Loading...
PC - Minutes 06-21-82q • p• CITY OF ROSEMEAD 8838 VALLEY BOULEVARD ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA 14 PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JUNE 21, 1982 MTNTTTF.S 1. CALL TO ORDER - The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemead was called to order by Chairman Ritchie in the Council Chambers of Rosemead City Hall, 8838 Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairman Ritchie. The Invocation was delivered by Commissioner Lowrey. 2. ROLL CALL - Present: De Cocker, Schymos, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Absent: None Ex Officio: Kress, Rankin, Carmona, de Zara 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting, June 7, 1982 It was moved by Commissioner Mattern, seconded by Commissioner Schymos, to approve the Minutes of June 7, 1982 as printed. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Schymos, Lowrey, Mattern Noes: None Absent: None Abstain: Ritchie Chairman Ritchie stated that he abstained from the vote because he was not present at that meeting. 4. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE - On items not on the Agenda Mr. Jose Gonzales 8527 Drayer Lane South San Gabriel, California Mr. Gonzales stated that there were trees blocking the intersection of Drayer Lane and Walnut Grove which caused a traffic hazard. Mr. Rankin stated,that the would refer the matter to the appropriate department and have it resolved. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82-244: Request by Alhambra Psychiatric Hospital for the establishment of a psychiatric hospital on property located at 4705 Rosemead Boulevard, to be used in conjunction with an existing psychiatric hospital located at 4619 Rosemead Boulevard. (Continued from May 3, 1982) The Staff Report dated June 15, 1982 was presented by Mr. Carmona. During his presentation, he informed the Commission that the request had been amended by the applicants to request a parking lot rather than an expansion of the hospital. In addition, Mr. Carmona.addressed the Commission regarding the traffic problem existing on Grand Avenue and Rosemead Boulevard. The recommendation for conditional approval was made. Chairman Ritchie opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. Ed Foulk, former Administrator Alhambra Psychiatric Hospital 4619 Rosemead Boulevard Rosemead, California Jay Wagner, Administrator Alhambra Psychiatric Hospital 4619 Rosemead Boulevard Rosemead, California -PROPONENTS: Andrew Boutelle Alhambra Psychiatric Hospital 4619 Rosemead Boulevard Rosemead, California Planning Commission Minutes Regular. Meeting - June 21, 1982 Page Two Mr. Foulk requested that the traffic problem in the area be studied further in order to determine the best means of solving the problem. In addition, he stated that staff's suggestion for closure of the driveway would cause a problem with access to the subject property. Mr. Boutelle stated his agreement with Mr. Foulk, and suggested as an alternative, the installation of a "no left-hand turn" sign. Chairman Ritchie closed the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. There was a lengthy discussion by the Commission with regard to this project. During the discussion, the Commission considered the necessity of a new application reflecting the amended request, the traffic accidents that have occurred at the Grand Avenue/Rosemead Boulevard intersection, restricting the use of the proposed parking lot to employees only, inclusion of paving standards for the driveway and parking lot, the absence of a landscaping plan, access to the proposed parking lot if the driveway is closed, and suggestions for a resolution to the traffic problem. Commissioner Schymos suggested that Grand Avenue be blocked off, or limited to southbound traffic only. Also considered during the discussion was the existing block wall on the northern- most portion of 4705 Rosemead Boulevard. Commissioner De Cocker requested that a condition be added requiring that the wall be reconstructed to City Engineer's standards. With regard to the traffic problem, it was recommended by Chairman Ritchie that this matter be referred to the Traffic Engineer and the Traffic Commission for further study and recommendation to the City Council. Mr. Kress agreed with Chairman Ritchie, and suggested the addition of the following condition: "The permit authorized by this resolution shall not become effective until such time as the Traffic Commission has studied the traffic flow at Grand Avenue and Rosemead Boulevard, and that the Traffic Commission has made a recommendation to the City Council for implementation of plans to alleviate the traffic problems at this intersection. Prior to the use of the parking lot authorized by this permit, the applicant shall fully cooperate with the City Traffic Engineer and the final decision in this matter by the City Council, including but not limited to, the closure of the driveway if the Traffic Commission and Council