CDC - Item 3A - The Glendon Hotel - Request for ProposalROSEMEAD COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
TO: THE HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSION MEMBERS
FROM: JEFF ALLRED, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
DATE: MARCH 9, 2010
SUBJECT: THE GLENDON HOTEL- REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)
SUMMARY
On July 2, 2008, the Rosemead Community Development Commission acquired the
Glendon Hotel (formerly known as the Rosemead Inn) located at 8832 Glendon Way for
$4.4 million using non-restricted tax increment dollars to fund the transaction.
Immediately following the purchase of the property, proposals were solicited from
reputable companies specializing in hotel operations thereby continuing the operation of
the hotel while a long term development plan for the site was finalized. The
Commission selected Rosemead Inn Hotel Partners, LLC as the operator for the hotel.
The purchase of the Glendon Hotel was originally part of an overall larger
redevelopment project (the Glendon Way Project). However, the Commission is no
longer working on a conceptual development plan for the Glendon Way Project and the
property is no longer needed for the purposes for which it was acquired. Due to the
interest by the development community to acquire vacant parcels of land for the
purpose of development in the City a Request for Proposal (RFP) to sell the Glendon
Hotel is being proposed.
Staff Recommendation
It is recommended that the Community Development Commission authorize staff to
advertise and solicit bids from qualified entities for the purchase of the Glendon Hotel
property through a Request for Proposal (RFP) process.
ANALYSIS
The Glendon Hotel site is an operational 53-room motel (22,507 sq. ft.) on a property
consisting of approximately 39,030 square feet. Since acquiring the property, the hotel
has operated at a loss. The Commission has not received any monthly lease payments
and the City has only received $16,867.67 in Tenant Occupancy Tax (TOT).
The original proposed development for which the Commission acquired the property is
no longer viable and the property is now considered surplus. R. P. Laurain &
Associates has been retained to conduct an appraisal of the property to determine its
current date-of value. The completed appraisal report will be available to the
APPROVED FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA: ITEM NO. ' )
Community Development Commission
March 10, 2010
Pace 2 of 2
Commission in the near future. In the meantime, an RFP could be issued soliciting an
experienced and qualified developer who has the potential and financial capacity to
purchase the subject site for the existing land use or demonstrate the ability to obtain
re-zoning for other uses. ,
FISCAL ANALYSIS
The sale of the property would generate onetime revenues for the Commission. There
is also the possibility of future tax increment or TOT depending on the use.
PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS
This item has been noticed according to the California Health and Safety Code Section
33490.
Prepared by:
Michelle.G. Ramirez
Economic Development Administrator
Submitted by:
Stan Wong
Community Development Director
Attachment A: Request for Proposal
ROSEMEAD
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
8832 GLENDON WAY
SUBMITTALS:
Seven (7) bound copies, one (1) unbound reproducible copy,
and one (1) electronic/digital copy of the proposal in a sealed
envelope must be received by the City of Rosemead's City
Clerk's Office by no later than Tuesday. April 6, 2010 at 5:00
p•m.
CONTACT PERSON:
Michelle Ramirez, Economic Development Manager
Rosemead Community Development Commission
8838 E. Valley Boulevard
Rosemead, California 91770
(626) 569-2140
mramirez@cityofrosemead.org
PROPOSALS RECEIVED AFTER THE TIME AND DATE STATED ABOVE SHALL
NOT BE CONSIDERED. FACSIMILE AND E-MAIL PROPOSAL WILL NOT BE
ACCEPTED.
MODIFICATIONS: Any modification of this RFP will be provided to
consultants who request notification of any
modifications.
ISSUANCE DATE:
APPROVED BY:
Stan Wong, Community Development Director
Reserved
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section I.
Introduction
1
Section II.
Site Offering Summary
1
A.
Redevelopment Objectives
1
B.
Owner
1
C.
Property Address
1
D.
Assessor's ID No
1
E.
Property Location
1
F.
Legal Description
1
G.
Site Description
2
H.
Site Dimensions and Area
2
1.
Topography
2
J.
Zoning
2
K.
Access
2
L.
