The URL can be used to link to this page

CC - Item 3B - Resolution No 2003-20 Adoption of the Annual Budget 2003-04 - Box 07097 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMED CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CRObVE, CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 16, 2003 RE: RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -20 ADOPTION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD'S 2003 -04 APPROPRIATION LIMIT AND ANNUAL BUDGET Attached for your consideration is a copy of Resolution No. 2003 -20 adopting the Appropriations Limit, the 2003 -04 Annual Budget, and making the appropriation for amounts budgeted. The budget document presented for adoption reflects the personnel and fringe benefit program recommendations presented in the Budget Study Session held on June 3, 2003. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -20 approving the 2003 -04 Appropriation Limit according to Article XIII -B (Gann Initiative) of the Constitution of the State of California, and approving the 2003 -04 Annual Budget, and making the appropriation for amounts budgeted. BC: klo Attachments klo:bd \reso.doc CQUINM AGENDA JUN 2 4 2003 ITEM No.- 21: —.A 'I RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY, COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMITATION FOR THE 2003 -04 FISCAL YEAR AND ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR 2003 -04, MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR`THE AMOUNTS BUDGETED WHEREAS, Article XIII -B of the Constitution of the State of California provides that total annual appropriations subject to limitation of the City shall not exceed the appropriations limit of the City for the prior year as adjusted for annual adjustment factors; and WHEREAS, Article XIII -B was modified in June, 1990 by the approval of Proposition 111 and SB 88 (Chapter 60/90) which revised the annual adjustment factors to be applied to the 1986 -87 Appropriation Limit and each year thereafter; and WHEREAS, the decision as to which of the factors: a) either the California Per Capita Income or the percentage change in the local assessment roll due to local non- residential construction; b) either the change in population in the City or County; must be done by a recorded vote of the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to set an appropriation limitation for the 2003- 04 Fiscal Year on those appropriations subject to limitation under Article XIII -B; and . WHEREAS, a proposed annual budget for the City of Rosemead for the Fiscal Year commencing on July 1, 2003 and ending June 30, 2004 was submitted to the City Council and is on file in the City Clerk's office; and WHEREAS, proceedings for the adoption of said budget have been duly taken; and WHEREAS, the City. Council has made certain revisions, corrections, and modifications to said proposed budget; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has caused the proposed budget document to be corrected to reflect the changes ordered by the City Council NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the cost of living factor used to compute the appropriation limit is the percentage change in the California per capita personal income combined with the change in population in Los Angeles County are to be applied to the 1986 -87 limit and each year thereafter, and that the annual appropriation limitation for the City of Rosemead during the 2003 -04 Fiscal Year for appropriations subject to limitation under Article XIII -B shall be twenty -nine million, five hundred forty -four thousand, two hundred ninety -nine ($29,544,299). Section 2. The Budget, as amended, is adopted as the Annual Budget of the City of Rosemead for the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 2003 and ending June 30, 2004. - Section 3. ` There is hereby appropriated to each account set forth in the "Expenditure Appropriation by Function" of said budget attached hereto, and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein, the sum shown for such account in the 2003 -04 Budget Column, and the City Manager is authorized and empowered to expend such sum for the purpose of such account, but no expenditure by any office or department for any item within an account shall exceed the amount budgeted without prior written approval of the City Manager. Section 4. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and thereupon the same shall take effect and be in force. ti PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 24th day of June, 2003. MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ATTEST: City Clerk 2003 -04 EXPENDITURE APPROPRIATION BY FUNCTION COST S258,840 CENTER ACTIVITY 4310 Parking Control GENERAL GOVERNMENT 4100 City Council 4110 City Administration 4120 City Clerk 4130 Finance 4140 City Treasurer 4150 City Attorney 4180 Buildings 4200 Community Promotion 4240 City Garage 4250 Appropriation Reserves 52,330 . Sub -Total PUBLIC SAFETY 2001 -02 ACTUAL 2002 -03 2003 -04 PROJECTED BUDGET 8192,533 S258,840 4300 Law Enforcement 4310 Parking Control 4320 Crossing Guards 4330 Animal Regulation 4340 Street Lighting 4350 Emergency Services 4360 Narcotics Fore. & Seizure 7,100 Sub -Total 2001 -02 ACTUAL 2002 -03 2003 -04 PROJECTED BUDGET 8192,533 S258,840 $290,510. 822,949 843,990 792,370 130,963 179,250 148,990 374,055 433,780 475,450 0 300 300 20,948 7,100 7,700 143,121 174,710 163,660 484,968 509,900 574,500 298,443 297,800 300,800 ' 41,193 52,330 28,300 0 100,000 100,000 82,874,880 $2,850,900 $2,488,225 $4,877,015 85,054,890 $5,368,340 184,752 183,310 209,940 127,844 141,120 155,050 67,319 78,700 86,000 321,478 367,000 386,000 20,948 7,100 7,700 54,818 59,450 61,450 $6,274,480 55.654,174 85.891.570 2003 -04 EXPENDITURE APPROPRIATION BY FUNCTION COST 4700 CENTER ACTIVITY Building Regulation 4720 TRANSPORTATION 4500 Construction- Streets 4510 Traffic Administration 4530 Construction - Signals 4600 Street Maintenance 4630 Traffic Signal Maintenance 4640 Tree & Parkway Maintenance 4650 Signs & Striping Maintenance 4660 Public Transit 252,300 Sub -Total COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4700 Planning 4710 Building Regulation 4720 Engineering 4740 Community Improvement 4750 CDBG 54,390 Sub -Total 2001 -02 2002 -03 2003 -04 ACTUAL PROJECTED BUDGET S585,297 $867,010 $9,897,900 34,291 64,800 54,390 150,296 27,800 200,000 240,087 365,900 490,500 149,325 110,000 112,000 268,083 243,600 252,300 208,994 145,100 146,500 802,592 873,120 1,124,220 $2,438,965 $2,697,330 $12,277,810 $318,834 $345,920 $418,700 600,672 722,590.' 724,300 263,662 323,430 321,100 147,063 170,900 187,690 3,411,007 1,778,170 3,045,659 $4,741,236 $3,341,010 S4.697,449 2003 -04 EXPENDITURE APPROPRIATION BY FUNCTION COST CENTER ACTIVITY 2003 -04 ACTUAL PUBLIC HEATH 4780 Solid Waste CULTURAL & LEISURE 4800 Parks & Recreation Admin 4810. Parks 4820 Recreation 4830 Aquatics 4840 Recr. Fee & Charge 4850 Aquatics Fee & Charge 4870 Dinsmoor Heritage House 4880 Park Projects Sub -Total CITY GRAND TOTAL 2001 -02 2002 -03 2003 -04 ACTUAL PROJECTED BUDGET 855,354 591,400 866,590 8267,847 8288,380 $320,780 1,115,752 1,306,830 1,521,450 588,827 712,030 850,300 390,400 339,900 375,610 233,030 246,500" 253,950 14,714 19,160 24,500 5,054 6,200 6,500 0 0 0 83,353,090 $2.919,000 52,615,624 $17,993,580 $17,791,210 $29,544,299 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS IN THE SUM OF $774,038.28 NUMBERED 41781 THROUGH 41967 Councilman Taylor requested a memo regarding Check No. 41805 to Arch Wireless in the amount of $1201.11 for the quarterly billing of paging service. MOTION BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER CLARK that the Council adopt Resolution No. 2003 -19. Vote resulted: Yes: Alarcon, Clark, Imperial, Taylor, Vasquez No: None Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. �B. RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -20 — ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMITATION FOR 2003 -04 FISCAL YEAR AND ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET The following resolution was presented to the Council for adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMITATION FOR THE 2003 -04 FISCAL YEAR AND ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR 2003 -04, AND MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE AMOUNTS BUDGETED MOTION BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN ALARCON that the Council adopt Resolution No. 2003 -20 approving the 2003 -04 Appropriation Limit according the Article XIII-B (Gann Initiative) of the Constitution of the State of California, and approving the 2003 -04 Annual Budget, and making the appropriation for amounts budgeted. Vote resulted: Yes: Alarcon, Clark, Imperial, Taylor, Vasquez No: None Abseni: None Abstain: None ftu*he Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. C. RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -21— MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND, DETERMINATIONS WITH RESPECT TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION PAYMENT FOR COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON SAN GABRIEL BOULEVARD CCMIN:6 -24 -03 Page #2 ` e 1 97 RESOLUTION NO. 2003 - 21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS WITH RESPECT TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION PAYMENT FOR COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON SAN GABRIEL BOULEVARD (1 -10 /SOUTH CITY LIMIT) WHEREAS, the improvement project will take place at a location within and adjacent to the boundaries of Project Area No. 1 as depicted in Exhibit "A "; and WHEREAS, the improvements on San Gabriel Boulevard will serve to upgrade City streets, improve public safety and reduce maintenance costs throughout the network of streets that have been previously improved with financing from the Rosemead Redevelopment Agency; and WHEREAS, the total Community Development Commission obligation for the project shall not exceed One Million Two Hundred Eighty Thousand Dollars ($1,280,000). NOW, THEREFORE, the Rosemead City Council resolves as follows: Section 1. The Rosemead City Council finds, determines, and declares: (a)The payment by the Rosemead Community Development Commission for costs associated with the improvements on San Gabriel Boulevard, as depicted in Exhibit "A", is of benefit to the Project Area. This finding is based on the fact that the improvements will serve to improve the infrastructure and eliminate blighting conditions by providing street resurfacing, street lighting, parkway trees, new sidewalk and handicap ramps, enhanced public safety and improved vehicular access along roadways within and adjacent to Project Areas No. 1, thus enhancing the value of abutting properties. (b)That there are no other reasonable means of financing such buildings, facilities, structures or other improvements available to the community. Although the City has a General Fund surplus, the uncertainty of continuing municipal revenue sources militates against the depletion of the existing reserves until such time as revenue sources and major required expenditures are stabilized. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of June, 2003. ATTEST: CITY CLERK MAYOR COUNCIL JUN 24 2003 ITETO No. 117. (1- EXHIBIT A 1 G I --m- � m � BaE.xbn a m y - -c<rnn � ------ 59NB41nAT. MO � � R F w�+� viumortr 2 't,�n � r •F � ,� I A PROJECT LOCATION ' o _ n� i �A A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS IN THE SUM OF $774,038.28 NUMBERED 41781 THROUGH 41967 Councilman Taylor requested a memo regarding Check No. 41805 to Arch Wireless in the amount of $1201.11 for the quarterly billing of paging service. - MOTION BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER CLARK that the Council adopt Resolution No. 2003 -19. Vote resulted: Yes: Alarcon, Clark, Imperial, Taylor, Vasquez No: None Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. B. RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -20 — ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMITATION FOR 2003 -04 FISCAL YEAR AND ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET The following resolution was presented to the Council for adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMITATION FOR THE 2003 -04 FISCAL YEAR AND ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR 2003 -04, AND MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE AMOUNTS BUDGETED MOTION BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN ALARCON that the Council adopt Resolution No. 2003 -20 approving the 2003 -04 Appropriation Limit according the Article XIII -B (Gann Initiative) of the Constitution of the State of California, and approving the 2003 -04 Annual Budget, and making the appropriation for amounts budgeted. Vote resulted: Yes: Alarcon, Clark, Imperial, Taylor, Vasquez No: None Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. www;yC. RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -21— MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS WITH RESPECT TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION PAYMENT FOR COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON SAN GABRIEL BOULEVARD CCMn4:6 -24 -03 Page a2 The following resolution was presented to the Council for adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS WITH RESPECT TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION PAYMENT FOR COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON SAN GABRIEL BOULEVARD (I -10 /SOUTH CITY LMT) MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL that the Council adopt Resolution No. 2003 -21. Vote resulted: Yes: Alarcon, Clark, Imperial, Taylor, Vasquez No: None Absent: None Abstain: None 4""*fhe Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR CC -A AWARD OF BID TO ED BUTTS FORD FOR PURCHASE OF REPLACEMENT VEHICLE 2003 CROWN VICTORIA CC-11 APPROVAL OF THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES, INC., AND THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD CC -C EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR CDBG AND HOME PROGRAM SERVICES CC -D APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR FAIR HOUSING SERVICES WITH THE HOUSING RIGHTS CENTER CC -E APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR SENIOR NUTRITION MEALS PROVIDER WITH MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST CC -F AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND ANNUAL LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE, SEPTEMBER 7-10,2003, SACRAMENTO CC -G ACCEPTANCE OF WORK FOR STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS ON VARIOUS CITY STREETS CC -H APPROVAL OF CPI ADJUSTMENT FOR STREET SWEEPING CONTRACT SERVICES PROVIDED BY CALIFORNIA STREET MAINTENANCE CCMRK:6 -24 -03 Page 43 NOR TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMUD CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CR'OWE, CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 16, 2003 RE: 2002 -03 BUDGET AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSFER $176,650, FROM UNAPPROPRIATED RESERVE TO ORGANIZATIONS 4110, 4180, 4240, 4320, 4330, 4340, 4640, 4650, 4710, and 4740. A review of this year's budget indicates that some departmental accounts have exceeded their budgeted amounts. Although total expenditures for the City are under budget, the City auditors are requiring that the City Council take Minute action to approve budget transfers from unappropriated reserve to each department. Listed below are the requested transfers: City Administration (4110) - $55,260 is requested for the increase in retirement annuity and for the annual administration fees for property tax collections and disbursements.. City Buildings (4180) - $1,300 is requested to cover additional costs for building maintenance and repairs and special insurance. City Garage (4240) - $15,430 is requested cover the budget shortfall for the purchase of replacement vehicle Unit #02. Crossing Guards (4320) - $1,400 is requested to cover the additional cost for workers compensation. Animal Regulations (4330) - $2,700 is requested to cover additional costs for animal control services. Street Lighting (4340) - $11,000 is requested to cover additional costs for energy and maintenance expenses. COUNCIL AGENDA JUN 24 2003 ITEM No. . ��' '� 2002 -03 Budget Authorization June 16, 2003 Page 2 Maintenance Trees & Parkways (4640) - $3,600 is requested to cover additional costs for routine tree maintenance. Maintenance Signs and Striping (4650) - $10,100 is requested to cover additional costs for traffic marking and striping. Building Regulations (4710) - $63,390 is requested to cover additional costs for building inspections. Community Improvements (4740) - $12,470 is requested to cover additional costs for graffiti removal supplies. The estimated expenditure's for 2002 -03 is $17,791,210. The adopted 2002 -03 Annual Budget is $21,151,154. These figures indicate that the City will again come in under budget. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize a transfer of $176,650 from unappropriated reserves to cover additional costs incurred during the current fiscal year 2002 -03 for organizations 4110, 4180, 4240, 4320, 4330, 4340, 4640, 4650, 4710, and 4740. klo: budget2003- 04\expovbud. doc CC -I EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT FOR PARKWAY AND MEDIAN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE WITH MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENTERPRISES, INC. CC -J EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT FOR STREET TREE MAINTENANCE WITH EVAN'S TREE SERVICE CC -K EXTENSION OF LIGHTING AGREEMENT WITH QRS SERVICE CC -L APPROVAL OF LEASE AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON FOR ZAPOPAN PARK CC -M ANNUAL ADOPTION OF CITY'S INVESTMENT POLICY afteJ& -N 2002 -03 BUDGET AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSFER $176,650 FROM UNAPPROPRIATED RESERVES TO ORGANIZATIONS 4110, 4180, 4240, 4320, 4330, 4340, 4640, 4650, 4710, AND 4740 CC-0 APPROVAL OF PARTNERSHIP WITH MONTEBELLO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR USE OF HOME FUNDS MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL that the Council approve the aforementioned items on the Consent Calendar. Vote resulted: Yes: Alarcon, Clark, Imperial, Taylor, Vasquez No: None Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor. declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. V. MATTERS FOR DISCUSSION AND ACTION - None VI. STATUS REPORTS - None VII. MATTERS FROM OFFICIALS Councilman Taylor requested that the shrubs and weeds be checked at 4623 Earle Avenue. Mayor Pro Tern Clark announced to the audience that the 4a' of July Parade will start on Valley Boulevard at 10:00 a.m., with the Opening Ceremonies, carnival and fireworks at Rosemead Park. VIII. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE - None CCMIN:6 -14 -03 Page #4 01-1114 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEM64D CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CR WE, CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 12, 2003 RE: APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR FAIR HOUSING SERVICES As part of its contractual obligations under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME programs, the City must make efforts to promote fair housing within its jurisdiction. The City previously contracted with the Fair Housing Council of San Gabriel Valley to provide these services. The Council has since merged with the Westside Fair Housing Center to form the Housing Rights Center. The City has received a proposal from the Housing Rights Center to provide continued fair housing services to the City. Specifically, the Housing Rights Center proposes to provide the following: • Housing Discrimination Complaint Services, including conciliation • Fair Housing Outreach Services to landlords and tenants Outreach to Immigrant Communities for fair housing education The proposal is for $26,250. However, the City has budgeted $25,000 for services in FY 2203 -2004, which is the same as the amount for FY 2002 -2003. A copy of the proposal is attached for your information. 'JUN 2 4 2003 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council authorize an agreement with Housing Rights Center to continue to provide fair housing services to the City of Rosemead in an amount not to exceed $25,000 and authorize the City Manager to execute the appropriate agreements. ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDING APPLICATION PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT AGENCY INFORMATION Agency Name: Housing Rights Center Agency Address: 520 S. Virgil Avenue, Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90020 Number Street City Zip Cod Administrator: Marlene Garza Title: Chief Executive Officer Administrator Telephone No. (213) 387 -8400 ext. 35 Fax: (213) 381 -8555 Project Site Address: 520 S. Virgil Avenue, Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90020 Lip Co Project Manager: Marlene Garza Title: Chief Executive Officer Project Manager's Telephone No. (213) 387 -8400 ext. 35 Fax: (213) 381 -8555 Describe Agency's overall function or purpose. Include history and experience in providing this service. (If more room is needed, please type on a blank sheet of paper and attach to the back of the•application with a reference number.) The Housing Rights Center's (HRC) mission is to actively support and promote freedom of residence through education, advocacy, and litigation, to the end that all persons have the opportunity to secure the housing they desire and can afford, without regard to their race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, familial status, marital status, disability, ancestry, age, source of income, or other characteristics protected by law. Has the Agency previously received funding from the City of Rosemead? � Yes _ No If yes, please identify the years and amounts funded: 2002 -2003 $25,000 2000 -2001 $23,000 2001 -2002 $25,000 1999 -2000 $23,000 II. PROJECT PROPOSAL AND DESCRIPTION In this section, briefly describe the project proposal, including cost estimates. Grant Amount Requested $26,250 Briefly describe your proposed Project/Program and the objectives. Your response should describe the scope of services for the project. Introduction The Housing Rights Center proposes to provide the Fair Housing Program for the City of Rosemead. The Program will include comprehensive public education on fair housing and landlord /tenant law, fair housing and landlord /tenant counseling, discrimination complaint investigation and, when appropriate, fair housing litigation. The Fair Housing Program attempts to prevent future incidents of housing discrimination through education and outreach targeting housing professionals, and by increasing the agency's media presence. The landlord /tenant counseling program will seek to provide self -help remedies for callers and to identify cases of discrimination that may be veiled by landlord /tenant disputes. These activities are aimed to address the Impediments identified in the City's most recent Al. Component 1: Housing Discrimination Complaint Services Our complaint resolution program is.designed to conduct thorough and efficient investigations, to achieve the most favorable results available to our clients, and to track complaint data and outcomes accurately and efficiently. 1. Inquiries Our Counseling Department staff is trained to provide counseling on landlord /tenant, fair housing, and predatory lending law. We conduct periodic training to assure that staff is current on changes to applicable legislation. In order to screen our calls for fair housing issues, our Counselors are trained to ask basic questions that are likely to reveal potential discrimination without prompting the caller to prematurely identify discrimination as the cause. When the Counselor suspects discrimination may be a factor in the caller's problem, the Counselor will complete the Discrimination Inquiry components of the intake database, in which we obtain contact and site information, as well as demographic information about the client. 2. Housing Discrimination Complaints a. Case Investigation HRC uses six (6) principal methods when investigating complaints of housing discrimination. While paired testing and surveying are the most common, all methods can be an important part of gathering evidence and each is used as appropriate. I. Testing: Every effort is made to initiate testing in cases where it is appropriate as soon as possible after intake. Typically, this is within 2 or 3 days of the initial complaint. A concerted effort is made to test immediately in complaints by a prospective renter of a refusal to rent. We have designed standardized report forms to elicit information gathered during tests. The forms require testers to provide a comprehensive narrative of their experience in addition to detailed specific information. The Testing Coordinator then compares and analyzes the reports. The Center's staff conducts both sales and rental testing. Staff is also trained in full application rental testing. ii. Surveys: When testing of the kind described above is not possible or appropriate, for example because there are no vacancies or because the allegation is by an in -place tenant complaining of harassment, we will often conduct surveys of other tenants at the complaint address. This is often the case where the apartment building has only a small number of units and tenant turnover is minimal. We seek comprehensive information from those surveyed about their tenancy, as well as their general impressions about the conditions at the complaint address, with specific attention to the issues raised in the complaint. When other tenants of the same protected class as the client report similar treatment, surveys provide strong evidence of a pattern or practice of discrimination and become invaluable in conciliation efforts and /or settlement negotiations. iii. On -site Visits: On -site visits by the Center's staff can be an important investigative tool when the physical conditions of the rental premises are at issue. This is often the case in an investigation of alleged disability discrimination. Physical evidence, such as photographs and diagrams, will verify the lack of an accommodation, such as a ramp, and the feasibility of installation. iv. Witness Statements: Clients frequently have witnesses who can verify elements of their allegation. We interview the witness and document the information they provide in signed and dated declarations. As with surveys, this sort of corroborating evidence is key in subsequent efforts to resolve the housing issue. V. Document requests and review: When building a case, we seek to maintain a complete file of the tenant and landlord's interaction. We will obtain rental agreements, advertisements, notices, and any correspondence that has been exchanged. We also conduct respondent property searches. This helps us determine whether there are other testing options, which can assist in establishing a pattern and practice of discrimination. A. Legal Research: The Center maintains an extensive law library that allows us to conduct legal research in order to support specific claims of discrimination. Most often, we employ the Fair Housing - Fair Lending (FH -FL) casebooks when in need of case law that supports our client's claim. Other legal resources in our library include: the California Civil Codes, housing discrimination practice manuals written by fair housing attorneys, the Code of Federal Regulations (CFRs), which offers HUD's interpretation of the Fair Housing Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, Federal Forms, and Rutter Guides. b. Findings Once we have concluded our investigation, we make a determination about the strength of the evidence that corroborates the client's allegation of discrimination, as'signing the case one of three possible findings. The strongest finding, "Sustains Allegation" (SA), is given to those cases for which we have obtained sufficient evidence to pursue diligent advocacy and /or legal remedies for the client. When the evidence we have obtained partially supports the allegation, or is otherwise inadequate for us to take further steps, we designate a finding of "Inconclusive Evidence" (IE) of discrimination. When our investigation reveals that the complaint lacked merit as a fair housing violation, we make a finding of "No Evidence of Discrimination" (NED). C. Resolution of Compliant If our investigation finds evidence supporting the allegation of discrimination, we work with the client to achieve his or her goal. At the intake interview, the CS will have explained the available options to the client and determined the client's goals. This fundamental question drives the investigation, and results in our office pursing one of the following actions: I. Conciliation This is often our first step in trying to resolve the problem. When conciliating a complaint, we act as advocates for the client. Typically, we contact the respondent by letter and detail the basis of the allegation, the results of our investigation, the applicable low, and a proposed solution. If the client's goal is to secure the housing at issue, this will be our first priority. These "demand letters" give the respondent an early opportunity to avert further action. It also serves to put the respondent on notice that the Center has and will continue to intervene on the client's behalf. Occasionally, a respondent is unaware that a violation of fair housing law has occurred and is willing to make a good faith effort to correct the problem. We obtain that assurance in wfiting and continue to monitor the situation. When the client feels that the issue is resolved, the case is closed as "Successfully Conciliated" (SC). There are times, however when a respondent is unwilling to consider conciliation As before, we present the client with his remaining options. If there is strong evidence of discrimination, we encourage the client to consider legal remedies. ii. Referral to a Government Administrative Agency Another option for clients is to file with one of three governmental agencies: California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH), U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), or the U.S. Department of Justice (DO-1). The advantage for a client in filing with one of these agencies is that the agencies are able to conduct an investigation with the strength of subpoena power. Moreover, the client need not hire an attorney to pursue an administrative remedy. Since the Center lacks enforcement authority or the ability to compel property owners to negotiate with us, a client will occasionally choose to file with one of these agencies so that compliance can be ordered without the need for litigation. When a client chooses this option, we cooperate with the government agency through document sharing. We also track the resolution of these referred cases. iii. Referral to Litigation Dept. and Continued Investigation When we have gathered evidence sustaining an allegation of discrimination, and the respondent has been unwilling to conciliate the matter or the client's stated goal is litigation, we pursue the appropriate legal remedies. The Center's Legal Department is able to advise and represent clients immediately upon intake. Although we continue to collaborate with several private attorneys who specialize in fair housing cases, our Staff Attorneys are able to provide our clients with ongoing legal assistance. When the alleged discrimination practice implicates housing policy or gives the Center an opportunity to highlight an issue of particular importance, the Center will join as a plaintiff. 3. General Housing and Landlord /Tenant Referrals The Center provides telephone and in- person counseling to both tenants and landlords regarding their respective rights and responsibilities under California law and local city ordinances. In addition to answering basic housing questions, Counselors advise clients on how to resolve their housing problems or issues. For example, staff members commonly cite specific civil codes that pertain to the client's matter and /or provide sample letters that discuss a particular issue. Often, a tenant will write to his or her landlord about a particular matter per the advice of a staff member, and is able to work out a quick and satisfactory resolution. Tenant /landlord counseling not only facilitates housing- rights education of residents, but also serves to empower them in their efforts to achieve fair housing for themselves and in their communities. In our database, we refer to these calls as "resolved" since we have provided the caller the information required to resolve the issue on their own. When Counselors determine that a particular client's matter is outside the scope of our agency's services, we provide appropriate referral information. Using referral books compiled by the Center, staff members provide clients with agency names, phone numbers, and addresses in that client's locality. These referral lists are updated regularly to verify that the services continue to be provided. These agencies include, but are not limited to local housing authorities, health and building & safety departments, legal assistance agencies, and other social service providers. Component 2: Fair Housing Outreach Services HRC will implement a citywide fair housing Outreach Program that will create greater public awareness of fair housing throughout the City and address specific needs of the protected classes listed in federal, state, and local fair housing laws. HRC will facilitate large citywide outreach activities and increase the opportunities for media exposure while also focusing resources on targeted outreach regarding specific issues. 1. Fair Housing and Landlord /Tenant Presentations and Workshops HRC provides outreach and education presentations and workshops in Rosemead and in collaboration with local programs and services. Our programs will be offered to a variety of audiences such as housing professionals (e.g., landlords, property managers, and realtors), tenants, prospective homebuyers, city employees, and other non - profit organizations. Depending on the audience, the presentations can be conducted by Center staff and volunteers into Armenian, Cantonese, Korean, Russian, or Spanish. The fair housing presentations entail an overview of fair housing laws, a discussion about common forms of housing discrimination and a question and answer session. The housing rights workshops include a comprehensive fair housing presentation and an overview of landlord /tenant law. HRC increases its effectiveness at these events by soliciting feedback in the form of evaluations that ask about fair housing issues addressed, presentation format, materials provided and overall program. HRC will conduct at least one tenant workshop in Rosemead each year. 2. Property Management and Landlord Training HRC also holds frequent property management seminars. These seminars are tailored to provide landlords with detailed analysis of fair housing law and interpretation, with specific information on discrimination against families with children, disability provisions; sexual harassment, hate crimes, and advertising. Our management training sessions are conducted by our staff attorneys. The Certification Training Manual was recently rewritten by the HRC's staff and has been translated into Spanish and Korean. Staff will be able to provide training'in English, Spanish, and Korean as needed. HRC will host at least 8 English- language, 3 Spanish - language, and 3 Korean - language sessions in the coming fiscal year. HRC will conduct at least one landlord workshop in Rosemead per year, and special targeted outreach will be conducted to Asian property owners for this session. 3. Development and Distribution of Materials HRC has developed new and updated materials that describe how housing injustices arise, the applicable laws that protect against housing discrimination and ways to prevent housing inequity. Our materials and programs will be offered to a variety of audiences such as housing professionals (e.g., landlords, property managers, and realtors), tenants, prospective homebuyers, city employees, and other non - profit organizations. Most of the written materials have been translated by Center staff into other languages including Armenian, Cantonese, Korean, Mandarin, Russian, and Spanish. Materials will be distributed during neighborhood visits and mailings throughout the City ensuring that all residents have access to fair housing information and services. 4. Booths The Center regularly staffs booths at community festivals, apartment owners association annual events, college events, and other events as they occur. We have developed eye- catching poster boards and banners that have proven helpful in drawing attendees to our booths. 5. Media HRC will continue use all media tools available to publicize fair housing and HRC's services. This past year, we have launched a massive media campaign in collaboration with the Los Angeles Times. Part of this campaign includes eye- catching ads in the Sunday Real Estate section as well as a media task force that draws participants from many housing industry and advocacy sectors. HRC will also contact local media outlets and request that they publish or air public service announcements ( "PSA's ") about fair housing laws and the HRC's services. Targeted community newspapers, such as La Opinion, The Daily Breeze, LA Sentinel, the Armenian Observer, and the Chinese American Daily News will be contacted to publicize fair housing and advertise the Center's services. Furthermore, media outlets such as radio (KTNG -AM 1020, KREA -FM 93.5, OED -AM 1540, etc.) and television (Telemundo, KCET -TV Channel 28, KVEA -TV Channel 52, etc.) will also be contacted. 6. Special Events HRC, in addition to these workshops and trainings, will hold two special events in the County of Los Angeles. These events will not only bring together residents to discuss fair housing, but will also raise public awareness of fair housing issues and services generally. The Center will continue to conduct the Fair Housing Summit in April that will bring together fair housing groups, social service providers, community members, and government entities to address fair housing and other related issues, such as slum housing and hate crimes. Persons not directly involved in fair housing will bring a fresh perspective to ways of addressing fair housing impediments and gain a new understanding of connections between fair housing and other issues. The Center's Basic Tools in the Litigation of Fair Housing Cases training will also be held again and will bring together leading fair housing attorneys, fair housing staff and agencies interested in developing a fair housing program to discuss the methods of fair housing enforcement and present ideas for improving fair housing service delivery. 7. Outreach to Immigrant Communities Immigrant populations are increasingly redefining neighborhoods throughout the County. These immigrant populations often face formidable barriers because of discriminatory housing practices. Fair housing efforts must therefore be directed toward educating immigrant populations about their fair housing rights and ensuring that enforcement mechanisms address the specific types of discrimination they encounter. The best way to achieve this goal will be through extensive outreach. Our goal is to increase public awareness of our presence, services we offer and housing rights under the law; to create a more active and extensive network with community and culturally based organizations that serve these communities; and to recruit volunteers to assist in outreach efforts from the target areas. Briefly describe the clientele that will benefit from your services (i.e. homeless youth, the elderly, disabled, handicapped, etc.) The primary beneficiaries of HRC's direct services are extremely low and low - income communities. In 2001 -2002, 73% of Rosemead clients were in the extremely low and low- income bracket. How do your services benefit the above listed clientele? The Housing Rights Center's services promote fair housing choice, help eliminate housing discrimination, and support informed and peaceful problem solving between housing consumers and housing professionals. Please list total number of clients that the Agency intends to serve if funded: 275 Can this Project/Program proceed on July 1, 2003? Yes No If No, please explain why and give timeline for beginning and end of project. If your proposal is for an existing Project /Program that is currently funded through Rosemead's CDBG program, this request will ... (Please check only one) Increase service. If so, how? Continue the existing CDBG funded program at current service levels. Replace a previous source of funding. If so, list source New program for FY 2003 -2004 New request (not currently funded). III. CLIENT INTAKE INFORMATION The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires that agencies obtain intake data from each client/family served. Does your agency obtain this information? Yes No If yes, does your intake sheet obtain the following: 2. Name Yes 1 No 3. Address Yes 1 No 4. City in which client last resided. Yes No 5. Number of family members. Yes No 6. Total family (household) income. Yes No 7. Ethnicity Yes No 8. Female head of household Yes No Describe any special characteristics of your client population. The Housing Rights Center's clients are principally people of color, female heads of households and /or low- and moderate - income persons. Provide the actual percentage of your total clients in the categories listed below: (For start-up agencies, please provide projected data.for upcoming fiscal year.) Youth' Women Youth Seniors i Disabled Homeless, At -Risk Af= Risk''' 7/1/01 Rosemead N/A N/A N/A 13% 10% N/A to 6/30/02 Agency N/A N/A N/A 13% 17% N/A 7/1/02 Rosemead N/A N/A N/A 9% 9% N/A to 12/31/02 Agency N/A N/A N/A 7% 11% N/A Provide the actual percentage of persons served in the following age categories: (For startup agencies, please provide projected data for upcoming fiscal year.) Report the actual unduplicated number of clients your agency served from July 1, 2001 through December 31, 2002. One person can only be counted one time, even though the client may have been served many times during the reporting period. Calculate the totals and percentage for each category. w Children, Youth Adult ., Elderly # of 1, Roseriieatl' Oi 12 : 1'3 - 7 ..51. 8,-, 54 1& 55 over Rosemead Agency Rosemead Agency Rosemead Agency Rosemead Agency 7 /1101 N/A N/A N/A N/A 87% 87% 13% 13% to the Income 3Size _ ! ' , Income Llmlt Income Llmlt' Income Llmlt o iLlmd 6/30/02 ., , ,. LIP 1 $30,850 2,863 13 7/1/02 N/A N/A N/A N/A 91% 93% 9% 7% to 1,738 28 1,738 28 4 $44,100 1,022 25 12/31/02 25 5 $47,600 995 30 995 30 6 and over Report the actual unduplicated number of clients your agency served from July 1, 2001 through December 31, 2002. One person can only be counted one time, even though the client may have been served many times during the reporting period. Calculate the totals and percentage for each category. w #.of Rosemead i� # of 1, Roseriieatl' Residents �t Residents .r CDBG Eligible- " # Served by served by :, # Servedsby Y served by Income Limit `- Agency Agency rrt Project. , project• below ' Household ' ; 2000 - below the . below the : below the the Income 3Size _ ! ' , Income Llmlt Income Llmlt' Income Llmlt o iLlmd . . n .a ., , ,. LIP 1 $30,850 2,863 13 2,863 13 2 $35,250 2,454 16 2,454 16 3 $39,650 1,738 28 1,738 28 4 $44,100 1,022 25 1,022 25 5 $47,600 995 30 995 30 6 and over $51,150 692 19 692 19 Unknown All below limit 8,657 249 8,657 249 Subtotal of CDBG Eligible 18,421 378 18,421 378 Households Total Households Served 20,259 418 20,259 418 Percentage of CDBG Income 91% 90% 91% 90% Eligible Families Served The source of funding for Public Service Grants comes from a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) received through the Department of Housing and Urban Development. CDBG funds are for the specific purpose of benefiting low /moderate income households. In order to be eligible for these funds, your organization must provide a service for the residents of the City of Rosemead and be able to document that at least 51 percent of the clientele served by the project/program earn less than the following income limits for 2003: Household Size Annual Income Limit 1 $31,600 2 $36,100 3 $40,600 4 $45,100 5 $48,750 6 $52,350 7 $55;950 8 $59,550 Please check the corresponding letter, which further describes the activity you are proposing. a) The project will benefit a clientele which is generally presumed by HUD to be below the eligible income limits. The following groups are presumed to meet this criteria: abused children, battered spouses, elderly persons, illiterate persons and persons with acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). b) The project information on family size and income shows that it is evident that at least 51 percent of the clientele are persons whose family income does not exceed the CDBG eligible income limit. C) The project has income limits that limit the activity exclusively to CDBG eligible income persons. d) The project is of such nature and location that it may be concluded that the clientele will primarily consist of CDBG income eligible persons. The following resolution was presented to the Council for adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS WITH RESPECT TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION PAYMENT FOR COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON SAN GABRIEL BOULEVARD (I -10 /SOUTH CITY LIMIT) MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL that the Council adopt Resolution No. 2003 -21. Vote resulted: Yes: Alarcon, Clark, Imperial, Taylor, Vasquez No: None Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR CC -A AWARD OF BID TO ED BUTTS FORD FOR PURCHASE OF REPLACEMENT VEHICLE 2003 CROWN VICTORIA CC -B APPROVAL OF THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES, INC., AND THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD CC -C EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR CDBG AND HOME PROGRAM SERVICES -D APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR FAIR HOUSING SERVICES WITH THE HOUSING RIGHTS CENTER CC -E APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR SENIOR NUTRITION MEALS PROVIDER WITH MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST CC -F AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND ANNUAL LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE, SEPTEMBER 7-10,2003, SACRAMENTO CC -G ACCEPTANCE OF WORK FOR STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS ON VARIOUS CITY STREETS CC -H APPROVAL OF CPI ADJUSTMENT FOR STREET SWEEPING CONTRACT SERVICES PROVIDED BY CALIFORNIA STREET MAINTENANCE CCMIN:6 -24 -03 page 43 CC -I EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT FOR PARKWAY AND MEDIAN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE WITH MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENTERPRISES, INC. CC -J EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT FOR STREET TREE MAINTENANCE WITH EVAN'S TREE SERVICE CC -K EXTENSION OF LIGHTING AGREEMENT WITH QRS SERVICE CC -L APPROVAL OF LEASE AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON FOR ZAPOPAN PARK CC -M ANNUAL ADOPTION OF CITY'S INVESTMENT POLICY CC -N 2002 -03 BUDGET AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSFER $176,650 FROM UNAPPROPRIATED RESERVES TO ORGANIZATIONS 4110, 4180, 4240, 4320, 4330, 4340, 4640, 4650, 4710, AND 4740 CC -O APPROVAL OF PARTNERSHIP WITH MONTEBELLO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR USE OF HOME FUNDS MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL that the Council approve the aforementioned items on the Consent Calendar. Vote resulted: Yes: Alarcon, Clark, Imperial, Taylor, Vasquez No: None Absent: None Abstain: None "= >*The Mayor. declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. V. MATTERS FOR DISCUSSION AND ACTION - None VI. STATUS REPORTS -.None VH. MATTERS FROM OFFICIALS Councilman Taylor requested that the shrubs and weeds be checked at 4623 Earle Avenue. Mayor Pro Tern Clark announced to the audience that the 4th of July Parade will start on Valley Boulevard at 10:00 a.m., with the Opening Ceremonies, carnival and fireworks at Rosemead Park. VIII. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE - None CCMIN:6 -24 -03 Page a4 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSED CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CREWE, CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 12. 2003 RE: APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR SENIOR NUTRITION MEALS PROVIDER Over the past three (3) years, the City has contracted with Morrison Management Specialists to provide meals to the ' Senior Nutrition Program. As part of its procurement requirements under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, the City went out for proposals from organizations to provide meal services to the City. The City received only one (1) proposal. That proposal was from Morrison Management Specialists (MMS). MMS is proposing to provide meals at a fixed price of $2.72 per meal for FY 2003 -2004 and in subsequent years for an increase set by the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), not to exceed 4% per year. Staff has attached a copy of the proposal. Thoroughness MMS submitted a full and thorough proposal including a proposed meal pattern plan for FY 2003 -2004 and Certificates showing food handling capabilities of staff. (AUNCIL J U N 2.4 2003 REM No. 14 CC' Overall Experience MMS has provided similar Nutrition programs since 1989 and currently serves a number of communities in the San Gabriel Valley. Performance MMS has consistently provided quality service to the City of Rosemead. There have been no consumer complaints regarding service in the last three (3) years. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council select Morrison Management Specialists as the City's service provider for the Senior Nutrition Program and authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all agreements. n U n U • SECTION 1 REQUIRED FORMS ITEM A ITEM B ITEM C ITEM D MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS BID FOR CITY OF ROSEMEAD U r-1 LJ • Exhibit "A" r iA PROPOSAL FORM I have received the proposal documents and have satisfied myself as to the scope of the work. In submitting this proposal, I agree: 1. To hold my proposal open for 60 calendar days from the date of the Proposal. 2. To comply with the provisions in the above - referenced document.. 3. Price shall include bulk food items, beverage, preparation, supplies, utensils, condiments and equipment for a complete meal and delivery of above items. I will provide 600 meals per week (Monday - Friday) for the initial 52 weeks (1st year) for the lump sum price of Eighty four thousand eight hundred _sixty four dollars and no /100 (Price in longhand) Cost Per Meal Per Person $2.72 In addition, I will provide 600 meals per week (Monday period (2nd. year) for the lump sum price of Eighty four thousand eight hundred sixty four dollars and no /100 (plus the annual CPW not to exceed 4 %)* (price in longhand) I will provide 600 meals per week (Monday for the lump sum price of Eighty four thousand eight hundred sixty four dollars and no /100 (plus the CPIU for the second year, plus the CPIU for the third year not to exceed 4 %annuallv)* (price in longhand) $ 84,864.00 (dollars) - Friday) for the second 52 week $ 84,864.00 (plus the annual CPIU not to exceed 4 %)* (dollars) - Friday) for the third 52 week period (3rd. year) $84,864.00 (plus the annual CPIU for the second year, plus the CPIU for the third year not to exceed 4% annually)* (dollars) * Corresponding to the annual increase in the Consumer Price Index, US for Los Angeles -Long Beach, CA as Publisl by the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. NAME: Morrison Management Specialists (check one) A Corporation A Partnership Sole Proprietor BY: Edward Clark DATE: 4/09 /2003 ADDRESS: 1727 Axenty Way, Redondo Beach, CA 90278 Exhibit "B" • BIDDER SPECIFICA'T`IONS 8 LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS The following is a true and complete list showing the name and location of the place of business of each subcontractor who will perform work or labor or render service to the CONTRACTOR in excess of one -half of one percent (0.5 %) of the CONTRACTOR'S total proposal. ( List the portion of the work which will be done by each subcontractor and list only one subcontractor for each such portion). WORK PORTION SUBCONTRACTOR'S NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS NONE N/A • 1] Form B FORM C . CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATE - Regarding Worker's Compensation Labor Code Section 3700 "Every employer, except the State and all political subdivisions or institutions thereof, shall secure the payment of Compensation in one or more of the following ways: a) By being insured against liability to pay Compensation in one or more insurers duly authorized to write Compensation insurance in this State. b) By securing from the Director of Industrial Relations a Certificate of Consent of Self - Insure, which may be given upon furnishing proof satisfactory to the Director of Industrial Relations of ability to self - insure and to pay any compensation that may become due to his employees. I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self - insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of this Contract. 0 44�z Signature Title `/ /a S� La a Date (In accordance with Article 5 [commencing at Section 18601 Chapter 1, Part 7, Division 2 of the Labor Code, the above Certificate must be signed and filed with the awarding body prior to performing any work under this Contract.) FORM D • CONTRACTOR'S QUALIFICATION STATEMENT SENIOR NUTRITION PROGRAM The undersigned certifies under oath, the truth and correctness of all statements and of all answers to questions made hereinafter. SUBMITTED TO: City of ROSEMEAD ROSEMEAD City Hall ADDRESS: 8838 East Valley Boulevard ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 SUBMITTED BY: Morrison Management Specialists, Inc. contract Central Juvenile Hall facility: NAME: Essie Mortaji, Director Food 8: Nutrition Services ADDRESS: 1605 Eastlake Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90033 • Regional Western Region — MHC Office: NAME: Edward Clark, Vice President ADDRESS: 1727 Axenty Way Redondo Beach, CA 90278 Corporation J Partnership Individual Joint Venture Other 1.0 How many years has your organization been in business as a Meat Service Provider? Food Service Management Contracts - over 40 years — also see Section 2 "Corporate Capabilities and Experience" 2.0 How many years has your organization been in business under its present business name? Since June, 1999 as Morrison Management Specialists and since March 1996 as an independent corporation Morrison Health Care, Inc. 2.1 Under what other or former names has your organization operated? – Morrison's Health Care Division – A Division of Morrison Restaurants Inc. – Morrison's Hospitality Group – A Division of Morrison Restaurants Inc. – Morrison's Custom Management – A Division of Morrison Incorporated – Morrison's Management Services – A Division of Morrison incorporated 49 FORM D CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATION STATEMENT Senior Citizen Lunch Program • 3.0 If a corporation, answer the following_ 3.1 Date of incorporation: June, 1999 3.2 State of Georgia incorporation: 3.3 President's name(s): Glenn Davenport, CEO Jerry Underhill,President, MHFS Division 3.4 Vice- president's name(s): K. Wyatt Engwall, Chief Financial Officer Jack Lawless, Division Vice President MHFS Edward Clark, Regional Vice President 3.5 Secretary's name: 3.6 Treasurer's name: 4.0 If an individual or a partnership answer the following; 4.1 Date of organization: 4.2 Name and address of all partners (state whether general or limited partnership): NIA 5.0. If other than a corporation or partnership, describe organization and name principals: NIA • 6.0 List years, makes and models of delivery vehicles used to transport meals to ROSEMEAD Program. 1997 — Ford Econoline Van — also see Section 6 "Proposal Information - Delivery and Vehicles" 7.0 List your kitchen capacity, types and quantities of ovens, ranges, etc. —see Section 5 "Proposal Information - Food Production Facility" 8.0 List the types, sizes and amounts of your food delivery containers. Equipment used - "Cambro" and "Igloo" — also see " Section.7 "Proposal Information - Transport Equipment" 9.0 Have you ever failed to complete any contract awarded to you? If so, note when, where, and why: NO -not at this location 10.0 Within the last five years, has any officer or partner of your organization ever been an officer or partner of another organization when it failed to complete a contract? If so, attach a separate sheet of explanation. NO- not at this location • 11.0 On a separate sheet provide /outline your billingAnvoice procedure and provide an example. —see bottom of page 1 of Section 4 "Proposal Information - Concept and Method of Service Proposed" — also see attached sample forms in same Section 4. 12.0 On a separate sheet, list contracts your organization has in process, giving the name of owner, phone number, contract amount, length of time you have had • contract —see Section 3 "Proposal Information - References" 13.0 On a separate sheet, list contracts your organization has completed in the last five years, giving the name of owner, phone number, contract amount and length of time you had the contract. --see page 2 of "Los Angeles Area - Senior Nutrition Programs" in Section 3 "Proposal Information - References" 14.0 On a separate sheet, list the food service experience of the key individuals of your organization. — see Section 5 "Proposal Information - Food Production Facility - staffing" and Section 9 "Attachment - Resumes" 15.0 Business references and contact person and phone number: 1. Pepsi Cola/National Syrup PO Box 290 Purchase NY 10577 (914) 253 -2000 2. A_ n_ gelica Uniform PO Box 60042 St. Louis, MO 63160 (800) 325 -8032 3. 4. 5. 6. 16.0 Bank reference, contact person and phone number: 1. AmSouth Bank of Mobile PO Drawer 1467 Mobile, AL 36621 (334) 694 -1452 (Call Credit Department) 2. 3. 4. 17.0 Attach a financial statement, audited if available, including Contractors latest balance sheet and income statement showing the following items: A. Current Assets (e.g., cash, joint venture accounts, accounts receivable, notes receivable, accrued income, deposits, material inventory, and prepaid expenses): B. Net Fixed Assets: C. Other Assets: D. Current Liabilities(e.g., capital, capital stock, authorized and outstanding shares per values, earned surplus, and retained eamings): E. Other laabilities(e.g., capital, capital stock, authorized and outstanding shares per values, earned surplus, and retained earnings): Name of firm preparing financial statement and date thereof: Deloitte & Touche 12/3/2002 Is this financial statement for the identical organization named on page one? No Of not, explain the relationship and financial responsibility of the organization who financial statement is provided (e.g., parent - subsidiary). Parent Company Will this organization act as guarantor of the contract? Yes • 0 0 0 Dated at this Name of Organization: says day Morrison Management Specialists FIR �! 'i / i being duly sworn deposes and of Morrison Management Specialists Contractor(s), and that answers to the foregoing questions and all statements therein contained are true and correct. Subscribed and sworn before me this of PS I 260iS. Notary Public: My Commission Expires: P-21 re e q tk day MARYANN VALBUENA Comm. No. 1273313 n G .NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA p p LOS ANGELES COUNTY My Comm. Exp. August 7, 2004. 7, -?, " '� 0 CORPORATE CAPABILITY AND EXPERIENCE MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS IIID FOR CITY OF ROSEMEAD SECTION -2 0 CORPORATE CAPABILITY and EXPERIENCE Originally, Morrison had its beginning in Mobile, Alabama in 1920. Our reputation was established through consistent food quality and superior service. Over the next few decades operation specific divisions were created for Specialty Restaurants, Cafeterias and Contract Service Management. As of March 1996, Morrison Restaurants Inc. separated into three independent, publicly owned companies: Morrison Health Care, Inc. (now Morrison Management Specialists), Morrison Fresh Cooking, Inc., and Ruby Tuesday, Inc.. We recently strengthened our portfolio of services and expertise by joining Compass Group North American Division in February 2001. Morrison Management Specialists provides professional food and nutrition management services to a wide range of health care facilities. Currently over. 11,00 team members serve approximately 700 clients in 32 states including Washington, DC. Our clients include senior nutrition programs, hospitals, nursing homes, retirement communities, and correctional facilities, The secret to Morrison's success is simple and will be applied to your needs and desires of your program recipients. We serve excellent food, prepared from quality ingredients, and proven recipes. This simple statement is the mainstay of any successful food operation. Few have gained the long -term success enjoyed by Morrison. Morrison is very pleased that our local client base includes various Senior Nutrition Programs funded through the Los Angeles City Department of Aging, as well as Los Angeles County Area Agency on Aging. The Morrison concept for growth in the Southern California area is through local support and supervision. We feel that the reaction time from the closeness of our Regional Office in Redondo Beach, California, does give us the "competitive edge" in service and supervision. Routine visits by members of the Western Region Team will help insure the continued success of your Senior Nutrition Program. Periodically, the Regional Director of Nutrition, Randall Connell RD, will visit the production kitchen to review compliance with contractual obligations regarding the nutritional needs of the seniors. He will monitor menu compliance, food handling, safety and sanitation practices, employee in- service records, and employee health records. Randall is also available to answer any questions of a clinical nature and to offer information or suggestions regarding the nutrient analysis of menu components. The Regional Team also includes a Regional Director of Operations, Terri Manoogian, who will also visit the production kitchen regularly. During her visit she will monitor purchasing, vendor service quality, menu development, food storage and food production practices, and adherence to Morrison standardized recipes. The Regional Director of Human Resources, Lynn Woodhouse, is available to assist in the coordination of employee services. She is responsible for recruiting the best management and skilled food service staff available. Her other responsibilities include: training and orientation, employee relations, career planning and development and team building at both the Regional and unit level. She is well informed in the areas of human resources and employee relations and is willing to assist you with any human resource question you might have during the tenure of our agreement. Edward Clark, Western Region Vice President, is available to visit with you and your staff to assess and monitor the progress and success of the Program. He is available through the Regional Office in Redondo Beach, should you have any concerns. The strength and expertise of the Regional and on -site management teams insures the consistent quality of our services to you and the seniors you serve. Furthermore, the strength of immediate back -up supervisory support can resolve any unusual problem which may arise in the course of normal operational business. • • 0 E • Auditors' Report Independent auditors' report to the members of Compass Group PLC We have audited the financial statements of Compass Group PLC for the year ended 30 September 2002 which comprise the consolidated profit and loss account, the balance sheets, the consolidated cash flow statement and related notes, the consolidated statement of total recognised gains and losses, the reconciliation of movements in consolidated shareholders' funds and the related notes 1 to 29. These financial statements have been prepared under the accounting policies set out therein. Respective responsibilities of directors and auditors As described in the statement of directors' responsibilities, the Company's directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with applicable United Kingdom law and accounting standards. Our responsibility is to audit the financial statements in accordance with relevant United Kingdom legal and regulatory requirements, auditing standards, and the Listing Rules of the Financial Services Authority. We report to you our opinion as to whether the financia I statements give a true and fair view and are properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 1985. We also report if, in our opinion, the directors' report is not consistent with the financial statements, if the Company has not kept proper accounting records, if we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit, or if information specified by law or the Listing Rules regarding directors' remuneration and transactions with the Company a nd other members of the Group is not disclosed. We review whether the corporate governance statement reflects the Company's compliance with the seven provisions of the Combined Code specified for our review by the Listing Rules and we report if it does not. We are not required to consider whether the Board's statements on internal control cover all risks and controls, or form an opinion on the effectiveness of the Group's corporate governance procedures or its risk and control procedures. We read the directors' report and the other information contained in the annual report for the above year as described in the contents section and consider the implications for our report if we become aware of any apparent misstatements or material inconsistencies with the financial statements. Basis of audit opinion We conducted our audit in accordance with United Kingdom auditing standards issued by the Auditing Practices Board. An audit includes examination, on a test basis, of evidence relevant to the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. It also includes an assessment of the significant estimates and judgements made by the directors in the preparation of the financial statements and of whether the accounting policies are appropriate to the circumstances of the Company and of the Group, consistently applied and adequately disclosed. We planned and performed our audit so as to obtain all the information and explanations which we considered necessary in order to provide us with sufficient evidence to g ive reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or other irregularity or error. In forming our opinion, we also evaluated the overall adequacy of the presentation of information in the financial statements. Opinion In our opinion, the financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company and of the Group as at 30 September 2002 and of the profit of the Group for the year then ended and have been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 1985. )ettive &-Tft kJ1:- Deloitte & Touche Chartered Accountants a nd Registered Auditors London 3 December 2002 Compass Group PLC 39 • Consolidated Profit and Loss Account for the year ended 30 September 2002 PLC Turnover 2 1 - 1 Betwe (2) 5 Continuing operations Beare - 9,959 8,716 goodwill GaodMll 658 gocdwill Goodwill _ - a niv-tion amonissuon Tetal amMisation emartisetun Operating costs and exceptional and exceptional 2001 and axcepti l and axcepbw Total items Items as ravatad items items 2002 az restated as restated Inota T Notes on on Em fm Ern im Turnover 2 1 - 1 7 (2) 5 Continuing operations 9,959 - 9,959 8,716 - 8,716 Acquisitions 658 - 658 - _ - Total turnover 2 10,617 - 10,617 8,716 - 8,716 Operating costs 3,4 (9,8241 (272) (10,096) (8,047) (327) (8,374) Operating profit - - - 127 - 127 Continuing operations 781 (2591 522 669 (327) 342 Acquisitions 12 (13) (1) - - - 793 (272) 521 669 (327) 342 undertakings Continuing operations 2 1 - 1 7 (2) 5 Acquisitions 11 _ 11 - - - Total operating profit: Group and 37 11381 (127) 35 share of associated undertakings 2 805 (272) 533 676 (329) 347 Reversal of discounting of net proceeds from 456 (294) 162 Equity minority interests disposal of businesses to net present value - - - 127 - 127 Other interest receivable and similar income 18 - 18 17 - 17 Total interest receivable and similar income 18 - 18 144 - 144 Interest payable and similar charges 6 (169) - (169) (237) - (237) Net interest _ (151) - (151) (93) - (93) Profit on ordinary activities before taxation 654 (272) 382 583 (329) 254 Tax on profit on ordinary activities 7 (175) 37 11381 (127) 35 (92) Profit on ordinary activities after taxation 479 (235) 244 456 (294) 162 Equity minority interests 1221 - (22) 116) - (16) •Profit for the financial year 457 (235) 222 440 (294) 146 Equity dividends 8 (159) (159) (126) - (126) Profit for the year retained 21 298 (235) 63 314 (294) 20 Basic earnings per ordinary share 9 10.Op 6.6p 0 Basic earnings per ordinary share amortisation and exceptional items 9 011uted earnings per ordinary share - excluding goodwill amortisation and exceptional items 9 20.3p 19.5p 40 Compass Group PLC • Consolidated Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses for the year ended 30 September 2002 Total gains and losses recognised in the year 181 62 Prior year adjustment in respect of the adoption of FRS 19 (note 7) (7) Total Reconciliation of Movements in Consolidated Shareholders' Funds for the year ended 30 September 2002 0. reM.tod Compass Group PLC 2002 20[01 Profit for the financial year 222 146 Currency translation differences on foreign currency net investments 141) (64) Total gains and losses recognised in the year 181 62 Prior year adjustment in respect of the adoption of FRS 19 (note 7) (7) Total Reconciliation of Movements in Consolidated Shareholders' Funds for the year ended 30 September 2002 0 Compass Group PLC 41 As re ate Compass Group PLC 2= fro 20r01 Profit for the financial year 222 146 Dividends 11591 (1 26) 63 20 Currency translation differences on foreign currency net investments (41) (84) Issue of shares 54 24 Shares to be issued 127) 28 Net addition to /(reduction in) shareholders' funds 49 (12) shareholders' funds 2,782 2,798 •Opening Prior year adjustment in respect of the adoption of FRS 19 (note 7) (4) Opening shareholders' funds as restated 2,782 2,794 Closing shareholders' funds 2,831 2,782 0 Compass Group PLC 41 • Consolidated Balance Sheet as at 30 September 2002 PLC A restated 2002 2001 Nocac [m Em Fixed assets - _- (415) Total assets less current liabilities Intangible assets 10 4,522 4,200 Tangible assets 11 2,369 2,081 Investments 12 101 27 2 2,931 2,782 6,992 6,308 Current assets 21 (1,635) (1,653) Stocks 13 196 181 Debtors: amounts falling due within one year 14 1,258 1,178 amounts falling due after more than one year 14 293 285 Businesses held for resale 15 35 75 Investments 3 12 Cash at bank and in hand _ 406 692 21191 2,423 Creditors: amounts falling due within one year 16 (3,870) (2,838) Net current liabilities (1,679) (415) Total assets less current liabilities 5,313 5,893 Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year 17 (1,954) (2,699) Provisions for liabilities and charges 19 (431) (377) Equity minority interests (97) (35) Net assets 2 2,931 2,782 t pnar anu reserves - - Called up share capital 20 223 222 Shares to be issued - 20 5 32 Share premium account 21 68 11 . Merger reserve 21 4,170 4,170 Profit and loss account 21 (1,635) (1,653) Total equity shareholders funds _ _ 2,831 2,782 i Approved by the Board of Directors on 3 December 2002 and signed on their behalf by Michael J Bailey, Director Andrew P Lynch, Director 42 Compass Group PLC Company Balance Sheet as at 30 September 2002 • Total assets less current liabilities 2002 2001 Compass Group PLC Nola: cm Cm Fixed assets 782 817 Investments 12 1,121 1,109 Called up share capital 20 1,121 1,109 Current assets 20 5 32 Debtors: amounts falling due within one year 14 3,048 1,934 Cash at bank and in hand 21 — 360 3,048 2,294 Creditors: amounts falling due within one year 16 (1,752) (577) Net current assets 1,296 1,717 Total assets less current liabilities 2,417 2,826 Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year 17 (1,635) (2,009) Net assets 782 817 Capital and reserves Called up share capital 20 223 222 Shares to be issued 20 5 32 Share premium account 21 68 11 Profit and loss account 21 486 552 Total equity shareholders' funds 782 817 Approved by the Board of Directors on 3 December 2002 and signed on their behalf by Michael J Bailey, Director Andrew P Lynch, Director C� J 0 Compass Group PLC 43 L J i Consolidated Cash Flow Statement for the year ended 30 September 2002 Compass Group PLC D, 2EM cm zcm Net cash inflow from operating activities before exceptional items (note 1) 62 925 Financing 748 Exceptional reorganisation costs 1,430 (17) 5 (44) Net cash inflow after exceptional items Debt due within one year: 908 Movement in net debt in the year 704 Dividends from associated undertakings (5051 2 (430) 2 Returns on investments and servicing of finance (2,390) Increase /(decrease) in bank loans and loan notes 289 Interest received 17 Capital element of finance lease rentals 16 Interest paid 1175) (258) (861', Interest element of finance lease rental payments (3) (267) (3) Dividends paid to minority interests (10) (5) Net cash outflow from returns on investments and servicing of finance (171) 1250) Taxation Tax received 31 19 Tax paid (731 (118) Net tax paid 1421 (99) Capital expenditure and financial investment Purchase of tangible fixed assets (384) 1355) Sale of tangible fixed assets 54 30 Sale of own shares, net 1 1 Total capital expenditure and financial investment (329) (324) Free cash flow 368 33 Acquisitions and disposals (note IV) Purchase of subsidiary companies and investments in associated undertakings (406) (1,337) Net proceeds from businesses held for resale 22 2,806 Sale of minority interest 7 - Sale of subsidiary companies and associated undertakings Deferred consideration relating to previous disposals acquisitions and disposals ity dividends cash (outflov 31 _ - 25 (3461 1,494 (126) (121) 1,373 Net cash (outflow) /inflow before financing 1104) 1,406 Management of liquid resources: Sale of marketable securities 545 62 - Financing Change in net debt resulting from cash flows (371 1,430 Issue of ordinary share capital 5 (73) 24 Debt due within one year: (51) Movement in net debt in the year (3121 Decrease in bank loans and loan notes (5051 (2,390) (430) Debt due after one year: (2,702) (2,390) Increase /(decrease) in bank loans and loan notes 289 (440) Capital element of finance lease rentals (14) (15) Net cash (outflow) from financing (225) (861', (DecreaseVincreass in cash in the year (267) 545 Reconciliation of net cash Row to movement in net debt (note 11) (Decrease) / ncrease in cash in the year (2671 545 Cash outflow from change in debt and lease finance 230 885 Change in net debt resulting from cash flows (371 1,430 Changes in finance leases, loans acquired with subsidiaries and other noncash changes (281) (73) Effect of foreign exchange rate changes 6 (51) Movement in net debt in the year (3121 1,306 Opening net debt (2,390) (3,696) Closing net debt (2,702) (2,390) 44 Compass Group PLC Notes to the Financial Statements continued • 29 Details of principal subsidiary companies Gauntry of r ,.ntm or i. anon Nnapai admties England and Wales Compass Group, UK & Ireland Ltd. Holding company for the provision of foodservice in the UK Compass Contract Services (UK) Ltd. Trading company for the provision of foodservice in the UK Moto Hospitality Ltd. Trading company for the UK motorway service area business Travelrest Services Ltd. Trading company for the UK roadside Little Chef and Travelodge businesses Letheby & Christopher Ltd. Trading company for the UK sports and events foodservice business Select Service Partner Ltd. Trading company for the UK travel, leisure and concessions business Medirest Ltd. Trading company for the provision of foodservices to the UK healthcare market Scolarest Ltd. Trading company for the provision of foodservices to the UK education market Vendepac Ltd. Trading company for the provision of vending foodservice in the UK Compass Group Holdings PLC Holding company and corporate activities Hospitality Holdings Ltd. Intermediate holding company Continental Europe and the Rest of the World Trading company for the provision of foodservice to the USA healthcare market Compass Group France SAS, France Holding company for the provision of foodservice in France Eurest France SA Trading company for the provision of foodservice in France Compass Group Deutschland GmbH, Germany Eurest Deutschland GmbH, Germany Compass Group Holdings Spain, S.L. Eurest S.A., Spain Eurest Colectividades S.A., Spain Compass Group Nederland Holdings BV Compass Group Nederland BV Selecta Group AG, Switzerland Selecta AG, Switzerland .Selecta S.A., France Rail Gourmet AG, Switzerland CJ Holding company for the provision of foodservice in Germany Trading company for the provision of foodservice in Germany Holding company for the provision of foodservice in Spain Trading company for the in- flight foodservice business in Spain Trading company for the provision of foodservice in Spain Holding company for the provision of foodservice in the Netherlands Trading company for the provision of foodservice in the Netherlands Holding company for the provision of vending foodservice in Continental Europe Trading company for the provision of vending foodservice in Switzerland Trading company for the provision of vending foodservice in France Holding company for the provision of on board rail foodservice in Continental Europe and the UK Restorama AG, Switzerland Trading company for the provision of foodservice in Switzerland Compass Group International BV the Netherlands Holding and financing company for the Group's operations in Continental Europe and the rest of the world Seiyo Food Systems Inc., Japan (67.8`) Trading company for the provision of foodservice in Japan USA Compass Holdings, Inc. Holding company for the provision of foodservice in the USA Compass Group USA, Inc. Trading company for the provision of foodservice in the USA Morrison Management Specialists, Inc. Trading company for the provision of foodservice to the USA healthcare market Crothall Services Group Trading company for the provision of facilities management services to the USA healthcare market Flik International Corp. Trading company for the provision of executive fine dining facilities in the USA The Patina Group LLC Trading company for the provision of executive fine dining facilities in the USA Bon Appetit Management Co. Trading company for the provision of foodservice in the USA Restaurant Associates Corp. Trading company for the provision of executive fine dining facilities in the USA All companies listed above are wholly owned by the Group, except where otherwise indicated. Particulars of certain subsidiary companies, none of which is material to the financial statements, are omitted and a complete list will be attached to the forthcoming annual return. All interests are in the ordinary share capital. All companies operate principally in their country of incorporation. as Compass Group PLC US Dollar and Euro Consolidated Profit and Loss Account Profit on ordinary activities before taxation 1,027 under UK Accounting Principles 600 399 for the year ended 30 September 2002 (4321 608 Before ee — Ooi Go • imi G@ amisti. mmhon u.6. mianon eM e¢e arM except.. mtl exce0rioaal eM exeptiem item items ilema 2002 2= 2001 items items 2002 2001 2002 Compass Group PLC gm Em Em $m Em Em em Em Turnover Profit on ordinary activities before taxation 1,027 (4271 600 399 1,040 (4321 608 Continuing operations 15,636 — 15,636 13,684 15,835 — 15,835 13,858 Acquisitions 1,033 — 1,033 — 1,046 — 1,046 — Total turnover 16,669 — 16,669 13,684 16,981 — 16,881 13,858 Operating costs 115,4241 (427) (15,851) (13,147) 115,620) 14321 (16,052) (13,315) Operating profit 727 13741 353 232 Equity dividends 12501 Continuing operations 1,226 (407) 819 537 1,242 (412) 830 543 Acquisitions 19 (20) (1) — 19 (20) (1) — 1,245 (427) 818 537 1,261 (4321 829 543 Share of profits of associated undertakings Continuing operations 2 — 2 8 2 — 2 8 Acquisitions 17 — 17 — 17 — 17 — Total operating profit: Group and share of associated undertakings - 1,264 (427) 837 545 1,280 (432) 848 551 Reversal of discounting of net proceeds from disposal of businesses to net present value — — — 199 — — — 202 Other interest receivable and similar income 28 — 28 27 29 — 29 27 Total interest receivable and similar income 28 — 28 226 29 — 29 229 Interest payable and similar charges 12651 — (265) (372) (269) — (269) (377) Net interest 12371 — (237) (146) (240) — (240) (148) • Compass Group PLC 69 Profit on ordinary activities before taxation 1,027 (4271 600 399 1,040 (4321 608 403 Tax on profit on ordinary activities (275) 58 (2171 (144) (278) 58 (220) (146) Profit on ordinary activities after taxation 752 (369) 383 255 762 (374) 388 257 Equity minority interests (34) — (34) (26) (35) — (351 (25) •Profit for the financial year 718 (3691 349 229 727 13741 353 232 Equity dividends 12501 (250) (198) (2531 (253) (200) Profit for the year retained 468 (369) 99 31 474 (3741 100 32 The exchange rates used to translate the above figures are those ruling at the 2002 balance sheet date (E1 = $1.57 = €1.59). • Compass Group PLC 69 0 US Dollar and Euro Consolidated Balance Sheet under UK Accounting Principles as at 30 September 2002 PLC 2002 2001 2002 2001 $m $m fm Em • 70 Compass Group PLC Fixed assets Intangible assets 7,100 6,594 7,190 6,678 Tangible assets 3,719 3,267 3,767 3,309 Investments 159 42 160 43 10,978 9,903 11,117 10,030 Current assets Stocks 308 284 311 287 Debtors: amounts falling due within one year 1,975 1,850 2,000 1,873 amounts falling due after more than one year 460 447 465 453 Businesses held for resale 55 118 56 119 Investments 5 19 5 19 Cash at bank and in hand 637 1,087 646 1,100 3,440 3,805 3,483 3,651 Creditors: amounts falling due within one year (6,076) (4,456) (6,153) (4,512) Net current(liabilities) /assets (2,636) (651) (2,670) 1661) Total assets less current liabilities 8,342 9,252 8,447 9,369 Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year (3,068) (4,237) 13,107) (4,291) Provisions for liabilities and charges (677) (592) (685) (599) Equity minority interests (152) (55) (154) (56) Net assets 4,445 4,368 4,501 4,423 Capital and reserves Called up share capital 350 349 355 353 Shares to be issued 8 5o 8 51 Share premium account 107 17 108 17 •Merger reserve 6,547 6,547 6,630 6,630 Profit and loss account (2,567) (2,595) (2,600) (2,628) Total equity shareholders' funds 4,445 4,368 4,501 4,423 The exchange rates used to translate the above figures are those ruling at the 2002 balance sheet date (f t = $1.57 = €1.59). • 70 Compass Group PLC 0 Notice of Annual General Meeting Notice is hereby given that the second Annual General Meeting of Compass Group PLC will be held in the Fleming Room at the Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre, Broad Sanctuary, Westminster, London SW l P 3EE on Friday 14 February 2003 at 11.00am in order to transact the following business: Routine business Resolution 1 To receive and adopt the financial statements of the Company for the financial year ended 30 September 2002 and the reports of the directors and auditors thereon. Resolution 2 To approve the Remuneration Committee's Report for the financial year ended 30 September 2002. Resolution 3 To declare a final dividend on the Company's ordinary shares for the financial year ended 30 September 2002. Resolution 4 To elect Peter H Blackburn as director. Resolution 5 To elect Sven A Kado as a director. Resolution 6 To elect Clive W P Grundy as a director. Resolution 7 To re -elect Peter E B Cawdron as a director. Resolution 8 To re-elect Andrew P Lynch as a director. • Resolution 9 To reappoint Deloitte & Touche as auditors. • Resolution 10 To authorise the directors to determine the auditors' remuneration. Special business To consider and if thought fit pass the following Resolutions which will be proposed as Special Resolutions: Resolution 11 "That the directors be and are hereby generally empowered pursuant to section 95 oft he Companies Act 1985 to allot equity securities within the meaning of section 940 of that Act for cash pursuant to the authority conferred by the Ordinary Resolution passed as Resolution 7 at the An nual General Meeting of the Company held on 15 February 2002 as if section 890) of that Act did not apply to any such allotment provided that this power shall be limited to: (i) the allotment of equity securities in connection with an issue to holders of ordinary shares of 10 pence each in the capital of the Company in proportion (as nearlyas maybe) to their existing holdings of such ordinary shares but subject to such exclusions or other arrangements as the directors may deem necessary or expedient in relation to fractional entitlements or any legal or practical problems under the laws of any territory or the requirements of any regulatory body or stock exchange; and (ii) the allotment (otherwise than pursuant to sub- paragraph(il above) of equity securities for cash up to an aggregate nominal amount of [I I million consisting of 110 million ordinary shares of 10 pence each in the capital of the Company; and further provided that this power shall expire at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company or 13 May 2004 if earlier, save that the Company may make any offer or agreement before the expiry of this power which would or might require equity securities to be allotted after such expiry date and the directors may allot equity securities in pursuance of any such offer or agreement as if the power had not expired." Resolution 12 "That the directors be and are hereby generally and unconditionally authorised, pursuant to Article 45 of the Company's Articles of Association and in accordance with section 166 of the Companies Act 1985 to make market purchases (within the meaning of section 163 of that Act) of ordinary shares of 10 pence each in the capital of the Company subject to the following conditions: (i) the maximum aggregate number of ordinary shares herebyauthorised to be purchased is 223,489,939 representing 10% of the Company's issued ordinary share capital as at 3 December 2002; (ii) the minimum price (exclusive of expenses) which may be paid for each ordinary share is 10 pence; (iii) the maximum price (exclusive of expenses) which maybe paid for each ordinary share is an amount equal to 105% of the average of the middle market quotations for an ordinary share as derived from the London Stock Exchange Daily Official List for the five business days immediately preceding the day on which the purchase is made; (iv) unless previously varied or revoked, the authority hereby conferred shall expire at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company or 13 August 2004 whichever is the earlier; and (v) the Company may make a contract or contracts to purchase ordinary shares under the authority hereby conferred prior to the expiry of such authority which will or may be executed wholly or part ly after the expiry of such authority and may make a purchase of ordinary shares in pursuance of any such contract or contracts." By Orderof the Board Ronald M Morley Company Secretary 2 January 2003 Registered Office: Cowley House, Guildford Street, Chertsey, Surrey KT16 9BA Notes (i) A member entitled to attend andvote at the Annual General Meeting (the "Meeting ") may appoint a proxy or proxies to attend and (on a poll) vote on his /her behalf. A proxy need not be a member of the Company. (ii) A form of proxy for use in relation to the Meeting is enclosed with this report . To be effective the form of proxy must be completed in accordance with the instructions set out therein and lodged at the office of the Registrars of the Company at least 48 hours before the Meeting. Completion and return of the form of proxy will not preclude a member from attending the Meeting and voting in person. (iii) Pursuant to Regulation 34 of the Uncertificated Securities Regulations 1995, the Company specifies that only those shareholders registered in the Register of Members of the Company as at 6.00pm on 12 February 2003, or in the event that the Meeting is adjourned, in the Register of Members 48 hours before the time of any adjourned meeting, shall be entitled to attend or vote at the Meeting in respect of the number of shares registered in their name at the relevant time. Changes to entries on the Register of Members after 6.00pm on 12 February 2003 or, in the event that the Meeting is adjourned, less than 48 hours before the time of anyadjourned meeting, shall be disregarded in determining the rights of any person to attend or vote at the Meeting. (N) Brief biographical details of directors standing for re-election at the Meeting are set out on pages 22 and 23. (v) Copies of the service contracts of the directors and the Register of Directors' Interests will be available for inspection during normal business hours from the date of this notice until the date of the Meeting (Saturdays, Sundays and public holidays excepted) at the registered office of the Company and will also be made available at the Meeting for a period of 15 minutes prior to and during the continuance of the Meeting. Compass Group PLC 71 11 Shareholder Information Registrars and transfer office •All administrative enquiries relating to shareholdings should, in the first instance, be directed to Capita IRG Plc, Bourne House, 34 Beckenham Road, Beckenham, Kent BR34TU, telephone (within the UK): 0870 162 31 00 and (from overseas): +442086392157; e -mail: ssd ®capita- irg.com. Shareholders can access a range of online services at www.mpita-irg.com American depositary receipts (ADRsI Further information about the Company's ADR programme can be obtained from The Bank of New York, Investor Relations, PO Box 11258, Church Street Station, New York, NY 10266 -1258, telephone: (within the US toll free) 1-8888NY-ADRS and (from overseas) +1 610 312 53115,e-mail: shareowner- svcsebankofny.com, and from websites: www.adrbny.com and www.stockbnycom Share dealing service Compass Group has established a low -cost postal share dealing service. Shareholders wishing to take advantage of the service should contact Hoare Govett Limited, Low -Cost Share Dealing Department for details, telephone 020 7678 8300. C. J Share price information The current share price of Compass Group shares is available on Ceefax, Teletext, FTCityline (operated by the Financial Times), telephone 0906 843 3250 and Compass Group's corporate website. Individual Savings Accounts (ISAsI Compass Group has introduced corporate sponsored Maxi and Mini ISAs. The ISAs offer UK resident shareholders a simple low-cost and tax eff icient wayto invest in the Company's shares. Full details together with a form of application are available from HSBC Trust Company (UK) Limited, Corporate Personal Equity Plans & Individual Savings Accounts, 5th Floor, City Plaza, 2 Pinfold Street, Sheff ield S1 2OZ. Client Liaison Department, telephone 0114 252 9166 or fax 0114 252 8039. 72 Compass Group PLC Unsolicited mail Compass Group is legally obliged to make its register of members available to the public. As a consequence of this some shareholders might have received unsolicited mail. Shareholders wishing to limit the amount of such mail should write to the Mailing Preferences Service ( "MPS "), FREEPOST 22 London W1 E 7EZ. MPS will then notify the bodies that support its service that you do not wish to receive unsolicited mail. Registered office Compass Group PLC, Cowley House, Guildford Street, Chertsey, Surrey KT16 9BA, United Kingdom, telephone +44 (0)1932 573000, fax +44 (0)1932 569 956 Corporate website Information about the Company is also available Numha of Financial calendar Shareholder analysis Number, of holders Holders % shares held mlulons Shares held % Type of holder: December Dividend payments Interim Banks, nominee companies, pension funds and investment trusts 20,898 20.08 1,957.99 87.66 Individuals 81,413 78.23 178.79 8.00 Insurance companies 122 0.12 19.09 0.86 Others 1,630 1.57 77.79 3.48 Total 104,063 100.00 2,233.66 100.00 Size of holding: 1-100 13,497 12.97 0.54 0.02 101 -200 14,666 14.09 2.17 0.10 201 - 500 25,503 24.51 8.61 0.38 501 -1,000 20,363 19.57 14.87 0.67 1,001 - 2,000 15,309 14.71 21.88 0.98 2,001 - 5,000 9,199 8.84 28.07 1.26 5,001 - 10,000 2,361 2.27 16.33 0.73 10,001 - 50,000 1,666 1.60 36.74 1.64 50,001 - 100,000 419 0.40 30.19 1.35 100,001 - 500,000 625 0.60 138.41 6.20 500,001 - 1,000,000 169 0.16 121.25 5.43 1,000,001 - 5,000,000 208 0.20 459.86 20.59 5,000,001 - 10,000,000 31 0.03 213.05 9.54 10,000,001 and above 47 0.05 1,141.69 51.11 Total 104,063 100.00 2.233.66 100.00 Registrars and transfer office •All administrative enquiries relating to shareholdings should, in the first instance, be directed to Capita IRG Plc, Bourne House, 34 Beckenham Road, Beckenham, Kent BR34TU, telephone (within the UK): 0870 162 31 00 and (from overseas): +442086392157; e -mail: ssd ®capita- irg.com. Shareholders can access a range of online services at www.mpita-irg.com American depositary receipts (ADRsI Further information about the Company's ADR programme can be obtained from The Bank of New York, Investor Relations, PO Box 11258, Church Street Station, New York, NY 10266 -1258, telephone: (within the US toll free) 1-8888NY-ADRS and (from overseas) +1 610 312 53115,e-mail: shareowner- svcsebankofny.com, and from websites: www.adrbny.com and www.stockbnycom Share dealing service Compass Group has established a low -cost postal share dealing service. Shareholders wishing to take advantage of the service should contact Hoare Govett Limited, Low -Cost Share Dealing Department for details, telephone 020 7678 8300. C. J Share price information The current share price of Compass Group shares is available on Ceefax, Teletext, FTCityline (operated by the Financial Times), telephone 0906 843 3250 and Compass Group's corporate website. Individual Savings Accounts (ISAsI Compass Group has introduced corporate sponsored Maxi and Mini ISAs. The ISAs offer UK resident shareholders a simple low-cost and tax eff icient wayto invest in the Company's shares. Full details together with a form of application are available from HSBC Trust Company (UK) Limited, Corporate Personal Equity Plans & Individual Savings Accounts, 5th Floor, City Plaza, 2 Pinfold Street, Sheff ield S1 2OZ. Client Liaison Department, telephone 0114 252 9166 or fax 0114 252 8039. 72 Compass Group PLC Unsolicited mail Compass Group is legally obliged to make its register of members available to the public. As a consequence of this some shareholders might have received unsolicited mail. Shareholders wishing to limit the amount of such mail should write to the Mailing Preferences Service ( "MPS "), FREEPOST 22 London W1 E 7EZ. MPS will then notify the bodies that support its service that you do not wish to receive unsolicited mail. Registered office Compass Group PLC, Cowley House, Guildford Street, Chertsey, Surrey KT16 9BA, United Kingdom, telephone +44 (0)1932 573000, fax +44 (0)1932 569 956 Corporate website Information about the Company is also available at www.compassgroup.com Financial calendar Annual General Meeting 14 February 2003 Half year results announcement May Full year results announcement December Dividend payments Interim October Final April 10 Corporate Offices Corporate Office Compass Group PLC Compass House Guildford Street Chertsey Surrey KT16 9BO United Kingdom Tel +44 1932 573 000 Fax +44 1932 569 956 www. compass -g roup.com Compass Group PLC (CE & ROW) 89191, rue du Faubourg St. Wrote 75008 Paris France Tel +33 15527 2300 Fax +33 15527 2399 United Kingdom Headquarters Compass Group, UK & Ireland Rivermead Oxford Road Denham Uxbridge U894BF United Kingdom Tel +44 1895 554 554 Fax +44 1895 554 555 North America Headquarters Compass Group, North America 2400 Yorkmont Road Charlotte NC 28217 USA Tel +1704 329 4000 Fax +1 704 329 4160 Designed and produced by Cartlidge Levene Printed by Westerham Press Printed in the United Kingdom using 100% elemental chlorine free virgin fibre from farmed forests 0 REFERENCES MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS BID FOR CITY OF ROSEMEAD • SECTION -3 0 MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS • LOS ANGELES AREA Senior Nutrition Programs Account Name Client Contact Date Address Position opened/ City, State, Zip ---------------------------------------------------------------- Telephone,Extension Meals ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF Ms. Barbara Linski 1989 -92 SOUTHEAST CALIFORNIA Executive Director 1994 1360 North St. Andrews Place (323) 957 -3900 -650 Hollywood, CA 90028 CITY OF AZUSA Ms. Carolyn Crawford 1996 Senior Programs Manager, Senior Services -150 740 North Dalton Avenue (626) 812 -5205 Azusa, CA 91702 CITY OF CLARMONT Ms. Melissa Vollaro 2002 660 N. Mountain Ave. Project Director 120 Claremont, CA 91711 CITY OF CULVER CITY Ms. Jill Cordova 1993 • 4153 Overland Avenue Senior Nutrition Director -120 Culver City, CA 90230 (310) 253 -6700 CITY OF EL MONTE Ms. Marian Last 4/1996 11333 Valley Boulevard Senior Services Manager -110 El Monte, CA 91731 (818) 580 -2210 CITY OF GARDENA Mr. Ralph Todd 1996 HUMAN SERVICES Program Director -350 1651 W. 162nd St. (310) 217 -9553 Gardena, CA 90247 CITY OF GLENDALE Ms. Joann Venditto 1990 -94 201 E. Colorado Boulevard Community Services Manager 1996 Glendale, CA 91206 -4393 (818) 548 -3793 -200 CITY OF LOS ANGELES SENIOR PROGRAM Ms. Nicole Royer 1994 DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION & PARKS Senior Program Manager 1,000 . City Hall South (213) 485 -4884 Los Angeles, CA 90012 CITY OF POMONA Ms. Mayela Aguilar 4/1996 499 E. Arrow Highway Recreation Supervisor -180 Pomona, Ca (909) 620 -2301 CITY OF ROSEMEAD Ms. Kim Boris 4/1996 8838 E. Valley Boulevard Recreation Supervisor -120 • Rosemead, CA 91770 -1559 (626) 569 -2251 Note: All information contained in this report is proprietary and may not be reproduced without the written permission of Morrison Management Specialists n U • • LOS ANGELES AREA Account Name Address City, State, Zip CITY OF SANTA MONICA 1527 4th Street, Room 106 Santa Monica, CA 90401 HUMAN SERVICES ASSOCIATION 6800 Florence Avenue Bell Gardens, CA 90201 ORGANIZATION FOR THE NEEDS OF THE ELDERLY (O.N.E) 17400 Victory Boulevard Van Nuys, CA 91406 SAN FERNANDO INTERFAITH COUNCIL 6541 Syhnar Avenue Van Nuys, CA 91401 SOUTHEAST AREA SOCIAL SERVICES FUNDING AUTHORITY 9845 Painter Ave. Suite B Whittier, CA 90605 ST. BARNABAS SENIOR SERVICES Senior Meal Program 675 South Carondelet St. Los Angeles, CA 90057 YMCA OF METRO L.A./ TORRANCE-SOUTH BAY BRANCH 2900 Sepulveda Boulevard Torrance, CA 90505 Client Contact Position Telephone,Extension Date opened Meals Ms. Anita Ivers 1993 Senior Program Director -200 (310) 458 -9 -8300 -1,300 Ms. Susanne J.Sundberg 1987 Executive Director -700 (310) 806 -5400 Ms. Sandy Matthews 1994 -500 (818) 705 -2345 Ms. Lori Litel 1991 -93 MPC Executive Director 1994 (818) 766 -5165 -1,300 Ms. Leah Monson 1997 Senior Program Director -600 (562) 946 -4711 Ms. Judith Beaubien 1997 -00 Project Director 200 (213) 738 -9479 Mr. David Villasenor 1990 Senior Director - 250 (310) 325 -5885 Note: All information contained in this report is proprietary and may not be reproduced without the written permission of Morrison Management Specialists • • MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS LOS ANGELES AREA- ACCOUNTS see separate list for Senior Nutrition Programs Account Name Address City, State, Zip BARRY J. NIDORF JUVENILE HALL 16350 Filbert Street Sylmar, CA 81342 CENTRALJUVENILE HALL 1605 Eastlake Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90033 CHALLENGER MEMORIAL YOUTH CTR. 5300 West Avenue I Lancaster, CA 93536 HARBOR /UCLA MEDICAL CENTER 1000 West Carson Street, Box #31 Torrance, CA 90509 HIGH DESERT HOSPITAL 44900 North 60th West Lancaster, CA 93534 LA CASA MENTAL HEALTH CTR 6060 Paramount Blvd. Long Beach, CA 90801 LAC & USC MEDICAL CENTER 1200 North State Street Los Angeles, CA 90033 M.L.K. Jr. /Drew MEDICAL CENTER 12021 South Wilmington Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90059 OLIVE VIEW MEDICAL CENTER 14445 Olive View Drive Sylmar, CA 91342 Client Contact Date Position opened Telephone,Extension Mr. Bill Fenton 1983 Superintendent (818) 3642001 Ms. Shirley Alexander 1985 Superintendent (323) 226 -8601 Ms. Cynthia Alexander 1991 General Services Manager (661) 940 -4102 Ms. Cynthia Moore -Oliver 1984 Assistant Hospital Administrator (310) 222 -2101 Mr. Beryl Brooks 1997 CEO (661) 945 -8285 Mr. David Heffron 1987 Administrator (562) 6349534 Mr. Cecil Clark 1983 Associate Executive Director Support Services (323) 226 -4242 Mr. Phil Valenzuela 1984 Assistant Hospital Administrator (310) 668 -4744 Ms. Maple Gray 1984 Assistant Administrator (818) 3643006 • Note: All information contained in this report is proprietary and may not be reproduced without the written permission of Morrison Management Specialists 0 CONCEPT and METHOD OF SERVICE PROPOSED MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS BID FOR CITY OF ROSEMEAD • SECTION -4 • • Morrison Management Specialists agrees to prepare, package as specified, and deliver meals to designated sites as established by your bid specification from our production site at Central Juvenile Hall in Los Angeles. , Morrison will meet the broad spectrum of regulations and statutes appropriate to the conduct of Nutrition Programs for the elderly as promulgated by the United State Department of Health and Human Services and administered by the Administration on Aging, the California Department of Aging, and the local Area Agency on Aging. Morrison will provide a nutritious meal to meet at least one third of the recommended Daily Allowances for adults 51 years old and older as established by the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Academy of Sciences National Research Council. An approved cycle menu will be adhered to including allowable substitutions. The special needs of the elderly are considered in all menu planning, food selection and meal preparation. A food preference survey will be conducted periodically to help ensure variety, religious, ethnic, cultural, or regional preference of the majority to be incorporated into the menu. All food will be prepared fresh daily at the production site. All HACCP and health regulations concerning food purchase, storage, and preparation will be observed. All racy food used in the preparation of meals will be of high quality and food standards will continue to meet or exceed current specifications. All equipment used in the preparation of food will meet standards set by the State Board of • Health and are approved by the National Sanitation Foundation. In case of an emergency, arrangements will be formulated through Morrison and the Project Director to provide a balanced meal. The program will be reimbursed for any out - of- pocket expenses incurred when replacing part or all of a meal that is not edible due to improper preparation. An emergency plan has been developed, and is on file in our offices. It outlines the procedures to provide your seniors and staff with nutritious meals in the event of a variety of emergency situations. Morrison will keep accurate sales and procurement records related to sales covered by the contract. All records will be kept by the Accounting Department in Mobile, Alabama. These records will be kept on file for a minimum of three (3) years after the end of the Federal fiscal year to which they pertain. Meal delivery tickets are provided daily for sales records. Weekly and end of the month invoices will be prepared and forwarded to the Project Directors office no later than 2 working days following the end of the billing period. Every effort will be made to encourage good communication between Monson Management Specialists and all representatives of the City of Rosemead Senior Citizen Lunch Program. We feel that throughout the years we have been serving the senior • nutrition programs, Morrison's flexibility and responsive attitude has been clearly demonstrated in handling various situations. You can be assured of our commitment to the City of Rosemead to provide the very best in quality meals through our management expertise. I' 1 I`J • MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS Food and Nutrition Specialists INVOICE REMIT TO: MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIA' ACCOUNT: CJH - Satellite Programs ADDRESS: 1605 Eastlake Av ue CITY: Los Angeles, CA 3 BILLED TO: City of Rosen 8838 E. e, O o..�e OF 0 i 41612003 Invoice # 097812 DATE: 4/7/2003 272 CONGREGATE MEAL� - ( daily count on attached sheet) Regular Meals 0 Box Lunches 0 TOTAL MEALS - C1 0 x 0.00 Total Invoice Adjustment - see attached summary Other - explain Extra Soup per Gal 0 x 0.00 MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS Food and Nutrition Specialists Please make check payable to "Morrison'" $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Morrison's Health Care Rosemead Recreation & Parks W eregate Meals Morntay gular 3/37/2003 GARVEY CNTR I RCRC Special Menu TOTAL BOX LUNCHES GARVEY CNTF RCRC Tuesday Wednesday 1 ji IM!1 Thursday 4/3/2003 From 3/31/2003 To: 41612003 Friday Saturday Sunday 414/2003 415/2003 4 /612003 0 Total Hot Meals 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Invoice Adjustment $0.00 \J C� 0 FOOD PRODUCTION FACILITY MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS BID FOR CITY OF ROSEMEAD n L_ J SECTION -5 • Morrison Management Specialists Central Juvenile Hall August, 2002 1605 Eastlake Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90033 (eatmatedtaw % Food Production Facility - STAFFING for AUC ( Senior Meal Programs Only) Management as needed Director or Food and Nutrition Services Essie Mortaji see attached Resume - responsible for overall food service operation and contract compliance. as needed Nutrition Services Specialist Randall Connell RD see attached resume - Regional Dietitian available as resource, support and monitor for all nutritional needs. 30% Assistant Director of Food & Nutrition Services David Colmenares over 17 years experience in food service operations, of which about 15 years in operational and administrative management. responsible for Senior Nutrition Programs - all aspects. including periodic site visits and advisory council participation. assists Food Service Director in all management responsibilities. 1o°i> Assistant Director of Office Systems Jesus Vega approximately 18 years experience in food service operation. - responsible for office and personnel, as well as operational management. - responsible for Senior Program accounting and communication, 30% Assistant Director Senior Nutrition Services Joel Medina • over 15 years of food service and supervisory experience. - responsible for Senior Nutrition Programs from CJH - all aspects. including periodic site visits and advisory council meetings - responsible for quality assurance & delivery systems. Operations 30% Production Lead / Cook Benito Benitez over 12 years experience in baking and hot/celd food production and cooking. 30% Cooks at least 7 years experience in hot and cold food production and cooking. 10% Baker over 15 years in food production and bating. 35% Salad / Cold Food Cook Juan Medina over'14 years experience in hot and cold food production and cooking. 10-30% Other Production Personnel (production - HDM packaging, etc.) employed at this facility for 6 months to 7 years +, Transit 100% Drivers between 1 and 9 years experience at this facility. - responsible to deliver all foods and supplies according to delivery slips and place items as directed by site staff. - responsible for cleanliness of all transport equipment Other 10' /e Storeroom - Utility - and additional personnel as needed is shared with overall food service operation. Our total staff consists of about 50 people at this time. • 0 Morrison Management Specialists Central Juvenile Hall #### 1605 Eastlake Avenue Los Angeles, Ca 90033 Food Production Facility and Food Service Operation (Facility owned by the Los Angeles County Probation Department) (Food Service Operation contracted with Morrison Management Specialist) A. Food preparation and storage areas Food production area = @ 3,000 sq. ft. / storage areas (cold, dry & other) = 4,500 sq. ft. B. Major food service equipment Convection ovens = 8 Steamers= 9 Trayline = 1 Steamkettles (60- 80gal) = 8 Mixers/Choppers/Slicers = 2 each Potwasher /Cleaning Machine = 1 each Flash Freezer (400 lbs.) = I double door C. Percentage use of the food production facility and equipment Senior Meal Programs 20 - 30 percent D. Number of meals that can be prepared at one time Approximately 2,000 - 3,000 senior meals. Senior meals prepared daily as of June 2002: appr. 1,800 - 2,400 E. Procedure for procurement, receiving,storing and inventory for all food and food service supplies Procurement: periodic bidding; regional & national contracts; market condition pricing comparisons. Receiving: checked and stored by storeroom personnel. Storing: administered by storeroom personnel according to policy & procedures. Inventory: controlled inventory levels; daily /weekly deliveries; weekly physical inventories taken. F. Method of portion control at production facility Daily production sheets for food preparation; All items counted, weighed, measured for shipping according to counts. G. Procedure for safety and sanitation in food production facility Safety: established rules, equipment, training and safety committee. Sanitation: established rules for employees; equipment and facility cleaning schedules; daily monitored by site management; periodic site audits by regional staff. HACCP: Management and Production Supervisors are "ServSafe" certified or scheduled to be. H. Method for meal transport from food production facility to meal site Insulated containers for shipment of all hot and cold foods (ice added if needed). Vehicles: Ford Econoline vans and Ford/Satellite step vans. Drivers have cellular phones. Temperatures are taken at shipping and at delivery point. All foods and supplies are shipped with itemized delivery slips. 1. Method of maintaining cost effectiveness and efficient food service operation Cost: purchasing procedures, standardized recipes, production planning and controls, continuous training , weekly financial reports and periodic audits. Efficiency: ongoing operations evaluations with appropriate adjustments being made; . employees and management participate in continuous training & development programs. 0 J C DELIVERY and VEHICLE MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS BID FOR CITY OF ROSEMEAD SECTION -6 0 DELIVERY & VEHICLES Morrison is the first owner of all vehicles which are used in the senior meal programs. All trucks and vans in the Los Angeles area are made by Ford Motor Company. Model used: Ford - Econoline Vans Ford - Econoline Step Van with a 1411. "Satellite" box A back -up vehicle is part of our fleet at Central Juvenile Hall. We will be able to respond quickly on short notice and in times of emergencies. We also have an agreement with a truck rental agency within a few miles to pick up vehicles as needed. Our vehicles are serviced on a regular basis and repairs are done by a certified service garage. We have been put on their priority list, if we are in need of road service and/or towing. All company vehicles are insured through Zurich American Insurance Company, with coverage of at least 1 million per occurrence (see Insurance Certificate). Our drivers have a cellular telephone in their vehicles, so that we can reach them at all times. It also enables them to communicate with us, the police and their respective program sites if unforeseen situations should occur. We are doing everything we can to have safe vehicles, safe drivers and avoid any delays in delivery schedules. The delivery routing for your program is done according to your requirements of receiving and serving times. We shall work with you to establish the best delivery system possible. 0 Morrison Health Care, Inc WEEK: DAY: XXX MEAL DELIVERY TICKET DATE: Agency: City of Rosemead Site Name: Onver's Name: TRUCK - Left Kitchen at: Arrived at Site: Serving Time: Did delivery exceed two(2) hours? Yes No Total number of Senior Signatures: XXX Meal Counts ORDERED IRECEIVE1 Served I Leftover NEXT DAY'S ORDER Meals: Milk: Low Fat Non Fat CONGREGATE Other HDM - Hot HDM - Frozen HDM - Snack X X X X X X Kitchen Management -inNal _ _ _ _ sae Manger - initial All "HOT' foods have to be above 170 F when loaded TODAY'S MENU Caterer Kitchen Site Information Hot Items Serving Instructions Loading Information Amount Food Temperature Port size serv. inst. Amount sent Temperature Received Arrival Served Serving X X X X X _ _ _ _ w I I I Kitchen Management - inlEal I SRe Manager - inlgal i r_niri 110mc All Y`r u n^ f.Mq haves to he hpinw An F when Imdnd lellvered: soup cambros: coolers: Picked up: vans: snee>pans: venvemu Picked up n� r�nr nr innl v nnnvn RecVd by: Port. size serv. inst. Amount sent Temperature Received Arrival Served Serving X X X X X X Kitchen Management -inNal _ _ _ _ sae Manger - initial lellvered: soup cambros: coolers: Picked up: vans: snee>pans: venvemu Picked up n� r�nr nr innl v nnnvn RecVd by: 0 TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS BID FOR CITY OF ROSEMEAD SECTION - 7 • DESCRIPTION of TRANSPORT EOLIPMENT Our food transport containers are made by "Cambro ". Cambro containers are known in the food service industry as excellent transport containers, which maintain required food temperatures and are manufactured to last. Hot Food: Camcarrier - Model No. 30OWC Cold Food: Camcarrier - Model No. 100MPC Igloo Insulated Containers - 48 qt. Milk and juices are packed with ice. Other foods will be packed with ice if needed. We have two 800 - 1,000 lb. ice makers in the kitchen. Soup: Camtainer - Model No. 350 LCD All transport equipment is marked to identify the meal program location. • Serving pans used to transport meals are marked with location, contents and count. Meal delivery tickets as reporting mechanisms are being used. These tickets are prepared in duplicate, so that the kitchen as well as the program can keep accurate and identical records. The information given on these tickets can be modified at any time to specific requirements and informational needs. The drivers are responsible to keep all transport equipment clean and sanitary at all times. Maintenance and repairs are done by our own staff as needed. Management does check the equipment for cleanliness and repairs periodically. Serving pans are washed and sanitized in our pot washing machine at the production site. If additional equipment is needed on occasion, the production kitchen does have an extra supply of Cambro or Igloo containers as well as insulated meal bags. 9 BENEFITS REGARDING your CONTRACT MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS BID FOR CITY OF ROSEMEAD • SECTION - S r1 LJ 0 Benefits Regarding your Contract Relationship with MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS * More control over your food service operations with Morrison. * Our management assumes the responsibility of handling day -to -day details of your food service operations. * A guarantee of continuous professional management. * The ability to provide a unique quality dining program and to support the success of that program. * A team of food service management specialists who work directly for you. 0 * Reserve management to protect our mutual interests. * Exchange of ideas within Morrison to benefit your food service operation. * Continual research regarding new products and systems. * Our management manages, not just supervises, your program. * We produce what we promise. * Most important the confidence that you are receiving the best food service programs at a realistic cost. * Morrison Management Specialists would like to serve you and maintain our reputation for excellence. Your reference will be important to us. Our incentive to do a great job is evident. 0 THAT SOMETHING SPECIAL 0 Our Morrison team at Central Juvenile Hall is very proud of the fact, that we do not "just" supply meals to our Nutrition Programs, but that we are also interested in their overall success. It means we get "involved ": We have done individual BBQ's at site locations or for a whole program in a park. We have dressed in Hawaiian shirts for a beach party, and are not afraid to help serve at a luncheon on the Promenade. Chefs hats have been paraded when carving Roast Beef, and breakfast has been served on a Saturday morning. We have spent days making candy ghosts for Halloween and surprise baskets, when fortune gave us free candies. We balanced layer cakes across the city and wrote "congratulations" and "good luck" on cakes in all kinds of colors. We served fruits in watermelon baskets and fresh baked cookies or rolls do fill our Is kitchen with wonderful smells. Holidays are special times and even though special placemats are a must, we try to add to it whenever possible. It may be napkins, or a piece of decoration or a fun routine breaker. Whatever it is you may need or you would like us to do, we hope you would not hesitate to talk with us. You may be surprised how committed we are to support your goals. E RESUMES DIRECTOR of FOOD & NUTRITION SERVICES and DIETITIAN MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS BID FOR CITY OF ROSEMEAD • SECTION -9 r1 LJ • RESIDENT MANAGEMENT TEAM Qualified local management is essential to a successful foodservice program. As such, Morrison has provided a qualified, professional Director of Food and Nutrition Services at Central Juvenile Hall /Central Satellite Program. The Director of Food and Nutrition Services is your key point of contact and the leader of the management team. Reporting to the Director of Food and Nutrition Services, the management team includes the following key positions: Assistant Director of Food & Nutrition Services Assistant Director of Office Systems & Information Services Assistant Director of Senior Nutrition Services Satellite Supervisor of Senior Nutrition Services Satellite Cooks The entire management team is assigned to Central Juvenile Hall /Central Satellite Programs and can be reached through the facility office in Los Angeles. The management team is here to assure the smooth transition and continued success of your Senior Nutrition Program. The Assistant Director of Senior Nutrition Services , Joel Medina will be assigned to oversee the production and distribution of meals from our production kitchen at 1605 Eastlake Ave., Los • Angeles, CA. In his capacity as Assistant Director, Joel provides management direction and support to all satellite production staff and drivers. All members of the management team are ServeSafe certified, possess or have applied for Food Handler Certificates and have completed or are in the process of completing the Morrison Management Training Program. Resumes for the key positions on the Management team can be found on the following pages of this section. 0 • Ashgar (Essie) Mortaji CDM Director of Food and Nutrition Services Current Position: Director of Food and Nutrition Services Morrison Management Specialists Central Juvenile Hall 1605 Eastlake Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90033 Years With Morrison: 19 years Education: BS/Civil Engineering California State University Certified Dietary Manager Long Beach City College Relevant Skills and Experience: Essie has extensive training and experience in Food Service Operations. He has participated in and completed the Morrison Management Training program. He excels in the following areas: Menu Cost Analysis, Purchasing and Procurement, Staff Training, General Accounting, Customer Service, Fine Dining, Inventory Controls, Catering Quality Control/Quatity Assurance, Safety and Sanitation. He is ServSafe certified by the Educational Foundation of the National Restaurant Association. He has been awarded Morrison Food Service Employee of the Year 1993 by Los Angeles County. Essie is fluent in English and Farsi. •Employment History: 2000 - Present Director of Food and Nutrition Services for Morrison Management Specialists at Central Juvenile Hall, Los Angeles, California. 1986 -2000 Director of Food and Nutrition Services for Morrison Management Specialists at Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall, Downey, California. 1984-1986 Assistant Director of Food and Nutrition Services for Morrison Management Specialists at Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall and Central Juvenile Hall. 1981-1984 Production Manager/Head Cook for Zsabo Food Service Company at Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall, Downey, California. 1978-1980 Management Assistant/Head Cook for Holiday Inn Airport, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma E Joel Medina • Central Juvenile Hall /Central Satellite Services 1605 Eastlake Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90033 Tel.: (323) 342 -6790 Current Position: Assistant Director of Senior Nutrition Services Central Juvenile Hall/Central Satellite Services Years with Morrison: 16 years Education: Fremont High School Los Angeles, CA Graduate Diploma Los Angeles Unified School District /49th St. Elementary School Enrolled in Substitute Teacher Training Relevant Skills & Experience: During his thirteen year career with Morrison, Joel has demonstrated great flexibility, adaptability and an earnest desire to succeed. These great attributes account for his numerous promotions throughout the years, including his recent promotion to Assistant Manager. He has been trained and is competent in the following areas: Food production, Purchasing, Staff Training, Client Relations, Medical Diets, Inventory Cost Controls, Catering, Quality Control /Quality Assurance, Safety and Sanitation. He is SERVSAFE certified by the Education Foundation of the National Restaurant Association. He is a Certified Food Handler. He is proficient in English and Spanish. • Employment History: 1997 - 1999 Satellite Supervisor for Morrison Health Care, Inc. at Central Juvenile Hall /Central Satellite Services, Los Angeles, CA. 1991 - 1997 Shift Supervisor /Cook for Morrison Custom Management, Morrison Restaurants, Inc. at Central Juvenile Hall /Central Satellite Services, Los Angeles, CA. 1989 - 1991 Storeroom Supervisor, Morrison Custom Management, Central juvenile Hall/Central Satellite Services, Los Angeles, CA 1987 - 1989 Food Service Worker, Satellite Driver, Morrison Management Services, Central Juvenile Hall, Los Angeles, CA r1 I`J Jesus Vega • Central Juvenile Hall /Central Satellite Services 1605 Eastlake Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90033 Tel.: (323) 342 -6790 Current Position: Assistant Director of Office Systems and Information Services Central Juvenile Hall/Central Satellite Services Years with Morrison: 18 years Education: Colegio Mexico Guanajuato, Mexico - Equivalent to BS /Education, Major in Spanish Relevant Skills & Experience: Since the beginning of his employment with Morrison, Jesus has demonstrated outstanding judgment, dedication and energy. His finely tuned organizational skills as well as his ability to perform as a mentor and coach have resulted in his steady climb from trayline supervisor to his current position as Assistant Manager. He has completed the Morrison Management Training Program and is competent in the following areas: Food Production, Staff Training and Development, General Accounting, Catering, Quality Control /Quality Assurance, Customer Service, Personnel Data Management, Office Management, Safety and Sanitation. He is SERVSAFE certified by the Education Foundation of the National Restaurant Association. He is fluent in both English and Spanish. Employment History. 1992 - Present Assistant Manager for Morrison Health Care, Inc. at Central Juvenile Hall /Central Satellite Services. Los Angeles, CA. 1989 - 1992 Trayline Supervisor for Morrison Custom Management at Central Juvenile Hall /Central Satellite Services, Los Angeles, CA. 1985 - 1989 Food Service Worker for Morrison Management Services at Central Juvenile Hall, Los Angeles, CA. 1978 - I982 Elementary teach for first and second grades in Guanajuato, Mexico. • David Colmenares Central Juvenile Hall /Central Satellite Services 1605 Eastlake Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90033 Tel.: (323) 342 -6790 Current Position: Assistant Director of Food & Nutrition Services Central juvenile HaII /Central Satellite Services Years with Morrison: 18 years Education: Escuela Secondaria, Benito Juarez Tijuana, Mexico Completed ESL Classes Lincoln High School, Los Angeles Relevant Skills & Experience: David began his career at Central Juvenile Hall in 1985 as a Food Service Worker. After a few short months he was promoted to Trayline Supervisor. He has held a number of positions over the years including Director of Food and Nutrition Services. Because he has consistently demonstrated an earnest desire to expand his knowledge base he has been routinely promoted through the ranks of supervisor and management. David's management style reflects his dedication to client retention. He is customer focused and is regarded as a key player in the development of his staff. David continues his personal growth and development by participating in the Morrison Management Training Program. He is competent in the following areas: Food Production, Inventory /Cost Controls, Staff Training and Development, General Accounting, Quality Control /Quality Assurance, Customer Service, Client Retention, Safety and Sanitation. He is SERVSAFE .certified by the Education Foundation of the National Restaurant Association. He is a Certified Food Handler. He has an extensive background in Senior Nutrition Programs. He is fluent in both English and Spanish. Employment History: 1996 - Present Assistant Director of Senior Nutrition Services for Morison Health Care, Inc. including the direct responsibility for the Glendale and Azusa Senior Nutrition Program's central kitchens. 1994 - 1996 Director of Food and Nutrition Services for Morrison Health Care, Inc. at Specialty Hospital of Southern California, La Mirada, CA. 1990 - 1994 Director of Food and Nutrition Services for Morrison Custom Management at Glendale Senior Nutrition central Mtchen. 