosemead EasVWest: Mission Blvd. Dr. North/SOUth: Rosemead Blvd. East/West: Marshall St. Norm /South: Rosemead Blvd. Whitmore St. North/South: Walnut EasVWest: Landis Grove Ave View Ln. East/West: dl4 r r !!!4 r !!4 r htfP hff� fttr ft• NorhtSouth: Walnut Grove Ave. East/West Valley Blvd. North/South: Rosemead Blvd. East/West: Glendon Wy. North /South: New Ave. East/1Nest: Garvey Ave. NortNSou#v WainutGrove Ave East/West, San Gabriel Blvd. ht� z hftt• � hf� � �I�wey North/South: Rosemead EaastfWest: Valley Blvd. Blvd. North/South: Temple City Blvtl. Dr. North/SoutN Del Mar Ave. Ave. NortNSoum San East/West SR Gabriel Blvd. 60 WB Ramps East/West Loftus East(West. Garvey z htfP ht* Nonh /South: Mission Dr. EaSVWest: Valley Blvd. J44 North/SoutN Del Mar Ave. Ave. r NordVSouth: San Gabriel Blvd. East/West Garvey Ave. J!!4 r North/South: SR 60 EB Ramps EestfWest: Town Center Dr. J1l�4 r East/West Hellman �l4 hft' z t htiP htfP North/South : Rio Hondo Ave. East/West Valley Blvd. NorWSouth San Gabriel Blvd. East/West Hellman Ave. Norte /South : Walnut Grove Ave Ave. North/south : San Gabriel Blvtl. East/West: Town Center Dr. Eastn^/est Garvey LEGEND © Intersection Reference No. =` Intersection e on Lane -- �! 4 r �► r' h t -r DO,. y .}r 1' _- h f f Z hh t t1 KOA CORPORATION City of Rosemead, CA- Circulation Element Figure 3B Study Intersection Configurations ' r ',,e a 11tre:,, Local Transportation Facilities Truck Routes A high proportion of the overall movement of freight and goods in the City of Rosemead is conducted by trucks. The State of California Vehicle Code establishes regulations on the use of local streets and roads by trucks and other heavy vehicles. The City has designated a number of streets and street segments as truck routes to ensure the orderly movement of commercial vehicles carrying goods and materials through the community. These truck routes include Mission Drive, Lower Azusa Road, Valley Boulevard, Garvey Avenue, Rush Street, San Gabriel Boulevard, New Avenue, Del Mar Avenue (north of Garvey Avenue), Temple City Boulevard, Potrero Grande Drive, Walnut Grove Avenue, and Rosemead Boulevard (south of Interstate 10). The truck routes in Rosemead connect with truck routes in adjacent cities to form an integrated sub - regional surface street truck network Figure 4 illustrates the locations of established truck routes within the City. Non - Motorized Transportation Non - motorized transportation includes bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The following sections describe these elements in detail. Bicycle Facilities Caltrans has developed statewide standards and definitions for the planning, design and implementation of bicycle facilities. The following is a summation of these standards. Class I (Bicycle Path) — A bicycle path is a special facility that is designed exclusively for the use of bicycles. Bicycle paths are physically separated from motor vehicle traffic by a barrier or spatial distance. Bicycle paths are used more often for recreation and are generally found in parks, recreation areas, and along river channels. Class II (cycle Lane) — A bicycle lane is a facility where a portion of the paved roadway area is marked as a special lane for use by bicycles only. It is identified by signage along the street that denotes "BIKE LANE ", pavement markings and lane line markings. Motor vehicles are prohibited from driving in bike lanes except when turning to and from driveways or intersections. Class III (Bicycle Route) — A bicycle route is defined as a bicycle way designated within a public right -of- way. The purpose of the bicycle route is primarily that of transportation, allowing the bicyclist to travel from one point in the City to another. They are identified by signage along the street that denotes "BIKE ROUTE ". No other pavement markings are employed with these facilities. Existing Rosemead Bicycle Network The bicycle network within Rosemead is limited to the Class I bicycle path that runs along the east side of the Rio Hondo River Channel. Figure 5 illustrates the location of the existing bike path adjacent to the City of Rosemead. There are no other major bicycle route corridors near the borders of the City. Some Class III (signed only) bicycle route corridors exist to the southeast of Rosemead, but none of these represent corridors that could be continued into the City. The Rosemead city limits and nearby bicycle routes are illustrated within Attachment A to this report. Rosemead Circulation Element Update pKOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis q February 19, 2010 — Page 19 _,r m `, y m r n Ave. 13 C Rd. ai 5 I I v I _I II SL i •i 10 San BemaMino F I nAve' TelstarA i i p Itmore St. •aa� i 1 Q I ZZ 2v sAv � I i m �m 5 _.J °a o _ c i !� Landis View Ln. It - de�c. �2D ` Qoae�Gca� O Pomona Fwy. �7 M a m LEGEND v� - - - City Boundary - - - -- Raiiroad N Truck Routes ■ a a�Truck Routes into Neighboring Cities KOA CORPORATION City of Rosemead, CA- Circulation Element Figure 4 PLANNING & ENGINEERING Local Truck Routes Local Transportation Facilities Pedestrian Circulation Pedestrian walking areas are an integral part of the circulation system, and pedestrian mobility and safety is enhanced by the presence of sidewalks. The sidewalk is an area of refuge that represents a convenient and safe route for pedestrian transport. In order for sidewalks to be an effective mode of transportation, they need to be kept free of obstructions. When equipment such as utility poles, fire hydrants, and traffic controls or street lighting must be placed on the sidewalk it should be placed to minimize interference with pedestrian flow. When street furniture becomes an obstacle to pedestrian flow, it should be prohibited. Public Transportation Public transportation in the City of Rosemead consists of fixed route bus service and demand responsive shuttles. Some modes of transportation serving Rosemead provide viable alternatives to use of the private automobile. These include regional transit services as well as local transit service: Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) — Metro operates bus and rail services for the greater Los Angeles region. Presently, the City of Rosemead is served by nine local bus routes operated by Metro. Montebello Municipal Bus Line — Montebello Bus Lines is responsible to provide transportation services to residents of Montebello and the neighboring cities. The City of Rosemead is served by one bus route operated by Montebello Bus Lines. Rosemead Explorer — Rosemead Explorer is a local bus service that connects residents in neighborhoods south of the 1 -10 freeway and the Garvey Boulevard shopping corridor to the shopping districts north of the freeway. Table 5 summarizes the operating characteristics of these routes. Table 5 - Local Transit Routes Route Origin /Destination and Description Metro 70/770 Los Angeles to El Monte via Garvey Avenue. Los Angeles to El Monte via Valley Boulevard and Rosemead Metro 76 Boulevard. El Monte to Highland Park via Mission Drive and Rosemead Metro 176 Boulevard Metro 266 Lakewood to Pasadena via Rosemead Boulevard. Altadena to Duarte /Altadena to El Monte via Temple City Metro 267 Boulevard and Valley Boulevard El Monte to Sierra Madre Villa Station via Garvey Avenue and Metro 287 Rosemead Boulevard. Sierra Madre to Downtown Los Angeles via Valley Boulevard Metro 487 and Del Mar Avenue. Rosemead to Downtown Los Angeles via Rosemead Metro 489 Boulevard. Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis .;.. • - • - ° " 13 February 19, 2010 —Page 22 Local Transportation Facilities Montebello Municipal Bus Line 20 Telegraph & Gage to Sierra Madre Villa Station via San Gabriel Boulevard. Rosemead Explorer Rosemead Square via Garvey Avenue. Jackson Avenue, Walnut Grove Avenue, Valley Boulevard, and Rosemead Place. El Monte Busway — The El Monte Busway provides a limited- access right -of -way for express bus service between the El Monte Station and downtown Los Angeles. The Busway also accommodates three - person carpools during the morning and evening peak periods and two person carpools at other times. The El Monte Busway terminates at the El Monte Station, which is just east of Rosemead. Multiple express bus routes operated by Foothill Transit and Metro operate on the Busway. Greyhound Bus also operates on the El Monte Busway and has a ticket office at the El Monte Station. Figure 6 illustrates the location of public bus transit routes within the City of Rosemead that are operated by Metro and the City of Montebello. Figure 7 illustrates the route of the Rosemead Explorer shuttle that is operated by the City of Rosemead. Rosemead Circulation Element Update KO, � CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis February 19, 2010 — Page 23 D KOA CORPORATION City of Rosemead, CA- Circulation Element Figure 6 PLANNING 9 ENGINEERING Transit Routes - Regional Bus Lines 0 00 3 Missio i �.£io� � m n O rand �r Ave. ~��. E m w U C ~� Lower Azure Rd. ti Q C I \ G 10 r -g.Y —m r, m Valley Blvd. l I Ir i I a II SY.1 1 s !I � 10 II n Ave. I I G N Ave. i i Z W G eves g ve 21 u I o e > m i m Hi / /Qr q �etoGepO � ,?o Pomona Fwy. i Town Center LEGEND m - - - City Boundary - - - -- Railroad Explorer Route 1 N -��• Explorer Route2 KOA CORPORATION City of Rosemead, CA- Circulation Element Figure 7 PLANNING & ENGINEERING Transit Routes - Rosemead Explorer Local Transportation Facilities Railroads The Union Pacific Railroad operates two railroad lines within the City. One line is located along the northern city limits, between San Gabriel Boulevard and Temple City Boulevard, and the other line runs parallel within the median of the San Bernardino Freeway, between both directions of freeway traffic. The line along the northern end of the City is part of Alameda Corridor -East (ACE) Jump Start Project Jump Start is a safety upgrade involving 42 rail crossings along the 35 -mile ACE corridor. "Jump Start" refers to improvements designed to increase safety and reduce congestion at these crossings. Construction of new medians to prevent motorists from driving around safety gates, construction of new sidewalks, installation of railroad and traffic signal measures, pedestrian safety and road restriping improvements have been completed at all of the ACE project grade crossings in the city of Rosemead. Construction of safety improvements at Encinita Avenue and Walnut Grove Avenue was completed in July 2001. The Lower Azusa Road and Temple City Boulevard projects were completed in June of 2002. A summary of the improvements includes the following: • Walnut Grove Avenue — Median Improvements, Railroad Signal Improvements, and Construction of New Sidewalks. • Lower Azusa Avenue — Median Improvements, Railroad Signal Improvements, Traffic Signal Improvements, and Construction of New Sidewalks. • Encinita Avenue — Median Improvements, Restriping. Railroad Signal Improvements, Traffic Signal Improvements, and Construction of New Sidewalks. • Temple City Boulevard — Traffic Signal Improvements and Construction of New Sidewalks. Amtrak passenger trains currently pass through the City utilizing the Union Pacific Railroad right -of -way; however, no direct passenger service is provided to the City of Rosemead. The nearest Amtrak stations are located to the west in Los Angeles. Regional commuter rail service is provided by Metrolink commuter trains. The closest station is in El Monte on the San Bernardino Line. Another Metrolink commuter rail station is located approximately four miles to the west at California State University, Los Angeles. Daily commuter service is provided between the Inland Empire and Downtown Los Angeles via the El Monte Metrolink Station. Air Transportation The City of Rosemead does not have any aviation facilities. Scheduled air carrier services are provided at four regional facilities including Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), Long Beach Airport, John Wayne Airport, and Ontario Airport These facilities provide a wide variety of opportunities for the movement of passengers and cargo. Rosemead is not under the direct landing or take -off path of any of the regional airport facilities. Rosemead Circulation Element Update IKOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis 'r_cNnwc s EvG:NFHPIN February 19, 2010 —Page 26 3. Existing (2009) Conditions The highway system in the City of Rosemead is comprised of a diverse network of facilities. The City is served by two major east -west freeways. The Interstate 10 Freeway (San Bernardino Freeway) bisects the commercial /retail areas at the center of the City, and the State Route 60 (Pomona Freeway), traverses the southern end of the City. Rosemead Boulevard, Walnut Grove Avenue, San Gabriel Boulevard, and Del Mar Avenue are the major north -south roadways within the City. All four major north -south roads provide connections to Interstate 10. In addition, San Gabriel Boulevard connects to SR -60 at the south end of the City. Mission Drive, Valley Boulevard, Garvey Avenue, Graves Avenue, and Rush Street are the major east - west roadways within the City. Interstate 10 and Sate Route 60 both travel in an east -west manner through the City and have full- access interchanges with the major north -south roadways. A. Peak -Hour Intersection Analysis The analysis of existing operations at the 26 study intersections focuses on the weekday am. and p.m. peak periods. The traffic counts at the study intersections were conducted on Wednesday, October 21, 2009 and on Thursday, October 22, 2009. The results of the analysis of existing intersection peak hour conditions are summarized in Table 6. Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis February 19, 2010 — Page 27 Existing f2009j Conditions Table 6 - Peak -Hour Intersection Performance - Existing Conditions (Year 2009) Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Vic LOS Vic LOS I Walnut Grove Ave at Mission Dr. 0.727 C 0.717 C 2 Rosemead Blvd. at Lower Azusa Rd. 0.762 C 0397 C 3 Rosemead Blvd. at Mission Dr. 1.021 F 0.931 E 4 Walnut Grove Ave. at Valley Blvd. 0.932 E 0.936 E 5 Rosemead Blvd. at Valley Blvd. 0.963 E 0.905 E 6 Valley Blvd. at Mission Dr. 0516 A 0305 A 7 Valley Blvd. at Rio Hondo Ave. 0.522 A 0.753 C 8 Valley Blvd. at Temple City Blvd, 0.921 E 0.791 C 9 Walnut Grove Ave. at Marshall St. 0.856 D 0.898 D 10 Rosemead Blvd. at Marshall St- 0.870 D 0.885 D I I Rosemead Blvd. at Glendon Way 0.828 D 0.744 C 12 Temple City Blvd. at Loftus Dr. 0.683 B 0.808 D 13 Del Mar Ave. at Hellman Ave. 0.812 D 0158 C 14 San Gabriel Blvd. at Hellman Ave. 0.858 D 0.778 C 15 Walnut Grove Ave. at Hellman /Ramona 0.779 C 0.963 E 16 Rosemead Blvd. at Telstar Ave. 0.764 C 0.890 D 17 Rosemead Blvd. at Whitmore St. 0.605 B 0.671 B 18 New Ave. at Garvey Ave. 0.765 C 0.803 D 19 Del Mar Ave. at Garvey Ave. 0.778 C 0.874 D 20 San Gabriel Blvd. at Garvey Ave. 0.910 E 0.964 E 21 Walnut Grove Ave. at Garvey Ave. 0.793 C 0.900 E 22 San Gabriel Blvd. at Rush St. /Potrero Grande 0.523 A 0.686 B 23 Walnut Grove Ave. at Rush St. 0.536 A 0.629 B 24 Walnut Grove Ave. at Landis View Ln. 0.417 A 0.417 A 25 Walnut Grove Ave. at San Gabriel Blvd. 0.725 C 0.872 D 26 San Gabriel Blvd. at SR -60 WB Ramps 0.793 C 0760 C 27 Town Center Dr. at SR -60 EB Ramps 0.529 A 0.540 A 28 San Gabriel Blvd. at Town Center Dr. 0.631 B 0.637 B Rosemead Circulation Element Update ME KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis PLANNING s EN. •. ' February 19, 2010 - Page 28 Existing j2009) Conditions As indicated by the analysis summary within Table b, there are seven study intersections currently operating at LOS values of E or F during one or both of the analyzed weekday peak periods: • Rosemead Boulevard at Mission Drive - LOS F in the a.m. peak period and LOS E p.m. peak period • Walnut Grove Avenue at Valley Boulevard - LOS E in the a.m. and p.m. peak periods • Rosemead Boulevard at Valley Boulevard - LOS E in the a.m. and p.m. peak periods • Valley Boulevard at Temple City Boulevard - LOS E in the a.m. peak period • Walnut Grove Avenue at Hellman Avenue /Ramona Boulevard - LOS E in the p.m. peak period • San Gabriel Boulevard at Garvey Avenue - LOS E in the a.m. and p.m. peak periods • Walnut Grove Avenue at Garvey Avenue - LOS E in the p.m. peak period The existing turning movements at the study intersections are provided on Figure 8 (a.m. peak hour), and on Figure 9 (p.m. peak hour). The existing level of service at each of the analyzed study intersections for both peak hours is illustrated on Figure 10. Existing intersection peak -hour turn movement counts are provided within Appendix BI, and existing roadway segment daily volume counts are provided within Appendix B2. The level of service worksheets for this scenario are provided within Appendix C. Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis PLANNING 6 ENGINEERING February 19, 2010 — Page 29 43 J°i Lt % J Lm 436 — 1 — 740 %—I F- 212 \ 18, 353 / / 1037 \ 'JIZ, , J L 273 3 — 2 — 2 13 '-') 556 51113,5 / 378 'x.J I L42 154 J L- m — 3 — 513 1e8 --1 123 157 1 12% / 7% \L° 9, —71 L % 583 —. 4 1205 097 224 \,M11r94// 595 / 1325 \ 2!] 156- L% 363 — 5 ^ 710 160 —I 199 2a1 1 ri,2 J L„e 23 J 3% — 6 — au / JIL" „- L,9 692 — 7 — 12" 977 n GItF /516 \ 2H I i 1 ,% 147 - L in %6 M 90 gas 1 F41 / 3e2 / %J10 4L1 \ se J L u 123 — 9 — in IN 5,11 e2 / ns 1885� gg55 78 138 — 10 258 IM I— 177 .911 r,� / 2],J I Le e J L 13, Zoe 11 471 1 F221 lo 428 \ 1 L1% L % 12 1 Jig / 557 298 J L 114 165 13 ^ m 49 53 B8B / 113111 L52 \ in J L 1,0 130 — 16 — 2% 75 1 33 U7 I r,4 945 / ' I 1 773 L'_a 217 - L 2e7 ee— 15 —87 tee 1 F- 5 \ 12;11 r5 / ..9 2236 \ I LM 16 r-- 1 r532 / ,550 2325 � I Los L% 1T r� 24 IIN 2995 / 5_'J I1 02 L,117 \ 135 - L,% 535 — 18 755 ,89 --I r m 7211 f;,, 566 1BJ I L "° 1M J L tae 574 — 19 — 7eo 1427 ]0 \ �1� / 615 L,2, \ 221- in 527 — 20 — e, \ V 157 592 /710 1 � L77, „s J Les 723 — 21 ^ 6% e7 1,6 \ °`l 1 fe9 / 32. / 2,J 7L," \ 55 - L 131 107 — 22 — IN 31 1— 32 ;411 r / 45B / ,3. 'J ILS1 21, J L ,0 5,— 23 —a z.� �— �5 >6 t 1264 515 / 560 1 LL 12 24 r�I— 32 1 113 �3 � / J1LS2J 4, J L. � — 25 — "2 11 \ 67173 / / +9M JIL% 4 J L 715 19 — 26 14 1P1 1 X73 / 992 / —I !I19 1 \ . LM 10 - L e46 m— 27 —e+ e 1^�-P105 31 I t l47 / 56 � 357 I � J L" m — 28 37 �1� 53. N ~ LEGEND • Study Intersection X Intersection Ref. Number Intersection Tum Volume KOA CORPORATION City of Rosemead, CA - Circulation Element Figure 8 PLANNING 6 ENGINEERING Existing (2009) AM Peak Hour Turning Movements / 3 \ 15 W I 110 84, — 1 — 4x 95 125 \ 15eN �1' f15e / 1328 \ J 109 4J Ln, 2 — 2 — 0 1—�� 302 28 1 r 1 3 � ,495 75 / / za JJ 10 82 520 — 3 — 253 151 73 IN 1 f;9 \ 15m / J51 L® „e J L 57 1043 — 4 — m7 100 L 204 \ e, 1 F2230 / 757 'JiLBS 276 Leo ego — 6 — me in m \ �Ites 13M / 28 L439 N m J } L 3,0 e,o — 6 — a, JiL! \ +eJ Ln „oe — 7 122 —1 58 Y 'tJ4i L'_54 \ 232 J L 118 ,m4 — 8 — Me 78 --1 m \ 130 1 1 1 6, / 59, I888�� O I L. m J L a II /\ 169 —� 9 '— 127 m —� r� 2m \ 74 ICI 532_ 101 J L i2o 258 — 10 — 217 132 157 \ 55 -1520 i�J+ L \ 11 J L 205 a 11 m „ �l 1 fe3, / � ,9 ,0 4i \ I L15p L ,a 12 1- so 1 205 / 817 1!11 LN ,m L 78 3m — 13 — 141 88 27 \ %15r / °'J os 1 L_, 132 L 99 251 — 14 — 113 104 43 \1t7 1272 / / 835 L184 \ 285 J L 2z7 Is 16 � a 14611 I2a \ ,094 / l L785 L 573 16 F- 431 1f N / 1943 IMKOA CoRpmmiON olri ° PLANNING A. ENGINEERING 210 713 \ IL'_5 7JILm L ex (20 J L 245 17 � ,w —i 20 - 2144 142 . ,s;.1 ' ri90 / 2028 - 7m % 17] j L20 \ IN J L 163 ,oe7 — 18 — e2, 74 s9 \ 58 n 1 117 / 3 N \ .?j I L56 IN L 191 114 — 18 — 738 83 67 \ ,w7 ' fe3 / 54e / J 4ae \ ' . L's, in J L ,e, 915 — 21 — 752 95 —I ,oe ,051 1 (, / 802 we J }J . L'9 _8 ,82 L 229 280 — 22 — 174 1s-1 �a sl 1 fie / / 850 \ II'J I L17 284 J L 14 is — 23 — 42 \w7Ir5/ 584 B31 \ I LnL ,8 24 lr 745 / 15 J I L'°° 59 J L 73, ns — 25 — 736 9 \ 71174 5 / 5 / 1e0e �1L179 BJ L779 13 — 26 — 24 3r !— lee � tie, / 99 JiLm 93 L 474 m, — 27 — 124 14 r IN 2 1 fins \ 134 / / B51 \ mJ I L32 37, J L 25 28 — 28 — ,8 311 r 18 241 F 419 / LEGEND • study IntereectIm X Intersection Ref. Number zx Intersection Tum Volume KOA CORPORATION City of Rosemead, CA - Circulation Element Figure 10 [ CCU r �:,., •::: , '.0 Existing AM /PM Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service Existing (2009) Conditions B. Roadway Segment Analysis Traffic operating conditions were analyzed on 23 roadway segments in the City. KOA collected existing daily traffic volumes on Thursday, October 22. 2009 and Thursday, October 29, 2009. Analysis was done by comparing the two -way daily traffic volume for each roadway segment to the corresponding estimated daily capacity. A VIC was determined for each roadway segment Table 7 provides the classifications of each of the roadway segments analyzed as well as the results of the traffic analysis calculations and a level of service based on the definitions provided within Table 2. The calculated volume -to- capacity ratios and corresponding level of service is provided within the right- most columns of Table 7. Based on the existing conditions analysis, 19 of the study roadway segments operate at LOS D or better, and four roadway segments operate at LOS E or F. Figure I I illustrates the existing roadway ADT by segment Figure 12 illustrates the roadway levels of service on a map of the study area. KOA CORPORATION Rosemead Circulation Element Update Traffic Impact Analysis "= February 19, 2010 — Page 33 Existing (2009) Conditions Table 7 - Roadway Segment Levels of Service for Existing Conditions (Year 2009) Primary Street N/E End of Segment S/W End of Segment Roadway class No. of Lanes Roadway Capacity Existing (2009) Conditions Volumes Vic LOS I Walnut Grove Av Grand Ave Mission Drive Secondary 4 30.000 12.855 0.429 A 2 Walnut Grove Av Wells/Edmond Valley Blvd Secondary 4 30.000 18,148 0.605 B 3 Walnut Grove Av Valley Blvd Marshall St Secondary 1 4 30,000 23.514 0.784 C 4 Walnut Grove Av Hellman Ave Garvey Ave Secondary 4 30.000 21,719 0.724 C 5 Walnut Grove Av Fern Ave Klingerman St Secondary 4 30.000 18,412 0.614 B 6 Walnut Grove Av Rush St Landis View Lane Secondary 4 30,000 16,260 0.542 A 7 San Gabriel Blvd Hellman Ave Emerson Place Major 4 40,000 31,976 0.799 C 8 San Gabriel Blvd Garvey Ave Klingerman St Major 4 40.000 23,799 0.595 A 9 San Gabriel Blvd Delta Ave Walnut Grove Ave Major 4 40,000 17,352 0.434 A 10 Del Mar Ave Hellman Ave Emerson Place Secondary 4 30,000 23,571 0.786 C 11 Del Mar Ave Garvey Ave Newmark Ave Collector 2 15.000 17,547 1.170 F 12 New Ave Newmark Ave Graves Ave Collector 2 15,000 8,005 0.534 A 13 Valley Blvd Muscatel Ave Ivar Ave Major 4 40.000 26,419 0.660 B 14 Valley Blvd Hart Ave Mission Drive Major 4 40,000 17,318 0.433 A 15 Valley Blvd Rio Hondo Ave Temple City Blvd Major 4 40,000 25.278 0.632 e 16 Temple City Blvd Valley Blvd Marshall St Secondary 4 30.000 17,060 0.569 A 17 Garvey Ave New Ave Del Mar Ave Major 4 40.000 26.370 0.659 B 18 Garvey Ave Del Mar Ave San Gabriel Blvd Major 4 40.000 27,222 0.681 B 19 Garvey Ave San Gabriel Blvd Walnut Grove Ave Major 4 40.000 29,432 0.736 C 20 Garvey Ave Walnut Grove Ave Rosemead Blvd Major 4 40,000 26,980 0.675 B 21 Rosemead Blvd Lower Azusa Road Mission Drive Major 5 50,000 47,151 0.943 E 22 Rosemead Blvd Valley Blvd Marshall St Major 4 40.000 49,258 1.231 F 23 Rosemead Blvd Telstar Ave Whitmore St Major 6 1 60,000 1 56.066 0.934 1 E As indicated by the analysis summary within Table 7, four roadway segments currently operate at LOS E or F. These locations are indicated by bold text within the table: • Del Mar Ave.. between Garvey Ave. and Newmark Ave. - segment would operate at LOS F • Rosemead Blvd.. between Lower Azusa Rd. and Mission Dr. - segment would operate at LOS E • Rosemead Blvd.. between Valley Blvd. and Marshall St. - segment would operate at LOS F • Rosemead Blvd. between Telstar Ave. and Whitmore St. - segment would operate at LOS E Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis a = E'° '° "' February 19, 2010 - Page 34 D FF KOA CORPORATION City of Rosemead, CA- Circulation Element Figure 11 Daily Study Roadway Segment Volumes Volumes 4. Future (2025) Conditions without General Plan Development This section estimates study roadway network operations in the future buildout period (Year 2025). In order to plan for future travel conditions through the future analysis year, traffic forecasts were developed based upon anticipated growth within the City and neighboring communities. Two scenarios were analyzed for the future horizon year of 2025, in order to determine the traffic impacts of the updated General Plan: • Regional /ambient growth without General Plan development, and • Growth with incremental General Plan development. Ambient growth represents regional increases in traffic volumes that affect trips traveling through the City (cut - through traffic during extreme freeway congestion and commute routes on surface streets). The analyzed "development' is the total conglomeration of growth that would be allowed by the updated Land Use Element of the General Plan, through proposed density and land use changes. A. Background Growth Assumptions The "pre - Project" scenario (no General Plan development) analyzed within this report section includes ambient growth only in the volume calculations. An ambient background traffic growth rate was utilized to increase existing study area traffic volumes to the buildout analysis year. Annual growth rates are defined within the 2004 Los Angeles County CMP, for specific horizon years. The total growth defined by the CMP between the years 2001 and 2025 (the base and buildout years analyzed for the CMP) is projected to be 19.7 percent. This total growth rate represents an annual growth rate of approximately 0.8 percent. An extrapolation of a conservative annual growth of one percent for the 16 years of growth between the existing analysis year of 2009 and the buildout year of 2025 results in a total compound growth rate of approximately 17 percent. A one percent growth rate was utilized to provide a more conservative analysis. Ambient growth rates for the buildout analysis year were applied to both the study intersections and the study roadway segments. B. Peak -Hour Intersection Analysis Intersection performance and level of service values for the future without General Plan development scenario are summarized within Table 8. Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis February 19, 2010 — Page 37 Future (20251 Conditions without General Plan Development Table 8 - Study Intersection Level of Service - Future (2025) Conditions without General Plan Development - Weekday Peak Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour VIC LOS VIC LOS I Walnut Grove Ave at Mission Dr. 0.832 D 0.822 D 2 Rosemead Blvd. at Lower Azusa Rd. 0.876 D 0.920 E 3 Rosemead Blvd. at Mission Dr. 1.179 F 1.072 F 4 Walnut Grove Ave, at Valley Blvd. 1.072 F 1.078 F 5 Rosemead Blvd. at Valley Blvd. 1.110 F 1.040 F 6 Valley Blvd. at Mission Dr. 0.587 A 0.574 A 7 Valley Blvd. at Rio Hondo Ave. 0.595 A 0.866 D 8 Valley Blvd. at Temple City Blvd. 1.061 F 0.907 E 9 Walnut Grove Ave. at Marshall St 0.984 E 1.034 F 10 Rosemead Blvd. at Marshall St. 0.999 E 1.019 F I I Rosemead Blvd. at Glendon Way 0.952 E 0.853 D 12 Temple City Blvd. at Loftus Dr. 0.782 C 0.928 E 13 Del Mar Ave. at Hellman Ave. 0.932 E 0.870 D 14 San Gabriel Blvd. at Hellman Ave. 0.985 E 0.892 D 15 Walnut Grove Ave. at Hellman /Ramona 0.895 D 1.108 F 16 Rosemead Blvd. at Telsmr Ave. 0.877 D 1.025 F 17 Rosemead Blvd. at Whitmore St. 0.692 B 0369 C 18 New Ave. at Garvey Ave. 0.879 D 0.922 E 19 Del Mar Ave. at Garvey Ave. 0.893 D 1.006 F 20 San Gabriel Blvd. at Garvey Ave. 1.049 F 1.110 F 21 Walnut Grove Ave. at Garvey Ave. 0.91 1 E 1.035 F 22 San Gabriel Blvd. at Rush St. /Potrero Grande 0.594 A 0.785 C 23 Walnut Grove Ave. at Rush St. 0.609 B 0.718 C 24 Walnut Grove Ave. at Landis View Ln. 0.470 A 0.471 A 25 Walnut Grove Ave. at San Gabriel Blvd, 0.832 D 1.003 F 26 San Gabriel Blvd. at SR -60 WB Ramps 0.910 E 0.871 D 27 Town Center Dr. at SR -60 EB Ramps 0.603 B 0.616 B 28 San Gabriel Blvd. at Town Center Dr. 0.720 C 0.729 C Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis PLANNING 6 ENGINEEV - -, February 19. 2010 - Page 38 Future (2025) Conditions without General Plan Development Table 8 indicates that during the analyzed weekday peak periods, all but eight of the study intersections would operate at LOS E or F. The following intersections would operate at good LOS values (D or better) during either of the weekday peak periods: • Walnut Grove Ave. at Mission Dr. — Intersection would operate at LOS D during both peak hours. • Rosemead Blvd at Lower Azusa Rd. — Intersection would operate at LOS D during the a.m. peak hour. • Valley Blvd. at Mission Dr. — Intersection would operate at LOS A during both peak hours. • Valley Blvd. at Rio Hondo Ave. — Intersection would operate at LOS A during the a.m. peak hour and at LOS D during the p.m. peak hour. • Rosemead Blvd. at Glendon Way — Intersection would operate at LOS D during the p.m. peak hour. • Temple City Blvd. at Loftus St — Intersection would operate at LOS C during the a.m. peak hour. • Del Mar Ave. at Hellman Ave. — Intersection would operate at LOS D during the p.m. peak hour. • San Gabriel Blvd. at Hellman Ave. — Intersection would operate at LOS D during the p.m. peak hour. • Walnut Grove Ave. at Hellman /Ramona Blvd. — Intersection would operate at LOS D during the a.m. peak hour. • Rosemead Blvd. at Telstar Ave. — Intersection would operate at LOS D during the am. peak hour. • Rosemead Blvd. at Whitmore St — Intersection would operate at LOS B during the a.m, peak hour and at LOS C during the p.m. peak hour. • New Ave. at Garvey Ave. — Intersection would operate at LOS D during the a.m. peak hour. • Del Mar Ave at Garvey Ave. — Intersection would operate at LOS D during the a.m. peak hour. • San Gabriel Blvd at Rush St — Potrero Grande Dr. — Intersection would operate at LOS A during the a.m. peak hour and at LOS C during the p.m. peak hour. • Walnut Grove Ave. at Rush St — Intersection would operate at LOS B during the a.m. peak hour and LOS C during the p.m. peak hour. • Walnut Grove Ave. at Landis View Ln. — Intersection would operate at LOS A during both peak periods. • Walnut Grove Ave. at San Gabriel Blvd. — Intersection would operate at LOS D during the a.m. peak hour. • San Gabriel Blvd at SR -60 westbound ramps — Intersection would operate at LOS D during the p.m. peak hour. • Town Center Dr. at SR -60 eastbound ramps — Intersection would operate at LOS B during both peak periods. • San Gabriel Blvd. at Town Center Dr. — Intersection would operate at LOS C during both peak periods. The other study intersections that would operate at LOS E or F during this scenario are, generally, the intersections of two major roadways. Generally these intersections operate at poor levels of service due to high traffic volumes on the primary arteries of the City, and these major intersections act as decision points and overall capacity is often curtailed due to the high number of turn movements. High traffic volumes can be attributed to regional traffic using parallel routes to the 1-10, SR -60, and (- Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis ^1',5 s kIG'NE,z'•= February 19, 2010 —Page 39 Future (2025) Conditions without General Plan Development 605 freeways, as well as cross -town trips that are most efficiently taken on arterial facilities rather than smaller collector or local roadways. Peak hour intersection turn movement volumes and related LOS for the future (2025) without General plan development scenario are illustrated in Figure 13 (a.m. peak) and Figure 14 (p.m. peak). Peak -hour level of service values for the study intersections are provided on a map of the study area within Figure 15. The study intersection level of service worksheets for this scenario are provided within Appendix D of this report Rosemead Circulation Element Update FFKOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis °' "" " IC, N: E: N February 19, 2010 — Page 40 / 739 \ 5-011 L'.30 62 —J L 54 512 — i '- See 115 2M 249 \ 215 -I 1 131171 / / 1213 \ J 1 L'_28 5 J L 319 4 - 2 2 15 770 ,B r �33W \ 1372 / / 1910 !.° \ ash 1 L 18o J L 96 315 - 3 - 990 197 144 -1 -� \ 1841 12I I- at / /9,8 \ 214 1 1 L" 1m L 75 659 - 4 - 1411 104 262 IRE 1 [227 592 / 1551 \ J1 L14 163 -1 L 116 425 6 - 631 222 ��--+ 233 \ 2401 1 127 F 131 / 45 1 1 376 \ 27 -J L 596 450 - 6 - 1094 n1L°' 13 J L22 893 7 - 14 113 -1 F 10 \ 1471F9b 12 / / 2a.Je1 L22b \ 172 J L 229 593 - 8 - 1121 53 -1 r 105 \ 245�1r / 124 / 12 10 \ n- L61 144 - 9 - 205 122 1 �+221 \ 65 61 225 / 25 61 � L a1 159 10 - 303 169 1-207 5711 r48 \ 1750 /21,0 \ 27L°_ 9 J L 153 0 — 11 37 246--j 104 \631 1 57 F2 1678 / 501 \ 1 Lam° L Its 12 r 379 652 / / B72 ,33J 1 L7° 243 - L 133 57 13 � 62 \591 FIB 1130 / ,410 �.J1L °' 150 L 129 59 69 -1 14 30 751156 „36 / 90. 17J 1 L92 254 L 312 60 — 16 — 102 190 6 14 --�21 1 1 1-18 \ 525 / 2618 \ 1— 7,5 16 220 1 rom / ,81a KOA CO"ORATION RIANNING 6 ENGINEERING 2724 1 1116 L� 17 1 r67 2406 =E \6J I Lin 158 - L 222 629 - 16 883 \ 84" r33 / 599 / 1 J851 L183 \ 168 -1 1— 214 672 — 19 — 900 its —1 82 �ii—Y I1r / 603 / 1891 °IIiI 31 \ 259 T L 228 617 - 20 -105 75 243 721 i rie4 / 693 / 831 \ 1}S}J 1 L°° 135 J L 76 645 - 21 - 104 102 173 ,171r 379 / / le�� \ 2513J11.16 es J 1 L 153 125 - 22 -225 35 -1 1- 37 \ ,el 1 No / 636 / 509 \ <.JIL6° 247 L 12 e0 — 23 9 63 7 -11 x332 601 / 560 N 1L" L14 24 L 37 1 1,5 ,045 }}J 1 L�,2 50 J L 964 746 - 26 - we 13 \ it 1 F° / 5 / 1224� � \ J 1 x-.16 s - L ea7 22 — 26 ` 16 25 102 2011 x202 / 1161 / ,5 eeJ 1 Lt7/ 12 J L 750 23 - Y7 - 70 0 -1 126 4 5 / I416 851 ; 1 L80 353 1— 54 30 — 28 — 99 111 �-13 \ 421 1 I R 976 / LEGEND • Study Intersec9on X Intersection Ref. Number xx Intersection Tum Volume Future (2025) Without Development - AM Peak 13 Movements of Rosemead, CA - Circulation Element Figur e 455 J!L2B 55 L 74 750 — 1 — 510 \183 1 218 880 / 1551 \ °J ! L2BD 5 _] L 200 2 — 2 0 ' —1--1 r 30 341 1 r4,2 / 1815 ,588 233J ! L9_' 239 - L 96 989 — 3 — 296 177 85 1631 1 r / 1785 / 820 L9° \ 9° I ! 1220 — 4 L 897 117 --1 239 \1067 1 r2e9 / am 1431 2}}21J ! L71 323 J t 94 av7 — 5 — 549 174 �207 \ 1707 1 1 197 / 1622 30 J L 353 an — 6 750 27 \ 22 -J ! �L 32 1286 — 7 -- aft 10-1 --, L as \ , 3a I 1 r255 / s, 52 �� 'J!LB2 271 L ,38 1257 — 8 -- 662 91 ! r as \ 152 1 1'1 / 69, 91e 49J !L as 198 — 9 — 149 104 245 �� \87 1 53 1164 / 9J ! L"5 ,1e J L 140 3ro — 10 — 264 1547 ,94 \111 1 1 x289 ,786 / ,547 \ -3851 ! L0 ,3 J L 240 78 11 � 85 ,-1 1 r736 / 2118 670 \ ! LZ" L 122 12 F sd2 1 F2- o / 757 ,87J 0 ! 55 L,e 205 -J t 92 "2 _ 13 — 165 81 —! ^ �32 F47 /976 1241 J!Its 154 -J L 116 329 — 14 r F 132 122 s0 071 1 r57 / 743 \ 151j ! L215 310 — 206 124 !-15 Le 1711 1 r 2025 \ ! L218 L 670 1B 504 F194 / 2273 2512 \ L18 �% 17 �233 rB /2373 2rr0,j5j L285 \ 232 J — 228 1237 — 18 — ]27 87 --1 103 , s \ }3J 1 L362 197 J L 223 1303 — 19 8e1 97 7e ,7671 r7 / an 340 - L 287 154 _ 20 — 780 106 l — 250 \ -"I- is / / us \ 1J Lae 169 J L 212 074 — 21 992 112 124 \ i2B r ` 1 177 / 938 /713 \ JIL721 213 J } L 264 328 — 22 — 202 8 75 \ ,el 1 r / 785 / 761 \ 2 J : L20 344 L 87 ,8 — 23 — 49 73 1 �-'270 \ 112 1 1 129 / 600 ,093 \ ! L20 2, 24 F 25 1r 872 / 8 \J ! L924 as L ass 907 — It 25 \ B11 Fs- 6 1815 \ ! L209 11 ? L 911 ,s — 26 — 28 40 194 —1 3/11/ r 139 797 / \J 3B !L,2 109-1 1--- ass 259 27 — 145 16 r ,97 \ 2" r58 / 157 BBB \ "ej ! L37 434 -1 L 29 — 28 — 2, 354 —1 ,9 \ 2071 r 49D N ~ LEGEND • Study Intersection X Intersection Ref. Number Intersection 7um volume KOA CORPORATION City of Rosemead, CA - Circulation Element Figure 14 ri..Nnu,o n cr+oir.ecclr.a Future (2025) Without Development- PM Peak Hour Turning Movements KOA CORPORATION City of Rosemead, CA- Circulation Element Figure 15 PLANNING a ENG NEERiNG Future (2025) Without Development AM /PM Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service Future (2025] Conditions without General Plan Development C. Roadway Segment Analysis Traffic operating conditions were analyzed for future (2025) conditions without General Plan development (annual ambient growth only) for each of the study roadway segments. Existing daily volume counts for the study roadways were increased by the ambient growth rate for each year between existing conditions and the future analysis year. The forecast average dally traffic volumes for this scenario were each compared to the corresponding estimated daily roadway rapacity. A V/C was determined for each roadway segment Table 9 provides the level of service for this scenario for each of the study roadway segments. The upper limit of LOS E is defined as the capacity limit of the facility (a WC value of 1.00). Of the 23 roadway segments, 16 would operate at LOS D or better. • Walnut Grove Ave., between Grand Ave. and Mission Dr. — segment would operate at LOS A • Walnut Grove Ave.. between Wells /Edmond and Valley Blvd. — segment would operate at LOS C • Walnut Grove Ave., between Hellman Ave. and Garvey Ave. — segment would operate at LOS D • Walnut Grove Ave between Fern Ave and Klingerman St. — segment would operate at LOS C • Walnut Grove Ave. between Rush St. and Landis View Ln. — segment would operate at LOS B • San Gabriel Blvd between Garvey Ave and Klingerman St. — segment would operate at LOS B • San Gabriel Blvd between Delta Ave. and Walnut Grove Ave. — segment would operate at LOS A • New Ave., between Newmark Ave. and Graves Ave. — segment would operate at LOS B • Valley Blvd between Muscatel Ave and Ivar Ave — segment would operate at LOS C • Valley Blvd. between Hart Ave. and Mission Dr. — segment would operate at LOS A • Valley Blvd between Rio Hondo and Temple City Blvd. - segment would operate at LOS C • Temple City Blvd., between Valley Blvd. and Marshall St. — segment would operate at LOS B • Garvey Ave., between New Ave. and Del Mar Ave. — segment would operate at LOS C • Garvey Ave.. between Del Mar Ave. and San Gabriel Blvd. — segment would operate at LOS C • Garvey Ave., between San Gabriel Blvd. and Walnut Grove Ave. — segment would operate at LOS D • Garvey Ave between Walnut Grove Ave. and Rosemead Blvd. — segment would operate at LOS C Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA Cop"RxnoN Traffic Impact Analysis PLANNING 8 ENGINEERING February 19, 2010 — Page 44 Future (2025) Conditions without General Plan Development Table 9 — Roadway Segment Levels of Service — Future (2025) Conditions without General Plan Development Primary Prima Street WE End of Segment S/W End of Segment Roadway Class No. of Lanes Roadway Capacity Future (2025) Without Developments Conditions Volumes VIC LOS I Walnut Grove Av Grind Ave Mission Drive Secondary 4 30,000 15.040 0.501 A 2 Walnut Grove Av Wells/Edmond Valley Blvd Secondary 4 30,000 21,233 0.708 C 3 Walnut Grove Av Valley Blvd Marshall St Secondary 1 4 30,000 1 27,511 0.917 E 4 Walnut Grove Av Hellman Ave Garvey Ave Secondary 4 30,000 1 25.411 0.847 D 5 Walnut Grove Av Fern Ave Klingerman St Secondary 4 30,000 21.542 0.718 C 6 Walnut Grove Av Rush St Landis View lane Secondary 4 30,000 19,024 0.634 B 7 San Gabriel Blvd Hellman Ave Emerson Place Major 4 40,000 37,412 0.935 E 8 San Gabriel Blvd Garvey Ave Klingerman St Major 4 40,000 27,845 0.696 B 9 San Gabriel Blvd Delta Ave Walnut Grove Ave Major 4 40,000 20,302 0.508 A 10 Del Mar Ave Hellman Ave Emerson Place Secondary 4 30,000 27,578 0.919 E 11 Del Mar Ave Garvey Ave Newmark Ave collector 2 15.000 20,530 1.369 F 12 New Ave Newmark Ave Graves Ave Collector 2 15,000 9,366 0.624 B 13 Valley Blvd Muscatel Ave Ivar Ave Major 4 40,000 30,910 0.773 C 14 Valley Blvd Hart Ave Mission Drive Major 4 40.000 20,262 0.507 A 15 Valley Blvd Rio Hondo Ave Temple City Blvd Major 4 40,000 29.575 0.739 C 16 Temple City Blvd Valley Blvd Marshall St Secondary 4 30,000 19,960 0.665 B 17 Garvey Ave New Ave Del Mar Ave Major 4 40,000 30,853 0.771 C 18 Garvey Ave Del Mar Ave San Gabriel Blvd Major 4 40,000 31.850 0.796 C 19 Garvey Ave San Gabriel Blvd Walnut Grove Ave Major 4 40,000 34,435 0.861 D 20 Garvey Ave Walnut Grove Ave Rosemead Blvd Major 4 40,000 31,567 0.789 C 21 Rosemead Blvd Lower Azusa Road Mission Drive Malor 5 50.000 55,167 1.103 F 22 Rosemead Blvd Valley Blvd Marshall St Major 4 40,000 57,632 1.441 F 23 Rosemead Blvd Telstar Ave Whitmore St Major 6 60,000 65.597 1.093 F Figure 16 illustrates the projected daily traffic volumes at the study roadway segments for this scenario. Figure 17 provides the related level of service values based on these volumes. Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis ' PLANNING a ENGINEERING February 19, 2010 —Page 45 o • a � Gran tln C, Ave. I L5 n Rd. m to a I p _ LO`Mer c E 1 I O D m �+ f 20 2 II Iv . 3 91 1 i e ISL L r.i - 1e an Bemardlno FNy. Ilm nAve. Telstar Ave. i J a® I E o P r $ itmore St. � N ry Av . 3 50 435 31 567 3 , 53 i N N 2 A ° > ush SL i E u _o N _.i p tr I Y — N I CL ?0 !� Landis View Ln. L �de i Qo�o�Gce � O Pomona Fwy. . �o Lp LEGEND m - - City Boundary - - - -- Railroad XXX ADT Volume N KOA CORPORATION City of Rosemead, CA- Circulation Element Figure 16 PLANNING 3 ENGINEERING Future (2025) Without Development -Daily Study Roadway Segment Volumes V � m 3 M rand �� Ave. a: 0 m_ `Lower Azu d. se R ¢. c m I e LL m LP ° m 5 3 s Vall Blvd. I m a h II St. L i fa an Bernardino FNy. llm Ave. Telslar Ave. W i E I' � Whitnwre SL Ga A C D C J I i L) rav s Av I 3 a m Co ush SL _.F 9 CIE m Yz y f !� Landis View Ln. �c O Pomona Fwy. m o ceN d� LEGEND - — - City Boundary - - - -- Railroad N X Roadway Level of Service KOA CORPORATION City of Rosemead, CA - Circulation Element Figure 17 ' F -.IN. 'IG a s _,h: e .5 1 Future (2025) Without Development Daily Roadway Level of Service S. Future (2025) Conditions with General Plan Development This scenario analyzes traffic volumes that include background growth and trips generated by future development within the City allowed by the updated Land Use Element of the General Plan. Traffic forecasts within this report section were developed based upon anticipated growth under the allowed density increases and changes to land use designations. The development assumptions represent all anticipated net incremental growth in residential and non - residential (commercial, industrial, and institutional) development through the buildout year of the General Plan (Year 2025). A. Analysis Methodology The development of traffic forecasts for a circulation element takes into account the type and density of future land uses within the analyzed jurisdiction. Future (Year 2025) traffic conditions with ambient annual growth only were analyzed within Section 4 of this report. That analysis did not include planned development under the updated Land Use Element of the General Plan. Ambient growth represents annual increases in sub - regional and regional traffic volumes. The development of future travel forecasts for this analysis scenario included the potential development of vacant parcels of land and the redevelopment of existing developed parcels into more intense or modified uses (land use designation changes). The incremental (net) development increase used to examine potential traffic impacts was derived by subtracting the intensity of the existing land uses from that of the future/planned land uses. The land use assumptions take into account the average densities allowed on each parcel and the assumed development that would occur within the Buildout year of the updated Land Used Element. Land Use Data Inputs KOA was provided a summary of City -wide land use acreage changes from Hogle- Ireland (based on parcel designations) that would result from the proposed update to the Land Use Element. The land use categories included the following • LDR: Low - Density Residential • MDR: Medium - Density Residential • HDR: High - Density Residential • C: Commercial • OLI: Office/Light Industrial • MU -RC: Mixed -Use Residential /Commercial • MU -HRC: Mixed -Use High Residential /Commercial • MU -IC: Mixed Use - Industrial /Commercial • PF: Public Facilities • CEM: Cemetery • OS: Open Space /Natural Resources A mapping data file was also provided which contained the proposed parcel designations for the City. KOA analyzed this data file within a geographic information systems (GIS) application and grouped the land uses into Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ). These TAZ areas were based on the existing regional traffic model maintained by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). The establishment of these areas allowed for a conglomeration of the land use changes to be analyzed for the Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis February 19, 2010 — Page 48 Future (2025) Conditions with General Plan Development traffic study. After the GIS processing work was complete, land use parcel categories, a conglomeration of land uses by TAZ, proportions of land uses planned for the overall City, and planned densities by land use were utilized to develop commercial, industrial, and residential intensity totals for the trip generation analysis. Sector -Based Trip Generation Analysis In order to analyze the impacts of the conglomerated incremental land use expansion envisioned for each analysis zone by the updated Land Use Element of the General Plan, the number of new trips, which could be generated on a weekday peak -hour basis were estimated and added to the roadway analysis network Trip generation rates defined by Trip Generation (7t^ Edition), published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), were utilized to estimate the number of trips associated with the incremental (net) land use expansion anticipated for each of the analysis zones. Trip generation totals and distribution percentages of residential and non - residential uses were then calculated separately for each zone. Trip distribution for each zone was based on distribution percentage summaries provided within the County of Los Angeles CMP document. These percentages were developed from the regional traffic analysis conducted for the CMP, and are broken down by major destinations such as other local cities and surrounding areas, outlying centers, and other counties within Southern California. Figure 18 illustrates the Traffic Analysis Zone extents within the study area. nservative Nature of Trio Generation To The trip generation totals for the updated Land Use Element provided within this report section are conservative, in that they do not include credits for potential higher transit use with increasing land use densities or potential higher use of walking trips and bicycle trips. As discussed within the next report sub - section, credits were taken for internal trip capture between uses within mixed -use projects. The synergy that is possible between multiple mixed -use and higher - density development projects has not been factored into the trip generation calculations. When this synergy occurs, more walking trips occur between different nearby developments and more non -auto trips can be generated. These aspects, however, are hard to estimate at this level of analysis. As trip reductions for these types of trips were not taken, the analysis provides a conservative review of potential traffic impacts. Rosemead Circulation Element Update FF KOA CORPO) ION Traffic Impact Analysis "' ^=F°'^- February 19, 2010 — Page 49 m o Missio v � n ran dnp� Ave. m � 6 w use Rd. a I Lower Az c m > e o > m Ji m K E ya N c 3 > Vail Iv . 