CC - Minutes 06-08-10Minutes of the
JOINT CITY COUNCIL
AND
FINANCE AUTHORITY AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
June 8; 2010
The regular meeting of the Rosemead City Council, Finance Authority and Community Development
Commission was called to order by Mayor Taylor at 6:08 p.m. in the Rosemead City Council Chamber
located at 8838 East Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California.
FLAG SALUTE: Vice-Chair/Mayor Pro Tern Ly
INVOCATION: Commissioner/Council Member Armenta
PRESENT: Mayor/Chairman/Chair Taylor, Mayor Pro TemNice-ChairmanNice-Chair Ly, Council
Member/Commissioner/ Board Member Armenta, and Council Member/Commissioner/ Board Member Low.
ABSENT: Council Member/Commissioner/ Board Member Clark
Council Member Clark had an excused absence because she attended the National League of Cities
conference in Maryland.
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Allred, City Attorney Montes, Community Development Director Wong,
Director of Finance Brisco, Director of Parks and Recreation Montgomery-Scott, Economic Development
Administrator Ramirez, Public Affairs Manager Flores, Deputy Public Works Director Marcarello, and City
Clerk Molleda
1. READING OF ORDINANCE TITLES
A. Reading of Ordinance Titles
California Government Code section 36934 requires that prior to adoption, ordinances must be
read in their entirety at either the Council meeting at which they are introduced or adopted,
unless reading, other than the title of the Ordinance, is waived. In order not to miss this
procedural step, many cities routinely include an agenda item at the front of the agenda, seeking
a motion from the City Council to approve all ordinances by title only. The alternative is to
include as part of the motion approving an ordinance first reading or adoption a request that
further reading of the ordinance be waived., In order to avoid missing that as part of a motion, the
City Attorney's office is recommendin6 that=the Council include a standing agenda item at the
beginning of each agenda to address !his procedural issue as set forth below:
Rosemead Community Development Commission, Finance Authority and
City Council Joint Meeting
Minutes of June 8, 2010
Page 1 of 12
Recommendations:
1'. That the City Council and the Community Development Commission determine that the titles
to all ordinances which appear on this public agenda have been read, and waived further
reading; and
2. That this item of "Reading of Ordinance Titles" be included on City Council meeting agendas
on an ongoing basis.
City Attorney Montes explained that this is a procedural requirement under California Government Code
section 36934 and therefore it is included as an agenda item.
Mayor Taylor reiterated that it would be best that the titles should still be read so people may know what item
is being discussed.
Mayor Pro TemNice-Chair Ly made a motion, seconded by Council Member/Commissioner Low, to
approve staff recommendation to included the reading of ordinances on the agenda as on going
basis and waived further reading of ordinances. Vote resulted in:
Yes: Armenta, Low, Ly, Taylor
No: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Clark
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE
Daniel Garcia - representative of Community Disability Services expressed concern with the availability of
the agenda for people with disabilities. Mr. Garcia stated he would like to work with the City on providing more
information to people with disabilities.
3. COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Claims and Demands
Resolution No. 2010 -19
Recommendation: to approve Resolution No. 2010 -19, entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -19 FOR PAYMENT OF COMMISSION EXPENDITURES IN THE
AMOUNT OF $113,118.70 DEMAND NOS. 10086 AND NOS. 11272 THROUGH 11279.
Mayor Pro Tern/Vice-Chair Ly made a motion, seconded by Council Member/Commissioner Armenta,
to approve Consent Calendar. Vote resulted in:
Rosemead Community Development Commission, Finance Authority and
City Council Joint Meeting
Minutes of June 8, 2010
Page 2 of 12
Yes: Armenta, Low, Ly, Taylor
No: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Clark
4. Matters from Executive Director and Staff
A. Designation of Dates For Regular Meetings of the Rosemead Financing Authority
The Rosemead Financing Authority was created on February 1, 2006 as part of the 2006
Tax Increment Bonds issuance. At the time of creation, formal action to designate when
regularly scheduled meetings would be held was not required. Government Code Section
6592.1 which became effective January 1, 2010 requires that any action by the Authority
related to the issuance of bonds be held at a regularly scheduled meeting of the Authority.
Since the Preliminary Official Statement and supporting resolutions will be brought before the
CDC and the Financing Authority on June 22nd, the designation of the regularly meeting
schedule must be done prior to taking any action on the proposed bond issuance.