agree that this is one or more of the appropriate ways to deal with the traffic." The Commission also added the following conditions: "4. A landscape plan utilizing automatic timers and moisture sensors shall be prepared and submitted to the Director of Planning for review and approval." "5. The parking lot shall be marked for employees only." "6. The parking lot shall be developed to City standards, 4 inches of AC over 6 inch base, or 6 inches of concrete." - "7. The existing block wall on the northern portion of 4705 Rosemead Boulevard be reconstructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer." Commissioner Lowrey expressed his concern with the lack of jurisdiction over Rosemead Boulevard. it was moved by Commissioner Schymos, seconded by Commissioner De Cocker, to approve the filing of a'Negative Declaration for Conditional Use Permit 82-244. Commissionei-Lowrey then stated-his opposition.to the-filing of`s Negative Declaration,.due to the traffic problem. Commissioners Schymos and De.Cocker then withdrew their motion and second for the filing of a Negative Declaration. Mr. Kress then stated.that the condition adopted by the Planning Commission making this permit invalid until such time as the Council has resolved the traffic problem would be included in the Negative Declaration as a mitigating measure. Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting - June 21, 1982 Page Three It was moved by Chairman Ritchie, seconded by Commissioner Mattern, to approve the filing of a Negative Declaration for Conditional Use Permit 82-244, with the findings that: (1) The Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with State and local guidelines for preparation of environmental documents; and, (2) The project could not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Schymos, Ritchie, Mattern Noes: Lowrey Commissioner Lowrey requested that the Minutes reflect that his "no" vote was because of the traffic problem in the area. It was moved by Commissioner Mattern, seconded by Commissioner Schymos, to grant Conditional Use Permit 82-244 subject to the conditions as amended. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Schymos, Ritchie, Mattern Noes: Lowrey 6. DESIGN REVIEW 82-8: Request by Atlantic Engineering for design approval of a proposed nine-unit apartment building to be located at 8852 Marshall Street, Rosemead, California. (Continued from May 17, 1982) The staff report dated June 1.4, 1982 was presented by Mr. Carmona and the recommendation for conditional approval was made. During the presentation, Mr. Carmona reviewed some of the changes made in the plan, in order to make this proposal more desirable to the city. Chairman Ritchie opened the public hearing at 8:25 p.m. PROPONENTS: Loren Phillips 1740 Huntington Drive Duarte, California Charles Hendron Atlantic Engineering 729 Atlantic Boulevard Monterey Park, California Mr. Phillips stated that he was representing the applicant in this matter. He further addressed the Commission regarding the need for rental housing in this area. He stated that this project would help fulfill that need. OPPONENTS: Hanna Abernathy 8851 Marshall Street Rosemead, California Mr. Juan Nunez 2702 Del Mar Avenue Rosemead, California Mr. Provenza 8844 Marshall Street Rosemead, California Mrs. Abernathy stated her,concern with adequate off-street parking being pro- vided for this project, and recommended that the City consider implementing a "no parking" zone for one side of Marshall Street. Mr. Provenza addressed the Commission through a translator. He expressed his concern with his loss of privacy, additional traffic, andsnoise:cause by the added traffic. Chairman Ritchie then explained that the structure would not be con- structed next to Mr. Provenza's property. Mr. Provenza remained opposed to the construction of an apartment building next to his home. REBUTTAL: Loren Phillips 1740 Huntington Drive Duarte, California Mr. Phillips stated that this project would have a semi-subterranean garage which would aid in the noise attenuation of the traffic within the project. Chairman Ritchie closed the public hearing at 8:45 p.m. Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting - June 21, 1982 Page Four There was a discussion by the Commission regarding Mr. Provenza's concerns with the project, especially with regard to the proposed location of the building in relation to Mr. Provenza's property. Also considered by the Commission was Commissioner De Cocker's concern with the 4 foot elevation of the first floor level for Units 8 and 9. Mr. Charles Hendron stated that the project had been designed in that manner because of the existing natural slope to the rear. There was a lenghty discussion regarding how best to lower the first floor elevation of the subject units. Mr. Carmona stated that in order to accomplish this, the City would have to accept a 17% grade ramp with a transition between Buildings 1 and 2. He stated that this would allow Building No. 2 to