CC - Item 10A - Design Development of Aqautic Facilities at Rosemead and Garvey Parkss
ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL &
COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE
CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
FROM: JEFF ALLRED, CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
DATE: MAY 25, 2010
SUBJECT: DESIGN DEVELOPMENT OF AQUATIC FACILITIES AT ROSEMEAD
AND GARVEY PARKS
SUMMARY
At its last regular meeting, City Council delayed action on this item in order to obtain
additional input from the community regarding the design of the proposed Rosemead
Aquatic Center. With the recent completion of schematic designs of Rosemead and
Garvey Aquatic Centers, the projects are ready to proceed with the full design and
construction specifications phase. The completed schematic drawings (Attachment A)
are the first step toward a detailed and three - dimensional view of the projects which
better enable the City to determine a realistic project scope and cost estimate.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the following:
1. That the City Council provide direction as to the design of Rosemead Aquatic
Center;
2. That the City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into a professional
services agreement with Aquatic Design Group in the amount of $522,450
($350,041.50 from existing 2006A Bond proceeds and $172,408.50 from funds
that will be available through the Redevelopment Agency's repayment of a City
loan as Garvey Park is located outside of Rosemead's redevelopment project
areas and is, therefore, not eligible for redevelopment bond funding) to complete
design development, construction documents and permit drawings, and to
perform construction observation for the renovation of aquatics facilities at
Rosemead and Garvey Pools; and
3. That the Community Development Commission and City Council adopt CDC
Resolution No. 2010 -17 appropriating $350,041.50 from the existing 2006A Bond
proceeds.
ITEM NO. ](T:�
City Council Meeling
May 25, 2010
Page 2 of 3
ANALYSIS
In February 2010, City Council authorized the completion of schematic drawings as a
first phase in design development of replacement facilities at Rosemead and Garvey
Pools. Schematic design resulted in a few changes as compared with conceptual
design. Changes include the following:
Rosemead Aquatic Center
• The addition of park restrooms at southeast corner of bath house (will replace
existing portable restroom east of existing pool facilities), and
• The addition of office restroom to serve staff and sick/injured patrons
Garvey Aquatic Center
• The addition of concession and storage facilities on southern end of proposed
bath house, and
• The addition of office restroom to serve staff and sick/injured patrons, and
• An increased number of shade structures on deck
Even with the additions, the estimated cost for Rosemead Aquatic Center has been
reduced to $6.52 million, while Garvey Aquatic Center has increased slightly to $3.32
million. However, there is also an available option to increase the size of the shallow
portion of the proposed pool at Rosemead Park. It would result in an additional 1700
square feet of shallow (4.5 feet depth or below) pool space and the possible addition of
peninsulas to further distinguish shallow and deep pool areas. This design option would
reduce the competitive swim area by only one lane and would increase the project cost
by no more than $95,000.
With completion of the schematic design phase, consideration should now be given to
full -scale design, creation of construction documents, and construction oversight. With
Council authorization, staff has been working with Aquatics Design Group through the
project's earliest stages.
Aquatic Design Group has proposed fees for design development in the amount of
$522,450. Representatives from Willdan Engineering, MIG, Inc., and the City's
Engineering division affirm that ADG's proposed design fees, less than 6% of total
project cost, are consistent with industry and market standards for a project of this
scope.
The portion of these fees (67% of total project) attributable to Rosemead Aquatic Center
are eligible for existing and future bond proceeds. Thus, $350,041.50 of design costs
can be charged to existing 2006A Bond proceeds. Because the Garvey Aquatic Center
falls outside either project area, it is not eligible for RDA bond funding. Therefore, with
City Council approval, it will primarily be funded through the RDA loan repayment to the
general fund. That funding will include the design development phase of the project at
$172,408.50, payable upon receipt of the proposed 2010 bond proceeds.
Co Council Meefing
May 25, 2010
Page 3 of 3
PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS
This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process.
FISCAL IMPACT:
A request to appropriate $350,041.50 from the existing 2006A bond proceeds is
included in order to complete design develop of the proposed Rosemead Aquatic
Center. It is anticipated that the proposed Garvey Aquatic Center, including design
development, will be paid for through an RDA loan repayment to the General Fund in
conjunction with the proposed 2010 Tax Allocation Bonds. Thus, an additional
appropriations request will be forthcoming.
Submitted by:
DAVID MONTGOMERY -SCOTT
Parks and Recreation Director
Attachment A: Schematic Drawings of Garvey and Rosemead Aquatic Centers
Attachment B: Cost Estimates for Garvey and Rosemead Aquatic Centers
Attachment C: Aquatic Design Group Proposal for Consultant Services
Attachment D: Modified Designs and Cost Estimates of Rosemead Aquatic Center
Attachment E: CDC Resolution No. 2010 -17
ErIER50N PLACE
1
Dr
z
c � i
m
P
� z
g.
