CC - Item I - Cooperatve agreement between the city and agency for street and lanscaping improvements - Internal Files Box 069c=.;.
✓ E M E
2: � w.•Y
TO: FRANK G. TRIPEPI, CITY MANAGER Cl�
FROM: ALFONSO RODRIGUEZ, CITY ENGINEER (^
DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 1991
RE: COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND AGENCY FOR STREET
AND LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS IN VALLEY BOULEVARD
(MUSCATEL /LOMA) AND CONCRETE REPAIRS TO VARIOUS STREETS
Attached for the City Council's review is a cooperative agreement
between the Agency and the City for the subject project.
The concrete repair project has been budgeted by the City as a
General Fund and Local Transportation Sidewalk Grant funded project.
In an effort to reduce costs, this project will be designed and bid
together with the Agency's Valley Boulevard street and landscaping
and concrete repair projects.
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached
agreement.
AR: js
Attachment
A:100891j(2)
INI
ocr g,�g5i I
( v
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ROSEMEAD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AND THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD FOR STREET AND LANDSCAPING
IMPROVEMENTS IN VALLEY BOULEVARD (MUSCATEL /LOMA)
AND CONCRETE REPAIRS TO VARIOUS STREETS
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this 8th day of October, 1991, by
and between the CITY OF ROSEMEAD (hereinafter "CITY ") and the
ROSEMEAD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (hereinafter "AGENCY ").
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code 33000 et seq., the
City Council of the City of Rosemead established the Rosemead
Redevelopment Agency under authority of the California Community
Redevelopment Law; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code 33000 et seq., the
City Council of the City of Rosemead, by enactment of Ordinance No.
340, on June 27, 1972, has established the Rosemead Redevelopment
Project Area No. 1; and
WHEREAS, CITY and AGENCY have a common interest in and wish to
facilitate redevelopment within the City and to provide for the
cooperation of CITY and AGENCY in carrying out redevelopment
activities; and
WHEREAS, CITY and AGENCY both desire to construct the public
improvements and facilities described herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree:
Section 1. Each party shall have access.to the services and
facilities of the other party and its staff. Each party shall
also cooperate with the other in providing for redevelopment
activities within the City.
Section 2. AGENCY shall supply to CITY such information and
reports as from time to time the CITY may require.
Section 3. CITY will assist AGENCY in the planning, financing,
acquisition, construction and maintenance or operation of
redevelopment activities undertaken by the AGENCY within CITY in
accordance with applicable state and federal law.
Section 4. CITY and AGENCY shall jointly undertake the
planning, design, and construction of street and landscaping
improvements on Valley Boulevard and concrete repairs at various
locations. City shall be "Lead Agency ", as defined in Public
Resources Code Section 21067 for the environmental review,
planning and development of such capital improvement projects.
. AGENCY shall pay the cost for the Valley Boulevard
and the concrete repairs projects benefitting Project Area No
1, Such payments shall be made in accordance with the findings
3445 of
previously made pursuant to Section 3ency Health h d
Board
Safety Code by the Rosemead Redevelopment y
Rosemead City Council. The total AGENCY obligation for the
project shall not exceed Two Hay undredcFortofThousand Dollars
($240,000). The CITY shall p Rosemead
Area No. of
The
°r
within the City of total CITY No. 1
and not ben Proj
jct shall not exceed One Hundred Thousand
obligation for the proe
Dollars ($100,000).
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement on the date first written above.
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
ROSEMEAD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
AGENCY SECRETARY
0
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR - CONTINUED
CC -E AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND U.S. CONFERENCE OF MAYORS SMALL
BUSINESS CONFERENCE IN KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, NOVEMBER 17 -20,
1991
CC -F AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND SISTER CITY CONFERENCE IN TULSA,
OKLAHOMA, JULY 6 -11, 1992
CC-G RECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR 40th HANDYMAN BID
PACKAGE TO LA VERNE CONSTRUCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,000
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN McDONALD that
the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar be approved. Vote
resulted:
Yes: Bruesch, Taylor, Imperial, Clark, McDonald
No: None
Absent: None
Abstain: None
The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered.
CC -H APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZATION TO
SEEKS BIDS FOR STREET AND LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS IN V ALLEY
BOULEVARD ( MUSCATEL /LAMA) AND CONCRETE REPAIRS TO VARIOUS
STREETS
CC -I COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY AND AGENCY FOR STREET AND
LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS IN VALLEY BOULEVARD (MUSCATEL /LOMA)
AND CONCRETE REPAIRS TO VARIOUS STREETS
These items were deferred for further information.
CC -D APPROVAL OF ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT FOR DIAMOND RESTAURANT,
9016 MISSION DRIVE
Mayor pro tem Clark asked that the applicant be given a copy of
the City's noise ordinance.
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN MCDONALD, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR that
the Council grant an entertainment permit to Diamond Restaurant. Vote
resulted:
Yes: Bruesch,
No: Imperial
Absent: None
Abstain: None
Taylor, Clark, McDonald
The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered.
Mayor Imperial stated that the City does not have a good handle on
this and until it does, he is concerned with Karaoke places.
CC -J COMBINATION OF NEWSLETTER AND
DECEMBER MAILING
«•V:+- 1 .
Councilman Taylor asked for a review of the original contract
price and the inclusion of the recreation schedule. This item was
deferred for further information.
CC -K APPROVAL OF ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT FOR CHARMING, KTV, 7940 E.
GARVEY AVENUE, SUITE 106
Councilman Bruesch asked about the Sheriff's report, asked for a
better map showing the surrounding area, and asked that the City noise
ordinance be provided at the time entertainment applications are
requested.