Recommendation: That the Rosemead Financing Authority designate the second and
fourth Tuesdays of each month at 6:00 p.m. as the regular meeting schedule (meetings of
the Financing Authority will be convened as needed to conduct business) and adopt
Resolution No. FA 2010-01, entitled:
RESOLUTION OF THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE ROSEMEAD FINANCING
AUTHORITY ESTABLISHING REGULAR MEETING DATES
Assistant City Manager Hawkesworth reviewed staff report.
Council Member/Board Member Low made a motion, seconded by Council Member/Board Member
Armenta, to designate dates for the Rosemead Finance Authority and adopt Resolution No. FA 2010-
01. Vote resulted in:
Yes: Armenta, Low, Ly, Taylor
No: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Clark
B. The Glendon Hotel Update
At the May 25, 2010 Commission meeting, it was requested that the complete file on the
Glendon Hotel (8832 Glendon Way) be placed on the next regular Commission meeting
agenda. Also, as directed by the Commission, negotiations have commenced on the sale of
the property to a private firm; and appropriate measures have been taken in an effort to
recover $55,384 owed to the Commission by the former Hotel Operator.
Rosemead Community Development Commission, Finance Authority and
City Council Joint Meeting
Minutes of June 8, 2010
Page 3 of 12
Recommendation: That the Community Development Commission receive and file the
report.
Mayor Pro Tem Ly- made a motion to receive and file the report and forward all related documents to the
District Attorney's Office, Public Integrity Unit.
Mayor Taylor- inquired about the bonding company. Mr. Taylor referred to page 7, section 14B, which
required a Fidelity Bond that would protect the Commission in case there was misapplications of funds by the
operator.
Economic Development Administrator Ramirez stated that the City did not receive anything from the operator
as proof of their insurance when the agreement was signed.
City Manager Allred explained that there should have been an effort to implement that provision and it was
not implemented.
City Attorney Montes explained that City can forward the report and other file materials to the District
Attorney's office.
Mayor Taylor asked that the letter include the $100,000 payment.
Mayor Pro Tern Ly asked that staff provide the minutes when Council discussed how much the City should
be receiving from the Hotel on a monthly basis and how it's not in the contract.
Council MemberArmenta stated that the Operator was supposed to take out permits with the $50,000 first
given to them and should be included in the letter to the DA's office.
Mayor Pro Tern Ly made a motion, seconded by Council Member Armenta to file the report and
forward all related Glendon Hotel documents to the District Attorney's office, Integrity Unit. Vote
resulted in: ,
Yes: Armenta, Low, Ly, Taylor
No: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Clark
5. CLOSED SESSION
A. Conference with Labor Negotiator
Government Code Section 54957.6;
Negotiator for the City: City Manager Jeff Allred and Human Resources Manager Su Tan
Employee Unit: Rosemead Employees Association
Rosemead Community Development Commission, Finance Authordy and
City Council Joint Meeting
Minutes of June 8, 2010
Page 4 of 12
City Attorney Montes requested that an additional closed session item be added for discussion as
consideration of Initiation of Litigation Government Code Section 54956.9 C.
Mayor Pro Tern Ly made a motion, seconded by Council Member Armenta to add possible Initiation of
Litigation item for discussion for closed session. Vote resulted in:
Yes: Armenta, Low, Ly, Taylor
No: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Clark
City Council recessed to Closed Session at 6:25 pm and reconvened back at 7:05 pm. City Attorney Montes
reported that City Council voted 4-0 to authorized initiation of litigation if needed to enjoin the operation of the
most recently discovered medical marijuana clinic.
Minutes of the
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
The regular meeting of the Rosemead City Council was called to order by Mayor Taylor at 7:06 PM in the
Rosemead City Council Chamber located at 8838 East Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California.
PRESENT: Mayor Taylor, Mayor Pro Tern Ly, Council Member Armenta, and Council Member Low.
ABSENT: Council Member Clark - Council Member Clark had an excused absence because she
attended the National League of Cities conference in Maryland.
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Allred, City Attorney Montes, Community Development Director Wong,
Director of Finance Brisco, Director of Parks and Recreation Montgomery-Scott, Economic Development
Administrator Ramirez, Public Affairs Manager Flores, Deputy Public Works Director Marcarello, and City
Clerk Molleda
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE
Daniel Garcia - expressed that the city did not have a commission on disability or anything relating to the
American Disabilities Act to advise the City.
Helen Gunther - expressed concern with a suspicious person in her neighborhood and advises everyone to
report suspicious acts.
Council Member Armenta stated that the residents should be encouraged to call the Sheriff's Department
when they see something suspicious in their neighborhood.
Council Member Low asked if the Sheriff's Department can have a respond time log so people can be more
aware of respond times for different issues.