Utilities
2
M.
Allowable Land Use
2
N.
General Plan
2
0.
Design Standards and Guidelines
2
P.
Public Transportation
2
Q.
Development Activity in the Vicinity of the Subject Site
3
Section III.
Site Use Parameters
3
Section IV.
Existing Site Conditions
3
Section V.
Developer/Development Team Obligations
3
Section VI.
Developer/Development Team Information
4
A.
Identification of Development Entity
4
B.
Identification of Developer and Associates
4
C.
Financial Capability
4
D.
Development Experience
5
Section VII.
Submission Requirements
5
A.
Format
5
B.
Quantity
5
C.
Deadline
6
D.
RFP Submission
6
E.
Inquiries
6
F.
Acceptance of Submittals
6
Section VII.
Evaluation and Selection Process
6
Section IX. Reservation of Rights 7
Exhibits
Exhibit A Arial photo of proposed site
Exhibit B Legal Description
Exhibit C Parcel Map
Exhibit D Rosemead Redevelopment Project Areas
Exhibit E Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Executive Summary
Rosemead Community Development Commission
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
SECTION I. INTRODUCTION
The Rosemead Community Development Commission (the "Commission") is seeking
proposals from qualified entities for the purchase of a 53-room motel property. The
property is owned by the Commission and is located at 8832 Glendon Way, Rosemead,
91770-1806.
The intent of this Request for Proposal is to retain an experienced and qualified
Developer who has the potential and financial capacity to purchase the subject site for
the existing land use or demonstrate the ability to obtain re-zoning for other uses. For
this site, the Commission envisions a number of potential uses which include but are not
limited to retail, office, and service uses. Potential respondents shall submit a
comprehensive proposal that includes the experience of the Development team, level of
responsibilities within the Development team, preliminary project schedule/obstacles for
developing the site, and a conceptual development plan, and offer. In addition to
demonstrated and adequate experience, the selected developer must have the
necessary financial capabilities to purchase the property. The submission requirements
are shown under Section VII.
SECTION II. SITE OFFERING SUMMARY
A. Redevelopment Objectives - Consistent with the vision and strategy for the
Rosemead Redevelopment Plan and the City of Rosemead's General Plan, it is the
objective of the Rosemead Community Development Commission to encourage the
development of retail, office, and service uses that serve local and regional needs.
B. Owner-The Rosemead Community Development Commission
C. Property Address - The subject site is located at 8832 Glendon Way, Rosemead,
91770-1806 (see Exhibit A)
D. Assessor's ID. No - 5390-018-904
E. Property Location - Southwest corner Glendon Way and Ivar Avenue
F. Legal Description -see Exhibit B
G. Site Description - The site consists of one parcel totaling 39,030 square feet (see
Exhibit C). There is presently an operational 53-room motel (22,507 sq. ft. per
Rosemead Building Permits) on the site.
H. Site Dimensions and Area - A slightly irregular rectangle with 184.09 feet on
Glendon Way and 202.5 feet on Ivar Avenue. The west property line dimension is
220 feet and the irregular south property line is 184.09 feet. 39,030 (per County
Assessor).
1. Topography - The subject site is essentially flat and level at street grade. There is
a very slight fall to the south and the site appears to drain to the southeast corner.
J. Zoning - The current zoning designation for the subject property is C3-D, medium
commercial with a design overlay (certain building improvements may require
Planning Commission approval). The project is located within Redevelopment
Project Area No. 2 (see Exhibit D).
K. Access - The subject site is located approximately, 10 miles east of downtown Los
Angeles, 30 miles east of the Los Angeles International Airport and approximately
30 miles west of Ontario International Airport. Interstate 10 provides access from
both of the major airports. Eastbound and westbound travelers from Interstate 10
can access the subject property via the Rosemead Boulevard exit, heading north
on Rosemead and making a left turn on to Glendon Way. The property is located
on the south side of Glendon Way, less than one mile from the Rosemead exit.
Glendon Way is a local street with a 60-foot wide right-of-way. The asphalt paved
street section has one traffic lane in each direction, parallel parking lanes and
concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk. Ivar is a local street with a 52- foot wide right-
of-way. The street improvements are virtually identical to those on Glendon Way.
