Loading...
PC - Minutes 03-01-82CITY OF ROSEMEAD 8838 VALLEY BOULEVARD ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA PLANNING COMMISSION: REGULAR MEETING MARCH 1, 1982 MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER - The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemead was called to order by Chairman Ritchie at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of Rosemead City Hall, 8838 Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Schymos. The Invocation was delivered by Chairman Ritchie 2. ROLL CALL - Present: De Cocker, Schymos, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Absent: None Ex Officio: Reisman, Dickey, Carmona, de Zara 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Study Session, January 11, 1982 Regular Meeting, February 1, 1982 It was moved by Commissioner Mattern, seconded by Commissioner Lowrey, to approve the Minutes of January 11, 1982, as printed. Chairman Ritchie then requested the amendment of Page 2, paragraph 4 to read as follows: "Mr. Carmona was then directed to draft-language, and drawings, for the amend- ments considered at this meeting." Commissioner Mattern and Commissioner Lowrey amended their motion to include Chairman Ritchie's request. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Schymos, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Noes: None It was moved by Commissioner Lowrey, seconded by Commissioner De Cocker, to approve the Minutes of February 1, 1982, as printed. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Schymos, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Noes: None 4. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE - On items not on the Agenda Chairman Ritchie asked if anyone present wished to address the Commission. No one came forward. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 74: Request by Frederick B. and Joan M. Cordova for the expansion of an existing conditional use permit to accommodate the construction of custodian:'s quarters in a storage rental complex, known as "American Mini-Storage Warehouse", and located at 8653 Garvey Avenue, Rosemead, California. The Staff Report dated February 18, 1982 was presented by Mr. Carmona and the recommendation for conditional approval was made. Chairman Ritchie opened the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. The witnesses were administered the oath by the secretary. PROPONENTS: Frederick B. Cordova, Jr. 2806 Oak Knoll San Marino, California Joan M. Cordova 2806 Oak Knoll San Marino, California Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting - March 1, 1982 Page Two Mr. Cordova stated that the construction of the custodian's quarters would add to the security of the complex. In addition, he stated that they intended to install electronic security gates and surveillance systems on the property. Further, he agreed to implement the two conditions recommended by staff. There was a discussion by the Commission regarding the type of security system to be used on the property, the placement of the gate, and the required parking for a residential use. Also, there was a discussion regarding the various ways the required two-car, covered parking could be implemented on the property. During the discussion, the applicants contended that two covered parking spaces were not needed; however, the Commission stated that the residential use of the addition would have to comply with the required parking. It was determined that the applicants could provide parking inside two of the storage units, and rent one of the units if it was not needed for parking. Accordingly, the following condition was added by the Commission: "Garage space for the residence shall be designated as Unit 3 and Unit 4. If one space is not required for parking, it may be used for storage." OPPONENTS: Sam Sameniego 3020 Burton Avenue Rosemead, California Marlene Sameniego 3020 Burton Avenue Rosemead, California Mr. and Mrs. Sameniego requested that the Commission add ,a condition requiring the installation of a block wall. They also addressed the Commission with re- gard to the problems they have encountered with noise and other nuisances generated by this use. In addition, they stated that the existing fence was in extremely poor condition. There was a lengthy discussion regarding the legality of requiring the installation of a block wall. It was determined that the Sameniego's property was in an M-1 zone; therefore, the requirement of the in- stallation of a block wall between residential and commercial/manufacturing zones was not applicable in this case. During this discussion, an oral agree- ment was reached between Mr. and Mrs. Sameniego and Mr. and Mrs. Cordova to replace the fence with a new chain link fence. Chairman Ritchie then stated that the replacement of the fence would not be added as a condition; however, he cautioned the Sameniegos that the City would not enforce this oral agreement. Chairman Ritchie closed the public hearing at 8:30 p.m. Commissioner Schymos expressed his desire to have the Fire Department review the proposed closure of the driveway. In addition, he requested that the applicants install a suitable trash bin with an enclosure on the property. There was also a discussion regarding trash pick-up services available. During this discussion, the following condition was added: "There will be a trash bin on the northwest corner, in a suitable enclosure." Chairman Ritchie-requested that a condition be added stating that-all original .conditions of approval remain in__effect. Further, Chairman Ritchie reviewed all conditions added by the Planning Commission. They were stated as follows: 3. Garage space for the residence shall be designated as Unit 3 and Unit 4. If one space is not required for parking, it may be used for storage. 4. There will be a trash bin on the northwest corner, in a suitable enclosure. 5. All original conditions of approval shall apply to this expansion. Commissioner De Cocker requested that the original conditions of approval be pro- vided with the resolution. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Schymos, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Noes: None 6. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 82-4: Request by St. Joseph Salesian Youth Center for the addition of a religious community building (rectory/residence) to be used in conjunction with an existing youth center, known as "St. Joseph Salesian Youth Center", and located at 8301 Arroyo Drive, Rosemead, California. Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting - March 1, 1982 Page Three The memorandum requesting the continuance of this matter was presented by Mr. Carmona. He stated that the continuance was being requested to allow staff and the applicant to clarify property lines depicted on the plot plan and development plans. After a short discussion of this matter, the Commission deferred this public hearing to the next regular meeting, March 15, 1982. 7. DESIGN REVIEW 82-7: Request by Thomas B. Hill for the review of a proposed office building, to be located at 8951 Glendon Way, Rosemead, California. ZONE VARIANCE 82-101: Request by Thomas B. Hill for a zone variance to Section 9122.9 (E) of the Rosemead Municipal Code for property located at 8951 Glendon Way, Rosemead, California. Chairman Ritchie called a recess at 8:50 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:05 p.m. The Staff Report dated February 22, 1982 was presented by Mr. Carmona and the recommendation for conditional approval was made. During the presentation, Mr. Carmona stated that the zone variance was being requested in order to accommodate the dedication of the right-of-way. He also stated that if the dedication was not given, the zone variance would be unnecessary. There was then a discussion by the Commission regarding the maintenance and responsibility of the planters in the proposed public right-of=way. The Commission was informed that, if the dedication was accepted, the maintenance of the planters would become the City's responsibility. Chairman Ritchie opened the public hearing at 9:15 p.m. PROPONENT: Thomas B. Hill 163 Arlington Drive Claremont, California Mr. Hill was administered the oath by the secretary. Mr. Hill addressed the Commission with regard to his intention to relocate his business into the City of Rosemead. Further, he stated that he would like to save the trees if.at all possible; however, he would agree to remove them if it was determined by the Commission that this was necessary. Mr. Hill then answered various questions regarding the sharing of a common wall with the service station adjacent to the site, the number of offices proposed in the development control of the small car parking, the width of the alley and any easements. There was a lengthy discussion regarding the alley main- tenance. Mr. Carmona stated that,lie would have to research the matter further to. determine if there easements recorded with the property at the time of their development. Mr. Carmona stated that in any event, the portion of the alley located directly behind the subject site was a dedicated'public alley, and as such, was maintained by the City. Chairman Ritchie closed the public hearing at 9:30 p.m. Commissioner Schymos stated that Mr. Hill had a sufficient driveway, which complied with the Code. Commissioner Schymos also stated that he did not believe that the trees could be saved due to their size, and the proposed trimming in order to fit them into 30" boxes. He stated that this would make them weak and more prone to being blown over in heavy wind thereby posing a hazard to the public. He suggested that the dedication would pose additional maintenance prob- lems to the City, and recommended that the trees should be removed and the' dedication not be accepted,-which-would eliminate the need_for:the parking. variance. There was then a lengthy discussion regarding this recommendation. Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting - March 1, 1982 Page Four Commissioner Mattern expressed his agreement with Commissioner Schymos and also stated that he would be in favor of prohibiting the wooden roofing material. There was a lengthy discussion regarding the roofing materials to be used on this structure. Commissioner De Cocker stated his disagreement with prohibiting this type of roof because it conformed to the design of existing structures in the area. In addition, Commissioner De Cocker stated that he would be in favor of requiring the removal of the trees. It was the consensus of the Commission that the dedication of the right-of-way not be accepted, and that the trees be removed. Commissioner Lowrey then stated.that he was concerned with the maintenance of the alley, and he wanted the Director of Recreation and Parks to advise them on the removal of the trees. Mr. Carmona then informed the Commission that the Director of Recreation and Parks had stated that in his opinion, the trees could not be saved. There was then further discussion regarding the maintenance of the alley. Mr. Carmona stated that the 15-foot portion of the alley that was dedicated was maintained by the City, and the remainder was maintained by the property owners. In any event, the project site was adjacent to the portion that was maintained by the City. Chairman Ritchie then spoke in favor of removing the trees. Further consideration was then given to the roofing materials. The Commission considered other types of roofing and the costs involved. The applicant stated that the roof was necessary due to the design of the structure. Further, he stated that the building design was in conformance with the existing structures in the area. Mr. Hill also informed the Commission that the roofing material proposed was "Flame-X", which was treated and much safer that the regular wooden shake roofing. Also considered in this discussion were fire insurance rates, which the applicant stated were not higher for wooden shake or shingle roofing. Commissioner Mattern then spoke against the wooden roofing material, and