0 h II St. L r. 10 an Bernardino F Jim nAve. I Telstar Ave. e o Whitmore SL m Z 1 6 rav s Av . S ci o d a ush St. E d � o � Hi / /pr Landis View Ln. de�� m2a ?oKeto C3a� mo pomona Fwy. Ne a anr�' Ce6ie �� °a y LEGEND v� e — • — • City Boundary - - - -- Railroad N F71xx Traffic Analysis Zone and Reference Number KOA CORPORATION City of Rosemead, CA- Circulation Element Figure 18 plgNNirdG a Traffic Analysis Zones B. Projected Traffic Volumes Future (2025) Conditions with General Plan Development The land use intensity inputs for incremental development that would be allowed under the updated Land Use Element is summarized within Table 10. Using rates per 1,000 square feet of commercial and industrial area, and rates per residential unit, all defined by Trip Generation (7t' edition), gross trip generation totals were calculated. In addition, reductions were made for commercial retail pass -by trips and internal capture within mixed -use developments. Pass -by reductions of 34% were taken for commercial retail trips during the p.m. peak hour only. These reductions were based on typical percentages of these occurrences (unplanned side trips that take place between a planned or regular daily origin and destination). This type of trip is not generated by the analyzed use, but rather is generated by the origin and destination for the overall trip. Pass -by trips would be generated for the nearby roadway segments in any case, whether the interim stop was made or not. Therefore, these trips are removed. Additional reductions were taken for internal trip capture within mixed -use developments. There are multiple mixed -use project zones envisioned within the updated Land Use Element. These mixed -use developments — most typically consisting of retail and residential uses in one building — capture some residential -to- commercial trip demand internally and such trips are therefore not generated on area roadways. Utilizing the Trip Generation Handbook (2001) published by ITE, the total residential and commercial land use trip generation totals were input into the analysis formulas, and the resulting percentage reduction was applied to all mixed -use projects. During the a.m. and p.m. peak periods, a reduction of I I percent were applied to the internal trip capture. The methodology takes into account the typical attraction between such uses, based on the intensity of each type of use. The trip generation of General Plan incremental (net) residential development increase is summarized within Table I IA (a.m. peak) and Table I I (p.m. peak). Trip generation of the net non - residential development increase is summarized within Table I I C (a.m. peak) and Table I I D (p.m. peak). The envisioned general plan land use intensity increases would generate the following net weekday peak - hour trips. Negative trip generation numbers are caused by reductions in overall trips, due primarily to shifts from standard residential and commercial uses to mixed -uses. "Inbound" and "outbound" designations refer to the relationship of the trips to the generating uses. • Residential a.m. peak trip generation would total 231 inbound and 659 outbound trips. • Residential p.m. peak trip generation would total 743 inbound and 450 outbound trips. • Non - residential a.m. peak trip generation would total 1,1 16 inbound and 434 outbound trips. • Non - residential p.m. peak trip generation would total 772 inbound and 1,615 outbound trips. Development outside of the City limits will generate additional increases in area traffic volumes. Such development has been incorporated into the ambient annual growth rate, added to existing volumes and compounded over the period between existing (Year 2009) and future buildout (Year 2025) conditions. Project traffic generated from developments envisioned under the updated Land Use Plan were added to the analysis after the creation of future ambient growth volumes. Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis �'`�'' ^' "'''- "'`'' "� February 19, 20 10 — Page 51 Future (2025) Conditions with General Plan Development The land use plan utilizes abbreviations for the major categories of development These abbreviations are also utilized within Table 10, Table I I A, Table I I B, Table I I C, and Table I I D for trip generation calculations: • LDR — Low Density Residential • MDR— Medium Density Residential • HDR — High Density Residential • Res — Residential • C — Commercial • O — Office • LI — Light Industrial • 1— Institutional • PF — Public Facilities • CEM — Cemetery • OS — Open Space • MU -RC — Mixed Used Residential /Commercial • MU-IC— Mixed Used Industrial /Commercial Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis February 19, 2010 —Page 52 C d n O D C O d d v 3 C v U Vl N Q C v w R C a0+ C d N J b C d E d L V c 0 d a b 'D a 7 Y C E d W W C b J C O V d Mb W � O O +1- +1+ d x E < E Q w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y L . E � 7 O O O O g N _ N � N 7 V a U = E � E - � x LL n xg O r .o ^ or V C Fm � 01- r v o � E c c � a 0 F O ydr N g m N N n A Yp J 7 D m A m 0 m E 9 0 J � m N 1n T � b C q Q a A O a� E N P p p d LL Q Q+ a o U 2 Future (2025) Conditions with Genera! Pion Development Table I I A — Future Trip Generation by Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) — Residential AM Trip Generaeion - AM Peak Hour Residential Land Uses Mired Land Uses TAZ LDR (DU) MDR (DU) HDR (DU) MU -RC (30) MU -RC (60) TOTAL In Out In Out In Out In Out In Out In Out 1673 46 137 -4 -18 -11 i4 13 64 0 0 44 139 1756 39 116 0 0 23 91 7 35 0 0 69 242 1680 50 151 0 0 13 50 0 0 S7 228 120 429 1774 0 0 -32 .157 4 -15 0 0 16 63 -20 -109 177S 4 13 -15 -75 0 0 10 50 0 0 -1 -12 1777 1 4 -44 -213 4 -14 0 0 0 0 -47 -223 1687 10 29 -3 -14 -2 .9 0 0 72 287 77 293 1776 8 23 -14 -71 -22 -88 8 38 0 0 -20 -98 1686 34 102 0 0 -5 -20 0 0 0 0 29 82 Total (Trip Generonon) 251 743 Trip Generation 4lntarnal Trip Capture 1673 46 137 -4 -18 -11 -44 12 57 0 0 43 132 1756 39 116 0 0 23 91 6 31 0 0 68 238 1680 5o 151 0 0 13 50 0 0 51 203 114 404 1774 0 0 -32 -157 -4 -15 0 0 14 56 -22 -116 177S 4 13 -15 -75 0 0 9 45 0 0 -2 -17 1777 1 4 -H -213 -4 -14 0 0 0 0 -47 -223 1687 10 29 -3 -14 -_ -9 0 0 64 255 69 261 1776 8 23 -14 -71 -22 -88 7 34 0 0 21 -102 1686 34 102 0 0 -5 -20 0 0 0 0 29 82 Net Total (Trip Generation + Internal Tnp Capture) 231 659 N= Bated on ITPs Trip Generwon Handbook (1001). 1 1% of ioteral trip capture were applied to mixed ure developments during the a.m. peak hour. Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis PLANNING n EaGIr4EERIHD February 19. 2010 — Page 54 Future (2025) Conditions with General Plan Development Table I I B — Future Trip Generation by Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) — Residential PM -N Based on RE's Top Generation Handbook (2001). 11% of Imenl trip capture were applied to mired use developments durug the p.m, peak hour. Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysi February 19, 2010 — Page 55� ??+WIF"_ ; ;-Ln " �>,,. •,5�,: __:_.: -:. Residential Land Uses Mixed Land Uses TOTAL TAZ LDR (DU) MDR (DU) MDR (DU) MU -RC (30) MU -RC (60) In Out In Out In Out In Out In out In Out 1673 155 91 -17 A 43 .23 61 30 0 0 156 90 1756 131 77 0 0 89 48 33 16 0 0 253 141 1680 170 100 0 0 50 27 0 0 225 121 445 248 1774 0 0 -150 -74 -15 -8 0 0 62 34 -103 48 1775 IS 9 -72 .35 0 0 47 23 0 0 -10 -3 1777 4 3 -203 -100 -14 -8 0 0 0 0 -213 405 1687 33 19 -13 b -9 -5 0 0 284 153 295 1776 26 IS b7 -33 -87 -47 36 IB 0 0 -92 1686 IIS 68 0 0 -20 -11 0 0 0 0 95 E44 Total (Trip Generation) 826 1673 I55 91 -17 -8 .43 27 0 0 149 87 1756 131 77 0 0 89 14 0 0 249 139 1680 170 100 0 0 5o 0 200 108 420 235 1774 0 0 -150 -74 -15 T-23S4 0 55 30 -110 -52 177S IS 9 -72 -35 0 20 0 0 -IS -6 1777 4 3 -203 -100 -14 0 0 0 -213 -105 bt7 33 19 -13 fi -9 0 253 136 264 144 1776 26 IS .67 -33 -87 -O 32 16 0 0 -96 .49 1686 115 1 68 1 0 0 -20 -11 1 0 0 77-o-- 0 95 57 Net Total (Trip Generation + Internal Trip Capture) 1 743 1 450 -N Based on RE's Top Generation Handbook (2001). 11% of Imenl trip capture were applied to mired use developments durug the p.m, peak hour. Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysi February 19, 2010 — Page 55� O v C O d O 1Cn V e N O a C U �i N b Q V_ i Q F b a C 0 O 9 f% d L C C U Z ai 3� � d = LL c G �N Al d a b T N C b Q 1 C U � E E o W � N C V P O � — J _p T � p j V � L � V LL v E N K n 8 Q e z o e +_ C 0 $ z f C U UW b O= e o' 0 'T TITITI 5 o U ,Y t - O0 0 0 0 o e e e o 0 0 0 0 o e e 0 _ _ G - ic = £ 0 -- ITI TT 3 _ - �_ _ eye - o � s s - s z a F 0 u _ _ 8 _ & F -- T N C b Q 1 C U � E E o W � N C V P O � — J _p T � p j V � L � V LL v E N K n 8 E 8 e z o e +_ C 0 $ z C U UW b O= N b C Q u i F- r C 0 O b d d � C C d O Y)'i ai F �NQ d F 7 � Y � i r LL O �N d L ro F Ea C' 0 oo__a ass R?A$k ,p Rs� k oyias =saa Ta c m i E 5 o L y {� H 3 � E e g 3 0 n ?E E E L x x 8 8 s� g t t t fr fr N r W c ,°8 Q a m EO_ ° N L v LL O Q oz Z O5 u u Oz � I < <' $ --Iml _ i ° °° ° e° e e° 0 m e m m m m° e e e e e° e m e° m m° m m° m° e e e e° e e° 0 N Q [$ 5 L eGe e�aeese L 0 t = d u t - E u O x s _ _ a 0 _ _ nit _ e It. Ea C' 0 oo__a ass R?A$k ,p Rs� k oyias =saa Ta c m i E 5 o L y {� H 3 � E e g 3 0 n ?E E E L x x 8 8 s� g t t t fr fr N r W c ,°8 Q a m EO_ ° N L v LL O Q oz Z O5 u u Oz � I < ° °° ° e° e e° m e m m m m° e e e e e° e m e° m m° m m° m° e e e e° e e° eGe e�aeese Ea C' 0 oo__a ass R?A$k ,p Rs� k oyias =saa Ta c m i E 5 o L y {� H 3 � E e g 3 0 n ?E E E L x x 8 8 s� g t t t fr fr N r W c ,°8 Q a m EO_ ° N L v LL O Q oz Z O5 u u Oz � I < Future (2025) Conditions with General Plan Development C. Study Intersection Operations Analysis A study intersection level of service analysis was performed, after adding the peak -hour intersection turning movement forecasts of the development analysis zones. The results of the level of service calculations are provided within Table 12. Intersections that would operate at LOS E or F with the addition of traffic from General Plan development in this scenario are indicated by bold text. Table 12 - Study intersection Operations - Future (2025) with General Plan Development Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Vic LOS Vic LOS I Walnut Grove Ave at Mission Dr. 0 -858 D 0.871 D 2 Rosemead Blvd. at Lower Azusa Rd. 0.889 D 0 942 E 3 Rosemead Blvd. at Mission Dr. 1.220 F 1.155 F 4 Walnut Grove Ave, at Valley Blvd. 1.132 F 1.171 F 5 Rosemead Blvd. at Valley Blvd. L I SS F 1.123 F 6 Valley Blvd. at Mission Dr. 0.615 B 0.614 B 7 Valley Blvd. at Rio Hondo Ave. 0.631 B 0 929 E 8 Valley Blvd. at Temple City Blvd. 1.079 F 0.942 E 9 Walnut Grove Ave. at Marshall St 1.432 F 1.586 F 10 Rosemead Blvd. at Marshall St. 1.051 F 1.107 F I I Rosemead Blvd. at Glendon Way 1.005 F 0.898 D 12 Temple City Blvd. at Loftus Dr. 0.799 C 0.952 E 13 Del Mar Ave. at Hellman Ave. 0.958 E 0.898 D 14 San Gabriel Blvd. at Hellman Ave. 1.014 F 0.906 E 15 Walnut Grove Ave. at Hellman/Ramona 0.989 E 1.207 F 16 Rosemead Blvd. at Telstar Ave. 0.931 E 1.056 F 17 Rosemead Blvd. at Whitmore St 0.742 C 0.831 D 18 New Ave. at Garvey Ave. 0,916 E 1.013 F 19 Del Mar Ave. at Garvey Ave. 0.948 E 1.084 F 20 San Gabriel Blvd. at Garvey Ave. 1.078 F 1.123 F 21 Walnut Grove Ave. at Garvey Ave. 1.009 F 1. 143 F 22 San Gabriel Blvd. at Rush St. /Potrero Grande 0.587 A 0.776 C 23 Walnut Grove Ave. at Rush St. 0.641 B 0.741 C 24 Walnut Grove Ave. at Landis View Ln. 0.490 A 0.507 A 25 Walnut Grove Ave. at San Gabriel Blvd. 0.923 E 1.069 F 26 San Gabriel Blvd. at SR -60 WB Ramps 0.945 E 0.921 E 27 Town Center Dr. at SR -60 EB Ramps 0.628 B 0.649 B 28 San Gabriel Blvd. at Town Center Dr. 0.750 C 0.778 C Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis PLANNING a ENG :1. I: -, February 19, 2010 - Page 58 Future (2025) Conditions with General Plan Development As indicated by the post- Project columns within Table 12, after the development assumed in the updated General Plan Land Use Element, 17 study intersections would operate at LOS E or F during the a.m. peak period and 18 study intersections would operate at LOS E or F during the p.m, peak period. Level of service values would worsen to E or F at these study intersections due to added trips from incremental land use growth envisioned by the updated Land Use Plan: • Valley Blvd. at Rio Hondo Ave. — Operations would worsen from LOS D to E within the p.m. peak hour. • Walnut Grove Ave. at Marshall St — Operations would worsen from LOS E to F within the a.m. peak hour. • Rosemead Blvd. at Marshall St. — Operations would worsen from LOS E to F within the a.m. peak hour. • Rosemead Blvd. at Glendon Wy. — Operations would worsen from LOS E to F within the a.m. peak hour. • San Gabriel Blvd. at Hellman Ave. — Operations would worsen from LOS E to F within the a.m. peak hour and from LOS D to E in the p.m. peak hour. • Walnut Grove Ave. at Hellman Ave. /Ramona Ave. — Operations would worsen from LOS D to E within the a.m. peak hour. • Rosemead Blvd. at Telstar Ave. — Operations would worsen from LOS D to E within the a.m. peak hour. • New Ave. at Garvey Ave. — Operations would worsen from LOS D to E within the a.m. peak hour and from LOS E to F within the pm. peak hour. • Del Mar Ave. at Garvey Ave. — Operations would worsen from LOS D to E within the a.m. peak hour. • Walnut Grove Ave. at Garvey Ave. - Operations would worsen from LOS E to F within the a.m. peak hour. • Walnut Grove Ave. at San Gabriel Blvd. — Operations would worsen from LOS D to E within the a.m. peak hour. • San Gabriel Blvd. at SR -60 westbound ramps — Operations would worsen from LOS D to E within the p.m. peak hour. It should be noted that operating conditions at the remaining intersections would all generally worsen with General Plan development, and some within LOS E or F. Worsening of a level of service value, or a non - change in level of service, do not necessarily define a significant impact determination. Significant traffic impacts to study intersections from development envisioned under the updated Land Use plan are discussed within the next report section. The peak -hour tuming movement volumes at the study intersections for the analyzed scenario are provided within Figure 19 (a.m. peak), and within Figure 20 (p.m. peak). Figure 21 illustrates the levels of service at the study intersections during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour. The level -of- service worksheets for this scenario are provided in Appendix E of this report Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis PLANNING B ENGINEERING February 19, 2010 — Page 59 752 50 1 1 �.. -a 62 l- a 580 — 1 912 115 259 \ 2161 1 574 4� / 12% \ J 1 L_'° 5 J L 319 4 — 2 2 16 '-'1 775 181 r 1 374 / \ 1348 / '� \ 4JiL� ,64 —1 L 98 331 — 3 517 226 \215 1 r 0, 1 ,545 / /21.!L7\ 715 09 7e J 4 L 7s 124 --1 288 \ ,.3 —,4F2-39 / e40 / 15,4 \ 3ff04] 1 L14 167 J L 11e 453 — 5 895 25, 1 236 \24071527 1686 / L319 \ 27 J L 585 474 — 5 -- 1163 JiL" 13 L22 717 -- 7 1481 132 -� 104 \ 2,B 1 / 72 2 /817 \ �.J 1 1220 172 J L 229 619 — 9 117 63 -1r^107 \ 2451 1 156 / 437 / - 130 70 \ 1 1 L� 77 1 —79 185 — 9 ^ 245 122 T- 515 2540 75 1 1 119 61 J L 110 177 — 10 ^ 364 188 �--, 234 \57 1 r r80 1791 / / p 2213 \ r.'J i L°_ 26 J L 153 0 — 11 ^ 37 253-1 104 \711 1 x257 1818 750 1 L250 L 19, 12 F- 378 1 G53B / 659 / 947 \ 82] 1 L70 250 L 133 221 577 13 62 \ / ,659 / ,412 \ 127J 1 LS_7 164 J L 125 Be Be -1^14 39 75156 \ ,�6 1/ / '� \ 22}'•J 1 L1_43 270 J } L 316 B0 — 1 5 105 192 6 148 1 56 \ 614 / 2777 \ L427 L 99 15 L 220 1 F-6zz / 2615 KOA CORPORATION PLANNING a ENGINEERING 285, L 27 17 �2B r 557 2540 / 20 JL\ 15 177 -J L 240 763 — 18 — 174 7 97 \ 88 4/ 1 �JIL'°' 205 J L M wo — 19 1008 165 —1 1 82 171 t fee / 580 / 2ee21 J L \ 282 J — 233 733 — 20 ^ 1153 75 —1�-, I--� 24, \ 73 r 184 / 542 / 2033J7LM209 \ 179 J L 91 908 — 21 1103 102 --j 152 11711 r / 412 754 26JiL5 51 J L 153 124 -- 22 238 36 37 is111 r / 572 595 ,152 1 So 245 J L 12 00 — 23 ^ 9 a7a 1 73L/ 789 1L" L ,4 u 1— 37 r r,5 1107 / / 11 J1L741 50 J L 703 25 ^ \ 71TF4 5 1274 \ JIL_67 5 L 57o 22 26 ^ 16 28 102 2011 F202 / 1228 15 \ J 1 L'6° 12 -J L7W 23 — 27 ^ 78 9 128 \ 411 Fis so /427 90J 1 Lao 388 J L 54 30 — 28 43 111 13 \ 422 1 125 1007 / LEGEND • Study Intersection X Intersection Ref. Number ,x Inlerseolion Turn volume 466 'J1L°' 55 J L Be 836 1 6,3 153 F23o / 887 1694 \ s L 201 2 2 ^ 0 , —1 361 1 M7 17 1 W x4452 / 245 J L 101 641 M ^ M 2M� �65 \ -115-7 / 714 \ 'J1Lw u L 97 1304 —. 4 ^ 987 118 —1 260 ,2611 x303 / ,022 1529 2!!j1L17 346 t 94 ee, 5 — 9m 190 —1 L 194 \ 22551 1 5-97 / 1721 / J L551 30 J L 397 1032 — 5 — 7w 22-J Liz ,373 — 7 ^ 982 lee 71 \ ,w 1 1 F25s / 5, 564 162J 1 L'.B2 271 J L ,3e 1337 — 8 ^ 704 91-1 X97 ,5-,1r / 701 905 \ "J1L7 as J L 79 264 — 8 221 104 r495 1679 'J 1 L187 „e L ,5s 354 — 10 ` 291 ,54 -1^� 7— 210 111 1 1 x-363 1911 / 41 11 L0 41 L 240 0 J 11 97 106 L 85 s511 F7—w \ 22,6 / 728 \ 1 LY25 L 397 12 842 I ra / 780 gp �9�I; '.J 1 L116 z49 J L 92 519 13 '— 224 e1 1 F- 32 \N'47/ m / lies \ 'J1L106 192 J L 116 30e — 14 ` 167 122 —1 L w wrF57 'uJ1 9911 I so 3w L 261 1164 -1 15 a \17511 76 F36 14/ 2317 \ 1 Lis, t— an 15 L sa r 5-94 / 2536 2909 \ 1 L,3 'L w 17 T— 233 1 5-9 / 2937 2_j 12 s 244 J L 287 1371 — 18 ^ 949 ,02 j ,03 ,271 2 5-37 11 519 \'I!J 1 L"° 48 J L 247 37 18 '— 1052 ez�^ r ] L/ 7411 574 / 7 2J 1 1 L3/0 391 J L 290 275 20 NO 105--j 249 \ ,s31 r Fmo / 613 62. \ 20J L204 273 L 223 1135 — 21 973 117 —1 L w \ 1261 1 5-40 / 013 / 688 \ e9J 1 L22t 222 J L 261 339 ^ 22 m' Is � 75 1 r 18'715 / f � \ 2Q1� 1 L� M L 87 to 23 49 73 —1 270 \ 11271 X29 / am 1 LL 21 24 F- 26 1r ,021 iB 89 J L 100, 947 25 605 11 \ °]' F5- / 8 N �— r - ,746 J 1 L20i i Lees ,5 25 26 40 194 34 1 —1^�1--' \ �I t3e / 39 JIL'°' toe J L 610 259 — 27 145 is —1 197 \ 21111158 /1' 57 / w10J1 12 L37 4811 J L 29 33 — 28 21 354 —1 1-19 \ 21111s 2 r' 51i LEGEND S tud Intersection Intersection Ref. Number Intersection Turn Volume KOA CORPORATION City of Rosemead, CA - Circulation Element Figure 20 61.UNNING 5 ENGINEERING Future (2025) With Development - PM Peak Hour Turning Movements KOA CORPORATION City of Rosemead, CA- Circulation Element Figure 21 [ EC' _ <.:.;. t r : -•.:.c Future (2025) With Development AM /PM Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service Future (2025) Conditions with General Plan Development D. Study Roadway Segment Operations Traffic operating conditions were analyzed at the study roadway segments, for future conditions with development of General Plan land uses. Link volumes from the traffic analysis database were utilized for analysis, with the resulting volumes including both ambient annual growth rates and trips from planned projects within the defined TAZs. A VIC was determined for each roadway segment in a similar manner to the previously - analyzed scenarios. Table 13 provides the results of the level of service calculations for each of the study roadway segments, based on this analysis scenario. LOS values of E or F are displayed in bold text on the right side of the table. The analysis of daily roadway segment operating conditions for this scenario indicates that the following four study roadway segments are projected to worsen to LOS E or F with the addition of trips from new development allowed by the General Plan: • Walnut Grove Ave between Valley Blvd and Marshall St — LOS would worsen from E to F • Walnut Grove Ave.. between Hellman Ave. and Garvey Ave. — LOS would worsen from D to E • Garvey Ave., between New Ave. and Del Mar Ave. -LOS would worsen from C to E. • Garvey Ave. between San Gabriel Blvd and Walnut Grove Ave. -LOS would worsen from D to E. The worsening of a level of service value, or a non - change in level of service, does not necessarily define a significant impact determination. Significant traffic impacts to study roadway segments from development envisioned under the updated Land Use plan are discussed within the next report section. Figure 23 illustrates the projected daily traffic volumes at the study roadway segments for this scenario. Figure 24 illustrates the level of service values at each segment. Significant impacts of general plan development are discussed within the next report section. Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis " "'.':c x t" GN E P'"' February 19, 2010 — Page 63 Future (2025) Conditions with General Plan Development Table 13 — Study Roadway Segment Operations — Future (2025) with General Plan Development Primary Street N/E End of Segment S/W End of Segment Roadway Class No. of Lanes Roadway Capacity Future (2025) w/ Development P Volume V/C LOS I Walnut Grove Av Grand Ave Mission Drive Secondary 4 30.000 15,608 0.520 A. 2 Walnut Grove Av Wells/Edmond Valley Blvd Secondary 4 30,000 21,710 0.724 C 3 Walnut Grove Av Valley Blvd Marshall St Secondary 4 30,000 30,614 1.020 F 4 Walnut Grove Av Hellman Ave Garvey Ave Secondary 4 30.000 29,107 0.970 E 5 Walnut Grove Av Fern Ave Klingerman St Secondary 4 30,000 21982 0.766 C 6 Walnut Grove Av Rush St Landis View Lane Secondary 4 30,000 20,322 0.677 8 7 San Gabriel Blvd Hellman Ave Emerson Place Major 4 40,000 36,520 0.913 E 8 San Gabriel Blvd Garvey Ave Klingerman St Major 4 40,000 26,000 0.650 B 9 San Gabriel Blvd Deln Ave Walnut Grove Ave Major 4 40,000 20,525 0.513 1 A 10 Del Mar Ave Hellman Ave Emerson Place Secondary 4 30,000 27,137 0.905 E I I Del Mar Ave Garvey Ave Newmark Ave Collector 2 15,000 19,273 1.285 F 12 New Ave Newmark Ave Graves Ave Collector 2 15,000 9,467 0.631 B 13 Valley Blvd Muscatel Ave Ivar Ave Major 4 40,000 33,212 0.830 D 14 Valley Blvd Hart Ave Mission Drive Major 4 40.000 21,519 0.538 A 15 Valley Blvd Rio Hondo Ave Temple City Blvd Major 4 40,000 1 31,573 0.789 C 16 Temple City Blvd Valley Blvd Marshall St Secondary 4 30,000 1 25,000 0.833 D 17 Garvey Ave New Ave Del Mar Ave Major 4 40,000 36,095 0.902 E 18 Garvey Ave Del Mar Ave San Gabriel Blvd Major 4 40,000 35,744 0.894 D 19 Garvey Ave San Gabriel Blvd Walnut Grove Ave Major 4 40.000 37,381 0.935 E 20 Garvey Ave Walnut Grove Ave Rosemead Blvd Major 4 40.000 32,728 0.818 D 21 Rosemead Blvd Lower Azusa Road Mission Drive Major 5 50.000 56,SOS 1.130 F 22 Rosemead Blvd Valley Blvd Marshall St Major 4 40.000 60,035 1.501 F 23 Rosemead Blvd Telstar Ave Whitmore St Major 6 60,000 71,215 1.187 F Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis I February 19, 2010 — Page 64 0 M�SSi - - Y �•�.�P 9 • - ft nd �� Ave. ~�`` :c 0 th o i m E ¢ c O m� a f M 3 151 Valle Blvd 3 21 i I � I I _ I I a II SL i 1 to San Bernardino Fury. Ilm n Ave. Telstar Ave. I' n �j I n 'r ftmore St. A 7 7 1 3 728 5 re i 6 •_ - m I I Z N N 2 rev, Av . u > ; o m < m SL = E v _O H I � — — N I CI !� Landis View Ln. pomona Fwy. Cu d LEGEND 9 m City Boundary - - - -- Railroad XXX ADT Volume N KOA CORPORATION City of Rosemead, CA- Circulation Element Figure 22 PLANNING a ENGINEERING Future (2025) With Development - Daily Study Roadway Segment Volumes m > 3 'r -La m 3 rend Ave. \'��'` a Z m W 6 er Azusa fi v `Low e m ? S M ` 5 - � Valle Blv 0 � c G I a h II 51. ° L ci fp an Bernardino Fwy. Ilm nAve. Telstar Ave. 11 �E W W Al Whitmore SL A D D i i I Q i v � rav s Av . x � i m sh St. _I CO !j Landis View UL ¢T � dew° - Qo�`oGceo Pomona Fwy. e a ° y LEGEND m - - - City Boundary - - - -- Railroad N X Roadway Level of Service KOA CORPORATION City of Rosemead, CA- Circulation Element Figure 23 ' P,4h1J "JG :: iV[,WzFP 141 Future (2025) With Development Daily Roadway Level of Service 6. Significant Traffic Impacts of General Plan Development This section evaluates the impact of new vehicle trips that would be generated by incremental development as envisioned by the updated Land Use Element of the General Plan. To ensure that adequate mobility is maintained within the City, locations that would be cumulatively impacted by future land use changes should be identified and then targeted for improvements when they are physically and financially feasible. The redevelopment of parcels can often allow for physical changes to roadway rights-of -way as part of the entitlement process, and the collection of impact fees over time (as in -lieu mitigation measures) can allow for the funding of major improvements. A discussion of significant impacts at the study intersections and study roadway segments, and recommended mitigation measures for each, follows below. A. Significant Impact and Minimum Performance Standards A significant impact is normally defined when new vehicle trips generated by a specific project or groups of project would cause level of service values, volume -to- capacity ratios, or other measured variables to deteriorate below a minimum acceptable threshold or increase by a set maximum amount These thresholds and maximums are specified by the local agency for a traffic impact analysis. A significant impact standard used for this analysis is defined within the document entitled City of Rosemead Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines (February 2007), which is as follows: '...a transportation impact for a project is considered significant if the Project increases traffic demand by 2% of capacity (VIC z 0.02), causing LOS 'F' (VIC z 1.00). If the facility is already at LOS 'F', a significant impact occurs when the Project increases traffic demand by 2% of capacity (V /C z 0.02)." This impact standard can be applied to both study intersections and study roadway segments. Significant impacts and the related need for mitigation were based on these thresholds for the analysis summarized within this chapter, with primary emphasis on "unacceptable" level of service (LOS E or 1), as defined by the City guidelines and the current General Plan: "The City of Rosemead's General Plan has a LOS 'D' standard for its roadway system. Intersections and roadway segments operating at LOS 'A', '13% 'C', or 'D' conditions are considered acceptable, while those operating at LOS 'E' or 'F' conditions are considered unacceptable." Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis February 19, 2010 — Page 67 Significant Traffic Impacts of General Plan Development B. Significant Traffic Impacts at Study Intersections The determination of significant cumulative impacts of development at the study intersections, anticipated under the updated Land Use Element, is summarized within Table 14 (a.m. peak) and Table 15 (p.m. peak). Significant impact determinations, based on V/C ratio changes, are provided on the right side of the table. Within Table 14 and Table I5, the significant traffic impacts at each study intersection were categorized as a "V /C impact' (where envisioned projects would create an impact based on City incremental v /c- change guidelines). As shown in the right -most columns of Table 14 and of Table 15, a majority of the study intersections would be significantly impacted under the updated Land Use Plan per City traffic impact guidelines. Study intersections that deteriorate to LOS E or F with envisioned development are the most critical locations and should be mitigated as the main priority during the General Plan timeframe. Using significance standards based on VIC changes, nine of the 28 study intersections would be significantly impacted during the future a.m. peak period, and 1 I of the study intersections would be significantly impacted during the future p.m. peak period. Rosemead Circulation Element Update FVKOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis `' ^ "•' '• ;',' "•: r "'' n February 19, 2010 — Page 68 Significant Trofc Impocts of Generol Plon Development Table 14 - Significant Impacts to Study Intersections - Future (2025) with General Plan Development - AM Peak Intersection Existing Conditions Year (2009) Future Ambient Growth Conditions Year (202S) Future With Projects Conditions Year (2025) DiH. VK Impact? V/C LOS VIC LOS V/C LOS I Walnut Grove Ave at Mission Dr. 0.727 C 0.832 D 0.858 D 0.026 No 2 Rosemead Blvd. at Lower Azusa Rd. 0.762 C 0.876 D 0.889 D 0.013 No 3 Rosemead Blvd. at Mission Dr. 1.021 F 1.179 F 1.220 F 0.041 yes 4 Walnut Grove Ave, at Valley BIM. 0.932 E 1.072 F 1.132 F 0.060 Yes 5 Rosemead Blvd. at Valley Blvd. 0. %3 E 1.110 F 1.155 F 0.045 Yes 6 Valley Blvd. at Mission Dr. 0.516 A 0.587 A 0.615 8 0.028 No 7 Valley Blvd. a Rio Hondo Ave. 0.522 A 0595 A 0.631 B 0.036 No 8 Valley Blvd. at Temple City BIM. 0.921 E 1.061 F 1.079 F 0.018 No 9 Walnut Grove Ave at Marshall St 0.856 D 0.984 E 1.432 F 0.448 Yes 10 Rosemead Blvd. at Marshall St 0.870 0 0.999 E 1.051 F 0.052 Yes 11 Rosemead Blvd. at Glendon Way 0.828 D 0.952 E 1.005 F 0.053 yes 12 Temple City BIM. at Loftus Dr. 0.683 B 0.782 C 0.799 C 0.017 No 13 Del Mar Ave. at Hellman Ave 0.812 D 0.932 E 0.958 E 0.026 No 14 San Gabriel Blvd. at Hellman Ave 0.858 D 0.985 E 1.014 F 0.029 Yes 15 Walnut Grove Ave at Hellman/Ramona 0.779 C 0.895 D 0.989 E D.0% No 16 Rosemead Blvd. at Telstar Ave. 0.764 C 0.877 D 0.931 E 0.054 No 17 Rosemead Blvd. at Whitmore St 0.605 8 0.692 B 0.742 C 0.050 No B New Ave, at Garvey Ave. 0.765 C 0.879 D 0.916 E 0.037 No 19 Del Mar Ave at Garvey Ave. 0.778 C 0.893 D 0.948 E 0.055 No 20 San Gabriel Blvd. at Garvey Ave 0.910 E 1.049 F 1.078 F 0.029 Yes 21 Walnut Grove Ave. at Garvey Ave. 0.793 C 0.911 E 1.009 F 0.098 Ya 22 San Gabriel Blvd. at Rush StJPotrero Grande 0.523 A 0.594 A 0.587 A -0.007 No 23 Walnut Grove Ave. at Rush St 0536 A 0.609 B 0.641 8 0.032 No 24 Walnut Grove Ave at Landis View Ln. 0.417 A 0.470 A 0.490 A 0.020 No 25 Walnut Grove Are. a San Gabriel Blvd. 0.725 C 0.832 D 0.923 E 0.091 No 26 San Gabriel Blvd. at SR-60 WB Ramps 0.793 C 0.910 0.945 E 0.035 No 27 Town Center Dr. at SR-60 ES Ramps 0529 A 0.603 JB 0.62 8 B 0.025 No 28 San Gabriel Blvd. at Town Center Dr. 0.631 8 0.720 0.750 C 0.030 No Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CO1KOxnnON Traffic Impact Analysis PLANNING 6 ENGINEERING February 19, 2010 - Page 69 Significant Traffic Impacts of General Plan Development Table IS - Significant Impacts to Study Intersections - Future (2025) with General Plan Development - PM Peak Intersection Existing Conditions Year (2009) Future Ambient Growth Conditions Year (2035) Future With Projects Condition Year (2035) DiR. V/C Impaa? Vic LOS Vic LOS V/C LOS I Walnut Grove Ave at Mission Dr. 0.717 C 0.822 D 0.871 D 0.049 No 2 Rosemead Blvd. at Lower Azusa Rd. 0.797 C 0.920 E 0.942 E 0.022 No 3 Rosemead Blvd. at Mission Dr. 0.931 E 1.072 F 1.155 F 0.083 Yes 4 Walnut Grove Ave, at Valley Blvd. 0.936 E 1.078 F 1.171 F 0.093 Yes 5 Rosemead Blvd. at Valley Blvd. 0.905 E 1.040 F 1.123 F 0.083 Yes 6 Valley Blvd. at Mission Dr. 0.505 A 1 0.574 1 A 0.614 B 0.040 No 7 Valley Blvd. at Rio Hondo Ave. 0.753 C 0.866 D 0.929 E 0.063 No 8 Valley Blvd. at Temple City Blvd. 0.791 C 0.907 E 0.942 E 0.035 No 9 Walnut Grove Ave. at Marshall St 0.898 D 1.034 F 1.586 F 0.552 Yes 10 Rosemead Blvd. at Marshall St 0.885 D 1.019 F 1.107 F 0.088 Yes 11 Rosemead Blvd. at Glendon Way 0.744 C 0.853 D 0.898 D 0.045 No 12 Temple City Blvd, at Loftus Dr. 0.808 D 0.928 E 0.952 E 0.024 No 13 Del Mar Ave. at Hellman Ave. 0.758 C 0.870 D 0.898 D 0.028 No 14 San Gabriel Blvd. at Hellman Ave. 0.778 C 0.892 D 0.906 E 0.014 No 15 Walnut Grove Ave. at Hellman/Ramona 0.963 E 1.108 F 1.207 F 0.099 Yes 16 Rosemead Blvd. at Telstar Ave 0.890 D 1.025 F 1.056 F 0.031 Yes 17 Rosemead Blvd. at Whitmore SL 0.671 B 0.769 C 0.831 D 0.062 No 18 New Ave. at Garvey Ave. 0.803 D 0.922 E 1.013 F 0.091 Yes 19 Del Mar Ave. at Garvey Ave. 0.874 D 1.006 F 1.084 F 0.078 Yes 20 San Gabriel Blvd. at Garvey Ave. 0.964 E 1.110 F 1.123 F 0.013 No 21 Walnut Grove Ave. at Garvey Ave. 0.900 E 1.035 F 1.143 F 0.108 Yes 22 San Gabriel Blvd. at Rush St/Potrero Grande 0.686 B 0.785 C 0.776 C -0.009 No 23 Walnut Grove Ave. at Rush St 0.629 B 0.718 C 0.741 C 0.023 No 24 Walnut Grove Ave. at Landis View Ln. 0.417 A 0.471 A 0.507 A 0.036 No 25 Walnut Grove Ave. at San Gabriel Blvd. 0.872 D 1.003 F 1.069 F 0.066 Yes 26 San Gabriel Blvd. at SR -60 WB Ramps 0.760 C 0.871 D 0.921 E 0.050 No 27 Town Center Dr. at SR -60 EB Ramps 0.540 A 0.616 B 0.649 8 0.033 No 28 San Gabriel Blvd. at Town Center Dr. 0.637 B 0.729 C 0.778 1 C 1 0.049 No Rosemead Circulation Element Update 1 KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis °' "''''`' ° "'G 1,Hs. "' February 19, 2010 - Page 70 Significant Traffic Impacts of General Plan Development The recommended mitigation measures and their estimated effect on LOS values are summarized in Table 16 (a.m. peak) and Table 17 (p.m. peak). Mitigations and related improvements in LOS are listed in each table for impacts specific to that time period (a.m. peak or p.m. peak). Mitigations have been tested, however, to verify that improvements in operations would occur for both peak periods, whether an impact would occur within both peak periods or not. The development of the mitigation measures was based on a planning -level analysis of potential physical improvements. Engineering -level analysis and conceptual design would be necessary to determine the real feasibility of each improvement, based on detailed geometry, adjacent land uses, and the ability to purchase additional right -of -way or receive dedicated right -of -way area with redevelopment Initial determinations on the need for widening are indicated within Table 16 and Table 17. Cumulative impacts should be addressed as each individual development proposal is reviewed during the entitlement process — fair -share contributions could be made for these improvements until funding is fully available for implementation of the mitigation measure. Adequate mitigation was determined based on the reduction of impacts to insignificance, based on established thresholds at LOS F. Residual impacts, for post - mitigation operations, were identified for some intersections. No additional physical mitigation measures have been recommended at these locations, due to either the need for additional widening that would be required, the need for unorthodox improvements for the area such as triple -left turn lanes, or the involvement of two -lane residential roadways. Signal synchronization along selected roadway corridors, however, could provide mitigation as an alternative to physical widening, or as a supplement to improve conditions further. This corridor mitigation tool, and the potential effects of its implementation, is discussed later in this report section. Rosemead Circulation Element Update FF KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis •��I_, .J`:•",_.':f.P., February 19, 2010 —Page 71 k} 7� \� /\ R tee» \\ \� ei z 0 � �\ 3! O\ f W4 7 ! !! §!! ` - -- -� i ;; | |■| ' || ! || | || |||| | \± f ( «! ! l� ! ! )f ! ! ! !! ; +! !{!! ! § §(M <` Y.-Ii „ f {�flfll | |! ■ || § _! ; § § ;§ §!! ; | ;E §| |!§!!� | |§ ! |. •; |,- �� |!! . • , :.= ; |! |!!t< f ;! ! |; , .! ; �',!y)! i!ll�..:.,•! ■ :: �.l :,• . :. ;�I!!|| |I! � �!!��l; |!} , . >! >,.,,l,�,l�,,l�,,�! , \\ \� ei z 0 � �\ 3! O\ f W4 C U C Q 0 v a v c a a a v C !O� L D E 0 H 0 Im c b DD 'a+ F � c c o= d b i of va c E -a >, I L V H V t v W fl C C d b E N d u � C v I E rl al a b E w v 0 9 i 3 vc S e 0 a c 2 N � IL � pip C �C as u o.�a — E°� u V A d LL z 0 0° 4 W U? ZO Oz � I i f y u i O w O O w w w w V s ��B o a _ a a a L2 3 fi i p i pp a 888E 51 M fl x e s% I 8< a 1 °Y 3 z i z w i 3 3 z W z N 3 3 2 a i z 3 a w 3 3 3 3 z 3 ; < gE g u 3 - 21 =1 E w v 0 9 i 3 vc S e 0 a c 2 N � IL � pip C �C as u o.�a — E°� u V A d LL z 0 0° 4 W U? ZO Oz � I i f Significant Traffic Impacts of General Plan Development C. Significant Traffic Impacts at Study Roadway Segments For the significant traffic impact analysis of the study roadway segments, two levels of impact standards were applied. The City's significant impact threshold was utilized for cumulative impacts, and level of service standards for acceptable operating conditions of D or better were also utilized. The mitigation measures for level of service impacts should be the priority improvement locations over the General Plan timeframe. Table 18 provides a summary of the study roadway segment impact analysis. There would be four study roadway segments (indicated by bold cells within the right -most column of the table) with significant traffic impacts from development envisioned under the updated Land Use Plan. Table 19 provides a summary of the recommended mitigation measures for the study roadway segments. The table provides a description of each recommended measure, and the effects of those measures on roadway segment V/C and LOS values. With the implementation of these mitigation measures, if feasible based on final engineering studies, all significant impacts at the study roadway segments would be removed. Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis ' February 19, 2010 — Page 74 Q O W 0 0 a O C O Q v 1- C v Om • m C G d E b Y m d In ` ob s I y o E a 0 Y d H d 00 N �a ap E L N c m 0 r c i eo 3 W� 1 N y O v m d d L F' 7 LL c c uu Z a Z Z y° Z Z 2 2 Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z N o q o 2 0== s o o s g 0 0 0 0 6 q q q o 0 0 o d o 6 0 0 6 u N ❑ Q U O W ❑ W ❑ LL LL LL ry E u tl� n O n NO O T n0 0 m N n m m O P _ O O O O O O O O O x m m p N G O Q U O V Ct W d< W LL m U< U V u U LL LL J 0 - ZS N N n n n ry ry n ry m ry ry n n n .n .n J N p O 6 m V U t0 < U Q< U LL Q m Q m< m V m W LL W � J O O O ~ p rY $Qj .p N P n N N 8 V' rnn N f S n O um1 a s V S od z9 r r S c r c e o ., e N • • • u � Y .. ' t Oae E g I> L t9 4 EE w Y 3 w z V s[ F❑ N 3 e I s 3 e Y Y • m Y < V t 135 ; E, s> L i � i i i � � i � � � ❑ ❑ Z > r V" l7 l7 a° c e° 1 2 A o _ _ _ _ 5 0 O O g O a O a u` N� A C A Q d V Ao E° N V P A b L LL O Q O U 2 Q i O Z riy a §k \� 3 f! I= t| E > %! �) �2 §� )} ƒ\ 2� �!!!, |!) !�!i �l,... |�.... § f f !! ! | !! ■!! |! ;1.... ƒ! |!!! u E a§ z § � j\ §\ «! �§ 14 Significant Traffic Impacts of General Plan Development The physical or financial feasibility of implementing the roadway improvements listed within Table 19 has not been investigated in detail for this report. The determinations of need for widening or other new roadway configurations are based on a planning -level analysis appropriate to this study. Issues associated with adjacent land uses were not factored into this analysis. Capacity enhancements would need to be implemented on these roadways within the General Plan timeframe, however, in order to mitigate the significant impacts of incremental increases in overall land use densities allowed within the Plan. D. AdditionallAfternative Mitigation — Corridor Synchronization Many local jurisdictions within the urban areas of the Southern California region are faced with traffic congestion problems that can no longer be resolved via capacity enhancements such as the restriping of roadways to provide additional lanes, or the widening of roadway segments or intersection approaches to provide additional physical capacity. This is due to a variety of factors such as the lack of funding to obtain additional right -of -way along built -out roadway corridors, or the physical inability to obtain it due to development constraints and environmental problems. An alternate strategy for traffic impact mitigation that many local municipalities and the County of Los Angeles are now employing includes the implementation of corridor traffic signal synchronization programs tied to Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) technologies. The application of ITS technology for signal synchronization, now commonly referred to as adaptive signal control systems, would allow the City to control traffic by using centralized computer coordination and networked communication technologies. These adaptive systems analyze and anticipate traffic flows and changes in queues between signals and extend green times or switch between preset timing plans to accommodate peak period congestion. Adaptive signal control technologies have the goals of reducing travel times, vehicle delay and overall congestion. Additional benefits that are accrued from the application of such systems include safety and traveler information. A number of communities in Southern California for example, have invested extensively in this technology through the application of the City of Los Angeles ATSAC (a signal synchronization program) and ATCS (a semi - automatic adaptive control system). According to studies conducted by the City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT), increases in roadway capacity by as much as ten percent (equating to one letter -grade improvement in LOS) can be achieved through the implementation of these signal system technologies. This gain appears in the form of less congestion, delays and stops at the included roadway intersections. Physical mitigation measures for all of the significantly - impacted roadway segments would involve an increase in the provided travel lanes. Alternatively, signal corridor synchronization and adaptive traffic signal control could be utilized if widening or restriping and removal of other roadway aspects such as on- street parking, raised medians, or dedicated bus stops and turn lanes is deemed infeasible after engineering -level study. The County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works, via the Traffic & Lighting Division, is currently studying and designing sub - regional ITS systems. With the cooperation and input of local cities, these systems would include local control /information systems within each City and centralized control through sub - regional Traffic Management Centers (TMCs). As the San Gabriel Valley ITS system(s) are implemented, Rosemead could expand the system from the initial corridors and include the additional roadways recommended for synchronization /control within this document. KOA CORPORATION Rosemead Circulation Element Update PF Traffic Impact Analysis February 19, 2010 —Page 77 vveoP-Si)�r #mnCFraj'fic Impactrtof Gertetal Plan Development E Overview of Potential Mitigation Measures Figure 24A illustrates the study intersections where recommended mitigation measures would be implemented, for both cumulative development and level of service impacts. Additional recommended approach lanes are indicated on Figure 24A by directional arrows at each intersection. If a mitigation measure is recommended for an intersection approach, all of the lanes in the post - mitigation period are indicated by hollow arrows. Solid arrows indicate existing lane configurations. The potential need for widening, along with the related need for the acquisition of additional right -of- way, is indicated by an asterisk at each applicable intersection and a related footnote. The need for widening and additional right -of -way is based on a planning -level analysis of existing roadway widths and intersection configurations. Candidate corridors for signal synchronization and adaptive control are illustrated within Figure 24B. These corridors are indicated by shaded lines that encompass multiple intersections. Signal synchronization and adaptive control systems can only improve traffic flow where there are multiple signals within reasonable distance from each other, where platoons of vehicles can be guided through multiple signalized intersections without significant stopping time. Therefore, the benefit of such systems would only be realized on major cross -town corridors. These mitigation measures may not be fully implemented, or may not be required based on future development trends. The graphics presented here, however, provide an overview of where mitigation measures could be necessary within the City under the Land Use Element update. Rosemead Circulation Element Update FF KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis "" "'' February 19, 2010 — Page 78 North /South: Walnut Grove Ave. EastlN/est: Mission Dr. NorthwSouth, Temple . EastWWest: Valley Blvd. North/South : Walnut Grove Ave North /South: San Gabttel Blvd. - East/West, Hellman/Ramona EestWest: Rush Meem GraiEe tiff• ht hif• z . North /South: Rosemead Blvd. NQdhlSouth: Walnut Grove Ave. North/South: Rosemead Blvd. NorOVSouth: Walnut Grove Av Eest/West: Lower Azusa Rd. East/Wasr Marshall St. EwVWest Telstar Ave. East/West: Rush St. Illc Dm,�= Norm /South: Rosemead Blvd. North/South: Rosemead Blvd. North/South: Rosemead Blvd. North/South: Walnut Grove Ave East/West: Marshall EastANest Mission Dr. SL East/West Whitmore SL East/West: Landis View Ln. �- _ if• _r � f f f P if• 94t4f4P ` North/South: Walnut Grove Ave. NortlVSouth: Rosemead Blvd. North /South: New Ave. North /South: Walnut Grove Ave East/West: Fasi/West. Valley Blvd. Eest/Wast: Glendon Wy. Garvey Ave. East/West; San Gabriel Blvd. -Qw- r-all ��4y hif z titi� � ht� � �,D�vawaY NorWSoum Rosemead Blvd. North /South Temple City Blvd. NoftSputh: Del Mar Ave. NorWSouth: an abriel Blvtl. East/West: Garvey Eastl Nest: Valley Blvd. East/West Loftus Dr. Ave. EastAWest SR 60 WB Ramps httP iP tiff D � tifif z g44PP . Northssuffi: Mission Dr. Nore✓South: Del Mar Ave. North /South: San Gabriel Blvd. NDrOVSouth: SR 60 EB Ramps Eesi/West Valley Blvd. Easl/West Hellman Ave. Easl/Weet Garvey Ave. EastfWest: Town Cemer Dr. hiFz t httP httP , 6eamegWmYpNmaeavas wmeb xrervr5m.vua awry rsWas msNreyx+Mnmp wM IM North/South: Rio Hondo Ave. Nodh/South San Gabriel Blvd. North/Soum: Walnut Grove Ave NorOVSouth: San Gabriel Blvd. pvmlaaedwmbmrripear « sy East/West Valley Blvd. EastnWest Hallman Ave. EasmWest: Garvey Ave. East/Wast Town Center D. LEGEND �! 