Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PC - Item 4C - Zone Change 10-01 - Zonign Claissification of eight city parks to the OS - open sapces zoning designation
ROSEMEAD PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TO: THE HONORABLE CHAI ROSEMEAD PLANNING FROM: PLANNING DIVISION DATE: MARCH 1, 2010 AN AND MEMBERS OF THE ISSION SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 10 -01, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF EIGHT (8) CITY PARKS TO THE O -S (OPEN SPACE) ZONING DESIGNATION SUMMARY The City of Rosemead proposes to change parks to the O -S (Open Space) zoning des bring the zoning designation of these park: General Plan goals and policies, as required affected by this zone change: Angelus Park Garvey Park (Assessor Parcel Number: 52£ 904), Guess Park (Assessor Parcel Nu (Assessor Parcel Numbers: 5282022 -27C (Assessor Parcel Number: 8592 - 018 -902), S; 5389 - 001 -903), Triangle Park (Assessor Par Park (Assessor Parcel Numbers: 5288 -005- 005 -804, 5288- 005 -805, and 5288- 005 -806) can be found in Exhibit "D." ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The Rosemead City Council adopted a accompanying Program Environmental Imp 2008. The certified Program EIR provi environmental impacts resulting from deVE implementation of the goals and policies set Plan, as well as the long -term implementa Zoning Code. Zone Change 10 -01 is consi; Public Resources Code 21083.3 and CEC 15183 is exempt from the requirement that prepared. the zoning classification of eight (8) City 3nation. The proposed zone change will into consistency with the City's existing )y State law. The following parks will be Assessor Parcel Number: 5283 - 032 -903), �- 020 -900, 5287 - 020 -903, and 5287-020 - nber: 5389 - 004 -800), Klingerman Park and 5282 - 022 -271), Rosemead Park Ily Tanner Park (Assessor Parcel Number: el Number: 5281 - 032 -900), and Zapopan 300, 5288 - 005 - 801,5288- 005 -802, 5288 - A location map of these eight (8) parks General Plan update and certified an ct Report (Program EIR) on October 14, ad a program -level assessment of the )pment pursuant to land use policy and :)rth in all chapters of the updated General :)n of the General Plan through a revised ant with the Program EIR, and pursuant to Guidelines sections 15162, 15168 and dditional environmental documentation be Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 Page 2 of 23 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution No. 10 -04, a resolution recommending that the City Council ADOPT Ordinance No. 887 changing the zoning classification of eight (8) City parks to the O -S (Open Space) zoning designation. ANALYSIS The Parks and Recreation Department is pursuing statewide grant funding for renovations to City parks, which will require the issuance of City permits. They are hoping to significantly improve the appearance, play opportunities, efficiency, safety, and accessibility to the parks. The current Land Use Element of the General Plan designates our City parks as Open Space or Public Facilities. However, on the zoning map, they are designated as either R -1 (Single - Family Residential), R -2 (Light Multiple Residential), R -3 (Medium Multiple Residential), A -1 (Light Agricultural), M -1 (Light Manufacturing and Industrial), or C -3 (Medium Commercial with a Design Overlay). Furthermore, these zoning designations are not listed as corresponding zoning districts with the Open Space land use designation in the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Consistency Matrix, as illustrated in "Exhibit C' and without General Plan and Zoning consistency, the proposed renovations cannot be completed. Below is a table illustrating the current General Plan designations, current zoning designations, and future zoning designations for these eight (8) parks. Park Current Zone General Plan Designation Future Zone