1987 - 1990 Assistant Director of Food and Nutrition Services for Morrison Custom Management at the Weingart Center Association, Los Angeles, CA 0 Randall L. Connell R.D. Morrison Management Specialists Western Region 1727 Axenty Way Redondo Beach, CA 90278 Tel.: (800) 686 -6322 or (310) 798 -4017 Current Position: Regional Director of Nutrition Services - Western Region Education: B.S. Degree in Food Science and Nutrition Auburn University Relevant Skills & Experience: Randall has spent her entire professional career working in the Food and Nutrition Services field. He began working for Morrison in May of 2002 as the Regional Director of Nutrition Services for Morrison Western Region which includes California, Arizona and Nevada. Prior to his employment with Morrison, Randall was employed as an Outpatient Diabetes Educator for the Gwinnett Medical Center in Lawrenceville, Georgia, were Morrison was contracted to provide Food & Nutrition Services. During his tenure at Gwinnett Medical Center, he also served for four years as a Clinical Dietitian in this 250 bed acute care hospital. Although Randall was a Medical Center employee he assisted Morrison with many projects including openings and the implementation of many new and innovative Morrison programs. After demonstrating excellent clinical and leadership skills he was recruited to fill the Western Regional Director of Nutrition Services position. Randall was very highly recommended by management and client alike because of his diligence and "can do" attitude. Always looking for a challenge Randall was the author of the Spanish Language Gestational Diabetes Training program for patients in his facility. The program was so successful that it was implemented throughout the company. In his new regional position he is responsible for the guidance and evaluation of all Clinical Nutrition Services for the Western Region. His responsibilities include support, evaluation and training of all clinical service programs and staff, adherence to performance standards, adherence to regulatory standards, clinical program development, and personnel development. No doubt Randall will quickly become an integral part of the Regional Support Team. His expertise in Clinical Nutrition Services and Patient Satisfaction will serve to enhance our regional clinical services. His outstanding organizational skills and leadership qualities am a result of years of education, diligence and dedication patient /client satisfaction and quality improvement. is Jun 12 02 11:31a Morrison UMC 702-383-2943 F.2 • • z 0 W-0 2 S, rn E 0 c I 0 V T LC 0 , . ., Cc DI .2 ir LU m or c LO r E < E N c C: • • r-, V S C3 c Q � � V o � � o CL LCLL v � L Q tzi v � U z �o a� �a r. to AQ 0 n u CERTIFIED, FOO^D. HANDLER It Courityo.L;os.NAngeles Department `pi�`H�,�alth Services ur -o, ASGHAR MORTAR has successfully met the educational requirements established by the County Health Officer and is therefore designated as a Certified Food Handler. CFH Certificate No. Expires: 7/19/03 2317 Director, Enviro mei al H alth CERTIFIED. Court "i Department HANDLER 'naeles th Services JESUS VEGA has successfully met the educational requirements established by the County Health Officer and is therefore designated as a Certified Food Handler. CFH Certificate No.: 43219 Expires: 7/31/2004 Director, Enviro e al H alth CERTIFIED FOOD HANDLER • County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services JESUS CFH Cert. No. 43219 Exp. Date 7/31/2004 Director, H -3044 (2/98) • 0 • R n O m I �J J L n Ln 0 N C� w � R 0. � S R a a. m � w a w s rn a �- T R� O m w � � R 0. fD � • o n a � � iv w lJ O 'J- O 0 • R n O m I �J J L n Ln 0 N C� w � R 0. � S R a a. m � w a w s rn a �- T R� O m w � � R 0. fD IMF r tTl a � � �- CD N IMF r tTl • • u CERTIFIE l� , LER Count)'N f ^ �'os Ar geles � y -�eFt� Department :p�Fealth Services JOEL MEDINA has successfully met the educational requirements established by the County Health Officer and is therefore designated as a Certified Food Handler. CFH Certificate No.: 1826 Expires: 06/29/05 CERTIFIED FOOD HANDLER County of Cos,Angeles Department of Health Services JOEL Tq -EDINA CFH Cert. No. 1826 Exp, Date 06/29/05 Director, Envir men al Health H -3044 (2/98) Director, Envir nmei tal alth 0 CERTIFIED f,PP "ANDLER n U • Co les Department oIealth Services DAVID COLMENARES has successfully met the educational requirements established by the County Health Officer and is therefore designated as a Certified Food Handler. CFH Certificate No.: 1825 Expires: 06/29/05 Director, Envir nine tal alth CERTIFIED FOOD HANDLER County of,Los Angeles Department o£,Health Services DAVID COLMENARES CFH Cert. No. 1825 Exp. Date 06/29/05 Director, Envir men al Health H -3044 (2/98) n TESTING FACILITIES MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS BID FOR CITY OF ROSEMEAD • SECTION -10 • 0 TESTING FACILITIES We are currently using the following testing facilities for: Food Service Employees: Pre - employment and yearly physicals Temple Medical Center 124 West Vignes Street Food/Product Testing: 0 0 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Michelson Laboratories Inc. 6280 Chalet Drive Commerce, CA 90040 0 CERTIFICATE of INSURANCE and LICENSES MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS BID FOR CITY OF ROSEMEAD • SECTION -11 U aL N O O F N � f 2: a o � v w , w LO J W N " N QZ 1 Fn A N 1 m 4 0 Y =. U Lr) _ Y �Y y 0 M M 0 0 OCCrn a W a E w w L . 0 0 " N 1 1 1 as _ a vi ` w in a Ln w D N t i E z w .-i .. ..i. W. N kD O i C7 o M .0 kD i x z 'ifA IC4 O W 4 i 'o M E. D " azxom a owx o F zUxaz m - m W a 0 M M 0 0 OCCrn a W a E w w L . 0 0 -1 C. 1 a-1 "D THIS PERMIT DOES NOT AUTHORIZE THE HOLDER TO ENGAGE IN ANY BUSINESS CONTRARY TO LAWS REGULATING THAT BUSINESS OR TO POSSESS OR OPERATE ANY ILLEGAL DEVICE. Not valid at any other address BT- 442 -R -LZ REV. 10 (6 -90) CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION SELLER'S PERMIT ACCOUNT NUMBER x10/1/1994 SY CHIC 30664248 0067 AS CENTRAL- SATELLITE PROGRAMS #127 MORRISON RESTAURANTS, INC. 1605 EASTLAKE AVENUE LLOS ANGELES, CA 90033 J IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED PURSUAN r TO SALES AND USE TAX LAW TO ENGAGE IN THE BUSINESS OF SELLING TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY AT THE ABOVE LOCATION THIS PERMIT IS VALID UNTIL REVOKED OR CANCELLED BUT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE. IF YOU SELL YOUR BUSINESS, OR DROP OUT OF A PARTNERSHIP, NOTIFY US OR YOU COULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SALES AND USE TAXES OWED BY THE NEW OPERATOR OF THE BUSINESS. DISPLAY CONSPICUOUSLY AT PLACE OF BUSINESS FOR WHICH ISSUED NOTICE TO TAXPAYERS INFORMATION FURNISHED TO THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION The Information Practices Act of 1977 requires this agency to provide the following notice to individual taxpayers who are asked by the State Board of Equalization to supply information: The principal purpose for which the requested information will be used is to administer the California Sales and Use Tax Laws, Special (Excise) Tax Laws, or Timber Yield Tax Law. This includes the determination and collection of the correct amount of tax. As on individual taxpayer, you have the right of access to personal Information about you in records maintained by the State Board of Equalization. Please contact your local Board office listed in the white pages for assistance. The Board officials responsible for maintaining this information are: Sales and Use Tax, Deputy Director, Sales and Use Tax Department, 450 N Street, MICA3, Sacramento, CA 95814, telephone (916) 445 -0464; Excise Tax and Environmental Fee Tax, Deputy Director, Special Taxes and Operations Department, 450 N Street, MIC:31, Sacramento, CA 95814, telephone (916) 3274208: Timber Yield Tax, Deputy Director, Property Taxes Department, 450 N Street, MIC:63, Sacramento, CA 95814, telephone (910) 445 -1516. It the local Board office or Deputy Director Is unable to provide the information sought, you may also contact the Information Security Office In Sacramento, telephone (916) 324 -1627. The California Revenue and Taxation Code, Parts 1, 1.5 and 1.6 (State Sales and Use Tax), 2 (Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax), 3 (Use Fuel Tax), 7 (Tax on Insurers), 13 (Cigarette and Tobacco Products Tax), 14 (Alcoholic Beverage Tax), 18.5 (Timber Yield Tax), 19 (Energy Resources Surcharge), 20 (Emergency Telephone Users Surcharge), 22 (Hazardous Substances Tax Law), 23 (Solid Waste Disposal Site Cleanup and Maintenance Fee Law), 24 (Oil Spill Response, Prevention and Administration Fees), and 26 (Underground Storage Tanks Maintenance Fee Law): Government Code, Title 7.3. Chapter 6 (Tire Recycling Fee): Public Resources Code, Div. 30, Part 7, Chapter 4 (Oil Recycling Fee); Health and Safety Code, Div. 1, Part 1, Chapter 2, Article 4.6 (Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Fee); and Chapter 1 of the Public Utilities Code (Hazardous Spill Prevention Fee) require parsons meeting certain requirements to file applications for registration, applications for permits or licenses, and tax returns or reports in such form as prescribed by the State Board of Equalization. It is mandatory that you furnish all of the required information requested by applications for registration, applications for permits or licenses, lax returns and other related data. Failure to provide all of the required Information requested by an application for a permit or license could result in your not being issued a permit or license. In addition, the law provides penalties for failure to file a return, failure to furnish specific information required, failure to supply information required by law or regulations, or for furnishing fraudulent information. Pursuant to California low, the Information appearing on the face of any permit or license issued by the Board is a public record. Information you furnish to this agency may be used for the purpose of collecting any outstanding tax liability and may be given to federal, state and local government agencies as authorized by law. GA -324 -A REV. 5 (6.93) • u u mS90nm 0 n �n:;l O �moQl 00 Oo00Z M0 O - c a.. mXXr --OD ~ i z m o CZNI N. OU mor<y;y yry O n 01 N .. m t 7 P -n nmimm.Z.mm ° i m m;< n C) a g m ZmZ S yC/) i.� O O> D-10 J "D O Mr 0 O O mrw m az i''' n, 8� !' I� Or'm r a r k N N H �mn N-Io Ll N zz, r! Jr1AD Cg Vm! N..b z a x I� m TU) w t - > 0 N .. m M 0 D �I Z -i m O S' Z m N n a m 0 ° o — N /� n W 0 T I y i D m n O n Q C m s m m N ACORD rtCERTIFIrCATE #O'F,LIA_IBILIT�Y�W RA � M�� fu��x �� ° "TEy04102 YY' PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ADD Risk Services, Inc. of the Carolinas ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE 121 West Trade Street •2400 Interstate Tower HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE Charlotte NO 28202 COMPANY A Zurich American Ins Co PHONE - (704) 343 -4100 FAX - (704) 343 -4111 INSURED Morrison Management Specialists, Inc. COMPANY American Zurich Ins Co B COMPANY C American Guarantee & Liability ins CO 5801 Peachtree Dunwoody Atlanta GA 30342 USA COMPANY Zurich American Ins Co of Illi is D �._'�:. -J: , ,. €"""x`rSIRMayiAP(?ly THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED AS E FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN I UBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED B AID CLAIMS. CO c TYPE OF ISSURASCE FOLIC \'SUMSER POLICY ECfI\'EPOLI DATE(m DAY) EXPIrL\TIO> LIMITS A GENERAL LIABILITY GLOB34423803 09130 /03 ERALAGGREGATE S10,000,000 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY ' X PRODUCTS - COMP /OP ADD 51,000,000 171 e'IiTdI CLAIMS MADE OCCUR PERSONAL B ADV INJURY $1,000,000 EACH OCCURRENCE $1,000,000 OWNER'S 8 CONTRACTOR'S PROT FIRE DAMAGE(Any One fire) S1, 000.000 X Contradual MED EXP (Anv one oerson) A AUTOMOBILE X LIABILITY ANY AUTO BAP834437602 Auto - AIM Other States 9/3 09/30/03 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $2,000,000 BO' DILY INJURY ( Per person) A ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS TAP834437702 Auto - Texas Only BAP834437802 0 0102 09/3 09/30/03 09/30/03 BODILY INJURY HIRED AUTOS Auto - Vlreinia Only X NON OMED AUTOS (Per aRidem) X Sett lns.Phys.Damaae PROPERTY DAMAGE A GARAGE LIABILITY P8344 09/30102 09130103 AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT X ANY AUTO OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY; s'n EACH ACCIDENT AGGREGAT E EXCESS LIABILITY W 202700 09130102 09/30103 EACH OCCURRENCE $20,000.000 X UMBRELLA FORM AGGREGATE 520,000,000 OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM ProdudelCOmdalod O $2,000,000 B WORKER'S COMPENSATION AND 02 09130/02 09130/03 X V.S STATU. nTH- R .cs`.c"`��5,,,,,, �.!!..�� j FR*9q••CAS. ✓:' EL EACH ACCIDENT 51,500,000 EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY pensalion - AIM Other Sta B THE PROPRIETOR/ X INCL PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ARE EXCL 02 Vrkem pensation (WI Only) 09/30/02 09/30103 EL DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $1,500,000 E L DISEASE -EA EMPLOYEE S1.500,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS /LOCATIONSA/EHICLESISPECIAL ITEMS Cancellation Provision shown is subject to shorter time periods depending on the jurisdiction of, and reason for, the cancellation. CERTIFICATE�:HOL`DER�s »":vY'".:��.'"`.,r`.. -.'," �' �..- "°'�,':'x A;•ti ' ...,....`XR,. r �4hzs.<...-: s; ..94A':'CANCELLATIONS.:s`.,.... SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE Central Juvenile Hall 1605 Eastlake Avenue EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT. Los Angeles CA 90033 USA BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE n •'hero .�f:1�3 .SfcrsftL, ilY.:�, f4y /lcf. C'Q/tGe,;Kld ACORD 25 =5- Il /95), Certificate No: 570004469038 Holder Identifier: 0 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS BID FOR CITY OF ROSEMEAD • SECTION -12 r1 LJ • l COMPASS TO: All Associates DATE: January 1, 2003 RE: Affirmative Action for Disabled Individuals, Special Disabled Veterans, and Veterans of the Vietnam Era Compass Group USA, Inc. maintains affirmative action programs to promote the employment opportunities of qualified individuals with disabilities, and qualified special disabled veterans and veterans of the Vietnam era. If you are either a disabled individual, special disabled veteran, or a Vietnam era veteran and would like to be considered under these programs, please ask your supervisor for a form that will be used to notify us as such. You may inform us of your desire for consideration under the affirmative action program(s) at this time and/or at any time in the future. Although giving this information is voluntary, such a disclosure by you will enable the Company to further assist you in the appropriate manner concerning your employment and in making accommodations concerning your employment if you are a disabled individual or a special disabled veteran. Be assured that providing such information will in no way result in adverse treatment. Information you submit will be kept confidential and will be used only in conjunction with federal reporting requirements, except that (1) supervisors and managers may be informed on a need tiftow basis, regarding restrictions on the work or duties of employees who are individuals with disabilities and s7MaI disabled veterans, and regarding necessary accommodations; (2) first -aid and safety personnel may be informed, when and to the extent appropriate, if a condition might require emergency treatment; and (3) government officials investigating compliance with disabled or veterans laws and regulations shall be informed. If you would like to review Compass Group USA, Inc.'s "Affirmative Action Plan for Individuals with Disabilities, Special Disabled Veterans, and Veterans of the Vietnam Era," you may do so by advising your supervisor during normal business hours. - Gary R. Green Christopher Ashcroft Chief Executive Officer Vice President, Human Resources • POST ON COMPANY BULLETIN BOARD 9 Cl n U MENU (Proposed) MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS BID FOR CITY OF ROSEMEAD LLl Z Y U Z a wW Ell z 0 Ell a z L o Ao c �A L w n � N x o• o• @ LL W a n q N 0 E f m w T o m � a 5 � E W b J U Y V z B$o zz �y PnEll f - x U D d 0 O O d L E E u U W c W w s° E v 3 c a t0 u 5r � co o n n d d o. a o � � n LA d U o °c L � � f7 v E a O Z a p u N ° n � _ x n a v m L o 'p E o 5 N °o E T _ ° d q v n ad m o ° m e n d p Z 11 Z 8 b O L ; Z Q ED A � ~ r T Y« O C U Y N A T 3 A A r A C 3 C N N A d d C 0 d p A A L d L T v O r a A d U A (/f d C C d N O n p O Y '7 L K O N D q 0 A r LL N T Z° O O O O c w N O O N m E u o d o n n x r N m A N °o IN i c LL o g d P e N N m o o y o o m C A= 10 o Ip c o t L m 3 >m P Ym >m�E 'm n ° d F T y d O Y N s LL (� v OJ i[ U a ° c O O : pC O c R C N - P y L d m y` O a N II m y N : E C :r m €:d 5c7Y Om --inti °' mP ivy A a E LL j U c A o H Ell v d o 3> O x lm .- m a m m ti u 3 E A a C O C d G d N d C Y d d C m �3 t wa m� E p O1 T n' �O.P 1jO� d it JU A V dow pMA y Zm g�:c d u c000 �6C N 1OP C e d� 3 >a Um �C E m a i3 ti U � 0 ° ° o H E d ° 0 0 c E o T V 016 d N d d O a d a O •yU q A l 0 Q 6 am N NDU p O .2 c d Y U n N o ir� d (uV 0 N LLO Z 0 ° m ° m NII W W Q P°NN P W Q U LL J r w+ s j a• C a w ° °.a u wg ^b o W z z N f N > s Q U U O 3 O O d L E E u U W c W w s° E v 3 c a t0 u 5r � co o n n d d o. a o � � n LA d U o °c L � � f7 v E a O Z W z U Z W Q Hy a `a o S y a n' N ¢ r W O m V pv V v WW w pO (y 6 V i N O U a F Cp O E U w m L—A W a 2 I� H U f U 2 w 2 w E Q m 0 Z °a O a D a C Y L � C t E ° s Y 2 s W 3 d x p) II c y �v v FL U 5Y `v v a 3 E n W X N II O w L 6) U N L N w E m = s_ m E E � O D d .'0 `� y L U ED N v 3 v m >. 9 C O Y N °n 3 m nV n o � lV m m LN y O l ua O U O c � E a w Z 'v d V pv V v y N pO (y 6 V i N O ry y D G E c T m N 0 0 x III O m y x O N O i N N H O 2 v D im v n U II LL -0 C o v v o C °o o o v u T � � a v I� $ to p C w YR 4i O o ry P i m 6 N b' fA Y C i3 W N E N 6 N Ol Y 3 too maV-Rm�m N IV v E c �p m�O O o O LL w zO o $ U= N N U ry oo 0 :2 o woo «m V 1O N 0' 7 ON 0 M 0 —0 '0 :0 N LL N J 1 `y J «I N N ci O iD 0 iN N W ry O d N O O 0 2 Co y to O O OI N Y '� fO N 1 vv IU' v 8i LL o n m I u V v m m N N N N n O iV O O O O O m m y `O `l i O N O « 0 lZO y W, MN W Qc 6Z m LLY �O J n U iN C 0C O A r C y o .{;m W w o v ' Y c 0 L 0 N O m N LL = to 0 o v Z o II r m O L O O N q O O O N C O O 9 m r LL N n n 0 fn N n O O 0 0 U a O W 88QU. 'p u Ea N N O N N N y �a m N N O A O G O O N N 11 LL II O C N O D N O u D U O n' v m o 3 I.j O iV L C Y Y N U m P T O D r LL Z ^ U W fn N; x n « �- N O m v L° c IE P N E o 0 o ON a iOV v Imp E v 3 V Z m .- > w Q w Q UD ; U tL U 0 C N V C C Rn < 0 C LL m O O V 7 D N NU' D N Co m �O U Y E y c m a o m D . 3 u F N O T N E0 D Dtm0' I T Z m 1N N 0 Y t 0� > O U O C O $ C r t F S J o �0 D uw Y m$ a DvslaS rn C x i% N N y d Y�mOm J O n m0 N V � On �iOm • pO.� JiU N O m J �L m U� m N O aP m(7 N N .O v II m D 'a" d d o LL Zm ry° 0 0(h m�V L '2V N�id U O 6 p e e g s€ w 8 wV to s W 3 d x p) II c y �v v FL U 5Y `v v a 3 E n W X N II O w L 6) U N L N w E m = s_ m E E � O D d .'0 `� y L U ED N v 3 v m >. 9 C O Y N °n 3 m nV n o � lV m m LN y O l ua O U O c � E a w Z Q Z U Z Q W � 9 � o Z y m D O O m w m ,a aqm L � L M a Z °o u O o ^ = o 2 �a o m O O C v 9 m g 0 f °o N Q > O ry A 0 W J r, rn U U Z E Z a W O O O Q v m J 8^ Y d a N cC n y X O � � II a £ y � L a U v Y N N a 3 V d o u m II rd a r OI W N m q Y m q E � W = 3; u 0 N C 1 � q = c Y 3 m v to O T C n O m y a ; o n N ry L 11 u m o I u a � c c � E U'r N O z E • c °o x � v U C 1J N l0 N N Ci U O V '� I.j V C a d O Y s e .m c V iq o Im v O c $�' d rn �o Qa Sao O1 trnd' —° In d U_ F- O a II a m C N is V Z m m N O q U 3 0o x `° N a C E W N 4 d `m ° g° m 9 •N. �� U° 0 m g m m d W W m «_$rioyN oL oY a' -NO o i~ o¢ rovoaa .ap a I(��o o —� a� u d'm m LL �= J m L �P. 10 • C C d m ' T 8 i = v mom a v O ry u a ° 3`li a. 0 aum$ m O cvni ;EW ° f V f�'6 L <O ° L U ~ X C O W W � rJ LL LL J 3 m p a V c W S N IuV a v m EP ' S N N Y N iN N ' Ap UUmym oU c m o 000 o w m¢ n a � o C w¢ m tl d z a d n v u ui O y y o ° C O Y y U m Q d O V d (i YO IIU O pO 9 0 i N II EN •• mK YQ i0a C q m m ;oC u° 3 Y d a N cC n y X O � � II a £ y � L a U v Y N N a 3 V d o u m II rd a r OI W N m q Y m q E � W = 3; u 0 N C 1 � q = c Y 3 m v to O T C n O m y a ; o n N ry L 11 u m o I u a � c c � E U'r N O z / ; \ ) / | ` \ �7\ ] ! |f f |i \{ ga I! §/ \ � � � - - /�a / \ ) ; / / 9 �! ) ■� 7� � � �• / 0) |2 |.l :I:$= ` ! § U Z a HO W m n Z ° c Y W j W O 0 O p N O O p g � N W m W U U • Z W n O O 0 m�� w f a O W a z Z b N c d m N b A T E O O W 6 A � m d a n N � II r y u 9 0 C r6 ° 7 (� L E a 2 g d ° N Y V n U" •C •v C m 'y E a o N EJ o o° O •S O y� CN q A O m °N ?� W'N N iTyN ° U o d O« m m v u II d U .A W c d d E m Z o `� ci N C A n o n E U A O m N 7 U id U wC IG K d U N 3 mmUmil ;`UC LL.-QS Jm R °1 n LL N 1O B m la N ; O N E i E =' n o v d w 0 • cam mF1 v c q v m N a imp II Bi LL Y m i. .. « L n : cy m II Z -do q v LL Nd _ m / C S c 6 I m r c $ 4 E s t 9 79 m T a Yet rn S Y B w a J L E b N c d m N b A T E O O W 6 A � m d a n N � II r y u 9 0 C r6 ° 7 (� L E a 2 A d E d Z 1 U W Q I w W Z Y w C� 1 Z a Z �L = UQq U 4 Z J X LL m 0 0 0 0 0 gcaCN W N V N d O O O O F O O O O L m - 80 O O -oOOO °OCi °m a O O O O O O O O O O O O O O °CCCCC 3 N ° •q .d c d °- - y q ui It Z O N d d O J ° CL O m d = d °O� LLI `o OC v A 1 1 o_ an O tdi 2 o m p u 9 II ici E J p :C m f0 m N t U L d 6 U U U Z N N C J o= ac C u U m m m � m A � i � O •- im S -- ;i °u Iw ;U d .m N d p y W D o qd A d ap v m A D NO d N RUC i.0 31 >.�Ndu au �� Lu i� u c °rn Z = ° O > O O r J m J 0 m u d °o 0. N N M o L 6 T ry d d O d 11 N pl L Z (J 10 m tI O 11 N W C Q U• > N 1 LL O e- J m d C d a Y u d — L = d n °° o 'n Ei n 21 rnN Y a N a m - « n o o 0 0 0 o L" � 'o o m C d 0 -• " C u > Q< H to r It m � W � > m< •J LL LL � m � J m n J d m U T o W.L m w d a d ly ry m < N C A a C v IJ O E O N 1n O O LL m O tJi �1 C O Um��3CA�d�d�U� oe ;vim LL�o� dim •' • $ � F a i k - o a g J m u 0 m- F q .5 55 0 LL' 9 8 O O � O U W F� OI •E b � W_ d d OI d C ; O y ` n r d � II d a y E d d = �U U y 0 3 u y n W. n W d OI pl C N d J E " C m d E L 3 =_ u E c � D 9 L c m L O C O 6 y n d y a 3 O d n q N L II N y u o u c J ° c o E � a O Z C m O v N E � d d N U K OOQ O Q « Q U li W Q Z U Z Q 11 K w m n � Foo Z 0 0 0 gCQ0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 p cl� nv 3 o O a 0 00 O O O O O o" O o N Lv 0 a C Q M O N U wmOlOa N Z O O O O O ' f Q a Z F a c m' N O d N Y d D r d FL o O d O yi LL `O pl H •O Q m m ifn W V , Z y U C F a N p II d V q d w.2 y .I°.. II V i'O V C C N T v C O II d . q d N 7 N d p O N Ih d F- N i0 U—,2 :5 11 r f/1 r J c0 d d d E a d o d D N N O C p y OI W E °I W UiC VC1 Y_ t N oo�� a bpd iG c O C d O d A ;U C U LL O� yp L N LL�U.JNNV11� a ik O 0d V d V O uII dIIID II C uUi�U D d dL Z INO II O0 �dU ry Cp y LL p _UryN U A mi CD � Q �� 6 m T d a d a d O a O d c °�-- 0 u" a `m o U Y D(pNmO j N :am d = N L w F N N g m C7y N N E II II `I V U C_ v ° N o d K m O N Y m O IL O C U ro ,U Ii Q J al c C C y 2 U d O 'oa cui �m 1° g`m o°¢ a IIa m Y N d m O d w c O d m O O C V « A O' t0 d O i° c1 O O 3 Y' a i0 Y U d °. E L II L y b W Q II d D` Z N« N 9 o L o C U 0.0 lu U W W Q ul V Q 1U LL S J t0 c a o y d o d L V F d V Y N O U o VI VI a « N! « u N tq la w o O c p c c m v oU °' ° a amm «•IJ a o C7 D = m c O E ~ D V is L y U d iiN 8a II d V W LL Z IV N O V j U U p C C C N d N O N U 10 O (7 W C4 (O W Q W Q Q LLI ;F IL IL p d N d `y d d M E 6. 0 co d O ° o LL = rod T W Y>.N a W O= V D O J N Y c F6 f j t C L N Og c m p m< °w_ II LL n rU dV(A ii y�m oli Iv II p d Z C Np Y Np Q U N N U ti .t Vp V O N O Q :EQ Y i d V m 7 U M W� A S a I a `o c w c u 3 8 w• S m I .E d b fie w O U � g? p y N m C $• Q b Y n° 4 K' U W LL E 4 W X V U 1- S LL m Y Cc a 5 ; O o a x 5 � u a L v U N � U Y O W � 3 v n III c a s ryrnry R y E � C N v � E v -- u E c pi I0 m « Y = U d a 3 a la 0 .g 'o .g n y T a 0 C N O L a" ° aaa d n 3 v p �O h i L II C v � � V d Q O�W u c U O W E U a U1 Z 11 w m aSoos z LN LNo 3 g a m c m • Y o 0 0 0 mC vCi o � c in v� o °o °o °o - CIO 0 00 gaoC LN �o ge,o� w n rn 1108-0-0- 0000 O O O O O cCmoC.- 9 F r 1 W F d W Oly C y O ; r 4 L •- b yaxk E U U L 3 b � d d •x- C W II m rn Y a o � Ern v � E 0 a E c � i a N a C L _rn y = a 0 a a O O O 2 y O b a b a ya > N t n a O� o E � O Z E N y N rn 6 a U o O d H `aY6 0d CNOCi! CON 'L SO ON Oa O LL N�N .)OOall db 75.2 iq�ll O i C U N �` j .z V O N N j-. N C pdd R Ip V V jt C rn C VO a � II il" 1 R m > 11 C a a 1 m a 1 v b Z ? L Z vai a vdi i II _ rnL 6-0 0 N O O m L N O `V .�. a d LL O N i0 Tj W rn �(7U 1y1 m0 U N U >>0 o c o N � O u L d — a d a° o c a c a u N U y ;Nd x° Orn Y " °° _� m N a to C g '.uwU y(Li " a SOP 3� iR'gu �n W z >au >r j m u °.-mom 10 a N O N _ v o m c u _ U m o• m m _ 9 3 mmoo°21° E a a 0 00 y N d 6 i41 m Z Y o'$E Z o m` aUaa P a U w C N a a O NrvNN?u K� 3'NmaNrq .bu c `o •-00000= C o `N 09 ly o U ro> m � U t/l W � W �- Q W P Q '� .- LL � U `o $ 1 w v Oly C y O ; r 4 L •- b yaxk E U U L 3 b � d d •x- C W II m rn Y a o � Ern v � E 0 a E c � i a N a C L _rn y = a 0 a a O O O 2 y O b a b a ya > N t n a O� o E � O Z I W i Y W • IT k a c coo. a00000 g 0 O O O O O 9 0 0 o a 0 C 13 OI P 00 E °o 0 0 0 0 0 8 000.. ��mrn o{nv J 4C4 � 5 ; o `w n m x II a m E u m m E L y U W y �g o ; u v n c .X- W II 01 m c E m � N 3 E u E C a °0 m N C L d m d m T O � n n�m G ; O 4 > 73 c II gd V L O U c 'c 'o E� a 0 z t i F I i i. q O � U .3 m a y i � Vp W N II I 11 C � Z Y S I`p m II a u � F m i3 Q t p o m q m E v iZ rnll ? 0 n 'c N rn E E N N N N m T N V m m m 0 O N H N j OI x m m y Y m a a$ m N a d a d a o N a N o V ° m m E 4i Nan �6Y 0 m II dm IPI m N II � a Z f m Uq N�fv 3 u u uV m N O E V O m O U O L m N N c N O m N m ( d U m N U C7 U U N W Q U Q (J Q U U li Q J m v s F N m O 'm II v LL II IV Z ' m N 56 O rn L m U m I i m i m F '� o o n iN N p �m N To E o Im ^� m m f X19 w LL oa dcN u m - a I °m v cu uI a m m Iq m m N x Ow ° IN 2 y 0 A N UW O pmU.0 E I m m '.m m U iN m In m N rn Z o m b ~ c c Y 1 � iyGg rn 4C4 � 5 ; o `w n m x II a m E u m m E L y U W y �g o ; u v n c .X- W II 01 m c E m � N 3 E u E C a °0 m N C L d m d m T O � n n�m G ; O 4 > 73 c II gd V L O U c 'c 'o E� a 0 z W W m y C� C CvCi Co mC �o [0[VV0000 ECC�o ^^ N 0 io oo om '00C.. • o 0 0 o m yj �0000 m 0000m N ^ O • d W d O 3 3 � d r L 1g1+ E L EO Y U y r 3 qU y d n 5 W II m d c 3 d E N a 3" 2 u E o q N C G 2 v 3 a o � YL Y n� 0 0 1/�II u N Va o ° C � E a 0 Z i I i I i o E `D m L� E T • LL V q F {O� N N a N {Vj N 0 N LL V Y 'cC LL as CO `q ?� o II Z pd r 6 u a •� U O 0 V IN U T N{ q q O N im y Y °1 U o N� 0 3 o IpL Si q C N c CL q nF N Hm N ; V L U d ;U V �N Ci� 11 o N C N N g O g N O O O O �y O y d m In ^ W^ W d 'a i� V p ° n O 0 E Aa np %nu� 31i E m g ;E° jm v0m�.- V >C ui GHQ !V C 1°L :3 ^ �0 d I !� Lt t m E E d E IH a d n V a o 0 0 .. i rn o c y W $ a n a m q m E z D m L q q d m Not V 0 Z A O U m 1 0 `w n v d o (O I C U d_ 3 c O Q N O N >�° 0- meo Y c°�rJ- uiC1 uiCa I0n ia��m A d ti a po d iA U N W a g H m q C d 7 Q U O] O N J D 0 {qp G q �:7 0 O 5 Q L .D (7 G m N 11 O1 U O N ! C V U y Z 1O1..]�� V o j z U U 0 i(9C C V O N >U Sm.- NmNUiCdC m°� UC m liUC �m v A qo I IN c .q pl u T A .f O o o N N yqj d di c nc o o ° 0 0 s g 2J ° r g N m AO °m o x °lo $�O E o [Q N v q 1 Z V_q J[NNYN� M O p O O F UT `V VI N N N !0U O 0 O O- V N ON O >(� m1n ^H(7r d LL' I0 C W QQQm^ Q ILL .-> C ^E LL Jm Z N O J N 2^ >~ V 0 f d W d O 3 3 � d r L 1g1+ E L EO Y U y r 3 qU y d n 5 W II m d c 3 d E N a 3" 2 u E o q N C G 2 v 3 a o � YL Y n� 0 0 1/�II u N Va o ° C � E a 0 Z U Z Q R W m w � 00000a z �c�ccs w C'F ,C r 17 � N 10 0 0 0 0 0 a o o m m o mm m(�uCiC� `CA° Vl�im 0 0 0 0 0000 C0�0 5' °mC'oCS� ^CI0000 O O O O O � s ° C g L g � CI <_ VI�m 0 rj 0 0 w H a Z s H I o e m 6 v d ° o o ° ° V, N O o m P il0 R p LL O Y m a V 9 ° Z a C o I a O O U_OIm TN 00 E r d L 6 J R q N p Y N _Y NO~`P W~ L .. O W g W° w P d m u S ! ON U O LL LLO d �Ew E T a .. of Z `oN U c .A flo'�uo'aC «ti du L yl EN .mu d° ICC d O m U n m N 3 � ° � Y J H v V- � ro U v m d m O° L II a tp O O 0 s e Homo d II E m O iE U O V O N T(7 Nm.Nm�f� 3 � f P IUC li �UC �m m N O a °v ry C o U It a E c C y 'N a0 d nWal 00 N � 0 c .q S 3 O C N= iN q y Ij v 'a 0 m r a F N d 6 a o y L N I 3 d N .Y ° Y N M J U Ok r C C q V U U !U C O N U Iry$O O IV m N IL Q O T L O a! a `a E E d Ea E E v In =ul O m o'm d m vj m v miy am c a 4 h a p Y y E' d K° $ v o p° V a '' o i y s O N 6 p v 11 a m a g mfU a N q 2 y 2 L O O v o.2 v ° fn a 'L 41 v:a c p N° fn V m !n � q O O U U O U N W Q Q m P QiE Q li O J m N v o _ h O N y Q C .q y �y P NOOLam° 9 yl V O N N c 0 P O CI �aUn' m�L l9C U Nd a (i ((pp E m � d �➢ II 111E G O 6 m Oi y N N V 0 W R II LL d Y N N u U O U Q V>LL U1 i U. U V O 'F°d N m N ° E N J 4 ° du H m m L U .- N IL Q Iii Q mc0 c;dD 0 W orO LLZ ° `o E 2 m a x 8 E o E i Fo ay J O O 2 3 E E b F a m � Z o P, s S 5 0 m� _E The following resolution was presented to the Council for adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS WITH RESPECT TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION PAYMENT FOR COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON SAN GABRIEL BOULEVARD (I -10 /SOUTH CITY LIMIT) MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL that the Council adopt Resolution No. 2003 -21. Vote resulted: Yes: Alarcon, Clark, Imperial, Taylor, Vasquez No: None Absent: None .Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR CC -A AWARD OF BID TO ED BUTTS FORD FOR PURCHASE OF REPLACEMENT VEHICLE 2003 CROWN VICTORIA CC -B APPROVAL OF THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES, INC., AND THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD CC -C EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR CDBG AND HOME PROGRAM SERVICES CC -D APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR FAIR HOUSING SERVICES WITH THE HOUSING RIGHTS CENTER CC -E APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR SENIOR NUTRITION MEALS PROVIDER WITH MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST CC -F AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND ANNUAL LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE, SEPTEMBER 7-10,2003, SACRAMENTO CC -G ACCEPTANCE OF WORK FOR STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS ON VARIOUS CITY STREETS CC -H APPROVAL OF CPI ADJUSTMENT FOR STREET SWEEPING CONTRACT SERVICES PROVIDED BY CALIFORNIA STREET MAINTENANCE CCMIN_6 -24-03 Page 43 lr CC -I EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT FOR PARKWAY AND MEDIAN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE WITH MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENTERPRISES, INC. CC -J EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT FOR STREET TREE MAINTENANCE WITH EVAN'S TREE SERVICE CC -K EXTENSION OF LIGHTING AGREEMENT WITH QRS SERVICE CC -L APPROVAL OF LEASE AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON FOR ZAPOPAN PARK CC -M ANNUAL ADOPTION OF CITY'S INVESTMENT POLICY CC -N 2002 -03 BUDGET AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSFER $176,650 FROM UNAPPROPRIATED RESERVES TO ORGANIZATIONS 4110, 4180, 4240, 4320, 4330, 4340, 4640, 4650, 4710, AND 4740 CC-0 APPROVAL OF PARTNERSHIP WITH MONTEBELLO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR USE OF HOME FUNDS MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL that the Council approve the aforementioned items on the Consent Calendar. Vote resulted: Yes: Alarcon, Clark, Imperial, Taylor, Vasquez No: None Absent: None Abstain: None c==jp,The Mayor.declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. V. MATTERS FOR DISCUSSION AND ACTION - None VI. STATUS REPORTS - None VII. MATTERS FROM OFFICIALS Councilman Taylor requested that the shrubs and weeds be checked at 4623 Earle Avenue, Mayor Pro Tern Clark announced to the audience that the 4's of July Parade will start on Valley Boulevard at 10:00 a.m., with the Opening Ceremonies, carnival and fireworks at Rosemead Park. VHI. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE - None CCMR4:6 -24 -03 page s4 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMtt(CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CR , CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 12, 2003 RE: EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR 'GDBG AND HOME PROGRAM SERVICES In compliance with Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) guidelines, the City of Rosemead issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME program services in 2001. The City received two (2) proposals to the RFP and the City Council awarded the bid for those services to Willdan Associates. The original agreement was approved on July 1, 2001. The agreement provides for two (2) one year extensions. In the past year, Willdan has provided the following: Completed the Annual Funding Plan for CDBG and HOME .CZ1 Completed the City's CAPER report, closing FY 2001 -2002 Monitored and tracked the progress of the City's subrecipients Provided Code Enforcement services Provided outreach for the City's commercial and residential rehabilitation programs • Operated the Residential Rehabilitation program • Operated the Lead Testing and Lead Remediation programs • Operated the Mortgage Assistance Program COUNCIL JUN 24 2003 ITEM.No.17. ce-e • Held a homeownership fair for first time home buyers • Updated the 2001 -2002 Rehabilitation Program report (the 2002 -2003 report will be updated in July 2003) • Continued City compliance with environmental guidelines • Provided assistance to owners of commercial property applying for assistance in the City and. Commission's Commercial Rehabilitation Programs The current contract with Willdan allows for one additional one -year extension of the contract on the mutual consent of the contractor and City. Staff is recommending that the contract be extended for a period of one year. All expenses incurred by the City under this agreement are eligible CDBG and HOME expenditures. A copy of the Program Cost Summaries have been attached for the Council's review. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a one (1) year extension to the City's agreement with Willdan Associates for CDBG and HOME program services and authorize the City Manager to execute the necessary agreements. W Program Cost Summaries EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF ROSEMEAD COST ESTIMATES FOR CDBG ADMINISTRATION The specific tasks to be performed by Willdan in administrating the City's CDBG Program for the 2001 -2002 Fiscal Year, and two (2) subsequent fiscal years, are as follows: 24 COST TASK 2001 -b2 2002 -03 2003 -04 1. Prepare the . City's annual Grantee Performance Report or $7,621 ,$7,926 $7,926 CAPERS requirement. 2.: Prepare the City's Annual I CDBG and HOME funding plan, $14,023 $14,584 $14,584 including project descriptions and cost summaries. 3. Prepare public notices for and conduct two annual public $9,300 $9,672 $9,672 hearings on the use of CDBG and HOME funds. 4. Work with Finance to prepare quarterly Cash Transaction $5,621 $5,846 $5,846. Reports and maintain the IDIS reporting requirements. 5. Work with Finance in preparation of drawdown requisitions for each project and $5,913 $6,149 $6,149 maintain projects and database in IDIS. 6. Prepare all performance reports: annual, bi- annual for each project (includes $6172 $6,419 56,419 Contractor Report, Semi - Annual Labor Standards Report, Section 3 Reports, etc.). 7. Coordinate with HUD staff regarding CDBG and HOME $15,264 $15,875 $15,875 monitoring. 8. Coordinate with Fin7inthe preparation of the City $6,172 $6,419 $6,419 budget and annual au areas of CDBG. 24 Program Cost Summaries 25 COST - TASK 2001 -02 2002 -03 2003 -04 9. Prepare all agreements with $5,865 $6,100 I $6,100 I City subrecipients: 10. Monitor all subrecipients, including invoice processing $11,052 $11,494 $11,494 and annual site visits and follow u. 11. Prepare all RFP's for . subrecipients, including Fair $7,712 $8,020 $8,020 Housing Services. 12. Environmental Review, including annual review, public $81600 $8,944 $8,944 notices and Request for Release of Funds. 13. Handle all correspondence and telephone and walk -in traffic of I $8,600 $8,944 $8,944 the office. 14. Provide timely status reports, staffing schedules, and $9,000 $9,360 $9,360' meetings with City Manager's office. 15. Prepare program literature and brochures, program updates, $8,200 $8,528 $8,528 attend City Council as necessary. ESTIMATED TOTAL COST I $129,115 $134,280 $134,280 25 Program Cost Summaries EXHIBIT "B" CITY OF ROSEMEAD COST ESTIMATES FOR - OPERATION OF RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION PROGRAMS The specific tasks to be performed by Willdan in administrating the City's Residential Rehabilitation Programs for the 2001 -2002 Fiscal Year, and two (2) subsequent fiscal years are indicated below. The total cost must reflect all tasks necessary_ to complete one case. The tasks may vary slightly depending on the rehabilitation work o�� program component involved. However, the consultant is generally responsible for the following: a COST 2001 -02 2002 -03 2003 -04 TASK 1. Prepare application intake and approval based on federal $40 S42 $42 income guidelines and program - eligibility guidelines. 2. Conduct initial property inspection for code violations and rehabilitation work necessary to bring the property $200 $208 $208 into conformance with the City's adopted rehabilitation standards. 3. Prepare and submit historical $40 $42 $42 clearance documentation. 4. Prepare and obtain property $22 $23 $23 environmental clearances. 5.' Prepare work description and $89 $93 $93 obtain homeowner a proval. 6. Prepare plans, specifications, - and contract documents for $56 $58 $58 bidding purposes. 7. Set up contractor walk- through and be present during walk- $39 $41 $41 through to ensure homeowner's questions are answered. 8. Receive and review bids, including checking license of $42 $43 $43 contractor and ensuring s /he is not debarred. a Program Cost Summaries 27 COST 2001 -02 2002 -03 2003 -04 TASK 9. Take information to Council for approval in accordance with $51 $53 $53 City's Rehabilitation Guidelines. 10 -. - Prepare Owner Participation Agreements, Contractor $56- $58 $58 Agreements, and obtain proper signatures. 11. Prepare loan documents and $42 $43 $43 financial statements. 12. Prepare and execute promissory note, deed of trust, and all required loan documents $56 $58 $58 for processing a loan. Prepare covenants, execute, and record if a grant. . 13. Conduct progress inspections to ensure work is proceeding in a timely manner and according to $105 $110 $110 plans and /or schedule of completion. 14. Authorize progress payments. $33 $34 $34 15. Conduct final inspections, prepare Notice of Completion, acquire homeowner signatures for work completed to $56 $58 $58 homeowner satisfaction and in accordance with contract specifications. 16. Execute contract completion by acquiring lien releases from contractor (building permits, etc.) and close out cases by $50 $52 $52 ensuring permanent file contains all documentation required for government audit purposes. 17. Be available to answer questions from the public and $50 $52 $52 from applicants. 18. Maintain the City's deferred loans. Process demand and $50 $52 $52 repayments. 27 LN Program Cost Summaries 28 �u A'1 l I COST TASK 2001 -02 2002 -03 2003 -04 19. Provide interface between Community Development $50 $52 $52 Division and Finance. 20. Provide timely status reports, staffing schedules, .periodic $70 $73 $73 meetings with City Manager's office. 21. Prepare program materials, brochures, outreach materials, $6G. $62 $62 Council agenda items, and provide program outreach. ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,257 $1,307 $1,307 28 �u A'1 l I Program Cost Summaries EXHIBIT "C" CITY OF ROSEMEAD COST ESTIMATES FOR ADMINISTRATION OF COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM The specific tasks to be performed by Willdan in administering the City's Commercial Rehabilitation Program for the 2001 -2002 Fiscal Year and two (2) subsequent years are indicated below. Total cost is to reflect all tasks necessary to complete one case. The tasks may vary slightly depending on the extent of the rehabilitation work to be performed. However, the consultant will be generally responsible for the following: 29 COST TASK 2001 -02 2002 -03 2003 -04 1. Conduct initial meeting with applicant. Review application $304 $316 $316 and approve program participation. 2. Review proposed improvements at property location to qualify $530 $551 $551 eligible improvements. 3. Inspect property for code violations and to ensure $290 $301 $301 conformance with City's adopted codes. 4. Prepare work write -up and /or itemized cost estimate. Review $510 $530 $530 work write -ups and /or cost estimates of architects. 5. Prepare loan- documents and /or $166 $172 $172 approve estimated rebate. 6. Approve proposed work by Planning and Building & Safety $160 $166 $166 Departments. 7. Conduct bid process procedures, review bids, select $600 $624 $624 contractor, award bid. 8. Conduct preconstruction meeting with contractor, $400 $416 $416 roperty owner. 9. Conduct progress inspections and approve work done in $1,650 $1,716 $1,716 conjunction with approved schedule. 29 it Program Cost Summaries 30 U COST 2001 -02 2002 -03 2003 -04 TASK 10. Conduct final inspection, obtain all lien releases from contractor, approve final payments and /or $300 $312 $312 approve rebate, file Notice of Completion. 11. Conduct outreach, make $450 $468 $468 presentations as appropriate. 12. Staff office, answer inquiries $400 $416 $416 from public and applicants. 13. Prepare reports, periodic meetings with City Manager's $480 $499 $499 office, staffing schedules. ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $6,240 $6,487 1 $6,487 30 U .'A7 Program Cost Summaries EXHIBIT "D" CITY OF ROSEMEAD COST ESTIMATES FOR HOUSING CODE COMPLIANCE The specific tasks to be performed by Willdan in administering the City's. Housing Code Compliance Program for the 2001 -2002 Fiscal Year and two (2) subsequent years are indicated below. Total cost is to reflect all tasks necessary to complete one case. The tasks may vary slightly depending on the extent of the code compliance work to be performed. However, the consultant will be generally responsible for the following: 31 COST 2001 -02 2002 -03 2003 -04 TASK 1. Using City's complaint form, document source of complaint $82 $85 $85 regarding substandard housing conditions. 2. Conduct_ initial site inspection from public right -of -way, within 15 days of request. If necessary, obtain permission to enter premises from person in $309 $321 $321 control of premises. Note .and photograph substandard conditions. Prepare plot plan of ro ert , as required. 3. If permission to enter is required, refer case to City Attorney to obtain a search warrant. Refer $82 $85 $85 fife /safety hazardous conditions to Building Official, if required, for possible summary abatement. 4: Review building permit job file, zoning files, and assessor's records to determine permit $121 $126 $126 status of the property and owner of record. 5. Send Notice of Violation signed by Building Official via certified mail .within five (5) days of the inspection along with information $54. $56 $56 on, and an application for, City's Housing Rehabilitation Program, if applicable. 31 YJ/ 1'47 t Program Cost Summaries 32 COST 2002 -03 2003 -04 TASK 6. Reinspect property fifteen (15) days . after notice to see if r2001-02 substandard conditions have $82 $85 $85 been corrected. Close and document case if conditions are corrected. 7. If conditions are not corrected, but progress has been made, $54 $56 $56 arrange single extension of time and schedule reins ection. 8. If voluntary compliance efforts fail, order a title search. Issue a Notice and Order by the Building Inspector. within 5 days of the $54 $56 $56, second inspection and notify all interested parties. Post Notice and Order on property. 9. During the thirty (30) day posting period, make every effort to contact the owner personally or $54 $56 $56 by telephone to obtain compliance. 10. If efforts for compliance fail, schedule case for an Administrative Hearing. Prepare and send Notice of Hearing via certified mail to the vested owner $82 $85 $85 and allow receipt at least ten (10) days prior to hearing. Post notice for at least ten (10) days prior to hearing. 11. Conduct hearing before the Building Official. Building Official will issue a decision regarding the existence of substandard conditions, and issue a citation $155 $161 $161 with deadline for abatement if substandard conditions exist. Deadline for abatement shall not exceed sixty 60 days. 12. If owner is instead found in compliance, close and document $54 $56 $56 case. 32 I i 1147 Program Cost Summaries 33 COST - TASK 2001 -02 2002 -03 2003 -04 13. If owner is not found in compliance, notify owner of the time. and place of the hearing before the Rehabilitation -$54 $56 $56 Appeals Board (City Council) which shall be held within thirty 30 days. 14. If Board does not find substandard conditions at the $54 $56 $56 rehearing, close and document case. 15. If Board confirms substandard conditions, and citation stands, transmit citation to the District Attorney for prosecution. Give $54 $56 $56 notice to the State Franchise Tax Board that the rental housing unit has been determined to be "substandard." 16. Prepare periodic reports, status reports, staffing schedules, $309 $321 $321 attend Rehab. meetings, and City Council as necessary. 17. Staff office, provide answers to questions from public either at $155 $161 $161 . counter or by telephone. ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $1,809 $1,878 $1,878 33 1'47 Program Cost Summaries EXHIBIT "E" , CITY OF ROSEMEAD COST ESTIMATES FOR OPERATION OF FIRST -TIME HOME BUYER PROGRAM The specific tasks to be performed by Willdan in administering the City's First -Time Home Buyer.Program for the 2001 -2002 Fiscal Year and two (2) subsequent fiscal years are indicated below. The total cost must reflect all tasks necessary to complete orie case. The tasks may vary slightly depending on the rehabilitation work or the program component involved. However, the consultant is generally responsible for the following: 34 COST 2001 -02 2002 -03 2003 -04 TASK 1. Prepare application intake and approval based on federal $302 $302 $313. income guidelines and program eligibility guidelines. 2. Conduct initial property inspection for violations and rehabilitation work necessary to $181 $181 $192 bring the property into conformance with HOME requirements. 3.. Apply City underwriting criteria $121 $121 $125' and prepare loan summaries. 4. Provide interface between City, title company, escrow company, $121 $121 $125 primary lender, etc. . as necessary. 5... Review proposed. loan documents and ensure $302` $302 $313 compliance with City lender requirements. 6. Obtain Voluntary Transaction paperwork, lead requirements, $61 $61 $63 and follow'up on status of any required repairs from inspection. 7. Prepare loan documents, payment requests, and provide interface between escrow $242 $242 $250 company and City for loan closing. 8. 1 Prepare and maintain client files. $121 $121 $125 34 A ■ i COST TASK 2001 -02 2002 -03 2003 -04 9. Prepare and maintain HOME funds, match reports and lending . $61 $61 $6$ summary. 10. Prepare summaries for IDIS $61 $61 $63 draws. 11. Provide program outreach, including presentations to $61 $61 $63 lenders. 12. Provide office staffing, answer program questions, and handle $302 $302 $313 telephone and walk -in traffic. 13. Prepare periodic progress reports, attend meetings of City $181 $181 $192' Manager's office. ESTIMATED TOTAL COST $2,117. $2,117 $2,200 i The following resolution was presented to the Council for adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS WITH RESPECT TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION PAYMENT FOR COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON SAN GABRIEL BOULEVARD (I -10 1SOUTH CITY LIMIT) MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL that the Council adopt Resolution No. 2003 -21. Vote resulted: Yes: Alarcon, Clark, Imperial, Taylor, Vasquez No: None Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR CC -A AWARD OF BID TO ED BUTTS FORD FOR PURCHASE OF REPLACEMENT VEHICLE 2003 CROWN VICTORIA CC -B APPROVAL OF THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES, INC., AND THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD -C EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR CDBG AND HOME PROGRAM SERVICES CC -D APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR FAIR HOUSING SERVICES WITH THE HOUSING RIGHTS CENTER CC -E APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR SENIOR NUTRITION MEALS PROVIDER WITH MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST CC -F AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND ANNUAL LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE, SEPTEMBER 7-10,2003, SACRAMENTO CC -G ACCEPTANCE OF WORK FOR STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS ON VARIOUS CITY STREETS CC -H APPROVAL OF CPI ADJUSTMENT FOR STREET SWEEPING CONTRACT SERVICES PROVIDED BY CALIFORNIA STREET MAINTENANCE CCMIN:6 -24 -03 Page #3 KKKVVV222"' 1 ' CC -I EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT FOR PARKWAY AND MEDIAN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE WITH MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENTERPRISES, INC. CC -J EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT FOR STREET TREE MAINTENANCE WITH EVAN'S TREE SERVICE CC -K EXTENSION OF LIGHTING AGREEMENT WITH QRS SERVICE CC -L APPROVAL OF LEASE AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON FOR ZAPOPAN PARK CC -M ANNUAL ADOPTION OF'CITY'S INVESTMENT POLICY CC -N 2002 -03 BUDGET AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSFER $176,650 FROM UNAPPROPRIATED RESERVES TO ORGANIZATIONS 4110, 4180, 4240, 4320, 4330, 4340, 4640, 4650, 4710, AND 4740 CC -O APPROVAL OF PARTNERSHIP WITH MONTEBELLO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR USE OF HOME FUNDS MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL that the Council approve the aforementioned items on the Consent Calendar. Vote resulted: Yes: Alarcon, Clark, Imperial, Taylor, Vasquez. No: None Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor, declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. V. MATTERS FOR DISCUSSION AND ACTION - None VI. STATUS REPORTS - None VII. MATTERS FROM OFFICIALS Councilman Taylor requested that the shrubs and weeds be checked at 4623 Earle Avenue. Mayor Pro Tern Clark announced to the audience that the 4a' of July Parade will start on Valley Boulevard at 10:00 a.m., with the Opening Ceremonies, carnival and fireworks at Rosemead Park. VIII. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE - None CCMIN:6 -24-03 Page 44 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA JULY 8, 2003, AT 8:00 P.M. CALL MEETING TO ORDER: 8:00 P.M. PLEDGE TO I'IIE, FLAG: COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL INVOCATION: REVEREND JONATHAN WU OF THE EVERGREEN BAPTIST CHURCH ROLL CALL OF OFFICERS: COUNCILMEMBERS ALARCON, IMPERIAL, TAYLOR, MAYOR PRO TEM CLARK, MAYOR j VASQUEZ APPROVAL OF MINUTES: JUNE 24, 2003 — REGULAR MEETING S OF INTEREST TO CI'ITZENSrW1S1IING TO PARTICIPATE 1) Those wishing to speak on any Agenda Item, including public hearing, should have their Speaker Request Form submitted to the City Clerk no later than the time immediately following Oral Communications, Immediately after approval of the minutes and again at the end of the meeting, there is a period of time set aside for those persons wishing to address the Council on matters not listed on 'the Agenda entitled: ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE (pl'ease complete the Speaker Request Form stating your preference to speak either at the beginning or at the end of ti:qA�. ieeting). Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with disabilities, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the City Clerk's office at 626/569 -2171 at least 48 hours before the meeting, if possible. /PRESENTATIONS: PROCLAMATION - NATIONAL KOREAN WAR VETERANS ARMISTICE DAY —.JULY 27, 2003 1. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM TILE AUDIENCE U. PUBLIC HEARINGS —NONE /Ill. LEGISI A�'IVE A. s/R(ESSOLUTION NO. 2003 -22 - CLAIMS AND DEMANDS mendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -22, for payment of City lB. 5 RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -23 — A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD AUTHORIZING EXAMINATION OF SALES CCAGENDA:7 -08 -03 Page 9 1 USE TAX RECORDS 2) C• Immediately after approval of the minutes and again at the end of the meeting, there is a period of time set aside for those persons wishing to address the Council on matters not listed on 'the Agenda entitled: ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE (pl'ease complete the Speaker Request Form stating your preference to speak either at the beginning or at the end of ti:qA�. ieeting). Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with disabilities, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the City Clerk's office at 626/569 -2171 at least 48 hours before the meeting, if possible. /PRESENTATIONS: PROCLAMATION - NATIONAL KOREAN WAR VETERANS ARMISTICE DAY —.JULY 27, 2003 1. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM TILE AUDIENCE U. PUBLIC HEARINGS —NONE /Ill. LEGISI A�'IVE A. s/R(ESSOLUTION NO. 2003 -22 - CLAIMS AND DEMANDS mendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -22, for payment of City lB. 5 RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -23 — A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD AUTHORIZING EXAMINATION OF SALES CCAGENDA:7 -08 -03 Page 9 1 USE TAX RECORDS 7� This resolution is required by the California State Board of Equalization and re- authorizes City staff by title to review confidential sales and use tax information. Previous authorization was by specific name and needs to be updated. Recorlrmendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -23 authorizing the examination of sales and use tax records. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR– RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL / C AD LEAS E AGREEMENT - SALLY TANNER PARK The City leases Sally Tanner Park from the San Gabriel County Water District. The lease duration is for 10 years at the cost of one dollar per year. Reco The City CC -C AL 3-50— –11 AS This in ar 1 and autl inc( on: Approve the Agreement and authorize its execution by the ITION OF SURPLUS CITY PROPERTY – 4623 EARLE AVENUE i purchased this property through the "Chapter 8, Tax - Defaulted Property To Power of Sale Program ", County of Los Angeles Treasurer and Tax n's Office. Title was transferred to the City on September 27, 2001. The received an offer for the vacant parcel in the amount of $245,000.00. emendation: Approve purchase of surplus City property at 4623 Earle e. RIZATION TO ATTEND INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGERS ATION'S ANNUAL CONFERENCE, SEPTEMBER 21 -24, )TTE. NORTH CAROLINA dear's conference sessions are planned around four theme tracks: Managing Evolving Economy, Changing Demographics and Aging Populations, icing and Developing the Profession, and Professionalism and Personal > Facing Local Government Managers and Their Families. n: Authorize the attendance of the City Manager. (LENO) – LOCAL GENE=RAL INCOME TAX – OPPOSE bill would authorize any city or county to form a public safety finance cy for the purpose of supplementing fire protection, police or sheriff services, financing needed capital improvements for those services, and would )rite any city or county that forms such an agency to levy a local general ne tax. Reci uunendation: Oppose AB 1690. V. MATTERS FOR DISCUSSIO /N� AA�NDD ACTION ' V1. STATUS REPORTS >� VII. MATTERS FROM. OFFICIALS VIII. ORAL C IINIMUNICAT10NS FROM TIIE AUDIENCE IX. AD.IOUR THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING IS SCHEDULED FOR JULY 22, 2003, AT 8:00 P.M. Posled 72 hours in advance of the meeting at the Cily Hall. 8838 E. Valley Boulevard, Rosemcadd; the L.A. County Library, Rosemead Branch, 8800 E. Valley Boulevard, Rosemead; and other locations pursuant to RMC Sec. 1.08.020. CcnccNOA:z -aa -m Nge N2 ref TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMCITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CRyOWE, CITY MANAGER DATE: JULY 8, 2003 RE: DISPOSITION OF SURPLUS CITY PROPERTY - 4623 EARLE AVENUE The City has received an offer from Xue Zhang and Jing Yan Guo to purchase the City -owned parcel located at 4623 Earle Avenue. The offer is for $245,000.00, with a three percent deposit and all cash upon closing. The proposed escrow period is thirty (30) days. The land will be sold "as is" with no contingencies. Mr. Zhang and Guo are local residential developers and their plan is to construct two new'single- family detached homes on the property. They do wish to subdivide the lot into two lots. However, they will need to go through the necessary application procedures to accomplish that goal. Public hearings will be required before the Planning Commission before any subdivisions may be recorded. The City has not offered any commissions to be paid to any realtors involved in the transaction. Staff felt that this property is one that would not require any special marketing to be sold by the City. The City acquired title to 4623 Earle Avenue on September 27, 2001 to eliminate blighted conditions within an existing single - family residential neighborhood, situated in the northwest portion of the City. This purchase was a lengthy, eighteen -month process, through the County's Tax Default sale program. This site has been a property maintenance problem to the City and the neighborhood for many years. The City seized this opportunity to purchase the land to ensure that this property was returned to an acceptable state for the neighborhood. By the time the City had purchased the property, all structures had been demolished and the site currently sits vacant. After the City purchased the property, staff received interest from two neighbors and Habitat for Humanity, to develop the property. The City Council then authorized staff to have an appraisal report prepared. The property was appraised at $240,000. This appraisal number was forwarded on to both of the neighbors that showed interest in the property. Although they were both initially interested, follow up interviews found that both parties had purchased other properties outside the City of Rosemead. Neither party was interested in continuing the process of acquiring the parcel from the City. In compliance with California Government Code §54222, the City also notified public housing agencies, School Districts, LA County Parks and Recreation Department and Habitat for Humanity to verify if any parties had interest in purchasing this property from the City. No response was received from any of the above- mentioned organizations. Also, in compliance with the provisions of Government Code §65402, the Planning Commission adopted a report finding that the disposition of the property for residential development is in conformance with the General Plan of the City. This report was approved by the Planning Commission on June 16, 2003. COUNCIL AGENDA J U L 0 8 2.003 ITE1M No.� e e :A The property is surplus to City needs, and staff believes that it is in the best interest of the City to dispose of this property to a developer and allow the developer to construct a project that fits within the parameters of the City's zoning ordinance and regulations of the R -1 zoning district. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council direct Counsel to prepare the necessary disposition documentation and direct the City Manager or designee to sign the required escrow documents. Attachments: 1) Offer from Xue Zhang & Jing Yan Gun, dated June 10, 2003 2) Appraisal Report, Himes & Himes, July 18, 2002 3) Planning Commission General Plan Conformity Report, June 16, 2003 4) RHDC Status Report -4623 Earle, July 3, 2001 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEWAD COUNCIL FROM: BILL C , CITY MANAGER DATE: JULY 8, 2003 RE: AB 1690 (LEND) — LOCAL GENERAL INCOME TAX - OPPOSE Attached for the City Council's review are copies of AB 1690 (Leno), current bill status and history, legislative analysis, and roll call vote record. This bill would authorize any city or county to form a public safety finance agency for the purposes of supplementing fire protection or police or sheriff services, and financing needed capital improvements for its fire or police or sheriff s department or for any other public agency that provides fire protection or police or sheriff services within its boundaries. More importantly, the bill would authorize any city or county that forms a public safety finance agency to levy a local general income tax, if that tax is approved by a majority of the voters voting on that tax. The bill was approved by the Assembly on June 4`s. Assemblymembers Lou Correa, Joe Canciamilla and Barbara Matthews joined all Republicans in opposing the bill. This new local general income tax would be subject to majority voter approval, although the revenue is earmarked through a step transaction. The revenue from the new income tax would go into a city's or county's general fund for general purposes. For those communities with both a public safety financing agency and a locally approved income tax, the public safety financing agency would then receive a portion of the local property tax levy equal to 50% of the local income tax. Critics argue that the step transaction -is a sham to get around Proposition 13's two - thirds vote requirement for earmarked or special taxes. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council oppose AB 1690. COUNCIL I =1�:om JUL 08 2003 ITEM Flo. / V . �� AB 1690 Assembly Bill - AMENDED BILL NUMBER: AB 1690 AMENDED BILL TEXT AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JUNE 2, 2003 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 23, 2003 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 1, 2003 INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Leno (Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Lieber) (Coauthors: Assembly Members Bermudez, Calderon, Chavez, Goldberg, Koretz, Laird, Montanez, Nation, Pavley, Steinberg, ^a °l!ff a) Vargas, Wiggins, and Yee) (Coauthor: Senator Burton) FEBRUARY 21, 2003 An act to add Article 4 (commencing with Section 55650) to Chapter 4 of Part 2 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code, and to ^a amend Sections 17041.5 and 19533 of, to add Section 99.3 to, and to add Part 10.1 (commencing with Section 18201) to, the Revenue and Taxation Code, relating to local government. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 1690, as amended, Leno. Public safety finance agencies. Under existing law, local fire protection services may be provided by, among other entities, a fire protection district, which may comprise territory including cities or counties, by a fire department or company organized in an unincorporated town, or by a fire department established by a city or county. This bill would authorize any city, county, or city and county to. form a public safety finance agency for the purposes of supplementing fire protection or police or sheriff services, and financing needed capital improvements for its fire or police or sheriff's department or for any other public agency that provides fire protection or police or sheriff services within its boundaries. Existing law provides that, with the exception of a business license tax, a city, county, city and county, or any other local entity may not impose,or collect a local income tax. This bill would authorize any city, county, or city and county that forms a public safety finance agency to levy a local general income tax, if that tax is approved by a majority of the voters voting. on that tax. ___ ____ _____ ____ oreEtw4ore that ___, This bill would require the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) to administer and collect these local income taxes and require the board to transmit the revenues derived from these taxes within 60 days of collection. This bill would also authorize the FTB to deduct its costs in collecting the tax prior to transmitting the revenues to the imposing local entity. This bill would also require, in the case of a local government that has both formed a public safety finance agency and adopted a local income tax, that property tax revenue be annually assigned to the public safety finance agency, from the forming local government, in an amount that is equal to 508 of the amount of revenues estimated to be collected from the local income tax in the first 12 months of imposition. This bill would also require the governing board of a public safety finance agency to annually allocate these revenues according to a specified formula. By imposing new revenue allocation Page 1 of 6 AB 1690 Assembly Bill - AMENDED Page 2 of 6 duties upon local officials, this bill would impose a state - mandated local program. This bill would also provide that if any provision of the bill, or any properly proposed ordinance enacted pursuant to the act, is invalidated by an appellate court, then the remaining provisions of the bill shall become inoperative. . The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement, including the creation of a State Mandates Claims Fund to pay the costs of mandates that do not exceed $1,000,000 statewide and other procedures for claims whose statewide costs exceed $1,000,000. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State - mandated local program: yes. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Article 4 (commencing with Section 55650) is added to Chapter 4 of Part 2 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code, to read: Article 4. Public Safety Finance Agency 55650. (a) Any city,,county, or city and county may form, by ordinance, a public safety finance agency for the following purposes: (1) To supplement fire protection services and finance needed capital improvements for its fire department or other outside agency that provides structural fire protection services within the boundaries of that city, county, or city and county. (2) To supplement police or sheriff services and finance needed capital improvements for its police or sheriff's department or other outside agency that provides police or sheriff services within the boundaries of that city, county, or city and county. (b) In the case of a city, county, or city and county that does not directly provide either its own fire protection services or its own police or sheriff services, or both, that.portion of the funds of the public safety protection agency that are available for the category of services not directly provided may be made available only to the outside agency that directly provides that same category of services within the boundaries of the city, county, or city and county. (c) When a decision, determination, or other action by the public safety finance agency formed pursuant to this section is required by this article, the governing body of that agency may not delegate the obligation to decide, determine, or act to another entity, unless this article specifically provides for that delegation. (d) A public safety finance agency formed pursuant to this section may, in addition to any funds provided by the city, county, or city and county that formed that agency, accept financial assistance from the state or federal government or any public or private source for any purpose set forth in subdivision (a). (e) All funds of a public safety finance agency formed pursuant to this section shall be held in trust for the purposes set forth in subdivision (a) and may not be utilized to supplant other funds applied to fire protection or police or sheriff services. SEC. 2. Section 99.3 is added to the Revenue and Taxation Code, to read: 99.3. For the purposes of the computations required by this chapter: (a) If a public safety finance agency is formed by a city, county, or city and county ordinance pursuant to Section 55650 of the AB 1690 Assembly Bill = AMENDED Page 3 of 6 Government Code and is located within a city, county, or city and county for which an income tax authorized by -•'--'•• "'` '� sf geet4men 1-,941 9 Part 10.1 (commencing with Section 18201) has been approved by the voters, the auditor shall assign to that public safety finance agency that portion of the annual property tax revenue allocation determined pursuant to Section 96 or subdivision (a) of Section 96.1 for that city, county, or city and county in an amount equal to 50 percent of the amount estimated by the Franchise Tax Board pursuant to subdivision (c) to be collected on behalf of the city, county, or city and county during the first 12 months in which the income tax is imposed. In each fiscal year that follows a fiscal year in which an assignment of ad valorem property tax revenues is made pursuant to this subdivision, ad valorem property tax revenue allocations made pursuant to Sections 96.1 and 96.5 shall fully reflect the allocation adjustments required by that assignment. In each fiscal year, the governing board of a public safety finance agency shall allocate the property tax revenues it receives under this subdivision according to the following: (1) Forty percent for the purposes described in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 55650 of the Government Code. (2) Forty percent for the purposes described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 55650 of the Government Code. (3) Twenty percent for the purposes specified in subdivision (a) of Section 55650 of the Government Code as specified in a written agreement between the following parties: (A) The chief fire official that directly provides public safety services in the city, county, or city and county that formed the public safety finance agency. (B) As applicable, the sheriff or police chief that directly provides public safety services in the city, county, or city and county that formed the public safety finance agency. (b) Upon the approval of an income tax authorized by ve _ -r —, (b) _< s-_ _ 14941'g Part 10.1 (commencing with Section 18201) the imposing city, county, or city and county shall give notice of that approval to the Franchise Tax Board, and to the assessor and auditor of the county within which the territory subject to the public safety finance agency is located. This notice shall specify the city, county, or city and county that has approved the imposition of the income tax. (c) The Franchise Tax Board shall, within 60 days of notice of the approval of the tax authorized by Gest4ogn 14941,; Part 10.1 (commencing with Section 18201) , estimate, based upon historical . data on state income tax collections for residents of that city, county, or city and county, the amount of tax to be collected on behalf of the city, county, or city and county in the first 12 months in which that tax is imposed. The Franchise Tax Board shall notify the county auditor of its estimate. (d) (1) The county assessor shall provide to the county auditor, within 30 days of the notice of approval of an income tax authorized by :..: _ f geet-49R 1 4941 9 Part 10.1 (commencing with Section 18201) a report that identifies the assessed valuations for the tax rate areas within the jurisdiction of the public safety finance agency. (2) The auditor shall estimate the amount of property tax revenue derived from the tax rate areas that are within the jurisdiction of the public safety finance agency. '(3) The auditor shall estimate that portion of the property tax _ revenue determined pursuant to paragraph (2) that is to be assigned to the public safety finance agency.pursuant to subdivision (a). (4) The auditor shall, within 45 days of receipt of the notice under subdivision (c), notify the governing body of the city, county, or city and county that formed the public safety finance agency of the assignment to be made pursuant to subdivision (a). SEC. 3. Section 17041.5 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read: 17041.5. —fa)— Except as provided in AB 1690 Assembly Bill - AMENDED Page 4 of 6 - ••'-J'••'- "•\ Part 10.1 (commencing with Section 18201) notwithstanding any statute, ordinance, regulation, rule or decision to the contrary, no city, county, city and county, governmental subdivision, district, public and quasi - public corporation, municipal corporation, whether incorporated or not or whether chartered or not, shall levy or collect or cause to be levied or collected any tax upon the income, or any part thereof, of any person, resident or nonresident. (bT SEC. 4. Part 10.1 (commencing with Section 18201) is added to the Revenue and Taxation Code, to read: PART 10.1. LOCAL INCOME TAX 18201. (a) (1) Any city, county, or city,and county that has formed a public safety finance agency by ordinance pursuant to Section 55650 of the Government Code may levy a general tax upon the taxable income of any peEseR ___`J'-; +_„_e,- individual who is a resident of the city, county, or city and county for each taxable year beginning on or after'January 1, 2004. The tax may not exceed an amount equal to the net tax 4!- 988@1 �I-p'-.- defined in Section 17039 multiplied by: (A) Eight percent with respect to a tax levied by a city. (B) Two percent with respect to a tax levied by a county. (C) Ten percent with respect to a tax levied by a city and county. (2) Any ordinance adopted by a city, county, or city and county for the purpose of levying a tax on income shall be subject to approval by a majority of the voters voting on that issue at an election. (A ) "a L..-.... 4 ..L.-.1 l +1... ..l l e 881 ;!888 +1... L...... -EP .. C (b) This section may not be construed so as to prohibit the levy or collection of any otherwise authorized license tax upon a business measured by or according to gross receipts. 18202. A local tax imposed under this part shall be administered in the same manner as a tax imposed under Part 10 (commencing with Section 17001). Part.10.2 (commencing with Section 18401) shall apply to any tax imposed under this part in the same manner and with the same force and effect and to the full extent as if the language of that part has been incorporated in full into this part, except to the extent that any provision is inconsistent with this part or is not relevant to this part. 18203. For purposes of this part, the term "resident" has the same meaning as under Section 17014, modified by substituting "the city," "the county," or "the city and county," as applicable, in lieu of "this state." 18204. (a) The Franchise Tax Board shall revise the personal income tax returns required to be filed pursuant to Part 10.2 (commencing with Section 18401) to allow an individual to report and pay a local income tax in accordance with this part. The returns shall require the taxpayer to include the individual's city and county of residence. (b) Subdivision (a) does not apply with respect to returns for any AB 1690 Assembly Bill - AMENDED Page 5 of 6 taxable year beginning on or after January 1 of a calendar year unless the Franchise Tax Board receives notice of approval of a local income tax, as required by Section 99.3, by June 1 of that calendar. year. 18205. The board shall transmit local income tax revenues collected pursuant to this part, net of refunds and net of an amount equal to the costs incurred by the Franchise Tax Board in implementing and administering the tax authorized in this part and related statutes as added or amended by the act adding this part, to the city, the county, or the city and county to which the amount due is owing on or before 60 days after collecting the tax. SEC. 5. Section 19533 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read: 19533. In the event the debtor has more than one debt being collected by the Franchise Tax Board and the amount collected by the Franchise Tax Board is insufficient to satisfy the total amount owing, the amount collected shall be applied in the following priority: (a) Payment of any delinquencies transferred for collection under Article 5 (commencing with Section 19270) of Chapter 5. (b) Payment of any taxes, additions to tax, penalties, interest, fees, or other amounts due and payable under Part 7.5 (commencing with Section 13201), Part 10 (commencing with Section 17001), Part 11 (commencing with Section 23001), or this part. (c) Payment of any taxes, additions to tax, penalties, interest, fees, or other amounts due and payable under Part 10.1 (commencing with Section 18201). (d) Payment of delinquent wages collected pursuant to the Labor Code. ,a �T (e) Payment of delinquencies collected under Section 10878. (e) — (f) Payment of any amounts due that are referred for collection under Article 5.5 (commencing with Section 19280) of Chapter 5. (f) (g) Payment of any amounts that are referred for collection pursuant to Section 62.9 of the Labor Code. ()- (h) Payment of delinquent penalties collected for the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to the Labor Code. (i) Payment of delinquent fees collected for the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to the Labor Code. (j) Notwithstanding the payment priority established by this section, voluntary payments made by a taxpayer designated by the taxpayer as payment for a personal income tax liability, shall not be applied pursuant to this priority, but shall instead be applied solely to the personal income tax liability for which the voluntary payment was made. SEC. 6. If any provision of this act, or any ordinance that is properly proposed by a local governing body pursuant to this act, is held invalid in a final decision of an appellate court, the remaining provisions of this act shall become inoperative. 699 6 SEC. 7. Notwithstanding Section 17610 of the Government Code, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 9 of Title 2 of the Government Code. If the statewide cost of the claim for AB 1690 Assembly Bill - AMENDED Page 6 of 6 reimbursement does not exceed one million dollars ($1,000,000), reimbursement shall be made from the State Mandates Claims Fund. AB 1690 Assembly Bill - Status CURRENT BILL STATUS MEASURE : A.B. No. 1690 AUTHOR(S) Lend (Principal coauthor: Lieber) (Coauthors: Bermudez, Calderon, Chavez, Goldberg, Koretz, Laird, Montanez, Nation, Pavley, Steinberg, Vargas, Wiggins and Yee) (Coauthor: Senator Burton). TOPIC Public safety finance agencies. HOUSE LOCATION SEN +LAST AMENDED DATE 06/02/2003 TYPE OF BILL : Active Non - Urgency Non - Appropriations Majority Vote Required State - Mandated Local Program Fiscal Non -Tax Levy LAST HIST. ACT. DATE: 06/19/2003 LAST HIST. ACTION Referred to Ccm. on REV. & TAX. COMM. LOCATION BEN REVENUE AND TAXATION HEARING DATE 07/09/2003 TITLE An act to add Article 9 (commencing with Section 55650) to Chapter 4 of Part 2 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code, and to.amend Sections 17091.5 and 19533 of, to add Section 99.3 to, and to add Part 10.1 (commencing with Section 18201) to, the Revenue and Taxation Code, relating to local government. Page 1 of 1 http:// www. leginfo.ca.gov /publbill /asm /ab_ 1651- 1700/ab_1690_bill_20030701 _status.html 7/2/2003 AB 1690 Assembly Bill - Status CURRENT BILL STATUS MEASURE : A.B. No. 1690 AUTHOR(S) Leno (Principal coauthor: Lieber) (Coauthors: Bermudez, Calderon, Chavez, Goldberg, Koretz, Laird, Montanez, Nation, Pavley, Steinberg, Vargas, Wiggins and Yee) (Coauthor: Senator Burton). TOPIC Public safety finance agencies. HOUSE LOCATION SEN +LAST AMENDED DATE 06/02/2003 TYPE OF BILL : Active Non - Urgency Non - Appropriations Majority Vote Required State - Mandated Local Program Fiscal Non -Tax Levy LAST HIST. ACT. DATE: 06/19/2003 LAST HIST. ACTION Referred to Com. on REV. &TAX. COMM. LOCATION SEN REVENUE AND TAXATION HEARING DATE 07/09/2003 TITLE An act to add Article 4 (commencing with Section 55650) to Chapter 4 of Part 2 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code, and to amend Sections 17041.5 and 19533 of, to add Section 99.3 to, and to add Part 10.1 (commencing with Section 18201) to, the Revenue and Taxation Code, relating to local government. Page 1 of 1 http: / /www.leginfo.ca.gov /pub /bill /asmlab_ 1651- 1700/ab_1690_bill_20030701 _status.html 7/2/2003 AB 1690 Assembly Bill - Bill Analysis Page 1 of 5 0 AB 1690 Page 1 ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 1690 (Zeno) As Amended June 2, 2003 Majority vote LOCAL GOVERNMENT 6 -2 APPROPRIATIONS 17 -7 IAyes:ISalinas, Lieber, Leno, IAyes:ISteinberg, Berg, Kehoe, I I (Mullin, I (Corbett, Diaz, I I ISteinberg, Wiggins I I Firebaugh, Goldberg, I I ILeno, Nation, I I I I IChan, Nunez, Pavley, I I I I (Ridley- Thomas, I I I I ISimitian, Wiggins, Yee, I I I I (Laird I I I I I-----+--------------------------+----- +--------------------- - - - - -I INays:IDaucher, La Suer INays:IBates, Daucher, Haynes, I I I I IMaldonado, Pacheco, I I I I IRunner, Samuelian I ----------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY Authorizes any city, county, or city and county that forms a public safety finance agency to levy a local general income tax and shift a specified portion of annual property tax allocation income to the public safety finance agency. Specifically, this bill . 1)Authorizes any city, county, or city and county to form a public safety finance agency to supplement fire protection or police or sheriff services, and finance capital improvements for its fire, police, or sheriff's department or for any other public agency that provides those services within its boundaries. 2)Authorizes any city, county, or city and county that forms a public safety finance agency to levy a local income tax, subject to approval of the majority of voters. 3)Specifies that the amount of this local personal income tax shall not exceed 8% of the state tax liability for a city - levied tax, 2% of the state tax liability for a county - levied tax, or 10% of the state tax liability for a tax levied by a city and county. AB 1690 Page 2 http: / /www.leginfo.ca.gov /pub /bill /asm/ab... /ab_ 1690_ cfa _20030604_003836_asm_floor.htm 7/2/2003 AB 1690 Assembly Bill - Bill Analysis Page 2 of 5 IN 4)Requires the county auditor, once the tax is approved, to transfer a portion of the annual property tax revenue allocation to the public safety finance agency in an amount equal to 508 of the estimated local income tax revenues to be collected within the first 12 months. 5)Requires the governing board of a public safety finance agency to allocate the property tax revenues it receives as follows: 408 of the funds shall be dedicated to fire protection services; 40% shall be dedicated to police and sheriff services; 208 shall be allocated as specified in a written - agreement between the chief fire official and sheriff or .police chief. 6)Provides that if any provision of this bill, or local measure enacted pursuant to this bill, is invalidated by an appellate court, the remaining provisions will become inoperative. 7)Imposes a state - mandated local program by imposing new duties upon local officials. EXISTING LAW prohibits any city, county, city and county, or any other local entity from imposing or collecting a local income tax, with the exception of a business license tax. Also AB 1690 Page 3 requires two - thirds voter approval for special taxes levied for specified purposes, and approval of a simple majority of voters for general taxes levied for general governmental purposes. FISCAL EFFECT . "According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee analysis, this bill authorizes cities and counties to generate up to $3.4 billion in local income tax revenue http: / /www.leginfo .ca.gov /pub/bill /asm /ab... /ab_1 690_ cfa _20030604_003836_asm_floor.htm 7/2/2003 AB 1690 Assembly Bill - Bill Analysis 7E Page 3 of 5 annually, and would require them to transfer $1.7 billion in property taxes to public safety finance agencies, beginning in 2003 -04, if each city and county in the state were to impose the local income tax authorized by this bill. Most likely, the amount generated and property taxes transferred would be much less, as not all cities and counties would impose the tax, and not all that would impose the tax would do so at the maximum rate authorized. The Franchise Tax Board (FTB) is still in the process of estimating the costs to implement and administer the local income taxes authorize by this bill, but indicates these costs would be in the millions of dollars. Although the bill authorizes FTB to deduct its administrative expenses from revenue collections, FTB believes that it would need a significant up -front appropriation to cover its start -up costs. Start -up costs would include, but not be limited to, system programming, creation of a billing system, and the creation of a schedule, form, or billing notices for the local income tax. Ongoing costs would depend upon the number of local taxes authorized, the number of residents subject to the tax, the level of self- assessment and compliance achieved, and the extent of the enforcement activities needed. Ongoing costs would include additional storage space, data entry, system programming and maintenance, reports, collections activities, and customer service personnel. COMMENTS This bill authorizes a locally- enacted income tax for cities and counties, approved by a majority of the voters, that would be a discretionary source of funding. The only requirement placed on local governments is that they agree to set up a public safety finance agency and transfer an amount of property tax revenue equal to 50% of the estimated first year local income tax collections to that agency to support local fire service and law enforcement. Local government revenue options have been severely limited AB 1690 Page 4 since the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978. Since then, local governments have looked to benefit assessments, which now require two- thirds voter approval, as a means to augment public safety budgets. All too often, fiscally strapped local agencies are forced to cut public services in order to alleviate local budget woes. According to the author's office, this bill will help local governments that have already implemented cuts in the wake of local budget crises to restore funds, as well as allow other local governments to avoid making them in the future. Proponents contend that California's existing tax structures are inequitable, and unlike Proposition 13, this bill empowers local voters to decide where and how their local tax dollars are raised and spent. Opponents note that new taxes levied at the local level are unprecedented and add another confusing layer of policy that http: / /www.leginfo.ca.gov /pub /bill /asm/ab... /ab_1 690_ cfa _20030604_003836_asm_floor.htm 7/2/2003 AB 1690 Assembly Bill - Bill Analysis Page 4 of 5 0 further exacerbate the problems inherent in California's tax system. Currently, local governments have the authority to place a fire protection benefits assessment before the voters for approval. However, approval of such special assessments require a two- thirds majority approval of the voters, which is higher threshold than the simple majority required under this bill as a general assessment. While this bill appears to follow the letter of the law, there is a long history of litigation since the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978 over the imposition of taxes for specified purposes by local governments and agencies, and this bill seems poised to continue this legacy. The California Constitution clearly states.that local special taxes raised for a specified purpose require approval of a two- thirds majority of voters. It is also clear, however, that taxes levied for general governmental purposes only require approval of the majority of voters., This bill states that the local income tax will be for general purposes, requiring approval of only a majority of the voters, but includes ties that bind the authority to assess the local tax with the establishment of a public safety finance agency that will receive a specified portion of property tax revenue. The end result will be that an agency will be established, a tax will be levied, and the agency will receive funds for specific purposes. The caveat is that the source of the funds, while tied to the new tax revenue, is existing property tax revenues. Proponents contend that since the estimate and shift occur only one time, there is no direct connection between the income tax and the revenues transferred from property taxes beyond the AB 1690 Page 5 first year of implementation, which removes the necessity of the two - thirds vote requirement for special taxes. Whatever the proper interpretation of the law on this matter may be will likely ultimately be a matter for the courts to decide. Analysis Preoared by Mark McKenzie' / L. GOV. / (916) 319 -3958 FN: 0001648 http: / /www.leginfo.ca.gov/ pub /bill /asm/ab... /ab_ 1690_ cfa _20030604_003836_asm_floor.htm 7/2/2003 AB 1690 Assembly Bill - Bill Analysis Page 5 of 5 http: / /www.leginfo.ca.gov /pub /bill /asm/ab... /ab_ 1690_ cfa _20030604_003836_asm_floor.htm 7/2/2003 AB 1690 Assembly Bill - Vote Information VOTES - ROLL CALL MEASURE: AB 1690 AUTHOR: Leno TOPIC: Public safety finance agencies. DATE: 06/05/2003 LOCATION: ASM. FLOOR MOTION: AB 1690 Leno Assembly Third Reading (AYES 91. NOES 35.) (PASS) AYES + + ++ Berg Bermudez Chavez Chu Cohn Diaz Dutra Dymally Frommer Goldberg Kehoe Koretz Laird Levine Lieber Longvil Montanez Mullin Oropeza Parra Pavley' Ridley- Thomas Salinas Vargas Wiggins Wolk Wesson NOES Calderon Chan Corbett Firebaugh Hancock Jackson Leno Le Lowenthal Nation Nunez Reyes Simitian Steinberg Yee Aghazarian Bates Benoit Bogh Campbell Canciamilla Cogdill Correa Cox Daucher Dutton Garcia Harman Haynes Shirley Horton Houston Keene La Malfa La Suer Leslie Maddox Maldonado Matthews Maze McCarthy Mountjoy Nakanishi Pacheco Plescia Richman Runner Samuelian Spitzer Strickland Wyland ABSENT, ABSTAINING, OR NOT VOTING ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ Jerome Horton Liu Nakano Negrete McLeod Page 1 of 1 http: / /www.leginfo.ca.gov /pub /bill /asm/... /ab_ 1690_ vote _20030605_1205AM_asm_floor.htm 7/2/2003 AGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA JUNE 3, 2003 AT 6:00 p.m. CA; Ll- MEETING TO ORDER: 6:00 p.m. PLEDGE TO THE FLAG: COUNCILMEMBER ALARCON INVOCATION: MAYOR PRO TEM CLARK . ROLL CALL OF OFFICE=RS: COUNCILMEMDERS ALARCON, IMPERIA1_, TAYLOR, MAYOR PRO TEM CLARK, AND MAYO f VASQUEZ C 4� I. l PPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR 4 Activity Accounts Account 4100 City Council All Accounts 4110 Administration All Accounts 4120 City Clerk All Accounts 4130 Finance All Accounts 4140 City Treasurer All Accounts 4150 City Attorney All Accounts 4180 Buildings All Accounts P4200 Community Promotions All Accounts 4240 City Garage All Accounts 4250 Appropriation Reserves All Accounts 4300 Law Enforcement All Accounts Except for 8250 4310 Parking Control All Accounts 4320 Crossing Guards All Accounts 4330 Animal Department All Accounts 4340 Street Lighting All Accounts 4350 Emergency Services All Accounts 4360 Narcotics Forfeiture and Seizure All Accounts 4510 Traffic AdminiMration All Accounts Except for 8250 4600 Mnt. Streets & Hwys All Accounts Approval of Consent Calendar (coat.) June 3, 2003 Page 2 I. APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR (coat.) Activit3 Accounts Account 4630 Mnt. Traffic Signals All Accounts 4G40 Mnt. Trees & Parkways All Accounts 4650 Mnt. Signs & Striping All Accounts 4660 Public Transit All Accounts Except for 8300 & New Projects 4700 Planning All Accounts 4710 Building Regulations All Accounts 4720 Engineering All Accounts 4740 Community Improvements All Accounts P 4780 Solid Waste All Accounts 4800 Parks Administration All Accounts 4810 Parks All Accounts 4820 Recreation All Accounts 4830 Aquatics All Accounts 4840 Recreation Fee & Charge All Accounts 4850 Aquatics Fee & Charge All Accounts 41370 Dinsmoor Heritage House All Accounts H. CONSIDERATION OF REMAINING ACCOUNTS (CAPITAL OUTLAY) 4300 Law Enforcement 8250 4500 Construction Streets and Highways All Accounts 4510 Traffic Administration 8250 45130 Construction Traffic Signals All Accounts 4060 Public Transit 8300 & New Projects Approval of Personnel Recommendations June 3, 2003 Page 3 III. Personnel Recommendations A. PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS IV. Adjournment . i THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING IS SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 10, 2003, AT 8:00 p.m. A n� q,_, ' I v VP Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formals to persons with disabilities, as required by Section 202 of [lie American with Disabilities Act of 1990. Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting, should direct such request to the City Clerk's office at (626) 569 -2171 at least 48 hours before the meeting, if possible. Posted 72 hours in advance of the meeting at the City Hall; 8838 E. Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, the I_ A. County Library, Rosemead Branch, 8800 E. Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, and other locations pursuant to RMC Sec. 2801. AGENDA REGULAR MEETING ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 14, 2004, AT 8:00 P.M. CALL MEETING TO ORDER: 8:00 P.M. PLEDGE TO THE FLAG: INVOCATION: MAYOR PRO TEM IMPERIAL COUNCILMAN TAYLOR ROLL CALL OF OFFICERS: COUNCILMEMBERS ALARCON, TAYLOR, VASQUEZ, MAYOR PRO TEM IMPERIAL, MAYOR CLARK APPROVAL OF MINUTES: JUNE 8, 2004 — REGULAR MEET�NG JULY 27, 2004 — REGULAR MEE" ING AUGUST 24, 2004 — REGULAR MEETING OF INTEREST TO CITIZENS WISHING TO PARTICIPATE 1) Those wishing to speak on any Agenda Item, including public hearing, should have their Speaker Request Form submitted to the City Clerk no later than the time immediately following Oral Communications. 2) Immediately after approval of the minutes and again at the end of the meeting, there is a period of time set aside for those persons wishing to address the Council on matters not listed on the Agenda entitled: ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE (please complete the Speaker Request Form stating your preference to speak either at the beginning or at the end of the meeting). 3) Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with disabilities, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the City Clerk's office at 626/569 -2171 at least 48 hours before the meeting, if possible. PRESENTATIONS: I. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE H. PUBLIC HEARINGS —NONE I11. LEGISLATIVE A. RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -40 - CLAIMS AND DEMANDS Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2004 -40, for payment of City expenditures. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR— RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL CCAGENDA:9 -14 -04 Page 91 CC -A ORDINANCE NO. 836 — AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH WAL -MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST FOR DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY LOCATED THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WALNUT GROVE AVENUE AND RUSH STREET (DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 04 -01) — ADOPT This Ordinance was introduced at the Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 7, 2004. Recommendation: Adopt Ordinance 836. CC -B ACCEPTANCE OF WORK FOR 2004 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT ON VARIOUS CITY STREETS The project has been completed in conformance with the approved plans and specifications, and is ready for acceptance. Recommendation: Accept the project, authorize recordation of the Notice of Completion by the City Clerk, and authorize release of the retention payment 35 days after the date of the Notice of Completion. CC -C AWARD OF BID TO EL MONTE FORD FOR THE PURCHASE OF CODE ENFORCEMENT VEHICLE 2005 FORD EXPLORER SPORT TRAC XLS Auto dealers were sent Notice Inviting Bids for the purchase of a 2005 Ford Explorer Sport Trac XLS. Three bids were received. Recommendation: Award the bid in the amount of $22,178.54 to El Monte Ford. CC -D AUTHORIZATION TO REJECT CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY FROM ROBERT KROMAN Claimant states his parked vehicle was struck by a street sweeper. Recommendation: Approve rejection of this claim and authorize that a letter of rejection be sent to the claimant. V. MATTERS FOR DISCUSSION AND ACTION V1. STATUS REPORTS VII. MATTERS FROM OFFICIALS VIII. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE IX. ADJOURNMENT v THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING IS SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 28, 2004, AT 8:00 P.M. Posted 72 hours in advance of the meeting at the City Hall, 8838 E. Valley Boulevard, Rosemead; the L.A. County Library, Rosemead Branch, 8800 E. Valley Boulevard, Rosemead; and other locations pursuant to RMC Sec. 1.08.020. CCAGENDA:9 -14 -04 Page #2 AGENDA REGULAR NFEETTNG ROSENIF.AD CITY COUNCIL CITY LIALL, COUNCIL CIIAM13EIIS ROSY MEAD, CALIFORNIA MAY 27, 2003, AT 8:00 P.M. CALL MEETING TO ORDER: 8:00 P.M. 6/1 � PLEDGE T'O TUE FLAG: COUNCILMANr rnnat:atAl, I INVOCATION: REVEREND SANTIAGO T'EZAGUIC OF T'11E NEIGI4130RHOOD COVENANT CHURCH ROLL CALL OT OFFICERS: COUNCILMEMBERS ALARCON, MPEI TAYLOR, MAYOR PRO TEM CLARK, MAYOR VASQUEZ APPROVAL OF MINUTES: DECEMBER 10, 2002 - REGULAR MEETING ,JANUARY 28,200") - REGULAR Mfr.ET ING v 3 FEBRUARY 11, 2003 - REGULAR MEETING -T- MAY 13, 2003 - REGULAR NIEETING %/ & 3 '� OF INTEREST TO CITIZENS WISHING TO PARTICIPAT F 1) . Those wishing to speak on any Agenda Item, including public hearing, should have their c'��V� peaker Request-Fo1 ni `subiuitted to the City Clerk no later than the time immediately CJ followmg Oral Conuntinications. 2) Immediately after approval of the minutes and again at the end of the meeting, there is a period of time set aside for those persons wishing to address the Council on matters not listecl on the Agenda entitled: ORAL COMMUNICA'T'IONS FROM T'1IE AUDIENCE (please complete the Speaker Request Form stating your preference to speak either at the beginning or at the end of the meeting). 3) Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with disabilities, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the City Clerk's office at 626/569 -2171 at least 48 hours before the meeting, if possible. PRESENTATIONS: IIONORING GARVE1Y SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT'S VICKI SUN AND JENNIFER TANG, AND TEACHER PAT KASAIIIAN, I. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM TITE AUDIENCE. L1. PUBLIC HEARINGS -NONE �ItII/ L��I;Cr,►SI,A'I'IVE ( �l1(kA.'V RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -16 - CLAIMS AND DEMANDS Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -16, for payment of City expenditures. CCAGBN DA' S -27 -03 Pngti n 1 IIIv,. -1 //I 37 V VI CONS I"NTCALENDAR— RLCONIIM1,NDATION: APPROVAL e!C'C -A APPROVAL OF ADDITIONAL FIREWORKS STAND LOCATIONS All deposits have been received and certificates of insurance are on file. Recommendation: Approve the two additional applicants and their stand locations and waive electrical permit fees. CC -B AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND LEAGUE, OF CALIFORNIA CITIES EXI:CU'I'IVGPORUM, JULY I6 -18, 2003, MONTEREY This year's session includes the following topics: State of Affairs of Cities, Maintaining the Public's Trust, Technology, Water Supply, Transportation and Housing. Recommendation: Authorize the attendance of any COUnCilnlember, City Attorney, City Manager and staff as assigned by the City Manager. CC -C AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND 8'" ANNUAL, RISK MANAGEMENT CONI,ERENCE, OCTOBER 8 -10, 2003, CARLSBAD Conference topics include: Developing a Cost Allocation Formula for Your Agency, Risk in Recreation, Employment Law Update, Surviving an OSHA Inspection, Pre - employment Testing Pitfalls and Lessons Learned 0'om Claims and Lawsuils. Recommendation: Authorize the attendance of any COLlncilmember, the City Manager and staff designee. MA'T'TERS FOR DISCUSSION AND ACTION — �� STATUS izu"mRTS -- �� VI1. MATTERS FROM OFFICIALS VIII. ORAL, COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUD,UENCE- IX. ADJOURNMENT THE NEXT REGULAR NIEETfNG IS SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 10, 2003, AT 8:00 P.M. Posted 72 hours in advance of the meeting at the City Hall, 8833 E. Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, the L.A. County Library, Rosemead Branch, 8800 E. Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, and other locations pursuant to RMC Sec. 1.08.020, CAG FNDA:5 -27 -07 rrK� r2 J7 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CROITY MANAGER DATE: MAY 22, 2003 RE: AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND 8'" ANNUAL RISK MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, OCTOBER 8-10,2003, CARLSBAD This year's conference is being held in Carlsbad. Conference topics include: Developing a Cost Allocation Formula for Your Agency, Risk in Recreation, Employment Law Update, Surviving an OSHA Inspection, Pre - employment Testing Pitfalls and Lessons Learned from Claims and Lawsuits. Council and staff have attended this conference on a regular basis. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Rosemead City Council authorize the attendance of any Council Member, the City Manager and staff designee. COUNCIL MAY 2 7 2003 ITEM No._FEr_t6_e CC -A APPROVAL OF ADDITIONAL FIREWORKS STAND LOCATIONS CC -B AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES EXECUTIVE FORUM, JULY 16-18,2003, MONTEREY CC -C AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND 8T" ANNUAL RISK MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, OCTOBER 8-10,2003, CARLSBAD MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER CLARK that the Council approve the aforementioned items on the Consent Calendar. Vote resulted: Yes: Clark, Taylor, Vasquez, Alarcon No: None Absent: Imperial Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. - V. MATTERS FOR DISCUSSION AND ACTION -None VI. STATUS REPORTS - None VII. MATTERS FROM OFFICIALS - None VIII. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE Juan Nunez, 2702 Del Mar, Rosemead, asked when the study session to discuss San Gabriel Boulevard improvements will be held? Bill Crowe, City Manager, stated that the Council will adjourn to June 3, 2003, for the Budget Study Session, and that the capital improvement study session be held on June 10 th , at 6:00 p.m., prior to the regular City Council meeting. Mr. Nunez requested that staff inspect the manholes on San Gabriel Boulevard, as they are in bad condition. IX. ADJOURNMENT There being no further action to be taken at this time, the meeting was adjourned at 8:35 p.m. to June 3, 2003, at 6:00 p.m. Respectfully submitte City Clerk CCM1\:548.03 Page k4 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMEAD CJTY ,COUNCIL FROM: BILL CROWE, ITY MANAGER DATE: MAY 20, 2003 RE: APPROVAL OF ADDITIONAL FIREWORKS STAND LOCATIONS Attached for your consideration are two additional fireworks applicants and their stand locations that the License Department has received for the year 2003. All deposits have been received and certificates of insurance are on file. With these two additional applicants, the total number of fireworks stands in the City total 17. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Rosemead City Council approve the two additional applicants and their stand locations and waive electrical permit fees. BC:js Attachments COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 2.7 2003 ITEM No. 2003 FIREWORKS STANDS ORGANIZATION STAND LOCATION Rosemead Boys & Girls Club 8235 Garvey Avenue Rosemead Athletic Association 8807 Mission Drive **#*�C -A APPROVAL OF ADDITIONAL FIREWORKS STAND LOCATIONS CC -B AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES EXECUTIVE FORUM, JULY 16-18,2003, MONTEREY CC -C AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND 8T" ANNUAL RISK MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, OCTOBER 8-10,2003, CARLSBAD . MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER CLARK that the Council approve the aforementioned items on the Consent Calendar. Vote resulted: Yes: Clark, Taylor, Vasquez, Alarcon No: None Absent: Imperial Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. V.- ___MATTERS FOR DISCUSSION AND ACTION - None VI. STATUS REPORTS - None VH. MATTERS FROM OFFICIALS - None VMM -ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE Juan Nunez, 2702 Del Mar, Rosemead, asked when the study session to discuss San Gabriel Boulevard improvements will be held? Bill Crowe, City Manager, stated that the Council will adjourn to June 3, 2003, for the Budget Study Session, and that the capital improvement study session be held on June 100', at 6:00 p.m., prior to the regular City Council meeting. Mr. Nunez requested that staff inspect the manholes on San Gabriel Boulevard, as they are in bad condition. IX. ADJOURNMENT There being no further action to be taken at this time, the meeting was adjourned at 8:35 p.m. to June 3, 2003,,at 6:00 p.m. Respectfully submitte City Clerk CCMrN:5 -28 -03 Page e4 5 E M E , o � O �JpI T RA I i TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CRO ITY MANAGER DATE: MAY 22, 2003 RE: AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND 8T14 ANNUAL RISK MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, OCTOBER 8 -10, 2003, CARLSBAD. This year's conference is being held in Carlsbad. Conference topics include: Developing a Cost .Allocation Formula for Your Agency, Risk in Recreation, Employment Law Update, Surviving an OSHA Inspection, Pre - employment Testing Pitfalls and Lessons Learned from Claims and Lawsuits. Council and staff have attended this conference on a regular basis. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Rosemead City Council authorize the attendance of any Council Member, the City Manager and staff designee. CDUNCf� AGERDrk V HY 2 7 20D) F i EM No. l EL' - � 'California JPIA eV tt sorut on, in managing rill Please select the Member with which you are affiliated. If you are not a CALIFORNIA JPIA Member, please seled 'Non Member- 8th Annual Risk Management Conference October 8 -10, 2003 Carlsbad, California First Name: ........ ........................ ..... Name Last Name: Titid ......................... First Name or Nickname: Name on Badg City / Organization Rosemead Addres 8838 East Valley Boulevard ei Rosemead Stat CA Zip 91770 -1787 Phon (626) 569 -2100 F (626) 307 -9218 E -Mail Attendee Registration Early Registration (available now - August 14) ),1-fr• / /�ananv n:r�:n nm /arirrti /uvanfe /rm rrrt ch5...19coc..:nnTTl- 7l1l12l1G1 41 Q 10 A IAA 41C 14 A 2 A L P. 4/1 L/n12 Califomia JPIA Page 2 of 4=; NOTE: Each additional registrant after one paid registrant will receive a $50.00 discount F. CALwomu JPIA Member Registratic r , Pre - Conference Workshop (October 8) C Golf Tournament (October 8) includes 18 holes golf, cart, box lunch and prizes Events In order to estimate the number of participants at each event, please indicate the even_ t plan to attend (the cost of these items is included in the registration fee) F! Welcome Dinner (October 8) Breakfast (October 9) r Lunch (October 9) C Movie Night ( Ocotber 9) r7 Breakfast (October 10) Spouse / Guest Registration First Name: Name Last Name: - .- - ----- First Name or Nickname: Name on Badge[--- C Use same address as above Addres Stat Zi Phon E -Mai Spouse / Guest Registration Events My guest Mil attend the following (guests may enjoy both breakfasts free of charge) Iu_. / /___ -__. --- /A A-.-: - L—In ---- - __TTl— ^1IVY1 I1L 1 L 1 G 10 A � n f LL�L A 0 A L 0- Ll1 L/A, California JPIA Page 3 Golf Tournament (October 8) E includes 18 holes golf, cart, box lunch and prizes F. Welcome Dinner (October 8) r Breakfast (October 9). r Lunch (October 9) . C Movie Night (October 9) I- Breakfast (October 10) Speaker / Sponsor Information Please indicate if you are a Speaker or Sponsor at this Conference. f- Platinum Sponsor E. Gold Sponsor C- Silver Sponsor r Speaker Comments Please provide any additional comments regarding your Risk Management Conference Registration. Hotel Reservations: CAUFORNIA JPIA group rate, (available October 7 -9 only) is $159. The hotel charges a resort fee of $10 /night and self - parking is $4 /day. Reservations mus' made by September 5 to receive the discounted rate. Book directly with The La Costa Re and Spa at (760) 438 -9111. Ask for the group rate for CALIFORNLI JPIA. Conference Cancellation Policy: Cancellation must be made in writing or through the website. All refund requests must be made in writing to the CAuFORNIA JPIA 100% refund if cancelled by September 5, 2003, 50% refund if cancelled by September 15, 2003. No refunds after September 15, 2003. Please allow 45 days after the end of the conference to receive refunds. CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY 8081 Moody Street, La Palma, CA 90623 ...........: ..:..... _e,. cicionIniccIKAIAKn. 411 cin12 Califomia JPIA Phone: (800) 229-2343 Email; info(cbcivia.orq Copyright @ 2001 1 Terms &-Cond-itions- I Privacy. Policy. Page 4 of 4-;� --- -L� 10 ------- TT—�A^n^lI lI H! /n, TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMEAADD CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CR'OWE, CITY MANAGER DATE: AUGUST 19, 2003 RE: AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND 23RD ANNUAL CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOCIATION FALL SEMINAR, OCTOBER 3 -5, 2003, MORRO BAY CALIFORNIA Attached for your consideration is information regarding the aforementioned seminar. This year's theme is "Contracting for Municipal Services Works Through Public Private Partnerships ". The Council has attended this Seminar in the past. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council authorize the attendance of any Council Member, City Attorney, City Manager and staff as assigned by the City Manager. COUNCIL AGENDA S E P 2 3 2003 ITEM ado. V- dd-q� (� California Contract Cities .Association. 4 10535 Paramount Blvd., Suite #100 • Downey, California 90241 (562) 928.5533 • FAX (562) 928 -9557 - www.tonlmClalialory Emall ara9�baal.wm July 31, 2003 TO: ALL MEMBERS AND SEMINAR PARTICIPANTS FROM:. CHERI KELLEY,. PRESIDENT 23'd Annual Fall Seminar The Inn at Morro Bay — Morro Bay, California October 3 -5, 2003 Mark your calendars now! The 23`d Annual Fall Seminar will be held October 3 -5, 2003. Our headquarters is The Inn at Morro Bay in Morro Bay, California. You won't want to )_Hiss this infonnation filled weekend, so make your reservations now. The room rates vary depending on type of room available and start at $89.00. The deadline to make your hotel reservation is September 1, 2003. Please do not snake a hotel reservation unless you are sure you will use it. Making reservations just to protect your options denies other attendees a room of their choice, costs the hotel business, is costly for the CCCA, and may actually cost you money. Your guest room reservation is an agreement between you and the hotel. If you make a reservation and later need to cancel, please do so as early as possible so the room may be made available to someone else. The theme for this year is "Contracting forMunicipal Services Works Through Public Private Partnerships. " Programs will include a session on how to balance and manage your tune, while juggling responsibilities between family, employment and your duties as an elected official. The 13th Annual "Jack Parks Memorial" Golf Tournament will be held on Friday, October 3, 2005. Entry forms are included in this mailing. Check our website for updates: contractcities. org CONTACT: CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOCIATION 23RD ANNUAL FALL SEMINAR THE INN AT MORRO BAY — MORRO BAY, CALIFORNIA - OCTOBER 3 -5, 2003 ADVANCE REGISTRATION FORM REGISTRATION FEE: Delegate's Registration is $380.00 and includes the following: 2- Saturday Continental Breakfast ticket; 2- Saturday Luncheon ticket; 2- Saturday Dinner tickets; and 2- Sunday Brunch tickets. NO DAY PASSES Please provide the names below for each DELEGATE AND GUEST. Note: "Guest" is defined as a spouse, personal friend or significant other. Guest privileges will not be used to avoid paying a second registration fee for city or private sector representative. NAME/TITLE GUEST TOTAL AMOUNT ENCLOSED Amount Enclosed NO CANCELLATIONS ACCEPTED OR REFUNDS GIVEN AFTER FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2003 Complete and forward this form, with your check to cover registration fees to: CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES CCCA FALL SEMINAR 10535 PARAMOUNT BLVD., SUITE 100 DOWNEY, CA 90241 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMMEEADD CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CROWE, CITY MANAGER DATE: AUGUST 18, 2003 RE: AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES 80TH CONGRESS OF CITIES AND EXPOSITION, DECEMBER 9 -13, 2003 NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE Attached for your consideration is information regarding the aforementioned conference. This years topics include: Homeland Security, City Employees and Armed Services Deployments, Affordable Housing, Economic Development, Downtown Revitalization and Planning for Growth. Members of the Council who are on policy committees will have their meetings just prior to the opening session. Council Members have attended. this conference in the past and it has proven to be of benefit to the City of Rosemead. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council authorize the attendance of any Council Member, City Attorney, City Manager and staff as assigned by the City Manager. COUNCIL AGENDA S E P 23 2003 ITEM No. Id S£I SlBa'ON 11Wtl3d al`dd awisod's'n '0tl0 LdOtldNON I li llu In 111 llll llllllnll nl�llnnlilllllll Illilllnnil�ll bILI-OLLI6 VO Qv3IAI3SMJ QA119 AaITIr`v'A 8£88 2Jaovgvw A.I.IO 'ISSV 2i3NJVAk I Q'IVXOQ Z60VOI00 LI6 SStJIQ £reOICPd.a +ex * »asssaee +aaaakxss £OOZI'IZ MINUAON 31tl0 880 no NOIIVHISIJ3'd 3ONVAUV EOOZ'9 H330p0 . NOI.LWISIO3N AIUV3 ifipuaasw -mla u a7 pma {Ipso mofi asn ssaema k'— rrr'n'� IV NOI.LMSIDId 2ON982dNOO MrINO 90002 "o'0'uol?ulgwm M N'amu v e!Ue^IAWUad IOEI 3JILL sm s31110 do 30Otl3'i'TwouYN E009 TI-6 n9ulaaao ' mssauuay'aIQ^4sTN Noulsodn d' 531]10 d0 ss3NONoo N109 e /ell ;3) UJAV Imud 6), Gaylord Opryland Resort and. Convention Center ^ MAWIPM� f W�' 1d C'OG�� J 0 F C E�' ISSS[JE , AND T'O��C�' Register now for the 2003 Congress of Cities in Nashville to take advantage of the more than 50 workshops that are being developed to address a wide range of needs identified by leaders from cities and towns of all sizes. Following is a preliminary list of the workshops that will be offered. Access to these workshops — and to five general sessions — is included in the confer- ence registration fee. Visit the NLC web site at www.nic.org to learn more about the workshops and other activities planned for all conference delegates. Creating Jobs for a Strong Worid'orce In light of current economic and final challenges, marry city governments are seeking new ways to develop a competitive workforce and create good jobs Ibis workshop will introduce participants to unique strategies to: serve hard -to- employ individuals through transitional jobs; leverage economic development efforts to secure good jobs for local residerts; and help youth prepare for and succeed in the labor force. .Spending on Homeland Security: Making the Case What are the first responder needs for local homeland security responsibilities? Haw are these needs quantified? What are the costs of providing added security during Code Orange alerts? How are cities and towns keeping track of homeland security expenditures? This workshop will address these questions and provide examples of how cities have reported and tracked casts for meeting homeland security requirements. Media 101 This workshop will offer the basics on presenting yourself in the public spotlight, whether for a campaign, council meetirig or dealing with a crisis. It will include tips on public speaking, message formation as individuals and as a council, and communicating with the public in times of crisis. Downtown Revitalization Proven Strategies for Success This workshop will provide best practices from cities that have undertaken successful revitalization efforts. Also featured, will be the America Downtown, New Thinking, New Life Program, a service from NLC and HyettPalma to help local leaders strengthen and revitalize downtowns. CommunitylD: Growing Your Retail Sector Learn how municipal leaders ran grow their retail sector in their cities and towns. This workshop will explain how leaders can increase their revenues, diversify their tax base and increase employment and satisfy citizens' desire to shop at home Increasing Opportunities for - Regional Communication and Planning for Growth in Rural Communities. Rural and non -rural communities need to connect with each other to enhance the dialogue among themselves By expanding channels for frequent communication, rural leaders will be able to share social and economic concems with other leaders and develop new strategies to address them Divided We Falb Equality and Opportunity in American communities This workshop will focus on NLC First Yce President Charlie Lyons' Presidential Agenda for 2004 and NLC's Futures Report on Economic Inequalities and Disparities This session will provide delegates with the opportunity to discuss changing demographics in regions; identify racial, spatial, and economic inequalities; and offer suggestions on how to start the conversation about then issues lolly. Federal -Loral Relationships: The Grant Process with federal funding cutbacks and grants competition becoming more intense, municipal officials are rethinking strategies tin applying for federal grants. This workshop will provide an overview of exiting grant programs, application processes, associated costs and matching funds requirements, waivers, and technical assistance services. Tour of Duty. City Employees and Armed Forces, Deploymentd Many municipal employees serve not only their community but also their country as members of National Guard or Military Reserve Units Activation of Reserve personnel for extended duty in homeland sevnity and antiterrorism operations limits a city's ability to deliver services and manage its finances. This session will highlight ways cities and twins are coping with this personnel and financial crisis Raising Roofs: Finance Strategies to Increase Affordable Housing City officials are leveraging their ada housing plans to make substantial progress in financing affordable housing. They are engaging lenders, investors and other home financing centers as active participants. This workshop offers practical and sound approaches from creditable sources in how to structure and subsidize affordable hauling. Tax Policy in an Anti-Tax Environment This roundtable session will explore the advantages and disadvantages for cities of the various ways of financing local government in an anti-tax environment. Options will be compared and evaluated based upon a number of criteria, including local autonomy, revenue adequacy, and fafiness. Silver Bullets of Economic Development Technologx stadiums, conventions centers, and gambling are often viewed by local officials as silver bullets of economic development Yet, experts and the media often contend that the costs (economic and social) of these development projects outweigh any benefits received. A panel of city officials and experts will examine the issues surrounding these "silver bullets" and discuss strategies for cities. Strategic Planning for Early Childhood: NLC's City Challenge At the Congressional City Conference in March 2003, NLC President John DeStefano, Jr., Mayor, New Haven, Connecticut. launched a year-long agenda on early childhood success by challenging city officials to develop mule -year early childhood plans Since that time approximately 100 cities and towns have made this commitment This workshop will highlight the progress these Challenge cities have made and how their experiences can be useful to other city leaders. How to Develop an Effective Transportation Plan Highways, transit systems; bicycle and pedestrian facilities, freight condors, and rail projects are developed by metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs). Often, local officials have a decision - making role an MPOs with no training or assistance navigating the myriad of federal and state transportation programs and regulations Find out what you need to know to develop a better plan for your city and how you can better integrate transportation with other city planning functions Keeping the Roof: Predatory Lending Practices in Affordable Housing Predatory lending generally occurs in the sub -prime mortgage market, where most borrowers use the collateral in their homes for debt consolidation or other comumu credit purposes Some lenders have engaged in high - pressure sales tactics and in some rases fr governments are being called on to do more to keep housing affordableby providing regulatory remedies, direct engagement with lenders, and consumer and financial counseling to homeowners. This session will discuss but practices in these areas. Airlines: State of the Industry and What It Means to Your Community Since September 11th the airline industry has experienced tremendous changes in its relationships with the federal government, local communities, and the traveling public Increases in security and decreases in passengers have caused marry airlines to shut down routes and discontinue service to awry communities. This workshop will examine the current state of air travel and actions your city can take to help keep the country connected through air travel. Making the Link Integrating Afterschool Initiatives into Education Reform Afterschool hours provide an ideal time to reinforce children's learning gains and supplement the academic curriculum offered at school. A moderator -led "fishbowl" discussion among participants will highlight the numerous approaches cities have taken to build expanded learning options for all students. No Child Left Behind: Now that NCLB is Law, Cities Must Tackle Implementation; Compliance and Collaboration In January of 2002, President Bush signed into law the "No Child left Behind Act" (NCLB), the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). Several key reforms were included in this legislation and these changes could have a significant impact on local education Participants will hear from a panel of experts about the effects of NCNB to local governments. Recycling Roundtable The members of tit NLC Energy, Environment and Natural Resources (EENR) Steering Committee invite other elected officials who have a recycling pro- gram they would like to showcase, or who would like to learn about recycling programs in general, to this interactive roundtable discussion. Cities of all sizes are welcome. Coping with the New Clean Air Mandates Speakers will discuss the new eight -hour ozone standard and recent changes to New Source Review. Attendees will learn what the new standards mean to their communities, and what can be done to meet them Effective Partnerships for Successful Children's Initiatives Engaging key partners in the community is an effective way for city leaders to develop and promote quality programs for children and their families. Based on examples from cities and towns across the country, attendees will lam how to maximize existing community resources to improve outcomes for children. Developing a Successful Stormwater Program New federal requirements to control pollutants in runoff from municipal separate storm sewer systems are in effect The new rules require implementation of public education programs and municipal good housekeeping practices. This two-part workshop will provide: critical background information for implementing a successful Stormwater Phase 11 program and a discourse on program elements. How to Alert Your Citizens Without Alarming Them: The Role of the Local Elected Official in Communicating about Homeland Security Orange Alert versus Yellow Alert Duct tape and plastic sheeting Screening shoes at airports Many of these attempts to alert and activate citizens have served only to create alarm and panic at one extreme and skepticism and complacency at the other. Join this roundtable discussion about how best to apply the warnings of the federal Homeland Security Advisory System to Your region - whether it's a large metropolitan area or a small rand community. Creative Masterplan: Turning Community Vision into Reality Outdated masterplam are negatively affecting quality of life for residents in cities across the country. During this session experts will discuss effective strate6m to assess how to define community vision in your city and how to translate that into a 21st century mi sterplan..Terhniques that encourage citizen participation, such as chamnes, will also be explored Collaborating fm Student Success Promising Approaches and Lessons Learned Municipal leaders are in a unique position to use their leadership capacity and access to City resources to strengthen and support public schools. in a facilitated discussion, participants will examine promising approaches and lessons teamed from NLC's 30 -month initiative to deepen and enhance the roles of mayors and council members in school improvement and afterschool programs. Spending Smart, Make the Most of Your City's Purchasing Power In times of budgetary pressures and fiscal constraints, one way cites can nuke the most of their tax dollars is through innovative and creative purchasing and procurement programs. One such program, the U.S. Communities Covemment Purchasing Alliance, enables cities and towns of all sizes to benefit from competitively bid national contracts on a variety of goods and services. loin a discussion with local purchasing officials who will give hands-on advice about how to help your city achieve significant administrative and product savings. Varieties of City Government Structures The previous distinctions between the mayor-council and the council- manager forms of government are blurting. Learn about this trend, compare your city's form of government with other cities, and consider how it affects the day - today city aperitiom . Bringing Back the Vote: Why and How to Increase Voter Turnout in Your City Loral leaden can be central to increasing voter turnout in state, local, and national elections. Currently only 40% of eligible voters participate in state and local elemom. Municipal leaders can strengthen democracy by encouraging disengaged populations, such as people of color and young adults, to exercise their right to vote. What Makes Local Elected Officials Successful State and Federal Advocates: Effective Strategies for Influencing State and National Policy Decisions Every day critical decisions are being made that have profound effects on the way cities and towns rtwnge budgets and policy. With high priced lobbyists and slick consultants it can be a challenge for small cities to compete with their larger counterparts for scarce state and federal resources. This workshopwill highlight strategies and methods for effective lobbying Learning through Service: Positive Implimtions of Student Involvement in Your Community While students all over the nation are focusing on GPAs and involvement in campus activities, others are joining a trend of active participation in the community. In establishing relationships and partnerships with campuses and students in their area, cities can enhance the strength of their commdnites and better serve their residents. Building a Relationship With Your Local Media This workshop will fans on how but to interact with members of the local media, with an emphasis on the hometown newspaper. It will include interview tips and information from members of the media on how but to get your city or town's message communicated to the public. Hurricanes, Tornadoes, Floods, and Earthquakes: How to Prepare Your Community for a Natural Disaster Federal, state, and local coordination is imperative in developing a successful plan . for how to respond to a natural disaster to minimize the loss of life and destruction of property. This workshop will help identify planning and funding options for mitigation and preparedness and provide information on what to do immediately following a disaster for effective response and recovery. Homeland Security on a Local Basis: the Patriot Act Enacted shortly after the September 11 attacks, the PATRIOT Act sought to strengthen the capacity of federal, state, and local law enforcement to conduct surveillance and share information necessary for preventing future acts of terrorism tram what concemsand liabilities are involved with carrying out these new responsibilities as local law enforcement agencies seek a balance between protecting the public and civil liberties and fighting terrorism Homeland Security Training Sessions: Lessons Learned First responders must undergo rigorous training and exercises in order to prevent and respond to acts of terrorism and all hazards As these exercises help improve readiness and response capabilities for first responders, what are some of the strengths and weaknesses identified? Workshop presenters will discuss lessons lamed and how they apply to emergency response and preparedness capabilities of other jurisdictions A Parade of Processes: An Exhibit of Innovative Approaches to Community Change This workshop will introduce participants to soma of the most innovative strategies for mobilizing change in these times Participants will be exposed to theories, models and practices of transformational change that will maximize opportunities for community growth and development Changing Communities, Changing Faces: A Focus on Immigration and Language Differences Leaders across the country continue to search for ways to face the challenges and meet the opportunities raised by the arrival of newcomers in their communities. Participants will hear how some communities are addressing hard questrpns, such as who are "we" in the first place? and how many people and which people should be allowed into the community? The Wondering Years: Emerging Challenges Facing Today's Youth This workshop will be a roundtable discussion and will address issues such as: establishing Cay Straight Alliances (CSAs) in schools, the challenges of coming out civil rights issues and, the plats of local officials, in challenging or accepting a family's norms and mores. Keeping Up with Your Elderly Citizens As a growing percentage of city dwellers become older, they will need and demand different services from their municipal goemmenu. Ibis session will examine the impact of the needs of the elderly on city programs and services. Dialogue and Understanding: The Key to Cultural Insight Mary times conflict has and will arise, most often because of communication misinterpretation. As the population in the U.S. continue to rise, so does the number of ethnic groups with van= cultures. This workshop will provide insight on the importance of opening yourself up to the knowledge and understanding of diversity in your community, and how to effectively communicate with citizens of various cultures. Building Communities through Civic Engagement Active citizen participation makes all the difference when it comes to building healthy communities This workshop will examine ways for local elected officials to initiate meaningful roles for citizens to take an active role in the governance of their community. Strategies and examples will be highlighted Making the Most of Your Media Resources This workshop will explore how to but use your local public access channel and other media outlets, including the Internet, to communicate with citizens. Participants will lam how to make an effective Public Service Announcement (PSA) and see examples of the most effective municipal websites. Visit the NLC wehsite at www.nic.org for updates and additions. Please note session titres and descriptions are subject to duange - staf f TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CROWE, JPMANAGER DATE:. NOVEMBER 18, 2003 RE: AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOCIATION SACRAMENTO LEGISLATIVE ORIENTATION TOUR JANUARY 12-14,2004, SACRAMENTO Attached for your consideration is information regarding the aforementioned conference. This annual event provides members of Contract Cities with the opportunity to inform the legislature of our goals and objectives. As this will be a critical year for contract cities, particularly in the area of revenue restoration and protection, the Council's participation is important. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the attendance of any Council member, City Attorney, City Manager and staff as assigned by the City Manager. COUNM AGENDA NOV 2 5 2003 {TEAR No. aiifornia Contract Cities Association o-\__J 10535 Paramount Blvd., Suite #100 • Downey, California 90241 • (562) 928 -5533 • FAX (562) 928 -9557 www.contracicities.org E -mail: ccca97 @aol.com EXECUTIVE BOARD November 13, 2003 PRESIDENT CHERI KELLEY Norwalk TO: ALL MEMBERS & EVENT PARTICIPANTS VICE PRESIDENT MARGARET E. FINLAY FROM: CHERI KELLEY, PRESIDENT - Duane ANTHONY PORTANTINO, LEGISLATIVE SECRETARY/TREASURER COMMITTEE CHAIR DAVID A. SPENCE La Canada Flintridge SUBJECT: SACRAMENTO LEGISLATIVE ORIENTATION TOUR DIRECTOR AT LARGE JANUARY 12-14,2004 MARGARETCLARK Rosemead DIRECTOR AT LARGE DEBORAH H. O'CONNOR Diamond Bar The Sacramento Legislative Orientation Tour is in its 37`h year. The Sheraton Grand BUDGET& AUDIT COMMITTEE RANDY BOMGAARS. CHAIR Hotel is our new conference headquarters. We urge all members of the Association to Bellflower attend. We want our concerns to be considered and we are counting on your support. BY- LAWS COMMITTEE The legislature convenes January 5, 2004 with Arnold Schwarzenegger as our new RAY T. SMITH. CHAIR Governor along with an eager new Assembly Speaker and many new Cabinet and Bellflower Department heads. This may be the most critical year for contract cities and local CITY /COUNTY CONTRACTS COMMITTEE government in general. MIKE DISPENZA. CHAIR Palmdale The history of this tour has proven to be effective in not only developing relationships CITY MGRSJCITY ADM- COMMITTEE with our legislators but it also provides us with the opportunity for face to face contact ERNIE GARCIA. CHAIR Norwalk and a vehicle for open discussion on pertinent issues. LEGAL COMMITTEE We have invited Governor Elect Arnold Schwarzene er to participate. The program � P P P 8 STEPHEN A. DEL GUERCIO. CHAIR La Canada Fluandge will include srriall meetings with legislators; coffee sessions with members of the State LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE Senate and Assembly Leadership; and a reception in the Capitol Rotunda. The ANTHONY J. PORTANTINO. CHAIR schedule below is tentative and subject to change. La Canada Flinuidge RESOLUTIONS COMMITTEE Remember, there is strength in numbers! BEATRICE PROD, CHAIR - Pico Rivera - MONDAY, JANUARY 12, 2004 SELECTION COMMITTEE 9:00 a.m. -3:00 p.m. "Meet `n Greet" with Senate & Assembly Leadership IACQUELIN McHE CHAIR Claremont nt 5:00 -6:30 p.m. Conference Registration & Delegate Reception SPECIAL EVENTS COMMITTEE TUESDAY, JANUARY 13, 2004 JOHN F CRAWLEY, CHAIR 9:00 -11:45 a.m. Coffee Sessions, Legislative Advocacy and Governor's Address Cerritos in the State Capitol , PAST PRESIDENT McTAGGART 12:00 p.m. -2:00 p.m. Luncheon Session - Sheraton Grand Ballroom ho Palos Verdes Rancho Department of Finance - Governor's Budget 5:30 -7:30 p.m. LEGISLATIVE RECEPTION State Capitol Rotunda Guests ojHonor: State Senators and Assembly members, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Constitutional Officers, Governor's Cabinet Members SAM OLIVITO S 1. 5 E M F C 7 of .s E r, z TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEME AD CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CRO , , CITY MANAGER •1 DATE: JULY 1, 2003 RE: AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGERS ASSOCIATION'S ANNUAL CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 21-24,2003, CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA Attached for your consideration is information regarding the aforementioned conference. This year's conference sessions are planned around four theme tracks: Managing in an Evolving Economy, Changing Demographics and Aging Populations, Enhancing and Developing the Profession and Professionalism and Personal Issues Facing Local Government Managers and Their Families. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the attendance of the City Manager at the . annual conference of the International City Managers Association. COUNCIL AGENDA JUL 08 2003 ITEM No. L. �' _L ISC.MA'S 89TH ANNUAL. CONFERENCE 'r i4 i �.s- S.sc1t"�J S ' 1 ♦ �, i is �: x slr,fl �L H. 1y F � ,�1 lLl11II1 LILItlI� � Y 9a � ^'t�'.�y .4Y�6 ' '•�_" N 1 .. E•nu SL 3 i� i — .. ,a -.. ti�K '�T �KC.. Fk� �. ...�� 1�34 y _ ..!•. S t K lLl11II1 LILItlI� � Y 9a � ^'t�'.�y .4Y�6 ' '•�_" N 1 .. E•nu SL 3 i� i — .. ,a -.. ti�K '�T �KC.. Fk� �. ...�� 1�34 y _ ..!•. Ater the session, participants will be invited to continue the discussion in small groups char will focus primarily on the responsibili Lies of local government senior executives. Prior to attending the session. par- ticipants should read two articles on the topic that were written by the Nalban- dians for the December 2002 and May 200; issues of Public Management maga- zine. Links to electronic versions of the articles will also be available on the con - f rence Web site, icma. org /confer- ence2003. This session addresses Practice Groups 2 (Policy Facilitation), 6 (Initiative, RiskTak- ing, D7sion, Creativity, and Innovation), 8 (Democratic Advocacy and Citizen Partici- pation), and 13 (Strategic Planning) and is cosponsored with the Innovation Groups, Inc. Promoting Organizational Excellence In Tough Times (for ICMA Credentialed Managers) Tuesday; Sept. 23, 2:15-5 p.m. When confronted with significant rev- enue shortfalls, public organizations typ- ically initiate hiring freezes, cut navel and employee development activities, and defer investments of all kinds, and they may eventually eliminate services and lay off employees. Such measures, while necessary-, create a grim pallor over the organization. Talented employ- ees leave, and the remaining "survivors" hunker down. Morale and productivity plummet. Frank Benest, city manager, Palo Alto, California, mid Audrey Seymour, assistant city manager, Menlo Park, Cali- fornia, NkU lead this session, which will be limited In attendance to individuals who have received the ICMA Creden- tialed Manager designation. It will analyze the complexities of cutback measures and then focus on strategies for retaining talent, enbancing employee commitment, and promoting orgarun- dora) excellence. This session addresses Practice Groups 1 (Sw E6ccrivcness) and 6 (Initiative, Risk Taking, Fision, Crcarivi.r)t and Innovation). small Community Managers Mrwl Supers ize Your Municipal Resources through Partnering Monday; Sept. 22, 1:15-2:25p.m. Wouldn't it be great to add to vour community's resources without adding to its expenses? With partnerships you can do just that. At this session, you will hear about innovative partnerships, how they conic together, and the lessons that can be learned. Personnel 101 Monda); Sept. 22, 2:45 -3:55 p.m. What is the process for hiring and firm g% How, do you negodate labor contracts? What are the current trends in personnel issues %These and other basic questions will be answered at this informative session. Attracting New (and Retaining Existing) . B u s i n es s e s Tucsda)l Sept. 23, 2:15 -3:25 p.m. This session will teach you how to evaluate the needs of businesses chat you hope to attract as well as of chose that are currently in your conmaunity. Does your community have what they're looking for', If not, how can you provide & Come to this session and find out. How Can I Possibly Do It All? Tuesday; Sept: 23, 3:45 -5 p.m. Good question! What you need are strategies and techniques to help you organize and prioritize. This session will teach you those Ihuigs and help you. to keep your head above water. Assistants and Other Non -CADS To Be or Not to Be... Monday Sept. 22, I:1 —2:25 p.m. How do you make the move from assis- tant to manager, manager to assistant. department head to man ager.'assistanr. How do von know, if such a move is the right move for vou� This session will' provide irsieriit into local government career choices. Mentoring: A Win -Wirt Situation Honda); Sept. 22, 2:45 -3:55 p.m. Managers as well as assisants are encouraged to attend this session and to bring their "menrees' Learn how to foster mencoring opoortunines in vour organization and Let iniormadon on how to choose and be a mentor. THEME TRACKS Managing in an Evolving Economy Design - Build- Operate: 21st-Century Public Works Contracting Monday, Sept. 22, 10:15 -11:45 a.m... Modern forms of competitive and collaborative public works contracting are producing striking time and cost savuhgs, transferring substantial risk to the private sector, and eliciting innova- tive and efficient designs. Get a close look at how and why two cities used the design- build- operate approach to achieve dramatically better results than traditional contracting would have pro- duced in delivering new, scare -of -die -art drinking water plants. Performance Measurement as a Budgeting Tool Monday, Sepr. 22, 10:15 -11:45 a. In. This session will explore how commu- nities use performance measurement in budgeting decisions, resource allocations, and presentations to elected officials. Panelists will provide examples of using performance measurement to set priori- ties and funding levels for jurisdictional services in times of tighter budgers, state mandates, and other cost - cutting scenarios. Reducing Costs through Better Energy Management Monda)t Sept. 22, 10:15 -11:45 a.m. Because ener. use can represent up to 10 percent of their budgets. local governments need to e,,plore ways to reduce ever, use is a nonev- saving strireg`•. Panelists will include emery, efficicncv experts who wiLl discuss energy etrciencv strategies as well as low- -cost financing mechanisms to pav for energy improvements. - -- RANKING ON CHANGE THE FUTURE OF MANAGEMENT (r1 Solutions to State Budget Cuts Monday, Sept. 22, 10:15-11:45 a.m. As many local governments are feeling the squeeze from state budget cuts, managers are consistently being faced with having to do more with Icss.This session will highlight conmhunities that have successfully manal,,ed reductions in state revenues. Participants will take away creative ideas for dealing with economic offsets. Fifty Creative Financing Tools for Local Government Monday, Sept. 22, 1:15-2:25 p. in. Join this roundtable "ideas exchange" to identify at least 50 creative financing too' and alternative revenue sources for local govermnent. Facilitators will lead discussions on alternative service deliv- ery stracegies, debt restructuring. ways to raise revenues for redevelopment to offset lost rax revenue. and more. Financing Economic Development Monday, Sept. 22, 2:45-3:55 p.m. Local eovermnents around die world are facing the critical issue of economic development. At this session, speakers will present practical solutions to issues such as workforce preparedness, business incentives, rein, of resources. and alter- n-ative funding sources. Participants will walk awnh with ideas for developing new snaceeies cc promote economic development in a declining economy. Fiscal Impact Modeling: A Tool for Local Government Decision Making Monday, Supt. 22, 2:45 -5:: 5. p.m. A fiscal impact model can provide information co support management and budget as well as land use and plan - rung decisions on a year -co -year basis. For. local governments, the use of fiscal impact analysis leads to a better under- standing of cite relationships among the various factors contributing to growth and development. and increases their confidence in the fiscal soundness of land use, management, and financial decisions.This session will present dif- . ferent fiscal impact analysis approaches and applications, the latest examples of fiscal impact modeling, and case studies from two communities. Finding Federal Resources to Support Local Programs: Counterterrorism, Land Recycling, Solid waste, and innovative Technologies Tuesday, Scpr. 23, 11:20 a.m. -12:30 p.m. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) provides grants to local governments in the areas of counterterrorism, cleanup and redevelopment of contaminated sites, land use controls, solid and haz- ardous waste treatnnem and recycling, and much more. OSWER also supports a siginficant percentage of ICMA's grant- funded research through such . ICMA progranns as Brownftelds, the National Brownfields Conference; and Community and Economic Develop - ni�yac. join Marianne Laiuont Horinko, :assistant administrator. EPA/OSWER, and representatives of local governments that have used EPA grants to success- . fully address local priorities as they dis- cuss the nun and bolts of obuirung and applying federal funds to support local initiatives. The Economy: Trends and Forecasting Titcsdo)q Sept. 23, 11:20 a.m. -12:30 p.m. Almost eve:v local government ineuhpts ro predict local economic crends.This session will address the difficult topic of predicting die tuture.of the economy. Speakers will present -then- estimates of ,o, , I n n a . . � u n n,u n n, ,ONF F R FNf F trends in die national and international economy, and local govermnent repre- sentatives will describe the methods they use to forecast trends in their communities. Capital Financing and Asset Management Tuesday, Scpr. 23, 2:15-3:15 p.m This session will address the best pmc- tices of fiscal policies for capital financ- ing and the use of standards such as . GASB -34 for cash flow and asset man- agement. Local government practition- ers will discuss public- private funding, design -build projects. bonds. futures retinaihcin„ debt restructuring, and a host of other tools.The session will also deal with internal i iana- "nhenc of capital financing actions. Eldon Fields Colloquium: Promise or Peril? Partnering with the Faith Community Tuesday, Scpr. 23, 2:15 -3:25 p.m. The role of faith -based organizations in the social welfare system has been at the center of the federal public polity debate ever since President Bush pro- posed his Faith - Based and Conhtnunity Initiative.Yec government partnerships . with the faith community are anything but new.This session will provide an overview of the political. administrative. and legal issues involved in working with religious organizations. Panelists will look at a wide variety of ways, from traditional contracting to innovative arrangements, in which local govern- merits have worked with the faith com- munity to provide an array of public services (such as public transportation, public sifm,. and public works) as well as social services. Elements of a Successful Health Care Plan Tuesday, Scot. 23, 3:45 —: p.m. Local government managers use a variety of approaches to address the rapid increase in the costs associated with health cur within die orgauiza- don.This session will provide examples of how government and the privare sec- tor manage these costs and work vvidh employees trod union, or iciais. Partici- pants will tale away solutions to this ditrtcul; onerane issue. smart Growth on the Ground Tuesday. Scpr. 24, 3:45 -5 p.m. Many communities have adopted visions, goals. and policies to support smart growth and are now grappling with the nest stage: getting smart growth projects on the gmund. In this session you will hear results from a 2000 nationwide survey and up -to -date case studies from practicing planners in Adiierican and Canadian commmvties ranging from a town of 4,200 to a county of 9 mullion. Changing Demographics and Aging Populations Services and Outreach for an Aging Population Mondah; Scpr. 12, 10:1.5 -11:45 a.m. How do the needs of an aging popula- tion differ from those of a younger one, and what strategies work best in responding to those needs- How can local govermneno effectively conunuhu- care with die older segment of the conmimhityi Attendees will hear about some approaches that have worked and will participate in a discussion with pan - elisrs and other attendees. Look into My Crystal Ball Moudap, Sept. 22, 1:15 -3:25 p.m. What does the future hold for your community. and how can you plan to meet the corvine challenges' This ses- sion will cover demographic trends and the implications for local gove,- mnents as they look to serve an older and more - diverse population. Providing Effective services to a Diverse community Monday, Scpr. 22. 3:a5 -3:55 n. m. Local governments are increasinJv faced with the need to provide effective services to diverse se_mhenr, of the com- muuiry. Outreach must be provided to =nouns of different cultural orientations. Tells session will cxanun- the issues associated with this subiect. colhsidcr successful esistinL programs, and provide an opoortutun* for discussion with and anhorg panelists and [she audience. NEW! Book Discussion: Geeks and Geezers Tvesda)t Scpr. 13, 11:30 a.ni.- 13:j0 p.m. join vour colleagues in a conversation about the relevance to our profession of the popular new book:. Ceck< and Geezers: Hop, Ern, i'Mics, and Defining Moniews Shape Lcaders, by Warren G. Benrns and Robert J. Thomas. How different are the leadership styles of "leeks;• who matured in the glow of computer screens, and "geezers;' who matured in the shadow of die Depres- sion and World War IF What qualities do they shtoe, What are the forces that enable anyone to ]earn and lead for a lifeinie? To get the most out of tie ses- sion, which will be facilitated by Bill - Buchanan, couury manager of Sedgnvick County, Kansas. and Karen Pinkos, assis- tant to the city uhanager of El Cerrito. California, read the book before coning to Charlotte and come prepared to discuss its concepts. Resources of a Diverse Community Tiicadap, Sept. 13, 11:20 a.m. -11:30 p.m As conununicies become increasingly diverse, local governments need to be aware of the new resources available in their changing cidzenry.This session will look at successfully implemented strategies that focus on diversity as a resource to the conununiry, both economically and culturally. Growing old Gracefully Tlmsda), Scpr. 23, 3:15 -3:25 p.m. How can a community use its aging population to enhance quality of life? This session will discuss programs that use aging residents as a resource or an economic development strategy Atten- dees will pardcpate in a discussion of the issue with panelrsu and other attendees. Managing a Multi-Generational workforce Tusday Scpr. 13• 3:45-5 p.m. An aging workicree introduces new challenges to local government. Managers must deal with many issue$. including succession piannim,- budaet, issues such as retirement and health insurance. and inter - generational con - flicts.As a sizeable portion of the work- force begins to look toward retirement, these issues will loom larger on the horizon for nianagehs.Tihls session will include a presentation of current strate- gies for dealing with these issues and will provide an opportunity for discus- sion with panelists and attendees. Enhancing and Developing the Profession and Professionalism Ethics! Ethics! Ethics! Mondah, Scpr. 31, 10:15 -11:45 a.m. This session will provide case studies and best practices L-oni the Committee on Professional Conduct An interactive session, it will help you to determine the best route to take when faced with an ethics dilenmha of your own. Making the Most of ICMA's Public Awareness campaign Tool Kit Mnuda)� Scpr. 21, 1:15 -2:35 p.m. During this session, you will learn about the tiffany creative ways in which ICMA members and other individuals across the country are using compo- nents of ICMA s "Building Conununi- ies ... It's No Small Chore" tool kit to Spread the word about the value of professional local govennnent manage- ment. Attendees at this session will be able to participate in an interactive discussion of how the tool kit can be used. Diversity within the Profession (Partnering with Diverse Affiliates) Monday, Sept. 11, 3:45 -4:55 p.m. Learn how to recruit and retain diverse candidates into your or-gamzaton. In addition. find out how ICMA 's affiliate organizations wridh diverse memberships link to ICMA and how a stronger con- nection• can be made.T. his session will provide a perfect opporrunin, to learn how you can increase your Pool of pateuial employees. Advocating the Council- Manager Form of Government through a Culture of Professionalism Tuesday Sc!):. 23, 11:20 a.m. -12:30 pm Local tovermmem professionals across the counrry use a varies. of techniques ro proinote the council- manager pan and the value that. professional manage- ment adds to elected officials. residents. the business connnunim and the media. This session will examine some of those technques and help you think about ways to develop your own strategies for successfully advocating the council - manager form of government. Developing Our Newest Managers Tuesday, Sept. 23, 2:15-3:25 p. n,. The future of the local govermnent management profession depends upon the newest and future •generations of managers. This session will share ways in which managers and assistants in their first five years of the profession can be encouraged and mentored. It will dis- cuss ethics, credendahng, career tracks, values, and core beliefs Council /Manager Relations Tucsdap, Sept. 23, 3:45 -5 p.m. This session will provide you with tips oil -how to educate council members about their role in relation to the man- ager's role. It will also offer suggestions for building and maintaining a positive relationship with the council, and advice on what to do if your relationship goes bad. Sometimes It's Personal: Personal Issues Facing Local Government Managers and Their Families So This Is the New Millennium? Retirement in Challenging Times Monday; Scpi. 22, 10:15-11:45 a. m. Girard Miller. president and CEO of ICMA Retirement Corporation, will provide his perenniallv popular program on the state of ICM.4 -RC. the econ- am%. invesring. and retirement. He will cover the scats of the Bush acinutus- nations -ax and bugger paths and the Capitol Hill developments chat aCCet local governments financially. In addi- tion. he will address what three years . of down markets have done to epecu- nons for retirement. what the coming years may bring. and how to realistically plan for a retirement that for many . seems less a reality than it did several years ago. Maximizing Life, Minimizing Stress Adanday, Sept. 22, 1:15 -2:25 p.m. Learn how to identiA7 your personal siims of stress and recognize that you have choices in how you respond to - them.-This session will teach you how to practice positive lifestyle adjusnnents to counter the pressures of everyday life. Retirement Planning for the Public Employee Monda); Sept. 22, 1:15 -2:25 p.m. Most of what we read and hear today in the media about retirement planning is directed toward private sector employ- ees. Bur unlike private sector plans, pub- lic sector plains don't have stock options, ERISA requirements. and Pension Ben- efit Guarantee Corporation guarantees. Retirement benefits for the public sec- tor differ from those of Elie private sec- tor in other significatht ways as well. The characteristic career patterns for local government managers -in particular call for careful planning chat is sensitive to these rechries.This program will outline retirement planning issues and strategies in the framework of public sector bene- ftts and will review illustrative cases. I Stjll Live Here — Honest! Monday, Sept. 22, -'A5 -3:55 p.m. Its couch. but there are ways cc over - coine the challenves of having to spend long hours away from your famiha Come hear some success stories and share some of your own! Employment Agreements: Best Practices for Negotiating Good Agreements Tuesday Sept. v+ 11:20 a.m. -12:30 cm. Learn what to neeoriate before taking a new position, what to include in an employment agreement. and what srracegies will be etfecove in helping you achieve your goals. hh this session. a panel o`managet-s will discuss severance clauses, pnusual benefits. negoultunct strategies. and ocher concaa issues. in addition. ICMA's new model eninlov- men: agreement will be hiphli,hted. Keynote Breakout: Get a Life! Tuesday, Scot. 23, 11:20 a.m. -12:30 p.m. loin Tuesday's keynote speaker Amanda Gore co further explore the role of the nund -bode connection in reducing stress. hnproving communication, build- ing personal relationships, and develop - ing teams of collaborative and nustirt, colleagues. - Retiree Health Care: A Challenge for Employers and Employees Tuesday; Sept. 23, 11:20 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. If Your jurisdiction is currently prodd- ing health care for retirees, you, as man- ager, may find that the costs are escalatin•-, dramatically.Additionally, GASB will soon be requiring you to recognize accruing costs for furore health care benefice in your financial statements. If your conununity doesn't offer these expensive benefits noun, you may feel significant pressure from employee _•roups to provide them in tie future. And if you have to pay for your own health insurance when you retire, that cost is likely to be more expensive than your mortgage and nor tax deductible! This session will review wlia[s happening with costs -, what the GASB statement will require, and what commuihicies can do to dead wich this growing problem. Enhancing Your Relationship with Your Partner Tuesday, .Scm. 23, 2:15 -3:25 p.m. Get some tips on enhancing and sus - curling your relationship with vour part- ner from colleagues who have sustained their partnerships for many years. Hour do they do ic: is there a secret.-, Hear it from die experts! r i it . V TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMEAL Y COUNCIL FROM: BILL CROP CITY MANAGER DATE: MAY 21; 2003 EXECUTIVE FORUM TULY 16 18E2003, I UITTEREYA CITIES Attached for your consideration is information regarding the aforementioned conference. This years sessions include the following topics: State of Affairs of Cities, Maintaining. the Public's Trust. Technology; eater Supply, Transportation and Housing. Council and staff have attended this conference in the past- RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council authorize the attendance of any Council Member, City Attorney, City Manager and staff as assigned by the City Manager. �tf! P i( 2 l 20 1 M LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ] qoo li STREET T r�ixsla PftOGRE55�THR0 UGH LE. P.RNING An.noucinol�r the 014q AND COUNCIL MEMBERS E.,CUTIVE FORUM Wednesday, July 16 - Friday, July 18, 2003 and ACADEMY WORKSHOPS Friday, July 18 - Sa.turde y, July 19, 2003 Monterey Conference Center, Monterey, California. You Will Want To Attend If You Are A... Mayor i Council Member City Manager You Will Benefit From These Two Programs By... ➢ Empowering yourself with current state budget information Gaining a better understanding of California's housing crisis ➢ Learg how to maintain the public's trust in local govern nin ment Making and renewing valuable contacts and friendships v V Earning Advanced Leadership level credit in the League's Mayors and Council Members Academy (MCA) Hotel Reservation Deadline Tuesday, June 10, 2003 Registration Deadline Friday, June 20, 2003 Executive Forum Preliminary Program Thursday July 17, 2003 Please Note: Session times. titles. and tonics are subiect to change. Registration and Cih7Books Open - Montere» Corzjerence Center 7:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Concurrent Breakfast Issue Briefings and Discussion Forums 8:00 — 930 a.m. BRIEFING: SETTING SENSIBLE TECHNOLOGY POLICIES FOR YOUR CITY Have you heard of working smarter and not harder? Technology is a key factor in working smarter.. From communicating to finding needed information on the web, technology affects the way we work, play, and manage our lives and those we represent. Learn what your city can do to set sensible technology policies. BRIEFING: WATER SUPPLY- HOW DOES A CITY PREPARE FOR THE FUTURE? Water sustains life and our supply of water is a growing concern. The public has a heightened awareness of potential shortages. Learn how to make better decisions on housing and redevelopment, as water becomes a more serious issue. FORUM: INVESTING IN THE FUTURE — CONNECTING WITH THE NEXT GENERATION OF CITIZENS How can you help the next generation of citizens become interested in city government? Learn what is being done to promote youth programs and local government so your constituents of the future are connected to their city. FORUM: SERVING OTHER CULTURES California is a collection of cultures. Effective communication with diverse cultures in _ your community is always a challenge. This interesting discussion explores what others have tried and what has been successful so you can be more effective. FORUM: SMALL CITIES - INFORMATION AND ANSWERS Small cities with populations under 15,000, that are not adjacent to larger cities, have unique issues andproblems. Here is a chance to participate in a round table discussion to share solutions among officials from smaller cities. General Session CITIES' LEADERSHIP ROLE IN PROVIDING HOUSING 10:00.- 11:45 a.m. This session will look at the various and conflicting issues defining California's housing crisis, how all cities are affected and how cities are taking the lead in solving the problem. Consider the options available to cities and how you can create the climate to exercise those options. General Luncheon Noon - 1:45 P.M. IS CALIFORNIA DREAi ZING' TIME TO WAKE UP! What are the major issues facing California in general and specifically for cities" W Budget, education, and housing are just some of the rrajor topics of public interest. Find out more at 'this luncheon. Thursday JuIv 17, 2003, continued Please Note: Session Limes, titles, and tonics are subiect to change. PUBLIC SAFETY ISSUES - GANG MITIGATION, MEGAN'S LAW UPDATE, AND THE AMBER ALERT PROGRAM Public safety and security is on the mind of everyone these days. In General. cane activity has been increasing along with crime. Learn how Meean's Law and the Amber .Alert System has helped to increase public awareness of crimes and help to solve some of them. FACILITATOR SKILLS FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS - PART II This is a continuation of this topic from the 2:00 - 3:15 p.m. session. Latino Caucus Reception 5:00 - 6:30 p.m. Eveninu Free Friday. J>xlyl.,_ -2 3 Please Note: ,,Session times: _ titles; .and topics.are subiect to change. Registration and CityBooks. Open - Monterey Conference Center. 7:30 — 11:00 a.m. Breakfast Issue Briefings and Discussion Forum 8:00 — 9:15 a.m. BRIEFING: HOT LAND USE ISSUES Learn about hot land use issues such as land acquisitions and casinos, and hillside development ordinances and how to set policies to deal with them. BRIEFING: COASTAL CITIES ISSUES What are the changes in the coastal commission and how does that affect your programs and options. Learn to better manage your city within.these restrictions. FORUM: CITY"- SCHOOL COLLABORATION What options and actions leverage resources in the public interest in the efforts to foster a good partnership? Discuss with others who want to achieve the same goal. FORUM: WEFLA AE THE N'EWTECHNOLOGY — NOWWFLAT? What technology is available to make your life easier and how can you use it Come prepared to discuss real problems and how technology can help solve them. FORUM: ATTRACTING TALENT TO YOUR CITY HALL What can you as an elected official do to help draw the best and fnx brightest to work for your cirv? Explore your options in this informative session. Academy Workshops Program Friday, July 18, 2003 These Academy Sessions require a separate registration. You must select a workshop to be registered Registration and CityBooks Open - Monlerey Conference Center 11:00 a.m. - 5:00 P.M. Concurrent Workshop Sessions 1:30 - 5:00 p.m. BUILDING COLLABORATIVE PARTNERSHIPS: AN INTRODUCTION TO INTEREST -BASED PROBLEM SOLVING AND NEGOTIATIONS - PART I Cities are becoming increasingly interested in cultivating relationships with employees and citizens that are consistent with values of community building. This includes approaches to negotiations, workplace relationships; and customer service. While you may not always be at the table, it is essential that you have a working knowledge of the principles and processes that are at work and the vital role that elected officials play in encouraging and supporting these approaches. This intensive and interactive two -part workshop will give a solid introduction to these increasingly valuable tools. Part II follows on Saturday. PRESIDING OFFICER WORKSHOP - PART I Have you ever sat through a meeting where the presider did not keep things focused and moving? Have you ever participated in various public meetings and felt things were not as orderly as you'd like? Do you ]crow how to get your points across and build consensus'? This workshop will provide some practical tips and skills for participating and running a meeting and give you a chance to practice what you have learned. It will cover both formal procedures and more informal facilitation skills. Part II follows on Saturday. THE FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBILITIES OF ELECTED OFFICIALS: BUDGETS, AUDITS AND MEANINGFUL REPORTS - PART I As a trustee of the city, you have a special and serious obligation to safeguard the fiscal assets of the public. Do you know how to best carry out this responsibility? Do you know the right questions to ask? Do you know what to look for in financial reports to determine if things are in good or bad shape or are trending in a certain direction? Come to the first of a two -part session for practical answers. Part II follows on Saturday. UNDERSTANDING REDEVELOPMENT PART I - ITS PURPOSE, POWERS, AND FUN*DLNG A panel of experts in the field of redevelopment will present the basics of what a redevelopment agency does and how it is financed. By attending this session, you will gain an understanding of redevelopment fundamentals that apply to every agency including the legal basis and powers of a redevelopment agency, how project areas are adopted and how property tax increment works and buying and selling property. Part II follows on Saturday. Reception 5:00 - 6:00 p.m. .4:....t..,.,..e ....et.,,. o ,A aw frionAc wiin ran heln you do your iob better. Re.gistration Refund Policy Special Accommodations Guest/Spouses Local Activities Hotel Reservations Hotels Airlines Directions L' Registrations postmarked by Frida}'. June 20, 2003. will receive in additiott to program materials and event coupons, a $25 discount coupon to be used at the CityBooks bookstore. 'Cit Books can help increase your leadership skulls and professional knowledge in vital areas. bon't miss this grea4 way to expand and share your leaning with colleagues at city hall! Full payment must accompany the registration form. Check, Money Order, Visa or MasterCard are accepted. The League is unable to accept purchase orders, American Express or Discover cards. If paying by credit card please fax your registration form to (916) 658 -8220 or register online at mww.cacities.org/events Executive Forum Full Conference City Officials $370.00 Other Public Officials 5420.00 All Others $470.00 One Day Only City Officials $225.00 Other Public Officials 527500 All Others $325.00 Acaden-..y Workshop Full Workshoo City Officials $290.00 If you have questions, please contact the League Conference Registration Office at (916) 658- 8291. Advance registrants unable to attend this meeting will only receive a refund of the registration fee, less a $50 processing charge, by submitting a written request to the League of California Cities, Conference Registration Office, 1400 K Street, Sacramento. CA 95814, fax (916) 658- 8220. Requests for refunds must be received by Friday, July 11, 2003, Substitutions may be made, even on -site. 0 If you require special accommodations related to facility access, communication and/or diet, please contact our Conference Registrar at (916) 658 -8291. There is no registration fee to attend the Mayors and Council Members Executive Forum sessions for guest/spouses who are not city or other public officials or vendors to cities. Guest/Spouses of registered attendees may purchase meal tickets for an additional fee at the meeting registration desk. For information on events within in the City of Monterey, please contact the hotel Concierge desk or visit www.gomonterev.org. Please complete the Hotel Reservation Form and mail or fax it to the Monterey Housing Bureau OR make your reservations on -line at www.cacities.org /events. Reservations must be received by Tuesday, June 10, 2003 and will require a deposit. If you are unable to attend, the deposit will be refunded if your reservation at the Marriott Hotel is cancelled 48 hours prior to arrival date or at the Doubletree Hotel is cancelled 24 hours prior to arrival date. Doubletree Hotel; Monterey Marriott Hotel 2 Portola Plaza 350 Calle Principal Monterey, CA 93940 Monterey, CA 93940 (83 1) 619 -4511 (83 1) 649 -4234 $165.00 single /double (plus 10.05% hotel tax) $161.00 single /double (plus 10.00° hotel tax) Valet parking S15 /day, self - parking S13 /day Valet parking $15 /day, nearby self - parking S5 /day www.doubletreemohterev.com www.mamott.com Check the League Web page, wnzw.cacities.org!travel, for the new Enhanced Local Government Airfare Program From Northern California Take Highway 101 South to Highway 156 west to Highway 1 South Exit at Pacific Grove /Del Monte Avenue. Continue down Del Monte Avenue for 1.5 miles, staying in the left lane. Stay to the left past the fork following downtown signs (not going through the to nel). The convention center is 2 blocks up on the right side in Portola Plaza (Right rum off Del Monte Blvd.). From Southern California Traveling On 101 North Take Montere } Peninsula Exit. which will bring you to Highway 6S. Travel on Hiehw'ac 68 to Highway 1 South. Take the rust Monterey exit Turn right at the first stop light. (Camino Aguapto) and continue until it dead -ends. Turn left on Del Monte Avenue and stay to the left past the fork following downtown signs (not going .. ..-. I _a:..0-1_ .. :- -- Playa (R ioht ORA& Rosemoad Community Development Commission " 8838 East Valley Boulevard, CA 91770 Tel 626.569.2100 Fax 626.307.9218 R(p( TO 140'\IOR'\BLECRA!F1\iA-NT AND 1,E? HERS ROSEI\, SAD COb^_MIU1 \7ITY DES ELOPI \dal CO) R LSSIOI' FROM: BILL CIiOwE -, CITi' blkNtAGER DATE: ?,24'r' 3 9. 200= RE: ,,UTHORIZATION TO ATTEND TNTEFX-ATIONAL COUNCIL OF SHOPPPvG CENTERS VEESTERN D5TISION C0147FERENCE HN7 DEAL MAKING, ING, PALMI SPRINGS. SEPTEIviBER 16-19: DOJO Att'dl'ned for \'ou7 COnSlder atICI', L info=a7don ."e^_ard -lll°_ the aforeIDEntloned coi;iPreac Th1.s ear`s session topics include: Dinui_ acid Food Trends is ^•.ez l; T� "`�' the F eta l Bubbly. Burst "., Homebuildinc and Retail. and the usual Deal Mating and E)-positio-LL Members of the Com rlssic n and staff have attended this conference m the past and it has pro \�en to be an cxcelieni opportumt., to introduce the Cit} to potential de\-elopers. P.E C O ?vL• fE>`; D A T I ON It is recor_uneuded thai the. Rosemead CornmtmiiN Dt-VeloPment Com- ad -sion authorize the aLCendanoe mnssion Member. Execunve Di eCtor and S�af;S Lssimed by the of an \: CO* E:xtm Live Director. r. 7 6VAU l0 1pi ZVVJ 1 9:00 — 10:00 am OPENING GENERAL SESSION Wal- Mart... The Analyst's. Assessment Wal -Mart's position as the worlds dominant retailer raises the anxiety level of smaller community shopping centers, grocer• chains and regional mall owners in secondary markets. Given its sheer size, market lout, access_ to capital and massive adverusrng budget, competing retailers are forced to adopt its "price is everything" approach or clearly differentiate its offering in quality and/or convenience. A panel of retail specialists will break down Wal -Mart s remarkable performance, its strategies for continued gw� rorh and its expanding impact on Corporate Arnerica. 9:00 am -5:00 pm INFORMAL DEAL MAKING Take this opportunity to have a seat and talk about your deal instead of standing in me hallway. Due to popular demand, half of the California Grand Ballroom in the Vlyndham has been set up for informal deal making. There will be unassigned tables and chairs available on a first -come, first - served basis. Have some coffee and make some deals in a comfortable environment created just for you. 10:00 — 11:00 am GENERAL SESSION Legends of the Game — Dining and Food Trends in Retail A panel of food industry legends shares its experiences and offers views of dining and food trends and the historic integration with retail. Sit -down restaurants, casual dining, and fast food reflect the changing tastes of America as the customer desires more prepared food. As dining and food components continue to complement and energize various retail formats, our "legends" provide industry insights into their world and efforts to be competitive. 11:00 am — 12:00 noon CONCURRENT SESSIONS A. Will the Retail Bubble Burst? Retail continues to produce despite a sluggish economy, low consumer confidence, international conflict and state:ecbnomicwoes. Retail has been an investor sanauan with the softening of me equity markers. Cap rates across the retail product spectrum have dropped to twenty year lows ... driven there by a broad array of new buyers and very efficient debt. Favorable interest rates have maintained pricing despite declining fundamentals. Will retail values hold and what trends will foretell a weakening.' Gain the perspe-ive of an enlightened panel on the issues of the current market and what is in store. B. Homebuilding and Retail — An Expanding Interdependence Homebuilding continues to drive construction nationally and contribute to the growth of goods and services. Homebuilding experts in this session will identify the hot residential j rrrowrh markets and the broadening array of residential product mat osiers new opportunities i for alignment with retail. Expanding innll opporrunities. and communities desire for mixed -use projects spur new interdependence between the retail and'nomebuilding sectors. 3 i; i l i 1 , 12:00 noon — 1:00 pm LUNCHEON SERVED 1:00 — 2:00 pm KEYNOTE PRESENTATION 5:30 — 7:30 pm BEER $ WINE GARDEN PARTY Enjoy premium wines and micro - Brewed beers with 3,000 of your closest friends and associates poolside at the Wvndham Hotel! For parriupant and sponsorship opportunities for the Beer & one Garden, call Geoff Reealund, Hughes Investments at (949) 759 -9531, eat. 241. 8:30 am — 3:30 pm REGISTRATION 8:30 — 9:30 am CONTINENTAL BREAKFAST SERVED 9:00 am — 4:00 pm DEAL MAKING,AND TRADE EXPOSITION 12 noon — 1:00 pm BOX LUNCHEON SERVED 4:00 pm CONFERENCE ADJOURNS Here's your chance to ger your company's name in lights! We are offering Sponsorship opportunities at the.Western Division Conference again this veal. The exposure you will receive is invaluable! It includes Bering your company's name in the program, frequent mention of your company's name on banners, table tent cards and on a video that will be tun before the general sessions and luncheon at the meeting. If you would like to participate in this exciting marketing opportunity, call iulie Trevino at (949) 224 -3830 or e -mail her at jrrevino@iesc.org E� �.I r a< `r TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSE WAD CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CMVE, CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 16, 2003 RE: AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND ANNUAL LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE, SEPTEMBER 7 -10, 2003, SACRAMENTO Attached for your consideration is information regarding the aforementioned conference. There will be sessions on Fiscal Stability, Effective Grassroots Advocacy, Housing and Land Use, Public Safety, Infrastructure and Transportation, and Legal Issues. Council members and staff have attended this conference on an annual basis. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the attendance of any Council member, City Attorney, City Manager and staff designee. COUNCIL AGENDA U N 2 4 2003 � Q Eg - t2 ell E2 L N = O > K N G N � A N C T Z w H n tz O T C - !1 .2 ZE �'_ >__ _•m 1 ms z o n m = ER Ew ZE O ER - v o � z T r O -v T Z 9. T T T T N ZE ° C v = O ° o K � C 2 - K N C ^ o ^ -- 731_ °_ P m_ O ER - O O O O E. - -_ — yam`^° �F-ti ° c _ L o apo c _ _. � m _ Q � c_ A r — T Z • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • T — O o O N� N n o< Q O' O' Q O -Do `� 1 `� < �. o M r n O T o m N o ^ -- 731_ °_ P m_ O ER - O O O O E. - -_ — yam`^° �F-ti ° c _ L o apo c _ _. � m _ Q � c_ A r — T Z • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • T — O o O N� n o< Q O' O' Q O -Do `� 1 `� < �. p N O o O O O N O (D CJ n CO u C ° N CD m f1 (D D n n o m O o C 3 G E CD a -. N r _ r CD o m co O o D E3 D o c C ° Q ° _' N 3 4 N n N D O CD O D CD _ CD. < - cz '- ° O co m c Q = r — c R - IMF m y -- u u— z z— c a I Z 9 00000. _ :i C_C C�n0000 i p° Cc O'_v" f" H �= _ %v x>O�A y `gyp= Ay ? N _ _ - _ i T _' n-- 52 Z > _> N_ c = T a< o tq o A -? M 3 3 o A y as m 3T 3 aQ cCO V_ _ N v I Q x x O T N O O 'O N G N O O p p' TON a O- C^ _ —4 m O 'O " -3 H !" c O 'O n -° CD S pP r. W O ID J < _ u c a o To ° x a o° o o Imo m rt c o (D = Z o_= n e =i_ ■ ■ ■ ■ _ ■ ■ ■ m x ° Z Z n-0 o g v—-_ ° co - o ti J °_ � n° r- o J o— D ° � o c O yr' _ s C a D F (D v= u p J D p = V J J n c i O M O n 7C O n p— O N' < p� O m N N O? m O n 0 'O p �_ c p (D Q W M N< C N Qj N C O c to D O (c O O p.p o co T Q O =1 O n O o p ' N' C L—' (D p O T O ,G ZD p .� p'' O-< D O o c- _�_� C_ (D x n- (D=° D v (m N CD O o C no N ^, O o O C, < V EEL (D C_ 0 !D J O N � r N m N .-J O =T N m C O OD „ .. v _ - _ _ CD C) m (D J G o G O O T N Z c. 0 c `n N =❑ p N L C �7 Z•� O O. " n 3 n O O a v x C� ? m N Z m nDO o'm `N °_., N >j G� v =� cna o NZ o U y a D� ?? = N o n c e O -- ��- O C -0--q �.0 �� C 2 j� 2 c m Z CI- T, _ _ = m `� Z o o? c 2 (� p Z �`-�' m o v n m m nD c '< n> o e o(D 2 v d o �' � -; - aZ c o o. m C L N rte. 3 m v+ f° (D H n m m' c -ti -0 CD = u- c g >?_ a m R? y o �^ o LID o < m c m n D<— 3 D O N J p G: C -O n 2 m m L" < O C C n C (C N c N C N r F '� L- (D N r, 0 0 N m N p co O O_ m N s 0 =m (D D N n0 CD c T L C� o° nC -� m O L n c n 0 �, O a n M 3 _ .� (D (D cD G (n CD D 2 N p- F S_ — '�' o D m O m (D C m n =m Op °mN— '`o m °n � Z 3= m(D0 n eCO N o o p_ N V D Co < n N e O S'� O N n = s C C n n n (D m - N N n C 0 0 _ O_ tD = i0 N Q 'O _ (p c FD O '< G_ T^ n n Q m O G N vOi �` n O N C(� O C °fro= �O °0 (Dc "m N n c <� C7 FD m C a m m' o e C sm L (D 0- m>> Z 4 m cm (D o m CD v r - r a a Z v n C Z n 3 T T N a n a v_ c o p- O < n N m -'-Z D � o _ a CL a G 7 C (D (D C C (C T C rS -J (D T O (L1 7) L r - r a a Z v n C Z n 3 T T N a n a v_ f } z T O D O z c o p- O < n N m -'-Z 2 -O CD _ a 7 C (D (D C C (C T C rS -J (D T O (L1 7) a T L (D n n L 0 3 0 G O O m C ` N n G' O T-4 o_N CD O -pp N N m D N N CD C C) G O o (r -m< p= y� Lo p -]i CD �, 0 0 7- p m ry n ° O- Vf N m m C n _(D M m o s o`er C- o< _C - Op co O N W 0 C) n 0 Q _ J m _. c o Z n 3 c m e a x. < C M 2 n L. N m m C< `� rD C O N a _ C T n C L N p< O C M ID — e O O n = O O r.. .�. p = N =. i s O C C? _ R _O — r p ry n ti O c X ` —1 ^ L r` Gi c - n. a ¢ r _ - T f } z T O D O z 'E M r0 9 ll \�7 u TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL ` FROM: BILL CROW &Y MANAGER DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 2003 RE: AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE: GUARDING THE PUBLIC CHECKBOOK, APRIL 22-24,2004, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS Attached for your consideration is information regarding the aforementioned conference. There will be sessions on: Infrastructure Planning and Financing; Financial Accounting, Reporting, and Annual Audit; and Local Government Capital Financing Strategies. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the attendance of any Council member and staff as assigned by the City Manager. CO.LINC!L AGE`N°;L A NOV 2 5 2003 . ITEM No. Guarding the Pu blic Check.Wlok 1 M fY.ro�'s $Y.`kc . �� •. , i�PVfi.� _x±"ss..Aa n_FA.. GLFi"3I li .s ^ � _ .. �.- .'.. 1 � �f ' } 4 lo 0 COSPONSORED BY THE FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES AND THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE .. u .............. ............................... ................................................ i............ .............................._ Understanding Your Role People often enter life as a local elected official with a pocketful of wonderful ideas to improve their city, school district, or county. It doesn't take long, however, before they hit a seemingly impenetrable barrier that frustrates their plans — a lack of understanding of their goverrrnent's budget and finances. Overseeing finances is not an easy job. As a local official, you are ultimately held accountable for your city budget and finances. It is the responsibility of the local official to know and understand the city budget, capital improvement programming and prioritization, as well as develop effective fiscal policies and understand local government financial administration Constituents expect their leaders to have integrity, along with the knowledge, skills, resources, and abilities to build a sound financial position for their city. Understanding Your Financial Oversight Responsibilities How do you live up to constituent expectations? There is a dearth of easily understood budget and financial information; much of the financial literature is written in a very technical and detailed manner. Yes, budgets, capital plans and financial reports can be intimidating. But they don't have to be. Take advantage of the opportunity to work in a small group setting and broaden your understanding of local government finance. Join leading trainers and experts who specialize in local government finance issues. Engage in a program where you can learn strategies and tech- niques to increase your proficiency and comfort in dealing with financial oversight responsibilities as an elected official. Gain knowledge of budget manage- ment, capital improvement planning, financial crisis warning signs and the perils of micro- management. Establish Accountability and Fiscal Responsibility As a leader, you must find effective solutions to emerging concerns and challenges in your commu- nity. Learn how to put capital facilities and infrastruc- tures into place Learn to develop strategies fo`r establishing a policy framework for capital budgeting in an effort for maintaining adequate operating fund balances and funding capital reserves. Solve the mystery of local government accounting as you learn the whys, what's and how's of the annual financial report and understand its key elements. The National League of Cities Leadership Institute on 'Local Government Finance: Guarding the Public Checkbook' will broaden your understanding and ability in dealing with financial oversight responsibili- ties to help you better serve your community. Local Government Finance: Guarding the Public Checkbook The preliminary schedule of events for the seminar (subject to change)... Thursday, January 29th / April 22nd 1:00-6:00 pm REGISTRATION Exploring Clearwater, FL /San Antonio, TX (on your own) Friday, January 30th / April 23rd 8:00 am CONTINENTAL BREAKFAST 9:00 -12:00 noon Dollars & Sense: Guarding the Public Checkbook * Len Wood 12:00 -1:30 pm LUNCH 1:30 -5:00 pm Dollars & Sense: Guarding the Public Checkbook * Len Wood 6:00 pm - RECEPTION Saturday, January 31st / April 24th 8:00 am CONTINENTAL BREAKFAST 8:30 -10:30 am Infrastructure Planning and Financing for Local Elected Officials * Dr. A. John "Jack" Vogt 10:30 -12:00 noon Local Government Capital Financing Strategies Roundtable * Ken Bacchus, Moderator Panel: Councilmember Renee Flowers; Mayor Pro Tem Ralph McCloud; Mayor Pro Tem Jacob Montoya; Councilmember Greg Patton; and Mayor Dottie Reeder 12:00-1:30 pm LUNCH 1:30 -3:30 pm Financiat Accounting, Reporting, and Annual Audit * David Bean 3:30 -5:00 pm Local Government Accountability and Fiscal Responsibility Roundtable * Ken Bacchus, Moderator Panel: Councilmember Renee Flowers; Mayor Pro Tem Ralph McCloud; Mayor Pro Tem Jacob Montoya; Councilmember Greg Patton; and Mayor Dottie Reeder Core Competency: Competent Practitioner... 8 Credits In the Certificate or Achievement in Leadership program .. �" w �.. _ _� -T _. N TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND I\EMBERS . ROSEI\ EAJ3; ITY COUNCLL ' FROM: ' BILL CRO�17, CITY 1 ANAGER DATE: MAY 21; 2003 RE: AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND LEAGU OF CALIFORNIA CITIES E'K,�CUTIVE FORUM, JULY 16- 18.2003, I4UNTEREY Attached for.your consideration s nformation regarding the aforementioned conference. This years sessions include the following topics: State of Affairs of Cities; 1\4ainta Wing. the Public's y; 'Water Supply. Transpor<aiion and HoLsmg• Council and staff ha�ie attended Test; Technolo this conference it the past. RECOA4MENDATION It is recommended that the Council authorize the attendance of any Council Member; City . Attorney, City Manager and staff as assigned by the City Manager. C2JU.i�CI AGE, -DIA - (IE,iNo.`� LEAGLir. OF CnUS . aim 6 SIRE9 Annoucin' L ®MAYOR .AND COUNCIL M.EMBERS .. ExECUT'I -\TE FORUM Wednesday, July 16 - Friday, July 18, 200 . 3 and ACADEMY WORKSHOP'S Friday, Jul3,,'18 - Sa.turday, July 19, 2003 Monterey� Conference Center, A1on.terey, California You Will want To Attend If You .4-re A... i Mayor . Council Member i- City Manager - You Will Benefit From �hesedTwo rPrograms ate budget information ➢ . Empowerin, y g crisis 7_ Gaining a better understanding of Califonia's housing Learning how. to maintain the public's Lust in local government i . Making and rnevnng valuable contacts and .friendships . 11 vvtaming Advanced Leadership level credit in the League's Mayors and Council Members Academy (MCP.) Hotel Reservation Deadline Tuesday, June 10,.2003 ' Registration Deadliize ' Friday, June .200' Executive Farurn Preliirinazy Pro cram 7) Thursday 3ul`-17,.2003 Please Note: Session times. titles. and tonics are subiect to chance. Registration and Cit}'Books Open - A4onterev Corijeren.ce Center i:_O a.m. - 5:00 p.m: Concurrent Breakfast Issue Briefings and Discussion Forums 8:00 - 9:30 a.m. BRIEFING: SETTING SENSIBLE TECHNOLOGY-POLICIES FOR YOUR CITY Have you heard of working smarter and not harder? Technology is a key factor in working smarter. From communicating to finding needed'information on the web, technology affects the way we work, play, and manage our lives and those we represent. Learn what your city can do to set sensible technology policies. BRIEFING: M ATER SUPPLY- HOW DOES A CITY PREPARE FOR THE FUTURE? ; Water - sustains life and our supply of water is a' growing concern. The public has a hei_htened awareness of potential shortages. Learn how to make better decisions on housing and redevelopment, as water becomes a more -serous issue. FORUM:. INVESTING IN THE'FUTURE - _CONNECTING WITH THE NEXT GENERATION OF CITIZENS How can you help the neat generation of citizens become interested in city government? Learn what is being done to promote youth prog7ams and local govenm�ent so your constituents of the future are connected to their city. FORUM: SERVING OTHER CULTURES California is a collection of cultures. Effective communication with diverse cultures in your community is always a challenge. This interesting discussion explores what others have tried and what has been successful so you can be more effective. FORUM: S)LALL CITIES - INFORNIATION AND ANSWERS Small cities with populations under 15.000, that are not adjacent to larger cities, have unique issues and problems. Here is a chance to participate in a round table discussion to share solutions among officials from smaller cities. General Session CITIES' LEADERSHIP ROLE IN PROVIDING HOUSING 10:00 11:45 a.m. This session will look at the various and conflicting issues defining California's housing crisis; how all cities are affected and how cities are taking the lead in solvina, the problem. Consider the options available to cities and how you can create the climate to exercise those options. General Luncheon Noon I :45 p.m: IS CALIFORNIA DREAMING TIME TO `,j'A E UP! \What are Lie major issues facing California in genetal and specifically for cities" Budget, education, and housing-are just Some of the major tonics oI public interest. i:ind e hursd2`' JTaly 17, 2003), continued Please Note: Session times, titles, and topics are subject to change. PUBLIC SAFETY ISSUES - GANG MITIGATION, MEGAN'S LAW UPDATE, AND THE AMBER ALERT PROGRAM Public safery and security is on the mind o.-everyone these days. In general, gang activity has been increasing along with crime. Learn how'Megan's Law and the Amber Alert System has helped to increase public awareness of crimes and help to solve some of them. FACILITATOR SKILLS FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS - PART II This is a continuation of this topic from the 2:00 - 3:15 p.m. session. Latino Caucus Reception 5:00 - 6:10 p.m. Evening Free Friday. July 18, 2003. Please Note: ,Session times; titles. -and topics are subject to change. Registration and CityBooks Open - MontereV Conference Center 7:30 — 1 1:00 'a.m. Breakfast Issue Briefings and Discussion Forum 8:00 -9:15 a.m. BRIEFING: HOT -LAND USE ISSUES . Learn about hot land use issues such as land acquisitions and casinos, and hillside development ordinances and how to set policies to deal with them. BRIEFING: COASTAL CITIES ISSUES What are the changes in the coastal commission and how does that affectyour programs and options. Learn to better manage your city within these restrictions. " FORUM: CITY- SCHOOL COLLABORATION What options and actions leverage resources in the public interest in the efforts to foster a good partnership? Discuss with others who want to achieve he same goal_ . FORUM: WE HAVE THE NEW TECHNOLOGY — NOW WHAT? R'hat technology is available to make your life easier and how can you use it? Come prepared to discuss real problems and how technology can help solve them. FORUM: ATTRACTING TALENT TO YOUR CITY HALL Mriat can you as an elected official do to help draw the best and tine brightest to WO! for your city? Explore your options in this informative session. eademy Workshops Program Friday. July 18, 2003 These Academy Sessions require a separate: rem isn-ation. You must select a workshop to be re;ietered. Registration and CityBooks Open - Monterev Conference Center 11:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Concurrent Workshop Sessions 1:30 - 5:00 p.m. BUILDING COLLABORATIVE PARTNERSHIPS: AN INTRODUCTION TO INTEREST -BASED PROBLEM SOLVING AND NEGOTIATIONS - PARTI Cities are becoming increasingly interested in cultivating relationships with employees and citizens that are consistent with values of community building. This 'includes approaches to negotiations, workplace relationships; and customer service. Rrhile you may not always be at the table, it is essential that you have a working knowledge of the principles and processes that are at work and the vital role that elected officials play in encouraging and supporting these approaches. This intensive and interactive two -part workshop will give a solid introduction to these increasingly valuable tools. Part .0 follows on Saturday. PRESIDING OFFICER WORKSHOP - PART I Have you ever sat through a'meeting where the presider did not keep things focused and moving? Have you ever participated in various public meetings and felt things were not as orderly as you'd like? Do you know how to get your points across and build consensus'? This workshop will provide some practical tips and skills for partictpatmg and'runnmg a meeting and give you a chance to practice what you have learned. It will cover both formal procedures and more informal facilitation skills. Part II follows on Saturday. THE FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBILITIES OF ELECTED OFFICIALS: BUDGETS, AUDITS AND MEANINGFUL REPORTS - PART I As a trustee of the city, you have a special and serious obligation to safeguard the fiscal assets of the public. Do you know.how to best carry out this responsibility? Do you know . the right questions to ask? Do you know what to look for in financial reports to determine if things are in good or bad shape or are trending in a certain direction? Come to the first of a two-part session for, practical answers. Par II follows on Saiurdxy. UNDERSTANDING REDEVELOPMENT PART I - ITS PURPOSE, POWERS, AND FUNDING A panel of experts in the field of redevelopment will present the basics of what a redevelopment agency does and how it is financed. By attending this session, you w ll gain an understanding ofredevelopment fundamentals that apply to every agency including the legal basis and powers of a redevelopment agency, how project areas are adopted and how proper tax increment works and buying and selling property. Par II follows on Saturday. . Reception 5:00 - 6:00 p.m. Registration Refund Policy Special Accommodations Guest/Spouses Local Activities Hotel Reservations Hotels Airlines Directions Registrations posimarked'ov Friday. June 20; :003. will receive in addition to program materials ' and event coupons; a $25 discount coupon. to be used at the CitvBooks bookstore. 'Cir -vBooks can help incease voui lead'ers'hip skills and piofessioral knowledge ir. vital areas. ':ion's miss, this great way to expand and share your ie.arnint with colleagues at city hall! Full pa }mleni must accom.rary the registration forma Check. Money Order. Visa or MasterCard are accepted. The League is unable to accept purchase orders_, American Express or Discover cards. if paving by `Aedit.card please fax your registration form to (9 1 6) 658 -8220 or register online at vow rareri PC nra /pvents Executive Forum Full Conference One Uav Only Academy Workshop City Officials 5370.00 Cit) Officials S225.00 I Full Workshon Other Public Officials 5420.00 Other P,ulolic Officials S275.00 City Officials 5290.00 All Others $ 470.00 All Others S325.00 If you have questions, please contact the League Conference Registration Vtnce at ly 10/ 0c0_ 8291. Advance registrants unable to attend this meeting will only receive a refund of the registration fee, less a S50 processing charge, by submitting a written request to the League of California Cities, Conference Regisration Office, 1400 K Street. Sacramento. CA 95814, fax (916) 658- 8220. Requests for refunds must be received by Friday, July 11, 2003. Suios iturions may be trade. even on -site. - - If you require special accommodations related to facility access; cominuuication and/or diet, please contact our Conference Registrar at (916) 658 -8291. . There is no regismition fee to attend the Mayors and Cbunci] Members Executive Forum sessions for gues spouses who are not oil-% or other public officials or vendors to cities. Guestispouses of registered attendees may purchase meal tickets for an additional fee at the meeting registration desk. For information on events within in the City of Monterey, please contact the hotel Concierge desk or visit www.gomont:rev.org. Please complete the Hotel Reservation Form and mail or fax it to the Monterey Housing Bureau OR make your reservations on -line at w's !.cacities.ora /events. Reservations must be . received by Tuesday. June 10, 2003 and will require a deposit. If you are unable to attend, the deposit will be refunded if your reservation at the Marriott Hotel is cancelled 48 hours prior to arrival date or at the Doubletree Hotel is cancelled 24 hours prior to arrival date. Doubletree Hotel; Monterey Marriott Hotel - 2 Portola Plaza 350 Calle Principal Monterey, CA 9.940 Monterey, CA 93940 (831) 619 -4511 (93 1) 649 -4234 S165.00 single/double (plus 10.05`.io hotel tar.) 5161.00 single /double (plus 10.00 0% hotel tax) Valet parking S15 /day, self- parking S13 /day Valet parking 515 /day, aearby self - parking SSiday, www.douhletreemonterev.com wra'w.marnott.com - Check the League Web page, ummi.cacities.orn!travel, for the new Enhanced Local Government Airfare Program From Northern California Take Highway 101 South to Highway 156 West to Highway 1 South Exit at Pacific Grove /Del Monte Avenue. Continue doom Del Monte Avenue for 1.5 nules. staying in the left lane. Stay to the left past the fork followine downtown signs (not going dtrough the tunnel). The eom %ention center is'_ blocks up on the right side in Ponola Plaza (Right ttum off Del Monte Blvd.). From Southern California Traveling On 101 North Take Monterey Peninsula Exit. which will bring you to Highway 6S. Travel on Highway 68 to High a ,,: 1 South. Take the first Monterey exit. Turn right at the first stop light (C:atdno Aeuapio) and continue until it dead -ends. Tic fen .... A. —, „ rn- 1Pf, naa me fork.followira downtown signs (not Virg Kew' rF. TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSE��CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL , CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 16, 2003 RE: AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND ANNUAL LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE, SEPTEMBER 7-10,2003), SACRAMENTO Attached for your consideration is information regarding the aforementioned conference. There will be sessions on Fiscal Stability, Effective Grassroots Advocacy, Housing and Land Use, Public Safety, Infrastructure and Transportation, and Legal Issues. C_ ouncil members and staff have attended this conference on an annual basis. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the attendance of any Council member, City Attorney, City Manager and staff designee. COUNCIL n Lh- DD U N 24 2003 c'£ _ _. C � � v. L 7C G• r1 Vl = _ _ �C � v! N C m. _r+oC r t C L G T °- ° c z° f T T O T G _ - c D ET c = v+= �^ N r o � vr -=a v R Q G n. o c-� � c s = FF. t = v - G Q m r Z _r+oC r t C L G T °- ° c z° f T T T - G _ - c ET c = v+= �^ N r o � vr -=a v R Q G n. o c-� � c _r+oC r t C L G T °- ° c z° f T N ET c = v+= G T EET T N - _ _ O r ' - - p_ p [_ _ ?J g CJ Ei _ O D-O _ - p O_ m � c �. O L ^<< N_ d n ^OG O— G !'1 A N m R O - G° 0 4 O O N Q' n' O Q i C o W co p'. C r m O M p H n.. � 9 . a- G n ° D zl CD : O m v C. Ol _ co — m o __ m _ a c 0 G G m O O m z. = m N = o D. j m - �m =F ... c O G � in L m m � s p to 9 . F' O N O O O C to V � 3 = X m m ° .p C O H O O' fD N m (D - _ v O O .n 'O _ P N o' cFD = -� xDCI< OC z�yn �. X Y� � m N C n` '., n = m O In ID m C O '9 �_ 'O n CO < `^ n c O O. O 0_ C p� -o �. o CD 3 n O 2 x n O C r. OOx O = ry' O m (� a- N CD a m CD 0 . N< OC N W N O N O (D F L C n CD U- —i O m c CD C ID cl ID CD N c O O C O cD = a_ N p n _ m L V O c - n l N G H N -< 0 <mx- m _ 2 c:: m o < _ -�'D _ - Vic„ < IL m `_• -a-i ••+- v 0 v. r^ _ O _ _. 7 ^ -.4-1 Q (p Cc"- G7 G .O O ^. N a =c n c d m m J m m > 0 N u z _ a �. o- . C> FD FD T. O. n �..n L m _ — n c L n 7 N G n = C j= a C N a' m. Z' N N C_ G N n� C N 0 n O N 0 n � N C. m D M :E (D p. C (p C n m .V,. C m n O -_ c O jp n .�. Z C CD o c o �. =c cn p m rD m= CD m G ,Z N = C' —. a (b a . _.. m m0 0 T -G' .`m _ m m- u, W CD �OmD_? �m '.�� a :j CO C�oo'O� 9- °� o o m__❑ CO 3 o' = CIL p o �. m — c m CD _ _. CD ? (D -- n �• m< (� O m _ C 'O O �. Z m �; .. O m- n n n —.pC 'N v 2 m _ . n ❑ m. 'n C>>+ !"1 (0 = c n N w D N <O. FD -.0 N..n =s'-p C> �nmN mmn C ❑�O= -G D FD g�< _ _ FD FD 77 m m (D n n v mm CD (D N �• ci O (D A O O n N N c� < n . (U FD LID N C T m D D m m y p C. O L I1 c7 0 C. L= m_ m s ❑ m O CN (D O 6 O C (D c x q J O m _ O C v ' FD _ ^ CC• L n o c c C (, Cn _ 7 m m r O O n O s G -' 0 C. = O C ei c N -2 = a o. o c L k_..c (D C,� v. c -r( m ❑ — �.. m n co.- G C '� ¢ ` m N r'' T � 'O _ N CU (D =.•1< j � — (<D. n C S .a < ry n m 3 m n- L` O❑ -'� ,G Z --3� _ N O CL m f z m a = 'n' -' p 'r0, m� 7:. - 2 .— cn= . (D m m 5 LD = O p —7- = -c CD O CD ZE Rosemead Community Development Commission ' CDC8838'East Valley Boulevard, CA 91770 Tel 626.569:2100 Fax 626.307.9218 T0: HG ^3LE C?i4 1 <O R. n *; Ru 1Ety '. D CO1\,f ' \ZTY. DE %ELpP',� C.OI �ZS510 N FROt i. BILL CITY htikNI A GER DATE: 111LA'1' 19. 2:003 . COt CIL OF AtTHORI'AT1O' N P TEP ?Ti c;- ;c":Ipp\G CEI,TERS `,�''STE.R� Dl \gSIO? C G;\ T:RE1.10E ?,7 DEAL 1'',F4I iIIG,PAI bfl SPRl?�GS. SEPTENSER, i6- 18,'rirU for vOIIr COLSldc' 3llCP, L L"�SOIi:�=i1UR r.`.Carimo ili °- a' TeID Ti15 . '� eai 5 jc55i0r1 lU ;CS include: Umil.lg and Food l Ttn S '-:) —eta �.11: �4�ai LIL' Y; t'Lli i�IJlllc h'Li St�; 1HUil,cb'lildlllE and ReL31_',a_T7 Cl the ,i.0 l Deal lv:a1:ing a113 E-- ,C'S111C,R. l! ° -ll1 eI5 01 til? CDn7, llC=3U!] and staff havt mien ed LCLs c0�:er.nce u. L�,e pas, and it T,Ws F'rU \'ell 10 i °. aD . - ):cel;eDl c)p1POii,llilt'r LU LLILrOducc flie. Ciij- 10 }OL`_llilal O ? \ %21V yeI= P.EC01V2, EN;DATIOld It SS reCGI1L!elld e.I L'1' =1 `Line ROSCIIleLd COSm' nli\ P vela rri Rl C:CIItC, Illl`S10I 'llL }lU\ °line alLendu')ce of a-rl\' C-0 rin 51C`il Selllbe;. E ?,tc:utive Di7tctor c1C' 1`La1 a5 a551? C D LI e , E -cuuve Dutcl.0i. i vi %n,� 'f ASS, i 9:00 — 10:00 am OPE'N'ING GENERAL SESSION Wal- Mart... The Analyst's, Assessment Wal- Mart's position as the world's dominant retailer raises the anxiety level of smaller community shopping centers, uocerv� chains and regional mall owners in seccndan• , markets. Given its sheer size; market clout, access co capital and massive advertising budget, comoeting retailers are forced to adopt its "price is everything" approach or clearly diirerendate its offering in quality and/or convenience. A panel of retail specialists will break down Wal- Marts remarkable oerformance, its strategies for continued growth and its expanding impact on Corporate .America. 9:00 am — 5:00 pm INFORMAL DEAL MAKING Take [his uppormniry to have a seat and talk about your deal.instead of sand rg in the hallwa }'. Due to popular demand, half of the California Grand Ballroorti,.in the \i ndham has been set up for informal deal making. There will be :uriassigried tables and crn airs available on a First -come, frrsr- served basis. Have some co .•and nawe so ne deals in a comfortable environment created just for You a 10:00 — 11:00 am , GENERAL SESSION Legends of the Game = Dining and Food "•T -rends - iii- Retail A panel of food industry legends shares its experiences and offers views of dinin and food trends and the historic integration with retail. Sit- down dining, and last food reflect the changim, tastes of America as the customer'desires more prepared food. As dining an d food components continue m comolemenr and energ.m various seta l formats, out "legends" provide industry insights inm their world and efforts to be compentiva. 11:00 am - 12:00 noon CONCURRENT SESSIONS A. Will the Retail Bubble Burst? Retail continues to produce despite a sluggish economy; low consumer conFidence, I nternational conflict and state•econon c woes. Retail has been an investor sanctua:,' with the softening of.rhe equity markets. Cap rates across the retail Product spectrum have dropped to twenty year lows... driven there by a broad array'of new buyers and very efficient debt. Favorable interest rates have maintained pricing despite declining fundamentals. Will retail values hold and what trends will foretell a weakenirar Gain the perspec ve of an enlightened panel on the issues of he current market and what is m store. B. Homebuilding and Retail — An Expanding Interdependence Homebuilding continues to drive construction nationally and contribute to the g-rovt= of >-oods and services. Homebuilding experts in this session will identify the hoc resident a growth markets and the broadening array o residential product that osiers new opporrumti- for ali;nmeni with retai ns; l. Empand inn11 opportunities and.commun.rues des.re,fo;,, mixed use projects spur new interdependence be;, ,ten the retail and'nomebuildinc sectors. i ii 1 Ii i i i i i i i !i 1 12:00 noon — LOG pm LUNCHEON SERVED 1:00 — 2:00 pm KEYNOTE PRESENTATION i 5:30 — 7:30 pm BEER WINE GARDEN PARTY f Enjoy premium wines and micro - brewed beers with 3,000 of your closest friends and 4 associates poolside at the Wyndham Hotel! For participant and sponsorship ooportnniues for the,Beer & Wine Garden, call Geoff Reeslund, Hu�ecs . Investments at (949) 759 -94;1, c 241. - -j 8 :30 am - 3:30 prr — REGISTRATION 8:30_— 9:30 am CONTINENTAL BREAKFAST SERVED 9:00 am — 4:00 pro DEAL MAKING AND TRADE EXPOSITION 12 noon — 1:00 pm BOX LUNCHEON SERVED 4:00 pm CONFERENCE ADJOURNS • I Here's your chance to gel your companvs name in lights! W, are offering Sponsorship opportunities at rht- %estern Division Conference again this year-The n:posure you will receive is invaluable! h includes eering your companys name in he program, frequent mention of your company's name on banners, table tent cards and on a video that will be run before the general sessions and luncheon at the meeting. If you woi;Id ace to participate in this exciting markerina opportunity,, call Julie Trevino at (949) 224 -3830 or e -mail her at jutvinoCicsc.org, TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMEAD CITY - COUNCIL FROM: BILL CR' , CITY MANAGER DATE: AUGUST 19, 2003 RE: AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND 23RD ANNUAL CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOCIATION FALL SEMINAR, OCTOBER 3 -5, 200' ), MORRO BAY CALIFORNIA Attached for your consideration is information regarding the aforementioned seminar. This year's theme is "Contracting for Municipal Services Works Through Public Private Partnerships ". The Council has attended this Seminar in the past. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council authorize the attendance of any Council Member, City Attorney, City, Manager and staff as assigned by the City Manager. COUNCIL M-3ENN -`Jib SEP_23 2003 ITEM ado.. 10535 Paramount Blvd.. Suit 0 Downey, California 90241 (562) 928.5533 FAX (562) 928 -9557 - _ - wnw.rommclnliaa.orq Emall: croe9/Baol.com July 31, 2003 TO: ALL MEMBERS AND SEMINAR PARTICIPANTS FROM- " CHERI KELLEY, PRESIDENT 23'd Annual Fall Seminar The Inn at Morro Bay - Morro Bay, California October 3 -5, 2003 Mark your calendars now! The 23`d Annual Fall Seminar will be held October 3 -5, 2003. Our headquarters is The Inn at Morro Bay in Morro Bay, California. You won't want to miss this infonnation filled weekend, so make your reservations now. The room rates vary )- depending on type of room available and start at $89.00. The deadline to make your hotel reservation is September 1, 2003: Please do not make a hotel reservation unless you are sure you will use it. Making reservations just to protect your options denies other attendees a room of their choice, costs the hotel business, is costly for the CCCA, and may actually cost you inoney. Your guest room reservation is an agreement between you and the hotel. If you make a reservation and later need to cancel, please do so as early as possible so the room may be made available to someone else. The theme for this year is "ContractingforMunicipal Services Works Through Public Private Partnerships. " Programs will include a session on how to- balance and manage your time, while juggling responsibilities between family, employment and your duties as an elected official. The I')"' Annual "Jack Parks Memorial" Golf Tournament will be held on Friday,. October 3, 2005. Entry fonns. are included in this mailing. contractcities.org Check our website for updates: CITY /AFFILIATION: CONTACT: Phone CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOCIATION 23RD ANNUAL FALL SEMINAR THE INN AT MORRO BAY — MORRO BAY, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 3 -5, 2003 ADVANCE REGISTRATION FORM REGISTRATION FEE: Delegate's Registration is $380.00 and includes the following: 2- Saturday Continental Breakfast ticket; 2- Saturday Luncheon ticket; 2- Saturday Dinner tickets; and 2- Sunday Brunch tickets. NO DAY PASSES Please provide the names below for each DELEGATE AND GUEST. 1 Note: "Guest" is defined as a spouse, personal friend or significant other. Guest privileges will not be used to avoid paying a second registration.fee for city or private sector representative.. NAM EITITLE GUEST Amount Enclosed TOTAL AMOUNT ENCLOSED NO CANCELLATIONS ACCEPTED OR REFUNDS GIVEN AFTER FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2003 Complete and forward this form, with your check to cover registration fees to: CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES CCCA FALL SEMINAR 10535 PARAMOUNT BLVD., SUITE 100 DOWNEY, CA 90241 r :'�!x-i( °ipi:;t,�CLVAC +PRIne'" Ci TO: HONORABLE MAYOR . AND MEMBERS ROSEMEADQTY COUNCIL . FROM: BILL CRO CITY MANAGER DATE: JULY 1, 2003 RE: AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGERS ASSOCIATION'S ANNUAL CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 21-24,2003, CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA Attached for your consideration is information regarding the aforementioned conference. This year's conference sessions are planned around four theme tracks: Managing in an Evolving Economy, Changing Demographics and Aging Populations, Enhancing and Developing the Profession and Professionalism and Personal Issues Facing Local Government Managers and Their Families. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the attendance of the City Manager at the annual conference of the International City Managers Association. COUNCIL AGENDA J U L 0 8 2003 ITEM No. ®t r ICMA'S 89TH ANNUAL. CONFERENCE "5 4nry T]A. P \ �I - �4 +'mil -Y r t+ �`• ;� L ` [�F� l F� 4 V .l r �`QY ` �'Me� j- c''?:ft.e�3`.4.�w.'.. " �C+,•C^xe�b'�,. .c 15r Z�,,,r .t " El �.9.T'1° 7rti is § .v .'�"+ .,p, i ^'�.,.. F� o < -g.? ,may -..c� y,�+ b e „�y�"^t' ♦ .4 �{ , '"5 !✓t�nc'Fr'�`�'-ss ��Y"�.r�'`',�, --••1a 'fir -a _ _ 1 1 @� x -�{i Ir� h .l ..tter the session. parocipanes will be invited to continue the discussion in sanaL groups that will focus primarily on the responsibiliues of local government Senior execupVeS. . Prior to atteidin_ the session, par- ticiparics should read two articles on the ccpic that were written by the Nalbara- . dians for the December 2002 and May 2003 issues of Public Management mAga- tine. Links to electronic versions of the articles will also be available on the tor,- f rence Web site, 111112-org/conier- ence2003. This session addressee Practice Groups 2 (Polit), Facilitation), 6 (Initiative, Risk Tak- ing, Lisinn, Creativity, and Innovation), 8 (Democratic-Advocacy and Citizen Partid- paiion), and 13 (Strategic Planning) and is cosponsored with tine Innovation Groups, Lu Small Community Managers 67. supers ize Your Municipal Resources " through Partnering Monda)� Sept. 22, 1:15- 2:25 p.m. Wouldn't it be great to add to your connnunit,'s resources without adding cc its expenses? With narmerships You can do just that. At this'session, you will hear about innovative partnerships, how they tome together; and the lessons that can be learned. Promoting organizational Excellence in Tough Times (for ICMA Credentialed Managers) 774esday, Sept. 23, 2:15 -5 p. in • When confronted with si- am -ficant rev- enue shortfalls, public organizations typ- ically initiate hiring freezes, cut travel and employee development activities, and defer, investments of all kinds, and they may eventually eliminate services and lay, of employes. Such measures. while necessary, create a grim pallor over the organization. Talented employ- ees leave. and the rertuh-ting - survivors"' hunker down. Morale and productivity plummet. F_anic Behest, city manager, Palo ..Alto, California, and Audrey Seymour. assistant airy manager.. Menlo Park, Cali- fornia. will lead this session, which will be limited in attendance to individuals who have received the ICMA Creden. tiaied Manager designation. It will analyze the complexities of cutback measures and then focus on strategies for retaining talent, enhancing employee comntinrient. and promoting orgariza- .. clonal excellence. - This sexton addresses Prantic Groups I iSraf Epacrivcncs) and 6 (Initiative, Risk Tatting, Vision, Creativity, and Innovation). Personnel 101 Moddu); Sept. 22, 2:4--3:55 p.m. What is the process for hiring and firing% How do you negotiate labor contracts? What are the. current trends in personnel isIsuni these and ocher basic questions_will_be answered at this informative smion. Attracting New (and Retaining - Existing_) Businesses , Titiesda); -Sept: 23, 2:15 -3:25 p.m.. This session will ' teach you how to evaluate the needs of businesses that you hope to attract as well as of those that are currently in your community. Does your community have what they're lookins for' If not, how can You provide it' Come cc this session and find out. HOW Can i Possibly Do It All? . Tuesday, Sevr. 23, 3:45 -5 p.m. Good question! What you need are : strategies and techniques to help you organize and paioritize.This session will teach you those things and -help you to keep your head above water Assistants and Other Non -CADS To Be or Not to Be.... Mondajt Stp[. 22, 1:1'5 -_':25 How do you make . the move from assis- ant to ntanaser, manager to assistant, department head to mauRger.%assistanc? How do you know if such a move is the ri�hr move for veu' This session will provide ins istht into local governtnent career choices. Mentoring: A Win -Win situation Mondag, Sept. 22, 2:45 -3:_x5 p.m. Ivlatlagers as well' as assistants are encouraged to artendthis session and to brim their . "inencees "Learn how to foster mentonng opporrunities in your orsanizadon and get information on how, to choose and be a mentor. THEME TRACKS Y Managing in an Evolving Economy Design- Build - Operate: 21st- Century Public Works Contracting ndonday, Sept. 22, 10:1. -11:45 Modern fortes of competitive and collaborative public works contracting are producing striking time and cost saving , nnnsferrins substan tial risk to the private sector, and eliciting innova- tive and efficient desi_gM. Get a close look at how and why rwo.cities used the.desigh- build- operate approach to achieve dramatically better results than traditional contracting would have pro- duced in delivering new, stare -or the -arc drinking water plants. performance Measurement as a Budgeting Tool Admaday, Sept. 22, 10:1.5-11:45 a.m.. This session will explore how conunu- - - nins use pertornvance measurement in budgeting decisions, resource allocations, and preserimnon_s to elected officials. Panelists will provide exanhples of using performance measurement to set priori des and funding levels for jurisdiconal services in rimes of tigiuer budgea, stare inandates, and otter cosNcutung - scenarios. - Reducing Costs through Better Energy Management Adonda)t Sept. -22, 10:15 - 11:4.5 a.m. . Because energy we can represent up to 10 percent of their budgets.local soeermnents need to explore ways to reduce energy use uc a looney- saving strzten.. panelists will include energy et,-iciency experts who wviL discuss enersv eficienevsiratcgies as well as love -cost nnancin_ mechariars to pay for enerLy improveinenrs.' . Solutions to State Budget Cuts Monday. Sept. 22, 10:1:— .11: 45 a.m. As numv local governiuenu are feeling the squeeze front state budget cuts, managers are consistently being faced with having to do more with 1css.This session will highlight communities dual have successfully managed reductions in state revenues. Parricipans will take away creative ideas for dealing with economic offsets. Fifty Creative Financing Tools for Local Government Monday, Son, 22, 1: 15 -2:25 p. in. loin . this roundtable "ideas exchange" to idendf& at least 50 creative financing too, and alternative revenue sources for local government. Facilitators will lead discussions on alternative service deliv- cry strafe gies. debt restructuring. ways to raise revenues for rcdevelopmtnc to offset lost tat: revenue. and more. Financing Economic Development Adondap, Sept. 2, 2:45 -3:55 p.m. Local ,oveenuencs around due world are facia, the critical issue of econonuc developnucnt. At this session, speakers . will present practical solutions to issues -' such as workforce preparedness, business incentives. reuse of resources. and alter- . native funding sources.- Pardeioanu wit vralk aivas w'iih ideas for developing . new: strategies tc prarnote econoimic development in a declining economy. Fiscal Impact Modeling: A Tool for Local Government Decision. Making Monday, SLOT. 22, - ':45 - - :: p. fit. A fiscal impact, [node) can provide information to support management and budget as well as land use and plan - tun; decisions on a year- to -vear basis. For local t;ovecnuments. the use of fiscal irvpact analysis leads to a better under - scatuding of the relationships anion, the various facrors contributing to growth and developnnent. and increases their confidence in the fiscal soundness of land use, management, and financial decsions.This session will presenr dif- ferent fiscal impact analysis approaches and applications: the latest examples of fiscal impact modeling, and case studies from two connmuniaes. Finding Federal Resources to support Local Programs: Counterterrorism, Land Recycling, solid waste, and Innovative Technologies Tiresdnp, Scpr. 23, 11:20 amt. -12:30 p.m. The U.S.Envir-onrientz] Protection Agency's (EPA) Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Pkesponse (OSWER) provides grants to local , vernmeuu in the areas of couvterterroris i, cleanup and redevelopment of contaminated sites, land use controls, solid and haz- t ardous'w•aste treatment and recycling, and much more. OSWER also supports a significant percencae of.ICMAs grant - funded research through such )CM A programs as Browri ields, tine - Nacional Browrrftelds Conference; and Comrnuniwand Econoiic Develop -. pie ;nt..join Marianne Lainont Horinko, assistant admiruscrator. EPA /OSWER, and representatives of local gove-imnents that have used EPA granu to success- fully a6cbess local priorities as they dis- cuss the imp and bolts of obuniung and applying federal ftundi cc support local initiatives. r. trends in the national and international economy. and local government reort- sentaaves will describe the methods they List to forecast trends in their communl2ts. Capital Financing and Asset Management Tuesday, Sept. 23. 1:15 -3:2= p.m. This session will address the best prac- tices of fiscal policies for capital financ- ing and the use of standards such as ., GASB -34 for cash flow and asset naiin- agennent. Local govtrnment practinon- ers will discuss public- private funding, design -build projects. bonds. futures refinancing, debt restructuring. and a host of other tools.The session wail] also deal with internal i nznagenient of - capital financing actions, - " Eldon-Fields Colloquium.Promtse or Peril? Partneringtwith the Faith., community .. . Yiiicsdap, Sept. 23, 2:15—_,:25 p.m. The role of faith -based orgainizations I n the social welfare systern has been at the center of the federal public policy debate ever since President Bush pro- posed his Faith-Based and Conununiry _ Initiative.) "ei government partnerships with the faith co :nnuurim- are anythin, but new.This session will provide an overview of the political. administrative. and le,al issues involved in working with religious or anizations. Panchlu will look at a wide variety of ways, fronn traditional contracting to innovative arrangenuenu, in which local govern- ments have worked with the faith com- munity'to provide an array of public services (such as public cansportation, public saftm and public works) as wet, as social services. .Elements of a successful Health Care, Plan .. The Economy: Trends and Forecasting Tuesday, Sept. 23, 11:10 a.m. -12:30 p.m. Almost everv"local eovernrineut actempLs to predict local tconolinc trends.This session will address the d:rireuir topic of predicring the tvnire.of.thr econonhy. Speake :< wit present their estimates of Tucsdaly Scpr. _3, :4- p.m. Local governnueih.t uuanagers use a variety of approaches to address the rapid increase in the costs associhre0 with health care within tine organiza- pon.This session wll provide examples of how government and the private sei- cor nn inaee t1i se costs and work with emplovees and union officials. Partici- nine will take away solutions to tills difficult operating issue. Smart Growth on the Ground Tiicsdoy, Scpr. 2i, is 45 -5 P.M. Many coninmi hits have adopted visions, goals, and policies to support smart 1,rOwzh and are now crippling with the nest stage: ,erring smart ` growth-: projects on the ground. In this session you will hear results h'oni a 2002 nationwide survey and up -to -date case studies from practcing planners in P.mtrican and Canadian communities ranging from a town, of 4.200 to a county of 9 million. Changing Demographics and Aging Pooulations -:1 Services and Outreach for an Aging Population Monday, Sept. 22, 10:15 -11:45 a.m. How do the needs of an aging popula- tion differ from chose of a youn,er one, and what strategies work best in responduig to those heeds- How can local ,ovenuuellu effective)), conlilhum- cate, with the older sepient of cite eoumimfiry-- Attendees will hear about some approaches that have worked and will parricipate,in a discussion with pan - elisrs and other attendees_ Look into My Crystal Ball Monday, Scpt. 22, 1:15 -2:25 p.m. What does rile future hold .for your community. and how can you plats to meet the confine challenges-, This ses , sion will cover denfographic trends and the ifnnlicadons for loe.tl eovermnents is they look to serve in older and more diverse population. Providing Effective Services to a Diverse Community Monday, Sept. 22. 2:45—_,:55 nm. Local ,ovcrnniei]ts are encreasin,6v faced with the need to provide effecnet services to diverse se_nuenu ofthe conl- nuulity. Outreach must be Provided to groups of dsnerenc cudcuni oriencations. T his session will exam in, :Ile issues associated with this subject. consider . succts%ful e>dring: programs, and prnvide III opnormmr�* for discussion with and 11110n, panthsr5 and me audience. NEW! Book Discussion: Geeks and Geezers Titc<dn)', Sept. 1 11:20 a.n;. -12: 0p.m. 1ninyour colleagues in a conversation about die relevance to our procession of the popular new book. GccL, and Gcc_ea: 1Jow Era, hahics, and Dc6nim, . Moniens Shopc Lxadcrs, by Warren G. Bennis and Robertj. Thomas. How _. dit`ierent are the leadership siyles of ",eeks: who macred in the glow of .. coniouter screens, and "geezers:' who matured in the shadow of the Depres- sion and World War IF What qualities do they share: What are die forcer that " enable anyone to learn and lead for a liferinre %To ,et tie most out of file ses- sion. which will be facilitated by Bill Buchanan, comicY manager of Sedgrwick County, Kansas. and Karen Pinkos, assis- tanr to the ciry ulanagtr of El Cerrito. California. read the book before coning to Charlotte and come prepared to discuss its concepts. Resources of a Diverse Community Tiicsdn), Sept. 25, 11:20 a.m. -12: 0,v.m. Ps conmmricies become increasingly diverse, local governments cited cc be aware of die new resources available in their changing cirtzem-y.This session will look at successfully implemented - strate�nts chat focus bn diversity as o , resource to the conuvuniy, both economically and culturally. Growing old Gracefully . Tuesday, Sept. 2 i, 2:15-3:25 p.m. . How can a Community use its aging population to enhance quality of lifed This session will discuss programs that . use aging residents as a resource or an econovuc development strategy. Arlen - de-s will pirdcfpate in a discussion of to issue with panelists and other attendees. ' Managing Multi- Generational workforce. Tresdaj. Scpr. 23, 3:45 p. tut A:; amn, workfoorce introduces new dlalle!hgts to local ,rivcrnmeyu. Ivi,naaers must deal widt nlaity issues. indudin succtssion piaruting_budgec: issues such as retirement and heaich, insurance. ails inter- gene:'ationai con - flicts..Ss a sizeable portion of file work- force beginy to look toward rtnrenlelt, these issues will loofa larger on the horizon for niallagers.This session will include a presentation of current Strate- gies for dealing with these issues and will provide an Opportunity for discus-. sion with panelists and ac endees. Enhancing and Developing the Profession and - Professionalism Ethics! Ethics! Ethics! - Mouday,, Scpi. 22, 10:1- -11:45 a.m. This session will provide case studies and best practices lrori the Conul]ictet on Professional Conduct. An interactive session. it ]will help you to determine the best route to take when faced with an ethics dil.ennna of your Own Making the Most of ICMA's Public . Awareness Campaign Tool Kit Alondap, Scpr. 2_', 1:1_ - -':2S p.nj.., During this session, you will le= ibour the many creative ways in which ICMA members and ocher individuals across the countmi are using compo- nents of ICMAs "Builditfe COnmimn- cies ... lt's No Small Chore" tool kit to spread die word about the value of professional local govertuaent manage- ment. Attendees at this cession will be able to participate in an interactive discussion ofhow'd]e cool kit can be used. Diversity within the Profession (Partnering with Diverse Affiliates) A4oudn)t Sept. 22, 2:45 —i:; 5 p.m. Learh how to recruit and retain diverse caniaaces into your organization. In addition. find out how ICMA's affiliate orgam=ioris with diverse memberships link to 1CN4-A and how: a strong er con- nection, can Ile made This session will provide a perfect opportunity to learn how you can increase your - poolof.. potential employees. Advocating the CounclkManager Form of Government through a Culture of Professionalism Tui )day, Scn[. X1_11:_°0 c. rn. -13:30 p.m. Local eovernmem uroiessionals across tilt coumtry use a varies of tecihniclues to oromhote the council- manager pan and The value that. professional marl ment adds to elected off clals, residents, the business commuhin', and the media. This session will examine some of those techniques and help you Chia. about mays to develop your own strategies for successfully advocating The council- manager form of government. Developing Our Newest Managers Tuesday-, Sept. 332 3:15 -3:35 p.m. The future of the local government management profession depends upon _ the newest and future generariots at�- managers.This session will share ways in ` wlhich managers and assistants in their first five years of the profession can be encouraged and uhentored. It will dig -' cuss ethic, credenualing, career track, values, and core beliefs . council /Manager Relations ' Tncsday, .Sept. 33, 3:45 -5 p.m. This session will provide you with tips' on how to educate council members about Their role in relation to the rran- a;er s role. IT will also offer suggestions for building and maintaining a positive relatiwrship with the council, and advice on what to do if your relationship ,rocs bad. Sometimes It's Personal, - Personal Issues Facing Local Government Managers and Their Families local aovernmerls. financially. In addi- oan. he will address what Three vears . of down marks CS !have don- to expecu- tions for recirenhent. what the coding vears rnav bi ing. and how to realistically plan for a retirement That for many seems less a realirR' Than it did several years ago. Maximizing Life, Minimizing Stress Adonday, Scpt. 22, 1:15 -3:35 p.m. Learn how to identify your personal sirs of stress and reco_rnize that you have choices in how you respond to them.-This session will teach you how to practice positive liftscyle adjustments to,counter the pressures of everyday life. Retirement Planning for the Public Employee . Adonday, Sept. 33, 1:15 -2 :25 p. m.: Most of what we read and hear Today in the media about retirement planning is directed toward private sector employ- ees. BUT unlike private sector plans, pub- lic sector plain don't have stock options. ERISA rcquircments. and Pension Ber7- etit Guarantee Corporation guarantees. Retirement benefits for the public sec- tor differ fi-om those of the private sec- tor in other significant ways as well. The characteristic career patterns for local government nvuhaoers in particular call for careful planning that is sensitive to these realities.This progrntn will outline retirement planning issues and strategies in the framework of public sector bene- fits and will review illustrative cases. I Still Live Here — Honest! Adnndag, Sept. 23, 2:45 -355 p.m. It's rough. but There are ways to over- come The challenges of having to spend long hours away from vour famih'. So This Is the New Millennium? Come hear some success stories and Retirement in challenging Times share some of vour own! Monday} Sept. 22, 10:15 -11:45 a.m. Employment Agreements: Best Girard Miller. president and CEO .of Practices for Negotiating Good Agreements ICM_A Retirement Corporation. will : T provide his perennially popular prog-:n .ucsdap, Sept, 33, 11:30 a.m. -1?; 30 c. m. m on The state of ICNL=i -RC. the econ Learn what To negotiate before taking a onhv investing, and retirement. He will new posioon, what To include in all cover the status of The Bush adminii employment a reenhent. and what - tacions tax and bud_er plats and the > strategies will be effccrive in helping Capitol Hill developments chat aiecc you achieve your goals. In this session. a panel of nhanaeea win discuss severanct clauses, unusual b-nefi' negodaring sirate -°1Cs. and other contract issues. In addition. ICM.k's new model tinfloc- menr agreement will be mahlignted. Keynote Breakout: Get a Life! Tucsdar. Sc:it. 23, 11:30 a.m. -13:30 p.m loin Tuesday's keynote speaker Amanda Gore to further explore the role of the mind -bode connection in reducing stress, nuproving conunurvcation, build- msg personal rela iorishios, and develop - ing tears of collaborative and m:usdng colleagues. Retiree Health Care: A Challenge for Employers and Employees Tacsday, Sept. 2.3, 11:30 a.m. -12:30 p.m. If your jurisdiction is curzntly provid- ing health care for retirees, you, as man- ager, may find That the costs are escalaring dramatically. Additionally. ' GASB will soon be requiring you to recotrruze accruing costs for future health care benefits in your financial stateahenTS. If your conunuuiry doesn :c offer These expensive benefits now., you may feel siplitteant pressure nom employee groups to provide them in the fuarre,And if you have Lo pay for your own health insurance whet-, you retire, that cost n like)\, to be more expensive etuh your mort_age and nor Tax deduerible! This session will review what's happeang with cosa, what the GASB suzenhent w,u require, and what communities can do to deal with This growing problem... Enhancing Your Relationship with Your Partner T4esday; Sept. 23, 2:1 5 -3:25 P.M. Get some lips on enhancing and sus - rainine vour relationship with your part- ner from colleagues who have sustained their partnerships for nvm' years. How do thev do ir. Is there a secret' Hea: it from the experts! i -V mi, g, R TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEDEAD CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CRO ( ITY MANAGER DATE: MAY 22; 2003 RE: AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND 8TH ANNUAL RISK MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, OCTOBER 8 -10, 2003: CARLSBAD This year's conference is being held in Carlsbad. Conference topics include: ,Developing a Cost .4llocation Fornmla for Your Agency, Risk in Recreation; Emplornent La-w, Update; Surviving an OSFL4 Inspection, Pre- employment Testing Pitfalls and Lessons Leamed_ from Claims and Lawsuits. Council and staff have attended this conference on a regular bas s. RECOMMENDATION It is reconunended that the Rosemead City Council authorize the attendance of any Council Member, the City Manager and staff designee. F r 9- 7 Z"370S FEW1 NO California JPIA Services t exper t sn1uti011 8th Annual Risk Management Conference October 8-10, 2003 .Carlsbad, California Please select the,Member wish' which you are affiliated. If you are not a CAUF©RNIA JPIA Member, please select 'Non Member' First Name: Name Last Name: TitleF First Name or Nickname: Name on Badg City / Organization Rosemead Addres 8838 East Valley Boulevard ___ _ ___ , _ �___ Ci Rosemead Stat CA _ ZiP 91770 1787 _.__... Phon (626) 569 -2100 F (626) 307 -9218 E -Mai l - Attendee Registration Early Registration (available now - August.14) California JPIA Page 2 of 4 NOTE: Each additional registrant after one paid registrant will receive a $50.00 discount'' 0' CALIFORNIA JPIA Member Registrati( (7 Pre Conference Workshop (October 8) Golf Tournament (October 8) includes 18 holes golf, cart, box lunch and prizes Events In order to estimate the number of participants at each event, please indicate the event plan to attend (the cost of these items is included in the registration fee) F. Welcome Dinner (October 8) Breakfast (October 9) F Lunch (October 9) Movie Night ( Ocotber 9) - F "Breakfast (October 10) Spouse 7 Guest Registration First Name: Name . Last Name: First Name or Nickname: v ^ Name on Badge r use same address as above California JPIA. _ Page 3 of4 Fin Golf Tournament (October 8) " r includes 18 holes golf, cart, box lunch and prizes F_- Welcome Dinner (October 8) F Breakfast (October 9) F Lunch (October 9) . Movie Night (October 9) F Breakfast (October 10) Speaker / Sponsor Information .Please . indicate if you are a Speaker or Sponsor at this Conference. - r Platinum Sponsor Gold Sponsor Silver Sponsor r Speaker Comments, Please provide any additional comments regarding your Risk Management Conference Registration. F . - ___........... ......... ....._:... . FSrationi a Hotel Reservations: CAuFORNLA JPIA group rate (available October 7 -9 only) is $159. The hotel charges a resort fee of $10 /night and self - parking is $4 /day. Reservations mus' made by September 5 to receive the discounted rate. Book directly with The La Costa Re and Spa at (760) 438 -9111. Ask for the group rate for CALIFORNIA JPIA. Conference Cancellation Policy: Cancellation must be made in writing or through the website. All refund requests must be made in writing to the CALIFORNIA JPIA 100% refund if cancelled by September 5, 2003._ 50% refund if cancelled by September 15, 2003. No refunds after September 15, 2003. Please allow 45 days after the end of the conference to receive refunds. CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY 8081 Moody Street, La Palma, CA 90623 - 3 n% 5Ya M1. � 4 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSE MEAD CITY COUNCIL, FROM: BILL CROWS, CITY MANAGER DATE: AUGUST 18, 2003 RE: AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES 80TH CONGRESS OF CITIES AND EXPOSITION, DECEMBER 9 -13, 2003 NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE Attached for your consideration is information regarding the aforementioned conference. This years topics include: Homeland Security, City Employees and Armed Services Deployments, Affordable Housing, Economic Development, Downtown Revitalization and Planning for . Growth Members of the Council who are on policy committees will have their meetings just prior to the opening session. Council Members have attended, this conference in the past and it has proven to be of benefit to the City of Rosemead. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council authorize the attendance of any Council Member, City . Attorney, City Manager and staff as assigned by the City Manager. COUNCIL AG NIDDA S EP 23 2003 . ITEM Flo. id S£l Ilnilull lln�ull �l�uliillllluull ll, ulllul�lnnill MLI-OLL16 VZ) (W3J`I3SMa CIA-19 l9'I'IVA 8£88 xa�drro vI �.u� issd daroVA1'f CIgVNOQ - Z60b0100 L16 , I. I�IQ-£ xaO .I.II�xtzzzzxxtszzzzzzzxxxzrx e £OObI'U N39W3AON 31VG d20.U10 NOIlV 1S103b 33NVAGV - - £OOZ'9 83HOpO 31tl0 d201f10 NoilvaiSIOR d'IM ,. ;fipu°7sul ms?5w °i N ° °7!pan s°°fi nn 553bm3 V.�MSI� $10•aIU'MtAM i� Noli�Iislo� .aON22I3,3NOO WrINO VOOOZ'O'0'u°18wys m - M:N'anuand' V!U"4wu3d i0£1 3.LOlI.LSW S31110 d0 3f10V31'TVN011VN EOOZ'£I-6A N-3 aO aamuuaL'aIO^N�N NOILISOM b, S31m d0 633HO��N77033�JJH�I1A9 2 -) CON GiRLSS OFT-MOBS' egister now. for the 2003. Congress of Cities in Nashville to take advantage of the more than 50 workshops that are being developed to address a wide range of needs identified by leaders from cities and towns of all sizes. Following is a preliminary list of the workshops that will be offered. Access to these workshops - and to five general sessions — is included in the confer- ence registration fee. Visit the AC web site at www.nic.org to leam more about the workshops and other activities planned for all conference delegates. Creating Jobs for a Strong World'orce In light of current economic and fiscal challengu, many city governments are Seeking new ways to develop a competitive workforce and create good jobs This workshop will introduce participants to unique strategies to: serve hard -to- employ individuals through transitional jabs; leverage economic development efforts to secure good jobs far IoW residents; and help youth prepare for and succeed in the - labor form. Spending on Homeland Security". Making the Case What are the first responder needs for local homeland security responsfoiaties? How are these needs quantified? What are the costs of providing added security during Code Orange alerts? How are cities and towns keeping track of homeland security expenditures? This workshop will address them auestions and provide examples of how cities have reported and tracked costs for meeting homeland security requirements.' Media 101 This workshop will offer the basics on presenting yourself in the public spotlight, whether for a ampaign, council meeting or dealing with a vises. It will include tips on public speaking, message formation as individuals and u a council, and communicating with the public in times of crises. Downtown Revitalization: Proven Strategies for Success This workshop will provide best pracbm from cities that have undertaken successful reVnaization efforts. Also featured, will be the America Downtown, New Thinking. New Life Program, a service from NLC and HvettPalma to help local leaders strengthen and revitalize downtowns. CommunitylD: Growing Your Retail Sector Learn how municipal leaders an grow their. retail sector in their cities and towns. This workshop will explain how leaders an increase their revenues, diversify their tax base and increase employment and satisfy citizens' desire to shop at home. Increasing Opportunities for Regional Communication and Planning for Growth in Rural Communities. Rural and non -rural communities need to connect with each other to enhance the dialogue among themselves. By expanding channels for.frequent communication, rural leaders will be able to share social and economic cancems with other leaders and develop new strategies to address them Divided We Fall Equality and opportunity in American Communities This workshop will focus on NLC First Via President Charlie Lyons' Presidential Agenda for 2004 and N'LC's Futures Report on Economic Inequalities and Disparities. This session will provide delegates with the opportunity to discuss changing demographics in regions; identify racial, spatial, and economic inequalities; and offer suggestions on how to Stan the conversation about these issues locally. Federal -Local Relationships: The Grant Process . With federal funding cutbacks and grants competition becoming more intense, municipal officials are rethinking strtegies in applying for federal grants Thu. workshop will provide an overview of existing grant programs, application processes, associated costs and matching funds requirements, waivers, and technical assistance service. Tour of Duty. City Employees and Armed Forces DeploymenL4 , Many municipal employees serve not only their community but also their country as; .members of National Guard or Military Reserve units. Activation of Reserve . personnel for extended duty in homeland security and antiterrorism operations limits a city's ability to deliver services and manage its financxs. This session will highlight ways cities and towns are coping with this personnel and financial crisis. Raising Roofs: Fmance Strategies .to Increase Affordable Housing City officials are leveraging their affordable housing plans to make substantial progress in financing affordable housing. They are engaging lenders, irnutors and other home financing centers as active participants. This workshop offers practical and sound approaches from creditable sources in how to structure and subsidize affordable housing. I�5'U ; ►� T`©r ?1C Tax Policy in an Anti-Tax Environment This roundtable session will explore the advantages and disadvantages for cities of the various ways of financing local government in an anti-tax environment Options will be compared and evaluated based upon a number of criteria, including local autonomy, revenue adequary, and fairness. Silver Bullets of Economic Development Technology, stadiums, conventions centers, and gambling are often viewed by local officials u silver bullets of economic development Yet, experts and the media often contend that the costs (economic and social) of thus development projects outweigh any benefits received. A panel of city officials and experts will eramme the issues surrounding these "silver bullets" and discuss strategies for cities. Strategic Planning for Early Childhood: NLC's City Challenge Al the Congressional City , Conference in March 2003, NLC President John DeStefano, Jr., Mayor, New Haven, Connecticut. launched a year -long agenda on early childhood success by challenging city officials to develop multi -year early childhood plans. Since that time approximately 100 citim and towns hale made this commitment This workshop will highlight the progress these Challenge cities have made and how their uperiences on be useful to other city leaders. How to Develop an Effective Transportation Plan Highways, transit systems; bicycle and pedestrian facilities, freight corridors, and rail projects are developed by metropolitan planning organizations (MPOS). Often, loaf officials have a decision - making role on MPOs with no training or assistance navigating the myriad of federal and state transportation programs and regulations. Find out what you need to know to develop a better plan for your city and how you an better integrate transportation with other city planning functions. Keeping the Roof: Predatory Lending Practices in Affordable Housing Predatory lending generally occurs in the sub -prime mortgage market, where most . borrowers use the collateral in their homes for debt consolidation or other consumer credit purposes. Some lenders have engaged in high - pressure sales tactics and in same cases fr governments are being called onto do more to keep housing affordableby providing regulatory remedies, direct engagement with lenders, and consumer and financial counseling to homeowners. This session will discuss best practices in these areas. Airlines: State of the Industry and What It Means to Your Community Since September 11th the airline industry has experienced tremendous changes in its relationships with the federal government, IoW communities, and the traveling public Increases in security and decreases in passengers have caused many airlines to shut dawn routes and discontinue service to marry communities. This workshop will examine the current state of air travel and actions your city an lake to help keep the country connected through air travel. _ Making the Link: Integrating Afterschool Initiatives into Education Reform Afterschool hours provide an ideal time to reinforce children's learning gains and supplement the academic curriculum offered at school. A moderator -led "fishbowl" discussion among participants will highlight the numerous approaches cities have taken to build expanded teaming options for all students. No Child Left Behind: Now that NCLB is Law, Cities Must Tackle Implementation; Compliance and Collaboration In January of 2002, President Bush signed into law the "No Child Leh Behind Act" (NCLB), the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Eduction Act (ESEA). Seveml key reforms were included in this legislation and these changes could have a significant impact on local education. Parucipmu will hear from a panel of experts about the effects of NCIB to local governments. Recycling Roundtable The members of the NLC Energy, Environment and Natural Resources (EENR) Steering Committee invite other elected officials wig have a reryding pro- gram they would like to showcase, or who would like to lam about recycling programs in general, to this interactive roundtable discussion. Cities of all sizes are welcome. Coping with the New. Clean Air Mandates Speakers will discuss the new en,ot. hour ozone standard and recent changes to New Source Review. Attendees will Into what the new standards mean to their communities, and what can be done to meet them. Effective Partnerships for Successful Children's Initiatives Engaging key partners in the community is an effective way for city leaders to develop and promote quality programs for children and their families. Based on examples from cities and towns across the country, attendees will learn how to maximize existing community resources to improve outcomes for children. . Developing a Successful Stormwater Program New federal requirements to control pollutants in runoff from municipal separate storm sewer systems are in effect The new rules require implementation of. public education programs and municipal good housekeeping practices_. This two-part workshop will provide: critical background - , information for implementing a successful Stormwater Phase II program and a discourse on program elements. How to Alert Your Citizens Without Alarming Them: The _ Role of the Local Elected Official in Communicating about Homeland Security Orange Alert versus Yellow Alert. Duct tape and plastic sheeting Screening shoes at airports. Many of these attempts to alert and activate citizens have served only to create alarm and panic at one extreme and skepticism and complacency at the other. loin this roundtable discussion about how best to apply the warnings of the federal Homeland Security Advisory System to Your region - whether it's a large metropolitans area or a small rural community. Creative Masterplan: Turning Community Vision into Reality Outdated mastemlam are negatively affecting quality of life for residents in cities ,truss the country. During this session experts will discuss effective strategies to assess how to define community vision in your city and how to translate that into a 21st century mastemlan. Techniques that encourage citizen participation, such as charettes, will also be explored. Collaborating for Student Success: Promising Approaches and Lessons learned Municipal leaders are in a unique position to use their leadership rapacity and access to city resources to strengthen and support public schools. In a'facilitated discussion, participants will examine promising approaches and lessons learned from NLC's 30 -month initiative to deepen and enhance the roles of mayors and council members in school improvement and afterschool pmgams. Spending Smart Make th e Most of Your City's Purchasing Power In times of budgetary pressures and fiscal constraints, one way cites can make the most of their an dollars is through innovative and creative purchasing and procurement programs. One such program, the U.S. Communities Government Purchasing Alliance, enables cities and towns of all sizes to benefit from competitively bid national contracts on a variety of goods and services. Join a discussion with local purchasing officials who will give hands-on advice about how to help your city achieve significant administrative and product savings. Varieties of City Government Structures The previous distinctions between the mayor - council and the council- manager forms of government are blurring. Lam about this trend, compare your city's form of government with other cities, and consider how it affects the day -to-day city operations Bringing Back the Vote: Why and How to Increase Voter Turnout in Your City Local leaders can be =in) to increasing voter turnout in state, local, and national elections. Currently only 40% of eligible voters participate in sate and local elections. Municipal leaders can strengthen democracy by encouraging disengaged populations, such as people of color and young adults, to exercise their right to vote. What Makes Local Elected officials Successful State and Federal Advocates: Effective Strategies for Influencing State and National Policy Decisions Even, day critical decisions are being made that have profound effects on the way cities and towns manage budgets and policy. With high priced lobbyists and slick consultants it can be a challenge for small cities to compete with their larger counterparts for sea ce state and federal resourcros This workshop will highlight strategies and methods for effective lobbying. Learning through Service: Positive Implications of Student involvement in Your Community while students all over the nation are frxnuing on GPAS and involvement in campus activities, others are joining a trend of active participation in the community. In establishing relationships and partnerships with campuses and students in their area, titles can enhance the strength of their communities and better serve their residents. Building a Relationship With Your Local Media This workshop will focus on how best to interact with members of the local media, with an emphasis on the hometown newspaper. It will include interview tips and information from members of the media on how best to get your city or town's message communicated to the public. Hurricanes, Tornadoes, Floods, and Earthquakes: How to Prepare Your Community for a Natural Disaster Federal, state, and local coordination is imperative in developing a successful plan - for how to respond to a natural disaster to minimize the loss of life and destruction of property. This workshop will help identify planning and funding options for mitigation and preparedness and provide information an what to do immediately following a disaster for effective response and recovery. Homeland Security on a Local Basis: the Patriot Act Enacted shortly after the September 11 attacks, the PATRIOT Act sought to strengthen the rapacity of federal, state, and -local law enforcement to conduct surveillance and share information necessary for preventing future acts of terrorism Lam what wncems and liabilities are involved with carrying out these new responsibilities as local law enforcement agencies seek a balance between protecting the public and civil liberties and fighting terrorism Homeland Security Training Sessions: Lessons Learned First responders must undergo rigorous training and exercises in order to prevent and respond to acts of terrorism and all hazards As these exercises help improve readiness and response capabilities for first responders, what are some of the strengths and weaknesses identified? Workshop presenters will discuss lessons learned and how they apply to emergency response and preparedness capabilities of other jurisdictions A Parade of Processes: An Exhibit of Innovative Approaches to Community Change This workshop will introduce participants to some of the most innovative strategies for mobilizing orange in these times. Participants will be exposed to theories, models and practices of transformational change that will maximize opportunities for community growth and development Changing Communities, Changing Faces: A Focus on Immigration and Language Differences Leaders across the country continue to search for ways to face the challenges and meet the opportunities raised by the arrival of newcomers in their communities- Pardo pants will hear how some communities are addressing hard�questfens, such as, who are "we" in the first place? ind how many people and which people should be allowed into the community? The Wondering Years: Emerging Challenges Facing Today's Youth This workshop will be a roundtable discussion and will address issues such as: establishing Gay Straight Alliances (GSAs) in schools; the challenges of coming out; civil rights issues and; the place of local officials, in challenging or accepting a family's nom z and mores. Keeping Up with Your Elderly Citizens As a growing percentage of city dwellers become older, they will need and demand different services Imm their municipal governments. This session will examine the Impact of the needs of the elderly on city programs and services. Dialogue and Understanding: The Key to Cultural Insight Many times conflict has and will arise, most often because of communication misinterpretation. As the population in the U.S. continues to rise, so does the number of ethnic groups with various cultures. Thu workshop will provide insight on the importance of opening yourself up to the knowledge and understanding of diversity in your communiy, and how to effectively communicate with citizens of various cultures. Building Communities through Civic Engagement Active citizen participation makes all the difference when it comes to building healthy communities. This workshop will examine ways for local elected officials to initiate meaningful roles for citizens to take an active role in the governance of their community. Strategies and examples will be highlighted Making the Most of Your Media Resources This workshop will explore how to bat use Your local public arc°« channel and other media outlets, including the Internet, to communicate with citizens. Participants ' will team how to make an effective Public Service Announcement (PSA) and see examples of the most effective municipal websites. Visit the NLC web site at www.nlc.or; for updates and additions. Please note session titles and descriptions arc subject to change. � fwM1 cc.- c,wcrx�4E- .F TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CROWE, 4WMANAGER DATE:. NOVEMBER 18, 2003 RE: AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOCIATION SACRAMENTO LEGISLATIVE ORIENTATION TOUR JANUARY 12-14,2004, SACRAMENTO Attached for your consideration is information regarding the aforementioned conference. This annual event provides members of Contract Cities with the opportunity to inform the legislature of our goals and objectives. As this will be a critical year for contract cities,, particularly in the area of revenue restoration, and protection, the Council's participation is important. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the attendance of any Council member, City Attorney, City Manager and staff as assigned by.the City Manager. FV 2 5 2003 4,0. alitornia. Contract Cities Association ov ' 10535 Paramount Blvd., Suite #100 Downey, California 90241 EXECUTIVE BOARD PRESIDENT. CHERI KELLEY Norwalk VICE PRESIDENT MARGARET E. FINLAY Duarte SECRETARY/TREASURER DAVID A. SPENCE _ -La Canada Flintridge DIRECTOR AT LARGE MARGARET CLARK 'Rosemead . ' ' DIRECTOR AT LARGE DEB_ ORAH H. O'CONNOR Diamond Bar BUDGET & AUDIT COMMITTEE RANDY BOMGAARS. CHAIR Bellflower BY -LAWS COMMITTEE RAY T. SMITH. CHAIR Bellflower CITY /COUNTY CONTRACTS COMMITTEE MIKE DISPENZA, CHAIR Palmdale _ CITY MGRSJCITY ADM. COMMITTEE ERNIE GARCIA- CHAIR Norwalk LEGAL COMMITTEE STEPHEN A. DEL GUERCIO. CHAIR La Canada Flintridge LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE ANTHONY I. PORTANTINO. CHAIR La Canada Flintridge RESOLUTIONS COMMITTEE BEATRICE PROD, CHAIR Pico Rivera SELECTION COMMITTEE JACQUELIN MCHENRY CHAIR Claremont SPECIAL EVENTS COMMITTEE JOHN F. CRAWLEY, CHAIR Cerritos PAST PRESIDENT JOHN C. McTAGGART Rancho Palos Verdes EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR • (562) 928 -5533 FAX (562) 928 -9557 www.contracicnies.org E -mail: ccca970aol.com November 13, 200' ALL MEMBERS & EVENT PARTICIPANTS FROM: CHERI KELLEY, PRESIDENT ANTHONY PORTANTINO, LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE CHAIR SUBJECT: SACRAMENTO LEGISLATIVE ORIENTATION TOUR JANUARY 12 -14, 2004 The Sacramento Legislative Orientation Tour is in its 37th year. The Sheraton Grand Hotel is our new conference headquarters. We urge all members of the Association to attend. We want our concerns to be considered and we are counting on your support. The legislature. convenes January 5, 2004 with Arnold Schwarzenegger as our new Governor along with an eager new Assembly Speaker and many new Cabinet and Department heads. This may be the most critical year for contract cities and local government in general. The history of this tour has proven to be effective in not only developing relationships with our legislators but it also provides us with the opportunity for face to face contact and a vehicle for open discussion on pertinent issues. We have invited Governor Elect Arnold Schwarzenegger to participate. The program will include small meetings with legislators; coffee sessions with members of the State Senate and Assembly Leadership; and a reception in the Capitol Rotunda. The schedule below is tentative and subject to change. Remember, there is strength in numbers! MONDAY. JANUARY 12, 2004 9:00 a.m. -3:00 p.m.. 5:00 -6:30 p.m. TUESDAY. JANUARY 13, 2004 9:00 -11:45 a.m 12:00 p.m.-2:00 p.m. 5:30 -7:30 p.m. "Meet 'n Greet" with Senate & Assembly Leadership Conference Registration & Delegate Reception Coffee Sessions, Legislative Advocacy and Governor's Address in the State Capitol Luncheon Session — Sheraton Grand Ballroom Department of Finance - Governor's Budget . LEGISLATIVE RECEPTION State Capiro( Rotunda .Guests of Honor: State Senators and Assembly members, Constitutional Officers, Governor's Cabinet Members Sta an or TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS, ROSEMEAD. CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CROVVJ�Y MANAGER DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 2003 RE: AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE:; GUARDING THE PUBLIC CHECKBOOK, APRIL. 22-24,2004, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS Attached for your consideration is information regarding the aforementioned conference. There will be sessions on: Infrastructure Planning and Financing; Financial Accounting, Reporting, and Annual Audit; and Local Government Capital Financing Strategies. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the attendance of any Council member and staff as assigned by the City Manager. NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES: LEADERSHIP TRAINING INSTITUTE ......... LoGal Government Finance: in the Public Chec.kh k Guard g 4 1 ��„yy��`;,' "�' -� � � 4iiW'u. Svii'fQ•ti� . Y.v5i . I � ' CO SPONSORED BY THE FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES AND THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE Understanding Your Role People often enter life as a local elected official with a pocketful of WWI ei'Tui ideas to improve their city, school district, or county. It doesi'ttake long, however, before they hit a seemingly impenetrable barrier that frustrates. their plans— a lack of understanding 'of their government's budget and finances. - - - Overseeing finances is not an easy job. As a local official, you are ultimately Yield accountable for your city budget and finances. It is the responsibility of the local official to know and understand the city budget, capital Improvement programming and prioritization, as well as develop effective fiscal policies and understand local government financial administration. Constituents expect their leaders to have Integrity, along with the knowledge, skills, resources, and abilities to build a sound financial position for their city. Understanding Your Financial Oversight Responsibilities . How do you live up to constituent expectations? There is a dearth of easily understood budget and financial information; much of the financial literature is written in a very technical and detailed manner. Yes, budgets, capital plans and financial reports can be intimidating. But they don't have to be. Take advantage of the opportunity to work in -a small group setting and broaden your urideistanding of local government finance. Join leading trainers and experts who specialize in local government finance. Issues. Engage in .a program where you-can.learn'strategies and tech- niques to increase your. proficiency and comfort in dealing with financial oversight i esponsibilities as an elected official. Gain knowledge of budget manage- merrt, capital Improvement planning, financial crisis warning signs and the perils of micro- management. Establish Accountability and Fiscal Responsibility As a leader, you must find effective solutions to emerging concerns and challenges in your commu- pity. Learn howto put capital facilities and infrastruc tures into place Learn to develop strategies for establishing a policy framework for capital budgeting in an effort for maintaining adequate operating fund balances and funding capital reserves. Salve the mystery of local government accounting as you learn the whys, what's and how's of the annual financial report and understand its key elements.' The National League of Cities Leadership Institute on 'Local Government Finance: Guarding the Public Checkbook' will broaden your understanding and ability in dealing with financial oversight responsibill- ties to help you better serve your community. Local Government Finance: Guarding the Public Checkbook The preliminary schedule of events for the seminar (subject to change)... Thursday, January 29th / April 22nd 1:00 -6:00 pm REGISTRATION Exploring Clearwater, FL /San Antonio, TX (on your own) Friday, January 30th / April 23rd 8100 am CONTINENTAL BREAKFAST 0:o0-12m noon Boilers & sense: Guarding the Public Checkbook is Len Wood 12:00 -1:30 om LUNCH 1:30 -5:00 pm Dollars °& sense: Guarding the Public Checkbook it Len Wood 6:00 pm RECEPTION Saturday, January 31 st / April 24th 8:00 am 830 -1730 am CONTINENTAL BREAKFAST infrastructure Planning and Financing for Local Elected officials * Dr. A. John "Jack" Vogt 10:30 -12:00 noon Local Government Capital Financing strategies Roundtable * Ken Bacchus, Moderator, Panel: Councilmember Renee Flowers; Mayor Pro Tem Ralph McCloud; Mayor Pro Tem Jacob Montoya; Councilmember. Greg Patton; and Mayor Dottie Reeder 12:00 -1:30 pm 1:30 -3:30 pm LUNCH Financial Accounting, Reporting, and Annual Audit it David Bean 3:30 -5:00 pm .. Local Government Accountability and Fiscal Responsibility nouadtable * Ken Bacchus, Moderator, Panel: Councilmember Renee Flowers; Mayor Pro Tem Ralph McCloud; Mayor Pro Tem Jacob Montoya; Councilmember Greg Patton; and Mayor Dottie Reeder Core Competency: Competent Practitioner_. 