At the point where Ivar Avenue makes its T-intersection with Glendon Way there is
a stop sign.
L. Utilities - All required public utilities services and sanitary sewer are installed in
the adjacent public rights-of-way and connected to the subject site.
M. Allowable Land Use - The Rosemead General Plan and Zoning Ordinance calls
for compatible development consisting of retail, office and service uses.
N. General Plan - The City of Rosemead is in the midst of a comprehensive General
Plan update. Anticipated completion of this project is spring of 2010. The
proposed updated General Plan will encourage a mix of retail, office, and service
uses.
0. Design Standards and Guidelines - Design standards and guidelines are
discussed in M and N above. Additional guidance will be provided by the City's
Planning Division and Architectural Review Committee.
2
P. Public Transportation - The subject site is served by the Metropolitan
Transportation Authority (MTA) and Foothill Transit.
Q. Development Activity in the Vicinity of the Subject Site - There are several
projects in various stages of planning and approval including: 1) an approved
39,703 square foot upscale health and fitness gym at 8920 Glendon Way (former
Levitz property); 2) an approved seven (7) unit multi-family residential development
totaling 8,711 square feet at 8907 Glendon Way; and 3) an approved 13,969
square-foot Fresh and Easy Neighborhood Market at the southeast corner of Valley
and Rosemead Boulevard.
SECTION III. SITE USE PARAMETERS
The subject site permitted uses include a broad range of retail, office, and service uses
that serve local and regional needs. Specifically prohibited uses include any type of
warehousing, manufacturing, or industrial uses.
Development approaches can include multi-story structures with underground or
structured parking. Subject site abuts residential neighborhoods. As a result, proposed
development must be designed with sensitivities to the residential uses in terms of
massing, siting of parking and loading facilities, and lighting.
Other important factors include:
Objective of the revitalization effort to create a network of pedestrian spaces and
pathways which serve as extensions of the sidewalk and the public realm,
providing amenities for shoppers, residents and visitors,
➢ Creation of signature urban design elements,
➢ Integration of new and surrounding land uses,
➢ Project market feasibility,
➢ Timing and phasing, and
Financing and public participation.
SECTION IV. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
The existing street adjacent to the subject site is Ivar Avenue on the east, a vacant
23,500 square foot parcel (8828 Glendon Way, Rosemead) for-sale on the west,
Glendon Way on the north, and a U-Haul Business (3527 Ivar Avenue, Rosemead) on
the south. The Commission would consider proposals that include the City of
Rosemead granting a permanent parking easement over the adjoining portion of Ivar
Avenue with the understanding that the potential buyer would grant the property at 3527
Ivar Avenue an access easement.
3
SECTION V. DEVELOPER/DEVELOPMENT TEAM OBLIGATIONS
Each developer/participant will be required to provide a summary description of the
development proposal for the site. The response shall include a summary description of
the proposed development, land uses, approximate building area and pedestrian
amenities. A conceptual site plan shall also be included which illustrates the positioning
of structures and uses on the site and pedestrian courtyards and spaces for public
gathering.
SECTION VI. DEVELOPER/DEVELOPMENT TEAM INFORMATION
All responses to this request for RFP must include the following information describing
the development team.
A. Identification of Development Entity - The Commission will accept responses
from entities and/or a combination of entities including, but not limited to, private
corporations, for-profit developers, non-profit developers and private individuals.
Joint ventures or partnerships formed for the purpose of strengthening team
qualifications are acceptable. Legal and financial development entities formed for
the development will provide a description of its legal and financial responsibilities
and liabilities as part of the submittal package.
Responses to this RFP shall describe the development firm's past experience and
expertise on similar projects (size, mixed use, type, etc.). Overall, the response
shall provide a description of the development team's approach to this project. In
addition, the proposal shall include a preliminary development budget and
stabilized operating proforma. The proposal must include preliminary conceptual
proformas that identify all pertinent costs associated with the cost of development
(development proforma) and operations (operating proforma). The proposal must
clearly identify all assumptions, sources of costs information, projected debt
service, project deficit (gap), NOI, etc.