Sally Tanner R -3 Open Space O -S Guess Park A -1 Open Space O -S Rosemead Park R -1 Open Space O -S Zapopan Park C -31D and R -2 Public Facilities O -S Garvey Park R -2 Open Space O -S Angelus Park M -1 AP Public Facilities O -S AP Triangle Park R -1 Open Space O -S Klingerman Park A -1 Open Space O -S The proposed zone change of these eight (8) parks to Open Space will bring the zoning designation of these parks into consistency with the City's General Plan. The Open Space designation applies to public properties set aside for diverse recreational interests, such as parks. The Open Space zone permits public uses such as parks and recreation facilities. Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 Page 3 of 23 MUNICIPAL CODE REQUIREMENTS Chapter 17.116 of the Rosemead Munic requirements for zone changes and amen( whenever the public necessity, convenienc justifies such action. Pursuant to Californ zone change must be found consistent with it Code sets forth the procedures and ents. A zone change may be permitted general welfare or good zoning practice Government Code Section 65860 (a), a City's General Plan. A. Land Use: The General Plan designation will remain as Open Space or Public Facilities and will allow for the eight) (8) City parks to be consistent with City codes and land uses in the surrounding area. The General Plan Open Space and Public Facilities land use designations are designed to support public facilities, including parks. The proposed zoning of the site is consistent with the current land uses of the City of Rosemead's General Plan and Municipal Code. According to the Zoning Ordinance /General Plan Consistency Matrix ((Table LU -2) of the General Plan, the Open Space land use designation is consistent with the Open Space zone and all zones are permitted under the Public Facilities land useldesignation. B. Circulation: Potential impacts extent of a proposed project and local cond be required to provide efficient vehicular projects will be required to satisfy the parl code. C. Housing: The proposed zo growth nor displace existing housing un Department is pursuing statewide grant fun improve the appearance, play opportunitie parks. D. Resource Management: Any Zone Change would be located in a develol in any impact upon natural resources. P provide adequate landscaped areas in the o, E. Noise: The proposed develc impacts to noise levels for the surrounding shall be required to comply with the City's M i traffic and transportation depend on the ms. Each new proposed park project will cess to the site. Furthermore, all park g requirements outlined in the municipal change will not induce new population or people. The Parks and Recreation ig for renovations to City parks, which will efficiency, safety, and accessibility to the posed development resulting from this urban area, and as such, will not result .. sed developments will be required to II site plan. nt will not generate any permanent All construction activities to the parks gal Code. F. Public Safety: There will not be a new increase in population or density as a result of the Zone Change, so the need for more public safety and public areas is not impacted. Instead, the improvements will significantly improve the appearance, play opportunities, efficiency, safety, and accessibility to the parks. The entire City of Rosemead is located in Flood Zone C (flood insurance is not mandatory) and is free from any flood hazard designations. 