8 Credits in the Certificate-of Achievement in Leadership program l TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMEAIaj t�ITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CRO CITY MANAGER DATE: MAY 21, 2003 RE: AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES EXECUTIVE FORUM, JULY 16-18,2003, MONTEREY Attached for your consideration is information regarding the aforementioned conference. This years sessions include the following topics: State of Affairs of Cities, Maintaining the Public's Trust, Technology, Water Supply, Transportation and Housing. Council and staff have attended this conference in the past. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council authorize the attendance of any Council Member, City Attorney, City Manager and staff as assigned by the City Manager. COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 2 7 2003 ITEM No.-1Y. e C -� 4 LEAGuT, OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 1400 K S7REEr SACK AMEN'ro. GA 95814 916 658.8200 Annoucing the 440 V VMAYORS AND COUNCIL MEMBERS EXECUTIVE FORUM Ifednesday, July 16 - Friday, July 18, 2003 and ACADEMY WORKSHOPS Friday, July 18 - Saturday, July 19, 2003 Monterey Conference Center, Monterey, California You Will g'i'ant To Attend If You Are A... i Mayor • Council Member • Ciry Manager You Will Benefit From These Two Programs By... i Empowering yourself with current state budget information Gaining a better understanding of California's housing crisis ➢ Learning how to maintain the public's trust in local government 9 )Making and renewing valuable contacts and friendships Prh,') V V taming Advanced Leadership level credit in the League's Mayors and Council Members Academy (MCA) .y Executive Forum Preliminary Program Thursday July 17, 2003 Please Note: Session times.- titles. and tonics are subiect to change. Registration and CityBooks Open - Monrerer Con erence Center 7:330 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Concurrent Breakfast Issue Briefings and Discussion Forums 8:00 — 9:30 a.m. BRIEFING: SETTING SENSIBLE TECHNOLOGY POLICIES FOR YOUR CITY Have you heard of working smarter and not harder? Technology is a key factor in working smarter. From communicating to finding needed information on the web, technology affects the way we work, play, and manage our lives and those we represent. Learn what your city can do to set sensible technology policies. BRIEFING: WATER SUPPLY- HOW DOES A CITY PREPARE FOR THE FUTURE? Water sustains life and our supply of water is a growing concern. The public has a heightened awareness of potential shortages. Learn how to make better decisions on housing and redevelopment; as water becomes a more.serious issue. FORUM: INVESTING IN THE FUTURE — CONNECTING WITH T14E NEXT GENERATION OF CITIZENS How can you help the neat generation of citizens become interested in city government? Learn what is being done to promote youth programs and local government so your constituents of the future are connected to their city. FORUM: SERVING OTHER CULTURES California is a collection of cultures. Effective communication with diverse cultures in your community is always a challenge. This interesting discussion explores what others have tried and what has been successful so you can be more effective. FORUM: SMALL CITIES — I'NFORn4ATION AND ANSWERS Small cities with populations under 15;000, that are not adjacent to larger cities, have unique issues and problems. Here is a chance to participate in a round table discussion to share solutions among officials from smaller cities. General Session . CITIES' LEADERSHIP ROLE IN PROVIDING HOUSING 10:00 - 11:45 a.m. This session will look at the'various and conflicting issues defining California's housing crisis, how all cities are affected and how cities are taking the lead in solving the problem. Consider the options available to cities and how you can create the climate to exercise those options. General Luncheon Noon - 1:45 p.m. IS CALIFORNIA DREAMING? TIME TO WAKE UP! What are the major issues facing California in general and specifically for cities? Budget. education, and housing are just some of the major topics of public interest. Find out more at this luncheon. Thursday July 17,_2003, continued Please Note; Session, time §;;,title`s, and topics are subiect to chance. PUBLIC SAFETY ISSUES - GANG MITIGATION, MEGAN'S LAW UPDATE, AND THE AMBER ALERT PROGRAM Public safety and security is on the mind of everyone these days. In general. gang activity has been increasing alone with crime. Learn how Megan's La%y and the Amber Alert System has helped. to increase public awareness of crimes and help to solve some of them. FACILITATOR SKILLS FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS - PART II This is a continuation of this topic from the 2:00 - 3:15 p.m. session. Latino Caucus Reception 5:00 - 6:30 p.m. Evening Free Friday �1, July 18 2003 _Please Note_, Session umesz-titles i. nd,topte, are_subiect to_change._ . Registration and CityBooks Open - Montere>> Conference Cemer- 7:30 — 11:00 a.m. Breakfast Issue Briefings and Discussion Forum 8:00 — 9:15 a.m. BRIEFING: HOT LAND USE ISSUES Learn about hot land use issues such as land acquisitions and casinos; and hillside development ordinances and how to set policies to deal with them. BRIEFING: COASTAL CITIES ISSUES What are the changes in the coastal commission and how does that affect your programs and options. Learn to better manage your city within these restrictions. FORUM: CITY - SCHOOL COLLABORATION What options and actions leverage resources in the public interest in the efforts to foster a good partnership? Discuss with others who want to achieve the same goal. FORUM: WE HAVE THE NEW TECHNOLOGY — NOW WHAT? What technology is available to make your life easier and how can you use it? Come prepared to discuss real problems and how technology can help solve them. FORUM: ATTRACTING TALENT TO YOUR CITY HALL What can you as an elected official do to help draw the best and the brightest to work for your city? Explore your options in this informative session. Academy Workshops Program Friday July 189'2093 These Academy Sessions regaire a separate registration. You ntust select a workshop to be registered Registration and CityBooks Open - Alonterev Conference Center 11:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Concurrent Workshop Sessions 1:30 - 5:00 p.m. BUILDING COLLABORATIVE PARTNERSHIPS: AN INTRODUCTION TO INTEREST - BASED PROBLEM SOLVING AND NEGOTIATIONS - PART I Cities are becoming increasingly interested in cultivating relationships with employees and citizens that are consistent with values of conununity building. This includes approaches to negotiations, workplace relationships. and customer service. While you may not always be at the table, it is essential that you have a working- knowledge of the principles and processes that are of work and the vital role that elected officials play in encouraging and supporting these approaches. This intensive and interactive two -part workshop will give a solid introduction to these increasingly valuable tools. Part II follows on Saturday. .PRESIDING OFFICER WORKSHOP - PART I Have you ever sat through a meeting where the presider did not keep things focused and moving? Have you ever participated in various public meetings and felt things were not as orderly as you'd like? Do you know how to get your points across and build consensus'? This workshop will provide some practical tips and skills for participating and running a meeting and give you a chance to practice what you have learned. It will cover both formal procedures and more informal facilitation skills. Part 11 follows on Saturday. THE FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBILITIES OF.ELECTED OFFICIALS: BUDGETS, AUDITS AND MEANINGFUL REPORTS - PART I . As a trustee of the city, you have a special and serious obligation to safeguard the fiscal assets of the public. Do you know how to best carry out this responsibility? Do you know the right questions to ask? Do you know what to look for in financial reports to determine if things are in good or bad shape or are trending in a certain direction? Come to the first of a two -part session for practical answers. Pan II follows on Saturday. UNDERSTANDING REDEVELOPMENT PART I - ITS PURPOSE, POWERS, AND FUNDING A panel of experts in the field of redevelopment will present the basics of what a redevelopment agency does and how it is financed. By attending this session, you will gain an understanding of redevelopment fundamentals that apply to every agency including the legal basis and powers of a redevelopment agency, how project areas are adopted and how property tax increment works and buying and selling property. Part II follows on Saturday. Reception 5:00 - 6:00 p.m. Enjoy this chance to relax and make new friends who can help you do your job better. Registration Refund Policy Special Accommodations Guest /Spouses Local Activities Hotel Reservations Hotels Airlines Directions Registrations postmarked by Friday, June 20, 2003, will receive in addition to program materials and event coupons, a 525 discount coupon to be used at the CityBooks bookstore. CitvBooks can help increase your leadership skills and professional knowledge in vital areas. Don't muss this great way to expand and share your learning with colleagues at city hall! Full payment must accompany the registration form. Check. Money Order, Visa of MasterCard are accepted. The League is unable to accept purchase orders, .American Express or Discover cards. If paying by credit card please fax your registration form to (916) 655 -8220 or register online at www.cacities.org/even_ts Executive Forum Full Conference One Day Only Academy Workshop City Officials $370.00 City Officials 5225.00 Full Workshop Other Public Officials 5420.00 Other Public Officials S275.00 City Officials 5290.00 All Others $470.00 All Others $325.00 If you have questions, please contact the League Conference Registration Office at (916) 656- 8291. Advance registrants unable to attend this meeting will only receive a refund of the registration fee, less a S50 processing charee, by submitting a written request to the League of California Cities, Conference Registration Office; 1400 R Street. Sacramento, CA 95814, fax (91,6) 658- 8220. Requests for refunds must be received by Friday. July 11, 2003. Substitutions may be made, even on -site. b i If you require special accommodations related to facility access, conin unication and /or diet, pease contact our Conference Registrar at (916) 658 -8291. There is no registration fee to attend the Mayors and Council Members Executive Forum sessions for guest/spouses who are not city or other public officials or vendors to cities. Guest/ spouses of registered attendees may purchase meal tickets for an additional fee at the meeting registration desk. For information on events within in the City of Monterey, please contact the hotel Concierge desk or visit www.gomonterev.ore. Please complete the Hotel Reservation Form and mail or fax it to the Monterey Housing Bureau OR make your reservations on -line at wu,w.cacities.org /events. Reservations must be received by Tuesday, June 10, 2003 and will require a deposit. If you are unable to attend, the deposit will be refunded if your reservation at the Marriott Hotel is cancelled 48 hours prior to arrival date or at the Doubletree Hotel is cancelled 24 hours prior to arrival date. Doubletree Hotel Monterey Marriott Hotel 2 Portola Plaza 350 Calle Principal Monterey, CA 93940 Monterey, CA 93940 (831) 619 -4511 (83 1) 649 -4234 $165.00 single/double (plus 10.05% hotel tax) . $161.00 single /double (plus 10.00% hotel tax) Valet parking 515 /day, self-parking S13 /day Valet parking 515 /dav, nearby self - parking S5 /day ww,w doubletreemonterev.com wtivw.marriott.com Check the League Web page; www.cacities.org /traveh for the new Enhanced Local Government Airfare Program. From Northern California Take Highway 101 South to Highway 156 West to Highway 1 South Exit at Pacific Grove /Del Monte Avenue. Continue down Del Monte .Avenue for 1.5 miles, staying in the left lane. Stay to the left past the fork following downtown signs (not going through the runnel). The convention center is 2 blocks,up on the right side in Portola Plaza (Right tun) off Del Monte Blvd.). From Southern California Traveling On 101 North Take Monterey Peninsula Exit, which will bring you to Highway 68. Travel on Highway 68 to Highway 1 South. Take the first Monterey exit Turn right at the first stop light (Camino Aguajito) and continue until it dead -ends. Turn left on Del Monte Avenue and stay to the left past the fork following downtown signs (not going through the tunnel). The convention center is 2 blocks up on the right side in Portola Plaza (Right tuna off Del Monte Blvd.). Mayors and Council Members Executive .Forum Wednesdcty, Judy 16 - Fridap, July 18, 2003 Monterey Conference Center, A4omere-, California (Please use the.A9C4 Registration form to register for that program) We invite you to register on -line by going to our website tvwtv.caci ties. ore /events Full Conference . OR fill out this form completely and return it to the City Officials _ @ 5370.00 . @ 5420.00 League of California Cities Other Public Officials _ 5470.00 All Others _ @ Please enter your name and title, as they should appear on "', One Dav Only Please indicate Total 5 which day you will be your name badge and registration. Please indicate, guest /spouse's name if attending (if guest spouse is.nofa attending , ❑ Wednesday ❑ Thursday ❑ Friday public or city official). Please complete one form per Ci Officials - _ @ S275.00 registrant. Confirmations will be mailed to the- address Other Public Officials . _ @ S275.00 desitmated below. All Others @ $325.00 Total S Name Title Fax 1 atmo Caucus @ S100.00 /year z Total S Payment Information'. `.� Please note the League. is•unable to accept purchase orders, ` : American Ekc ,ress or Discover cards at this ume. If -paying by credit Icara please fax your repstrait on form to (916) 658 -5220. 1 r r� ❑AfasterCard t ❑Pso ernal Check —.... ... .... Cardholder -Name CQil Card Nombef -f , ' c; Expiralma Date If you require special accommodations related to facility access, communication and /or diet ,please ^arnor "` contact oiir Conference Rey tstrar at (916) :658-8294-. Submit this Registration form by Friday, June 20, 2003, receive a coupon worth S25 redeemable at CityBooks. League of California Cities Board policy allows cip officials who wish to join a recognized diversity group to do so in conjunction with this conference. If interested in joining, simply include your dues when remitting your registration fee. ing by check or money order, please mail to: League of California Cities' 1400 K Street Sacramento, California 95814 NOTE: All cancellations must be submitted in writing and are subject to a 850 processing fee. No refunds will be Riven for cancellation requests received after Friday. July 11, 2003 Registration Forms Must Be Postmarked or Faxed By Friday, June 20, 2003 After this date, please register on site. Mayors and Council Members Academy Workshop Wednesda-, July 1 S - Frick% Julie 19, 20031 Alotuere- Coi ference Center, Alonterev, California (Please use the E- vecutive Forrim Registration farm to regisierfor that program) We invite you to register on -line by going to our website www.cacities.ora,/events OR fill out this form completely and return it to the Leap to of California Cities Please enter vom' name and title, as they should appear on your name badge and registration. Please indicate guest /spouse's name if attending (if guest/spouse is not a public or city official). Please complete one form per registrant. Confirmations will be mailed to the address designated below. Full Workshop City Officials @ S290.00 Total S _ Please indicate one choice of workshops: (A workshop MUST be selected to be i ceistered.) • Bttildine Collaborative Partnerships Workshop • Presiding Officer Workshop • Redevelopment Workshop • Fiduciaty Responsibilities Workshop (Each workshop tuns Friday afternoon through Saturday Morning) Name -_ _ Title Payment Information: Please note; the League.is tunable to accept purchase orders, Address where confirmation is to be mailed - . `. American Express or Discover cards at this time. If paying by ' credii card please fax your registration form to (916) 658 -8220. Ciq zip Code - ';❑ MasterCard - ❑Personal Check' ❑� isa ❑City Check Cardholder Name -. Telephone Fax Credit Card Number Expiration rate Email - Au[horiied Signature If you require special accommodations related to If paying by check or money order, please mail to: facility access, communication and /or diet, please,;,, contact out- Conference Registrar at (916) 658- 8291_. League of California Cities 1400 K Street Sacramento, California 9814 Submit this Registration form by Friday, June 20, 2003, and receive a coupon worth $25 redeemable at CityBooks. NOTE: All cancellations must be submitted in N%riting and are subject to a $50 processing fee. No refunds will be given for cancellation requests received after Friday, July 11, 2003. Registration Forms Must Be postmarked or Faxed By Friday, June 20, 2003 After this date, please register on site. HOTEL RESERVATION FORM. Mayors and Council Members Executive Forum and Academy Workshops I•I'ednesday, Al'v 16 - Saturday, Jttl>> 19, 2003 tLlonterer Conference Center Monterey California Please DO NOT return this fonn to the League of California Cities We invite you to reserve your room by going to our website Deposit Information: The hotel requires a deposit in the amount of the first night room rate. wN'W.ea CItIC,S.Org /C \'C�ts Housing fonts received without a valid credit card or check deposit OR fill out this fort completely and mail or fax it to the' will be returned and will not be processed. (No cash deposits Monterey Housing Bureau at (83 1) 6488-5373. _ - accepted.) Please make copies of this form if additional rooms are to be reserved. If faxing this form, please do not mail a duplicate copy. •Please make checks payable to: Phone reservations will not be accepted MCCVB- Housne Bureab' ' PO Box 1770 Name Title r Mailing Address City Zip Code t i e I i :rf Telephone ' Pax v'•71 Email i a Arrival Date and Time w � e�3 Departure Dale and Time � ,�„1.. • ' � S' 1 p' s,yi '] AM; OrPM'`'F'- xk Room Preferences: ❑ I will share a room with: • Non smoking room • Handicapped access ❑ Single - Kimi ❑ Double - 1 Bed ❑ Double - 2 Beds There are no guarantees on room type, although the hotel will do evennhing possible to accommodate your request. Room assignments are based can a first -come. first- seined basis Monterey, Californiau93942' ' _ Deposits by .credit card, require :the following information: 1 ,Cred+i Card Number��t Expiration Date 1e i Please check the hotel 5165;00 single /double (plus 10.05% hotel tax) - ;Moritere}.�Marrziott Hotel t r $161:OO+sirtg le/ double (plus 10.00 % hotel tax) ;'hotels aret'full, please refer to the nest available hotel —Comparable room rate Proximity to conference site Confirmation: If you do not receive a confirmation via e -mail, fax or mail within 14 days after any transaction, please contact the Monterey Housing Bureau at (831) 657 -6419. FAX completed reservation fonn to the MONTEREY HOUSING BUREAU at (8j 1) 645 -5373 Reservations Must Be Received no Later Than 3:00 PM on TUESDAY, JUNE 10,2003 CC -A APPROVAL OF ADDITIONAL FIREWORKS STAND LOCATIONS C -B AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES �C EXECUTIVE FORUM, JULY 16-18,2003, MONTEREY CC -C AUTHORIZATION TO.ATTEND 8Tn ANNUAL RISK MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, OCTOBER 8-10,2003, CARLSBAD MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER CLARK that the Council approve the aforementioned items on the Consent Calendar. Vote resulted: Yes: Clark, Taylor, Vasquez, Alarcon No: None Absent: Imperial Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. V. MATTERS FOR DISCUSSION AND ACTION'= None VI. STATUS REPORTS - None VH. MATTERS FROM OFFICIALS - None V111. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE Juan Nunez, 2702 Del Mar, Rosemead, asked when the study session to discuss San Gabriel Boulevard improvements will be held? Bill Crowe, City Manager, stated that the Council will adjourn to June 3, 2003, for the Budget Study Session, and that the capital improvement study session be held on June 10 th , at 6:00 p.m., prior to the regular City Council meeting. Mr. Nunez requested that staff inspect the rmanholes on San Gabriel Boulevard, as they are in bad condition. IX. ADJOURNMENT There being no further action to be taken at this time, the meeting was adjourned at 8:35 p.m. to June 3, 2003, at 6:00 p.m. Respectfully submitte : City Clerk CCWN:5 -28 -03 Page 94 1,, TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE ROSE CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL C OWE, CITY MANAGER DATE: June 18, 2002 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PARTNERSHIP WITH THE MONTEBELLO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR USE OF HOME FUNDS In Fiscal Year 1996, the City of Rosemead became an entitlement jurisdiction for HOME funds. HOME funds are federal funds restricted to the creation of affordable housing. Under this program, the City is entitled to a formula share of HOME funds. The City's annual allocation is a little over $500,000 per year. Of the total amount, 15% must be set aside for Community Development Housing Organizations (CHDO's). Since 1996, the City was successful in using HOME funds in the acquisition and construction of the Garvey senior housing development. However, beginning in 1999, the City has had difficulty in finding eligible projects in which to expend the funds. HOME funds are highly restrictive and must be obligated for expenditure within twenty -four (24) months of receipt of funds or they are subject to recapture by the federal government. Background The City has created the Mortgage Assistance Program (MAP) using HOME funds. That program began in FY 2001 -2002. Because of the steep increase in housing prices in the City of Rosemead, the City has had difficulty in expending the full amount of HOME funds available. Because of this, the City will not meet its July obligation deadline for use of FY 2001 HOME funds. The total amount of at -risk funding is $250,000 for FY 2001 funds, the period for which obligation is required. COUNCIL AGE DA JUN 2 4.2003 ITEM ado.. y . de-0. Discussion In 2002, staff met with representatives of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in order to discuss fund obligation and expenditure. In that meeting, HUD staff stated that there was no statutory requirement that HOME funds be spent within the jurisdiction and further stated that the City had the opportunity to partner with other communities in order to use these funds. HUD further stated that the City could partner for both entitlement funds, as well as CHDO set -aside funds. In June 2002, the City partnered with the Los Angeles Community Development Commission for the use of HOME funds in the construction of affordable rental housing in the East Los Angeles area. That project is currently under construction. Units will be marketed to Rosemead residents, as well as to other County residents. Recognizing the needs to expend HOME funds for projects other than the Mortgage Assistance Program, the City Council, in a public hearing on May 13, 2003, approved creation of a HOME development fund. During preparation for the City's annual home ownership fair, the City was approached by the Montebello Housing Development Corporation (MHDC) regarding regional development opportunities. The MHDC was originally' created by the City of Montebello, but has since become an independent non - profit organization that develops affordable housing within the region. The MHDC is a recognized Community Housing Development Corporation (CHDO) by the State of California. The MHDC is proposing to construct six (6) affordable for -sale housing units within the City of Montebello. Staff is recommending that the City enter ` into a commitment agreement to provide $250,000 in HOME - funded financing for the project. In return, the MHDC must market the units and make applications available to Rosemead residents. The agreement will provide that the units: 1. Be available to HOME - qualified low -to- moderate income residents 2. Be marketed and available to Rosemead residents 3. That the loan will be forgiven on a per -unit basis once the units are sold to qualified purchasers and the funds can be used to subsidize the purchase by qualified applicants . 4. That funds returned to the MHDC from resale of the property will be used to develop additional affordable housing Attached for your review are the following: 1. Letter from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development regarding partnerships 2. Letter from MHDC 3. Draft Marketing Plan 4. Proposed Financing Plan 5. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Montebello- Planned Development and Tentative Parcel Map for Townhouse Condominium Purposes HOME Partnership, 2 RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the City Council approve the partnership with Montebello Housing Development Corporation; 2. Authorize the City Attorney to finalize the commitment agreement and related documents; and 3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute all agreements HOME Partnership, 3 p YF M1` Ip..M1 Oo Lsb+n oNE o�z U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Los Angeles Area office, PacifirJHavraii 611 W. 6th Street, 6th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017 MEMORANDUM FOR: HOME Participating Jurisdictions within the jurisdiction of the Los Angeles Community Planning and Development (CPD) Field Office Attention: Chief Executive Officials and HOME Program Coordinators FROM Ro ert G. llumi r, D epu� re tor, Office of Community Planning and Development, Los Angeles Field Office, 9DDS Subject: HOME Investment Partnership Program Timeliness and Program Capacity During the last several months, CPD Program staff have been engaged in reviewing Southern California's HOME Participating Jurisdictions (PJ) progress in committing and expending HOME funds. This review is necessary because the HOME Program Statute requires that HOME funds awarded to local governments must be committed within 2 years of award by HUD and expended within 5 years as described in 24CFR 92.500 (d)(1) of the HOME Regulations. While a large majority of PJs in Southern California have been successful in meeting the HOME commitment and expenditure requirement, there is still a handful of PJs each year that have not been so successful. This has resulted in the deobligation of uncommitted funds by HUD of valuable affordable housing resources involving several million dollars. The recaptured funds are returned to Washington D.C. but more importantly, they are lost to many low and moderate income families in Southern California seeking and needing safe, decent and sanitary affordable housing. We recognize that affordable housing in Southern California is at a premium, as land for development becomes more limited and its use more restrictive. Housing articles appearing in local papers and elected officials with housing, as their platform, have underscored the need to maintain and develop more affordable housing. But some communities somehow find themselves not being able to use the limited housing resources awarded by HUD. In some cases several thousand dollars have been taken away from a PJ and combined with other deobligation actions over the years, have resulted in the loss of several million dollars to Southern California. HUD and Local Government Partnerships. Since the inception of the HOME Program in 1992, the Los Angeles Community Planning and Development Office has provided HOME PJs with technical assistance, on how to manage and develop HOME assisted projects by offering workshops and problem solving, one on one, technical assistance. PJs have taken advantage of the TA that has been offered and many have been successful under the HOME program. For those PJs that continue to. struggle with the program, the time has come.for an honest self- examination of their capacity to effectively administer and carryout the HOME program in a timely manner. If a PJ cannot commit and expend HOME funds within the statutory time limits, established for the program, perhaps they should terminate their PJ status. If funds are not being committed in a timely manner because of limited staffing, perhaps it is.time to hire staff. If a PJ is dependent on a consultant to manage and develop HOME assisted housing and now finds itself losing HOME funds perhaps it is time to re- examine its consultants abilities in carrying out the City /County's affordable housing program. As you know, the Los Angeles CPD Field Office will do whatever it can to assist PJs in carrying out authorized HOME activities in order to prevent the loss of an important affordable housing resource for Southern California. However, avoiding the deobligation of HOME funding can only be done if the PJ is willing to make fundamental change(s) in how their program is designed and or managed. If not, no amount of TA can prevent funds from being deobligated from a non- performing or slow performing PJ. There are several alternatives available to PJs that are finding it difficult to implement its HOME program. One alternative is partnering with a neighboring PJ or a Community Development Block Grant entitlement community. Pooling �nbrJ resources can be a cost effective approach since the need for affordable housing is a regional concern and not confined to county or city boundaries. Another p alternative is forming a HOME Consortium. \ Consortiums are contiguous communities. A lead agency is identified and is responsible for the overall administration of the program. Members of the consortium are free to develop policies for selecting appropriate projects. Depending on the number of consortium members HOME allocations to Consortiums are often 50 -100% more than what a typical PJ receives. Another alternative is awarding all or a significant amount of HOME funds to a very capable housing nonprofit and if it qualifies as a community housing development organization (CHDO), the PJ will meet the 15 percent CHDO set -aside requirement. Remember a PJ is allowed to go beyond the 15 percent CHDO set - aside requirement. Again, the point of this exercise is to keep affordable housing resources in our region instead of returning it and losing it. If you are interested in exploring or pursuing these and other program alternatives, please call your CPD Representative. Our goal is to assist grantees to effectively utilize the limited housing and community development resources that have been awarded by HUD. When program funds are returned, we need to examine whether we, as partners, with local governments have been effective in utilizing the resources that are available for improving low- income neighborhoods and preserving and increasing the number of affordable housing units. In addition to monitoring grantee compliance with regulatory and statutory program requirements, a Field Office must also provide adequate notice to grantees concerning their performance and provide grantees the necessary tools and advice to improve performance. We will continue to provide the notices and the technical assistance necessary to assist grantees in carrying out authorized activities and trust that as a HOME PJ that you will make the improvements that are necessary to fully utilize the affordable housing resources awarded to you by HUD. Y Y A Non- Profi[ Corporuion .Tune 12. 2003 Mr. Bill Crowe City Manager City of Rosemead 8838 E. Valley Boulevard Rosemead, California 91770 Dear Mr. Crowe; I want to thank you and your staff for taking the time to meet with me and discuss the potential of the Montebello Housing Development Corporation (MHDC) receiving a funding allocation from the city's HOME funds. As indicated during our conversation, our agency is a non - profit public benefit corporation 501 (c) (3) with a mission of addressing housing issues in the community. We are in the final pre - development stages of an in -fill single- family detached housing project for homeownership by low- income individuals and families. The project is being built on property owned by MHDC, located in the city of Montebello at •236 -240 3rd Street. Said development will utilize a vacant parcel (26,400 sq. ft.) and deliver six single - family detached dwellings.. These 1,475 ft. two-story homes. will provide four bedrooms, 2.5 bathrooms and a two -car garage. The City of Montebello has approved this PUD and we are in the process of resubmitting plans for final correction check and permit issuance for construction. We anticipate that construction will begin within 45 days of.permit issuance (9/03) and that construction will be completed within 160 to 180 days. We estimate that development costs will be 51.310,000. Construction will account for $872,000 and land for 5260,000, and soft costs of $178,000. The homes will be made available to first -time homebuyers within the 80% of the county of Los Aneeles Median Income. Which will make the use of HOME funds possible. Our proposal calls for the City of Rosemead to provide 5240,000 of HOME funds to assist us with the construction costs. Upon construction being completed and the homes being 1619 Paramount Boulevard • "0ontebello. California 90640 (323) 722 -3955 • (323) 722 -3958 • Fax (323) 722 -3837 www.intbhousingeorp.com sold, instead of repaying the funds to the City of Rosemead, the funds would be utilized to provide second mortgage loans to qualified buyers. MHDC would work with City of Rosemead housing staff to provide a priority to homebuyers meeting Rosemead criteria for the second mortgage loan program. These individuals would receive assistance of $40,000 each. Additionally, MHDC would consider providing the land value ($43,000 per home) as added acquisition assistance. The loans will be deferred for a period of thirty years, with a simple interest rate of 3 %. Occupancy and resale restrictions will be conditions imposed on the loans. We would ask that the City of Rosemead consider granting the funds to our corporation upon repayment of the loans by participants via a provision that makes MHDC the beneficiary of the mortgage notes. We would further commit that the repayment funds must be utilized on future projects that are done jointly with or within the City of Rosemead. Please feel free to contact me at (323) 722 -3955 if you find that the above proposal may be of interest to your community. We are prepared to move forth on this immediately, we await your reply. Sincer ly, N elson E. Oliva Executive Director MUDC A Non- Profit Corporation MARKETING PLAN 236 TO 240 S. THIRD STREET SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES The Montebello Housing Development Corporation will undertake the marketing of these homes. Marketing efforts will include outreach to the community via printed media and community presentations. The primary market group will be first time homebuyers of low- income means. Particular focus will be those large families within the community who are the primary targeted client base designated by the source of mortgage assistance funds. Residents of the -City of Rosemead and clients of the Montebello Housing Corporation will be focus of any outreach and marketing. CURRENT HOUSING MARKET CONDITION Due to the current housing market conditions specifically the price of homes in the San Gabriel Valley area, MHDC anticipates that the availability of homes, with the proposed mortgage assistance will generate overwhelming interest from aspiring homebuyers. A more realistic concern will be the selection of buyers from a large pool of qualified applicants/buyers. If needed MHDC will work with Rosemead staff on a lottery system to fairly select the buyers for these homes. MHDC has conducted these types of lotteries in the past to address the sale of homes for similar projects. PRINTED MEDIA / AVENUES Advertising will be placed in local newspapers in English, Spanish and Chinese. Flyers and information mailers will be sent to individuals in existing database of aspiring homebuyers who have been identified as meeting the qualifying criteria. PRESENTATIONS to COMMUNITY Presentations will be provided at community meetings including meeting of local service clubs, local Boards /.Associations of Realtors and the local Chambers of Commerce. Office visits will be made to local realtors, non- profit agencies and housing industry related agencies. CITY OF ROSEMEAD / MHDC CLIENT LIST MHDC will coordinate all outreach and marketing efforts with designated representatives of the City of Rosemead Housing program This coordination will include the utilization of client waiting list. 1619 Paramount Boulevard • Niontebell'o, California 90640 (323) 722 -3955 • (323) 722 -3958 • Fax (323) 732 -3837 www. mtbhousingcorp.com MUDC /lloncenclL� d- (oustn5 'Deudogmenr G'�; >nacion FINANCING PLAN 236 -240 S. THIRD STREET SINGLE FAMILY HOMES PROPERTY: A Non- Profit Corporation The Montebello Housing Development Corporation owns the subject property; which consist of approximately 26,400 sq. ft of vacant land. Said property has been approved by the City of Montebello as a Planned Unit Development of six single - family detached 1475 sq. ft. two story four bedroom homes. Homes will share common driveway, guest parking area and landscaped areas. EXPENSES (DEVELOPMENT COST): The Montebello Housing Development Corporation will develop this project utilizing multiple sources of funding. The construction will be addressed by utilizing an existing line -of credit approved by East West Bank. The following provides an overview of projected development costs: Land: 5270,000 Indirect Costs: 5210.000 Direct Costs: 5785,000 Finance /marketing costs: S 52,600 Developer Fee 5110,400 Total: $1.428,000 CITY OF ROSEMEAD HOME FUNDS: Funds provided by the City of Rosemead will be utilized to address Direct Construction Costs. Hence the projected construction loan for this activity will be reduced to 5535,000. Which will reduce the finance costs associated with this part of the development. 1619 Paramount Boulevwd • 1vlontebello. California 90640 (323)) 722 -3955 • (323) 722 -3958 • Fax (323) 722 -3837 www.mtbhousingcorp.com INCOME (SALE of HOMES):. INDIVIDUAL PROJECT Market Sale Price of Home $238,000 1,428,000 MHDC /CalHome Loan .-70,000 - 420,000 Rosemead HOME Funds Assistance - 41,666 - 249,996 $126,334 758,004 Down Payment (buyer) 5% 6,317 37,902 First Mortgage Loan $120,017 720,102 FIRST MORTGAGE LOANS: MHDC will utilize the mortgage lenders that have experience with assisting low- income first -time. homebuyers. In addition, lenders will be require to assist homebuyers in addressing the requirements for processing and obtaining Mortgage Credit Certificates as part of the home acquisition transaction. MHDC MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE LOANS: The Montebello Housing Development Corporation will utilize $420,000 of State of California CalHome Program funds to provide mortgage assistance loans of up to $70,000 to the buyers. ROSEMEAD HOME FUNDS: The HOME funds provided by the City of Rosemead to the Montebello Housing Development Corporation will be utilized for the construction of the project. MHDC is requesting that upon completion of the construction phase, the HOME funds be granted to MHDC with the condition that the funds be utilized to provide mortgage assistance loans of up to $41,666 to each qualified homebuyer ($249,966). MHDC would be the recipient of the funds upon repayment of the funds in the future. Recaptured funds would be utilized to provide housing programs approved by HUD and acceptable to the City of Rosemead as programs that would provide a benefit to Rosemead residents. MHDC would monitor compliance of the loan terms and conditions and provide annual reports to the City of Rosemead. RESOLUTION NO - 00-78A A, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MON T EBEL LO APPROVING A. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR TOWNHOUSE CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES CASE NO.: ZONE CHANGE 1 -00 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 3 -99 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. _25786 ZONE VARIANCE 2 -00 APPLICANT: ARROYO BUILDERS LOCATION: 236 and 240 S. 3b Street THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF MONTEBELLO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Montebello does hereby find, determine and declare as follows: 1. That the owners of certain real property heretofore applied for a Planned Development, a Tentative Parcel'Map, and a Zone Variance for the construction of 6 new single - family dwelling units; and 2.- Thai the Planning Commission did, on June 12,.2000 conduct a duly noticed public he:.r',ng upon said applications, and thereafter recommended approval of such applications; and 3.. Thal the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing upon said applications and based upon the said evidence presented at said hearing, and each member of the Council being familiar with the site, determined that the facts required for the approval of a Planned Development and of a Tentative Parcel Map to allow the establishment of single-family detached dwelling units on townhouse condominium sized lots is consistent wilh the provisions of the Montebello Municipal Code, and that the Planned Development and Tentative Parcel Map should be granted sup ject to the conditions hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act have been satisfed with respect to this project, In trial the City Council has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment and has adopted a Negative Declaration to that effect; and the following findings are hereby adopted as the Findings of the City Council: 1. The proposed Planned Development Precise PlahfSite Plan, Tentative Parcel Map, and Zone -Variance to alloy the establishment of 6 new single - family detached dwelling unts will not have an adverse impact on the environment as evidenced by the Initial Study of environmental impacts and Negative Declaration. 2. The proposed project will allow the establishment of 6 new single- family detached dwelling units which are consistent with subdivision rec- IS!io,s and tnj Gene, a: P:3n Land Use desienation of "Medium Density Residential" and the R-3-PD density requirement which allows for multiple family development of the type and density proposed. Moreover, the project is consistent with the objectives of the Montedelo General Plan Housing Element which encourages the development of affordable housing types in a manner which is compatible with adjacent uses. 3. Planned Development 3 -99 and Zone Variance 2 -00, together with the recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance with Section 17.38 et seq. (Planned Devlopment Dlstricis) of the Montebello Municipal Code and is consistent with the zoning regulations ?nd all ofner provisions of the Montebello Munid.Pal Code. 4. Planned Development 3 -99 and Zone Valance 2 -00 are compatible with present and future development of properties within the immediate vicinity. The subject site is located in the R-3 PD (Multiple Family Residential - Planned Development Oveday) zone which allows line proposed development. Moreover, there are other properties in the immediate vicinity of the site which have been developed at densities similar to that of the proposed project. As such, the proposal to construct 5 new detached dwelling units should not have a significant adverse impact on adjacent or abutting properties in general and the neighborhood in particular. 5. Planned Development 3 -99 and Zone Variance 2 -00 are consistent with the general peace, health, safety and general welfare of the surrounding neighborhood. The proposal includes the development of o new two -story detached dwelling units which are similar in type to typical single family dwelling units providing quality living environments. Moreover, the intent of the proposed detached dwelling units is to provide home ownership for a segment of the population in Montebello which might not otherwise have the opportunity for home ownership. NOW THEREFORE HE IT RESOLVED. that the above described Planned Development and Tentative Parcel Map are hereby granted provided that the applicant and its successors in interest comply with the following conditions of approval: 11. The development and utilization of the subject site shall substantially conform to the site plan labeled "Planning Commission Exhibit A' and dated June 112, 2000 including the uses as shown, except as provided for herein, and by subsequent revisions found by the city planner to be in substantial compliance with the intent of these provisions. 2. The following shall be provided and/or the 'planned development precise plan' shall be revised as necessary to ' provide the following in a manner subject to the approval of the Planning Department: a. A homeowners association shall be established prior to the sale of any dwelling, and conditions, covenants and restrictions shall be recorded to specify the obligations and responsibilities of each properly o4mer within the association. b. Front yards shall be landscaped by the developer with sod, shrubs, trees, and automatic Imoalion. At least one shade tree in the front yard of each new detached dwelling unit shall be provided.. Such trees shall have a minimum 3 -inch caliper trunk, a minimum height of six. (o) feel from the ground to the lowest limb, and shall reach at least fifteen (t 5) feet minimum height at maturity. C. Landscape and irrigation plans shall pe submitted for review and approval. The plan shall specify plants that would not obstruct the private street and shall be maintained so as not .. to obstruct the street at any time in the future. d. Landscape and property maintenance responsibilities of property owners shall be specified in the covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC &Rs) for the homeowners association, and shall be subject to approval_by the Planning Department. The CC &Rs shall claify use easements and maintenance responsibilities for functional landscaped areas which ey.;end nm5s lot fines and f.;r "front lard" e. The precise plan of development and the conditions, covenants and restrictions (CC &Rs) sh =_!I ereclude the addition of any new fences in front yard areas (i.e., only fencing as sho .n on precise plan shall be permit ed). f. Peroetual maintenance of the common driveway shall be provided for through the homeowners association and shall be incorporated into the conditions, covenanl=_, and restrictions (CC &Rs). g. 1 he guest parking spaces shall be striped with double lines spaced six riches apart. h. Segmented (i.e. "roll up ") garage doors with window onenines shall be installed. i. All mechanical equipment shall be screened from view from the adjacent properties. All overhead u(ility service c-onnec ions shall be placed underorcund for all units. This shall Include all power, telephone, cable television a. ",d any otiier overhead lines. The developer shall make proper provisions for all utilities including cable television. (It is recommended that electrical facilities be desioned and installed consistent with Southern California Edison Company guidelines to minimize exposures of building occupants to elactromag :netic fields.) k. Individual trash containers shall be kept in a desionated trash area on each lot. The CCERs shall specify, trash col!ectiorrservice obligations of each props y owner. 1. Parking along the private street shall not be permitted and shall be posted per City standards and included as a condition in the CC &Rs. m. Vehicles shall not be allowed to remain parked in the driveway aprons in excess of 72 hours and the CC &Rs shall include a condition to this eflect. n. All perimeter walls in public view shall consist of decorative materials such as split face block, slump stone, stucco, or other similar materials subject to the approval of the Planning Deoarment. o. 4 copy of the 'Final Conditions of Approval' shall be attached to the Bui!dinglConstniction plans when the plans are submitted for plan check. 3. The following improvements shall be completed in a manner subject to the approval of the Public Works Department:' a. All driveway approaches shall be ccnslnucted tq city standards except as othewise stated in the project's tfaSic letter, subject to the approval of the Cij' Engineer. b. All sidewalks shall be constructed to city standards on the private driveway and 3" Street frontage, except as otherwise stated in the orojec('s traffic letter. C. All utilities including water, sewer, storm drain, gas and lighting shall be installed by the developer. Note: Additional Public Wo�Ks Department conditions and comments may be required when a complete set of construction plans are submitted for review. 4. The development of and utilization of tie site shall comply with all the provisions of the Montebello tdunjcipal Code.and the City adopted versions of the Uniform Building and Fire Codes and/or the specifications of the Building or Fire Departments, including but not limited to the following: a. -I! buildings shall be fully fire sprin'klered to occupancy use oa. b. The pmpe; ty shall be posted for Fire Lane Enforcement. The PAontebello Fire Dspa;iment shall be conlacled for fire lane regiiremen's. Note: ,Addi!ional Fire Department and Building Decartmen: conditions and comments may be required when a complete se'. of construction plans are su'bmilted for revievl. 5. The development and utilization of the site shall comply with the security provisions of the lvton!ebello 1;1n nicipal Code and/or Ine SpediIC2t1gnS of the Police Depa inent Including but riot lirmd ed to the lollo',vine a. Address numbers for each dweliing uni! shall be prominently displayed on the buildings using mamerals that 2r a minimum : 4 Iaches hi heichi 2nd In a contrasting color to the background..Alj address numbers shall be illuminated during hours of darkness. 3 b. A site map shall be provided near the entrance to the site, in a bright and weather resistant case showing t'ne layout of the development and the addresses of each unit. Night lighting shall be provided for the map. C. All exterior lighting devices shall be equipped with vandal resistant covers, and shall be placed on automatic timer` so they are fumed on at dusk and ofd a•. dawn. d. Liohtino shall be provided along the common access areas aiid sidewal'rs. A liahlinc plan shall be submitted subject to the approval of the Police Department. e. The private street shall be posted for California Vehicle Code enforcement. I. All landscaping materials shall be maintained in a manner to enhance the safety and security of the site. Only low profile plants shall be used near the windows of all structures and the landscaping shall not obscure any lighting fixtures. Trees shall maintain a ground to first limb clearance of no less than six (6) feel. Ground cover materials shall not exceed three (3) feet in height, and all bushes, shrubs, hedges, etc., shall be trimmed from the ground up to a minimum of six (6) inches. g. W'al:s and fences along the perimeter of the site shall be treated to facilitate araffiti removal. In. The covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC &Rs) of the homeowners association shall include a provision that when rot in use, all garage doors shall remain secured. 6. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the planning department and by the city attorney a written document with covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC &Rs) applicable to the operation of the homeowners association for the proposed dwellings, and shall record the approved documents. The recorded CC &Rs shall include covenants to satisfy the conditions of approval specified by the city, such as those drafted by the city atiomey or as otherwise required or approved by the city attorney and the planning department. No exterior modifications to any structure or lot within this planned development, other than landscaping, shall be permitted unless the approved 'planned development precise plan' is amended. If a in would be so minor that It would have no effect on the exterior design of the precise plan, it may be approved administratively by the City Planner. Any other proposed modification, including any modifications to the location of any building walls or fences, shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission, vJIh appeal to the City Council. 8. A. legal instrument in a form acceptable to the City Attorney shall be recorded on each lot In the Planned Development so as to inform any prospective purchaser that the use of the property is subject to the requirements of this 'planned development precise plan', and of the limitations contained in Condition No. 7 above. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall forward a certified copy to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and the applicant. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 18th DAY OF July , 2000. ATTEST. Robert J. King, Clly'Clerk / Wlltiam N'. Pholinan, Nayor STATE OF CALIFORINIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )ss. CITY OF MONTEBELLO ) 1, ROBERT J. KING, City Cle ;k of the City of Montebello, do hereby certif that the foregoing Resolution No. 00 -78 duly and regul: ^sly approved and adopted by the Montebello City Council at a reeular meeting.as provided by law held.on the 18th day of, July, 2000, by the following vote therco` AYES: Members: Salazar, Lopez -Reid, Saucedo, Vasquez, Molinari NOES: Members: None ABSTAIN: Members: None ABSENT: Members: None IN P1ITNESS WHEREOF, I have herewtlo set my hand and affixed the official seal of said City on this 18th day of July, 2000. U Robert J. King, City Clerk (rm.' ) CC -I EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT FOR PARKWAY AND MEDIAN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE WITH MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENTERPRISES, INC. CC -J EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT FOR STREET TREE MAINTENANCE WITH EVAN'S TREE SERVICE CC -K EXTENSION OF LIGHTING AGREEMENT WITH QRS SERVICE CC -L APPROVAL OF LEASE AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON FOR ZAPOPAN PARK CC -M ANNUAL ADOPTION OF CITY'S INVESTMENT POLICY CC -N 2002 -03 BUDGET AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSFER $176,650 FROM UNAPPROPRIATED RESERVES TO ORGANIZATIONS 4110, 4180, 4240, 4320, 4330, 4340, 4640, 4650, 4710, AND 4740 ftft*CC -O APPROVAL OF PARTNERSHIP WITH MONTEBELLO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR USE OF HOME FUNDS MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR SECOND BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL that the Council approve the aforementioned items on the Consent Calendar. Vote resulted: Yes: No: Absent: Abstain: Alarcon, Clark, Imperial, Taylor, Vasquez None None None The Mayor, declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. V. MATTERS FOR DISCUSSION AND ACTION - None VI. STATUS REPORTS - None VII. MATTERS FROM OFFICIALS Councilman Taylor requested that the shrubs and weeds be checked at 4623 Earle Avenue. Mayor Pro Tem Clark announced to the audience that the 4a' of July Parade will start on Valley Boulevard at 10:00 a.m., with the Opening Ceremonies, carnival and fireworks at Rosemead Park. VIII. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE - None CCMIN:6 -24-03 Page s4 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEM %%CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CRVE, CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 17, 2003 RE: ACCEPTANCE OF WORK FOR STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS ON VARIOUS STREETS The referenced project has been constructed in conformance with the approved plans and specifications. Attached is a list of the streets included in the project. Attached is the final report of project cost. The original contract amount was $167,705.00. The total amount to be paid to the contractor including quantity adjustments and the retention is $167,920.70. RECOMMENDATION 1. Accept the above referenced project. 2. Authorize the recordation of the Notice of Completion by the City Clerk. 3. Authorize the release of the 10 percent retention payment 35 days after the recorded date of the Notice of Completion. Attachments 2003rsmd /staff rpts /city COUNCIL AGENDA JUN 24 2003 ITEM No. I �-� Exhibit "A" • Hellman Avenue (West City Limit/Walnut Grove) • Emerson Place (West City Limit/Del Mar) • Dorothy Avenue (Del Mar /Kelburn) • Whitmore Street (West City Limit/Jackson) • Jackson Avenue (Garvey /Columbia) • Kelburn Avenue (Emerson /Hellman) • Evelyn Avenue (Garvey /Hellman) • Prospect Avenue (Garvey/Whitmore) M G z a E @ z o a a I°- U 0 m 0 LL r O O r O O O CL c V LU I.f �O � 0 r O E Co Co 0 (V ui ♦� v I p = a! a L U m = rp aL° ,� d ° O O V ol Ix 49 CO) U U 10 E 0 U n a m o r ot x `o 00 m 4U LPL = w . U v fno'_ Z UN O m m d m�+ so so U G z a E @ z o a a I°- U 0 E i ° .° - W d o m m 0 0 c 0 c V d �O 0 r O E Co Co 0 (V ui m a! L U m = c m Vl ° 10 E 0 U n m o r ot x `o 00 m V = w . U v fno'_ E i ° .° - W d o m M I S W D a O as a z O U r N Z V ' y U) N wQ W CL _ 9 O a a m U 0 m 0 m0 0 o� m c W a CL V �O r O r O Co Co 0 (V ui 43 Q Z r O a 0 0 O O N O ;J 0 0 O N r 0 00 0 o ma. � Ul 2 U �w da wwU 7 a m y. p 1 1 F O O FS c p E rn m rn o N..F. } F Q O m ir m m z 0 ?4_' p U a > p 0 7 O o o j a o m tir f �r-am rn m N m m m N; 7 F r O R O Q rC O m � LU w a t` o F W �1 fq �+Sd I o a CS a z Q U O QQ QQ J J J QQ , W W W rv�w ay ��tll as U O W W N y n s` m a m m E E 8 m 'a ' d E o s s z n Q Q U x N x m .-. 6 6 ui O x x v m = L L m ,.1 m o c vE�EE W M I S W D a O as a z O U r N Z V ' y U) N wQ W CL _ 9 O a a m U 0 m 0 m0 0 o� m c W a CL The following resolution was presented to the Council for adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS WITH RESPECT TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION PAYMENT FOR COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON SAN GABRIEL BOULEVARD (I -10 /SOUTH CITY LIMIT) MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL that the Council adopt Resolution No. 2003 -21. Vote resulted: Yes: Alarcon, Clark, Imperial, Taylor, Vasquez No: None Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR CC -A AWARD OF BID TO ED BUTTS FORD FOR PURCHASE OF REPLACEMENT VEHICLE 2003 CROWN VICTORIA CC -B APPROVAL OF THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES, INC., AND THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD CC -C EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR CDBG AND HOME PROGRAM SERVICES CC -D APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR FAIR HOUSING SERVICES WITH THE HOUSING RIGHTS CENTER CC -E APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR SENIOR NUTRITION MEALS PROVIDER WITH MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST CC -F AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND ANNUAL LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE, SEPTEMBER 7-10,2003, SACRAMENTO -G ACCEPTANCE OF WORK FOR STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS ON VARIOUS CITY STREETS CC -H APPROVAL OF CPT ADJUSTMENT FOR STREET SWEEPING CONTRACT SERVICES PROVIDED BY CALIFORNIA STREET MAINTENANCE CCMIN:6 -24 -03 Page u3 CC -I EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT FOR PARKWAY AND MEDIAN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE WITH MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENTERPRISES, INC. CC -J EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT FOR STREET TREE MAINTENANCE WITH EVAN'S TREE SERVICE CC -K EXTENSION OF LIGHTING AGREEMENT WITH QRS SERVICE . CC -L APPROVAL OF LEASE AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON FOR ZAPOPAN PARK CC -M ANNUAL ADOPTION OF CITY'S INVESTMENT POLICY CC-N 2002 -03 BUDGET AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSFER $176,650 FROM. UNAPPROPRIATED RESERVES TO ORGANIZATIONS 4110, 4180, 4240, 4320, 4330, 4340, 4640, 4650, 4710, AND 4740 CC-0 APPROVAL OF PARTNERSHIP WITH MONTEBELLO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR USE OF HOME FUNDS MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL that the Council approve the aforementioned items on the Consent Calendar. Vote resulted: Yes: Alarcon, Clark; Imperial, Taylor, Vasquez No: None Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor. declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. V. MATTERS FOR DISCUSSION AND ACTION - None VI. STATUS REPORTS - None VH. MATTERS FROM OFFICIALS Councilman Taylor requested that the shrubs and weeds be checked at 4623 Earle Avenue. Mayor Pro, Tern Clark announced to the audience that the 4h of July Parade will start on Valley Boulevard at 10:00 a.m., with the Opening Ceremonies, carnival and fireworks at Rosemead Park. VIII. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE - None CCMIN:6 -24 -03 Page 4 =*41P A TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSE EAD CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CEE, CITY MANAGER DATE: JUNE 16, 2003 RE: AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND ANNUAL LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE, SEPTEMBER 7-10,2003, SACRAMENTO Attached for your consideration is information regarding the aforementioned conference. There will be sessions on Fiscal Stability, Effective Grassroots Advocacy, Housing and Land Use, Public Safety, Infrastructure and Transportation, and Legal Issues. Council members and staff have attended this conference on an annual basis. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the attendance of any Council member, City Attorney, City Manager and staff designee. COUNCIL JUN 24 2003 ITEM No. ■ z �itv�tt. t 5 t ` ! 1 4$ tit ✓� 'ro t F t f� Ij �iEl 2t r-F-i I 1 k ■ \ / � : e-i 0 k � j 0 � 2 S E -\s / » / \ cc E _z Ln \o { \ Ts §^ ƒ \» !2 - -a - ® ZE 2 2 Z sp = - z= o E3 2 § lz Ci - � k - . % _/»_: k 2�= yz§- \ . § � \ §" 4 k \ � V, � 0 0 D � � � � � 1 LD k ■ \ / � : e-i 0 k � j 0 � 2 S E -\s / » / \ cc E _z Ln \o { \ Ts §^ ƒ \» !2 - -a - ® ZE 2 2 Z sp = - z= o E3 2 § lz Ci - � k - . % _/»_: k 2�= yz§- \ . § � \ §" 4 k \ � V, � 0 0 D � � � � � 1 Vf r �iC T T ° ° O kn iE O A_ Z ZE' � I y Z1 'a .'V ..'.� T T T .e, f cr . oo< e p n D o O 0 O W o (fe CA cc co °..� •.gyp � Er R � 3 � ''. m . c. �' � = m = .. CC co c co -N :O O N N° 6 N M7 _ o m OD CC n r. O L+ m m D W _ . . . . O O O s O m �� x ° C O F 4 a3 c O O Z Q T Z R r w S c ? n ° no 0 0 No o° c°oV0 m 00 D n- (D - O 900009000 X (D ° O = N o n a O Q O O S _ O C n D T_ D -Q �' .. N x 3 O O O (D (D X - — m O N - O Q B O O A (D' c ° m O = O F3 Q do (Q O O .O N _ c O _ N O m N O T O x � O rr Co cc 25 E O F rr o- - a.p BOO = V r' N m m D W _ . . . . O O O s O m �� x ° C O F 4 a3 c O O Z Q T w S c ? n ° no 0 0 a 0 m 00 D n- (D - O p X (D ° O = N o n a O Q O O S _ O C n D T_ D -Q O O N CD CD - (D N x 3 O O O (D (D X - — m O N - O Q B O O A (D' c ° m O = O Q ^ r (Q O O .O N _ c O _ N O N 0 n (D . O x O O n Q (D a O (D N . . . . - -, . . . z3 m D o ° ° O (mli O O Z V p 0 0 P< o' 0 3 n r< > > w— _ O Q O (D (D (D CD Q (p 0 m N (D 'C, - Co (c P -- _ m(Q A (D' F C - < � C N n m N O T O x � O ° O O O - N < N N _ = y O T C a- � o n D= .< O N ^ j. x a (D m c O (D - Z �--OOx n� °- O Z Q O" 5' N 3 C Na .a c° < r 2 D O ° N C r O T 2 m C D 0-0 Q �e C C °- O m p F O O c N S° C S O Q ~_ < 2 (D Q (D o N'< n.= O c _? n ? C =� - j O Q n D O(D C Q D ? ? (D n L (D W C J O Q O N o f n Q O 5 L, < .< = N N o m 0 '^ N N O p O O (D n G ID m Q 0 3 G -_0 n� CD Z c o m �c tin o o N =m - N 0 O u r- C Q N�o m =Z) N o Q O c� o c o N a- c S N o o o o 0 O n O p N O Q - - Q C n n D N N O ° D o. N cr. > > N N N --O 5m H o m O (D Q O- Q a v p 3 0 ° a n, c0 , c m ° ° v b I - ^'n C - O 0 c D n (D ° o 0 N � m N c Q - N � c` o o o (D Z Z o� n N n Q- 0 D 3C: p o �. HrC M_ m n f m _T m cn � Q a C vria OD N N, O (Q y o o n N g m n O _ n (D Z c n o O m N N O (D O n p m N Z 0 v Q- C O o O (D r p F, U C N cp p Z °off O �m�T3N v+ N n �zo-o a C m FD o c O o, O n 0 O N D (D o NO m n ° - n C v(Di n o N o (DN n Q O 5 L, < .< = N N o m 0 '^ N N O p O O (D n G ID m Q 0 3 G -_0 n� CD Z c o m �c tin o o N =m - N 0 O u r- C Q N�o m =Z) N o Q O c� o c o N a- c S N o o o o 0 O n O p N O Q - - Q C n n D N N O ° D o. N cr. > > N N O Q >> O N O O S 3 < rn n. N - C p 3 A' o t ' iQ„ (o 0 0 Z O 3 c n. 3 LD (D o o M m Q C N C1 (D J p n o v n n p n O m Q m Qo QID m H LN' Q Q O C n (C = �_ N a DD C N N n' 2 N C N D C O n A'1 _= c o Q O c -p o C •'C " -n O N n 0 0 `' ID D 3 p N ^< n o o N cc C n 5 O -< v+ mo -o =Q� =o''p oco D N Q N N C Q N c< m o o c Ti Q o p p p N CL (D m n N o (D < Q � O - 3 = o = c.< N T ID _ D N O. C T - N c o o (D C c N a 0 N a Z v n ' O C Z n CO CO a n a v_ 3 N Q D N --O 5m H o m O (D Q O- Q a v o 3 0 ° ~-1 y n, c0 z 00 FD o ° v b I - ^'n C H C �y (D m �Z N � m N c Q - N � 0 o o (D Z Z 6 in -. a� n D Q 3C: p o �. HrC D G a n n cD cn � Q a C vria OD N N, O (Q y o o D P 0 < = N m n _ O Q >> O N O O S 3 < rn n. N - C p 3 A' o t ' iQ„ (o 0 0 Z O 3 c n. 3 LD (D o o M m Q C N C1 (D J p n o v n n p n O m Q m Qo QID m H LN' Q Q O C n (C = �_ N a DD C N N n' 2 N C N D C O n A'1 _= c o Q O c -p o C •'C " -n O N n 0 0 `' ID D 3 p N ^< n o o N cc C n 5 O -< v+ mo -o =Q� =o''p oco D N Q N N C Q N c< m o o c Ti Q o p p p N CL (D m n N o (D < Q � O - 3 = o = c.< N T ID _ D N O. C T - N c o o (D C c N a 0 N a Z v n ' O C Z n CO CO a n a v_ 3 N Q D N --O 5m H o m O (D Q O- Q a v o 3 0 ° ~-1 y n, c0 m O - 00 FD o ° v b I - ^'n C H C �y (D I �Z (D m N c Q - OC o o (D Z Z 6 in -. a� (D D Q 3C: p o �. HrC D G T T �v 0 N S cD cn � Q a C vria OD N N, O (Q y o o D P 0 Z N o =cc n n m (D Z N 0 O -Z5 T v Q o o O y 0 M (D a � Z 0 v Q- C O Q >> O N O O S 3 < rn n. N - C p 3 A' o t ' iQ„ (o 0 0 Z O 3 c n. 3 LD (D o o M m Q C N C1 (D J p n o v n n p n O m Q m Qo QID m H LN' Q Q O C n (C = �_ N a DD C N N n' 2 N C N D C O n A'1 _= c o Q O c -p o C •'C " -n O N n 0 0 `' ID D 3 p N ^< n o o N cc C n 5 O -< v+ mo -o =Q� =o''p oco D N Q N N C Q N c< m o o c Ti Q o p p p N CL (D m n N o (D < Q � O - 3 = o = c.< N T ID _ D N O. C T - N c o o (D C c N a 0 N a Z v n ' O C Z n CO CO a n a v_ 3 N Q D N --O =' r. � 0 O (D Q O- Q (D I N O O N Z N C N N N N 0 0 Q- C O C O 0 r p F, U C N �. p Z °off �m�T3N v+ s��°�,(D n �zo-o a C m p^ °- N D (D o NO o C n C v(Di O N o ,G p= C w p T N (ND C N Q Mj o - (p C n - Vf v N _� N O O r s C - Q Q N O- Q j o o o o o _ N m �'z v N N_ o- o N c O O m Q - c n n. o m O Z 3 0 `x° S m o° o n �, �° 2 CD m° o a _z Q C O O n T - m (D c �, o -< n 000 0�< <0 o Q B A N = JG= C) n O 'D `z D m (� n s Q� = n �. m G (O T r 3- o o O= r O (D n n O? Oc 7G m 0 On c `_D C. (D m n s _ p o N cc x N n N x N N Q? n O -� O (p CO c < n N . N O o (D C H N. N m Z O - O n __ � T ®d .LL .. 7A ELL JLL i d ®LA z T O iC7 z O z The following resolution was presented to the Council for adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS WITH RESPECT TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION PAYMENT FOR COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH STREET MTROVEMENTS ON SAN GABRIEL BOULEVARD (I -10 /SOUTH CITY LIMIT) MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL that the Council adopt Resolution No. 2003 -21. Vote resulted: Yes: Alarcon, Clark, Imperial, Taylor, Vasquez No: None Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR CC -A AWARD OF BID TO ED BUTTS FORD FOR PURCHASE OF REPLACEMENT VEHICLE 2003 CROWN VICTORIA CC -B APPROVAL OF THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES, INC., AND THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD CC -C EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR CDBG AND HOME PROGRAM SERVICES CC -D APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR FAIR HOUSING SERVICES WITH THE HOUSING RIGHTS CENTER CC -E APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR SENIOR NUTRITION MEALS PROVIDER WITH MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST ftmOSC-F AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND ANNUAL-LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE, SEPTEMBER 7-10,2003, SACRAMENTO CC -G ACCEPTANCE OF WORK FOR STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS ON VARIOUS CITY STREETS CC-11 APPROVAL OF CPI ADJUSTMENT FOR STREET SWEEPING CONTRACT SERVICES PROVIDED BY CALIFORNIA STREET MAINTENANCE CCMIN:6 -24 -03 Page #3 YYY CC -I EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT FOR PARKWAY AND MEDIAN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE WITH MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENTERPRISES, INC. CC -J EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT FOR STREET TREE MAINTENANCE WITH EVAN'S TREE SERVICE CC -K EXTENSION OF LIGHTING AGREEMENT WITH QRS SERVICE CC -L APPROVAL OF LEASE AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON FOR ZAPOPAN PARK CC -M ANNUAL ADOPTION OF CITY'S INVESTMENT POLICY CC -N 2002 -03 BUDGET AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSFER $176,650 FROM UNAPPROPRIATED RESERVES TO ORGANIZATIONS 4110, 4180, 4240, 4320, 4330, 4340, 4640, 4650, 4710, AND 4740 CC -O APPROVAL OF PARTNERSHIP WITH MONTEBELLO. HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR USE OF HOME FUNDS MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL that the Council approve the aforementioned items on the Consent Calendar. Vote resulted: Yes: Alarcon, Clark, Imperial, Taylor, Vasquez No: None Absent: None Abstain: None e Mayor. declared said motion duly carved and so ordered. V. MATTERS FOR DISCUSSION AND ACTION - None VI. STATUS REPORTS - None VII. MATTERS FROM OFFICIALS Councilman Taylor requested that the shrubs and weeds be checked at 4623 Earle Avenue. Mayor Pro Tern Clark announced to the audience that the 4° of July Parade will start on Valley Boulevard at 10:00 a.m., with the Opening Ceremonies, carnival and fireworks at Rosemead Park. VHI. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE - None CCMIN:6 -24 -03 Page u4 3L5' TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMEADY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CROW, CITY MANAGER DATE: JULY 1, 2003 RE: AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGERS ASSOCIATION'S ANNUAL CONFERENCE' SEPTEMBER 21-24,2003, CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA Attached for your consideration is information regarding the aforementioned conference. This year's conference sessions are planned around four theme tracks: Managing in an Evolving Economy, Changing Demographics and Aging Populations, Enhancing and Developing the Profession and Professionalism and Personal Issues Facing Local Government Managers and Their Families. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the attendance of the City Manager at the annual conference of the International City Managers Association. COUNCIL AGENDA 4L L 0 8 2003 ITEM No. NE. M- After the session, participants will be invited to continue the discussion in small groups that will focus primarily on the responsibilities of local government senior executives. Prior to auending the session, par - ricipants should read two articles on the topic that were written by the Nalban- dians for the December 3002 and May 2003 issues of Public Management nmaga- zine. Links to electronic versions of-the articles will also be available on the con- ference Web site, icma.org /confer- ence2003. - This session addresses Practice Gmups 2 (Policy Facilitation), 6 (Initiative, Risk 'Fak- ing, vision, Creativity and Innovation), 3 (Democratic Advoca , and Citlzcn Partici- pation), and 13 (Strategic Planning) and is cosponsored with the Innovation Groups, Inc. Promoting Organizational Excellence. in Tough Times (for ICMA Credentialed Managers) Tuesday, Sept. 23, 2:15-5 pin. When confronted with significant rev- enue shortfalls. public organizations n'p- ically initiate hiring freezes, cut travel and employee development activities, and defer investments of all }ands, and thev may eventually eliminate services and lay off employees. Such measures. while necessary, create a grim pallor over the organization.Talem.ed employ- ees leave, and the remaining "survivors" hunker down. Morale and productivity plurnmet. _ . ,Frank Benest, city manager, Palo Alto, California- and Audrey. Seymour. assistant city manager. Menlo Park, Cali- fornia, will lead this session, which will he limited in attendance to individuals who have received the ICMA Creden- tialed Manager designation. It will .analyze the complexities of cutback .measures and then focus on strategies for retaining talent, enhancing employee comnutmentand promoting organiza- tional excellence. . This session addresses Practice Groups 1 (Staff L caiveness) and 6 (Initiative, Risk Takiq, Vision, Crcativit); and Innovation). Small Community Managers '.7 Supersize Your Municipal Resources through Partnering Monday Sept. 22, 1:.15 -2:2 p. lit. . Wouldn't it be great to add to your ' cotnmunitv's - resources without adding to its expenses? With- partnerships you can do just that At this session. you will hear.about innovative partnerships, how they come together; and the lessons that can be learned. Personnel 101 Adonday, Sept. 22, 2:45 -3: 5.p.m. What is the process for hiring and firing-, How, do you negotiate labor - contracts? What are the current trends in personnel issues %These and other basic questions will be answered at this informative session. Attracting New (and Retaining Existing) Businesses Tuesday, Sept. 23, 2:15 -3:25 p. nn. This session will teach you how to evaluate the needs of businesses that you hope to attract as well as of those that are currently in your conmumin• Does your community have what thevte looking for? if not, how can you provide it;. Come to this session and find out. How Can I Possibly Do It All? Tuesday,, Sept. 23, 3:45 -5 p. Ill. Good question! What, you need are strategies and techniques to help you organize and prioritize. This session will teach you those things and help you to keep your head above water. Mentoring: A Win -Win Situation Monday, Sept. 22, 2:45 -3:55 p.m. Managers as well as assistants are encouraged to attend this session and to bring their "matinees" Learn how to foster mentoring opportunities in your organization and get information on how to choose and be a mentor. THEME TRACKS V Managing in an Evolving Economy Design - Build- Operate: 21st-Century Public Works Contracting Monda), Sept. 2, 10:15-11:45 a.m... Modern forms of competitive and collaborative public works connecting are producing striking time and cost savings. transferring substantial risk to the private sector, and eliciting innova- tive and efficient designs. Get a close look at how and why. two cities used the design - build - operate approach to achieve dramatically better results than traditional con¢ acting would have pro- duced in delivering mesa; stare -of -die -art drinking water plants. Performance Measurement as a Budgeting Tool Monda), Sept. 22, 10:15 -11:45 a.m. This session will explore how conumu- runes use performance measurement in budgeting decisions. resource allocations. and presentations to elected officials. Panelists will provide examples of using performance nheasurement to set priori- ties and funding levels for jurisdictional services in times of tighter budgets, state mandates, and other cost - cutting Assistants and Other scenarios. Reducing Costs through Better Non -CAOs i -' Energy Management 1 To Be or Not to Be... 1 Monda)t Scpt. 22, 10:15 -11:45 a,m. A4ondag, Scpt- 22, 1:15 -2:25 p. nn. Because enemy use can represent up - How do make the move from assis- to 10 percent of their budgets. local you governments need to explore ways to cant to manager, manager to assistant, reduce energy use as a monev- saving department head to manager /assistant? strategy. Panelists will include energy How do you know if such a move is the efficiency experts who will discuss 'right move for vou? This session will energy y efficiency strategies as well as provide insight into local government low-cost financing mechanisms to pay career choices. for energy improvements. BANKING ON CHANGE THE FUTURE OF MANAGEMENT 17 ) Solutions to State Budget Cuts Monday. Sept. 22. 10:15 -11:35 a.m. As mauv local governments are feeling the squeeze fiom state budget cuts, manages are consistently being faced with having to do more with less.This session will highlight communities that have successfully managed reductions in state revenues. Participants will Like away creative ideas for dealing with economic offsets. Fifty Creative Financing Tools for Local Government Ivlondnl; Sept. 22, 1:15 -2:25 p.m. loin this roundtable "ideas exchange" to identify at least 30 creative financing tools and alternative revenue sources for local government. Fecilivarois will lead discussions on alternative service deliv- ery strategies, debt resu-ucturin�. ways to raise revenues for redevelopment to offset lost tax revenue. and more. Financing Economic Development Monday. Sen. 22, 2:4.5 -3:55 p.m. Local governments around the world are facing the critical issue of economic development. At this session, speakers will present practical solutions to issues such as workforce preparedness, business incentives, reuse of resources, and aher- native funding sources. Participants will walk away with ideas for developing new strategies to promote economic development in a declining econonry. Fiscal Impact Modeling: A Tool for Local Government Decision Making Monday, Sept. 22, ?:45 -3:35 p.m. A fiscal impact model can provide infm-matiou to support management and budget as well as land use and pltur ring decisions on a vear -to -vear basis. For local governments. the use of fiscal impact analysis leads to a better under- standing of the relationships among the . various factors contributing to growth and development, and increases their confidence in the fiscal soundness of land use. managernern. and financial decisions.This session will present dif- ferent fiscal impact analysis approaches and applications, the latest examples of fiscal impact modeling. and case studies from two communities. Finding Federal Resources to Support Local Programs: Counterterrorism, Land Recycling, Solid Waste, and Innovative Technologies Ttcsday, Sept. 23, 11?0 a.m. -12:30 p.nt. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) provides grants to local governments in the areas of counterterrorism. cleanup and redevelopment of contaminated sites, land use controls. solid and haz- ardous waste treatment and recycling, and truth 11101 C. also supports a significant percentage of 1CMAs grant- funded research through such ICMA programs as Brownfields, the National Brownfields Conference, and Community and Economic Develop- ment. Join Marianne Lannont Horinko. assistant administrator, EPA /OSWER, and representatives of local governments that have used EPA grants to success- fully address local priorities as they dis- cuss the nuts and bolts of obtaining and applying federal funds to support local initiatives. The Economy: Trends and Forecasting Tiicsdnl; Sept. 23, 11:30 a.m. -13:30 p.m. Almost every local government attempts to predict local economic trends.This session will address the difficult topic OF predicting the future of the economy. Speakers will present their estinhare.s of ( 8 ) I C M A ' S 89TH A N N U A L C O N F E R E N C E trends in the national and international economy; and local government repre- sentatives will describe the methods they use to forecast trends in their communities. Capital Financing and Asset Management Tuesday, Sept. 23, 2:15 -3:25 p.m. This session will address the best pro- [ices of fiscal policies for capital financ- ing and the use of standards such as , GASB -34 for cash flow and asset man- agement. Local government practition- ers will discuss public - private funding, design -build projects. bonds, futures refinancing, debt restructuring. and a host of other tools. The session will also deal with internal managernem of capital financing actions. Eldon Fields Colloquium: Promise or Peril? Partnering with the Faith Community Tuff dag Sept. 23, 2:15 -3:23 p.m. The role of faith -based organizations in the social welfare system has been at the center of the federal public policy debate eve since President Bush pro- posed his Faith -Based and Conmhunity Lnitiative.Yet government partnerships with the faith community are anvdning but new.This session will provide an ove view, of the political, administrative. and legal issues involved in working with religious organizations. Panelists will look at a wide variety of ways. from traditional contracting to innovative arrangements, in which local govern - ments have worked with the faith coin- inanity to provide an array of public services (such as public tia nsportation, public safety, and public works) as well as social services. Elements of a Successful Health Care Plan Tiicsdal; Sepr. 23, 3:45 -5 p.m. Local government manages use a variety ofapproaches to address the rapid increase in the costs associated with health care within the O"'Iniza- tion.This session will provide examples of how government and the private sec- tor nnnnaV these costs and work with employees and union officials. Partiei- I 7J :t t ,y papa will take away solutions to this difficult operating issue_' Smart Growth on the Ground Tuesday, Sept. 23, 3:45 -5µm. Many communities have adopted visions, goals, and policies to support smart growth and are now grappling with the nest stage: getting smart growth projects ou the ground. In this session you will hear results from a 3002 nationwide survey and up -to -date case studies froth practicing planners in American and Canadian communities ranging from a town of 4.300 to a county of 9 million. Changing Demographics and Aging Populations Services and Outreach for an Aging Population Adonda), Sept. 22, 10:15 -11:45 a.m. How do the needs of an aging popula- tion differ from those of a younger one, and what strategies work best in responding to those needs' Hosv can local governments effectively communi- care with the older segment of the couumuhiry' Attendees will hear about some approaches that have worked and will participate in a discussion with part - elists and other attendees. Look into My Crystal Ball Mouda); Sept. 22, 1:15 -2:25 p.m. What does the future hold for your community, and how can you plan to sneer the cominng challenges' This ses- sion will cover demographic trends and the implications for local governments as they look to serve an older and more diverse population. Providing Effective Services to a Diverse Community AQonda)� Sept. 22, 2:45 -3:55 p.m._ Local governments are - increasingly faced with the need to provide effective services to diverse segments of the com- munity. Outreach must be provided to groups of different cultural orientations. This session will examine the issues associated with this subject, consider successful existing programs, and provide an opportunity for discussion with and among panelists and the audience. NEW! Book Discussion: Geeks and Geezers Tesda)S Sept. 23, 11:20 7.w.-12:30 p.m join your colleagues in a conversation about the relevance to our profession of the popular new book. Geeks atd Geezers: Holt, Era, 1'aloes, and Defiuiug Moturuts Shape. Leaders, by Warren G. Bennis and Robert ).Thomas. How different are the leadership styles of " "eeks: who matured in the glow of computer screens, and "geezers;' who matured in the shaddw of the Depres- sion and World War II? What qualities do the), share? What are the forces that enable anvone to learn and lead for a lifetime: To get the most out of the ses- sion, which will be facilitated by Bill Buchanan.couun, manager ofSedgwick County. Kansas. and Karen Pinkos, assis- tant to the city inanager of El Cerrito. California. read the book before coming to Charlotte and come prepared to discuss its concepts. Resources Of a Diverse Community Tiiesdu)q Sept. 23, 11:20 amv -12:30 p.rn As communities become increasm.,,ly diverse, local ,,over meats need to be aware of the new resources available in their changing citizenry. This session AN ill look at successfully inhplemented strategies that focus oil diversity as a resource to the community, both econonilcally and c l urally. Growing Old Gracefully Tuesday, Sept. 23, 2:15-3:25 I nt. How can a community use its will population to enhance quality of life This session will discuss programs that use aging residents as a resource or an economic development strategy. Atten- dees will participate in a discussion of the issue with panelists and othe- attendees - Managing a Multi- Generational Workforce Tucsda), Sept. 23, 5:45 -5 1). tit. An aging workforce introduces new challenges to local <•overnmeut. Managers must deal with many issues. including succession planting, budget issues such as retirement and health insurance. and inter -en elao ona) con- flicts. Asa sizeable portion of the work- force begins to look toward retrement, these issues will loom lager on the horizon for nhanagers.This session will include a piesent<ation of current strate- gies for dealing with these issues ind will provide an opportunity for discus- sion with panelists and attendees. Enhancing and Developing the Profession and Professionalism EthiCS! Ethics! Ethics! Alouday, Sept. 2, 10:15 -11:45 a.m. This session will provide case studies and best practices fiom the Committee on professional Conduct.An interactive session. it will help you to determine the best route to take when faced with an ethics dilemma of vour own. Making the Most of ICMA's Public Awareness Campaign TOOT Kit !Wonda); Scpt. 22. 1:15 -3:25 p. Ili. During this session. you will learn about the many creative ways in which. , ICMA members and other individuals across the country are using compo- nents of ICMA's "Building Communi- ties ... Its No Small Chore" tool kit to spread the word about the value of professional local government manage- ment. Attendees at this session will be able to participate in an interactive discussion of how the tool kit can be used. Diversity within the Profession (Partnering with Diverse Affiliates) A4onday, Scpt. 22, 2:45 -3:55 p.m. Lean how to recruit and retain diverse candidates into your organization. hh addition. fad out how ICMA's affiliate organizations with diverse memberships link to ICMA and how a snonger con- nection can be made.This session will provide a perfect opportunity to learn how you.can increase your pool of potential employees. BANKING ON CHANGE THE FUTURE OF MANAGEMENT t91 Advocating the Council- Manager Form of Government through a Culture of Professionalism Tjrrsdnl; Sept. 23, 11:20 a.w. -12:30 p.m Local government professionals across the count° use a varier, of techniques to promote the council- mana,er plan .and the value that professional uunage- meat adds to elected ofticials, residents. the business community and the media. This session will examine some of those techntiques and help you think about ways to develop your own strategies for successfi 11v advocating the council - menager form of govermnent. Developing Our Newest Managers Tiesdnl% Scpt. 23, 2:15 -3:25 1). all The future of the local .overnment management profession depends upon the newest and future generations of nvmagers.This session will share ways in which mmiagers and assistants in their first five years of the profession can be encouraged and nhentored. It will dis- cuss ethics, credentialing, career cracks, values. and core beliefs, Council /Manager Relations 'Tucsdal; Scpt. 23, 3:45 -5 p.m. This session will provide you with tips on how to educate council members about their role in relation to the man- agers role. It will also offer suggestions for building and maintaining a positive relationship with the council, and advice on what to do if your relationship goes bad. Sometimes It's Personal'. Personal Issues Facing Local Government Managers and Their Families So This Is the New Millennium? Retirement in challenging Times AAondap, Sept. 22, 10:15 - 11:45 a. m. Girard Miller, president and CEO of ICMA Retirement Corporation, will provide his perennially popular program on the state of ICMA -RC. the econ- omy. investing, and retirement. He will cover the status of the Bush adrninis- trioOn's tax and budget plans and the Capitol Hill developments that affect local governuhents financially. In addi- tion, lie will address what three years of down markets have done to expecta- tions for retirxment, what the coming years may bi ing. and how to realistically plan for a retirement that for many seems less a reality than it did several years ago. Maximizing Life, Minimizing Stress Moadal; Scpt. 22 1:15 -2:2.1 p. m. Learn how to identify your personal signs of stress and recognize that ,you have choices in how von respond to them. -This session will teach you how to practice positive lifestyle adjusnnents to counter the pressures of eveuwday life. Retirement Planning for the Public Employee tfondag, Sept. 22, 1:15-2:25 p.ru. Most of what we read and hear todav in the media about retirenhem planning is - directed toward private sector employ- ees. But unlike private sector plans, pub- lic sector plans don't have stock options, ERISA requirements, and Pension Ben- efit Guarantee Corporation ,t uarancees. Retirement benefits for the public sec- tor differ from those of the private sec- tor in other significant ways as well. The characteristic career patterns for local government managers in particular call for careful planning that is sensitive to these realities.This program will oudine retirement planning issues and strategies in the G-anhework of public sector bene- fits and will review illustrative cases. I Still Live Here Honest! Mondap, Sept. 22, 2:45 3:55 p.m Its tough_ but there are ways to over- collie the challenges of having to spend long hours away trout your family. Come hear some success stories and share sonhe of your own! Employment Agreements: Best Practices for Negotiating Good Agreements Tucsdth, Sept. 23, 11:20 a.nt. -12:30 p.m. Learn what to negotiate before caking a new position, what to include in an employment agreement. and what strategies will be effective in helping you achieve your goals. In this session. a 1 101 t C M A ' S 89TH A N N U A L C O N F E R E N C E panel of managers will discuss severance clauses, unusual benefits. ne,oriating strategies. and ocher contract issues. In addition. ICMA's new model enhplov- nhe-rt agreement will be highlighted. Keynote Breakout: Get a Life! Trtesdal; Sept. 23, 11:20 a.m. -12:30 pnr. loin Tuesday's keynote speaker Amanda Gore to further explore the role of the. mind -body connection in reducing stress, improving conununicacion, bufd- ing personal relationships, and develop - ing teams of collaborative and Lusting colleagues. Retiree Health Care: A Challenge for Employers and Employees Trtesdal; Sept. 23, 19:20 amt. -12:30 p.nr. r If voo jurisdiction is, currently provid- ing health care for retirees, you. as man- ager, may find that the costs are escalating dramatically. Additionally, GASB will soon be requiring you to recognize accruing costs for future health care benefits in vour financial statements. If your conununity doesn't offer these expensive benefits now, you may feel significant pressure front employee groups to provide them in the fume. And if you have to pay for your own health insurance when you retire, that cost is likely to be more expensive than your mortgage and not tax deductible! This session will review what's happening with costs, what the GASB statement will require, and what communities can do to deal with this growing problem. Enhancing Your Relationship with Your Partner - Ttesdal; Scpt. 23, 2:15-3:25 p.m Get some tips on enhancing and sus- taining your relationship with your part- ner front colleagues who have sustained their partnerships for many.yeans. How do they do id 1s there a secret Hear it front the experts! al TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL _j i FROM: BILL CROWE, CITY MANAGER DATE: OCTOBER 7, 2003 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR RED CURB ON EMERSON PLACE OVER ALHAMBRA WASH BRIDGE Traffic Commission Chairperson Knapp requested the review of visibility of vehicles coming over the bridge on Emerson Place in the vicinity of the Alhambra Wash east of Falling Leaf Avenue. Based on a field review of the site, the elevation difference between the bridge and the adjacent homes makes visibility from driveways adjacent to the bridge difficult. If vehicles are parked on the bridge, visibility is further obstructed. While the installation of parking restrictions on the bridge will not eliminate the reduction in visibility entirely, it will provide some additional visibility by not adding to the elevation difference already caused by the bridge. In addition, staff concluded that the installation of parking restrictions over the Alhambra Wash would not directly affect the residences fronting Emerson Place. Therefore, staff recommended the installation of R27 "No Parking on Bridge" signs and red curb adjacent to the Alhambra Wash Bridge on Emerson Place. At the October 2nd Traffic Commission meeting, the Traffic_ Commission approved the staff recommendation by a unanimous vote. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Rosemead City Council approve the staff recommendation as approved by the Traffic Commission on October 2nd, 2003. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A —Traffic Commission Staff Report, dated September 23, 2003 Exhibit B — Traffic Commission Minutes, dated October 2, 2003 1 COUNCIL AGENDA OCT 14 2003 ITEM No.1Z Staff Report Rosemead Traffic Commission TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSSION FROM: JOANNE ITAGAKI, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPUTY DATE: September 23, 2003 RE: Request for Red Curb on Emerson Place Over Alhambra Wash Bridge REQUEST Chairman Knapp requested staff to review the visibility on Emerson Place in the vicinity of the Alhambra Wash east of Falling Leaf Avenue. Chairman Knapp indicated residents have expressed concerns regarding visibility of vehicles coming over the bridge. CONDITIONS Exhibit A depicts conditions on Emerson Place in the vicinity of Alhambra Wash. The elevation at the bridge of the Alhambra Wash is higher•,than the street level both east and west of the bridge.., The greatest elevation difference appears to be west of the bridge. DISCUSSION Field observation of the location occurred in the afternoon. Traffic on Emerson Place was sporadic and no vehicles were observed parked on the bridge or in the immediate vicinity. However, field observation clearly identified the elevation difference between the bridge and the adjacent homes. This elevation difference did make visibility from driveways adjacent to the bridge difficult. If vehicles are parking on the bridge, visibility is reduced even further. The installation of red curb or "No Parking" restrictions over the Alhambra Wash would not directly affect the residential homes fronting Emerson Place. There appears to be several lots with multiple dwellings. However, each of these lots has on -site parking available for their residents. The installation of parking restrictions over the Alhambra Wash will not remove the need for caution to be taken by residents on Emerson Place. The proposed parking restrictions will provide some additional visibility but the elevation difference is the primary visibility restriction. At this time, staff is discussing the situation with the City Engineer to determine if any change to the elevation of the bridge is proposed in the near future. October 2, 2003 Traffic Commission Meeting Request for Red Curb on Emerson Place Over Alhambra Wash Bridge Page 2 of 2 RECOMMENDATION The installation of R27 "No Parking on Bridge" signs and red curb adjacent to the Alhambra Wash bridge on Emerson Place is recommended. These recommendations are depicted on Exhibit A. Attachment P:\06- 160 \JIt\RSD\2003 Agendas & Documents \Oct - Emerson PI at Alhambra Wash.doc U O Z N C N N Y C fa 'o c �a O Nomcu"i c Z c L o o in O- w O � L u io u c CD v Q CZ O L N W 0 0 0 a� 0 N � 7 '1 5r Y` O O ro °- 0 'O N w O � L is u M " N 2 I co LO r O L lf7 -O M w L ro O u U) N U C 2 v 0 L is u c 0 2 L Z O L N O •�n � L i V N •C X CL CO N � Ihlb'I'f Q ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 2, 2003 ROLL CALL Present: Chairperson Knapp, Commissioner Matsdorf, Commissioner Quintanilla & Commissioner Baffo Absent: None Ex- Officio: Assistant Planner: Jennifer Villasenor Traffic Engineering Deputy: Joanne Itagaki CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance: Commissioner Matsdorf Invocation: Commissioner Quintanilla I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Commissioner Quintanilla, seconded by Commissioner Matsdorf, to approve the minutes for September 4, 2003. Vote Results: Yes: Chairperson Knapp, Commissioner Quintanilla, Commissioner Matsdorf Noes: None Absent: None Abstain: Commissioner Baffo Commissioner Baffo abstained his vote because he was not present at the September meeting. ' II. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE Speaking before the Commission was: 4011 M741TO" 2409 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California 91770 Mr. Ochoa stated that there are high speeds of traffic on Klingerman and Fern in the alleyway (west side), between the hours of 7:30 a.m. - 7:45 a.m., and again from 2:30 p.m. - 2:45 p.m. The alleyway is being used to drop off kids at Sanchez School. III. OLD BUSINESS - None IV. NEW BUSINESS A. REQUEST FOR RED CURB ON EMERSON PLACE OVER ALHAMBRA WASH BRIDGE Deputy Traffic Engineer Itagaki presented the staff report. RECOMMENDATION: The installation of R27 "No Parking on Bridge' signs and red curb adjacent to the Alhambra Wash bridge on Emerson Place was recommended. It was moved by Commissioner Baffo, seconded by Commissioner Matsdorf and carried unanimously to approve the Traffic Engineer's recommendation. B. REQUEST FOR RED CURB AT 7525 EMERSON PLACE Deputy Traffic Engineer Itagaki presented the staff report. RECOMMENDATION: The installation of 14 feet of red curb between 7525 and 7531 Emerson Place was recommended. Chairperson Knapp requested that staff send a letter to both addresses informing them of what is going to be done, and invite them to appeal it to the City Council should they not agree with the recommendation. Assistant Planner Villasenor stated that a letter will be sent on Monday to both residents informing them of the Traffic Commissions recommendation. It was moved by Commissioner Quintanilla, seconded by Commissioner Baffo and carried unanimously to approve the Traffic Engineer's recommendation, with direction to staff to send out a letter to both residents. • r AGENDA REGULAR MEETING ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA AUGUST 12, 2003, AT 8:00 P.M. CALL MEETING TO ORDER: 8:00 P.M. rb PLEDGE TO THE FLAG: COUNCILMAN TAYLOR INVOCATION: CHAPLAIN JUDY BEVER OF THE CALIFORNIA CHRISTIAN HOME / ROLL CALL OF OFFICERS: COUNCILMEMBERS ALARCON, IMPERIAL, TAYLOR, MAYOR PRO TEM CLARK, MAYOR VASQUEZ APPROVAL OF MINUTES: JULY 22, 2003 – REGULAR MEETING 5 �� OF INTEREST TO CITIZENS WISHING TO PARTICIPATE 1) Those wishing to speak on any Agenda Item, including public hearing, should have their Speaker Request Form submitted to the City Clerk no later than the time immediately following Oral Communications. 2) Immediately after approval of the minutes and again at the end of the meeting, there is a period of time set aside for those persons wishing to address the Council on matters not listed on the Agenda entitled: ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE (please complete the Speaker Request Form stating your preference to speak either at the beginning or at the end of the meeting). 3) Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with disabilities, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the City Clerk's office at 626/569 -2171 at least 48 hours before the meeting, if possible. V PRESENTATIONS: MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT BRIEFING BY BOARDMEMBER ROBERT BRUESCH AND KELLY MIDDLETON 1. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE H. PUBLIC HEARINGS – EXPLANATION OF T' PUBLIC HEARING PROCEDURES BY THE CITY ATTORNEY — n e� /1 ✓ / A. PUBLIC HEARING – ORDINANCE NO. 826 – AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE ROSEMEAD MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO SECOND DWELLING UNITS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES IN COMPLIANCE ` WITH STATE ASSEMBLY BILL 1866 (} l This is a City - initiated municipal code amendment of various sections of the Rosemead Municipal Code pertaining to second dwelling units in residential zones in compliance with AB 1866. AB 1866 is a new State law that prohibits discretionary reviews and hearings for second dwelling applications. CCAGENDA:8 -I2 -03 Page 01 Recommendation: Introduce Ordinance 826 on first reading, approving Municipal Code Amendment 03 -01, amending several sections of the Rosemead Municipal Code and adding Chapter 17.03. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING REALLOCATION OF CDBG FUNDS, AMENDMENT TO ANNUAL PLAN AND APPROVAL OF OWNER / PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT FOR C.H. AUTO FOR ACQUISITION OF j� 8351 GARVEY AVENUE L/y C.H. Auto has requested City assistance to acquire and relocate its auto sales business to the former Laidlaw Harley Davidson site, located at 8315 E. Garvey Avenue. The proposed $125,000 Owner Participation Agreement, includes an option for the City to purchase or assign the purchase of C.H. Auto's current location at 7815 -21 E. Garvey Avenue due to a proposed retail development that will include the entire north block of Garvey Avenue between Brighton Street and Del Mar Avenue. This Owner Participation Agreement is contingent upon C.H. Auto depositing all remaining down payment sums necessary to close escrow. Recommendation: After public testimony, review and any amendments, that the Council approve the City's proposed reallocation of CDBG funds for FY 2003- 2004; authorize this as an amendment to the City's Annual Funding Plan; approve assistance in the amount of $125,000 in CDBG funds for C.H. Auto; and authorize the Mayor to execute the Owner Participation and Option Agreement, and authorize the City Manager to take steps to implement the Agreement, including the execution of documents and agreements. IL LEGISLATIVE A. RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -29 - CLAIMS AND DEMANDS (FY 2002 -03) Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -29, for payment of City expenditures. B. RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -31 — CLAIMS AND DEMANDS (FY 2003 -04) Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -3 I, for payment of City expenditures. C. RESOLUTION NO.. 2003-26 — A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF / THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF GRANT FUNDING REQUEST UNDER LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT (LLEBG) PROGRAM The LLEBG Program provides units of local government with funds to underwrite projects designed to reduce crime and improve public safety. For FY 2003 -04, the City is eligible to receive $67,895 (when matched with $6,790 of City funds) from the Department of Justice to fund law enforcement activities. Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -29, authorizing application for funding in the amount of $67,895, and approve matching funds of $6,790 from unappropriated reserves. D1. RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -27 — A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, TO AUTHORIZE AND APPROVE SELF- INSURANCE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION FOR ITS EMPLOYEES THROUGH THE SELF - INSURANCE AND LOSS POOL PROGRAM OF y CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY The City of Rosemead, as a member of the California Joint Powers Authority, participates in the general liability insurance program. Staff is recommending that the City participate in the Insurance Authority's workers compensation program. The City's current workers compensation provider, State Fund, estimates an ccncENOA:8-1 ao3 Page a2 annual premium of $284,909 for fiscal year 2003 -04. Membership in the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority's workers compensation program will cost the City $61,162 for FY 2003 -04. Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -27 to Authorize and Approve Self Insurance of Workers Compensation for its Employees through the Self Insurance and Loss Pooling Program of California Joint Powers Insurance Authority, effective October 1, 2003. D -2. RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -28 — A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, PROVIDING WORKERS' COMPENSATION COVERAGE FOR CERTAIN CITY VOLUNTEERS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 3363.5 OF THE LABOR CODE / Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -28. (I E. RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -30 — A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS WITH RESPECT TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION PAYMENT FOR COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PARK ADA (AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT) AND BALLFIELD LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS By adopting this resolution, the City Council finds that Community Development Commission payment for costs associated with the project benefits Project Areas Nos. 1 and 2. There are no other reasonable means of financing, and that the project will improve ADA access and safety by upgrading play equipment and providing ballfield lighting within and adjacent to Project Areas Nos. I and 2, thus enhancing the value of abutting properties. Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -30. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR- RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL C -A AUTH ORIZATION TO REJECT CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY FROM JULIO RODRIGUEZ Claimant states that he slipped and fell on a wet floor in a City -owned facility. tj The City's claims adjuster, Carl Warren & Company has recommended rejection of this claim. Recommendation: Rejection of claim CC -B AUTHORIZATION TO REJECT CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY FROM NICK D.VASQUEZ Claimant states that a City tree limb fell on his vehicle while parked. The City's claims adjusters, Carl Warren & Company has recommended rejection of this claim. Recommendation: Rejection of claim. CC -C AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD AND THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TO PROVIDE A GANG ALTERNATIVE PREVENTION PROGRAM (GAPP) This agreement extends the Gang Alternative Prevention Program for fiscal year 2003 -04. Recommendation: Authorize the extension of the GAPP agreement with the County of Los Angeles for fiscal year 2003 -04. CCAGENDA:8 -12 -03 Page 03 CC -D APPROVAL OF COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION FOR PARK ADA (AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT) AND BALLFIELD LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS This is an agreement between the City and the Rosemead Community Development Commission to jointly undertake the construction of ADA improvements at Rosemead, Garvey and Zapopan Parks, and the Rosemead Community Recreation Center; and ballfield lighting improvements at Garvey Park. The City will be the lead agency. Recommendation: Approve the agreement. CC -E APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZATION TO SEEK BIDS FOR PARK ADA (AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT) AND BALLFIELD LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS The project includes installation of rubber surfacing and play equipment and construction of walkways necessary to comply with ADA requirements. The improvements will be conducted at Rosemead Park, Garvey Park, Zapopan Park and the Rosemead Community Recreation Center. The project also includes installation of a centerfield light at the Garvey Park baseball field. Recommendation: Approve plans and specifications and authorize advertisement for bids. V. MATTERS FOR DISCUSSION AND ACTION _— VI. STATUS REPORTS — G— � VII. MATTERS FROM OFFICIALS VIII. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE TX. ADJOURNMENT r� l �p' M THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING IS SCHEDULED FOR AUGUST 26, 2003, AT 8:00 P.M. Posted 72 hours in advance of the meeting at the City Hall, 8838 E. Valley Boulevard, Rosemead; the L.A. County Library, Rosemead Branch, 8800 E. Valley Boulevard, Rosemead; and other locations pursuant to RMC Sec. 1.08.020. CCAGENDA:8-12 -03 Page N4 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL FROM: V ` CROWE, CITY MANAGE DATE: AUGUST 6, 2003 SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 826 — AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE ROSEMEAD MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO SECOND DWELLING UNITS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES IN COMPLIANCE WITH STATE ASSEMBLY BILL 1866. On July 7, 2003, the Planning Commission held a public hearing relative to a municipal code amendment recommending adoption of an ordinance pertaining to second dwelling units in residential zones in compliance with State Assembly Bill 1866. AB 1866 is a new state law that prohibits discretionary reviews and hearings for second dwelling unit applications. A copy of the staff report providing a detailed analysis of the second dwelling ordinance is attached for your review. After hearing all testimony, the Commission voted 4 -0 to recommend City Council approval of Municipal Code Amendment 03 -01. The new law, AB 1866, requires cities to approve second units that meet minimal state requirements or meet specific, objective development and design standards based on a city's own ordinance. One of the provisions of AB 1866 is that the City adopt an ordinance that provides a strictly ministerial process of approval for second units. That is, if the second unit application meets all the standards, it must be given an `over- the - counter' approval. In addition, AB 1866 specifically prohibits holding public hearings as a review process for these applications. The City of Rosemead recognizes the need for affordable housing in the community, as well as throughout the entire state of California. The purpose of the proposed municipal code amendment and adoption of a second unit ordinance, is to serve the public necessity, convenience and general welfare by enabling the provision of lower cost housing for lower income people. However, in order to avoid approving second units that do not meet the desired standards of the City, a second unit ordinance must be adopted that provides for the preservation of the character of the City's residential neighborhoods. The design standards for second dwelling unit applications are included in the proposed ordinance. COUNCIL A EM:DA AUG 12 2003 ITEM No. _7 , A. Rosemead City Council August 12, 2003 Page 2 of 2 Rosemead Municipal Code: Chapter 17.30 will be added to the Rosemead Municipal Code to address and implement the adoption of a second residential unit ordinance. The new chapter will have the following sections: • 17.30.010 Purpose • 17.30.020 Definitions • 17.30.030 Single -story Second Residential Unit Requirements 17.30.040 Second -story/ Two -story Second Residential Unit Requirements • 17.30.050 Revocation • 17.30.060 Existing Second Residential Units There are also several sections of the Rosemead Municipal Code that will be amended with the adoption of the second unit ordinance. Sections 17.16.020, 17.20.020, 17.24.020, and 17.28.020 pertaining to permitted uses in the R -1, R -2, R -3, and R -4 zones, respectively, will be amended by adding subsections for single -story second residential units as permitted uses. Section 17.112.030 pertaining to uses allowed with a conditional use permit in specific zones, will be amended by adding subsection 29 to include second -story and two -story second residential units in accordance with the requirements of Section 17.30.040. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions: 1. INTRODUCE Ordinance No. 826 APPROVING Municipal Code Amendment 03 -01, AMENDING several sections of the Rosemead Municipal Code and adding Chapter 17.30. ATTACHMENTS: EXHIBIT A - Ordinance No. 826 EXHIBIT B - Planning Commission Staff Report, dated July 7, 2003 EXHIBIT C - Planning Commission Minutes, dated July 7, 2003 EXHIBIT D, Planning Commission Resolution No. 03 -41, dated July 7, 2003 3 AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, 4 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING VARIOUS 5 SECTIONS OF THE ROSEMEAD MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO SECOND 6 UNITS IN COMPLIANCE WITH STATE ASSEMBLY BILL 1866 8 WHEREAS, the State Legislature has declared that second dwelling units provide a 9 valuable form of housing in California, providing housing for family members, students, the 10 elderly, in -home health care providers, the disabled and others at below - market prices within 1 I existing neighborhoods and has found that homeowners who create second units benefit from 12 added income and an increased sense of security; and 13 14 WHEREAS, the Legislature stated its intent that any second -unit Ordinances adopted by 15 local agencies have the effect of providing for the creation of second units, and that provisions 16 in these Ordinances relating to matters including unit size, parking, fees and other 17 requirements are not so arbitrary, excessive or burdensome so as to unreasonably restrict the 18 ability of homeowners to create the second units in zones in which they are authorized by 19 local Ordinance; and 20 21 WHEREAS, the Legislature in 1982 stated its commitment to second units as a valuable 22 form of housing and restated its commitment in 2002 with the passage of Assembly Bill 1866, 23 which amends Government Code Section 65852.2 by eliminating the authority to require a 24 discretionary review for second units that meet specified requirements; and 25 26 WHEREAS, Section 65852.2 authorizes a local agency to: (i) designate areas where 27 second units may be permitted based on criteria that may include adequacy of sewer services, 28 impact on traffic flow or other factors identified by the City, which the City has done; and (ii) 29 subject to certain limitations, impose standards that include parking, height, setbacks, lot 30 coverage, architectural review, maximum size, owner - occupancy and standards that prevent 31 adverse impacts listed on properties found on the National Register of Historic Places; and 32 33 WHEREAS, the legislative history of Section 65852.2 indicates that the purpose of 34 allowing an owner- occupancy provision is to protect neighborhood stability and the character 35 of existing family neighborhoods and to discourage speculation and absentee ownership; and 36 37 WHEREAS, in compliance with AB 1866 the City wishes to amend the Rosemead 38 Municipal Code to permit accessory second units in all residential zones on lots on which 39 only a single family home currently exists; and 40 41 WHEREAS, the adoption of this Ordinance to accommodate second units without 42 discretionary review to implement the provisions of Section 65852.2 is statutorily exempt 43 from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code 44 Section 21080.17 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15282(i), and, to the extent that Code 45 provisions are revised to ensure internal consistency, that the project is categorically exempt 46 under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), which provides that where it can be seen with EXH 181T '�" I ORDINANCE NO. 826 3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY 4 OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF 5 THE ROSEMEAD MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO SECOND UNITS IN 6 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE ASSEMBLY BILL 1866 8 WHEREAS, the State Legislature has declared that second dwelling units provide a 9 valuable form of housing in California, providing housing for family members, students, the 10 elderly, in -home health care providers, the disabled and others at below - market prices within I 1 existing neighborhoods and has found that homeowners who create second units benefit from 12 added income and an increased sense of security; and 13 14 WHEREAS, the Legislature stated its intent that any second -unit Ordinances adopted by 15 local agencies have the effect of providing for the creation of second units, and that provisions 16 in these Ordinances relating to matters including unit size, parking, fees and other 17 requirements are not so arbitrary, excessive or burdensome so as to unreasonably restrict the 18 ability of homeowners to create the second units in zones in which they are authorized by 19 local Ordinance; and 20 21 WHEREAS, the Legislature in 1982 stated its commitment to second units as a valuable 22 form of housing and restated its commitment in 2002 with the passage of Assembly Bill 1866, 23 which amends Government Code Section 65852.2 by eliminating the authority to require a 24 discretionary review for second units that meet specified requirements; and ?5 26 WHEREAS, Section 65852.2 authorizes a local agency to: (i) designate areas where 27 second units may be permitted based on criteria that may include adequacy of sewer services, 28 impact on traffic flow or other factors identified by the City, which the City has done; and (ii) 29 subject to certain limitations, impose standards that include parking, height, setbacks, lot 30 coverage, architectural review, maximum size, owner- occupancy and standards that prevent 3 t adverse impacts listed on properties found on the National Register of Historic Places; and 32 33 WHEREAS, the legislative history of Section 65852.2 indicates that the purpose of 34 allowing an owner - occupancy provision is to protect neighborhood stability and the character 35 of existing family neighborhoods and to discourage speculation and absentee ownership; and 36 37 WHEREAS, in compliance with AB 1866 the City wishes to amend the Rosemead 38 Municipal Code to permit accessory second units in all residential zones on lots on which 39 only a single family home currently exists; and 40 41 WHEREAS, the adoption of this Ordinance to accommodate second units without 42 discretionary review to implement the provisions of Section 65852.2 is statutorily exempt 43 from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code 44 Section 21080.17 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15282(i), and, to the extent that Code 45 provisions are revised to ensure internal consistency, that the project is categorically exempt 46 under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), which provides that where it can be seen with I certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect 2 on the enviromnent, the activity is not subject to CEQA; and 3 4 WHEREAS, the Legislature has required that this Ordinance be in place by July 1, 2003 5 and therefore it is necessary to adopt this Ordinance to avoid having state - imposed standards 6 placed on the City of Rosemead, which do not include an owner- occupancy requirement, 7 which could negatively impact the land -use patterns of the City, overburden existing 8 infrastructure, cause traffic and parking congestion, increased noise, loss of privacy, and 9 overburden areas where existing density is already among the highest in the City and therefore 10 interfere with the public safety, welfare, peace and health. 11 12 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD DOES 13 HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 14 15 Section 1. Environmental Determination. The City Council HEREBY FINDS and 16 DETERMINES that this ordinance is statutorily and categorically exempt from CEQA. 17 18 Section 2. Zoning Amendment Findings. In approving this Urgency Ordinance, the City 19 Council hereby finds and determines that the zoning amendment serves the public necessity, 20 convenience, and general welfare in that it will help provide lower cost housing for lower 21 income persons such as students, disabled persons, senior citizens and members of property 22 owners' families as required by Section 17.116.010 of the Rosemead Municipal Code. The 23 Council further finds that the proposed change is consistent with good city planning and N zoning practices in that it furthers city and state housing goals. 25 26 Section 3. Additional Findings. 27 28 A. Parking Findings. 29 30 This Ordinance amends Section 17.84.020 to the Municipal Code that will require 31 enclosed parking spaces for second units. This provision meets the requirements of 32 Government Code section 65852.2(e) as covered parking is required for all required parking 33 in residential zones which are impacted by this Ordinance. 34 35 Section 4. Section 17.16.020 of the Rosemead Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding 36 a subsection H to read as follows: 37 38 H. Single -story second residential units in accordance with Chapter 17.30 of the 39 Rosemead Municipal Code. 40 41 Section 5. Section 17.20.020 of the Rosemead Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding 42 a subsection D to read as follows: 43 44 D. Single -story second residential units in accordance with Chapter 17.30 of the 45 Rosemead Municipal Code. 46 Ordinance I Section 6. Section 17.24.020 of the Rosemead Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding 2 a subsection E to read as follows: 3 4 A. Single -story second residential units in accordance with Chapter 1730 5 of the Rosemead Municipal Code. 6 7 Section 7. Section 17.28.020 of the Rosemead Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding 8 a subsection D to read as follows: 9 10 D. Single -story second residential units in accordance with Chapter 17.30 of the I I Rosemead Municipal Code. 12 13 14 Section 8. Chapter 17.30 is hereby added to the Rosemead Municipal Code to read as follows: 15 16 17 1. SECOND RESIDENTIAL UNITS 1s 19 17.30.010 Purpose 20 21 A. The purpose of this Chapter is to implement Government Code section 22 65852.2 which allows the City to adopt a second residential unit ordinance in 23 lieu of being subjected to the State requirements for such units. 24 25 B. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Rosemead Municipal Code 26 to the contrary, the provisions herein shall govern the development of second 27 residential units in the City of Rosemead. 28 29 17.30.020 Second Residential Unit - Definitions 30 31 C. "Second Residential Unit' shall mean a detached or attached dwelling 32 unit that provides complete independent living facilities for one or more 33 persons. It shall include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, 34 cooking and sanitation on the same parcel or parcels upon which the primary 35 single family residence is situated. 36 37 D. "Single -story Second Residential Unit' shall mean a second residential 38 unit that is no higher than fifteen (15) feet from ground level. 39 40 E. Second residential units shall not be considered to be an accessory 41 structure. 42 43 44 45 46 .Ordinance 3 1 17.30.030 Single -story Second Residential Units - Requirements 2 3 An attached or detached one -story second residential unit shall be permitted by the a Planning Director or the Director's designee if the application meets all of the following 5 requirements set forth in this section. The one -story second residential unit shall: 6 7 A. Be located on a residential lot that has only one existing single - family unit 8 thereon that meets the following minimum lot size: 9 10 �p a 1. R- 1 Zone — 6,7-2- square feet 11 2. R -2 Zone — 6,000 square feet 12 3. R -3 Zone — 5,000 square feet 13 14 A. Be a permanent structure on a permanent foundation and contain 15 accommodations for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation separate 16 from the primary dwelling on the same lot. 17 t8 B. Have no more than two bedrooms. 19 20 C. Be no smaller than 400 square feet for an efficiency unit and 550 square feet 21 for a one- or two- bedroom unit. 22 23 D. Be no larger than 30% of the size of the living space of the primary structure or 24 800 square feet, whichever is smaller. In cases where 30% of the primary 25 dwelling unit is less than or equal to 400 square feel, then one 400 square foot 26 efficiency unit shall be permitted. 27 28 E. Be restricted so that one of the two units on the property is always owner- 29 occupied. A recorded covenant shall be provided prior to occupancy of the 30 second unit providing such notice and further providing that the second 31 residential unit shall be a legal unit only so long as either the main dwelling, 32 unit or the second unit is occupied by the owner of record of the property and 33 providing that this restriction shall be binding upon any successor in ownership 3a of the property. 35 36 F. If detached, be no closer than 10 feet to any other building on the lot, including 37 the primary residential unit, nor closer than 15 feet from a building on an 38 adjacent lot. 39 40 G. Have windows and doors placed such that privacy of adjacent lots is not 41 impinged; windows shall be above eye level, shall face toward the existing 42 primary residence or the street, or shall be screened from view from adjacent 43 lots. 44 45 H. Not result in or contribute to a floor area ratio greater than 45% in any zone 46 even when attached to the primary structure. Ordinance 4 2 L Not be higher than the primary unit unless it is an attached second -story second 3 unit, in which case it is subject to the conditional use second unit permit 4 provisions listed in Section 17.30.040 below. 5 6 J. Have 400 square feet of usable outdoor living area with a minimum dimension 7 of 15 feet in any direction and not including parking areas, driveways, front or 8 rear setback areas, or outdoor living area required for the primary residential 9 unit on the lot. 10 11 K. Be permitted only when the primary unit has the parking required by this title. 12 13 L. Have one enclosed parking space for an efficiency or one - bedroom unit, and 14 two enclosed spaces for a two - bedroom unit. 15 16 M. Meet the development standards of the zone in which it is located (i.e., 17 setbacks, lot coverage) unless indicated otherwise in this Section. 1S 19 N. Not be sold separately from the primary unit. 20 21 0. Be subject to all single- family development fees and permits. 22 23 P. Meet the following design criteria: 24 25 1. Be of the same architectural style as the primary unit. 26 27 2. Match the primary unit in materials, colors, types of windows, doors, trim, 28 proportions, amount of overhang, architectural embellishments, roof 29 shape, and quality, although proposed higher quality materials shall be 30 allowed. 3] 32 3. Have its own entrance, but its entrance shall not be oriented to the street or 33 otherwise change the single- family appearance of the primary structure. 34 35 4. Have its outdoor living area and immediate surroundings landscaped. 36 37 17.30.040 Second- Story/Two -Story Second Residential Units. 38 39 A conditional use permit may be granted for the construction of a second -story or two - 40 story second residential unit in accordance with Chapter 17.1,12 of the Rosemead Municipal 41 Code provided the additional findings of this section are met. A second -story or two -story 42 second unit, whether attached or detached shall: 43 44 A. Unless modified by this section, meet all standards for one -story units listed in 45 Section 17.30.030 above, except that setbacks shall be those applicable to 46 primary dwelling units of the residential district in which the lot is located. Ordinance 5 I 2 B. Not have stairs that are visible from a street or shall have stairs that are 3 screened from view. 4 5 C. Not have its door visible from the street in single - family neighborhoods, and 6 generally shall not create an appearance out of character with the single - family 7 nature of the R -1 zone. 8 9 D. Have an upper story that is smaller than the lower story to decrease the bulk 10 and mass of the building and add architectural character. The square footage of 11 the upper story shall be at least 10% less than the lower story. 