Loading...
PC - Minutes 04-05-82CITY OF ROSEMEAD 8838 VALLEY BOULEVARD ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING APRIL 5, 1982 MINUTES R E V I E® 1. CALL TO ORDER - The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemead was called to order by Chairman Ritchie at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of Rosemead City Hall, 8838 Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California. r The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairman Ritchie. The Invocation was delivered by Commissioner Lowrey. 2. ROLL CALL - Present: De Cocker, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Absent: Schymos (excused) Ex Officio: Kress, Dickey, Carmona, de Zara 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting, March 15, 1982 It was moved by Commissioner Mattern, seconded by Commissioner De Cocker, to approve the Minutes of March 15, 1982 as printed. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Noes: None Absent: Schymos h 4. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE - On items not on the Agenda Chairman Ritchie asked if anyone present wished to address the Commission. 1 No one came forward. PUBLIC HEARING Chairman Ritchie requested that anyone wishing to address the Commission with regard to any of the matters scheduled for public hearing, rise and be administered the oath. The witnesses were administered the oath by the secretary. 5. ZONE VARIANCE 82-100: Request by Nicholas Gelalich for a zone variance to Section 9104.20 (G) of the Rosemead Municipal Code, for property located at 9415 De Adelena and 3802 Rio Hondo Avenue. The staff report dated March 26, 1982 was presented by Mr. Carmona, and the recommendation for conditional approval was made. Chairman Ritchie opened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. PROPONENT: Nicholas Gelalicb 5066 Alhambra Avenue Los Angeles, California Mr. Gelalich stated that he was the owner of the property and that he was present to answer any questions by the Commission. In answer to a question regarding the cost of relocating the garage on the 3802 Rio Hondo Avenue property, he stated that he did not know the cost. Chairman Ritchie closed the public hearing at 7:43 p.m. There was a discussion by the Commission regarding the clarification of Variance No. 2, and the cost of relocating the garage on 3802 Rio Hondo.Avenue to alleviate the need for Variance No. 3. Mr. Pat Murray, 3606 Rio Hondo Avenue, stated that he was familiar with cost of this type of construction and estimated that it would be approximately $8,000. Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting - April 5, 1982, Page Two The Commission then considered Variance No. 2, the relocation of the garage, and this could best be accomplished. All the Commissioners present agreed that a five-foot setback from the adjacent property line would not be acceptable. Mr. Gelalich then requested an explanation of what was being required by the Commission, and Chairman Ritchie explained that the garage would have to demolished and reconstructed at another location on the property. Chairman Ritchie also added that the garage could be replaced by a carport. There was then a discussion by the Commission regarding the requirements for carports. Mr. Carmona stated that the only requirement was that the parking space provided be large enough to accommodate two cars, and that this space be a minimum of 20' X 20'. Chairman Ritchie then advised Mr. Gelalich that the carport should be constructed in an aesthetically pleasing manner, and perhaps contain some storage space. Lengthy consideration was also given to the best location on the property for the construction of the new garage/carport. It was determined by the Commission that the new structure should be located on the northeast corner of 3802 Rio Hondo Avenue, and that the placement of the structure should be such that all current setback requirements were complied with. It was further detemined that the construction/relocation should be completed prior to the recordation of the final parcel map, and the proposed property line,-,be adjusted to allow for a minimum of five-foot yard setbacks between structures on both lots. During this discussion, the Commission added the following condition: "The existing garage on the 3802 Rio Hondo Avenue parcel be relocated to-the northeast corner of the same parcel, or the existing garage-be demolished and a new garage or carport be constructed to City standards." It was moved by Commissioner Lowrey, seconded by Commissioner Mattern, to approve Variances 1, 4, and 5 of Zone Variance 82-100, subject to Conditions 1 and 2. There was then a discussion-between Mr. Gelalich, Mr. Murray and the Commission regarding the addition of Condition No. 2 and the reasons compliance must be achieved prior to the recordation of the final parcel map. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Noes: None Absent: Schymos 6. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 81-240: Request by the Church in Los Angeles for the establishment of a church on property located at 2454 North San Gabriel Boulevard, and 2451 Gladys Avenue. The staff report dated March 29, 1982 was presented by Mr. Carmona and the recommendation for conditional approval was made. Chairman Ritchie opened the public hearing at 8:25 p.m. PROPONENTS: Don Hardy Church in Los Angeles 1041 South Elden Avenue Los Angeles, California Bill Wong 8543 Garibaldi San Gabriel, California David Wang 4416 Franklin Avenue Los Angeles, California Mr. Hardy addressed the Commission on behalf of the applicants. In addition, he stated the church's desire to work with the city and neighbors to make their project acceptable and an asset to the community. Further, he addressed the Commission regarding the many changes that have been implemented as a result of meetings with city staff. Mr. Hardy also expressed agreement to abide by all conditions imposed by the Commission. Mr. Wong made a slide presentation and explained in detail the proposed construction. In addition, he answered various questions by the Commission regarding the project. Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting - April 5, 1982 Page Three Mr. Wang stated that he was the civil engineer retained by the applicants, and addressed the Commission with regard to the grading of the property, the proposed widening of the driveway on San Gabriel Boulevard to 30 feet, and the Fire Department requirement of two access ways for emergency use. OPPONENTS: Phillip Berumen 2418 North San Gabriel Boulevard Rosemead, California Loretta Olea 2449 Gladys Avenue Rosemead, California Rita Duran 2442 Gladys Avenue Rosemead, California Mr. Berumen addressed the Commission with regard to his concern with additional traffic flow in the area, possible.problems created by vehicles parking on the street, and traffic congestion. He requested that an environmental impact report be completed for this project, and submitted a petition signed by residents in the area, expressing their opposition to the granting of the conditional use permit. Mrs. Duran stated that she lived adjacent to the subject property and expressed her concern with additional traffic on Gladys Avenue causing additional hazard to children playing in the neighborhood. She also stated that there was a problem with rodents in the area, and requested that the trash bins be placed away from the residential area on Gladys Avenue. Mrs. Olea expressed her concern with the possible noise, additional traffic, and drainage onto her property. She stated that at present, there was adequate drainage; however, she requested that a drainage device be installed to prevent flooding of her property. ..In addition to these concerns, she stated that she was concerned that her privacy would be infringed due to the windows proposed on the second story of the church building. REBUTTAL: William Lujan 2451 Gladys Avenue Rosemead, California Ernie Lui 226 North E1 Molino Pasadena, California Judy Lee 3124 Muscatel Avenue Rosemead, California Mr. Lujan expressed his support of the project because it would alleviate the unsightly condition presently existing on the property. Ms. Lee stated that she was a member of the church, and stated her belief that parking would not be a problem since many members of the church carpooled to services. Mr. Lui addressed the Commission regarding the various alternatives that could be employed to prevent flooding of Mrs. Oleo's property. He stated that he was the engineer for the project, and agreed to contact Mrs. Olea to discuss an acceptable drainage plan and device. Mr. Hardy answered various questions by the Commission regarding the number of services held weekly, and the estimated hours the services would be in progress. Further, he stated that the second story windows were being provided for light and would not be accessible to anyone in the church. He also addressed the Commission regarding the sound attenuation devices proposed to prevent any noise from disturbing the adjacent residents. Chairman Ritchie called a recess at 9:40 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:55 p.m. Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting - April 5, 1982 Page Four There was a lengthy discussion by the Commission regarding the testimony of the witnesses. Among the matters considered were the proposed emergency exit on Gladys Avenue, the installation of speed bumps in the parking area and driveway, the best location for the installation of the trash bin and trash bin enclosure, the proposed residential parsonage and it's compliance with Health and Safety codes, proposed fencing on the property, the design and landscaping, the accessibility of the second-story windows, and the maximum occupancy of the church. The Commission also gave lengthy consideration to the grading plans and drainage of the property, and possible noise from the services. During the discussion, the Commission amended Conditions 4 and 8; and added the following conditions to address their concern with the matters discussed: 4. Gladys Avenue shall be used for emergency access only. Gate to be subject to the approval of the Fire Department and not to be used otherwise. 8. The sanctuary shall be limited to a maximum of 250 fixed seats, or limited to 250 people. 10. Speed bumps shall be installed in the parking area and driveway per the City Engineer's specifications. 11. Install a trash bin and trash bin enclosure on the northeast corner of the property. 12. The drainage design and design of the wall shall be subject to review by the City Engineer, and a report by the City Engineer shall be submitted to the Planning Commission. 13. All trees shall be approved by the Director of Recreation and Parks. 14. Residence shall be subject to the Health and Safety Code. 15. All utilities shall be underground. 