1 i Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 Paoe 4 of 23 PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS Pursuant to California Government Code Se been mailed to all owners of real property as roll within 300 feet of the real property subje notice has been published in at least one r local agency. Lastly, this notice is also post, availability of the application, plus the date, ti Prepare Lily Trinh Assistant Planner Exhibits: A. Planning Commission Resolution No B. Draft Ordinance No. 887 C. Location Map of Parks D. General Plan and Zoning Ordinance E. Assessor Parcel Maps of Parks on 65091, this public hearing notice has town on the latest equalized assessment to Zone Change 10 -01. In addition, this rspaper of general circulation within the in six (6) public locations, specifying the and location of the public hearing. Director Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 Pape 5 of 23 Exhibit "A" PC RESOLUTION 10 -04 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE ZONE CHANGE 10 -01 AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 887, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF EIGHT (8) CITY PARKS TO THE O -S (OPEN SPACE) ZONING DESIGNATION (ANGELUS PARK (APN: 5283- 032 -903), GARVEY PARK (APNs: 15287- 020 -900, 5287- 020 -903, and 5287 - 020 -904), GUESS PARK (APN: 5389 - 004 -800), KLINGERMAN PARK (APNs: 5282022 -270 and 5282 - 022 -271), ROSEMEAD PARK (APN: 8592 - 018 -902), SALLY TANNER PARK (APN: 5389 - 001 -903), TRIANGLE PARK (APN: 5281 - 032 -900), and ZAPOPAN PARK (APNs: 5288 - 005 -800, 5288 - 005 -801, 5288 - 005 -802, 5288 - 005 -804, 5288 -005- 805, and 5288 - 005 -806). 1 WHEREAS, Section 17.116.010 of the Rosemead Municipal Code sets forth procedures and requirements for Zone Changes; and WHEREAS, the City of Rosemead has adopted the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, including specific development st i ndards, to control development; and WHEREAS, Sections 17.116 and 17.124 of the Rosemead Municipal Code authorize the Planning Commission to consider and recommend proposed zone changes to the City Council; and 1 WHEREAS, on February 18, 2010,1 mailed to all owners of real property as shov within 300 feet of the real property subjee published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribunes posted in six (6) public locations, specifying date, time and location of the public hearing Section 65091(a)(3); and WHEREAS, on March 1, 2010, the advertised public hearing to receive oral 10 -01; and five hundred twenty (520) notices were rn on the latest equalized assessment roll t to Zone Change 10 -01, a notice was on February 19, 2010, and notices were the availability of the application, plus the pursuant to California Government Code nning Commission held a duly noticed and written testimony relative to Zone Change WHEREAS, the Rosemead Planning Commission has sufficiently considered all testimony presented to them in order to make the following determination. Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 Paqe 6 of 23 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL of Rosemead as follows: SECTION 1. The Rosemead City C certified an accompanying Program Envirc October 14, 2008. The certified Program EI the environmental impacts resulting from de implementation of the goals and policies set Plan, as well as the long -term implemental Zoning Code. Zone Change 10 -01 is consi,, Public Resources Code 21083.3 and CEC 15183 is exempt from the requirement that prepared. by the Planning Commission of the City uncil adopted a General Plan update and mental Impact Report (Program EIR) on provided a program -level assessment of elopment pursuant to land use policy and :)rth in all chapters of the updated General m of the General Plan through a revised :nt with the Program EIR, and pursuant to k Guidelines sections 15162, 15168 and dditional environmental documentation be SECTION 2. The Planning Commission HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES that Zone Change 10 -01 is in the best interest of the public necessity and general welfare, and good city planning practice dictates and supports the proposed zone change, in that the change to the Rosemead Municipal Code will provide a superior level of planning and protection to the quality and character of the City. SECTION 3. The Planning Comm that Zone Change. 