4
DOROT147 STREET
�V
Q
AQUATIC
� DESIGN GROUP
6
�_
�m.,�...m
m Bvr� •�c
IlwolM G <vm
p
5��������
N
-
AQUATIC
DESIGN GROUP
m arnw
cwDa.0 w hsm
a
_ e=
AQUATIC
tl..Y¢.01
DESIGN GROUP
ava pt
.aYll.q C. vnm
CA
V
N
m
W
R
y
a
0
W
0
D
r
o
Wm
W
9
�
as
x
a
�
O
a
s
m
m
y
�
0
z
0
z
❑0
a
i
1
�
y
W
m
I�
9
O
y
13
yA�y
9
E
Y
S
i
a
�
E
n.mo. Way.maa
.y
. AQUATIC
ss
6
DESIGN GROUP
� y mum .� rm.smi
J
.Lf BC.R1 .K
y
1
S
C
v
i
z
i
aye
ifa
$u
e
e
e
e
o
e
o
e
®o
JI I
e
e
�O
-
I I
\^ I 1
e
e
e
e
o
e
o
e
®o
e
e
]
Si
93
53
5S
33
33
SS
;3
53
i3
3S
�
3gsiii
�i
s
e.r vur urea w
�; �`Z �► AQUATIC
j a..rEr .111a 1Gl.1Ci cane � ��� � �
DESIGN Q0., OU P
b � C. alnl
\
;
:
2!
;
|
2�»
|
�
)
■
|
' §m �
\
)
ƒ
AQUATIC
2!
2�»
■� _ _ _
AQUATIC
' (°
§ � P
P
/ |
|
|)
|\ 41
@q
|
it
�
.
~
~
-
| ƒ
ƒ
�
�^
]] $ �
(S �
AQUATIC
' (°
_nozsvus aoaE u.wr w
:all AQUATIC
� ®ESIGN GROUP
aoesra a vvra
J
.i
1 1
1
� Y
i
... 1 1 1 1 _
49.
a
z
i
gf sagas ;aa
i���i
�
E
_nozsvus aoaE u.wr w
:all AQUATIC
� ®ESIGN GROUP
aoesra a vvra
.i
1 1
1
� Y
Y
aoesra a vvra
D m
m s
s
e �
�
i
r
s
y y
y
S I
I I
I
v
G
m
r v
O O
m O
I r
r
O
m I
I m
m m
m
E y
1
y I
I y
y E
y 1
I
I I
I
I
I I
j j
j 4
I
4 i
AQUATIC
�� curvEr ru¢�aluica r�^a —�_ DDESIGN GROUP
ImE1EM C.
—D
AQUATIC
ESIGN GROUP
°�P�OW°C4AEA
�e
®j
Wl ..A AM
'—
E•.Dea w .mo
Mm
Nil
(Bill
30
Z
e
e((c
4
iY'ai�R
.3�dAyig 9
9
A➢
3E
a iii
msa�
c
R g
pp99
3R
P aEi
b a�
Fz
➢
t
six E
i a
riPT�
u
�� E
:➢ gnat
A
0 Z
➢
➢
s
0 r -
o
o
sla \
y
O GF9i
�
f
V
r3
f
...-
@3
.i Si P d
�
� �
n 'a D
➢
o
s �
tot
c
s
p�R� 3aajj `ggry�� a�1A
5 SR
4
i j�eq-e2i �iai
jot ➢ a`i F�naid i
u
0
.0 0 [➢0 0
At v B PyiB
9
i���
➢�
Eii
� ➢ 3 �; �@ d Ed
i
c � i� 5� ��
�$
�
1
� • e e e 00 e a e e
a CdfP iC Bi yE p��g X�
'" o • � � � as ! ?i ��
•
R R
q
cR
➢ 4
9 9
O E e2
y [
fl `fR� �J9i EF i
� � ��
D
p
�
5
m y § 3i
it
1i
Ai
➢gi �
i
E�a�CCC�CSi "3t9� i �F
4# $ v
s
Si�
—D
AQUATIC
ESIGN GROUP
°�P�OW°C4AEA
�e
Wl ..A AM
'—
E•.Dea w .mo
Mm
—
AQUATIC
DESIGN GROUP
u.v.�NUn aa�Snp CSM1Y1
s
a 9$ $t€i�` c iJ
a7i
aIT
�K; agE :
�• _
iHIT!
1, (sit, HIP
��$ �
d
a
�4
m
m
Y
a
FA FA
!!,l) IF
#
R4 W
4 5 4
if
r P
�
O
M
, g
On
i35
y
T
g
j•
�I
•
r
o
Gr•
10
a ..
gh�94p{
SF 0i�
'
x xE'
m.p •
°€ 14 8°
lit ! 4
s
n
.1
It
iy
9
T--T i
a�. C_.8o Ex �gias 9�o 4aya$3
%
0
AH3 a
9Ai
I �I¢
v
z
vil
?p
6a`3M.
�.gpa
i
0
2
i
—
AQUATIC
DESIGN GROUP
u.v.�NUn aa�Snp CSM1Y1
�• _
.o.ev�n, a .vm
Va�RYE�PUOI
— --
AQUATIC
DBE SI GN GROUP
.aWaaa �[n�
E °—
° Em
a � °
° °
° lm °
m eyA de a
e
E a,�
°n
a
Va�RYE�PUOI
— --
AQUATIC
DBE SI GN GROUP
.aWaaa �[n�
y
r�
..
—
� AQUATIC
DESIGN GROUP
cttry rtt5 ttutlq carte
� ®rrue r raam�
un ncmt the
_ _
twOGW Ct vmo
o
F
=
m
I:
0
�
t
m
D
i
D
�y
t�
b
r
�i
a
y
D
T
t
I
A
n
G
m
E
y
r�
..