CC 10 -8 -91
Page #10
MEMORANDUM
TO: FRANK TRIPEPI, CITY MANAGER
FROM: DON WAGNER, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
DATE: OCTOBER 16, 1991
RE: VALLEY BOULEVARD
Attached is a copy of the Agency Memorandum we gave Margaret Clark
and other members of the Agency. This was in response to her request
of September 10, 1991 meeting, where she wanted all the background
information on Valley Boulevard. In that packet we gave her the
following information:
1. February 4, 1991, letter from the Board of Supervisors
regarding Valley Boulevard Peak Period Parking Restriction
Study
2. Staff Report for the Council meeting of December 11, 1990,
Agenda Item regarding Resolution No. 90 -75 - Request to Los
Angeles County for Aid to Cities Funds
3. Staff Report for Council Agenda Item from the meeting of
September 11, 1990, regarding Engineering Proposal for
Street and Landscaping Improvements in Valley Boulevard
(Muscatel /Loma) and Concrete Repairs on Various City
Streets.
4. Staff Report for the City Council meeting of June 26, 1990,
regarding Time Based Traffic Synchronization Along Valley
Boulevard.
5. Staff Report for Redevelopment Agency Meeting of February 7,
1989, regarding Study Session for Radio Corrected Time Based
Units - Valley Boulevard and Garvey Avenue.
6. Letter dated May 21, 1990, from the County Board of
Supervisors regarding Valley Boulevard Reverse Flow Traffic
Lane Study.
7. Council Memorandum to Jay Imperial, dated May.10, 1990,
regarding Valley Boulevard Planter Modification Status.
C C
Page 2.
8. Letter dated March 2, 1990, from the County of Los Angeles
Department of Public Works, regarding Aid to Cities Program
Response to Board Order of January 3, 1990, Synopsis, All
Supervisorial Districts.
9. . Staff Report for the Council Meeting of February 27, 1990,
regarding Landscape Parking Lane Planters Along Valley
Boulevard.
10. City Council Resolution No. 91 -6, Making Certain Findings
and Terminations With Respect To The Redevelopment Agency
Payment for Construction of Visual and Traffic Flow
Improvements on Valley Boulevard Between Charlotte Avenue
and Easterly City Limits, dated February 12, 1991.
11. Redevelopment Agency Resolution No. 91 -3, Making Certain
Findings and Terminations With Respect To The Redevelopment
Agency Payment for Construction of Visual and Traffic Flow
Improvements on Valley Boulevard Between Charlotte Avenue
and Easterly City Limits, dated February 12, 1991.
12. Letter dated February 9,'1990 from the County Board of
Supervisors regarding Valley Boulevard Traffic Signal
Synchronization Project.
13. Council Memorandum to Jay Imperial dated October 6, 1989,
regarding Landscaped Parking Lane Planters Along Valley
Boulevard.
14. Redevelopment Agency Staff Report for the Agency Meeting of
February 7, 1989, regarding Study Session for Radio
Corrected Time Based Units Valley Boulevard and Garvey
Avenue.
15. Minutes from
February 12,
City Council
Meeting June
City Council
February 27,
7, 1989.
DJW:nv
the following meetings: City Council Meeting
1991; City Council Meeting December 11, 1990;
Meeting September 11, 1990; City Council
26, 1990; City Council Meeting May 8, 1990;
Meeting February 27, 1990; City Council Meeting
1990; and Redevelopment Agency Meeting February
FGT:H- 2 -N:24
U3 a
ROSEMEAD
R
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENCY MEMORANDUM
TO: VICE CHAIRMAN MARGARET CLARK
FROM: FRANK G. TRIPEPI, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR=
DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 1991
RE: VALLEY BOULEVARD
At the September 10, 1991 meeting of the Rosemead Redevelopment
Agency, Vice Chairman Clark requested all items received by the Agency
regarding the Valley Boulevard planter modifications project and Los
Angeles County's proposals for congestion management along Valley
Boulevard. Attached are copies of the requested items as well as Los
Angeles County's peak hour parking restriction study.
Staff has made an application to receive $56,210 in County
Aid -to- Cities Funds towards the Valley Boulevard planter modification
project. The City Council's resolution outlines the removal of the
protruding planters which will allow for a possible future lane in
each direction which is consistent with the revised congestion
management requirements of the County Aid -to- Cities (ATC) program (per
March 2, 1990 Board Action item). The Application of funds, or
approval of the planter modification project, does not obligate the
City to approve the peak hour parking proposal, rather, it would
merely facilitate implementation if it was Council's decision to do
SO. while it is not a requirement for the City to approve the
County's proposal in order to receive ATC funds, staff is unsure if
the application will be approved if it is Council's decision to
disapprove the recommendation of the County's peak hour parking
restriction study.
If you have any questions regarding this, please let me know.
FGT:)s
tac-menz
C..- ..-1-i(54)
BOARD OF SliPERVISORS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
E56 PALL OF AOMINIS7RAT:CN LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90012
12131 9744111
PETER F SCMASARVM
February 4, 1991
Honorable Dennis McDonald
Mayor, City of Rosemead
8838 East valley Boulevard
Rosemead, CA 91770
Dear Mayor McDonald:
VALLEY BOULEVARD
FEAR - PERIOD PARKING RESTRICTION STUDY
The County Director of Public Works has completed a comprehensive
study (copy enclosed) of the feasibility of peak - period parking
restrictions along valley Boulevard between the Long Beach
Freeway and Durfee Avenue in the City of E1 Monte.
The findings indicate that the restrictions would greatly improve
traffic flow and transit service along this highly congested
east -west corridor. These restrictions would link up with
similar restrictions in the City of Los Angeles to provide an
additional third lane of travel between Santa Anita Avenue in the
City of E1 Monte to the intersection of Mission Road /Macy Street
near downtown Los Angeles.