12 13 E. If a detached unit, be no higher than the primary unit. 14 15 F. If on an alley, may be allowed tandem parking within a garage as an option if 16 tandem parking will result in a unit that (a) faces the alley and (b) has a garden 17 or landscaped area facing the alley. This provision is intended to be an 18 .incentive for making the alley an attractive living environment and a secondary 19 street. 20 21 G. Have its architectural character, design, style, massing, height, construction 22 materials, trim, and color in harmony with the primary unit and the 23 surrounding neighborhood. 24 25 H. Not cause excessive noise, traffic, parking or overloading of public facilities or 26 infringe upon the privacy of adjacent residences. 27 28 I. Not invade privacy, cast excessive shade on adjacent properties or reduce light 29 available for solar energy. 30 31 32 17.30.050 Revocation 33 34 The Placing Director shall have the authority to revoke a second residential unit permit 35 and the planning commission shall have the authority to revoke a conditional use second 36 residential unit permit if one or more of the requirements of this Chapter are no longer met. 37 The decision of either the Planning Director or the Planning Commission may be appealed to 38 the City Council in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 17.124.070 of this 39 Code. 40 41 17.30.060 Existing Second Residential Units 42 43 Second residential units which have been previously approved shall be allowed to remain 44 in existence as a legally established non - conforming use. This Chapter shall in no way . 45 validate any existing illegal second residential unit. 46 Ordinance 6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 Section 9. Section 17.112.030 of the Rosemead Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding subsection 29 to read as follows: 29. Second -story and two -story second residential units in accordance with Section 17.30.040 of this Code. Section 10. Severability The City Council of the City of Rosemead hereby declares that should any section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance of the Code, hereby adopted, be declared for any reason to be invalid, it is the intent of the Council that it would have passed all other portions of this Ordinance independent of the elimination herefrom of any such portion as may be declared valid. Section 11. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause it to be published and posted pursuant to the provisions of law in that regard. In accordance with Section 3A above, this Ordinance shall be introduced and take effect immediately upon adoption. Section 12. The City Clerk shall transmit a copy of this Ordinance to the State Department of Housing and Community Development within 60 days of its adoption. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of August, 2003, by the City Council of Rosemead, California. ATTEST: City Clerk Ordinance Mayor of the City of Rosemead 7 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING ROSEDIEAD CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 23, 2003, AT 8:00 P.M. CALL MEETING TO ORDER: 8:00 P.M. PLEDGE TO TIIE FLAG: MAYOR VASQUEZ INVOCATION: REVEREND JUAN VARGAS OF IGLESIA JESUSCRISTO ES EL SENOR ROLL CALL OF OFFICERS: COUNCILMEMBERS ALARCON, IMPERIAL, TAYLOR, MAYOR PRO TEM CLARK, MAYOR/ VASQUEZ APPROVAL OFNIINUTES: OCTOBER 22,2002 – REGULAR MEETING JUNE 3, 2003 – ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OFINTERESTTO CITIZENS WISHING TO PARTICIPATE 1) Those wishing to speak on any Agenda Item, including public hearing, should have their Speaker Request Form submittcd to the City Clerk no later than the time immediately following Oral Communications. 2) Immediately after approval of the minutes and again at the end of the meeting, there is a period of time set aside for those persons wishing to address the Council on matters not listed on the Agenda entitled: ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE. (please complete the Speaker Request Form stating your preference to speak either at the beginning or at the end ofthe meeting). 3) Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with disabilities, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the City Clerk's office at 626/569 -2171 at least 48 hours before the meeting, if possible. PRESENTATIONS: �PKOCt_.AMATION TO CHIEF DAN SCOTT PROCLAIMING `D—.-OCTOBER AS FIRE PREVENTION MONTH ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE II. PUBLIC HEARINGS C/A. PUBLIC HEARING – RECOMMENDED PROGRAM EXPENDITURES OF CITIZEN'S OPTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY (COPS) GRANTS FUNDS CCAGENDA:9 -27 -07 r:s�01 This Public Hearing is to permit public input on Sheriff's Department expenditure recommendations prior to City Council review and approval of COPS finding recommendations. Recommendation: Approve expenditure of COPS funds. CA (/ I B. PU13LIC HEARING — RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -33 — CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PLAN The Congestion Management Program (CMP) requires the City to annually attest to the fact that the City has met all requirements of the CMP. This resolution accomplishes that task. Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -33. III LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -34 - CLAIMS AND DEMANDS Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -34, for payment of City expenditures. tom. ORDINANCE NO. 826 — AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE ROSEMEAD MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO SECOND UNITS IN / COMPLIANCE WITH STATE ASSEMBLY BILL 1866 Ordinance No. 826 was approved on first reading at the City Council meeting of August 13, 2003, Recommendation: Adopt Ordinance No. 826. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR— RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL S 00000, CC -A CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FROM CONSOLIDATED DISPOSAL SERVICES (CDS) FOR ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT OF RESIDENT AND COMMERCIAL RATES Consolidated Disposal Services (CDS) has requested an increase in residential refuse rates of 3.0 %, and for commercial refuse rates an increase of 4.7 %. Recommendation: Approve the request by Consolidated Disposal Services, Inc. for a 2003 adjustment in residential rate of 3.0% and a commercial /industrial refuse rate of 4.7 %, effective October I, 2003. CC -B REQUEST FOR "KEEP CLEAR" PAVEMENT MARKINGS AT IIELLMAN AVENUE AND ROCKHOLD AVENUE Due to blockage of access to and from Rockhold Avenue as a result of traffic on Hellman Avenue, the Traffic Commissioners requested installation of "KEEP CLEAR" pavement markings and "Do Not Block Intersection" signs at the intersection of Hellman and Rockhold Avenues. At their meeting of July 10 "i, the Traffic Commission unanimously approved the installation of one "KEEP CLEAR" pavement marking and one "Do Not Block Intersection" sign at the south leg of Rockhold Avenue at Hellman Avenue. Recommendation: Approve the installation of one "KEEP CLEAR" pavement marking and one "DO NOT BLOCK INTERSECTION" sign as approved by the Traffic Commission on July 10, 2003. CC -C REQUEST FOR THE INSTALLATION OF PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON MISSION DRIVE NEAR CLAUDIA AVENUE Per a request by a resident in the vicinity of Mission Drive and Claudia Avenue, the traffic engineer reviewed parking control measures on the north side of Mission Drive, east and west of Claudia Avenue. Staff recommended the installation of 22 feet of red curb and "No Parking Anytime" signs on the north CCAGENDA:9 -23 -03 Page M2 side of Mission Drive, The Traffic Commission unanimously approved this recommendation at their July 10, 2003 meeting. Recommendation: The installation of 22' of red curb and "No Parking Anytime" signs on the north side of Mission Drive. CC -D REQUEST FOR REVISIONS IN PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON ANGELUS AVENUE AT ELDRIDGE RICE SCI -IOOL The Principal at Rice School requested revision of the parking restrictions on Angelus Avenue in front of the school. The location of the school bus parking area has been changed and more on- street parking for parents is needed. The traffic engineer observed current parking restrictions and recommended several revisions to the parking restrictions. Staff recommended the installation of red curb adjacent to the existing crosswalks and school driveway approaches. The Traffic Commission unanimously approved the recommendations at their September 4, 2003 meeting. Recommendation: Approve the parking restrictions in front of Rice School be revised to read "No Parking 7 AM to 4 PM School Days" and "Passenger Loading Permitted ". Remove the "No Parking 7 AM to 4PM and "No Stopping 7 AM to 4 PM School Days Only" restrictions to minimize confusion. Red curb is recommended adjacent to the existing crosswalks as well as the approaches to the driveway of the school CC -E AUTHORIZATION TO REJECT CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY FROM ERIC OZUNA Claimant states he was driving on a City street and his vehicle fell into a hole in the roadway. The City's claims adjuster, Carl Warren R Company has recommended rejection of this claim. Recommendation: Rejection ofclaim. / CC -F AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES 80TIl CONGRESS OF CITIES AND E \'POSITION, DECEMBER 9 -13, 2003, NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE This years topics include: Homeland Security, City Employees and Armed Services Deployments, Affordable Housing, Economic Development, Downtown Revitalization and Planning for growth. Recommendation: Authorize the attendance of any Councilmember, City Attorney, City Manager and staff as assigned by the City Manager. CC-G AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND 23 HD ANNUAL CALIFORNIA CONTRACT (ff CITIES ASSOCIATION FALL SEMINAR, OCTOBER 3 -5, MORRO BAY, CALIFORNIA This year's theme is "Contracting for Municipal Services Works Through Public Private Partnerships. Mcon3mendation: Authorize the attendance of any Council member, City nager and staff as assigned by the City Manager. NSIDERATION OF DANCE AND ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT, YUMBA RESTAURANT, 3514 ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD CCAGFNDA:9 -23 -03 Page k3 An Administrative Hearing was held on August 21, 2003 regarding the approval of a Dance and Entertainment permit for the Mayumba Cuban Restaurant. The hours of operation shall be 1 1:00 a.m. to midnight and the dance and entertainment shall be Monday through Saturday, S:00 p.m. to midnight and Sunday, 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. Recommendation: Grant the Dance and Entertainment permit to the Mayumba Cuban Restaurant, 3514 Rosemead Boulevard, contingent upon the List of Conditions. CC-[ REJECTION OF BID AND AUTHORIZATION TO RE- ADVERTISE FOR PARK ADA AND BALLFIELD LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS Only one bid was received on September 11, 2003 (Malibu Pacific Tennis Courts Inc., $375,950.00). CDBG guidelines require that at least three bids be received. Recommendation: Reject the bid from Malibu Pacific Tennis Courts Inc., and authorize this project to be re- advertised. CC -J APPROVAL OF UNDERTAKING AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL MAP 26776, 111 3323 -3327 MUSCATEL AVENUE The Undertaking Agreement was executed to guarantee the construction of sewer laterals, curb & gutter, driveway and sidewalk, subsequent to the recordation of the parcel map. A Certificate of Deposit in the amount of $10,500 has been submitted to the City. Recommendation: Approve the Undertaking Agreement for the installation of the improvements. CONSIDERATION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF ROSEMEAD AND APPLIED PLANNING, INC., FOR PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR PROPOSED 22 ACRE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER TO WALNUT GROVE AVENUE AND RUSH STREET In order to process the Wal-Mart application, the City is required to prepare an Environmental Impact Report. Wal -Mart will pay for the complete cost of the report_ Staff surveyed numerous EIR consulting firms and is recommending that Applied Planning Inc. prepare the report. Recommendation: Approve the proposal and authorize the City to contract for the services under the City's standard form consulting agreement. V. MATTERS FOR DISCUSSION AND ACTION A. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD VV AUTHORIZING A REWARD FOR INFORMATION LEADING TO THE. APPREHENSION AND CONVICTION OF THE FUGITIVE WANTED FOR �/ THE MURDER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPUTY DAVID w�u„��/� MARCH li/' On April 29, 2002, Temple Station Deputy David March was shot and killed 1 while making a routine traffic stop. The Sheriff's Department investigation led to the identification of the killer. The suspect is believed to have fled to Mexico. Sheriff Lee Baca has requested that a reward be offered. The L.A. County Board of Supervisors has approved a $10,000 reward and Governor Davis has offered a reward of up to $100,000 for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the fugitive. CCAGCNDA:9 -23 -03 r,b� n4 Recommendation: if the City Council should choose to offer a reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the fugitive responsible for the murder of Deputy David March, it is recommended that the draft resolution be adopted and that staff be directed to earmark reward funds from appropriated reserves. VI. STATUS REPORTS VII. NIATTERS FROM OFFICIALS VIII. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE IX. ADJOURNMENT THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING IS ADJOURNED TO SEPTEMBER 25, 2003, AT 7:00 P.M. V Posted 72 hours in advance of the meeting at the City Hall, 8838 E. Valley Boulevard, Rosemead; the L.A. County Library, Rosemead Branch, 8800 E. Valley Boulevard, Rosemead; and other locations pursuant to RMC Sec. 1.08.020. CCAGENDA:9 -2M3 Page 45 ORDINANCE N0. 826 2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY 4 OF LOS ANGELES; STATE OF CALIFOR \TIA; AME D1NG VARIOUS SECTIO1�'S OF 5 THE ROSEME-AD MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO SECOND UNITS IN 6 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE ASSEMBLY BILL 1866 7 8 WHEREAS, the State Legislature has declared that second dwelling units provide a 9 valuable form of housing in California, providing housing for family members, students; the 10 elderly, in -home health care providers, the disabled and others at below- market prices within 11 existing neighborhoods and has found that homeowners who create second units benefit from 12 added income and an increased sense of security; and 13 14 WHEREAS, the Legislature stated its intent that any second -unit Ordinances adopted by 15 local agencies have the effect of providing for the creation of second units, and that provisions 16 in these Ordinances relating to matters including unit size, parking, fees and other 17 requirements are not so arbitrary; excessive or burdensome so as to unreasonably restrict the is ability of homeowners to create the second units in zones in which they are authorized by 19 local Ordinance; and 20 21 WHEREAS, the Legislature in 1982 stated its commitment to second units as a valuable 22 form of housing and restated its conmliunent in 2002 with the passage of Assembly Bill 1866; 23 which amends Goyenmrlent Code Section 65852.2 by eliminating.the authority to require a 24 discretionary review for second units that meet specified requirements; and 25 26 WHEREAS, Section 658522 authorizes a local agency to: (i) designate areas where 27 second units may be permitted based on criteria that may include adequacy of sewer services; 28 impact on traffic flow or other factors identified by the City, which the City has done, and (ii) 29 subject to certain limitations, impose standards that include parking, height, setbacks, lot 30 coverage, architectural review, maximum size; owner - occupancy and standards that prevent 31 adverse impacts listed on properties found on the National Register of Historic Places; and 32 33 AVHEREAS, the legislative history of Section 65852.2 indicates that the purpose of 34 allowing an owner - occupancy provision is to protect neighborhood stability and the character 35 of existing family neighborhoods and to discourage, speculanon and absentee ownership; and 36 37 WHEREAS, in compliance with AB 1866 the m City wishes to amend the Rosemead 38 Municipal Code to permit accessory second units in all residential zones on lots on which 39 only a single family home currently exists; and 40 41 \WHEREAS; the adoption of this Ordinance to accommodate second units without 42 discretionary review to implement the provisions of Section 65852.2 is statutorily exempt 43 fi om the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code 44 Section 21080.17 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15282(i), and; to the extent that Code 45 provisions are revised to ensure internal consistency, that the project 1s categorically exempt 46 under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), which provides that where it can be seen wi FZ( P 2 3 2003 ITEM No. I certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect 2 on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA; and 3 4 INHEREAS, the Legislature has required that this Ordinance be in place by July 1, 2003 5 and therefore it is necessary to adopt this Ordinance to avoid having state - imposed standards 6 placed on the City of Rosemead; which do not include an owner - occupancy requirement, 7 which could negatively impact the land -use patterns of the City, overburden existing 8 infrastructure, cause traffic and parking congestion, increased noise, loss of privacy, and 9 overburden areas where existing density is already among the highest in the City and therefore 10 interfere with the public safety, welfare, peace and health. 11 12 - NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD DOES 13 HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 14 15 Section 1. Environmental Determination. The City Council HEREBY FINDS and 16 DETERMINES that this ordinance is statutorily and categorically exempt from CEQA. 17 18 Section 2. Zoning Amendment Findings. In approving this Urgency Ordinance, the City 19 - Council hereby finds and determines that the zoning amendment serves the public necessity, 20 convenience, and general welfare in that it will help provide lower cost housing for lower 21 income persons such as students, disabled persons, senior citizens and members of property 22 owners' families as required by Section 17.116.010 of the Rosemead Municipal Code. The 23 Council further finds that the proposed change is consistent with good city planning and 24 zoning practices in that it furthers city and state housing goals. 75 26 Section 3. Additional Findings. 27 28 A. Parking Findings. 29 30 This Ordinance amends Section 17.84.020 to the Municipal Code that will require 31 enclosed parking spaces for second units. This provision meets the requirements of 32 Government Code section 65852.2(e) as covered parking is required for all required parking 33 in residential zones which are impacted by this Ordinance. 34 35 Section 4. Section 17.16.020 of the Rosemead Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding 36 a subsection H to read as follows: 37 38 H. Single -story second residential units in accordance with Chapter 1730 of the 39 Rosemead Municipal Code. 40 41 Section 5. Section 17.20.020 of the Rosemead Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding 42 a subsection D to read as follows: 43 44 D. Single -story second residential units in accordance with Chapter 17.30 of the 45 Rosemead Municipal Code. 46 Ordinance 1 . Section 6. Section 17.24.020 of the Rosemead Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding 2 a subsection E to read as follows: 3 4 A. Single -story second residential units in accordance with Chapter 17.30 5 of the Rosemead Municipal Code. 6 7 Section 7. Section 17.28.020 of the Rosemead Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding 8 a subsection D to read as follows: 9 10 D. Single -story second residential units in accordance with Chapter 1750 of the 11 Rosemead Municipal Code. 12 13 14 Section S. Chapter 17.30 is hereby added to the Rosemead Municipal Code to read as follows 15 16 17 1. SECOND RESIDENTIAL UNITS 18 19 17.30.010 Purpose 20 21 A. The purpose of this Chapter is to implement Govennnent Code section 22 65852.2 which allows the City to adopt a second residential unit ordinance in 23 lieu of being subjected to the State requirements for such units. 24 75 B. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Rosemead Municipal Code 26 to the contrary; the provisions herein shall govern the development of second 27 residential units in the City of Rosemead. 28 29 17.30.020 Second Residential Unit - Definitions 30 31 C. "Second Residential Unit" shall mean a detached or attached dwelling 32 unit that provides complete independent living facilities for one or more 33 persons. It shall include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, 34 cooking and sanitation on the same parcel or parcels upon which the primary 35 single family residence is situated. 36 37 D. "Single -story Second Residential Unit' shall mean a second residential 38 unit that is no higher than fifteen (15) feet from ground level. 39 40 E. Second residential units shall not be considered to be an accessory 41 structure. 42 43 44 45 46 Ordinance 3 1 1730.030 Single -story Second Residential Units - Requirements 2 3 An attached or detached one -story second residential unit shall be-pennitted by the 4 Planning Director or the Director's designee if the application meets all of the following 5 requirements set forth in this section. The one -story second residential unit shall: 6 7 A. Be located on a residential lot that has only one existing single - family unit 8 thereon that meets the following minimum lot size: 9 10 1. R -I Zone - 6,`32 square feet 11 2. R -2 Zone — 6,000 square feet 12 3. R -3 Zone — 5,000 square feet 13 14 A. Be a permanent structure on a permanent foundation and contain 15 accommodations for living; sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation separate . 16 from the primary dwelling on the same lot. 17 18 B. Have no more than two bedrooms. 19 20 C. Be no smaller than 400 square feet for an efficiency unit and 550 square feet 21 for a one- or two- bedroom unit. 22' 23 D. Be no larger than 30% of the size of the living space of the primary structure or 24 800 square feet, whichever is smaller. In cases where 30% of the primary 25 dwelling unit is less than or equal to 400 square feet, then one 400 square foot 26 efficiency unit shall be permitted. - 27 28 E. Be restricted so that one of the two units on the property is always owner - 29 occupied. A recorded covenant shall be provided prior to occupancy of the 30 second unit providing such notice and further providing that the second 31 residential unit shall be a legal unit only so long as either the main dwelling 32 unit or the second unit is occupied by the owner of record of the property and 33 providing that this restriction shall be binding upon any successor in ownership 34 of the property. 35 36 F. If detached, be no closer than 10 feet to any other building on the lot, including 37 the primary residential unit; nor closer than 15 feet from a building on an 38 adjacent lot. 39 40 G. Have windows and doors placed such that privacy of adjacent lots is not 41 impinged; windows shall be above eye level, shall face toward the existing 42 primary residence or the street, or shall be screened from view from adjacent 43 lots. 44 45 H. Not result in or contribute to a floor area ratio greater than 45% in any zone 46 even when attached to the primary structure. Ordinance 4 2 I. Not be higher than the primary unit unless it is an attached second -story second 3 unit, in which case it is subject to the conditional use second unit permit 4 provisions listed in Section 17.30.040 below. 5 6 1. Have 400 square feet of usable outdoor living area with a minimum dimension 7 of 15 feet in any direction and not including parking areas, driveways, front or 8 rear setback areas, or outdoor living area required for the primary residential 9 unit on the lot. 10 11 K. Be permitted only when the primary unit has the parking required by this title. 12 13 L. Have one enclosed parking space for an efficiency or one - bedroom unit, and 14 two enclosed spaces for a two - bedroom unit. 15 16 M. Meet the development standards of the zone in which it is located (i.e., 17 setbacks, lot coverage) unless indicated otherwise in this Section. 1s 19 N. Not be sold separately from the primary unit_ 20 21 0. Be subject to all single- family development fees and permits. 22 23 P. Meet the following design criteria 24 25 1. Be of the same architectural style as the primary unit. 26 27 2. Match the primary unit in materials, colors, types of windows, doors, trim, 28 proportions, amount of overhang, architectural embellislunents, roof 29 shape, and quality, although proposed higher quality materials shall be 30 allowed. 31 .. 32 3. Have its own entrance, but its entrance shall not be oriented to the street or otherwise change the single - family appearance of the primary structure. 34 35 4. Have its outdoor living area and immediate surroundings landscaped. 36 37 17.30.040 Second- Story/Two -Story Second Residential Units. 38 39 A conditional use permit may be granted for the construction of a second -story or two - 40 story second residential unit in accordance with Chapter 17.112 of the Rosemead Municipal 41 Code provided the additional findings of this section are met. A second -story or two -story 42 second unit, whether attached or detached shall: 43 44 A. Unless modified by this section, meet all standards for one -story units listed in 45 Section 17.30.030 above, except that setbacks shall be those applicable to 46 primary dwelling units of the residential district in which the lot is located. Ordinance 5 2 B. Not have stairs that are visible from a street or shall have stairs that are 3 screened from view. 4 5 C. Not have its door visible from the street in single - family neighborhoods, and 6 generally shall not create an appearance out of character with the single- faruly 7 nature of the R -1 zone. 8 9 D. Have an upper story that is smaller than the lower story to decrease the bulk 10 and mass of the building and add architectural character. The square footage of 11 the upper story shall be at least 10% less than the lower story. 12 13 E. If a detached unit, be no higher than the primary unit. 14 15 F. If on an alley, may be allowed tandem parking within a garage as an option if 16 tandem parking will result in a unit that (a) faces the alley and (b) has a garden 17 or landscaped area facing the alley. This provision is intended to be an 18 incentive for making the alley an attractive living environment and secondary 19 street. 20 21 G. Have its architectural character, design, style, massing; height, construction 22 materials, trim, and color in harmony with the primary unit and the 23 surrounding neighborhood. 24 25 H. Not cause excessive noise, traffic, parking or overloading of public facilities or 26 infringe upon the privacy of adjacent residences. 27 28 I. Not invade privacy, cast excessive shade on adjacent properties or reduce light 29 available for solar energy. 30 911 32 17.30.050 Revocation 33 34 The Planting Director shall have the authority to revoke a second residential unit permit 35 and the planning commission shall have the authority to revoke a conditional use second 36 residential unit permit if one or more of the requirements of this Chapter are no longer met. 37 The decision of either the Planning Director or the Planning Commission may be appealed to 38 the City Council in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 17.124.070 of this 39 Code. 40 41 17.30.060 Existing Second Residential Units 42 43 Second residential units which have been previously approved shall be allowed to remain 44 in existence as a legally established non- conforming use. This Chapter shall in no way 45 validate any existing illegal second residential unit. 46 Ordinance 6 I Section 9. Section 17.112.030 of the Rosemead Municipal Code is hereby amended by 2 adding subsection 29 to read as follows: 3 4 29. Second -story and two -story second residential units in accordance with Section 5 17.30.040 of this Code. 6 7 Section 10. Severability 8 9 The City Council of the City of Rosemead hereby declares that should any section. 10 paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance of the Code, hereby adopted, be declared for 11 any reason to be invalid, it is the intent of the Council that it would have passed all other 12 portions of this Ordinance independent of the elimination herefrom of any such portion as 13 may be declared valid. 14 15 Section 11. 16 17 The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance is and shall cause it to be published and posted pursuant to the provisions of law in that regard. 19 In accordance with Section 3A above, this Ordinance shall be introduced and take effect 20 immediately upon adoption. 21 22 Section 12. 23 24 The City Clerk shall transmit a copy of this Ordinance to the State Department of 25 Housing and Community Development within 60 days of its adoption. 26 27 28 APPROVED AND ADOPTED this._ day of August, 2003, by the City Council of 29 Rosemead, California. 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 ATTEST: City Clerk Ordinance Mayor of the City of Rosemead 7 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CROWE, CITY MANAGER DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 2003 RE: APPROVAL OF DANCE & ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT FOR THE MAYUMBA CUBAN RESTAURANT & BAR, 3514 ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD Pursuant to the Rosemead Municipal Code, an Administrative Hearing was held on August 21, 2003 regarding the approval of a Dance & Entertainment permit for the Mayumba Cuban Restaurant & Bar, 3514 Rosemead Boulevard. This establishment is a restaurant and bar serving food and alcoholic beverages. The owner wishes to allow dance and entertainment. The hours of operation shall be 11:00 a.m. to midnight and the dance and entertainment shall be Monday through Saturday, 8:00 p.m. to midnight and Sunday, 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. Staff is recommending approval of the Dance and Entertainment permit contingent upon the attached conditions. Attached for your information are the following items: List of Conditions. Copy of the Sheriff's Department License Detail Investigators report. A copy of the minutes of the Administrative Hearing on August 21, 2003. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Rosemead City Council grant the Dance & Entertainment permit to the Mayumba Cuban Restaurant, 3514 Rosemead Boulevard contingent upon the attached conditions. BC:;s Attachments c�UNCIL ACERDA S c P 23 2003 ITEM No. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT BUSINESS LICENSE / PERMIT CONDITIONS MAYUMBA CUBAN RESTAURANT 3514 ROSEMEAD BL. ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 1. The entire premises is subject to inspection by the Sheriff's Department at anytime. Any locked or otherwise secured rooms shall be opened upon demand. 2. The approved floor plan and /or room use shall not be changed without prior approval of the Sheriff's Department. 3. All licenses, permits, and adopted conditions shall be displayed where they are clearly visible and readable by the public. " 4. All required permits and licenses shall be valid at all times. 5. All employees shall possess, at the site, a valid California Department of Motor Vehicles driver's license or identification card. They shall present such identification upon demand of any regulatory official. 6. An owner and /or person in charge shall be present at all times that the business is open. The person in charge shall be familiar with all codes and adopted conditions regulating this establishment. The person in charge shall meet the following qualifications: A. Be at least twenty -one (21) years of age. B. Possess, on their person, a valid DMV issued California driver's license or identification card. C. Be able to communicate effectively with regulatory officials. D. Have the ability to immediately contact the owner. 7. The owner and /or person in charge shall immediately introduce him /herself to any regulatory official (Sheriff, Fire, Code Enforcement, etc.) at such time as the officials's presence is announced to any employee. 8. The owner and /or person in charge shall fully cooperate with the regulatory officials. 9. Smoking shall not be allowed within the premises. 10. The most current security plan, as approved by the Sheriffs License Detail, shall be complied with at all times. The security plan may be altered by the Sheriffs License Detail as needed without approval by the License and Permit Hearing Board. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT BUSINESS LICENSE / PERMIT CONDITIONS MAYUMBA CUBAN RESTAURANT 3514 ROSEMEAD BL. ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 11. Security and video taping plans are subject to review and revision by the Sheriff's Department License Detail at any time. A video taping plan shall not require approval by the License and Permit Hearing Board. 12. The entertainment format shall not change without the prior approval of the Sheriff's Department License Detail. 13. The use of entertainment promoters shall not occur without prior approval of the Sheriffs Department License Detail 14. The hours of operation shall be 11:00 A.M. to midnight. 15. The hours of entertainment shall be Monday through Saturday 8:00 P.M. to midnight, and Sunday 4:00 P.M. to 10:00 P.M. 16. The hours of dance shall be limited to the hours of entertainment shown in condition #15. 17. Any violations of any applicable laws and /or these conditions shall be grounds for suspension and /or revocation of this license. 11WE HAVE READ, UNDERSTAND, AND ACCEPT THESE CONDITIONS. SIGNED DATE r' �- 2 v� 3" G D - -- - -- DATE WITNESSED DATE County of Los Angeles Shereff'S Department Headquarters °? 4700 Ramona Boulevard Monterey Park, California 91754-2169 c y a zra�e, sr September 17, 2003 LICENSE UNIT INVESTIGATION REPORT 103 - 00142 - 3410 -446 City of Rosemead Application for Business License and /or Permit Public Eating Business Name: Maymba Cuban Restaurant & Bar Address: 3514 Rosemead Blvd., Rosemead, CA Applicants: Galan, Fernando Luis ia} P 14 4 1� gg " Result of investigation fails to indicate a basis for protest. Result of investigation indicates a basis for protest. See narrative report attached in clarification of recommendation. Investigating Officer T. McLaughlin Report Approved C. Newsom, Sergeant # 449065 # 213454 Departmental Recommendation Approval with Conditions (see attachment) LEROY D. BACA, SHERIFF Daniel W. Larson, Acting Captain Major Crimes Bureau �w.`7radlion of C5erurce cSrnce 1950 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING MAYUMBA CUBAN RESTAURANT 3514 ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD AUGUST 21, 2003 The Hearing was opened by the Hearing Officer, Donald Wagner, at 10:16 a.m. on August 21, 2003. Mr. Wagner asked everyone in attendance to state their name for the record. Fernando Galan, owner,,Manuel Miller, Terri McLaughlin, Sheriff's Business License Investigator, Joan Hunter, Rosemead Chamber of Commerce, Stacy Abajian, Rosemead Shopping Center Management, and Jan Saavedra, Business License Clerk. Investigator McLaughlin spoke on the Sheriffs Department background investigation results. Ms. McLaughlin stated that the Sheriffs Department would have to recommend denial of the application at this time, due to not receiving the results of the fingerprint results on Luis Ruiz, partner of the business. The Hearing Officer stated that the City requested Lt. Wallace of the Los Angeles County Sheriff s Department to call the Department of Justice to expedite the results on Mr. Ruiz. The Hearing Officer also stated that Mr. Miller has spoken to the City Attorney, Robert Kress, and that it was agreed that the business could have a 3 -piece combo band and dancing only at this time and if they wanted a singer, Mr. Miller would have to speak to Mr. Kress again for approval. Joan Hunter stated that the Chamber of Commerce was in favor of this business Stacy Abajian stated that the Property Management has no problems with the business. Also stated that the business owner has spent a lot of money fixing the business and that she will be monitoring the site for any problems. The Hearing Officer stated that this item would be on the September 23`d Council Meeting. The Hearing was closed at 10:30 a.m. •'�i -O TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CROWE, CITY MANAGER DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 2003 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR "KEEP CLEAR" PAVEMENT MARKINGS AT HELLMAN AVENUE AND ROCKHOLD AVENUE Traffic Commission Chairperson, Holly Knapp, has observed a blockage of access to and from Rockhold Avenue as a result of traffic on Hellman Avenue. Chairperson Knapp has requested the installation of "KEEP CLEAR" pavement markings and "Do Not Block Intersection" signs at the intersection of Hellman Avenue and Rockhold Avenue. Due to the intersection's proximity to the signalized intersection of Walnut Grove Avenue and Hellman Avenue and the I -10 freeway ramps, the City's Traffic Engineer recommended the installation of two "KEEP CLEAR" pavement markings and "Do Not Block Intersection" signs at the subject intersection. At the July 10`' Traffic Commission meeting, the Traffic Commission approved the installation of one "KEEP CLEAR" pavement marking and one "Do Not Block Intersection" sign at the south leg of Rockhold Avenue at Hellman Avenue by a unanimous vote. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Rosemead City Council approve the installation of one "KEEP CLEAR" pavement marking and one "Do Not Block Intersection" sign as approved by the Traffic Commission on July l Oth, 2003. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A — Traffic Commission Staff Report, dated June 30, 2003 Exhibit B — Traffic Commission Minutes, dated July 10, 2003 COUNCIL AGENDA S E P 23 2003 ITEM No. L r cC- Staff Report Rosemead Traffic Commission TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSSION FROM: JOANNE ITAGAKI, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPUTY DATE: June 30, 2003 RE: Request for "KEEP CLEAR" Pavement Markings at Hellman Avenue and Rockhold Avenue REQUEST Commissioner Knapp requested the installation of "KEEP CLEAR" pavement markings at the intersection of Hellman Avenue and Rockhold Avenue. Traffic on Hellman Avenue often blocks access to and from Rockhold Avenue during the peak hours. The "KEEP CLEAR" pavement marking would be in conjunction with "Do Not Block Intersection" signs for enforcement purposes. CONDITIONS Hellman Avenue is a 36 -foot wide east/west roadway with one lane of traffic in each direction separated by a double yellow centerline. The posted speed limit on Hellman Avenue is 30 mph. Rockhold Avenue is 30 feet wide north of Hellman Avenue and 38 feet wide south of Hellman Avenue. Rockhold Avenue is an offset intersection with the north leg approximately 90 feet east of the south leg. Rockhold Avenue is stopped controlled at its intersection with Hellman Avenue. The prima facie speed limit on Rockhold Avenue is 25 mph. Exhibit A depicts conditions at the intersection of Hellman Avenue and Rockhold Avenue. 73 L1 The reported collision history at and within 100 feet of the intersection of Hellman Avenue and Rockhold Avenue was reviewed for the period from January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2001. There was one reported collision at the intersection during this period. This collision occurred on Monday January 4, 1999 at 2:15 PM and involved a westbound vehicle turning left colliding with a westbound vehicle proceeding straight. The primary collision factor was "improper turn and inattention ". July 10, 2003 Traffic Commission Meeting Request for "KEEP CLEAR" Pavement Markings At Hellman Avenue and Rockhold Avenue Page 2 DISCUSSION Field review of the intersection was conducted in the mid - morning, before peak periods of the roadways. Of course, during this time, no blockage of the intersections was observed. However, due to the proximity of the subject intersection to the signalized intersection of Hellman Avenue and Walnut Grove Avenue and the 1 -10 ramps, blockage through Rockhold Avenue on Hellman Avenue is conceivable. In addition, Commissioner Knapp has experienced this blockage. The installation of "KEEP CLEAR" pavement markings and a "Do Not Block Intersection" sign at the intersection of Hellman Avenue and Rockhold Avenue is recommended. Due to the offset nature of the intersection, two separate installations are recommended. This recommendation is based on the intersection's proximity to signalized intersections and the 1 -10 ramps. RECOMMENDATIONS The installation of two "KEEP CLEAR" pavement markings and two "Do Not Block Intersection" signs at the intersection of Hellman Avenue and Rockhold Avenue is recommended. Exhibit A depicts this recommendation. Attachment P: \06- 160 \JI1 \RSD \2003 Agendas & Documents \July - Hellman & Rockhold -Do Not Block Intersection.doc AUG.19'2003 14:45 in 0 `o 2 Rockhold A venue Paint 12 inch white limit lines and "KEEP CLEAR" Pavement markings. \ I Il 18 It n II J 93730 P.002/002 Install R66 sign on new post. a II � II a Q c E II RevisED D f T eQ LR oold A venue a II � II a Q c E II RevisED D ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSION MEETING JULY 10, 2003 ROLL CALL Present: Chairperson Knapp, Commissioner Matsdorf, Commissioner Quintanilla Absent: Commission Ruiz & Commissioner Baffo Ex- Officio: Assistant Planner: Jennifer Villasenor Traffic Engineering Deputy: Joanne Itagaki CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance: Commissioner Quintanilla Invocation: Chairperson Knapp I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Commissioner Matsdorf, seconded by Commissioner Quintanilla, and carried unanimously to approve the minutes for June 5, 2003. II. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE - None III. OLD BUSINESS - None IV. NEW BUSINESS A. REQUEST FOR "KEEP CLEAR" PAVEMENT MARKINGS AT HELLMAN AVENUE AND ROCKHOLD AVENUE Traffic Engineering Deputy Itagaki presented the staff report. It was moved by Chairperson Knapp, seconded by Commissioner Matsdorf, and carried unanimously to approve the Traffic Engineer's recommendation, but to only install the "keep clear' markings on the south leg of Rockhold, not the north leg. B. REQUEST FOR PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON MISSION DRIVE AT CLAUDIA AVENUE Traffic Engineering Deputy Itagaki presented the staff report. Speaking before the Commission was: Kevin Donnelly 4208 Claudia Avenue Rosemead, California 91770 Mr. Donnelly stated that this location is really a safety issue, and has impacted the kids at the high school, and agrees with the recommendation. It was moved by Commissioner Matsdorf, seconded by Commissioner Quintanilla, and carried unanimously to approve the Traffic Engineer's recommendation. Mr. Donnelly also stated that in the mornings between 7:40 - 8:00 a.m., people use Claudia Avenue as a shortcut to get onto Mission Drive. He recommended that the Sheriff's Units (motorcycle officers), monitor this location. Mr. Donnelly also stated that this past 4th of July, at approximately 8:45 p.m., just prior to the fireworks, there was a huge gridlock on Claudia Avenue. He was recommended "Temporary No Parking" signs be posted in the streets around the park, to allow emergency vehicles access, should there be an emergency situation. V. STAFF REPORTS - None VI. COMMISSIONER REPORTS Commissioner Quintanilla thanked Chairperson Knapp and City Hall staff for all their hard work on the Parade. Chairperson Knapp stated that the "Welcome to Rosemead" sign off they 60 freeway, was re- painted, but was painted a different color and is now pink. It should be repainted with the correct color. Commission Knapp stated that at the Target Shopping Center, she mentioned before, she would like to see a "Right Turn Only" sign placed at Marshall on the first driveway at Rosemead Place, and also look into extending the median. VIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 7:52 p.m. TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CROWE, CITY MANAGER DATE: AUGUST 19. 2003 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR THE INSTALLATION OF PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON MISSION DRIVE NEAR CLAUDIA AVENUE At the request of a resident in the vicinity of Mission Drive and Claudia Avenue, the Deputy Traffic Engineer reviewed the appropriateness of parking restrictions on Mission Drive near Claudia Avenue. Based on a field review of the site, staff reported back to the Traffic Commission and recommended the installation of twenty -two (22) feet of red curb east of Claudia Avenue on the north side of Mission Drive and the installation of "No Parking Any Time" signs on the north side of Mission Drive between Claudia Avenue and Encinita Avenue. At the July 10th Traffic Commission meeting, the Traffic Commission approved the staff recommendation by a unanimous vote. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Rosemead City Council approve the staff recommendation as approved by the Traffic Commission on July 10th, 2003. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A — Traffic Commission Staff Report, dated June 30, 2003 Exhibit B — Traffic Commission Minutes, dated July 10, 2003 go COUNCIL AGENDA S E P 23 2003 ITEM No. �- �- Staff Report Rosemead Traffic Commission TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSSION FROM: JOANNE ITAGAKI, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPUTY DATE: June 30, 2003 RE: Request for Parking Restrictions on Mission Drive at Claudia Avenue REQUEST A resident in the vicinity of Mission Drive and Claudia Avenue has requested the installation of parking restrictions on Mission Drive. The resident indicated vehicles are parking on Mission Drive close to Claudia Avenue and blocking visibility for southbound vehicles exiting Claudia Avenue on to Mission Drive. CONDITIONS Mission Drive is a 60 -foot roadway traveling generally in a northwest/southeast direction through the City. There are two lanes of traffic separated by a double yellow centerline. The posted speed limit on Mission Drive is 40 mph. Claudia Avenue is a 36 -foot wide north /south residential street. Claudia Avenue is stop controlled at its intersection with Mission Drive. There is no striping on Claudia Avenue. The prima facie speed limit Claudia Avenue is 25 mph. Exhibit A depicts conditions at the intersection of Mission Drive and Claudia Avenue. DATA The reported collision history at and within 100 feet of the intersection of Mission Drive and Claudia Avenue was reviewed for the period from January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2001. There were no reported collisions at the intersection during this period. DISCUSSION Field observation of the intersection of Mission Drive and Claudia Avenue identified vehicles are parking on Mission Drive both east and west of Claudia Avenue. These parked vehicles did block visibility of vehicles traveling on Mission Drive. It appears these vehicles are parked most of the day indicating ExHiBiT A July 10, 2003 Traffic Commission Meeting Request for Parking Restrictions On Mission Drive at Claudia Avenue Page 2 of 2 they may be commuter vehicles or possibly employees of businesses in the vicinity. Research of the existing striping pattern on Mission Drive indicates the northwest curb lane between Claudia Avenue and Encinita Avenue is not wide enough to allow striping. This curb lane is 19 feet wide at Claudia Avenue and narrows to 14 feet at Encinita Avenue. Therefore, parking for this entire block should be removed. RECOMMENDATION Based on field observations, 22 feet of red curb east of Claudia Avenue on the north side of Mission Drive is recommended. The installation of "No Parking Any Time" signs on the north side of Mission Drive between Claudia Avenue and Encinita Avenue is also recommended. These recommendations are depicted on Exhibit A. Attachment PA06- 160WI1\RSDt2003 Agendas & Documents \July- Mission & Claudia Parking Restrictions.doc ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSION MEETING JULY 10, 2003 ROLL CALL Present: Chairperson Knapp, Commissioner Matsdorf, Commissioner Quintanilla Absent: Commission Ruiz & Commissioner Baffo Ex- Officio: Assistant Planner: Jennifer Villasenor Traffic Engineering Deputy: Joanne Itagaki CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance: Commissioner Quintanilla Invocation: Chairperson Knapp I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Commissioner Matsdorf, seconded by Commissioner Quintanilla, and carried unanimously to approve the minutes for June 5, 2003. II. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE - None III. OLD BUSINESS - None IV. NEW BUSINESS A. REQUEST FOR "KEEP CLEAR" PAVEMENT MARKINGS AT HELLMAN AVENUE AND ROCKHOLD AVENUE Traffic Engineering Deputy Itagaki presented the staff report. It was moved by Chairperson Knapp, seconded by Commissioner Matsdorf, and carried unanimously to approve the Traffic Engineer's recommendation, but to only install the "keep clear" markings on the south leg of Rockhold, not the north leg. EH 11317 B B. REQUEST FOR PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON MISSION DRIVE AT CLAUDIA AVENUE Traffic Engineering Deputy Itagaki presented the staff report. Speaking before the Commission was: Kevin Donnelly 4208 Claudia Avenue Rosemead, California 91770 Mr. Donnelly stated that this location is really a safety issue, and has impacted the kids at the high school, and agrees with the recommendation. It was moved by Commissioner Matsdorf, seconded by Commissioner Quintanilla, and carried unanimously to approve the Traffic Engineer's recommendation. Mr. Donnelly also stated that in the mornings between 7:40 - 8:00 a.m., people use Claudia Avenue as a shortcut to get onto Mission Drive. He recommended that the Sheriff's Units (motorcycle officers), monitor this location. Mr. Donnelly also stated that this past 41 of July, at approximately 8:45 p.m., just prior to the fireworks, there was a huge gridlock on Claudia Avenue. He was recommended "Temporary No Parking' signs be posted in the streets around the park, to allow emergency vehicles access, should there be an emergency situation. V. STAFF REPORTS - None VI. COMMISSIONER REPORTS Commissioner Quintanilla thanked Chairperson Knapp and City Hall staff for all their hard work on the Parade. Chairperson Knapp stated that the "Welcome to Rosemead" sign off they 60 freeway, was re- painted, but was painted a different color and is now pink. It should be repainted with the correct color. Commission Knapp stated that at the Target Shopping Center, she mentioned before, she would like to see a "Right Turn Only" sign placed at Marshall on the first driveway at Rosemead Place, and also look into extending the median. VIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 7:52 p.m. TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CROWE, CITY MANAGER DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 2003 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR REVISIONS TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON ANGELUS AVENUE IN FRONT OF RICE SCHOOL A letter was received by Mr. Frank Busigin, Principal of Eldridge Rice School, requesting revisions to the existing parking restrictions on Angelus Avenue in front of Rice School. The request was based on a change in the location of the school bus parking area and the need for more on- street parking for parents. Based on a field review of the site and an analysis of the current parking signs, staff reported back to the Traffic Commission and recommended the parking restrictions in front of Rice School to read, "No Parking 7 AM to 4 PM School Days" and "Passenger Loading Permitted ". Staff also recommended the removal of "No Parking 7 AM to 4 PM" and "No Stopping 7 AM to 4 PM School Days Only" signs to minimize confusion. The installation of red curb adjacent to the existing crosswalks as well as at the driveway of the school is recommended. At the September 4t Traffic Commission meeting, the Traffic Commission approved the staff recommendation by a unanimous vote. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Rosemead City Council approve the staff recommendation as approved by the Traffic Commission on September 4th, 2003. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A — Traffic Commission Staff Report, dated August 25, 2003 Exhibit B — Traffic Commission Minutes, dated September 4, 2003 COUNCIL AG SEP 2 3 2003 ITEM No. I • eL' Staff Reaort Rosemead Tra>fc Commission TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSSION FROM: JOANNE ITAGAKI, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPUTY DATE: August 25, 2003 RE: Request for Revisions in Parking Restrictions on Angelus Avenue at Eldridge Rice School REQUEST A letter was received from Mr. Frank Busigin, Principal, Eldridge Rice School on Angelus Avenue. Mr. Busigin has requested revisions to the parking restrictions on Angelus Avenue in front of the school. He indicated that there has been a change in the location of the school bus parking area and that more on- street parking for parents would be appropriate. A copy of Mr. Busigin's letter is attached. CONDITIONS Exhibit A depicts the existing parking restrictions on Angelus Avenue in front of Rice School. DISCUSSION Field observations of the parking restrictions in front of Rice School identified several different signs with the same basic message of no parking on school days. The observations were made when school was not in session. Based on Mr. Busigin's letter and a phone conversation, it appears the school is seeking more on- street parking for parents. The bus zone originally in front of the school has been relocated and on- street parking for parents would be helpful. Mr. Busigin also indicated that vehicles often park immediately adjacent to the crosswalks and that additional red curb would also be beneficial. The parking restrictions on Angelus Avenue were intended to allow pick-up /drop- off of students and not allow parking in front of the school for safety purposes. As such, the wording of the parking signs in front of Rice School can be confusing. In addition, there are several signs with the same message but in different sizes. September 4, 2003 Traffic Commission Meeting Request for Revisions in Parking Restrictions on Angelus Avenue at Eldridge Rice School Page 2 of 2 To remove the confusion of the signs and provide the parking requested by Mr. Busigin, staff is recommending the reposting of the parking signs on Angelus Avenue to minimize confusion and provide additional on- street parking. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the parking restrictions in front of Rice School be revised to read, "No Parking 7 AM to 4 PM School Days" and 'Passenger Loading Permitted ". This removes the "No Parking 7 AM to 4 PM --Y and "No Stopping 7 AM to 4 PM School Days Only 4" restrictions and minimizes confusion. In addition, red curb is recommended adjacent to the existing crosswalks as well as the approaches to the driveway of the school. The specific recommendations are depicted on Exhibit A. Attachment P: \06- 160\JI1\RSD \2003 Agendas & Documents \Sept - Angelus at Rice School Parking Restrictions.doc AUG.25'2003 10:16 Not to Scale Groves Avenue KCim Street ncd cM•rb. C Pay ^} rtd curb. m C d Q n d tT Q •o #7282 P.002/003 �emnve Cxl7�t ..� roTe�n a..�e� fepince w1 +ti q ) SL�oo� WGGA Tn'� J CX�a�'l� 91 c�n. �.• i�@mWG EXi T^� glrr Pr �'+AH A Y% Pw•n v curb o�Gr � ; Q W 63 eil�^^J wo �1 • a EGG W"A 7 75 El NO NO w�sseucna PARKING �owortio PARKING` T,M rowPM vearmrreo T�vn TO. vrn 0 0 NO NO PARKING $TAPPING TGMTO +CM iAM TOa PM I �� YFV:X M�80M.Y O NOpPPING �nM TO, oM W6G sc «oo�wrsomT 3CHpOl I ,dGGA XINO r Ott n ,kUG.25'2003 10:17 „7282 :'.003/003 Jul 22 03 08:45a G26SG92303 F•ef BOARD OF EDUCATIOt Loretta Gonzalez GARVEY SCHOOL Sohn Tran (� )ohn flora DISTRICT John Yuen 0 Anthony 1NOng dice School 2150 N. Angelus Ave., Rosemead, Ca. 61770 SUPERINTENDENT (626) 3073348 FAx (626) 307.8163 William V. Loose, Ed.D, Frank Buslgin, MndPal , July 16, 2003 Dear Sirs, I would like the traffic signs changed on the west side of the curb, which goes along the north parking lot of Eldridge Rice School. This area was previously used for school bus parking. We have now moved the school bus parking area to the west side of the campus by the south parkn i lot. This now gives us better flow of traffic between the cross streets of Graves and Keim on Angelus Avenue. The parents now should be allowed to park along the curb on the tvc, side of the north parking lot . I would like the posted signs to. remain ( "No Stopping lam to 4pm School Days Only' bul have the sign "Passenger Loading Permitted" added. This would be consistent with all the traffic signs posted along the curb on the westside of the school. Thank you taking this matter into consideration. Frank Busigin Principal The StudentS oL the Gervey School DSotL let will learn academic ekill[. moral and ethical values find a respect .for dirgzalty ShaC Will enablo sham to be life -long learners ant psodoctik•e rn�,becs of a q_obal society. Equal opportunity Employer - Non- Diacrlminatlon on Bd91s or Raco, Color. Ancestry, Religious Cmed, box, Nondi0.np: Age ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 4, 2003 ROLL CALL Present: Chairperson Knapp, Commissioner Matsdorf, Commissioner Quintanilla Absent: Commissioner Ruiz & Commissioner Baffo Ex- Officio: Assistant Planner: Jennifer Villasenor Traffic Engineering Deputy: Joanne Itagaki CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance: Commissioner Matsdorf Invocation: Chairperson Knapp I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Commissioner Matsdorf, seconded by Commissioner Quintanilla, and carried unanimously to approve the minutes for July 10, 2003. II. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE Speaking before the Commission was: Helen Gunther 3646 Dubonnet Street Rosemead, California 91770 Ms. Gunther wanted to know what is being done about the bicycle riders as it pertains to the vehicle code. She states that they should be riding on the street and not on the sidewalk. Traffic Engineering Deputy Itagaki recommended that an article be placed in the Rosemead Reporter advising the residents of the bicycle safety laws. Ms. Gunther also stated that on the east /west corner of Marshall and Rosemead Boulevard the light seems to change too quickly, and only one car can get through the light. Ms. Gunther went on to say that at the Glendon Way Apartments, there always seems to be large items, such as, mattresses, furniture, etc., sitting on the sidewalk. III. OLD BUSINESS - None IV. NEW BUSINESS A. REQUEST FOR REVISIONS IN PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON ANGELUS AVENUE AT ELDRIDGE RICE SCHOOL Traffic Engineering Deputy Itagaki presented the staff report. It was moved by Commissioner Quintanilla, seconded by Commissioner Matsdorf, and carried unanimously to approve the Traffic Engineer's recommendation. Chairperson Knapp asked that this item be placed on the agenda for the City Council at the September 23rd meeting. V. STAFF REPORTS Assistant Planner Villasenor stated that there will be 3 items on the agenda at the next regularly scheduled Council meeting. VI. COMMISSIONER REPORTS Commissioner Matsdorf asked for a memo updated the Commission on the situation as it pertains to abundance of graffiti throughout the City that is not being taken care of, since it's been contracted out. Commissioner Quintanilla asked what the latest was on the traffic issue at the Target Shopping Center. Traffic Engineering Deputy Itagaki stated that there are no additional traffic studies being done until the plaza is fully occupied. Chairperson Knapp asked the Sheriffs to look into the number of accidents that have been reported at this location. VII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 7:33 p.m., with 2 people in the audience. The next regularly scheduled meeting is set for Thursday, October 2, 2003. TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMEADD CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CROWE, CITY MANAGER DATE: AUGUST 18, 2003 RE: AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES 80TH CONGRESS OF CITIES AND EXPOSITION, DECEMBER 9 -13, 2003 NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE Attached for your consideration is information regarding the aforementioned conference. This years topics include: Homeland Security, City Employees and Armed Services Deployments, Affordable Housing, Economic Development, Downtown Revitalization and Planning for Growth. Members of the Council who are on policy committees will have their meetings just prior to the opening session. Council Members have attended this conference in the past and it has proven to be of benefit to the City of Rosemead. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council authorize the attendance of any Council Member, City Attorney, City Manager and staff as assigned by the City Manager. COUNCIL AGENDA S E P 23 2003 ITEM No. I - M,'P Id S£.L Slgv ON IIW83d aldd 30visod s DHO IIdO1dNON rin rin lrllnln lrllurinilllun nlllnrlluilllrunlr bILI-OLLI6VD Qd3AHS0TI QA'19 ].3'I'IdA 8£88 2HaovKvw ELM LSSV NA IJdA1 l Q'IVNIOQ Z60OM Lib LIJIQ £krO L[IVsemes +sa aae rx: aaas* £OOZ'IZ 839KMON' 31tl0 ddOJ110 NOI1N81SIJ38 30NVAOtl EOOZ 19 8990130 3Itl0 dd03d10 NOI1tR11S1098 A'Iiltl3 �filaugsm �alsl6a� q yon aquas mofi asp $AO'JIU'MMA1 IV N0LLVIUSI03H 30NMAN00 WINO vOOOZ'O'0 'uo18wymm 'IA N'anuanV nuejAwuad IOEI KnIIISNI S3II13 d0 3nON3"I'INNOIINN EOOZ'EI-6+agwaoa0 aassauual•aO!nyseN NOIIISOMX Y S31110,10 SS3HONO3 HIOS 20033 C'0W; I S Register now for the 2003 Congress of Cities in Nashville to take advantage of the more than SO workshops that are being developed to address a wide range of needs identified by leaders from cities and towns of all sizes. Following is a preliminary list of the workshops that will be offered. Access to these workshops — and to five general sessions — is included in the confer- ence registration fee. Visit the NLC web site at www.nic.org to learn more about the workshops and other activities planned for all conference delegates. Creating Jobs for a Strong World'orce In light of current economic and fiscal challenges, many city governments are seeking new ways to develop a competitive workforce and create good jobs. This workshop will introduce participants to unique strategies to: serve hard- to-emplov individuals through transitional jobs; leverage economic development efforts to secure good jobs for local residents; and help youth prepare for and succeed in the labor force. Spending on Homeland Security: Making the Case What are the first responder needs for local homeland security responsibilities? How are these needs quantified? what are the costs of providing added security during Code Orange alerts? How are cities and towns keeping track of homeland security expenditures? This workshop will address these questions and provide examples of how cities have reported and tacked costs for meeting homeland security requirements. Media 101 This workshop will offer the basics on presenting yourself in the public spotlight, whether for a campaign, council meeting or dealing with a crisis. It will include tips on public speaking, message formation as individuals and as a council, and communicating with the public in times of crisis. Downtown Revitalization: Proven Strategies for Success This workshop will provide best practices from cities that have undertaken successful revitalization efforts. Also featured, will be the America Downtown, New Thinking, New Life Program, a service from NLC and HyettPalma to help local leaders strengthen and revitalize downtowns. CommunitelD: Growing Your Retail Sector Liam how municipal leaders can grow their retail sector in their cities and towns. This workshop will explain haw leaders can increase their revenues, diversify their tax base and increase employment and satisfy, citizens' desire to shop at home. Increasing Opportunities for Regional Communication and Planning for Growth in Rural Communities. Rural and non -rural communities need to connect with each other to enhance the dialogue among themselves. By expanding channels for frequent communication, rural leaders will he able to share social and economic concerns with other leaders and develop new strategies to address them. Divided We Fall: Equality and Opportunity in American Communities This workshop will focus on NLC First Vice President Charlie Lyons' Presidential - Agenda for 2004 and NLC's Futures Report on Economic Inequalities and Disparities. This session will provide delegates with the opportunity to discuss changing demographics in regions; identify racial, spatial, and economic inequalities; and offer suggestions on haw to start the conversation about these issues locally. Federal -Local Relationships: The Grant Process With federal funding cutbacks and grants competition becoming more intense, municipal officials are rethinking strategies in applying for federal grants. This workshop will provide an overview of existing grant programs, application processes, associated costs and matching funds requirements, waivers, and technical assistance services. Tour of Duty: City Employees and Armed Forces Deployments Many municipal employees serve not only their community but also their country as members of National Guard or Military Reserve Units. Activation of Reserve personnel for extended duty in homeland security and antiterrorism operations limits a city 's ability to deliver services and manage its finances. This session will highlight ways cities and towns are coping with this personnel and financial crisis. Raising Roofs: Finance Strategies to Increase Affordable Housing City officials are leveraging their affordable housing plans to make substantial progress in financing affordable housing. They are engaging lenders, investors and other home financing centers as active participants. This workshop offers practical and sound approaches from creditable sources in how to stmcture and subsidize affordable housing. Tax Policy in an Anti -Tax Environment This roundtable session will explore the advantages and disadvantages for cities of the various wa)a of financing local government in an anti -tax environment Options will be . compared and evaluated based upon a number of criteria, including local autonomy, revenue adequacy, and fairness. Silver Bullets of Economic Development Technology, stadiums, conventions centers, and gambling are often viewed by local officials as silver bullets of economic development. Yet, experts and the media often contend that the costs (economic and social) of these development projects outweigh any benefits received. A panel of city officials and experts will examine the - issues surrounding these "silver bullets" and discuss strategies for cities. Strategic Planning for Early Childhood: NLC's City Challenge At the Congressional Ciq' Conference in March 2003, NLC President John DeStefano, Jr., Mayor, New Haven, Connecticut, launched a year -long agenda on early childhood success by challenging city officials to develop multi -year early childhood plans. Since that time approximately 100 cities and towns have made this commitment. This workshop will highlight the progress these Challenge cities have made and how their experiences an be useful to other city leaders. How to Develop an Effective Transportation Plan Highways, transit systems, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, freight corridors, and ail projects are developed by metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs). Often, local officials have a decision - making role an MPOs with no training or assistance navigating the myriad of federal and stale transportation programs and regulations. Find out what you need to know to develop a better plan for your city and how you can better integrate transportation with other city planning functions. Keeping the Roof: Predatory Lending Practices in Affordable Housing Predatory lending generally occurs in the sub -prime mortgage market, where most borrowers use the collateral in their homes for debt consolidation or other consumer credit purposes. Some lenders have engaged in high - pressure sales tactics and in some cases fi governments are being called on to do more to keep housing affordable by providing regulatory remedies, direct engagement with lenders, and consumer and financial counseling to homeowners. This session will discuss best practices in these areas. Airlines: State of the Industry and What It Means to Your Community Since September 11th the airline industry has experienced tremendous changes in its relationships with the federal government, local communities, and the traveling public. Increases in security and decreases in passengers have caused many airlines to shut down routes and discontinue service to many communities. This workshop will examine the current state of air travel and actions your are can take to help keep the country, connected through air travel. Making the Link: Integrating Afterschool Initiatives into Education Reform Afterschool hours provide an ideal time to reinforce children's learning gains and supplement the academic curriculum offered at school. .A moderator -led "Fishbowl" discussion among participants will highlight the numerous approaches cities have taken to build expanded teaming options for all students. No Child Left Behind: Now that NCLB is law, Cities Must Tackle Implementation; Compliance and Collaboration In January of 2002, President Bush signed into law the "No Child Left Behind Act' (NCLBI, the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). Several key reforms were included in this legislation and these changes could have a significartt impact on local education. Participants will hear from panel of experts about the effects of NCLB to local governments. Recycling Roundtable The members of the NLC Energy Environment and Natural Resources (EENR) Steering Committee invite other elected officials who have a recycling pro- gam they would like to showcase, or who would like to team about recycling programs in general, to this interactive roundtable discussion. Cities of all sizes are welcome. Coping with the New Clean Air Mandates Speakers will discuss the new eight -hour ozone standard and recent changes to New Source Review. Attendees will learn what the new standards mean to their communities, and what can be done to meet them. Effective Partnerships for Successful Children's Initiatives Engaging key partners in the community is an effective way for city leaders to develop and promote quality programs for children and their families. Based on examples from titles and towns across the country, attendees will Ieam how to maximize existing community resources to improve outcomes for children. Developing a Successful Stormwater Program New federal requirements to control pollutants in runoff from municipal separate storm sewer systems are in effect. The new roles require implementation of public education programs and municipal good housekeeping practices. This two -part workshop will provide: critical background information for implementing a successful Stormwater Phase II program and a discourse on program elements. How to Alert Your Citizens Without Alarming Them: The Role of the Local Elected Official in Communicating about Homeland Security Orange Alert versus fellow Alert. Duct tape and plastic sheeting Screening shoes at airports. Many of these attempts to alert and activate citizens have served only to create alarm and panic at one extreme and skepticism and complacency at the other. Join this roundtable discussion about how best to apply the warnings of the federal Homeland Security Advisory System to your region - whether its a large metropolitan area or a small rural community. Creative Masterplan: Turning Community Vision into Reality Outdated masterplans are negatively affecting quality of life for residents in cities across the country. During this session experts will discuss effective strategies to assess how to define community vision in your city, and how to translate that into a 21stcenturymasterplan. Techniques that encourage citizen participation, such as charettes, will also be explored. Collaborating for Student Success: Promising Approaches and Lessons Learned Municipal leaders are in a unique position to use their leadership capacity, and access to city resources to strengthen and support public schools. In a facilitated discussion, participants will examine promising approaches and lessons learned from NLC's 30 -month initiative to deepen and enhance the roles of mayors and council members in school improvement and aiterschool programs. Spending Smart: Make the Most of Your City's Purchasing Power In times of budgetary pressures and fiscal constraints, one wav cites can make the most of their tax dollars is through innovative and creative purchasing and procurement programs. One such program, the U.S. Communities Government Purchasing Alliance, enables cities and towns of all sizes to benefit from competitively bid national contacts on a variety of goods and services. Join a discussion with local purchasing officials who will give hands -on advice about how to help your city achieve significant administrative and product savings. Varieties of City Government Structures The previous distinctions between the mayor- council and the council - manager forms of government are blurring. Learn about this trend, compare your city's form of government with other cities, and consider how it affects the day -to -day city operations. Bringing Back the Vote: Why and How to Increase Voter Turnout in Your City Loral leaders can be central to increasing voter turnout in state, local, and national elections. Currently only 40% of eligible voters participate in state and local elections. Municipal leaders can strengthen democracy by encouraging disengaged populations, such as people of color and young adults, to exercise their right to vote. What Makes Local Elected Officials Successful Stale and Federal Advocates: Effective Strategies for Influencing State and National Policy Decisions Every day critical decisions are being made that have profound effects on the way cities and towns manage budgets and policy. With high priced lobbyists and slick consultants it can be a challenge for small cities to compete with their larger counterparts for scarce state and federal resources. This workshop will highlight strategies and methods for effective lobbying. Learning through Service: Positive Implications of Student involvement in Your Community While students all over the nation are focusing on CPA; and involvement in campus activities, others are joining a trend of active participation in the community. In establishing relationships and partnerships with campuses and students in their area cities can enhance the strength of their communities and better serve their residents. Building a Relationship With Your Local Media This workshop will focus on how best to interact with members of the local media, with an emphasis on the hometown newspaper. It will include interview tips and information from members of the media on how best to get your city or town's message communicated to the public. Hurricanes, Tornadoes, Floods, and Earthquakes: How to Prepare Your Community for a Natural Disaster Federal, state, and local coordination is imperative in developing a successful plan for how to respond to a natural disaster to minimize the loss of life and destruction of property. This workshop will help identify planning and funding options for mitigation and preparedness and provide information on what to do immediately following disaster for effective response and recovery. Homeland Security on a Local Basis: the Patriot Act Enacted shortly after the September 11 attacks, the PATRIOT Act sought to strengthen the capacity of federal, state, and local law enforcement to conduct surveillance and share information necessary, for preventing future acts of terrorism. Learn what concerns and liabilities are involved with carrying out these new responsibilities as local law enforcement agencies seek a balance between protecting the public and civil liberties and Fighting terrorism. Homeland Security Training Sessions: Lessons Learned First responders must undergo rigorous training and exercises in order to prevent and respond to acts of terrorism and all hazards. As these exercises help improve readiness and response capabilities for first responders, what are some of the strengths and weaknesses identified? Workshop presenters will discuss lessons learned and how they apply to emergency response and preparedness capabilities of other jurisdictions A Parade of Processes: An Exhibit of Innovative Approaches to Community Change This workshop will introduce participants to some of the most innovative strategies for mobilizing change in these times. Participants will be exposed to theories, models and practices of transformational change that will maximize opportunities for community growth and development. Changing Communities, Changing Faces: A Focus on Immigration and language Differences Leaders across the country continue to search for ways to face the challenges and meet the opportunities raised by the arrival of newcomers in their communities. Participants will hear how some communities are addressing hard questions, such as, who are `We" in the first place? and how many people and which people should be allowed into the community? The Wondering Years: Emerging Challenges Facing Today's Youth This workshop will be a roundtable discussion and will address issues such as: establishing Gay Staight.Alliances (GSAs) in schools; the challenges of coming out; civil rights issues and; the place of local officials, in challenging or accepting a family's norms and mores. Keeping Up with Your Elderly Citizens As a growing percentage of city, dwellers become older, they will need and demand different services from their municipal , governments. This session will examine the impact of the needs of the elderly on city programs and services. Dialogue and Understanding: The Key to Cultural Insight Many times conflict has and will arise, most often because of communication misinterpretation. As the population in the U.S. continues to rise, so does the number of ethnic groups with various cultures. This workshop will provide insight on the importance of opening yourself up to the knowledge and understanding of diversity in your community, and how, to effectively communicate with citizens of various cultures. Building Communities through Civic Engagement Active citizen participation makes all the difference when it comes to building healthy communities. This workshop will examine ways for local elected officials to initiate meaningful roles for citizens to take an active role in the governance of their community. Strategies and examples will be highlighted, Making the Most of Your Media Resources This workshop will explore how to best use your local public access channel and other media outlets, including the Internet, to communicate with citizens. Participants will team how to make an effective Public Service. Announcement TSA) and .see examples of the most effective municipal websites. Visit the NLC website at www.nlc.org for updates and additions. Please note session titles and descriptions am subject to range. � A TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMEAADD CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CROWE, CITY MANAGER DATE: AUGUST 19, 2003 RE: AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND 23RD ANNUAL CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOCIATION FALL SEMINAR, OCTOBER 3-5,2003, MORRO BAY CALIFORNIA Attached for your consideration is information regarding the aforementioned seminar. This year's theme is "Contracting for Municipal Services Works Through Public Private Partnerships ". The Council has attended this Seminar in the past. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council authorize the attendance of any Council Member, City Attorney, City Manager and staff as assigned by the City Manager. COUNCIL AG S E P 23 2003 ITEM No. = 6d California Contract Cities Association o-\� 10535 Paramount Blvd., Suite #100 July 31, 2003 Downey, California 90241 (562) 928 -5533 • FAX (562) 928 -9557 www.wmredcnie¢.oq Email'. cxa970ao1,wm TO: ALL MEMBERS AND SEMINAR PARTICIPANTS FROM: CHERI KELLEY, PRESIDENT 23'd Annual Fall Seminar The Inn at Morro Bay — Morro Bay, California October 3 -5, 2003 Mark your calendars norm! The 23`d Almual Fall Seminar will be held October 3 -5, 2003. Our headquarters is The Inn at Morro Bay in Morro Bay, California. You won't want to miss this information filled weekend, so make your reservations now. The room rates vary depending on type of room available and start at $89.00. The deadline to make your hotel reservation is September 1, 2003. Please do not make a hotel reservation unless you are sure you will use it. Making reservations just to protect your options denies other attendees a room of their choice, costs the hotel business, is costly for the CCCA, and may actually cost you money. Your guest room reservation 1s an agreement between you and the hotel. If you make a reservation and later need to cancel, please do so as early as possible so the room may be made available to someone else. The theme for this year is "Conu•acting for Municipal Services Works Through Public Private Partnerships. " Programs will include a session on how to balance and manage your time, while juggling responsibilities between family, employment and your duties as an elected official. The 13i11 Annual "Jack Parks Memorial" Golf Tournament will be held on Friday, October 3, 2005. Entry forms are included in this mailing Check our website for updates: contracteities.org CITY/AFFILIATION- CONTACT: Phone CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOCIATION 23RD ANNUAL FALL SEMINAR THE INN AT MORRO BAY — MORRO BAY, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 3 -5, 2003 ADVANCE REGISTRATION FORM REGISTRATION FEE: Delegate's Registration is $380.00 and includes the following: 2- Saturday Continental Breakfast ticket; 2- Saturday Luncheon ticket; 2- Saturday Dinner tickets; and 2- Sunday Brunch tickets. NO DAY PASSES Please provide the names below for each DELEGATE AND GUEST. Note: "Guest" is defined as a spouse, personal friend or significant other. Guest privileges will not be used to avoid paying a second registration fee for city or private sector representative. NAME /TITLE GUEST TOTAL AMOUNT ENCLOSED Amount Enclosed . NO CANCELLATIONS ACCEPTED OR REFUNDS GIVEN AFTER FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2003 Complete and forward this form, with your check to cover registration fees to: CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES CCCA FALL SEMINAR 10535 PARAMOUNT BLVD., SUITE 100 DOWNEY, CA 90241 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL CITY IIALL COUNCIL CYIAM13ERS ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA JULY 22, 2003, A'1' 8:00 P.1%1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER: 8:00 P.M. PLEDGE TO TIIE FLAG: COUNCILMAN TAYLOR INVOCATION: REVEREND JOSHUA CHENG OP TFIE FIRST AMERICAN EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF SAN GABRIEL r ROLL. CALL OF OFFICERS: COUNCILMEMBERS ALARCON, IMPERIAL, ,ff�� n ✓�It TAYLOR, MAYOR PRO TEM CLARK, MAYOR tV y VASQUEZ tl APPROVAI�OF MINUTES: JULY 8, 2003 — REGULARM E "PING I OF INTEREST TO CITIZENS WISHING TO PARTICIPATE 1) Those wishing to speak on any Agenda item, including public hearing, should have their Speaker Request Form submitted to the City Clerk no later than the time immediately following Oral Communications. 2) Immediately after approval of the minutes and again at the end of the meeting, there is a period of time set aside for those persons wishing to address the Council on matters not listed on the Agenda entitled: ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM TFIE AUDIENCE (please complete the Speaker Request Form stating your preference to speak either at the beginning or at the end of the meeting). 3) Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with disabilities, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the City Clerk's office at 626/569 -2171 at least 48 hours before the meeting, iCpossible. PRESENTATIONS: L ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE / II. PUBLIC HEARINGS — EXPLANATION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCEDURES BY THE CITY ATTORNEY A. PUBLIC BEARING — APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PREPARED FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF t GARVEY AVENUE BRIDGE The City Council will consider approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Section 21000 et. se(l. of the Public Resources Code) for the subject project. The finding of the Mitigated Negative Declaration is that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on °the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made. Recommendation: Adopt and approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Lb/ ccnor•.NDA:7- 22-03 Page 0 1 III. LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -24 - CLAIMS AND DEMANDS (FY 2002 -03) � /- 1 Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -24, for payment of City % expenditures. K3. RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -25 — CLAIMS AND DEMANDS (FY 2003 -04) Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2004 -25, for payment of City expenditures. I CONSENT CALENDAR— RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL CC -A AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION ANNUAL STATE CONFERENCE, SEPTEMBER 28- OCTOBER I, 2003 — SANTA BARBARA l � This year's sessions will be orientated around housing, CEQA, smart growth, infill /mixed use development and other various land use and planning related issues. Recommendation: Authorize the attendance of the Planning Director. CC-13 AUTHORIZATION TO REJECT CLAIM AGAINST TILE CITY FROM ALFONSO GALINDO Claimant states that a City tree fell on his vehicle after a heavy rain and then windstorm. "file City's claims adjuster, Carl Warren & Company has recommended rejection of this claim. Recommendation: Rejection of claim. CC -C REJECTION OF BID FOR'TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES On July 10, 2003, bids were received for this project that will provide for the replacement of obsolete traffic signal conu-oller equipment and the installation of ADA compliant pedestrian push buttons. Only one bid was received. Funding requirements stipulate that at least three bids shall be received. The City Council will consider rejection of the bid and authorize that this project be incorporated into a bid with a future, traffic signal project. Recommendation: Reject the bid from R & M Electrical Contracting; and authorize this project be bid along with the traffic signal improvements at Walnut Grove /Hellman /I -10 OfTramp. �g CC -D APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZATION I TO SEEK BIDS FOR CONCRETE REPAIRS A "1' VARIOUS LOCATIONS AND CHARLOTTE AVENUE TREE REPLACEMENT This project provides for concrete repairs at various locations throughout the City as well as the removal and replacement of parkway trees on Charlotte Avenue. Recommendation: Approve the plans and specifications and authorize advertisement for bids by the City Clerk. V. MATTERS FOR DISCUSSION AND ACTION VI. STATUS REPORTS ccncENnA:7-22 -03 1'age M2 Vu. MATTERS FROM OFFICIALS VIII. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE IX. ADJOURNMENT "Y r %S� "II -IE NEXT REGULAR MEETING IS SCHEDULED FOR AUGUST 12, 2003, AT 8:00 P.M. Posted 72 hours in advance of the meeting at the City Hall, 8838 E. Valley Boulevard, Rosemead; the L.A. County Library, Rosemead Branch, 8800 E. Valley Boulevard, Rosemead; and other locations pursuant to RMC Sec. 1.08.020. CCAGI7NDA:7 -22 -03 rage n3 0 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILLWROWE, CITY MANAGER DATE: JULY 14, 2003 SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION ANNUAL STATE CONFERENCE, SEPTEMBER 28- OCTOBER 1, 2003 - SANTA BARBARA Attached for your consideration is information regarding the aforementioned conference. There will be sessions on housing, CEQA, smart growth, infill/mixed use development and other various land use and pertinent planning related subjects. Staff has attended this annual conference over the years. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Rosemead City Council authorize the attendance ofthe Planning Director ,.. COUNCIL AGENDA JUL 22 2003 ITEM No. - C�_ A \: California Chaper American Planning Association Santa Barbara Conference 2003 A Link' to the u�} I'aet... R y A Bridge to the funtre Register Hotel Sponsors Exhibitors Highlights Opening Reception Session Tracks Mobile Workshops Conference Committee California Chapter American Planning Association 2oo� State Cori f erence Santa Barbara September 28 - October I, 2003 less Parker's Donl'letree Resort Page 1 of 1 The APA Central Coast Section will host 1 APA Conference in Santa Barbara. Autun to visit Santa Barbara. The weather is w, You will experience a city that was pede! New Urbanism was born. Santa Barbara past, but is looking forward to a challenc California Chapter APA I Central Coast Section I National Site Development by ImagoWebDesign.Com http:// www. calapa. oig/santabarbara2003 /default.htm 7/14/03 .California Chaper American Planning Association Santa Barbara Conference 2003 Sessions Page 1 of I A Link California Cfjaltter to the. ' American Planning Association w 2oo3 State Conference � _ Santa Barbara �o. MMAJ A Bridge to the rintre September 28 - October It 200, less Parker's Dotfl'letree Resort Register SESSION TRACKS Hotel Sessions will be oriented around: Hi hli hts • Sustainable solutions for livable communities Opening Reception • Regional solutions and cooperative efforts Mobile Workshops • International and national trends and practices - Sponsors • Professional development Exhibitors California Chapter AP A I Central Coast Section I National 'Conference I http:// www.calapa.org/santabarbara2003 /sessions.htm 7/14/03 4 . q TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL FROM: _ BILL CRO E, CITY MANAGER DATE: JULY 15, 2003 RE: APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZATION TO SEEK BIDS FOR CONCRETE REPAIRS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS AND CHARLOTTE AVENUE TREE REPLACEMENT The project includes removal and reconstruction of existing damaged and uplifted concrete sidewalk, curb and gutter, and drive approaches, as well as tree replacement of parkway trees with root control barriers, if it is determined that uplifting is a result of the tree. The locations for concrete repairs were selected based on highest priority among streets that are not identified for near - future street pavement upgrading. Locations where citizen requests have been verified as needing concrete repairs as well as the Los Angeles County's maintenance list were also included in the project. The project also includes tree replacement on Charlotte Avenue between Park Street and Hellman Avenue. Removal of Ash trees that are aged and exhibiting structural problems is necessary to mitigate the potential for personal injury and property damage. On April 17, 2003, staff mailed notices inviting affected residents to attend a community meeting on April 29 to discuss the project and answer questions. No residents attended. New Goldenrain trees will be planted to replace those removed and where none currently exist in an effort to improve the overall aesthetics of the street. Background information on the Goldenrain tree is attached for your reference. The proposed schedule for construction is as follows: Receive Bids September 9, 2003 Award Contract September 23, 2003 Begin Work October 20, 2003 Complete Work November 21, 2003 COUNCIL JUL 22 2003 ITEM No _�L_ - e-6-L) The specifications have been reviewed and are acceptable to the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is $210,000. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications and authorize advertisement for bids by the City Clerk. Attachments. Wl WW1 Z- l Z- Wl O O o Y c V; .". n c Y Y m p F� i � 3 c .'=' >= •o y 3 v c E � I v 9 is L D 3 7 L CID F. c o �` O> A U v ❑ m R U 'O ch Y U O E° F w ° R a: =° r o Z in v� C7 O F r% vai r° ri .5 rb ME TO: BILL CROWE, CITY MANAGER n FROM: KEN RUKAVINA, CITY ENGINEER DATE: JULY 14, 2003 RE: REJECTION OF BIDS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES The following bid was received for the subject project on Thursday, July 10, 2003: R &M Electrical Contracting $219,625.00 Unfortunately, only one bids was received. A portion of the project will be funded by Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. CDBG guidelines stipulate that at least three bids shall be received. For this reason, staff is recommending that the bid be rejected and the project readvertised for bids. To encourage more bidders, this projectwill be combined with the upcoming Walnut Grove /Hellman /1 -10 Freeway Off -ramp traffic signal improvement project. The Walnut Grove /Hellman /1 -10 Freeway Off -ramp traffic signal improvement project is currently at Caltrans for review, approval and permit issuance. Upon Caltrans' approval of the traffic signal project plans, the combined project will be submitted to City Council for approval and authorization to advertise for bids. It is anticipated that this,will be in about six weeks. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: Reject the bid from R &M Electrical Contracting; and Authorize this project to be bid along with the traffic signal improvements at Walnut Grove /Hellman /1 -10 Offramp. COUNCIL AGENDA JUL 2 2 2003 ITEM No. CITY OF ROSEMEAD PROPOSAL FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLER UPGRADES AND PEDESTRIAN PUSHBUTTON REPLACEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2003 -2004 IN THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD TO THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, as AGENCY In accordance with AGENCY's NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS, the undersigned BIDDER hereby proposes to furnish all materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals required for the above - stated project as setforth in the Plans, Specifications, and Contract Documents therefore, and to perform all work in the manner and time prescribed therein. BIDDER declares that this proposal is based upon careful examination of the work site, Plans, Specifications, INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS, and all other contract documents. If this proposal is accepted for award, BIDDER agrees to enter into a contract with AGENCY at the unit and /or lump -sum prices set forth in the following BID SCHEDULE. BIDDER understands that failure to enter into a contract in the manner and time prescribed will result in forfeiture to AGENCY of the proposal guarantee accompanying this proposal. BIDDER understands that a bid is required forthe entire work, thatthe estimated quantities set forth in the BID SCHEDULE are solely for the purpose of comparing bids, and that final compensation under the contract will be based upon the actual quantities of work satisfactorily completed. THE AGENCY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO INCREASE OR N AND TO DELETE ANY ITEM DECREASE THE AMOUNT OF ANY QUANTITY SHOW FROM THE CONTRACT. It is agreed that the unit and/or lump -sum prices bid include all appurtenant expenses, taxes, royalties, and fees. In the case of discrepancies in the amounts bid, unit prices shall govem over extended amounts, and words shall govern over figures. If awarded the Contract, the undersigned further agrees that in the event of the BIDDER's default in executing the required contract and filing the necessary bonds and insurance certificates within ten (10) working days after the date of the AGENCY's notice of award of contract to the BIDDER, the proceeds of the security accompanying this bid shall become the property of the AGENCY and this bid and the acceptance hereof may, at the AGENCY'S option, be considered null and void. t r_� l . iu .il P 1 BID SCHEDULE A FOR TRAFFIC DESTRIIIAN PUSH BUTTON REPLACEMENT D FISCAL YEAR 2003 -2004 IN THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD TEM DESCRIPTION UNIT NO. ,, Replace pedestrian push buttons. EA TOTAL BID SCHEDULE IN WORDS cornz_ZS C-2 UNIT PRICES TY 289 $ / _ $ BID SCHEDULE B FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLER UPGRADES AND PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON REPLACEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2003 -2004 IN THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATLU QUANTITY UNIT PRICES AMOUNT NO. 1. Replace Type III -BF service. EA. 1 $ �� 3y $ 2. Replace existing conductors. L.S. 1 $ / Lion $ 3. Replace controller unit. EA. 12 $ /CCP' $GCO 4. Replace conflict monitor unit. EA. 6 $ $ 5. Replace controller cabinet. EA. 1 $ /l� $ SS`/ Replace existing controller L.S. 1 $ i- $. 6. a ui ment. EA. 70 $ S %� $ 371 / 7, Install new DLC's. 6. Replace sensor units. EA. 6 $ 9. InstaII.GPS time source. EA. 2 $ 3s D $ 7 Install 2" conduit with wiring L F 50 $ A/ 10. re uired. Insta113" conduit with wiring L.F. 200 $ $ 11. � 12. re uired. Install battery backup system. EA. - 3 $ $ $ 79 TOTAL BID SCHEDULE "B° IN FIGURE ® TOT BID SC/HE�DULE "B° IN WORDS�, /d? /AL /U` i TOTAL BID SCHEDULE "A" AND "B" IN FIGURE TOTAL BID SCHEDULE "A" AND "B° IN WORDS C -3 SPC03 -35 - �;� - DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS BIDDER proposes to subcontract certain portions of the work which are in excess of one - `` half of 1 percent of the total amount bid or $10,000; whichever is greater, as follows: NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER PORTION OF WORK OF SUBCONTRACTORS 11_ Prior to award of Contract, Contractor shall submit a list of suppliers and vendors in writing to the City. Engineer. SPC03 -35 C-4 REFER CES The following are the names, addresses and telephone numbers for three public agencies for which BIDDER has performed similar work within the past 2 years: 7 2. Name Address of Owner Date completed JoyQaire flu �9;� —yyy� Name and telephone number of person familiar with project d.— _ f n,,.. c� r\�' i Contract amount Type �r a 3. );A Jlomd Name and Address of Owner amount. - i) mow! of person familiar with project Type of work Date W/6 /Us Date completed The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for all brokers and sureties from whom BIDDER intends to procure insurance and bonds: EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE BIDDER certifies that in all previous contracts or subcontracts, all reports which may have been due under the requirements of any AGENCY, State, or Federal equal employment opportunity orders have been satisfactorily filed, and that no such reports are currently outstanding. QD!`!1Z_1ri C -5 l� iCID G0 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION CERTIFICATION eek out and BIDDER certifies that affirmative portions of the work to to , subcontracted, consider and such baid documentation is open to business enterprises for those affirmative action that said affirmative en fully action will remain that n eff ect for the life of any contract inspection, a awarded hereunder. FurthermoreBIDDER ufrertments oft a affirmative action umenbs.taken o. meet all equal employment opportunity Ja NON COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT principals BIDDER declares that the only persons or parties interested to e of the AGENCY is personally are those named herein, that no officer, agent, or emp y interested, directly or indirectly, in this proposal; that this proposal is made without . connection to any other individual, firm, or corporation making a bid for the same work. and that this proposal is in all. respects fair and without collusion or fraud. i J I C -6 spco3 -35 __ _ ADDENDUM NO. 1 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD DRAWINGS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLER UPGRADES AND PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON REPLACEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2003 -2004 IN THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD This Addendum forms a part of the Contract Documents for the above - identified project and modifies the original Specifications and Contract Documents, as noted below: Portions,of the Contract, not specifically mentioned in the Addendum, remain in force. All trades affected shall be fully advised of these changes, deletions, and additions. Replace Prevailing Wage Section Replace General Wage Decision Modification Number 21, dated March 7, 2003, with Modification No. 0 dated June 13, 2003, attached. Kenneth J. Ru <avina, RCE 42866 Date I acknowledge receipt of this Addendum No. 1 and accept the aforementioned. Date Bidder Attachment ASCJI 14153/0226/06 -160 Spc03 -35 Addendum 1 BIDDER'S INFORMATION I' BIDDER certifies that the following information is true and correct' Bidders Name Business Address Telephone No. " State Contractor's License No. and Class n �� Original Date Issued i - It , Expiration Date �\ - CA The following are the names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of all individuals, firm members, partners, joint venturers, and /or corporate officers having a principal interest in this proposal: I r r The date of any voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy judgements against any principal having an interest in this proposal, or any firm, corporation, partnership or joint venturer of which any principal having an interest in this proposal was an owner, corporate officer, partner, or joint venturer are as follows: I^V-%n A's alias, and fictitious business names for any principal having All current and prior DB an interest in this proposal are as follows: VMS MIN-WOUVOWIF"Ime, C -7(a) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BIDDER executes and submits this proposal•vvith the names, titles, hands, and seals of all aforenamed principals this ,� day of 2003 The undersigned declares under penalty of perjury underthe laws of the State of California that the representatives made hereto are te a�j��nd corrrect. C 1 j�/1,�„JJ1�12l��nn2 R� Contractor's Signature 'Yr� Ifl ln'yle -(- Printed Name Subscribed and swom to this _ day of , 200 NOTARY PUBLIC RP .03 -35 C -7(b) 1997 Reproduction prohibited. Reorder from American Society of Notaries, 800.522 -3392. 8/99 CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of CCL l it 1 County of at V-`t_r � On nn � before me,'`00`C'l52 �QY1P� L�In� \ ► 1ItJD t Date Name, title - e.g., John Doe, Notary Public personally appeared }�i l �Q Y l (- P YY e-w r Name(s) of Signers(s) 1-Personally known to me .OR ❑ Proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) -whose name(s- is ubscri bed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me thaoshef -- t4te-q-executed the same in(]&htk4i. r authorized capacity(tes4, and that tt is ignature(4on the DENISE HANCE instrum erson("r the entity upon behalf of which COMM. # 7293398 3 NOTARYPUBUC• CALIFORNIA �, the erson(s} -a ted, executed the instrument. g ORANGE COUNTY , Comm. E . MARCH 5, 2005 / Signature o/Notalry ( nn tj t 1 tin hoe— VS Seal '""Prim Notary s Name. County in u lach Conyxvssialzd afid Commi . wn Explrauon Dale OPTIONAL The data below is not required by law, however it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. SIGNATURE AUTHORITY OF SIGNER: DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT ❑ INDIVIDUAL O OR TIE OFFICER(S) Tide(s) TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ❑ PARTNER ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL NUMB R OF PAGES ❑ ATTORNEY -IN -FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) U! D ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR DATE OF DOCUMENT 0 OTHER: SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE: OAF PERSONS EENTITY(IIEESS) SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: /'S) ,OrR� 1997 Reproduction prohibited. Reorder from American Society of Notaries, 800.522 -3392. 8/99 CONTRACTOR'S SECTION 3 COMPLIANCE REPORT Name and Address of Reporting Entity (Recipient, Contractor, Subcontractor) �� 1 G1 �G {�t C(t( C�n11'LICf() (0005 a<�4utt�l�nc?s �l ( �_\i 2. Federal Identfif Gon (Contract/Award No.): - i 3. Dollar Amount of Award: q' Contact Person: 5 �En�se �c_hc'. 5. Phone (Include Area Code): 6. Reporting Period: _ 7 0 7. Date Re S� mitted: 8. Program Code: C� (Use a separate sheet for each Program Code) in I: Employment and Training Commitment JOB CATEGORY TOTAL NEW HIRES SECTION 3 NEW HIRES % OF AGGREGATE HIRES WHO ARE SECTION 3 HIRES RACIAUETHNIC CODE (S) 1 2 3 4 5 6 professionals 4 = Homeless Assistance 10= Other Housing Programs 5= HOME 'echnicians )ffice/Clerical rade: PZ 'it c h lade: i gO Trade: trade: trade: rraJo: TOTAL: 'art II: Contract Award Commitment to Section 3 Businesses (Contractors, Subcontractors, Suppliers, Vendors, or Service Providers) NAME OF SECTION 3 BUSINESS CONCERN SPECIFY CONSTRUCTION OR NONCONSTRUCTION CONTRACT CONTRACT AMOUNT RACIAL/ETHNIC CODE (SS ) 1 2 3 4 15 CDBG —State Administered 6 9= Oher CD Pmgrems 4 = Homeless Assistance 10= Other Housing Programs 5= HOME Program Codes: - 1= Merdble Subsidy 5= .HOME —State Administered 2 = Section 2021511 7= CDBG — Entitlement 3= Publidlndlen Housing Development. 5= CDBG —State Administered Operation and Modernizeton 9= Oher CD Pmgrems 4 = Homeless Assistance 10= Other Housing Programs 5= HOME C_10 RaclaVEthnic Codes: 1= White American 2 = Black American 3 = Native American 4= Hispanic American 5= Asian Pacific American 5 = Hasidic Jewish (For Part II only) BOND NO: SU 5001070 CITY OF ROSEMEAD PROPOSAL GUARANTEE FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLER UPGRADES AND PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON REPLACEMENT FISCAL YEAR 2003 -2004 IN THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD 'KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that R 5 M Electrical Contracting as BIDDER, and a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Missouri , and duly authorized to transact business underthe laws of the State of California, as SURETY, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Rosemead, as AGENCY, in the penal sum of TEN PERCENT OF THE BID AMOUNT dollars ($ !Ox ), which is 10 percent of the total amount bid by BIDDER to AGENCY for the above - stated project, for the payment of which sum, BIDDER and SURETY agree to be bound, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITIONS OF THIS OBLIGATION ARE SUCH that, whereas BIDDER is about to submit a bid to AGENCY for the above - stated project, if said bid is rejected, or if said bid is accepted and a contract is awarded and entered into by BIDDER in the manner and time specified, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise it shall remain in full force and effect in favor of AGENCY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have set their names, titles, hands, and seals, this 25th day of June 20_p3 BIDDER* R &,M Electrical Contracting SURETY' By Eric Schmalz / Attorney -in -Fact Subscribed and sworn to this day of NOTARY PUBLIC 20 " Provide BIDDER/ADMITTED SURETY name, address, and telephone number and the name, title, address, and telephone number for authorized representative, oD! nZ75 C-8(b) 0 1997 Reproduction prohibited. Reorder from American Societv of iNbmries. 800 -522 -3392. 8/99 C_ CALIFORNIA ALL- PURPOSE CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of C& �I -//—; rn ! r County of On 7 42 d 3 before me, if L -1 (r n C2 NIJ iQYt 1 �l h Date personally appeared s C l Name, title - e.g., John Due, Notary flublic h-f �? 1 1 r Name(s) of Signers(s) C(Personally known to me OR ❑ Proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person( -whose nam iswue subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he she/ they executed the same in EIS - ef4h '. authorized capaci ty (i�s� that by�'/' �signature(n�on the DENISE HANCE instrume the perso or the entity upon behalf of which COMM' #1293398 3 NOTARY PUS000 CALIFORNIA 0 the pets n(s-} -acted executed t e instrument. ORANGE COUNTY Comm. Ex . MARCH 5, 2005 ` Signature of N �Q Nance_ arc' h f.�e_ nc� -s eS- Seal Prim Notary's Name. County in eIuch Commissioned and Commiti''sion Expiration Date OPTIONAL The data below is not required by law, however it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. SIGNATURE AUTHORITY OF SIGNER: DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT ❑ INDIVIDUAL 14 C RP RATE OFFICER(S) 1 i�LJ S i C) Q 4�i 1 U Ir lU Title(s) ❑ PARTNER TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ❑ LIMITED 0 GENERAL NUMBER OF PAGES ❑ ATTORNEY -IN -FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) "- ❑ GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR DATE OF DOCUMENT OTHER: SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE: NANIE S OF PERSON 5 OR ENTITY(IES) SIGNER IS REPRESEN71 .NG: f dyqI f &( 0 1997 Reproduction prohibited. Reorder from American Societv of iNbmries. 800 -522 -3392. 8/99 C_ CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of Los Anseles On ,I(UJha I 5 11)al S before me, Susan E. Morales/Notary Puhlic NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER personally appeared Eric Schmalz NAME OF SIGNER(S) ® Personally known to me - or - ❑ SUSAN E. MORALES W 'o` od C041M, #1332202 Notary PlAb1!C�Calllo(nla y LO,, ANGELESrOUNTY My comm. EXP. Dec 15, 2005 Proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ❑ INDIVIDUAL /OWNER ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE(S) ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL ® ATTORNEY -IN-FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) Arch Insurance Company DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT POWER OF ATTORNEY Know All Men By These Presents That the Arch Insurance Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Missouri, having its principal office in Kansas City, Missouri (hereinafter referred to as the "Company ") does hereby appoint Lawrence W. Carlstrom, Raymond E. Gail, Michael Cundiff, Susan E. Morales, George Munana, Matthew J. Huggins and Eric Schmalz of Los Angeles, CA (EACH) its true and lawful Attorney(s) -in -Fact, to make, execute, seal, and deliver from the date of issuance of this power for and on its behalf as surety, and as its act and deed: Any and all bonds and undertakings EXCEPTION: NO AUTHORITY is granted to make, execute, seal and deliver bonds or undertakings that guarantee the payment or collection of any promissory note, check, draft or letter of credit. This authority does not permit the same obligation to be split into two or more bonds in order to bring each such bond within the dollar limit of authority as set forth herein. The Company may revoke this appointment at any time. The execution of such bonds and undertakings in pursuance of these presents shall be as.binding upon the said Company as fully and amply to all intents and purposes, as if the same had been duly executed and acknowledged by its regularly elected officers at its principal office in Kansas City, Missouri. This Power of Attorney is executed by authority of resolutions adopted by unanimous consent of the Board of Directors of the Company on March 3, 2003, true and accurate copies of which are hereinafter set forth and are hereby certified to by the undersigned Secretary as being in full force and effect: "VOTED, That the Chairman of the Board, the President, or any Vice President, or their appointees designated in writing and filed with the Secretary, or the Secretary shall have the power and authority to appoint agents and attomeys -in -fact, and to authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company, and attach the seal of the Company thereto, bonds and undertakings, recognizances, contracts of indemnity and other writings, obligatory in the nature thereof, and any such officers of the Company may appoint agents for acceptance of process." This Power of Attorney is signed, sealed and certified by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution adopted by the unanimous consent of the Board of Directors of the Company on March 3, 2003: VOTED, That the signature of the Chairman of the Board, the President, or any Vice President, or their appointees designated in writing and filed with the Secretary, and the signature of the Secretary, the seal of the Company, and certifications by the Secretary, may be affixed by facsimile on any power of attorney or bond executed pursuant to the resolution adopted by the Board of Directors on March 3, 2003, and any such power so executed, sealed and certified with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached, shall continue to be valid and binding upon the Company. OOML0013 00 03 03 Page 1 of 2 Printed in U.S.A. ARCH Insurance Company ARCH Surety NOTICE — DISCLOSURE OF TERRORISM. PREMIUM In accordance with the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002, we are providing this disclosure notice for bonds on which Arch Insurance Company is the surety. DISCLOSURE OF PREMIUM The portion of the premium attributable to coverage for terrorist acts certified under the Act is Zero Dollars ($0.00). DISCLOSURE OF FEDERAL PARTICIPATION IN PAYMENT OF TERRORISM LOSSES The United States will pay ninety percent (90 %).of covered terrorism losses exceeding the applicable insurer deductible. r sa /^ im a ARCH Insurance Company ARCH Surety NOTICE — DISCLOSURE OF TERRORISM. PREMIUM In accordance with the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002, we are providing this disclosure notice for bonds on which Arch Insurance Company is the surety. DISCLOSURE OF PREMIUM The portion of the premium attributable to coverage for terrorist acts certified under the Act is Zero Dollars ($0.00). DISCLOSURE OF FEDERAL PARTICIPATION IN PAYMENT OF TERRORISM LOSSES The United States will pay ninety percent (90 %).of covered terrorism losses exceeding the applicable insurer deductible. 61 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL FROM: KEN RUKAVINA, CITY ENGINEER DATE: JULY 14, 2003 RE: PUBLIC HEARING - APPROVAL OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PREPARED FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF GARVEY AVENUE BRIDGE Attached for your consideration is a Mitigated Negative Declaration, prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Section 21000 et. seq. of the Public Resources Code) for the subject project. The finding of the Mitigated Negative Declaration is that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made. Attached is a copy of the Mitigation Monitoring Program that has been prepared to ensure that mitigation measures occur. Pursuant to Sections 15072 and 15073 of the California Environmental Quality Act ` Guidelines, public notice of the availability, intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and opportunity for public review of the document were given. The notice was published,in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune on June 13, 2003. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was also submitted to the State Clearinghouse on June 10, 2003. Minor comments from only two agencies were received (see attached copies); no additional action or revisions to the Mitigated Negative Declaration or plans are required. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Rosemead City Council approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program. COUNCIL Attachments JUL 2 2 2003 2003rsmd /staff rpt/city ITEM No. GARVEY AVENUE BRIDGE OVER THE RIO HONDO CHANNEL Initial Study, Environmental Checklist and Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared for.• City of Rosemead 8838 Valley Boulevard Rosemead, CA 91770 Prepared by: Willdan 13191 Crossroads Parkway North Suite 405 Industry, California 91746 -3479 June 2003 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration INITIAL STUDY, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 1. Project Title: Garvey Avenue Bridge Over the Rio Hondo Channel Project 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: 4. Project Location: 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: 6. General Plan Designation: 7. Zoning: 8. Surrounding Land Uses and Settings: Garvey Avenue Bridge Over the Rio Hondo Channel City of Rosemead 8838 East Valley Boulevard Rosemead, California 91770 Ken Rukavina City Engineer (626) 569 -2150 The project is located along Garvey Avenue between stations 392 +67 and 402 +00, at the conjunction of the Cities of Rosemead, El Monte, and South El Monte, in Los Angeles County, California, where Garvey Avenue crosses the Rio Hondo Channel. See Figures 1 and 2. City of Rosemead 8838 East Valley Boulevard Rosemead, California 91770 Public Right -of Way (Roadways) Public Right -of -Way (Roadways) The land use in northwest quadrant of the Garvey Avenue /Rio Hondo Channel crossing is commercial and industrial, consisting of retail stores, a warehouse, and a distribution center. The Golden Vista commercial plaza occupies the northeast quadrant of the site. The land use of the southeast quadrant is mainly industrial but includes a plant nursery; and the southwest quadrant is a community center /senior housing facility. See Figure 3. June 2003 Page 1 .0 2 .1 Dzcll • • • N �a - 14 . ' C W In .1AGMUM J O Lij Al t n`. WN wsa to . r 6 y3y/ In .1AGMUM Lij t 130 WN to . x W W b // g Y v 77NN n. A 013idaVfl > 14 1 a .: o r 6 y3y/ � ;, r ,, eY , NN� , 4 . . YJLJL-�,i T MAL A e U -lj�v 14"' 'A Lf]P t 0 j 7 1; 41 6 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration 9. Description of Project: The proposed project consists of the replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The project is located along Garvey Avenue between stations 392 +67 and 402 +00, in the City of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California (See Figures 1 and 2). The existing bridge was built in 1936 and consists of continuous concrete tee beams over nine 67 -foot and two 26 -foot spans. The bridge is approximately 655 feet long and approximately 52 feet wide. The approach roadway width is 78 feet and the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of Garvey. Avenue is 26,000 vehicles. The existing bridge is a traffic and pedestrian hazard. The bridge is a bottleneck — its width is only two thirds the width of the approach roadways. In addition, the bridge does not have shoulders, and since the sidewalks are only three (3) feet wide, the bridge places pedestrians dangerously close to vehicular traffic. The existing bridge also requires seismic retrofitting. After investigation, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) deemed the bridge structurally deficient, and it was, therefore, placed on Caltrans' Eligible Bridge List (EBL), since its sufficiency rating is 46.6. Furthermore, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Bridge Inspection Report and Field Inspection for the bridge lists the following deficiencies: the deck is in poor condition, the bridge rail is substandard, the bridge geometry is intolerable and obsolete, the roadway approach is substandard, and the sidewalk next to the bridge deck is substandard. The purpose of this project is to improve an eastem.access to City of Rosemead, south of the San Bernardino Freeway, that can operate at a reasonable Level of Service (LOS), is structurally sound, and safe for both vehicles and pedestrians. The City proposes to accomplish this. goal by replacing the existing Garvey Avenue Bridge, which crosses the Rio Hondo Channel. The existing bridge is the only entrance to the City south of the San Bernardino Freeway, and is one of the City's major east -west arterial roadways. As discussed, the existing bridge is a traffic and pedestrian hazard. The City of Rosemead proposes to design and construct a replacement bridge that meets current standards and reduces potential hazards. Project construction would be funded by the Local Federal Highway Bridge Rehabilitation and Replacement Program (HBRR), seismic retrofit funds, and local funds — all of which have been allocated. The proposed bridge would be 100 feet wide, within the existing right -of -way, and be joined to the existing approach roadway approximately 170 feet on the east side and 340 feet on the west side of the bridge. It will accommodate a 76 -foot wide roadway and two 11 -foot wide sidewalks. The roadway consists of a 10 -foot center median, four 11 -foot traffic lanes and one 11 -foot shoulder at each side. The paved Rio Hondo Channel is narrower than the existing bridge length. The replacement bridge will be shortened to approximately 420 -foot long, or the width of the channel. The roadway alignment and profile would be kept approximately the same as the existing. Retaining Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 5 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration walls or slopes would be required to support the approaching roadway to the bridge abutments at both ends. The number of piers in the Rio Hondo Channel would be reduced from five to three, resulting in a total thickness of piers less than that of the existing bridge. This improves the hydraulic characteristics of the channel. Based on the final locations of new bridge abutments, the existing channel lining, equestrian trail, and Rio Hondo Bicycle Trail would all need to be modified accordingly as part of the bridge replacement. Three bridge superstructure alternatives have been studied. They are: precast prestressed Bulb -Tee girder, precast prestressed standard 1- girder, and cast -in -place prestressed box girder. All three alternatives involve identical physical impacts to the Rio Hondo Bicycle Trail. However, the duration of construction varies between alternatives, and thus, temporary impacts to the Rio Hondo Bicycle Trail vary. The preliminary investigation indicates that the precast prestressed bulb -tee girder provides the most feasible solution for this project due to its duration of construction, constructability, cost- effectiveness, and structural performance during earthquakes. The following details the bridge structure alternatives: • Precast Prestressed Bulb -Tee Girder Alternative This alternative utilizes precast prestressed girders ranging from 90 to 120 feet long supported on reinforced concrete abutments and piers. They are connected together by a cast -in -place concrete deck. Since no falsework would be required for the erection of the girders and later the casting of concrete deck, the construction of the bridge superstructure would not be confined to dry seasons. Uninterrupted construction would minimize the duration of construction, and thus, minimize impacts to the Rio Hondo Bicycle Trail. Therefore, the precast prestressed bulb -tee girder is the preferred and proposed bridge structure alternative. • Precast Prestressed Standard I- Girder Alternative The precast prestressed standard 1- girder alternative uses five equal spans, and has a total bridge length of 430 feet. This alternative and the precast prestressed bulb -tee girder alternative would have similar durations of construction. However, the precast prestressed standard 1- girder alternative requires each span to be simply- supported; and consequently, all piers would have to be fixed at the bottom. Thus, the pier foundations are much larger than those of the precast prestressed bulb -tee girder alternative and the cost would be higher. Another disadvantage of this alternative is that, due to large skew angle, the simply supported girders tend to rotate during an earthquake. This may cause girder unseating. Therefore, the precast prestressed standard 1- girder alternative is not preferred. • Cast -In -Place Prestressed Box Girder Alternative The cast -in -place prestressed box girder alternative is the same bridge length as the precast prestressed bulb -tee girder alternative, but has three spans. This alternative is not preferred because it requires falsework inside the channel for the superstructure construction, which restrains the construction within dry seasons and makes it impossible to build the bridge in one year. Consequently, the cast -in -place prestressed box girder alternative would have the greatest impacts to the Rio Hondo Bicycle Trail. In addition, the duration of construction required for this alternative will cause the new and existing piers to coexist in the channel during one rainy season, which would increase flood potential and may not be acceptable to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (U.S. ACOE). Therefore, the Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 6 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration cast -in -place prestressed box girder alternative is not preferred. Vehicular and pedestrian traffic on the existing bridge would be maintained during the construction period. To achieve this, the construction would be performed in two stages. In the first stage, the existing bridge would be partially removed with adequate bridge width remaining for designated traffic lanes during construction. The outside portions of the new bridge would be constructed at each side. In the second stage, after the traffic is routed to the new bridge on the outside, the remaining portions of the existing bridge would be demolished, and the interior bridge section would be constructed. The project also involves improvements to the Rio Hondo Channel. The existing channel is concrete lined within the limits of the proposed project. An existing combination maintenance road /bike path, known as the Rio Hondo Bicycle Trail, is located on the left (easterly) levee and is considered a shared trail. There are two access points to Garvey Avenue to this trail, one upstream and one downstream of the bridge. Currently, the trail passes under the bridge within the channel. There is a maintenance road on the top of the right (westerly) levee. The bridge abutment is set several feet back from this levee and there is no access to Garvey Avenue from the maintenance road. An existing equestrian trail is also located along the western levee of the Rio Hondo Channel. This trail does not currently have an adequate crossing of Garvey Avenue. The proposed project includes the relocation of the existing equestrian trail currently on the landward side of the west levee. The proposed equestrian trail would be located within the channel passing under the new bridge structure similarly to existing maintenance road /bike trail on the easterly levee. The equestrian trail underpass would include a 12 -foot wide trail with a 2% cross fall. The proposed longitudinal slopes are limited to 15 % up to 300' in length, otherwise 10% longitudinal slope is considered to be the maximum. The necessary channel improvements are dependent on the extent of the proposed bridge improvements (i.e. the locations of the bridge abutments in relation to each levee and the location of the proposed piers for the bridge within the channel.) The proposed channel improvements would consist mainly of reconstructing Rio Hondo Bicycle Trail underpass to maintain adequate vertical clearance under the new bridge, modifying the existing trail access points to Garvey Avenue, constructing an equestrian trail underpass along the western channel levee, and repaving the existing channel invert as part of the new pier construction for the bridge. Although the exact improvements to the Rio Hondo Channel are not yet known, it is estimated that the extent of the work would be limited to 400 feet upstream and downstream of the existing Garvey Avenue Bridge. Garvey Avenue Bddge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 7 I • I Z x i IY� e CV) 00 is O •. Q 0 4 N co C cri '. W J It (A U Q 2 6 Z W LL o O ' � a3, x i IY� e a g � � 2 .a, \ Fo .• a 'N CV) 00 is O •. Q 0 4 N co C cri '. W b a It (A O V Q 2 6 Z W LL o O ' � a3, a g � � 2 .a, \ Fo .