Loading...
CC - Item 5A - SB 10 - Safe Routes to School Construction - Internal Files box 069TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL FROM: FRANK G. TRIPEPI, CITY MANAGEZ- DATE: APRIL 24, 2001 RE: SB 10 (SOTO)- SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM; EXTENSION - SUPPORT Attached for the City Council's review are copies of SB 10 (Soto), current bill status, complete bill history, and Senate committee analysis. SB 10 would extend the Safe Routes to School Construction Program, which is due to expire and be repealed on January 1, 2002. Senator Nell Soto, who authored the original Safe Routes to School bill (AB 1475), has requested the City Council's support of SB 10. A copy of her letter requesting Rosemead's support is also attached. A total of 85 projects were funded throughout the state under the first funding cycle. Of the $130 million requested, only $20 million worth of projects were funded due to funding limitations. Rosemead received $120,000 in funding to install a traffic signal at Hellman and Jackson and replace school-zone traffic signage and markings. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council support SB 10 (Soto) and authorize the Mayor to send letters of-eppusitien. S UP f0 /'2 J - (~UNO L AGEfI~DA APR 2 4 2001 ITEM No. SB 10 Senate Bill -AMENDED this state. The commission, the department, boards of supervisors, and city councils are authorized to do ail things necessary in their respective jurisdictions to secure and expend federal funds in accordance with the intent of the federal act and of this chapter. SEC. 2. Section 2331 of the Streets and Highways Code, as added by Section 2 of Chapter 663 of the Statutes of 1999, is repealed. SEC. 3. Section 2333 of the Streets and Highways Code, as amended by Section 3 of Chapter 663 of the Statutes of 1999, is amended to read: 2333. In each annual proposed budget prepared pursuant to Section 165, there shall be included an amount equal to the estimated apportionment available from the federal government for the programs described in Sections 2331 and 2333.5. The commission may allocate a portion of those funds each year for use on city streets and county roads. It is the intent of the Legislature that the commission allocate the total amount received from the federal government for all of the programs described in Sections 2331 and 2333.5 in a manner that, over a period of five years, makes not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) of those funds available for use pursuant to Section 2333.5 and the remaining funds available for use in approximately equal amounts on state highways, local roads, and the program established under Section 2333.5. In addition, it is the intent of the Legislature that the commission shall apportion for use, in financing the railroad grade separation program described in Section 190, a substantial portion of the funds received pursuant to the federal rail-highway crossings program. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the share of any railroad of the cost of maintaining railroad crossing protection facilities funded, in whole or in part, by funds described in Section 2331 shall be the same share it would be if no federal funds were involved and the crossing protection facilities were funded pursuant to an order of the Public Utilities Commission pursuant to Section 1202 of the Public Utilities Code; and in case of dispute, the Public Utilities Commission shall determine that share pursuant to this section. SEC. 4. Section 2333 of the Streets and Highways Code, as added by Section 4 of Chapter 663 of the Statutes of 1999, is repealed. SEC. S. Section 2333.5 of the Streets and Highways Code is amended to read: 2333.5. (a) The department, in consultation with the Department of the California Highway Patrol, shall establish and administer a "Safe Routes to School" construction program pursuant to the authority granted under Section 152 of Title 23 of the United States Code and shall use federal transportation funds for construction of bicycle and pedestrian safety and traffic calming projects. (b) The department shall make grants available to local governmental agencies under the program based on the results of a statewide competition that requires submission of proposals for funding and rates those proposals on all of the following factors: (1) Demonstrated needs of the applicant. (2) Potential of the proposal for reducing child injuries and fatalities. (3) Potential of the proposal for encouraging increased walking and bicycling among students. (4) Identification of safety hazards. (5) Identification of current and potential walking and bicycling routes to school. (6) Consultation and support for projects by school-based associations, local traffic engineers, local elected officials, law enforcement agencies, and school officials. (c) With respect to the use of funds provided in subdivision (a), prior to the award of any construction grant or the department's use of those funds for a "Safe Routes to School" construction project encompassing a freeway, state highway or county road, the department shall consult with, and obtain approval from, the Department of the Page 2 of 3 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_0001-.../sb_10_bill_20010314_amended_sen.htm 4/11/2001 SB 10 Senate Bill - AMENDED California Highway Patrol, ensuring