—
� AQUATIC
DESIGN GROUP
cttry rtt5 ttutlq carte
� ®rrue r raam�
un ncmt the
_ _
twOGW Ct vmo
Garvey Park Aquatic Center
Schematic Design Phase Cost Estimate
NO. DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT UNIT COST EXTENSION
1.0 Site Work:
1.1
General Conditions
I
LS
$50,000
$50,000
1.2
Demolition
I
LS
$150,000
$150,000
1.3
Engineered Fill
3,000
CY
$10
$30,000
1.4
Pool Decks
13,500
SF
$14
$189,000
1.5
Deck Drainage
480
LF
$50
$24,000
1.6
Landscape & Irrigation
7,500
SF
$15
$112,500
1.7
Perimeter Fencing
700
LF
$80
$56,000
1.8
Site Lighting Fixtures
10
EA
$5,000
$50,000
1.9
Site Concrete Benches
I
LS
$30,000
$30,000
1.10
Pilasters
18
EA
$2,000
$36,000
Subtotal- Site Work $727,500
2.0 Site Utilities:
2.1
3" Domestic Water
70
LF
$60
$4,200
2.2
3" Backflow Preventer
I
EA
$25,000
$25,000
2.3
3" Gate Valve
2
EA
$400
$800
2.4
Domestic Water Hook -up
I
LS
$30,000
$30,000
2.5
6" Sanitary Sewer
70
LF
$80
$5,600
2.6
Sanitary Sewer Hook -up
I
LS
$15,000
$15,000
2.7
6" Storm Sewer
70
LF
$50
$3,500
2.8
Storm Sewer Hook -up
I
EA
$15,000
$15,000
2.9
2" Natural Gas
70
LF
$60
$4,200
2.10
Natural Gas Hook -up
I
LS
$10,000
$10,000
2.11
3" Electrical Conduit
70
LF
$50
$3,500
2.12
Electrical Hook -up
I
LS
$15,000
$15,000
Subtotal- Site Utilites
$131,800
3.0
Buildings:
3.1
Bathhouse Building
3,366
SF
$260
$875,160
3.2
Shade Structures
3,388
SF
$25
$84,700
Subtotal- Buildings
$959,860
Aquatic Design
Group, Inc.
5/4/2010
Page 1 of 3
Garvey Park Aquatic Center
NO. DESCRIPTION
4.0 Swimming Pools:
4.1 . Wet Play
4.2 Teaching Pool
4.2 Water Slides
Subtotal- Swimming Pools
Schematic Design Phase Cost Estimate
QTY. UNIT UNIT COST EXTENSION
I LS $175,000
1,500 SF $110
1 LS $180,000
$175,000
$165,000
$180,000
$520,000
Aquatic Design Group, Inc. 5/4/2010 Page 2 of 3
Garvey Park Aquatic Center
SUMMARY OF COSTS:
1.0
SITE WORK
2.0
SITE UTILITIES
3.0
BUILDINGS
4.0
SWIMMING POOLS
TOTAL HARD COSTS
PLUS CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY AT 10%
PLUS GENERAL CONTRACTOR O/H & PROFIT AT 15%
PLUS BONDS & INSURANCE AT 2%
PLUS SOFT COSTS AT 10%
GRAND TOTAL
Schematic Design Phase Cost Estimate
$727,500
$131,800
$959,860
$520,000
$2,339,160
$233,916
$385,961
$59,181
$301,822
$3,320,040
Aquatic Design Group, Inc. 5/4/2010 Page 3 of 3
a; w
_
AQUATIC
GROUP
FOF14PpmkOIl�llta ClRe�
ifj
DESIGN
ENCO�R RK
hm.
--
AQUATIC
OESIGN GROUP
_
roeErw. w Imo
AQUATIC
N. �omaru nt urnC�®In -�
DESIGN GROUP
�oerm a EoA
m
0
I=
I
e�Lsed 114 E � -1 �i� �I a � —✓RVl_ _
i.i .
e a e Fea
�ya6
FE
VM
e00F11FK PN0!eC11zlIG ttTU
a
i. g...
C
C:
DESIGN
y rmuio ti �wm�
r�
LW 90fa AM
_
eoeoe,o. u vvra
i
i.i .
"�
e a e Fea
�ya6
FE
...
e00F11FK PN0!eC11zlIG ttTU
i %
i. g...
_
— -U
DESIGN
y rmuio ti �wm�
r�
LW 90fa AM
eoeoe,o. u vvra
i
"�
— -
AQUATIC
GROUP
feo Eo0. u,wf 11.W
e00F11FK PN0!eC11zlIG ttTU
i %
_
— -U
DESIGN
y rmuio ti �wm�
r�
LW 90fa AM
eoeoe,o. u vvra
sg
caw
�.
M
AQUATIC
.�.P..4.a„s,a.
���� DESIGN GROUP
'0=
v
LYfOOl1 �Yl.
NeH[/0. C1 NIO
m
T
_
H
a
M
4
O
mm
y
O_
1
T
Q
m
o
a
w
�
�
x
v
o
a
0
m
m
a
0
8
E
m
S
3
x
+
a
a
�i
i
i
4
i
sg
caw
�.
a�em. eanmwa
AQUATIC
.�.P..4.a„s,a.
���� DESIGN GROUP
'0=
v
LYfOOl1 �Yl.