added that the close proximity of the service station, with the highly flammable gasoline, would pose an additional fire hazard. There was then a discussion regarding the additional protection offered by the proposed wall. During this discussion, the Commission added conditions requiring the-installation of an automatic sprinkler system in_.the garages, and the installation of smoke alarms/ smoke detectors in each officeain the structure. Chairman Ritchie also stated that he would like to modify Condition 2 to require the installation of a sprinkler system in the landscaped area, utilizing timers and moisture sensors. It was the consensus of the Commission that the wooden, fire-treated roof would be allowed, because this project is not close to a residential neighborhood and the changing of the roofing material would be too costly. Mr. Reisman advised the Commission to accept the withdrawal of the zone variance request by Mr. Hill, and that it would not be necessary to require a new plot plan. He stated that the modification of Condition No. 1 would be sufficient. However, staff was directed by the Commission to forward the modified plot plan to the Commission when it was submitted. Chairman Ritchie then reviewed the conditions added and modified by the Commission as follows: 1. Project shall be developed in accordance with the plot plan modified on March 1, 1982. 2. Landscaped areas shall be fully maintained and remain free of litter and debris. Automatic sprinklers shall be provided with moisture sensors and timers. 3. Remove the two trees on Glendon Way and repair the sidewalk. 4. Each office shall be provided with a smoke detector to meet the Building Code. Automatic sprinklers shall be installed in the garage area to the approval of the City Engineer. Planning Commission Minutes Regular.Meeting - March 1, 1982 Page Five Mr. Hill then withdrew his application for Zone Variance 82-101. It was moved by 'Commissioner Lowrey, seconded by Commissioner De Cocker, to approve Design Review 82-7, subject to the amended Conditions 1 through 4. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Schymos, Ritchie, Lowrey Noes: Mattern Commissioner Mattern stated that he voted against the project because of the wooden shake roof to be installed on'the structure. He added that he did not wish.to sacrifice safety for aesthetics. 8. PC RESOLUTION 82-4 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD GRANTING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL FOR AN EXPANSION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 80-201, ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4110 TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND 9739 ABILENE STREET, ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA. Mr. Reisman read the resolution by title only. It was moved by Commissioner Lowrey, seconded by Commissioner Mattern to waive further reading and adopt PC Resolution 82-4. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Schymos, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Noes: None 9. PC RESOLUTION 82-6 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82-242, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3220 DEL MAR AVENUE, ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA. Mr. Reisman read the resolution by.title only. It was moved by Commissioner Schymos, seconded by Commissioner De Cocker, to waive further reading and adopt PC Resolution 82-6. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Schymos, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Noes: None 10. PC RESOLUTION 82-7 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD GRANTING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP 14769, (A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS TO CREATE TWO SEPARATE PARCELS), AND VACATION OF CERTAIN EASEMENTS. Mr. Reisman read the resolution by title only. It was moved by Commissioner Schymos, seconded by Commissioner Lowrey, to waive further reading and adopt PC Resolution 82-7. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: De Cocker, Schymos, Ritchie, Lowrey, Mattern Noes: None 11. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE: On any matter Chairman Ritchie asked if anyone present wished to address the Commission. No one came forward. 12. MATTERS FROM CITY OFFICIALS AND STAFF A. Commissioner Schymos asked if the minutes submitted to the Commission prior to this meeting would be considered. Chairman Ritchie stated-that they would not be considered until the next regular meeting. - B. Commissioner Mattern requested that the Temple City Sheriff's Station be contacted regarding the illegal consumption of alcoholic beverages and loitering at the Alpha Beta Market property located at Jackson and Garvey Avenues. Further, he requested that the property owners be advised that the property is not being maintained in accordance with the Code. Mr. Dickey stated that he would investigate the matter. Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting - March 1, 1982 Page Six C. Chairman Ritchie asked Mr. Carmona when the illustrations for the amendments to the Parking Ordinance will be completed. Mr. Carmona stated that they would be completed within one week. D. Chairman Ritchie inquired.regarding the status of the video game ordinance was. Mr. Carmona stated that the City Council had directed the City Attorney to investigate other cities' ordinances. E. Chairman Ritchie asked when the drawings and illustrations for the Condominium Ordinance would be completed. Mr. Carmona stated that they would be completed within 1 to 2 weeks. There was then a discussion regarding the tentative scheduling of a study session to review the proposed Condominium Ordinance. A tentative date was scheduled for Wednesday, March 17, 1982 at 7:00 p.m. It was agreed by the Commission that this date would be confirmed at their next regular meeting, March 15, 1982. 13. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Commission, Chairman Ritchie adjourned the meeting at 10:45 p.m.