The Director recommends a four - phased program to implement the
restrictions as follows:
Proceed with immediate peak -hour parking
prohibitions along valley Boulevard at its
intersections of Atlantic Boulevard, Garfield
Avenue, and San Gabriel Boulevard.
Implement peak -hour parking restrictions at
Rosemead Boulevard after the parking bays have
been removed in the City of Rosemead in June or
July 1991.
implement peak -hour parking restrictions at
Fremont Avenue after the required widening is
co-:pie*_ed in 'the City of Alhambra.
T
C C
'Honorable Dennis McDonald
February 4, 1991
Page 2
4. Implement peak -hour parking restrictions along the.
remaining mid -block locations after the required
widening is completed in the City of Alhambra.
In the City of Rosemead, I propose that the County prepare the
design plans and install the signs at the key intersection of
Rosemead Boulevard, at no cost to your City, immediately
following the completion of your contract to remove the parking
bays and widen valley Boulevard.
Phases 3 and 4, which involve major work in the City of Alhambra,
would allow the implementation of the restrictions for the entire
route. However, because of the high cost of this work, a
schedule for the implementation of these phases cannot be
determined now. The Director's staff will be working with the
City of Alhambra to move ahead with these phases and will
coordinate their efforts with your City to implement the full
length restrictions.
As always, it is a pleasure to work with you and your City, and I
look forward to hearing from you very soon regarding this
proposal.
Sincerely yours,
PETE SCHABARUM
Supervisor, First District
PS: jeb
Enc.
cc: Department of Public Works
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
TRAFFIC AND LIGHTING DIVISION
VALLEY BOULEVARD
PEAK- PERIOD PARKING RESTRICTIONS
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
To improve traffic flow and transit service along Valley Boulevard:
1. Proceed with immediate peak -hour parking prohibitions along
Valley Boulevard at its intersectjons of Atlantic Boulevard,
Garfield Avenue, and San Gabriel Boulevard.
2. Implement peak- hour - parking restrictions at Boulevard
°after. -the parking bays "have :been - xe moved by_the -City of Rosemead
An_�)une .or -July - 1991..
3. Implement peak -hour parking restrictions at Fremont Avenue
after the required widening is completed in the City of
Alhambra.
4. Implement peak -hour parking restrictions along the remaining,
mid- block Jocations after,the. required widening is comleted.
in the City of Alhambra. (Implementing mid -block
restrictions in the other cities sooner would only provide
marginal benefits, since the increase in capacity through
the other cities would not be gained through Alhambra, where
congestion also exists. The full benefits of these
restrictions will not be realized until the widening and
restrictions are completed in Alhambra.)
INTRODUCTION
This study assesses the feasibility of restricting parking /stopping and adding
a traffic lane An the peak direction during peak periods on Valley Boulevard
to help improve traffic flow =and reduce congestion, The original limits were
from the Long Beach (710) Freeway to Santa Anita Avenue but were extended to
Ourf.ee Avenue at the request of E1 Monte. As an alternative, the study also
examines the possible establishment of parking restrictions near selected
intersections in conjunction with the addition of a localized through lane.
Peak -perio 4 restrictions typically result in the addition of
a traffic:lmwX&W;eliminate friction between through traffic and parking
vehiciesi This increases roadway and intersection capacity and improves the
intersection level of service (LOS). It also reduces friction between transit
buses and other vehicles by eliminating the need to maneuver in and out of the
traffic stream.
This study includes a review of the existing'roadway conditions, existing
parking /stopping restrictions, parking demand, traffic volumes, intersection
LOS, and impact on adjacent development.
{ {
Peak - Period Parking Restrictions
Page 2
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Between the 710 Freeway and Santa Anita Avenue, Valley Boulevard is typically
76 feet between curbs within 100 feet of right of way. In Rosemead, the widt
is reduced to 56 feet between curbs from Muscatel Avenue to Lama Avenue by
parking bays. The City is currently in the process of advertising a contract
to remove them and to widen Valley Boulevard to 84 feet between curbs. The
contract is expected to be completed in June or July of 1991. The striping
along this portion of Valley Boulevard consists of two through lanes in each
direction and left turn lanes at the intersections. Striping along the
remainder of Valley Boulevard provides two through traffic lanes, left -turn
lanes at intersections, and a continuous two -way left -turn lane between
intersections. There is either limited or full time on- street parking. The
posted speed limit is 35 mph. There are 41 signalized intersections. The
adjacent development is typically commercial /retail with some industrial and
residential areas.
Between Santa Anita Avenue and Durfee Avenue in the City of El Monte, Valley
Boulevard has raised median and /or insufficient roadway width to accommodate
an additional traffic lane.
A review of traffic volumes along Valley Boulevard, collected in February
1990, disclosed traffic volumes exceed 40,000 vehicles per day between the
710 Freeway and Fremont Avenue. Volumes range from 25,000 to 30,000 vehicles
per day between Fremont Avenue and Santa Anita Avenue (see Appendix A).- There
is also a heavy left -turn movement from eastbound Valley Boulevard to
northbound Fremont Avenue. Heavy north /south volumes cross Valley Boulevard.
on Fremont Avenue, Atlantic Boulevard, Garfield Avenue, San Gabriel Boulevard,
and Rosemead Boulevard.
Traffic volumes on the above major cross streets during the peak periods are
typically greater than those on Valley Boulevard. Traffic volume information
revealed that the morning peak - period along Valley Boulevard occurs between
6 a.m. to 9 a.m., and the afternoon peak - period occurs between 4 p.m. to
7 p.m. from the 710 Freeway to Santa Anita Avenue. The average daily traffic
(ADT) on the can Bernardino Freeway within the limits of this project ranges
from 200,000 to 215,000 vehicles per day.