10 -01 is consistent with A. Land Use: The General Plan i Public Facilities and will allow for the eigt codes and land uses in the surrounding a Public Facilities land use designations are d parks. The proposed zoning of the site is City of Rosemead's General Plan and N Ordinance /General Plan Consistency Matrix Space land use designation is consistent w permitted under the Public Facilities land usi B. Circulation: Potential impacts extent of a proposed project and local cond be required to provide efficient vehicular projects will be required to satisfy the part code. C. Housing: The proposed zon growth nor displace existing housing unit; Department is pursuing statewide grant fund improve the appearance, play opportunities parks. n FURTHER FINDS AND DETERMINES Rosemead General Plan as follows: ;signation will remain as Open Space or (8) City parks to be consistent with City Ba. The General Plan Open Space and Signed to support public facilities, including >nsistent with the current land uses of the nicipal Code. According to the Zoning Table LU -2) of the General Plan, the Open i the Open Space zone and all zones are designation. traffic and transportation depend on the 1s. Each new proposed park project will ess to the site. Furthermore, all park requirements outlined in the municipal change will not induce new population or people. The Parks and Recreation ig for renovations to City parks, which will efficiency, safety, and accessibility to the Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 Page 7 of 23 D. Resource Management: Any Zone Change would be located in a develo in any impact upon natural resources. P provide adequate landscaped areas in the o E. Noise: The proposed deve impacts to noise levels for the surrounding shall be required to comply with the City's P F. Public Safety: There will not t a result of the Zone Change, so the need fi impacted. Instead, the improvements will opportunities, efficiency, safety, and acce Rosemead is located in Flood Zone C (flc from any flood hazard designations. SECTION 4. The Planning Comm CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL of Zone Chang of eight (8) City parks to the O -S (Open IS zone change will bring the zoning designati City's General Plan goals and policies, as r( will be affected by this zone change: Ange 032 -903), Garvey Park (Assessor Parcel N 5287 - 020 -904), Guess Park (Assessor Pa Park (Assessor Parcel Numbers: 5282022• (Assessor Parcel Number: 8592 - 018 -902), S 5389 -001 -903), Triangle Park (Assessor Pa Park (Assessor Parcel Numbers: 5288 -005 005 - 804,5288- 005 -805, and 5288 - 005 -806). SECTION 5. This resolution is the Commission March 1, 2010 by the following YES: NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: posed development resulting from this urban area, and as such, will not result )sed developments will be required to II site plan. nent will not generate any permanent �a. All construction activities to the parks icipal Code. a new increase in population or density as more public safety and public areas is not gnificantly improve the appearance, play Jbility to the parks. The entire City of I insurance is not mandatory) and is free ion HEREBY RECOMMENDS TO THE 10 -01 to change the zoning classification ace) zoning designation. The proposed 1 of these parks into consistency with the luired by State law. The following parks is Park (Assessor Parcel Number: 5283 - mber: 5287 - 020 -900, 5287 - 020 -903, and ;el Number: 5389 - 004 -800), Klingerman 70 and 5282 - 022 -271), Rosemead Park ly Tanner Park (Assessor Parcel Number: el Number: 5281 - 032 -900), and Zapopan 100, 5288 - 005 -801, 5288 - 005 -802, 5288- It of an action taken by the Planning Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 Paqe 8 of 23 SECTION 6. The secretary shall cel tify shall transmit copies of same to the applicant and PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED thi; I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true ci Commission of the City of Rosemead at its 2010 by the following vote: YES: NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: to the adoption of this resolution and the Rosemead City Clerk. 