NeH[/0. C1 NIO
_
n
m
��
AQUATIC
DESIGN G0.0llV
emus rom. :cools
�+
'E
rus .ml.,x. i9�A
m
I _
IF
v�
I
I
I
I
ssmr�u. e� rvlo
�i
I
I
it
i
♦
�R
I
I
Ism
F
I
I
I
s
n I
9
n t
C
I -
S
1
n
♦
� CS
r
�
G
1
�L I
��
AQUATIC
DESIGN G0.0llV
emus rom. :cools
�+
rus .ml.,x. i9�A
ssmr�u. e� rvlo
•
A
a
AQUATIC
wa�•awle<wpYnea ®nn
i
DESIGN GROUP
y
w e AM
wwerrwo, w °vio
9
tt
�
a
4
r
9
g
IF �:2 i? i is
� pg
A OA,,
g �F
�o
is
'j 1
b
C
.
ppp��x�rri
S
i
0 9
a c
•
6�
Ira
I-
<
u
99
S
EaF
- jj
se •e e• •
Rr j�y 4
w
a
a
•'
HI! hT
��
1�` a a «i
O p�
Es
a t.1 iEjC=�C aE ;
m • ••e ••••a•
6
j r
n a�a is jav
83FiY
s
�a5si�aj'a�9
DLg
Aim
R
m i� p
4j
&e ®
FIR
AQUATIC
wa�•awle<wpYnea ®nn
i
DESIGN GROUP
y
w e AM
wwerrwo, w °vio
N
pJ
AQUATIC
�
—
�i
�°Parw PUP tauttFt CBn[t
is
+
a7 2
{+ T
I I
z
o
DESIGN GROUP
y
.s,
•". oo.• .te
o
�
we[irwq a ma
3
n
4
S
a
m
m
t1
>
m A
ggq
i
i
,911
�
� 0
a
o i;
> iJ➢�aas9��
r Q
1 i 3 H 2�
5
o
g
g
3yy0
�Q �i
rm
v
t
i
I�kJ
P
P
P
t—f
1
{---� i--f�
I
i—f
m
9 Fc
QBQp$ QaiiC$
pp
$A�
EQ$l
>
i
°
z
19 C
N
pJ
AQUATIC
�
—
�i
�°Parw PUP tauttFt CBn[t
°
as
DESIGN GROUP
y
.s,
•". oo.• .te
we[irwq a ma
AQUATIC
GROUP
DESIGN
� tNa i1C�l, iv!
IInl1FKW a .vN
Ltdd �� �
�� 9
^va
r.• �
� ,!
ie ie
0 5v
g
10!
di€
y
MV
5s
Pis
i
¢g
�i
a
s
s•
s
s
a
I I
$ 99
¢Qv�i
—
Ca�°
a
u
y
� ;�
IIILLLIII
S
xt
i
z
F a�
dR
gp
id$
ills
a
p 1
6
a 9 P
IL
I
AQUATIC
GROUP
DESIGN
� tNa i1C�l, iv!
IInl1FKW a .vN
AQUATIC
- �° ���
�,
CA
�
ell
\ f
;
®
•
� |
,
¥
\
�'
dill
®`'
�
|
.
/�
12 `
§
/
Z|
§ ,
-
,,
)
-
- -
m§
a.
\
AQUATIC
- �° ���
�,
CA
§A 4 g
g g p gp
V
�°'
v 1 aom�uR.anc aaa.nca cam
OW
DESIGN GROUP
WA
AM
aau eean ave
.3.3
q w
{�
6;
$�FeI
(SIN
P
g
o g
� s
� �•
o ¢ q ppp
cg;
i�e49�� ���
s
•
� -7
0
a
1 1
$
1
a
�
o
_
��
�B €•€eggg$ �' ���ig�9p °�BBi�7�g�qB�2�AF��6B =BjF��@
4as5y 5 RFF 3}�8Bg a Fll`@ ��a
�c
�
B
� O
>
14
e � dill
�a F aF �� : 3A iFe a E�
FIB
Fa
P
i
a
,.. AQUATIC
�°'
v 1 aom�uR.anc aaa.nca cam
DESIGN GROUP
WA
AM
aau eean ave
.3.3
q w
ell
r Rp P 9 mm R IB
AQUATIC
gip
IL
h
j1p.116 4a
s
DEIGN GROUP
ila F
�
KO MI
Iroeer�4 u .mo
mum j
y
1 p' iS
m O
a ci FEE D
m
edAE a�a
Fj
AQUATIC
oerua
DEIGN GROUP
Iroeer�4 u .mo
_ r
AQUATIC
GROUP
DESIGN
P
$
Eqqjij
"
30 0 see 9
;
i
E Jill
E
a All
4-T11
i
P
P
®
»
41 T
'€
i ii
P
_
Qi
O
V, e a;
'
�
a
O
00 9 el
>
OZ
i'i
<1
too
22 pe p4
�Eoo,
a9,9
6t
8 6i
a i as
O
P
»
°
e�t
=i ii :�
s q�eeipiyiieiieaep lwpaea�
�
,P"
P
e_f9i9s
O e
P)i
P
44
jy
_ r
AQUATIC
GROUP
DESIGN
°aene°n a °vro
■!
_
AQUATIC
__ _
�;
_
: 2
FOE DESIGN GROUP
`
\$
!
�
■
`±
,
|�
(,
' '
m
% §7
AM
§
�
| m H1111, , ,
|
.
|
|
.
7FT
m
)`
q
}
11 HIP
:.
. .
x
■
.
;
)
It
|
#
sl ]�
k \�
n
||
■!