Existing intersection LOS were calculated for five high- volume intersecting
routes along Valley Boulevard, including Fremont Avenue, Atlantic Boulevard,
Garfield Avenue, San Gabriel Boulevard, and Rosemead Boulevard. These
intersections are operating at LOS D, E, or F during peak periods. Their
volume /capacity ratios range from 0.81 to 1.21 during the morning peak hour
and from 1.13 to 1.42 during the afternoon peak hour (see Appendix B). The
remaining intersections along the route are dot expected to significantly
affect capacity in the immediate future. These are intersections with local
and local collector streets which serve nearby residential areas. The streets
C
Peak - Period Parking Restrictions
Page 3
c
identified above could.be considered major north /south routes through the
San Gabriel Valley.
As part of the Five -Year Traffic Signal Synchronization Program, a traffic
signal synchronization project along Valley Boulevard from Cabrillo Avenue to
New Avenue in Alhambra was recently completed using Radio - Corrected Time -Base
(RCTB) technology. A RCTB unit is installed with each signal controller along
the route which allows the system to remain synchronized. A similar project
is scheduled to be constructed in the next several months on Valley Boulevard
from Prospect Avenue, in San Gabriel, to Fairway Drive, in Walnut. This
project will synchronize the traffic signals in San Gabriel, Rosemead, and at
a shared intersection in E1 Monte.
All four cities currently have one- or two -hour time -limit parking within the
limits of this study, beginning between 6 a.m. and 9 a.m. and ending at 6 p.m.
Alhambra has a posted restriction of No Stopping, 6 a.m. to 8 a.m., along the
north side of Valley Boulevard. West of the 710 Freeway, the City of
Los Angeles currently has 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. peak - period parking restrictions
for westbound Valley Boulevard traffic, and 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. restrictions for
eastbound traffic, which they plan to extend to 7 p.m.
The rideability of the curb lane was reviewed and found less than desirable.
There are approximately 50 locations with rises or falls near intersections,
in the vicinity of drainage structures. All of these locations are in
Alhambra.
Southern California Rapid Transit District (SCRTD)
length of Valley Boulevard. Line 76 operates 152
route, with 66 operating during the peak periods.
that run a short distance on Valley Boulevard. An
cross Valley Boulevard at various locations.
PARKING STUDY
Line 76 runs the entire
buses each day on this
There are three other lines
additional seven lines
As part of this study, a field review of the demand for on- street parking was
conducted during the morning (6 a.m. to 8 a.m.) and afternoon (4 p.m. to
6 p.m.) peak periods. This included a review of the type of adjacent
development and identification of potential satisfactory relocation parking on
side streets, opposite side of street, and /or off - street facilities.
A review of the parking dmiand an the north side of Valley Boulevard during
the morning peak - period disclosed that parking is extremely light, with an
abundance of nearby relocation parkinga A review of the parking demand on the
south side of Valley Boulevard during the afternoon peak period disclosed that
parking is generally light, except for several scattered locations along the
route, with moderate to heavy parking. However, nearby relocation parking to
side streets and /or off - street parking lots can accommodate most of the
displaced vehicles. Potential relocation parking to the north side of the
Peak - Period Parking Restrictions
Page 5
route or by limiting the restrictions to the vicinity of key intersections,
which are the capacity constraints.
The implementation of the peak - period parking /stopping restrictions the full
length-Of the route would involve varying amounts of roadway reconstruction,
restriping, and the posting of appropriate signs.
A review of existing traffic counts along Valley Boulevard disclosed a morning
westbound peak occurring between approximately 6 a:m:_to:9.a.m'. The afternoon•
eastbound-.peak occurs between approximately 4 p.m._.-to _7,,p.mlt
Significant improvements in traffic flow could be achieved by improving the
intersections of Atlantic Boulevard, Garfield Avenue, San Gabriel Boulevard,
and Rosemead Boulevard. These improvements would provide an additional travel
lane in each direction through the intersections during Peak periods.
We recommend the implementation of peak - period stopping restrictions near the
intersections of Atlantic Boulevard, Garfield- Avenue, and San Gabriel:
Boulevard which can be accomplished immediately and near Rosemead Boulevard
upon completion of the removal of the parking bays in June or July 1991•.+
These regulations would establish or extend stopping restrictions near the
intersections. The cities may wish to consider the establishment of full -time
parking prohibitions (red curb) at these locations in lieu of peak - period
restrictions. Red curb markings are highly visible and more readily
recognized by motorists than peak - period signing and would be easier to
enforce. In conjunction with these regulations, we 7.ecmlmend -the -instal lationr
of -a striped third _traffic -lane aoh. -Airection near. these intersection �pnl
Valley Boulevaeas This would include the posting of signs on the north side
of Valley Boulevard stating 'NO STOPPING; 6 a.m. to 9 a.m.; EXCEPT SAT E SUN•
and striping a third westbound - travel lane through the intersections. On the
south side of Valley Boulevard at the same.four identified intersections,
install signs stating -•NO STOPPING 4 p.m. to 7 p.m.; EXCEPT SAT & SUN* and
stripe a third eastbound_travei lane through the intersections. The afternoon
peak - period will complement the same identified peak that the City of
Los Angeles is posting for eastbound Valley Boulevard west of the Alhambra
City boundary near the 710 Freeway. The third travel lane and transitions
would be wi`1iajothetproposed restrictions which would begin approximately - 200 1
feet bef orvamm2mdutanection and .extend Jkpproximately 400 - f eet each
intersectioM The total cost of signing and striping for these four
intersections is estimated at $10,000 (see Appendix D, page 1, for cost
breakdown).