4 �! 4 J !! 4 L © Intersection r r D Reference No. hfi� hid z hhi� Z► Intersection Lane �MoodmdifieedoorAdded Lanes for Mitigation KOA CORPORATION City of Rosemead, CA- Circulation Element Figure 24A Recommended Intersection Mitigation Measures 1_s�'Jf. 1 e <ca =E. 1s L - � N 3 Ave. ` r v w 6 use Rd. ,v m v C/ 2 Lower AZ c Q' m i -Aq- p c V 1 Valle Blv I i � I I a II SL E/C E 12 ter. i i 10 San Bernardino Fury. i klellm n Ave. : •.p/ Telstar Ave. 3 li E er o P Whitmore St. C/o D/E 18 i Q I 3 _ _ m i z i rav s Av . � > m ush SL BIG E 22 23 i E 1 i r !� Landis thew UL Glee mac` Pomona Fwy. ?as mo O /C M 7 m'28 N a m�O 9'7s LEGEND m - - - City Boundary - - - -- Railroad • Study Intersection N X/X AM/PM Peak Intersection Levels of Services X Intersection Reference Number KOA CORPORATION City of Rosemead, CA - Circulation Element Figure 24B x,_41:::,.., r.:,; „,_;; !" Potential Synchronization Corridors Significant Traffic Impacts of General Plan Development The effects of signal synchronization and adaptive control on the study intersections in the buildout period are summarized in Table 20 (a.m. peak) and Table 21 (p.m. peak). The anticipated letter -grade improvement in level of service was applied to the intersections that would overlap with the recommended synchronization corridors defined on Figure 24B. Where study intersections would not overlap with these corridors, the physical mitigation analyzed within Table 16 and Table 17 were carried over to these tables. Mitigation measures and related improvements in LOS are listed in each table for impacts specific to that time period (a.m. peak or p.m. peak). Mitigations have been tested, however, to verify that improvements in operations would occur for both peak periods, whether an impact would occur within both peak periods or not Rosemead Circulation Element Update I�U:� CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis February 19, 2010 — Page 81 Significant Traffic Impacts of General Plan Development Table 20 -Study Intersection Operations with Synchronization - AM Peak Hour Intemcdon Recommended Mitigation Measure Future With Mitigation Conditions Y. (2025) Diff. VIC Impact? VIC LOS I Walnut Grove Ave at Mission Dr. Corridor Signal 5ynchronintion and Adaptive Control 0.758 C -0.074 No 2 Rosemead Blvd. at Lower Azusa Rd. Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 0.789 C -0.087 No 3 Rosemead Blvd. at Mission Dr. Corridor Signal Synchronoadon and Adaptive Control L120 F -0.059 No 4 Walnut Grove Ave at Valley Blvd. Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 1.032 F -0.040 No 5 Rosemead Blvd. at Valley Blvd. Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 1.055 F -0.055 No 6 Valley Blvd. at Mission Dr. Corridor Signal Synchronindon and Adaptive Control 0.515 A • No 7 Valley Blvd. at Rio Hondo Ave. Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 0.531 A ' No 8 Valley Blvd. at Temple City Blvd. Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 0.979 E -0.082 No 9 Walnut Grove Ave. at Marshall Sc Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 1.332 F 0.348 Yes 10 Rosemead Blvd. at Marshall St Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 0.951 E -0.048 No I I Rosemead Blvd. at Glendon Way Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 0.905 E .0.047 No 12 Temple City Blvd. at Loftus Dr. WA 0.799 C ° No 13 Del Mar Ave. at Hellman Ave. Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 0.858 D -0.074 No 14 San Gabriel Blvd. at Hellman Ave. Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 0.914 E -0.071 No 15 Walnut Grove Ave at Hellman /Ramona Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adapive Control 0.889 D -0.006 No 16 Rosemead Blvd. at Telstar Ave. Corridor Signal Synchronlzadon and Adaptive Control 0.831 D -0.046 No 17 Rosemead Blvd. at Whitmore St Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 0.642 C * No 18 New Ave. at Garvey Ave. Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 0.816 D -0.063 No 19 Del Mar Ave at Garvey Ave. Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 0.848 D -0.045 No 20 San Gabriel Blvd, at Garvey Ave. Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 0.978 E -0.071 No 21 Walnut Grove Ave. at Garvey Ave. Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 0.909 E -0.002 No 22 San Gabriel Blvd. at Rush SUPouero Grande N/A 0.587 A No 23 Walnut Grove Ave. at Rush Sc WA 0.641 B ° No 24 Walnut Grove Ave. at Landis View Ln. NIA 0.490 A "* No 25 Walnut Grove Ave. at San Gabriel Blvd. No feasible mitigation 0.923 E 0.091 No 26 San Gabriel Blvd. at SR -60 WB Ramps NIA 0.945 E ° No 27 Town Center Dr. at SR -60 EB Ramps N/A 0.628 B *� No 28 r San Gabrel Blvd. at Town Cente Dir WA 0.750 D •These hrtesenwm xouW rwr here zBrvpcam vaI(ir mpam Thve bmdom wvWE h imWded h tAe syn<hrorced rorndnz ra se[tssiry oI [amde rprq'n <mn. Thve would ravnue ra be an aESnere d lmpom n these laations aftty mpenimue. These ireiv mwod=mWm margasion measures, anti Mar waud nm tr nuLded x mshe rtcanvn ottf sydvtnit o rarndors. Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis PLANNING a ;NGwfEp!NG February 19, 2010 - Page 82 Significant Traffic Impacts of General Plan Development Table 21 - Study Intersection Operations with Synchronization - PM Peak Hour Intersection Recommended Mitigation Measure Future with Mitigation Conditions Year (2025) DiA. VIC Impact? VIC LOS I Walnut Grove Ave at Mission Dr. Corridor SIgm1 Synchronization and Adaptive Control 0.771 C -0.051 No 2 Rosemead Blvd. at Louver Azusa Rd. Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 0.842 D -0.078 No 3 Rosemead Blvd. at Mission Dr. Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 1.055 F 4017 No 4 Walnut Grove Ave, at Valley Blvd. Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 1.071 F -0.007 No 5 Rosemead Blvd. at Valley Blvd. Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 1.023 F -0.017 No 6 Valley Blvd. at Mission Dr. Corridor Signal Synchronintion and Adaptive Control 0.514 B " No 7 Valley Blvd. at Rio Hondo Ave. Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 0.829 D " No 8 Valley Blvd. at Temple City Blvd. Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 0.842 D -0.065 No 9 Walnut Grove Ave. at Marshall SL Corridor Signal Synchronintion and Adaptive Control 1,486 F 0.452 Yes 10 Rosemead Blvd. at Marshall SL Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 007 F -0.012 No I I Rosemead Blvd. at Glendon Way Corridor Signal Synchronintion and Adaptive Control 0.798 C -0.055 No 12 Temple City Blvd. at Loftus Dr. SB It& turn lane 0.952 E "" No 13 Del Mar Ave. at Hellman Ave Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 0.798 C -0.072 No 14 San Gabriel Blvd. at Hellman Ave. Corridor Signal Synchronintion and Adaptive Control 0.806 D -0.086 No 15 Walnut Grove Ave. at Hellman/Ramona Corridor Signal Synchronintion and Adaptive Control 1.107 F -0.001 No 16 Rosemead Blvd. at Telmr Ave. Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 0.956 E -0.069 No 17 Rosemead Blvd. at Whitmore SL Corridor Signal Synchronintion and Adaptive Control 0.731 D No I8 New Ave. at Garvey Ave. Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 0.913 E -0.009 No 19 Del Mar Ave. at Garvey Ave. Corridor Signal Synchronintion and Adaptive Control 0.984 E -0.022 No 20 San Gabriel Blvd. at Garvey Ave. Corridor Signal Synchronization and Adaptive Control 1.023 F -0.087 No 21 Walnut Grove Ave. at Garvey Ave. Corridor Signal Synchronintion and Adaptive Control 1.043 F 0.008 No 22 San Gabriel Blvd. at Rush StJPotrero Grande N/A 0.776 C " No 23 Walnut Grove Ave at Rush SL N/A 0.741 C ke No 24 Walnut Grove Ave. at Landis Vim Ln. N/A 0.507 A "" No 2S Walnut Grove Ave. at San Gabriel Blvd. No (easibk mitigation 1.069 F 0.066 Yes 26 San Gabriel Blvd. at SR 60 WB Ramps WA 0.921 E ^ No 27 Town Center Dr. at SR -60 Ell Ramps N/A 0.649 B ° No 28 San Gabriel Blvd. a Town Center Dr. WA 0378 C ^ No Thu nasrnwm want mr taw K vlkors bg6t mpaez These ecaaas i w W ncWded n de "m oorsd cardws for Money o([onNn ranpeteoee Thae raJd tonmue to h m oavxe , o(mpam a Uwe W. a(ea mplememoroa - iiwe wersmuv vood not reprre ."a. mextors od they x nor tr rddM •slot one ntommendeol oWacatoo carton Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis 6 fNc!IEEt N February 19, 2010 -Page 83 Significant Traffic Impacts of General Plan Development With the implementation of signal synchronization and adaptive control within the recommended corridors. only two intersections within the corridors would continue to have significant impacts: • Walnut Grove Ave. at Marshall St — a.m. peak and p.m. peak hours • Walnut Grove Ave. at San Gabriel Blvd. — p.m. peak hour Out of the 20 intersections that would be included within the recommended synchronization corridors, physical mitigation measures would also be necessary at the two locations to fully remove significant traffic impacts of the updated Land Use Element. Nonetheless, the potential improvement to intersection operations with corridor synchronization would be the equivalent of one letter grade of LOS. Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA Cf )RPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis �� February 19, 2010 — Page 84 7. Conclusions and Recommendations This section summarizes the conclusions and recommendations of the traffic impact analysis conducted for the Circulation Element Update. The recommendations described in Section 6 of this report and summarized below have been targeted to improve roadway and intersection levels of service to acceptable conditions where determined to be reasonably feasible for buildout conditions. These measures are also required to meet forecast traffic demand associated with anticipated background traffic growth, which is unrelated to incremental development envisioned by the updated Land Use Element of the General Plan. A. Recommended Improvements The analysis presented within this document demonstrates that several roadways and intersections are forecast to operate at poor levels of service in the Year 2025. Therefore, further transportation system enhancements are warranted to maintain adequate service levels. The recommended improvements to the transportation system are described below, which are targeted to remove significant impacts based on City standards. The proposed mitigation measures for the Circulation Element Update consist of the following elements: • Additional intersection approach lanes and traffic signal improvements • Additional roadway segment travel lanes • Corridor traffic signal synchronization B. Intersection Capacity Enhancements As discussed in the previous section of this report, there are a number of study intersections that would operate at LOS E or LOS F during weekday peak periods, which are considered to be poor operating conditions. Intersection improvements have been identified at these locations that would remove significant impacts at LOS F based on City - established standards. The proposed mitigation measures for all identified study intersection impacts are summarized within the list below, which excludes the study intersections that would not be significantly- impacted by development under the updated Land Use Element: Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis s ENG NEE "3 February 19, 2010 — Page 85 Conclusions and Recommendations Intersection Recommended Intersection Improvement 3 Rosemead Blvd. at Mission Dr. NB & SB thru lane 4 Walnut Grove Ave at Valley Blvd. EB & WB thru lane 5 Rosemead Blvd. at Valley Blvd. NB & SB thru lane 9 Walnut Grove Ave. at Marshall St. EB & WB left turn lane; NB right turn lane 10 lRosemead Blvd. at Marshall St NB & SB thru lane I I Rosemead Blvd. at Glendon Way SB shared thm -right lane (near I.10 on & off ramps) 14 San Gabriel Blvd. at Hellman Ave Resvipe SS shared thm -right lane to new thru lane and right turn lane 15 Walnut Grove Ave. at HellmaNRamona Restripe right turn lane to ES shared left -thru- right, and exclusive left turn 16 Rosemead Blvd. at Telstar Ave. NB thru lane IS New Ave. at Garvey Ave WB thru lane 19 Del Mar Ave at Garvey Ave Restria parking providing an additional EB & WB thru lane 20 JSan Gabriel Blvd. at Garvey Ave. EB & WB thru lane 21 Walnut Grove Ave at Garvey Ave JWB thru lane 25 Walnut Grove Ave at San Gabriel Blvd. SB all -way into thru -right turn lane; new second left turn No = nortnnouna, as = soumoouna, we = westoouno, to = easrmuna Widening of one or both roadways at the approaches to each of the impacted intersections would potentially be necessary as part of the recommended mitigation measures. Such widening could be accomplished incrementally through dedications from redeveloping parcels, or could be accomplished through outright purchases for City projects or major impact mitigation measures. In many locations, there may not be sufficient right -of —way available to implement the proposed mitigation measure, which would result in unavoidable adverse impacts. A review of the need for widening at intersection approaches for each of the recommended mitigation measures, based on a planning -level analysis of the measures, is provided within Section 6 of this report Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis °'' i" February 19, 2010 — Page 86 Conclusions and Recommendations These improvements would need to be studied in more detail as the City considers implementation of each of the mitigation measures. Combinations of signal timing improvements, roadway reconfigurations within the existing pavement width (parking removal, center median modifications, etc.), and implementation of corridor signal synchronization and adaptive signal control technologies could provide the same operational benefits as some of the more intensive physical improvements. C. Roadway Segment Capacity Enhancements The analysis of significant traffic impacts revealed that several street segments will require widening or restriping by Year 2025 in order to operate at a good level of service and /or avoid the significant impacts of cumulative developments. However, it should be noted that some of the street segments with less than standard widths might not be easily widened to provide the needed capacity. To do so may entail the purchase of right -of -way, demolition of existing structures, or relocation of utilities. Therefore, it is recommended for such segments that roadway widening be accomplished as conditions of approval for individual property development Such conditions would require a newly developed parcel to dedicate a portion of its property necessary to widen adjoining roadway right -of -way to designated standards. Once the rights -of -way is obtained or dedicated, the City could subsequently widen the roadway to increase capacity. The recommended roadway segment improvements for the General Plan timeframe are as follows. Roadway segments without significant impacts in the future period analysis were excluded from this list: W87 northbound. SB = southbound, WB = westbound. EB = eastbound Cumulative impacts should be addressed as each individual development proposal is reviewed during the entitlement process — fair -share contributions could be made for these improvements until funding is fully available for implementation of the mitigation measure. D. Corridor Capacity Enhancements — Synchronization An alternate strategy for traffic impact mitigation is the implementation of corridor traffic signal synchronization with adaptive control technology. Adaptive signal control technologies have the goals of reducing travel times, vehicle delay and overall congestion. According to studies conducted by the City of LADOT, increases in roadway capacity by as much as ten percent can be achieved through the implementation of these signal system technologies. This gain appears in the form of less congestion, delays and stops at the included roadway intersections. Rosemead Circulation Element Update MKOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis . ^`'" "" a " "" E""' February 19, 2010 — Page 87 IMPROVEMENT N/E End of S/W End of Roadway No. of Primary Street No. of Segment Segment class Lanes Destaiption Lanes 3 Walnut Grove Av Valley Blvd Marshall St Secondary 4 On -street parking removal would likely be required 6 On -urea p'rinng removal on wen curb would likely be 21 Rosemead Blvd Lower Azusa Road Minion Drive Major 5 6 required. Widening and on-sovet parking removal would likely be 8 22 Rosemead Blvd Valley Blvd Marshall 5t Major required. 23 Rosemead Bivd Telsnr Ave Whitmore st I Major 1 6 Widening would likely be required. 8 W87 northbound. SB = southbound, WB = westbound. EB = eastbound Cumulative impacts should be addressed as each individual development proposal is reviewed during the entitlement process — fair -share contributions could be made for these improvements until funding is fully available for implementation of the mitigation measure. D. Corridor Capacity Enhancements — Synchronization An alternate strategy for traffic impact mitigation is the implementation of corridor traffic signal synchronization with adaptive control technology. Adaptive signal control technologies have the goals of reducing travel times, vehicle delay and overall congestion. According to studies conducted by the City of LADOT, increases in roadway capacity by as much as ten percent can be achieved through the implementation of these signal system technologies. This gain appears in the form of less congestion, delays and stops at the included roadway intersections. Rosemead Circulation Element Update MKOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis . ^`'" "" a " "" E""' February 19, 2010 — Page 87 Conclusions and Recommendations Corridor synchronization improvements, however, can only be effective in implementation where there are multiple traffic signals along a corridor that can control platoons of vehicles while minimizing delay on the major street The primary City roadway corridors would have groups of closely- spaces signalized intersections that would have poor levels of service after implementation of the updated Land Use Element of the General Plan, and would be ideal candidates for the implementation of this technology. The implementation of synchronization /adaptive control within the major City roadway corridors is estimated to improve level of service by one letter grade, based on experience with such systems within other local jurisdictions. With the implementation of signal synchronization and adaptive control within the recommended corridors, the following intersections within the corridors would continue to have significant impacts: • Walnut Grove Ave. at Marshall St — a.m. peak and p.m. peak hours • Walnut Grove Ave. at San Gabriel Blvd. — p.m. peak hour Out of the 20 intersections that would be included within the recommended synchronization corridors, physical mitigation measures would also be necessary at both locations to fully remove significant traffic impacts of the updated Land Use Element Nonetheless, the potential improvement to intersection operations with corridor synchronization would be the equivalent of one letter grade of LOS. E Unavoidable Adverse Impacts An engineering -level review of the recommended mitigation measures should be conducted. This detailed study could, on completion, indicate that the necessary rights -of -way could not realistically be acquired in order to fully mitigate the significant traffic impacts of the updated Land Use Element. If the mitigation measures identified within this traffic study document are deemed to be infeasible at certain intersections or roadway segments after detailed engineering analysis, then the impacts resulting from development envisioned under the updated Land Use Element will result in the creation of unavoidable adverse impacts. The Circulation Element should be revisited at a future timeframe, in combination with an engineering study, to further consider the feasibility of the mitigation measures recommended within this traffic impact study. Rosemead Circulation Element Update Ff KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis , -, ^r &= r4G 1N�[P,"' February 19, 2010— Page 88 8. Congestion Management Program Analysis The state -wide Congestion Management Program was created from the approval of Proposition I 11. and has been implemented locally by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro). The CMP for Los Angeles County requires that the traffic impact of individual development projects of potentially regional significance be analyzed. A speck system of arterial roadways plus all freeways comprises the CMP system. One hundred sixty intersections are identified for monitoring on the system. There is one CMP primary arterial and one CMP arterial monitoring station within the City of Rosemead, which require analysis in this study. The San Bernardino and Pomona Freeways serving the City of Rosemead are also part of the CMP system and are discussed below. CMP Arterial Monitoring Station Analysis The intersection of Rosemead Boulevard at Valley Boulevard is classified as a CMP arterial monitoring station, and identified as CMP intersection #131. As noted within the existing conditions analysis, this intersection operates at LOS E during the morning and evening peak periods, and would worsen to LOS F during both peak periods by the buildout analysis year. Identified level of service and incremental volume -to- capacity impacts at this intersection can be mitigated with the following capacity improvements: • Additional northbound and southbound thru lanes. • Corridor signal synchronization on Rosemead Boulevard and /or Valley Boulevard, including this intersection, could alternatively remove impacts. The intersection LOS would be restored to the existing LOS E, with mitigation, but would still technically remain within an unacceptable operating range per the City traffic impact guidelines. CMP Arterial Roadway Analysis Rosemead Boulevard is classified as a primary arterial in the CMP System. The study roadway segments on Rosemead Boulevard currently operate at LOS E (Lower Azusa Road to Mission Drive), LOS F (Valley Blvd. to Marshall Street), and LOS E (Telstar Avenue to Whitmore Street). All of these segments would operate at LOS F by the buildout analysis year. Mitigation measures, either physical or related to potential future signal synchronization systems, would remove the incremental impacts on these roadway segments, but unacceptable level of service values would remain. CMP Mainline Freeway Seement Analysis The San Bernardino Freeway (1 -10) and the Pomona Freeway (SR -60) provide regional access to and from the City. On both facilities during the morning peak period, the westbound segments operate at LOS F. During the evening peak period, the eastbound segments operate at LOS F. In addition to these two periods, these freeways have periods of severe congestion during the midday and weekends as well. Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis "'' 1 6113 ' "' February 19, 2010 — Page 89 Congestion Management Program Analysis Larger projects such as the mixed -use developments planned for the City core could potentially create significant impacts that would add 150 or more trips to the freeway in each direction. Currently, no single project can be identified at this time as meeting the threshold for significant impacts. The City, in accordance with the CMP guidelines, shall track new development activity in order to effectively mitigate congestion - generating impacts on the freeway system. CMP Transit Analysis The proposed General Plan Land Use is not expected to add significant additional demand to the transit system. New riders may be generated because of changes in market conditions and development of properties outside the City Limits. As such, the impact associated with future growth and development on the transit system cannot readily be quantified. The number of new transit trips generated by new developments allowed under the updated Land Use Element could likely be accommodated on the area bus transit lines operated by Metro and the City of Rosemead, without causing any adverse impacts on operations. Future expansions of train service on the Metrolink San Bernardino Line (access locally via a station in El Monte) would likely keep up with growth within Rosemead. CMP Credit -Debit Analysis and New Development Activity Report Each City in Los Angeles County is required to annually submit a report to Metro, which identifies building permits that have been issued that year, and calculates the jurisdiction's Congestion Mitigation Goal. The Congestion Mitigation Goal is an estimation of the impact of the net new trips, which will be added to the County's roadway system by the developments being built calculated using Impact Values listed in the CMP. Each city must also identify the measures it has implemented to offset the cumulative Congestion Mitigation Goal. The mitigation credits associated with potential improvements are derived from the Countywide Deficiency Plan Toolbox of Strategies. Rosemead Circulation Element Update PfKOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis I 1 l % & ENG'N`EG'N-' February 19, 2010 —Page 90 APPENDIX A Regional Bicycle Routes Map Rosemead Circulation Element Update �KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis February 19, 2010 —Appendices CL Q W 3 U M� W a ,0 V LU cc O N Q S o° F a3 O O d C2 ,N ♦it % W 0 0 y73a m W� s W 1"• � �o M, iw �lry oS C M3,.uz` ))s PEC" qLS f,! m Q ac StT ♦w z N3�r <IILM q.1M5 �i�OJ I3 ,r7W/3J ,wtN3J ♦Gf dd, u WEB µ1J- 037MIN 03OM3N Sys Ln 01 QYQ y�� Bl • • — •' — OM3MlOd 05370d ..i TE e cm LU o m �. D OHM e o� 33, M �. cn N J e 3� 3 I W � Q l3BIN + ' 18 003N3+OM Z � • I J i i y V' • i m 3noMO m1w7.vM 3AOtl." 1f'N7VM 3',. c�• r� i • z • s lM 131MOV0 NY5 1M 131MM,'O N3'S ' 78 b n $ y w • t 6'Vd Sv �A i bs wN,3o MVW 130 ••� s 3S a NOS1i Tf I• ib •�I�'�Z•.�• =O YNOYYIItl SO Od g c > > 0 ') ZS Z =' _ MOSMNIr i � �' 0,awvv nn 313eMv0 WweOx O N Q S o° F a3 O O d C2 APPENDIX BI Intersection Traffic Counts Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis P "NN""" °N"'N =r"N5 February 19, 2010— Appendices Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by- National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Walnut Grove Ave DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Mission Or DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -001 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 6:00 AM NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 6:15 AM 223 175 I 1112 72 75 I 720 206 372 I 1422 80 5349 I 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 20 37 10 7 69 3 5 45 24 24 115 4 363 7:15 AM 31 43 29 15 131 8 7 61 20 29 184 4 562 7:30 AM 32 81 53 31 156 13 15 106 19 50 189 9 754 7:45 AM 52 119 53 25 148 20 19 145 23 66 205 18 893 8:00 AM 62 78 27 30 181 5 10 99 30 46 164 7 739 8:15 AM 38 75 13 25 147 5 9 88 26 50 182 12 670 8:30 AM 49 60 23 21 137 9 3 73 35 58 190 7 665 8:45 AM 47 68 15 21 143 9 7 103 29 49 193 19 703 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 331 561 223 175 I 1112 72 75 I 720 206 372 I 1422 80 5349 I AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES= 1 184 353 146 1 111 632 43 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 0.762 0.910 CONTROL: Signalized 53 438 98 0.787 212 740 46 I 3056 0.863 0.856 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Walnut Grove Ave DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Mission Dr DAY: WEDNESDAY PRO3ECT# 09 -5341 -001 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES = I 66 941 22 I 201 721 38 I 87 1 99 192 I 212 g� WR I 5 2S1 PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK VOLUMES 1 156 9 186 1 110 15 I 95 1 125 63 I 8 PEAK FACTOR: 0 91 0.868 0.916 0 867 0914 HR. CONTROL: Signalized NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 37 80 26 20 83 4 12 142 23 26 85 10 548 4:15 PM 28 90 25 16 77 6 11 137 28 15 104 10 547 4:30 PM 17 99 34 29 79 11 5 117 23 17 96 10 537 4:45 PM 28 91 51 26 93 2 11 162 23 29 114 18 648 5:00 PM 33 135 41 21 99 4 9 125 15 24 90 14 610 5:15 PM 47 158 46 25 107 4 8 171 28 37 126 17 774 5:30 PM 34 143 37 29 73 4 18 172 24 31 99 19 683 5:45 PM 42 145 62 35 110 3 13 173 28 33 121 13 778 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES = I 66 941 22 I 201 721 38 I 87 1 99 192 I 212 g� WR I 5 2S1 PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK VOLUMES 1 156 9 186 1 110 15 I 95 1 125 63 I 8 PEAK FACTOR: 0 91 0.868 0.916 0 867 0914 HR. CONTROL: Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Rosemead Blvd DATE: 10/22/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Lower Azusa Rd DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 09- 5341-002 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES PEAK H FACTOR: I S 0 852 315 I 99 0 938 1 14 03 556 13 1 658 0.937 273 I 05943 CONTROL: Signalized! 148 U-TUms SB U -Turns 0 1 2 0 3 4 4 2 1 3 2 2 2 1 1 2 NB U -Tums I S8 U -Tums 15 15 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL Wi WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 1.5 0 0.5 6:00 AM 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 2 193 37 11 255 0 0 0 1 124 0 51 674 7:15 AM 4 244 48 14 268 0 0 0 1 143 2 63 787 7:30 AM 2 265 81 23 277 0 0 0 2 168 0 75 893 7:45 AM 1 328 94 25 246 1 2 1 6 156 2 74 936 8:00 AM 0 292 73 25 237 0 0 0 3 185 0 64 879 8:15 AM 2 236 67 26 277 0 2 2 2 149 0 60 823 8:30 AM 1 258 68 31 253 0 0 0 0 161 1 80 853 8:45 AM 4 262 45 21 238 2 0 0 0 120 2 41 735 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 16 2078 513 176 2051 3 4 3 15 1206 7 508 6580 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES PEAK H FACTOR: I S 0 852 315 I 99 0 938 1 14 03 556 13 1 658 0.937 273 I 05943 CONTROL: Signalized! 148 U-TUms SB U -Turns 0 1 2 0 3 4 4 2 1 3 2 2 2 1 1 2 NB U -Tums I S8 U -Tums 15 15 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Rosemead Blvd DATE: 10/22/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Lower Azusa Rd DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -002 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM VOLUMES = I 9 2669 722 1 468 2544 7 I 16 17 12 1 586 3 331 I 7384 PM Peak Fir Begins at: 445 PM PEAK VOLUMES = 6 1406 378 1 232 1328 5 4 2 1 302 0 171 3835 FACTOR: I 0.981 I 0.929 I 0.583 I 0.931 I 0.971 CONTROL: Signalized NB U -Turns SB U -Turns 6 1 2 2 5 2 0 1 9 2 5 3 9 1 5 2 NB U-Tums S13 U-TUr 41 1re 4 Ni. NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 1.5 0 0.5 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 2 316 78 52 295 1 5 9 4 85 2 35 884 4:15 PM 1 295 102 60 312 0 3 4 4 51 0 38 870 4:30 PM 0 329 88 47 272 1 2 1 2 69 0 46 857 4:45 PM 3 360 93 52 348 1 1 2 0 70 0 40 970 5:00 PM 3 356 88 51 310 0 0 0 0 76 0 41 925 5:15 PM 0 354 91 62 357 2 2 0 0 70 0 49 987 5:30 PM 0 336 106 67 313 2 1 0 1 86 0 41 953 5:45 PM 0 323 76 77 337 0 2 1 1 79 1 41 938 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM VOLUMES = I 9 2669 722 1 468 2544 7 I 16 17 12 1 586 3 331 I 7384 PM Peak Fir Begins at: 445 PM PEAK VOLUMES = 6 1406 378 1 232 1328 5 4 2 1 302 0 171 3835 FACTOR: I 0.981 I 0.929 I 0.583 I 0.931 I 0.971 CONTROL: Signalized NB U -Turns SB U -Turns 6 1 2 2 5 2 0 1 9 2 5 3 9 1 5 2 NB U-Tums S13 U-TUr 41 1re 4 IntersectkwTurning-- Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Rosemead Blvd DATE: 10/22/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Mission Or DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -003 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NIL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 6:00 AM NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 6:15 AM 82 80 I 2663 617 275 I 465 313 213 I 884 140 8373 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 26 239 9 10 329 68 20 28 24 16 94 17 880 7:15 AM 31 282 9 10 351 68 29 31 34 27 79 14 965 7:30 AM 24 293 17 14 312 67 38 97 52 30 99 20 1063 7:45 AM 38 381 18 16 329 83 45 77 46 43 99 32 1207 8:00 AM 39 350 7 4 329 85 38 88 56 22 140 15 1173 8:15 AM 32 258 7 12 370 95 42 50 26 30 128 18 1068 8:30 AM 48 303 12 10 348 92 29 54 40 28 146 17 1127 8:45 AM 35 262 3 4 295 59 34 40 35 17 99 7 890 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 273 I 2368 82 80 I 2663 617 275 I 465 313 213 I 884 140 8373 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 745 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 157 1292 44 1 42 1376 355 1 154 269 168 1 123 513 82 1 4575 PEAK HR. FACTOR: I 0.854 I 0.929 I 0.812 I 0.940 I 0.948 CONTROL: Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Rosemead Blvd DATE: 10/2212009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Mission Dr DAY:THURSDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -003 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 8596 I 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 27 328 8 10 319 55 45 102 37 12 49 17 1009 4:15 PM 26 280 9 15 267 30 29 104 33 15 75 18 901 4:30 PM 29 391 18 11 316 46 44 121 47 9 47 12 1091 4:45 PM 39 352 7 30 341 52 53 125 25 19 60 22 1125 5:00 PM 36 407 12 17 351 49 47 130 42 21 67 28 1207 5:15 PM 35 376 12 20 356 52 60 144 37 24 79 20 1215 5:30 PM 33 325 17 27 279 27 42 132 25 9 87 22 1025 5:45 PM 18 309 13 21 298 54 46 119 34 18 74 19 1023 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 243 2768 96 151 I 2527 365 366 I 977 280 127 I 538 158 8596 I PM Peak Hr Begins at: 430 PM PEAK VOLUMES = 139 1526 49 1 78 1364 199 1 204 520 151 1 73 253 82 PEAK HR. FACTOR: I 0.942 I 0.959 I 0.908 I 0.829 CONTROL: Signalized 4638 0.954 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Walnut Grove Ave DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Valley Blvd DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09- 5341 -004 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 6:00 AM 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 13 56 16 5 115 14 9 63 12 26 154 5 488 7:15 AM 17 80 22 9 180 20 12 78 14 35 234 8 709 7:30 AM 25 154 61 8 201 41 18 128 10 58 254 17 975 7:45 AM 34 140 69 18 200 43 27 173 27 72 364 23 1190 8:00 AM 26 108 32 22 211 51 18 120 24 55 281 18 966 8:15 AM 35 104 32 18 173 48 28 142 28 39 306 7 960 8:30 AM 22 96 38 19 179 33 17 128 17 46 254 7 856 8:45 AM 24 100 35 21 195 40 16 158 29 43 258 10 929 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR VOLUMES= 196 838 305 120 1454 290 145 990 161 374 2105 95 7073 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 120 506 194 66 785 183 91 563 89 224 1205 65 4091 PEAK HR. 1 FACTOR: 0.844 0.910 0.818 0.814 0.859 CONTROL: Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Walnut Grove Ave DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Valley Blvd DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09- 5341 -004 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1:00 PM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL 1:15 PM 185 I 1338 437 118 I 961 152 224 I 1987 188 367 I 1410 119 7486 I 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 21 125 52 16 81 18 24 232 21 50 168 12 820 4:15 PM 26 151 52 14 134 19 32 228 19 37 158 20 890 4:30 PM 19 150 57 10 103 15 31 224 17 39 137 13 815 4:45 PM 28 155 46 10 113 15 21 260 31 37 180 17 913 5:00 PM 18 147 56 17 126 23 23 235 26 41 172 16 900 5:15 PM 22 223 58 17 122 21 17 273 22 54 198 15 1042 5:30 PM 22 154 47 18 127 15 43 249 20 59 218 8 980 5:45 PM 29 233 69 16 155 26 33 286 32 50 179 18 1126 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 185 I 1338 437 118 I 961 152 224 I 1987 188 367 I 1410 119 7486 I PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK VOLUMES = 91 757 230 1 68 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 1 0.814 CONTROL: Signalized 530 85 1 116 1043 100 1 204 767 57 0.867 1 0.897 I110YA 4048 Dit -k-B] Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Rosemead Blvd DATE: 10/22/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Valley Blvd DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 09- 5341 -005 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 1 192 1305 112 1 28 1328 246 1 156 363 190 1 199 710 99 1 4928 FAACTOR: I 0.874 I 0.960 I 0.784 I 0.910 I 0.907 CONTROL: Signalized NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT Wit TOTAL NB U -Tums SB U -Tums LANES: 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 6:00 AM 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 23 224 10 4 295 33 8 43 29 36 119 8 832 3 1 7:15 AM 35 285 21 2 294 56 27 42 21 36 163 13 995 3 0 7:30 AM 47 358 26 7 340 64 43 70 25 44 162 22 1208 3 0 7:45 AM 43 394 23 10 317 68 47 122 57 56 191 30 1358 3 1 8:00 AM 44 316 34 7 362 48 26 89 52 49 185 20 1232 3 0 8:15 AM 58 237 29 4 309 66 40 82 56 50 172 27 1130 4 0 8:30 AM 47 321 35 7 313 73 33 81 39 52 158 16 1175 6 2 8:45 AM 50 297 27 11 294 57 34 88 55 47 173 17 1150 1 0 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB U -Tums 58 U -Tums VOLUMES = 347 2432 205 52 2524 465 258 617 334 370 1323 153 9080 26 4 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 1 192 1305 112 1 28 1328 246 1 156 363 190 1 199 710 99 1 4928 FAACTOR: I 0.874 I 0.960 I 0.784 I 0.910 I 0.907 CONTROL: Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Rosemead Blvd DATE: 10/22/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Valley Blvd DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 09- 5341 -005 PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM VOLUMES PEAK = i 142 1386 168 i 64 1223 189 i 276 690 149 i 177 469 80 I 5013 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 1 0.951 CONTROL: Signalized 0.944 1 0.908 1 0.908 1 0.967 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB U -Turns SO U-Turns LANES: 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 47 258 33 14 285 31 45 108 36 36 92 7 992 1 2 4:15 PM 51 317 38 14 286 43 60 154 43 36 113 17 1172 1 1 4:30 PM 42 361 33 18 296 54 66 148 41 34 103 14 1210 3 0 4:45 PM 34 333 39 14 300 49 65 156 43 46 92 20 1191 2 0 5:00 PM 34 370 42 15 305 46 54 165 41 47 135 18 1272 3 1 5:15 PM 41 323 42 24 291 46 77 197 33 36 124 19 1253 4 0 5:30 PM 39 360 44 13 327 51 69 171 42 43 117 20 1296 3 1 5:45 PM 28 333 40 12 300 46 76 157 33 51 93 23 1192 1 0 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER W. WT WR TOTAL NBU -TUMS SBU -Turns VOLUMES = 316 2655 311 124 0 23966 3 512 1256 312 329 869 138 9578 18 5 PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM VOLUMES PEAK = i 142 1386 168 i 64 1223 189 i 276 690 149 i 177 469 80 I 5013 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 1 0.951 CONTROL: Signalized 0.944 1 0.908 1 0.908 1 0.967 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Mission Or DATE: 10/22/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Valley Blvd DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 09-5341 -006 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 2 1 6:00 AM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL 6:15 AM ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 0 6:30 AM 0 471 I 0 53 38 I 655 0 6:45 AM 1703 892 3812 7:00 AM 28 3 0 43 168 95 337 7:15 AM 34 5 6 47 199 120 411 7:30 AM 67 16 9 79 267 197 635 7:45 AM 120 15 8 119 214 114 590 8:00 AM 68 3 3 99 214 73 460 8:15 AM 61 5 3 88 240 100 497 8:30 AM 46 4 1 98 199 97 445 8:45 AM 47 2 8 82 202 96 437 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 0 0 0 471 I 0 53 38 I 655 0 0 I 1703 892 3812 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES = I 0 0 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 1 0.000 CONTROL: Signalized 0 1 316 0 39 I 23 385 0.657 0.803 0 1 0 935 484 1 2182 0.765 1 0.859 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Mission Dr DATE: 10/22/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Valley Blvd DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 09- 5341 -006 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 2 1 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM 86 5 2 146 111 62 412 89 5 7 151 129 64 445 100 7 6 158 123 56 450 84 5 6 210 138 83 526 104 5 8 186 158 68 529 76 12 6 225 177 90 586 148 5 8 185 147 80 573 111 6 4 214 159 72 566 TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 0 0 0 798 I 0 50 47 I 1475 0 0 I 1142 575 4087 I PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM 7313 VOLUMES = I 0 0 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 0.000 CONTROL: Signalized 0 1 439 0 28 1 26 810 0 1 0 641 310 1 2254 0.763 1 0.905 1 0.890 1 0.962 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Rio Hondo Ave DATE: 10/22/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Valley Blvd DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -007 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2.5 0.5 6:00 AM NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 6:15 AM 155 66 I 44 61 18 I 969 141 I 164 2296 29 4203 I 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 16 3 10 5 2 9 3 60 11 11 240 4 374 7:15 AM 29 5 23 10 6 5 0 71 7 11 282 0 449 7:30 AM 69 3 10 7 7 11 2 126 20 15 387 4 661 7:45 AM 53 6 23 15 9 10 3 188 44 13 262 6 632 8:00 AM 16 1 27 3 6 2 5 150 17 19 270 3 519 8:15 AM 19 0 17 12 8 11 1 128 16 40 309 6 567 8:30 AM 18 1 21 9 2 3 2 127 17 30 278 1 509 8:45 AM 18 3 24 5 4 10 2 119 9 25 268 5 492 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 238 22 155 66 I 44 61 18 I 969 141 I 164 2296 29 4203 I AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 1 157 10 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 1 0.744 CONTROL: Signalized 77 I 37 34 I 11 97 I 67 19 I 0.743 05945 0.821 039 0 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Rio Hondo Ave DATE: 10/22/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Valley Blvd DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -007 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2.5 0.5 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 16 10 34 9 3 5 6 207 21 15 157 13 496 4:15 PM 12 4 46 4 5 5 6 210 22 15 171 6 506 4:30 PM 16 10 40 5 1 4 4 243 15 14 163 5 520 4:45 PM 21 10 53 2 4 10 10 264 16 16 187 11 604 5:00 PM 30 17 57 6 8 11 0 260 31 8 187 3 618 5:15 PM 29 9 50 6 7 13 8 268 24 24 224 3 665 5:30 PM 33 9 62 8 4 7 10 292 32 14 189 14 674 5:45 PM 19 9 49 6 4 6 1 288 35 12 206 7 642 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM VOLUMES = 1 176 78 391 1 46 PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK VOLUMES = 111 44 218 1 26 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 1 0.897 CONTROL: Signalized 36 61 pj ;�Y1 0.827 45 2032 196 1 118 1484 62 FCIiiGI:iF�. 