1st day of March, 2010. Diana Herrera, Chairwoman TION of a resolution adopted by the Planning filar meeting, held on 15t day of March, Stan Wong, Secretary Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 Page 9 of 23 Exh AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COU APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 11 CLASSIFICATION OF EIGHT (8) C SPACE) ZONING DESIGNATION. 1 AFFECTED BY THIS ZONE CHANT 032 -903), GARVEY PARK (APNs: 5287 - 020 -904), GUESS PARK (AF PARK (APNs: 5282022 -270 and 4 (APN: 8592 - 018 -902), SALLY TAN TRIANGLE PARK (APN: 5281 -032 4 5288 - 005 -800, 5288- 005 -801, 5288• 805, and 5288 - 005 -806). JCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD i -01, AMENDING THE ZONING ITY PARKS TO THE O -S (OPEN HE FOLLOWING PARKS WILL BE ;E: ANGELUS PARK (APN: 5283- 5287- 020 -900, 5287 - 020 -903, and N: 5389 - 004 -800), KLINGERMAN 282 - 022 -271), ROSEMEAD PARK JER PARK (APN: 5389 - 001 -903), 00), and ZAPOPAN PARK (APNs: )05 -802, 5288 - 005 -804, 5288 -005- WHEREAS, the City of Rosemead I has an adopted Zoning Ordinance and associated maps, including specific development standards to control development; and WHEREAS, approval of Zone Char as O -S (Open Space), allowing parks; and . WHEREAS, State Planning and Zor Rosemead Municipal Code authorizes and applications and governs development of p WHEREAS, Section 17.116.010 of authorizes the City Council to approve zorn necessity, convenience, general welfare or and WHEREAS, City of Rosemead policy with the General Plan and promotes separ planning practices; and WHEREAS, on March 1, 2010, considered Zone Change 10 -01 and re the Commission made findings that the impact on the environment; and 10 -01 would designate the eight (8) parks Law, Title 17, and Chapter 17.116 of the s standards for approval of Zone Change e properties; and the City of Rosemead Municipal Code change applications whenever the public 3ood zoning practices justify such action; urages consistency of its Zoning Code of conflicting land uses through good the I City of Rosemead Planning Commission ;ommended approval to the City Council after proposed application will not have a significant WHEREAS, on , tiv to all owners of real property as shown on 300 feet of the real property subject to Zor hundred twenty (520) notices were mailed 1e latest equalized assessment roll within Change 10 -01, a notice was published in Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 Page 10 of 23 the San Gabriel Valley Tribune on February 1b, 2010, and notices were posted in six (6) public locations, specifying the availability of the application, plus the date, time and location of the public hearing pursuant to California Government Code Section 65091(a)(3); and WHEREAS, on March 1, 2010, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to receive testimony, and after hearing all testimonies from the public, the Commission recommended approval to the City Council oflZone Change 10 -01; and WHEREAS, on March 1, 2010, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 10- 04, thereby recommending approval to the City Council of Zone Change 10 -01; and WHEREAS, on the public testimony relative to Zone Change 1 WHEREAS, the City Council has s to them and hereby make the following del Council held a public hearing to receive ; and iently considered all testimony presented ination: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the City Council of the City of Rosemead as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to the City of F Guidelines, it