_
AQUATIC
__ _
�;
: 2
FOE DESIGN GROUP
AQUATIC
OESIGN GROUP
—_ �0rruas r.. rrum�
s
--
H
G
a Gp
G67
e�ane
�l���•I�l '
��t�l I ^ -1 '[mil i•+
I
is
nk
1
4
+YGIIIIIIINIIIII
J
AQUATIC
OESIGN GROUP
—_ �0rruas r.. rrum�
r� wf oLtrt. �YG
N�Ol�4 a YVA
Rosemead Park Aquatic Center
Schematic Design Phase Cost Estimate
NO. DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT UNIT COST EXTENSION
1.0 Site Work:
1.1
General Conditions
I
LS
$100,000
$100,000
1.2
Demolition
I
LS
$200,000
$200,000
1.3
Engineered Fill
4,000
CY
$10
$40,000
1.4
Pool Decks
21,400
SF
$14
$299,600
1.5
Deck Drainage
560
LF
$50
$28,000
1.6
Concrete Walkways
4,500
SF
$10
$45,000
1.7
Landscape & Irrigation
6,000
SF
$5
$30,000
1.8
Perimeter Fencing
900
LF
$80
$72,000
1.9
Site Lighting Fixtures
10
EA
$15,000
$150,000
1.10
Bleachers
8
EA
$4,200
$33,600
1.11
Pilasters
25
EA
$2,000
$50,000
2.12
Subtotal- Site Work
I
LS
$25,000
$1,048,200
2.0 Site Utilities:
2.1
4" Domestic Water
100
LF
$80
$8,000
2.2
4" Backflow Preventer
I
EA
$25,000
$25,000
2.3
4" Gate Valve
2
EA
$500
$1,000
2.4
Domestic Water Hook -up
I
LS
$50,000
$50,000
2.5
8" Sanitary Sewer
120
LF
$80
$9,600
2.6
Sanitary Sewer Hook -up
I
LS
$25,000
$25,000
2.7
8" Storm Sewer
300
LF
$60
$18,000
2.8
Storm Sewer Hook -up
I
EA
$25,000
$25,000
2.9
2" Natural Gas
120
LF
$60
$7,200
2.10
Natural Gas Hook -up
I
LS
$10,000
$10,000
2.11
4" Electrical Conduit
200
LF
$50
$10,000
2.12
Electrical Hook -up
I
LS
$25,000
$25,000
Subtotal- Site Utilites
$213,800
3.0 Buildings:
3.1 Bathhouse Building 4,471 SF $260 $1,162,460
3.2 Shade Structures 8,300 SF $45 $373,500
3.3 Solar System 7,200 SF $22 $158,400
Subtotal- Buildings $1,694,360
Aquatic Design Group, Inc. 5/4/2010 Page I of 4
Rosemead Park Aquatic Center
NO. DESCRIPTION
4.0 Swimming Pools:
4.1 25 Y x 45 M Pool
4.2 Timing System / Scoreboard
4.3 Competition Equipment
Subtotal- Swimming Pools
Schematic Design Phase Cost Estimate
QTY. UNIT UNIT COST EXTENSION
11,154 SF $135 $1,505,790
I LS $80,000 $80,000
1 LS $50,000 $50,000
$1,635,790
Aquatic Design Group, Inc. 5/4/2010 Page 3 of 4
Rosemead Park Aquatic Center
SUMMARY OF COSTS:
1.0 SITE WORK
2.0 SITE UTILITIES
4.0 SWIMMING POOLS
TOTAL HARD COSTS
PLUS CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY AT 10%
PLUS GENERAL CONTRACTOR O/H & PROFIT AT 15%
PLUS BONDS & INSURANCE AT 2%
PLUS SOFT COSTS AT 10%
GRAND TOTAL
Schematic Design Phase Cost Estimate
$1,048,200
$213,800
$1,694,360
$1,635,790
$4,592,150
$459,215
$757,705
$116,181
$592,525
$6,517,776
Aquatic Design Group, Inc. 5/4/2010 Page 4 of 4
eeDESIGN GROUP
AQUATIC
1.0 INTRODUCTION
PROPOSAL FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
1.1 AQUATIC DESIGN GROUP, INC. of Carlsbad, California (hereinafter referred
to as "CONSULTANT'), proposes to provide consulting design services to
CITY OF ROSEMEAD (hereinafter referred to as "CLIENT') for the following
project
Rosemead and Garvey Park Aquatic Centers
Rosemead, California
1.2 In conformance with the Request for Proposal dated 10 February 2010 as
issued by Mr. David Montgomery Scott, CONSULTANT shall provide:
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
2.1 CONSULTANT shall provide design and engineering services as hereinafter
described for the following aquatic centers:
2.1.1 Rosemead Park Aquatic Center which includes the following elements:
demolition of existing pool building, mechanical building, and swimming
pool and pool deck; new bathhouse of approximately 3.850 SF; new
utility points of connection; new structures and solar system; new 25Y
x 45M swimming pool; new pool decks and deck drainage; and
associated landscape.
2.1.2 Garvey Park Aquatic Center which includes the following elements:
demolition of existing pool building, mechanical enclosure, swimming
pool and pool deck; new bathhouse building of approximately 2,480 SF;
new utility points of connection; new shade structures; new wet play
area; new teaching pool; new water slides; new pool deck and deck
drainage; and associated landscape.
3.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES
3.1 Schematic Design Phase:
3.1.1 CONSULTANT shall review the program furnished by CLIENT to
ascertain the requirements of the project and shall arrive at a mutual
understanding of such requirements with CLIENT.
Proposal for Consultant Services
Rosemead and Garvey Park Aquatic Centers- Rosemead, California
Page 2 of I I
3.1.2 Based upon the mutually agreed upon program, schedule and
construction budget requirements, CONSULTANT shall prepare, for
approval by CLIENT, Schematic Design Documents consisting of
drawings and other documents illustrating the scale and relationship of
project components. Schematic Design Phase deliverables shall include
the following:
.I Swimming pool plan views.
.2 Swimming pool longitudinal sections.
.3 Swimming pool finish details.
