Loading...
PC - Minutes 01-05-81CITY OF ROSEM_EAD 8838 VALLEY BOULEVARD ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA PLANNING COMMISSION STUDY SESSION JANUARY 5, 1981 MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER - The Study Session was called to order by Chairman Cleveland at 6:00 p.m., in the Conference Room of Rosemead City Hall, 8838 Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California. 2. ROLL CALL - Present: De Cocker, Lowrey, Cleveland, Ritchie, Mattern Absent: None Ex Officio: Kress, Dickey, Carmona, Fernandez 3. MATTERS DISCUSSED - Condominium Ordinance The discussion began with a review of matters discussed at the Study Session of December 15, 1980 (Commissioner Ritchie's concerns). The consideration of Commissioner Ritchie's concerns then continued. 5. ALLOWABLE LENGTH OF BUILDINGS SHORTENED Commissioner Ritchie expressed his desire to shorten the allowable length of buildings to 120 feet. There was no objection by mem- bers of the Commission and staff was instructed to make the approp- riate change in the draft of the new Condominium Ordinance. 6. REQUIRING TWO PLANS FROM DEVELOPERS There was adiscussion by -theCommission with regard to the preliminary discussions between the developer and staff. It was stated by Commissioner Ritchie that he would like to see two plans submitted and a brief summary of the discussions during pre- liminary plan check. He also stated that the summary should in- clude the reasoning behind the changes in the plan (if any) and the discussions leading up to the plan that is ultimately sub- mitted to the Commission for their consideration. 7. REQUIRING STEEL SUPPORTING POSTS FOR WOODEN FENCES Commissioner Ritchie stated that he would like to see this incorporated into the Ordinance to prevent the deterioration of wooden fences, if they are to be utilized. It was also determined that only wooden fences would be required to haveasteel supports installed. All the Commissioners concurred with Commissioner Ritchie. 8. REQUIRING THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION: The following is a brief summary of the items to be required and the discussions regarding each item. a. plot plan - Shall include an aerial view of the project and the placement of structures, parking, landscaping and fencing. b. elevation plan - Ordinance shall include the following statement: "Elevation plans of project and adjacent properties--both existing and proposed grades." Commissioner Mattern requested that the elevation plans also illustrate the proposed and existing grades of neighboring (adjacent) properties. Planning Commission Minutes Study Session - January 5, 1981 Page Two c. grading and drainage plans - It was determined by the Commission that the accuracy of the drainage and grading plans should be set forth. After some discussion it was determined that the plans should be done at sea-level elevations, and that both grading and drainage plans should be required. There was also a discussion regarding the pumps and back-up systems, flooding of the streets and the adequacy of the flood control systems. Consideration of Commissioner Lowrey's Concerns 1. REQUIRING STEEL SUPPORTS FOR WOODEN FENCES TO BE SET IN CEMENT There was a discussion by the Commission regarding requiring elevation plans of the proposed enclosure to surround the project, in addition to plot plans illustrating placement,of the enclosure from an aerial view. In addition, Commissioner Lowrey requested that the steel supports for wooden fences to be set in cement to prevent them from collapsing. There was no objection by the members of the Commission, and staff was instructed to include this item. 2. PARKING REQUIREMENTS There was a lengthy discussion regarding the parking requirements. Among the matters discussed was the trade-off of open space for additional parking, the possible discouraging effects of parking on larger unit/ family-type developments, the possibility of allowing tandem parking within projects, and the possibility of restrictions on condominiums discouraging development. Mr. Carmona addressed the results of the Condominium Parking Survey and stated that in the smaller projects, there did not seem to be as much of a problem with parking. The possibility of allowing staff to submit a parking requirement was discussed; however, it was determined that the Commission should give staff direction in the area of parking. It was suggested by Mr. Carmona that due to the lengthy consideration of the parking requirements, this discussion should be continued at a later date. The Commission concurred with this suggestion. 4. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Cleveland adjourned the Study Session at 7:25 p.m., to the regular meeting of the Planning Commission, scheduled for 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers. 0 CITY OF ROSEMEAD . 8838 VALLEY BOULEVARD.' ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 5, 1981 MTNIITF. S 1. CALL TO ORDER - The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemead was called to order by Chairman Cleveland at 7:30 p.m in the Council Chambers of Rosemead City Hall, 8838 Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Lowrey. The Invocation was delivered by Commissioner Mattern. 2. ROLL CALL - Present: De Cocker, Lowrey, Cleveland, Mattern, Ritchie Absent: None Ex Officio: Kress, Dickey, Carmona, Fernandez 3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE - On items not on the Agenda. Chairman Cleveland asked if anyone wished to address the Commission. No one came forward. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 80-207. Request by Rosemead Growers, Inc. for the establishment of a nursery/growing ground on property known as the Southern California Edison Right-of-Way, located at the west terminus of Klingerman Street, adjacent to the Los Angeles County Flood Control Channel. The Staff Report dated January 5, 1981 was presented by Mr. Carmona, and the recommendation for approval was made. Chairman Cleveland opened the Public Hearing at 7:40 p.m. Seeing no one wishing to address the Commission, Chairman Cleveland inquired if the applicants were present. He was informed that they would be arriving late, but intended to appear at this evening's meeting. it was suggested by Commissioner Lowrey that this matter be continued later in the meeting and that the rest of the Agenda be considered in the meantime. There being no objections raised, this suggestion was carried out. 5. PC RESOLUTION 80-48 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 80-206 FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN CONJUNCTION WITH "ROSE'S MARKET", LOCATED AT 8923 EAST MISSION DRIVE. Mr. Kress read the Resolution by title only. it was moved by Commissioner Lowrey, seconded by Commissioner Mattern, to waive further reading and adopt PC Resolution 80-48. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Lowrey, Cleveland, Ritchie, Matterr, Noes: None 6. PC RESOLUTION 80-49 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE ROSEMEAD GENERAL PLAN FOR THAT AREA LOCATED AT 4020-4106 WALNUT GROVE AVENUE, ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA. (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 80-1) Mr. Kress read the Resolution by title only. Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting - January 5, 1981 Page Two it was moved by Commissioner Lowrey, seconded by Commissioner De Cocker, to waive further reading and adopt PC Resolution 80-49. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Lowrey, Cleveland, Ritchie, Mattern Noes: None Commissioner Ritchie then asked if the City Council would be provided with a map of thearea when they considered General Plan Amendment 80-1. Mr. Carmona stated that the City Council would be given a full Staff Report, which would include all attachments. 7. PC RESOLUTION 80-50 - A.RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD GRANTING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP 13844. (A ONE-LOT SUBDIVISION FOR COMMERCIAL USE.) Mr. Kress informed the Planning Commission that the City Council is appealing this decision. He further stated that the City Council would be holding a Public Hearing for consideration of this Parcel Map. He then requested that the Planning Commission adopt this Resolution so that the formal recommendation could be presented to the City Council at that time. I Mr. Kress read the Resolution by title only. It was moved by Commissioner Lowrey, seconded by Commissioner De Cocker, to waive further reading and adopt PC Resolution 80-50. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Lowrey, Cleveland, Ritchie, Mattern Noes: None 8. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE - On any matter. Chairman Cleveland asked if anyone present wished to address the Commission. No one came forward. 9. MATTERS FROM CITY OFFICIALS AND STAFF A. Commissioner Mattern stated that at the last meeting, he had requested a brief summary of Council action on Planning Commission recommendations. He submitted a copy of a memorandum to the Traffic Commission to illus- trate his request. He also stated that he has--been receiving the Council minutes, and did not mean to imply that he hadn't. There was then a discussion regarding the amount of detail desired in the memorandum, and the impact this would have on staff's workload. Commissioner Ritchie then stated that the last Minutes of a City Council meeting he received were of the meeting, December 9, 1980. He also stated that often there was a delay in receiving the Minutes, and it would be adventageous to be informed of Council action as soon as possible. Staff was then directed to provide the Planning Commission with the memorandum requested by Commissioner Mattern. B. Commissioner Ritchie expressed his concern with the new legislation concerning the Housing Element. He stated that the amount of work would require many hours of time and a larger staff. He questioned how the funds and staff would be acquired. Mr.'Dickey stated that there was a meeting scheduled to consider this matter. He also stated that at the 1981 Planning Commissioner's Institute, this matter would be addressed. Commissioner Ritchie then stated that he was concerned, since staff was limited. He then asked if outside help was being considered by the City Council. Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting - January 5, 1981 Page Three Mr. Dickey stated that he could not provide an answer to Commissioner Ritchie's question at this time, but agreed to inform the Commission of any decisions with regard to this matter. C. Mr. Dickey requested the Commission be polled on their attendance at the Planning Commissioner's Institute in Sacramento. D. The secretary polled the Commission on their attendance at the West San Gabriel Valley Planning Congress dinner/meeting, January 8, 1981. Chairman Cleveland was then informed that the applicant for Conditional Use Permit 80-207 was present, and the consideration of this matter was continued. 