B. Identification of Developer and Associates - The response to this RFP shall
include the following information with respect to the Developer and associate
members of the team:
• Name, address, telephone, e-mail and fax number of the development entity.
Responses shall identify a specific contact person(s).
• Identification and organization of development entity (individual, company,
corporation, partnership, joint venture, etc.)
• Identification of principals of the development organization (e.g. corporate
officers, principal stockholders, general and limited partners) and manager
responsible for the project.
• Indicate any relationship the development entity may have with a parent
corporation, subsidiaries, joint ventures or other entities.
4
Identification of the roles and expertise of the development team. For example;
architectural firm, principal associates or consultants to work with the
development team on the project.
C. Financial Capability - The response to this RFP shall include the following
information with respect to the Developer and associate members of the team:
• Copies of annual reports, financial rating reports or other documents indicating
the financial condition of the development entity.
• Statement indicating how the development entity proposes to finance the
project. The statement should show the proposed source(s) of financing.
• List of names, addresses, and references of bank(s) and/or financial
institutions the development team may utilize. To support the proposal, a letter
of recommendation from the development entity's bank would be helpful in
assessing qualifications.
D. Development Experience - The response to this RFP shall include the following
information with respect to the Developer and associate members of the team:
• Provide a list of similar projects in which the developer and team have
participated. The list should include, but is not limited to, a description of the
project's location, type, size, design features and development time frame.
• Identify the development teams past experience in working with a local
community and city to arrive at development concept consensus.
• Submit descriptions and illustrations of the proposed architect's work on
development projects that have been built or are under construction. These
should be similar in scale and mix of uses if possible.
• Identify the development teams past experience and explain each person's role
and expertise in areas such as development, leasing, architecture, project
financing, marketing, community consensus building and project management.
Identify the overall team leader responsible for coordinating the project.
Describe experience in the ownership and management of completed projects.
• Provide any other relevant information regarding the ability of the developer
and the development team to complete projects of this size, caliber and scope.
SECTION VII. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
A. Format - Submissions shall be 8 Y2 " x 11" in size. Illustrations, graphs, charts and
renderings may be submitted; size shall not be larger than 11" x 17". Color prints
are acceptable.
B. Quantity - Seven (7) bound copies of your proposal, one (1) unbound reproducible
copy, and one (1) electronic/digital copy of the proposal in sealed envelope(s) that
shall be clearly marked:
5
"SEALED PROPOSAL FOR 8832 GLENDON WAY, ROSEMEAD - DO NOT
OPEN WITH REGULAR MAIL."
In addition, bid price must be submitted to the Commission in a separate sealed
envelope.
C. Deadline - Tuesday, April 6, 2010 at 5:00 P.M. Proposals received after the due
date/time will be returned unopened.
D. RFP Submission materials shall be sent to:
Rosemead Community Development Commission
City Clerk's Office
8838 E. Valley Boulevard
Rosemead, California 91770
Attention: Michelle Ramirez, Economic Development Manager
Faxed or e-mailed proposals will not be accepted. Hand carried proposals will be
accepted before the response due date/time at the address above during normal
business hours of 7:00 a.m. through 6:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday. The
City of Rosemead is closed on Fridays.
E. Inquiries - For additional information, please contact Michelle Ramirez, Economic
Development Manager at (626) 569-2158.
F. Acceptance of Submittals - At its sole discretion, the Commission may, for any
reason, reject any and all submittals. The Commission may reject incomplete
submittals if, in its judgment, the submittal lacks information adequate and
complete enough to allow for the effective evaluation of the submittal
SECTION VIII. EVALUATION AND SELECTION PROCESS
Concurrent with the submittal of responses to the RFP, an evaluation panel comprised
of Commission staff will be formed. The panel will review and evaluate the responses
to the RFP and make recommendations for a short list of development teams deemed
qualified to purchase the 8832 Glendon Way property. Subsequently, it is anticipated
that these teams could be asked to present their proposed development concepts to the
panel and possibly the Rosemead Community Development Commission.