0.935 58 806 27 0.887 4725 P4311:'J 0.964 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Temple City Blvd DATE: 10/22/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Valley Blvd DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 09- 5341 -008 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 2 0 6:00 AM 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 46 62 7 23 133 33 16 54 4 19 172 35 604 7:15 AM 47 91 12 35 131 44 23 67 8 22 269 32 781 7:30 AM 64 87 7 38 108 54 29 95 12 22 280 61 857 7:45 AM 45 96 12 60 135 60 44 160 17 27 197 62 915 8:00 AM 48 91 9 50 135 55 42 135 15 23 222 27 852 8:15 AM 52 88 13 40 140 72 32 117 10 18 259 46 887 8:30 AM 47 64 13 45 131 44 33 104 6 22 231 51 791 8:45 AM 33 79 12 36 116 43 30 99 6 14 225 44 737 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM VOLUMES = 1 382 658 85 1 327 1029 405 1 249 831 78 1 167 1855 358 I 6424 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES= 1 209 362 41 1 188 518 241 147 507 54 90 958 196 3511 PEAK HR. FACTOR: I 0.968 I 0.928 I 0.801 I 0.857 I 0.959 CONTROL: Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Temple City Blvd DATE: 10122/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Valley Blvd DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -008 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM VOLUMES = 1 207 996 124 1 287 923 264 1 430 1948 147 1 138 1055 220 1 6739 PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK VOLUMES 1 130 59 0.9 8 0 945 0 68 61 1 164 4861 130 1 232 78 I 76 118 I 3706 9 8 PEAK FACTOR: 0 HR. CONTROL: Signalized NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 2 0 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 20 75 14 24 102 30 43 219 11 14 121 20 693 4:15 PM 17 94 13 31 107 37 49 203 15 19 126 24 735 4:30 PM 18 112 16 37 100 31 61 224 24 13 111 28 775 4:45 PM 22 124 20 31 128 36 45 228 19 16 131 30 830 5:00 PM 40 133 18 40 117 46 59 255 17 19 137 21 902 5:15 PM 27 145 15 39 116 24 55 259 18 18 151 26 893 5:30 PM 36 154 12 40 131 32 58 283 20 18 140 43 967 5:45 PM 27 159 16 45 122 28 60 277 23 21 138 28 944 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM VOLUMES = 1 207 996 124 1 287 923 264 1 430 1948 147 1 138 1055 220 1 6739 PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK VOLUMES 1 130 59 0.9 8 0 945 0 68 61 1 164 4861 130 1 232 78 I 76 118 I 3706 9 8 PEAK FACTOR: 0 HR. CONTROL: Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Walnut Grove Ave DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Marshall St DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -009 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 6:00 AM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL 6:15 AM 91 1213 300 67 I 1849 96 92 I 190 178 368 I 329 78 4851 I 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 7 86 12 6 157 7 6 9 16 30 21 1 358 7:15 AM 10 101 37 5 180 11 5 21 16 42 33 6 467 7:30 AM 16 191 68 15 218 12 23 44 19 41 42 7 696 7:45 AM 17 198 61 9 273 19 21 35 35 65 37 22 792 8:00 AM 14 163 27 7 272 19 7 23 30 44 40 8 654 8:15 AM 9 153 36 13 271 10 15 21 20 39 57 15 659 8:30 AM 5 174 31 8 237 10 10 22 21 51 55 13 637 8:45 AM 13 147 28 4 241 8 5 15 21 56 44 6 588 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 91 1213 300 67 I 1849 96 92 I 190 178 368 I 329 78 4851 I AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 56 705 192 1 44 1034 60 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 1 0.863 0.945 CONTROL: Signalized 66 123 104 1 189 176 52 0.805 0.841 2801 0.884 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Walnut Grove Ave DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Marshall St DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -009 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1:00 PM NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 1:15 PM 484 82 1320 68 121 I 282 150 411 I 226 70 5100 I 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 16 159 41 14 139 6 9 21 18 40 28 9 500 4:15 PM 19 194 44 6 167 6 10 29 14 35 27 4 555 4:30 PM 18 185 44 8 148 5 8 27 14 57 18 9 541 4:45 PM 13 213 53 11 167 9 18 36 15 70 26 7 638 5:00 PM 17 221 62 10 152 6 11 40 21 55 33 6 634 5:15 PM 19 279 81 18 179 10 17 40 21 43 31 11 749 5:30 PM 11 229 83 11 175 10 22 41 23 56 28 12 701 5:45 PM 27 266 76 4 193 16 26 48 24 55 35 12 782 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 140 1746 484 82 1320 68 121 I 282 150 411 I 226 70 5100 I PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK VOLUMES = 74 995 302 1 43 699 42 1 76 169 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 1 01904 0.920 0.852 CONTROL: Signalized 89 1 209 127 41 I 2866 0.924 0.916 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Rosemead Blvd DATE: 10/22/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Marshall St DAY:THURSDAY PROJECT# 09-5341 -010 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 6:00 AM NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 6:15 AM 199 177 I 3162 105 87 I 222 199 332 I 461 155 8080 I 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 7 307 12 16 361 7 4 9 5 27 29 14 798 7:15 AM 9 338 19 14 354 13 10 12 7 44 50 13 883 7:30 AM 12 462 27 18 426 19 11 19 19 43 67 18 1141 7:45 AM 13 403 25 26 388 16 16 46 44 49 76 20 1122 8:00 AM 17 359 48 27 467 9 9 41 44 40 55 17 1133 8:15 AM 7 272 25 24 384 20 16 30 37 45 61 23 944 8:30 AM 12 399 20 24 409 9 13 38 24 39 56 25 1068 8:45 AM 16 348 23 28 373 12 8 27 19 45 67 25 991 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 93 I 2888 199 177 I 3162 105 87 I 222 199 332 I 461 155 8080 I AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 49 1496 125 1 95 1665 64 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 1 0.833 0.907 CONTROL: Signalized 52 136 144 1 177 259 0.783 0:1.11 78 I 4340 0.951 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Rosemead Blvd DATE: 10/22/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Marshall St DAY:THURSDAY PROJECT# 09- 5341 -010 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 12 347 58 38 328 10 12 48 13 33 32 32 963 4:15 PM 19 387 51 46 303 7 20 39 22 40 46 45 1025 4:30 PM 16 458 63 31 376 15 8 47 22 35 44 27 1142 4:45 PM 20 391 77 33 319 7 20 45 29 35 44 41 1061 5:00 PM 18 400 66 34 378 5 21 52 43 40 41 27 1125 5:15 PM 31 361 47 32 306 9 27 71 32 42 71 29 1058 5:30 PM 27 386 61 37 371 12 24 52 29 35 59 25 1118 5:45 PM 19 381 56 38 326 7 29 81 28 40 46 39 1090 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM TOTAL I NL NT NR I SL ST 52 VOLUMES = 162 3111 479 289 2707 72 PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK VOLUMES = 95 1528 230 1 141 1381 33 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 1 0.957 0.926 CONTROL: Signalized 161 435 218 1 300 383 265 I 8582 101 256 132 1 157 217 120 I 4391 0.886 0.870 0.976 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Rosemead Blvd DATE: 10/22/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Glendon Way DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -011 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANES: NL 1 NT 2.5 NR 0.5 SL ST 0 2 SR 1 EL 1 ET 0 ER 1 WL 0.5 WT 0.5 WR 1 TOTAL 6:00 AM VOLUMES= I 47 1605 220 i 0 1803 234 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 0 258 41 314 88 0 0 24 12 10 26 773 7:15 AM 8 328 58 341 78 0 0 41 19 7 32 912 7:30 AM 10 485 51 428 65 3 0 47 19 8 34 1150 7:45 AM 13 413 58 425 52 2 0 62 26 12 33 1096 8:00 AM 9 397 59 494 61 2 0 46 21 6 34 1129 8:15 AM 15 310 52 456 56 1 0 54 23 6 30 1003 8:30 AM 9 441 64 422 68 1 0 27 17 7 43 1099 8:45 AM 6 339 48 350 67 2 1 39 24 15 45 936 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR VOLUMES = 70 2971 431 0 3230 535 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES= I 47 1605 220 i 0 1803 234 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 1 0.857 0.918 CONTROL: Signalized Legend 1 ER from I -30 WB off ramp EL ET ER I WL WT WR I TOTAL 11 1 340 161 71 277 8098 8 0 209 1 89 32 131 1 4378 0.848 1 0.887 1 0.952 See Legend Bek 1 ER 38 50 62 93 88 84 58 69 ER 542 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Rosemead Blvd DATE: 10/22/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Glendon Way DAY:THURSDAY PROJECT# 09- 5341 -011 LANES: NORTHBOUND NL NT NR 1 2.5 0.5 SOUTHBOUND SL ST SR 0 2 1 EL 1 EASTBOUND ET ER 0 1 WL 0.5 WESTBOUND WT WR 0.5 1 TOTAL 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 13 402 133 292 81 1 0 21 17 9 44 1013 4:15 PM 24 419 139 282 69 4 0 13 18 24 42 1034 4:30 PM 18 511 151 331 86 2 0 27 15 21 55 1217 4:45 PM 27 470 153 307 92 6 0 14 16 12 65 1162 5:00 PM 27 396 159 376 70 0 0 14 19 18 50 1129 5:15 PM 34 467 142 315 75 1 1 11 20 24 45 1135 5:30 PM 30 477 177 324 92 4 1 28 18 29 45 1225 5:45 PM 27 426 120 264 72 2 0 19 19 17 48 1014 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES = 1 200 3568 1174 I OL 2 91 637 I 20 E2 47 I 42 154 94 I 8929 PM Peak Hr Begins at: 445 PM PEAK VOLUMES = 118 1810 631 1 0 1322 329 1 11 2 67 73 83 205 I 4651 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 1 0.935 0.925 0.606 0.970 0.949 CONTROL: Signalized Legend 1 ER from I -10 WB off ramp See Legend Bel, 1 ER 45 47 62 59 46 44 48 67 F ER 418 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Temple City Blvd DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Loftus Or DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -012 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 6:00 AM 576 366 I 831 0 0 I 0 0 6:15 AM 0 159 3607 I 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 106 72 37 92 61 17 385 7:15 AM 125 78 41 105 81 21 451 7:30 AM 140 81 56 95 82 42 496 7:45 AM 138 87 50 118 80 17 490 8:00 AM 154 66 49 110 80 18 477 8:15 AM 130 68 42 108 76 15 439 8:30 AM 134 57 49 111 80 11 442 8:45 AM 140 67 42 92 68 18 427 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 0 1067 576 366 I 831 0 0 I 0 0 608 I 0 159 3607 I AM Peak Hr Begins at: 715 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 0 557 312 1 196 428 0 1 0 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 1 0.966 0.929 CONTROL: Signalized 0 0 323 0 98 1 1914 0.000 0.849 0.965 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Temple City Blvd DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Loftus Dr DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09- 5341 -012 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 78 47 40 BO 88 10 343 4:15 PM 137 57 35 95 94 23 441 4:30 PM 127 43 48 88 119 22 447 4:45 PM 114 53 44 102 117 19 449 5:00 PM 129 45 49 107 154 21 505 5:15 PM 167 57 50 130 155 35 594 5:30 PM 158 61 37 136 144 26 562 5:45 PM 193 42 44 114 96 22 511 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM VOLUMES = I 0 1103 405 1 347 852 0 I 0 0 0 1 967 0 178 I 3852 PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK VOLUMES = 0 647 205 1 180 487 0 0 0 0 549 0 104 2172 PEAK HR. ACTOR: I 0.906 I 0.926 I 0.000 I 0.859 I 0.914 CONTROL: Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Del Mar Ave DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Hellman Ave DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09-5341 -013 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 6:00 AM NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 6:15 AM 37 96 I 1353 211 380 I 278 87 89 I 511 202 5023 I 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 9 130 2 7 93 20 21 14 5 6 26 22 355 7:15 AM 21 186 8 9 106 18 42 22 8 7 56 26 509 7:30 AM 12 277 1 15 161 20 48 29 8 13 50 36 670 7:45 AM 11 239 4 17 219 31 50 41 15 17 74 27 745 8:00 AM 14 238 4 15 230 40 42 32 14 13 76 24 742 8:15 AM 13 212 6 13 221 23 68 56 12 10 65 27 726 8:30 AM 17 192 7 13 170 27 60 38 13 10 68 20 635 8:45 AM 11 197 5 7 153 32 49 46 12 13 96 20 641 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 108 1671 37 96 I 1353 211 380 I 278 87 89 I 511 202 5023 I AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 50 966 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 1 0.889 CONTROL: Signalized 15 1 60 831 114 1 208 158 49 0.882 0.763 53 265 114 1 2883 0.915 1 0.967 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Del Mar Ave DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Hellman Ave DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -013 LANES: NORTHBOUND NL NT NR 1 2 0 SOUTHBOUND SL ST SR 1 2 0 EL 1 EASTBOUND ET ER 1 0 WL 1 WESTBOUND WT WR 1 0 TOTAL 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 10 158 10 16 182 30 34 57 15 7 23 19 561 4:15 PM 8 206 8 15 195 38 36 57 21 6 28 8 626 4:30 PM 7 153 9 22 158 23 31 59 9 2 37 10 520 4:45 PM 12 172 8 23 216 29 38 88 17 2 20 15 640 5:00 PM 12 188 9 25 191 33 46 97 17 6 18 13 655 5:15 PM 16 211 5 33 258 39 33 96 15 7 28 23 764 5:30 PM 13 213 12 21 205 33 48 90 21 9 42 20 727 5:45 PM 15 222 14 20 248 38 49 95 16 5 53 23 798 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM SL ST TOTAL NL NT NR VOLUMES = I 93 15 3 75 I 175 1653 63 I 3 5 639 31 I 44 249 31 I T09i1 PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM TWI13 VOLUMES = I 56 834 40 I 99 143 1 176 69 I 27 79 I 0944 PEAK ACTOR 0 926 0.867 0.973 0.762 HR. CONTROL: Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: San Gabriel Blvd DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Hellman Ave DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09-5341-014 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND AM Peak Hr Begins at: 745 AM 91.124 VOLUMES = 1 64 945 PEAK HR. FAC_T_( R: y, QA�0 •i `�: CONTROL: Signalized 14 1 52 1231 173 1 132 0.908 136 75 133 203 110 I 3168 0.953 0.930 0.943 .10 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 6:00 AM 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 9 157 4 7 148 19 14 12 13 6 25 17 431 7:15 AM 9 253 5 6 154 22 23 25 17 4 41 30 589 7:30 AM 19 264 2 4 254 23 31 32 16 7 46 29 727 7:45 AM 14 260 4 16 331 43 28 40 22 10 36 36 840 8:00 AM 19 232 3 15 329 57 30 37 19 7 56 20 824 8:15 AM 19 224 4 11 307 35 33 29 18 11 53 24 768 8:30 AM 12 229 3 10 264 38 41 30 16 5 58 30 736 8:45 AM 18 251 11 9 295 50 34 24 11 8 52 18 781 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 119 1870 36 78 2082 287 234 229 132 58 367 204 5696 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 745 AM 91.124 VOLUMES = 1 64 945 PEAK HR. FAC_T_( R: y, QA�0 •i `�: CONTROL: Signalized 14 1 52 1231 173 1 132 0.908 136 75 133 203 110 I 3168 0.953 0.930 0.943 .10 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: San Gabriel Blvd DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Hellman Ave DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -014 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL Wr WR TOTAL LANES: 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 15 231 6 16 221 24 32 46 20 5 17 22 655 4:15 PM 19 254 13 20 239 15 26 43 15 7 23 19 693 4:30 PM 14 274 11 19 222 32 17 50 19 10 17 19 704 4:45 PM 19 312 14 22 255 30 39 70 22 5 18 15 821 5:00 PM 18 302 9 27 250 19 32 60 30 8 21 22 798 5:15 PM 20 329 8 22 279 22 30 70 27 14 24 24 869 5:30 PM 18 305 19 31 264 20 31 75 17 10 29 28 847 5:45 PM 27 336 13 21 268 23 39 76 30 11 39 25 908 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST 5R EL ET ER WL WT VOLUMES= I 50 23 3 93 1 178 1998 85 1 246 490 180 I 70 88 174 1 16295 PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK VOLUMES = 83 1272 49 1 101 1061 84 132 281 104 43 113 99 3422 PEAK HR. ACTOR: I 0.934 I 0.964 I 0.891 I 0.850 I 0.942 CONTROL: Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: Nationar Data & Surveying Services' N -S STREET: Walnut Grove Ave DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Hellman Ave /Ramona DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -015 VOLUMES = 1 236 801 24 1 131 1455 296 1 363 111 293 1 10 166 454 1 4340 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 1 121 449 15 I 79 153 1 217 162 I 5 267 I 3 PEAK ACTOR 845 0 888 0.901 0.628 09 6 HR. CONTROL: Signalized NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 0.5 0.5 1 0 1 0 6:00 AM 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 25 56 1 11 120 31 21 6 25 0 14 37 347 7:15 AM 29 85 2 11 146 23 43 12 31 2 24 75 483 7:30 AM 35 107 1 12 143 26 75 11 38 0 27 116 591 7:45 AM 29 142 2 25 215 43 40 21 34 3 22 78 654 8:00 AM 34 92 5 29 196 41 54 20 37 2 19 30 559 8:15 AM 23 108 7 13 219 43 48 16 53 0 19 43 592 8:30 AM 27 104 3 18 199 50 40 14 32 2 26 30 545 8:45 AM 34 107 3 12 217 39 42 11 43 1 15 45 569 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM VOLUMES = 1 236 801 24 1 131 1455 296 1 363 111 293 1 10 166 454 1 4340 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 1 121 449 15 I 79 153 1 217 162 I 5 267 I 3 PEAK ACTOR 845 0 888 0.901 0.628 09 6 HR. CONTROL: Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Walnut Grove Ave DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Hellman Ave /Ramona DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09- 5341 -015 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 0.5 0.5 1 0 1 0 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM 33 195 4 27 144 26 38 21 19 1 7 32 547 35 190 2 29 168 29 68 23 16 1 10 46 617 40 186 2 26 134 19 50 27 22 2 8 22 538 27 233 5 31 133 24 70 24 17 2 10 41 617 45 247 7 31 143 25 67 24 18 1 7 58 673 30 271 9 78 135 25 65 28 20 1 24 53 739 25 271 6 29 158 35 66 31 21 3 6 53 704 46 305 4 46 199 47 67 23 16 3 10 63 829 VOLUMES = 1 281 1898 39 1 297 1214 230 1 491 201 149 1 14 82 368 1 5264 PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM W.'" VOLUMES = 1 146 1094 26 1 184 635 132 1 265 106 75 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 0.892 0.814 0.945 CONTROL: Signalized 8 47 227 1 2945 r'r� Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Rosemead Blvd DATE: 10/22/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Telstar Ave DAYr THURSDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -016 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL- ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 0 3 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 6:00 AM 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 238 77 52 366 30 19 782 7:15 AM 340 120 74 479 50 15 1078 7:30 AM 424 113 70 476 50 18 1151 7:45 AM 413 163 112 605 47 19 1359 8:00 AM 369 132 79 583 47 28 1238 8:15 AM 344 124 91 574 44 33 1210 8:30 AM 363 113 74 491 49 40 1130 8:45 AM 283 95 73 422 43 27 943 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM VOLUMES= 1 0 2774 937 1 625 3996 0 1 0 0 0 1 360 0 199 1 8891 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES I O 532 1 352 ? 0 I O 0 0 1 186 98 I 9 PEAK H FACTOR R. 0.904 0 903 .000 0.929 09 2 CONTROL: Signalized EB U -Turns 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 F 7U-Turns 5TU Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Rosemead Blvd DATE: 10/22/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Telstar Ave DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 09-5341 -016 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANES: NL NT 0 3 NR 1 SL 1 ST SR 3 0 EL ET ER WL 0 0 0 1 WT WR 0 2 TOTAL 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 432 36 54 386 90 107 1105 4:15 PM 482 26 46 373 104 122 1153 4:30 PM 460 42 41 409 113 179 1244 4:45 PM 455 44 44 367 106 143 1159 5:00 PM 462 41 31 458 118 160 1270 5:15 PM 481 26 56 430 103 150 1246 5:30 PM 498 42 43 417 118 157 1275 5:45 PM 502 57 52 427 92 106 1236 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES = 10 3772 3 4 I 367 3 67 0 SR EL ET I 0 0 0R 144 o 12 I 90688E PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK VOLUMES = i 0 1943 166 i 182 1732 0 i 0 0 0 1 431 0 573 I 5027 PEAK HR. FACTOR: I 0.943 I 0.979 I 0.000 I 0.903 I 0.986 CONTROL: Signalized EB U -Turns i 1 2 1 1 0 2 1 EB U -Tums 9 Intersection Turning Movement prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Rosemead Blvd DATE: 10/22/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Whitmore St DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 09- 5341 -017 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES I O 143 I 69 3 0 I O 0. 0 I 29 0.568 26 I PEAK H ACTOR R. 9 0 000 944 0 25 0.901 CONTROL: Signalized NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL AT WR TOTAL SB U -Turns LANES: 1 3 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 6:00 AM 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 323 35 8 391 7 1 765 1 7:15 AM 449 29 9 514 2 2 1005 2 7:30 AM 540 31 12 518 5 2 1108 4 7:45 AM 568 42 34 606 8 3 1261 5 8:00 AM 499 36 24 614 11 11 1195 0 8:15 AM 449 34 19 590 0 10 1102 1 8:30 AM 466 25 21 527 8 14 1061 1 8:45 AM 364 27 15 441 8 10 865 0 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL SB U -Turns VOLUMES = 0 3658 259 142 4201 0 0 0 0 49 0 53 8362 14 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES I O 143 I 69 3 0 I O 0. 0 I 29 0.568 26 I PEAK H ACTOR R. 9 0 000 944 0 25 0.901 CONTROL: Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Rosemead Blvd DATE: 10/22/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Whitmore St DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 09- 5341 -017 PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK VOLUMES = 0 2028 42 1 9 2147 0 1 0 0 0 1 199 0 82 1 4507 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 1 0.938 0.928 0.000 0.657 0.963 CONTROL: Signalized NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NIL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL SB U -Tums LANES: 1 3 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 453 6 5 471 24 18 977 2 4:15 PM 498 11 1 474 17 6 1007 0 4:30 PM 494 7 2 522 61 18 1104 0 4:45 PM 473 14 2 469 41 16 1015 0 5:00 PM 476 6 3 578 79 28 1170 3 5:15 PM 487 8 3 521 38 19 1076 1 5:30 PM 527 14 1 541 56 19 1158 2 5:45 PM 538 14 2 507 26 16 1103 1 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL SB U -Tums VOLUMES = 0 3946 80 19 4083 0 0 0 0 342 0 140 8610 9 PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK VOLUMES = 0 2028 42 1 9 2147 0 1 0 0 0 1 199 0 82 1 4507 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 1 0.938 0.928 0.000 0.657 0.963 CONTROL: Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: New Ave DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Garvey Ave DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -018 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 6:00 AM NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 6:15 AM 192 1 270 338 146 221 I 877 156 120 I 1439 346 5137 I 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 5 73 10 18 33 22 10 41 8 5 126 23 374 7:15 AM 10 135 8 42 46 29 23 71 5 6 166 56 597 7:30 AM 9 152 19 40 56 23 32 102 12 13 163 54 675 7:45 AM 25 132 25 67 76 13 36 141 23 24 179 47 788 8:00 AM 22 87 30 20 25 12 30 132 28 26 202 43 657 8:15 AM 16 135 40 20 35 9 37 163 46 20 211 46 778 8:30 AM 10 116 34 35 39 21 22 111 23 13 189 41 654 8:45 AM 13 92 26 28 28 17 31 116 11 13 203 36 614 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 110 922 192 1 270 338 146 221 I 877 156 120 I 1439 346 5137 I AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 72 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 506 114 1 147 192 57 1 135 538 109 1 83 755 190 1 2898 ," • o CONTROL: Signalized 0.635 0.795 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: New Ave DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Garvey Ave DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -018 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 10 71 28 42 82 34 39 194 13 17 125 31 686 4:15 PM 8 56 19 38 76 38 33 254 12 20 163 33 750 4:30 PM 13 74 26 37 87 47 43 229 18 13 144 36 767 4:45 PM 18 80 29 0 101 48 49 231 11 24 145 23 799 5:00 PM 13 71 21 42 95 30 52 262 22 27 133 35 803 5:15 PM 14 77 31 56 116 50 47 288 18 19 168 52 936 5:30 PM 16 87 30 71 118 42 0 258 19 20 155 50 906 5:45 PM 16 102 35 75 103 55 59 249 15 22 165 56 952 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR VOLUMES = I 08 618 219 I O1 778 344 1 362 1965 128 I 62 1198 316 I T6599 PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK VOLUMES = 59 337 117 1 244 432 177 198 1057 74 88 621 193 3597 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 1 0.838 0.915 0.941 0.928 0.945 CONTROL: Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: E -W STREET: Del Mar Ave Garvey Ave DATE: 10/21/2009 DAY: WEDNESDAY LOCATION: PROJECT# City of Rosemead 09- 5341 -019 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 6:00 AM 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 15 102 5 15 63 14 11 54 16 2 118 26 441 7:15 AM 37 100 10 19 82 19 20 84 13 6 177 43 610 7:30 AM 19 155 8 26 97 34 25 111 26 11 179 58 749 7:45 AM 27 130 19 40 162 54 41 130 38 27 188 45 901 8:00 AM 36 132 17 47 178 52 40 172 47 22 199 44 986 8:15 AM 17 98 12 43 126 27 38 161 31 10 203 36 802 8:30 AM 26 113 11 48 87 31 30 142 22 13 179 33 735 8:45 AM 25 127 10 41 103 32 38 127 34 16 177 32 762 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 202 957 92 279 898 263 243 981 227 107 1420 317 5986 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 99 515 56 156 563 167 144 574 142 70 769 183 3438 PEAK HR. 1 FACTOR: 0.905 0.800 0.830 0.964 0.872 CONTROL: Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Del Mar Ave DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Garvey Ave DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -019 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 7352 I 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 40 93 16 50 105 34 45 219 15 14 145 34 810 4:15 PM 36 89 22 61 93 31 45 228 12 10 162 46 835 4:30 PM 25 111 10 55 96 43 40 221 14 10 153 33 811 4:45 PM 35 115 22 54 106 34 46 276 7 9 147 46 897 5:00 PM 33 130 25 59 106 41 33 272 15 19 174 40 947 5:15 PM 32 136 17 57 147 24 39 277 13 15 197 55 1009 5:30 PM 34 140 20 61 104 22 45 248 20 14 141 46 895 5:45 PM 51 140 21 81 132 25 51 317 35 19 226 50 1148 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 286 954 153 478 I 889 254 344 I 2058 131 110 I 1345 350 7352 I PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK VOLUMES = 1 150 546 83 1 258 489 112 1 168 1114 83 1 67 738 191 1 3999 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 1 0.919 CONTROL: Signalized 0.902 0.847 0.844 1 0.871 416•.- Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: San Gabriel Blvd DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Garvey Ave DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -020 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 6:00 AM NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 6:15 AM 246 520 I 1385 270 400 I 854 102 355 I 1567 359 7343 I 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 9 82 10 28 85 17 28 42 9 21 116 24 471 7:15 AM 9 172 20 31 137 19 43 75 8 33 159 46 752 7:30 AM 11 172 28 52 197 30 44 103 7 42 191 49 926 7:45 AM 14 158 35 73 215 28 54 118 15 53 212 55 1030 8:00 AM 15 136 41 78 192 34 43 138 12 54 220 46 1009 8:15 AM 19 152 44 98 222 54 63 154 21 54 216 47 1144 8:30 AM 14 146 37 79 150 45 61 117 16 47 254 47 1013 8:45 AM 16 160 31 81 187 43 64 107 14 51 199 45 998 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 107 1178 246 520 I 1385 270 400 I 854 102 355 I 1567 359 7343 I AM Peak Hr Begins at: 745 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 62 592 157 1 328 779 PEAK HR. FACTOR: CONTROL: 0.943 Signalized AM 161 1 221 527 64 1 208 902 195 4196 0.853 0.938 0.917 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: San Gabriel Blvd DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Garvey Ave DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09- 5341 -020 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM VOLUMES = NY" 27 151 36 27 170 40 31 176 44 27 216 50 32 169 32 36 203 53 34 187 55 29 217 50 61 142 29 62 219 14 57 142 6 75 162 35 78 196 15 69 114 68 73 136 23 67 214 19 6 136 50 67 153 20 61 238 29 58 142 57 49 173 42 72 248 30 52 175 59 82 180 41 65 241 27 49 167 61 76 165 37 68 241 18 59 161 63 79 195 51 86 256 16 54 164 62 986 1049 1015 1118 1133 1205 1164 1259 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR 243 14 9 360 1 562 16 278 1 559 13 68 1 444 1201 66 I T 02991 PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM VOLUMES = 1 131 0.927 190 1 286 0.900 171 1 291 0 955 91 1 214 0 984 245 I 07945 PEAK HR. FACTOR: CONTROL: Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Walnut Grove Ave DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Garvey Ave DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -021 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 6:00 AM 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM 13 60 11 11 63 13 19 85 9 28 109 24 29 74 20 20 63 11 17 78 25 20 82 16 23 113 21 16 134 21 22 138 19 33 191 30 37 170 29 61 195 33 43 154 40 45 171 38 4 51 14 18 77 14 24 127 27 33 144 20 19 169 27 31 216 14 32 194 26 16 129 20 22 115 8 23 163 22 26 188 16 49 245 12 30 216 14 46 221 20 23 211 19 37 177 20 455 575 700 918 834 931 862 771 VOLUMES = 1 157 614 129 1 280 1266 231 1 177 1107 162 1 256 1536 131 1 6046 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 745 AM PEAK VOLUMES = I 94 324 73 80 1 174 7809 132 1 115 O 686 87 1 148 893 0 952 65 I PEAK ACTOR 0.7 0 0 HR. CONTROL: Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data -& Surveying Services N -S STREET: Walnut Grove Ave DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Garvey Ave DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -021 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM VOLUMES = 1 221 1484 296 1 321 904 234 1 323 1888 197 1 228 1482 368 1 7946 PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK VOLUMES PEAK 1 108 0 961 151 1 161 9807 129 1 170 099>� 96 1 106 0.927 181 I 0.9 1 PEAK HR. CONTROL: Signalized NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 21 162 35 41 107 35 28 238 19 22 164 51 923 4:15 PM 29 142 33 41 116 29 40 230 23 35 191 44 953 4:30 PM 30 173 33 40 114 23 43 261 33 31 178 43 1002 4:45 PM 33 205 44 38 99 18 42 241 26 34 187 49 1016 5:00 PM 35 177 35 39 89 28 41 214 28 28 166 52 932 5:15 PM 23 226 27 44 130 35 54 222 13 28 191 45 1038 5:30 PM 23 198 42 34 122 33 38 231 28 22 189 45 1005 5:45 PM 27 201 47 44 127 33 37 251 27 28 216 39 1077 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM VOLUMES = 1 221 1484 296 1 321 904 234 1 323 1888 197 1 228 1482 368 1 7946 PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK VOLUMES PEAK 1 108 0 961 151 1 161 9807 129 1 170 099>� 96 1 106 0.927 181 I 0.9 1 PEAK HR. CONTROL: Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National DafCdVSVIVeying SdnMes N -S STREET: San Gabriel Blvd DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Rush St/ Potrero Grande DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -022 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 3771 I 6:00 AM 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 18 90 31 9 77 3 3 27 32 13 9 2 314 7:15 AM 17 89 41 4 121 11 10 45 21 23 13 4 399 7:30 AM 1 143 8 23 167 44 15 17 9 7 43 38 515 7:45 AM 3 115 14 54 145 53 14 30 5 6 52 34 525 8:00 AM 5 98 11 53 171 61 15 33 9 9 40 35 540 8:15 AM 5 102 10 54 189 58 12 27 8 10 58 24 557 8:30 AM 0 109 10 48 127 45 30 22 4 7 30 30 462 8:45 AM 2 123 7 52 117 23 17 33 4 10 46 25 459 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 51 869 132 1 297 1114 298 116 I 234 92 85 I 291 192 3771 I AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 14 458 43 1 184 672 216 1 56 107 31 1 32 PEAK HR. ACTOR: I 0.847 I 0.890 I 0.851 CONTROL: Signalized 193 131 1 2137 0.967 1 0.959 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: San Gabriel Blvd DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Rush St/ Potrero Grande DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -022 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 5 98 16 46 122 10 25 38 0 12 28 49 449 4:15 PM 4 118 13 51 114 21 24 40 4 6 44 49 488 4:30 PM 2 172 10 42 126 22 37 40 3 9 35 49 547 4:45 PM 5 154 14 44 139 20 41 55 3 12 30 51 568 5:00 PM 2 144 18 34 149 26 35 53 2 17 37 56 573 5:15 PM 2 172 18 44 153 26 52 72 3 19 55 52 668 5:30 PM 3 182 19 57 151 16 64 67 6 17 33 54 669 5:45 PM 8 156 24 54 156 14 31 88 4 11 48 64 658 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM VOLUMES = I 31 1196 132 1 372 1110 155 1 309 453 25 1 103 310 424 I 4620 PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK VOLUMES = 15 654 79 1 189 609 82 182 280 15 64 173 226 2568 PEAK HR. ACTOR: I 0.917 I 0.982 I 0.870 I 0.919 I 0.960 CONTROL: Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Walnut Grove Ave DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Rush St DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09-5341 -023 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 6:00 AM 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM 16 106 50 11 77 39 24 6 5 3 0 8 345 12 98 60 13 86 55 39 11 7 2 2 2 387 24 142 62 13 73 75 31 6 12 3 2 2 445 21 149 97 15 112 124 64 18 13 0 1 3 617 20 113 70 11 93 113 66 13 15 3 3 2 522 11 112 55 12 156 64 50 14 14 0 2 3 493 17 111 57 10 116 40 38 6 12 2 1 0 410 9 128 47 13 96 48 44 8 19 2 1 4 419 VOLUMES = 1 130 959 498 1 98 809 558 1 356 82 97 1 15 12 24 1 3638 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM 110_\9 VOLUMES = I 76 516 284 I 51 434 376 1 211 51 54 PEAK OR: HR. FACT 0.820 0.858 0.832 CONTROL: Signalized 6 8 10 1 2077 0.750 1 0.842 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Walnut Grove Ave DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Rush St DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -023 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES = I 81 1N2 6T 45 I 43 1 50 407 1 536 37 24 1 412 8 127 I T502 PM Peak Hr Begins at: 445 PM WIN VOLUMES = I 96 684 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 0.875 CONTROL: Signalized 25 1 17 650 220 1 294 15 62 1 231 42 74 1 2410 0.960 1 0.814 1 0.796 1 0.952 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 12 115 2 3 158 38 49 7 17 38 16 10 465 4:15 PM 21 143 7 8 165 48 48 5 18 55 9 14 541 4:30 PM 18 147 4 9 131 38 49 5 9 45 7 13 475 4:45 PM 21 174 6 7 179 45 72 3 17 75 9 25 633 5:00 PM 22 145 7 5 165 50 55 5 19 68 13 16 570 5:15 PM 27 170 3 4 153 57 68 6 12 52 11 16 579 5:30 PM 26 195 9 1 153 68 99 1 14 36 9 17 628 5:45 PM 34 173 7 6 146 63 96 5 18 43 4 16 611 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES = I 81 1N2 6T 45 I 43 1 50 407 1 536 37 24 1 412 8 127 I T502 PM Peak Hr Begins at: 445 PM WIN VOLUMES = I 96 684 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 0.875 CONTROL: Signalized 25 1 17 650 220 1 294 15 62 1 231 42 74 1 2410 0.960 1 0.814 1 0.796 1 0.952 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Walnut Grove Ave DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Landis View Ln DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -024 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND AM Peak Hr Begins at: 745 AM PEAK VOLUMES = i 0 893 13 i 9 564 0 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 1 0.812 0.868 CONTROL: Signalized GI [7 RM 0 1 32 0 12 1 1523 0.846 1 0.913 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 00 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 6:00 AM 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 185 6 2 104 10 4 311 7:15 AM 169 6 2 107 11 7 302 7:30 AM 207 4 2 110 13 10 346 7:45 AM 277 2 4 123 8 3 417 8:00 AM 199 3 3 139 8 3 355 8:15 AM 200 5 1 164 10 3 383 8:30 AM 217 3 1 138 6 3 368 8:45 AM 198 2 2 91 4 1 298 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 0 1652 31 17 976 0 0 0 0 70 0 34 2780 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 745 AM PEAK VOLUMES = i 0 893 13 i 9 564 0 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 1 0.812 0.868 CONTROL: Signalized GI [7 RM 0 1 32 0 12 1 1523 0.846 1 0.913 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Walnut Grove Ave DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Landis View Ln DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -024 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 00 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 122 6 4 227 2 3 364 4:15 PM 145 6 3 231 6 3 394 4:30 PM 148 6 4 184 5 4 351 4:45 PM 179 5 8 279 7 5 483 5:00 PM 178 8 7 200 9 7 409 5:15 PM 189 10 8 257 5 2 471 5:30 PM 199 6 2 198 1 4 410 5:45 PM 198 8 3 179 6 8 402 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM TOTAL TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR VOLUMES = 0 1358 55 39 1755 0 0 0 0 41 0 36 3284 PM Peak Hr Begins at: 445 PM PEAK VOLUMES = 0 745 29 25 934 0 0 0 0 22 0 18 1773 PEAK HR. 1 FACTOR: 0.944 0.835 0.000 0.625 0.918 CONTROL: Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Walnut Grove Ave DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: San Gabriel Blvd DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -025 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 0 1 0 1.3 0.3 0.3 1 2 0 0 2 2 6:00 AM 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 0 1 2 98 0 14 3 103 4 140 185 550 7:15 AM 0 1 2 101 2 17 9 115 3 208 168 626 7:30 AM 0 2 1 114 0 8 10 129 2 251 198 715 7:45 AM 3 1 0 118 5 9 16 207 5 227 263 854 8:00 AM 2 1 0 131 0 15 8 135 3 174 191 660 8:15 AM 1 0 2 160 4 11 9 167 1 190 198 743 8:30 AM 0 1 1 131 2 10 9 139 5 140 209 647 8:45 AM 3 0 0 84 3 9 6 146 2 151 195 599 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM VOLUMES = I 9 7 8 1 937 16 93 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 6 4 3 1 523 9 43 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 1 0.813 0.821 CONTROL: Signalized 70 1141 25 43 638 11 0.759 i[[3i[:lrfl�.YrL•S1 842 850 1 2972 0.863 1 0.870 • Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: Walnut Grove Ave DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: San Gabriel Blvd DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09- 5341 -025 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM TOTAL NL NT VOLUMES = I 11 10 9R 1 1658 28 10 I 98 1359 18 I OL 134 302 I TOTAL PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK VOLUMES 17 7 4 1 790 813 50 I 59 0 933 9 I 0 731 I PEAK FACTOR D 66 0. 0 939 0.953 HR. CONTROL: Signalized NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 0 1 0 1.3 0.3 0.3 1 2 0 0 2 2 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 1 0 1 213 3 12 7 139 2 122 119 619 4:15 PM 0 1 2 216 3 19 15 157 0 146 136 695 4:30 PM 1 1 2 175 3 10 6 152 5 163 144 662 4:45 PM 2 3 0 264 4 19 11 136 2 172 172 785 5:00 PM 1 3 2 192 6 10 16 207 3 160 165 765 5:15 PM 1 2 0 248 3 12 14 177 4 189 185 835 5:30 PM 3 0 2 180 2 15 13 183 1 190 189 778 5:45 PM 2 0 0 170 4 13 16 208 1 199 192 805 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM TOTAL NL NT VOLUMES = I 11 10 9R 1 1658 28 10 I 98 1359 18 I OL 134 302 I TOTAL PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK VOLUMES 17 7 4 1 790 813 50 I 59 0 933 9 I 0 731 I PEAK FACTOR D 66 0. 0 939 0.953 HR. CONTROL: Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: San Gabriel Blvd DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: SR -60 WB Ramps DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -026 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 3 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 1.5 6:00 AM ST SR EL ET ER VOLUMES = 46 1831 I 365 225 I 1821 6 I 13 26 42 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK 6:15 AM 173 99 1046 4 4 19 22 PEAK HR. I I FACTOR: 0.854 0.889 0.804 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 6 211 46 35 157 0 0 0 6 13 1 119 594 7:15 AM 6 238 48 38 189 0 4 1 5 17 5 136 687 7:30 AM 9 286 51 21 227 1 1 7 5 17 3 164 792 7:45 AM 3 260 44 29 278 1 1 5 8 25 8 235 897 8:00 AM 4 219 30 19 249 1 1 5 3 24 1 150 706 8:15 AM 1 227 48 30 292 1 1 2 6 21 2 166 797 8:30 AM 7 211 37 26 241 0 3 1 2 23 0 136 687 8:45 AM 10 179 61 27 188 2 2 5 7 34 1 161 677 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER VOLUMES = 46 1831 I 365 225 I 1821 6 I 13 26 42 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 17 992 173 99 1046 4 4 19 22 PEAK HR. I I FACTOR: 0.854 0.889 0.804 CONTROL: Signalized WL WT WR I TOTAL 174 21 1267 1 5837 87 14 715 0.761 3192 mm Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: San Gabriel Blvd DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: SR-60 WB Ramps DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09- 5341 -026 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES = I 62 1239 221 I 361 2673 17 I 14 27 68 I O5 39 92 I 64 8i PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK FACT( 0 90 0.913 OCT I 29 9 119 1 179 0.933 0 681 O 934 7 I 9 34 1 166 779 I PEAK HR. CONTROL: Signalized NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 3 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 0.5 1.5 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 10 116 30 36 301 5 0 3 9 35 3 129 677 4:15 PM 8 145 30 47 336 2 1 1 10 44 6 132 762 4:30 PM 6 150 19 41 294 1 3 4 4 25 0 152 699 4:45 PM 9 147 23 58 336 2 1 6 11 35 6 200 834 5:00 PM 3 151 33 46 342 3 0 5 7 38 4 180 812 5:15 PM 8 163 26 61 374 1 1 5 8 56 7 212 922 5:30 PM 10 193 25 37 332 2 5 0 10 36 6 177 833 5:45 PM 8 174 35 35 358 1 3 3 9 36 7 210 879 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES = I 62 1239 221 I 361 2673 17 I 14 27 68 I O5 39 92 I 64 8i PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK FACT( 0 90 0.913 OCT I 29 9 119 1 179 0.933 0 681 O 934 7 I 9 34 1 166 779 I PEAK HR. CONTROL: Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: SR -60 EB Ramps DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Town Center Or DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -027 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 1 1 1.5 1.5 0 3 0 1.5 1.5 1 6:00 AM NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 6:15 AM 92 659 I 23 1 15 I 30 12 211 I 101 1096 2343 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 0 4 17 63 1 0 0 2 1 18 3 91 200 7:15 AM 1 15 10 66 3 0 1 0 2 31 5 101 235 7:30 AM 0 13 8 85 0 1 0 0 0 25 9 144 285 7:45 AM 2 20 13 122 8 0 0 5 1 31 22 158 382 8:00 AM 0 13 15 82 2 0 4 2 3 27 14 149 311 8:15 AM 1 9 13 73 0 0 4 5 2 20 17 193 337 8:30 AM 0 14 6 88 3 0 2 8 2 30 14 148 315 8:45 AM 1 10 10 80 6 0 4 8 1 29 17 112 278 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 5 98 92 659 I 23 1 15 I 30 12 211 I 101 1096 2343 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 745 AM T_13 VOLUMES = 3 56 47 1 365 13 0 10 20 8 1 108 67 PEAK HR. FACTOR: 0.757 0.727 0.792 0.895 CONTROL: Signalized 648 1 1345 NUM APPENDIX B2 Roadway Segment Traffic Counts Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis February 19, 2010 — Appendices Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: SR -60 EB Ramps DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Town Center Or DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -027 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 1 1 1.5 1.5 0 3 0 1.5 1.5 1 1:00 PM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR 1:15 PM VOLUMES = 4 274 265 1 684 69 0 181 I 360 31 307 I 257 1:30 PM 3412 I 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 0 34 35 68 13 32 25 7 33 38 121 406 4:15 PM 2 39 32 98 10 20 38 2 42 29 145 457 4:30 PM 0 29 37 84 9 19 34 4 21 34 119 390 4:45 PM 0 38 26 82 4 17 42 4 43 32 121 409 5:00 PM 0 36 29 73 6 23 59 4 39 26 118 413 5:15 PM 0 34 43 86 9 26 53 4 51 42 128 476 5:30 PM 0 35 41 101 7 18 42 2 37 24 103 410 5:45 PM 2 29 22 92 11 26 67 4 41 32 125 451 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 4 274 265 1 684 69 0 181 I 360 31 307 I 257 980 3412 I PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK 134 VOLUMES ACTOR: 12 0.880 135 1 352 03891 0 I 93 0.845 14 1 168 0 867 474 I 0.9 9 PEAK HR. CONTROL: Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -S STREET: San Gabriel Blvd DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Town Center Or DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -028 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 2 2 0 1 2 1 1.5 0.5 1 0 1 0 6:00 AM NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL 6:15 AM 61 1609 49 1 123 632 1286 546 I 54 181 26 I 64 108 4739 I 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 1 189 3 12 62 104 58 9 13 5 5 18 479 7:15 AM 8 239 9 11 72 125 45 3 30 3 7 13 565 7:30 AM 8 257 7 12 80 160 66 2 23 0 9 15 639 7:45 AM 13 201 5 25 99 190 102 7 33 6 9 10 700 8:00 AM 5 183 6 15 86 177 64 5 28 2 8 10 589 8:15 AM 10 193 4 16 92 209 70 12 11 3 11 11 642 8:30 AM 9 179 9 19 75 173 71 6 23 5 11 11 591 8:45 AM 7 168 6 13 66 148 70 10 20 2 4 20 534 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL VOLUMES = 61 1609 49 1 123 632 1286 546 I 54 181 26 I 64 108 4739 I AM Peak Hr Begins at: 730 AM PEAK VOLUMES = 36 834 CONTROL: Signalized 22 I 68 357 736 1 302 26 0.916 0.745 95 I 11 37 46 0.940 2570 0.918 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services N -5 STREET: San Gabriel Blvd DATE: 10/21/2009 LOCATION: City of Rosemead E -W STREET: Town Center Dr DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5341 -028 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM EL TOTAL NL NT VOLUMES = I 61 91 NR 7 I 53 SL ST SR 1548 1444 I 674 6 5 2 I 30 9 54 I TOTAL PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK FACTOR VOLUMES = I 24 0.874 8 I 32 0.917 723 1 371 029 0 311 lIl I 16 PEAK HR. CONTROL: Signalized 18 25 1 2826 0.819 1 0.951 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 2 2 0 1 2 1 1.5 0.5 1 0 1 0 .1;0(1 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2:00 PM 2:15 PM 2:30 PM 2:45 PM 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 6 73 2 4 158 183 74 4 49 3 3 8 567 4:15 PM 12 89 4 5 187 198 86 8 75 3 7 7 681 4:30 PM 9 101 1 9 156 158 73 9 73 3 6 7 605 4:45 PM 10 109 2 3 196 182 70 7 74 5 5 7 670 5:00 PM 4 87 0 9 207 172 84 9 69 4 5 4 654 5:15 PM 5 103 2 7 218 213 89 7 86 4 4 5 743 5:30 PM 5 123 1 10 216 154 109 2 72 3 4 8 707 5:45 PM 10 106 5 6 210 184 89 10 84 5 5 8 722 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 6:30 PM 6:45 PM EL TOTAL NL NT VOLUMES = I 61 91 NR 7 I 53 SL ST SR 1548 1444 I 674 6 5 2 I 30 9 54 I TOTAL PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM PEAK FACTOR VOLUMES = I 24 0.874 8 I 32 0.917 723 1 371 029 0 311 lIl I 16 PEAK HR. CONTROL: Signalized 18 25 1 2826 0.819 1 0.951 Prepared by NDS /ATD 00:00 15 10 12:00 118 101 00:15 13 5 12:15 87 93 00:30 11 9 12:30 85 115 00:45 6 45 4 28 73 12:45 84 374 96 405 779 01:00 3 81 1 19 14 13:00 86 73 72 10 16 01:15 10 315 101 323 7 13 63 6 54 117 13:15 71 90 01:30 11 6 13:30 79 75 01:45 10 34 4 18 52 13:45 99 335 90 327 662 02:00 5 9 14:00 93 98 02:15 2 3 14:15 95 78 02:30 5 4 14:30 91 108 02:45 4 16 3 19 35 14:45 124 403 107 391 794 03:00 3 1 15:00 117 130 03:15 1 3 15:15 112 124 03:30 1 1 15:30 93 121 03:45 4 9 3 8 17 15:45 101 423 108 483 9D6 04:00 0 81 4 19 14 16:00 97 73 110 10 16 04:15 4 315 101 323 6 13 63 6 54 117 16:15 123 125 04:30 6 6 16:30 118 129 04:45 10 20 8 24 44 16:45 141 479 105 469 948 05:00 9 14 17:00 142 140 05:15 4 18 17:15 164 107 05:30 23 26 17:30 165 134 05:45 20 56 17 75 131 17:45 157 628 158 539 1167 06:00 16 36 18:00 141 141 06:15 35 43 18:15 169 118 06:30 34 55 18:30 158 96 06:45 41 126 73 207 333 18:45 118 586 111 466 1052 07:00 44 76 19:00 120 80 07:15 55 134 19:15 % 77 07:30 1D9 198 19:30 81 73 WAS 125 333 196 604 937 19:45 76 373 69 299 672 08:00 139 167 20:00 62 63 08:15 83 187 20:15 73 67 08:30 94 199 20:30 68 50 08:45 101 417 155 708 1125 20:45 54 257 37 217 474 09:00 80 133 21:00 46 39 09:15 79 115 21:15 45 39 09:30 67 80 21:30 47 29 09:45 6B 294 95 423 717 21:45 49 187 29 136 323 10:00 58 89 22:00 35 32 10:15 64 87 21:15 44 18 10:30 72 85 22:30 34 34 10:45 71 265 83 344 609 22:45 26 139 27 111 250 11:00 78 68 73:00 21 18 11:15 75 81 73:15 19 14 11:30 75 73 23:30 10 16 11:45 87 315 101 323 638 23:45 13 63 6 54 117 % Peak Hr. 07:30 07:45 Volume 456 749 07:30 Peak Hr. 17:30 17:30 22 1 Volume 532 551 7 - 9 Vol. 750 1312 2062 14 - 6 Vol. 1107 1008 Peak Hr. 07:30 07:45 07:30 Peak Hr, 17:00 17:00 Volume 456 749 1204 Volume 628 539 P.H.F. 0.820 0.941 0.938 P.H.F. 0.952 0.853 17:30 1183 2115 17:00 1167 0.926 00:00 17 11 PM 12:00 116 Peak Hr. 147 07:45 07:30 00:15 19 17:30 5 Volume 671 12.15 120 Volume 133 684 1596 00:30 16 0.932 16 P.H.F. 0.974 12:30 116 7 - 9 Vol. 132 1823 2887 00:45 16 68 11 43 111 12:45 115 467 141 553 1020 01:00 12 1022 8 Volume 855 13:00 128 P.H.F. 135 0.932 0.899 01:15 9 0.934 8 13:15 115 128 01:30 9 10 13:30 131 127 01:45 L5 45 3 29 74 13:45 116 490 116 506 996 02:00 30 11 14:00 159 140 02:15 7 9 14:15 167 111 02:30 4 3 14:30 153 159 02:45 6 27 4 27 54 14:45 143 622 142 552 1174 03:00 5 5 15:00 165 153 03:15 4 3 15:15 133 189 03:30 5 7 15:30 151 128 03:45 3 17 9 24 41 15:45 143 592 144 614 1206 01:00 6 4 16:00 158 119 04:15 8 20 16:15 174 156 04:30 6 19 16:30 210 115 04:45 11 31 24 67 98 16:45 179 721 126 516 1237 05:OD 20 21 17:00 194 167 05:15 19 34 17:15 205 146 05:30 27 39 17:30 234 177 05:45 38 104 66 160 264 17:45 222 855 171 661 1516 06:00 27 55 18:00 231 173 06:15 32 70 18:15 225 163 0630 55 89 18:30 184 132 06:45 61 175 123 337 512 16:45 170 810 122 590 1400 07:00 75 139 19:00 178 111 07:15 85 195 19:15 142 110 07:30 197 216 19:30 131 100 07:45 195 552 272 822 1374 19:45 116 547 83 404 951 08:00 138 274 20:00 118 75 08:15 141 246 20:15 92 75 08:30 121 230 20:30 94 80 08:45 112 512 251 1001 1513 20:45 82 386 66 296 682 09:00 101 175 21:00 88 57 0935 81 166 21:15 66 65 09:30 110 161 21:30 72 55 09:45 100 392 142 644 1036 21:45 64 290 61 238 528 10:00 88 124 22:00 66 39 10:15 94 103 22:15 51 44 