4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 80-207 (Continuation of consideration.) Chairman Cleveland stated that the Public Hearing was open. The witnessLwas administered the oath by the secretary. PROPONENT: Mr. Eddie Acosta 18012 East Delford Azusa, California Mr. Acosta stated that he was the applicant for the project. He stated that he had read the Staff Report and addressed the Commission regarding the use of chemicals/sprays. He informed the Commission that the plants are only sprayed when the Department of Agriculture determines that it is necessary and places a quarantine on a plant. In addition, he informed the Commission that the plants growing on the site would only be one gallon is size, eliminating the need for spraying upward. Addressing the concern of the use of chemicals in close proximity to the school, he further stated that the flood control channel provided a barrier to the school, and that any spraying necessary would be done on the weekends when children would not be in the school yard. He was asked by Chairman Cleveland if he would agree to 'a condition addressing itself to this matter and Mr. Acosta indicated to the Commission that he would. There was then a discussion regarding the chemicals to be utilized and their safety. Also discussed by the Commission was,whether or not a license is required to purchase the chemicals. Mr. Acosta stated that the chemicals were available to the general public. In addition to this, Commissioner Ritchie inquired if the.-nursery had any other locations in a residential zone. Mr. Acosta stated that he also operated the nursery at 2453 San Gabriel Boulevard, which is the Monterey Park Water Company Right-of-Way. Commissioner Ritchie asked how frequent spraying takes place and Mr. Acosta stated that spraying only takes place one to four times a year, and is limited to plants quarantined by the Department of Agriculture. Commissioner Ritchie then inquired regarding the use and size of trucks, and expressed his concern with the possible problems associated with the use of large trucks in a residential zone. Mr. Acosta stated that there would be very limited traffic and that the largest vehicle was a two-axle, twenty-foot bobtail truck. He also stated that the large trucks were being used to pick up plants purchased, and did not belong to the nursery. Commissioner Ritchie then asked if the applicants had given any consideration to controlling mud being spread by the vehicles. Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting - January 5, 1981 Page Four Mr. Acosta stated that asphalt would be placed on Klingerman Street, and gravel would be utilized in the interior roadways and maintained to prevent the carrying of soil to the street. Commissioner Ritchie then asked what the proposed hours of operation were. Mr. Acosta stated that they intended to operate between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 4100 p.m. Commissioner Ritchie then asked if any of the insecticides or herbicides were flammable, and if a Fire Department permit was required for storage of the chemicals. Mr. Acosta then informed the Commission that the storage of chemicals required approval of the location from the Department of Agriculture. In addition, he stated that in order to operate a nursery;-a-State license was required. Commissioner Ritchie then asked if the applicants had an idea of where the chemicals would be stored. Mr. Acosta stated that he hoped to utilized an empty pump house for this; however, Southern California Edison and the Department of Agriculture would have to give their approval first. Commissioner Ritchie then inquired what type of sprayer would be used and how noisy this device was. Mr. Acosta stated that the sprayer held 200 gallons of water and was not noisy. He also stated that spraying would not be done when there was wind or a breeze, and that the time needed for spraying was not very long. Commissioner Ritchie then asked if Mr. Acosta would agree to a condition limiting the allowable hours of spraying, and Mr. Acosta stated that this would not present a problem. Commissioner Ritchie then asked where potting of the plants would be. conducted, and where the soil would be mixed. Mr. Acosta then explained their procedure for mixing and potting of the soil. He indicated that precautions would be taken,-to minimize the dust and that much of the potting would be taking place off-site. Also, the soil would be mixed at another location and then moved to the subject site. He estimated that the hauling of soil would be done on a limited basis,.ance or twice a year, since one or two loads of soil would yield approximately 1,000 to 1,500 plants. He also stated that this potting would be done on the south end of the property. - There was then a discussion regarding the type of chemicals to be used. Mr. Acosta stated that weed oil would probably not be used on the site, since the odor is objectionable and the Department of Agriculture also objects to.it's use. Commissioner Ritchie then stated his concern with the size of the trucks to be used, the mud that might be carried out onto Klingerman Street, and the hours of operation. He again inquired if the plants would be 1-imited to one-gallon size. There was also a discussion regarding the separating wall between the flood control channel and the subject property, and the location of':the property in relation of the school. Commissioner Lowrey asked if the applicant had received and read a copy of the report from the Air' Quality Management and the County Agriculture Commission. The applicant indicated that he had not and was given a copy for his information and review. After reading the report, Mr. Acosta stated that he fully agreed with the report. Commissioner De Cocker asked Mr. Acosta how many employees would be present on the site, and if loading and unloading of plants would be done on the site. Mr. Acosta stated that the number of employees would range between two to five people, and that loading and unloading would be done entirely inside the boundaries of the site to eliminate blocking of the public right-of-way. Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting - January 5, 1981 Page Five Commissioner Ritchie then stated that the plot plan submitted to the Commission did not appear to be drawn to scale, and asked if there was an easement. Mr. Carmona stated that this part of an old sub- division. There was then a discussion by the Commission regarding the width of the driveway. Commissioner Ritchie asked if the applicants had given any thought to providing access to their property closer to Delta Avenue. Mr. Acosta stated that this matter would have to be approved by Southern California Edison. Mr. Acosta also stated that the entrance was situated so that there would be more room for the vehicles to turn around, and informed the Commission that the gate was not accurately represented on the plot plan. He also stated that the plot plan had not been drawn to scale. There was then a discussion by the Commission regarding the moving of the driveway entrance and the installation of a newdriveway apron. PROPONENT: Mr. Bob Pitts Southern California Edison 1000 Potrero Grande Monterey Park, California Mr. Pitts addressed the commission regarding the driveway. He informed the Commission of possible modifications to the fence, and stated that redesigning of the fence and gate were being considered. He also stated that landscaping wouldr'be installed to discourage the use of the apron presently located at the site, and that the apron is a common apron used by Southern California Edison and the neighboring property to the north. He stated that the widening of the driveway apron would be unfeasible. OPPONENT: Mr. Alberto Caloca 14221 Prichard Street La Puente, California Mr. Caloca addressed the Commission regarding the fence which was installed in conjunction with the establishment of the nursery/growing ground. He stated that he-believed that the fence was causing traffic to use his property to pass-by, and that they were infringing upon his property. It was determined by the Commission that Mr. Caloca's property was encroaching upon the public right-of-way. Mr. Carmona suggested that Mr. Caloca meet with him to determine his property boundary. Mr. Caloca agreed to this solution. Chairman Cleveland closed the Public Hearing at 8:50 p.m. There was a discussion by the Commission with regard to the suggestion by commissioner Ritchie to amend Condition No. 2, restricting the use of chemicals, and the addition of conditions. Commissioner Lowrey stated that he was concerned with the use of chemicals and suggested that the following wording be incorporated into Condition No. 2: "That the use of chemicals shall be restricted to those listed on the Environmental Assessment, Mitigation Measures 1, 2, 3;.'and 4". However, after further discussion, it was decided by the Commission that Mitigation Measure No. 4 was not appropriate, and it was deleted. Commissioner Ritchie then added the following as Condition No. 3: "The growing shall be restricted to one-gallon size plants." Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting - January 5, 1981 Page Six Commissioner.Ritchie also stated he wished to add the following to Condition No. 2: "The spraying of plants shall be limited to 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on Saturday-and 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m, on Sunday." it was then brought to the attention of the Commission that if the plants were limited to one-gallon size,,the trees requested by Southern California Edison surrounding the property would not be allowed. To remedy this situation, Condition No. 3 was re-written as follows: "Growing shall be restricted to one-gallon size plants,. excluding one row of trees around the perimeter." Commissioner Ritchie also added the following conditions: 4. Hours of operation shall be from 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p,m. 5. Potting is to be done at the south end of the property. 6. Interior roads of the property shall have gravel placed on them and maintained to prevent mud or dust. 7. Any storage of herbicides or chemicals shall be approved by the Department of Agriculture. Commissioner Mattern expressed his concern with the increase of traffic on Delta Avenue and the possible breaking-down of the driveway apron due to the large trucks utilizing the driveway. He requested the following condition be added: 8. All access to the property shall be from Klingerman Street. Chairman Cleveland asked the secretary to review the conditions for the Commission, and they were stated as follows: 2. That the use of chemicals shall be restricted to those listed on the Environmental Assessment, Mitigation measures 1, 2, and 3. Spraying is to be limited to 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on Saturday and 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. on Sunday. 3. Growing shall be restricted to one-gallon size plants, excluding one row of trees around the perimeter. 4. Hours of operation shall be from 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. 5. Potting is to be done at the south end of the property. 6. Interior roads of the property shall have gravel placed on them and shall be maintained to prevent mud or dust. 7. Storage of herbicides or chemicals shall be approved by the Department of Agriculture. 8. All access to the property shall be from Klingerman Street. it was moved by Commissioner Ritchie, seconded by Commissioner Mattern, to adopt the Negative Declaration for Conditional Use Permit 80-207, subject to the Mitigation Measures. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Lowrey, Cleveland, Ritchie, Mattern Noes: None it was moved by Commissioner Mattern, seconded by Commissioner Ritchie, to approve Conditional Use Permit 80-207, subject to Conditions 1 through 8, as amended. ROLL ^_ALI'- VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Lowrey, Cleveland, Ritchie, .Mattern .Noes: None Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting - January 5, 1981 Page Seven 10. ADJOURNMENT - There being no further business to come before the Commission, Chairman Cleveland adjourned the meeting at 9:30 p.m., to the Study Session scheduled for January 7, 1981, at 7:00 p.m.