The major criteria for selecting an entity will be the submission of an economically
sound proposal that incorporates efficient use of the site and complies with the
objectives stated previously. A qualified entity is an individual or legal entity which, in
the opinion of Commission staff, possesses the experience and financial resources
necessary to successfully undertake and complete the development of the site within
the requirements of federal, state, and local laws and regulations.
The ultimate selection of the preferred proposal rests with the Commission. The
evaluation panel will make recommendations to the Commission for their consideration
as part of the evaluation and selection process. The recommended proposal will be the
basis for the possible commencement of an escrow for the sale of the subject site. The
following evaluation criteria will be used to evaluate the responses and proposals:
6
1. Demonstrated experience in development/management of similar projects
2. Financial capability of developer/development team
3. Proposed use development concept/consistency with Rosemead Redevelopment
Plan and the City of Rosemead's General Plan
4. Proposed schedule
SECTION IX. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
The Rosemead Community Development Commission reserves, and may exercise the
right to request one or more of the Proposers to provide additional material, clarification,
confirmation or modification of any information in their submission. In addition, the
Commission can supplement, amend, substitute, cancel, or otherwise modify this
Request for Proposal anytime prior to or after the selection of one or more developers.
This Request for Proposal does not constitute or guarantee the commencement of an
escrow for the sale of the subject site by the Rosemead Community Development
Commission
PLEASE NOTE: PROPERTY WILL BE SOLD "AS IS"
Prospective candidates are hereby notified that the Community Development
Department has conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment that is available
for review (see Exhibit E for Executive Summary). Each firm is encouraged to conduct
its own due diligence regarding the environmental condition of the property and is
notified that the property may be the subject of environmental contamination. The
Rosemead Community Development Commission makes absolutely no warranty or
representation regarding the environmental conditions of the site offered within this
Request for Proposal.
7
Reserved
8
EXHIBIT A
4
g ~ 231 ft
N CityGIS
Copyright O 2006 All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein is the proprietary property of the
contributor supplied under license and may not be approved except as licensed by Digital Map Products.
EXHIBIT B
/I
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
EXHIBIT "A"
PARCEL l
THE NORTHERLY 220 FEET OF THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE EAST 184.09 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF LOT 3,
BLOCK 7, OF ROSEMEAD, IN THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE(S) 114 AND 115 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOW:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3, THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID
LOT, SOUTH 890 10' WEST 84.09 FEET TO A POINT IN THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE STORM DRAIN
RIGHT OF WAY, SHOWN ON RECORDER'S FILED MAP NO. 510, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG
SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE NORTH 40° 01'55" WEST 678,43 FEETTO A POINT IN THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF
THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR ROAD PURPOSE, RECORDED IN
BOOK 105, PAGE 237, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, NORTH
890 10' EAST 512.50 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE SLANG SAID
EASTERLY LINE, SOUTH 9° 58' 30" EAST 525 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID MEASUREMENTS BEING MADE ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND, AND THE
EAST AND WEST LINES OF THE PROPERTY HEREBY CONVEYED BEING PARALLELTO THE EAST LINE OF THE
ABOVE DESCRIBED LOT 3.
EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 50 FEET OF THE NORTHERLY 100 FEET, AND THE EASTERLY 45 FEET OF THE
SOUTHERLY 120 FEET THEREOF.
PARCEL 2:
THE NORTHERLY 220 FEET OF THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE EAST 184.09 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF LOT 3
IN BLOCK 7 OF ROSEMEAD, IN THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 PAGE(S) 114 AND 115 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE SLANG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID
LOT, SOUTH 09° 10' WEST 84.09 FEET TO A POINT IN THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE STORM DRAIN
RIGHT OF WAY SHOWN AS RECORDER'S FILED MAP NO. 310, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG
SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE NORTH 400 01'55" WEST 678.43 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF
THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO SAID COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR ROAD PURPOSES, RECORDED
IN BOOK 105, PAGE 237 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE
NORTH 89° 10' EAST 512.50 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE ALONG SAID
EASTERLY LINE, SOUTH 0° 58' 30" EAST 525 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID MEASUREMENT BEING MADE ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND AND THE
EAST AND WEST LINES OF THE PROPERTY HEREBY CONVEYED BEING PARALLELTO THE EAST LINE OFTHE
ABOVE DESCRIBED LOT 3.
EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 50 FEAT OF THE NORTHERLY 100 FEET AND THE WESTERLY 55 FEET OF THE
SOUTHERLY 120 FEET THEREOF.
PARCEL 3
THAT PORTION OF LOT 3, BLOCK 7 OF ROSEMEAD, IN THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21, PAGE(S) 114 AND 115 OF MAPS, IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOW:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3: THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID
LOT, SOUTH 89° 10' WEST 84.09 FEET TO A POINT IN THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE STORM DRAIN
RIGHT OF WAY SHOWN ON THE RECORDER'S FILED MAP NO. 310., IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNT(
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 0'50'30" WEST PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT,
525 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED OF SAID COUNTY
OF LOS ANGELES, FOR ROAD PURPOSES, RECORDED IN BOOK 105, PAGE 237, OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE
QTA Prelbninary Report Pomt - Modified (11117/06)
D(HIBCF"A"(continued)
ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE NORTH 89° 10' EAST 84.09 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID
LOT 3; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE SOUTH 0° 50'30 EAST 525 FEEFTO THE POINTOF BEGINNING.
EXCEPT THEREFROM THE SOUTH 382.5 FEAT THEREOF.
PARCEL 4:
THE NORTH 60 FEET OF THE SOUTH 382.5 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF LOT 3, BLOCK 7, OF ROSEMEAD, IN
THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 21, PAGE(S) 114 AND 115 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS;
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID
LOT, SOUTH 890 10' WEST 84.09 FEET TO A POINT IN THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE STORM DRAIN
RIGHT OF WAY SHOWN ON RECORDER'S FILED MAP NO. 310, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER
OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 0° 50'30" WEST PARALLELTO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 525 FEETTO
A POINT IN THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED OF SAID COUNTY OF LOS
ANGELES FOR ROAD PURPOSES RECORDED IN BOOK 105, PAGE 237, OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE ALONG
SAID SOUTHERLY LINE NORTH 890 10' EAST 84.09 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3;
THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE SOUTH 00 58' 30" EAST 525 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
APN: 5390-018-031
CLTA Ptlimi Report F..-Medifed(11/17/06)
Reserved
EXHIBIT C
p2
~
wow
~0
LLz0
a
o°
'
I ,
I~
OS
Z9l
C
m
~
09
m N N
m N
a
~
}
Q
m
I
~
°o O 0929L
n
I
a0
(h °
I
N
O
O
w
F_
fi9'9CZ N.94.64.0 N
~ 90'bZZ M.44.fiS.0 N
m _
.
S.O N n ~'J n
m
I
$
Um~
r
m
O~
F-
U 09'Z9L
0S 'Z92
z
_
m
I
a d,
m
m
K $ (D
6 °'p
°
0
F-
m
~
mol Z.
N
~
9V LVZ
avnl
m
~9AV
I z
M..069S.ON
LN19 t 1013NI13
'
'
LSL !
09
}
I W
ZOZ -
OS
I
W m
02
I$
Z6n,
z
~I~
h
O
I Q
u7
m
os'c~i O
0
I-
0y m
a--
N
~
I
rr
NN
Q OZZ
r
~L
L- m
Qy
1
01
N
~
oS
m
O
M
^
d'
m LL1 O¢
~
OS X04
3
Y
m
o o
°
N
m
m !n
~ ~PS
_
°
o m
Cam'^- 9l'OZE
„
-
,ay/
W~O
°
~
q
~ O3
9/
O
Z
z
^50 /0' 9Zi
O
LU
40'C9L /
I
9g
9
J
.