We recommend adding a third lane and implementation of peak - period
restrictions near Fremont Avenue, which is the most congested intersection
along Valley Boulevard. However, this would require roadway widening because
additional roadway width is needed for the eastbound dual left -turn lanes. The
possibility of three eastbound and two westbound lanes was explored, but not
considered feasible because of the insufficient turning radius. It would also
Peak- Period Parking Restrictions
Page 6
require full -time elimination of parking along the north side of Valley
Boulevard and leave only one westbound lane during bus loadings.
The additional width near Fremont Avenue would be provided by reconstructing
the south curb seven feet southerly and transitioning approximately 400 feet
east of and 400 feet west of the intersection. A small amount of right of way
would be required at the southeast and southwest corners for the
reconstruction of the curb returns. The widening would also require the
construction of a storm drain to replace the existing box culverts. The cost
for these improvements are estimated at $1 million (see Appendix D, page 2,
for the cost breakdown).
We also recommend that a third through lane in each direction be provided
during the peak periods along the entire length of the route. However, this
would require roadway improvements in the City of Alhambra to provide a
satisfactory ride along the curb lane. This work would include the removal
and reconstruction of several drainage structures and some pavement
rehabilitation to accommodate the increased traffic loads and to provide a
better riding surface. The extent of this work can only be roughly estimated
at this time. A detailed recommendation would require field sampling and
materials testing. The cost of minimum needed improvements necessary to
provide the additional travel lane is estimated at $2.5 million (see
Appendix D, page 3, for cost breakdown).
Existing improvements in Alhambra are very old and have served most of their
useful life. As an alternative to the minimum needed improvements, the City
may wish to consider some overall improvements to rehabilitate the entire
roadway, possibly widening to Highway Plan Major Standards (84 feet between
curbs). This would further increase costs since it would require the
relocation of all street lights and traffic signals along the route, as well
as parkway improvements. The additional cost for widening is estimated at
$3.15 million (see Appendix D, page 4, for cost breakdown).
PJB:jeb.
T- 4 /VALRPT3
IS]
11
AR
VALLEY BLVD 1990 TRAFFIC VOLUMES
CROSS :
CROSS STREET
VALLEY BLVD
INTERSECTION
STREET
24 HOUR
24 HOUR
24 HOUR
NAME
VOLUMES
VOLUMES
VOLUMES
FREMONT
---- ----------
800 /1500
AT X- STREET
- - -.
5100
FREMONT
-- --
37000
:--- ------- - -
41000
78000
ATLANTIC :
41000
29000
70000
GARFIELD :
35000
28000
63000
SN GABR
35000
28000
27000
63000
800004
- ROSEMEAEf
53000+-
:VALLEY VOLUMES
- - --
VALLEY BOULEVARD PEAK PERIOD
DIRECTIONAL SPLIT
CROSS
: CROSS STREET
:VALLEY VOLUMES :
INTERSECTION
STREET
:(AM PEAK -HOUR)
:(AM PEAK - HOUR) :
PEAK -HOUR
NAME
NIS
E/W
- - - - -
TOTAL
FREMONT
---- ----------
800 /1500
:----------
1200/1600 :
5100
ATLANTIC
: 1100 /1500
700/1500
4800
4400
GARFIELD
: 1100/1300
600/1400
3600
SN GABR
1000 /1100
600/900 00.Q.;
ROSEMEAD
1900/1500A
:
--------------- :
CROSS
: CROSS STREET
:VALLEY VOLUMES
INTERSECTION
STREET
:(PM PEAK -HOUR)
:(PM PEAK -HOUR)
PEAK -HOUR
NAME
NIS
E/W
--------- - - - - -:
TOTAL
FREMONT
900/2400
2500/700
6500
5900
ATLANTIC
: 1400/1900
1700/900
1500/1300
6400
GARFIELD
: 1900/1700
1400/1500
1200/1100
5200
SN GABR
ROSEMEA k: 2600AI5001•
1000/1000 - :
- 61001 :
Q
LLI
O
LLJ
LU
t
J
O
O
Z
N
0
O
co
J
O
O
d
O
N
>
U
Z
O
D
Q
�
U
w
2
W
C0
w
0)
¢
w
z
J
W_
¢
G
LLJ
Z
Z
Q
z
o
C)
w
0
W
w
LL
n
¢
CI)
�-
J
�}
vJ
�
O
J
Q
W
�
J
O
Z
O
W
W
¢
w
w
rt
F
CO
LL
O
¢
0
O
co
O
(
O
d
O
N
U
U
v�
Q
w
O 1
C
iV
0 7
O
W
0 J
0
> 0
Y
W
Q
c C
co L "t co N c
co
J
0
Q
_
W
�.
Y
LL1,
U);
0.
W
a
J
W
E
r
a
Q
W
co L "t co N c
O
co
J
0
Q
_
W
�.
Y
LL1,
U);
0.
W
a
J
W
E
a
Q
W
z
J
>>
O
�
W
o
J
LU
W
°
LL
<
<
C[
r
J
�
J
5
co
U
O
z
Q
U
J
Q
�;
J
O
F-
L11
z
u
cr
o
2
LU
¢
¢
U
O
r
0
LLJ
O�
c
C
`
L
J
O
cc
0
I O
Y
Q
/ w / �
L.
L
G
CD O N O
J
O
in
w Y
2 Q
w w
U) a
a
J a
m
�:�i�
J
z °
C)
LLJ m
w W
r
C
LLJ
Q � J
U O
c //,,
Q V C 6
J J
Q 0
w
w
Z Q
O
:5 Cf)
w y
¢ U
L L1
U
I
kix
c'
R
CD O N O
J
O
in
w Y
2 Q
w w
U) a
a
J a
m
�:�i�
J
z °
C)
LLJ m
w W
r
C
LLJ
Q � J
U O
c //,,
Q V C 6
J J
Q 0
w
w
Z Q
O
:5 Cf)
w y
¢ U
L L1
U
R
RM u U
I
aoV)
i I
. .. ..