16. All wooden fences shall have steel supports set in concrete. It was moved by Commissioner Lowrey, seconded by Commissioner Mattern, to approve the filing of a Negative Declaration for Conditional Use Permit 81-240. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Noes: None Absent: Schymos It was moved by Commissioner Lowrey, seconded by Commissioner Mattern, to approve Conditional Use Permit 81-240, subject to Conditions 1 through 16. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Noes: None Absent: Schymos 7. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82-243: Request by James Yang for the establishment of a preschool on property located at 3220 Del Mar Avenue. The staff report dated March 29, 1982 was presented by Mr. Carmona, and the recommendation for conditional approval was made. Chairman Ritchie opened the public hearing at 10:40 p.m. PROPONENT: James Yang 7903 Virginia Rosemead, California Mr. Yang stated that he was the applicant. He also requested a waiver of the required installation of a six-foot block wall on the portion of the property adjacent to the school. He proposed a wooden fence for that location as a substitute. REVISED Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting - April 5, 1982 Page Five OPPONENT: Mao Wang 2501 Midwickhill Drive Alhambra, California Mr. Wang stated that he owned property adjacent to the project. He requested that the six-foot block wall requirement not be waived, and that a survey be completed prior to the construction of the wall to ensure that the wall would not infringe upon his property. He further stated his concern with additional traffic in the area, and an excessive number of children attending the school. Chairman Ritchie closed the public hearing at 10:50 p.m. There was a lengthy discussion by the Commission regarding this request's compliance with State laws governing this type of request, the demolition of the-structure existing on the property, the possible relocation of the classroom site and the elimination of Playground Area No. 1, the retention of as many trees as possible, the location of the trash bin and trash bin enclosure, limiting the number of children allowed to attend the school, installation of a fire sprinkler system in the classroom building, the paving and striping of the driveway and parking area to city standards, the proposed drainage in order to eliminate ponding of the play areas, and the building materials proposed for the building.* Geeke- expressed his desiue to releeate the P4AARrAQw h,~U&Jag 2vd aliminate Playground Area No 1, sinee rwa play areas required LJ la ..A tLO plimlnat4ven ..F~]a....«~..ad_A.+-.... 1 were net state _l J L-t r -tie-sh~lren ~^v .L •~L~ as that la d Area N 1 ..t required by stare la During the discussion, the Commission amended Condition No. 3, and added the following conditions: 3. That an application be made and approved by the State Department of Social Welfare, and that a copy of the license to operate be given to the Planning Department for the city record, and that a copy of the application to the State be submitted to the Planning Department. 7. Remove or demolish the existing building and construct a block wall fence to the City standards, prior to any new construction. 8. Lot survey to establish property lines. 9. Trash bin and enclosure shall be located inside Playground Area No. 1, as designated. Enclosure to the approval'of the Planning Department. 10. Playground Area No. 1 not required by state law. 11. All utilities shall be underground. 12. Fire sprinkler system to be installed to the approval of the Los Angeles County Fire Department. 13. Parking area to be paved to current City standards, 4 inches of AC over 4 inch base; or 6 inches of concrete, and parking area to be double-striped. 14. Dedicate five feet (5') of right-of-way to the city for street widening and shall offer said dedication at the close of escrow and prior to the issuance of building permits. 15. Drainage plan is to be submitted to the City Engineer and a report be submitted to the Planning Department. 16: Paved.area shall drain to Del Mar Avenue. No ponding allowed in play area. 17. Building design and construction materials shall be to the approval of the Planning Department. *Amended by the Planning Commission, May 3, 1982. Please see Attachment "A" for amendment. Planning Commission Minutes April 5, 1982 - Regular Meeting Amendment to Page Five ATTACHMENT "A" Commissioner De Cocker expressed his desire to require the relocation of the classroom building ten feet (10') to the west and five feet (5') to the south to eliminate Playground Area No. 1, since two play areas are not required by state law: In addition, Commissioner De Cocker stated that the elimination of Playground Area No. 1 would provide better security for the children. There was a discussion between the applicant and Commission during which the applicant agreed to investigate the matter further, and comply with Commissioner De Cocker's wishes. It was the consensus of the Commission that this not be added as a condition; however, it was allowed to be stated that Playground Area No. 1 is not required by State law. Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting - April 5, 1982 Page Six It was moved by Commissioner Mattern, seconded by Commissioner De Cocker, to approve the filing of a Negative Declaration for Conditional Use Permit 82-243. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Noes: None Absent: Schymos It was moved by Commissioner Mattern, seconded by Commissioner Lowrey, to approve Conditional Use Permit 82-243, subject to Conditions 1 through 17. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Noes: None Absent: Schymos OTHER BUSINESS 8. EXTENSION REQUEST - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 81-211: Request by Avery Datsun for an extension to Conditional Use Permit 81-211, which allows the use of a temporary trailer on property located at 8930 Mission Drive. (Continued from March 15, 1982) Mr. Robert Taylor, Manager Avery Datsun 8930 Mission Drive Rosemead, California Mr. Taylor addressed the Commission regarding the reasons for the extension request. He stated that the reasons were basically financial. In addition, he informed the Commission that Avery Datsun had been sold in December, thereby causing a delay in the plans for a permanent office structure. After a short discussion of the matter, Chairman Ritchie cautioned Mr. Taylor that this extension was the last one that could be granted. Chairman Ritchie further stated that at the end of this extension, the trailer would have to be removed from the premises. Mr. Taylor stated that he understood this stipulation. It was moved by Commissioner Lowrey, seconded by Commissioner Mattern, to grant a one-year extension to Conditional Use Permit 81-211. ROLL CALL.VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Noes: None Absent: Schymos -9. EXTENSION REQUEST - CONDITIONAL USE PEMIT 81-217: Request by C.F. Bolster Company for an extension to Conditional Use Permit 81-217, which allows the use of a temporary trailer on property located at 8515 Garvey Avenue. Robert Bolster 8515 Garvey Avenue Rosemead, California Mr. Bolster stated that the reasons for his request were contained in his correspondence dated March 23, 1982. He cited financial reasons as the basis for the extension request. There was a short discussion by the Commission regarding this matter. It was moved by Commissioner De Cocker, seconded by Commissioner Lowrey, to grant a one-year extension to Conditional Use Permit 81-217. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Noes: None Absent: Schymos 10. MODIFICATION TO SECTION 8110: Request by Tony and Maria Martinez for the waiver of the sidewalk requirement for property located at 3206 Ivar Avenue. Mr. Carmona informed the Commission that this request had been withdrawn by the applicants for financial reasons. 11. MODIFICATION TO SECTION 8110: Request by Rosemary Wirasatien for a waiver of the sidewalk requirement for property located at 8253 Artson Avenue. Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting - April 5, 1982 Page Seven There was a discussion by the Commission regarding future plans for installation of street improvements through an assessment district, and the cost of the street improvements. Mr. Dickey informed the Commission that there were no immediate plans for the installation of sidewalks along Artson. It was moved by Chairman Ritchie, seconded by Commissioner Mattern, to deny a waiver of Section 8110 for property located at 8253 Artson. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Noes: None Absent: Schymos 12. PC RESOLUTION 82-10 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 81-241, FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CHURCH ON A VACANT LOT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SAN GABRIEL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN NORTH LAWRENCE AVENUE AND ROSE GLEN AVENUE, ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA. Mr. Kress read the resolution by title only. It was moved by Commissioner Lowrey, seconded by Commissioner Mattern, to waive further reading and adopt PC Resolution 82-10. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Noes: None Absent: Schymos 13. PC RESOLUTION 82-11 - Memorandum Chairman Ritchie stated that due to the inability of Saint Joseph's Salesian Youth Center to secure a written covenant with Don Bosco Technical Institute for the joint parking, an alternate parking plan had been submitted. However, it was determined by the Modification Committee that the alternate plan should be reviewed by the full Commission. Therefore, Planned Development Review 82-4 would be scheduled for rehearing before the Planning Commission. 14. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE - On any matter Chairman Ritchie asked if anyone present wished to address the Commission. No one came forward. 15. MATTERS FROM CITY OFFICIALS AND STAFF A. Mr. Carmona informed the Commission that at the March 23, 1982 City Council meeting, the Council had adopted an ordinance requiring a conditional use permit for the construction/operation of cogeneration equipment. B. The Commission was polled regarding their attendance at the Southern California Planning Congress meeting, April 8, 1982. C. Chairman Ritchie requested that the wall along Ramona Boulevard be sandblasted to remove the graffiti. Mr. Dickey stated that the subject wall was under the jurisdiction of Cal Trans and he would notify them of the request. D. Chairman Ritchie requested that staff contact Mr. Boyd and inform him that the parking area to the east of Avery Datsun should be paved in accordance with the city standards for parking lots. There was then a discussion regarding this matter. 16. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Commission, Chairman Ritchie adjourned the meeting at 12:05 a.m.