M1~+
rm=
1/no
P
~ E
~
4
I
m
b
I
J~
d m
a~
I
PI C
a
P
~ J
G
5
P
oJG
~J
V
a O
cb M
ASSOISL
O
o„
°r g
M
° aw
O
OJ ~
0
EXHIBIT D
7
t k
Y
ikl-~ I 7~ ~
1 1 lW ~ 3
t J yi
l1
milt, 1, 7.4 j
J71 J y t
k
I t° I dI~ y: I t { I l-' I
I~
-4 fli
cy ~~~LC~TTI~J#7~
a EI i t
,..`.wC 1 3~I-t
I t 9
N
r ~ t ra F~ ~rjl.
12 a I Ir'J: k- [ r ~ ,
I E r j' ~ ~ I `
yi n ~r 1 iy V
r. # ;
l- R a ~ a I. I L 1 J Ilv ! C .1 - f-II
1 -IY i L i CA f1.
F_"~~ ref l:r F3 i .T t v;
i
z 6.
15~'j r 3 Flij 'a
1 ~
1 4
V
-j 7~1
4 II I M~
4 .3
t_
_2
1
~ j
I
a I ~ airici ~ ) I~~
Rosemead Community Development Commission
THE REDEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE ROSEMEAD
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NOS., AND2
PROJECT AREAS MAP
URBAN
mMN e~. Fw...M
FUTURES
IiCORPoRATED
LEGEND
CJ Rosemead City Boundary
- Freeways
- Railroads
Rosemead Redevelopment Projects
Cu project Area No. ,
C7 Proiea Area No.2
N
A
1.000
wo
o
iwt
EXHIBIT E
'I
~I
1
1
1
1
1
1
PHASE I
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Target Property:
8832 Glendon Way
Rosemead, CA 91770
APN 5390-018-031
County of Los Angeles
Submitted to:
Michelle G. Ramirez
Economic Development Administrator
City of Rosemead
8838 E. Valley Blvd.
Rosemead, CA 91770
Prepared by:
Hemphill, Green & Associates LLC.
1001 E. Morton Pl., Suite C
Hemet, CA 92543
(951) 658-0114
Date:
March 25, 2008
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A. Executive Summary
Hemphill, Green & Associates LLC (HGA) has performed a Phase I Environmental
Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard
Practice E1527-05 on the property known as 5390-018-031, Parcel 31 located on the
southwest corner of Glendon Way and Ivar Ave., Rosemead, CA.
GeneraLSite Description:
The subject property is a rectangular shaped parcel
totaling approximately .9 acres. The subject property
is located on the southwest corner of Glendon Way
and Ivar Ave., in the City of Rosemead.
The subject property is currently occupied by The
Rosemead Inn, a fifty-three (53) unit three (3) story
motel. Concrete parking and drive way areas provide
access on the north, east and west sides of the motel
structure.
The subject property is bordered on the north by
Glendon Way, on the south by U Haul Self Storage,
on the west by residential properties and on the east by
Ivar Ave.
Sybject-.Property Use and,
The site is currently a commercial Hotel/Motel known
Operations: -
as the Rosemead Inn.
YEAR
Summary of Historical Subject Property Use
From
The target property was undeveloped land.
approximately
1928 to
approximately
1957
From
Subject site was commercial/residential property.
approximately
1957 to
approximately
1984
APN 5390-018-031 Section I - Executive summary
Rosemead, CA I-1 Hemphill, Green & Associates LLC
~I
~I
~i.
From The subject site has been developed as commercial lodging.
approximately
1984 to
present
Subject Property
Environmental Database
Records:
Geology:
The subject site lies within the northern portion of the
Potrero Grande. The general topographic gradient is to
the south.
Soils:
The sediments upon which the site sits are sandy loam
with deeper gravely - sandy loam.
Hydrology:.
The depth to ground water in the vicinity of the subject
site is greater than 275 feet below ground surface.
FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS
HGA has performed Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the
scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-05 of the site known as APN 5390-
018-031, Parcel 31 Rosemead, CA. the subject property. Any exceptions to, or
deletions from, this practice are describes in Section II of this report. This assessment
has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with
the subject property.
This ESA is subject to the Limitations listed in Section II of this report.
APN 5390-018-031 Section I - Executive Summary
Rosemead, CA 1-2 Hemphill, Green & Associates LLC