I
O W
0
0
rl
v
1 H> I
N
.--I
.-1
O
N
I F O I
I F 5 d I
I U H I
>31
U
I
I a 0 V] I
W
W
k•
W
f•1
I I
>
W
I
N
I I
I O 1
N
tp
M
N
f'7
M
'-I
en
!1
O
F Z I
A
E Z F 1
a
0 U I
W
1 U
W
> W
a
I 1
z
I
<
I I
I a 0 V7 I
W
Q
O
U
�i
�
, I
F
Q
I I
I H> 1
o
CO
CO
r
o
E•
F O I
I Q C
H
o
0
0
U
Q £
!„
U H 1
U
�
I
..
..
.. .. ..
Cal
I I
U V) I
w
W
W
Q
O
z
O
C1
m
F
U
E- Z I
i
O
O
U
E F I
z
Q U] 1
W
I U H I
E.
X I
z
>w1
H
I I
1
I
' I
a
I
1 o I
�
I > I
F ] I
a
>
a
T
a
I I
<
N
W< I
F
H
q
I
o
z
H
O
>
W
a
c
z
c
F
<
Q
I
w
<
v
cn
(A
M 7 UIR119"INKIKIM
T
X
t+
C
Z
W
W
G
Q
.a
rn
.-1
u1
.r
a
v
.a
u
t ro,
41 C) 7
a :3 a c
0 c c ro
rn 0 -� h
>x
dQw c
ro 0
rya 0
pi —1 C O
O Q d
,.I -+
ro ro m >
y U U
N c O w
C ro .a
O U] O t7
--1
> m A
w w
0 > ro
0 m C7
A 3 c
0 ci w
C w 0
m r�
J A
t ro
E IJ
a
cro
c 0 >
I m ro
r 3
v« W
O O
9 A
- 0
w 'O i
U >
a (a Q
co
C r C
> a
04
fu
a
c> z a
0 c
0
C 0 0
w 7
C O
O u >
a� U +
C ^
G o: U
1
I
U a) I
w O U
w. ro ro ,
rf C Ul > I
'
'
O
Z
I
I
IA
I
U
O
CJ
F I
ro a'
r O
I I
W I
>
tf1
c
« D
i
In
CD
C I
v
O
N
F ,
U ,
c•1 O U N
Ln
b
U a I
N aj -i m
c
I ,
O to
U
G I
C
ro
m
N
U
y
I
# •O C1 U1
N
I w I
I
x 0 1
I Q N A
o
b a l
('1 N
ro
> V
0
F I
U
O
W I
U a l
C
w 1
I
o n
>� I
C
F
L rl
I ro I
W I
X c/I I
I
N 1
' w I
I
O I
c l
I
, I
O I
I
I >• I
I
'
ti
W I
E
E
i I
w l
m
I ..a I
W I
z I
I A
ro b
1
O I
l�
3
C)
m
w
>
>
I
11 I
+i
I G I
I
N i
�
A
I I
I ,
I
I
'
I
I ,
t
I
Nl
ro
I
't
> ro
I
Q >
I
n
N
�
I
)
N
acl
wxul
W O
I
1
w
'
'
I
n
, E
c
C m
l N w
w c
1 w N w w
41
1 i..l
m (a 4j
p 7
0 O
'
I
1
I
� G
1 CCCl .7 C)
1
�
I
I
i
'
�
I
I o
I
I J
3
0
I
ll
I rl ••a
I
I U V
ro ) 0 o c
EX roa)41
O U
.� ro 0 •., x ro
�E a >a>
C)
IA
N
O
CJ
d
C
G
m
N
tf1
c
« D
b C)
y
CD
O
v
O
N
N
O
Ln
Ln
b
rn
ro ) 0 o c
EX roa)41
O U
.� ro 0 •., x ro
�E a >a>
C)
IA
N
O
>
vo
C
G
ro ) 0 o c
EX roa)41
O U
.� ro 0 •., x ro
�E a >a>
C)
>
>
>
C
G
y
O
V
c
« D
b C)
y
w
a
O
E
v
N
w
d
w
wa1
w
c
ro 0
« 0
C m
4 j
C
ro
m
N
C7
y
N
N
ro ) 0 o c
EX roa)41
O U
.� ro 0 •., x ro
�E a >a>
>
>
C
Q
y
O
E
U U7
« D
b C)
y
y O
a) 0
O O
N
mrn
w
wa1
ro 0
« 0
C m
4 j
NC7
Ua
v�
rn
Ln
La
N
T
N
L ro
y1 y 7
0 7 C: c
o c c ro
In N - h
>x
C1 4 N c
t ro o
,J 1
11 �
Q+•.a c O
c c o 3
O 4 O
ro to ro >
J U 67
N C C N
c ro i
C U1 O
J L CJ
roc >. -a
> ro A w
N N
O >1 ro
mroe�
A 3 c
O C
O w
C+ N O
C P.