.4 Swimming pool decks and drainage details.
.5 Site and building plan views.
.6 Building longitudinal sections.
.7 Building finish details.
.8 Landscaping and hardscape details.
3.1.3 CONSULTANT shall submit to CLIENT an estimate of probable
construction cost based upon current area, volume, or other unit costs.
3.2 Design Development Phase:
3.2.1 Based upon the approved Schematic Design Documents and any
adjustments authorized by CLIENT in the program, schedule or
construction budget, CONSULTANT shall prepare, for approval by
CLIENT, Design Development Documents consisting of drawings and
other documents to fix and describe the size and character of the
Project as to architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical systems,
materials and such other elements as may be appropriate. Design
Development Phase deliverables shall include the following:
.I Swimming pool plan views.
.2 Swimming pool longitudinal and cross - sections.
.3 Swimming pool finish details.
.4 Swimming pool rail goods I competitive equipment details.
.5 Site and building plan views.
.6 Building longitudinal sections.
.7 Building finish details.
.8 Landscaping and hardscape details.
Proposal for Consultant Services
Rosemead and Garvey Park Aquatic Centers- Rosemead, California
Page 3 of I I
.9 Outline specification in CSI format
.10 Swimming pool decks and drainage details.
3.2.2 CONSULTANT shall provide CLIENT with building and infrastructure
requirements, including design criteria, as needed to service the
swimming pool and building equipment, including.
.I Swimming pool equipment room dimensions.
.2 Building mechanical room dimensions.
.3 Sanitary/storm sewer requirements and points of connection.
.4 Domestic water requirements and points of connection.
.5 Natural gas requirements and points of connection.
.6 HVAC requirements for swimming pool and building
equipment
.7 Electrical requirements and points of connection for swimming
pool and building equipment.
.B Swimming pool decks and drainage details
.9 Landscaping and hardscape details.
3.2.3 CONSULTANT shall advise CLIENT of any adjustments to the estimate
of probable construction cost.
3.3 Construction Documents ! Permit Drawings Phase:
3.3.1 Based upon the approved Design Development Documents and any
further adjustments in the scope or quality of the Project or in the
construction budget authorized by CLIENT, CONSULTANT shall
prepare, for approval by CLIENT, Construction Documents consisting
of Drawings and Specifications setting forth in detail the requirements
for construction of the swimming pools. Construction Documents
Phase deliverables shall include the following:
Architectural Drawings:
• Swimming pool plan views.
• Swimming pool longitudinal and cross - sections.,
• Swimming pool finish details.
• Swimming pool rail goods / competitive equipment details.
Proposal for Consultant Services
Rosemead and Garvey Park Aquatic Centers- Rosemead, California
Page 4 of I I
• Swimming pool decks and drainage details.
• Building plan view.
• Site plan view.
• Building longitudinal and cross- sections.
• Building equipment details.
.2 Structural Drawings:
• Swimming pool / surge tank structural sections.
• Swimming pool / surge tank reinforcement schedules.
• Building structural sections.
• Building reinforcement schedules.
• Miscellaneous building and swimming pool structural details.
.3 Mechanical Drawings:
• Swimming pool piping plan.
• Swimming pool mechanical equipment piping plan.
• Swimming pool mechanical equipment sections.
• Building piping plan.
• Building equipment piping plan.
• Building mechanical equipment sections.
• Miscellaneous building and swimming pool mechanical
details.
.4 Electrical Drawings:
• Swimming pool underwater lighting plan.
• Swimming pool timing system I scoreboard plan.
• Swimming pool single phase panel schedule.
• Building lighting plan.
• Building marquee plan.
• Building panel schedule.
• Miscellaneous building and swimming pool electrical details.
.5 Miscellaneous:
• Swimming pool / surge tank structural calculations.
Proposal for Consultant Services
Rosemead and Garvey Park Aquatic Centers- Rosemead, California
Page 5 of I I
• Final form swimming pool technical specifications in CSI
format
• Swimming pool decks and appurtenances details
3.3.2 CONSULTANT shall advise CLIENT of any adjustments to previous
estimates of probable construction cost indicated by changes in
requirements or general market conditions.
3.3.3 CONSULTANT shall assist CLIENT in the preparation of the necessary
bidding information, bidding forms, the Conditions of the Contract, and
the form of Agreement between the Owner and the Contractor, as it
relates to the design program elements.
3.3.4 CONSULTANT shall assist CLIENT in connection with CLIENT's
responsibility for filing documents required for the approval of
governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project
3.4 Construction Observation Phase:
3.4.1 CONSULTANT shall be a representative of and shall advise and consult
with CLIENT: 1) during construction until final payment to the
Contractor is due; and 2) as an Additional Service at CLIENTS
direction from time to time during the correction period described in
the Contract for Construction. CONSULTANT shall have authority to
act on behalf of CLIENT only to the extent provided in this proposal
unless otherwise modified. CONSULTANT shall provide the following
construction support services:
.I Provide clarification, as required, of construction documents
and respond to contractor requests for information.
.2 Review and approval of swimming pool- related sample and
material submittals specified in Contract Documents.
.3 Assistance with the issuance and negotiation of change orders.
.4 Review of contractor - submitted Record Drawings for contract
conformance and completeness based upon field observations.