10:30 98 130 22:30 57 45 10:45 96 376 107 464 840 22:45 35 209 37 165 374 11:OD 99 115 23:00 42 31 11:15 102 128 23:15 34 25 11:30 122 124 23:30 24 9 11:45 138 461 115 482 943 23:45 26 126 13 78 2D4 AM PM _ - Peak Hr. 07:30 07:45 07:30 Peak Hr. 17:30 17:30 17:30 Volume 671 1022 1679 Volume 912 684 1596 P.H.F. 0.852 0.932 0.899 P.H.F. 0.974 0.966 0.971 7 - 9 Vol. 1064 1823 2887 4 - 6 Vol. 1576 1177 2753 Peak Hr. 07:30 07:45 07:30 Peak Hr. 17:00 17:00 17:00 Volume 671 1022 1679 Volume 855 661 1516 P.H.F. 0.852 0.932 0.899 P.H.F. 0.913 0.934 0.922 00:00 23 18 12:00 195 190 00x5 24 35 12:15 190 204 00:30 20 621 17 908 1529 1230 204 7D4 194 540 1244 00:45 5 72 13 63 135 12:45 159 748 204 792 1540 01:00 5 165 661 6 31 141 15 113 254 13:00 154 7 - 9 Vol. 160 1914 3313 01:15 12 1517 5 Peak Hr. 07:30 13:15 165 Peak Hr. 202 16:45 17:00 01:30 18 778 5 1006 1784 13:30 150 505 171 478 983 01:45 15 50 7 23 73 13:45 176 645 194 727 1372 02:00 8 10 14:00 163 203 02:15 8 9 14:15 164 168 02:30 10 590 9 761 1351 14:30 198 345 175 344 689 02:45 8 34 5 33 67 14:45 222 747 190 736 1483 03:00 5 3 15:00 198 203 03:15 2 9 15:15 175 222 03:30 6 4 15:30 199 186 03:45 8 21 7 23 44 15:45 182 754 202 813 1567 04:00 4 9 16:OD 195 167 04:15 9 13 16:15 203 178 04:30 17 16 16:30 225 186 04:45 13 43 21 59 102 16:45 191 814 203 734 1548 05:00 19 28 17:00 276 201 05:15 19 42 17:15 268 177 05:30 26 60 17:30 287 214 05:45 32 96 53 183 279 17:45 272 1103 191 783 1886 06:00 39 71 18:00 270 218 06:15 51 93 18:15 298 172 06:30 95 113 18:30 269 192 06:45 85 270 142 419 689 18:45 1% 1033 188 770 1803 07:00 81 171 19:00 201 141 07:15 118 195 19:15 188 140 07:30 204 268 19:30 165 134 WAS 218 621 274 908 1529 19:45 150 7D4 125 540 1244 08:00 204 160 283 39 36 20:00 148 161 119 33 31 08:15 181 165 661 236 31 141 15 113 254 20:15 133 7 - 9 Vol. 139 1914 3313 08:30 192 1517 268 Peak Hr. 07:30 20:30 114 Peak Hr. 115 16:45 17:00 08:45 201 778 219 1006 1784 20:45 110 505 105 478 983 09:00 201 0.929 213 21:00 82 103 09:15 140 216 21:15 96 104 09:30 132 182 21:30 86 71 09:45 117 590 150 761 1351 21:45 81 345 66 344 689 10:00 128 161 22:00 85 78 10:15 149 161 22:15 80 52 10:30 140 172 22:30 65 51 10:45 128 545 151 645 1190 22:45 55 285 48 229 514 11:00 157 155 23:08 38 31 11:15 143 160 23:15 39 36 11:30 195 161 23:30 33 31 11:45 232 727 165 661 1388 23:45 31 141 15 113 254 Split 0/0 44.6% 55.4% 36.7% 52.6 % 47.4% 633 9/0 AM PM Peak Hr. 11:45 07:30 07:30 Peak Hr. 17:30 15:00 17:30 Volume 821 1061 1868 Volume 1127 813 1922 P.H.F. 0.885 0.937 0.949 P.H.F. 0.945 0.916 0.959 7 - 9 Vol. 1399 1914 3313 4 - 6 Vol. 1917 1517 3434 Peak Hr. 07:30 07:30 07:30 Peak Hr. 17:00 16:45 17:00 Volume 807 1061 1868 Volume 1103 795 1886 P.H.F. 0.925 0.937 0.949 P.H.F. 0.961 0.929 0.941 Prepared by NDSIATD 00:00 20 224 20 327 551 12:00 167 1007 152 669 1676 00:15 13 8 Peak Hr. 11:00 12:15 164 Peak Hr. 176 17:00 17:00 00:30 9 1050 13 Volume 1165 12:30 178 P.H.F. 172 0.921 0.956 00:45 13 55 13 54 109 12:45 160 669 215 715 1384 01:00 9 488 12 759 1247 13:00 171 648 144 505 1153 01:15 8 781 6 P.H.F. 0.913 13:15 156 P.H.F. 191 0.876 0.923 01:30 9 5 13:30 165 147 01:45 13 39 7 30 69 13:45 149 641 166 648 1289 02:0 5 529 it 1000 1529 14:00 200 534 114 365 899 02:15 4 6 14:15 166 177 02:30 7 7 14:30 234 173 02:45 7 23 9 33 56 14:45 223 823 177 641 1464 03:00 6 489 7 660 1149 15:00 196 363 166 306 669 03:15 2 2 15:15 202 156 0:30 3 6 15:30 209 186 03:45 5 16 6 21 37 15:45 209 816 153 661 1477 04:00 8 490 10 615 1105 16:00 243 230 135 193 423 04:15 7 17 16:15 236 173 04:30 13 21 16:30 223 146 04:45 14 42 28 76 118 16:45 257 959 173 627 1586 05:00 14 731 20 581 1312 17:00 271 120 194 99 219 05:15 25 28 17:15 302 185 05:30 34 43 17:30 303 223 05:45 31 104 60 151 255 17:45 286 1162 179 781 1943 06:00 36 57 18:00 274 176 06:15 44 76 18:15 288 172 06:30 68 69 18:30 230 171 06:45 76 224 125 327 551 18:45 215 1007 150 669 1676 07:00 78 130 Peak Hr. 11:00 19:00 188 Peak Hr. 130 17:00 17:00 07:15 111 1050 168 Volume 1165 19:15 183 P.H.F. 141 0.921 0.956 07:30 143 0.876 201 7 - 9 Vol. 1017 19:30 145 4 - 6 Vol. 138 1408 3529 07:45 156 488 260 759 1247 19:45 132 648 % 505 1153 08:00 148 781 273 P.H.F. 0.913 20:00 165 P.H.F. 90 0.876 0.923 08:15 123 285 20:15 141 99 08:30 133 232 20:30 137 112 08:45 125 529 210 1000 1529 20:45 91 534 64 365 899 09:00 121 202 21:00 113 78 09x5 121 168 21x5 94 77 09:30 111 127 21:30 79 80 09:45 136 489 163 660 1149 21:45 77 363 71 306 669 10:00 108 176 22:00 85 66 10:15 134 132 22:15 64 54 10:30 119 161 22:30 50 38 10:45 129 490 146 615 1105 22:45 31 230 35 193 423 11:00 171 131 23:00 38 21 11:15 183 125 23:15 24 27 11:30 196 167 23:30 26 25 11:45 181 731 158 581 1312 23:45 32 120 26 99 219 7537 7972 6210 14182 Split % 42.9% 57.1% 34.7% 56.2 % 43.8% 65.3% AM PM Peak Hr. 11:00 07:45 07:45 Peak Hr. 17:15 17:00 17:00 Volume 731 1050 1610 Volume 1165 781 1943 P.H.F. 0.932 0.921 0.956 P.H.F. 01961 0.876 0.923 7 - 9 Vol. 1017 1759 2776 4 - 6 Vol. 2121 1408 3529 Peak Hr. 07:30 07:45 07:45 Peak Hr. 17:00 17:00 17:00 Volume 570 1050 1610 Volume 1162 781 1943 P.H.F. 0.913 0.921 01956 P.H.F. 0.959 0.876 0.923 00:00 25 61.3% 15 57.7% 12:00 147 AM 140 00:15 13 7 Peak Hr. 11:15 12:15 130 Peak Hr. 135 17:15 17:00 00:30 9 948 10 Volume 1043 1230 147 P.H.F. 129 0.901 0.875 00:45 16 63 10 42 105 12:45 141 565 182 586 1151 01:00 9 07:30 it Peak Hr. 17:00 13:00 146 Volume 155 948 1348 01:15 7 646 8 P.H.F. 0.832 13:15 131 P.H.F. 155 0.883 0.953 01:30 5 3 13:30 114 149 01:45 7 28 5 27 55 13:45 134 525 156 615 1140 02:00 7 6 14:00 152 119 02:15 3 2 14:15 170 132 02:30 6 5 14:30 182 157 02:45 4 20 3 16 36 14:45 173 677 137 545 1222 03:00 4 5 15:00 152 120 03:15 0 5 15:15 146 147 03:30 2 8 15:30 170 137 03:45 3 9 7 25 34 15:45 189 657 133 537 1194 04:00 3 12 16:00 215 119 04:15 8 12 16:15 225 129 04:30 11 21 16:30 210 115 04:45 16 38 26 71 109 16:45 241 891 130 493 1384 05:00 7 17 17:00 265 143 05:15 10 40 1715 252 159 05:30 26 54 17:30 266 161 05:45 22 65 55 166 231 17:45 260 1043 183 646 1689 06:00 24 59 18:00 230 146 05:15 47 70 18:15 225 143 06:30 47 79 18:30 208 149 05:45 69 187 129 337 524 18:45 204 867 137 575 1442 07:00 67 145 19:00 170 102 07:15 85 168 19:15 158 109 07:30 98 220 19:30 132 89 07:45 122 372 263 796 1168 19:45 137 597 76 376 973 08:00 90 235 20:00 156 91 08:15 90 230 20:15 110 85 08:30 104 206 20:30 116 103 08:45 78 362 175 846 1208 20:45 105 487 59 338 825 09:00 85 171 21:00 110 60 09:15 95 137 21:15 81 53 09:30 86 107 21:30 83 58 09:45 78 344 157 572 916 21:45 86 360 54 225 585 10:00 88 123 22.00 84 45 10x5 72 112 22:15 50 34 10:30 79 119 2230 51 26 10:45 104 343 128 482 825 22:45 38 223 18 123 346 11:00 122 122 23:00 32 18 11:15 164 98 23:15 22 16 11:30 178 125 23:30 23 20 11:45 141 605 128 473 1078 23:45 26 103 15 69 !'2 Split e/a 38.7% 61.3% 34.2% 57.7% 42.3% 65.8% AM PM Peak Hr. 11:15 07:30 07:30 Peak Hr. 17:00 17:15 17:00 Volume 630 948 1348 Volume 1043 649 1689 P.H.F. 0.885 0.901 0.875 P.H.F. 0.980 0.887 0.953 7 - 9 Vol. 734 1642 2376 4 - 6 Vol. 1934 1139 3073 Peak Hr. 07:45 07:30 07:30 Peak Hr. 17:00 17:00 17:00 Volume 406 948 1348 Volume 1043 646 1689 P.H.F. 0.832 0.901 0.875 P.H.F. 0.980 0.883 0.953 00:00 20 14 12:00 115 148 00:15 15 5 12:15 127 109 00:30 13 7 12:30 113 101 00:45 11 59 6 32 91 12:45 163 518 85 443 961 01:00 13 8 13:00 117 101 01:15 8 8 13:15 110 111 01:30 5 9 13:30 93 100 01:45 6 32 5 30 62 13:45 103 423 91 403 826 02:00 9 4 14:00 97 104 02:15 10 4 14:15 125 119 02:30 9 5 14:30 111 127 03:00 4 11:15 4 915 523 15:00 101 0.883 126 1605 870 03:15 1 07:45 5 915 509 15:15 94 0.872 136 03:30 6 6 15:30 100 135 03:45 5 16 4 19 35 15:45 114 409 181 578 987 04:OD 5 9 16:00 139 170 04:15 13 7 16:15 154 209 04:30 19 21 16:30 133 168 04:45 37 74 21 58 132 16:45 171 597 214 781 1378 05:00 26 11 17:00 141 245 05:15 27 23 17:15 201 236 05:30 42 38 17:30 197 193 05:45 SO 145 36 108 253 17:45 213 752 210 884 1636 06:00 59 41 18:00 167 174 06:15 76 57 18:15 177 171 06:30 90 48 18:30 144 162 06:45 147 372 74 220 592 18:45 115 603 117 624 1227 07:00 173 71 19:00 112 95 07:15 176 88 19:15 107 65 07:30 236 99 19:30 102 61 07:45 266 851 119 377 1228 19:45 99 420 85 306 726 08:00 210 146 20:00 90 87 08:15 203 119 20:15 72 69 08:30 179 125 20:30 67 75 08:45 162 754 103 493 1247 20:45 70 299 56 287 586 09:00 142 98 21:00 76 43 09:15 131 104 21:15 56 46 09:30 94 88 21:30 67 44 09:45 80 447 103 393 840 21:45 52 251 39 172 423 10:00 72 79 22:00 54 47 10:15 73 97 22:15 43 33 10:30 71 90 22:30 51 26 10:45 91 307 89 355 662 2245 41 189 16 122 311 11:00 119 100 23:00 29 14 11:15 106 113 23:15 26 13 11:30 108 130 23:30 24 14 11:45 98 431 132 475 906 23:45 22 101 9 50 split %o 57.7% 42.3% 3 /.b %o 49.G 10 7U.8 %0 C[.D 10 Peak Hr. 07:30 11:15 Volume 915 523 P.H.F. 0.860 0.883 7 - 9 Vol. 1605 870 Peak Hr. 07:30 07:45 Volume 915 509 P.H.F. 0.860 0.872 07:30 Peak Hr. 17:15 16:45 13 1 Volume 778 888 17:00 1636 2475 4 - 6 Yol. 1349 1665 3014 07:30 Peak Hr. 17:00 16:45 17:00 1396 Volume 752 888 1636 0.906 P.H.F. 0.883 0.906 0.936 00:00 38 32 12:W 281 237 00:15 28 AM 50.8% 31 52.2% 12:15 235 AM 261 00:30 26 40 Peak Hr. 07:30 12:30 298 Peak Hr. 235 17:30 17:30 00:45 20 112 20 123 235 12:45 231 1045 269 1002 2047 01:00 20 0.987 24 7 - 9 Vol. 1972 13:00 250 4 - 6 Vol. 218 2193 4728 01:15 19 07:45 16 Peak Hr. 17:00 13:15 285 Volume 243 1324 2382 01:30 18 1166 15 P.H.F. 0.955 13:30 243 P.H.F. 243 0.978 0.936 01:45 12 69 9 64 133 13:45 270 1048 227 931 1979 02:00 22 13 14:00 255 237 02:15 23 12 14:15 265 244 0230 13 11 14:30 282 240 02:45 10 68 6 42 110 14:45 321 1123 242 %3 2086 03:00 8 12 15:00 267 245 03:15 4 8 15:15 298 298 03:30 12 8 15:30 297 277 03:45 9 33 7 35 68 15:45 256 1118 235 1055 2173 04:00 7 16 16:00 247 259 04:15 16 17 16:15 312 266 04:30 23 22 16:30 294 261 04:45 24 70 20 75 145 16:45 335 1188 241 1027 2.215 05:00 28 20 17:00 312 291 05:15 41 25 17:15 328 281 05:30 67 32 17:30 334 296 05:45 71 207 60 137 344 17:45 373 1347 298 1166 2513 06:00 78 58 18:00 340 299 06:15 99 74 18:15 348 303 06:30 124 101 18:30 317 272 06:45 137 438 122 355 793 18:45 278 1283 270 1144 2427 07:00 153 179 19:00 253 241 07:15 230 160 19:15 259 221 07:3D 287 283 19:30 209 227 07:45 286 956 315 937 1893 19:45 182 903 177 866 1769 08:00 273 363 20:00 199 182 08:15 250 324 20:15 175 154 08:30 249 322 20:30 162 156 08:45 244 1016 272 1281 2.297 20:45 145 681 151 643 1324 09:00 209 243 21:00 151 153 09:15 186 213 21:15 144 143 D9:30 209 230 21:30 116 119 09:45 220 824 227 913 1737 21:45 121 532 103 518 1050 10:00 203 205 22:00 99 106 10:15 205 219 22:15 92 99 10:30 198 229 22:30 59 70 10:45 183 789 247 900 1689 22:45 65 315 60 335 650 11:00 248 233 23:00 64 56 11:15 230 235 23:15 38 57 11:30 269 217 23:30 48 52 11:45 263 1010 224 909 1919 23:45 28 178 37 202 380 VOL 5592 20613 Split 0/0 49.2% AM 50.8% 35.5% 52.2% PM 47.8% 64.50/0 AM PM Peak Hr. 07:30 07:45 07:45 Peak Hr. 17:30 17:30 17:30 Volume 1096 1324 2382 Volume 1395 1196 2591 P.M.F. 0.955 0.912 0.936 P.H.F. 0.935 0.987 0.965 7 - 9 Vol. 1972 2218 4190 4 - 6 Vol. 2535 2193 4728 Peak Hr. 07:30 07:45 07:45 Peak Hr. 17:00 17:00 17:00 Volume 1096 1324 2382 Volume 1347 1166 2513 P.H.F. 0.955 0.912 0.936 P.H.F. 0.903 0.978 0.936 00:00 19 19 12:00 189 160 00:15 14 21 12:15 202 166 00:30 21 20 11-30 SA 141 00:45 20 74 18 78 152 12:45 166 736 187 654 1390 01:00 14 13 13:00 173 179 01:15 11 13 13:15 185 181 01:30 12 11 1330 167 189 01:45 15 52 5 42 94 13:45 166 691 173 722 1413 02:00 11 8 14:00 192 197 02:15 8 5 14:15 198 178 02:30 13 6 14:30 256 177 02:45 5 37 4 23 60 14:95 234 880 188 740 1620 03:00 6 7 15:00 172 20B 03:15 2 5 15:15 215 1% 03:30 9 5 15:30 216 234 03:45 5 22 2 19 41 15:45 184 787 206 844 1631 04:00 6 16 16:00 212 195 04:15 9 6 16:15 239 240 04:30 17 14 16:30 224 224 04:45 16 48 15 51 99 16:45 264 939 217 876 1815 05:00 22 21 17:00 261 224 05:15 28 24 17:15 252 222 05:30 32 27 17:30 322 253 05:45 47 129 43 115 244 17:45 268 1103 260 959 2062 06:00 43 44 18:00 290 241 06:15 65 69 18:15 246 241 06:30 88 82 18:30 237 216 06:45 102 298 81 276 574 18:45 210 983 189 887 1870 07:00 113 149 19:00 173 210 07:15 175 164 19:15 168 150 07:30 206 222 19:30 185 132 07:45 205 701 259 794 1495 19:45 195 721 154 646 1367 08:00 246 306 20:00 152 130 08:15 166 237 20:15 139 121 08:30 191 255 20:30 103 106 08:45 170 773 198 996 1769 WAS 89 483 97 454 937 09:00 135 177 21:00 104 125 09:15 141 166 21:15 105 97 09:30 162 154 21:30 73 76 09:45 144 582 151 648 1230 21:45 80 362 78 376 738 10:00 144 130 22:00 68 75 10:15 lift 148 22:15 61 62 10:30 150 145 22:30 45 51 10:45 158 568 148 571 1139 22:45 51 225 36 224 449 11:00 162 168 23:00 52 35 11:15 150 154 23:15 26 41 11:30 177 168 23:30 31 31 11:45 190 679 176 666 1345 23:45 20 129 29 136 265 Peak Hr. 07:15 07:45 Volume 834 1057 07:45 Peak Hr. 17:15 17:30 1865 Volume 1132 995 0.1 1 P.H.F. 0.879 0.957 17:30 2121 7 - 9 Vol. 1474 1790 3264 14-6VOI. 2042 1835 3877 Peak Hr. 07:15 07:45 07:45 Peak Hr. 17:00 17:00 17:00 Volume 834 1057 1865 Volume 1103 959 2062 P.H.F. 0.848 0.864 0.845 P.H.F. 0.856 0.922 0.897 00:00 16 55.4% 36.8 ° /0 29 45.Y %° 54.1 %a 12:00 78 123 PM OD:15 26 Peak Hr. 23 07:45 07:45 Peak Hr. 12:15 102 17:30 115 725 791 1516 00:30 5 819 22 P.H.F. 0.749 12:30 89 0.963 109 0.953 7 - 9 Vol. 00:45 9 56 20 94 150 12:45 90 359 122 469 828 01:00 11 725 18 Volume 749 13:00 122 P.H.F. 113 0.951 0.888 P.H.F. 01:15 7 0.932 13 13:15 97 116 01:30 7 11 13:30 107 125 01:45 6 31 13 55 86 13:45 108 434 142 496 930 02:00 6 11 14:OD 106 124 02:15 8 14 14:15 113 116 02:30 5 10 14:30 127 131 02:45 7 26 14 49 75 14:45 125 471 145 516 987 03:00 1 4 15:00 160 140 03:15 4 4 15:15 187 145 03:30 2 7 15:30 149 147 03:45 2 9 4 19 28 15:45 136 632 131 563 1195 04:00 8 4 16:00 136 141 04:15 14 6 16:15 156 141 04:30 16 5 16:30 164 151 04:45 14 52 16 31 83 16:45 164 620 173 606 1226 05:00 23 17 17:00 186 169 05:15 28 22 17:15 176 207 05:30 44 33 17:30 191 198 05:45 37 132 62 134 266 17:45 196 749 217 791 1540 06:00 54 41 MOD 177 195 06:15 49 56 18:15 191 209 06:30 63 98 18:30 136 197 06:45 67 233 123 318 551 18:45 133 637 173 774 1411 07:00 91 145 19:00 135 165 07:15 117 203 19:15 106 144 07:30 148 171 19:30 117 124 WAS 162 518 197 716 1234 19:45 109 467 122 555 1022 08:00 179 201 20:00 89 105 08:15 142 208 20:15 50 95 08:30 242 185 20:30 55 95 08:45 119 682 155 749 1431 20:45 66 260 76 371 631 09:00 99 145 21:00 61 74 09:15 81 126 21:15 49 94 0930 105 105 21:30 38 111 09:45 103 388 127 503 891 21:45 32 180 77 356 536 10:00 103 93 22:00 46 96 10:15 68 85 22:15 42 75 10:30 98 103 22:30 33 53 10:45 91 360 121 402 762 22:45 29 150 60 284 434 11:00 81 94 23:00 25 46 11:15 89 121 23:15 15 44 11:30 99 109 23:30 23 32 1145 93 362 142 466 828 23:45 14 77 28 150 227 Total Vol. 2849 3536 6385 5036 5931 10967 split 44.60k 55.4% 36.8 ° /0 45.Y %° 54.1 %a b3.2 /o M PM Peak Hr. 07:45 07:45 07:45 Peak Hr. 17:30 17:30 17:30 Volume 725 791 1516 Volume 755 819 1574 P.H.F. 0.749 0.951 0.888 P.H.F. 0.963 0.944 0.953 7 - 9 Vol. 1200 1465 2665 4 - 6 Vol. 1369 1397 2766 Peak Hr. 07:45 07:45 07:45 Peak Hr. 17:00 17:00 17:00 Volume 725 791 1516 Volume 749 791 1540 P.H.F. 0.749 0.951 0.888 P.H.F. 0.955 0.911 0.932 00:00 27 38 12:00 202 153 00:15 28 854 25 757 1611 12:15 171 504 197 532 1036 00:30 15 32 Peak Hr. 07:30 12:30 165 Peak Hr. 185 17:15 17:15 00:45 27 97 17 112 209 12:45 168 706 151 686 1392 01:00 19 0.927 33 7 - 9 Vol. 1671 13:00 174 4 - 6 Vol. 177 1724 3373 01:15 20 724 15 533 1257 13:15 173 400 153 431 831 01:30 28 943 10 P.H.F. 0.918 13:30 158 P.H.F. 182 0.900 0.921 01:45 19 86 16 74 160 13:45 189 694 157 669 1363 02:00 12 13 14:00 164 178 02:15 11 646 9 538 1184 14:15 153 306 174 352 658 02:30 9 9 14:30 220 201 02:45 3 35 8 39 74 14:45 249 786 216 769 1555 03:00 6 9 15:00 207 179 03:15 7 689 8 623 1312 15:15 191 161 199 202 363 03:30 8 9 15:30 170 179 03:45 5 26 5 31 57 15:45 191 759 173 730 1489 04:00 9 15 16A0 197 197 D4:15 11 11 16:15 173 188 04:30 9 IS 16:30 183 198 04:45 21 50 9 50 100 16:45 197 750 198 781 1531 05:00 20 16 17:00 194 219 05:15 33 26 17:15 237 262 05:30 47 24 17:30 251 249 05:45 47 147 43 109 256 17:45 217 899 213 943 1842 06:00 61 32 18:00 262 248 06:15 69 42 18:15 248 220 06:30 131 58 18:30 219 229 06:45 163 424 84 216 640 18:45 188 917 214 911 1828 07:00 166 100 19:00 194 185 07:15 179 151 19:15 160 158 07:30 243 202 19:30 139 158 07:45 229 817 233 686 1503 19:45 166 659 160 661 1320 08:0D 192 227 20:00 172 144 08:15 228 183 20:15 112 142 08:3D 222 174 20:30 110 131 08:45 212 854 173 757 1611 20:45 110 504 115 532 1036 09:00 196 140 Peak Hr. 07:30 21:00 106 Peak Hr. 114 17:15 17:15 09:15 158 845 128 Volume 978 21:15 108 P.M.F. 116 0.907 0.940 09:30 181 0.927 132 7 - 9 Vol. 1671 21:30 99 4 - 6 Vol. 101 1724 3373 09:45 189 724 133 533 1257 21:45 87 400 100 431 831 10:00 170 943 139 P.H.F. 0.918 22:00 92 P.H.F. 101 0.900 0.921 10:15 144 134 22:15 61 93 10:30 157 127 22:30 85 74 10:45 175 646 138 538 1184 22:45 68 306 84 352 658 11:00 159 148 23:00 53 71 11:15 168 153 23:15 37 43 11:30 178 153 23:30 43 52 11:45 184 689 169 623 1312 23:45 28 161 36 202 363 8363 7541 7667 15208 Split 54.9% 45.1% 35.5% 49.6% 50.4% 64.5% AM PM Peak Hr. 07:30 07:30 07:30 Peak Hr. 17:30 17:15 17:15 Volume 892 845 1737 Volume 978 972 1939 P.M.F. 0.918 0.907 0.940 P.H.F. 0.933 0.927 0.950 7 - 9 Vol. 1671 1443 3114 4 - 6 Vol. 1649 1724 3373 Peak Mr. 07:30 07:30 07:30 Peak Mr. 17:00 17:00 17:00 Volume 892 845 1737 Volume 899 943 1842 P.H.F. 0.918 0.907 0.940 P.H.F. 0.895 0.900 0.921 00:00 27 22 12:00 143 104 00:15 22 21 17 198 205 12:15 123 25 121 192 186 00:30 6 115 42 110 17 197 736 173 738 1474 12:30 116 35 109 172 199 00:45 13 68 15 71 139 12:45 106 488 98 432 920 01:00 12 312 69 201 21 146 677 205 813 1490 13:00 118 78 108 143 169 01:15 30 120 14 138 130 13:15 123 Volume 106 780 1438 01:30 10 634 6 686 1320 13:30 108 397 111 424 821 01:45 5 37 8 49 86 13:45 118 467 111 436 903 02:00 13 12 14:00 112 122 02:15 3 8 14:15 128 112 02:30 8 542 5 378 920 14:30 153 292 131 347 639 02:45 3 27 13 38 6S 14:45 176 569 135 500 1069 03:00 8 11 15:00 140 130 03:15 4 2 15:15 125 170 03:30 6 474 7 310 784 15:30 130 241 133 257 498 03:45 2 20 1 21 41 15:45 132 527 128 561 1088 04:00 5 14 16:00 149 120 04:15 10 16 16:15 129 130 04:30 7 509 5 351 860 16:30 146 121 119 148 269 04:45 13 35 14 49 84 16:45 148 572 144 513 1085 05:00 12 22 17:00 149 174 05:15 19 21 17:15 198 205 05:30 37 25 17:30 192 186 05:45 47 115 42 110 225 17:45 197 736 173 738 1474 06:00 49 35 18:00 172 199 06:15 68 34 18:15 183 207 06:30 94 63 18:30 176 202 06:45 101 312 69 201 513 18:45 146 677 205 813 1490 07:00 125 78 19:00 143 169 07:15 164 120 19:15 138 130 07:30 174 AM 45.4% 170 49.6% 19:30 105 AM 116 07:45 161 624 196 564 1188 19:45 138 524 127 542 1066 08:00 145 780 250 Volume 759 20:00 118 P.H.F. 132 0.780 0.910 08:15 178 0.982 164 7 - 9 Vol. 1258 20:15 88 4 - 6 Vol. 114 1251 2559 08:30 152 07:30 136 Peak Hr. 17:00 20:30 95 Volume 88 780 1438 08:45 159 634 136 686 1320 20:45 % 397 90 424 821 09:00 155 88 21:00 90 91 09:15 132 93 21:15 73 85 09:30 126 88 21:30 68 91 09:45 129 542 109 378 920 21:45 61 292 80 347 639 10:00 109 75 22:00 76 81 10:15 101 62 22:15 55 50 10:30 129 88 22:30 56 63 10:45 135 474 85 310 784 22:45 54 241 63 257 498 11:00 112 64 23:00 35 39 11:15 122 95 23:15 29 39 11:30 134 96 23:30 35 42 11:45 141 509 96 351 860 23:45 22 121 28 148 269 Tnt.l Vd_ 439] 7878 6225 5611 5711 11322 Split % 54.6% AM 45.4% 35.50/c 49.6% PM 50.4% 64.5% AM PM Peak Hr. 07:30 07:30 07:30 Peak Hr. 17:15 18:00 17:15 Volume 658 780 1438 Volume 759 813 1522 P.H.F. 0.924 0.780 0.910 P.H.F. 0.958 0.982 0.944 7 - 9 Vol. 1258 1250 2508 4 - 6 Vol. 1308 1251 2559 Peak Hr. 07:30 07:30 07:30 Peak Hr. 17:00 17:00 17:00 Volume 658 780 1438 Volume 736 738 1474 P.H.F. 0.924 0.780 0.910 P.H.F. 0.929 0.900 0.914 00:00 9 22 12:D0 45 63 00:15 1 6 12:15 54 55 D0:30 2 8 12:30 48 59 00:45 13 25 6 42 67 12:45 44 191 44 221 412 01:00 6 362 5 P.N.F. 0.865 13:00 49 P.M.F. 46 0.905 0.910 01:15 1 493 2 4 - 6 Vol. 754 13:15 60 Peak Hr. 57 07:30 07:30 01:30 3 356 4 275 631 13:30 35 169 41 156 325 01:45 2 12 1 12 24 13:45 46 190 70 214 404 02:00 3 3 14:00 44 51 02:15 1 1 14:15 67 81 02:30 2 256 3 169 425 14:30 88 111 95 116 227 02:45 0 6 2 9 15 14:45 60 259 86 313 572 03:00 2 0 15:00 59 65 03:15 2 5 15:15 59 66 03:30 0 204 2 167 371 15:30 60 90 56 81 171 03:45 0 4 0 7 11 15:45 46 224 58 245 469 D4:00 1 2 16:00 70 66 D4:15 3 3 16:15 73 73 04:30 4 264 2 173 437 16:30 73 48 69 44 92 D4:45 10 18 4 11 29 16:45 81 297 89 297 594 05:00 7 362 9 P.N.F. 0.865 17:00 108 P.M.F. 90 0.905 0.910 05:15 6 493 5 4 - 6 Vol. 754 17:15 110 Peak Hr. 89 07:30 07:30 05:30 12 356 9 275 631 17:30 107 169 85 156 325 05:45 10 35 12 35 70 17:45 132 457 91 355 812 06:00 18 6 18:00 106 86 06:15 24 17 18:15 90 100 06:30 61 256 12 169 425 18:30 67 111 68 116 227 06:45 53 156 32 67 223 18:45 56 319 58 312 631 07:00 79 34 19:00 52 55 07:15 97 48 19:15 41 54 07:30 109 67 19:30 55 50 07:45 88 373 69 218 591 19:45 55 203 40 199 402 08:00 83 07:30 77 Peak Hr. 17:00 20:00 50 Volume 47 304 656 08:15 72 362 91 P.N.F. 0.865 20:15 48 P.M.F. 41 0.905 0.910 08:30 88 493 59 4 - 6 Vol. 754 20:30 39 Peak Hr. 32 07:30 07:30 08:45 113 356 48 275 631 20:45 32 169 36 156 325 09:00 90 0.835 43 P.H.F. 0.866 21:00 33 36 09:15 62 38 21:15 27 35 09:30 58 44 21:30 24 20 09:45 46 256 44 169 425 21:45 27 111 25 116 227 10:00 56 52 22:D0 30 21 10:15 46 31 22:15 27 25 10:30 52 43 22:30 17 15 10:45 50 204 41 167 371 22:45 16 90 20 81 171 11:00 44 34 23:00 17 15 11:15 82 51 23:15 10 11 11:30 66 54 23:30 14 13 11:45 72 264 34 173 437 23:45 7 48 5 44 92 2558 2553 Peak Hr. 07:15 07:30 07:30 Peak Hr. 17:00 17:30 17:00 Volume 377 304 656 Volume 457 362 812 P.N.F. 0.865 0.835 0.932 P.M.F. 0.866 0.905 0.910 7 - 9 Vol. 729 493 1222 4 - 6 Vol. 754 652 1406 Peak Hr. 07:15 07:30 07:30 Peak Hr. 17:00 17:00 17:00 Volume 377 304 656 Volume 457 355 812 P.H.F. 0.865 0.835 0.932 P.H.F. 0.866 0.975 0.910 00:00 37 15 12:00 207 268 00:15 31 16 PM 12:15 191 Peak Hr. 234 07:30 07:30 00:30 36 12:00 21 Volume 867 12:30 256 Volume 225 955 1989 00:45 25 129 19 71 200 11-45 204 858 228 955 1813 01:00 21 1568 18 Peak Hr. 07:30 13:00 237 Peak Hr. 184 16:45 17:00 01:15 7 1274 14 Volume 1138 13:15 224 P.H.F. 209 0.890 0.874 01:30 15 0.915 20 13:30 198 172 01:45 18 61 it 63 124 13:45 226 885 195 760 1645 02:00 18 11 14:00 241 203 02:15 17 7 14:15 254 216 02:30 8 8 14:30 230 197 02:45 14 57 5 31 88 14:45 226 951 214 830 1781 03:00 7 3 15:00 254 215 03:15 1 4 15:15 253 198 03:30 3 1 15:30 206 232 03:45 10 21 7 15 36 15:45 255 968 162 807 1775 04:00 4 11 16:00 238 181 04:15 5 4 16:15 245 199 04:30 12 6 16:30 252 173 01:45 19 40 14 35 75 16:45 277 1012 185 738 1750 05:00 8 16 17:00 294 212 05:15 13 22 17:15 289 227 05:30 25 30 17:30 274 207 05:45 3D 76 46 114 190 17:45 281 1138 184 830 1968 06:00 17 45 18:00 267 210 06:15 26 84 18:15 345 221 06:30 42 103 18:30 270 197 06:45 65 150 156 388 538 18:45 237 1119 190 818 1937 07:00 75 177 19:00 195 183 07:15 107 249 19:15 189 162 07:30 172 312 19:30 185 159 07:45 210 564 358 1096 1660 19:45 140 7D9 138 642 1351 08:00 159 296 20:00 134 114 08:15 171 308 20:15 145 121 08:30 153 287 20:30 143 103 08:45 160 643 287 1178 1821 20:45 123 545 94 432 977 09:00 132 268 21:00 150 98 09:15 146 282 21:15 122 118 09:30 170 240 21:30 127 136 09:45 174 622 262 1052 1674 21:45 125 524 92 444 968 10:00 146 242 22:00 114 75 10:15 183 222 22:15 119 77 10:30 143 221 22:30 58 44 10:45 168 640 191 876 1516 2245 63 354 38 234 588 11:00 160 176 23:00 72 52 11:15 167 223 23:15 47 29 11:30 2D0 217 23:30 47 36 17:45 213 740 235 851 1591 23:45 41 207 29 146 353 AM PM Peak Hr. 11:45 07:30 07:30 Peak Hr. 17:30 12:00 17:30 Volume 867 1274 1986 Volume 1167 955 1989 P.H.F. 0.847 0.890 0.874 P.H.F. 0.846 0.891 0.879 7 - 9 Vol. 1207 2274 3481 4 - 6 Vol. 2150 1568 3718 Peak Hr. 07:30 07:30 07:30 Peak Hr. 17:00 16:45 17:00 Volume 712 1274 1986 Volume 1138 831 1968 P.H.F. 0.848 0.890 0.874 P.H.F. 0.968 0.915 0.953 cam; r 00:00 19 13 12:00 132 131 00:15 14 8 12:15 136 139 00:30 15 13 12:30 136 142 00:45 19 67 14 48 115 12:45 126 530 110 522 1052 01:00 13 11 13:00 154 127 01:15 6 182 6 123 105 13:15 142 290 123 104 69 0130 9 336 221 860 11% 9 85 439 73 347 786 13:30 155 224 138 92 73 01:45 11 39 10 36 75 13:45 128 579 138 526 1105 02:00 9 392 191 851 1243 7 72 319 52 251 570 14:00 160 4 - 6 Vol. 132 1144 2705 02:15 11 445 4 556 1001 14:15 166 181 120 143 324 02:30 7 640 7 P.H.F. 0.784 14:30 167 P.H.F. 135 0.936 0.914 02:45 10 37 4 22 59 14:45 160 653 125 512 1165 03:00 7 6 15:00 160 114 03:15 1 511 3 506 1017 15:15 147 120 118 66 166 03:30 4 0 15:30 178 135 03:45 12 24 4 13 37 15:45 199 684 106 473 1157 04:00 5 5 16:00 145 121 04:15 3 5 16:15 172 128 04:30 6 9 16:30 183 128 04:45 12 26 11 30 56 16:45 209 709 127 504 1213 05:00 8 7 17:00 199 171 05:15 11 18 17:15 237 171 05:30 21 27 17:30 205 140 05:45 32 72 29 81 153 17:45 211 852 158 640 1492 06:00 13 41 18:00 195 134 06:15 17 49 18:15 245 141 06:30 20 79 18:30 186 104 06:45 33 83 128 297 380 18:45 161 787 108 487 1274 07:00 43 167 19:00 127 100 07:15 56 182 19:15 123 105 07:30 97 290 19:30 104 69 07:45 140 336 221 860 11% 19:45 85 439 73 347 786 08:00 104 224 20:00 92 73 08:15 91 222 20:15 84 58 08:30 104 214 20:30 71 68 08:45 93 392 191 851 1243 20:45 72 319 52 251 570 09:00 104 224 21:00 68 44 09:15 99 154 21:15 65 50 09:30 95 229 21:30 81 54 D9:45 104 402 167 784 1186 21:45 54 268 60 208 476 10:00 101 168 Peak Hr. 11:45 22:00 56 Peak Hr. 40 17:00 17:00 10:15 129 957 174 Volume 856 22:15 48 P.H.F. 46 0.825 0.897 10:30 103 0.936 107 7 - 9 Vol. 728 22:30 41 4 - 6 Vol. 27 1144 2705 10:45 112 445 107 556 1001 22:45 36 181 30 143 324 11:00 123 640 126 P.H.F. 0.784 23:00 39 P.H.F. 22 0.936 0.914 11:15 120 125 23:15 27 13 11:30 115 134 23:30 21 16 1145 153 511 121 506 1017 23:45 33 120 15 66 166 S lit % 37.3% 62.7% 37.60/b 56.7% 43.3 ° /a 62.4% AM PM Peak Hr. 11:45 07:30 07:30 Peak Hr. 17:30 17:00 17:00 Volume 557 957 1389 Volume 856 640 1492 P.H.F. 0.910 0.825 0.897 P.M.F. 0.873 0.936 0.914 7 - 9 Vol. 728 1711 2439 4 - 6 Vol. 1561 1144 2705 Peak Hr. 07:45 07:30 07:30 Peak Hr. 17:00 17:00 17:00 Volume 439 957 1389 Volume 852 640 1492 P.H.F. 0.784 0.825 0.897 P.H.F. 01899 0.936 0.914 00:00 22 11 12:00 180 154 00:15 19 10 12:15 153 186 00:30 21 17 12:30 223 170 00:45 19 81 14 52 133 12:45 181 737 130 640 1377 01:00 15 10 13:00 210 164 01:15 10 8 1115 191 152 01:30 30 14 13:30 229 174 01:45 15 50 12 44 94 13:45 215 845 186 676 1521 02:00 13 9 14:00 233 197 02:15 15 9 14:15 232 166 02:30 9 7 14:30 241 199 D245 11 48 4 29 77 14:45 237 943 197 759 1702 03:00 6 6 15:00 274 171 03:15 5 4 15:15 245 176 03:30 2 2 15:30 274 167 03:45 15 28 5 17 45 15:45 291 IDS4 178 692 1776 D4 :0 7 6 16:00 247 166 04:15 6 10 16:15 255 176 D4:30 it 9 16:30 273 163 04:45 19 43 30 35 78 16:45 314 1089 198 703 1792 05:00 12 17 17:00 317 215 05:15 17 29 17:15 327 209 05:30 36 45 17:30 340 209 05:45 43 108 48 139 247 17:45 344 1328 189 822 2150 06:00 26 72 18:00 323 207 06:15 34 99 18:15 372 203 06:30 57 161 18:30 311 169 06:45 80 197 250 582 779 18:45 248 1254 152 731 1985 07 :0 75 239 19:00 218 151 07:15 112 319 19:15 202 141 07:30 144 397 19:30 194 128 07:45 232 563 288 1243 1806 19:45 124 738 116 536 1274 08:00 182 299 20:00 156 100 08:15 154 354 20:15 128 86 08:30 153 307 20:30 118 96 08:45 146 635 282 1242 1877 20:45 101 503 70 352 855 09:00 121 283 21:00 100 64 09:15 143 242 21:15 105 71 09:30 151 256 21:30 116 81 09:45 161 576 248 1029 1605 21:45 86 407 71 287 694 10:00 140 219 22:00 102 55 10:15 157 205 22:15 Bo 66 1030 170 161 22:30 53 50 WAS 163 630 130 715 1345 22:45 50 285 36 207 492 11:00 162 151 73:00 51 31 11:15 162 162 23:15 47 26 11:30 157 156 23:30 29 21 11:45 181 662 182 651 1313 23:45 38 165 18 96 261 a Peak Hr. Volume 11:45 07:30 07:30 Peak Hr. 737 1338 2050 Volume 59. 17:30 16:45 17:30 1379 831 2187 7 - 9 Vol. 1198 2485 3683 4-6 Vol. 2417 1525 3942 Peak Hr. 07;45 07;30 07:30 Peak Hr. 17:00 16:45 17:00 Volume 721 1338 2050 Volume 1328 831 2150 P.H.F. 0.777 0.843 0.947 P.M.F. 0.965 0.966 0.979 00:00 5 17 12:W 116 146 00:15 20 510 9 542 1052 12:15 113 210 118 309 519 00:30 11 10 12:30 98 106 WAS 18 54 17 53 107 12:45 109 436 139 509 945 01:00 10 9 13:00 112 128 01:15 13 443 8 S26 969 13:15 100 171 128 202 373 01:30 13 11 13:30 107 119 01:45 6 42 10 38 80 13:45 118 437 130 505 942 02:00 11 12 14:00 102 147 02:15 it 373 7 490 863 14:15 112 123 132 117 240 0230 9 8 14:30 118 170 02:45 12 43 11 38 81 14:45 142 474 136 585 1059 03:00 5 5 15:00 103 139 03:15 9 16 15:15 129 114 03:30 10 13 15:30 133 112 03:45 14 38 16 50 88 15:45 127 492 128 493 985 04:00 11 19 16:00 121 123 04:15 8 31 16:15 128 140 0430 15 30 16:30 138 124 04:45 28 62 49 129 191 16:45 158 545 148 535 1080 05:00 22 53 17:00 181 132 05:15 36 70 17:15 177 149 05:30 48 80 17:30 168 165 05:45 67 173 90 293 466 17:45 185 711 161 607 1318 06:00 54 118 18:00 181 126 06:15 74 116 18:15 173 146 06:30 108 107 18:30 162 133 06:45 115 351 122 463 814 18:45 146 662 106 511 1173 07:00 121 153 19:00 107 105 07:15 150 166 19:15 102 104 07:30 175 135 19:30 88 81 07:45 151 597 156 610 1207 19:45 89 386 78 368 754 08:00 151 165 20:00 77 72 08:15 154 156 20:15 78 84 08:30 135 157 20:30 66 56 08:45 125 565 133 611 1176 20:45 70 291 75 287 578 09:00 110 137 21:00 60 107 09:15 125 131 21:15 65 74 09:30 136 154 21:30 49 66 09:45 139 510 120 542 1052 21:45 36 210 62 309 519 10:00 127 124 22:00 50 54 10:15 116 146 22:15 48 61 10:30 93 138 22:30 40 47 10:45 107 443 118 S26 969 22:45 33 171 40 202 373 11:00 87 128 23:00 38 29 11:15 89 131 23:15 41 38 11:30 98 125 23:30 28 25 11:45 99 373 106 490 863 23:45 16 123 25 117 240 Peak Hr. Volume P.H.F. 7 -9 Vol Peak Hr Volume P.H.F. 07:30 07:45 631 634 1162 1221 07:30 07:45 631 634 0.901 0.961 07:15 Peak Hr. 17:00 17:00 1249 1 Volume 711 607 2383 1 4 - 6 Vol. 1256 1142 07:15 Peak Hr. 17:00 17:00 1249 Volume 711 607 0.988 P.H.F. 0.961 0.920 17:00 1318 17:00 1318 0.952 00:00 34 72 24 301 285 12:00 198 106 206 301 224 00:15 25 168 139 357 525 17 265 1193 228 976 2169 12:15 210 168 247 264 205 00:30 16 239 14 201 167 12:30 208 241 235 166 117 00:45 26 101 17 72 173 12:45 210 826 215 903 1729 01:00 15 706 21 1086 1792 13:00 219 568 207 444 1012 01:15 30 0.943 7 13:15 231 203 01:30 16 17 13:30 222 186 01:45 11 52 12 57 109 1345 208 880 197 793 1673 02:00 12 592 7 910 1502 14:00 235 380 183 379 759 02:15 13 2 14:15 210 187 02:30 6 6 14:30 250 218 02:45 7 38 4 19 57 14:45 263 958 250 838 1796 03:00 7 5 15:00 282 197 03:15 7 8 15:15 266 185 03:30 5 5 15:30 271 192 03:45 4 23 4 22 45 15:45 274 1093 195 769 1862 04:00 8 3 16:00 268 193 04:15 9 7 16:15 295 196 04:30 8 13 16:30 308 206 04:45 20 45 12 35 80 16:45 299 1170 243 838 2008 05:DD 15 21 17:00 301 234 05:15 16 29 17:15 308 234 05:30 22 34 17:30 318 206 240 914 2169 06:00 32 40 18:00 326 239 06:15 31 72 18:15 301 285 06:30 40 106 18:30 301 224 06:45 65 168 139 357 525 18:45 265 1193 228 976 2169 07:00 80 168 19:00 264 205 07:15 107 239 19:15 201 167 07:30 171 241 19:30 166 117 07:45 209 567 263 911 1478 19:45 167 798 109 598 1396 08:00 218 17:45 266 Volume 770 20:00 181 Volume 132 988 2244 WAS 167 0.939 289 P.H.F. 0.975 20:15 153 7 - 9 Vol. 91 1997 3270 08:30 170 1752 259 Peak Hr. 07:30 20:30 111 Peak Hr. 106 16:30 17:00 08:45 151 706 272 1086 1792 20:45 123 568 115 444 1012 09:00 140 0.943 228 21:00 116 117 09:15 157 226 21:15 84 92 09:30 137 224 21:30 94 82 09:45 158 592 232 910 1502 21:45 86 380 88 379 759 10:00 184 215 22:00 80 89 10:15 163 187 22:15 70 70 10:30 201 181 22:30 44 75 10:45 166 714 191 774 1488 22:45 46 240 44 278 518 11:00 184 177 23:00 47 42 11:15 184 222 23:15 34 39 11:30 204 191 23:30 40 29 11:45 154 726 208 798 1524 23:45 31 152 20 130 282 AM PM Peak Hr. 11:45 08:00 07:45 Peak Hr. 17:15 17:45 17:45 Volume 770 1086 1841 Volume 1280 988 2244 P.H.F. 0.917 0.939 0.951 P.H.F. 0.975 0.867 0,957 7 - 9 Vol. 1273 1997 3270 4 - 6 Vol. 2425 1752 4177 Peak Hr. 07:30 08:00 07:45 Peak Hr. 17:00 16:30 17:00 Volume 765 1086 1841 Volume 1255 917 2169 P.H.F. 0.877 0.939 0.951 P.H.F. 0.957 0.943 0.955 00:00 42 744 21 1012 1756 12:00 183 599 213 465 1064 00:15 16 P.H.F. 23 1313 1897 12:15 215 Peak Hr. 227 07:45 07:45 00:30 24 785 17 1797 Volume 12:30 220 0.934 216 P.M.F. 00:45 23 105 13 74 179 12:45 213 831 192 848 1679 01:00 20 648 18 965 1613 13:00 211 386 205 331 717 01:15 9 7 13:15 207 189 01:30 26 13 13:30 224 201 01:45 12 67 9 47 114 13:45 222 864 226 821 1685 02:00 19 755 7 823 1578 14:00 229 244 191 264 508 02:15 13 4 14:15 222 222 02:30 6 8 14:30 243 228 02:45 12 50 4 23 73 14:45 260 954 249 890 1844 03:00 7 798 5 835 1633 15:00 268 133 234 140 273 03:15 9 6 15:15 280 204 03:30 6 5 15:30 300 196 03:45 4 26 3 19 45 15:45 289 1137 186 620 1957 04:00 8 5 16:00 306 222 04:15 6 6 16:15 352 212 04:30 13 9 16:30 307 182 04:45 16 43 15 35 78 16:45 310 1275 236 852 2127 05:00 18 22 17:00 325 231 05:15 20 34 17:15 349 222 05:30 26 32 17:30 333 245 05:45 32 96 54 142 238 17:45 356 1363 261 959 2322 06:00 36 49 18:00 331 248 06:15 40 74 18:15 290 284 06:30 35 105 18:30 312 242 06:45 64 175 177 405 580 18:45 272 1205 241 1015 2220 07:00 78 172 19:00 273 234 07:15 111 205 19:15 196 185 07:30 174 250 19:30 191 124 07:45 206 569 258 885 1454 19:45 154 814 128 671 1485 08:00 218 226 20:00 187 145 08:15 187 271 20:15 150 104 08:30 174 257 20:30 137 97 08:45 165 744 258 1012 1756 20:45 125 599 119 465 1064 09:00 153 P.H.F. 241 1313 1897 21:00 112 Peak Hr. 100 07:45 07:45 09:15 174 785 247 1797 Volume 21:15 109 0.934 82 P.M.F. 09:30 154 233 21:30 107 79 09:45 167 648 244 965 1613 21:45 58 386 70 331 717 10:00 191 216 22:00 83 82 10:15 180 200 22:15 76 62 10:30 198 199 22:30 48 78 10:45 186 755 208 823 1578 22:45 37 244 42 264 508 11:00 200 176 73:00 42 50 11:15 187 237 23:15 29 40 11:30 227 192 23:30 34 29 11:45 184 798 230 835 1633 23:45 28 133 21 140 273 Peak Hr. 11:30 08:15 07:45 Peak Hr. Volume 809 1027 1797 Volume P.H.F. 0.891 0.947 0.968 P.H.F. 7 - 9 Vol. 1313 1897 3210 4 - 6 Vol Peak Hr. 07:30 07:45 07:45 Peak Hr. Volume 785 1012 1797 Volume P.H.F. 0.900 0.934 0.968 P.M.F. 9805 8076 17881 17:15 17:30 17:30 1369 1038 2348 2638 1811 4449 17:00 17:00 17:00 1363 959 2322 0.957 0.919 0.941 00:00 30 25 12.00 212 255 00:15 15 17 12:15 243 213 00:30 17 11 12:30 240 257 00:45 24 86 12 65 151 12:45 240 935 232 957 1892 01:00 12 11 13:00 249 234 01:15 13 8 13:15 245 228 01:30 23 9 13:30 223 217 01:45 10 58 9 37 95 13:45 233 950 222 901 1851 02:00 13 11 14:00 250 207 02:15 13 8 14:15 247 244 02:30 7 7 14:30 274 290 02:45 9 42 4 30 72 14:45 271 1042 272 1013 2055 03:00 7 6 15:00 256 251 03:15 5 3 15:15 287 202 03:30 2 670 4 969 1639 15:30 272 820 217 764 1584 03:45 5 19 4 17 36 15:45 290 1105 217 887 1992 04:00 10 1187 9 16:00 281 238 04:15 7 9 16:15 329 211 Q4:30 12 897 26 1133 2030 16:30 315 632 254 517 1149 04:45 18 47 37 81 128 16:45 324 1249 259 962 2211 05:00 15 35 17:00 316 266 05:15 39 25 17:15 336 254 05:30 41 735 32 1084 1819 17:30 341 411 284 366 777 05:45 35 130 58 150 280 17:45 342 1335 308 1112 2447 06:00 36 52 18:00 328 297 06:15 40 74 16:15 337 298 06:30 61 774 120 913 1687 18:30 318 249 282 240 489 06:45 98 235 164 410 645 18:45 265 1248 230 1107 2355 07:00 85 183 19:00 256 264 07:15 117 222 19:15 201 228 07:30 204 277 19:30 174 154 07:45 264 670 287 969 1639 19:45 189 820 118 764 1584 08:00 267 Peak Hr. 281 07:30 07:30 Peak Hr. 20:00 195 17:30 172 972 1151 2119 08:15 233 1187 306 20:15 150 109 08:30 208 261 20:30 152 118 08:45 189 897 285 1133 2030 20:45 135 632 118 517 1149 09:00 161 255 21:00 137 110 09:15 193 261 21:15 92 86 09:30 185 274 21:30 92 93 09:45 196 735 294 1084 1819 21:45 90 411 77 366 777 10:00 201 263 22:00 80 73 10:15 197 205 22:15 77 61 10:30 194 213 22:30 60 61 WAS 182 774 232 913 1687 22:45 32 249 45 240 489 11:00 219 231 23:00 41 35 11:15 210 246 23:15 24 41 11:30 211 233 23:30 27 28 11:45 213 853 241 951 1804 23:45 28 120 20 124 244 8950 19046 5 6t% 93.8vo 56.2% 35.3% 53.0% 47.0% 64.7% AM PM Peak Hr. 07:45 07:30 07:30 Peak Hr. 17:30 17:30 17:30 Volume 972 1151 2119 Volume 1348 1187 2535 7 - 9 Vol. 1567 2102 3669 14 - 6 Vol. 2564 2074 4656 Peak Hr. 07:45 07:30 07:30 Peak Hr. 17:00 17:00 17:00 Volume 972 1151 2119 Volume 1335 1112 2447 P.H.F. 0.910 0.940 0.961 P.H.F. 01976 0.903 0.941 00:00 16 14 12:00 185 265 00:15 9 14 17-15 233 223 00:30 11 13 12:30 214 232 00:45 21 57 11 52 109 12:45 220 852 219 939 1791 01:00 7 13 13:00 223 245 01:15 12 7 13:15 208 231 01:30 13 7 13:30 212 220 01:45 11 43 10 37 60 13:45 227 870 218 914 1784 02:00 13 11 14:00 203 201 02:15 9 5 14:15 211 243 02:30 6 9 14:30 201 227 02:45 9 37 6 31 68 14:45 230 845 249 920 1765 03:00 4 6 15:00 222 217 03:15 5 4 15:15 207 186 03:30 4 6 15:30 242 217 03:45 4 17 3 19 36 15:45 252 923 225 845 1768 04:00 5 11 16:00 258 235 04:15 9 9 16:15 296 196 04:30 15 11 16:30 272 251 04:45 14 43 21 52 95 1g:45 246 1072 236 918 1990 05:00 21 32 17:00 240 265 05:15 32 30 17:15 290 276 05:30 42 30 17:30 244 293 05:45 47 142 41 133 275 17:45 278 1052 270 1109 2156 06:00 40 44 18:00 254 313 06:15 50 67 18:15 270 298 06:30 67 106 18:30 232 287 06:45 112 269 176 393 662 18:45 211 967 256 1154 2121 07:00 94 203 19:00 187 264 07:15 119 206 19:15 152 194 07:30 173 260 19:30 139 133 07:45 239 625 291 960 1585 19:45 137 615 155 746 1361 08:00 257 270 20:00 159 139 08:15 261 301 20:15 133 100 08:30 266 270 20:30 103 101 08:45 229 1013 256 1097 2110 20:45 96 491 102 442 933 09:00 178 238 21:00 109 95 09:15 210 254 21:15 76 78 09:30 163 258 21:30 77 70 09:45 176 727 248 998 1725 21:45 62 324 51 294 618 10:00 192 229 22:00 61 64 10:15 181 219 22:15 35 54 10:30 208 221 22:30 43 48 10:45 165 746 212 881 1627 22:45 30 169 35 201 370 11:00 195 234 23:00 39 34 11:15 236 224 23:15 75 39 11:30 189 215 23:30 17 21 11:45 209 829 229 902 1731 23:45 21 102 24 118 220 Peak Hr. Volume 7 -9 Vol. Peak Hr. Volume P.H.F. 07:45 1023 0.961 1638 07:45 1023 0.961 07:45 07:45 Peak Hr. 1132 2155 1 Volume 2057 3695 4 - 6 Vol. 07:45 07:45 Peak Hr. 1132 2355 Volume 0.940 0 .959 P.H.F. 15:45 17:30 17:30 1078 1174 2220 2124 2022 4146 16:00 17:00 17:00 1072 1104 2156 0.905 0.942 0.952 00:00 79 62 12:00 357 326 00:15 59 42 PM 12:15 356 Peak Hr. 349 07:15 08:30 00:30 45 17:45 41 Volume 1394 12:30 352 Volume 349 1639 3323 00:45 55 238 47 192 430 12:45 332 1397 327 1351 2748 01:00 33 3128 24 Peak Hr. 07:15 13:00 342 Peak Hr. 353 17:00 17:00 01:15 49 1695 11 Volume 1676 13:15 305 P.H.F. 356 0.900 0.909 01:30 35 01960 23 13:30 339 352 01:45 31 148 19 77 225 13:45 292 1278 355 1416 2694 02:00 32 29 14:00 357 354 02:15 30 14 14:15 334 359 02:30 23 22 14:30 388 383 _ 02:45 19 104 17 82 186 14:45 369 1448 384 1480 2928 03:00 17 12 15:00 445 386 03:15 20 15 15:15 398 364 03:30 21 20 15:30 405 380 03:45 15 73 16 63 136 15:45 388 1636 367 1497 3133 04:00 17 20 16:00 387 382 04:15 15 35 16:15 386 379 04:30 33 59 16:30 410 372 04:45 48 113 68 182 295 16:45 410 1593 379 1512 3105 05:00 41 72 17:00 410 421 05:15 52 96 17:15 395 392 05:30 69 124 17:30 451 401 05:45 102 264 143 435 699 17:45 420 1676 402 1616 3292 06:00 101 161 18:00 417 420 06:15 137 204 18:15 398 414 06:30 232 270 18:30 429 403 06:45 246 716 315 950 1666 18:45 377 1621 355 1592 3213 07:00 239 338 19:00 419 403 07:15 268 393 19:15 346 322 07:30 342 471 19:30 357 333 07:45 336 1185 415 1617 2802 19:45 339 1461 233 1291 2752 WOO 314 416 20:00 341 279 08:15 268 371 20:15 322 255 08:30 313 436 20:30 263 241 08:45 334 1229 455 1678 2907 20:45 251 1177 245 1020 2197 09:00 361 379 21:00 267 239 09:15 327 394 21:15 232 252 09:30 322 338 21:30 286 212 09:45 269 1279 334 1445 2724 21:45 218 1003 200 903 1906 10:00 279 337 22:00 216 177 10:15 255 329 22:15 195 144 10:30 336 301 22:30 184 141 10:45 255 1125 324 1291 2416 22:45 146 741 121 583 1324 11:00 294 341 23:00 126 120 11:15 311 310 23:15 114 88 11:30 338 338 23:30 111 68 11:45 329 1272 328 1317 2589 23:45 83 434 74 350 784 AM PM Peak Hr. 11:45 07:15 08:30 Peak Hr. 17:30 17:45 17:30 Volume 1394 1695 2999 Volume 1686 1639 3323 P.H.F. 0.976 0.900 0.950 P.H.F. 0.935 0.976 0.975 7 - 9 Vol. 2414 3295 5709 4 - 6 Vol. 3269 3128 6397 Peak Hr. 07:15 07:15 07:15 Peak Hr. 17:00 17:00 17:00 Volume 1260 1695 2955 Volume 1676 1616 3292 P.H.F. 0.921 0.900 0.909 P.H.F. 0.929 01960 0.966 00:00 73 52 12:00 381 355 00:15 60 59 12.115 416 356 00:30 65 42 1230 354 397 00:45 39 237 38 191 428 12:45 369 1520 371 1479 2999 01:00 54 32 13:00 361 4DO 01:15 36 24 13:15 385 388 01:30 39 28 13:30 360 354 01:45 44 173 26 110 283 13:45 348 1454 363 1525 2979 02:00 32 28 14:00 367 368 02:15 21 31 14:15 370 399 02:30 28 20 14:30 427 384 02:45 37 I1B 26 105 223 14:45 406 1570 387 1538 3108 03:00 20 24 15:00 368 409 WAS 24 16 15:15 396 391 03:30 32 22 15:30 350 383 03:45 21 97 24 86 183 15:45 424 1538 397 1580 3118 04:00 21 21 16:00 382 368 04:15 24 43 16:15 444 383 04:30 33 65 16:30 407 369 04:45 53 131 78 207 338 16:45 451 1684 414 1534 3218 05:00 54 101 17:00 418 383 05:15 80 111 17:15 445 401 05:30 68 145 17:30 406 387 05:45 125 327 163 520 847 17:45 440 1709 413 1584 3293 06:00 142 183 18:00 396 358 06:15 176 239 18:15 4DO 426 06:30 259 242 18:30 367 373 D6:45 268 845 306 970 1815 18:45 411 1574 371 1528 3102 07:00 281 362 19:00 410 351 07:15 349 388 19:15 366 321 07:30 454 397 19:30 335 273 07:45 486 1570 463 1610 3180 19:45 324 1435 270 1215 2650 08:00 375 438 20:00 281 264 08:15 314 446 20:15 271 281 08:30 408 413 20:30 249 229 08:45 364 1461 414 1711 3172 20:45 231 1032 221 995 2027 09:00 347 364 21:00 243 267 09:15 357 381 21:15 232 239 09:30 328 367 21:30 239 226 09:45 340 1372 357 1469 2841 21:45 215 929 242 974 1903 10:00 324 355 22:00 189 169 10:15 347 372 22:15 200 174 10:30 318 347 22:30 151 142 10:45 336 1325 341 1415 2740 22:45 125 665 90 575 1240 MOD 336 311 23:00 131 113 11:15 373 337 23:15 107 77 11:30 391 333 23:30 81 89 11:45 391 1491 360 1341 2832 23:45 80 399 61 340 739 Peak Hr. 07:15 07:45 Volume 1664 1760 7 - 9 Vol. 3031 3321 Peak Hr. 07:15 07:45 Volume 1664 1760 P.H.F. 0.856 0.950 07:30 Peak Hr. 16:30 16:45 3373 1 Volume 1721 1585 16:45 3305 6352 4 - 6 Vol. 3393 3118 6511 07:30 Peak Hr. 16:30 16:45 16:45 3373 Volume 1721 1585 3305 0.889 P.H.F. 0.954 0.957 0.955 D0:00 66 51.1% 66 53.1% 12:00 408 AM 404 00:15 53 66 Peak Hr. 07:30 12:15 428 Peak Hr. 390 17:00 17:00 00:30 49 2304 58 Volume 2280 12:30 448 P.H.F. 394 0.954 0.909 00:45 30 198 59 249 447 12:45 475 1759 407 1595 3354 01:00 48 07:45 24 Peak Hr. 17:00 13:00 415 Volume 390 2304 4372 01:15 45 2057 25 P.H.F. 0.875 13:15 435 P.H.F. 382 0.951 0.961 01:30 36 26 13:30 437 390 01:45 42 171 29 104 275 13:45 482 1769 373 1535 3304 02:00 30 31 14:00 441 385 02:15 22 26 14:15 463 410 02:30 26 23 14:30 456 406 02:45 29 107 24 104 211 14:45 489 1849 428 1629 3478 03:00 28 19 15:00 427 404 03:15 23 20 35:15 466 451 03:30 28 17 15:30 470 414 03:45 24 103 18 74 177 15:45 532 1895 479 1748 3643 04:00 19 30 16:00 490 446 04:15 27 32 16:15 526 457 04:30 48 62 16:30 497 502 04:45 61 155 74 198 353 16:45 532 2045 488 1893 3938 05:00 61 68 17:00 513 541 05:15 94 97 17:15 562 504 05:30 115 118 17:30 536 502 05:45 155 425 155 438 863 17:45 601 2212 510 2057 4269 05:00 193 155 18:00 553 487 06:15 218 233 18:15 590 460 06:30 272 258 18:30 514 440 06:45 340 1023 360 1006 2029 18:45 524 2181 380 1767 3948 07:00 321 397 19:00 414 335 07:15 462 476 19:15 433 302 07:30 520 486 19:30 332 258 07:45 598 1901 604 1963 3864 19:45 383 1562 230 1125 2687 OB:Do 502 579 20:00 307 262 08:15 474 568 2D:15 286 250 08:30 494 553 20:30 206 198 08:45 420 1890 562 2262 4152 2045 284 1083 209 919 2002 09:00 425 448 21:00 228 221 09:15 412 464 21:15 237 198 09:30 307 427 21:30 209 218 09:45 402 1546 424 1763 3309 21:45 181 855 193 830 1685 10:00 378 414 22:00 179 166 10:15 372 403 22:15 155 176 10:30 360 360 22:30 151 144 10:45 412 1522 380 1557 3079 22:45 113 598 85 571 1169 11:00 367 371 23:00 97 100 11:15 446 354 23:15 77 88 11:30 426 389 23:30 81 67 11:45 464 1703 378 1492 3195 23:45 54 309 71 326 63S 5 lit% 48.9% 51.1% 39.2% 53.1% 46.9% 60.8074 AM PM Peak Hr. 07:30 07:45 07:45 Peak Hr. 17:30 17:00 17:00 Volume 2094 2304 4372 Volume 2280 2057 4269 P.H.F. 0.875 0.954 0.909 P.H.F. 0.948 0.951 0.961 7 - 9 Vol. 3791 4225 8016 4 - 6 Vol. 4257 3950 8207 Peak Hr. 07:30 07:45 07:45 Peak Hr. 17:00 17:00 17:00 Volume 20% 2304 4372 Volume 2212 2057 4269 P.H.F. 0.875 0.954 0.909 P.H.F. 0.920 0.951 0.961 APPENDIX C Existing (Year 2009) Conditions Intersection Level of Service Calculation Worksheets Rosemead Circulation Element Update MKOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis PLANNING a E.