N
G ^-I
OA
�t
G ^-
C ro
kD O >
I N m
r1 3
aj w
N O
.0., 17 p
N b •.�
O > +
Garo a
X l+ C]
ro > m
0 C
C
N 7
w �-1 G •-I
< n U
T
x
C
z
W
G
G
4
I E
1 W
I W
C
I
E-
1 N
N
ro I W
O I G
Z I Ln
I V1
w 1
O
r-
0
y F W
� 1w
A
ro I O
I O
•.i I N
ro I
> I
I
> I
� O I
ro .1 I
> ro I
Q > I
act
0 O
U O I
w O U
o a> 1
U
I ro a l
> U2 1
, I
I I
U
1 U a 1
O U1 I
I I
I 11 I
c
x U1 1
W
I I
I I —
I 1
I U I W
m a I
> V) I
I 1
I I
U .i
1 U a 1
O to I
I ,
I 1.1 I
N C
1 -1 aI
I x U1 I
I W I
I I
I , —
I I
I ,
I I
I I
1 d I
I E I
1 z I >
1 a
1 d I C
I O I m
1 N E
I 11 I G1
Lo C
O
I I +J
I I U]
I I
1
I --
I
U 1I1
U G ,
p In I
1
41 1
J V1 O
U1 "1 a I
W x U) I
W I
I
1 —
I
Ol N I
G
N I
y 1
ro
y1
G I
C U ro
yJ
.i I
O N •
4j
1.1 N U
K
q i
I
I
E (n O R. a)
I
I
U1
I
O
I
> >+
I
4 O
1
N
m 1
c C
4 1
ro lj
E c
E I
O 0
a I
0
�0
r
Z
MA
„
>.
d
N
rJ
a.1
c
O
YL
O
V)
r
7
yz
U J
4 1 T
CD
�o
-
0 U
0 0 In w
T
>
N
()
W ro
10 to
r
C)
N
m
u
Q
.K ro
0)
co ro u
>
E »a c
y C U Q I
N
Q
ti
1
?
I
ra
Q
�
1
V
I
N
�
I
t+)
I
M
t7
I I
ro
I U I
ro
i
q
a
F
I ro d l
N
M
Ln
W
I > V) I
N
C
y
F
I U I
V1
I U I
O U) ) I
fT I
w
l
I K I
1
0
1 7)
i X
ro
1 U i
U
O K K
ro
—
U) a) .•
r7
I C I
I I
> X
O 1
1
I U I
d Q w
K
O
I -1 1
I i1 1
1 ro a I
Ip
4 it a
I (o I
I > V7 1
4
b
I U
C
C K O
a)
3
1 0
I . I
F
I U 1
O
U a l
O V: I
fa to
>
4-1 U
Q)
I T I
F
I L) I
La C O
w
I A 1
1 t4 1
V]
I 71 I
I .•{ d l
K ro ti
O C1
9
I ro
67
I X N I
41
ro C T
U
> ro A
w
t w I
O
K
1
I
W
I I
O
I I
Q) T ro
I T 1
I
1
N ro CJ
K
I N I
F
I Q) I
ro I
G•� w p
1 ^-i I
w
l z I
a
a
K w
I A I
1 ro 1
0
I 1
1 JJ I
IQ
w >,
X O y
I w I
ro r^'
I ro
>
U,
U) I
a ro
— I
b A
a
I r-1 m I
U a l
H
o cn I
Q
ro
> a I
ro l
O
iU > 11
I Q > I
(n
1 UI
a" ro
4
Q
C7
I I
I a C 1
(a
N '-V a
W X a
I (I] 7
I In O 1
X
to Tro
z
'
a) >
Q
N
ro
C N
C > rn
a)
K
I
4-)
�
a
C 0 O
O
'
7 N
T
'
ca)
Q 0
t O U
a
w C
Q V)
U
1
I
I
I
I
N
I
L
I
�
E
1
I
.a
O
V)
r
7
yz
aJ
4 1 T
CD
�o
-
r
0 0 In w
T
>
N
()
w 0
10 to
r
C)
N
m
u
Q
.K ro
0)
co ro u
>
E »a c
a)
N
Q
w
Q
?
�
ra
Q
.r
.•I
V
N
C%
t+)
�
M
t7
ro
ro
ro
O
V)
r
7
yz
U
4 1 T
CD
�o
-
r
0 0 In w
E K
Kl
+ U O 'O
fn
T
C] >
yz
U
4 1 T
C
ro
.-1
La ro w
0 0 In w
E K
Kl
+ U O 'O
O 41
w 0
10 to
A ,-I a) K
>
Itl r1
m
u
Q
.K ro
0)
co ro u
>
E »a c
a)
w
Q
w
>
A
ro
Q
>,
�
E
�
ro
ro
ro
i
q
a
U)
�
N
M
Ln
N
fn
I
T
C] >
yz
U
4 1 T
C
ro
41
La ro w
0 0 In w
E K
C r1
+ U O 'O
O 41
w 0
10 to
A ,-I a) K
, 4
w 'O w O U
Itl r1
U U
K 'D b 7 U
ro •.� • m ,�
.K ro
0)
co ro u
d d •.� ro41
E »a c
am
>a v
qE >.a a)
I
W
C] >
� Q
>
a
C
y w
w T
1 w>
A
A O
C Q
L ro
ro ro
E
O
r
w C
K
ro 0
O ro
q
ro ro
F n
N
x
D
z
L•]
a
Q
O
:I
w
a
ro > I
U a> 1
z'
I
U7
C U) Q 1
I
.ti I
� 1
I
I
I
U 1
u1
O
p
�
I
F 1
ro a 1
c O
,n
I
W I
> Lo 1
41 N
,. I
w I
C
I
•O C)
M
N I
U I
U a l
a% N U N
f+1 1: *'I N
M
O LO
cc
L' 1
U '•'I C
„� U •.1
C
W I
°
�
+ d C N
h
YH` 1
x �
�
GI
Q aD as
ro 1
a O
7
�
n 7
O G C
0
N
>x
>
I
U I
y Q w
C I
p ,
-1 1
I
I
ro G I
.c ro
41 ro a
I
L) I
v
> V1 I
1
. yl
•d I
U I
I
Qf -1 C
c c o
3 I
3
O 1
E 1
0
0 q •.1
y
Cl I
W I
U al
O In I
I
G' I
1
ro ro ro
,j U
> I
o
>• I
F I
` i
Nco
w
F
In I
1
• G I
o
C ro •-1
C)
I
b
w 1
ro
w I
x U1 I
O (n
w
W 1
-I
41 'C
G) I
z 1
H 1
1
> ro F
W
w
I
C
y
O
I
O I
ro
I
>' I
i
1
Ll
N t0 O
L a c
I
1.1 I
F I
U 1
I ^I I
W I
ro I
rJ w
1 ro 1
1
11 I
„ >�
X o 1
C
0 1
I
O 1
U
>
N
I ro I
I
w I
Q
ror-�
>
I
1J
I
Lo i
W
— .a ro
ro
E JJ
I
I I
w
+i
I
I
1
In
0 0
0 !A I
ro .i
1) N
Nl
U> y
a
Q >
I
N •-'1 G
I N
rl