that the "Safe Routes to School" proposal compliments the California Highway Patrol's Pedestrian Corridor Safety Program and is consistent with its statewide pedestrian safety statistical analysis. (d) (1) The department shall study the effectiveness of the program established under this section with particular emphasis on the program's effectiveness in reducing traffic accidents and its contribution to improving safety and reducing the number of child injuries and fatalities in the vicinity of the project. (2) The department shall submit a report to the Legislature on or before December 31, 2003, regarding the results of the study described in paragraph (1). Page 3 of 3 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_0001-.../sb_]0_bill_20010314_amended_sen.htm 4/11/2001 SB 10 Senate Bill -Bill Analysis SENATE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Senator KEVIN MURRAY, ChairMAN Analysis by: Steve Schnaidt SUBJECT: Bill No: SB 10 Author: Soto VERSION: 3/14/01 Fiscal:yes Safe Routes to School construction program: extension. DESCRIPTION: This bill would repeal the sunset date on the Safe Routes to School Program and extend the grant program indefinitely. It would also delay for two years a required evaluation of the program. ANALYSIS: Existing law requires the Department of Transportation, in consultation with the Department of the California Highwav Patrol, to establish and administer a "Safe Routes to School" construction program under authority granted under federal law and to use specified federal transportation funds for construction of bicycle and pedestrian safety and traffic calming projects. The law requires the department to make grants available to local governmental agencies under the program based on the results of a statewide competition that requires submission of proposals for funding and rates those proposals on specified factors. These provisions became effective in 2000 and are due to expire and be repealed on January 1, 2002. Prior to the establishment of the Safe Routes to Schools Program last year, approximately $60 million annually was received by the state through the federal transportation Hazard Elimination/Safety Program. The funds were authorized to be used for projects to improve highway safety and reduce traffic congestion through the addition of guardrails, median barriers and railroad grade crossing improvements. Half of the annual funding amounts were allocated to the state and half were allocated to local transportation agencies. SB 10 (Soto) Page 2 AB 1475 (Soto, 1999), in establishing the Safe Routes Page 1 of 4 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_.../sb_10_cfa_20010402_085156_sen_comm.htm 4/11/2001 SB 10 Senate Bill -Bill Analysis Program, redirected 1/3 (approximately $20 million) of the annual Hazard Elimination/Safety funds to the new program, with the state and local transportation agencies sharing equally the reduced funding effects of the redirection. This bill would repeal the January 1, 2002 sunset, or termination, date on the Safe Routes to School Program, thereby making the program permanent. The bill would delay the submission date of the Department of Transportation's study of the program's effectiveness for two years, resulting in a new reporting date of December 31, 2003. COMMENTS: 1.According to the author and sponsors, the intent of AS 1975's Safe Routes Program was to make streets and roads near schools safer for children walking and biking to school. Proponents noted that pedestrian accidents are a leading cause of fatal injuries among 5-12 year olds, while many school areas lack crosswalks or even sidewalks. The program funds can be used for improvements such as crosswalks, pedestrian and bicycle paths, bike lanes, sidewalks and other traffic calming measures. Sponsors report that the Safe Routes program attracted far more applications than available funding in its first year (2000), with applications totaling $130 million for the approximately $20 million available. The current bill is intended to continue the Safe Routes to School grant program indefinitely. 2.The Senate Transportation Committee approved the Safe Routes program legislation in 1999 with the conditions that there be a 3-year sunset on the program and that the Department of Transportation would study the program's effectiveness and report to the Legislature. The Committee's action was intended to review the effectiveness of the program before determining whether to extend its operation and authority. AS 1975 was amended to be a 4-year program after the bill SB 10 (Soto) Page 3 left the Transportation Committee. The Senate Appropriations Committee's action scaled the term of the program back to 2 years, however, and set the study reporting date for December 31, 2001. 