3.4.2 CONSULTANT shall visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage
of construction or otherwise agreed by CLIENT and CONSULTANT in
Proposal for Consultant Services
Rosemead and Garvey Park Aquatic Centers- Rosemead, California
Page 6 of I I
writing to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the
Work completed and to determine in general if the Work is being
performed in a manner indicating that the Work when completed will
be in accordance with the Contract Documents. However,
CONSULTANT shall not be required to make exhaustive or
continuous on -site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the
Work. On the basis of on -site observations, CONSULTANT shall keep
CLIENT informed of the progress and quality of the Work, and shall
endeavor to guard CLIENT against defects and deficiencies in the
Work.
3.4.3 CONSULTANT shall visit the site at approximately eleven (1 1) months
following the completion of project to conduct a warranty review / site
walk with CLIENT and owner. Other than reimbursable expenses
which will be billed in accordance with 7.1.3 below, CLIENT will not be
billed for this visit
3.5 Visits to the Project Site:
3.5.1 CONSULTANT shall visit the offices of CLIENT and /or the Project Site
in conformance with the following schedule:
.I Schematic Design Phase ..................... Two (2) site visits
.2 Design Development Phase ................ Two (2) site visits
.3 Construction Documents Phase ....... Four (4) site visits
.4 Construction Observation Phase ..... Twelve (12) site visits
.5 1 ]-Month Warranty .................... One (I) site visit
4.0 EXCLUSIONS TO SCOPE OF SERVICES
4.1 CLIENT shall provide full information regarding requirements for the project
including a program which shall set forth CLIENTS design objectives,
constraints and criteria, including space requirements and relationships,
flexibility and expandability, special equipment, systems and site requirements.
Additional information that may be required by CONSULTANT as prepared by
other members of the project team shall include:
Proposal for Consultant Services
Rosemead and Garvey Park Aquatic Centers- Rosemead, California
Page 7 of I I
4.1.1 Soils testinglengineering, including finalized geotechnical investigation
report. Note: Unusual soil conditions such as expansive soils, fill soils,
soils with low bearing capacity (under 2,000 psf), and high water tables
which require additional engineering will be considered an additional
service and compensated for in conformance with Article 7.1.2, below.
4.1.2 Destructive testing of existing pool structures to confirm as -built
condition. Note: CONSULTANT cannot guarantee structural integrity
of existing pool structures without confirming as -built condition of pool
wall thickness, concrete reinforcement and compressive strength.
Additional engineering for deficient structures will be considered an
additional service and compensated for in conformance with Article
7.1.2, below.
4.1.3 Site topography surveys.
4.1.4 Miscellaneous plan check and permit fees as may be required by
regulatory agencies.
5.0 INDEMNITY
5.1 The CONSULTANT agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to
indemnify and hold the CLIENT harmless from any damage, liability or cost
(including reasonable attorney's fees and costs of defense) to the extent caused
by the CONSULTANTS negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance
of professional services under this Agreement and those of his or her
subconsultants or anyone for whom the CONSULTANT is legally liable. The
CLIENT agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold
the CONSULTANT harmless from any damage, liability or cost (including
reasonable attorney's fees and costs of defense) to the extent caused by the
CLIENT's negligent acts, errors or omissions and those of his or her
contractors, subcontractors or consultants or anyone for whom the CLIENT is
legally liable, and arising from the project that is the subject of this Agreement.
The CONSULTANT is not obligated to indemnify the CLIENT in any manner
whatsoever for the CLIENT's own negligence.
6.0 USE OF DOCUMENTS I ELECTRONIC FILES
Proposal for Consultant Services
Rosemead and Garvey Park Aquatic Centers- Rosemead, California
Page 8 of I I
6.1 CLIENT acknowledges the CONSULTANTS construction documents as
instruments of professional service. Nevertheless, the drawings and specifications
shall become the property of CLIENT upon completion of the work and payment
in full of all monies due to the CONSULTANT. CLIENT shall not reuse or make
any modifications to the drawings and specifications without the prior written
consent of CONSULTANT. CLIENT agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by
law, to indemnify and hold the CONSULTANT harmless from any claim, liability
or cost (including reasonable attorney's fees and defense costs) arising or allegedly
arising out of any unauthorized reuse or modification of the construction
documents by CLIENT or any person or entity that acquires or obtains the plans
and specifications from or through CLIENT without the written authorization of
the CONSULTANT.
6.2 Electronic files may be provided by CONSULTANT for review by CLIENT and
use by the Design Team in the preparation of construction documents.
CONSULTANT assumes no responsibility for determining whether the data or
software format are correct, up -to -date, or together represent actual
conditions, or liability for the translations or results thereof. Acceptance or use
by CLIENT of electronic files shall constitute a total release from liability, and as
an indemnification for all costs or expenses from any claims, suits, judgments, or
any other actions or liability as a result of such use. Under no circumstances
shall delivery of the electronic files be deemed a sale by CONSULTANT, and
CONSULTANT makes no warranties, either express or implied, of
merchantability and fitness for any particular purpose. In no event shall
CONSULTANT be liable for any loss of profit of any consequential damages as
a result of re -use of electronic files. Drawing plan views may be delivered in
AutoCAD .dwg or Adobe .pdf format Drawing detail sheets will be delivered
in Adobe .pdf format only. For use outside of the Design Team or for purposes
other than the generation of construction documents a handling fee of $250.00
plus $25.00 per drawing sheet shall be remitted to CONSULTANT.
7.0 COMPENSATION
7.1 CLIENT shall compensate CONSULTANT for services rendered as follows:
7.1.1 Basic Services: The Scope of Services described above shall be
compensated for by a lump sum, fixed fee equivalent to: FIVE
Proposal for Consultant Services
Rosemead and Garvey Park Aquatic Centers- Rosemead, California
Page 9 of 1 I
HUNDRED EIGHTY THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND 00 /100
DOLLARS ($580,500.00) equivalent to 7% of construction valuation.