Rosemead Community Development Commission, Finance Authority and
City Council Joint Meeting
Minutes of June 8, 2010
Page 5 of 12
Sharon Esquiviel - asked if the residents will get their address painted on the curbs in front of their homes
anytime soon.
Deputy Public Works Director Marcarello explained that curbs painting will be done throughout the City as the
Slurry Seal Project commences.
Mayor Taylor stated that it was done more efficiently when a contractor would come in the city to re-paint
addresses on curves.
Council Member Armenta commented that in the past there have been people asking residents for money to
paint their address on the curve.
Mayor Taylor reiterated when re-painting of addresses is scheduled to start, there are people who ask
residents to give money to paint their curbs.
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Consideration of the Imposition of Rubbish Liens
Pursuant to the contract between the City of Rosemead and Consolidated Disposal Services,
a Public Hearing has been scheduled to consider protest regarding the imposition of liens on
real property from those customers who are delinquent in paying their trash collection bills.
Recommendation: That the City Council direct staff to place liens on those properties
whose owners have not paid their trash collection bills in full by 6:00 p.m. on June 30, 2010.
City Manager Allred reviewed staff report
Mayor Taylor opened the Public Hearing at 7:19 p.m. There being no comments, Mayor Taylor closed the
Public Hearing at 7:19 p.m.
Council MemberArmenta commented that residents on the list should have received a notice that a lien is
being placed on their properties.
Mayor Pro Tem Ly made a motion, seconded by Council Member Low to place liens on those
properties whose owners have not paid their trash collection bills. Vote resulted in:
Yes: Armenta, Low, Ly, Taylor
No: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Clark
Rosemead Community Development Commission, Finance Authority and
City Council Joint Meeting
Minutes of June 8, 2010
Page 6 of 12
B. Extension of Urgency Ordinance No. 897 to prohibit Issuance of any New Permit,
License, Approval, or Entitlement pertaining to New Massage Establishments and
Massage Technicians
On May 11, 2010, pursuant to Government Code section 65858, the City Council enacted
Urgency Ordinance No. 897, which imposed a moratorium on the issuance of any new
permit, license, approval, or entitlement pertaining to new massage establishments and
massage technicians for a period of 45 days. During this 45-day period, staff and the City
Attorney have begun to monitor the initial operations of the California Massage Therapy
Council, as well as the interaction between Assembly Bill 1822 ("AB 1822") and Senate Bill
731 ("SB 731"). There remains a considerable delay in the processing of applications by the
California Massage Therapy Council, and there remain uncertainties regarding the Council's
ability to effectively implement SB 731. Due to City staffs and the City Attorney's on-going
review of SB 371 and AB 1822, as well as review of the Council's interpretations of SB 731
and its implementation of SB 731, the limited 45-day period has not provided a sufficient
amount of time to undertake a thorough review of the City's current massage regulations and
to determine how such regulations may need to be revised to work in conjunction with AB
1822 and SB 731. Taken together, this warrants the City Council's consideration of the
adoption of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. 900 to extend Urgency Interim Ordinance No.
897 for a period of ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days.
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 897, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA,
ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF ANY NEW PERMIT, LICENSE,
APPROVAL, OR ENTITLEMENT PERTAINING TO NEW MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS
AND MASSAGE TECHNICIANS
City Manager Allred reviewed staff report.
Mayor Taylor opened the Public Hearing at 7:21 p.m. There being no comments, Mayor Taylor closed the
Public Hearing at 7:21 pm.
Council Member Low made a motion, seconded by Council Member Armenta, to adopt Urgency
Interim Ordinance No. 900 to extend Urgency Interim Ordinance No. 897 for a period of ten (10)
months and fifteen (15) days. Vote resulted in:
Yes: Armenta, Low, Ly, Taylor
No: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Clark
Rosemead Community Development Commission, Finance Authority and
City Council Joint Meeting
Minutes of June 8, 2010
Page 7 of 12
8. CITY COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Minutes
April 27, 2010 - Regular Meeting
B. Claims and Demands Resolution No. 2010 - 35
Recommendation: to approve Resolution No. 2010 -35, entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2010 - 35, FOR PAYMENT OF CITY EXPENDITURES IN THE
AMOUNT OF $802,408.52 NUMBERED 100850 THROUGH 100864 AND 69830 AND
69972, INCLUSIVELY.
C. Ordinance 896 - Second Reading: Amending Chapter 8.20.110 of the Municipal Code
Concerning the Maximum Bingo Payout Amount
On May 25, 2010, the City Council introduced Ordinance No. 896, which amends Chapter
5.20.110 of the Municipal Code changing the maximum bingo payout from $250 to $500.