3.Policy issues/suggested amendments . Proponents of the program and bill seek to make the program permanent before any evaluation of the program's effectiveness is completed. It would seem prudent to retain a reasonable sunset date on the program to foster Page 2 of 4 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_.../sb_10_cfa_20010402_085156_sen_comm.htm 4/11/2001 SB 10 Senate Bill -Bill Analysis the Legislature's evaluation of the program's funding allocations and results, including whether the redirection of the funds from other safety programs has produced increased safety benefits overall. A reasonable sunset date would be January 1, 2004, which would give the new program four full years of operation and would facilitate retention of the department's original December 31, 2002 effectiveness study date. Under these timelines, the department would have up to 3 years of program operations and results to review, and proponents would have a full year after submission of the study to seek legislation further extending the program if warranted. POSITIONS: (Communicated to the Committee before noon on Wednesday, 3/28/01) SUPPORT: Surface Transportation Policy Project California Bicycle Coalition Brookside Elementary School Parent Faculty Club California School Employees Association California Council of the Blind California State Parent Teachers Association Cities of Fontana, Rancho Cucamonga, Claremont, Oakland. Clovis and Fresno Counties of Alameda and Marin Bay Area Pedestrian Education Group Latino Issues Forum Planning and Conservation League Walk San Jose Santa Barbara AREA Council of PTA's Safety SB 10 (Soto) Page 4 Committee Coalition Commission and Safety San Francisco Bicycle Coalition San Diego Bicycle Touring Society Los Angeles County PTA Bay Area Transportation and Land Use Culver City PTA Santa Cruz Regional Transportation Walk Sacramento Stanislaus County Health Services Agency California Coalition for Children's Health ACORN Metropolitan Transportation Commission Bicycle Civil Liberties Union Bike for A Better City Oakland Pedestrian Safety Project Safe Routes to Schools, Marin Page 3 of 4 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_.../sb_]0_cfa 20010402_085156_sen_comm.htm 4/11/2001 SB 10 Senate Bill -Bill Analysis Pedestrian Safety Task Force Santa Clara/San Mateo SAFE KIDS Bikestation Coalition Safe Paths of Hillsborough Peninsula Bicycle & Pedestrian Coalition of San Mateo County Local Government Commission Walk & Roll Berkeley Woodacre Improvement Club Fresno Cycling Club Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition Ventura County Bicycle Coalition Merin County Bicycle Coalition Children's Advocacy Institute, University of San Diego Board of Supervisors, Marin County Center for Civic Partnerships Letters from 99 individuals OPPOSED: None received. 3/29/01 Page 4 of 4 http://w",w.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_.../sb_10_cfa_20010402_085156_sen_comm.htm 4/11/2001 STATE CAPITOL ROOM 4074 SACRAMENTO. CA 95814-4900 (916) 445-6868 (916) 445 0128 FAX 822 N. EUCLID AVENUE SUITE A ONTARIO, CA 91762 (909) 9847741 (909) 984-6695 FAX 215 NORTH"D"STREET SUITE 106 SAN BERNARDINO. CA 92410 (909) 381-3832 (909) 381-0739 FAX 505 S. GAREY AVENUE POMONA, CA 91766 (909) 4699935 (909) 469-9206 FAX March 23, 2001 (IT %Ualifornia $tate J$$ hate SENATOR NELL SOTO - THIRTY-SECOND SENATORIAL DISTRICT t. (J ~5~' ~rlt:: O r/~` „C.,~tJ Mr. Donald Wagner, Director of Public Works City of Rosemead P.O. Box 399 Rosemead, CA 91770 Dear Mr. Wagner: COMMITTEES: PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT AND RETIREMENT (CHAIR) GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION INSURANCE LOCAL GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTATION VETERANS AFFAIRS SELECT COMMITTEES: DEFENSE CONVERSION, RETENTION AND SPACE FLIGHT INDUSTRIES (CHAIR) ALAMEDA CORRIDOR EAST Each year 5,000 child pedestrians are killed or maimed in California; one of the highest in the nation. Pedestrian accidents are the second leading cause of fatal injuries among 5-12 year olds statewide. Many school areas do not have crosswalks or sidewalks, which creates a more dangerous situation for students that walk or bike to school. In 1999 I authored AB 1475, Safe Routes to School, to address this problem. This bill, which was signed by Governor Davis, made $20 million available from federal transportation safety funds to be used by local governments to improve school area safety. Last year, along with your project, a total of 85 projects were funded throughout the state. The projects included making new crosswalks, pedestrian and bicycle paths, bike lanes, constructing sidewalks, and other "traffic calming" measures. This program has been very successful in finding projects, such as yours, that will make it safer for children that walk or bike to school. However, there were not enough funds available to serve the need. In the first round of grant applications, there were $130 million worth of applications. Only $20 million was funded. There is a second round of grants beginning; however, after the second round the bill will sunset. It is clear that with $130 million in applications, and only $40 million available through the program, it is necessary to extend Safe Routes to School and make it a permanent program. This year I have introduced SB 10, which will remove the sunset from the statutes and allow the program to continue. This is important because of the great need to create a safer pedestrian environment for our children. I am asking for your support for this bill, to ensure that we continue towards our goal of creating a safer environment for all children. I have enclosed a sample resolution that your council can adopt in support of the bill. The first hearing in Senate Transportation Committee will be Tuesday, April 3 at 1:30. Thank you for your interest in child pedestrian safety. Sincerely' NE LL SOTO Senator, 32nd District