has been determined that the potential significant environmental impact. General Plan update and certified an accc Report (Program EIR) on October 14, 200 program -level assessment of the environm pursuant to land use policy and implemental chapters of the updated General Plan, as H General Plan through a revised Zoning Coc the Program EIR, and pursuant to Publi Guidelines sections 15162, 15168 and 15 additional environmental documentation be p :)semead's CEQA Procedures and CEQA adoption of this ordinance will not have a The Rosemead City Council adopted a npanying Program Environmental Impact . The certified Program EIR provided a !ntal impacts resulting from development :)n of the goals and policies set forth in all ;II as the long -term implementation of the Zone Change 10 -01 is consistent with Resources Code 21083.3 and CEQA 83 is exempt from the requirement that epared. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Rosemead HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES AND DECLARES that changing the zoning classification of these eight (8) parks to O -S (Open Space) will bring the zoning designation into consistency with the City's General Plan. Section 3. The City Council FURTHER FINDS that Zone Change 10 -01 meets the City's goals and objectives as follows: I A. Land Use: The General Plan designation will remain as Open Space or Public Facilities and will allow for the eight, (8) City parks to be consistent with City Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 Page 11 of 23 codes and land uses in the surrounding ai Public Facilities land use designations are de parks. The proposed zoning of the site is c City of Rosemead's General Plan and Mi Ordinance /General Plan Consistency Matrix Space land use designation is consistent wil permitted under the Public Facilities land use B. Circulation: Potential impacts extent of a proposed project and local cond be required to provide efficient vehicular projects will be required to satisfy the party code. 3. The General Plan Open Space and gned to support public facilities, including isistent with the current land uses of the icipal Code. According to the Zoning able LU -2) of the General Plan, the Open the Open Space zone and all zones are esianation. traffic and transportation depend on the 1s. Each new proposed park project will ess to the site. Furthermore, all park requirements outlined in the municipal C. Housing: The proposed zone change will not induce new population growth nor displace existing housing units or people. The Parks and Recreation Department is pursuing statewide grant funding for renovations to City parks, which will improve the appearance, play opportunities, efficiency, safety, and accessibility to the parks. D. Resource Management: Any Zone Change would be located in a develol in any impact upon natural resources. P provide adequate landscaped areas in the o' E. Noise: The proposed develc impacts to noise levels for the surrounding shall be required to comply with the City's M F. Public Safety: There will not t a result of the Zone Change, so the need f, impacted. Instead, the improvements will opportunities, efficiency, safety, and acce Rosemead is located in Flood Zone C (flc from any flood hazard designations. Section 4. The City Council HER change the zoning classification of eight (8) designation. The proposed zone change parks into consistency with the City's Gen( State law. The following parks will be aff (Assessor Parcel Number: 5283 - 032 -903) 5287 - 020 -900, 5287 - 020 -903, and 5287 - Number: 5389 - 004 -800), Klingerman Park posed development resulting from this urban area, and as such, will not result sed developments will be required to II site plan. tent will not generate any permanent a. All construction activities to the parks cipal Code. a new increase in population or density as more public safety and public areas is