• a 'N is O •. C cri '. It O Q 2 �m Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, 'financing approval, or participation agreement) a) Regional / Local Agencies City of El Monte: An encroachment permit to work within public right -of -way of the City of El Monte will be required. City of South El Monte: An encroachment permit to work within public right -of -way of the City of South El Monte will be required. Los Angeles County Flood Control District: An encroachment and improvement permit to work within the Rio Hondo Channel will be required from the Los Angeles County Flood Control District. Los Angeles County Department of Parks and Recreation: A permit from the Los Angeles County Department of Parks and Recreation will be required for temporary blockages of the multi -use and equestrian trails on site. b) State Agencies rnia Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) (Responsible Agencyl: The California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) will use this ISMND when reviewing CDFG Code 1603 permits and issuing a Streambed Alteration Agreement. This includes determining actions or other mitigation measures necessary to protect wildlife and natural watercourses. California Department of Transportation ( Caltrans): Caltrans will use this ISMND in coordination with the FHWA to administer funds from the Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program and the Seismic Retrofit program. In addition, a permit for temporarily encroaching on a state highway may also be required from Caltrans. Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB): The LARWQCB is Region (4) of the State Water Resources Control Board and is responsible for enforcing Section 401 of the Clean Water Act of 1972. This Act requires any applicant for a Federal license or permit to obtain a water quality certification from the state. The RWQCB will use this ISMND when reviewing applications for Water Quality Certification and Section 401 permits and developing corresponding mitigation measures. c) Federal Agencies United States Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE) [Responsible Agency]: The Regulatory Unit of USACE is responsible for enforcing Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 1972. This Act prohibits the discharge of dredged or filled materials into "waters of the United States" without proper permits. The Regulatory Unit of the USACE will use this ISMND when reviewing applications for Section 404 permits. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 9 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration 11. References and Appendices The following are referenced where appropriate in the Environmental Checklist Form and are available upon request at Rosemead City Hall: a. City of Rosemead, California, General Plan, Adopted 1987. b. City of South El Monte, California, General Plan, Adopted 1981. The following are referenced where appropriate in the Environmental Checklist Form and are included as appendices of this report: a. Willdan, Initial Site Assessment Checklist, September 2002. b. AAA LEAD Consultants and Inspections, Inc., Lead Paint Inspection Report for City of Rosemead Performed at Garvey Avenue over Rio Hondo Channel, March 2003. C. White & Leatherman BioServices, Natural Environment Study for the Garvey Bridge Replacement Project, Revised May 2003. d. Arroyo Geotechnical, Preliminary Foundation Report for Structure Type Selection, October 2002. e. Willdan, Floodplain Evaluation, January 2003. f. Myra L. Frank & Associates, Inc., Negative Historic Property Survey Report, March 2003. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 10 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration CONSULTATION, COORDINATION, AND REPORT PREPARERS Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration: Willdan 13191 Crossroads Parkway North, Suite 405 Industry, California 91746 (562) 908 -6200 Floodplain Evaluation: Willdan 27042 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 270 Foothill Ranch, California 92610 (949) 470 -8840 Geotechnica/ Investigations: Arroyo Geotechnical 13200 Brooks Drive, Suite B Baldwin Park, California 91706 (626) 337 -5103 Historic Resource Investigations: Myra L. Frank & Associates, Inc. 811 West 7th Street, Suite 800 Los Angeles, California 90017 (213) 627 -5376 Archaeological Resource Investigations Applied EarthWorks 3292 E. Florida Ave., Suite A Hemet, CA 92544 (909) 766 -2000 Natural Environment Study. White & Leatherman BioServices 5622 Amberdale Drive Yorba Linda, California 92866 (714) 701 -0863 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment: Phase One, Inc. 2680 Walnut Avenue Suite B Tustin, California 92780 (800) 524 -8877 Lead -Based Paint Inspection AAA LEAD Consultants and Inspections, Inc. 1307 West Sixth Street, Ste. 134 Corona CA 92882 (909) 582 -9071 Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 11 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration +r INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages: . ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology /Soils • Hazards & Hazardous Materials ❑ Hydrology/ Water Quality ❑ Land Use/ Planning • Mineral Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Population / Housing • Public Services ❑ Recreation ❑ Transportation / Traffic • Utilities / Service Systems ❑Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑ 1 find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 13 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ 1 find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ 1 find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been address by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. I ^�A Signature Ken Rukavina. P.E., City Engineer Garvey Avenue Bridge Over the Rio Hondo Channel &1910.3 Date City of Rosemead June 2003 Page 12 Initial Study and Mitigated Neqative Declaration EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers, except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project - specific factor as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project - specific screening analysis.) 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including offsite as well as onsite, cumulative as well as project - level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross- referenced). 5) . Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiring, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. C) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site - specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 13 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 14 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: Explanation of Checklist Judgements: I(a, c). Less than SignificantImpact: The City of Rosemead's General Plan does not identify any scenic resources within the City... In addition, the project is not within the view of. an eligible or officially designated portion of the State. Scenic Highway System as identified by the Califomia Depart' ment "of`Transportation,(Caltrans). Consequently, the project wouldliave'no.irrpa6t to'any'designated `scenic resources.. In addition, the proposed bridge,would'be designed to enhance the aesthetic character of the project site. The project team;. has examined roadway bridges throughout southern Califomia for aesthetic treatments and styles. In ad'dition,`the,project team has reviewed aesthetic features in the City of,14 emead'to ensure "the proposed bridge will be consistent with local styles. Although specific aesthetic treatments have hot been identified to date; it is estimated that:five,(5)Percent of the construction budget will be dedicated to aesthetic measures. .`With the use of the aesthetic treatments, the proposed project would have a beneficial impact to scenic vistas and the visual character and quality of the project site and surrounding areas. I(b). No Impact: The project is not within the view of an eligible or officially designated portion of the State Scenic Highway System as identified by the California Department of Transportation ( Caltrans). Therefore, the project would have no impact on scenic resources within a state scenic highway. I(d). Less than Significant Impact: The existing bridge is not currently lighted. However, to conform to the safety requirements of both Caltrans and the City of Rosemead the proposed bridge includes streetlights. It is possible that the illumination from these streetlights could spill into the surrounding parcels. The surrounding land uses of project site are commercial, industrial, and a community center /senior housing facility. Of these, only the residences of the senior housing facility are sensitive light receptors. Between the residences of senior center and the project bridge is the community center, a parking lot and the channel levee, the top of which will be vegetated. The parking lot will be lighted during evening hours. In addition, the senior housing facility would be screened from the light emitted by the proposed streetlights by the community center. Consequently, the increase in nighttime illumination at the residential portion of the Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 15 Less Than - Potentially Significant Less Than AESTHETICS Significant with Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project., `� ❑ -.❑ s' =,❑ ❑ a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources; including but- not limited to, trees, rods outcroppings, and historic`. bu!,I within a statescenic hi -nwa El El - r7( - El 1-1 c) Substantially degrade: the existing; visual character or quality of the site and Its surroundings? El El . ❑ d) create a -_ new -- source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views In. the area ?`... .. .... Explanation of Checklist Judgements: I(a, c). Less than SignificantImpact: The City of Rosemead's General Plan does not identify any scenic resources within the City... In addition, the project is not within the view of. an eligible or officially designated portion of the State. Scenic Highway System as identified by the Califomia Depart' ment "of`Transportation,(Caltrans). Consequently, the project wouldliave'no.irrpa6t to'any'designated `scenic resources.. In addition, the proposed bridge,would'be designed to enhance the aesthetic character of the project site. The project team;. has examined roadway bridges throughout southern Califomia for aesthetic treatments and styles. In ad'dition,`the,project team has reviewed aesthetic features in the City of,14 emead'to ensure "the proposed bridge will be consistent with local styles. Although specific aesthetic treatments have hot been identified to date; it is estimated that:five,(5)Percent of the construction budget will be dedicated to aesthetic measures. .`With the use of the aesthetic treatments, the proposed project would have a beneficial impact to scenic vistas and the visual character and quality of the project site and surrounding areas. I(b). No Impact: The project is not within the view of an eligible or officially designated portion of the State Scenic Highway System as identified by the California Department of Transportation ( Caltrans). Therefore, the project would have no impact on scenic resources within a state scenic highway. I(d). Less than Significant Impact: The existing bridge is not currently lighted. However, to conform to the safety requirements of both Caltrans and the City of Rosemead the proposed bridge includes streetlights. It is possible that the illumination from these streetlights could spill into the surrounding parcels. The surrounding land uses of project site are commercial, industrial, and a community center /senior housing facility. Of these, only the residences of the senior housing facility are sensitive light receptors. Between the residences of senior center and the project bridge is the community center, a parking lot and the channel levee, the top of which will be vegetated. The parking lot will be lighted during evening hours. In addition, the senior housing facility would be screened from the light emitted by the proposed streetlights by the community center. Consequently, the increase in nighttime illumination at the residential portion of the Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 15 6 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration senior center by the proposed streetlights would be minimal. Therefore, the project would have a less than significant impact from light and glare. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: II(a). No Impact: Prime farmland, unique farmland, and farmland of statewide importance as defined in the Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA) are lands identified by appropriate state or local government agencies as containing valuable farmland soils. Urban areas are excluded from FPPA as described in 7 CFR 9 Part 658. The urban density of the project site greatly exceeds 30 structures per 40 acres. Thus, the project site is committed to urban development and cannot be considered farmland for FPPA regulatory purposes. Therefore, development of the site would have no impact to prime or unique farmland or to farmland of statewide importance. II(b). No Impact: The proposed project is in a completely urban area. In addition all improvements would occur within existing public right -of -way. Therefore, there would be no impact to agricultural zoning or Williamson Act contract land. II(c). No Impact: The proposed project would not change the land use of involved area and would not any isolate parcels, create any barriers, or alter any traffic patterns. Therefore, the project would have no impact to any surrounding or regional agricultural practices. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 16 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than II AGRICULTURE RESOURCES significant with significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment - Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland, Would the project., a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland ❑ ❑ ❑ Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? ❑ ❑ ❑ (fir IJ b) Conflict with ebsdng zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? ❑ ❑ ❑ C) Involve other changes in the epsting environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: II(a). No Impact: Prime farmland, unique farmland, and farmland of statewide importance as defined in the Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA) are lands identified by appropriate state or local government agencies as containing valuable farmland soils. Urban areas are excluded from FPPA as described in 7 CFR 9 Part 658. The urban density of the project site greatly exceeds 30 structures per 40 acres. Thus, the project site is committed to urban development and cannot be considered farmland for FPPA regulatory purposes. Therefore, development of the site would have no impact to prime or unique farmland or to farmland of statewide importance. II(b). No Impact: The proposed project is in a completely urban area. In addition all improvements would occur within existing public right -of -way. Therefore, there would be no impact to agricultural zoning or Williamson Act contract land. II(c). No Impact: The proposed project would not change the land use of involved area and would not any isolate parcels, create any barriers, or alter any traffic patterns. Therefore, the project would have no impact to any surrounding or regional agricultural practices. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 16 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Explanation of Checklist Judgements: III(a). No Impact: The project is in the South Coast Air Basin, which is bounded by the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains to the north and east and the Pacific Ocean to the south and west. The air quality in the South Coast Air Basin is managed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District ( SCAQMD). Transportation planning in this region is managed by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). To manage air pollution in the South Coast Air Basin, the SCAQMD adopted a new Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) in 1997. This plan is designed to achieve the five percent annual reduction goal of the California Clean Air Act. The Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) developed by SCAG has been evaluated to ensure consistency with the 1997 AQMP. The proposed project would replace the existing Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. This action is not growth inducing (see Section XII) and would not permanently alter traffic patterns (see Section XV). Therefore, it is consistent with the SCAG's RTP. Since the RTP is consistent with the AQMP, and the proposed project is consistent with the RTP, the proposed project is considered consistent with the AQMP. Therefore, the project would not conflict with or obstruct the applicable air quality plan and would have no impact in this regard. III(b). Less than Significant Impact: Air quality standards in southern California are identified by both the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) in the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) in the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS). These standards have been established for five pollutants — ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), fine particulate matter (PM10), and Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 17 Potentially Less Than Less Than III AIR QUALITY significant Significant No Impact With Mitigation Incorporation Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relief upon to make the following determinations. Would the project., ❑ E] El 1'7 IL f a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? ❑ Q. b) violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region Is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient ❑ ❑ ❑ air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitattve thresholds for ozone precursors)? ❑ ❑ 1"7r LI d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? ❑ ❑ r7r ❑ e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? LI Explanation of Checklist Judgements: III(a). No Impact: The project is in the South Coast Air Basin, which is bounded by the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains to the north and east and the Pacific Ocean to the south and west. The air quality in the South Coast Air Basin is managed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District ( SCAQMD). Transportation planning in this region is managed by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). To manage air pollution in the South Coast Air Basin, the SCAQMD adopted a new Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) in 1997. This plan is designed to achieve the five percent annual reduction goal of the California Clean Air Act. The Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) developed by SCAG has been evaluated to ensure consistency with the 1997 AQMP. The proposed project would replace the existing Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. This action is not growth inducing (see Section XII) and would not permanently alter traffic patterns (see Section XV). Therefore, it is consistent with the SCAG's RTP. Since the RTP is consistent with the AQMP, and the proposed project is consistent with the RTP, the proposed project is considered consistent with the AQMP. Therefore, the project would not conflict with or obstruct the applicable air quality plan and would have no impact in this regard. III(b). Less than Significant Impact: Air quality standards in southern California are identified by both the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) in the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) in the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS). These standards have been established for five pollutants — ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), fine particulate matter (PM10), and Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 17 6 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration lead. The South Coast Air Basin is designated as a non - attainment area for 03, CO, and PM1o. The proposed project is not growth inducing (see Section XII) and would not permanently alter traffic patterns (see Section XV). Thus, the traffic induced air pollutants generated at the project site would not permanently increase as a result of the project. During construction, however, Garvey Avenue through the project area would be reduced from four to two vehicular travel lanes. Reducing the number of travel lanes would cause congestion and slower traffic through the project area. This localized increase in traffic would cause a temporary, concentrated area, or hot spot, of vehicle emission air pollutants. The vehicle emissions at the project site would contribute to the non - attainment of CO standards in the project area. However, this impact would be temporary and would cease with the end of construction. Therefore, transportation - related air quality impacts are less than significant. Construction of the proposed project would also generate fugitive dust. Fugitive dust is common at construction sites and caused by land clearing, ground excavation, cut and fill activities, and vehicle travel on unpaved roadways. Fugitive dust particles that are smaller that 10 microns in diameter are PM10 pollutants. Construction of the proposed project would contribute to the non- attainment of PM10 standards in the project area. However, the majority of the construction of the proposed project would occur above ground on impervious surfaces, reducing the amount of fugitive dust created during construction. In addition, the emission of fugitive dust at the project site would be reduced to a minimum in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403, and the generation of fugitive dust would cease with the end of construction. Therefore, construction- related air quality impacts are less than significant. III(c). Less than Significant Impact: The proposed project would replace the existing Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The existing bridge consists of four (4) vehicular travel lanes and the proposed replacement bridge would also have four (4) vehicular travel lanes. Thus, the project is not growth inducing (see Section XII). In addition, the only change in traffic due to the project would be during construction (see Section XV); and although traffic at the project site would increase during construction, the project would not alter the amount of vehicles on the local roadway network. Consequently, vehicular emissions associated with the project would not impact the cumulative air quality. Construction of the project, however, would generate fugitive dust, which includes PM10 pollutants. Although these pollutants would be mostly localized, the project would cause a minor increase in the regional concentrations of PM10 pollutants. Based on the most recent SCAQMD data (1999) collected from the nearest monitoring station (Lynwood), the average ambient PM10 concentrations within this region. were 56.3 Ng /m3, and exceeded 24 hour state standards of less than 0.09 pg /m for 35 days by 58 %. The monitored concentrations, however, do not exceed federal standards. Although there are no established PM10 "hot spot" analysis protocols for a project level analysis, conditions at the project site are such that any localized violation of national PM10 standards is not likely, after application of required SCAQMD Rule 403 PM10 control measures. In addition, the generation of fugitive dust would terminate and the end of construction, and the project would have no long -term affects to regional PM10 Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 18 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration concentrations. Therefore, the project would have a less than significant impact to cumulative air quality. III(d). Less than Significant Impact: The land uses surrounding the Garvey Avenue crossing of the Rio Hondo Channel are as follows: • Northwest quadrant — commercial and industrial, consisting of retail stores, a warehouse, and a distribution center; • Northeast quadrant — the Golden Vista commercial plaza, consisting of retail stores and business offices; • Southeast quadrant — industrial uses and a plant nursery; and • Southwest quadrant — an under construction, community center /senior housing facility. Of these land uses, the only sensitive air pollution receptors are the under construction community center and senior housing facility in the southwest quadrant of the project area. The community center /senior housing facility consists of two parallel structures. The structure closest to the project site is the community center that consists of lounge areas, a game /activity room, multi - purpose rooms, a pre - school classroom, a kitchen, and two banquet rooms. The other structure, which is the senior housing facility, is screened from the project site by the community center. This facility consists of 72 senior housing units with an associated office area and community room. As discussed, the project would cause a temporary increase in localized air pollutants. Reducing the bridge from four (4) to two (2) lanes of vehicular traffic would cause an increase in CO emissions in the project vicinity. In addition, the construction activities during development of the bridge would generate fugitive dust, including PM,o. The proposed project's generation of these air pollutants would terminate at the end of construction. However, during construction, these air pollutants have the potential to affect the air quality at the community center and senior housing facility adjacent to the project site. The amount of air pollutants reaching the community center and senior housing facility would be reduced by climatic conditions and construction practices. Prevailing winds in the project area are southwesterly, meaning air in the project area typically moves from southwest to northeast. The sensitive receptors in the project vicinity are located in the southwest quadrant of the project site, upwind of the proposed construction and traffic congestion areas. In addition, fugitive dust generated from the construction of the proposed bridge would be required to be reduced to a minimum, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. The intended use and design of the community center /senior housing facility would also limit human exposure to project induced air pollution. Since the community center /senior housing facility does not include any outdoor space other than parking lots, sidewalks, and landscaping, activities at the community center /senior housing facility will take place almost exclusively indoors. In addition, the facilities are air conditioned so windows will likely remain closed at most times, keeping temporary air pollutants outdoors and away from humans. In conclusion, the project would have no permanent or long -term affect to the air quality of sensitive receptors. During construction, however, the project would generate CO Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 19 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration and PMtp, which have the potential to impact the community center and senior housing facility in the southwest quadrant of the project area. However, these impacts would be short-term and would be reduced by wind direction, construction practices, and the intended uses and design of these facilities. Therefore, the project would have a less than significant impact to sensitive air pollution receptors. III(e). Less than Significant Impact: The proposed bridge would carry four lanes of vehicular traffic, which would emit related odors. However, the existing bridge also carries four lanes of vehicular traffic. Thus, as discussed in Section XV of this report, the project would not increase the traffic on -site, and the related odors emitted by vehicular traffic would not increase as a result of the project. . Development of the proposed project could release additional odors from construction equipment exhaust and other construction activities. These odors would be localized and would not likely affect any sensitive receptors, the nearest of which would be the community center and senior housing facility in the southwest quadrant of the project area. These receptors are. west of the proposed construction site, which is upwind since prevailing winds in the project area are southwesterly. In addition, construction - generated odors would be short term and would cease at the completion of construction. Therefore, the project would have a less than significant impact from odors. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 20 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than IV BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES significant With significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status species in ❑ ❑ local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community Identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California ❑ ❑ ❑ Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. . c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, ❑ ❑ ❑ coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife ❑ E] El ❑ corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites ❑ E] E] e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation I'7f LI Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation Ian? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 20 6 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration White & Leatherman BioServices (WLB) prepared a Natural Environment Study (NES) for the proposed project based on literature research and field investigations on 11 September 2002. The following is based on information contained in this NES, which is contained in this report as Appendix C. IV(a). No Impact: White & Leatherman BioServices (WLB) searched the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), the California Native Plant Society's Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California (CNPS), and a compendia of special status species published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the CDFG to compile a list of special status floral and faunal species that potentially occur within the project vicinity. Appendix A of the project's NES (Appendix C) shows the potentially occurring special status floral and faunal species. The tables in this appendix also describe the habitat and distribution, active or flowering season, special status designation, and occurrence probability of each species. As shown in Appendix A of the project's NES, the project site does not contain suitable habitat for any of the special status plant species that potentially exist in the project vicinity. The Rio Hondo Channel is cement lined, and consequently, vegetation on -site is scarce. Although individual plants and small clusters of individuals occur, none of the vegetation on -site function as a demonstrable community. Within the channel, individuals or small clumps of plants occur where the cement lining is cracked, and occasionally where sediment has collected. The species observed in the channel included willow herb (Epilobium ciliatum), common knotweed (Polygonum arenastrum), great water speedwell (Veronica anagallis- aquatica), tall umbrella sedge (Cyperus eragrostis), rabbit -foot grass (Polypogon monspeliensis), broad - leaved cattail (Typha latifolia), and greater duckweed (Spirodela polyrhiza). Landscaping outside the channel supports ornamental and non - native plants. The observed plant taxa outside the channel included annual bur -weed (Ambrosia acanthicarpa), horseweed (Conyza canadensis), shortpod mustard (Hirschfeldia incana), Iamb's quarters (Chenopodium album), jimsonweed ( Datura wrightii), ripgut brome (Bromus diandrus) and foxtail chess (Bromus madritensis ssp. rubens). None of the special status plant species that potentially occur in the project vicinity were observed during reconnaissance and none are expected to occur. (WLB 2002) Similarly, the project site does not contain suitable habitat for any of the special status wildlife species that potentially exist in the project vicinity. The diversity and extent of wildlife on -site is limited. by the lack of vegetation communities. The sediment that has collected in the channel provides a small amount of habitat for shorebirds. However, the soil deposits in the channel were observed in the summer and will likely be washed out by winter storms. The bird species observed foraging in the channel include least sandpiper (Calidris minutilla), western sandpiper (Calidds maun), and killdeer (Charadrius vociferus). Bird species that are typical of urbanized areas.also occur on- site, including the observed mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), rock dove (Columba livia), bushtit (Psaltriparus minimus), black phoebe (Sayomis. nigricans), European starling (Stumus vulgaris), and house sparrow (Passer domesticus). The existing overhang on the bridge provides nesting opportunities for cliff swallows (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota). Although no cliff swallows were observed during on the 11 September 2002 field view, mud nests were present on the existing bridge and the species was observed on -site during prior cursory site visits. The only other bird species observed Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 21 6 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration during site reconnaissance was an individual Cooper's hawk (Accipiter cooperii) seen foraging in the project area. The project site supports few other wildlife species. The channel does not possess any pools or backwater areas preferred by aquatic species and no fish or amphibian species were observed. Mosquito fish are likely introduced into the channel for mosquito control. One reptilian species, the western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis), was seen on -site, and another, the southern alligator lizard (Elgaria multicarinata), may also occur in the project area. Mammals that commonly occur in urban settings, including Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginianus), black rat (Rattus rattus) and house mouse (Mus musculus), may pass through the project site. However, no mammal species or signs of their presence were observed on the project site. Of the wildlife species observed or detected on the project site, only the Cooper's hawk is of special status. The Cooper's hawk is a state species of special concern. The concern for this species is specifically for nesting habitat and not for individuals or populations. Cooper's hawks nest in riparian forests or otherwise dense concentrations of trees. This nesting habitat does not occur on the project site and the proposed project would not affect any Cooper's hawk nesting habitat. Since no special status plant species occur on the project site and the proposed project would not affect any special status wildlife species, the proposed project would have no impact to any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status. IV(b -c). Less than Significant Impact: The Rio Hondo Channel is a cement -lined channel, and consequently, vegetation on -site is scarce. Although individual plants and small clusters of individuals occur, none of the vegetation on -site function as a demonstrable community. Within the channel, individuals or small clumps of plants occur where the cement lining is cracked, and occasionally where sediment has collected. The site does not contain USACE jurisdictional wetlands. Jurisdictional wetlands, as defined by the USACE are lands that, during normal conditions, possess hydric soils, are dominated by wetland vegetation, and are inundated with water for a portion of the growing season. The only portion of the project site that is inundated with water is the . channel itself, and since the channel is concrete lined, it does not contain hydric soils. Thus, the project would not affect USACE jurisdictional wetlands. The Rio Hondo Channel, however, is jurisdiction of the USACE, as defined the United States" are defined by the inside the Rio Hondo Channel will Similarly, placement of piers in the c from the CDFG. a "Water of the United States" that falls under the in 33 CFR 238.3(a). The limits of the "Waters of normal high water mark. The placement of piers equire a Section 404 Permit from the USACE. hannel will require a Section 1600 series permit Despite requiring permits from the USACE and CDFG, the project would have a less than significant impact to riparian habitats, since the site does not possess the biological quality normally associated with drainages. As discussed none of the vegetation on -site functions as a demonstrable community and the natural integrity of the Rio Hondo Channel is greatly reduced due to channelization. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over the Rio Hondo Channel June 2003 Page 22 Initial Studv and Mitigated Negative Declaration IV(d). Less than Significant Impact: As discussed, the proposed project involves the replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The wildlife habitat on site is limited to shallow water within the channel that provides temporary foraging habitat for common shorebirds, individual and small clusters of vegetation that could provide nest sites for migratory birds, and bridge overhands that provide nest sites for cliff swallows (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota). Replacing the Garvey Avenue Bridge would not affect the foraging habitat in the channel and would not restrict the movement of any wildlife. Therefore, the proposed project would have no impact to wildlife movement corridors or native wildlife nursery sites. During construction, however, the project could impact the individual and small clusters of vegetation that may provide nest sites for migratory birds and the cliff swallow nesting habitat. Migratory birds, including the cliff swallow, are protected by.the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and birds are given some level of protection under CDFG Code Section 3800 and their nests and eggs under Section 3503. However, neither the cliff swallow nor any of the avian species expected to nest on -site are special status species. After construction, the project site would offer nesting opportunities similar to the existing conditions. The proposed precast prestressed bulb -tee girder bridge would have suitable overhang for nesting cliff swallows and vegetation would reinhabit permeable areas. Thus, impacts to nesting bird habitat would be temporary. Mitigation Measures IVA and IV -2 would reduce.the potential temporary impacts on nesting birds, including cliff swallows, during construction. Therefore, the proposed project's potential impacts on nesting birds would be less than significant with mitigation. Mitigation Measure IVA: Any grubbing and /or removal of vegetation shall be done outside the bird nesting season (August 16- February 14). Any grubbing and /or removal of vegetation during the bird nesting season (February 15- August 15) will require a survey at least on week prior to construction. If any nests are present, work cannot commence until all fledglings have left the nest, which would likely not occur until the end of the nesting season. Mitigation Measure IV -2: The mud nests occurring under the bridge eaves shall be scraped or water blasted from the bridge prior to March 15t (before cliff swallows are likely to begin arriving and building nests for the breeding season). If nests are water blasted from the bridge, netting shall be used to catch the debris to prevent parasites from washing into the flowing water of the Rio Hondo Channel. If construction does not start prior to March 1s`, then a qualified biologist shall survey the bridge to ensure that cliff swallows have not begun nesting. Swallows shall not be allowed to nest on the bridge during the duration of construction. To ensure this, during construction a biologist shall survey the area weekly between the dates of February 15 and October 15 to ensure that nests more than one -third built do not exist on the bridge. If swallows have begun nesting, the project shall halt until a representative from the California Department of Fish and Game gives further direction. IV(e). No Impact. Neither the City of Rosemead's General Plan nor Municipal Code identify any policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, and the proposed project would have no related impact. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 23 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration IV(f)l. No Impact. The project site is located in an urbanized area of the City of Rosemead and not within a proposed, approved, or adopted conservation plan. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan and would have no related impact. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: V(a). No Impact: Two structures exist in the project area, the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel and the Rio Hondo Channel flood control facility. Both structures were evaluated for historic significance in 2003 by Myra L. Frank & Associates, Inc., a qualified historical resource consultant. The complete methods and results of these investigations are contained in the project's Historic Property Survey Report, which is contained in this report as Appendix F. The following is based on this report. The Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel, built in 1936, was designed by the California Department of Public Works under the supervision of State Highway Engineer Charles H. Purcell. Charles H. Purcell is a known as one of the most distinguished engineers of our time. His work includes conceiving and supervising the. building of the San Francisco - Oakland Bay Bridge. The Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel does not possess high artistic value and is not among Charles H. Purcell's greatest lifetime achievements. The bridge is also not associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. Furthermore, the concrete lining of the Rio Hondo Channel in 1957 severely compromised the bridge's historical integrity and setting. Consequently, the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places or the California Register of Historical Resources. The Rio Hondo Channel flood control facility is a concrete lined water conveyance channel that is part of the San Gabriel River Improvement/Whittier Narrows Flood Control Basin. The segment that under crosses Garvey Avenue is 300 -feet wide with a 150 -foot invert and is 0.9 miles long. This segment of the Rio Hondo Channel flood control facility was constructed in 1957 and does not meet the National and California Registers 50 -year age criterion. The channel also does not have exceptional importance. Thus, the Rio Hondo Channel flood control facility is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places or the California Register of Historical Resources. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 24 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than V CULTURAL RESOURCES Significant with Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: ❑ E] ❑ I'7r IJ a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? ❑ E] ❑ I7f IJ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature? ❑ 1:1 ❑ I'7( IJ d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: V(a). No Impact: Two structures exist in the project area, the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel and the Rio Hondo Channel flood control facility. Both structures were evaluated for historic significance in 2003 by Myra L. Frank & Associates, Inc., a qualified historical resource consultant. The complete methods and results of these investigations are contained in the project's Historic Property Survey Report, which is contained in this report as Appendix F. The following is based on this report. The Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel, built in 1936, was designed by the California Department of Public Works under the supervision of State Highway Engineer Charles H. Purcell. Charles H. Purcell is a known as one of the most distinguished engineers of our time. His work includes conceiving and supervising the. building of the San Francisco - Oakland Bay Bridge. The Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel does not possess high artistic value and is not among Charles H. Purcell's greatest lifetime achievements. The bridge is also not associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. Furthermore, the concrete lining of the Rio Hondo Channel in 1957 severely compromised the bridge's historical integrity and setting. Consequently, the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places or the California Register of Historical Resources. The Rio Hondo Channel flood control facility is a concrete lined water conveyance channel that is part of the San Gabriel River Improvement/Whittier Narrows Flood Control Basin. The segment that under crosses Garvey Avenue is 300 -feet wide with a 150 -foot invert and is 0.9 miles long. This segment of the Rio Hondo Channel flood control facility was constructed in 1957 and does not meet the National and California Registers 50 -year age criterion. The channel also does not have exceptional importance. Thus, the Rio Hondo Channel flood control facility is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places or the California Register of Historical Resources. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 24 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Since the proposed project would not impact a resource eligible for the National Register of Historic Places or the California Register of Historical Resources, the proposed project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource and would have no associated impacts. V(b). No Impact: An Archaeological Survey Report was prepared for the project in 2003 by Applied EarthWorks, a qualified archaeological resource consultant. The complete Archeological Survey Report is contained in the project's Historic Property Survey Report (Appendix F). The following is based on this report. The project site is not within one -half mile of a known archaeological resource site. In addition, the project site is in a built environment that contains little exposed sediment. The sediment that is exposed appears to be either highly disturbed or to consist of imported fill. Field investigation by Applied EarthWorks in November 2002 did not identify any cultural resources. Furthermore, it is Caltrans policy that if buried cultural resources are encountered during construction, work must halt until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the nature and significance of the find. Therefore, the proposed project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource and would have no associated impacts. V(c). No Impact: The replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel would not involve grading into undisturbed subsurface materials. The majority of the construction of the replacement bridge would occur aboveground. The only subsurface work that would be conducted for the project would be the placement of piers and the preparation of roadway approaches. Subsurface work associated with the placement of piers would take place within the concrete lined channel; and subsurface work to prepare the roadway approaches would be minor grading of the existing roadway. Both of these subsurface activities would take place within engineered materials. Therefore, the proposed project would not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature, and would have no associated impacts. V(d). No Impact: Numerous site inspections did not reveal any human remains on the project site. In addition, the Archaeological Survey Report prepared for the proposed project did not reveal a likelihood that historic or prehistoric human remains exist on the project site. Thus, human remains are not expected to be disturbed during project construction. If human remains are discovered during project construction, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 requires the project to halt until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to the origin and disposition of the remains pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. Therefore, the proposed project would not disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries, and would have no associated impacts. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 25 6 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Explanation of Checklist Judgments: VI(a)i) No Impact. The project is located along Garvey Avenue on the eastern boundary of the City of Rosemead. This portion of the City is shown on the California Department of Mines and Geology (CDMG) Fault- Rupture Hazard Zones Map, El Monte Quadrangle (Revised 1991). Review of this map revealed that the project site is not located within an Alquist - Priolo Special Studies Zone. Therefore, the proposed project would not rupture a known earthquake fault and would have no associated impacts. VI(a)ii) Less than Significant Impact. Table VI -1 lists faults within 15 kilometers of the project site and identifies each faults Maximum Credible Event (MCE) and peak acceleration. Table VIA: Known Seismic Fault Lines Within the Project Area Peak Bedrock Fault Name MCE Moment Style of Closest Distance to Acceleration in Magnitude Faulting Site (km) /(mi) g's Elysian Park Seismic Zone 7.0 Reverse (Thrust) 4.012.48 0.52 Whittier- Elsinore 7.5 Strike Slip 7.314.54 0.49 Malibu-Santa Monica Hollywood- 7.5 Reverse-Oblique 8.0/4.97 0.47 Raymond, Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 26 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than VI GEOLOGY AND SOILS Significant with significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project., - a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, Injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated the PJquist Earthquake Fault ❑ ❑ ❑ on most recent -Pdolo Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ R1 _ ❑ ❑ ,17f II ❑JJ ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii)Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv)Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, ❑ ❑ r"7f LJ and potentially result in on or offsite landslide, lateral spreading. subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? E] 1:1 El d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18.1 -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risk to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems ❑ I'7f LJ where sewers are not available for the. disposal of wastewater9 Explanation of Checklist Judgments: VI(a)i) No Impact. The project is located along Garvey Avenue on the eastern boundary of the City of Rosemead. This portion of the City is shown on the California Department of Mines and Geology (CDMG) Fault- Rupture Hazard Zones Map, El Monte Quadrangle (Revised 1991). Review of this map revealed that the project site is not located within an Alquist - Priolo Special Studies Zone. Therefore, the proposed project would not rupture a known earthquake fault and would have no associated impacts. VI(a)ii) Less than Significant Impact. Table VI -1 lists faults within 15 kilometers of the project site and identifies each faults Maximum Credible Event (MCE) and peak acceleration. Table VIA: Known Seismic Fault Lines Within the Project Area Peak Bedrock Fault Name MCE Moment Style of Closest Distance to Acceleration in Magnitude Faulting Site (km) /(mi) g's Elysian Park Seismic Zone 7.0 Reverse (Thrust) 4.012.48 0.52 Whittier- Elsinore 7.5 Strike Slip 7.314.54 0.49 Malibu-Santa Monica Hollywood- 7.5 Reverse-Oblique 8.0/4.97 0.47 Raymond, Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 26 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Eagle Rock 6.0 Unknown 12.0/7.457 0.20 San Fernando Siena Madre -Duarte 7.5 Reverse 12.7/7.89 0.37 Five fault lines having an MCE moment magnitude of 6.0 or greater are located within 15 kilometers (9.3 miles) of the project site, and peak ground acceleration at the site is between 0.5 and 0.6 g's: The project site is underlain by alluvium (stiff soil) and, in accordance with Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria (Version 1.2, December 2001), has a type "D" soil profile. The " Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria, Version 1.2, December 2001" presents AIRS spectral curves. AIRS spectral curves are structural design criteria based on a project site's soil profile, earthquake magnitude, and ground acceleration. A typical bridge would be designed to the spectra shown in Figure B -8 of this document. The project's geotechnical consultant has identified the project's soil profile as type "D ", the base earthquake magnitude as 7.25 + / -0.25, and base ground acceleration as 0.6 g. Due to the proximity of the project site to seismic sources and the existence of reverse faults, the project's geotechnical consultant recommends the proposed bridge be designed to follow a 20% stricter spectra than that shown on Figure B -8 for the said parameters. The proposed bridge is designed to these standards, and therefore, would have a less than significant impact from seismic ground shaking. VI(a)iii) Less than Significant. Four borings and four cone penetration tests (CPT) were run at the project site in 2000, in preparation for the proposed bridge retrofit. Earth Mechanics, Inc. prepared and presented a report dated July 5, 2000 describing the results of these tests. Subsurface soil conditions were further investigated by Arroyo Geotechnical, which drilled four additional borings 78 to 100 feet in depth along one additional CPT sounding. A report was prepared and submitted dated October 30, 2002, describing the results of these tests. Analysis of the liquefaction potential for the project site included 4 borings and 4 soundings provided by EMI and 4 borings and 1 sounding by Arroyo Geotechnical. Evaluation of the liquefaction potential was made through the analysis of soundings through the use of the Standard Penetration Test and the Cone Penetration Test. Site inspection determined that the soil is comprised of several clayey sand lenses. Soil liquefaction does not generally occur in clay soils or clayey sand. Groundwater was encountered at a minimum depth of 205 feet. The channel bottom elevation is approximately 227 feet throughout the site. There is a potential for liquefaction at 212 and 218 feet; however the soil density leads to the conclusion that, within the channel, which is the low point of the site, there are no likely liquefiable soils. Though liquefaction might occur in an isolated sand lens at about 255 feet, borings made in October 2002 indicated that at 225 and 215 feet, sands were dry. In addition, the amount of soil which might liquefy due to seismic activity appears to be small and the conclusion was reached that no downdrag forces need to be considered in the foundation design. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact from ground failure including liquefaction. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 27 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration VI(a)iv)No Impact. In addition to soil characteristics and liquefaction potentials, the proposed bridge crosses a flood control channel which was constructed for the purpose of controlling damage such as landslides which might result from over - saturation of unstable soils. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project. In addition, a local hydrology study of Garvey Avenue Bridge was conducted by Willdan and a report submitted in January 2003. This analysis confirmed that the Rio Hondo River base flood is contained within the improved channel upstream and downstream of the Garvey Avenue Bridge crossing.. No significant changes are expected to the channel configuration or existing flood plain. This further supports the conclusion that no landslide potentials are associated with the project. Therefore, the proposed project would have no impact from landslides. VI(b). Less than Significant Impact. The project is located within an engineered concrete flood control channel, surrounded by level or nearly level ground. It is not expected to result in substantial soil erosion. During construction the proposed project could temporarily expose unvegetated soils. Unvegetated soils are prone to erosion during storm events. Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (33CFR26 Section 1342) established the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES). This act requires local governments to obtain an NPDES Permit for their storm water induced water pollutants including sediment. In California, the Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) of the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) administer NPDES Permits. Los Angeles County obtained a storm water pollution permit (Permit # 01 -182) from the Los Angeles RWQCB. This permit requires all construction activities, including the proposed project, to limit, to the maximum extent feasible, discharges of storm water pollutants using Best Management Practices (BMPs). The BMPs for this project may include sandbagging the project site to prevent siltation and prohibiting construction during the rainy season. The required compliance with NPDES would ensure that loss of topsoil would not be a significant impact of the proposed project. VI(c). Less than Significant Impact. As discussed in Sections IV(a)iii) and VI(a)iv) of this report, the project site is not subject to significant ground failure, liquefaction, or landslides. Therefore, the proposed project would not have significant impacts from unstable soil or geologic units. VI(d). No Impact. Site inspection determined that the soil is comprised of several clayey sand lenses. Soil liquefaction does not generally occur in clay soils or clayey sand. In- addition, the in situ density of soils was determined to be in excess of 108 pcf, which is quite high. No significant risk to property as a result of soil expansion is anticipated, and the proposed project would have no related impacts. VI(e). No Impact. The project site will cross a concrete flood control channel and does not include any habitable structures which might require septic tank service. The project area in general is served by a local sewer system and associated facilities. No impact to such services is expected as a result of the proposed project. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 28 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VII(a -b). Less than Significant Impact: The proposed project involves replacement of the Garvey Avenue.Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The completed bridge would not generate or require the use of any hazardous materials. Two potential sources of hazardous materials could be exposed during construction — lead -based paint and vehicle /equipment fuels and fluids. The project site was evaluated for lead -based paint in March of 2003 by AAA LEAD Consultants and Inspections, Inc. The complete methods and results of this investigation are contained in the project's "Lead Paint Inspection Report," which is contained in Appendix B of this report. After in -field meter tests and laboratory analysis, the "Lead Paint Inspection Report" concludes that the three items on the project site — the water line, the hand rail, and the hanger — contain measurable levels of lead based paint. However, only one item on the project site — the water line — contains lead -based paint in concentration above the HUD /EPA action level of 1.0 mg /cm2 on the existing bridge. Mitigation Measures VII -1 and VII -2 would reduce the potential impacts from exposure of lead -based paint to a less than significant level. The other potential source of hazardous materials that may be used during construction of the proposed project are vehicle and equipment fuels and fluids. Release or spillage Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 29 Less Than VII HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS Potentially significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact MATERIALS Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project E] ❑ ❑ a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and rJf IJ accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste ❑ I"7f within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed U school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, ❑ ❑ ❑ would It create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two of a public airport or public use airport, would the ❑ 1:1 E] project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? ❑ ❑ ❑ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? El E] 1:1 g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation Ian? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where 17f LJ wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where _ residences are intermixed with wildlands? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: VII(a -b). Less than Significant Impact: The proposed project involves replacement of the Garvey Avenue.Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The completed bridge would not generate or require the use of any hazardous materials. Two potential sources of hazardous materials could be exposed during construction — lead -based paint and vehicle /equipment fuels and fluids. The project site was evaluated for lead -based paint in March of 2003 by AAA LEAD Consultants and Inspections, Inc. The complete methods and results of this investigation are contained in the project's "Lead Paint Inspection Report," which is contained in Appendix B of this report. After in -field meter tests and laboratory analysis, the "Lead Paint Inspection Report" concludes that the three items on the project site — the water line, the hand rail, and the hanger — contain measurable levels of lead based paint. However, only one item on the project site — the water line — contains lead -based paint in concentration above the HUD /EPA action level of 1.0 mg /cm2 on the existing bridge. Mitigation Measures VII -1 and VII -2 would reduce the potential impacts from exposure of lead -based paint to a less than significant level. The other potential source of hazardous materials that may be used during construction of the proposed project are vehicle and equipment fuels and fluids. Release or spillage Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 29 Initial Studv and Mitigated Negative Declaration of these fuels or fluids during construction could lead to contamination of surrounding soils or water. Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (33CFR26 Section 1342) regulates the discharge of water pollutants through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES). Los Angeles County obtained an NPDES permit (Permit #01 -182) from the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) that requires all construction activities within the county, including the proposed project, to limit to the maximum extent feasible, discharges of water pollutants by using Best Management Practices (BMPs). The BMPs for this project, such as equipment maintenance and emergency procedures, would reduce the potential for accidental spills and reduce the harm from any spills that may occur. With the incorporation of Mitigation Measures VII -1 and VII -2 and the BMP requirements for the proposed project, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact from the transport, use, disposal, or potential release of hazardous materials. Mitigation Measure VII -1: The water line shall be considered lead - laden, and any maintenance or repair on the water line shall be performed in an abatement/containment environment as required by Cal /OSHA Construction and Safety Orders, Lead Section 1532.1. Mitigation Measure VII -2: Any component that is below the HUD /EPA action level but still contains lead requires personal exposure level (PEL) testing be performed to determine the workers skill or certification required to perform the activity if an outside contractor will do the work. VII(c). No Impact: The nearest school to the project site is the Willard School, which is about 0.75 miles west of the project site. Therefore, there would be no impacts from handling or emitting hazardous substances within one - quarter mile of a school. VII(d). No Impact: The following databases were searched in September 2002 to determine if any known hazardous waste sites exist within a one -mile radius of the project site: National Priority List (NPL), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS), Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS), Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS), California Cal -Sites Database (CAL- SITES), Cortese Hazardous Waste and Substance Site Lists (CORTESE), Spills -1990, Solid Waste Information System (SWIS), Waste Management Unit Database System (WMUDS), Permits, Registered Underground Storage Tank/Above Ground Storage Tank (RUST /RAST) lists, and Leaking Underground Storage Tank Lists. Twenty-six (26) sites listed on these databases occur within one (1) mile of the project site, however, none of the listed hazardous waste sites occur on the project site. The 26 listed sites include 10 RCRA Generators within % mile, 1 ERNS within 1/8 mile, 6 RUSTS /RASTs within '% mile, and 9 LUSTs within '/2 mile of the project site. None of the RCRA Generators or RUSTs/RASTs would be disturbed by the proposed project. The ERNS listed site is Harbor Seal, located'at 2755 Lee Avenue in South El Monte, approximately 0.10 miles southeast of the project site. Details regarding this incident are not available, however, the official status of the site is "fixed facility." Of the LUST sites in the project vicinity, five (5) have an official status of "case closed," two (2) have an official status of "pollution characterization," and the other two (2) sites are in the Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 Me Rio Hondo Channel Page 30 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration remediation phases. None of the leaks at these sites are expected to have contaminated the project site and the proposed project is not anticipated to use or affect the soils or water contaminated from these occurrences. Since the proposed project would not disturb any of the listed RCRA Generators or RUSTS /RASTs or the ERNS and LUSTs contaminated soils and water, the proposed project would have no impact from hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. VII(e -f). No Impact: The closest airport to the City of Rosemead is the El Monte Airport, located 2.25 miles to the northeast of the project site. The project site is not located within the runway clear zones for the El Monte Airport (El Monte Airport Layout Plan, approved by the FAA 1- 22 -96). Therefore, the project would have no impact from the hazards associated with proximity to airports. VII(g). Less than Significant Impact: The proposed project involves replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. Garvey Avenue is an evacuation route for the City of Rosemead, as shown on Figure PS -2 of the City's General Plan. However, as discussed in Section XV of this document, the proposed bridge would be constructed in phases and Garvey Avenue would remain open to vehicular traffic during construction. Therefore, although construction would take place on an evacuation route, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact because the roadway would remain open. VII(h). No Impact: The project is located in and surrounded by urban land. Consequently, the project is not within and area where wildfires occur. Therefore, there would be no impact from wildfires. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 31 Less Than VIII HYDROLOGY AND WATER Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact QUALITY Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project., ❑ a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or Interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production El 1:1 1'7r IJ rate of pre - existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would ❑ ❑ Q result in substantial erosion or siltation on or offsite? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the 1:1 E] ❑ rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or offsite? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stone water drainage I'7f 0 systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 31 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Explanation of'Checklist Judgements: Vill(a). Less than Significant Impact: The proposed project involves replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The proposed bridge would not be a point -source generator of water pollutants. However, during construction the proposed project could temporarily expose unvegetated soils. Unvegetated soils are prone to erosion during storm events. If a storm event occurs while unvegetated soils are exposed, the project could increase the sediment load in on -site and downstream runoff. Storm water runoff could also carry construction debris into the nearby drainage courses. Thus, the construction of the proposed project could contribute to nonpoint- source water pollution. Another concern for water quality during construction is accidental spillage of vehicle or equipment fluids. Spillage of such fluids would be a single event, point- source of water pollution. Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (33CFR26 Section 1342) established the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES). This act requires local governments to obtain an NPDES Permit for their storm water induced water pollutants. In California, the Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) of the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) administer NPDES Permits. Los Angeles County obtained a storm water pollution permit (Permit # 01 -182) from the Los Angeles RWQCB. This permit requires all construction activities, including the proposed project, to limit, to the maximum extent feasible, discharges of storm water pollutants using Best Management Practices (BMPs). The BMPs for this project may include sandbagging the project site to prevent siltation, diversion of surface water flows from construction material storage areas, prohibiting construction during the rainy season, construction site maintenance, and procedures for handling equipment and vehicle fluids. The required compliance with NPDES would ensure that the proposed project's potential impact to surface water quality is less than significant. VIII(b). Less than Significant Impact: The proposed project involves the replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The replacement bridge and its approach roadways would be wider than the existing facilities. However, the project site is in an urbanized area with mostly impermeable surfaces including parking lots and concrete flood control facilities. The placement of the proposed bridge and approach roadways may encroach upon a minor amount of Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 32 Less Than VIII HYDROLOGY AND WATER Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact QUALITY Impact Mitigation Impact incorporation 0 Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ❑ ❑ ❑ _ 1'7t LJ g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood ❑ ❑ ❑ I'7r IJ Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? ❑ ❑ Q ❑ h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? ❑ ❑ ❑ i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, Including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? ❑ ❑ ❑ Ef j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Explanation of'Checklist Judgements: Vill(a). Less than Significant Impact: The proposed project involves replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The proposed bridge would not be a point -source generator of water pollutants. However, during construction the proposed project could temporarily expose unvegetated soils. Unvegetated soils are prone to erosion during storm events. If a storm event occurs while unvegetated soils are exposed, the project could increase the sediment load in on -site and downstream runoff. Storm water runoff could also carry construction debris into the nearby drainage courses. Thus, the construction of the proposed project could contribute to nonpoint- source water pollution. Another concern for water quality during construction is accidental spillage of vehicle or equipment fluids. Spillage of such fluids would be a single event, point- source of water pollution. Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (33CFR26 Section 1342) established the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES). This act requires local governments to obtain an NPDES Permit for their storm water induced water pollutants. In California, the Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) of the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) administer NPDES Permits. Los Angeles County obtained a storm water pollution permit (Permit # 01 -182) from the Los Angeles RWQCB. This permit requires all construction activities, including the proposed project, to limit, to the maximum extent feasible, discharges of storm water pollutants using Best Management Practices (BMPs). The BMPs for this project may include sandbagging the project site to prevent siltation, diversion of surface water flows from construction material storage areas, prohibiting construction during the rainy season, construction site maintenance, and procedures for handling equipment and vehicle fluids. The required compliance with NPDES would ensure that the proposed project's potential impact to surface water quality is less than significant. VIII(b). Less than Significant Impact: The proposed project involves the replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The replacement bridge and its approach roadways would be wider than the existing facilities. However, the project site is in an urbanized area with mostly impermeable surfaces including parking lots and concrete flood control facilities. The placement of the proposed bridge and approach roadways may encroach upon a minor amount of Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 32 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration landscaping, and thus increase the amount of impermeable surface at the project site. However, the increase of impermeable surface would be minimal and would have an negligible affect to the amount of water percolating from the surface into the groundwater table. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact to groundwater recharge. VIII(c). Less than Significant Impact: Siltation and sedimentation is governed by the volume of surface water, the velocity. of surface water, and ground cover. Increased surface water would cause an increase in siltation and sedimentation because water's potential to hold sediment increases with the volume of water soil is exposed to. Increased water velocity also increases siltation and sedimentation because water's ability to transport sediment increases as water velocity increases. Ground cover affects siltation and sedimentation in two ways. First, exposed soils or loose soils are more susceptible to erosion that soils covered by vegetation or packed soils. Second, impermeable surfaces can prevent soils from being exposed to surface water, and thus, restrict siltation and sedimentation. The proposed project involves the replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. This action could change volume and velocity of surface water and the ground cover of the project site. The proposed bridge is wider that the existing bridge, and thus, impermeable surface area could increase. In turn, this would increase the volume and velocity of surface water. However, the proposed project's change to the site's ground cover is negligible, because the project would install impermeable surfaces to a project site that, in its existing state, is almost exclusively covered with impermeable surfaces. Consequently, post - project surface water on -site would not come in contact with a substantial amount of exposed soils. Thus, any change in surface water volume or velocity would also have a negligible affect to siltation and sedimentation. Therefore, the completed proposed bridge would have a less than significant impact from siltation and sedimentation. During construction, however, soils on -site could become exposed. Exposed soils and erosion is typical of construction sites throughout the country, and is regulated by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES). NPDES, which was established by Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (33 CFR 26 Section 1342), requires local governments to obtain an NPDES Permit for their storm water induced water pollutants. In California, the Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) of the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) administer NPDES Permits. Los Angeles County obtained a storm water pollution permit (Permit # 01 -182) from the Los Angeles RWQCB. This permit requires all construction activities, including the proposed project, to limit, to the maximum extent feasible, discharges of storm water pollutants using Best Management Practices (BMPs). The project's required compliance with NPDES would ensure that siltation and sedimentation from proposed project's construction site would be a less than significant impact. VIII(d). Less than Significant Impact: The proposed project involves the replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. As discussed, this action could change the site drainage pattern it two ways. First, the proposed bridge is wider that the existing bridge, and thus, impermeable surface area could increase. Second, the project involves the demolition of exiting piers and placement of new piers. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 33 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration As discussed, the proposed project's increase to the site's impermeable surface area is negligible, because the project site is in an urbanized area with few permeable surfaces. The proposed bridge itself would collect more runoff than the existing bridge. However, the existing catch basins that collect the existing bridge's runoff are adequately sized to handle the proposed bridge's runoff. Flood flows from the project area are collected in, and discharged via, the Rio Hondo Channel. This channel is sized to contain the base flood within its levees. The existing Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel includes six (6) piers in the Rio Hondo Channel. The proposed bridge would only have three (3) piers within the channel. Consequently, the hydraulic dept of the project flood flow volume at the Inside Bridge Upstream would reduce from 10.29 feet in the Rio Hondo Channel to 10.18 feet (Willdan 2003). Thus, the project flood flow would remain within the Rio Hondo Channel after the proposed project is enacted. Since the existing catch basins can handle the proposed bridge's runoff and the project flood flow would remain contained within the Rio Hondo Channel, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact to the site's drainage patterns and would not result in on or off -site flooding. VIII(e). Less than Significant Impact: The proposed project involves the replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. This action could change the drainage patterns and surface water runoff from the project site. Section VIII(d) of this report explains that these changes would not exceed the capacity of existing stormwater drainage systems. Similarly, Section VIII(c) explains that the project would have a less than significant impact from polluted runoff. VIII(f). No Impact: The proposed project involves the replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The proposed facility would not be a point -source generator of water pollutants. Potential water pollutants that could be released from the project site include runoff induced sediment and siltation and accidental release of vehicle or equipment fluids. These potential water pollutants are addressed in Sections VIII(a), VIII(c), and VIII(d) of this report. The project would wound not otherwise substantially degrade water quality and would have no associated impacts. VIII(g). No Impact: The proposed project involves the replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. This project does not involve placing housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area and would have no associated impacts. VIII(h). Less than Significant Impact: The proposed project involves the replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The Rio Hondo Channel is a flood control facility and the base flood is contained within its levees. The proposed project involves the demolition of the exiting Garvey Avenue Bridge's piers in the Rio Hondo Channel and the placement of new piers within the channel. However, the existing bridge includes six (6) piers in the Rio Hondo Channel and the proposed bridge includes only three (3). Consequently, the proposed project would reduce the hydraulic dept of the project flood flow volume at the Inside Bridge Upstream from 10.29 feet in the Rio Hondo Channel to 10.18 feet (Willdan 2003). Thus, the Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 34 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration project flood flow would remain within the Rio Hondo Channel after the proposed project is enacted. Therefore, the project would have a less than significant impact from placing structures in a flood flow area. VIII(i). No Impact: The proposed project involves the replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The project would have no direct or indirect impacts to dam. The project does, however, involve work to the concrete levees of the Rio Hondo Channel. All work involving the levees of the Rio Hondo Channel will be conducted at the approval of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE) and in accordance with USACE design standards. Thus, the proposed project would not reduce the structural capacity of the levees of the Rio Hondo Channel. In addition, the proposed project design, as discussed in Section VIII(h) of this report, would increase the capacity of channel. Therefore, the proposed project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam, and would have no associated impacts. Villa). No Impact: The City is approximately 23 miles from the Pacific Ocean. In addition, the project site is not within the potential flood area of Whittier Narrows, and not within a potential liquefaction area (City of Rosemead General Plan, Figure PS -1). Therefore, the project would have no impact from potential tsunami, seiche, or mudflow. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IX(a). No Impact: The proposed project involves the replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. This action would not impose any physical barriers or any additional traffic to the surrounding communities. In addition, the proposed bridge would increase the width of the sidewalks on the bridge from three (3) feet to eight (8) feet, which would allow for easier pedestrian movement between the Cities of Rosemead and South El Monte. Therefore, the project would not divide an established community and would have no impact in this regard. IX(b). No Impact: The proposed project would replace the existing Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The proposed replacement bridge would be constructed entirely within the existing right -of -way. In addition, the accesses to the surrounding parcels would not be closed as a result of this project, either permanently or during Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 35 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than IX LAND USE AND PLANNING Significant with Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project., ❑ ❑ ❑ 17f IJ a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific ❑ 17r plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) L� 1 adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? . E] ❑ ❑ C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: IX(a). No Impact: The proposed project involves the replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. This action would not impose any physical barriers or any additional traffic to the surrounding communities. In addition, the proposed bridge would increase the width of the sidewalks on the bridge from three (3) feet to eight (8) feet, which would allow for easier pedestrian movement between the Cities of Rosemead and South El Monte. Therefore, the project would not divide an established community and would have no impact in this regard. IX(b). No Impact: The proposed project would replace the existing Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The proposed replacement bridge would be constructed entirely within the existing right -of -way. In addition, the accesses to the surrounding parcels would not be closed as a result of this project, either permanently or during Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 35 6 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration construction. Thus, the proposed project would not alter the land use of the project site or any surrounding parcels. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation, and would have no impact in this regard. IX(c). No Impact: The City of Rosemead does not have any community conservation plans. In addition, project site is not within a habitat conservation plan. Therefore, the project would not conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan, and would have no impact in this regard. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: X(a). No Impact: The replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel would not involve grading into undisturbed subsurface materials. The majority of the construction of the replacement bridge would occur aboveground. The only subsurface work that would be conducted for the project would be the placement of piers and the preparation of roadway approaches. Subsurface work associated with the placement of piers would take place within the concrete lined channel; and subsurface work to prepare the roadway approaches would be minor grading of the existing roadway. Both of these subsurface activities would take place within engineered materials. Therefore, the proposed project would have no impact to mineral resources. X(b). No Impact: The General Plan of the City of Rosemead does not identify any known mineral resource sites; and the General Plan of the City of South El Monte states that there are no mineral resources to be conserved or reclaimed within the City. The project site is not known to contain any mineral resources. Therefore, the project would have no impact to a known or delineated mineral resource recovery site. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than X MINERAL RESOURCES Significant With Significant No Impact - Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: ❑ ❑ ❑ a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? ❑ 1:1 L1"7r I El b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other general Ian specific plan, or other land use Ian? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: X(a). No Impact: The replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel would not involve grading into undisturbed subsurface materials. The majority of the construction of the replacement bridge would occur aboveground. The only subsurface work that would be conducted for the project would be the placement of piers and the preparation of roadway approaches. Subsurface work associated with the placement of piers would take place within the concrete lined channel; and subsurface work to prepare the roadway approaches would be minor grading of the existing roadway. Both of these subsurface activities would take place within engineered materials. Therefore, the proposed project would have no impact to mineral resources. X(b). No Impact: The General Plan of the City of Rosemead does not identify any known mineral resource sites; and the General Plan of the City of South El Monte states that there are no mineral resources to be conserved or reclaimed within the City. The project site is not known to contain any mineral resources. Therefore, the project would have no impact to a known or delineated mineral resource recovery site. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 36 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than XI NOISE Significant With Significant No Impact - Impact Mitigation Impact . Incorporation Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan E] ❑ L1"7r I El or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? El E] r7 r E] b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground bome vibration or ground bome noise levels? El 1:1 U F-1 El c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? - Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 36 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Explanation of Checklist Judgments: XI(a). Less Than Significant Impact: The southwest quadrant of the project area contains a senior center with associated residences, which are the only sensitive noise receptors in the project area. These residents are receptors to the noise generated by traffic along Garvey Avenue. However, as discussed in Section XV of this report, the project would not generate any additional traffic, and would, consequently, not increase long -term ambient noise levels. Construction of the proposed bridge would have a temporary impact on ambient noise levels. Noise during construction could be generated by demolition activities, site preparation, and the operation of construction vehicles and equipment. Short-term noise generated by construction of the proposed project could exceed City standards for multi - family residential land uses. The City's noise standard for multi - family residential uses is 45 decibels (db) interior and 65 db exterior noise, as identified in Table N -1 of the City of Rosemead's General Plan. The senior center in the southwest quadrant of the project site includes multi - family residential uses and could be exposed to construction noise. However, the City of Rosemead Municipal Code Section 8.36.030 requires that, between the hours of 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM, exterior noise in the vicinity of a residential receptor shall not exceed 45 dBA for more than 30 minutes /hour, 50 dBA for 15 minutes /hour, 55 dBA for 5 minutes /hour, or 65 dBA for any length of time; and between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM, exterior noise shall not exceed 60 dBA for more than 30 minutes /hour, 65 dBA for 15 minutes /hour, 70 dBA for 5 minutes /hour, or 80 dBA for any length of time. Scheduling and equipment noise limits are expected to relieve the perceptions of excessive noise from this project and construction is not expected to exceed the City's Municipal Code requirements. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact from exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of established standards. XI(b). Less Than Significant Impact: Construction activities will include demolition of the existing bridge. The removal of five piers and installation of three new piers and the bridge structure are expected to result in ground -borne vibrations. Compliance with hours of operations will limit the time of impact. The nearest point of the project is approximately 220 feet from the nearest residential use, the senior center. Exposure of this facility to vibrations is expected, however, vibration is not included in the municipal noise control standards. Construction schedules are expected to curtail the periods of Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 37 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than XI NOISE Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient levels in the project vicinity above levels existing ❑ ❑. El without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the ❑ ❑ ❑ project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? ❑ - 1:1 El f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Explanation of Checklist Judgments: XI(a). Less Than Significant Impact: The southwest quadrant of the project area contains a senior center with associated residences, which are the only sensitive noise receptors in the project area. These residents are receptors to the noise generated by traffic along Garvey Avenue. However, as discussed in Section XV of this report, the project would not generate any additional traffic, and would, consequently, not increase long -term ambient noise levels. Construction of the proposed bridge would have a temporary impact on ambient noise levels. Noise during construction could be generated by demolition activities, site preparation, and the operation of construction vehicles and equipment. Short-term noise generated by construction of the proposed project could exceed City standards for multi - family residential land uses. The City's noise standard for multi - family residential uses is 45 decibels (db) interior and 65 db exterior noise, as identified in Table N -1 of the City of Rosemead's General Plan. The senior center in the southwest quadrant of the project site includes multi - family residential uses and could be exposed to construction noise. However, the City of Rosemead Municipal Code Section 8.36.030 requires that, between the hours of 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM, exterior noise in the vicinity of a residential receptor shall not exceed 45 dBA for more than 30 minutes /hour, 50 dBA for 15 minutes /hour, 55 dBA for 5 minutes /hour, or 65 dBA for any length of time; and between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM, exterior noise shall not exceed 60 dBA for more than 30 minutes /hour, 65 dBA for 15 minutes /hour, 70 dBA for 5 minutes /hour, or 80 dBA for any length of time. Scheduling and equipment noise limits are expected to relieve the perceptions of excessive noise from this project and construction is not expected to exceed the City's Municipal Code requirements. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact from exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of established standards. XI(b). Less Than Significant Impact: Construction activities will include demolition of the existing bridge. The removal of five piers and installation of three new piers and the bridge structure are expected to result in ground -borne vibrations. Compliance with hours of operations will limit the time of impact. The nearest point of the project is approximately 220 feet from the nearest residential use, the senior center. Exposure of this facility to vibrations is expected, however, vibration is not included in the municipal noise control standards. Construction schedules are expected to curtail the periods of Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 37 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration time that vibrations will occur to the degree possible, and the project would have a less than significant impact from vibrations. XI(c). No Impact: The proposed project would not increase vehicular travel lanes, and thus, would not generate any additional traffic or associated noise. The only increased noise generated from the proposed project would be construction noise, which would cease once development of the project is complete. Therefore, the proposed project would not cause a permanent increase in ambient noise levels and would have no associated impacts. XI(d). Less Than Significant Impact: Demolition of the existing bridge and construction of the new one will result in temporary increases in ambient noise levels, depending on the type of equipment and methods of demolition and construction used. Encroachment permits required for construction in the Rio Hondo Channel will allow staging of the work to be done within the channel, during the dry season, which will confine some operational noise to that area. Most adjacent property is industrial or commercial in nature, and the potential of the channel itself to carry noise further than the project area is not expected to result in significant increases in noise impacts to channel adjacent areas. Permitted hours for construction activities will also control general noise impacts on the senior center's residential uses. In addition, Municipal Code Section 8.36.030.A.7 provides an exception to noise standards for public work projects. This exception applies; however, noise control can be expected from placement of the staging area and from confining operations to the allowed hours. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact from temporary increases in ambient noise levels. XI(e). No Impact: The closest airport to the project site, public or private, is the El Monte Airport, located 2.25 miles to the northeast, and the project is not within the land use plan for this or any other airport. In addition, the proposed project does not involve the placement of any noise sensitive uses that could be exposed to air travel related noise. Therefore, the proposed project would not expose people to excessive airport generated noise, and would have no related impact. XI(f). No Impact: As noted above, the El Monte Airport is the closest public or private air travel facility to the project site. This airport is more than two (2) miles away from the project site and outside the area of potential concern for noise impact purposes. In addition, the proposed project does not involve the placement of any noise sensitive uses that could be exposed to air travel related noise. Therefore, the proposed project would not expose people to excessive private airstrip generated noise, and would have no related impact. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 38 . Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than XII POPULATION AND HOUSING Significant with Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the pmject a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and El businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension I of roads or other infrastructure)? Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 38 . Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration �r necessitating the construction of replacement housing Q elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ❑ El the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? LI Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XII(a). No Impact: The proposed project consists of the replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. This project does not involve the development of any new homes or businesses, and thus would not directly induce growth. In addition, the proposed project would replace an existing bridge without increasing the number of travel lanes, and would not extend any public utilities or services. Consequently, the proposed project would not induce any secondary growth. Therefore, the project would have no impact to population growth. XII(b -c). No Impact: The proposed project involves the on -site replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. All proposed development would remain within the existing right -of -way. Therefore, the project would not displace any residents and would have no associated impacts. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XIII(a -e). No Impact: The intensity of public services needed in a community is a factor of the number of residents and number of businesses within the community. The larger the community's population and the more people that visit the community the greater the need for support services. The proposed project involves the on -site replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. As discussed in Section XI of this report, this project would not induce any growth, either directly or indirectly. Therefore, the proposed project would have no impact to fire protection, police protection, schools, parks, libraries, or other support services. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 39 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than XIII PUBLIC SERVICES significant with significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporatio n Would the project: result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service rabos, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 1:1 ❑ ❑ C7f Q R1 il-/r a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? c) Schools? d) Parks? e) Other public facilities? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XIII(a -e). No Impact: The intensity of public services needed in a community is a factor of the number of residents and number of businesses within the community. The larger the community's population and the more people that visit the community the greater the need for support services. The proposed project involves the on -site replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. As discussed in Section XI of this report, this project would not induce any growth, either directly or indirectly. Therefore, the proposed project would have no impact to fire protection, police protection, schools, parks, libraries, or other support services. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 39 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XIV(a). No Impact: The proposed project involves the on -site replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. As discussed in Section XII of this report, this project would not induce any growth, either directly or indirectly. In addition, the project would not alter traffic patterns and would not increase the accessibility of any recreational facilities. Therefore, the project would not alter the use of any recreational facilities. XIV(b). Less than Significant Impact: The project site includes two recreational facilities, an equestrian trail and the Rio Hondo Bicycle Trail. The existing equestrian trail is a partially asphalt, partially earthen facility that ranges from eight (8) to twelve (12) feet in width. The trail is approximately 15 miles long stretching from Peck Road Park, near the northern border of the City of El Monte, to the channel's confluence with the Los Angeles River in the City of South Gate. The equestrian trail currently crosses under the Garvey Avenue roadway bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The trail's maximum overhead clearance of this crossing is approximately ten (10) feet, which is substandard for equestrian purposes. The equestrian trail will be replaced as part of the Garvey Avenue Bridge Replacement Project. The City of Rosemead met with the Los Angeles County Department of Parks and Recreation ( LACDPR) on November 06, 2002 to discuss the requirements and alternatives for the trail's replacement. The proposed replacement equestrian trail will be located within the channel passing under the new bridge structure. The proposed trail will meet LACDPR standards, which include a 12 -foot wide trail with a 2% cross fall and 15% longitudinal slopes if less than 300 feet in length, otherwise 10% longitudinal slope. Construction of the proposed bridge project would have temporary impacts to the equestrian trail. The trail under crossing of the Garvey Avenue Bridge would be closed during project construction, which is expected to last approximately 18 months. It should be noted that temporary impacts to the existing equestrian trail are negligible due to existing substandard trail conditions, and consequentially, infrequent use of the trail. The Rio Hondo Bicycle Trail also traverses the project site, passing under the existing Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The trail runs along the western edge of the Rio Hondo Channel, from Peck Road Park near the northern border of the City of El Monte to the channel's confluence with the Los Angeles River in the City of South Gate. At its northern termini the Rio Hondo River Trail connects to the Santa Anita Wash Trail; and at its southern termini the Rio Hondo River Trail connects to the Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 40 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than XIV RECREATION Significant With Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Would the project increase the use of existing . neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational ❑ ❑ ❑ facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities ❑ 17r IJ which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XIV(a). No Impact: The proposed project involves the on -site replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. As discussed in Section XII of this report, this project would not induce any growth, either directly or indirectly. In addition, the project would not alter traffic patterns and would not increase the accessibility of any recreational facilities. Therefore, the project would not alter the use of any recreational facilities. XIV(b). Less than Significant Impact: The project site includes two recreational facilities, an equestrian trail and the Rio Hondo Bicycle Trail. The existing equestrian trail is a partially asphalt, partially earthen facility that ranges from eight (8) to twelve (12) feet in width. The trail is approximately 15 miles long stretching from Peck Road Park, near the northern border of the City of El Monte, to the channel's confluence with the Los Angeles River in the City of South Gate. The equestrian trail currently crosses under the Garvey Avenue roadway bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The trail's maximum overhead clearance of this crossing is approximately ten (10) feet, which is substandard for equestrian purposes. The equestrian trail will be replaced as part of the Garvey Avenue Bridge Replacement Project. The City of Rosemead met with the Los Angeles County Department of Parks and Recreation ( LACDPR) on November 06, 2002 to discuss the requirements and alternatives for the trail's replacement. The proposed replacement equestrian trail will be located within the channel passing under the new bridge structure. The proposed trail will meet LACDPR standards, which include a 12 -foot wide trail with a 2% cross fall and 15% longitudinal slopes if less than 300 feet in length, otherwise 10% longitudinal slope. Construction of the proposed bridge project would have temporary impacts to the equestrian trail. The trail under crossing of the Garvey Avenue Bridge would be closed during project construction, which is expected to last approximately 18 months. It should be noted that temporary impacts to the existing equestrian trail are negligible due to existing substandard trail conditions, and consequentially, infrequent use of the trail. The Rio Hondo Bicycle Trail also traverses the project site, passing under the existing Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The trail runs along the western edge of the Rio Hondo Channel, from Peck Road Park near the northern border of the City of El Monte to the channel's confluence with the Los Angeles River in the City of South Gate. At its northern termini the Rio Hondo River Trail connects to the Santa Anita Wash Trail; and at its southern termini the Rio Hondo River Trail connects to the Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 40 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Los Angeles River Trail. All three trails are multiple -use trails, mainly used by bicyclists, hikers, and equestrians. Combined, the three trails form a contiguous multi -use trail from the forest trails of the Angeles National Forest near the Cities of Sierra Madre and Monrovia to the mouth of the Los Angeles River at the Pacific Ocean near the Port of Long Beach. The Rio Hondo River Trail is located on land owned by the U.S. ACE and managed by the Los Angeles County Department of Parks and Recreation. The Rio Hondo River Trail passes under the existing Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. Consequently, the proposed project involves demolishing and replacing 860 linear feet of the existing trail. The replacement trail would meet or exceed the functional value of the existing trail. The replacement trail would connect to the existing trail along the eastern levee of the Rio Hondo Channel, slope down the side of the channel, cross under the proposed bridge, and then slope back up the side of the channel to reconnect to the existing bicycle trail. The replacement trail would be 15 feet wide and provide at least 12 feet of clearance under the proposed bridge. The steepest grade the replacement trial would be is 5.18 %, which is shallower than existing trail's slope. All proposed dimensions meet or exceed Los Angeles County Department of Parks and Recreation standards. The construction of the proposed project would require the trail's under passing of the Garvey Avenue Bridge to be closed for approximately 18 months. The length of trail to be closed is 1000 feet. Mitigation Measure XIV -1 would reduce the temporary impacts to the Rio Hondo Bicycle Trail. Since the project would have no permanent negative impacts to the two recreational facilities in the project area and Mitigation Measure XIV -1 would reduce temporary impacts, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact to recreational facilities with incorporation of mitigation measures. Mitigation Measure XIV -1: To reduce impacts of the temporary trial closing, the City of Rosemead shall detour the users of the Rio Hondo Bicycle Trail. The City shall clearly mark the trail "temporarily closed" at the closest upstream and downstream trail access points, and users of the trail will be directed off the trail onto surface streets. In addition, a detour map shall be placed at the closest upstream and downstream trail access points. The detour map shall identify the trail, the portion of the trail closed, the local roadway network, and trail access points. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 41 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than XV TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC significant with significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial Increase in ❑ Q either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or con estion at intersections)? ❑ 13 El b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or hi hwa s? ❑ 1:1 ❑ Q c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 41 6 1 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves -or dangerous intersections) or ❑ incompatible uses e.., farm equipment)? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ r/r 1 :1 E] Q Result in inadequate emergency access? Result In inadequate parking capacity? Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, ❑ ❑ ❑ Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XV(a). Less than Significant Impact: The proposed. project consists of the replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The proposed project would not change the number of traffic lanes or the capacity of the roadway. The existing roadway bridge consists of four traffic lanes a striped median and no shoulders. The proposed bridge consists of a 10 -foot center median, four 11 -foot traffic lanes and one 11 -foot shoulder at each side. This action would improve vehicular and pedestrian safety by improving the bride's geometry and increase its ability to withstand seismic activity. The proposed project would not permanently generate any traffic and would have no related impacts. During development of the proposed project, construction workers and equipment would be additional vehicles on the local roadway network. The addition of construction related vehicles would be temporary and would cease with the completion of construction, which is anticipated to last 18 months. Furthermore, the number of construction related vehicles would be negligible compared to the average daily traffic of Garvey Avenue, which is 26,000 vehicles. Consequently, the temporary addition of construction related vehicles during project development is a less than significant impact. XV(b). Less than Significant Impact: The proposed project consists of the replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The proposed project would not change the number of traffic lanes or the capacity of the roadway. The existing roadway bridge consists of four traffic lanes a striped median and no shoulders.' The proposed bridge consists of a 10 -foot center median, four 11 -foot traffic lanes and one 11 -foot shoulder at each side. Consequently, the proposed project would have no permanent impact on traffic and circulation patterns and would not impact the levels of service of any roadways. During construction of the project, however, the number of through traffic lanes would be reduced from two in each direction to one in each direction. The City of Rosemead proposes to construct the, replacement bridge in two phases. The first phase would develop the outside lanes of the replacement bridge. During this time, one traffic lane in each direction would be maintained by diverting vehicular traffic to the two inside lanes of the existing bridge. The second phase of construction would develop the inside lanes of the replacement bridge. During this phase, one traffic lane in each direction would be maintained by diverting vehicular traffic to the newly constructed outside lanes. Reducing Garvey Avenue from two to one traffic lane in each direction would reduce its level of service. However, the reduction of traffic lanes is temporary and Garvey Avenue would return to its current level of service upon project completion. Total construction of Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 42 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration the proposed Garvey Avenue Bridge is estimated to take 18 months to complete. Reducing Garvey Avenue from two to one vehicular traffic lane in each direction for approximately 18 months would be a less than significant impact to the levels of service of the local roadway network. XV(c). No Impact: The proposed project consists of the replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel and does not involve the development of residences, businesses, or industry. Thus, the proposed project would not induce growth or the need for air travel. Additionally, the proposed project would not affect air travel patterns since the nearest airport, the El Monte Airport, is 2.75 miles northeast of the project site. Therefore, the project would have no impact to air travel. XV(d). No Impact: The proposed project consists of the replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The existing bridge is a traffic and pedestrian hazard. The bridge is a bottleneck - its width is only two thirds the width of the approach roadways. In addition, the bridge does not have shoulders, and since the sidewalks are only three (3) feet wide, the bridge places pedestrians dangerously close to vehicular traffic. After investigation, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) deemed the bridge structurally deficient, and it was, therefore, placed on Caltrans' Eligible Bridge List (EBL), since its sufficiency rating is 46.6. The proposed project would eliminate these hazardous conditions. The proposed bridge would have a 10 -foot center median, four 11 -foot traffic lanes, 11 -foot shoulders, and 8 -foot sidewalks. In addition, the proposed replacement bridge is designed to meet local and state seismic standards. The proposed project would have a beneficial impact on vehicular and pedestrian safety by improving the bridge's geometry and increasing its ability to withstand seismic activity.. Since the project proposes the onsite replacement of an existing bridge that is compatible with surrounding uses, the proposed project would not be an incompatible use. Therefore, the proposed project does not increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible use, and would have no associated impacts. XV(e). Less than Significant Impact: The proposed project involves replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. Garvey Avenue is an evacuation route for the City of Rosemead, as shown on Figure PS -2 of the City's General Plan. However, as discussed in Section XV of this document, the proposed bridge would be constructed in phases and Garvey Avenue would remain open to vehicular traffic during construction. Therefore, although construction would take place on an evacuation route, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact because the roadway would remain open. XV(f). No Impact: The proposed project involves replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The bridge and roadway involved in this project does not currently provide any parking opportunities. Consequently, the proposed project would have not affect parking, would not result in inadequate parking capacity, and would have no related impacts. XV(g). No Impact: The proposed project site is a vehicular transportation facility and is recognized as such in all appropriate policies and plans. The proposed project would replace this transportation facility with a facility of identical capacity. The only alternative transportation facilities present onsite are the Los Angeles County Department of Parks Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 43 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration and Recreation ( LACDPR) bicycle and equestrian trails along the levees of the Rio Hondo Channel. As discussed in Section XIV of this report, the proposed project would replace the exiting trails, in a manner that is consistent with LACDPR policies. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation, and would have no associated impacts. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVI(a). No Impact: The proposed project consists of the on -site replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. This action would not alter wastewater generation. Therefore, the proposed project would not exceed the wastewater treatment requirements of the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board, and would have no associated impacts. XVI(b). No Impact: The proposed project consists of the on -site replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. This action would not increase the need for water supply and would not alter wastewater generation. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in the need for the construction of or expansion of water or wastewater treatment facilities, and would have no associated impacts. XVI(c). No Impact: The proposed project consists of the on -site replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The replacement bridge and its approach roadways would be wider than the existing facilities; hence, the project would create some additional impervious surfaces. However, the existing catch basins that collect the existing bridge's runoff are adequately sized to handle storm water generated from the proposed project. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 44 Less Than XVI UTILITIES AND SERVICE Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact SYSTEMS Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Would the project. ❑ ❑ ❑ a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing E] ❑ I'7f IJ facilities, the construction of which could cause .. significant environmental effects? C) - Require or result in the construction of new stone water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the ❑ -17r IJ construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? ❑ 1:1 E] d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected El 1:1 demand in addition to the providers - existing commitments? El 1:1 1:1 f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? ❑ ❑ E] r7r IJ g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVI(a). No Impact: The proposed project consists of the on -site replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. This action would not alter wastewater generation. Therefore, the proposed project would not exceed the wastewater treatment requirements of the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board, and would have no associated impacts. XVI(b). No Impact: The proposed project consists of the on -site replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. This action would not increase the need for water supply and would not alter wastewater generation. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in the need for the construction of or expansion of water or wastewater treatment facilities, and would have no associated impacts. XVI(c). No Impact: The proposed project consists of the on -site replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The replacement bridge and its approach roadways would be wider than the existing facilities; hence, the project would create some additional impervious surfaces. However, the existing catch basins that collect the existing bridge's runoff are adequately sized to handle storm water generated from the proposed project. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 44 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration XVI(d). No Impact: The proposed project consists of the on -site replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. As discussed in Section XII, this action would not directly or indirectly cause growth. Therefore, the project would not increase the need for water supply, and would have no associated impacts. XVI(e). No Impact: The proposed project consists of the on -site replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. As discussed in Section XII, this action would not directly or indirectly cause growth. Therefore, the project would not affect the capacity of any wastewater treatment facilities, and would have no associated impacts. XVI(f). No Impact: The proposed project consists of the on -site replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. As discussed in Section XII, this action would not directly or indirectly cause growth. Therefore, the project would not induce any generators of solid waste, and would have no associate impacts. XVI(g). No Impact: Disposal of waste materials generated during construction will comply with all local, state, and federal requirements for integrated waste management (e.g., recycling, green waste) and solid waste disposal. Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVII(a). No Impact: As discussed in Sections IV and V of this report, the project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 45 - Less Than - XVII MANDATORY FINDINGS OF Potentially significant Less Than Significant Significant nt No Impact SIGNIFICANCE Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Does the project: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, ❑ ❑ ❑ reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? rCumulatively considerable' means that the incremental effects of a ❑ ❑ IJ 0 project are considerable when viewed in connection with . the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) ❑ ' ❑ ❑ c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Explanation of Checklist Judgements: XVII(a). No Impact: As discussed in Sections IV and V of this report, the project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 45 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration XVII(b). Less than Significant Impact: Table XVII -t: Potential Project Impacts and Cumulative Affects of the Proposed Project Resource Potential Project Impacts Level of Significance Cumulative Affect of the Proposed Project I. Aesthetics Views of the bridge would be altered Less than Significant No Cumulative Impact Streetlights on he proposed bridge Less than Significant No Cumulative Impact would be a new source of light II. Agricultural None No Impact No Cumulative Impact Resources III. Air Quality Construction induced traffic could create Less than Significant Less than Significant a temporary CO hots 22t Construction would emit fugitive dust Less than Significant Less than Sig nificant IV. Biological Placement of piers would encroach Less than Significant Less than Significant Resources upon 'Waters of the United States' and CDFG'urisdictional streambed Temporary impacts to cliff swallow Less than Significant Less than Significant nestin habitat V. Cultural None No Impact No Cumulative Impact Resources VI. Geology and The proposed project would be exposed Less than Significant No Cumulative Impact Soils to a base earthquake magnitude as 7.25 + / -0.25 and a base ground acceleration of 0.6 g. The proposed project would be exposed Less than Significant No Cumulative Impact to a slight potential for liquefaction The proposed project could increase the Less than Significant No Cumulative Impact soil erosion potential of the project site durinq construction VII. Hazards and Potential for accidental spillage of Less than Significant No Cumulative Impact Hazardous construction equipment fluids Materials Existence of lead -based paint on Less than Significant No Cumulative Impact portions of the existing ro'ect bridge Construction on an identified evacuation Less than Significant No Cumulative Impact route VIII. Hydrology and Potential for accidental spillage of Less than Significant Less than Significant Water Quality construction equipment fluids, which could contaminate water Potential increase the soil erosion Less than Significant Less than Significant potential of the project site during construction, which could contaminate water Potential minimal increase in Less than Significant Less than Significant impermeable surfaces on the project site that could Increase runoff and sediment load from the project site Potential minimal changes to drainage Less than Significant Less than Significant patterns and surface water runoff from the project site The proposed project Involves Less than Significant Less than Significant replacement of piers within the base flood lain IX. Land Use and None No Impact No Cumulative Impact Planning X. Mineral None No Impact No Cumulative Impact Resources XI. Noise Temporary noise generation from Less than Significant No Cumulative Impact construction activities XI I. Population and None No Impact No Cumulative Impact Housing All. Public Services None No Impact No Cumulative Impact XIV. Recreation Temporary closure of a portion of the Less than Significant No Impact Rio Hondo Bicycle Trail Garvey Avenue Bridge Over June 2003 the Rio Hondo Channel Page 46 6 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration XV. Transportation Construction vehicles would be added to Less than Significant Less than Significant and Traffic the local roadway network during project development During project construction the number Less than Significant Less than Significant of through traffic lanes along the Involved bridge would be reduced from two in each direction to one in each direction Construction on an identified evacuation Less than Significant No Cumulative Impact route XVI. utilities and None No Impact No Cumulative Impact Services As shown in Table XVII -1, all potential project impacts are less than significant. Many of these impacts would not contribute to cumulative impacts. Those impacts that may contribute cumulative impacts are minimal and less than significant. Therefore, the proposed project has a less than significant impact to resources when considered in conjunction the cumulative impacts of past and current projects. XVII(c). No Impact: As discussed in Sections VI does not have environmental effects which human beings, either directly or indirectly. Garvey Avenue Bridge Over the Rio Hondo Channel and VII of this report, the proposed project will cause substantial adverse effects on June 2003 Page 47 Appendix A Initial Site Assessment Checklist Willdan, September 2002 ' Initial Site Assessment (ISA) Checklist Project Information District 07 County LA Route -- Kilometer Post (Post Mile) - - -- EA — Description The project consists of the replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel in the City of Rosemead, California. The existing bridge was built in 1936 and consists of continuous concrete tee beams over nine, 67 -foot and two, 26 -foot spans. The bridge is approximately 655 feet long and approximately 52 feet wide. The approach roadway width is 78 feet and the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of Garvey Avenue is 26,000 vehicles. Is the project on the HW Study Minimal -Risk Projects List (HW 1)? No Project Manager Adel Freii phone # (562) 908 -6262 Project Engineer Peter Liu phone # (714) 940 -6324 Proiect Screening Attach the project location map to this checklist to show location of all know and/or potential HW sites identified. 1. Project Features: New R/W? No Excavation? Yes Railroad Involvement? No Structure demolition/modification? Yes Subsurface utility relocation? No 2. Project Setting: Rural or Urban Urban Current land uses Existinn street Adjacent land uses Commercial residential light industrial (industrial, light industry, commercial, agricultural, residential, etc.) 3. Check federal, State, and local environmental and health regulatory agency records as necessary, to see if any ]mown hazardous waste site is in or near the project area. If a known site is identified, show its location on the attached map and attach additional sheets, as needed, to provide pertinent information for the proposed project: There are no known hazardous waste sites that will be impacted by the project There is a RCRA generator site approximately o 12 miles southwest of the project but it does not appear this will have any impact on the project. 