7.1.2 Additional Services: If requested, additional services will be billed for
on an hourly basis, in conformance with the rates outlined in Article
7.3, below.
7.1.3 Reimbursable Expenses: In addition to basic compensation, an
allowance of $2,000 shall be provided for reimbursable expenses.
Reimbursable expenses will be billed at CONSULTANTS direct cost,
and shall include the following:
I Plotting and reproduction expense of Drawings, Specifications
and other documents.
.2 Special delivery and handling of documents and correspondence
such as courier and overnight delivery services.
.3 Travel and lodging expense associated with travel outside of
Southern California in connection with the Project.
7.2 Terms of Payment
7.2.1 Payments for Basic Services shall be made based upon percentage of
completion in not less than monthly installments, in conformance with
the following schedule of values:
.I Schematic Design Phase ...................
$ 58,050.00 COMPLETED
.2 Design Development Phase ............
$ 145,125.00
.3 Construction Documents Phase ...
$ 290,250.00
.4 Bidding or Negotiation Phase ........
$ 29,025.00
.5 Construction Observation Phase ..
$ 58,050.00
7.3 Hourly Rates:
7.3.1 Compensation for additional services (when requested and authorized
in advance by CLIENT) shall be provided in conformance with the
following hourly rates:
Proposal for Consultant Services
Rosemead and Garvey Park Aquatic Centers- Rosemead, California
Page 10 of I I
.I Principal . ...............................
.2 Project Engineer ......................
.3 Senior Project Manager ..............
.4 Project Manager .......................
.5 CAD Technician ......................
.6 Graphics Technician .................
.7 Clerical .. ...............................
8.0 TIME
$ 195.00 per hour
$ 165.00 " "
$ 135.00 " "
$ 125.00 " "
$ 100.00
$ 85.00
$ 50.00
8.1 CONSULTANT shall prosecute design work in conformance with the following
schedule, contingent upon receipt of all required information (program, base
sheets, soils data, etc.) from CLIENT or CLIENT's designated representative:
8.1.1 Schematic Design Phase: Complete within forty (40) calendar days of
CONSULTANTS receipt of fully executed professional services
agreement between CLIENT and CONSULTANT.
8.1.2 Design Development Phase: Complete within fifty (50) calendar days of
approval of Schematic Design Documents and authorization to proceed
with Design Development Phase.
8.1.3 Construction Documents Phase: Complete within sixty (60) calendar
days of approval of Design Development Documents and authorization
to proceed with Construction Documents Phase.
as •w41Y0BY10 POBL 4MUf RM __....n .amwF ti �ay.ansi J
�g - '•'��• �j AQUATIC
F � r•.e ABSFI6�0 rABR AWAM.B caR�m .�.� �
DESIGN GROUP
It
3
ai
O
0
D
0
4
... ... F F B P... F F d g S
NA p
E A ■t
EE 33,,�� [5[ EypE gygy yF 9Eg d y S B
W mac. AMt EHCOtt1 AK y
xoeErEAO. a amo
G F
F 1
1
11 �
�
I I
I I
I 1
1
I I
IF
VIII I
I I IIP
blll I
IIIE
�Iil I
III'
�II I
I
It
3
ai
O
0
D
0
4
... ... F F B P... F F d g S
NA p
E A ■t
EE 33,,�� [5[ EypE gygy yF 9Eg d y S B
W mac. AMt EHCOtt1 AK y
xoeErEAO. a amo
4
111m-
-
y-1' ` P i4y�
it .... i.. r... A.
a
i 5
CAP
..Wawmwo root uwur ruw
AQUATIC
r
4w.v '
pO5E1FIp PAW( AWAMS CFllipl
��EmpN
a
!
GROUP
E
Is I
.Jtl p .VE
PoevcMAO. CA c. nrro
�.�-�
" I
I
♦
�/
F1�-
tw
�I
_� -�
X71—
— — — — — —
-
-- ---
- - - - --
1;
F
I
I
_
I
I
_a
-
II--
F_ _ ____
_______ -'x ---------
III
I I d.
I I III
9,11
I
X9111______
st
-- ,_ �- - IIIF
I'
y-1' ` P i4y�
it .... i.. r... A.
a
i 5
CAP
..Wawmwo root uwur ruw
AQUATIC
r
4w.v '
pO5E1FIp PAW( AWAMS CFllipl
��EmpN
a
!
GROUP
E
Is I
.Jtl p .VE
PoevcMAO. CA c. nrro
�.�-�
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION, ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA APPROPRIATING $350,100 FOR
ROSEMEAD AQUATIC CENTER DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
Whereas, the FY 2009 -10 budget was passed and adopted by the
Community Development Commission on June 23, 2009; and
Whereas, appropriations are the legal authority for redevelopment
agencies to spend; and
Whereas, as program and project plans change throughout the year,
specific appropriations need to be amended to accommodate the changes; and
Therefore, $350,100 is appropriated in 4215 - 4420- P53245 (Special
Projects — Architectural Services — Aquatic Renovation — Rosemead) to be
funded from 2006A Bond Proceeds for Rosemead Aquatic Center Design
Development.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of May 2010.
ATTEST:
GLORIA MOLLEDA
COMMISSION SECRETARY
GARY TAYLOR
CHAIRMAN
APPROVE AS TO FORM:
JOSEPH M. MONTES
COMMISSION ATTORNEY