not gnificantly improve the appearance, play Jbility to the parks. The entire City of I insurance is not mandatory) and is free BY APPROVES Zone Change 10 -01, to :ity parks to the O -S (Open Space) zoning rill bring the zoning designation of these iI Plan goals and policies, as required by ,ted by this zone change: Angelus Park Garvey Park (Assessor Parcel Number: ?0 -904), Guess Park (Assessor Parcel Assessor Parcel Numbers: 5282022 -270 Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 Page 12 of 23 and 5282 - 022 -271), Rosemead Park (Asse Tanner Park (Assessor Parcel Number: 538 Number: 5281 - 032 -900), and Zapopan Park 5288 - 005 - 801,5288- 005 - 802,5288- 005 -804 Section 5. If any section, subsection, is for any reason held to be invalid by a coi shall not affect the validity of the remaining K of the City of Rosemead HEREBY DECLAR Ordinance No. 867 and each and all provisic one or more of said provisions may be declai Section 6. The City Clerk shall ce PASSED AND APPROVED, this ATTEST: GLORIA MOLLEDA, City Clerk >or Parcel Number: 8592 - 018 -902), Sally 001 -903), Triangle Park (Assessor Parcel Assessor Parcel Numbers: 5288 - 005 -800, 5288 - 005 -805, and 5288 - 005 -806). sentence, clause or word of this ordinance rt of competent jurisdiction, such decision )rtions of this Ordinance. The City Council :S that it would have passed and adopted is thereof, irrespective of the fact that any A to be invalid. the passage of this Ordinance. 2010. Margaret Clark, Mayor Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 Paqe 13 of 23 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) CITY OF ROSEMEAD ) I Gloria Molleda, City Clerk of the City of foregoing Ordinance No. 887 being: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COU APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 1 CLASSIFICATION OF EIGHT (8) ( SPACE) ZONING DESIGNATION. 1 AFFECTED BY THIS ZONE CHAN, 032 -903), GARVEY PARK (APNs: 5287 - 020 -904), GUESS PARK (AI PARK (APNs: 5282022 -270 and ! (APN: 8592 - 018 -902), SALLY TAN TRIANGLE PARK (APN: 5281 -032 -! 5288 - 005 -800, 5288 - 005 -801, 5288• 805, and 5288 - 005 -806). Ordinance 887 was duly introduced and plat of the City Council on the was duly adopted and passed, by the followir AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: do hereby certify that the JCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD -01, AMENDING THE ZONING ITY PARKS TO THE O -S (OPEN -IE FOLLOWING PARKS WILL BE iE: ANGELUS PARK (APN: 5283- 5287- 020 -900, 5287 - 020 -903, and N: 5389 - 004 -800), KLINGERMAN 282 - 022 -271), ROSEMEAD PARK JER PARK (APN: 5389 - 001 -903), DO), and ZAPOPAN PARK (APNs: )05 -802, 5288 - 005 -804, 5288 -005- :ed upon first reading at a regular meeting 2010, and that thereafter, said Ordinance q vote, to wit: Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 Page 14 of 23 .1c" Zone Change 10 -01 Sally Tanner Park (R -3 to O-S) " "'n P� Rosemead Park (R -1 to O-S) 0.52 Ac. �� �.,,a 19.23Ac. Guess Park (A -1 to O-S) 0.30 Ac. Garvey Park (Al to 0.S) 12.62Ac. s Angelus Park (M-1 D to O-S) 0.10 Ac. 0 1.000 2.000 4.000 6.000 U Zapopan Park (C -3 and R -2 to O-S) 6.76 Ac. Klingarman Park (R -1 to O-S) 0.68 Ac. Triangle Park (R -1 to O -S) 0.21 Ac. N, E )0: Feet g, Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 Pace 15 of 23 Exhibit "D" Table 12 -2 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Consistency Correspinding Existing Zone General Plan Land Use Categort; Districts (1) R -1 LDR 1,A)wDen0y Residential P -D \[DR \4ediunl DensilrResidential R-2 P -D R -3 HDR High Densily Residential P -O D -O C -1 P -D C Conlniercial C -3 P CBD D -O CBD P \IRC. \'lined -Use- RC - \I D -O ReSidenIiaUconlnlei " "clal P -D V -\1 \4ised -Use- CBD P \IHRC High Densils RC - \l D -O Re idenliab'coiltirtereial P -D V -\I CI -\1 Mic \Iixcd- Ilse- liuiustrial(Cnaurtcr ial P -D `_;I P C- 5 P -D 