4. Conduct Field Inspection. Date 9/19/02 Use the attached map to locate potential or known HW sites. STORAGE STRUCTURES / PIPELINES: Underground tanks None Surface tanks None Sumps Ponds None Drums None Basins None Transformers None Landfill None Other None Initial Site Assessment (ISA) Checklist (continued) CONTAMINATION: (spills, leaks, illegal dumping, etc.) Surface staining None Oil sheen None Odors None Vegetation damage None Other None HAzARDOus MATERIALS: (asbestos, lead, etc.) Buildings None Spray -on fireproofing None Pipe wrap Friable tile Acoustical plaster None Serpentine Paint [IATSi 5. Additional record search, as necessary, of subsequent land uses that could have resulted in a hazardous waste site. Use the attached map to show the location of potential hazardous waste sites. 6. Other comments and/or observations: ISA Determination Does the project have potential hazardous waste involvement? No If there is known or potential hazardous waste involvement, is additional ISA work needed before task orders can be prepared for the Investigation? NA If "YES," explain; then give an estimate of additional time required: NA A brief memo should be prepared to transmit the ISA conclusions to the Project Manager and Project Engineer. ISA Conducted by: �iy'►xd Date: 9/20/02 Ken Steele e TRACK >INFO SERVICE.% LLC Environmental FirstSearch TM Report TARGET PROPERTY: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL ROSEMEAD CA 91770 Job Number: GARVEY PREPARED FOR: Willdan Associates 27042 Towne Centre Dr. Foothill Ranch, CA 92610 09 -18 -02 FI I y. Tel: (619) 562 -4842 Fax: (619) 562 -4844 Environmental FirstSearch Search Summary Report Target Site: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL ROSEMEAD CA 91770 FirstSearch Summary Database Sel Updated Radius Site 1/8 1/4 1/2 1/2A ZIP TOTALS NPL Y 05 -08 -02 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CERCLIS Y 05 -08 -02 0.50 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 RCRA TSD Y 06 -08 -02 0.50 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 RCRA COR Y 06 -08 -02 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RCRA GEN Y 06 -08 -02 0.25 0 1 9 - - 0 10 RCRA NLR Y 06 -08 -02 0.12 0 0 - 0 0 ERNS Y 12 -31 -01 0.12 0 1 - - - 1 2 State Sites Y 10 -25-00 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spills -1990 Y 01 -15 -02 0.12 0 0 - - 0 0 SWL Y 08 -06 -02 0.50 0 0 0 0 - 1 1 Permits Y 12 -I1 -01 0.12 0 0 - - - 0 0 Other Y 01 -11 -01 0.12 0 0 - 0 0 REG UST /AST Y 08 -13 -02 0.25 0 0 6 - 0 6 Leaking UST Y 07 -11 -02 0.50 0 1 3 5 - 0 9 - TOTALS- 0 3 18 5 0 2 28 Notice of Disclaimer )ue to the limitations, constraints, inaccuracies and incompleteness of government information and computer mapping data cimen ly available to TRACK Info iervic es, certain conventions have been utilized in preparing the locations of all federal, stab and local agency sibs residing in TRACK Info services' Iatabases. All EPA NPL and state Iardni l sites are depicted try a rectangle approdmatng Moir location and s ®. The boundaries d the recbngles represent he eastern and western most longitudes; the northern and southern most latitudes. As such, the mapped areas may exceed Me actual areas and do not epresent the actual boundaries of these properties. All other sites are depicted by a point representing their apprommate address location and make no attempt o represent the actual areas of the associated property. Actual boundaries and locations of individual properties can be found in the files residing at the agency asponsiWe for such irdormation. Waiver of Liability Although TRACK Info Services uses its bast efforts M research the actual location of each site, TRACK Info Services does not and can not warrant the accuracy at these sites with regard to elect location and size. All authorized users of TRACK Info Sarvioes'services proceeding are signifying an understanding of TRACK Into Services' searching and mapping conventions, and agree to waive any and all liability claims associated with search and map results showing incomplete and or inaccurate site locations. I Environmental FirstSearch Site Information Report Request Date: 09 -18 -02 Search Type: COORD Requestor Name: Willdan - Job Number: GARVEY Standard: ASTM Sel Filtered Report TARGET ADDRESS: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL ROSEMEAD CA 91770 Demographics Sites: 28 Non - Geocoded: 2 Population: NA Radon: NA Site Location Degrees (Decimal) Degrees (Min/Sec) UTMs Longitude: - 118.068819 - 118:4:8 Easting: 401365.126 Latitude: 34.062734 34:3:46 Northing: 3769432.504 Zone: 11 Comment Comment:GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL Additional Requests /Services Adjacent ZIP Codes: 1 Mile(s) Services: ZIP Cade City Name ST DisMr Sel Requested? Date 91731 EL MONTE CA 0.16 NE 91733 SOUTH EL MONTE CA 0.01 SE Y Y SanbOrns NO 09 -18.02 Aerial Photographs No 09 -18-02 Topographical Maps No 09 -18-02 City Directories No 09 -18-02 Title Search No 09 -18-02 Municipal Reports No 09 -18 -02 Online Topos No 09 -18-02 Environmental FirstSearch Sites Summary Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL TOTAL: 28 GEOCODED: 26 NON GEOCODED: 2 SELECTED: 0 ID DB Type Site Name/1D /Status Address DisVDtr Map ID 18 LUST BEN CHERNICK 2737 LEE AVE 0.10 SE 20 . I- 14400 1CASE CLOSED EL MONTE CA 91733 11 ERNS HARBOR SEAL 2755 LEE AVENUE 0.10 SE 12 205146/FLCED FACILITY SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 3 RCRAGN BLUETONE MUFFLER CO 9118 GARVEY AVE 0.12SW 3 CAD009659277/SGN ROSEMEAD CA 91770 2 RCRAGN BIRKESTRAND CO 2705 LEE AVE 0.13 SE 2 CAD982488611/SGN LOS ANGELES CA 91733 5 RCRAGN CHEVRON STATION 93516 2750 ROSEMEAD BLVD 0.17 NE 5 CAD983624701 /SGN SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 13 UST KARLS AUTO DETAILING 2750 ROSEMEAD 0.17 NE - 5 1ISIDSTATE22780 / ACTVE SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 8 RCRAGN K& K BODY & PAINT 9057 E GARVEY 0.19 N W 9 CAD9820506351SGN ROSEMEAD CA 91770 12 UST 1 M CARPET CO 9050 GARVEY 020 SW 15 TISID- STATF22589 1ACTIVE ROSEMEAD CA 92671 9 RCRAGN LA TRIM INC 2638 LEE AVE 021 SE 10 CAD9835841I I /SGN SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 25 LUST MOBIL #11 -MW 9401 GARVEY AVE E 0.22 NE 18 1- 01946/CASE CLOSED SOUTH FL MONTE CA 91733 15 UST MOBIL OIL CORP S/S#18 -MWJ 9401 EGARVEY AVE 0.22 NE 18 LAC0001871 SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 16 UST MOBIL OIL CORP SS I IMWJ 9401 GARVEY 022 NE 18 TIS1D- STATE22561 /ACTIVE EL MONTE CA 91505 20 LUST CHEVRON k20 -6008 (FORMER) 9420 GARVEY AVE 023 NE 22 R-04640 /CASE CLOSED SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 6 RCRAGN D T GRAPHICS 2621 LEE AVE 0.23 SE 6 CA0000134809 /SGN SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 7 RCRAGN FRANK AND SMITH MASONRY 2639 TROY AVE 0.23 SE 8 CAR000065813 /SGN S EL MONTE CA 91733 14 UST MC WHIRTER REAL ESTATE CO 9432 EGARVEY AVE - 0.24 NE 17 LAC0011413 SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 24 LUST MCWHIRTER TEXACO.S.S.(FORMER) 9432 GARVEY AVEE 0.24 NE 17 1- 11450 /REMEDIATION PLAN EL MONTE CA 91731 17 UST SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO 3208 ROSEMEAD 6.24 NE 19 TLSID- STATE24239 /ACTIVE EL MONTE CA 91731 4 RCRAGN BOZUNG J A CO 9401 WHITMORE 025 NE 4 CAD009520081/SGN EL MONTE CA 91731 10 RCRAGN SO CA GAS CO ROSEMEAD SPNGS FACM 9407 WHITMORE AVE 0.25 NE 11 CAD981664931/SGN EL MONTE CA 91731 Environmental FirstSearch Sites Summary Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL TOTAL: 28 GEOCODED: 26 NON GEOCODED: 2 SELECTED: 0 ID DB Type Site Name/ID /Status Address Dist/D r Map ID I RCRAGN AAMEC CORP 2611 ROSEMEAD BLVD 025 SE l CAD009660226/SGN SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 21 LUST IRISH CONSTRUCTION CO 2641 RIVER AVEN 028 SW 14 "5495/POLLURON CHARACTERI ROSEMEAD CA 91770 26 LUST RUSSELL TRANSPORTATION INC. 2713 RIVER AVE N 030 SW 7 917700016/POLLUTION CHARACTERI ROSEMEAD CA 91770 19 LUST CHAMP CORP. 2500 ROSEMEAD BLVD N 035 SE 21 1- 094301CASE CLOSED SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 22 LUST IRISH CONSTRUCTION CO. 2649 STINGLE AVE 0.40 SW 13 1- 14349 /REMEDIAL ACTION ROSEMEAD CA 91770 23 LUST MARGE WARNER 2459 LEE AVE N 0.43 SE - 16 I -23117 /CASE CLOSED SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 Environmental FirstSearch Sites Summary Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL TOTAL: 28 GEOCODED: 26 NON GEOCODED: 2 SELECTED: 0 ID DB Type Site Name/ID /Status Address Dist/Dir Map 1D 28 SWL CALTRANS- ROSEMEAD E OF ROSEMEAD BTW GARVEY &? NON GC W MUD4 190174NUR ROSEMEAD CA 27 ERNS UNKNOWN DURFEE RD NORTH OF GARVEY AVE NON GC 305289 /HIGHWAY RELATED EL MONTE CA 91733 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH ID: 18 DIST /D1R: 0.10 SE MAP ID: 20 NAME: BENCHEENICK REV: 06/31/01 ADDRESS: 2737 LEE AVE IDI: 1- 14400 EL MONTE CA 91733 ID2: LOS ANGELES STATUS: CASECLOSED CONTACT: PHONE: RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that.some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred dating after the year 1000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: LOCAL AGENCY REGIONAL BOARD: 04 LOCAL CASE NUMBER RESPONSIBLE PARTY: BEN CHERMCK ADDRESS OF RESPONSIBLE PARTY: 801 GARFIELD AVE., S.', ALHAMBRA, 91801 SITE OPERATOR CHERNICK BEN WATERSYSTEM: CASE NUMBER I -14400 CASE TYPE: SOIL ONLY SUBSTANCE LEAKED: GASOLWE SUBSTANCE QUANTITY: LEAK CAUSE: UNKNOWN LEAK SOURCE: UNKNOWN HOW LEAK WAS DISCOVERED: TANKCLOSURE DATE DISCOVERED (blank if not reported): 21811990 HOW LEAK WAS STOPPED: CLOSE TANK STOP DATE (blank H not reported): 21811990 STATUS: CASE CLOSED ABATEMENT METHOD (please note that not all code translations have been provided by the reporting agency): ENFORCEMENT TYPE (please note that not all code translations have been provided by the reporting agency): 222 DATE OF ENFORCEMENT (blank H not reported): 11111965 ENTER DATE (blank If not reported): 41811990 REVIEW DATE (blank If not reported): 716/1992 DATE OF LEAK CONFIRMATION (blank if not reported): DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank H not reported): 912111988 DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN BEGAN (blank H not reported): 1012611989 DATE POLLUTION CHARACTERIZATION PLAN BEGAN (blank if not reported): DATE REMEDIATION PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank H not reported): DATE REMEDIAL. ACTION UNDERWAY (blank if not reported): DATE POST REMEDIAL ACTION MONITORING BEGAN (blank H not reported): DATE CLOSURE LETTER ISSUED (SITE CLOSED) (blank H not reported): 71611992 REPORT DATE (blank If not reported): 311411990 MINE DATA FROM THE I AFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD I T DATA13ASE MTBE DATE(Date of historical mavens, MTBE concentration): MTBE GROUNDWATER CONCENTRATION: MTBE SOIL CONCENTRATION: MTBE CMS: 0 MTBE FUEL: / MTBE TESTED: SITE NOT TESTED FOR MTBE INCLUDES UNKNOWNANDNOTANAL= MTBE CLASS: " Site Details Page - I Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL RCRA GENERATOR SITE EMERGENCY RESPONSE NOTIFICATION SITE SEARCH ID: 1 I DIST /D1R: 0.10 SE MAP H): 12 NAME: HARBORSEAL REV: 2/15/91 ADDRESS: 2755 LEE AVENUE IDl: 205146 SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 ID2: U72: LOS ANGELES STATUS: FIXED FACILITY CONTACT: PHONE: PHONE: DETAILS NOT AVAILABLE S(TEINFORMAT /ON RCRA GENERATOR SITE SEARCH ID: 3 DIST /D1R 0.12 SW MAP H): 3 NAME: BLUETONE MUFFLER CO REV: 818/02 ADDRESS: 9118 GARVEY AVE IDI: CAD009659277 ROSEMEAD CA 91770 U72: LOS ANGELES STATUS: SON CONTACT: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER PHONE: 2132801753 S(TEINFORMAT /ON CONTACT INFORMATION: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER ENVIRO MANAGER 9118 GARVEY AVE ROSEMEAD CA 91770 PHONE: 2132801753 UNIVERSE NAME: - SGN: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SIC INFORMATION; 3714 - MANUFACTURING - MOTOR VEHICLE PARTS AND ACCESSORIE ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: VIOLATION INFORMATION: Site Details Page - 2 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL Site Details Page - 3 RCRA GENERATOR SITE SEARCH ID: 2 DIST /DIR: 0.13 SE MAP 1D: 2 NAME: BIRKESI'RANDCO REV: 8/8102 ADDRESS: 2705 LEE AVE IDI: CAD982488611 EL MONTE CA 91733 ID2: LOS ANGELES STATUS: SGN CONTACT: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER PHONE: 8184436273 SITEW£ORMAT /ON CONTACT INFORMATION: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER ENVIRO MANAGER 2705 LEE ST LOS ANGELES CA 91733 PHONE: 8184436273 UNIVERSE CSR NAME: SON: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG /MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE . SIC INFORMATION: ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: VIO .ATION INFORMATION, - Site Details Page - 3 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL Site Details Page - 4 RCRA GENERATOR SITE SEARCH 1D: 5 DISUDIR: 0.17 NE MAP ID: 5 NAME: CHEVRON STATION 93516 REV: 8/8/02 ADDRESS: 2750 ROSEMEAD BLVD IDl: CAD983624701 EL MONTE CA 91733 ID2: LOS ANCFIES STATUS: SGN CONTACT: DESIREE CLOSS PHONE: 3106947452 SITE/NFORMATfON CONTACT INFORMATION: DESIREE CLASS ENV COMP ASST P 0 BOX 2833 LA HABRA CA 90632 PHONE: 3106947452 UNIVERSE NAME: SGN: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SIC INFORMATION: ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: VIOLATION INFORMATION: Site Details Page - 4 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH ID: 13 DIST /DIR: 0.17 NE MAP ID: 5 NAME: KARLS AUTO DETAILING REV: 01/01/94 ADDRESS: 2750 ROSEMEAD IDI: TISID- STATE22780 SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 ID2: Los Angeles STATUS: ACTIVE CONTACT: PHONE: DETAILS NOT AVAILABLE CAD982050635 Site Details Page - 5 RCRA GENERATOR SITE SEARCH ID: 8 DIST /DIR: 0.19 NW MAP ID: 9 NAME: K & K BODY & PAINT REV: 8/8102 ADDRESS: 9057 EGARVEY IDl: CAD982050635 ROSEMEAD CA 91770 I32: LOS ANGELES STATUS: SON CONTACT: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER PHONE: 8182886920 SITEINFORMATION CONTACTINFORMATION: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER ENVIRO MANAGER 9057 E GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 PHONE: 8182886920 UNIVERSE NAME: SGN: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG /MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SI NC NC I�eTIO ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: VIOLATION INFORMATION: Site Details Page - 5 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL Site Details Page - 6 REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH ID: 12 DIST /D1R: 0.20 SW MAP ID: 15 NAME: JMCARPET CO REV: 01/01/94 ADDRESS: 9050 GARVEY IDI: TISID- STATE22589 ROSEMEAD CA 92671 ID2: Los Angela STATUS: ACTIVE CONTACT: PHONE: DETAILS NOT AVAILABLE SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 Site Details Page - 6 RCRA GENERATOR SITE SEARCH ID: 9 DIST /DIR 0.21 SE MAP ID: 10 NAME: LA TRIM INC REV: 8/8102 ADDRESS: 2638 LEE AVE IDl: CAD983 5941 11 SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 ID2: LOS ANGELES STATUS: SGN CONTACT: RICARDO PACHECO PHONE: 8184425705 ' SITE INFORMATION CONTACT INFORMATION: RICARDO PACHECO ENVIRO MANAGER 2638 LEE AVE SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 PHONE: 8184425705 UNIVERSE NAME: SGN: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG /MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SIC INFORMATION: ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: VIOLATION INFORMATION: Site Details Page - 6 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH 1D: 25 DIST /DH3: 0.22 NE MAP 1D: 18 NAME: MOB1LH11 -MW REV: 06131/01 ADDRESS: 9401 GARVEY AVE E IDI: 1 -01946 SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 LD2: LOS ANGELES STATUS: CASE CLOSED CONTACT: PRONE: RELEASE _ _ T FROM TRRCALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUS71S database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred dating after the year 2000 may not have much injarmation. Field headers with blank information following aftershould be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: LOCALAGENCY REGIONAL BOARD: 04 LOCAL CASE NUMBER RESPONSIBLE PARTY: MOBIL OIL CORPORATION ADDRESS OF RESPONSIBLE PARTY: PO BOX 2112, 612 FLOWER ST, LOS ANGELES, CA 9005/ SITE OPERATOR WATERSYSTEM: CASE NUMBER 1-01946 CASE TYPE: SOIL ONLY SUBSTANCE LEAKED: GASOLWE SUBSTANCE QUANTITY: LEAK CAUSE: UNKNOWN LEAK SOURCE: UNKNOWN HOW LEAK WAS DISCOVERED: DATE DISCOVERED (blank If not reported): HOW LEAK WAS STOPPED: STOP DATE (blank If not reported): STATUS: CASE CLOSED ABATEMENT METHOD (please note that not all code translations have been provided by the reporting agency): ENFORCEMENT TYPE (please note that not all code translations have been provided by the reporting agency): DATE OF ENFORCEMENT (blank H not reported): ENTER DATE (blank if not reported): 1213111986 REVIEW DATE (blank H not reported): 21911995 DATE OF LEAK CONFIRMATION (blank H not reported): DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank if not reported): 1111511989 DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN BEGAN (blank H not reported): DATE POLLUTION CHARACTERIZATION PLAN BEGAN (blank if not reported): DATE REMEDIATION PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank H not reported): DATE REMEDIAL. ACTION UNDERWAY (blank If not reported): DATE POST REMEDIAL. ACTION MONITORING BEGAN (blank H not reported): DATE CLOSURE LETTER ISSUED (SITE CLOSED) (blank If not reported): 21911995 REPORT DATE (blank if not reported): 71811986 MTBE DATA FROM THE 1 1 N A SrATF, WATER RESOURCES COMR01, BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE MTBE DATE(Date of historical mssimum MTBE m tceatration): MTBE GROUNDWATER CONCENTRATION: MTBE SOIL CONCENTRATION: MTBE CNTS: 0 MTBE FUEL: I MTBE TESTED: SITE NOTTESTED FOR MTBE INCLUDES UNKNOWNANDNOTANALYZED MTBE CLASS: Site Details Page - 7 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH ID: 15 DIST /D1R: 0.22 NE MAP H): 18 NAME: MOBIL OIL CORP S/S N18 -MWJ ADDRESS: 9401 E GARVEY AVE SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 Los Angeles CONTACT: TANIGUCHLIACK REV: 10/04/00 HH: LAC0001871 ID2: THOMAS GUIDE: 0636J2 STATUS: SIDNEY CROSSLEY?EMPFSTEQUITT /INDIVIDUAL PHONE: 8184442712 According to the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works the following information is current as of 07102/02 Tax Ac xsson Parcel #/s: 8595 10191022 File Number. 001946 File Name: MOBIL OIL CORP S/S #18 -MWJ Property Owner Name & Type: SIDNEY CROSSLEY?EMPFSTEQUITT /INDIVIDUAL Property Owner Address: 2800 LAFAYETTE AVE #B NEWPORTBEACH, CA 92663 Tank Owner Name & Type: MOBIL OIL CORP/ CORPORA 77ON Tank Owner Address: EHS ANALYSTRM 208 3700 W 190771 ST TORRANCE, CA 90509 Tank Owner Phone: 31012124668 PERMIT INFORMATION 00001640A /TANK Permit Number & Category: 00000376A /TANK Permit Type & Date: ADD ADDITIONAL TANK 119860619 Permit Expiration Dale: 19910619 Permit Status: REM Fee Exempt: No Penalty Dateh: / Suspenclon Date & Reason: / PERMIT MIT NFiR INFORMATION Permit Number & Category: 00001640A /TANK Permit Type & Date: ADD ADDITIONAL TANK 119880629 Permit Expiration Date: 19930630 Permit Status: REM Fee Exempt No Penalty Date /s: / Suspenclon Date & Reason: / PERMIT MITF INFORMATION Permit Number & Category: 00001689T /TANK Permit Type & Date: TANK OPERA77NG PERMIT /19910812 Permit Expiration Date: 20020630 Permit Status: PERM Fee Exempt: No Penalty Batch: / Suspenclon Date & Reason: / PERMIT INFORMATION Permit Number & Category: 00004537B /TANK Permit Type & Date: CLOSURE BYREMOVAL / 19880629 Permit Expiration Date: 19930630 Permit Status: REM Fee Exempt: Yes Penalty Date /s: / Suspenclon Date & Reason: / - Continued on next page - Site Details Page - 8 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH H): 15 DIST /DIR: 0.22 NE NAME: MOBIL OIL CORP S/S #18 -MWJ ADDRESS: 9401 E GARVEY AVE SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 Los Angeles CONTACT: TANIGUCHI, JACK SPECIFIC TANK INFORMATION FOR TANK NUMBER: 00001 Unique Took Number: 000002543 Status: Permanent Installation Date: 19880619 Eahange Application Number & Date: 1 Owner Number: I Capacity: 0000010000 Content: Permanent MAP ID: 18 REV: 10 /04/00 IDl: LAC0001871 ID2: THOMAS GUIDE: 0636J2 STATUS: SIPHONED TO TANK# I PHONE: 8184442712 J Fad Type: REGULAR UNLEADED GASOLINE CAS Number. Product or Waste In Tank ( ?): PRODUCT Additional Notes & Information: Additional Notes & Information: SPECIFIC TANK INFORMATION FOR TANK NUMBER: 00002 Unique Tank Number: 000002544 Status: Permanent Installation Date: '19880629 Eshange Application Number & Date: / Owaer Number. 2 Capacity: 0000010000 Content: J Fad Type: REGULAR UNLEADED GASOLINE CAS Number: 000002546 Product or Waste in Took( ?): PRODUCT Additional Notes & aformation: SIPHONED TO TANK# I Additional Notes & Information: 1 SPECIFIC TANK INFORMATION FORT NKN FR 00003 Unique Tank Number: 000002545 Status: Permanent Installation Date: 19880629 Eabange Application Number & Date: 1 Owner Number: 3 Capacity: 0001010000 Content: J Fad Type: PREMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINE CAS Number: Product or Waste In Tank ( ?): - PRODUCT Additional Notes & information Additional Notes & Information SPECIFIC TANK INFORMATION FOR TANK NUMBER: 00004 Unique Tank Number: 000002546 Status: Permanent Insulation Date: 19880629 Exhange Application Number & Date: 1 Owner Number: 4 Capacity: 0000010000 - Continued on next page - Site Details Page - 9 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH 111: 15 DIST /DIR: 0.22 NE MAP ID: 18 NAME: MOBIL OIL CORP S/S 818&MWJ ADDRESS: 9401 E GARVEY AVE SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 Los Angeles CONTACT: TANIGUCHI, JACK Content. J Fvel Type: CAS Number: Product or Waste In Tank ( ?): Additional Notes & Information: Additional Notes & Information: REV: 10/04/00 IDI: LAC0001871 1132: THOMAS GUIDE: 063612 STATUS: 19880629 PHONE: 8184442712 MID -GRD UNLEADED GASOLINE PRODUCT SPECIFIC TANK INFORMATION FORTANK N .R 00005 Unique Tank Number: 000002547 Status: Permanent Installation Date: 19880629 Ezhange Application Number & Date: / Owner Number: 5 Capacity: 0000001000 Content: WASTE OIL J Fad Type: FUEL TYPE NOT IN TABLE CAS Number. 12035 Product or Waste In Tank( ?): WASTE Additional Notes & Information: Additional Notes & Information: Unique Tank Number. Status: Installation Date: Erhange Application Number & Date: Owner Number. Capacity: Content: J Fuel Type: CAS Number: Product or Waste in Tank ( ?): Additional Notes & Information: Additional Notes & Information &L 00006 000002548 Removed 19920514 0636 0000000285 WASTE 01L FUEL TYPE NOT IN TABLE 12035 WASTE SPECIFIC TANK INFORMATION FOR TANK NUMBER: 00007 Unique Tank Number: 000002549 Sans: Removed Installation Date: 19910514 Eibauge Application Number & Date: / Owner Number: 0637 Capacity: 0000007500 Content: J Fuel Type: PREMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINE CAS Number: Product or Waste in Tank ( ?): PRODUCT Additional Notes & Information: Additional Notes & Information: - Continued on nett page - Site Details Page -10 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE '& RIO HONDO CHANNEL REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH 11): 15 DISTIDHL• 0.22 NE MAP ID: 18 NAME: MOBIL OIL CORP S/S #18-MWJ REV: 10/04/00 ADDRESS: 9401 E GARVEY AVE IDI: LAC0001871 SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 ID2: THOMAS GUIDE: 063612 Los Angeles STATUS: CONTACT: TANIGUCHI, JACK PHONE: 8184442712 SPECIFIC TANK INFORMATION FORTANKNUMBER: Unique Tack Number: 00008 000002550 - Status; Removed Installation Rafe: 19920514 Erhange Application Number & Date: 1 Owner Number: .0638 Capacity: 0000007500 - Content: J Fuel Type: LEADED GASOLINE . CAS Number: Product or Waste in Tank ( ?): PRODUCT Additional Notes & Information: Additional Notes & Information: SPECIFIC TANK INFORMATION FOR TANK NUMBER: 00009 Unique TankNumber: 000002551. - Sbms; Removed Immila ton Date: 19920514 Eshange Application Number & Date: 1 Owner Number. 0639 Capacity: 0000007500 Content: J Fuel Type: REGUMR UNLEADED GASOLINE CAS Number: Product or Waste in Tank( ?): PRODUCT Additional Notes & Infortm don: Additional Notes & Information: TANK CLOSING & REMOVAI INFORMATION M ADQUE1111110 FOR TANK p: 00001 Application Closing Number. Date Tank Closed: Last Used Daft: Remaining Quantity; 0000000000 Inert Fill: Removal Application Number. _ . INFORMATION TANK CLOSING & ` (if anolicable) FOR TANK 9_00002 Application Closing Number: - Date Tank Closed: Last Used Date: Remaining Qua ity: 0000000000 - Continued on next page - Site Details Page -11 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH 111: 15 DIST /D1R: 0.22 NE MAP 111: 18 NAME: MOBIL OIL CORP S/S #18 -MWJ REV: 10/04/00 ADDRESS: 9401 E GARVEY AVE HIE LAC0001871 SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 tD2: THOMAS GUIDE: 063612 Los Angeles STATUS: CONTACT: TANIGUCHI, JACK PHONE: 8184442712 Inert Fig: Removal Application Number: TANK CLOSING & RE MOV i INFO MATION 0f applicable) FOR TANK #• 00004 Application Closing Number. Date Tank Closed: Last Used Date: Remaining Quantity: 0000000000 Inert Fill: Removal Appticatiop Number. TANK CLOSING & REMOVAL INFORMATION (if applicable) FOR TANK #:00005 Application Closing Number. Date Tank Closed: Last Used Date: Remaining Quantity: 0000000000 Inert Fig: Removal Application Number: TANK CLOSING & REMOVAL INFORMATION of pli ble) FOR TANK q 00006 Application Closing Number: 000030018 Date Tank Closed: 19910415 Last Used Date: 19920415 Remaining Quantity: 0000000000 Inert Fig: Removal Application Number. 000030018 TANK CLOSING & REMOVAL INFORMATION (if applicable) FOR TANK #: MW7 Application Closing Number: 000030028 Date Tank Cloned: 19910415 Last Used Date: 19920415 Remaining Quantity: 0000000000 Inert Fig: Removal Application Number: 000030028 TANK CLOSING 8 REMOVAL INFORMATION (if goofcabl 1 FOR TANK #• 00008 Application Closing Number: 000030028 Date Tank Closed: 19910415 Last Used Date: 19920415 Remaining Quantity: 0000000000 - Inert Fin: Removal Application Number: 000030028 TANK CLOSING & REMOVAL INFORMATION Of anplicable) FOR TANK #: 00009 Applica tion Closing Nnnsber: 000030028 Date Tank Closed: 19920415 Last Used Date: 19920415 Remaining Quantity: 0000000010 Inert Fig: - Continued on next page - Site Details Page -12 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH ID: 15 DIST /D1R: 0.22 NE MAP 1D: 18 NAME: MOBIL OIL COPP S/S #18 -MWI REV: 10/04/00 ADDRESS: 9401 EGARVEY AVE HH: LAC0001871 SOUTH EL MONDE CA 91733 ID2: THOMAS GUIDE: 063612 Los Angeles STATUS: CONTACT: TANIGUCHI, JACK PHONE: 8184442712 Removal Application Number: 000030028 TANK & PIPING MATERIALS fit aRplicable) 00001 Manufacturer: XEE.YES Construction Type Description: Construction Material Description: Construction Lining Description: Piping Type Description Piping Construction Description Piping Material Description: Piping Leak Detection Description: Leak Detection System 1: Leak Detection System 2: Last Update: 20001106 Last Operator. E288439 TANK &PIPING MATERIALS (if applicable) FOR TANK #: 00001 Manufacturer: - . XERXES Construction Type Description: Construction Material Description: - Construction Lining Description: Piping Type Description: Piping Construction Description: Piping Material Description Piping Leak Detection Description: Leak Detection System 1: Leak Detection System 2: Last Update: 20001106 Last Operator: E288439 TANK & PIPING ATE IAIS(if applicable) FOR TANK #: 00003 Manufacturer: XERXES Construction Type Description: Construction Material Description: Construction Lining Description: Piping Type Description: Piping Construction Description: Piping Material Description: Piping Leak Detection Description: Leak Detection System 1: Leak Detection System 2: Last Update: 20001106 Last Operator: E288439 TANK &PIPING MATERIALS (if applicable) FOR TANK #1 00004 Manufacturer: XERXES Construction Type Description: Construction Material Description: Construction Lining Description: - Continued on next page - Site Details Page -13 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH ID: 15 DIST /DIR: 0.22 NE MAP 1D: 18 NAME: MOBIL OIL CORP S/S #18 -MWJ REV: 10/04100 ADDRESS: 9401 EGARVEY AVE 1D1: LAC0001871 SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 ID2: THOMAS GUIDE: 063612 Los Angeles STATUS: CONTACT: TANIGUCHL JACK PHONE: 8184442712 Piping Type Description: . Piping Construction Description: Piping Material Description: Piping Leak Detection Description: Leak Detection System 1: Leak Detection System 2: Last Update: 20001106 Last Operator: E288439 TANK & PIPING_ MATEUI Al sS (if aoolinblel FOR TANK #: 00005 Manufacturer: )ffRXES "Construction Type Description: Construction Material Description: Construction Lining Description: FIBERGLASS Piping Type Description Piping Construction Description: Piping Material Description: Piping Leak Detection Description: Leak Detection System 1: Leak Detection System 2: Last Update: 19981202 Lost Operator: E448464 TANK & PIPING MATERIALS (if applicable) FOR TANK #: 00006 Manufacturer. UNKNOWN Construction Type Description: Construction Material Description: Construction Lining Description: Piping Type Description: Piping Construction Description: Piping Material Description: Piping Leak Detection Description: Leak Detection System 1: Leak Detection System 2: Last Update: 19920617 Last Operator: E274419 TANK & PIPING MATERIALS (if applicable) FOR TANK #: 00007 Manufacturer. UNKNOWN Construction Type Description: Construction Material Description: Construction Lining Description: Piping Type Description: Piping Construction Description: Piping Material Description Piping Leak Defection Description: Leak Detection System 1: Leak Detection System 2: Last Update: 19920617 Last Operator: E274419 Continued on next page - Site Details Page -14 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH ID: 15 DIST /DIR: 0.22 NE MAP ID: 18 NAME: MOBIL OIL CORP S/S #I8 -MWJ REV: 10 /04100 ADDRESS: 9401 E GARVEY AVE U)1: LAC0001871 SOUTH EL MONDE CA 91733 U)2: THOMAS GUIDE: 063612 Los Angeles STATUS: CONTACT: TANIGUCHI, JACK PHONE: 8184442712 TANK & PIPING AT. IAL S (if applicable) FOR TANK #: 00008 Manufacturer: UNKNOWN Construction Type Description: - Construction Material Description: Construction Lining Description: Piping Type Description: Piping Construction Description: Piping Material Description: Piping Leak Detection Description: - Leak Detection System 1: Leak Detection System 2: Last Update: 19920617 Last Operator. E274419 TANK & PIPING MATERIALS (if applicable) FOR TANK #: 00009 Manufacturer: UNKNOWN Construction Type Description: Construction Material Description: Construction Lining Description: Piping Type Description: Piping Construction Description: Piping Material Description: Piping Leak Detection Description: Leak Detection System 1: Leak Detection System 2: Last Update: 19920617 Last Operator. E274419 Site Details Page -15 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL Site Details Page -16 REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH 1D: 16 DISUD1R: 0.22 NE MAP ID: 18 NAME: MOBILOIL CORP SS I IMW1 REV: 01/01/94 ADDRESS: 9401 GARVEY - 1D1: TISID- STATE22561 EL MONTE CA 91505 ID2: Los Augda STATUS: ACTIVE CONTACT: PHONE: DETAILS NOT AVAB.ABLE Site Details Page -16 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH ID: 20 DIST /DIR: 0.23 NE MAP ID: 22 NAME: CHEVRON #20-6008 (FORMER) REV: 06/31/01 ADDRESS: 9420 GARVEY AVE IDI: R -04640 SOUTH EL MONCE CA 91733 ID2: LOS ANGELES STATUS: CASE CLOSED CONTACT: PHONE: RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTS database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred dating after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency LEAD AGENCY: REGIONAL BOARD REGIONAL BOARD: 04 LOCAL CASE NUMBER: RESPONSIBLE PARTY: CHEVRONPRODUCTSCO ADDRESS OF RESPONSIBLE PARTY: 1300 S. BEACH BLVD., LA HABRA, CA 90631 SITE OPERATOR SAME AS 2750 ROSEMEAD WATERSYSTEM: CASE NUMBER R -04640 CASE TYPE: OTHER SUBSTANCE LEAKED: GASOLINE SUBSTANCE QUANTITY: LEAK CAUSE: UNKNOWN LEAK SOURCE: UNKNOWN HOW LEAK WAS DISCOVERED: SUBSURFACEMONITORING DATE DISCOVERED (blank if not reported): HOW LEAK WAS STOPPED: CHANGE PROCEDURES STOP DATE (blank H not reported): 41611990 STATUS: CASECLOSED ABATEMENT METHOD (please note that not all code translations have been provided by the reporting agency): VACUUMFXTRACT- USE PUMPS OR BLOWERS TODRAW AIR THROUGH SOIL ENFORCEMENT TYPE (please note that not all code translations have been provided by the reporting agency): DATE OF ENFORCEMENT (blank if nal reported): ENTER DATE (blank H not reported): 811011995 REVIEW DATE (blank K not reported): 1212211999 DATE OF LEAK CONFIRMATION (blank If not reported): DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank If not reported): DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN BEGAN (blank If not reported): DATE POLLUTION CHARACTERIZATION PLAN BEGAN (blank U not reported): DATE REMEDIATION PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank U not reported): 81311993 DATE REMEDIAL ACTION UNDERWAY (blank if not reported): DATE POST REMEDIAL ACTION MONITORING BEGAN (blank H not reported): DATE CLOSURE LETTER ISSUED (SITE CLOSED) (blank H not reported): 91811999 REPORT DATE (blank if not reported): 811011995 MTBR DATA FROM THE CAI IFORNLA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS PAIABASL MTBE DATE(Date of historical maximum MTBE concentration): 11111965 MTBE GROUNDWATER CONCENTRATION: 10000 MTBE SOIL CONCENT RATION: MTBE CNTS: / MTBE FUEL: I MTBE TESTED: YES MTBE CLASS: Site Details Page -17 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL Site Details Page - 18 RCRA GENERATOR SITE SEARCH 1D: 6 DIST /DIR: 0.23 SE MAP ID: 6 NAME: D T GRAPHICS REV: 8/8/02 ADDRESS: 2621 LEE AVE 1DI: CA0000134809 SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 ID2: LOS ANGELES STATUS: SGN CONTACT: DAN WONG PHONE: 8184428863 SITERWORMATION CONTACT INFORMATION: DAN WONG MGR 2621 LEE AVE SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 PHONE: 8184428863 UNIVERSE NAME: SGN: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SIC N(' IRMATION- ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: VIOLATION INFORMATION: Site Details Page - 18 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL . JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL Site Details Page -19 RCRA GENERATOR SITE SEARCH ID: 7 DIST /DIR: 0.23 SE MAP ID: 8 NAME: FRANK AND SMITH MASONRY REV: 8/8102 ADDRESS: 2639 TROY AVE HA: CAR000065813 S EL MONTE CA 91733 H12: LOS ANGELES STATUS: SON CONTACT: KEVIN SMITH PHONE: 6265792135 SITE /NFORMAT /ON CONTACT INFORMATION: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER ENVIRO MANAGER - 2639 TROY AVE S EL MONTE CA 91733 PHONE: UNIVERSE NAME: SON: GENERATES 100 -1000 KG /MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SIC INFORMATION: ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: VIOLATION INFORMATION: - Site Details Page -19 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH: ID: 14 DIST /D1R: 0.24 NE MAP ID: 17 TANK OPERA TING P Permit Expiration Date: /9960430 NAME: MC WHIRTER REAL ESTATE CO REV: 10/04/00 ADDRESS: 9432 E GARVEY AVE IDI: LACO011413 SOUTH EL MOMS CA 91733 U)2: THOMAS GUIDE: 000000 Los Angeles STATUS: 000018516 CONTACT: COLLEY, CHUCK PHONE: 8188432914 According to the Los Angeles County Depot at of Public Works the following information is current as of 07/02/02 GENERAL INFORMATION REGARDING SITE Tax Accesson Parcel Mh: File Number: File Name: Property Owner Name & Type: Property Owner Address: Tank Owner Name & Type: Tank Owner Address: Tank Owner Phone: PERMIT INFORMATION Permit Number & Category: Permit Type & Date: Permit Expiration Date: Permit Status: Fee Exempt Penalty Dates: Suspendon Date & Reason: 011450 MC WHIRTHR REAL ESTATE CO 00000116H /TANK TANK OWNERSHIP CHANGE / 19880725 19930725 REM No Permit Number & Category: OW02973T /TANK Permit Type & Date: TANK OPERA TING P Permit Expiration Date: /9960430 Permit Status: REM Fee Exempt: No Penalty Date: / Smpendon Date & Reason: / SPECIFIC TANK INFORMATION FORTANK N 00001 Unique Took Number: 000018516 Status: Removed Installation Date: 19840101 Exhange Application Number & Date: / Owner Number. 1 Capacity: 0000004000 Content J Fuel Type: LEADED GASOLINE CAS Number: Product or Waste In Tank ( ?): PRODUCT Additional Notes & information: Additional Notes & Information: SPECIFIC TANK INFORMATION FORTANK NUMBER: 00002 Unique Tank Number: 000018527 Stams: - Removed Installation Dam: 19840101 /19910428 - Continued on next page - Site Details Page - 20 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH 111: 14 DIST /D1R: 0.24 NE MAP 1D: 17 NAME: MC WHIRTER REAL ESTATE CO ADDRESS: 9432 E GARVEY AVE ID2: SOUTH EL MONIE CA 91733 STATUS: Los Angeles CONTACT: COLLEY, CHUCK REV: 10/04100 IDI: LAC0011413 ID2: THOMAS GUIDE: 000000 STATUS: 19840101 PHONE: 8188432914 Exhange Application Number & Date: NUMBER: 00003 Owner Number. 000018528 Capacity: Removed Content: 19840101 J Fad Type: / CAS Number: 3 Product or Waste In Tank( ?): PRODUCT Additional Notes & Information: DIESEL Additional Notes & Inforandom REGULAR UNLEADED GASOLINE 1 0000006000 REGULAR UNLEADED GASOLINE SPECIFIC TANK INFORMATION FUR TANK NUMBER: 00003 Unique Tank Number: 000018528 Status: Removed Installation Date: 19840101 Exhange Application Number & Date: / Owner Number. 3 Capacity: 0000010000. Content DIESEL J Fad Type: REGULAR UNLEADED GASOLINE CAS Number. Prodnd or Waste in Tank (?):. PRODUCT Additional Notes & Information: Additional Notes & Information: SPECIFIC TANK INFORMATION FOR TANK NUMBER: 00004 Unique Tank Number: 000018529 Status: Removed Installation Date: 19840101 Exhange Application Number & Date: / Owner Number: 4 Capacity: 0000010000 Content DIESEL J ft el Type: DIP-SEL CAS Number: PRODUCT Product or Waste In Tank ( ?): PRODUCT Additional Notes & Information Additional Notes & Information 00005 Unique Tank Number: 000018530 Status: Removed Installation Date: 19840101 Exhange Application Number & Date: Owner Number. 5 Capacity: 0000010000 Content: J Fuel Type: DIESEL CAS Number: Product or Waste in Tank (7): PRODUCT - Continued on next page - Site Details Page - 21 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH ID: 14 DIST /D1R: 0.24 NE MAP ID: 17 NAME: MC WHIRTER REAL ESTATE CO REV: 10 /04/00 ADDRESS: 9432 E GARVEY AVE IDl: LAC0011413 SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 ID2: THOMAS GUIDE: 000000 Los Angeles STATUS: CONTACT: COLLEY, CHUCK PHONE: 8188432914 Additional Notes & Information: Additional Notes & Information: TANK CLOSING & REMOVAL INFORMATION (if applicable) FOR TANK N: 00001 Application Closing Number: 000081388 Date Tank Closed: 19910917 Last Used Date: 19910917 Remaining Quantity: 0000000000 Inert Fill: NO Removal Application Number: 000081388 TANK CLOSING & REMOVAL INFORMATION (U applicable) FOR TANK N: 00002 _ Application Closing Number: 00008138B Date Tank Closed: 19910917 Lost Used Date: 19910917 Remaining Quantity: 0000000000 Inert Fill: NO Removal Application Number. 00M138B TANK CLOSING & REMOVAL INFORMATION of applicable) FOR TANK N: 00003 Application Closing Number: 00008138B Date Tank Closed: 19910917 Last Used Date: 19910917 Remaining Quantity: 0000000000 Inert Fill: NO Removal Application Number: 00008138B TANK CLOSING & REMOVAL INEO MATION (H applicable) FOR TANK N• 00004 Application Closing Number: 00008138B Date Tank Closed: 19910917 Last Used Date: 19910917 Remaining Quantity: 0000000000 Inert FIB: - NO Removal Application Number: 000081388 TANK CLOSING & REMOVAL NFO MATION of applicable) FOR TANK N :00005 Application Closing Number. 00008138B Date Tank Closed: 19910917 Last Used Date: 19910917 Remaining Quantity: - 0000000000 Inert Fill: NO Removal Application Number: 00008138B TANK &- PIPING MATERIALS (i( applicable) FORTANK N• 00001 Manufacturer: UNKNOWN Construction Type Description: Construction Material Description: Construction Lining Description: Piping Type Description - Continued on next page - Site Details Page - 22 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL ROSEMEAD CA 91770 JOB: GARVEY GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS 11 SEARCH ID: 14 DIST /DIR: 0.24 NE MAP ID: 17 II NAME: MC WHIRTER REAL ESTATE CO ADDRESS: 9432 E GARVEY AVE SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 Los Angeles rONTArT: COLLEY. CHUCK Piping Construction Description: Piping Material Description: Piping Leak Detection Description: Leak Detection System 1: IAA Detection System 2: Last Update: 19940310 Last Operator: E218376 TANK &PI PING MAIZRIAI S (if applicable) FOR TANK B: 00002 Manufacturer: UNKNOWN Constmetlon Type Description: Construction Material Description: Construction Lining Description: Piping Type Description: Piping Construction Description: Piping Material Description: Piping Leak Defection Description: Leak Detection System 1: leak Detection System 2: Last Update: - 19940310 last Operator. E218376 TANK &P PING MATER I A I S(if applicable) FOR TANK q: 00003 Manufacturer: UNKNOWN Construction Type Descrlpdon: Construction Material Description: Construction Lining Description: Piping Type Description: Piping Construction Description: Piping Material Description: Piping Desk Defection Description: Leak Detection System L Leak Detection System 2: Last Update: /9940310 Lag Operator. E218376 TANK & Pi PING MATERI AI S (if applicable) FOR TANK H: 00004 Manufacturer: UNKNOWN Construction Type Description: Construction Material Description: Construction Lining Description: REV: 10(04/00 HH: I AC0011413 ID2: THOMAS GUIDE: 000000 STATUS: PHONE: 8188432914 - Continued on nett page - Site Details Page - 23 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH 1D: 14 DIST /DIR: 0.24 NE MAP ID: 17 NAME: MC WHIRTER REAL ESTATE CO REV: 10104/00 ADDRESS: 9432 E GARVEY AVE H)1: LACO011413 SOUTH EL MONCE CA 91733 ID2: - THOMAS GUIDE: 000000 Los Angeles STATUS: CONTACT: COLLEY, CHUCK PHONE: 8188432914 TANK & PIPIN MATERIALS (i( applicable) FOR TANK k: 00005 Manufacturer: UNKNOWN Construction Type Description: ' Constroefbn Material Description: Construction Lining Description: Piping Type Description: Piping Construction Description: Piping Material Description: Piping Leak Detection Description: Leak Detection System 1: Leak Detection System 2: Last Update: 19940310 Last Mentor: E218376 Site Details Page - 24 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH ID: 24 DIST /DIR: 0.24 NE MAP 1D: 17 NAME: MCWHIRTER TEXACO.S.S.(FORMER) REV: 06/31/01 ADDRESS: 9432 GARVEY AVE E HIl: 1 -11450 EL MONTE CA 91731 ID2: LOS ANGELES STATUS: REMEDIAT)ON PLAN CONTACT: PHONE: RELEASE ASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database q not current1v being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred dating after the year 1000 may not have much mfornzation. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: REGIONAL BOARD REGIONAL BOARD: 04 LOCAL CASE NUMBER RESPONSIBLE PARTY: MS. DONNA MCHWHIRTER ADDRESS OF RESPONSIBLE PARTY: 10523 PENFIELD AVE. _ SITE OPERATOR: MCWHIRTER, VAN WATER SYSTEM: CASE NUMBER: I- -11450 CASE TYPE: OTHER SUBSTANCE LEAKED: GASOLINE SUBSTANCE QUANTITY: LEAK CAUSE: UNKNOWN LEAK SOURCE: UNKNOWN HOW LEAK WAS DISCOVERED: OTHER MEANS DATE DISCOVERED (blank U not reported): 112411991 - HOW LEAK WAS STOPPED: OTHER MEANS STOP DATE (blank If not reported): 112411991 STATUS: REMEOIATIONPLAN ABATEMENT METHOD (please note that not all code trawindons have been provided by the reporting agency): REMOVE FREE PRODUCT - REMOVE FLOAT6VG PRODUCTFROM WATER TABLE ENFORCEMENT TYPE (please note that not all code translations have been provided by the reporting agency): DATE OF ENFORCEMENT (blank H not reported): 311412001 ENTER DATE (blank Knot reported): 41511991 REVIEW DATE (blank B not reported): 1012912001 DATE OF LEAK CONFIRMATION (blank If not reported): DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank H not reported): 511511991 DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN BEGAN (blank if not reported): 91611991 DATE POLLUTION CHARACTERIZATION PLAN BEGAN (blank B not reported): 1 12 011 9 9 5 DATE REMEDIATION PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank H not reported): 91712000 DATE REMEDIAL ACTION UNDERWAY (blank if not reported): DATE POST REMEDIAL ACTION MONITORING BEGAN (blank B not reported): DATE CLOSURE LETTER ISSUED (SITE CLOSED) (blank if not reported): REPORT DATE (blank If not reported): 211911991 MTBE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STAT WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD Tlc DATAq SE MTBE DATE(Date of historical maximum MTBE concentration): 912&2000 MTBE GROUNDWATER CONCENTRATION: 1,600 MTBE SOIL CONCENTRATION: MTBE CNTS: I MTBE FUEL: I MTBE TESTED: YES MTBE CLASS: Site Details Page - 25 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report . TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL RCRA GENERATOR SITE REGISTERED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH 1D: 17 DIST /D1R: 0.24 NE MAP ID: 19 NAME: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO REV: 01/01194 ADDRESS: 3208 ROSEMEAD H)1: TISID- STATE24239 EL MONTE CA 91731 H)2: ID2: Los Angela STATUS: ACTIVE CONTACT: PHONE: PHONE: DETAILS NOT AVAILABLE SITE INFORMATION RCRA GENERATOR SITE SEARCH ID: 4 DIST /DIR: 0.25 NE MAP ID: 4 NAME: BOZUNG I ACO REV: 818102 ADDRESS: 9401 WHITMORE 1DI: CAD009520081 EL MONTE CA 91731 ID2: LOS ANGELES STATUS: SGN CONTACT: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER PHONE: 2132838267 SITE INFORMATION CONTACT INFORMATION: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER ENVIRO MANAGER 9401 WHIIMORE EL MONTE CA 91731 PHONE: 2132838267 UNIVERSE NAME, SON: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SICINFORMATION, 3599 - MANUFACTURING - INDUSTRIAL. MACHINERY, NEC ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION, VIOLATION INFORMATION: Site Details Page - 26 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL RCRA GENERATOR SITE SEARCH ID: 10 DISUD1R: 0.25 NE MAP 1D: 11 NAME: SO CA GAS CO ROSEMEAD SPNGS FACIL REV: 8/8/02 ADDRESS: 9407 WHITMORE AVE IDl: CAD981664931 EL MONTE CA 91731 H12: LOS ANGELES STATUS: SGN CONTACT: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER - PHONE: 2136893075 SITE INFORAL4 CONTACT INFORMATION: ENVIRONMENTALMANAGER ENVIRO MANAGER 9407 WHITMORE AVE EL MONTE CA 91731 PHONE: 2136893075 UNIVERSE NAME, SGN: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SIC INFORMATION: ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION, VIOLATION INFORMATION: Site Details Page - 27 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL RCRA GENERATOR SITE SEARCH ID: I DIST /DIR: 0.25 SE MAP 1D: I NAME: AAMECCORP REV: 818102 ADDRESS: 2611 ROSEMEAD BLVD IDI: CAD009660226 SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 ID2: LOS ANGELES STATUS: SGN CONTACT: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER PHONE: 8184424373 SITE LNFORMAT /ON CONTACT INFORMATION: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER ENVIRO MANAGER - 2611 ROSEMEAD BLVD SOUTH EL MONTE CA 91733 PHONE: 8184424373 UNIVERSE NAME: SGN: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KGIMONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SIC INFORMATION, ' ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION, VIOLATION INFORMATION: Site Details Page - 28 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & R10 HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH 1D: 21 DIST /DIR: 0.28 SW MAP ID: 14 NAME: IRISH CONSTRUCTION CO REV: 06131101 ADDRESS: 2641 RIVER AVEN IDI: R -05495 ROSEMEAD CA 91770 ID2: LOS ANGELES STATUS: POLLUTION CHARACTERIZATION CONTACT: PHONE: RELEASE DATA FROM THE I IFY1 FORMA STATE WATER RESOI IRCES CONTROL ROAM LUSTIS DAIARAM Please note that same data previoasly pro vided by the State Water Resotoces Control Board in the LUS17S database is not currently being pro vided by the agency in the macs recent edition. Incidents that occurred dating after the year 2000 may not have mach information. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted at unreported by the agency LEAD AGENCY: REGIONAL BOARD REGIONAL BOARD: 04 LOCAL CASE NUMBER RESPONSIBLE PARTY: RANDYDALE ADDRESS OF RESPONSIBLE PARTY: 2641N. RIVER AVE. SITE OPERATOR: WATERSYSTEM: CASE NUMBER R -05495 CASE TYPE: OTHER SUBSTANCE LEAKED: DIESEL SUBSTANCE QUANTITY: LEAK CAUSE: UNKNOWN LEAK SOURCE: TANK HOW LEAK WAS DISCOVERED: TANK CLOSURE DATE DISCOVERED (blank if not reported): 5/18/1998 HOW LEAK WAS STOPPED: OTHERMEANS STOP DATE (blank If not reported): STATUS: POLLUTION CHARACTERIZATION ABATEMENT METHOD (plum note that not all code translations have been provided by We reporting agency): ENFORCEMENT TYPE (please note that not all code translations have been provided by the reporting agency): DATE OF ENFORCEMENT (blank If not reported): 311212001 ENTER DATE (blank H not reported): REVIEW DATE (blank H not reported): 1112712001 DATE OF LEAK CONFIRMATION (blank H not reported): DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank If not reported): DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN BEGAN (blank H not reported): DATE POLLUTION CHARACTERIZATION PLAN BEGAN (blank H not reported): 711212000 DATE REMEDIATION PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank H not reported): DATE REMEDIAL ACTION UNDERWAY (blank If not reported): DATE POST REMEDIAL ACTION MONITORING BEGAN (blank B not reported): DATE CLOSURE LETTER ISSUED (SITE CLOSED) (blank H not reported): REPORT DATE (blank if nol reported): 61211999 MT DATA FROM THE CAL] FORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONT_R_O_L _BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE MTBE, DATE(Date of historical maximum MTBE concentration): 11111965 MTBE GROUNDWATER CONCENTRATION: MTBE SOIL CONCENTRATION: ND MTBE CNTS: I MTBE FUEL: 0 MTBE TESTED: YES MTBE CLASS: Site Details Page - 29 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH 1D: 26 DIST /D1R: 0.30 SW MAP ID: 7 NAME: RUSSELL TRANSPORTATION INC. REV: 06131/01 _ ADDRESS: 2713 RIVER AVE N IDl: 917700016 ROSEMEAD CA 91770 1132: LOS ANGELES STATUS: POLLUTION CHARACTERIZATION CONTACT: PHONE: RELEASE DATA FROM THE C I LEO N A STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BO R I T DAT Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSRS database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred dating after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agenry. LEAD AGENCY: REGIONAL BOARD REGIONAL BOARD: 04 LOCAL CASE NUMBER RESPONSIBLE PARTY: RUSSELL 7RANSPORTA770NBVC ADDRESS OF RESPONSIBLE PARTY: 2713 N RIVER AVE, ROSEMEAD, C,4 91770 SITE OPERATOR DAVIDDELAMOTTE WATERSYSTEM: CASE NUMBER 917700016 CASE TYPE: SOIL ONLY SUBSTANCE LEAKED: GASOLINE SUBSTANCE QUANTITY: LEAK CAUSE: OTHER CAUSE LEAK SOURCE: PIPLVG HOW LEAK WAS DISCOVERED: TANK TEST DATE DISCOVERED (blank if not reported): 711611987 HOW LEAK WAS STOPPED: REPAIR PIPING STOP DATE (blank if not reported): 711611987 STATUS: POLLUTON CHARACTERIZATION ABATEMENT METHOD (please note that not an code translations have been provided by the reporting agency): ENFORCEMENT TYPE (please note that not all code translations have been provided by the reporting agency): DATE OF ENFORCEMENT (blank H not reported): ENTER DATE (blank H not reported): 1211711987 REVIEW DATE (blank If not reported): 4/2411996 DATE OF LEAK CONFIRMATION (blank if not reported): DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank if not reported): DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN BEGAN (Wank H not reported): DATE POLLUTION CHARACTERIZATION PLAN BEGAN (blank H not reported): 1013011987 DATE REMEDIATION PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank H not reported): DATE REMEDIAL ACTION UNDERWAY (blank if not reported): DATE POST REMEDIAL ACTION MONITORING BEGAN (blank H not reported): DATE CLOSURE LETTER ISSUED(SITE CLOSED) (Wank H not reported): REPORT DATE (blank if not reported): 51911986 MTBE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE MTBE DATE(Date of historical maximum MTBE caneentration): MTBE GROUNDWATER CONCENTRATION: MTBE SOIL CONCENTRATION: MTBE CMS: 0 MTBE FUEL: / MTBE TESTED: SITE NOT TESTED FOR MTBE. INCLUDES UNKNOWN AND NOTANAL YZED MTBE CLASS: Site Details Page - 30 Environmental FirstSeareh Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH ID: 19 DIST /D1R: 0.35 SE MAP H): 21 NAME: CHAMP CORP. REV: 06/31/01 ADDRESS: 2500 ROSEMEAD BLVD N IDl: 1-09430 SOUTH EL MON1E CA 91733 ID2: LOS ANGELES STATUS: CASE CLOSED CONTACT: PHONE: RELEASE E ASE DATA FROM THE CAI.I FO N A STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUS77S database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred dating after the year 2000 may not have much informadon. Field headers with blank information following after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. . LEAD AGENCY: REGIONAL BOARD REGIONAL BOARD: 04 LOCAL CASE NUMBER RESPONSIBLE PARTY: M & T COMPANY ADDRESS OF RESPONSIBLE PARTY: 2439 ROSEMEAD BLVD A EL MONTE, 91733 SITE OPERATOR WATERSYSTEM: CASE NUMBER 1 -09430 CASE TYPE: SOIL ONLY SUBSTANCE LEAKED: GASOLINE SUBSTANCE QUANTITY: LEAK CAUSE: UNKNOWN LEAK SOURCE: UNKNOWN HOW LEAK WAS DISCOVERED: TANK CLOSURE DATE DISCOVERED (blank R not reported): 91&1991 HOW LEAK WAS STOPPED: CLOSE TANK STOP DATE (blank H not reported): 811 611991 STATUS: CASE CLOSED ABATEMENT METHOD (please note that not all code translations have been provided by the reporting agency): ENFORCEMENT TYPE (please note that not all code translations have been provided by the reporting agency): DATE OF ENFORCEMENT (blank H not reported): ENTER DATE (blank B not reported): 512 &1992 REVIEW DATE (blank if not reported): &1811996 , DATE OF LEAK CONFIRMATION (blank If not reported): DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank If not reported): DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN BEGAN (blank H not reported): 412211991 DATE POLLUTION CHARACTERIZATION PLAN BEGAN (blank H not reported): DATE REMEDIATION PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank H not reported): DATE REMEDIAL. ACTION UNDERWAY (blank If not reported): DATE POST REMEDIAL. ACTION MONITORING BEGAN (blank H not reported): DATE CLOSURE LETTER ISSUED (SITE CLOSED) (blank H not reported): 611811996 REPORT DATE (blank If not reported): 412211992 MTBE DATA FROM THE CAL] STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE MTBE DATE(Date of historical madmvm MTBE concentration): MTBE GROUNDWATER CONCENTRATION: MTBE SOIL CONCENTRATION: MTBE CNTS: 0 MTBE FUEL: / MTBE TESTED: STTENOTTFSTEOFOR MTBE INCLUDES UNKNOWNANDNOTANALYIED MTBE CLASS: Site Details Page - 31 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH ID: 22 D1ST /D1R: 0.40 SW MAP ID: 13 NAME: IRISHCONSTRUCTION CO. REV: 06/31101 ADDRESS: 2649 SI7NGLE AVE IDl: I -14349 ROSEMEAD CA 91770 ID2: LOS ANGELES STATUS: REMEDIAL ACTION CONTACT: PHONE: RELEASE DATA FROM THE LIFO NIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTLS DATABASE Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUS77S database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that accused dating after the year 1000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information foUowtng after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: REGIONAL BOARD REGIONAL BOARD: 04 LOCAL. CASE NUMBER RESPONSIBLE PARTY: RANDYDALE ADDRESS OF RESPONSIBLE PARTY: 2641 RIVER AVE. SITE OPERATOR WATER SYSTEM: CASE NUMBER: 1 -14349 CASE TYPE: OIHER SUBSTANCE LEAKED: GASOLINE SUBSTANCE QUANTITY: LEAK CAUSE: UNKNOWN LEAK SOURCE: PIPING HOW LEAK WAS DISCOVERED: DATE DISCOVERED (blank H not reported): HOW LEAK WAS STOPPED: STOP DATE (blank if not reported): STATUS: REAfFOALACI70N ABATEMENT METHOD (please note that not all code translations have been provided by the reporting agency): ENFORCEMENT TYPE (please note that not all code translations have been provided by the reporting agency): DATE OF ENFORCEMENT (blank If not reported): 311212001 ENTER DATE (blank H not reported): REVIEW DATE (blank if not reported): 813012001 DATE OF LEAK CONFIRMATION (blank H not reported): DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank if not reported): DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN BEGAN (blank U not reported): 11911989 DATE POLLUTION CHARACTERIZATION PLAN BEGAN (blank H not reported): 1211511993 DATE REMEDIATION PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank if not reported): 526//999 DATE REMEDIAL ACTION UNDERWAY (blank if not reported): 711412000 DATE POST REMEDIAL. AMON MONITORING BEGAN (blank if not reported): DATE CLOSURE LETTER ISSUED (SITE CLOSED) (blank H not reported): REPORT DATE (blank If not reported): 1211211989 MTBE DATA FROM T F C L IEORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE MTBE DATE(Date of historical maximum MTBE concentration): 11111965 MTBE GROUNDWATER CONCENTRATION: NO MTBE SOIL CONCENTRATION: MTBE CNTS: I MTBE FUEL: / MTBE TESTED: YES MTBE CLASS: Site Details Page - 32 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS SEARCH 1D: 23 DIST /DIR: 0.43 SE MAP ID: 16 NAME: MARGE WARNER REV: 06/31/01 ADDRESS: 2459 LEE AVE N IDl: 1 -23117 SOUTH EL MONYE CA 91733 1112: LOS ANGELES STATUS: CASE CLOSED CONTACT: PHONE: RELEASE DATA FROM THE 1 1F0 N A STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD T DATABASE Please note that "me data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred dating after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information f l owing after should be interpreted as unreported by the agency. LEAD AGENCY: LOCALAGENCY REGIONAL BOARD: 04 LOCAL CASE NUMBER: RESPONSIRI PARTY: MYMARGE WARNER ADDRESS OF RESPONSIBLE PARTY: TEMPLE CITYCA 91780 -3848 SITE OPERATOR: WATERSYSTEM: CASE NUMBER: 1 -23117 CASE TYPE: SOIL ONLY SUBSTANCE LEAKED: / SUBSTANCE QUANTITY: LEAK CAUSE: UNKNOWN LEAK SOURCE: UNKNOWN HOW LEAK WAS DISCOVERED: DATE DISCOVERED (blank if not repotted): HOW LEAK WAS STOPPED: STOP DATE (blank If not reported): STATUS: CASECLOSED ABATEMENT METHOD (please note that not W code translations have been provided by the reporting agency): ENFORCEMENT TYPE (please note that not all code translations have been provided by the reporting agency): DATE OF ENFORCEMENT (Wank H not reported): ENTER DATE (blank H not reported): 1211811995 REVIEW DATE (blank H not reported): 1211211995 DATE OF LEAK CONFIRMATION (blank If not reported): DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank H not reported): DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN BEGAN (Wank H not reported): DATE POLLUTION CHARACTERIZATION PLAN BEGAN (blank H not reported): DATE REMEDIATION PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank D not reported): DATE REMEDIAL AMON UNDERWAY (blank if not reported): DATE POST REMEDIAL ACTION MONITORING BEGAN (blank B not reported): DATE CLOSURE LETTER ISSUED (SITE CLOSED) (blank H not reported): 1211211995 REPORT DATE (blank if not reported): 1211211995 THE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD T DATABASE MTBE DATE(Date of historical marimum MTBE concentration): MTBE GROUNDWATER CONCENTRATION: - MTBE SOIL CONCENTRATION: MTBE CMS: 0 MTBE FUEL: 0 MTBE TESTED: NOT REQUIRED TO BE TESTED MTBE CLASS: Site Details Page - 33 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL Site Details Page - 34 SOLID WASTE LANDFILL SITE SEARCH ID: 28 1HST /D1R- NON GC MAP ID: NAME: CALTRANS- ROSEMEAD REV: 07/03/00 ADDRESS: EOF ROSEMEAD BTW GARVEY &7 IDl: WMUD4190174NUR ROSEMEAD CA ID2: LOS ANGELES STATUS: CONTACT: PHONE: WMUDS FACT i ITY INFORMATION (blank= t repitroc m Regional ID #: NPDES ID #: Region: 4 Edit Date: Last Edit: Waste Discharger Facility: No Sub Chapter 15 Facility: No Solid Waste Assessment Test Site: yes Toxic Pita Cleanup Act Facility: No RCRA Factlity: No Department of Defense Facility: No Municipal Solid Waste Facility: No Total WMUS at Facility: / Facility Open to the Public: No Facility Type: SIC 1 & SIC 2: / Primary Waste Type: Secondary Waste Type: Tons Per Day: 0 Complexity: LAND OWNER INFORMATION Land Owner: Department: Contact & Phone: Lend Owner Address: .. CA AGENCY INFORMATION Agency Name: CALTRANS Department: Agency Contact & Phone: , WASTE. MANAGEMENT UNIT INFORMATION WMU ID #: (ble k =not renortem 4190174NUR -01 WMU Status: CEASEDISCHARGE WMU Sin In Acres: Year WMU Will Reach Capacity: Close Plan: 0 Avg Depth to Groundwater: 0 Primary Liner Present: 0 Site Details Page - 34 Environmental FirstSearch Site Detail Report TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL Site Details Page - 35 EMERGENCY RESPONSE NOTIFICATION SITE SEARCH ID: 27 DIST /DIR: NON GC MAP ID: NAME: UNKNOWN REV: 1/20193 ADDRESS: DURFEE RD NORTH OF GARVEY AVE IDI: 305289 EL MONTE CA 91733 ID2: LOS ANGELES STATUS: HIGHWAY RELATED CONTACT: PHONE: DEfAUS NOT AVAILABLE Site Details Page - 35 Environmental FirstSearch Federal Databases and Sources NPL: National Priority List. The EPA's list of confirmed or proposed Superfund sites. Source: Environmental Protection Agency. Updated quarterly. CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System. The EPA's database of current and potential Superfund sites currently or previously under investigation. Source: Environmental Protection Agency. Updated quarterly. RCRIS: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System. The EPA's database of registered hazardous waste generators and treatment, storage and disposal facilities. Included are RAATS (RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System) and CMEL (Compliance Monitoring & Enforcement List). Source: Environmental Protection Agency. RCRA TSD: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. The EPA's database of RCRIS sites which treat, store, dispose, or incinerate hazardous waste. This information is also reported in the standard RCRIS - detailed data. RCRA COR: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System Corrective Action Sites. The EPA's database of RCRIS sites with reported corrective action. This information is also reported in the standard RCRIS detailed data. RCRA GEN: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System Large and Small Quantity Generators. The EPA's database of RCRIS sites that create more than 100kg of hazardous waste per month or meet other RCRA requirements. Included are RAATS (RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System) and CMEL (Compliance Monitoring & Enforcement List). RCRA NLR: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System sites No Longer Regulated. The EPA's database of RCRIS sites that create less than 100kg of hazardous waste per month or do not meet other RCRA requirements. All RCRA databases are Updated quarterly. ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System. The EPA's database of emergency response actions. Source: Environmental Protection Agency. Updated quarterly. RELEASES: Air and Surface Water Releases. A subset of the EPA's ERNS database which have impacted only air or surface water. Updated semi - annually. NPDES: National Pollution Discharge Elimination System. The EPA's database of all permitted facilities receiving and discharging effluents. Source: Environmental Protection Agency. Updated semi - annually. FINDS: The Facility Index System. The EPA's Index of identification numbers associated with a property or facility which the EPA has investigated or has been made aware of in conjunction with various regulatory programs. Each record indicates the EPA office that may have files on the site or facility. Source: Environmental Protection Agency. updated semi- annually. TRIS: Toxic Release Inventory System. The EPA's database of all facilities that have had or may be prone to toxic material releases. Source: Environmental Protection Agency. Updated semi - annually. ACHC: Areas of Critical Environmental Concern. This database contains state and federally designated areas of environmental concern such as endanged species habitats, protected open spaces, parks, conservation areas and wildlife preserves. It also contains contact information for threatened and endangered species. Source: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services, Ecological Services Offices; State GIS Departments. Updated periodically. Floodplains: 100 year and 500 year flood zone boundaries for select counties in the United States. Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). This database will be updated as new data becomes available. Receptors: 1995 TIGER census listing of schools and hospitals that may house individuals deemed sensitive to environmental discharges due to their fragile immune systems. Historic Sites: National Register of Historical Places Database. The nation's official list of cultural resources worthy of preservation. Properties listed include districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that are significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering, and culture. Source: National Park Service. Updated yearly. Wetlands: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service produces information on the characteristics, extent, and status of the Nation's wetlands and deepwater habitats. This data is available for select areas of the United States. Source: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory. - This database will be updated as new data becomes available. Fed Land use: Federal Land data includes information from the following government agencies including Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Defense, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service, and the Tennessee Valley Authority. This database also contains data regarding wild and scenic rivers. Source: USGS. Updated periodically. ENVIRONMENTAL FIRST SEARCH CALIFORNIA DATABASES (DB) AND SOURCES CAL SITES: DB TYPE = ST (STATE SITES) Source: The CAL EPA, Depart. Of Toxic Substances Control Phone:(916) 323 -3400 The CAL EPA Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) maintains a database of information on properties (or sites) in California where hazardous substances have been released, or where the potential for such release exists. The types of properties in the CALSITES database are categorized as: Annual Work Plan, Backlogged Properties, Certified / De- listed Sites, No Further Action, Preliminary Endangerment Assessment in Progress, Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Required, Removal Action Required, Expedited Remedial Action Program, Voluntary Cleanup Program, Deed Restricted Properties, and Referred Properties. For more information on individual sites call the number listed above. CORTESE: DB TYPE = ST (STATE SITES) Source: The CAL EPA, Department of Toxic Substances Control Phone:(916) 445 -6532 Pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, the Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List has been compiled by Cal /EPA, Hazardous Materials Data Management Program. The CAL EPA Dept. of Toxic Substances Control compiles information from subsets of the following databases to make up the CORTESE list: 1. The Dept. of Toxic Substances Control; contaminated or potentially contaminated hazardous waste sites listed in the CAL Sites. database. Formerly known as ASPIS are included (CALSITES formerly known as ASPIS). 2. The California State Water Resources Control Board; listing of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks are included (LTANK) 3. The California Integrated Waste Management Board; Sanitary Landfills which have evidence of groundwater contamination or known migration of hazardous materials (formerly WB -LF, now AB 3750). Note: Track Info Services collects each of the above data sets individually and lists them separately in the following First Search categories in order to provide more current and comprehensive information: CALSITES: SPL, LTANK: LUST, WB -LF: SWL SWIS SOLID WASTE INFORMATION SYSTEM: DB TYPE = SW (SOLID WASTE RELATED SITES) Source: The Integrated Waste Management Board Phone:(916) 255 -2331 The California Integrated Waste Management Board maintains a database on solid waste facilities, operations, and disposal sites throughout the state of California. The types of facilities found in this database include landfills, transfer stations, material recovery facilities, composting sites, transformation facilities, waste tire sites, and closed disposal sites. For more information on individual sites call the number listed above. Note: This database contains poor site location information for many sites in the First Search reports; therefore, it may not be possible to locate or plot some sites in First Search reports. WMUDS: DB TYPE = SW (SOLID WASTE RELATED SITES) Source: The State Water Resources Control Board Phone:(916) 227 -4365 The State Water Resources. Control Board maintained the Waste Management Unit Database System ( WMUDS) . It is no longer updated. It tracked management units for several regulatory programs related to waste management and its potential impact on groundwater. Two of these programs (SWAT & TPCA) are no longer on -going regulatory programs as described below. Chapter 15 (SC15) is still an on -going regulatory program and information is updated periodically but not to the WMUDS database. The WMUDS System contains information from the following agency databases: Facility, Waste Management Unit (WMU), Waste Discharger System (WDS) , SWAT, Chapter 15, TPCA, RCRA, Inspections, Violations, and Enforcement's. Note: This database contains poor site location information for many sites in the First Search reports; therefore, it may not be possible to locate or plot some sites in First Search reports. ORANGE COUNTY LANDFILLS: DB TYPE - SW (SOLID WASTE RELATED SITES) Source: Orange County Health Dept. Phone:(714) 834 -3536 LUSTIS: DB TYPE = LU (LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS) Source: The State Water Resources Control Board Phone:(916) 227 -4416 The State Water Resources Control Board maintains a database of sites with confirmed or unconfirmed leaking underground storage tanks. Information for this database is collected from the states regional boards quarterly and integrated with this database. SAN DIEGO COUNTY LEAKING TANKS: DB TYPE = LU (LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS) Source: San Diego County Dept. of Environmental Health Phone:(619) 338 -2242 Maintains a database of sites with confirmed or unconfirmed leaking underground storage tanks within its HE17/58 database. For more information on a specific file call the HazMat Duty Specialist at phone number listed above. - SLIC REGIONS 1 - 9: DB TYPE = SP (SPILLS -90). Source: The CAL EPA Regional Water Quality Control Boards 1 - 9 The California Regional Water Quality Control Boards maintain report of sites that have records of spills, leaks, investigation, and cleanups. For phone number listings of departments within each region visit their web sites at: http: / /www.swrcb.ca.gov /regions.html SAN DIEGO COUNTY BE17 PERMITS: DB TYPE = PE (PERMITS) Source: The San Diego County Depart. Of Environmental Health Phone:(619) 338 -2211 The HE17 /58 database tracks establishments issued permits and the status of their permits in relation to compliance with federal, state, and local regulations that the County oversees. It tracks if a site is a hazardous waste generator, TSD, gas station, has underground tanks, violations, or unauthorized releases. For more information on a specific file call the HazMat Duty Specialist at the phone number listed above.. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PERMITS: DB TYPE = PE (PERMITS) Source: San Bernardino County Fire Dept. Phone:(909) 387 -3080 Handlers and Generators Permit Information Maintained by the Hazardous Materials Div. LA COUNTY SITE MITIGATION COMPLAINT CONTROL LOG: DB TYPE = OT (OTHER UNIQUE DATABASES) Source: The Los Angeles County Hazardous Materials Division Phone: (323) 890 -7806 The County of Los Angeles Public Health Investigation Compliant Control Log ORANGE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL SITE CLEANUPS: DB TYPE = OT (OTHER UNIQUE DATABASES) Source: Orange County Environmental Health Agency Phone-.(714) 834 -3536 AST ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANKS: DB TYPE = US (UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS) Source: The State Water Resources Control Board Phone:(916) 227 -4364 The Above Ground Petroleum Storage Act became State Law effective January 1, 1990. In general, the law requires owners or operators of AST's with petroleum products to file a storage statement and pay a fee by July 1, 1990 and every two years thereafter, take specific action to prevent spills, and in certain instances implement a groundwater monitoring program. This law does not apply to that portion of a tank facility associated with the production oil and regulated by the State Division of Oil and Gas of the Dept. of Conservation. SWEEPS / FIDS STATE REGISTERED UNERGOROUND STORAGE TANKS: DB TYPE = US Source: CAL EPA Dept of Toxic Substances Control Phone:(916)227 -4404 Until 1994 the State Water Resources Control Board maintained a database of registered underground storage tanks statewide referred to as the SWEEPS System. The SWEEPS UST information was integrated with the CAL EPA's Facility Index System database (FIDS) which is a master index of information from numerous California agency environmental databases. That was last updated in 1994. Track Info Services included the UST information from the FIDS database in its First Search reports for historical purposes to help its clients identify where tanks may possibly have existed. For more information on specific sites from individual paper files archived at the State Water Resources Control CUPA DATABASES & SOURCES (DB TYPE = US (UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS) DEFINITION OF A CUPA: A Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) is a local agency that has been certified by the CAL EPA to implement six state environmental programs within the local agency's jurisdiction. These can be a county, city, or JPA (Joint Powers Authority). This program was established under the amendments to the California Health and Safety Code made by SB 1082 in 1994. A Participating Agency (PA) is a local agency that has been designated by the local CUPA to administer one or more Unified Programs within their jurisdiction on behalf of the CUPA. A Designated Agency (DA) is an agency that has not been certified by the CUPA but is the responsible local agency that would implement the six unified programs until they are certified. Please Note: Track Info Services, LLC collects and maintains information regarding Underground Storage Tanks from majority of the CUPAS and Participating Agencies in the State of California. These agencies typically do not maintain nor release such information on a uniform or consistent schedule; therefor, currency of the data may vary. Please look at the details on a specific site with a UST record in the First Search Report to determine the actual currency date of the record as provided by the relevant agency. Numerous efforts are made on a regular basis to obtain updated records. ALAMEDA COUNTY CUPA'S • County of Alameda Department of Environmental Health • Cities of Berkeley, Fremont, Hayward, Livermore / Pleasanton, Newark, Oakland, San Leandro, Union ALPINE COUNTY CUPA * Health Department (Only updated by agency annually) ANADOR COUNTY CUPA * County of Amador Environmental Health Department BUTTE COUNTY CUPA * County of Butte Environmental Health Division (Only updated by agency biannually) CALAVERAS COUNTY CUPA * County of Calaveras Environmental Health Department COLUSA COUNTY CUPA * Environmental Health Dept. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CUPA * Hazardous Materials Program DEL NORTH COUNTY CUPA (US) * Department of Health and Social Services ELDORADO COUNTY CUPA'S* County of El Dorado Environmental Health - Solid Waste Div (Only updated by agency annually) * County of E1 Dorado EMD Tahoe Division (Only updated by agency annually) FRESNO COUNTY CUPA * Haz. Mat and Solid Waste Programs GLENN COUNTY CUPA - * Air Pollution Control District HUMBOLDT COUNTY CUPA (US) * Environmental Health Division IMPERIAL COUNTY CUPA (US) * Department of Planning and Building INYO COUNTY CUPA (US) * Environmental Health Department KERN COUNTY CUPA (US) • County of Kern Environmental Health Department • City of Bakersfield Fire Department KINGS COUNTY CUPA (US) * Environmental Health Services LAKE COUNTY CUPA (US) * Division of Environmental Health LASSEN COUNTY CUPA (US) * Department of Agriculture LOS ANGELES COUNTY CUPA -S (US) • County of Los Angeles Fire Department • County of Los Angeles Environmental Programs Division • Cities of Burbank, E1 Segundo, Glendale, Long Beach /Signal Hill, Los Angeles,Pasadena, Santa Fe Springs, Santa Monica, Torrance, Vernon MADERA COUNTY CUPA (US) * Environmental Health Department NARIN COUNTY CUPA (US) • County of Marin Office of Waste Management • City of San Rafael Fire Department MARIPOSA COUNTY CUPA (US) * Health Department MENDOCINO COUNTY CUPA (US) * Environmental Health Department MERCED COUNTY CUPA (US) * Division of Environmental Health MODOC COUNTY CUPA (US) * Department of Agriculture MONO COUNTY CUPA (US) * Health Department MONTEREY COUNTY CUPA (US) * Environmental Health Division NAPA COUNTY CUPA (US) * Hazardous Materials Section NEVADA COUNTY CUPA (UST) * Environmental Health Department ORANGE COUNTY CUPA'S (US) *. County of Orange Environmental Health Department * Cities of Anaheim, Fullerton, Orange, Santa Ana * County of Orange Environmental Health Department PLACER COUNTY CUPA (US) • County of Placer Division of Environmental Health Field Office • Tahoe City • City of Roseville Roseville Fire Department PLUMAS COUNTY CUPA (UST) * Environmental Health Department RIVERSIDE COUNTY CUPA (US). * Environmental Health Department SACRAMENTO COUNTY (US) * County Environmental Mgmt Dept, Haz. Mat. Div. SAN BENITO COUNTY CUPA (US) * City of Hollister Environmental Service Department SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CUPA -S (US) • County Of San Bernardino Fire Department, Haz. Mat. Div. • City of Hesperia Hesperia Fire Prevention Department City of Victorville Victorville Fire Department SAN DIEGO COUNTY CUPA (US) * The San Diego County Dept. of Environmental Health HE 17/56 SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY CUPA (US) * Department of Public Health SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY CUPA (US) * Environmental Health Division SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY CUPA'S (US) • County of San Luis Obispo Environmental Health Division • City of San Luis Obispo City Fire Department SAN MATEO COUNTY 'CUPA (US) * Environmental Health Department SANTA BARBARA COUNTY CUPA (US) * Co Fire Dept Protective Services Div SANTA CLARA COUNTY CUFA'S (US) • County of Santa Clara Hazardous Materials Compliance Division • Santa Clara Cc Central Fire Prot. Dist. (Covers Campbell, Cupertino, Los Gatos, & Morgan Hill) * Cities of Gilroy, Milpitas, Mountain View, Palo Alto, San Jose- Fire, Santa Clara, Sunnyvale SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CUPA (US) * Environmental Health Department SHASTA COUNTY CUPA (US) * Environmental Health Department SIERRA COUNTY CUPA (US) * Health Department SISEIYOU COUNTY CUPA (US) * Environmental Health Department SONOMA COUNTY CUPA'S (US) • County of Sonoma Department Of Environmental Health • Cities of Healdsburg / Sebastapol, Petaluma, Santa Rosa STANINSLAUS COUNTY CUPA (US) * Dept. of Env. Rsres. Haz. Mat. Div. SUTTER COUNTY CUPA (US) * Department of Agriculture TEHAMA COUNTY CUPA (US) * Department of Environmental Health TRINITY COUNTY CUPA (US) * Department of Health TULARE COUNTY CUPA (US) * Environmental Health Department TUOLUMNE COUNTY CUPA (US) * Environmental Health VENTURA COUNTY CUPA'S (BNT UST'S & CERTIFIED UST-S) • County of Ventura Environmental Health Division • Cities of Oxnard, Ventura YOLO COUNTY CUPA (US) * Environmental Health Department YUBA COUNTY CUPA (US) * Yuba County of Emergency Services Environmental FirstSearch Street Name Report for Streets within 5 Mile(s) of Target Property TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL Street Name MUM Street Name MUM Adelia Ave 0.58 NE Klingerman St 0.49 SE Adelita Ln 1.57 SE La Press Ave 0.67 SW Aerojet Ave 0.41 NE Lake Knoll Dr 1.36 SW Alesia St 1.26 SE Langford PI 0.99 SW Alpaca St 1.06 SE Lashbrook Ave 0.32 NE Als Dr 0.88 SE Lawton St 1.50 SE Amber Rose Ln 1.32 SW Lee Ave 0.10 SE Anderson Rd 0.81 SE Lee St 0.93 NW Angelus Ave 1.07 NW Lerma Rd 1.69 SE Arden Dr 1.40 NE Leybum Dr 0.25 NW Argo PI 0.16 N W Linda Lee Ave 0.78 NE Arnie St 0.99 NW Lindcove Ln 0.57 NW Artson St 0.99 NW Linn Ave 0.96 SE Asher St 0.90 NE Loftus Dr 0.92 NW Baldwin Ave 1.11 NE Loma Ave 0.07 SE Baldwin A 1.04 NE Lori Ln 1.52 SW Bartlett Ave 0.58 -W Lynn Ln 0.44 NW Beatrice PI 0.44 N W Mabel Ave 0.07 SE Beuville Ave 1.39 NE Maroon St 1. 16 SE Bishop Way 0.50 NW Marshall St 0.90 N- Bodger St 1.00 NE Marybeth Ave 0.44 SE Broadmead St 1.59 SE Max Shapiro Way 1.38 SE Brockway A 0.62 NE Mayfair Ave 1.29 NE Brockway St 0.38 NE Merced Ave 0.99 -E Brookline Ave 0.95 NE Mildred St 1.13 NE Bruin Ave 0.25 SE Millet Ave 1.15 SE Burton Ave 0.67 SW Muscatel Ave 0.49 SW Cedar Ln 1.22 NE N Charlotte Ave 1.37 NW Central Ave 1.25 NE N Vane Ave 0.81 NE Chariette Ave 1.09 NW N Walnut Grove Ave 0.76 -W Charlotte Ave 1.12 N W Nevada Ave 1.24 NW Cheri Way 0.48 NW Nevada St 1.19NW Chico Ave 0.50 -E NORTH Charlotte Ave 1.37 NW Claudia Cir 0.88 NE NORTH Vane Ave 0.81 NE Cortada St 0.21 NE NORTH Walnut Grove A 0.76 -W Crain Dr 1.62 SW Norwood PI 1.03 NW De Adalena St 0.97 NW Olney St 0.76 NE De Ganno Ave 1.57 NE Paljay Ave 0.73 SW Del Pino Dr 1.52 SW Park St 1.03 NW Delta Ave 1.01 NW Pinetree Ln 1.53 SW Delta P1 0.96 NW Pon= Ave 0.73 SE Delta St 1.25 SW Ralph St 1.04 NW Dennis Dr 0.71 NW Ramona Blvd 0.69 NE Dorothy St 0.84 NW Reifer St 1.51 SW Driggs Ave 0.12 NW Remer St 1.12 SE Dubonnet Ave 0.59 SW Reynolds Ave 1.36 SW E Marshall St 1.35 NW Rio Hondo Ave 0.51 NE E Valley Blvd 1.49 NW Rio Hondo Pky 0.73 NE Environmental FirstSearch Street Name Report for Streets within 5 Mile(s) of Target Property TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL Street Name Dist/Dir Street Name MUM Earle Ave 0.93 SW River Ave 0.26 SW Earlswood Dr 0.52 NW Rockhold Ave 0.90 N W EAST Marshall St 1.35 NW Rockwell Ave 1.22 NE EAST Valley Blvd 1.49 NW Rose Ave 1.63 NE Edda Villa Dr 1.02 NW Rosebrook Ln 1.34 SW Edwards Ave 1.12 NE Rosemead Blvd 0.16 NE El Poche St 1.01 SE Rosemead A 0.26 -W Ellis Ln 0.88 NE Rowland Ave 1.43 NE Elsmore Dr 1.44 SW Roxie St 1.40 NE Emerson A 0.38 NW Rush St 0.74 SE Enloe St 0.92 SE S Charlotte Ave 1.29 NW Esto Ave 1.51 NE S Gladys Ave 1.47 NW Eunice Ave 1.44 NE San Bernardino Ramp 0.61 NE Factorial Way 0.85 SE Sarah St 1.46 SW Fern Ave 0.49 SW Sastre Ave 0.83 NE Fern St 0.25 SE Scenic Dr 1.56 SW Flair Dr 0.23 NE Schmidt Rd 1.30 SE Fletcher Ave 0.66 NE Seaman Ave 0.91 -E Fletcher Park Way 1.22 NE Seelert Ln 1.64 SW Friendswood Ave 1.07 NE Shea PI 1.26 NW Garrett St 0.40 NW Shirley Ave 1.47 NE Garvey Ave 0.00-- Sierra Bonita Ave 1.39 SW Gaydon Ave 1.23 NW SOUTH Charlotte Ave 1.29 NW Gernert Ave 1.23 NW SOUTH Gladys Ave 1.47 NW Gibson Rd 1.16 NE Stallo Ave 0.98 NW Giovane St 0.35 SE Steele St 1.19 NW Gladys Ave 1.19 N W Stingle Ave 0.36 SW Glendon Way 0.79 NW Strang Ave 0.99 NE Graves Ave 1.22 SW Strozier Ave 1.09 SE Greendale Ave 0.54 NW Sullivan Ave 0.18 -W Guess St 1.12 NW Tamora Ave 0.71 SE Hart Ave 0.69 NE Telstar Ave 0.41 NE Havenpark Ave 1.20 NE Temple City Blvd 0.92 NE Hayward Way 1.28 SE Townway Dr 0.82 NE Heglis Ave 0.12 N W Troy Ave 0.21 SE Hellman Ave 0.87 NW Twin Ave 1.28 NW Hershey St 0.46 NW Vacco St 1.65 SE Hidden Ln 1.27 NE Vachon Dr 1.42 NW Hidden Pines PI 1.41 NW Valley Blvd 1.26 N W Hoyt Park PI 1.27 NE Vane Ave 0.42 NE Humbert Ave 0.62 NE Velma Ave 1.54 NE 1 -10 0.65 N- Walnut Grove Ave 0.90 SW lvar Ave 0.40 SW Weaver St 1.37 SE Jade Ln 0.36 SW Whispering Pines PI 1.42 NW Jenny Way 0.60 NW Whitmore St 0.21 NE Joe Vargas Way 1.45 SE Willard Ave 0.84 SW Kahns Dr 0.33 NW Woodrich Ln 1.21 NE Kale St 0.87 SE Yarrow St 1.39 SW Environmental FirstSearch Street Name Report for Streets within 5 Mile(s) of Target Property TARGET SITE: GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL JOB: GARVEY ROSEMEAD CA 91770 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL Street Name Dist/Dir Street Name Dist/Ar Katie Ln 0.52 NW Kellner Ave 1.39 SW cA' Environmental FirstSearch 1 Mile Radius ASTM Map: NPL, RCRACOR, STATE Sites s GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL, ROSEMEAD CA 91 z W Source: 1999 U.S. Census TIGER Fifes ' Target Site (Latitude: 34.062734 Lo*nWc: -118.068919) ........ Identified Site, Multiple Sites. Receptor ............. .............. NPL, Solid Waste rcifill (SWL) car Hazardous Waste ......... ................... Block Rini Represent 1/4 Nfim Radu; Red Ring 9eptesems 500 R Radius CA' Environmental FirstSearch .5 Mile Radius ASTM Map: CERCLIS, RCRATSD, LUST, SWL d GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL, ROSEMEAD CA 91 Snurcc: 1999 U.S. Census TIGER Files Tart Sim Longitude:- 118.068819)........ (Lautude:34.062734 Idmrifiod Sim. Multiple Sims Rereptm ........................... ® A NPL, Solid Wasm Landfill (SWL) m Hazardaus Wssm ... ................ _....._ Bled Rings Repmseot 1/4 Mile Radii; Red Ring Reprt is 500 R Radius �v Environmental FirstSearch .25 Mile Radius ASTM Map: RCRAGEN, ERNS, UST 6 GARVEY AVE. BRIDGE & RIO HONDO CHANNEL, ROSEMEAD CA 91 o Source: 1999 U.S. Censar TIGER Files Tuget Sim (fatiade:34.062734 Lwngimde:- 118.068819).. ...... /� �. Identified Sim, Mukiple Sias. RecMw .......................... .. ® 8 NPL, Solid Waste Landfill (SWL) orHazndous Waste ..._ ............... _....... Black Rip Reptvent 1/4 Mile Radii; Rd Ring Repmsenn 500 fl Radiva y Appendix B Lead Paint Inspection Report for City of Rosemead Performed at Garvey Avenue over Rio Hondo Channel AAA LEAD Consultants and Inspections, Inc., March 2003 I a AAA LEAD Consultants and Inspections. Inc. Consulting • Inspections • Risk Assessment • Project Monitoring STATE CERTIFIED / INSURED LEAD PAINT INSPECTION REPORT FOR City of Rosemead performed at Garvey Avenue over Rio Hondo Channel State Bridge # 53CO148 ' County Bridge #1027 ' Phone 909 552 -9071 1307 West Sixth Street, Ste. 134 • Corona, Ca 92982 http: //w w.l)e.net/- aaalead Fax 909 552.9073 a Q I LEAD PAINT INSPECTION REPORT REPORT NUMBER: INSPECTION FOR: S#01122 -03/6/03 11:40 City of Rosemead 8838 East Valley Blvd. Rosemead, Ca. 91770 PERFORMED AT: Garvey Ave. over Rio Hondo Channel County Bridge #1027 State Bridge #53C0148 INSPECTION DATE: INSTRUMENT TYPE: ACTION LEVEL: OPERATORS LICENSE March 6, 2003 RMD MODEL LPA -1 XRF TYPE ANALYZER SERIAL # 1122 1.0mg/Cm2 6212 -33 SIGNED: DATE: March 11, 2003 Michael P. Cohn INSPECTOR 1437 This Inspection was conducted in conformance with HUD Guidelines as published in 1997. AAA Lead Consultants and Inspections, Inc. utilized state-of-art practices and techniques in accordance with regulatory standards while performing this Inspection. AAA Lead Consultants and Inspections, Inc. evaluation of the relative risk of exposure to lead identified during this inspection Is based on conditions observed at the time inspection. AAA Lead Consultants and Inspections, Inc. cannot be responsible for changing conditions that may alter the relative exposure risk or for changes in accepted methodology. AAA Lead Consultants and Inspections, Inc. 1307 West Sixth Street #134, Corona, Ca Phone (909) 582 -9071 Fax (909) 582 -9073 htte' / /www.oe.neU- aaalead 1 TAB TAB 2 TAB 3 TAB 4 TAB 5 1 M TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 .0 Introduction 2.0 Scope of Work 3.0 Property Description 4.0 Inspectors Qualifications 5.0 Method of Testing 6.0 Testing Protocol 7.0 Summary of Results 8.0 Recommendations 9.0 Site Specific Observations 10.0 Inspection Limitations How to Read Your Report Tables Distribution Report Summary Report Detailed Report Laboratory Analysis Site Footprint Photos of Components Which Contain Lead Inspectors Certifications DHS 8552 AAA Lead Consultants end Inspections, Inc. 1307 West Sixth Street #134, Corona, Ca Phone (909) 582 -9071 Fax (909) 582 -9073 http: //w .m.net/- ,%ulmd F r r r r LEAD BASED PAINT INSPECTION REPORT GARVEY AVENUE OVER RIO HONDO CHANNEL COUNTY BRIDGE #1027 STATE BRIDGE #53C0148 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of AAA LEAD Consultants and Inspections, Inc. lead -based paint inspection of the above referenced bridge, located at Garvey Avenue / Rio Hondo Channel, Rosemead, California (Subject Property). AAA LEAD Consultants and Inspections, Inc. performed the inspection on March 6, 2003, in accordance with L. A. County Public Works guidelines for lead inspections. This document is prepared for the sole use of City of Rosemead and any regulatory agencies that are directly involved in this project. No other party should rely on the information contained herein without prior written consent of the City of Rosemead. The scope of services, inspection methodology and results are presented below. 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK The purpose of this inspection is to identify and assess the presence of Lead -Based Paint on the surfaces of painted components on the aforementioned bridge. On March 6, 2003 AAA LEAD Consultants and Inspections, Inc. performed an inspection for lead - based paint at the subject property in Rosemead, California. The intent was to ascertain the presence of lead -based paint above specified action levels. If lead -based paint was found, the inspection would identify individual architectural components and their respective concentrations of lead in such a manner that this report could be used for subsequent abatement and / or maintenance activity. 3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The bridge is a concrete structure supported by concrete abutments at each end of the channel along with five concrete bents evenly spaced along the width of the channel. Just west of the channel are two more bents which support the remaining portion of the bridge. The bridge is used to support Garvey Avenue over the Rio Hondo Channel. On the deck of the bridge are metal handrails. 4.0 INSPECTOR'S QUALIFICATIONS Mr. Michael Cohn of AAA LEAD Consultants and Inspections, Inc. performed the inspection at the site using an RMD XRF spectrum analyzer instrument. Mr. Cohn has attended the radiation safety course for operation and handling of the RMD instrument, and completed an EPA sponsored curriculum at the University Extension Services at University of California, San Diego, in Lead Inspector, Lead Abatement for Contractors and Supervisors and Risk Assessor Training. Mr. Cohn is a State Certified Inspector for Lead Inspections, Project Monitoring, Project Design and Project Supervision. AAA Lead Consultants and Inspections, Inc. 1307 West Sixth Street #134, Corona, Ca Phone (909) 582 -9071 Fax (wv) DU-w /a httu-H/ ne netl- aalead I I I I 1 I I J r 5.0 METHOD OF TESTING The testing method employed was x -ray fluorescence (XRF) using a Radiation Monitoring Device Paint Analyzer. The instrument was calibrated to the manufacture's specifications and was also periodically verified against known lead samples produced by the National Institute of Standards and Testing (NIST). The duration for each test result is determined by a combination of the actual reading relative to the designated action level, the age of the radioactive source, and the substrate on which the test was taken. Substrate corrections (SEL) were not required in compliance with the HUD guidelines for spectrum analyzers. Together these quality control procedures produce a 95% confidence level that the corrected lead concentration (CLC) accurately reflects the actual level of lead in the tested surfaces. 6.0 TESTING PROTOCOL Testing was conducted in compliance within the guidelines set forth by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works. The bridge was inspected with a minimum of one representative surface of each painted component in each area tested. The HUD /EPA action level for lead based paint is 1 .0 mg /cm2. The action level for this report conforms to this level. None of the components tested "inconclusive" which is the statistical range of uncertainty around the action level. HUD has published guidelines that address test results in the inconclusive range. The inconclusive range in this report (0.8 -1.2mg /cm2) was developed to acknowledge the limits of detection for XRF technology. 7.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS A summary table with the results of this site has been provided in the "tables" section of this report. Below is a brief description of the components that tested at or above the action level of 1.Omg /cm2 and their respective locations. Two items tested positive for the presence of lead with the XRF unit: Water Line Handrails Confirming laboratory analysis indicates only the water line hangers contain lead based paint. All other components tested negative for the presence of lead based paint. 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS All components that tested positive for the presence of lead at or above the HUD action level and any similar untested components should be considered lead - laden. Any maintenance or repair activities on these components should be performed in an abatement/containment environment as required by Cal /OSHA Construction and Safety Orders, Lead Section 1532.1. Any component that is below the HUD action level but still contains lead requires Personal exposure level (PEL) testing be performed to determine the workers skill or certification required to perform the activity if an outside contractor will do the work. AAA Lead Consultants and Inspections, Inc. 1307 West Sixth Street #134, Corona, Ca Phone (909) 582 -9071 Fax (909) 582 -9073 httn' //w ne net/ -ualmd lJ 1 9.0 SITE SPECIFIC OBSERVATIONS Most of the paint on the handrails of the bridge has worn off. The concrete that has been painted is primarily graffiti cover up. 1 10.0 INSPECTION LIMITATIONS AAA LEAD Consultants and Inspections planned, developed and implemented this inspection based on AAA LEAD Consultants and Inspections previous experience in performing lead - based paint inspections. This inspection was conducted in conformance with HUD Guidelines as published in 1997. AAA LEAD Consultants and Inspections, Inc. utilized state -of -the -art practices and techniques in accordance with regulatory standards while performing this inspection. A copy of personnel certifications has been provided for your review. AAA LEAD Consultants and Inspections evaluation of the relative risk of exposure to lead identified during this inspection is based on conditions observed at the time of the inspection. AAA LEAD Consultants and Inspections cannot be responsible for changing conditions that may alter the relative exposure risk or for future changes in accepted methodology. AAA Lead Consultants and inspections, Inc. 1307 West Sixth Street #134, Corona, Ca Phone (909) 582 -9071 Fax (909) 582 -9073 htto,H/ .ne.net/-aaalead I U D I I I I I I HOW TO READ YOUR REPORT TABLES Depending upon our findings there are several different tables that can be used to generate an accounting of the final results. These tables use two different formats. The first table is the Distribution Report. This report is an accounting of all components that were tested with correlating results of how many of each component tested positive, negative or inconclusive. In cases of over 1,000 readings it is necessary to divide the report into two sections. When this happens we provide a Project Distribution report combining the Distribution Reports from both report sections with grand total figures. The second fonnat is found in the rest of our "tables ". The following is a brief summary of what each heading in the table means. Reading No. Each test is assigned a reading number. Room No. Each room has its own identifying number. Room Name Along with its own number is a description of the room. Wall There is a site map towards the end of (office, hall, bath, etc) A letter, either A, B, C identifies each wall, or D. �- the report that identifies each location. S t r r r r truC Ure This is the actual name of the component being tested. (wall, window, door, etc) Location The area tested on the component. (U Ift is upper left, L Ctr is lower center, etc) Member The portion of the component tested. If the component is a door, the member could be the casing or the jamb. Paint Condition I = Intact, F = Fair and P = Poor Substrate This is what the component is made of. (wood, Color Though seldom used if a component contains more than one color but only one of the colors tests positive, the positive color will be identified. Lead (mg/cm2) This is the lead content of the component tested. Mode The equipment can be operated in three modes Std (standard), QM (Quick Mode) or TC (Time Corrected). Std is used to acquire a measurement for a fixed amount of time. QM is the mode used to test components throughout a site. TC mode is used to calibrate the equipment against a known lead source based on a predetermined amount of time. The equipment will only produce an answer after it has reached a 95% confidence level the reading is correct. The time can vary from 2 to 60 seconds. metal, gypsum, plaster etc..) AAA Lead Consultants and Inspections, Inc. 1307 West Sixth Stnxt #134, Corona, Ca Phone (909) 582 -9071 Fax (909) 582 -9073 htto• //w tx.net/-aaalead I DISTRIBUTION REPORT OF LEAD PAINT INSPECTION FOR: City of Rosemead Inspection Date: 03/06/03 Garvey Ave over Rio Hondo Channel Report Date: 3/6/2003 County Bridge # 1027 Abatement Level: 1.0 State Bridge # 53CO148 1 Report No. S#01122 - 03/06/03 11:40 Total Reading Sets: 14 Job Started: 03/06/03 11:40 1 Job Finished: 03/06/03 13:16 Structure Distribution Structure Total Positive Negative Inconclusive Abutment 1 0 <06> 1 <1006> 0 <0%> Bent 1 0 <0%> 1 <100%> 0 <0%> Gas Line 2 0 <0%> 2 <1006> 0 <0 %> Handrail 3 3 <100%> 0 <0%> 0 <0 %> Hanger 3 1 <336> 2 <67%> 0 <0%> - Trans Ham 1 0 <0%> 1 <1006> 0 <0%> Water Line 3 3 <100%> 0 <0%> 0 <06> Inspection Totals: 16 7 < 508> 7 < SOB> 0 < 09> I �J 1 r r r r r r r r 1 ASUMMARY REPORT OF LEAD PAINT INSPECTION FOR: City of Rosemead Inspection Date: Report Date: Abatement Level: Report No. Total Readings: Job Started: 1 Job Finished: LI I I r r r r r 03/06/03 3/6/2003 1.0 S#01122 - 03/06/03 11:40 26 Actionable:7 03/06/03 11:40 03/06/03 13:16 Reading No. Wall Structure Location Member Garvey Ave over Rio Hondo Channel County Bridge # 1027 State Bridge # 53CO148 Paint LOBO Cond Substrate Color (mg/cm') Mode Interior Room 001 Bridge 016 A Handrail Lft P Metal N/A >9.9 QM 015 A Handrail Rgt P Metal N/A 7.1 QM Ole B Water Line Lft I Metal N/A 3.3 ON 014 C Handrail Lft P Metal N/A 4.7 QM 020 C Hanger Rgt P Metal N/A >9.9 QM 009 D Water Line Rgt I Metal N/A 3.5 QM 010 D Water Line Rgt I Metal N/A 5.3 QM Calibration Readings - - -- End of Readings - - -- 1 (DETAILED REPORT OF LEAD PAINT INSPECTION FOR: City of Rosemead I I I 1 r r r r Inspection Date: Report Date: Abatement Level: Report No. Total Readings: Job Started: Job Finished: 03/06/03 3/6/2003 1.0 S#01122 - 03/06/03 11:40 26 03/06/03 11:40 03/06/03 13:16 Garvey Ave over Rio Hondo Channel County Bridge # 1027 State Bridge # 53CO148 Reading Paint Lead No. Wall Structure Location Member Cond Substrate Color (mglcm') Mode Interior Room 001 Bridge 001 0.9 TC 002 016 A Handrail Lft P Metal N/A >9.9 QM 017 A Gas Line Lft P Metal N/A 0.1 QM 019 A Hanger Lft I Metal N/A 0.0 QM 015 A Handrail Rgt P Metal N/A 7.1 QM o18 B Water Line Lft I Metal N/A 3.3 QM 014 C Handrail Lft P Metal N/A 4.7 QM 020 C Hanger Rgt P Metal N/A >9.9 QM 007 D Gas Line Lft I Metal N/A 0.1 QM 008 D Abutment Lft I Concrete N/A -0.1 QM 012 D Trans Beam Lft I Concrete N/A 0.0 QM 013 D Bent Lft I Concrete N/A -0.1 QM 009 D Water Line Rgt I Metal N/A 3.5 QM 010 D Water Line Rgt I Metal N/A 5.3 QM 011 D Hanger Rgt I Metal N/A 0.2 QM Calibration Readings 001 0.9 TC 002 0.9 TC 003 0.9 TC 004 0.0 TC 005 0.0 TC 006 0.0 TC 1.0 TC 021 0.8 TC 022 023 0.9 TC 024 -0.1 TC 025 0.0 TC 026 -0.1 TC - - -- Bnd of Readings - - -- 1 PAGE 01 ' MACS Lab, Inc. Analysis Report 2070A Walsh Avenue Santa Clara, CA 95050 -2542 Lead in Paint (408) 727 -9727 USEPA 7000/7420 Person to contact: Michael Cohn AAA Lead Consultants & Inspect Contact phone: 909.582 -9071 1307 West Sixth St., Ste. #134 FAX phone: 909- 582 -9073 CA 92882 Samples received on: March 10, 2003 Corona Report prepared on: March 11, 2003 at: 12:37 ' corresponding invoice number. 11826a Bias: 3.2% Precision: -1.4% Michelle Qoole 'Analyst: Laboratory manager: (signature) 4O�N(s-ignature) r Job ity of RosemeadBridge #1027, Rio Hondo /Garvey �Cajib R cvd Ac• LOO Lead lab Sample Client Sample Number OK cord ppm % ppm m9/cm2 Number and Description P119268 -1 PC -001 7967 ®® 207 < 0.021 < 207 N/A Abutment 'D' 'C' P119268 -2 PC -002 7967 ®® 214 0.118 1,180 NIA Hanger 'A' 'R' End of report. I� I� This report may not be reproduced except in full and with the permission of MACS Lab, Inc. This report relates only to the item(s) tested. For OC data refer to Calibration Number QA Report. MACS Lab is accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) for the analysis of lead in paint and soil (laboratory ID #11172). Some paint samples submitted contain substrate material that can't be removed from the paint layer. This may cause erroneous results. Proper field sampling techniques must be used. Analysis is performed on a flame Atomic ANN Absorption Spectrometer. LOO= Limit Of Quantification. PPM = parts per million & 10,1X10 ppm , 1 % Note: 1 C AOREDtTED mgrkg = 1 ppm NOTICE: FOR XRF Confirmation: When the actual sampled area is provided to the laboratory, the LMOROTORY results can be calculated in mglcm2 exactly like an XRF instrument result. Otherwise NO XRF comparison can ever be made because the lab analyzes only a portion of a normal sample and the area of a scrape can't be known Page 1 of after the fact. Without the area N!A is reported. ' 03/11/2003 16:09 4087277065 MACS LAB PAGE 02 I A I I I 11 MACS Lab, Inc. quality Control Report 2070A Walsh Avenue Santa Clara, CA 95050 -2542 Calibration # AA -7967 Element Lead Matrix: Paint Date March 11, 2003 Method Detection Limit 0.29 lug gm - soil/paint µg/sq_ ft - dust Analyst DN NgMer -air Measured Target Acceptance Value Value Criterion Correlation coefficient 0.25 µg /ml Reference Glassware rinse water Initial Calibration Blank Method Blank Beginning CCV Beginning ICV Beginning LCS Before sample 1 CCV Before sample 11 CCB Before sample 11 Method Blank Before sample 11 CCV Before sample 21 CCB Before sample 21 Method Blank Before sample 21 CCV Before sample 31 CCB Before sample 31 Method Blank Before sample 31 CCV After CCB After Method Blank After if LCS After Spike of sample119141 - Spike of sample 0- Spiked Duplicate 119141 - Spiked Duplicate 0- 'Muplicate of sample119141 Duplicate of sample 0- ONats: = Initial Calibration Blank DL Minimum Detection Limit of the method (absolute) P V= Initial Calibration Verification CV. Continuing Calibration Verification 9= Continuing Calibration Blank N/A = Not Applicable �CS= Laboratory Control Sample - NIST ' SRM -7579 0.999983 0.278 µg /ml < 0.299 µg /ml < 0.299 µg/ml -0.804 µg 4.992 itg /ml 5.022 µg /ml 10.696 µg /ml 5.016 pg/ml < 0.299 'µg /ml -1.704 gg N/A µg/ml WA µg/ml N/A µg N/A Ag /ml N/A pg /ml N/A µg 4.932 µg /ml < 0.299 µg /ml 0.095 µg 10.498 41ml 1 20.99800 Acceptable 0.25 >0.06 Acceptable 0 µg 0.0 0 5 0.25 Acceptable 0 <_ 12.5 Acceptable 5.0000 ± 10.0 % Acceptable 5.0000 ± 10.0 % Acceptable 10.6093 ± 10.0 % Acceptable 5.0000 ± 10.0:% Acceptable 0 5 0.25 Acceptable 0 512.5 Acceptable 5.0000 ± 10.0% 0 5 0.25 0 < 12.5 5.0000 t 10.0 % 0 5 0.25 0 <_ 12.5 5.0000 t 10.0 % Acceptable 0 < 0.25 Acceptable 0 <_ 12.5 Acceptable 10.6093 t 10.0% Acceptable 1 561.1 lag 500.0 t 25.0% Acceptable 0 N/A µg 0.0 ±25,0% 1 477.9 µg 500.0 ± 25.0 % Acceptable 0 WA µg 0.0 ± 25.0% 1 88728 ppm 86840 ± 25.0 % Acceptable 0 N/A ppm ± 25.0 % Duplicate analyses are measurements of the variable of interest (in this case lead) performed identically on two subsamples of the same sample. The results from duplicate analyses are used to evaluate anaytical or measurement precision but not the precision of sampling. Spiked samples are prepared by adding a known mass of the target anayte (in this case lead) to a specified amount of matrix sample for which an independent estimate of target ansyte concentration is available. Spiked samples are used to determine the effect of the matrix on a method's recovery efficiency. The Method Blank is a mixture of all reagents used for the digestion of paint, soil, or dust matrices but without the matrix. The blank is carried through an steps of the analysis starting with the digestion step. This blank evaluates the process for contamination from the laboratory. Accuracy is the degree of agreement between an observed value and an accepted reference value such as the LCS NIST SRM -1579 sample. Precision is the degree to which a set of observations or measurements of the same propany conform to themselves. NEVER depend upon the laboratory to "fix -up" a poorly taken sample. 1 r 11; z} all 555 o9V VH ❑0E] Qy p r, �t ISO 1 M PW'i17 a +al$M amA m o g�E M m ' rx$ya ° P�'U* =. a �ltiM =®1� v 1H3S �• Z V U �6v$i$� U r7 tiid'sadiM) pun ,. (KInH) Ni7d a C'M 1wu ri T� 9 �Q 13 g e> x� ❑O t E•, r � a m 0 K o a c o � p y < r:�S -i1 a M a r $xe A � a u� < Z< U L. W N C I 1 1 I [] 1 r r r r r r 0 w 0 U) 00 L ~ T > O U O M N it Lo U o > O < _0 O ? m �_�� M.00U) CD a-' U cA m w 0 Q w 0 U � w O 0 Z W 0 w 0 U) 00 L ~ T > O U O M N it Lo U o > O < _0 O ? m �_�� M.00U) CD a-' U cA m w 0 Q w 0 a N W qh O T X LL or P N h 0 j S V C t . .tl, w?L�I Fm it •F, • • CJ"�31 cd I3 .F' 1 �}4 1 1F (( Js�, Fli N � • • A e iri a N W qh O T X LL or P N h 0 j S V C t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ft N 2 c �v 0 w M C O V a v cn K W M C O V a _3 . .' r 1 -1i i 17 YY, r -ate .v �T V 0 `FJ U �1 Uz W . � O 0 c� L V V J V G C 0 V T V V V' c n :J c T M U C C C/) . O (1) a. r--j �N 1�1 _T C.3 C O =� V Y C J � C L L C V r I 1 r t r Wo U� 0 s r �< IL �7 O a Q 3 v s s e U,. o ao U � a V c� r z V �l �I g d z 'zr N O O im; 9:. Deeemm l Of Hedth S8MCM is d COArOrda Haden onE Human servkee Ayencr , LEAD HAZARD EVALUATION REPORT 1 —Section 1 Date of Lead Hazard Evaluation acct' iion 2 Type of Lead Hazard Evaluation (Check one box only) ll Lead inspection ❑ Risk assessment ❑ Clearance inspection ❑Other (specify) action 3 Structure Where Lead Hazard Evaluation Was Conducted Hnm. o rnumber, street, apartment (if applicable)] Ciry County ZIP coos Iq nstruct'on date (year) f Ty0of structure (check one box o") 1 buctur0 " ❑ Single family dwelling [I Multi-unit building ❑Child - occupied facility Other (spec) Ir Section 4 Owner of Structure (If business/agency, list contact person) Name Telephone number Address [number, strebt, apartment (it applicable)) Ciry n State i ` ZIP q, "J _C. - V!� - r�vY~0 Ck L 41 to I d`, X 110 Section 5 Results of Lead Irlazard Evaluation (Check one box only) �❑ No lead -based paint detected. A lead inspection was conducted following the procedures outlined in Title 17, California Code of Regulations, Division 1, Chapter 8. No lead -based paint was detected during this lead inspection. This structure is found to be lead -based paint free. ❑ No lead hazards detected. Lead hazard evaluation was conducted following the. procedures outlined in Title 17, California Code of Regulations, Division 1, Chapter 8. No lead hazards were detected. Lead -based paint and/or lead hazards detected. Lead hazard evaluation was conducted following the procedures outlined in Title 17, California Code of Regulations, Division 1, Chapter 8. Lead -based paint and/or lead hazards were detected. Section 6 Individual Conducting Lead Hazard Evaluation Name Telephone number (90q ) SSA -90 I Address inumber, street, apartment (it applicable)] city State ZIP code 13b Weir S Tl. #13 L0cc.rAL, CA gags), Brand name and serial number of any portable x-ray fluorescence (XRF) instrument used (it appiicable) DHS certification number 11 V Signature =Date Section 7 Attachments A. A foundation diagram or sketch of the structure indicating the specific locations of each lead hazard or presence of lead -based paint; B. Each testing method, device, and sampling procedure used; C, All data collected, including quality control data, laboratory results, including laboratory name, address, and phone number. First copy and attachments retained by Inspector Second copy and attachments retained by owner Third copy only (no attachments) mailed to: Department of Health Services Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch Reports 1515 Clay Street, No. 1001 Oakland, CA 9x612 FAX (510) 622 -5002 DHS 8552 (2,W) Appendix C Natural Environment Study for the Garvey Bridge Replacement Project White & Leatherman BioServices, Revised May 2003 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT STUDY FOR THE GARVEY BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT Prepared for: WILLDAN 13191 Crossroads Parkway North, Suite 450 Industry, California 91746 -2120 Prepared by: WHITE AND LEATHERMAN BIOSERVICES 4848 Lakeview Avenue, Suite 100E Yorba Linda, California 92886 (714) 701 -0863 (714) 701 -0869 fax NOVEMBER 2002 REVISED: MAY 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Natural Environment Study Garvey Bridge Replacement Project Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... ..............................1 1.1 Project Location ...................................................................... ..............................2 1.2 Project Description .................................................................. ..............................2 2.0 METHODS ...................................................................................... ..............................4 2.1 Literature Review .................................................................... ..............................4 2.2 Survey Methods ...................................................................... ..............................5 3.0 EXISTING BIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS ................................ ..............................5 3.1 Vegetation and Habitat ................................... ............................... 3.2 Wildlife .......................................................... ............................... 3.3 Special Status Species ..................................... ............................... 3.3.1 Special Status Plants ........................... ............................... 3.3.2 Special Status Wildlife ........................ ............................... 3.3.3 Special Status Habitats ....................... ............................... 4.0 IMPACTS ANALYSIS ................................................................... ..............................9 4.1 Significance Criteria ............................................................... ..............................9 4. 1A CEQA Mandatory Findings of Significance ............... ..............................9 4.1.2 CEQA Significance Criteria for Biological Resources .............................10 4.1.3 CEQA Definitions of Endangered, Rare, or Threatened Species ..............11 4.2 Direct Impacts .......................................................................... .............................12 4.2.1 Vegetation .................................................................... .............................12 4.2.2 Wildlife ........................................................................ .............................12 4.2.3 Special Status Plants .................................................... .............................12 4.2.4 Special Status Wildlife ................................................. .............................13 4.2.5 Wildlife Movement ...................................................... .............................13 4.3 Indirect Impacts ....................................................................... .............................13 4.4 Cumulative Impacts ................................................................. .............................13 5.0 RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES ....................... .............................13 5.1 Mitigation for Potential Impacts to Nesting Cliff Swallows ... .............................14 6.0 MITIGATION MONITORING .................................................... .............................14 7.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................ .............................14 i White & Leatherman BioServices WIL.01 Natural Environment Study Garvey Bridge Replacement Project LIST OF FIGURES Follows Page Figure1. Project Vicinity Map .............................................................. ..............................2 APPENDICES Appendix A: Special Status Species Tables . Appendix B: Plant and Wildlife Species Lists 11 white & Leatherman BioServices WIL.01 Natural Environment Study Garvey Bridge Replacement Project EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed Garvey Avenue Bridge Replacement Project consists of the on -site replacement of the existing Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. This action would improve traffic and pedestrian safety, as the existing bridge does not meet current seismic and geometric standards. The proposed project is located along Garvey Avenue where it crosses over Rio Hondo Channel near the borders of the Cities of Rosemead, El Monte, and South El Monte, in Los Angeles County, California. The project site and surrounding area is urbanized, consisting primarily of commercial and industrial developments. A literature search and subsequent reconnaissance -level survey were used to document existing conditions and evaluate the potential occurrence of special status plant and animal species. The Rio Hondo Channel is cement lined from bank to bank, and native vegetation is represented primarily by individual plants growing out of cracks in the cement or silt that accumulates in the channel. The shallow water in the channel provides foraging habitat for common shorebirds, and the bridge overhang provides nesting habitat for cliff swallows. Mitigation to avoid impacts to nesting cliff swallows is recommended. The potential occurrence of 22 special status species known from the region is evaluated in this report. One Cooper's hawk, a State a species of special concern, was observed foraging in the project vicinity, but no nesting habitat occurs in the project area. No other special status plants or animals are expected to occur on the project site due to lack of suitable habitat. Therefore, implementation would not result in impacts to special status species. 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Natural Environment Study (NES) has been prepared to support National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documentation for the proposed Garvey Avenue Bridge Replacement Project (hereafter referred to as the proposed project). The proposed project consists of the on -site replacement of the existing Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. This action would improve traffic and pedestrian safety, as the existing bridge does not meet current seismic and geometric standards. The proposed project would utilize the existing right -of -way by widening the crossing from approximately 52 feet to 100 feet. Described in this report are the existing conditions of the biological resources on the project site, the methods used to evaluate biological resources, and the significance of the potential impacts to biological resources that would result from project implementation. The impacts are assessed based on significance criteria in CEQA. This information has been collected and reported in accordance with accepted scientific and technical standards that are consistent with the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). White & Leatherman BioSemces WIL.01 Natural Environment Study Garvey Bridge Replacement Project 1.1 Project Location The proposed project consists of the replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The project is located along Garvey Avenue between stations 392 +67 and 402 +00, in the City of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California (Figure 1). 1.2 Project Description The existing bridge was built in 1936 and consists of continuous concrete tee beams over nine, 67 -foot and two, 26 -foot spans. The bridge is approximately 655 feet long and approximately 52 feet wide. The approach roadway width is 78 feet and the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of Garvey Avenue is 26,000 vehicles. The existing bridge is a traffic and pedestrian hazard. The bridge is a bottleneck; its width is only two thirds the width of the approach roadways. hi addition, the bridge does not have shoulders, and since the sidewalks are only three (3) feet wide, the bridge places pedestrians dangerously close to vehicular traffic. After investigation, the California Department of Transportation ( Caltrans) deemed the bridge structurally deficient, and it was, therefore, placed on Caltrans' Eligible Bridge List (EBL), since its sufficiency rating is 46.6. Furthermore, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Bridge Inspection Report and Field Inspection for the bridge lists the following deficiencies: the deck is in poor condition, the bridge rail is substandard, the bridge geometry is intolerable and obsolete, the roadway approach is substandard, and the sidewalk next to the bridge deck is substandard. The purpose of this project is to create an eastern access to City of Rosemead, south of the San Bernardino Freeway, that can operate at a reasonable Level of Service (LOS), is structurally sound, and safe for both vehicles and pedestrians. The City proposes to accomplish this goal by replacing the existing Garvey Avenue Bridge, which crosses the Rio Hondo Channel. The existing bridge is the only entrance to the City south of the San Bernardino Freeway, and is one of the City's major arterial roadways. As discussed, the existing bridge is a traffic and pedestrian hazard. The City of Rosemead proposes to design and construct a replacement bridge that meets current standards and reduces potential hazards. Project construction would be funded by the Local Federal Highway Bridge Rehabilitation and Replacement Program (HBRR), seismic retrofit funds, and local funds — all of which have been allocated. The proposed bridge would be 100 feet wide, within the existing right -of -way, and be joined to the existing approach roadway approximately 170 feet on the east side and 340 feet on the west side of the bridge. It can accommodate a 76 -foot wide roadway and two 11 -foot wide 2 White & Leatherman BioServices WIL.01 Natural Environment Study Garvey Bridge Replacement Project sidewalks. The roadway consists of a 10 -foot center median, four 11 -foot traffic lanes and one 11 -foot shoulder at each side. The paved Rio Hondo Channel is narrower than the existing bridge length. The replacement bridge is shortened to approximately 420 -foot long, or the width of the channel. The roadway alignment and profile would be kept approximately the same as the existing. Retaining walls or slopes would be required to support the approaching roadway to the bridge abutments at both ends. The number of the piers in the Rio Hondo Channel is reduced from five to three, resulting in a total thickness of its piers less than that of the existing bridge. This improves the hydraulic characteristics of the channel. Based on the final locations of new bridge abutments, the existing channel lining, equestrian trail, and bike path would all need to be modified accordingly as part of the bridge replacement. Three bridge superstructure alternatives have been studied. They are: precast prestressed Bulb -Tee girder, precast prestressed standard I- girder, and cast -in -place prestressed box girder. The preliminary investigation indicates that the first alternative, precast prestressed bulb -tee girder, provides the most feasible solution for this project due to its cost - effectiveness, constructability and great structural performance during earthquakes. This alternative utilizes precast prestressed girders ranging from 90 to 120 feet long supported on reinforced concrete abutments and piers. They are connected together by cast -in -place concrete deck. Since no falsework would be required for the erection of the girders and later the casting of concrete deck, the construction of bridge superstructure would not be restrained within dry seasons. The precast prestressed standard I- girder alternative uses five equal spans, and has a total bridge length of 430 feet. Since each span is simply- supported, all piers have to be fixed at the bottom. Thus, the pier foundations are much larger than those of the Bulb -tee girder and cost would be higher. Another disadvantage of this alternative is that, due to large skew angle, the simply supported girders tend to rotate during an earthquake. This may cause girder unseating. Therefore, the precast prestressed standard I- girder alternative is not preferred. The cast -in -place prestressed box girder alternative is the same bridge length as the Bulb -tee girder, but has three spans. This alternative is not preferred because it requires falsework inside the channel for the superstructure construction, which restrains the construction within dry seasons and makes it impossible to build the bridge in one year. This will cause the new and existing piers to coexist in the channel during one rainy season, which would increase flood potential and may not be acceptable to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Therefore, the cast -in -place prestressed box girder alternative is not preferred. The vehicular and pedestrian traffic on the existing bridge would be maintained during the construction period. To achieve that, the construction would be performed in two stages. In the first stage, the existing bridge would be partially removed with adequate bridge width for designated traffic lanes during construction. The outside portions of the new bridge would be constructed at each side. In the second stage, after the traffic is routed to. the new bridge on 3 White & Leatherman BioScmces WIL.01 Natural Environment Study Garvey Bridge Replacement Project the outside, the remaining of the existing bridge would be demolished, and the interior bridge would be constructed. The project also involves improvements to the Rio Hondo Channel. The existing channel is concrete lined within the limits of the proposed project. An existing combination maintenance road/bike path is located on the left (easterly) levee and is considered a shared trail. There are two access points to Garvey Avenue to this trail, one upstream and one downstream of the bridge. Currently, the trail passes under the bridge within the channel. There is a maintenance road on the top of the right (westerly) levee. The bridge abutment is set several feet back from this levee and there is no access to Garvey Avenue from the maintenance road. An existing equestrian trail is also located along the western levee of the Rio Hondo Channel. This trail does not currently have an adequate crossing of Garvey Avenue. The proposed project includes the relocation of the existing equestrian trail currently on the landward side of the west levee. The proposed equestrian trail will be located within the channel passing under the new bridge structure similarly to existing maintenance road/bike /pedestrian trail on the easterly levee. The equestrian trail underpass will include a 12 -foot wide trail with a 2% cross fall. The proposed longitudinal slopes are limited to 15% up to 300' in length, otherwise 10% longitudinal slope is considered to be the maximum. The necessary channel improvements are dependent on the extent of the proposed bridge improvements (i.e. the locations of the bridge abutments in relation to each levee and the location of the proposed piers for the bridge within the channel.) The proposed channel improvements would consist mainly of reconstructing the existing shared trail underpass to maintain adequate vertical clearance under the new bridge, modifying the existing shared trail access points to Garvey Avenue, constructing an equestrian trail underpass along the western channel levee, and repaving the existing channel invert as part of the new pier construction for the bridge. Although the exact improvements to the Rio Hondo Channel are not yet known, it is estimated that the extent of the work would be limited to 400 feet upstream and downstream of the existing Garvey Avenue Bridge. 2.0 METHODS 2.1 Literature Review White & Leatherman BioServices reviewed available literature to identify any special status plants, animals, or communities known from the vicinity of the project site. The review included the California Department of Fish and Game's Natural Diversity Data Base (CDFG 2002a), California Native Plant Society's Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California (CLAPS 2002), and compendia of special status species published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1999) and California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG 2002b,c). Numerous additional references and resources were used to compile information on the current distribution, habitat requirements, and life histories for particular species and groups. Appendix A presents a compilation of the special status 4 White & Leatherman BioServices WIL.01 Natural Environment Study Garvey Bridge Replacement Project species known from the region and summarizes their habitat, distribution, agency status designations, and occurrence probability on the project site. 2.2 Survey Methods A reconnaissance level biological survey of the project site was conducted on 11 September 2002 by Brian Leatherman, a consulting biologist with over 10 years of experience in southern California. Mr. Leatherman was assisted by John Bellas of Willdan. The purpose of the survey was to describe the existing biological resources within the project site area, document occurring plants and wildlife, and evaluate the project site for its potential to support special status species that are known or are expected to occur in the region. The survey consisted of walking back and forth along the edge of the Rio Hondo Channel and associated bike /pedestrian paths in the vicinity of Garvey Avenue for a distance of approximately 500 feet upstream and downstream of the bridge. Both banks of the channel were surveyed. The survey was conducted from approximately 1010 to 1200 hours. Weather conditions included high temperatures in the 80 -85 degree Fahrenheit range, winds in the 2 -5 mph range, and clear skies. All plant species observed were recorded in field notes or collected for future identification. Plants were identified using taxonomic keys in Hickman (1993), Munz (1974), Abrams and Ferris (1960), and Abrams (1923, 1944, 1951). Taxonomy follows Hickman (1993) for scientific and common names. All wildlife observed or detected (identified by scat, tracks, burrows etc.) on the project site was documented in field notes. Observations were made with the aid of 8 by 42 Bosch & Lomb Elite binoculars. Taxonomy and nomenclature follow Fisher and Case (1997) for amphibians and reptiles, American Ornithologists' Union (1998) for birds, and Jones et al. (1992) for mammals. A list of plants and wildlife observed or detected during the survey was compiled and is included in Appendix B. A formal wetlands delineation of the Rio Hondo Channel was not conducted as part of the biological survey. Presumably, because the entire channel is cement lined, the project site would not be considered wetlands (it would not meet soils requirements of the ACOE evaluation process). However, the presence of a discernable bed and bank of the stream course indicates that it is likely "waters of the United States" and under the jurisdiction of the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and CDFG up to the ordinary high water mark of the bed and bank. 3.0 EXISTING BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section describes the biological resources that either occur or potentially occur in the study area. Vegetation types, wildlife populations and movement patterns, special status vegetation types, and special status plant and wildlife species either known or potentially occurring in the study area are discussed below. 