.ti
a IC
,
I a c
I
w x U)
1
X p .�
T
W
1 U] O
1
w
I
I
G.-I C7
PG
OI N
1
yJ
C N
I
>1 ro
w O N
O C
�
y.1 C
I ro � U N
•O
.-I 17 O
X 7 0 7
41 O N O
•O
O'
1
y •�
I N -a .�
U N 11 CJ'
N .0 b a: U
G C
O U
b Cl 7
•-�
>�
I
17 7
I .-I O C) O 1.1
Ea1 Q .7
R: U7
C O
Q61
aaX W Cl
t�TJ U
1
i
W
I Cl
>
>1
O Q
p 41
O
Z
1
N
1 N O
O
V
yJ
J
I > C
ro ro
U O
w
O U
w 0 U ro
a a>
(nZV)<
m
IF
x
H
a
Z
w
G
G
.0
o ro
oacr
m C C
ro -+
a) > x
A Q w
'
�4j
O C 0
ro �
ro ro
to yJ U
C C O
o a
�ul U
w
> >
w ro A
4 w
y > ro
A O
A 3 C
O U
aJ w
01$4 O
C w
xo:j
ro r
a -1
C) A
t ro
E u
n cro
nro>
G ro
�a
I j w
a O
O A
O C
o
w b •,
O > y
p�m
W 7
ro >• ro
o�>
a�a)
ro
C > <T
O C
O 4
C O •D
w ^.
C O 1
yl b U
w •-+ C
G y
If1 W I
,a E I
I I I
w I
I C i W l
O I
w 1 x I 1
ro I w I 1
p I ro I 1
I O I I
C -1
O j b
b U I
cu
1
3 E I
a1 1 al I W I
> C
Q) > E I
w A I In I
1 w 1 1
9 f ro I w l
C I W I 1
I O I C I
I I O I
I
I y I E I
W 1
1 H 1 w I
I A I I
H 1 O I
, ..{ I N I
I > I 1
I G I I
, I 1
, I I
1 1
I I
I I
I I --
I 1
I 1
I � I
I H al I
I ro -I 1
F .a >�
Z I I
p 1 ac 1
� I cn o 1
'] I
w 1
I
1
I
w I
O 1
I
� 1
yJ I
U 1
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
m
a O
>. z
U O
ro a r r 0
> V) I 11
I m
O a
U I O a U m
U a l rn 4.1 -1 (n
O In I ro W a)
I U - C
yJ 1 ► •^I U '•"
m OO a)m
xUl I r D mA
W +
I
— I
I
1
U 1 r
ro a I
> w I
U
U a
O In
m
x
W
a)
E
ro
z
y
u
u
w
a�
U
U a
O W
41
1 m
y •-1 a
w x w
w
tp y
C y
•a (1)
♦J C
4 J
O y
A C
G C1
in
a!
E
a
N
9
C
G
O
m
A
U
r�
o -+
b
O
C) a
a i
C C
7 ro
C C
U1 U
H H
�
>. y
U •o
aJA
\ v
u
b
O
C) a
>
>
G
G
o
a ro
>. y
E
aJA
C�
w (�
y >
C O
O
N
r c
1
COST SUMMARIES
Addition of a third travel lane during peak - periods at 4 key
intersections.
Signing and striping on valley Boulevard
Atlantic Boulevard
Garfield Avenue
San Gabriel Boulevard
Rosemead Boulevard
Signing and Striping
(Alhambra)
(Alhambra)
(San Gabriel)
(Rosemead)
TOTAL
$2,500
$2,500
$2,500
$2,500
$10,000
C C
1.
Addition of a third travel lane during peak periods at Fremont
Avenue with widening of valley Boulevard
(100 percent Alhambra)
Roadway Reconstruction
Storm Drain System
Signing and Striping
Street Light Relocation
Traffic Signal Relocation
preliminary and
Construction Engineering
Construction Total
Right -of -way Acquisition
$200,000
$400,000
$10,000
$15,000
- -- $100,000_
Subtotal $725,000
--- $225,000
$950,000
$50,000
TOTAL $1,000,000
2
C C
Addition of a third travel lane during peak periods along the
remainder of Valley Boulevard with minimum needed curb lane
improvments in Alhambra (no widening)
Modify Culverts at 50 Locations $300,000
Construct Storm raioadway
Replace inadequate
section, reconstruct curb 1,000,000
and gutter, both sides $ $69,000
Signing and Striping
Preliminary and construction $565,000
engineering _
Subtotal $2,434,000
(100 percent Alhambra)
Signing and striping, other cities
San Gabriel
;4tosomea6d
E1 Monte
TOTAL
* Extent of work required
to be determined by soils
and materials testing.
$18,500
$29x000
$18,500
$2,500,000
9
C. C
Addition of a third travel lane during peak periods along the
remainder of Valley $Oplanastandards 84 overall
fe t improvements Alhambra
between curbs
(widening to Highway $400,000
street Light Relocation $1,500,000
Traffic signal Relocation $850,000
parkway Improvements
preliminary and construction $400,000
.engineering ------------
TOTAL $3,150,000
(100 percent Alhambra)
4