Ordinance No. 896 is now before Council at the required second reading for adoption.
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 896 at its second reading,
entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 5.20.110 OF THE
ROSEMEAD MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING THE MAXIMUM BINGO PAYOUT
AMOUNT
D. Authorization of Agents to Execute on Behalf of the City for the Purpose of Obtaining
State and Federal Financial Assistance through Emergency Management Assistance
Programs
The City Council will consider adoption of Resolution No. 2010-38 authorizing officials and
employees to take actions on behalf of the City to obtain financial assistance from State and
Federal agencies for emergency preparedness and disaster relief.
Recommendation: That the City Council approve Resolution No. 2010-38, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA,
APPOINTING AND APPROVING AUTHORIZED AGENTS TO EXECUTE FOR AND ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD FOR THE PURPOSES OF OBTAINING STATE
AND FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE THROUGH EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
Rosemead Community Development Commission, Finance Authority and ,
City Council Joint Meeting
Minutes of June 8, 2010
Page 8 of 12
E. Proposition 1B Transportation Bond Local Streets and Roads Improvement
The California Department of Finance requires cities to identify a list of potential street
improvement projects that may be completed using Proposition 1 B funding. $853,729.42
has been allocated to the City of Rosemead for the 2010-11 fiscal year.
Recommendation: That the City Council approve the list of potential projects as required by
the California Department of Finance to establish eligibility and participation in Proposition
1 B Local Streets and Roads Improvement Funds.
Resolution No. 2010.37, Consenting to the Recordation of the Irrevocable Offer of
Dedication for those Portions of LA County Assessors Parcel No. 5283.016-024
Proposed for Use for Public Sidewalks and Amenities
In accordance with the City of Rosemead Municipal Code Section No. 15.04.040, the
owner(s) of the property located at 2515 Angelus Avenue, Rosemead, California have
submitted an executed irrevocable offer of dedication. The irrevocable offer of dedication
has been determined by the City Engineer to be necessary and appropriate to permit the
installation of a street tree in accordance with city standards.
Recommendation: That the City Council approve Resolution No. 2010-37, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING THE RECORDATION OF THE OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR THOSE
PORTIONS OF LA COUNTY ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 5283-016-024 PROPOSED FOR
USE FOR PUBLIC SIDEWALKS AND AMENITIES
Mayor Taylor inquired about the finality of the list of item 8 E, and asked if the list included pictures of streets
that Mayor Pro Tern Ly previously brought to Council.
Deputy Public Works Director Marcarello explained that staff is keeping a list of the streets previously
mentioned by Council and most have been included in the list.
Mayor Pro Tern Ly made a motion, seconded by Council Member Low, to approve Consent Calendar.
Vote resulted in:
Yes: Armenta, Low, Ly, Taylor
No: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Clark
Rosemead Community Development Commission, Finance Authority and
City Council Joint Meeting
Minutes of June 8, 2010
Page 9 of 12
9. MATTERS FROM CITY MANAGER & STAFF
A. Establishment of Procedures and Criteria for Determination Whether Public
Convenience or Necessity will be Served by Issuance of Off-Sale or On-Sale Liquor
Licenses Where a Finding of Undue Concentration has been made by the Department
of Alcohol Beverage Control
In certain instances (i.e., to facilitate economic development) the City may wish to have the
flexibility to allow for the sale of alcohol in an area that has been deemed to have an undue
concentration of such establishments. Resolution No. 2010-34 would establish procedures
and criteria for reviewing the public convenience or necessity of issuing alcohol licenses in
areas where the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control has determined an undue
concentration of licenses exists. The resolution designates the Planning Commission as the
decision making body to review such situations and make findings.
Recommendation: That the City Council approve Resolution No. 2010-34, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA
FOR DETERMINATION OF WHETHER PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY WILL
BE SERVED BY ISSUANCE OF OFF-SALE OR ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSES WHERE A
FINDING OF UNDUE CONCENTRATION HAS BEEN MADE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF
ALCOHOL BEVERAGE CONTROL
Principal Planner Bermejo reviewed staff report
Mayor Taylor- clarified that the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control will still issue a summary report that
has to go to the Planning Commission.
Mrs. Bermejo stated that was correct. Ms. Bermejo explained that when a conditional use permit is received,
the Planning Department will request a report from ABC. For particular licenses, if there is over concentration
the local government body can decide for ABC to not issue the license.
Mayor Taylor stated the safety net is that it can be appealed in the City Council.