+c • +a February 19, 2010 —Appendices INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Mission Drive Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: AM (7:30 -8:30) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 184 184 1 1600 0.115 < == 2 NB Thru 353 353 2 3200 0.156 0 NB Right 146 146 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 111 111 1 1600 0.069 2 SB Thru 632 632 2 3200 0.211 0 SB Right 43 43 0 0 — 1 EB Left 53 53 1 1600 0.033 2 EB Thru 438 438 2 3200 0.168 0 EB Right 98 98 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 212 212 1 1600 0.133 2 WB Thru 740 740 2 3200 0.246 0 WB Right 46 46 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.627 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.727 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Lower Azusa Road Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: AM (7:30 -8:30) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume (11 I No. of 1 Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.80 D 1 NB Left 15 15 1 1600 0.009 — 2 NB Thru 1121 1121 2 3200 0.350 1 NB Right 315 315 1 1600 0.197 1 SB Left 110 110 1 1600 0.069 — 2 SIB Thru 1037 1037 2 3200 0.324 0 SIB Right 1 1 0 0 — 0 ES Left 4 8 0 0 — < == 1 EB Thru 3 3 1 1600 0.015 0 EB Right 13 13 1 0 0 — 2 WB Left 658 658 1 2 2880 0.228 0 WB Thru 2 2 1 0 0 0.000 0 WB Right 273 273 1 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.662 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.762 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabi e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Mission Drive Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: AM (7:45 - 8:45) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 157 157 1 1600 0.098 < == 2 NB Thru 1292 1292 2 3200 0.418 0 NB Right 44 44 0 0 — 1 SS Left 42 42 1 1600 0.026 2 SB Thru 1376 1376 2 3200 0.541 0 SB Right 355 355 0 0 — 1 EB Left 154 154 1 1600 0.096 2 EB Thru 269 269 2 3200 0.137 0 EB Right 168 168 0 0 — 1 WB Left 123 123 1 1 1 1600 0.077 < == 2 W8 Thru 513 513 1 2 3200 0.186 0 WB Right 82 82 1 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.921 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.021 Level of Service (LOS) -Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabi e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. r LOS Maximum V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a Lanes 70 I- C INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Valley Blvd Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Agency: City of Rosemead Movement Adjusted I Volume Volume Ill No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 0.80 NB Left 120 120 1 1600 0.075 NB Thru 506 506 2 3200 0.219 NB Right 194 194 0 0 — SB Left 66 66 1 1600 0.041 SB Thru 785 785 2 3200 0.303 SB Right 183 183 0 0 — EB Left 91 91 1 1600 0.057 < == EB Thru 563 563 2 3200 0.204 EB Right 89 89 0 0 — WB Left 224 224 1 1600 0.1401 < == 1 WB Thru 1205 1205 2 3200 0.397 WB Right 65 65 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.832 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.932 Level of Service (LOS) -Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: Valley Blvd at Rosemead Blvd Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 -8:30) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume [11 I No. ofJ 1 Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 205 205 1 1600 0.128 2 NB Thru 1305 1305 2 3200 0.408 1 NB Right 112 112 1 1600 0.070 1 SB Left 29 29 1 1600 0.018 <__ 2 SB Thru 1328 1328 2 3200 0.415 1 SB Right 246 246 1 1600 0.154 1 EB Left 156 156 1 1600 0.098 <__ 2 EB Thru 363 363 2 3200 0.113 1 EB Right 190 190 1 1600 0.119 1 WB Left 199 199 1 1 1 1600 0.1241 <__ 1 2 WB Thru 710 710 2 3200 0.222 1 WB Right 99 99 1 1 1 1600 0.062 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.863 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.963 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabI e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: Valley Blvd at Mission Drive Count Date: Thursday. October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 -8:30) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume [11 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total free flow right turn (if applicabi e). B 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 — 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of E 1 NB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 NB Right 0 0 0 0 — 2 SB Left 316 316 2 2880 0.110 < == 0 SB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 1 SB Right 39 39 1 1600 0.024 1 EB Left 23 23 1 1 1 1600 0.014 1 < == 2 ES Thru 385 385 1 2 3200 0.120 0 EB Right 0 0 1 0 0 — 0 WB Left 0 0 0 0 — 2 WB Thru 935 935 2 3200 0.292 1 WB Right 464 464 1 1600 0.290 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.416 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.516 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below A Maximum NOTES LOS V/C 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or A 0.60 free flow right turn (if applicabi e). B 0.70 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph C 0.80 dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph D 0.90 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of E 1.00 shared lane used by movement. F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: Valley Blvd at Rio Hondo Ave Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 1211 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 157 157 0 0 — 1 NB Thru 10 10 1 1600 0.153 0 NB Right 77 77 0 0 — 0 SB Left 37 41 0 0 — 1 SB Thru 30 30 1 1600 0.066 0 SB Right 34 34 0 0 — 1 EB Left 11 11 1 1600 0.007 < == 2 EB Thru 592 592 2 3200 0.215 0 EB Right 97 97 0 0 — 1 WB Left 87 87 1 1 1 1600 0.054 < == 3 WB Thru 1228 1228 3 4800 0.260 0 WB Right 19 19 1 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.422 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.522 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below A NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabi e). 2. Per4ane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS WC A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: Valley Blvd at Temple City Blvd Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 -8:30) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 1.00 F 1 NB Left 209 209 1 1600 0.131 < == 2 NB Thru 362 362 2 3200 0.126 0 NB Right 41 41 0 0 — 1 SIB Left 188 188 1 1600 0.118 < == 2 SIB Thru 518 518 2 3200 0.237 0 SIB Right 241 241 0 0 — 1 EB Left 147 147 1 16001 0.092 < == 2 EB Thru 507 507 2 3200 0.158 1 EB Right 54 54 1 1600 0.034 ' WB Left 90 90 1 1 1 1600 0.056 < == 2 WB Thru 958 958 2 3200 0.361 0 WB Right 196 196 1 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.821 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.921 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if appliGabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Marshall St Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume IAdjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes [3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1.00 NB Left 56 56 1 1600 0.035 < == 2 E NB Thru 705 705 2 3200 0.280 01 NB Right 192 192 0 0 — SB Left 44 44 1 1600 0.028 2 E SB Thru 1034 1034 2 3200 0.342 01 SB Right 60 60 0 0 — 0 EB Left 66 132 0 0 — 1 EB Thru 123 123 1 1600 0.224 0 EB Right 104 104 0 0 — 0 WB Left 189 378 1 0 0 — < == 1 WB Thru 176 176 1 1 1 1600 0.379 0 WB Right 52 52 1 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.756 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.856 Level of Service (LOS) -Refer to table below D zEel : 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabi e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. • Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Marshall St Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: AM (7:30 -8:30) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume [11 No. of 1 Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 49 49 1 1600 0.031 < == 2 NB Thru 1496 1496 2 3200 0.468 1 NB Right 125 125 1 1600 0.078 1 SB Left 95 95 1 1600 0.059 2 SB Thru 1665 1665 2 3200 0.540 0 SB Right 64 64 0 0 — 1 EB Left 52 52 1 1600 0.033 < == 2 EB Thru 136 136 2 3200 0.088 0 EB Right 144 144 0 0 — 1 WB Left 177 177 1 1 1 1600 0.111 2 WB Thru 259 259 2 3200 0.105 0 WB Right 78 78 1 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.770 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.870 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Glendon Way Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 47 47 1 1600 0.029 < == 3 NB Thru 1605 1605 3 4800 0.380 0 NB Right 220 220 0 0 — 0 SB Left 0 0 0 0 — 2 SB Thru 1803 1803 2 3200 0.563 1 SB Right 234 234 1 1600 0.146 1 EB Left 8 8 1 1600 0.005 < == 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 1 EB Right 209 209 1 1600 0.131 WB Left 89 178 0 0 — < == E l WB Thru 32 32 1 1600 0.131 WB Right 131 131 1 1600 0.082 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.728 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.828 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabi e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: Temple City Blvd at Loftus Drive Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:15 -8:15) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. ofJ Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 — < == 1 NB Thru 557 557 1 1600 0.348 1 NB Right 312 312 1 1600 0.195 1 SB Left 196 196 1 1600 0.123 < == 2 SB Thru 428 428 2 3200 0.134 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 — 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 — 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 — 2 WB Left 323 323 1 2 2880 0.112 1 < == 0 WB Thru 0 0 1 0 0 0.000 1 WB Right 98 98 1 1 1 1600 0.061 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.583 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.683 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below B NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: Del Mar Ave at Hellman Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October, 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 -8:30) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 50 50 1 1600 0.031 < == 2 NB Thru 966 966 2 3200 0.307 0 NB Right 15 15 0 0 — 1 SB Left 60 60 1 1600 0.038 < == 2 SB Thru 831 831 2 3200 0.295 0 SB Right 114 114 0 0 — 1 EB Left 208 208 1 1600 0.130 < == 1 EB Thru 158 158 1 1600 0.129 0 EB Right 49 49 0 0 — 1 WB Left 53 53 1 1 1 1600 0.033 < == 1 WB Thru 265 265 1 1 1600 0.237 0 WB Right 114 114 1 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.712 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.812 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabI e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F Na INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at Hellman Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:45 - 8:45) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume ill No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 1 NB Left 64 64 1 1600 0.040 < == 3 NB Thru 945 945 3 4800 0.200 0 NB Right 14 14 0 0 — 1 SB Left 52 52 1 1600 0.033 < == 2 SB Thru 1231 1231 2 3200 0.439 0 SS Right 173 173 0 0 — 1 EB Left 132 132 1 1600 0.083 < == 1 EB Thru 136 136 1 1600 0.132 0 EB Right 75 75 0 0 — 1 WB Left 33 33 1 1 1 1600 0.021 < == 1 WB Thru 203 203 1 1 1 1600 0.196 0 WB Right 110 110 1 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.758 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.858 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabi e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F Na Lanes C 1 2 C C 1 1 C 1 1 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Hellman Ave /Ramona Blvd Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Agency: City of Rosemead Movement Volume Adjusted Volume I'll No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical I V/C Total D NB Left 121 121 1 1600 0.076 < == NB Thru 449 449 2 3200 0.145 NB Right 15 15 0 0 — SB Left 79 79 1 1600 0.049 SB Thru 773 773 2 3200 0.289 SB Right 153 153 0 0 — EB Left 217 434 1 0 0 — < == EB Thru 68 68 1 1 1 1600 0.314 EB Right 162 162 1 1 1 1600 0.101 WB Left 5 10 0 0 — WB Thru 87 87 1 1600 0.061 WB Right 267 267 1 1600 0.167 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.679 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.779 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Telster Ave Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 — < == 3 NB Thru 1550 1550 3 4800 0.323 1 NB Right 532 532 1 1600 0.333 1 SB Left 356 356 1 1600 0.223 < == 3 SB Thru 2238 2238 3 4800 0.466 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 — 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 — 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 188 188 1 1600 0.118 <_ _ 0 WB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 2 WB Right 98 98 1 2 2880 0.034 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.664 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.764 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabi e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS WC A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F We INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour "Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Whitmore St Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NS Left 0 0 0 0 — < == 3 NB Thru 2056 2056 3 4800 0.428 1 NB Right 143 143 1 1600 0.089 1 SB Left 99 99 1 1600 0.062 < == 3 SB Thru 2328 2328 3 4800 0.485 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 24 24 1 1600 0.015 < == 0 WB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 1 WB Right 26 26 1 1600 0.016 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.505 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.605 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below B NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: New Ave at Garvey Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume [11 I No. of 1 Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total free flow right turn (if applicabl e). B 1 NB Left 72 72 1 1600 0.045 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of E 2 NB Thru 506 506 2 3200 0.194 0 NB Right 114 114 0 0 — 1 SB Left 147 147 1 1600 0.092 < == 2 SB Thru 192 192 2 3200 0.078 0 SB Right 57 57 0 0 — 1 EB Left 135 135 1 1600 0.084 2 EB Thru 538 538 2 3200 0.202 0 EB Right 109 109 0 0 — 1 WB Left 83 83 1 1 1 1600 0.052 < == 2 WB Thru 755 755 2 3200 0.295 0 WB Right 190 190 1 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.665 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.765 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C Maximum NOTES LOS Vic 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or A 0.60 free flow right turn (if applicabl e). B 0.70 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph C 0.80 dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph D 0.90 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of E 1.00 shared lane used by movement. F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: Del Mar Ave at Garvey Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21. 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 -8:30) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume [11 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 99 99 1 1600 0.062 2 NB Thru 515 515 2 3200 0.178 0 NB Right 56 56 0 0 — 1 SB Left 156 156 1 1600 0.098 < == 2 SIB Thru 563 563 2 3200 0.228 0 SIB Right 167 167 0 0 — 1 EB Left 144 144 1 1600 0.090 2 EB Thru 574 574 2 3200 0.224 0 EB Right 142 142 0 0 — 1 WB Left 70 70 1 1 1 1600 0.044 < == 2 WB Thru 769 769 2 3200 0.298 0 WB Right 183 183 1 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.678 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.778 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at Garvey Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:45 - 8:45) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead E 1.00 Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume Ill No of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total E 1.00 1 NB Left 62 62 1 1600 0.039 2 NB Thru 592 592 2 3200 0.185 1 NB Right 157 157 1 1600 0.098 1 SB Left 328 328 1 1600 0.205 2 SB Thru 779 779 2 3200 0.243 1 SB Right 161 161 1 1600 0.101 1 EB Left 221 221 1 1600 0138 2 EB Thru 527 527 2 3200 0.165 1 EB Right 64 64 1 1600 0.040 WB Left 208 208 1 1600 0.130 < == 2 L WB Thru 902 902 1 2 3200 0.282 11 WB Right 195 195 1 1 1 1600 0.122 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.810 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.910 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS WC A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Garvey Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: AM (7:45 - 8:45) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.80 D 0.90 NB Left 94 94 1 1600 0.059 < == 2 E NB Thru 324 324 2 3200 0.126 01 NB Right 80 80 0 0 — SB Left 174 174 1 1600 0.109 2 E SB Thru 710 710 1 2 3200 0.263 01 SB Right 132 132 1 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 115 115 1 1600 0.072 < == 2 EB Thru 723 723 2 3200 0.253 0 EB Right 87 87 0 0 — 1 WB Left 146 148 1 1 1 1600 0 .093 <__ 2 WB Thru 893 893 2 3200 0.299 0 WB Right 65 65 1 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.693 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.793 Level of Service (LOS) -Refer to table below C NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabi e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at Rush SUPotrero Grande Dr Count Date: Wednesday, October 21. 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: AM (7:30 -8:30) Agency: City of Rosemead -'VP - Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 1.00 F 1 NB Left 14 14 1 1600 0.009 < == 2 NB Thru 458 458 2 3200 0.157 0 NB Right 43 43 0 0 — 1 SB Left 184 184 1 1600 0.115 2 SB Thru 672 672 2 3200 0.278 0 SB Right 216 216 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 56 56 1 1600 0.035 2 EB Thru 107 107 2 3200 0.043 0 EB Right 31 31 0 0 — 1 WB Left 32 32 1 1 1 1600 0.020 < == 2 WB Thru 193 193 2 3200 0.101 0 WB Right 131 131 1 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.423 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.523 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below A NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS Vic A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Rush St Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume Ill No '' Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 76 76 1 1600 0.048 < == - 2 NB Thru 516 516 2 3200 0.250 0 NB Right 284 284 0 0 — 1 SB Left 51 51 1 1600 0.032 < == 2 SB Thru 434 434 2 3200 0.253 0 SB Right 376 376 0 0 — 1 EB Left 211 211 1 1600 0.132 2 EB Thru 51 51 2 3200 0.033 0 EB Right 54 54 0 0 — 1 WB Left 6 6 1 1600 0.004 2 WB Thru 6 8 2 3200 0.003 1 WB Right 10 10 1 1600 0.006 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.436 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.536 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below A NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Landis View Lane Count Date: Wednesday, October 21. 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:45 - 8:45) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 — — 2 NB Thru 893 893 2 3200 0.283 0 NB Right 13 13 0 0 -- 1 SIB Left 9 9 1 1600 0.006 — 2 SIB Thru 564 564 2 3200 0.176 0 SIB Right 0 0 0 0 — 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 — 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 — 0 WB Left 32 32 1 0 0 — < == 1 WB Thru 0 0 1 1 1600 0.028 0 WB Right 12 12 1 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.317 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.417 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below A NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabi e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. LOS Maximum Vic A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at San Gabriel Blvd Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 6 6 0 0 — < == 1 NB Thru 4 4 1 1600 0.008 0 NB Right 3 3 1 0 0 — 1 SB Left 523 523 1 1600 0.327 < == 1 SB Thru 9 9 1 1600 0.033 0 SB Right 43 43 0 0 — 1 EB Left 43 43 1 1600 0.027 < == 2 EB Thru 638 638 2 3200 0.203 0 EB Right 11 11 0 0 — 0 WB Left 0 0 0 0 — 2 WB Thru 842 842 1 2 3200 0.263 2 WB Right 850 850 1 2 2880 0.295 Sum of Critical WC Ratios 0.625 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.725 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= I 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS WC A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at SR -60 WB Ramps Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Total 0.90 Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 17 17 1 1600 0.011 < == 3 NB Thru 992 992 3 4800 0.243 0 NB Right 173 173 0 0 — 1 SB Left 99 99 1 1600 0.062 2 SB Thru 1046 1046 2 3200 0.328 0 SB Right 4 4 0 0 — 1 EB Left 4 4 1 1600 0.003 < == 1 EB Thru 19 19 1 1600 0.026 0 EB Right 22 22 0 0 — 1 WB Left 87 87 1 1600 0.054 -. 1 WB Thru 14 14 1 1600 0.009 1 WB Right 715 715 1 1600 0.447 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.693 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.793 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: Town Center Drive at SR-60 EB Ramps Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: AM (7:45 -8:45) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume [11 I No. of 1 Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 3 3 1 1600 0.002 2 NB Thru 56 56 2 3200 0.018 1 NB Right 47 47 1600 0.029 1 SIB Left 365 365 1 1600 0.228 2 SIB Thru 13 13 2 3200 0.004 1 SIB Right 0 0 1 1600 0.000 1 EB Left 10 10 1 1600 0.006 < == 2 EB Thru 20 20 2 3200 0.009 0 EB Right 8 8 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 108 108 1 1 1 1600 0.068 2 WB Thru 67 67 2 3200 0.021 1 WB Right 648 648 1 1 1600 0.405 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.429 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.529 Level of Service (LOS) -Refer to table below A NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabi e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. • <. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at Town Center Drive Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: AM (7:30 -8:30) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume Ill No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 1.00 F 2 NB Left 36 36 2 2880 0.013 < == 2 NB Thru 834 834 2 3200 0.268 0 NB Right 22 22 0 0 — 1 SB Left 68 68 1 1600 0.043 < == 2 SB Thru 357 357 2 3200 0.112 1 SB Right 736 736 1 1600 0.460 1 EB Left 302 302 1 1600 0.189 < == 1 EB Thru 26 26 1 1600 0.016 1 EB Right 95 95 1 1600 0.059 0 WB Left 11 12 0 0 — < == 1 WB Thru 37 37 1 1600 0.031 1 WB Right 46 46 1 1600 0.029 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.531 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.631 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below B NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: Valley Blvd at Rosemead Blvd Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 1.00 F 1 NB Left 153 153 1 1600 0.096 < == 2 NB Thru 1386 1386 2 3200 0.433 1 NB Right 168 168 1 1600 0.105 1 SB Left 66 66 1 1600 0.041 < == 2 SB Thru 1223 1223 2 3200 0.382 1 SB Right 189 189 1 1600 0.118 1 EB Left 276 276 1 1600 0.173 2 EB Thru 690 690 2 3200 0.216 1 EB Right 149 149 1 1600 0.093 1 WB Left 177 177 1 1 1 1600 0.111 1 < =_ 2 WB Thru 469 469 2 3200 0.147 1 WB Right 80 80 1 1 1 1600 0.050 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.805 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.905 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabi e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS Vic A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Lower Azusa Road Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (4:45 -5:45) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 VIC Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 29 29 1 1600 0.018 < == 2 NB Thru 1406 1406 2 3200 0.439 1 NB Right 378 378 1 1600 0.236 1 SB Left 239 239 1 1600 0.149 < == 2 SB Thru 1328 1328 2 3200 0.417 0 SB Right 5 5 0 0 — 0 EB Left 4 4 0 0 — < == 1 EB Thru 2 2 1 1600 0.004 0 EB Right 1 1 0 0 — 2 WB Left 302 302 1 2 2880 0.105 <__ 0 WB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 WB Right 171 171 1 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.697 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.797 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS VIC A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Mission Drive Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 156 156 1 1600 0.098 < == 2 NB Thru 581 581 2 3200 0.240 0 NB Right 186 186 0 0 — 1 SB Left 110 110 1 1600 0.069 — 2 SB Thru 389 389 2 3200 0.126 0 SB Right 15 15 0 0 — 1 EB Left 48 48 1 1600 0.030 — 2 EB Thru 641 641 2 3200 0.230 0 EB Right 95 95 0 0 — 1 WB Left 125 125 1 1 1 1600 0.078 2 WB Thru 436 436 2 3200 0.156 0 WB Right 63 63 1 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.617 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.717 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS Vic A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Mission Drive Count Date: Thursday. October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (4:30 - 5:30) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume Ill No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 1 NB Left 139 139 1 1600 0.087 < == 2 NB Thru 1526 1526 2 3200 0.492 0 NB Right 49 49 0 0 — 1 SB Left 78 78 1 1600 0.049 < == 2 SB Thru 1364 1364 2 3200 0.488 0 SB Right 199 199 0 0 — 1 EB Left 204 204 1 1600 0.128 < == 2 EB Thru 520 520 2 3200 0.210 0 EB Right 151 151 0 0 — 1 WB Left 73 73 1 1600 0.046 < == 2 WB Thru 253 253 2 3200 0.105 0 WB Right 82 82 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.831 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.931 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if a licable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= I 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Valley Blvd Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 - 6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No of Lanes . 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1.00 NB Left 91 91 1 1600 0.057 < == 2 E NB Thru 757 757 2 3200 0.308 01 NB Right 230 230 0 0 — SB Left 68 68 1 1600 0.043 2 E SB Thru 530 530 2 3200 0.192 01 SB Right 85 85 0 0 — 1 EB Left 116 116 1 1600 0.073 0.357 — < == 2 EB Thru 1043 1043 2 3200 0 EB Right 100 100 0 0 1 WB Left 204 204 1 1600 0.128 2 WB Thru 767 767 2 3200 0.258 0 WS Right 57 57 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.836 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.936 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applirabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS Vic A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: Valley Blvd at Mission Drive Count Date: Thursday. October 22. 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 — 1 NB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 NB Right 0 0 0 0 — 2 SB Left 439 439 2 2880 0.152 0 SB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 1 SB Right 28 28 1 1600 0.018 1 EB Left 26 26 1 1600 0.016 < == 2 EB Thru 810 810 2 3200 0.253 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 — 0 WB Left 0 0 0 0 — 2 WB Thru 641 641 2 3200 0.200 1 WB Right 310 310 1 1 1 1600 0.194 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.405 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.505 Level of Service (LOS) -Refer to table below A NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F We INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: Valley Blvd at Rio Hondo Ave Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 111 111 0 0 — < == 1 NB Thru 44 44 1 1600 0.233 0 NB Right 218 218 0 0 — 0 SB Left 26 52 0 0 — 1 SB Thru 23 23 1 1600 0.070 0 SB Right 37 37 0 0 — 1 EB Left 19 19 1 1600 0.012 < == 2 EB Thru 1108 1108 2 3200 0.384 0 EB Right 122 122 0 0 — WB Left 58 58 1 1600 0.036 < == 3 L WB Thru 806 806 1 3 4800 0.174 01 WB Right 27 27 1 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.653 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.753 Level of Service (LOS) -Refer to table below C NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabi e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS WC A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: Valley Blvd at Temple City Blvd Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 130 130 1 1600 0.081 2 NB Thru 591 591 2 3200 0.204 0 NB Right 61 61 0 0 — 1 SB Left 164 164 1 1600 0.103 < == 2 SB Thru 486 486 2 3200 0.193 0 SB Right 130 130 0 0 — 1 EB Left 232 232 1 1600 0.145 < == 2 EB Thru 1074 1074 2 3200 0.336 1 ES Right 78 78 1 1600 0.049 1 WB Left 76 76 1 1 1 1600 0.048 1 < == 2 WB Thru 566 566 2 3200 0.214 0 WB Right 118 118 1 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.691 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.791 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C :61I*=: 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabi e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS Vic A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a Lanes C 701 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Marshall St Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (5:00 - 6:00) Agency: City of Rosemead Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 I V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total D NB Left 74 74 1 1600 0.046 < == NB Thru 995 995 2 3200 0.405 NB Right 302 302 0 0 — SB Left 43 43 1 1 1 1600 0.027 1 < == SB Thru 699 699 1 2 3200 0.232 SB Right 42 42 1 0 0 — EB Left 76 84 1 0 0 — EB Thru 169 169 1 1 1 1600 0.214 EB Right 89 89 1 0 0 — WB Left 209 418 0 0 — WB Thru 127 127 1 1600 0.366 WB Right 41 41 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.798 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.898 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Marshall St Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 1 NB Left 95 95 1 1600 0.059 < == 2 NB Thru 1528 1528 2 3200 0.478 1 NB Right 230 230 1 1600 0.144 1 SB Left 141 141 1 1600 0.088 < == - 2 SB Thru 1381 1381 2 3200 0.442 0 SB Right 33 33 0 0 - -- 1 EB Left 101 101 1 1600 0.063 < == 2 EB Thru 256 256 2 3200 0.121 0 EB Right 132 132 0 0 - -- 1 WB Left 157 157 1 1 1 1600 0.098 1 < == 2 WB Thru 217 217 2 3200 0.105 0 WB Right 120 120 1 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.785 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.885 Level of Service (LOS) -Refer to table below D 11GI &K 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if a licable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F We INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Glendon Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (4:45 -5:45) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 118 118 1 1600 0.074 < == 3 NB Thru 1810 1810 3 4800 0.509 0 NB Right 631 631 0 0 — 0 SB Left 0 0 0 0 — 2 SB Thru 1322 1322 2 3200 0.413 1 SB Right 329 329 1 1600 0.206 1 EB Left 11 11 1 1600 0.007 < == 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 1 EB Right 67 67 1 1600 0.042 0 WB Left 73 80 0 0 < == 1 WB Thru 83 83 1 1600 0.102 1 WB Right 205 205 1 1600 0.128 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.644 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.744 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: Temple City Blvd at Loftus Drive Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume [11 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NS Left 0 0 0 0 — < == 1 NB Thru 647 647 1 1600 0.404 1 NB Right 205 205 1 1600 0.128 1 SB Left 180 180 1 1600 0.113 < == 2 SB Thru 487 487 2 3200 0.152 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 — 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 2 WB Left 549 549 1 2 2880 0.191 0 WB Thru 0 0 1 0 0 0.000 1 WB Right 104 104 1 1 1600 0.065 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.708 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.808 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if ap licable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: Del Mar Ave at Hellman Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October. 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume [11 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 56 56 1 1600 0.035 < == 2 NB Thru 834 834 2 3200 0.273 0 NB Right 40 40 0 0 — 1 SB Left 99 99 1 1600 0.062 < == 2 SB Thru 902 902 2 3200 0.327 0 SB Right 143 143 0 0 — 1 EB Left 176 176 1 1600 0.110 < == 1 EB Thru 378 378 1 1600 0.279 0 EB Right 69 69 0 0 — 1 WB Left 27 27 1 1 1 1600 0.017 1 WB Thru 141 141 1 1 1 1600 0.138 0 WB Right 79 79 1 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.658 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.758 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at Hellman Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 - 6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume Ill No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 1.00 F 1 NB Left 83 83 1 1600 0.052 < == 3 NB Thru 1272 1272 3 4800 0.275 0 NB Right 49 49 0 0 — 1 SB Left 101 101 1 1600 0.063 < == 2 SB Thru 1061 1061 2 3200 0.358 0 SB Right 84 84 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 132 132 1 1600 0.083 < == 1 EB Thru 281 281 1 1600 0.241 0 EB Right 104 104 0 0 — 1 WB Left 43 43 1 1600 0.027 < == 1 WB Thru 113 113 1 1600 0.133 0 WB Right 99 99 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.678 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.778 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. " S. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a Intersection Count Date: Analyst: INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Walnut Grove Ave at Hellman Ave /Ramona Blvd Wednesday, October 21, 2009 KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (5:00 - 6:00) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph C 1 NB Left 146 146 1 1600 0.091 shared lane used by movement. F 2 NB Thru 1094 1094 2 3200 0.350 0 NB Right 26 26 0 0 — 1 SB Left 184 184 1 1600 0.115 < == 2 SB Thru 635 635 2 3200 0.240 0 SB Right 132 132 0 0 — 0 ES Left 265 530 0 0 — < == 1 EB Thru 106 106 1 1600 0.398 1 EB Right 75 75 1 1600 0.047 0 WB Left 8 9 1 0 0 — 1 WB Thru 47 47 1 1600 0.035 1 WB Right 227 227 1 1600 0.142 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.863 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.963 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E Maximum NOTES LOS V/C 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or A 0.60 free flow right turn (if applicabl e). B 0.70 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph C 0.80 dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph D 0.90 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of E 1.00 shared lane used by movement. F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Telstar Ave Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 — < == 3 NB Thru 1943 1943 3 4800 0.405 1 NB Right 166 166 1 1600 0.104 1 SB Left 186 186 1 1600 0.116 < == 3 SB Thru 1732 1732 3 4800 0.361 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 — 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 — 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 — 1 WB Left 431 431 1 1 1 1600 0.269 1 < == 0 WB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 2 WB Right 573 573 1 2 2880 0.199 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.790 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.890 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Whitmore St Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 - 6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph C 0 NS Left 0 0 0 0 — shared lane used by movement. F 3 NB Thru 2028 2028 3 4800 0.423 1 NB Right 42 42 1 1600 0.026 1 SB Left 16 16 1 1600 0.010 < == 3 SB Thru 2147 2147 3 4800 0.447 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 — 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 — 0 ES Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 — 1 WB Left 199 199 1 1600 0.124 < == 0 WB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 1 WB Right 82 82 1 1600 0.051 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.571 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.671 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below B Maximum NOTES LOS V/C 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or A 0.60 free flow right turn (if applicabl e). B 0.70 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph C 0.80 dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph D 0.90 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of E 1.00 shared lane used by movement. F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: New Ave at Garvey Ave Count Date: Wednesday. October 21. 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 - 6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume Ill No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 59 59 1 1600 0.037 < == 2 NB Thru 337 337 2 3200 0.142 0 NB Right 117 117 0 0 — 1 SB Left 244 244 1 1600 0.153 < == 2 SB Thru 432 432 2 3200 0.190 0 SB Right 177 177 0 0 — 1 EB Left 198 198 1 1600 0.124 < == 2 EB Thru 1057 1057 2 3200 0.353 0 EB Right 74 74 0 0 — 1 WB Left 88 88 1 1600 0.055 2 WB Thru 621 621 2 3200 0.254 0 WB Right 193 193 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.703 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.803 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if a licable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: Del Mar Ave at Garvey Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume ill No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 150 150 1 1600 0.094 < == 2 NB Thru 546 546 2 32001 0.197 0 NB Right 83 83 0 0 — 1 SB Left 258 258 1 1600 0.161 2 SB Thru 489 489 2 3200 0.188 0 SB Right 112 112 0 0 — 1 EB Left 168 168 1 1600 0.105 < == 2 EB Thru 1114 1114 2 3200 0.374 0 EB Right 83 83 0 0 — 1 WB Left 67 67 1 1600 0.042 < == 2 WB Thru 738 738 2 3200 0.290 0 WB Right 191 191 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.774 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.874 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= _ 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS Vic A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at Garvey Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (5:00 - 6:00) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume Ill No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 131 131 1 1600 0.082 < == 2 NB Thru 776 776 2 3200 0.243 1 NB Right 190 190 1 1600 0.119 1 SB Left 286 286 1 1600 0.179 < == 2 SB Thru 713 713 2 3200 0.223 1 SB Right 171 171 1 1600 0.107 1 EB Left 291 291 1 1600 0.182 < == 2 EB Thru 986 986 2 3200 0.308 1 EB Right 91 91 1 1600 0.057 1 WB Left 214 214 1 1 1 1600 0.134 <__ 2 WB Thru 667 667 2 3200 0.208 1 WB Right 245 245 1 1 1600 0.153 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.864 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.964 Level of Service (LOS) -Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per-lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a Lanes- 7E C I- INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Garvey Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 - 6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Crtical V/C Total D NB Left 108 108 1 1600 0.068 NB Thru 802 802 2 3200 0.298 NB Right 151 151 0 0 — SB Left 161 161 1 1 1600 0.101 < == SB Thru 468 468 2 3200 0.187 SB Right 129 129 0 0 — EB Left 170 170 1 1 1 1600 0.106 < == EB Thru 918 918 1 2 3200 0.317 EB Right 96 96 0 0 — WB Left 106 106 1 1600 0.066 < == - WB Thru 762 762 2 3200 0.295 WB Right 181 181 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.800 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.900 Level of Service (LOS) -Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if a licable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= I 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS Vic A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at Rush SUPotrero Grande Dr Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 6"; V/C Tt2tio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 15 15 1 1600 0.009 < == 2 NB Thru 654 654 2 3200 0.229 0 NB Right 79 79 0 0 — 1 SB Left 189 189 1 1600 0.118 — 2 SB Thru 609 609 2 3200 0.216 0 SB Right 82 82 0 0 — 1 EB Left 182 182 1 1600 0.114 — 2 EB Thru 280 280 2 3200 0.092 0 EB Right 15 15 0 0 — ' WB Left 64 64 1 1 1 1600 0 .040 < == 2 WB Thru 173 173 2 3200 0.125 0 WB Right 226 226 1 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.586 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.686 Level of Service (LOS) -Refer to table below B M410K 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Rush St Count Date: Wednesday. October 21. 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 - 6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 96 96 1 1600 0.060 2 NB Thru 684 684 2 3200 0.222 0 NB Right 25 25 0 0 — 1 SB Left 17 17 1 1600 0.011 < == 2 SB Thru 650 650 2 3200 0.272 0 SB Right 220 220 0 0 — 1 EB Left 294 294 1 1600 0.184 < == 2 EB Thru 15 15 2 3200 0.024 0 EB Right 62 62 1 0 0 — 1 WB Left 231 231 1 1600 0.144 < == 2 WB Thru 42 42 2 3200 0.013 1 WB Right 74 74 1 1600 0.046 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.529 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.629 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below B NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Landis View Lane Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (4:45 -5:45) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume [1 No of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 — 2 NB Thru 745 745 2 3200 0.242 0 NB Right 29 29 0 0 — 1 SB Left 25 25 1 1600 0.016 < == 2 SB Thru 934 934 2 32001 0.292 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 — 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 — 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 — 0 WB Left 22 22 1 D 0 — 1 WB Thru 0 0 1 1 1 1600 0.025 0 WB Right 18 18 1 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.317 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.417 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below A NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at San Gabriel Blvd Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 7 7 0 0 — < == 1 NB Thru 5 5 1 1600 0.010 0 NB Right 4 4 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 790 790 1 1600 0.494 < == 1 SB Thru 15 15 1 1600 0.041 0 SB Right 50 50 0 0 — 1 EB Left 59 59 1 1600 0.037 < == 2 EB Thru 775 775 2 3200 0.245 0 EB Right 9 9 0 0 — WB Left 0 0 0 0 — 2 L WB Thru 738 738 2 3200 0.231 20 WB Right 731 731 2 2880 0.254 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.772 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.872 Level of Service (LOS) -Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabi e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at SR -60 WB Ramps Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 - 6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume [11 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 29 29 1 1600 0.018 < == 3 NB Thru 681 681 3 4800 0.167 0 NB Right 119 119 0 0 — 1 SB Left 1 179 179 1 1 1600 0.112 2 SIB Thru 1406 1406 2 3200 0.442 0 SIB Right 7 7 1 0 0 — 1 EB Left 9 9 1 1600 0.006 1 EB Thru 13 13 1 1600 0.029 0 EB Right 34 34 0 0 — Left 166 166 1 1600 0.104 E WB Thru 24 24 1 1600 0.015 lWB WB Right 779 779 1 1600 0.487 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.660 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.760 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if ap licable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: Town Center Drive at SR-60 EB Ramps Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -4:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity [211 VIC Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 2 2 1 1600 0.001 2 NB Thru 134 134 2 3200 0.042 1 NB Right 135 135 1 1600 0.084 1 SB Left 1 352 352 1 1 1600 0.220 < == 2 SB Thru 33 33 1 2 3200 0.010 1 SB Right 0 0 1 1 1600 0.000 1 EB Left 93 93 1 1600 0.058 < == 2 EB Thru 221 221 2 3200 0.073 0 EB Right 14 14 0 0 — ' WB Left 168 168 1 1 1 1600 0.105 < == 2 WB Thru 124 124 2 3200 0.039 1 WB Right 474 474 1 1 1600 0.296 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.440 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.540 Level of Service (LOS) -Refer to table below A NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabl e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS VIC A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at Town Center Drive Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (5:00 - 6:00) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 2 NB Left 24 24 2 2880 0.008 < == 2 NB Thru 419 419 2 3200 0.133 0 NB Right 8 8 0 0 — 1 SB Left 32 32 1 1600 0.020 — 2 SB Thru 851 851 2 3200 0.266 1 SB Right 723 723 1 1600 0.452 1 EB Left 371 371 1 1600 0.232 — 1 EB Thru 28 28 1 1600 0.018 1 EB Right 311 311 1 1600 0.194 0 WB Left 16 32 1 0 0 — — 1 WB Thru 18 18 1 1 1 1600 0.031 1 WB Right 25 25 1 1 1 1600 0.016 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.537 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.637 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below B NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn (if applicabi e). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a APPENDIX D Forecast (Year 2025) without General Plan Development Peak Hour Level of Service Calculation Worksheets Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis PI &NNING & ENGINEERING February 19, 2010 — Appendices INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Mission Drive Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 -8:30) Analyst: KOA Corportation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 215 215 1 1600 0.134 2 NB Thru 413 413 2 3200 0.183 0 NB Right 171 171 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 130 130 1 1600 0.081 0.247 -- 2 SB Thru 739 739 2 3200 0 SB Right 50 50 0 0 1 EB Left 62 62 1 1600 0.039 2 EB Thru 512 512 2 3200 0.196 0 EB Right 115 115 0 0 — 1 WB Left 248 248 1 1600 0.155 2 WB Thru 866 866 2 3200 0.288 0 WB Right 54 54 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.732 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.832 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Lower Azusa Road Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:15 -8:15) Analyst: KOA Corportation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume [11 I No. of 1 Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical I V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 18 18 1 1600 0.011 2 NB Thru 1312 1312 2 3200 0.410 1 NB Right 369 369 1 1600 0.231 1 SB Left 129 129 1 1600 0.081 2 SB Thru 1213 1213 2 3200 0.379 0 SB Right 1 1 0 0 -- 0 EB Left 5 10 0 0 -- 1 EB Thru 4 4 1 1600 0.018 0 EB Right 15 15 0 0 2 WB Left 770 770 2 2880 0.267 L0 WB Thru 2 2 0 0 0.000 WB Right 319 319 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.776 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.876 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D R+SI*=: 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Mission Drive Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corportation Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacityl 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 184 184 1 1600 0.115 2 NB Thru 1512 1512 2 3200 0.488 0 NB Right 51 51 0 0 — 1 SB Left 49 49 1 1600 0.031 2 SB Thru 1610 1610 2 3200 0.633 0 SB Right 415 415 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 180 180 1 1600 0.113 2 EB Thru 315 315 2 3200 0.160 0 EB Right 197 197 0 0 — WB Left 144 144 1 1600 0.090 2 L WB Thru 600 600 2 3200 0.218 01 WB Right 96 96 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 1.079 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.179 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Valley Blvd Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corportation Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 140 140 1 1600 0.088 2 NB Thru 592 592 2 3200 0.256 0 NB Right 227 227 0 0 — 1 SB Left 77 77 1 1600 0.048 2 SB Thru 918 918 2 3200 0.354 0 SB Right 214 214 0 0 — 1 EB Left 106 106 1 1600 0.066 2 EB Thru 659 659 2 3200 0.238 0 EB Right 104 104 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 262 262 1 1600 0.164 2 WB Thru 1410 1410 2 3200 0.464 0 WB Right 76 76 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.972 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.072 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: Valley Blvd at Rosemead Blvd Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: AM Analyst: KOA Corportation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Crtical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 240 240 1 1600 0.150 0.477 0.082 2 NB Thru 1527 1527 2 3200 1 NB Right 131 131 1 1600 1 SB Left 34 34 1 1600 0.021 <-- 2 SB Thru 1554 1554 2 3200 0.486 1 SB Right 288 288 1 1600 0.180 1 EB Left 183 183 1 1600 0.114 2 EB Thru 425 425 2 3200 0.133 1 EB Right 222 222 1 1600 0.139 1 WB Left 233 233 1 1600 0.146 2 WB Thru 831 831 2 3200 0.260 1 WB Right 116 116 1 1600 0.073 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 1.010 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.110 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn If appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: Valley Blvd at Mission Drive Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corportation Peak Hr: AM (7:30 -8:30) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. ofl Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph C 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 - -- shared lane used by movement. F 1 NB Thru 0 0 1 1600 0.000 0 NB Right 0 0 0 0 — 2 SB Left 370 370 2 2880 0.128 0 SB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 1 SB Right 46 46 1 1600 0.029 1 EB Left 27 27 1 1600 0.017 2 EB Thru 450 450 2 3200 0.141 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 0 WB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 2 WB Thru 1094 1094 2 3200 0.342 1 WB Right 566 566 1 1600 0.354 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.487 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.587 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below A Maximum NOTES LOS V/C 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or A 0.60 free flow right turn Jif appli vable). B 0.70 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph C 0.80 dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph D 0.90 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of E 1.00 shared lane used by movement. F n/a INTERSECTION eAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: Valley Blvd at Rio Hondo Ave Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Analyst: KOA Corportation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 184 184 0 0 — 1 NB Thru 12 12 1 1600 0.179 0 NB Right 90 90 0 0 -- 0 SB Left 43 47 0 0 — 1 SB Thru 35 35 1 1600 0.076 0 SB Right 40 40 0 0 — 1 EB Left 13 13 1 1600 0.008 2 EB Thru 693 693 2 3200 0.252 0 EB Right 113 113 0 0 -- ' WB Left 102 102 1 1600 0.064 3 WB Thru 1437 1437 3 4800 0.304 0 WB Right 22 22 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.495 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.595 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below A NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: Valley Blvd at Temple City Blvd Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:45 -8:45) Analyst: KOA Corportation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. oil Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NS Left 245 245 1 1600 0.153 2 NB Thru 424 424 2 3200 0.148 0 NB Right 48 48 0 0 -- 1 SB Left SB Thru SB Right 220 606 282 220 606 282 1 2 0 1600 3200 0 0.138 0.278 — 2 0 1 EB Left 172 172 1 1600 0.108 2 EB Thru 593 593 2 3200 0.185 1 EB Right 63 63 1 1600 0.039 1 W13 Left 105 105 1 1600 0.066 0.422 -- 2 WB Thru 1121 1121 2 3200 0 WB Right 229 229 0 0 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.961 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.061 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F :[x1111:: 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Marshall St Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Analyst: KOA Corportation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph C 1 NB Left 66 66 1 1600 0.041 shared lane used by movement. F 2 NB Thru 825 825 2 3200 0.328 0 NB Right 225 225 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 51 51 1 1600 0.032 2 SB Thru 1210 1210 2 3200 0.400 0 SB Right 70 70 0 0 -- 0 EB Left 77 154 0 0 - -- 1 EB Thru 144 144 1 1600 0.263 0 EB Right 122 122 0 0 -- 0 WB Left 221 442 0 0 -- 1 WB Thru 206 206 1 1600 "43 0 WB Right 61 61 0 0 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.884 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.984 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E Maximum NOTES LOS V/C 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or A 0.60 free flow right turn if appil vable). B 0.70 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph C 0.80 dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph D 0.90 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of E 1.00 shared lane used by movement. F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Marshall St Count Date: Thursday, October. 22, 2009 Peak Hr: AM Analyst: KOA Corportation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 57 57 1 1600 0.036 2 NB Thru 1750 1750 2 3200 0.547 1 NB Right 146 146 1 1600 0.091 1 SB Left 111 111 1 1600 0.069 2 SB Thru 1948 1948 2 3200 0.632 0 SB Right 75 75 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 61 61 1 1600 0.038 2 EB Thru 159 159 2 3200 0.102 0 EB Right 168 168 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 207 207 1 1600 0.129 2 WB Thru 303 303 2 3200 0.123 0 WB Right 91 91 0 0 -- Sum of Critical VIC Ratios 0.899 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.999 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Glendon Way Count Date: Thursday, October, 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corportation Peak Hr: AM (7:45 - 8:45) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 55 55 1 1600 0.034 < - 3 NB Thru 1878 1878 3 4800 0.445 0 NB Right 257 257 0 0 -- 0 SB Left 0 0 0 0 — 2 SB Thru 2110 2110 2 3200 0.659 1 SB Right 274 274 1 1600 0.171 1 EB Left 9 9 1 1600 0.006 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 1 EB Right 245 245 1 1600 0.153 0 WB Left 104 208 0 0 — 0.153 0.096 1 WB Thru 37 37 1 1600 1 WB Right 153 153 1 1600 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.852 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.952 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS Vic A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: Temple City Blvd at Loftus Drive Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corportation Peak Hr: AM (7:30 -8:30) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 31 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 1.00 F 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 1 NB Thru 652 652 1 1600 0.408 1 NB Right 365 365 1 1600 0.228 1 SB Left 229 229 1 1600 0.143 2 SB Thru 501 501 2 3200 0.157 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 — 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 2 WB Left 376 378 2 2880 0.131 0 WB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 1 WB Right 115 115 1 1600 0.072 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.682 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.782 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: Del Mar Ave at Hellman Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM Analyst: KOA Corportation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.80 D 1 NB Left 59 59 1 1600 0.037 2 NB Thru 1130 1130 2 3200 0.359 0 NB Right 18 18 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 70 70 1 1600 0.044 2 SB Thru 972 972 2 3200 0.345 0 SB Right 133 133 0 0 — 1 EB Left 243 243 1 1600 0.152 1 EB Thru 185 185 1 1600 0.151 0 EB Right 57 57 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 62 62 1 1600 0.039 0.277 -- 1 WB Thru 310 310 1 1600 0 WB Right 133 133 0 0 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.832 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.932 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at Hellman Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21. 2009 Peak Hr: AM (8:00 - 9:00) Analyst: KOA Corportation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 111 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 75 75 1 1600 0.047 3 NB Thru 1106 1106 3 4800 0.234 0 NB Right 16 16 0 0 — 1 SB Left 61 61 1 1600 0.038 2 SB Thru 1440 1440 2 3200 0.513 0 SB Right 202 202 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 154 154 1 1600 0.096 1 EB Thru 159 159 1 1600 0.154 0 EB Right 88 88 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 39 39 1 1600 0.024 1 WB Thru 238 238 1 1600 0.229 0 WB Right 129 129 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.885 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.985 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non- integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS WC A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Hellman Ave /Ramona Blvd Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:45 - 8:45) Analyst: KOA Corportation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 111 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 1.00 F 1 NB Left 142 142 1 1600 0.089 2 NB Thru 525 525 2 3200 0.170 0 NB Right 18 18 0 0 — 1 SB Left 92 92 1 1600 0.058 2 SB Thru 904 904 2 3200 0.338 0 SB Right 179 179 0 0 — 0 EB Left 254 508 0 0 -- 1 EB Thru 80 80 1 1600 0.368 1 EB Right 190 190 1 1600 0.119 0 WB Left 6 12 0 0 — 1 WB Thru 102 102 1 1600 0.071 1 WB Right 312 312 1 1600 0.195 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.795 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.895 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS Vic A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Telstar Ave Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corportation Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 3 NB Thru 1814 1814 3 4800 0.378 1 NB Right 622 622 1 1600 0.389 1 SB Left 417 417 1 1600 0.261 3 SB Thru 2618 2618 3 4800 0.545 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 — 1 WB Left 220 220 1 1600 0.138 0 WB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 2 WB Right 115 115 2 2880 0.040 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.777 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.877 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Whitmore St Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corportation Peak Hr: AM (7:45 - 8:45) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. of Lanes 3 I Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Crtical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 — 3 NB Thru 2406 2406 3 4800 0.501 1 NB Right 167 167 1 1600 0.104 1 SB Left 116 116 1 1600 0.073 3 SB Thru SB Right 2724 0 2724 0 3 0 4800 0 0.568 -- 0 0 EB Left EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- 0.000 0 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 28 28 1 1600 0.018 0 WB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 1 WB Right 30 30 1 1600 0.019 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.592 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.692 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below B NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS WC A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: New Ave at Garvey Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (8:00 - 9:00) Analyst: KOA Corportation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 84 84 1 1600 0.053 2 NB Thru 592 592 2 3200 0.227 0 NB Right 133 133 0 0 — 1 SB Left 172 172 1 1600 0.108 2 SB Thru 225 225 2 3200 0.091 0 SB Right 67 67 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 158 158 1 1600 0.099 2 EB Thru 629 629 2 3200 0.237 0 EB Right 128 128 0 0 -- 1 WS Left 97 97 1 1600 0.061 2 WB Thru 883 883 2 3200 1345 0 WB Right 222 222 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.779 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.879 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a �. INTERSECTIOWCARACIiY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: Del Mar Ave at Garvey Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM Analyst: KOA Corportation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of 1 Lanes 3 I Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical WC Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 116 116 1 1600 0.073 2 NB Thru 603 603 2 3200 0.209 0 NB Right 66 66 0 0 — 1 SB Left 183 183 1 1600 0.114 2 SB Thru 659 659 2 3200 0.267 0 SB Right 195 195 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 168 168 1 1600 0.105 2 EB Thru 672 672 2 3200 0.262 0 EB Right 166 166 0 0 — ' WB Left 82 82 1 1600 0.051 2 WB Thru 900 900 2 3200 0.348 0 WB Right 214 214 0 0 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.793 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.893 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at Garvey Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:45 - 8:45) Analyst: KOA Corportation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/CJ Total 0.80 D 1 NB Left 73 73 1 1600 0.046 2 NB Thru 693 693 2 3200 0.217 1 NB Right 184 184 1 1600 0.115 1 SB Left 384 384 1 1600 0.240 2 SB Thru 911 911 2 3200 0.285 1 SB Right 188 188 1 1600 0.118 1 ES Left 259 259 1 1600 0.162 2 EB Thru 617 617 2 3200 0.193 1 EB Right 75 75 1 1600 0.047 1 WB Left 243 243 1 1600 0.152 2 WB Thru 1055 1055 2 3200 0.330 1 WB Right 228 228 1 1600 0.143 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.949 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.049 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F :I9ji9 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a t� INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Garvey Ave Count Date: Wednesday. October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Analyst: KOA Corportation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 I Capacityl 2 V/C Ratio Critical I V/C Total 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph C 1 NB Left 110 110 1 1600 0.069 shared lane used by movement. F 2 NB Thru 379 379 2 3200 0.148 0 NB Right 94 94 0 0 — 1 SB Left 204 204 1 1600 0.128 2 SB Thru 831 831 2 3200 0.308 0 SB Right 154 154 0 0 — 1 EB Left 135 135 1 1600 0.084 2 EB Thru 846 846 2 3200 0.296 0 EB Right 102 102 0 0 — 1 WB Left 173 173 1 1600 0.108 2 WS Thru 1045 1045 2 3200 0.350 0 WB Right 76 76 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.811 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.911 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E Maximum NOTES LOS V/C 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or A 0.60 free flow right turn if appli vable). B 0.70 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph C 0.80 dual turn lane cap.- 2880 vph D 0.90 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of E 1.00 shared lane used by movement. F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at Rush SUPotrero Grande Dr Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:45 -8:45) Analyst: KOA Corportation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. ofJ Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical I V/C I Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 16 16 1 1600 0.010 2 NB Thru 536 536 2 3200 0.183 0 NB Right 50 50 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 215 215 1 1600 0.134 0.325 — 2 SB Thru 786 786 2 3200 0 SB Right 253 253 0 0 1 EB Left 66 66 1 1600 0.041 2 EB Thru 125 125 2 3200 0.050 0 EB Right 36 36 0 0 -- WB Left 37 37 1 1600 0.023 2 L0 WB Thru 226 226 2 3200 0.118 WB Right 153 153 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.494 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.594 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below A NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn Jif appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Rush St Count Date: Wednesday, October 21.. 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:45 - 8:45) Analyst: KOA Corportation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio I Critical V/C I Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 89 89 1 1600 0.056 2 NB Thru 604 604 2 3200 0.293 0 NB Right 332 332 0 0 — 1 SB Left 60 60 1 1600 0.038 0.296 — 2 SB Thru 508 508 2 3200 0 SB Right 440 440 0 0 1 EB Left 247 247 1 1600 0.154 2 EB Thru 60 60 2 3200 0.038 0 EB Right 63 63 0 0 1 — 1 WB Left 7 7 1 1600 0.004 2 WB Thru 9 9 2 3200 0.003 1 WB Right 12 12 1 1600 1 0.008 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.509 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.609 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below B NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn Jif appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Landis View Lane Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Analyst: KOA Corportation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of 1 Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 — 2 NB Thru 1045 1045 2 3200 0.331 0 NB Right 15 15 0 0 — 1 SB Left 11 11 1 1600 0.007 2 SB Thru 660 660 2 3200 0.206 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 — 0 WB Left 37 37 0 0 — 1 WB Thru 0 0 1 1600 0.032 0 WB Right 14 14 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.370 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.470 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below A Ilk isSi=K 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli cable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at San Gabriel Blvd Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Analyst: KOA Corportation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical WC Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 7 7 0 0 — 1 NB Thru 5 5 1 1600 0.010 0 NB Right 4 4 0 0 1 — 1 SB Left 612 612 1 1600 0.383 1 SB Thru 11 11 1 1600 0.038 0 SB Right 50 50 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 50 50 1 1600 0.031 2 EB Thru 746 746 2 3200 0.237 0 EB Right 13 13 0 0 — 0 WB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 2 WS Thru 985 985 2 3200 0.308 2 WS Right 994 994 2 2880 0.345 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.732 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.832 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn Jif appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at SR -60 WB Ramps Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corportation Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 20 20 1 1600 0.013 < -- 3 NB Thru 1161 1161 3 4800 0.284 0 NB Right 202 202 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 116 116 1 1600 0.073 2 SB Thru 1224 1224 2 3200 0.384 0 SB Right 5 5 0 0 — 1 EB Left 5 5 1 1600 0.003 1 EB Thru 22 22 1 1600 0.030 0 EB Right 26 26 0 0 — 1 WB Left 102 102 1 1600 0.064 1 WB Thru 16 16 1 1600 0.010 1 WB Right 837 837 1 1600 0.523 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.810 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.910 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: Town Center Drive at SR -60 EB Ramps Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 -8:30) Analyst: KOA Corportation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of 1 Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 4 4 1 1600 0.003 2 NB Thru 66 66 2 3200 0.021 1 NB Right 55 55 1 1600 0.034 1 SIB Left 427 427 1 1600 0.267 0.005 0.000 2 SB Thru 15 15 2 3200 1 SIB Right 0 0 1 1600 1 EB Left 12 12 1 1600 0.008 2 EB Thru 23 23 2 3200 0.010 0 EB Right 9 9 0 0 -- ' WB Left 126 126 1 1600 0.079 < == 2 WB Thru 78 78 2 3200 0.024 1 WB Right 758 758 1 1600 0.474 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.503 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.603 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below B NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth AM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at Town Center Drive Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30.8:30) Analyst: KOA Corportation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 2 NB Left 42 42 2 2880 0.015 2 NB Thru 976 976 2 3200 0.313 0 NB Right 26 26 0 0 1 -- 1 SB Left 80 80 1 1600 0.050 2 SB Thru 418 418 2 3200 0.131 1 SB Right 861 861 1 1600 0.538 1 EB Left 353 353 1 1600 0.221 1 EB Thru 30 30 1 1600 0.019 1 EB Right 111 111 1 1600 0.069 0 WB Left 13 14 0 0 -- 1 WB Thru 43 43 1 1600 0.036 1 WB Right 54 54 1 1600 0.034 Sum of Critical WC Ratios 0.620 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.720 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn Jif appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Mission Drive Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. ofl Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 183 183 1 1600 0.114 2 NB Thru 680 680 2 3200 0.281 0 NB Right 218 218 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 129 129 1 1600 0.081 2 SB Thru 455 455 2 3200 0.148 0 SB Right 18 18 0 0 — 1 EB Left 56 56 1 1600 0.035 2 EB Thru 750 750 2 0 EB Right 111 111 0 iff WB Left 146 146 1 1600 0.091 L WB Thru 510 510 2 3200 0.183 WB Right 74 74 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.722 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.822 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS Vic A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Lower Azusa Road Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (4:45 - 5:45) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph C 1 NB Left 34 34 1 1600 0.021 shared lane used by movement. F 2 NB Thru 1645 1645 2 3200 0.514 1 NB Right 442 442 1 1600 0.276 1 SB Left 280 280 1 1600 0.175 2 SB Thru 1554 1554 2 3200 0.488 0 SB Right 6 6 0 0 — 0 EB Left 5 10 0 0 -- 1 EB Thru 2 2 1 1600 0.008 0 EB Right 1 1 0 0 -- 2 WB Left 353 353 2 2880 0.123 0 WB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 WB Right 200 200 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.820 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.920 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E Maximum NOTES LOS V/C 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or A D.60 free flow right turn if appli vable). B 0.70 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph C 0.80 dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph D 0.90 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of E 1.00 shared lane used by movement. F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Mission Drive Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (4:45 - 5:45) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph C 1 NB Left 163 163 1 1600 0.102 shared lane used by movement. F 2 NB Thru 1785 1785 2 3200 0.576 0 NB Right 57 57 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 91 91 1 1600 0.057 2 SB Thru 1596 1596 2 3200 0.572 0 SB Right 233 233 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 239 239 1 1600 0.149 2 EB Thru 608 608 2 3200 0.245 0 EB Right 177 177 0 0 — 1 WB Left 85 85 1 1600 0.053 2 WB Thru 296 296 2 3200 0.123 0 WB Right 96 96 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.972 Adjustment for Lost Time 0100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.072 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F Maximum NOTES LOS V/C 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or A 0.60 free flow right turn if apph vable). B 0.70 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph C 0.80 dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph D 0.90 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of E 1.00 shared lane used by movement. F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Valley Blvd Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (4:45 - 5:45) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacityl 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 106 106 1 1600 0.066 2 NB Thru 886 886 2 3200 0.361 0 NB Right 269 269 0 0 1 SB Left 80 80 1 1600 0.050 2 SB Thru 620 620 2 3200 0.225 0 SB Right 99 99 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 136 136 1 1600 0.085 2 EB Thru 1220 1220 2 3200 0.418 0 EB Right 117 117 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 239 239 1 1600 0.149 2 WB Thru 897 897 2 3200 0.301 0 WB Right 67 67 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.978 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.078 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: Valley Blvd at Rosemead Blvd Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: AM Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 111 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 179 179 1 1600 0.112 2 NB Thru 1622 1622 2 3200 0.507 1 NB Right 197 197 1 1600 0.123 1 SB Left 77 77 1 1600 0.048 2 SB Thru 1431 1431 2 3200 0.447 1 SB Right 221 221 1 1600 0.138 1 EB Left 323 323 1 1600 0.202 2 EB Thru 807 807 2 3200 0.252 1 EB Right 174 174 1 1600 0.109 WB Left 207 207 1 1600 0.129 2 L W13 Thru 549 549 2 3200 0.172 11 WB Right 94 94 1 1600 0.059 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.940 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.040 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: Valley Blvd at Mission Drive Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of 1 Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 1 NB Thru 0 0 1 1600 0.000 0 NB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 2 SB Left 514 514 2 2880 0.178 0 SB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 1 SB Right 33 33 1 1600 0.021 1 EB Left 30 30 1 1600 0.019 2 EB Thru 948 948 2 3200 0.296 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 — 0 WB Left 0 0 0 0 — 2 WB Thru 750 750 2 3200 0.234 1 WB Right 363 363 1 1600 0.227 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.474 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.574 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below A NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a ,i,.- - INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: Valley Blvd at Rio Hondo Ave Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume Ill No. of Lanes 3 Capacit4 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 130 130 0 0 - -- 1 NS Thru 51 51 1 1600 0.273 0 NB Right 255 255 0 0 — 0 SB Left 30 60 0 0 -- 1 SB Thru 27 27 1 1600 0.081 0 SB Right 43 43 0 0 — 1 EB Left 22 22 1 1600 0.014 2 EB Thru 1296 1296 2 3200 0.450 0 EB Right 143 143 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 68 68 1 1600 0.043 3 WB Thru 943 943 3 4800 0.203 0 WB Right 32 32 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.766 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.866 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: Valley Blvd at Temple City Blvd Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. ofl Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 152 152 1 1600 0.095 2 NB Thru 691 691 2 3200 0.238 0 NB Right 71 71 0 0 - -- 1 SB Left 192 192 1 1600 0.120 2 SB Thru 569 569 2 3200 0.225 0 SB Right 152 152 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 271 271 1 1600 0.169 2 EB Thru 1257 1257 2 3200 0.393 1 EB Right 91 91 1 1600 0.057 ' WB Left 89 89 1 1600 0.056 2 WB Thru 662 662 2 3200 25 0.0 0 WB Right 138 138 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.807 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.907 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if ap livable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Marshall St Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (4:45 - 5:45) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. ofl Lanes 3 Capacityl 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 87 87 1 1600 0.054 2 NB Thru 1164 1164 2 3200 0.474 0 NB Right 353 353 0 0 — 1 SB Left 50 50 1 1600 0.031 2 SB Thru 818 818 2 3200 0.271 0 SB Right 49 49 0 0 -- 0 EB Left 89 98 0 0 — 1 EB Thru 198 198 1 1600 0.250 0 EB Right 104 104 0 0 — 0 WB Left 245 490 0 0 — < == 1 WB Thru 149 149 1 1600 0.429 0 WB Right 48 48 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.934 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.034 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=j 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Marshall St Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Y � Peak Hr: AM Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 111 111 1 1600 0.069 2 NB Thru 1788 1788 2 3200 0.559 1 NB Right 269 269 1 1600 0.168 1 SB Left 165 165 1 1600 0.103 2 SB Thru 1616 1616 2 3200 0.517 0 SB Right 39 39 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 118 118 1 1600 0.074 2 EB Thru 300 300 2 3200 0.142 0 EB Right 154 154 0 0 — WB Left 184 184 1 1600 0.115 2 L WB Thru 254 254 2 3200 0.123 01 WB Right 140 140 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.919 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.019 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. LOS Maximum V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Glendon Way Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (4:45 -5:45) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume Ill No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 138 138 1 1600 0.086 3 NB Thru 2118 2118 3 4800 0.595 0 NB Right 738 738 0 0 -- 0 SB Left 0 0 0 0 — 2 SB Thru 1547 1547 2 3200 0.483 1 SB Right 385 385 1 1600 0.241 1 EB Left 13 13 1 1600 0.008 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 1 EB Right 78 78 1 1600 0.049 0 WB Left 85 94 0 0 — < == 1 WB Thru 97 97 1 1600 0.119 1 WB Right 240 240 1 1600 0.150 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.753 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.853 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: Temple City Blvd at Loftus Drive Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 1 NB Thru 757 757 1 1600 0.473 1 NB Right 240 240 1 1600 0.150 1 SB Left 211 211 1 1600 0.132 2 SB Thru 570 570 2 3200 0.178 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 — 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 2 WB Left 642 642 2 2880 0.223 0 WB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 1 WB Right 122 122 1 1600 0.076 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.828 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.928 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: Del Mar Ave at Hellman Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: AM Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume Ill No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio I Critical V/C I Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 66 66 1 1600 0.041 2 NB Thru 976 976 2 3200 0.320 0 NB Right 47 47 0 0 — 1 SB Left SB Thru SB Right 116 1055 167 116 1055 167 1 2 0 1600 3200 0 0.073 0.382 -- 2 0 1 EB Left 206 206 1 1600 0.129 1 EB Thru EB Right 442 81 442 81 1 0 1600 0 0.327 -- 0 1 1 WB Left 32 32 1 1600 0.020 1 WB Thru 165 165 1 1600 0.161 0 WB Right 92 92 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.770 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.870 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at Hellman Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (4:45 - 5:45) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 97 97 1 1600 0.061 3 NB Thru 1488 1488 3 4800 0.322 0 NB Right 57 57 0 0 — 1 SB Left 118 118 1 1600 0.074 2 SB Thru 1241 1241 2 3200 0.418 0 SS Right 98 98 0 0 — 1 EB Left 154 154 1 1600 0.096 1 EB Thru 329 329 1 1600 0.282 0 EB Right 122 122 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 50 50 1 1600 0.031 < == 1 WB Thru 132 132 1 1600 0.155 01 Right 116 116 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.792 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.892 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Hellman Ave /Ramona Blvd Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (4:45 - 5:45) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 171 171 1 1600 0.107 2 NB Thru 1280 1280 2 3200 0 NB Right 30 30 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 215 215 1 1600 0.134 2 SB Thru 743 743 2 3200 0.280 0 SB Right 154 154 0 0 — 0 EB Left 310 620 0 0 -- 1 EB Thru 124 124 1 1600 0.465 1 EB Right 88 88 1 1600 0.055 O WB Left 9 18 0 0 -- 1 WB Thru 55 55 1 1600 0.046 1 WB Right 266 266 1 1600 0.166 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 1.008 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.108 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F [0SI4: 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS Vic A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Telstar Ave Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume I'll No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 3 NB Thru 2273 2273 3 4800 0.474 1 NB Right 194 194 1 1600 1 0.121 1 SB Left 218 218 1 1600 0.136 3 SB Thru 2026 2026 3 4800 0.422 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 — WB Left 504 504 1 1600 0.315 0 L WB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 21 WB Right 670 670 2 2880 0.233 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.925 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.025 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Whitmore St Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (4:30 - 5:30) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V!C Ratio Critical V!C Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 3 NB Thru 2373 2373 3 4800 0.494 1 NB Right 49 49 1 1600 0.031 1 SB Left 19 19 1 1600 0.012 3 SB Thru 2512 2512 3 4800 0.523 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 — 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 — 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 — 1 WB Left 233 233 1 1600 0.146 0 WB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 1 WB Right 96 96 1 1600 0.060 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.669 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.769 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: New Ave at Garvey Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (4:45 - 5:45) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. ofl Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V!C Ratio Critical V/C Total 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph C 1 NB Left 69 69 1 1600 0.043 shared lane used by movement. F 2 NB Thru 394 394 2 3200 0.166 0 NB Right 137 137 0 0 1 SB Left 285 285 1 1600 0.178 2 SB Thru 505 505 2 3200 0.223 0 SB Right 207 207 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 232 232 1 1600 0.145 2 EB Thru 1237 1237 2 3200 0.414 0 EB Right 87 87 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 103 103 1 1600 0.064 2 WB Thru 727 727 2 3200 0.298 0 WB Right 226 226 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.822 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.922 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E Maximum NOTES LOS V/C 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or A 0.60 free flow right turn if appli vable). B 0.70 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph C 0.80 dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph D 0.90 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of E 1.00 shared lane used by movement. F n!a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection Del Mar Ave at Garvey Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM Analyst: KOA CogAoration Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph C 1 NB Left 176 176 1 1600 0.110 shared lane used by movement. F 2 NB Thru 639 639 2 3200 0.230 0 NB Right 97 97 0 0 — 1 SB Left 302 302 1 1600 0.189 2 SB Thru 572 572 2 3200 0.220 0 SB Right 131 131 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 197 197 1 1600 0.123 2 EB Thru 1303 1303 2 3200 0.438 0 EB Right 97 97 0 0 — 1 WB Left 78 78 1 1600 0.049 2 WB Thru 863 863 2 3200 0.339 0 WB Right 223 223 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.906 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.006 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F Maximum NOTES LOS V/C 1. Counted volume adjusted for left tum PCE or A 0.60 free flow right turn if appli vable). B 0.70 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph C 0.80 dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph D 0.90 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of E 1.00 shared lane used by movement. F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at Garvey Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (5:00 - 6:00) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3] Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 153 153 1 1600 0.096 2 NB Thru 908 908 2 3200 0.284 1 NB Right 222 222 1 1600 0.139 1 SB Left 335 335 1 1600 0.209 2 SB Thru 834 834 2 3200 0.261 1 SB Right 200 200 1 1600 0.125 1 EB Left 340 340 1 1600 0.213 2 EB Thru 1154 1154 2 3200 0.361 1 EB Right 106 106 1 1600 0.066 1 WB Left 250 250 1 1600 0.156 2 WB Thru 780 780 2 3200 0.244 1 WB Right 287 287 1 1600 0.179 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 1.010 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.110 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Garvey Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 - 6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1] I No. of 1 Lanes 3 I Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 126 126 1 1600 0.079 2 NB Thru 938 938 2 3200 0.348 0 NB Right 177 177 0 0 — 1 SB Left 188 188 1 1600 0.118 2 SB Thru 548 548 2 3200 0.218 0 SB Right 151 151 0 0 — 1 EB Left 199 199 1 1600 0.124 2 EB Thru 1074 1074 2 3200 0.371 0 EB Right 112° 112 0 0 -- 1 1 WB Left 124 124 1 1600 0.078 < == 2 WB Thru 892 892 2 3200 0.345 0 WB Right 212 212 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.935 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.035 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at Rush SUPotrero Grande Dr Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (4:45 - 5:45) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 18 18 1 1600 0.011 2 NB Thru 765 765 2 3200 0.268 0 NB Right 92 92 0 0 — 1 SB Left 221 221 1 1600 0.138 2 SB Thru 713 713 2 3200 0.253 0 SB Right 96 96 0 0 1 -- 1 EB Left 213 213 1 1600 0.133 2 EB Thru 328 328 2 3200 0.108 0 EB Right 18 18 0 0 - -- 1 WB Left 75 75 1 1600 0.047 2 WB Thru 202 202 2 3200 0.146 0 WB Right 264 264 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.685 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.785 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C .19111*=: 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Rush St Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 - 6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Cr tical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 112 112 1 1600 0.070 2 NB Thru 800 800 2 3200 0.259 0 NB Right 29 29 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 20 20 1 1600 0.013 2 SB Thru 761 761 2 3200 0.318 0 SB Right 257 257 0 0 — 1 EB Left 344 344 1 1600 0.215 2 EB Thru 18 18 2 3200 0.028 0 EB Right 73 73 0 0 — 1 WB Left 270 270 1 1600 0.169 2 WB Thru 49 49 2 3200 0.015 1 WB Right 87 87 1 1600 0.054 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.618 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.718 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap, 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Landis View Lane Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 2 NB Thru 872 872 2 3200 0.283 0 NB Right 34 34 0 0 -- 1 SIB Left 29 29 1 1600 0.018 2 SIB Thru 1093 1093 2 3200 0.342 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 0 WB Left 26 26 0 0 — 1 WB Thru 0 0 1 1600 0.029 0 WB Right 21 21 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.371 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.471 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below A NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 16001 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at San Gabriel Blvd Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes I Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 8 8 0 0 -- < == 1 NB Thru 6 6 1 1600 0.012 0 NB Right 5 5 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 924 924 1 1600 0.578 1 SB Thru 18 18 1 1600 0.048 0 SB Right 59 59 0 0 — 1 EB Left 69 69 1 1600 0.043 2 EB Thru 907 907 2 3200 0.287 0 EB Right 11 11 0 0 -- 0 WB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 2 WB Thru 863 863 2 3200 0.270 2 WB Right 855 855 2 2880 0.297 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.903 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.003 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS Vic A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at SR -60 WB Ramps Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (5:00 - 6:00) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 I Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 34 34 1 1600 0.021 3 NB Thru 797 797 3 4800 0.195 0 NB Right 139 139 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 209 209 1 1600 0.131 2 SB Thru 1645 1645 2 3200 0.517 0 SB Right 8 8 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 11 11 1 1600 0.007 1 EB Thru 15 15 1 1600 0.034 0 EB Right 40 40 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 194 194 1 1600 0.121 < == 1 WB Thru 28 28 1 1600 0.018 1 WB Right 911 911 1 1600 0.569 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.771 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.871 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: Town Center Drive at SR -60 EB Ramps Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (4:45 - 5:45) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of 1 Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 2 2 1 1600 0.001 2 NB Thru NB Right 157 158 157 158 2 1 3200 1600 0.049 0.099 1 1 SB Left SB Thru 412 39 412 39 1 2 1600 3200 0.258 0.012 2 1 SB Right 0 0 1 1600 0.000 1 EB Left 109 109 1 1600 0.068 2 EB Thru 259 259 2 3200 0.086 0 EB Right 16 16 0 0 -- 1 1 WB Left 197 197 1 1600 0.123 2 WB Thru 145 145 2 3200 0.045 1 WB Right 555 555 1 1600 0.347 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.516 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.616 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below B 21 IOU: K 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.; 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Ambient Growth PM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at Town Center Drive Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (4:45 - 5:45) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 ]1 Capacity [21 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 2 NB Left 28 28 2 2880 0.010 2 NB Thru 490 490 2 3200 0.156 0 NB Right 9 9 0 0 - -- 1 SB Left 37 37 1 1600 0.023 2 SB Thru 996 996 2 3200 0.311 1 SB Right 846 846 1 1600 0.529 1 EB Left 434 434 1 1600 0.271 1 EB Thru 33 33 1 1600 0.021 1 EB Right 364 364 1 1600 0.228 0 WB Left 19 38 0 0 -- 1 WB Thru 21 21 1 1600 0.037 1 WB Right 29 29 1 1600 0.018 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.629 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.729 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free Flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a APPENDIX E Forecast (Year 2025) with General Plan Development Peak Hour Level of Service Calculation Worksheets Rosemead Circulation Element Update KOA CORPORATION Traffic Impact Analysis PLANNING 6 ENGINEERING February 19, 2010 —Appendices INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Mission Drive Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 -8:30) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 215 215 1 1600 0.134 2 NB Thru 423 423 2 3200 0.187 0 NB Right 174 174 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 136 136 1 1600 0.085 2 SB Thru 752 752 2 3200 0.251 0 SB Right 50 50 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 62 62 1 1600 0.039 2 EB Thru 560 560 2 3200 0.211 0 EB Right 115 115 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 259 259 1 1600 0.162 2 WB Thru 912 912 2 3200 0.305 0 WB Right 64 64 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.758 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.858 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if applic able). 