5 White & Leatherman BioServices WIL.01 Natural Environment Study Garvey Bridge Replacement Project 3.1 Vegetation and Habitat Vegetation is largely absent from the project area. Individual trees, shrubs and annual plants occur sporadically where soils are exposed, but no group of vegetation occurs as a demonstrable community. The majority of the plants identified occurred as individuals or small clumps growing out of cracks in the existing cement channel. In some small areas, there appeared to be sufficient soil deposits within the channel to support a few species, but never in the extent or abundance to warrant recognition as a plant community or even sub - association. Species observed within the channel included willow herb (Epilobium ciliatum), common knotweed (Polygonum arenastrum), great water speedwell ( Veronica anagallis- aquatica), tall umbrella sedge (Cyperus eragrostis), rabbit -foot grass (Polypogon monspeliensis), broad - leaved cattail (Typha latifolia), and greater duckweed (Spirodela polyrhiza). Outside the channel within the project site, ornamental plants and ruderal non - native species grow in landscape beds from adjacent commercial and industrial developments. Native and non - native species (that were not ornamentals) in these areas included annual bur -weed (Ambrosia acanthicarpa), horseweed (Conyza canadensis), shortpod mustard (Hirschfeldia incana), lamb's quarters (Chenopodium album), jimsonweed (Datura wrightii), ripgut brome (Bromus diandrus) and foxtail chess (Bromus madritensis ssp. rubens). 3.2 Wildlife Wildlife habitats are often based on the vegetation communities that dominate an area. Despite the lack of vegetation communities within the project area, wildlife habitat in the form of very shallow flowing water in the cement channel provides limited habitat for shorebirds, primarily sandpipers. Sandpipers feed on a variety of aquatic invertebrates that are usually associated with mud flats in shallow water. Very limited suitable habitat (mudflats) occurs in the project area channel, and soil deposits occurring now will likely be washed out during the first winter storms. Species observed foraging in the channel include least sandpiper (Calidris minutilla), western sandpiper (Calidris mauri), and killdeer (Charadrius vociferus). Other bird species that inhabit highly urbanized areas also occur in the project area and vicinity. Species observed include mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), rock dove (Columba livia), bushtit (Psaltriparus minimus), black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans), European starling (Sturnus vulgaris), and house sparrow (Passer domesticus). The bridge overhang provides suitable nesting habitat for cliff swallows (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota). No cliff swallows were observed during the survey, but mud nests built by cliff swallows were evident under the bridge and nesting earlier in the year was confirmed by Willdan (John Bellas, pers. comm. 2002). Most creeks and waterways in southern California are ephemeral and subject to periods of high water flow in winter and spring and little to no flow in late summer and fall. At the time 6 White & Leatherman BioServices WIL.01 Natural Environment Study Garvey Bridge Replacement Project of the survey, the Rio Hondo Channel had from approximately one -half to one inch of water flowing in it. Typically, water is present in the Rio Hondo Channel; however, it is not unlikely for the channel to be dry during drought conditions. The channel is an engineered flood control facility, and water in the Rio Hondo channel is likely the result of urban runoff. The engineering and flood control improvements to the Rio Hondo Channel in the project area have eliminated habitat for most fishes and other terrestrial vertebrates. The small but precise downstream gradient and level channel bottom from bank to bank result in no pools or backwater areas that usually support aquatic species. Introduced mosquito fish (Gambusia afnus) are likely planted in the system for mosquito control but none were observed. Even common stream breeding amphibians such as the western toad (Bufo boreas) and Pacific treefrog (Hyla regilla) are likely absent. One reptile, the western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis) was observed near the western bridge buttress in a debris pile, and one other commonly occurring species, the southern alligator lizard (Elgaria multicarinata), may also occur in the project area. Otherwise, reptiles are not expected to occur. Mammals and their sign were not observed. Pocket gophers (Thomomys bottae) may occur in the landscaped areas, but their burrows were not observed. Mammals that commonly occur in urban settings may pass through the area. These might include Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginianus), black rat ( Rattus rattus) and house mouse (Mus musculus). The effects of habitat fragmentation and importance of corridors were reviewed by Harris and Gallagher (1989) and Soule (1991), among many others. In many regions, land development and linear structures (e.g., roadways) have converted once - contiguous habitat into scattered patches separated by barriers, so that individual animals and entire populations are now isolated in remnant habitat "fragments." Depending on their size and other characteristics, these fragments many not support viable populations of some animals. "Wildlife corridors" are intended to mitigate the effects of fragmentation by providing movement routes across barriers and increasing the acreage of habitat available to them. Larger habitat areas can support larger populations, which are less susceptible to extinction. The Garvey Avenue Bridge is located in a highly urbanized commercial and industrial center with no native habitats. Whittier Narrows Golf Course and Whittier Narrows Recreation Area, a stretch parklands and remnant riparian vegetation, occurs downstream, but there doesn't appear to be a similar habitat area upstream to which the Rio Hondo channel could serve as a connection. Wildlife may pass through the Garvey Avenue Bridge underpass but any wildlife in the area would be species that commonly occur in the urban environment and acclimated to the noise and lighting associated with the route. 3.3 Special Status Species Certain plants and animals have been listed as threatened or endangered under State or federal Endangered Species Acts. Other species have not been formally listed, but declining populations or decreasing habitat availability represent causes for concern for their long -term viability. These species are included in lists compiled by resource management agencies or private conservation organizations., In this report, the term "special status species" refers to 7 White & Leatherman BioServices WIL.01 Natural Environment Study Garvey Bridge Replacement Project all species included in one or more compendia or formal list of threatened or endangered species. A total of four special status plants and four special status animals were identified from data base searches (CDFG 2002a, CNPS 2002) for the project region. An additional four plants and ten animals were added to include species that are currently listed or known to occur in riverine /riparian habitats to provide a thorough assessment. All of these species were judged to be absent based on one or a combination of factors, including lack of suitable habitat, out of geographic or elevational range, or intolerance of human disturbance. Some birds that were judged to be absent during the nesting season have some potential to occur while foraging, during migration, or during the non - breeding season (winter). 3.3.1 Special Status Plants The potential occurrence of special status plant species is evaluated in Appendix A (Table 1). The following special status plants have been documented (at least historically) in the project region based on data base searches: Brand's phacelia ( Phacelia stellaris), Parish's gooseberry (Ribes divericatum var. parishii), southern scullcap (Scutellaria bolanderi ssp. austromontana), and Mesa horkelia ( Horkelia cuneata ssp. puberula). The following special status plants were added to the evaluation to provide a thorough assessment: Ventura marsh milk vetch (Astragalus pycnostachys var. lanosissima), Nevin's barberry (Berberis nevinii), Los Angeles sunflower (Helianthus nuttallii ssp. parishii), and Gambel's water cress (Rorippa gambelii). Of these species, the Ventura marsh milk vetch, Nevin's barberry, and Gambel's water cress are currently listed as State and federal Endangered Species. None of these species are expected to occur on the project site because of lack of suitable habitat. 3.3.2 Special Status Wildlife The potential occurrence of special status animals is evaluated in Appendix A (Table 2). The following special status wildlife have been documented (at least historically) in the project region based on data base searches: southwestern pond turtle (Clemmys marmorata pallida), San Diego homed lizard (Phrynosoma coronatum blainvillei), western yellow - billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus occidentalis), and least Bell's vireo (Vireo pusillus bellii). The following special status animals were added to the evaluation to provide a thorough assessment: arroyo toad (Bufo microscaphus), California red - legged frog (Rana aurora draytonii), mountain yellow - legged frog (Rana muscosa), two- striped garter snake (Thamnophis hammondii), southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus), California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica), yellow warbler (Dendroica petechia), yellow - breasted chat (Icteria virens), and tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor). Several of these species are currently State or federally listed as threatened or endangered species (see Appendix A). None of these species are expected to occur on the project site because of lack of suitable habitat. One special status bird species, the Cooper's hawk (Accipiter cooperii), was observed foraging in the project area during the survey on 11 September 2002. No nesting habitat for 8 White & Leatherman BioServices WIL.01 Natural Environment Study Garvey Bridge Replacement Project the Cooper's hawk, which consists of riparian forest or an otherwise dense concentration of trees, occurs in the project site. Several other sensitive bird species occur in southern California as rare nesters, migrants, or wintering birds. None of these are expected to nest because of the lack of suitable nesting habitats. Like the Cooper's hawk, some may occur in the area briefly as they pass through during migration or while foraging. However, none of these species are expected to occur on the project site for prolonged periods and none are expected to rely substantially on resources found in the project area. 3.3.3 Special Status Habitats Riparian associations, which may include wetlands and "Waters of the United States" are protected under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and are under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE). "Waters of the United States" include navigable coastal and inland waters, lakes, rivers, and streams and their tributaries, interstate waters and their tributaries, wetlands adjacent to such waters, and isolated wetlands and lakes, intermittent streams, and other waters that could affect interstate commerce. Rio Hondo Channel immediately below the project site, which could be impacted by construction activities, may be determined to be jurisdictional. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act requires any applicant for a Federal license or permit to conduct an activity that may result in the discharge into a "Water of the Unites States" to receive a clean water certification from the state. In California, the responsibility of issuing clean water certification was delegated to Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) through the Porter - Cologne Water Quality Act. Thus, the ACOE will not issue a Section 404 Permit until the state, in this case represented the Los Angeles RWQCB, has issued a clean water certification for the project in accordance with Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The Rio Hondo Channel or portions of it may also meet the criteria established by Section 1600 of the California Fish and Game Code, which could require a Streambed Alteration Agreement from the CDFG prior to any construction. Permits or agreements from the ACOE and/or CDFG may be required prior to any alteration of the beds or banks resulting from construction of the project. 4.0 IMPACTS ANALYSIS Implementation of the proposed project would qualify as a discretionary project under . CEQA. CEQA is a public disclosure law intended to inform decision makers, and the public, of the impact that a project may have on the environment, and thus provide a basis for approval or rejection of a project. Projects may have direct, indirect, or cumulative impacts on biological resources (and the environment). Direct impacts are those that include the initial loss of habitat due to grading and construction. Indirect impacts are secondary effects that might occur at a later time or off the project site (i.e., increased foot traffic on adjacent lands). 4.1 Significance Criteria 9 White & Leatherman Bio.Services WIL.01 Natural Environment Study Garvey Bridge Replacement Project 4.1.1 CEQA Mandatory Findings of Significance Under CEQA Guidelines (Section15065) a lead agency must conclude that a project would have a significant effect on the environment if any of the following would occur: (a) The project has the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish and wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range or an endangered, rare, or threatened species, or eliminate important examples of California history or prehistory. (b) The project has the potential to achieve short -term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long -term environmental goals. (c) The project has possible environmental effects which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of probable future projects as defined in Section 15130 [of CEQA]. 4.1.2 CEQA Significance Criteria for Biological Resources CEQA requires the lead agency to reach findings regarding potentially significant impacts to biological resources. Based on the Environmental Checklist Form in the CEQA Guidelines (Appendix G), a project may have a significant impact on biological resources if the project would: - a) have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the Califomia Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. b) have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. c) have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means. d) interfere substantially with the movement of native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. 10 White & Leatherman BioServices WIL.01 Natural Environment Study .Garvey Bridge Replacement Project e) conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. f) conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. 4.1.3 CEQA Definitions of Endangered, Rare or Threatened Species CEQA Guidelines (Section 15380) provide several definitions of endangered, rare, or threatened as they apply here, including listing as threatened or endangered under either state or federal Endangered Species Acts or meeting criteria for listing, quoted below: (b) A species of animal or plant is: (1) "Endangered" when its survival and reproduction in the wild are in immediate jeopardy from one or more causes, including loss of habitat, change in habitat, overexploitation, predation, competition, disease, or other factors; or (2) "Rare" when either: (A) Although not presently threatened with extinction, the species is existing in such small numbers throughout all or a significant portion of its range that it may become endangered if its environment worsens; or (B) The species is likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range and may be considered "threatened" as that term is used in the Federal Endangered Species Act. (c) A species of animal or plant shall be presumed to be endangered, rare or threatened, as it is listed in: (1) Sections 670.2 or 670.5, Title 14, California Code of Regulations [i.e., state Endangered Species Act]; or (2) Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations Section 17.11 or 17.12 pursuant to the Federal Endangered Species Act as rare, threatened, or endangered. (d) A species not included in any listing identified in subsection (c) shall nevertheless be considered to be endangered, rare or threatened, if the species can be shown to meet the criteria in subsection (b). Thus, a species need not be listed as rare, threatened, or endangered to meet mandatory criteria for significance in terms of CEQA, but its rarity or vulnerability to extinction must be similar to listing criteria under the state and federal Endangered Species Acts. These criteria are generally met for species included on the Fish and Wildlife Service's list of "candidate" species (formerly "category 1 candidates ") or in special cases where new information becomes available (e.g., when a previously unknown threat is identified or when a species formerly considered extinct is rediscovered). Adverse impacts to other special status plants and animals (e.g., the Department of Fish and Game's "species of special concern," or many 11 White & Leatherman BioServices WIL.01 Natural Environment Study Garvey Bridge Replacement Project of the California Native Plant Society's "List I B" plants) generally do not meet these mandatory CEQA criteria for significance, though local agencies may apply less stringent criteria in judging significance. Thus, impacts to "species of special concern," or "List 113" plants may be considered significant by local criteria. 4.2 Direct Impacts 4.2.1 Vegetation Project approval and implementation would result in construction of a wider bridge that would replace the existing Garvey Avenue Bridge over Rio Hondo Channel. The channel is cement lined from bank to bank, and adjacent areas are developed. No impacts to native vegetation communities would occur as a result of the project. 4.2.2 Wildlife Wildlife habitat in the project area is limited to the shallow water within the channel that provides temporary foraging habitat for common shorebirds, and bridge overhangs that provide nest sites for cliff swallows. This shallow water habitat is common along the Rio Hondo Channel and other cement lined channels throughout the Los Angeles basin. Soft bottom channels in the Los Angeles basin are also common, and provide a higher quality resource. Any impacts to the Rio Hondo Channel caused by construction would be temporary. Temporary impacts to the shallow water habitat would not be considered significant in terms of CEQA. Cliff swallows nest under the bridge overhangs. Cliff swallows are not considered species of special concern, and similar nesting sites occur throughout the Los Angeles Basin. Therefore, impacts to cliff swallows would not be considered significant under CEQA. However, as a migratory species, cliff swallows are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. In addition, the birds are given some level of protection under Section 3800 of the California Fish and Game Code and their nests and eggs under Sections 3503. Therefore, mitigation to avoid impacts to cliff swallows during the nesting season is identified in Section 5.1. The proposed bridge would also have an overhang suitable for nesting cliff swallows, so the loss of suitable nesting habitat would be temporary. 4.2.3 Special Status Plants No special status plant species are expected to occur in the project area because of the lack of suitable habitat. Therefore, no impacts to special status plant species would occur as a result of project implementation. 12 White & Leatherman BioServices WIL.01 Natural Environment Study Garvey Bridge Replacement Project 4.2.4 Special Status Wildlife One special status animal was observed in the project area; none others are expected to occur in the project area because of the lack of suitable habitat. One Cooper's hawk was observed foraging in the area, but it is not expected to nest because of the lack of suitable habitat (trees). The Cooper's hawk is a State species of special concern. However, the concern is directed at nest sites in particular, and not at individual birds or the population as a whole. Therefore, no impacts to special status resources (individuals or nests) would occur as a result of project implementation. 4.2.5 Wildlife Movement No impacts to wildlife movement are expected as a result of project implementation. The proposed project would not impede wildlife movement through the area, or to otherwise inaccessible habitats necessary for their continued existence in the region. 4.3 Indirect Impacts The proposed bridge would not have more traffic lanes than the existing bridge. Therefore, no indirect impacts to biological resources would occur as a result of bridge's increased capacity. Noise levels will increase during the construction of the proposed project. The increase in noise levels would be temporary and would not substantially alter the existing conditions in the project area given the extent of commercial and industrial development in the area. No indirect impacts to biological resources from increased noise levels during construction would occur. 4.4 Cumulative Impacts The project would not result in the direct loss of biological resources, and therefore would not contribute to a cumulative direct loss of vegetation and wildlife habitat in the region. No cumulative impacts to biological resources would occur as a result of project implementation. 5.0 RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES CEQA defines mitigation as (a) avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action, (b) minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation, (c) rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the impacted environment, (d) reducing or eliminating the impact over time.by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action, or (e) compensating for the impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments. 13 White & Leatherman BioServices WIL.01 Natural Environment Study Garvey Bridge Replacement Project 5.1 Mitigation for Potential Impacts to Nesting Birds Mitigation to minimize impacts to nesting birds, which are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, is recommended. To minimize impacts to nesting birds in the vegetation on -site, any grubbing and/or removal of vegetation shall be done outside the bird nesting season (August 16- February 14). Any grubbing and/or removal of vegetation during the bird nesting season (February 15- August 15) will require a survey at least on Week prior to construction. If any nests are present, work cannot commence until all fledglings have left the nest, which would likely not occur until the end of the nesting season. Mitigation to minimize impacts to cliff swallows, which are known to nest on the existing bridge structure, is recommended. Cliff swallows are migratory birds that do not occur in southern California during the winter. To minimize impacts to nesting birds, the mud nests occurring under the bridge eaves shall be scraped or water blasted from the bridge prior to March 0 (before cliff swallows are likely to begin arriving and building nests for the breeding season). If nests are water blasted from the bridge, netting shall be used to catch the debris to prevent parasites from washing into the flowing water of the Rio Hondo Channel. If construction does not start prior to March 1St, then a qualified biologist shall survey the bridge to ensure that cliff swallows have not begun nesting. Swallows shall not be allowed to nest on the bridge during the duration of construction. To ensure this, during construction a biologist shall survey the area weekly between the dates of February 15 and October 15 to ensure that nests more than one -third built do not exist on the bridge. If swallows have begun nesting, the project shall halt until a representative from the California Department of Fish and Game gives further direction. 6.0 MITIGATION MONITORING California law requires monitoring for mitigation measures imposed under CEQA (Guidelines 15097). A form or other suitable document to verify compliance with the stated mitigation measures shall be submitted to the Lead Agency upon completion. 7.0 REFERENCES Abrams, L. 1923, 1944, 1951. Illustrated Flora of the Pacific States, Volumes I -III. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. Abrams, L. and R.S. Ferris. 1960. Illustrated Flora of the Pacific States, Volume IV. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. American Ornithologists' Union. 1983. Checklist of North American birds, sixth edition, and supplements through 1991. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C., and Auk (July issue, odd - numbered years). 14 White & Leatherman BioServices WIL.01 Natural Environment Study Garvey Bridge Replacement Project California Department of Fish and Game, Natural Diversity Data Base. 2002a. Rarefind electronic data base of special status species locations for the following USGS 7.5 minute series quadrangles: Big Bear Lake. CDFG, Natural Heritage Division, Sacramento. California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), Natural Diversity Data Base. 2002b. Special Plants. Unpublished report available from CDFG, Natural Heritage Division, Sacramento. January. California Department of Fish and Game, Natural Diversity Data Base. 2002c. Special Animals. Unpublished report available from CDFG, Natural Heritage Division, Sacramento. January. California Native Plant Society. 2002. Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California (electronic records of sensitive species on the USGS 7.5' Big Bear City, Big Bear Lake, Fawnskin, and Moonridge quads). California Native Plant Society, Sacramento. Fisher, Robert N. and T.J. Case. 1997. A Field Guide to the Reptiles and Amphibians of Coastal Southern California. Lazer Touch, San Mateo, CA. 45 pp. Garrett, K. and J. Dunn. 1981. Birds of Southern California: Status and Distribution. Los Angeles Audubon. Society, Los Angeles, California. Grinnell, J. and A.H. Miller. 1944. The Distribution of the Birds of California. Pacific Coast Avifauna 27 (reprinted 1986 by Artemisia Press, Lee Vining, Calif.). Hamilton, R.A. and Doug R. Willick. 1986. The Birds of Orange County, California. Status and Distribution. Sea & Sage Press. Sea & Sage Audubon Society, Irvine, California. Harris, L.D., and P.B. Gallagher. 1989. New initiative for wildlife conservation: the need for movement corridors. Pages 11 -34 in G. MacIntosh (ed.) In defense of wildlife: preserving communities and corridors. Defenders of Wildlife, Washington DC. Hickman, J. (editor). 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. University of Califomia Press, Berkeley, California. Ingles, L.G. 1965. Mammals of the Pacific States. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. Jennings, M. and M. Hayes. 1994. Amphibian and Reptile Species of Special Concern in California. California Department of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division, Contract No. 8023. 255 pp. 5 White & Leatherman BioServices WIL.01 Natural Environment Study Garvey Bridge Replacement Project Jones, J. K., R. Hoffmann, D. Rice, C. Jones, R. Baker, and M. Engstrom. 1992. Revised checklist of North American Mammals north of Mexico, 1991. Occassional Papers: The Museum of Texas Tech University. 23 pp. Munz, P.A. 1974. A Flora of Southern California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. National Geographic Society. 1999. Field Guide to the Birds of North America. Yd ed. National Geographic Society, Washington DC. Remsen, J.V. 1978. Bird species of special concern in California. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California. Skinner, M. W. and B. M. Pavlik. 1994. California Native Plant Society's Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. Special Publication No. 1, Fifth Edition, California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, California. Small, A. 1994. California Birds: Their Status and Distribution. Ibis Publishing Company, Vista, California. 342 pp. Soule, M.E. 1991. Land use planning and wildlife maintenance: guidelines for conserving wildlife in an urban landscape. Journal of American Planning Association 57:313 -323. Stebbins, R.C. 1985. A Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians. Houghton Mifflin Company. Boston, Massachusetts. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1996. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; review of plant and animal taxa that are candidates for listing as endangered or threatened species. Federal Register 61:7596 -7613. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1999. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; review of plant and animal taxa that are candidates or proposed for listing as endangered or threatened. Federal Register 64:57534 - 57547. Zeiner, D.C., W.F. Laudenslayer and K.E. Mayer (editors). 1988. California's Wildlife Vol. 1, Amphibians and Reptiles. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California. Zeiner, D.C., W.F. Laudenslayer and K.E. Mayer (editors). 1990. California's Wildlife Vol. Ill, Mammals. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California. 16 White & Leatherman BioServices WIL.01 APPENDIX A SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES TABLES APPENDIX A: Table 1. Special status plants of the project region. Special Status Plants Habitat and Distribution Flower Status Occurrence 11)d all CNPS: List 1B season Designation Probability Astragalus pycnostachyus var. Coastal salt marsh and adjacent July - Fed: END Asent lanosissimus habitats; only known locations are October Calif: END, 1.1 Ventura marsh milk -vetch Ventura Co.; historically also from CNPS List 1B LA and Orange Cos. Berberis nevinii (= Mahonia nevinh) Nevin's barberry Helianthus nuttallii ssp. parishii Los Angeles sunflower Coastal sage scrub, chaparral, oak woodland, usually below 2000 ft.; scattered localities in LA, San Bernardino, Riverside, and San Spring; Fed: END Absent (can be Calif 2.2, END 11)d all CNPS: List 1B year) R- E- D:3 -3 -3 Historically from freshwater and Aug - coastal marshes, wet ground, sea Oct level to about 2000 ft. elev.; LA, San Bern., Orange Cos.. Recently rediscovered west of Valencia Fed:none Absent (listing now likely) Calif: SH CNPS: List IA Horkelia cuneata ssp. Shrublands, woodlands, gen sandy April - Fed: none Absent puberula alluvial plains; SLO to San Diego Sep. Calif: 52.1 Mesa horkelia Co, away from immediate coast; CNPS: List 1B rarely inland to San Bern. Co.; about R- E- D:2 -3 -3 200 -2300 ft. elev. LA and San Bern. Cos., t 300 -1000 Phacelia stellaris Brand's phacelia Dunes, coastal sage scrub, about sea level to 1200 ft. elev.; Los Angeles, Riverside, San Diego Cos.; Baja Calif. March - June Fed: none Absent Calif: S31.1 CNPS: List 1B R- E- D:3 -34 Ribes divaricatum var. parishii Riparian woodland, historically from Feb. - Fed: none Absent Parish's gooseberry LA and San Bern. Cos., t 300 -1000 April Calif: 51.1 ft. elev.; possibly extinct (most CNPS: List 1 B recent obs. at Whittier Narrows, R- E- D:3 -3 -3 1980 Rorippa gambellli Fresh or brackish marsh, stream and April - Fed: END Absent Gambel's water cress lake banks, below about 1100 ft. June Calif: 1.1 THR elev.; central and S Calif; only CNPS: List 1B known extant sites in SLO Co. and R- E- D:3 -3 -2 Scutellaria bolanderi ssp. Stream banks and other moist sites, a June - Fed: none Absent austromontana few scattered sites from Victorville August Calif 52.2? Southern skullcap through San Diego Co; 1900 -6500 ft. CNPS: List 113 elev. R- E- D:2 -2 -3 APPENDIX A: Table 1. Special status plants of the project region. References and notes Hickman (ed.) 1993, Munz 1974, Skinner and Pavlik 1994 I Status Designations Federal designations ( USFWS 1997; USFWS 1999): END: Federally listed, endangered. THR: Federally listed, threatened. PROP: Proposed for the federal status shown. CAND: Candidate for federal listing; sufficient data are available to support listing, but not yet listed. None: Not designated. State designations (CDFG 2002b) END: State listed, endangered. THR: State listed, threatened. RARE: State listed as rare (Listed "Rare" animals have been re- designated as Threatened, but Rare plants have retained the Rare designation.) PROP: Proposed for the state status shown. None: Not designated. CDFG Natural Diversity Data Base Designations: Applied to special status species and sensitive plant communities; where correct category is uncertain, CDFG uses two categories or question marks. Sl: Fewer than 6 occurrences or fewer than 1000 individuals or less than 2000 acres. SI.1: Very threatened 51.2: Threatened S1.3: No current threats known S2: 6 -20 occurrences or 1000 -3000 individuals or 2000 - 10,000 acres (decimal suffixes same as above). S3: 21 -100 occurrences or 3000 - 10,000 individuals or 10,000 - 50,000 acres (decimal suffixes same as above). S4: Apparently secure in California; this rank is clearly lower than S3 but factors exist to cause some concem, i.e., there is some threat or somewhat narrow habitat. No threat rank. S5: Demonstrably secure or ineradicable in California. No threat rank. SH: All California sites are historical. California Native Plant Society (CNPS) designations: (Note: According to CNPS (Smith and Berg 1988), plants on Lists 1 B and 2 meet definitions for listing as threatened or endangered under Section 1901, Chapter 10 of the California Fish and Game Code.) List IA: Plants presumed extinct in California. List IB: Plants rare and endangered in California and throughout their range. List 2: Plants rare, threatened or endangered in California but more common elsewhere in their range. List 3: Plants about which we need more information; a review list. List 4: Plants of limited distribution; a watch list. CNPS R -E -D Code: Rarity 1: Rare, but found in sufficient numbers and distributed widely enough that the potential for extinction or extirpation is low at this time. 2: Occurrence confined to several populations or one extended population. 3: Occurrence limited to one or a few highly restricted populations, or present in such small numbers that it is seldom reported. Endangerment 1: Not endangered. 2: Endangered in a portion of its range. 3: Endangered throughout its range. Distribution 1: More or less widespread outside California. 2: Rare outside California. APPENDIX A: Table 1. Special status plants of the project region. 3: Endemic to California (i.e., does not occur outside California). Occurrence Probabilities Occurrence probabilities are determined from field surveys and habitat analyses reported here, plus information in the following references: CDFG 2002a, Hickman 1993, Munz 1974, Skinner and Pavlik 1994. Definitions: Occurs: Observed on the site during this study, or recorded on -site by other qualified biologists. Expected: Although the species has not been observed or recorded on the site, it is highly likely that the species is present during at least a portion of the year. High: Reported sighting(s) in similar habitat in region by qualified biologists, or habitat on the site is a type often utilized by the species and the site is within the known range of the species. Moderate: Reported sighting(s) in surrounding region, or site is within the known range of the species and habitat on the site is marginally suitable or of a type occasionally used by the species. Low: Site is within the known range of the species but habitat on the site is rarely used by the species, and there are no reported sighting(s) of the species in the vicinity. It is unlikely that the species exists in substantial numbers if present. Absent: A focused study failed to detect the species, the site is out of the currently known range, or no suitable habitat is present. Unknown: No focused surveys have been performed in the region, and the species' distribution and habitat are poorly known. APPENDIX A: Table 2. Special status wildlife of the project region. Special Status Wildlife Habitat and Distribution' Activity Status Occurrence ilocionntinn2 Probability' AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES Nests and hunts in forests and Year- Fed: none Nesting: Absent Bufo microscaphus Alluvial washes, often xeric areas; Late Fed: END Absent californicus desert margins and scattered locn's in winter - USFS sensitive and S America Arroyo southwestern toad cismontane s Calif; no records from spring Calif: CSC, Fed: END Nesting: Absent Santa Ana River watershed willow riparian forests; SW US and N S2S3 Protected Migration: Rana aurora draytond Pools in low- gradient foothill and Spring Fed: THR Absent California red - legged frog valley streams (esp. intermittent) to Calif: CSC, ±4000 ft.; only extant S Calif. S2S3 populations are in Ventura Co. and Santa Rosa Plateau (Riv. Co.) Rana muscosa Perennial mountain streams above lust after Fed: prop. END Absent Mountain yellow - legged about 6000 ft. elev.; Sierra Nevada snow- USFS: sensitive frog Mts. and ruts. of S. Calif. (where its melt to Calif: CSC, S2, elev. range historically was as low as August Protected 3000 fit.); extinct in much of ranee (diurnal) Clemmys marmorata Perennial ponds, streams, irrigation Year- Fed: none Absent pallida ditches; coastal S and cent. Calif, NW around Calif: CSC, S2, Southwestern pond turtle Baja Calif., below about 4800 ft. elev. Protected (a few higher elev introduced pops) Phrynosoma coronatum Forest, shrubland or grassland with Spring - Fed: none Absent ssp. blainvillei sandy areas; W Calif. from LA Co. S summer USFS: sensitive San Diego homed lizard through Baja Calif, below ±6000 ft. Calif: CSC, S2S, elev. Protected Thamnophis hammondii In or near perennial fresh water and Spring - Fed: none Absent Two - striped garter snake adjacent riparian habitat, usually summer USFS: sensitive about pools in streams; SW Calif and Calif: CSC, S2, NW Baja Calif Protected Accipiter cooperii Nests and hunts in forests and Year- Fed: none Nesting: Absent Cooper's hawk woodlands occasionally forages in around USFS: sensitive Foraging: open areas; most of US, Central Calif CSC, S3 Occurs and S America (nesting onlvl Empidonax traillii extimus Rare and local is S Calif.; breeds in Summer Fed: END Nesting: Absent Southwestern willow willow riparian forests; SW US and N Calif: END, Sl Migration: flycatcher Baja (full species) Absent Vireo bellti pusillus Riparian forests and willow scrub; Spring - Fed: END Nesting: Absent Least Bell's vireo breeds in S Calif. and N Baja, winters summer Calif: END, S2 Migration: in Baja; endangered by habitat loss Absent and cowbird parasitism APPENDIX A: Table 2. Special status wildlife of the project region. Special Status Wildlife Habitat and Distribution' Status Occurrence Coccyzus americanus Nests in dense riparian forests along Spring - Fed: None Nesting: Absent occidentalis broad floodplains; rare and local in summer Calif: END, S2 Migration: Western Yellow- billed Calif.; subspecies not recognized as (nesting only) Absent cuckoo distinct by some experts Mex. to S Amer. Polioptila californica Coastal sage scrub; SW Calif Year- Fed: THR Nesting: Absent California gnatcatcher (Moorpark area, Palos Verdes Penins., around Calif: CSC, S2 Foraging: Orange, Riverside, San Bent., & San Absent Diego Cos) and N Baia Calif Dendroica petechia Breeds in willow and cottonwood Spring - Fed: none Nesting: Absent Yellow warbler riparian habitat; much of N Amer. but summer Calif. CSC, S2 Migration: increasingly rare in S Calif (habitat (nesting only) Absent loss, cowbird parasitism); winters Mex. to S Amer. /cteria virens Breeds in dense riparian habitat, low Spring - Fed: none Nesting: Absent Yellow- breasted chat elev., much of US, winters S to Cent. summer Calif CSC, S3 Migration: Amer.; becoming rare in Calif Absent (cowbirds & habitat loss) Agelaius tricolor Breeds colonially in freshwater Year- Fed: none Nesting: Absent Tricolored blackbird marshes, nomadic among marshes and around Calif: CSC, S2 Foraging: (nesting colony) fields in winter; almost completely en- Absent demic to Calif. ' References and notes Amphibians and Reptiles: Jennings and Hayes 1994; Stebbins 1954, 1985; Zeiner et al. 1988. Birds: Grinnell & Miller 1944; Remsen 1978; Garrett & Dunn 1981; National Geographic Society 1999; Zeiner et al. 1990. 2 Status Designations Federal designations ( USFWS 1997; USFWS 1999): END: Federally listed, endangered. THR: Federally listed, threatened. PROP: Proposed for the federal status shown. CAND: Candidate for federal listing; sufficient data are available to support listing, but not listed at this time. None: Not designated. State designations (CDFG 2002c) END: State listed, endangered. THR: State listed, threatened. PROP: Proposed for the state status shown. CSC: California Species of Special Concern Fully Protected: Fully protected under California Fish and Game Code, Sections 3511, 4700, 5050, 5515. Protected: Protected under California Code of Regulations, Sections 41, 42. APPENDIX A: Table 2. Special status wildlife of the project region. SA: California "Special Animal." Meets any one of several Department of Fish and Game criteria, but no specific reason is given for the designation. None: Not designated. 3 Occurrence Probability Occurrence probabilities are determined from field surveys and habitat analyses reported here, plus information in the following references: Amphibians and Reptiles: Stebbins 1985; Jennings and Hayes 1994; CDFG 2002a. Birds: Garrett & Dunn 1981; Small 1994; Hamilton and Willick 1996; CDFG 2002a. Definitions: Occurs: Observed on the site during this study, or recorded on -site by other qualified biologists. Expected: Although the species has not been observed or recorded on the site, it is highly likely that the species is present during at least a portion of the year. High: Reported sighting(s) in similar habitat in region by qualified biologists, or habitat on the site is a type often utilized by the species and the site is within the known range of the species. Moderate: Reported sighting(s) in surrounding region, or site is within the known range of the species and habitat on the site is marginally suitable or of a type occasionally used by the species. Low: Site is within the known range of the species but habitat on the site is rarely used by the species, and there are no reported sighting(s) of the species in the vicinity. It is unlikely that the species exists in substantial numbers if present. Absent: A focused study failed to detect the species, the site is out of the currently known range, or no suitable habitat is present. Unknown: No focused surveys have been performed in the region, and the species' distribution and habitat are poorly known. APPENDIX B PLANT AND WILDLIFE SPECIES LISTS Appendix B: Table 1. Garvey Bridge Plant List SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME DICOTYLEDONES Dicots Amarantbaceae Amaranth Family Amaranthus albus tumbleweed Asteraceae Sunflower Family Ambrosia acanthicarpa annual bur -weed Baccharis salicifolia mule fat Bidens pilosa• common beggar -ticks Conyza canadensis• horseweed Lactuca serriola prickly lettuce Brassicaceae Mustard Family Hirschfeldia incana' shortpod mustard Raphanus sativus wild radish Chenopodiacene Goosefoot Family Atriplex rosea Redscale Chenopodium album lamb's quarters Salsola tragus' Russian thistle Euphorbiaceae Spurge Family Chamaesyce maculata spotted spurge Fabaceae Pea Family Melilotus albs white sweet - clover Geraniacene Geranium Family Erodium cicutarium red- stemmed filaree Malvaceae Mallow Family Malva parviora cheeseweed Onagraceae Evening Primrose Family Epilobium ciliatum willow -herb Polygonaceae Buckwheat Family Polygonum arenastrum common knotweed Polygonum hydropiperoides mild water pepper Salicaceae Willow Family Salix gooddingii black willow Scrophulariaceae Figwort Family Veronica anagallis - aquatics great water speedwell Solanaceae Nightshade Family Datura wrightii jimsonweed Nicotiana glauca' tree tobacco Solanum americanum white nightshade Vitis girdiana desert wild grape MONOCOTYLEDONES Monocots Cyperaceae Sedge Family Cyperus eragrostis tall umbrella sedge Lemnaceae Duckweed Family Spirodela polyrhiza greater duckweed Poaceae Grass Family Bromus diandrus• ripgut brome Bromus madritensis ssp. rubens• foxtail chess Cynodon dactylon" Bermuda grass Appendix B: Table 1. Garvey Bridge Plant List Phalaris sp. Polypogon monspeliensis Typhaceae Typha latifolia canary grass rabbit -foot grass Cat -tail Family broad - leaved cattail Appendix B: Table 2. Garvey Bridge Wildlife List The following is a list of species observed or detected on the project site. Non - native species are indicated by an asterisk. Species on CDFG's Special Animals list are indicated by two asterisks. Other species may have been overlooked or inactive /absent because of the season (amphibians are active primarily during /after rains, reptiles during summer, some birds (and bats) migrate out of the area for summer or winter, some mammals hibernate etc.). Taxonomy and nomenclature generally follow Fisher and Case (1997) for amphibians and reptiles, AOU (1998) for birds, and Jones at al. (1992) for mammals. SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME REPTILIA Reptiles Phrynosomatidae Phrynosomatids Sceloporus occidentalis hiseriatus Western fence lizard AVES Birds Accipitridae Raptors ** Accipiter cooperii Cooper's hawk Charadriidae Plovers Charadrius vociferus Killdeer Scolopacidae Sandpipers Calidris mauri Western sandpiper Calidris minutilla Least sandpiper Columbidae Pidgeons and doves * Columha Livia Rock dove Zenaida macroura Mourning dove Trochilidae Hummingbirds Calypte anna Anna's hummingbird Tyrannidae Tyrant flycatchers Sayornis nigricans Black phoebe Hirundinidae Swallows Petrochelidon pyrrhonota Cliff swallow Aegithalidae Bushtits Psaltriparus minimus Bushtit Sturnidae Starlings * Sturnus vulgaris European starling Passeridae Old world sparrows * Passer domesticus House sparrow MAMMALIA Mammals Canidae Dogs/wolves/foxes * Canis familiarus Domestic dog Appendix D Preliminary Foundation Report for Structure Type Selection Arroyo Geotechnical, October 2002 P J w r JAN 24 103 08 :54AM WILLDAN 714 940 6399 ARROYO V TO: Limin He P.2 MEMORANDUM FROM: Tom Evans DATE: October 30. 2002 SUBJECT: Darvey Avenue Bridge Selection Preliminary Foundation Report for Structure Type Rosemead. California . Arroyo Geotechnical Project No. 13565 -3000 INTRODUCTION We prepared this Memorandum to provide geotechnical information to aid the structural designer In the type selection process for the Garvey Avenue Bridge in Rosemead, California. A new bridge will be built to replace the existing bridge. This mamorandum should be included with the Type Selection Submittal Package. AS -BUILT DATA The Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel was originally constructed In 1937. It has a length of 655 feet and a width of 52 feet. There are nine spans and two end cantilevers. Six spans are located over the concrete lined channel. The remaining spans, one at the east end and two at the west end are either partially buried or just above the ground line. The two cantilevers are buried. The superstructure is supported on ten piers that are, in turn. supported on driven step - tapered piles. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS In 2000 four borings and four cone penetration tests (CPT) were run at the bridge site fora proposed retrofit project Earth Mechanics, Inc. prepared a report dated July 5, 2000 presenting the borings and soundings. Arroyo Geotechnicai has investigated the subsurface soil conditions by drilling four additional borings ranging in depth from 78 to 100 feet along with one additional CPT sounding. The typical soil conditions consist of lenses of clean sands, silty sands and clayey sands. Occasional silt and clay lenses were noted, generally below a depth of 50 feet. Groundwater was observed at depths of 23 to 40 feet below the surface. Plans for the original bridge indicate the water level at that time was about ten feet above the present channel bottom. JAN 24 103 08 :55AM WILLDAN 714 940 6399 October 30, 2002 SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA P.3 Type Selection Report Garvey Avenue Sddge Rosemead, CaNbmia Page 2 We were requested to provide deterministic seismic design data in accordance with Caltrans criteria. The site is underlain by alluvium (stiff soil) with standard penetration resistance 15< N < 50. In accordance with Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria (Version 1.2, December 2001), this is a type "D" site. The location of nearby active faults within 15 km, the. style of faulting of the Individual faults, the moment magnitude for a Maximum Credible Event (MCE) on each fault, and the shortest fault-to-site distance were determined using Caltrans California Seismic Hazard Detail Index Map 1996 and A Technical Report to Accompany the Calimns California Seismic Hazard Map 1996. The 1996 map presents peak acceleration contours, which Indicate the peak acceleration at any site in California (based on the author's attenuation relationship); and for this site the peak acceleration is between 0.5 and 0.6 g's. For design use 0.6 g's. A summary. of the seismic data for the faults within 15 kilometers of the site Is given in Table 1. Table 1. Summary of seismic data for nearby faults after Caltrans. Faults in Table 1 are within 15 kilometers of the. site and require an increase In the ARS curves to account for near source effects. The Increase is 20% for all periods because of Reverse faults. This increase exceeds all other spectral increases given in Caltrans Guidelines for Foundation investigation Reports, Version 1. 1, September 2000. AIRS spectral curves are presented in Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria, Version 1.2, December 2001 for various soil types, earthquake magnitudes and ground accelerations. The spectra given in Figure B-8 on page B -10 for a soil profile type "D', an earthquake magnitude of 7.25+-0.25, and a ground acceleration of 0.6 g's should be used as a base. The published spectra should be increased 20 % for all periods. MCE Closest Peak Bedrock, Fault Name Moment Style Distance to Acceleration Magnitude of Faulting Site (km) . in g's .. Elysian Paris Seismic 7.0 Reverse 4.0 0.52 Zone (Thrust) Whittier - Elsinore 7.5 Strike Slip 7.3 0.49 Malibu-Santa Monkas 7.5 Reverse- 8.0 0.47 Hollywood-Raymond Oblique Eagle Rock 6.0 Unknown .12.0 020 San Fernando 7.5 Reverse 12.7 0.37 Sierra Madre- Duarte Faults in Table 1 are within 15 kilometers of the. site and require an increase In the ARS curves to account for near source effects. The Increase is 20% for all periods because of Reverse faults. This increase exceeds all other spectral increases given in Caltrans Guidelines for Foundation investigation Reports, Version 1. 1, September 2000. AIRS spectral curves are presented in Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria, Version 1.2, December 2001 for various soil types, earthquake magnitudes and ground accelerations. The spectra given in Figure B-8 on page B -10 for a soil profile type "D', an earthquake magnitude of 7.25+-0.25, and a ground acceleration of 0.6 g's should be used as a base. The published spectra should be increased 20 % for all periods. JAW 24 103 08:56AW.WILLDRN 714 940 6399 October 30, 2002 191 Type Selection Report Garvey Avenue Bridge Rosemead, California Page 3 LIQUEFACTION EVALUATION The term °liquefaction° describes a phenomenon in which a saturated cohesionless soil loses strength and acquires a degree of mobility as a result of strong ground shaking caused by an earthquake. Soil liquefaction generally occurs in clean or silty sands below water. Our analysis included the 4 borings we drilled and 1 CPT sounding along with 4 borings and 4 CPT soundings prepared previously by EMI. On this site we encountered several clayey sand lenses In various borings along with dean and silty sands. According to Youd (1998) soil liquefaction does not generally occur In clayey sand or clay soils. A common way to evaluate liquefaction is to obtain Standard Penetration Test (SPT) N -value blowcounts for the various samples. Another way is to obtain Cone Penetration Test (CPT) soundings and convettto N values. Both procedures were used on this project. About half of the soil samples obtained on this project were liner samples for laboratory testing. For these samples we used a correlation of 0.65 between SPT N values and the liner sampler to obtain approximate N values for the liner samples. The results raised some doubts as typically th converted blowcount was relatively low and yet the measured densities of the samples usually quite high. Low blowcounts and high densities do not usually occur together. Where the in -situ density was in excess of 108 pcf the questionable biowcount was disregarded. We encountered groundwater at about elevation 205 feet. EMI reported water at 212 to 216 feet The construction plans for the present bridge indicate water at bottom of the channel (at that time) of 237 feet. We have assumed the water can rise to the current (and future) channel bottom elevation of approximately 227 feet throughout the site. For design we assumed a ground acceleration of 0.5 g's and a Moment Magnitude (Mw) of 7.5 In the existing channel the analysis Indicates only nlly very limited liquefaction potential. In our Boring 1 the soil at elevation 222 feet may liquely. in EMI Boring 2 the soil at elevation 218 feet may liquefy. in EMI Boring 3 the soil at elevation 212 feet might liquefy, however, the in -situ density was quite high. The 2 CPT's in the charnel Indicated no likelyy liquefiable soils. At Abutment 1 our Boring 4 indicates liquefaction might occur in an isolated lense at about elevation 225 feet. At Abutment 5 our Boring 3 indicated possible liquefaction at elevations 225 and 215 feet In sands that are currently dry. The CPT's indicated minor zones of possible liquefaction. The CPT's are more useful in determining the extent of liquefiable zones due to the continuous readings. Based on the CPT's near Abutment 5 we estimate the total thickness of liquefiable soil is about 2 feet at that location. Overall, small. It the amount of soil that possibly might liquefy due to seismic activity appears our opinion that no downdrag forces need be considered in the foundation design. JAN 24 '03 08:56AM WILLDAN 714 940 6399 P•5 Type Selection Report October 30, 2002 Garvey Avenue Bridge Rosemead, Califomis Page 4 PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS Shallow footings have not been considered favorably due to the possibiility of di in theal settlements in the soils below footings. The SPT blowcounts were quite zone below possible shallow footings. CIDH piles could be considered, however, there may be serious caving when drilling in the sands below water. Based on these considerations we recommend the new bridge foundations be supported on driven piles. Usually the most economical driven piles in this area are precast prestressed concrete piles. For this report we assumed 14 inch square concrete piles with a 70 ton working capacity would be used. Axial pile capacities were determined using procedures presented by the Corps of Engineers In ASCE (1983). Using idealized soil profiles for abutment and pler conditions, the ultimate axial pile capacities in compression and tension were determined. The entire channel will be protected against scour conditions by concrete paving. The design lengths of the Class 70 piles have been estimated as 28 feet for the pile p r elevationsfof 236r piers. feet t Abutment lengths based 1 234 feet a abutment 5 and 224 feet for the 3. center plem. Appendix E Floodplain Evaluation Willdan, January 2003 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3 II. RISK ASSESSMENT STATEMENT 4 III. FLOODPLAIN EVALUATION 4 -5 IV. APPENDIX • Figure 1 - Vicinity Map • Figure 2 — Flood Insurance Rate Map • Appendix A — Hydraulics Report 2 FLOODPLAIN EVALUATION GARVEY AVENUE BRIDGE OVER RIO HONDO CHANNEL Bridge No. 53C -0148 CITY OF ROSEMEAD LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA January 2003 0 L qv\ oP N0. NT 30511 EX P. 3 -31- 4 \IL ENW�% Willdan 27042 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 270 Foothill Ranch, California 92610 (949) 470 -8840 LOCATION HYDRAULIC STUDY GARVEY AVENUE BRIDGE OVER RIO HONDO CHANNEL PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project consists of the replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The project is located along Garvey Avenue between stations 392 +67 and 402 +00; in the City of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California. The existing bridge was built in 1936 and consists of continuous concrete tee beams over nine, 67 -foot and two, 26- foot spans supported by ten 2'-4" piers. The bridge is approximately 655 feet long and approximately 52 feet wide. The approach roadway width is 78 feet and the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of Garvey Avenue is 26,000 vehicles. The existing bridge is a traffic and pedestrian hazard. The bridge is a bottleneck — its width is only two thirds the width of the approach roadways. In addition, the bridge does not have shoulders, and since the sidewalks are only three (3) feet wide, the bridge places pedestrians dangerously close to vehicular traffic. After investigation, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) deemed the bridge structurally deficient, and it was; therefore, placed on Caltrans' Eligible Bridge List (EBL), since its sufficiency rating is 46.6. Furthermore, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Bridge Inspection Report and Field Inspection for the bridge lists the following deficiencies: • the deck is in poor condition, • the bridge rail is substandard, • the bridge geometry is intolerable and obsolete, • the roadway approach is substandard, and • the sidewalk next to the bridge deck is substandard. The purpose of this project is to create an eastern access to City of Rosemead, south of the San Bernardino Freeway, that can operate at a reasonable Level of Service (LOS), is structurally sound, and safe for both vehicles and pedestrians. The City proposes to accomplish this goal by replacing the existing Garvey Avenue Bridge, which crosses the Rio Hondo Channel. The existing bridge is the only entrance to the City south of the San Bernardino Freeway, and is one of the City's major arterial roadways. As discussed, the existing bridge is a traffic and pedestrian hazard. 3 The City of Rosemead proposes to design and construct a replacement bridge that meets current standards and reduces potential hazards. The proposed bridge will be 100 feet wide and 420 feet long. The proposed bridge design will be supported by four 2' -6" piers. The Local Federal Highway Bridge Rehabilitation, and Replacement Program (HBRR), seismic retrofit funds, and local funds — all of which have been allocated, would fund project construction. II. RISK ASSESSMENT STATEMENT The floodplain encroachment risk associated with the Garvey Avenue Bridge improvements is low. This conclusion is based on a site visit, review of topography, engineering judgement, and the following Floodplain Evaluation Study discussion and documentation. III. FLOODPLAIN EVALUATION A. Brief Description Description of Existinq Base Floodplain The Rio Hondo River base flood is contained within an improved channel both upstream and downstream of the Garvey Avenue Bridge crossing. Existing base floodplain waters do not overtop the existing channel and does not encroach upon the existing buildings or structures adjacent to the channel. The new base floodplain analysis was completed using the HEC -2 hydraulic computer program. Because there will be no changes to the channel configuration there will be insignificant or no negative impact to the existing flood plain. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) shows the flood plain is designated a Zone C for the City of Rosemead, California, in Los Angeles County. The area was not studied by detailed methods and base flood elevations were not calculated in the study. B. Traffic The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of Garvey Avenue is 26,000 vehicles C! C. Properties at Risk None. The flow is contained within the channel. D. Discussion 1. The risk flood damage associated with this project is negligible. Floodplain widths associated with the proposed improvements will not increase significantly. The existing hydraulic depth is 10.29' at the Inside Bridge Upstream. The proposed hydraulic depth is 10.18' at the Inside Bridge Upstream. Both the existing and proposed flooded widths are contained within the channel. The change in hydraulic depth resulted from the reduction in the number of piers for the new bridge from 6 piers to 3 piers within the channel. 2. Impacts on natural and beneficial Floodplain values will be negligible as a result of this project. 3. No incompatible floodplain development will be associated with this project. 4. The proposed , project improvements are not a, significant encroachment. We are reducing the number of bridge piers. 5. The proposed project improvements are not a significant longitudinal encroachment. We are adding a horse trail underpass within the channel on the westerly levee. E. Preparer The Location Hydraulic Study, Risk Assessment, Floodplain Evaluation, and Calculations were prepared under the supervision of David L. Hunt P.E., Senior Vice President, Orange County Regional Manager, Willdan. 5 ivtaN output UNMAPPI 8881418081C P MSC Product Map Search ' ' �` n T• tmlt'I^'^ Legend Temple City 9nae Com,]6am0_tomoom Selected Features ANGELES 4 3 n` -. -. Ce'ta m won Cities UNt1APPED_88a859 ..x� • �.'4 UlGNAPPEDS088808 '} • u c> tnmam t f�yO R4 - .� • 9nm Tawec2Le�Um Page 1 of 3 http: / /gis l .mse. fema.gov /servleticom. esri.esrimap.Esrimap? ServiceName— mscstore&ClientVersion =3.1 &I... 1/22/2003 ' ' �` • T• tmlt'I^'^ 085843 • 9nae Com,]6am0_tomoom If -_ Ce'ta m won s El Moniq • s�t:r�cm tamaan�omnm • egcae mmom -lammm UlGNAPPEDS088808 '} • u c> tnmam 9 � Y Maprroads y Atrltdil 3X .-af+. az 40V MAP NgybaYs D1 f NAR R,,d, ` iF'Y a. i .. ra MoMS . 5 I $ $IQIS Ramps n lA�➢rWPPED 88a182 {,. # /• FQarc�s . - ` :-��, Raioads Stale BotdeB 1905858��` �' � /�✓ Minor RiVert, desks -� Lakes, Major Rivers -.., i-0.�.� h' fi{ 9B ttlrmafbda )881A8 805A:P Madvn lalnavtbrds 3nae llleav NSk �. 9pra Hiwsv9rrm•s Ramsms Bars tilts Ca�.I'gskvm Parks Nadvrpbbed Farr �PSb aaa Femn City ti ft Nap ceaa> t.mmmemm ft cif a. ]OaaflfLt.pefrfi00 Staatsa:atca 'rmmn one I C+ .tomamm. -win 9n11 Ctaa.30.aa1_10maam Tpa+ac toam0�tl0m Beam T�9 W .toemm amv Pa .t.2MO Counties Page 1 of 3 http: / /gis l .mse. fema.gov /servleticom. esri.esrimap.Esrimap? ServiceName— mscstore&ClientVersion =3.1 &I... 1/22/2003 e (l W O s � V b x b 8 w i.i x ^C O O f; r_ i M � O N O 'o C4 O � � O M 0 O M 00 � O N 0 A y Ole IL O of .o d � U � aw M O O N N a Appendix F Negative Historic Property Survey Report Myra L. Frank & Associates, Inc., March 2003 I`MCL•t11T4r:f.PU effectiveness, constructability and great structural performance during earthquakes. This alternative utilizes precast prestressed girders ranging from 90 to 120 feet long supported on reinforced concrete abutments and piers. They are connected together by cast -in -place concrete deck. Since no falsework would be required for the erection of the girders and later the casting of concrete deck, the construction of bridge superstructure would not be restrained within dry. seasons. The precast prestressed standard I- girder alternative uses five equal spans, and has a total bridge length of 430 feet. Since each span is simply- supported, all piers have to be fixed at the bottom. Thus, the pier foundations are much larger than those of the Bulb -tee girder and cost would be higher. Another disadvantage of this alternative is that, due to large skew angle, the simply supported girders tend to rotate during an earthquake. This may cause girder unseating. Therefore, the precast prestressed standard I- girder alternative is not preferred. The cast -in -place prestressed box girder alternative is the same bridge length as the Bulb -tee girder, but has three spans. This alternative is not preferred because it requires falsework inside the channel for the superstructure construction, which restrains the construction within dry seasons and makes it impossible to build the bridge in one year. This will cause the new and existing piers to coexist in the channel during one rainy season, which would increase flood potential and may not be acceptable to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Therefore, the cast -in -place prestressed box girder alternative is not preferred. The vehicular and pedestrian traffic on the existing bridge would be maintained during the construction period. To achieve that, the construction would be performed in two stages. In the first stage, the existing bridge would be partially removed with adequate bridge width for designated traffic lanes during construction. The outside portions of the new bridge would be constructed at each side. In the second stage, after the traffic is routed to the new bridge on the outside, the remaining of the existing bridge would be demolished, and the interior bridge would be constructed. The project also involves improvements to the Rio Hondo Channel. The existing channel is concrete lined within the limits of the proposed project. An existing combination maintenance road/bike path is located on the left (easterly) levee and is considered a shared trail. There are two access points to Garvey Avenue to this trail, one upstream and one downstream of the bridge. Currently, the trail passes under the bridge within the channel. There is a maintenance road on the top of the right (westerly) levee. The bridge abutment is set several feet back from this levee and there is no access to Garvey Avenue from the maintenance road. An existing equestrian trail is also located along the western levee of the Rio Hondo Channel. This trail does not currently have an adequate crossing of Garvey Avenue. The proposed project includes the relocation of the existing equestrian trail currently on the landward side of the west levee. The proposed equestrian trail will be located within the channel passing under the new bridge structure similarly to existing maintenance road/bike/pedestrian trail on the easterly levee. The equestrian trail underpass will include a 12- foot wide trail with a 2% cross fall. The proposed longitudinal slopes are limited to 15% up to 300' in length, otherwise 10% longitudinal slope is considered to be the maximum. The necessary channel improvements are dependent on the extent of the proposed bridge improvements (ie. the locations of the bridge abutments in relation to each levee and the location of the proposed piers for the bridge within the channel.) The proposed channel improvements would consist mainly of reconstructing the existing shared trail underpass to maintain adequate vertical clearance under the new bridge, modifying the existing shared trail access points to Garvey Avenue, constructing an equestrian trail underpass along the western channel levee, and repaving the existing channel invert as part of the new pier construction for the bridge. Although the exact improvements to the Rio Hondo Channel are not yet known, it is estimated that the extent of the work would be limited to 400 feet upstream and downstream of the existing Garvey Avenue Bridge. W *1Ai W ZIT; &-]-;I I. HIGHWAY PROJECT DESCRIPTION Los Angeles I WA I WA I WA I WA I Locator: 07- LA -0-RSMD The proposed project consists of the replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel. The project is located along Garvey Avenue between stations 392 +67 and 402+00, in the City of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California. The existing bridge was built in 1936 and consists of continuous concrete tee beams over nine, 67- foot and two, 26 -foot spans. The bridge is approximately 655 feet long and approximately 52 feet wide. The approach roadway width is 78 feet and the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of Garvey Avenue is 26,000 vehicles. The existing bridge is a traffic and pedestrian hazard. The bridge is a bottleneck — its width is only two thirds the width of the approach roadways. In addition, the bridge does not have shoulders, and since the sidewalks are only three (3) feet wide, the bridge places pedestrians dangerously close to vehicular traffic. After investigation, the California Department of Transportation ( Caltrans) deemed the bridge structurally deficient, and it was, therefore, placed on Caltrans' Eligible Bridge List (EBL), since its sufficiency rating is 46.6. Furthermore, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Bridge Inspection Report and Field Inspection for the bridge lists the following deficiencies: • the deck is in poor condition, the bridge rail is substandard, • the bridge geometry is intolerable and obsolete, • the roadway approach is substandard, and the sidewalk next to the bridge deck is substandard. The purpose of this project is to create an eastern access to City of Rosemead, south of the San Bernardino Freeway, that can operate at a reasonable Level of Service (LOS), is structurally sound, and safe for both vehicles and pedestrians. The City proposes to accomplish this goal by replacing the existing Garvey Avenue Bridge, which crosses the Rio Hondo Channel. The existing bridge is the only entrance to the City south of the San Bernardino Freeway, and is one of the City's major arterial roadways. As discussed, the existing bridge is a traffic and pedestrian hazard. The City of Rosemead proposes to design and construct a replacement bridge that meets current standards and reduces potential hazards. Project construction would be funded by the Local Federal Highway Bridge Rehabilitation and Replacement Program (HBRR), seismic retrofit funds, and local funds — all of which have been allocated. The proposed bridge would be 100 feet wide, within the existing right -of -way, and be joined to the existing approach roadway approximately 170 feet on the east side and 340 feet on the west side of the bridge. It can accommodate a 76- foot wide roadway and two 11 -foot wide sidewalks. The roadway consists of a 10 -foot center median, four 11 -foot traffic lanes and one 11 -foot shoulder at each side. The paved Rio Hondo Channel is narrower than the existing bridge length. The replacement bridge is shortened to approximately 420 -foot long, or the width of the channel. The roadway alignment and profile would be kept approximately the same as the existing. Retaining walls or slopes would be required to support the approaching roadway to the bridge abutments at both ends. The number of the piers in the Rio Hondo Channel is reduced from five to three, resulting in a total thickness of its piers less than that of the existing bridge. This improves the hydraulic characteristics of the channel. Based on the final locations of new bridge abutments, the existing channel lining, equestrian trail, and bike path would all need to be modified accordingly as part of the bridge replacement. Three bridge superstructure alternatives have been studied. They are: precast prestressed Bulb -Tee girder, precast prestressed standard I- girder, and cast -in -place prestressed box girder. The preliminary investigation indicates that the first alternative, precast prestressed bulb -tee girder, provides the most feasible solution for this project due to its cost- NEGATIVE HPSR 11. AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS The Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the proposed project includes the maximum existing or proposed right -of -way for all alternatives currently under consideration, easements, (temporary and permanent), all improved properties subject to temporary or permanent changes in access and areas outside the required right -of -way where visual or audible changes could occur. The geographic area within which effects of this project may occur includes the continuation of the 100 foot wide right - of -way of `the existing bridge 170 feet on the east side of the bridge along Garvey Avenue in the City of Rosemead, and 340 feet on the west side of the bridge along Garvey Avenue in the City of South El Monte. It is estimated that the extent work in the Rio Hondo Channel would be limited to 400 feet upstream and downstream of the existing Garvey Avenue Bridge. The APE Map reflects these boundaries. Utility services currently carried over the bridge are the San Gabriel Valley Water Company, The Gas Company, Pacific Bell and California Edison. All of these utilities are to be relocated to the new bridge. III. SOURCES CONSULTED See Attached List ❑ Other (Names and dates) IV. LIST OF ATTACHED DOCUMENTATION ® Archaeological Survey Report (ASR) ❑ Correspondence from SHPO ® Caltrans Historic Highway Bridge Inventory print -out ® •Other (specify) Project Location Map, Project Vicinity Map, APE Map DPR 523 Form for Garvey Avenue Bridge over Rio Hondo #53C0148 DPE 523 Form for Portion of the Rio Hondo Flood Control Channel and Flood Control System V. INTRODUCTION NAME(S) OF SURVEYORS QUALIFICATIONS Month/Year • National Register of Historic Places and updates to: November. 2002 • OHP Database of Determinations of Eligibility and updates to: January , 2003 • California Register of Historical Landmarks and updates to: January. 2003 • California Historical Landmarks and updates to: November. 2002 • California Points of Historical Interest May. 1992 • Caltrans Historic Highway Bridge Inventory November. 2002 • Archaeological Site Records (Name of Institutions) November. 2002 • Local Historical Society (Names and dates contacted) November. 2002 See Attached List ❑ Other (Names and dates) IV. LIST OF ATTACHED DOCUMENTATION ® Archaeological Survey Report (ASR) ❑ Correspondence from SHPO ® Caltrans Historic Highway Bridge Inventory print -out ® •Other (specify) Project Location Map, Project Vicinity Map, APE Map DPR 523 Form for Garvey Avenue Bridge over Rio Hondo #53C0148 DPE 523 Form for Portion of the Rio Hondo Flood Control Channel and Flood Control System V. INTRODUCTION NAME(S) OF SURVEYORS QUALIFICATIONS DATE (S) OF FIELDWORK Alms Carlisle B.A. Howard University /Architecture November 2002 Graduate Studies in Historic Preservation - Howard University VI. CALTRANS APPROVAL NEGATIVE HPSR Recommended For Approval District Heritage Resource Coordinator Approved: Chief, District Environmental Planning Branch VII. FHWA DETERMINATION Check one: nKA. No cultural resources are present within or adjacent to the project's APE 2 B. The only cultural resources present within or adjacent to the project's APE are: 0 Buildings or structures previously determined ineligible in consultation with the SHPO G Bridges listed as Category 5 in the Caltrans Historic Highway Bridge Inventory Vlll. FHWA TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER APPROVAL Cultural studies are complete and satisfactory. The requirements of 36 CFR 800 have been completed. ©'' Name I Date GARVEY AVENUE BRIDGE Historical Societies and Interested Individuals Julie Gentry (Contacted by phone 10/7/02) Friends of the Rosemead Library 8915 Nevada Street Rosemead, California 91770 Phone: (626) 572 -4564 2. Maxine Rosch (contacted by phone 10/07/02) Rosemead Women's Club 8845 Guess Street Rosemead, California 91770 -1717 Phone: (626) 288- 2928 3. Donna Crippen El Monte Historical Society Museum 3150 Tyler Avenue El Monte, CA 91733 Phone: (626) 4443813 4. Gary Myrick, Director Planning Department City of South El Monte 1415 Santa Anita Avenue S. El Monte CA 91733 5. Mr. Brad Johnson, Director Planning Department City of Rosemead 8838 E. Valley Boulevard Rosemead, CA 91660 -1714 6. Los Angeles Conservancy Attention: Ken Bernstein 523 W. Sixth Street, Suite 826 Los Angeles, CA 90014 (213) 623 -CI1`Y 7. Sig Demke Historical Society of Southern California 200 E. Avenue 43 Los Angeles, CA 90028 (323) 222 -0546 8. Louis Skeleton, Chairman Historic Landmarks and Records Commission County of Los Angeles Hall of Administration 500 W. Temple Street, Room 383 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Phone (213)974 -1431 9. Morgan Yates Southern California Automobile Club 2601 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90001 10. Kastytis Nefas U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District P. O. Box 53711 Los Angeles, CA 90053 -2335 11. Laura Lozano Housing Preservation and Rehabilitation Community Development Department City of South El Monte 1415 Santa Anita Avenue South El Monte, CA 91733 Chris Alvares, City Engineer Community Development Department City of South El Monte 1415 Santa Anita Avenue South El Monte, CA 91733 Jim Harris, Traffic Engineer Community Development Department City of South El Monte 1415 Santa Anita Avenue South El Monte, CA 91733 Mr. Greg Fuderer, Public Affairs Specialist Public Affairs Office U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District P. O. Box 53711 Los Angeles, CA 90053 -2335 MFI-Myra L. Frank & Associates, Inc. November 4, 2002 Ms. Julie Gentry Friends of the Rosemead Library 8915 Nevada Street Rosemead, CA 91770 Dear Ms. Gentry: Cc�P- (213) 627 -5376 Fax: (213) 627 -6853 Environmental Impact Reports and Statements Architectural History On behalf of the City of Rosemead and the California Department of Transportation, Myra L. Frank & Associates, Inc. is preparing historic and cultural resources documentation for the Replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Project in order to comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. As part of our research, we are contacting local historical organizations and other local organizations to help identify any historic buildings, districts, sites, objects, or archaeological sites of significance within the project area. The proposed project is to construct a replacement bridge for the existing Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo. The new bridge will be located essentially in the same location of the existing bridge and will improve traffic and pedestrian safety and provide congestion relief on Garvey Avenue. As part of our study of the project area, we are examining local, state and federal lists of historic properties as well as previous surveys. Also, we are conducting research on the properties within the project area to determine their archaeological, architectural, and historical significance. Our assessment of significance will be based on the criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Any information you can provide will help assure that historic properties are considered and protected. If you know of any properties in the project area that should be considered historic properties, please indicate, in writing, their locations and any information about their significance you can provide. If writing is not convenient, please call me at my office, telephone number (213) 627 -5376, or send an e-mail to aarlisle@mwafrank.com to discuss any issues or information you may have. I am looking forward to hearing form you. Thank you in advance for taking the time to consider this request. Sincerely, Alma Carlisle Architectural Historian Enclosure: Map of Project Area cc: Dr. Diane Kane, Caltrans, District 7 John Bellas, Willdan 8 1 1 W e s t 7 . t h . S c r e e t , S u i t e 8 0 0 , L o s A n g e l es, C A. 9 0 0 1 7 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NEGATIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT District County Route Post Mile Charge Unit Expenditure Authorization 07 1 Los Angeles I N/A I N I N/A I N/A The proposed project consists of the replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel in the City of Rosemead, Los Angeles County, California. The existing bridge was built in 1936 and consists of continuous concrete tee beams over nine 67 -ft and two 26 -ft spans. Both Caltrans and the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works have determined that the existing Garvey Avenue Bride is a structurally deficient. Therefore, the City of Rosemead proposes to design and construct a replacement bridge over the Rio Hondo that is structurally sound, and safe for both vehicles and pedestrians. Project construction would be funded by the Local Federal Highway Bridge Rehabilitation and Replacement Program, seismic retrofit funds, and local funds. The proposed bridge would be 100 ft wide, within the existing right -of -way, and be joined to the existing approach roadway, approximately 170 ft on the east side and 340 ft on the west side of the bridge. This bridge would accommodate a 76 -ft -wide roadway that would consist of a 10 -ft -wide center median, four I 1 -ft -wide traffic lanes, and one 11 -11 shoulder at each side. The proposed bridge would also accommodate two 11 -ft -wide sidewalks. Three bridge superstructure alternatives have been studied: precast prestressed Bulb -Tee girder, precast prestressed standard I- girder, and cast -in -place prestressed box girder. Preliminary studies indicate that the precast prestressed Bulb -Tee girder alternative provides the most feasible solution for the project due to its cost - effectiveness, constructability, and structural performance during earthquakes. To maintain vehicular and pedestrian traffic on the existing bridge, construction would be performed in two stages. During the first stage, the existing bridge would be partially removed with adequate bridge width for designated traffic lanes during construction, while the outside portions of the new bridge would be constructed at each side. In the second stage, after the traffic is routed to the bridge on the outside, the remaining portions of the existing bridge would be demolished, and the interior bridge would be constructed. The project also involves improvements to the Rio Hondo Channel. The proposed channel improvements would consist mainly of reconstruction of the existing shared maintenance road/bike /pedestrian underpass trail on the easterly levee to maintain adequate vertical clearance under the new bridge, modifying the existing shared trail access points to Garvey Avenue, constructing an equestrian trail underpass along the western channel levee, and repaving the existing channel invert as part of the new pier construction for the bridge. 11. STUDY FINDINGS No archaeological resources were identified as a result of the archaeological survey of the Project APE as defined in the Project Location Map (attached; all subsequent references to the Project APE will refer to this Project Map; see also Figure 3 (Project APE Map] of the HPSR). Therefore, no further archaeological work should be necessary unless Project plans change to include unsurveyed areas. If buried cultural resources are encountered during construction, it is Caltrans' policy that work in that area must halt until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the nature and significance of the find. If human retrains are unearthed during construction, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to the origin and disposition of the remains pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. In either instance, Caltrans District 7, Environmental Division, Cultural Studies Branch will be immediately notified (Environmental Handbook, Vol. 2, Chap. 1). III. INTRODUCTION NAME(S) OF SURVEYORS QUALIFICATIONS DATE(S) OF FIELDWORK Nina M. Harris M.A. Archaeology, R.P.A. November 20, 2002 Durham University, UK, 1992 14 years archaeology experience in California PRESENT ENVIRONMENT: The study area is within a built, highly disturbed, light industrial environment located along the Rio Hondo which has been contained within a concrete channel. Located at the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains and the northern edge of the Los Angeles coastal plain, the study area is characterized by transportation systems, light industry, commercial businesses, and residential housing. A shared maintenance road/bike /pedestrian underpass trail also extends along the eastern levee of the Rio Hondo Channel. Observed flora and fauna are all introduced species. ETHNOGRAPHY: The Project APE is within the territorial cultural boundaries of Gabrielino Indians (McCawley 1996: Bean and Smith 1978). DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NEGATIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES E Year: 2002 CALIFORNIA INVENTORY OF HISTORIC RESOURCES Year: 2002 CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL LANDMARKS El . I Year: 2002 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD 0 (Name(s) of Insfltution(s)) South Central Coastal Information Center An archaeological records and literature search of the Project APE was conducted by Ms. Nina Harris of Applied EarthWorks, Inc., at the South Central Coastal Information Center at the Department of Anthropology, California State University, Fullerton, on 20 November 2002. No historical or prehistoric archaeological sites have been recorded within a'' /a -mile radius of the Project APE; therefore, no archaeological site records are available. OTHER: Historic maps, including Pasadena (1896, 1906) 15' series USGS topographic maps were also inspected. Other sources consulted include lists of the California Register of Historical Resources (2002), California Points of Historical Interest (2002), and the Office of Historic Preservation Database of Determinations of Eligibility (2002). NATIVE AMERICAN CONSULTATION: A letter sent on 18 November 2002 to Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) requesting a review of the Sacred Lands Inventory, as well as a list of Native American individuals or organizations who may have knowledge of cultural resources in the Project area. A reply from NAHC on 21 November 2002 indicated that no Sacred Lands were located within the project location. A list of 11 Native American individuals and organizations were contacted for additional information regarding cultural resources within the vicinity of the Project APE on 21 November 2002. On 25 November 2002 Nina Harris received a telephone call from Mr. Samuel Dunlap recommending that archaeological and Native American monitors be present during Project - related trenching activities because the Whittier Narrows area is a potentially sensitive are for prehistoric cultural resources. As of 13 January 2003, no other comments have been received from the Native American organizations and individuals contacted. RESULTS: The archaeological records and literature search indicated that seven cultural resources studies have been conducted previously within a Y2 -mile radius of the project area. However, no prehistoric or historical archaeological sites have been identified previously within a Y2-mile radius of the Project APE. The National Register of Historic Places shows no properties listed within a Vi-mile radius of the Project APE. The Office of Historic Preservation Database of Determinations of Eligibility, including the California Register of Historical Resources, the California Points of Historical Interest, and the California Inventory of Historic Resources list no properties within a Y2-mile radius of the Project APE. Additionally, the California Historical Landmarks of the Office of Historic Preservation lists no landmarks within a % -mile radius of the Project APE. V. FIELD METHODS An archaeological survey of the Project APE was conducted by one Applied EarthWorks archaeologist on 20 November 2002. Because the Project APE is located within a built, residential/light industrialized area, the surveyor inspected only those portions of the Project APE where the ground surface was exposed. Throughout these areas the sediments appear to be either highly disturbed or to consist of imported fill sediments. No cultural resources were identified during the archaeological survey. VI. REMARKS As stated in Section V, supra, no archaeological resources were identified as a result of the archaeological survey of the Project APE. However, the archaeological survey was confined to those areas where the ground surface was exposed. If buried cultural resources are encountered during construction, it is Caltrans policy that work in that area must halt until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the nature and significance of the find. If human remains are unearthed during construction, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to the origin and disposition of the remains pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. In either instance, Caltrans District 7, Environmental Division, Cultural Studies Branch will be immediately notified (Environmental Handbook, Vol. 2, Chapter 1). DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NEGATIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT DPO -EP -25 (REV 2/83) VII. CERTIFICATION Preparer. Nina M. Harris, R.P.A. I Title: Staff Archaeologist Signature / Date I a3 Reviewer �i Title �S61t% 5FNlo/Z f}yx.W�4Eotpb[S7 Signature Date 3 O� VIII. MAPS DISTRICT LOCATION ❑ PROJECT VICINITY MAP O . PROJECT LOCATION MAP D Quadrangle Name: El Monte; Date: 1988 Revised 1981,1994 (Delineate area of actual survey on Project Map, or largest scale map available.) IX. PHOTOGRAPHS YES ❑ NO El ATTACHED ❑ (OPTIONAL) Bean, J. and C. Smith 1978 Gabrielino. In Handbook of the North American Indians: Volume 8 California, Smithsonian Institute. McCawley, W. 1996 The First Angelinos. Malld Museum Press / Ballena Press. Project Vicinity MAP ll`.;n J A lips ". I((IN z so i BEmig e a U V, WHITT NARR WS A M zlElp U N T -V iRECREATIO SCALE 1:24 000 0 1 MLE Iwo 0 1000 moo 3000 4WD 5000 mm I= FEET • 1 3 0 1 KILO&CEM GN 114' 241 MILS 11 A UTU CWD AND 1994 MAGNETIc NoKrH EL MONTE, CA 7.5'USGS Quad 1966 (1981, 1994) DECU10TION AT CeTrER (Y SHM Figure 2 Location of the Garvey Avenue Bridge Project Area. PE T .lk4 l, so i BEmig e a U V, WHITT NARR WS A M zlElp U N T -V iRECREATIO SCALE 1:24 000 0 1 MLE Iwo 0 1000 moo 3000 4WD 5000 mm I= FEET • 1 3 0 1 KILO&CEM GN 114' 241 MILS 11 A UTU CWD AND 1994 MAGNETIc NoKrH EL MONTE, CA 7.5'USGS Quad 1966 (1981, 1994) DECU10TION AT CeTrER (Y SHM Figure 2 Location of the Garvey Avenue Bridge Project Area. roll- I so i BEmig e a U V, WHITT NARR WS A M zlElp U N T -V iRECREATIO SCALE 1:24 000 0 1 MLE Iwo 0 1000 moo 3000 4WD 5000 mm I= FEET • 1 3 0 1 KILO&CEM GN 114' 241 MILS 11 A UTU CWD AND 1994 MAGNETIc NoKrH EL MONTE, CA 7.5'USGS Quad 1966 (1981, 1994) DECU10TION AT CeTrER (Y SHM Figure 2 Location of the Garvey Avenue Bridge Project Area. California Department of Transportation Historical Significance - Local Agency Bridges Caltrans Structure Maintenance and Investigations Los Angeles County Bridge Year Year Number District Structure Name Location Historical Significance Built Wid/Ext 5300150 07 COYOTE CREEK 53C0151 07 FIRST STREET OC 5300153 07 FIGUEROA ST 53C0l 54 07 TELEGRAPH RD UNDER AT &SF 5300156 07 RIO HONDO RIVER 5300157 07 SAN GABRIEL RIVER 53C0158 07 LOS ANGELES RIVER 5300159 07 LOS ANGELES RIVER 53C0160 07 RIVERSIDE DRIVE BOH 53C0161 07 MYRAAVE 5300163 07 LOS ANGELES RIVER BOH 5300164 07 SEPULVEDA TUNNEL 5300166 07 RIO HONDO 53C0168 07 WILSHIRE BLVD 5300172 07 EATON WASH 5300174 07 BURBANK- WESTERN CHANNEL 5300178 07 VALLEY BLVD OH 53C0183 07 SIERRA HW- TUNNEL STATION 5300185 07 LOS ANGELES RIVER 53C0190L 07 LOS ANGELES RIVER 53C0190R 07 LOS ANGELES RIVER 5300191 07 WALNUT CREEK 5300192 07 PARAMOUNT BLVD UP 5300193 07 GARVEY AVE UNDER SPTC 5300198 07 BURBANK BLVD OH 5300200 07 MAGNOLIA BLVD 5300201 07 OLIVE AVE FRG RD 5300202 07 SPRING ST UC 5300203 07 N FK COYOTE CREEK 5300208 07 ORANGE AVE OH 53CO209 07 MARINE STADIUM & APPIAN 5300210 07 LOS CERRITOS CHAN 5300211 07 LOS CERRITOS CHANNEL 63CO214 07 LOS CERRITOS DRAINAGE CH 5300215 07 LOS CERMOS DR CHAN BR 5300216 07 LOS CERITOS DRN CHANN BR 53CO218 07 LOS CERRITOS DRA CHAN BR 53CO219 07 PALO VERDE DRAIN BR 5300220 07 LOS CERRITOS DRAINAGE CH 5300221 07 LOS CERRITOS DRAINAGE CH 53CO226 07 VERDUGO WA 5300227 07 LOS CERRITOS DR CHANNEL 53CO229 07 LOS CERRITOS DRAIN CHANN OCTOBER 1, 2001 0.8 MI E VALLEY VIEW AVE - 0.9 MI E VALLEY VIEW AVE 0.4 MI SW /O US 101 0.1 MI S/O US 101 0.1 MI W GARFIELD AVE 0.5 MI W PARAMOUNT BL 0.1 MI W SAN GABR FWY 0.3 MI S FLORENCE AVE 500'W/0 LONG BEACH FWY 0.1 MI W/O SR 11 BTW ST GEORGE ST/MYRA AVE RIO VSTA AV -SNTA FE AV 0.5 MI W/O 1.405 0.5 MI S FIRESTONE BLVD 0.25 MI W OF SAN DIEGO FW 0.2 MI W BALDWIN AVE 1/4 MI W GOLDEN STATE FRY 1/2 MI E HACIENDA BLVD 0.1 MI EAST OF 1 -5 1/2 MI S ALONDRA BLVD 0.1 MI E LONG BEACH FWY 0.1 MI E LONG BEACH FWY 100' S/O SBD FWY 5/8 MI S WASHINGTON BLVD 1/4 MI E VALLEY BLVD 300'W GOLDEN STATE FRWY 1/8 MI W GOLDEN STATE FRY 1/8 MI W GOLDEN STATE FRY 1/4 MI W/O LAKEWOOD BLVD 0.3 MI W VALLEY VIEW AVE 1/2 MI S WILLOW ST 1/2 MI W PACIFIC COAST HY 0.1 MI W STUDEBAKER RD 1/4 MI W/O STUDEBAKER RD 0.1 MI S SPRING ST 0.1 MI W PALO VERDE AVE 0.1 MI S WILLOW ST 0.1 MIS SPRING ST 0.1 MI W PALO VERDE AV 0.2 MI W BELLFLOWER BLVD 1/4 MI E CLARK AVE 118 MI N VENTURA FRY . 0.4 MI W BELLFLOWER BL 0.4 MI W BELLFLOWER BL Page 75 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eliglble for NRHP 2 Br eligible for NRHP 2 Br eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eliglble for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eliglble for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 5 Not ellgible for NRHP 5 Not eliglble for NRHP 5 Not eliglble for NRHP 5 Not eligible for NRHP 1950 1940 1940 1925 1951 1961 1939 1940 1939 1925 1925 1929 1951 1957 1956 1949 1957 1911 1937 1951 1951 1975 1958 1933 1958 1949 1949 1978 1959 1932 1955 1984 1956 1954 1954 1956 1954 1953 1963 1962 1939 1963 1963 1971 1959 1978 1934 1972 1972 1959 1959 1966 1977 hs_loca/ Project Location Sources: U.S. Census Bureau TIGER Data, 1995; Myra L. Frank & Associates, Inc., 2003. Replacement of Garvey Avenue Bridge Figure 2. Project Location Map over the Rio Hondo Channel Bridge # 53CO148 • �E �,E �, �'f•� i a .,aYl� 4 9 6 + G Wig off° � � ,��. '�.. • �F ,\ 4 O � 6✓ J b r I, I z q r 4 � •S S � \ �l tl 1 vl� _' r - •�i r r.= a ti � as 'State of California —The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PRIMARY RECORD Other Listings Review Code Primary # HR # Trinomial NRHP Status Code Reviewer Page I of 6 • Resource Name or #: Garvey Avenue Bridee over the Rio Hondo #53CO148 P1. Other Identifier: • P2. Location: ❑Not for Publlcatlon MUnrestricted a. County Los Angeles b. USGS 7.5' Ouad El Monte Ouad Date 1981 T_; R_; _ 1/4 of _1/4 of Sec_; B.M. c. Address City Rosemead Zip 91770 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear feature) Zone mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g. parcel #, legal description, directions to resource, elevation, additional UTM9, etc. as app Project APE Map # 1, on Garvey Avenue from approximately 125 feet east and 125 feet west of the Rio Rondo Channel, Locator 07- LA- 0 -RSMD. Located 1/8 mile west of Rosemead Boulevard • P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries.) The Garvey Avenue Bridge ( Bridge No. 53CO148) spans the Rio Hondo Channel to connect the cities of Rosemead and South El Monte in Los Angeles County, California; however, the Bridge is within the Corporate Boundaries of the City of Rosemead. The Rio Hondo Channel at the location of the Garvey Avenue Bridge is a concrete lined channel that is a component of the Rio Hondo/Whittier Narrows Flood Control Basin. The bridge is located to the north of the Whittier Narrows County Recreation Area and approximately two (2) miles north of the Whittier Narrows Dam. It is a reinforced concrete, deck type bridge with nine, sixty -seven foot spans and two, twenty -six foot cantilevers. The substructure consists of thin, concrete piers. The concrete piers align with the flow of the river. Major design features include segmental arches with closed spandrels and a metal pipe rail and concrete balustrade. The 655 foot long bridge carries a major, four lane roadway, two lanes in each direction and two, three foot wide raised pedestrian sidewalks. The structure was built on a forty -five degree skew to conform to the river channel. (See Continuation Sheet) • P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP19 Bridee E] Element of District ❑Other (Isolates, etc.) P5b. Description of Photo: (View, date, etc.) View to north. 9/4102 P8. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: ❑Prehistoric ®Historic E] Both 1936 Major Structure Data Report 1936 Factual P7. Owner and Address: City of Rosemead 8838 E. Valley Boulevard Rosemead. CA 91770 P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation, address) Alma Carlisle Myra L. Frank &. Assoc., Inc. 811 W. 7th St., Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90017 •P9. Date Recorded: 10/17/2002 •P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Repu St for Determination of Eliaibility PI1. Report Citation: (Cite survey reportlother sources or "none') HPSR Garvey Avenue Bridee over the Rio Hondo Attachments: ❑NONE []Location Map E] Sketch Map ©Continuation Sheet ©Building, Structure, and Object Record ❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record E] Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record E] Artifact Record []Photograph Record ❑Other: (List) DPR 523A (1195) - • Required Information Page 2 of 6 NRHP Status Code • Resource Name or ft: Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo #53CO148 B1. Historic Name: Route 23 Bridge Route 99 Bridge Garvey Avenue Bridge B2. Common NameGarvey Avenue Bridge B3. Original Use: Bridge over Rio Hondo B4. Present Use: Bridge over Rio Hondo Channel • B6. Architectural Style: Closed spandrel multi -arch bridg,e • E6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.). The bridge was constructed in 1937 before the 1959 incorporation of the City of Rosemead and before the 1954 concrete channelization of the Rio Hondo by the U. S. Corps of Engineers. The bridge was constructed by the State of Califomia, Department of Public Works, Division of Highways in 1937. Construction began on June of 1936 and the bridge was opened to traffic February 5, 1937. The project was financed 58% from Federal funds and 42% from the State 1936 -37 Budget The resident Engineer was A. D. Hunting. B7. Moved? ®NO ❑Yes ❑Unknown Date: Original location: _ B8. Related Features: Bicycle Trail, maintenance road, the Rio Hondo Channel, and the Whittier Narrows Flood Control Channel. B9a. Architect Resident Engineer - A.D. Hunting, b. Builder. CA Department of Public Works, Hwy Div. 810. significance: Theme Vehicular(Pedestrian Transportation Area San Gabriel Valley Period of Significance 1936 -02 Property Type Concrete Bridg,e Applicable Criteria N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural mnte)a as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address Integrity.) Rosemead is an independent community in the San Gabriel Valley 11 miles east of downtown Los Angeles. It was incorporated in 1959. The name means 'Rose's meadows" and honors an early couple Leonard J. and Amanda Rose, who established a horse farm called Sunnyslope Estate. In the winter of 1861 -1862 a flood caused the San Gabriel River to overflow its banks and join the Los Angeles River to create a new channel known as Rio Hondo. Other destructive floods occurred in 1914, 1934,193 8, and 1969. The Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo was built in 1936/1937 and was classified as "5, Not Eligible for the National Register of Historic Places" in the 1986 California Department of Transportation, Local Agency Bridge Historical Significance Report. At the time of this Survey, the Bridge was not quite 50 years old and therefore did not meet the age requirements for consideration as an individual property. The bridge was originally designed by the California Department of Public Works, Charles H. Purcell was the State Highway Engineer for the project and Earl Lee Kelly was the Director of Public Works in 1935. Mr. Purcell is known as one of the most distinguished engineers of our time. He conceived and supervised the building of the San Francisco - Oakland Bay Bridge. In January of 1943, he was named head of the Department of Public Works. (See Continuation Sheet). 871. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes): AH7 • B12. References: 1 , d . b Ken Rukavina P.E. City Engineer, City of Rosemead 9/17/02, Pitt, Leonard' „^ & Dale. Los Angeles A to Z. Major Structure Report: Garvey Avenue Bridge over Rio Hondo Channel s !1 Plan and Profile of State Highway in Los Angeles County between Monterey s Park and Mountain View Road 813. Remarks: .. er,erucen t r• p � ®1 toE (• ' 1314. Evaluator: • A • Date of Evaluation: 10 /16/2002 so m n °^ (This apace reserved for official comments.) — ... .n -._i_. f�bf P . State of California -The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HR # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of _6 *Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder) Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo * Recorded by: Alma Carlisle [x] Continuation [] Update P3a. Description (Continued): The pier faces are capped by flat moldings at the arches' spring lines then the piers continue vertically in a quarter circle arc alongside the spandrels to meet the edge of the bridge and then continue upward to form the supports for the horizontal top and bottom pipe rails of the balustrade. The balustrade is divided vertically by pipes that are connected to the top rail by eye type fasteners. Each segment of the balustrade has an infill of evenly spaced balusters. The bridge was designed in the Closed Spandrel Multi-arch Style. Based upon on site inspection the bridge and the original working drawings for the structure, the bridge appears to be unaltered. It is in fair condition. The bridge setting has changed significantly due to the change of the channel from a natural waterway to a concrete lined channel. B10. Significance (Continued)- Mr. Purcell was Bridge Engineer of the Oregon State highway Department and Division Engineer of the U. S, Bureau of Public Roads and President of the American Association of State Highway Officials. Contract number 814XC2 was issued in 1936 to construct this reinforced concrete girder bridge for the total cost of $135,979. The contractor was Oscar Oberg. Garvey Avenue, in 1936, was a portion of state highway route LA -26 -A, extending from Los Angeles east toward Pomona. State highway 23 served a suburban district and also linked with the transcontinental highway system. The highway carried local suburban traffic and tourists to locations in the San Bernardino County Mountains. The existing Garvey Avenue Bridge is not the first bridge at this location. The former crossing at Rio Hondo consisted of ten timber truss spans with a roadway width of about 27 feet. This earlier bridge was constructed in 1924, a number of years prior to the extension of this route into Pomona and before Garvey Avenue had become a major thoroughfare and before the cities of Rosemead and South El Monte were incorporated. This early, narrow bridge was replaced since it was found to be a traffic bottleneck. Today's Bridge was constructed in 1936 and the bridge setting has changed dramatically since then. At the time of construction the Rio Hondo was dry and unlined. Its channelization in 1957 severely compromised its integrity of setting. The bridge was not included in the 1986 "Historical and Architectural Evaluation -Los Angeles County Drainage Area Feasibility Study Bridges ", by Roger Hatheway nor is it included in the "Historical Resource Overview and Survey for the Los Angeles County Drainage Area Review Study, 1985, by Stephen Van Wormer. Even though the bridge is linked with the master bridge designer, Charles H. Purcell, who was responsible for the design and construction of the most famous San Francisco /Oakland Bridge, this bridge does not possess high artistic value and it is not among his greatest lifetime achievements. Neither is it associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history nor is it associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. The Garvey Avenue Bridge predates the 1938 Floods that are associated with the Flood Control Act of 1938 and the associated bridges, dams and other constructions related to flood control in the Los Angeles Basin and the Los Angeles Flood Control Drainage Area Project. It does not appear to yield information important to history or prehistory. It does not appear to individually meet criterion (d). The bridge is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places or The California Register of Historical Resources under any criteria. This property has been evaluated in accordance with Section 15064.5 (1) (2) (3) of the CEQA Guidelines using the criteria outlined in Section 5024.1 of the California Register Resources. The property does not appear to meet the criteria for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources B 12. References (Continued) "Great Loss Charles H. Purcell Retires as Director of State Department of Public Works" California Highways & Public Works Magazine, July - August 1951 "Final Report of the Construction of a Concrete Girder Bridge across Rio Hondo at Garvey Avenue ". State of California, Department of Public Works, Sacramento 1937. Telephone Interviews with Laurel Clark, Supervising Librarian, State of California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA "Metropolitan Los Angeles, Proposed Parkway System ". Automobile Club of Southern California, 1949. : \ wep $/ \�� « State of Cafifornia•The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HR # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page _5_ of _6_ *Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder) Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo * Recorded by: Alma Carlisle [x]Continuation [] Update P5a. Photographs (Continued) : not lined until 1956) DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information State of California — The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PRIMARY RECORD Other Listings Review Code Primary If HR # Trinomial NRHP Status Code Reviewer Page —I— of 3 ' Resource Name or #: Portion of the Rin Hondo Flood Control Channel and Flood Control System P1. Other Identifier: • P2. Location: E] Not for Publication MUnrestricted a. County Los Angeles b. USGS 7.5' Ouad El Monte Date 1981 Tom; RIL; —W 1/4 of _1/4 of Sec_; B.M. c. Address city Rosemead Zip N.A. d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear feature) Zone mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g. parcel #, legal description, directions to resource, elevation, additional UTMs, etc. as app Item # 2 on the APE Map, APN #8595 017 904, E. J. Baldwin's First Subdivision in the Rancho Potero Grande (M.R. 66- 94 -95), (See Continuation Sheet). ' 133a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries.) The Rio Hondo Flood Control Channel is a component of the San Gabriel River Improvement/Whittier Narrows Flood Control Basin. This system in tum is a part of and forms the eastern boundary of the Los Angeles County Flood Control Area ( LACFCA). The LACFCA also includes the watersheds of the Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers. The segment of the Rio Hondo Channel in the vicinity of the Garvey Avenue Bridge contains the Garvey Avenue and Rosemead Avenue Bridges, left and right channel levees, a paved invert, maintenance road, bike trail, chain link fencing, horse ramps and the inlet from the Rubio Wash. This segment travels in a very flat "S" curve, in a southeasterly direction between the Cities of Rosemead, El Monte and South El Monte in Los Angeles County. The channel continues downstream to the Whittier Narrows Dam County Recreation Area. This channel segment is 300 - feet wide with a 150 -foot invert (located in the channel bottom) and it is 4,800 -feet or 0.9 of a mile long. Channel sides are sloped concrete with a slope ratio of 1:2.25. A paved 6 -foot wide equestrian ramp on the left bank leads from the top of the levee to the toe of the levee. (See Continuation Sheet) • P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) BPI 1 Engineering structure P4. Resources Present: 135a. Photograph or Drawing E] Element of District []Other (Isolates, etc.) P5b. Description of Photo: (View, date, etc.) Looking up channel November 2002 nhotooranher faring north • P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: [J Prehistoric MHistoric F1 Both 19570peration/Maintenance Manual 195700eration/Maintenance Manual • P7. Owner and Address: 11. S. Army Cors of Engineers P. O. Box 532711 Los Angeles. CA 90053 -2325 F-- Federal ' P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation, address) Alma Carlisle ft. Frank & Associates, Inc Seventh Street, Suite 800 i nc Angeles - CA 90017 • P9. Date Recorded: 12/11/2002 •P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive rrvev Effort Determination of Eligibility P-- Proiect Review P11. Report Cltation: (Cite survey report/other sources or "none ") Historical Resource Compliance ReDort Caltrans--City of Rosemead December 2002 ' Attachments: ❑NONE E] Location Map []Sketch Map S6 Continuation Sheet MBuilding, Structure, and Object Record E] Archaeological Record ❑District Record E] Linear Feature Record E] Milling Station Record E] Rock Art Record ❑Artifact Record ❑Photograph Record []Other: (List) DPR 523A (1/95) ' Required Information Page 2 of 3 ' NRHP Status Code • Resource Name or #: Portion of the Rio Hondo Flood Control Channel and Flood Control System B1. Hlstodc Name: Rio Hondo Flood Control Channel& Drainage System B2. Common NameRio Hondo Flood Control Channel Rr T)rninnoe . .QvatP.rn B3. original Use: Flood Control 64. Present Use: Flood Control • B5. Architectural Style: Utilitarian/Industrial B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations.) The construction of the Rio Hondo Channel was started on March 30, 1954 and completed on March 29, 1957. Contract # Eng 3601 was issued to A. Teichert and Son and M.1. Bevanda. Plans were D.O. Series 146/1 -98 and the project title was San Gabriel River Improvement - Whittier Narrows Flood Control Basin: West Embankment and Outlet Works. The Bicycle Trail was designed by the L.A. County Road Department (now Department of Public Works) and constructed in two phases during 1979 by a private contractor. It was resurfaced in 1995. • 87. Moved? ©NO ❑Yes ❑Unknown Date: Original Location: d B6. Related Features: Garvey Avenue Bridge, Rosemead Avenue Bridge, Rubio Wash, chain link fencing, Bicycle Trail/Maintenance Road, public utiliites, side drains, access ramp at right berm at Garvey Avenue from embankment, Whittier Narrows Recreation Area. Bsa. Architect: Edward Koch (sn ) Chief Design b. Builder: A. Teichert and Son and M J Bevanda • 810. Significance: ThemeFublic Works Area Flood Control Period of Significance 1957 Property Type Flood Channel Applicable Criteria N/A terms (Discuss importance in of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address Integrity.) The Rio Hondo Flood Control Channel and Drainage System was designed in 1954, construction began in 1954 and construction ended in 1957. It would not meet the National and California Register 50 -year age criterion prior to completion of the proposed project, the Replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Project. As of 2002, the Los Angeles County Drainage Area Project ( LACDA) System has not yet been fully documented by the Corps of Engineers for National Register Eligibility. After the Channel becomes 50 years of age in 2007, the property should be re -evaluated as part of the LACDA System, which is under the jurisdiction of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. The overall LACDA System was constructed from March 30, 1954 to March 29, 1957. The Rio Hondo Flood Control Channel was constructed in 1957, relatively late in this period. The Channel does not have exceptional importance, either individually or as part of the LACDA System for it to meet National Register Criteria Consideration G regarding properties less than 50 years of age. 811. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes): AH16 ' \\\N • 812. References: Operation and Maintenance Manual, LACDA Project, Los Angeles District, Corps of Engineers, 12/1975. .. t Greg Fuderer, Public Affairs Specialist, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los ! t Angeles District K. Nefas, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, L A District, A. Nijivh, L A Co. Dept of Public Works. - f B13. Remarks: 11 �ml li4SEt�dP � {m� ' B14. Evaluator: Richard Starzak Date of Evaluation: 12/11 /2002 so :_ aaoa (This space reserved for official comments.) �, : t .: t ouasr ♦vexe mmoe . y State of Califomia -The Rewurces Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HR # CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 3 of 3 *Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder) Replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel * Recorded by: Alma Carlisle [x] Continuation [] Update P2e. Other Locational Data (Continuation) Segment of the Rio Hondo Channel in the Project APE crosses under the Garvey Avenue Bridge. P3a. Description (Continued): A 10 -foot wide, concrete paved bicycle trail and maintenance mad are located on the easterly levee and are considered as a "shared trail." This shared trail passes under the bridge within the channel. There is a paved maintenance road on the top of the westerly levee. The bridge abutment is set back several feet from this levee. The channel bottom is paved concrete and is silt covered. The channel bottom supports vegetation and the waterway is littered with miscellaneous debris. Entrance to the bicycle trail is by way of chain link gates near the two bridges. Container held landscaping elements line the eastern side of the levee south of the Garvey Avenue Bridge and additional landscaping associated with new buildings is on the western side of the Channel. Industrial Uses are adjacent to the channel north of the Garvey Avenue Bridge. A senior residential building and recreation center complex are located in Rosemead south of the bridge. The channel and its related features appear to be in good condition. B12. References (Continued): Los Angeles County Drainage Area, California, San Gabriel River Improvement, Whittier Narrows Flood Control Basin, West Embankment and Outlet Works, Rio Hondo Channel, File No 146/28.1, Rev. "A ", July 1954. TRW/EXPERIAN DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information R CD R 0 wa ~ Z wW 0 _-- w 02 Z mp w� :a z w� F a� w a a Cw G w 0) O w LL O T H 5 r z w f 0 O U H 0 O r z O f t7 Z C O �w Z r f o om U wo mp m ov?a °—� d 'y o, a °—� .€ .c 22cYY o c > mo my,§c 3 2255 rn u� N 3n d i o .mac v �aa mn mm•: t h j m rn `L° w `L° rn a v € co $ m ca m €fin yOj E m m o >- o° w adi m '° E t° $ d a E a�i $ m E t a E N U N. c$ d j °— O K 2$ d m_ a a p o o d 0 2,d o N y m o Dd E` o t>� > US"° D m r� UEEd`aci Umc> r >ai`> m m oEcS j.m m p d nw EYJ EG' cg'�a dani�'^a O$ o e d E m O � O rn Z NNN� r o yy O 6 c O W p� C C Oof Ti � tip m Z. zo, o °1a � c° C N m o m 3 d d 0 0 L' d Qt N N d N 5 5" 9 5 tv E ° d._ m 2. m o h $' co m L a m d m 5 d o d o'i YJ o rn c m o `w o" D 20 yc� m a d� `.'o rn'airo ndo c 3 `� c 53�°w p Nm.—ap rn$ 20 Sz c d�2 in y�L d a¢ a F d = 0 V M M d E Ea 2 d N T c$ o E a 3 2 w �'� v q u o c ia N a O C E a ° ° m ° ° V EU o U e ` E $ t o m o n a Q vJ m `O m N w A N p1 $ E `Ca Z g j¢ f o °� ' vZ� `� c ; o EE 00 � p ' C O Q O d n . ° L C^ $ P E Co [2 O � c vi E a d y vc . �6 v d° d d f m frno0 do vdi 3`c43w 'F ��maa n$n�ca53 °o nO M �- O N N � J a� G � [O U G �TO Q Y Z co N Q N c w 0 U N K O r z O f O Z C O �W 2 r f O S mi c E w 00 v m €013 n,`o� d € co ° � 3 m c_ m ,�'� E E4 m° E= n'm o E m 1- U VEE ooi d - d `o 'Ltl �$�� ow"3 mo'm� 2 y m °° 2 aci 0 0$ - A m o y d v_ 5 w ry b aci 0 c p d€ z O a a v m n R E f m a g m c m E v w° c e t v o° m y° $ r o c °_ .< c c c J N N N im E O E O E O o Z a �E$ E N Z.G U w U w w f C U O ry o w Z O W O O aO O aO d' 3 d O W v S' V u2 u2 m O J 6 - 1� U K U U K U U 3 m e m y E 0 a b° a m Z EtZ0 �o U a� 8+ d ids `°„s�o� $oho= _ o Sc m g5 m co !° y a 3 E o n a v y ao d¢= u H n q$ o y '9c U' O lay € §° r m o a m $S'N ai o m €0 2m ESL a c �° E E o a E- 5 m w Q EU $ gna ZSomm�m�.bv �2 �£ 3'0 0 0 .0N m �o � � oa g �g K $ z0 w° c o m C- �° `o O= f a a A 3- m E o o a, °@ w E E �° ".oa- E E$ rn= c a m`e m m o.5 w ',z�y £ U W rn_ 2Emw`$$m"dm o'p f x F m E n E f 5 $$$ f S 'a ° `o M N O N N W ,a a c c _ a0 U ca � O Q W 0 US )apace ueiuw eor use ur UOUnry cnerx Jury) SAN GABRIEL VALLEY TRIBUNE affiliated with SGV Newspaper Group 1210 N. Azusa Canyon Road West Covina, CA 91790 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Los Angeles I am a citizen of the United States, and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above - entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of SAN GABRIEL VALLEY TRIBUNE, a newspaper of general circulation which has been adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, on the date of September 10, 1957, Case Number 684891. The notice, of which the annexed is a true printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to wit: 6/13/03 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at West Covina, LA Co. California this y 20 43_ 0 sign e 2 Proof of Publication of PUBLIC NOTICE`OF ADOPT ANEGATIVE.DE It `is 'they City.'of %.Rosemi adobt. two Negative.Deco ,reconstruction of Garvey, over. the Rio Hondo..Chann site is - located on Gi approximately 800. feet we. Boulevard. The protect wil replacement of the entire 'I 'Rio Hondo Channel. .The, bridge will be 100 feet w existing : right. of :wa accomodate a 76 foot .. road foot sidewalks: Copies of are.: available - for,..review Works 'Department. of. Rosemead, California loci Valley', Boulevard.,' Comn received by July 14, 20031 at 8:00 p.m., at "Rosemeai MMI July 10, 2003 Ken Rukavine City of Rosemead 8838 Valley Blvd Rosemead, CA 91770 Subject: Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel SCH #:.2003061056 Dear Ken Rukavine: The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named Negative Declaration to selected state agencies for review. On the enclosed Document Details Report please note that the Clearinghouse has listed the state agencies that reviewed your document. The review period closed on July 9, 2003, and the comments from the responding agency (ies) is (are) enclosed. If this comment package is not in order, please notify the State Clearinghouse immediately. Please refer to the project's ten -digit State Clearinghouse number in future correspondence so that we may respond promptly. Please note that Section 21104(c) of the California Public Resources Code states that: "A responsible or other public agency shall only make substantive comments regarding those activities involved in a project which are within an area of expertise of the agency or which are required to be carried out or approved by the agency. Those comments shall be supported by specific documentation." These comments are forwarded for use in preparing your final environmental document. Should you need more information or clarification of the enclosed comments, we recommend that you contact the commenting agency directly. -This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Please contact the State Clearinghouse at (916) 445 -0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. Sincerely, ��/ =erryerts Director, State Clearinghouse Enclosures cc: Resources Agency 1400 TENTH STREET P.O. BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO. CALIFORNIA 93812-3044 (916)445 -0613 FAX(916)323 -3018 www.opr.ca.+ov +c�26 otSS},Oi� w% STATE OF CALIFORNIA Governor's Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse OF MW Gray Davis Tal Finney Governor Interim Director July 10, 2003 Ken Rukavine City of Rosemead 8838 Valley Blvd Rosemead, CA 91770 Subject: Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel SCH #:.2003061056 Dear Ken Rukavine: The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named Negative Declaration to selected state agencies for review. On the enclosed Document Details Report please note that the Clearinghouse has listed the state agencies that reviewed your document. The review period closed on July 9, 2003, and the comments from the responding agency (ies) is (are) enclosed. If this comment package is not in order, please notify the State Clearinghouse immediately. Please refer to the project's ten -digit State Clearinghouse number in future correspondence so that we may respond promptly. Please note that Section 21104(c) of the California Public Resources Code states that: "A responsible or other public agency shall only make substantive comments regarding those activities involved in a project which are within an area of expertise of the agency or which are required to be carried out or approved by the agency. Those comments shall be supported by specific documentation." These comments are forwarded for use in preparing your final environmental document. Should you need more information or clarification of the enclosed comments, we recommend that you contact the commenting agency directly. -This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Please contact the State Clearinghouse at (916) 445 -0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. Sincerely, ��/ =erryerts Director, State Clearinghouse Enclosures cc: Resources Agency 1400 TENTH STREET P.O. BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO. CALIFORNIA 93812-3044 (916)445 -0613 FAX(916)323 -3018 www.opr.ca.+ov +c�26 Document Details Report State Clearinghouse Data Base SCH# 2003061056 Project Title Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel Lead Agency Rosemead, City of Type Neg Negative Declaration Description The proposed project involves the replacement of the Garvey Avenue Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel and all associated infrastructure including approach roadways, channel lining and recreational trails. Lead Agency Contact Name Ken Rukavine Agency City of Rosemead Phone 626.569.2100 Fax email Address 8838 Valley Blvd City Rosemead State CA Zip 91770 Project Location County Los Angeles City Rosemead Region Cross Streets Garvey Avenue and Lee Avenue Parcel No. Public Right -of -Way Township Range Section Base Proximity to: Highways 19, 60, 1 -10 Airports Railways Waterways Rio Hondo Channel, Rubio Wash, Alhambra Wash Schools Garvey School District Land Use Public Right -of -Way Project Issues Aesthetic/Visual; Agricultural Land; Air Quality; Archaeologic- Historic; Drainage /Absorption; Flood Plain /Flooding; Forest Land /Fire Hazard; Geologic/Seismic; Noise; Public Services; Recreation /Parks; Schools/Universities; Soil Erosion /Compaction /Grading; Toxic/Hazardous; Traffic/Circulation; Vegetation; Water Quality; Wetland/Riparian; Wildlife; Growth Inducing; Landuse; Cumulative Effects Reviewing Resources Agency; Department of Boating and Waterways; Department of Conservation; Department Agencies of Fish and Game, Region 5; Office of Historic Preservation; Department of Parks and Recreation; Reclamation Board; Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 4; Department of Toxic Substances Control; Air Resources Board, Transportation Projects; California Highway Patrol; Caltraris, District 7; Caltrans, Division of Transportation Planning; Native American Heritage Commission Date Received 06/10/2003 Start of Review 06/10/2003 End of Review 07/09/2003 Note: Blanks in data fields result from insufficient information provided by lead agency. SPATE OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GRAY DAVIS G e DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 7, REGIONAL PLANNING IGR/CEQA BRANCH 120 S. SPRING STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 Flexyourpower.! PHONE (213) 897 -4429 Be energy efficient. FAX (213) 897 -1337 7 ' 8171 JUN 3 0 2003 Mr. Ken Rukavina City of Rosemead 8838 Valley Blvd. Rosemead, CA 91770 Dear Mr. Rukavina: June 26, 2003 IGR/CEQA cs/030635 NEG DEC City of Rosemead Garvey Ave. Bridge over the Rio Hondo Channel Vic. LA- 1644.81 SCH # 2003061056 Thank you for including the California Department of Transportation in the environmental review process for the above - mentioned project. Based on the information received, we have the following comments: Since State Route 164 (Rosemead Blvd.) is located close to the project site, any work to be performed within the State Right -of -way will need a Caltrans Encroachment Permit. Since federal funds have been allocated for this project, Caltrans will have oversight responsibility. Construction related Road or lane closures and/or detours, as well as closure of pedestrian and bicycle facilities will require a Construction traffic Management Plan. In respect to relinquishment of State highways, the city should initiate relinquishment proceedings to allow transfer of control of Rosemead Blvd. (State Route 164) from the State over the local - agency If you have any questions regarding our response, refer to our internal IGR/CEQA Record # cs/030635, and please do not hesitate to contact me at (213) 897-4429. Sincerely, Original Signed By STEPHEN BUSWELL IGR/CEQA Branch Chief cc: Mr. Scott Morgan, State Clearinghouse Caltrans improves moh&ty across California' Winston H. Hickox Agency Secretary California Environmental Protection Agency July 9, 2003 Department of Toxic Substances Control Mr. Ken Rukavina, P. E. City Engineer 8838 Valley Boulevard Rosemead, California 91770 Edwin F. Lowry, Director 1011 N. Grandview Avenue Glendale, California 91201 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE GARVEY AVENUE BRIDGE OVER THE RIO HONDO CHANNEL, SCH 2003061056 Dear Mr. Rukavina: The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has received your Notice of Completion of Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS /MND) for the project mentioned above. Based on the review of the document, DTSC comments, are as follows: Gray Davis Governor If during construction of the project, soil contamination is suspected, construction in the area should stop, and appropriate health and safety procedures should be implemented. If it is determined that contaminated soils exists, the IS /MND should identify how any required investigation and /or remediation will be conducted, and which government agency will provide regulatory oversight. DTSC provides guidance for Preliminary Endangerment Assessment preparation and cleanup oversight through the Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP). For additional information on the VCP please visit DTSC's web site at www.dtsc.ca.gov. If you would like to meet and discuss this matter further, please contact Mr. Alberto Valmidiano, Project Manager, at (818) 551 -2870 or me, at (818) 551 -2877. Sincerely, yat, �P�� Harlan R. Jeche Unit Chief Southern California Cleanup Operations Branch — Glendale Office Enclosure The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our Web -site at www.dtsc. ca.gov. 9 Printed on Recycled Paper Mr. Ken Rukavina, P.E. July 9, 2003 Page 2 cc: Governor's Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse P. 0. Box 3044 Sacramento. California 95812 -3044 Mr. Guenther W. Moskat, Chief Planning and Environmental Analysis Section CEQA Tracking Center Department of Toxic Substances Control P. O. Box 806 Sacramento, California 95812 -0806 v Department of Toxic Substances Control Edwin F. Lowry, Director 1001 "I' Street, 25`h Floor Winston H. Hickox P.O. Box 806 Agency Secretary Sacramento, California 95812 -0806 California Environmental Protection Agency (a M E M O R A N D U MP A7lJrNT DF TD):If, 51J i$ AiJCES CCi`j i "OL SUUTHEStl CAI_!rQfl;!Mk SqTHVIFIGATIGII 65ANClt TO: Sayareh Amirebrahimi, Branch Chief JUN 1 6 2003 Site Mitigation Program, Region 3 FROM: Guenther W. Moskat, Chief RECEIVED Planning and Environmental Analysis Section DATE: ��Q, 1 l Z 0 03 Gray Davis Governor SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL AND REVI W OF LEAD AGENCY EN xIRONMENTAL DQCUMENTS FOR Gw cve� Av9_,\,L �\6 ovu Ak-IL. `W\o. V\0�0& Q v\06 0,E6 The Department has received the project listed above. The project is being referred to you as a: W /Non- Essential /Information Item Only A Courtesy Copy of the Notice of Completion Transmittal Form has also been sent to: ❑ Sensitive Land Use Project / Y Permitting Branch (document not included) ❑ Non - Sensitive land Use Project The Department is encouraged to review this project and if applicable make comments pertaining to the project as it relates to hazardous waste andior.,ny-ac:lvities wnici, niay fall within the Department's jurisoiction. Please have your steli: 1) Conduct its review o, Lne attached document pribcto . the.end of the comment period; 2) complete the applicable items below' stating whether the department made comments or that no comments were necessary for the document; and 3) return this original transmittal sheet and a copy of any response letter from your office to: Planning & Environmental Analysis Section (PEAS) CEOA Tracking Center 1001 I Street, 22nd Floor P.O. Box 806 Sacramento, California 95812 -0806 Fax (916) 323 -3215 `� Reviewed by: IUl�.t� Date Comment Period Began: Comments due to OPR: COMMENTS have been prepared and a copy has been provided to PEAS via: ins Attached Copy r ❑ FAX (916) 323 -3215 NO COMMENTS NECESSARY because: • All Department concerns have been adequately addressed; OR • Project does not fall within the Department's areas of responsibility :Y �)(9/ I N Zob3 cm/ a9 / 2-003 Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions, please contact, Ken Tipon, CEQA Tracking Center, at (916) 322 -5266. The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. Fora list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our Web -site at www.dtsc.ca.gov. ® Printed on Recycled Paper