be lowered to a level that would be more acceptable to the Commission. It was the consensus of the Commission that Mr. Carmona's suggestion would be the most effective means of dealing with the elevation. Therefore, Condition No. 11 was amended as follows: "11. That the project shall be developed in accordance with the development plans dated June 11, 1982, (Reference: File, Design Review 82-8), and accept the driveway ramp of 17% from the street, with the grade transition between Buildings 1 and 2 so that the first floor level of Units 8 and 9 shall not exceed 3 feet." It was moved by Commissioner Lowrey, seconded by Commissioner Matter,, to approve the filing of a Negative Declaration for Design Review 82-8 with the findings that: (1) The Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with State and local guidelines for preparation of environmental documents; and, (2) The project could not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Schymos, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Noes: None It was moved by Commissioner Lowrey, second_ed.by Commissioner Mattern, to approve Design Review 82-8, subject to the conditions, as amended. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Schymos, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Noes: None Chairman Ritchie called a recess at 9:30 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:40 p.m. Chairman Ritchie stated..that Planned Development Review 81-2 and Planned Development Review 82-5 would be heard together. 7. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 81-2: Request by Narramore Christian Foundation for the addition of housing units and dining room with a basement; audio-visual and maintenance building addition to the service building on property located at 1409 Walnut Grove Avenue, Rosemead, California. 8. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 82-5: Request by Narramore Christian Foundation and Southern California Edison Company for the remodeling of an existing structure to accommodate an office use on property located at 1409 Walnut Grove Avenue, Rosemead, California. The staff reports dated June 15, 1982 were presented by Mr. Carmona and the recommendation for conditional approval of both requests was made. During his presentation, Mr. Carmona stated that there was adequate room on the site to support both uses and the required parking. He also addressed the Commission with regard to the method and basis on which the parking requirements were set forth for this project. There was a short recess due to problems with the tape recorder. The meeting reconvened at 10:01 p.m. and Chairman Ritchie declared the public hearing open at that time. PROPONENTS: Mr. Richard Hull Dr. Lee Bendell 15935 Amber Valley Drive Narramore Christian Foundation Whittier, California 1409 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting - June 21, 1982 Page Five Roy Bergeson Southern California Edison 1000 Potrero Grande Avenue Monterey Park, California Holly Knapp 8367 Whitmore Rosemead, California Geraldine Cromroy 8511 Drayer Lane Rosemead, California Les Travis Southern California Edison 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California Herman Funk 2624 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California Mr. Hull stated that he was the architect for Narramore Christian Foundation. He addressed the Commission with regard to the adjustment of the parking and requested that the requirement not be amended. He added that this would allow them to preserve some of the landscaping and avoid large areas of asphalt. Dr. Bendell addressed the Commission with regard to the Southern California Edison leas for the office space, and answered various questions by the Commission with regard to the use of the facilities and the proposed new buildings. Mr. Bergeson and Mr. Travis answered questions by the Commission with regard to the operation of the Southern California Edison (SCE) offices on the Narramore property, employee parking needs, the expansion of the cafeteria area provided in the office building, and the unlikelyhood that SCE employees would utilize the dining facilities at Narramore. Dr. Bendell added that the dining room would only be utilized during seminars and meals would be served only to those attending the seminar. Dr. Bendell read a letter submitted to the Commission by Mrs. Cromroy. In her correspondence, Mrs. Cromroy stated that she could not be present because of illness; however, she wished to inform the Commission that she had no objections to the Narramore expansion. Mr. Funk and Mrs. Knapp both expressed their support of the work being conducted by the Narramore Christian Foundation, andurged the Commission to approve this request so that the work could be carried on. Chairman Ritchie closed the public hearing at 10:26 p.m'. Commissioner Schymos expressed his concern with the use of the property and it's possible conversion into a commercial use. He further inquired regarding