2. Per -lane Capacity=j 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Lower Azusa Road Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:15 -8:15) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 1.00 F 1 NB Left 18 18 1 1600 0.011 2 NB Thru 1348 1348 2 3200 0.421 1 NB Right 374 374 1 1600 0.234 1 SB Left 130 130 1 1600 0.081 2 SB Thru 1259 1259 2 3200 0.394 0 SB Right 1 1 0 0 — 0 EB Left 5 10 0 0 — 1 EB Thru 4 4 1 1600 0.018 0 EB Right 15 15 0 0 — 2 WB Left 775 775 2 2880 0.269 0 WB Thru 2 2 0 0 0.000 0 WB Right 319 319 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.789 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.889 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D .191[1 ;9 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Mission Drive Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 215 215 1 1600 0.134 2 NB Thru 1546 1546 2 3200 0.499 0 NB Right 51 51 0 0 1 -- 1 SB Left 52 52 1 1600 0.033 2 SB Thru 1655 1655 2 3200 0.648 0 SB Right 418 418 0 0 — 1 EB Left 184 184 1 1600 0.115 2 EB Thru 331 331 2 3200 0.175 0 EB Right 228 228 0 0 — WB Left 144 144 1 1600 0.090 2 L0 WB Thru 617 617 2 3200 0.223 WB Right 98 98 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 1.120 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.220 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Valley Blvd Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 143 143 1 1600 0.089 2 NB Thru 640 640 2 3200 0.275 0 NB Right 239 239 0 0 1 SB Left 77 77 1 1600 0.048 2 SB Thru 1030 1030 2 3200 0.390 0 SB Right 219 219 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 109 109 1 1600 0.068 2 EB Thru 715 715 2 3200 0.262 0 EB Right 124 124 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 288 288 1 1600 0.180 2 WB Thru 1475 1475 2 3200 0.485 0 WB Right 76 76 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 1.032 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.132 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: Valley Blvd at Rosemead Blvd Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: AM Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph C 1 NB Left 246 246 1 1600 0.154 shared lane used by movement. F 2 NB Thru 1588 1588 2 3200 0.496 1 NB Right 127 127 1 1600 0.079 1 SB Left 34 34 1 1600 0.021 2 SB Thru 1614 1614 2 3200 0.504 1 SB Right 304 304 1 1600 0.190 1 EB Left 187 187 1 1600 0.117 2 EB Thru 453 453 2 3200 0.142 1 EB Right 261 261 1 1600 0.163 ' WB Left 238 238 1 1600 0.149 2 WB Thru 895 895 2 3200 0.280 1 WB Right 116 116 1 1600 0.073 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 1.055 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.155 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F Maximum NOTES LOS Vic 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or A 0.60 free flow right turn if appli vable). B 0.70 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph C 0.80 dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph D 0.90 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of E 1.00 shared lane used by movement. F n/a *fib' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: Valley Blvd at Mission Drive Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 -8:30) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted 1 Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 — 1 NB Thru 0 0 1 1600 0.000 0 NB Right 0 0 0 0 — 2 SB Left 389 389 2 2880 0.135 0 SB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 1 SB Right 46 46 1 1600 0.029 1 EB Left 27 27 1 1600 0.017 2 EB Thru 474 474 2 3200 0.148 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 0 WB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 2 WB Thru 1163 1163 2 3200 0.363 1 WB Right 585 585 1 1600 0.366 Sum of Critical WC Ratios 0.515 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.615 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below B NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: Valley Blvd at Rio Hondo Ave Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of 1 Lanes 3 I Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 218 218 0 0 -- 1 NB Thru 12 12 1 1600 0.201 0 NB Right 91 91 0 0 -- 0 SB Left 43 47 0 0 -- 1 SB Thru 35 35 1 1600 0.076 0 SB Right 40 40 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 13 13 1600 0.008 2 EB Thru 717 717 tO 3200 0.265 0 EB Right 132 132 0 — 1 WB Left 104 104 1 1600 0.065 3 WB Thru 1491 1491 3 4800 0.315 0 WB Right 22 22 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.531 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.631 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below B NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn Jif appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: Valley Blvd at Temple City Blvd Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:45 -8:45) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity [2] V/C Ratio Critical /C V Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 245 245 1 1600 0.153 2 NB Thru 437 437 2 3200 0.154 0 NB Right 56 56 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 220 220 1 1600 0.138 2 SB Thru 611 611 2 3200 0.279 0 SB Right 282 282 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 172 172 1 1600 0.108 2 EB Thru 619 619 2 3200 0.193 1 EB Right 63 63 1 1600 0.039 1 WB Left 107 107 1 1600 0.067 2 WB Thru 1177 1177 2 3200 0.439 0 WB Right 229 229 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.979 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.079 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Marshall St Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 I Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 66 66 1 1600 0.041 2 NB Thru 871 871 2 3200 0.385 0 NB Right 361 361 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 70 70 1 1600 0.044 2 SB Thru 1349 1349 2 3200 0.443 0 SB Right 70 70 0 0 -- 0 EB Left 77 154 0 0 1 EB Thru 188 188 1 1600 0.290 0 EB Right 122 122 0 0 -- 0 WB Left 515 1030 0 0 -- < == 1 WB Thru 248 248 1 1600 08481 0 WB Right 79 79 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 1.332 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.432 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Marshall St Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: AM Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.80 D 1 NB Left 57 57 1 1600 0.036 2 NB Thru 1791 1791 2 3200 0.560 1 NS Right 160 160 1 1600 0.100 1 SB Left 119 119 1 1600 0.074 2 SB Thru 2040 2040 2 3200 0.661 0 SB Right 75 75 0 0 - -- 1 EB Left 61 61 1 1600 0.038 2 EB Thru 177 177 2 3200 0.108 0 EB Right 168 168 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 234 234 1 1600 0.146 2 WS Thru 364 364 2 3200 0.148 0 WB Right 110 110 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.951 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.051 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Glendon Way Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:45 - 8:45) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 I Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph C 1 NB Left 71 71 1 1600 0.044 shared lane used by movement. F 3 NB Thru 1916 1916 3 4800 0.453 0 NB Right 257 257 0 0 -- 0 SB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 2 SB Thru 2213 2213 2 3200 0.692 1 SB Right 291 291 1 1600 0.182 1 EB Left 26 26 1 1600 0.016 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 1 EB Right 263 263 1 1600 0.164 0 WB Left 104 208 0 0 — 1 WB Thru 37 37 1 1600 0.153 1 WB Right 153 153 1 1600 0.096 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.905 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.005 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F Maximum NOTES LOS V/C 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or A 0.60 free flow right turn Jif appli vable). B 0.70 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph C 0.80 dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph D 0.90 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of E 1.00 shared lane used by movement. F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: Temple City Blvd at Loftus Drive Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 -8:30) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. of Lanes 3 I Capacity 2) V/C Ratio Cr tical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 1 NB Thru 659 659 1 1600 0.412 1 NB Right 365 365 1 1600 0.228 1 SB Left 250 250 1 1600 0.156 2 SB Thru 750 750 2 3200 0.234 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 2 WB Left 378 378 2 2880 0.131 0 WB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 1 WB Right 191 191 1 1600 0.119 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.699 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.799 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: Del Mar Ave at Hellman Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead I Total 0.90 Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of 1 Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical I V/C I Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 59 59 1 1600 0.037 2 NB Thru 1059 1059 2 3200 0.337 0 NB Right 18 18 0 0 — 1 SB Left 70 70 1 1600 0.044 2 SIB Thru 947 947 2 3200 0.347 0 SIB Right 162 162 0 0 — 1 EB Left 250 250 1 1600 0.156 1 EB Thru 221 221 1 1600 0.174 0 EB Right 57 57 0 0 — 1 WB Left 62 62 1 1600 0.039 1 WB Thru 376 376 1 1600 0.318 0 WB Right 133 133 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.858 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.958 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at Hellman Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: AM (8:00 - 9:00) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. ofl Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio I Critical V/C I Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 75 75 1 1600 0.047 3 NB Thru 1065 1065 3 4800 0.225 0 NB Right 16 16 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 67 67 1 1600 0.042 0.512 — 2 SB Thru 1412 1412 2 3200 0 SB Right 227 227 0 0 1 EB Left 164 164 1 1600 0.103 1 EB Thru 185 185 1 1600 0.171 0 EB Right 88 88 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 39 39 1 1600 0.024 1 WB Thru 278 278 1 1600 0.252 0 WB Right 125 125 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.914 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.014 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Hellman Ave /Ramona Blvd Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:45 - 8:45) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. of Lanes 3 I Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 148 148 1 1600 0.093 2 NB Thru 614 614 2 3200 0.198 0 NB Right 18 18 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 143 143 1 1600 0.089 2 SB Thru 1058 1058 2 3200 0.402 0 SB Right 229 229 0 0 -- 0 EB Left 270 540 0 0 -- 1 EB Thru 90 90 1 1600 0.394 1 EB Right 192 192 1 1600 0.120 0 WB Left 6 12 0 0 -- 1 WB Thru 105 105 1 1600 0.073 1 WB Right 316 316 1 1600 0.198 Sum of Critical WC Ratios 0.889 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.989 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Telstar Ave Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 3 NB Thru 2045 2045 3 4800 0.426 1 NB Right 622 622 1 1600 0.389 1 SB Left 427 427 1 1600 0.267 3 SB Thru 2777 2777 3 4800 0.579 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 — 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 220 220 1 1600 0.138 0 WB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 2 WB Right 99 99 2 2880 0.034 Sum of Critical WC Ratios 0.831 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.931 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Whitmore St Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: AM (7:45 - 8:45) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. ofl Lanes 13 Capacity 2] V/C Ratio Critical I V/C Total 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph C 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 -- shared lane used by movement. F 3 NB Thru 2640 2640 3 4800 0.550 1 NB Right 167 167 1 1600 0.104 1 SB Left 118 118 1 1600 0.074 3 SB Thru 2881 2881 3 4800 0.600 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 1 1 WB Left 28 28 1 1600 0.018 0 WB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 1 WB Right 27 27 1 1600 0.017 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.642 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.742 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C Maximum NOTES LOS V/C 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or A 0.60 free flow right turn Jif appli vable). B 0.70 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph C 0.80 dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph D 0.90 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of E 1.00 shared lane used by movement. F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: New Ave at Garvey Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: AM (8:00 - 9:00) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.80 D 1 NB Left 82 82 1 1600 0.051 2 NB Thru 468 468 2 3200 0.188 0 NB Right 133 133 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 218 218 1 1600 0.136 <_ 2 SB Thru 269 269 2 3200 0.105 0 SS Right 67 67 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 177 177 1 1600 0.111 2 EB Thru 783 783 2 3200 0.299 0 EB Right 174 174 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 97 97 1 1600 0.061 2 WB Thru 980 980 2 3200 0.381 0 WB Right 240 240 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.816 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.916 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: Del Mar Ave at Garvey Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. of Lanes 3 I Capacity 2] V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 111 111 1 1600 0.069 2 NB Thru 560 560 2 3200 0.196 0 NB Right 66 66 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 193 193 1 1600 0.121 2 SB Thru 613 613 2 3200 0.262 0 SB Right 225 225 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 205 205 1 1600 0.128 2 EB Thru 800 800 2 3200 0.302 0 EB Right 165 165 0 0 -- 1 1 WB Left 82 82 1 1600 0.051 2 WB Thru 1006 1006 2 3200 0.389 0 WB Right 239 239 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.848 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.948 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if applic able). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS WC A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at Garvey Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:45 - 8:45) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1.00 NB Left 73 73 1 1600 0.046 2 E NB Thru 642 642 2 3200 0.201 11 NB Right 184 184 1 1600 0.115 1 SB Left 385 385 1 1600 0.241 < 2 SB Thru 858 858 2 3200 0.268 1 SB Right 221 221 1 1600 0.138 1 EB Left 282 282 1 1600 0.176 < -- 2 EB Thru 733 733 2 3200 0.229 1 EB Right 75 75 1 1600 0.047 1 WB Left 241 241 1 1600 0.151 2 WB Thru 1153 1153 2 3200 0.360 1 WB Right 233 233 1 1600 0.146 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.978 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.078 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn iif appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap: 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Garvey Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of 1 Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 117 117 1 1600 0.073 < -- 2 NB Thru 412 412 2 3200 0.153 0 NB Right 78 78 0 0 — 1 SB Left 209 209 1 1600 0.131 2 SB Thru 920 920 2 3200 0.351 0 SB Right 203 203 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 179 179 1 1600 0.112 2 EB Thru 908 908 2 3200 0.316 0 EB Right 102 102 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 152 152 1 1600 0.095 < - 2 WB Thru 1103 1103 2 3200 0.373 0 WB Right 91 91 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.909 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.009 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn Jif appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at Rush St/Potrero Grande Dr Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: AM (7:45 -8:45) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1] I No. ofl 1 Lanes 31 Capacity [2] V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 16 16 1 1600 0.010 2 NB Thru 512 512 2 3200 0.176 0 NB Right 50 50 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 215 215 1 1600 0.134 < - 2 SB Thru 754 754 2 3200 0.317 0 SB Right 261 261 0 0 1 - -- 1 EB Left 61 61 1 1600 0.038 < 2 EB Thru 124 124 2 3200 0.050 1 0 EB Right 36 36 0 0 -- 1 1 WB Left 37 37 1 1600 0.023 < 2 WB Thru 238 238 2 3200 0.122 0 WS Right 153 153 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.487 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.587 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below A 1[0Y111:K 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Rush St Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:45 - 8:45) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume [1] No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2] V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 1 89 1 89 1 1 t 1600 0.056 2 NB Thru 624 624 2 3200 0.299 0 NB Right 332 332 0 0 - -- 1 SB Left 60 60 1 1600 0.038 2 SB Thru 596 596 2 3200 0.328 0 SB Right 452 452 0 0 1 EB Left 246 246 1 1600 0.154 < 2 EB Thru 60 60 2 3200 0.038 0 EB Right 63 63 0 0 Left 7 7 1 1600 0.004 < -- L WB Thru 9 9 2 3200 0.003 IWB WB Right 12 12 1 1600 0.008 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.541 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.641 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below B :G4111'=K 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if applic able). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Landis View Lane Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 I Capacity (2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 2 NB Thru 1107 1107 2 3200 0.351 0 NB Right 15 15 0 0 — 1 SB Left 11 11 1 1600 0.007 2 SB Thru 789 789 2 3200 0247 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 0 WB Left 37 37 0 0 -- 1 WB Thru 0 0 1 1600 0232 0 WB Right 14 14 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.390 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.490 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below A NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if applic able). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at San Gabriel Blvd Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 111 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 7 7 0 0 -- 1 NB Thru 5 5 1 1600 0.010 0 NB Right 4 4 0 0 — 1 SB Left 741 741 1 1600 0.463 1 SB Thru 11 11 1 1600 0.038 0 SB Right 50 50 0 0 — 1 EB Left 50 50 1 1600 0.031 2 EB Thru 708 708 2 3200 0.225 0 EB Right 13 13 0 0 -- ' WB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 2 WB Thru 1022 1022 2 3200 0.319 2 WB Right 1057 1057 2 2880 0.367 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.823 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.923 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.: 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. T,FrunTIlu. LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at SR -60 WB Ramps Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 - 8:30) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. of Lanes 3 I Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 20 20 1 1600 0.013 3 NB Thru 1226 1226 3 4800 0.298 0 NB Right 202 202 0 0 — 1 SB Left 157 157 1 1600 0.098 2 SB Thru 1274 1274 2 3200 0.400 0 SB Right 5 5 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 5 5 1 1600 0.003 1 EB Thru 22 22 1 1600 0.030 0 EB Right 26 26 0 0 — 1 WB Left 102 102 1 1600 0.064 < == 1 WB Thru 16 16 1 1600 0.010 1 WB Right 870 870 1 1600 0.544 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.845 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.945 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph s 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: Town Center Drive at SR -60 EB Ramps Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 -8:30) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. ofl Lanes 31 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical WC Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 4 4 1 1600 0.003 < -- 2 NB Thru 66 66 2 3200 0.021 1 NB Right 55 55 1 1600 0.034 1 SB Left 460 460 1 1600 0.288 2 SB Thru 15 15 2 3200 0.005 1 SB Right 0 0 1 1600 0.000 1 EB Left 12 12 1 1600 0.008 < 2 EB Thru 23 23 2 3200 0.010 0 EB Right 9 9 0 0 -- 1 1 WB Left 126 126 1 1600 0.079 < == 2 WB Thru 78 78 2 3200 0.024 1 WB Right 799 799 1 1600 0.499 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.528 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.628 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below B NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn Jif appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 1 Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout AM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at Town Center Drive Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM (7:30 -8:30) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. ofl Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 2 NB Left 42 42 2 2880 0.015 2 NB Thru 1007 1007 2 3200 0.323 0 NB Right 26 26 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 80 80 1 1600 0.050 2 SB Thru 427 427 2 3200 0.133 1 SB Right 902 902 1 1600 0.564 1 EB Left 386 386 1 1600 0.241 < - 1 EB Thru 30 30 1 1600 0.019 1 EB Right 111 111 1 1600 0.069 0 WB Left 13 14 0 0 — < -- 1 WB Thru 43 43 1 1600 0.036 1 WB Right 54 54 1 1600 0.034 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.650 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.750 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C ,I [all 1 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used bV movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Mission Drive Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 I Capacity 2 I V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.80 D 1 NB Left 183 183 1 1600 0.114 2 NB Thru 697 697 2 3200 0.290 0 NB Right 230 230 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 143 143 1 1600 0.089 0.151 -- < -- 2 SB Thru 466 466 410 2 3200 0 SB Right 18 18 0 1 EB Left 56 56 1 1600 0.035 < 2 EB Thru 836 836 2 3200 0.296 0 EB Right 111 111 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 153 153 1 1600 0.096 < -- 2 WB Thru 613 613 2 3200 0.219 0 WB Right 88 88 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.771 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.871 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D z Loll I *' 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Lower Azusa Road Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (4:45 - 5:45) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 34 34 1 1600 0.021 2 NB Thru 1709 1709 2 3200 0.534 1 NB Right 452 452 1 1600 0.283 1 SB Left 280 280 1 1600 0.175 0.503 -- 2 SB Thru 1604 1604 2 3200 0 SB Right 6 6 0 0 0 EB Left 5 10 0 0 -- < -- 1 EB Thru 2 2 1 1600 0.008 0 EB Right 1 1 0 0 -- 2 WB Left 361 361 2 2880 0.125 < - 0 WB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 WB Right 201 201 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.842 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.942 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E 11SI& y 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS Vic A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a 'r INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Mission Drive Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (4:45 - 5:45) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. ofl Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total free flow right turn if appli vable). B 0.70 NB Left NB Thru 222 1847 222 1847 1 2 1600 3200 0.139 0.595 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of E 2 E 01 NB Right 57 57 0 0 — 1 SB Left 96 96 1 1600 0.060 2 SB Thru 1644 1644 2 3200 0.588 0 SB Right 239 239 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 245 245 1 1600 0.153 2 EB Thru 641 641 2 3200 0.275 0 EB Right 239 239 0 0 — 1 WB Left 85 85 1 1600 0.053 2 WB Thru 325 325 2 3200 0.133 0 WB Right 101 101 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 1.055 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection apacity Utilization (ICU) 1.155 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F Maximum NOTES LOS V/C 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or A 0.60 free flow right turn if appli vable). B 0.70 2. Per -lane Capacity=j 1600 vph C 0.80 dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph D 0.90 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of E 1.00 shared lane used by movement F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Valley Blvd Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (4:45 - 5:45) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 111 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 126 126 1 1600 0.079 2 NB Thru 1022 1022 2 3200 0.414 0 NB Right 303 303 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 80 80 1 1600 0.050 2 SB Thru 714 714 2 3200 0.256 0 SB Right 105 105 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 144 144 1 1600 0.090 2 EB Thru 1304 1304 2 3200 0.444 0 EB Right 118 118 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 260 260 1 1600 0.163 2 WB Thru 987 987 2 3200 0.329 0 WB Right 67 67 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 1.071 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.171 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn Jif appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: Valley Blvd at Rosemead Blvd Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: AM Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Rati Critical V/C I Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 225 225 1 1600 0.141 < == 2 NB Thru 1721 1721 2 3200 0.538 1 NB Right 197 197 1 1600 0.123 1 SB Left 77 77 1 1600 0.048 2 SB Thru 1529 1529 2 3200 0.478 1 SB Right 233 233 1 1600 0.146 1 EB Left 346 346 1 1600 0.216 2 EB Thru 891 891 2 3200 0.278 1 EB Right 180 180 1 1600 0.113 1 WB Left 194 194 1 1600 0.121 2 WB Thru 603 603 2 3200 0.188 1 WB Right 94 94 1 1600 0.059 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 1.023 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.123 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: Valley Blvd at Mission Drive Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. of Lanes 3 ]1 I Capacity [211 WC Ratio Critical WC Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 1 NB Thru 0 0 1 1600 0.000 0 NB Right 0 0 0 0 — 2 SB Left 551 551 2 2880 0.191 0 SB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 1 SB Right 33 33 1 1600 0.021 1 EB Left 30 30 1 1600 0.019 2 EB Thru 1032 1032 2 3200 0.323 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 0 WB Left 0 0 0 0 — 2 WB Thru 790 790 2 3200 0.247 1 WB Right 397 397 1 1600 0.248 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.514 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.614 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below B NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: Valley Blvd at Rio Hondo Ave Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of 1 Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 1.00 F 0 NB Left 166 166 0 0 — - 1 NB Thru 51 51 1 1600 0.297 0 NB Right 258 258 0 0 — 0 SB Left 30 60 0 0 — 1 SB Thru 27 27 1 1600 0.081 0 SB Right 43 43 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 22 22 1 1600 0.014 2 EB Thru 1373 1373 2 3200 0.488 0 EB Right 188 188 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 71 71 1 1600 0.044 3 WB Thru 982 982 3 4800 0.211 0 WB Right 32 32 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.829 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.929 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: Valley Blvd at Temple City Blvd Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Agency: City cif Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 I Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 152 152 1 1600 0.095 2 NB Thru 701 701 2 3200 0.243 0 NB Right 76 76 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 192 192 1 1600 0.120 2 SB Thru 584 584 2 3200 0.230 0 SB Right 152 152 0 0 — 1 EB Left 271 271 1 1600 0.169 2 EB Thru 1337 1337 2 3200 0.418 1 EB Right 91 91 1 1600 0.057 1 WB Left 97 97 1 1600 0.061 2 WB Thru 704 704 2 3200 0.263 0 WB Right 138 138 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.842 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.942 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn Jif appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS Vic A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Marshall St Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (4:45 - 5:45) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of 1 Lanes 3 I Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 87 87 1 1600 0.054 2 NB Thru 1322 1322 2 3200 0.631 0 NB Right 698 698 0 0 1 SB Left 79 79 1 1600 0.049 2 SB Thru 905 905 2 3200 0.298 0 SB Right 49 49 0 0 -- 0 EB Left 89 178 0 0 -- 1 EB Thru 264 264 1 1600 0.341 0 EB Right 104 104 0 0 -- 0 WB Left 495 990 0 0 -- 1 WB Thru 221 221 1 1600 0.806 0 WB Right 79 79 0 0 — Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 1.486 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.586 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Marshall St Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: AM Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. ofJ Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 111 111 1 1600 0.069 2 NB Thru 1911 1911 2 3200 0.597 1 NB Right 303 303 1 1600 0.189 1 SB Left 187 187 1 1600 0.117 2 SB Thru 1679 1679 2 3200 0.537 0 SB Right 39 39 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 118 118 1 1600 0.074 2 EB Thru 364 364 2 3200 0.162 0 EB Right 154 154 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 210 210 1 1600 0.131 2 WB Thru 291 291 2 3200 0.139 0 WB Right 155 155 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 1.007 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.107 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=l 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Glendon Way Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (4:45 -5:45) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 111 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 1.00 F 1 NB Left 165 165 1 1600 0.103 3 NB Thru 2248 2248 3 4800 0.622 0 NB Right 738 738 0 0 — 0 SB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 2 SB Thru 1611 1611 2 3200 0.503 1 SB Right 411 411 1 1600 0.257 1 EB Left 41 41 1 1600 0.026 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 1 EB Right 105 105 1 1600 0.066 0 WB Left 85 94 0 0 -- 1 WB Thru 97 97 1 1600 0.119 1 WB Right 240 240 1 1600 0.150 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.798 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.898 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn lif appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: Temple City Blvd at Loftus Drive Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 I Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 1 NB Thru 780 780 1 1600 0.488 1 NB Right 240 240 1 1600 0.150 1 SB Left 225 225 1 1600 0.141 2 SB Thru 726 726 2 3200 0.227 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 2 WB Left 642 642 2 2880 0.223 0 WB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 1 WB Right 387 387 1 1600 0.242 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.852 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.952 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E RGIWK 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli cable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: Del Mar Ave at Hellman Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: AM Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. ofl Lanes 3 Capacityl 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 66 66 1 1600 0.041 2 NB Thru 922 922 2 3200 0.303 0 NB Right 47 47 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 116 116 1 1600 0.073 2 SB Thru 969 969 2 3200 0.362 0 SB Right 190 190 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 249 249 1 1600 0.156 <_- 1 EB Thru 519 519 1 1600 0.375 0 EB Right 81 81 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 32 1 32 1 1 1 1600 1 0.020J < == 1 WB Thru 224 224 1 1600 0.198 0 WB Right 92 92 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.798 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.898 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at Hellman Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (4:45 - 5:45) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacityl 2 V/C Ratio Critical V /C Total 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph C 1 NB Left NB Thru 97 1436 97 1436 1 3 1600 4800 0.061 0.311 shared lane used by movement. F 3 0 NB Right 57 57 0 0 — 1 SB Left 105 105 1 1600 0.066 2 SB Thru 1185 1185 2 3200 0.408 0 SB Right 122 122 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 192 192 1 1600 0.120 1 EB Thru 368 368 1 1600 0.306 0 EB Right 122 122 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 50 50 1 1600 0.031 1 WB Thru 167 167 1 1600 0.177 0 WB Right 116 116 0 0 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.806 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.906 Level of Service (LOS) -Refer to table below E Maximum NOTES LOS V/C 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or A 0.60 free flow right turn if appli cable). B 0.70 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph C 0.80 dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph D 0.90 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of E 1.00 shared lane used by movement. F n/a L INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Hellman Ave /Ramona Blvd Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (4:45 - 5:45) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume Ill No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 175 175 1 1600 0.109 2 NB Thru 1478 1478 2 3200 0.471 0 NB Right 30 30 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 163 163 1 1600 0.102 2 SB Thru 908 908 2 3200 0.342 0 SB Right 186 186 0 0 -- 0 EB Left 369 738 0 0 -- 1 EB Thru 116 116 1 1600 0.534 1 EB Right 94 94 1 1600 0.059 0 WB Left 9 18 0 0 — 1 WB Thru 59 59 1 1600 0.048 1 WB Right 281 281 1 1600 0.176 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 1.107 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.207 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn Jif appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Telstar Ave Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 11 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph C 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 -- shared lane used by movement. F 3 NB Thru 2536 2536 3 4800 0.528 1 NB Right 194 194 1 1600 0.121 1 SB Left 181 181 1 1600 0.113 3 SB Thru 2317 2317 3 4800 0.483 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 - -- 1 1 W B Left 504 504 1 1600 0.315 < -- 0 WB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 2 WB Right 663 663 2 2880 0.230 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.956 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.056 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F Maximum NOTES LOS V/C 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or A 0.60 free flow right turn if appli vable). B 0.70 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph C 0.80 dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph D 0.90 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of E 1.00 shared lane used by movement. F n/a �.X -. INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: Rosemead Blvd at Whitmore St Count Date: Thursday, October 22, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (4:30 - 5:30) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 — 3 NB Thru 2637 2637 3 4800 0.549 1 NB Right 49 49 1 1600 0.031 1 SB Left 13 13 1 1600 0.008 3 SB Thru 2809 2809 3 4800 0.585 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 233 233 1 1600 0.146 0 WB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 1 WB Right 95 95 1 1600 0.059 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.731 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.831 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below D NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Suildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: New Ave at Garvey Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (4:45 - 5:45) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of 1 Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph C 1 NB Left 127 127 1 1600 0.079 0.175 -- shared lane used by movement. F 2 NB Thru 424 424 2 3200 0 NB Right 137 137 0 0 1 SB Left 318 318 1 1600 0.199 2 SB Thru 412 412 2 3200 0.202 0 SB Right 234 234 0 0 1 — 1 EB Left 244 244 1 1600 0.153 2 EB Thru 1371 1371 2 3200 0.460 0 EB Right 102 102 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 103 103 1 1600 0.064 2 WB Thru 949 949 2 3200 0 WB Right 287 287 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.913 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.013 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F Maximum NOTES LOS V/C 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or A 0.60 free flow right turn Jif appli vable). B 0.70 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph C 0.80 dual turn lane cap.- 2880 vph D 0.90 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of E 1.00 shared lane used by movement. F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: Del Mar Ave at Garvey Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: AM Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 WC Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 174 174 1 1600 0.109 2 NB Thru 574 574 2 3200 0.210 0 NB Right 97 97 0 0 1 SB Left 340 340 1 1600 0.213 < == 2 SB Thru 519 519 2 3200 0.221 0 SB Right 188 188 0 0 — 1 EB Left 248 248 1 1600 0.155 2 EB Thru 1437 1437 2 3200 0.478 0 EB Right 92 92 0 0 -- 1 1 WB Left 78 78 1 1600 0.049 2 WB Thru 1052 1052 2 3200 0.406 0 WB Right 247 247 0 0 -- Sum of Critical WC Ratios 0.984 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.084 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn Jif applic able). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS Vic A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a RTERSECTI"CAPACITY - UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at Garvey Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 - 6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 153 153 1 1600 0.096 2 NB Thru 818 818 2 3200 0.256 1 NB Right 220 220 1 1600 0.138 1 SB Left 340 340 1 1600 0.213 2 SB Thru 744 744 2 3200 0.233 1 SB Right 253 253 1 1600 0.158 1 EB Left 391 391 1 1600 0.244 2 EB Thru 1275 1275 2 3200 0.398 1 EB Right 106 106 1 1600 0.066 1 WB Left 249 249 1 1600 0.156 2 WB Thru 940 940 2 3200 0.294 1 WB Right 290 290 1 1600 0.181 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 1.023 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.123 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Garvey Ave Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Analyst: KOA Corporation Peak Hr: PM (5:00 - 6:00) Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. of Lanes 3 I Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical I V/C Total 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph C 1 NB Left 126 126 1 1600 0.079 shared lane used by movement. F 2 NB Thru 1043 1043 2 3200 0.370 0 NB Right 140 140 0 0 — 1 SB Left 204 204 1 1600 0.128 2 SB Thru 624 624 2 3200 0.265 0 SB Right 225 225 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 273 273 1 1600 0.171 2 EB Thru 1135 1135 2 3200 0.391 0 EB Right 117 117 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 90 90 1 1600 0.056 2 WB Thru 973 973 2 3200 0.374 0 WB Right 223 223 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 1.043 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.143 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F Maximum NOTES LOS V/C 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or A 0.60 free flow right turn if appli vable). B 0.70 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph C 0.80 dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph D 0.90 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of E 1.00 shared lane used by movement. F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at Rush St/Potrero Grande Dr Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (4:45 - 5:45) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. ofJ 1 Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 18 18 1 1600 0.011 2 NB Thru 715 715 2 3200 0.252 0 NB Right 92 92 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 221 221 1 1600 0.138 2 SB Thru 668 668 2 3200 0.238 0 SB Right 95 95 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 222 222 1 1600 0.139 2 EB Thru 339 339 2 3200 0.112 0 EB Right 18 18 0 0 — 1 WB Left 75 75 1 1600 0.047 2 WB Thru 205 205 2 3200 0.147 0 WB Right 264 264 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.676 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.776 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C : OI&K 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildoul PM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Rush St Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 - 6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume [11 No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical I V/C I Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 112 112 1 1600 0.070 2 NB Thru 880 880 2 3200 0.284 0 NB Right 29 29 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 20 20 1 1600 0.013 2 SB Thru 809 809 2 3200 0.334 0 SB Right 260 260 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 355 355 1 1600 0.222 2 EB Thru 18 18 2 3200 0.028 0 EB Right 73 73 0 0 1 WB Left 270 270 1 1600 0.169 2 WB Thru 49 49 2 3200 0.015 1 WB Right 87 87 1 1600 0.054 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.641 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.741 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if applic able). 2. Per -lane Capacity,=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at Landis View Lane Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. ofJ Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 0.90 E 0 NB Left 0 0 0 0 — 2 NB Thru 1021 1021 2 3200 0.330 0 NB Right 34 34 0 0 — 1 SB Left 29 29 1 1600 0.018 2 SB Thru 1209 1209 2 3200 0.378 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Left 0 0 0 0 -- 0 EB Thru 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 EB Right 0 0 0 0 — 0 WB Left 26 26 0 0 — 1 WB Thru 0 0 1 1600 0.029 0 WB Right 21 21 0 0 -- Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.407 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.507 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below A NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: Walnut Grove Ave at San Gabriel Blvd Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 -6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. ofJ 1 Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph C 0 NB Left 8 8 0 0 — shared lane used by movement. F 1 NB Thru 6 6 1 1600 0.012 0 NB Right 5 5 0 0 1 SB Left 1040 1040 1 1600 0.650 1 SB Thru 18 18 1 1600 0.048 0 SB Right 59 59 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 69 69 1 1600 0.043 2 EB Thru 947 947 2 3200 0.299 0 EB Right 11 11 0 0 — 0 WB Left 0 0 0 0 — 2 W13 Thru 845 845 2 3200 0.264 2 WB Right 1004 1004 2 2880 0.349 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.969 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 1.069 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below F Maximum NOTES LOS V/C 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or A 0.60 free flow right turn if appli vable). B 0.70 2. Per -lane Capacity= 1600 vph C 0.80 dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph D 0.90 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of E 1.00 shared lane used by movement. F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at SR -60 WB Ramps Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (5:00 - 6:00) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph C 1 NB Left 34 34 1 1600 0.021 shared lane used by movement. F 3 NB Thru 873 873 3 4800 0.211 0 NB Right 139 139 0 0 -- 1 SB Left 264 264 1 1600 0.165 2 SB Thru 1746 1746 2 3200 0.548 0 SB Right 8 8 0 0 -- 1 EB Left 11 11 1 1600 0.007 1 EB Thru 15 15 1 1600 0.034 0 EB Right 40 40 0 0 -- 1 WB Left 194 194 1 1600 0.121 < == 1 WB Thru 28 28 1 1600 0.018 1 WB Right 965 965 1 1600 0.603 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.821 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.921 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below E Maximum NOTES LOS V/C 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or A 0.60 free flow right turn if appli vable). B 0.70 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph C 0.80 dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph D 0.90 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of E 1.00 shared lane used by movement. F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: Town Center Drive at SR -60 EB Ramps Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (4:45 - 5:45) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement I Volume Adjusted Volume 1 No. of Lanes 3 I Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C Total 0.90 E 1 NB Left 2 2 1 1600 0.001 2 NB Thru 157 157 2 3200 0.049 1 NB Right 158 158 1 1600 0.099 1 SB Left 466 466 1 1600 0.291 2 SB Thru 39 39 2 3200 0.012 1 SB Right 0 0 1 1600 0.000 1 EB Left 109 109 1 1600 0.068 2 EB Thru 259 259 2 3200 0.086 0 EB Right 16 16 0 0 — 1 WB Left 197 1 197 1 1 1 1600 L 0.123 2 WB Thru 145 145 2 3200 0.045 1 WB Right 610 610 1 1600 0.381 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.549 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.649 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below B NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.= 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION Future Buildout PM Peak Hour Intersection: San Gabriel Blvd at Town Center Drive Count Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 Peak Hr: PM (4:45 - 5:45) Analyst: KOA Corporation Agency: City of Rosemead Lanes Movement Volume Adjusted Volume 1 I No. of Lanes 3 Capacity 2 V/C Ratio Critical V/C I Total 0.90 E 2 NB Left 28 28 2 2880 0.010 2 NB Thru 512 512 2 3200 0.163 0 NB Right 9 9 0 0 — 1 SB Left 37 37 1 1600 0.023 2 SB Thru 1042 1042 2 3200 0.326 1 SB Right 901 901 1 1600 0.563 1 EB Left 488 488 1 1600 0.305 1 EB Thru 33 33 1 1600 0.021 1 EB Right 364 364 1 1600 0.228 0 WB Left 19 38 0 0 — 1 WB Thru 21 21 1 1600 0.037 1 WB Right 29 29 1 1600 0.018 Sum of Critical V/C Ratios 0.678 Adjustment for Lost Time 0.100 Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) 0.778 Level of Service (LOS) - Refer to table below C NOTES 1. Counted volume adjusted for left turn PCE or free flow right turn if appli vable). 2. Per -lane Capacity=1 1600 vph dual turn lane cap.: 2880 vph 3. Non - integer values indicate proportion of shared lane used by movement. Maximum LOS V/C A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F n/a