0111 Office /Light Industrial P -O D -O \4 -1 PF Public Facilities All7oncs OS Open Space: - Natural Resnurces O -S CF\I Cenleler O -S (1) This table compares the General Plan land'use categories with the existing zoning districts and overlay districts. It is anticipated that the Zoning Ordinance will be updated and these zoning districts, shown here, may be changed. Note: Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 Pace 16 of 23 Exhibit "E" _ T ��� 5369 Sy'a.'NXL)'6 Ate_ N i K CGRANG a - ,}iGABReLi a REPUT ° RICHAR0.50M5 TRACT BEA$i;�r; I :3W NiCY�M1 s - � I hl iii _ I • l IO MT$ � 1 116 Y `. PG v ♦N i !7 Iv`P- K ^rw.Pp NJxIV�,'f"i M` a9 .^ i If '(B `•< w P I � M4v ^35^PIONRix MrJLPYP6AGIlR IJA+i KYL6VlRWPMNIYR9f '+RNIKLMFIIMFAi 4S LTIPRRWSBSPiL'JP�NRW [PCB AT]IMrR WM.ORIIPY. d1Y42OM'NtY I _ - 'J ' V. Pvx.araaza.�wxluv..aln BR R�, 1 1NiHC: C]IWMNG iAPe30� C /L6I¢ 5'721 I •�•'iGitiv�•••- Y 1 ��• -�M�1: •,v^:J IPKI UI Y l T41 ggI,51 � a NIEA BNBf SW ) — Sally Tanner M$S =N I ='NT. IS J \ 0 Park ' ni9 Q43 I i I ... .. .. _. ... .. — wunrr a ms Pnuuu. uul, 5389 4 Guess Park o I / ,Ng1J23T OWE �fso•. e•n.: y1w � ® a - cr ,.. yny os- w6.• O 0 ,W .0 i to y tl 5373 t o 'Q' i 6 Qc A i 5 6 aun lur.. xw MY �V n.;.., 2� 7 J i i crm• af� J 337LLAn •,Ye' r a` I o� mOC TPX7 N] 15027 MB 315 - 27 -20 8219 TPAR NDJ5954 µB. 352.39 -11p TWN016120 M.B. 303-21-25 � MN. LL6xT R[. IJtE•PED YMVEY0113 MAP 1.130 -2-tt n � nu•: 24 25 � ua•. vx- 2j 22 Q 0 O AV0 i N IS 16 n 0 IB 19 �13 CI IO I O�a ©1 e . AVE y i 0K S3J2 yst w gMINIT 7 L%3.90.65. MIF. c Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 Pace 18 of 23 8592 1a �.I too' 2001 CODE LM (' Z nn < Z v I .I I W e ao.t x :_ D t E cow's �Jy+ N c o e7u�r_ Q L. 5. 6-:772 W w W 0 0 NIJ e l A I{ Rf(e � tea. A . W. 6522 -32 !.S 36-J6 TRACT NO 1812 0, M. B. 20- 193 > J 3V:5: I vTm PIiKIN 6', I 12 I 7w rxs< U� i r RIO DELL 51 W" 3 :n7 Ross es B•2117 1 121• P r3•fl 1.6-61 ,.Zee ^,r Rosemead Park Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 5 2 00 6 �J Zapopan Park I4' ff.n a: vi. M, fn fdiwnTe � k .l.I 1.�E 4p, elm dln..i.. uM{ 39R —N— 3981 EARLE 9 I v(� If 3 U ®•. se A n•H i Y I i I i fc f4 TV. .3. QI I DELTA n W 9 AVE ANGELUS _ AVE- t.,,,,, �.l P n O Q 0 O.ufn 31 1 I :28 R9f H6 1 m I ( ILT1�y ro 1 14. 37r li i. 6u - 33 �•L oa. 3 -, _ _ _ I I u+i - n } 3986 7RACTH0.66TT N. B. 74 -12 CFURLOTTE AVE . OCT D} ifM P9LY, ciSf'� xi: LICENSED SURVEYOR'$ NAP L3.3046 -20 AS scS OP frr- f:At.ff AANCEL NAP __ _�' lA- :i9 _�Q CWM1nT OF LOS bN0ELE5; C4Lti. Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 Page 20 of 23 5287 120 5287 21 9 ST 3[1 114411 av 114 I11>r) ••-- GOIN EMERSON PE. Y LANDS OF THE SAN GABRIEL IMPROVEMENT COMPANY ,.......... M.R. 54- 71- 72 1 � .11 P a IWVI. m.1. 9.66' Iv Ra. LOT a Garvey Park EMERSON PE. Y LANDS OF THE SAN GABRIEL IMPROVEMENT COMPANY ,.......... M.R. 54- 71- 72 1 � .11 P a IWVI. m.1. Planning Commission Meeting March 1. 2010 5283 2 Angelus / '/PG Park l9gS/ pppRl 1m N2 - -,�j m I � vaa •E I s:.aa TB - i 69 IYI TI AVER R 1 %. PG I n 33 — Y i I I . 1 m m t - I I- 14 BK ..I. ,' PL1 347.15.16 * 5279 qT r; •RR -a N wu - " wm 1, I Y _ m s 3MR TO a69 - 11" d � ��TRACT N019971 rrohm MB 116.45 -46 —' 0111 i149 M MR ww'ANGELUS e e Angelus / '/PG Park l9gS/ pppRl 1m N2 - -,�j m I � vaa •E I s:.aa TB - i 69 IYI TI AVER R 1 %. PG I n 33 — Y i I I . 1 m m t - I I- 14 BK ..I. ,' PL1 347.15.16 * 5279 qT r; •RR -a N wu - " wm 1, I Y _ m s 3MR TO a69 - 11" d � ��TRACT N019971 rrohm MB 116.45 -46 —' 0111 i149 Planning Commission Meeting March 1, 2010 Page 22 of 23 i5281 j 32 SLIt[ 1• = ioa 1439 • 6elT 6433 wx No 195 r% REV. r53M'T XF IF �E7 POMONA FRWY TRACT N0 701 141115•110-111 PARCEL MAP - - - PM 20.69 PARCFI. MAP PM 22 -99 TRACr NO 36455 1A0.9R541a l I 0 IY 3"- rr50rn- a n 4i o-uLa NO SCALE I 1n Ll a TAIL A NO SCALE uanr� 1SWegie arrntol veers Ne3�i WAmn A wSFHV CO,TY OF LOS ANGELFS. EAIJT.