the payment of taxes on portions of the property being leased to Southern California Edison. Dr. Bendell replied that Narramore Christian Foundation paid taxes on the portions of the building that were leased to Southern California Edison, and submitted copies of the tax receipts to the Commission for their information. Commissioner De Cocker inquired if the approval of Planned Development Review 81-2 would supercede the 1969 Master Plan. Mr. Carmona stated that it would, and Commissioner De Cocker requested the addition of a condition to that effect. Commissioner De Cocker also inquired regarding the submission of a development schedule. Mr. Carmona stated that a development schedule is not required to be submitted; however, he informed the Commission that the additions would be constructed in phases and the Southern California Edison remodeling would be completed prior to that, as a separate project. Chairman Ritchie inquired regarding seating capacity in the dining facility and meeting room, the means to be utilized to screen persons entering the dining facility,.and the use of the housing units. Dr. Bendell stated that the meals to be served in the dining room would be served only during seminars to persons attending the seminars, and the dining room would not be open on a day to day basis. Mr. Hull explained the use of the housing units saying that they were designed to be utilized as single rooms without a private bathroom or as family units with a bathroom. The family units would be achieved by opening a door which would join the necessary rooms together. Commissioner Schymos then inquired with regard to the terms of the lease with Southern California Edison, and expressed his concern that Narramore will find Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting - June 21, 1982 Page Six it necessary to request an other additionrather than being able to utilize their existing office structure. Dr. Bendell explained the terms of the lease and stated that it was for only five years. Dr. Bendell added that Narramore did not anticipate expanding their operation in that period of time, and he did not feel that there would be a problem with this. Commissioner Schymos also inquired if the Narramore Foundation held any other leases with other companies. Dr. Bendell stated that the only other agency in operation on Narramore property was the Rosemead Counseling Service, which was a branch of Narramore. Mr. Kress then suggested the addition of"a condition to both Planned Development Review 81-2 and Planned Development Review 82-5 that will require the Narramore Christian Foundation to notify the City Planning Department, in writing, of any proposed lease renewal or new lease on the property. Commissioner Mattern stated that the small car parking provisions should be limited to the SCE parking area, due to the problem with enforcement. There was then a discussion regarding the requirement to.provide parking in accordance with the Code. It was the consensus of the Commission to allow the condition requiring compliance with the code to remain, because this would apply no matter which Code is adopted. Also during this discussion, a condition was proposed which required all parking to be installed prior to building occupancy. However, at the request of Southern:California Edison representatives, the condition was modified to conform to the Edison remodeling;ewhich they estimated to be com- pleted in October of this year. The following conditions were added to Planned Development Review 81-2: 10. All of the required parking spaces for this project shall be paved and marked prior to building occupancy, on a building-by-building basis. 11. Prior to renewal or renegotiation of this lease, or proposal for any others, the City Planning Department shall be given thirty (30) days written notice. 12. The approval of Planned Development Review 81-2 shall supercede the Master Plan approved in 1969. The following conditions were added to Planning Development Review 82-5: 7. The required 144 parking spaces shall be paved, marked, and developed .according to City standards prior to occupancy by Southern California Edison. 8. Prior to renewal or.renegotiation of this lease, or proposal for any others, the City Planning Department shall be given thirty (30) days written notice. It was moved'by Commissioner Lowrey, seconded by Commissioner De Cocker, to approve the filing of a Negative Declaration for Planned Development Review 81-2, with the findings that: (1) The Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with State and local guidelines for the preparation of environmental documents; and, (2) The project could not have an significant adverse effect on the environment. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Schymos, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Noes: None it was moved by.Commissioner Lowrey,.seconded by Commissioner De Cocker, to recommend approval of Planned Development Review 81-2 to the City Council, subject to Conditions 1 through 12. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Schymos, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Noes: None It was moved by Commissioner De Cocker, seconded by Commissioner Lowrey to approve the filing of a Negative Declaration for Planned Development Review 82-5, with the findings that: (1) The Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with State and local guidelines for the preparation of environmental documents; and, (2) The project'could hat have a significant adverse effect on the environment. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes:' De Cocker, Schymos, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Noes: None Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting - June 21, 1982 Page Seven It was moved by Commissioner Lowrey, seconded by Commissioner De Cocker, to recommend approval of Planned Development Review 82-5 to the City Council, subject to Conditions 1 through 8. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Schymos, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Noes: None OTHER BUSINESS 9. PARCEL MAP 12877: Request from Olen D: Murray Civil Engineering for a waiver of the required fire flow for a proposed parcel map located at 3213 Burton Avenue, Rosemead, California. The memorandum dated June 15, 1982 was presented by Mr. Carmona and the recom- mendation for conditional approval was made. During his presentation, Mr. Carmona informed the Commission that the request for a waiver of the fire flow requirement was unopposed by the Los Angeles County Fire Department or the City Engineer's office. Chairman Ritchie stated that this was a very minimal development of only one additional housing unit. There was also a discussion regarding the responsibility and obligation of the water company to upgrade their water systems. Mr. Carmona informed the Commission that the water company had no obligation to assist this developer in the upgrading of their water system, and by requiring the developer to bear the cost of this upgrade, they would be placing a severe financial burden property owners. Commissioner De Cocker added that since this request was unopposed by the Fire Department and the City Engineer, he had no opposition to granting the request. It was moved by Commissioner De Cocker, seconded by Commissioner Mattern, to waive the fire flow requirement for Parcel Map 12877, on property located at 3213 Burton Avenue. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Schymos, Ritchie, Lowrey; Mattern Noes: None - 10. GARAGE/YARD SALE ORDINANCE: Discussion regarding the proposed Garage/Yard Sale Ordinance. (Continued from June 7, 1982) Mr. Kress stated that the draft including all the amendments requested by the Planning Commission had been submitted, and asked if there were any questions or further amendments. There being no further amendments requested by the Commission, staff was directed to schedule this matter for public hearing. 11. PC RESOLUTION 82-17 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82-245 FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9108 EAST GARVEY AVENUE, ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA. 12. PC RESOLUTION 82-18 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD GRANDING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82-246 FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9341 EAST VALLEY BOULEVARD, ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA. 13. PC RESOLUTION 82-19 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD GRANTING CONDITIONAL,APPROVAL OF DESIGN REVIEW 82-8 FOR A PROPOSED ADDITION TO AN EXISTING MOTEL LOCATED AT 8711 VALLEY BOULEVARD, ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA. Mr. Kress read the-resolutions by title only. It was moved by Commissioner Schymos, seconded by Commissioner Lowrey, to waive further reading and adopt PC Resolution 82-17, PC Resolution 82-18, and PC Resolution 82-19. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Schymos, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Noes: None 14. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE - On any matter Chairman Ritchie asked if anyone present wished to address the Commission. No one came forward. Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting - June 21, 1982 Page Eight 15. MATTERS FROM CITY OFFICIALS AND STAFF A. Commissioner Mattern requested that he be removed from the Modification Committee. After a short discussion, Commissioner Schymos accepted the appointment to the Modification Committee. B. Chairman Ritchie asked if everyone had received the memorandum from Mr. Kress regarding the Council's.consideration of amendments to the Parking Ordinance. He also reminded the members of the Commission that the Council will discuss this matter at their next regular meeting, June 22, 1982. 16. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Commission, Chairman Ritchie adjourned the meeting at 11:30 p.m.