City Manager Allred explained this ordinance has an important economic development purpose. For example
the Auto Auction property, which can be development with restaurants, if deemed as undue concentration in
that area, restaurants would have difficulty opening up. The action by Council will give flexibility to make a
case by case determination.
Mayor Taylor expressed concern with smaller facilities such as restaurants in a shopping center that may
serve alcohol, would ABC still control that.
Rosemead Community Development Commission, Finance Authority and
City Council Joint Meeting
Minutes of June 8, 2010
Page 10 of 12
Principal Planner 8ermejo explained that with restaurant establishments, they wouldn't go through this public
convenience or necessity finding, which is handled through ABC and the applicant makes an application
directly to ABC office. The City Council and the Planning Commission in this case would be involved for a
bar, an off-sale license such as Target, Walgreens, Rite-aid or a liquor store. The criteria the Planning
Commission would use a particular service is augmenting in the community and focusing on a segment not
being served, that would be convenience or necessity finding. Ms. Bermejo stated that Fresh and Easy
Market were on an over concentrated area, but since there were no other markets that sold the type of items
to the community in this area it was a public need for that type of service.
Mayor Taylor asked if Target had gone through the same procedure.
Mrs. Bermejo stated that Target has been interested in making an application and the City does have another
application on file for Walgreens that is pending.
Mayor Pro Tern Ly made a motion, seconded by Council Member Armenta, to approve Resolution No.
2010.34. Vote resulted in:
Yes: Armenta, Low, Ly, Taylor
No: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Clark
10. MATTERS FROM MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Pro Tem Ly inquired about the SRO update and when staff can deliver it to Council.
Chief of Police Lieutenant Murakami stated that staff is working on it and will forward to Council soon
Council Member Low mentioned that the Upper Water District dug up in some streets and repaved; she
asked if they were done with what they are doing.
City Manager Allred replied yes, the Upper San Gabriel Water District installed the recycled water line and put
on an asphalt cap. Before the asphalt was dry, cars were allowed to drive on it and left tire marks on Walnut
Grove. The City contacted the Contractor and the Upper San Gabriel Water District and agreed that they
would clean up and the matter has been resolved.
Council MemberArmenta stated that she noticed the new lines on the pavement, because previously there
were no lines and you could not see where the lanes were.
City Manager Allred explained that it was part of the agreement the contractor would restripe the entire street.
Deputy Public Works Director Marcarello stated initially the district was required to restripe a portion of the
street but staff was able to get them to restripe from Garvey all the way to San Gabriel Boulevard. In addition
the contractor used thermoplastic tape which has a longer life span.
Rosemead Community Development Commission, Finance Authority and
City Council Joint Meeting
Minutes of June 8, 2010
Page 11 of 12
Council Member Low asked that the contractor dug up and paved and on Walnut Grove; yet the rest of the
street it seemed that a different type of asphalt material was used and it has a different feel.
Deputy Public Works Director Marcarello explained that staff attends a quarterly Utility meeting where all
other utility companies attend and discuss what projects they have and what we have, and we try to
coordinate our projects. If the City resurfaces a street, we do not want the water district to come down and dig
it up a month later. Also, there is a moratorium plan to not allow a company to come and do the same; the
moratorium prevents a company from doing that.
Council Member Armenta stated that adjacent to where the trench was filled there was asphalt missing
Deputy Public Works Director Marcarello replied he was not aware of that, however the inspectors did look at
the work done by the contractor and there is an agreement with the water district to make sure the street is
brought back or bettered condition than what it was originally.
Council Member Low asked if there was any plan on resurfacing that area.
Mayor Taylor stated that he has been involved with construction and the new black asphalt will turn grey and
the expense to re-slurry it and if the street is in good condition, the esthetics will blend in.
City Manager Allred stated that for a while the trenches were not capped and it was softer; the cap that has
been placed is hard.
11. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:40 pm. The next regular joint Rosemead Community Development Commission,
the Financing Authority, and City Council meeting is scheduled to take place on June 22, 2010 at 6:00 p.m.
and 7:00 p.m., respectively.
Gary Ta&V
Mayor ~v/
ATTEST:
Gloria Molleda
City Clerk
Rosemead Community Development Commission, Finance Authority and
City Council Joint Meeting
Minutes of June 8, 2010
Page 12 of 12
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS.
CITY OF ROSEMEAD 1
I, Gloria Molleda, City Clerk for the City of Rosemead, do hereby certify that the minutes of
June 8, 2010 were duly and regularly approved by the Rosemead City Council on the 22nd of June
2010, by the following vote to wit:
Yes: Armenta, Clark, Low, Ly, Taylor
No: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
~dl t c~ k kj~V s
Gloria Molleda
City Clerk