Loading...
PC - Minutes 07-21-80t CITY OF ROSEMEAD 8838 VALLEY BOULEVARD ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA i PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JULY 21, 1980 MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER - The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemead was called to order by Chairman.Cleveland at 7:30 p.m. in the .Council Chambers of Rosemead City Hall, 8838 Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Lowrey. The Invocation was delivered by Commissioner Mattern. 2. ROLL CALL - Present: Handy, Lowrey, Cleveland, Ritchie, Mattern .Absent: None Ex Officio: Carmona, Fernandez 3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE - On items not on the Agenda. Chairman Cleveland asked if anyone present wished to address the Commission. No one came forward. OTHER BUSINESS 4. PC RESOLUTION 80-23 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 80-190. 5. PC.RESOLUTION 80-24 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF . ROSEMEAD GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 80-184 AND ZONE VARIANCE 80-88. Mr. Carmona read the Resolutions by title only. It was moved by Commissioner Handy, seconded by Commissioner Ritchie, to waive further reading and adopt PC Resolution 80-23 and PC Resolution 80-24. ROLL CALL VOTE - Ayes: Handy, Lowrey, Cleveland, Ritchie, Mattern 6. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE - On any matter. Chairman Cleveland asked if anyone present wished to address the Commission. No one came forward. 7. MATTERS FROM CITY.OFFICIALS AND STAFF A. Commissioner. Ritchie made-a statement regarding the election of the vice-Chairman at the last regular meeting. He stated that he wished to change his vote to a "yes" vote for Commissioner Lowrey. Staff was directed to amend vtheirecord'to show- ;that rCommissioner.:Lowrey was elected by a unanimous vote. 8. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Commission, Chairman!, Cleveland adjourned the meeting to the Study.Session, at 7:40 p.m. Y CITY OF ROSEMEAD 8838 VALLEY BOULEVARD ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA PLANNING COMMISSION STUDY SESSION JULY 21, 1980 MINUTES 1. CALL TO.ORDER---The Study Session was called to order;by Chairman Cleveland at 7:45 p.m., in the Conference Room of Rosemead City Hall, 8838 Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California. 2. ROLL CALL - Present: Handy, Lowrey, Cleveland, Ritchie, Mattern Absent: None Ex Officio: Dickey, Carmona, Fernandez 3. MATTERS DISCUSSED The first order.of.business was a tour of the areas of concern. The Commission .___,boarded the van at 8:00 p.m. and returned.to City Hall at 8:30 p.m. The consultants then presented a slide presentation and their recommendations for the various areas. AREA NO. 1 - GRAND. AVENUE: This area.is recommended for R-3 to encourage the development of apartments/condominiums. It was pointed out by the consultants that the sewage problems in this area could be corrected by requiring developers in install sewers at the time their projects are being constructed. AREA NO. 2 - MISSION.DRIVE.TO WEST CITY BOUNDARY: It is the recommendation^of the consultants that this area remain R-3 to encourage the construction of apartment dwellings, because the street is of sufficient size to accommodate the additional traffic! AREA NO. 3 - VALLEY BOULEVARD TO WEST CITY BOUNDARY: This area is presently zoned M-1 and recommended for C-3 because it is presently developed with commercial, rather than manufacturing uses. " AREA NO. 4 MUSCATEL AVENUE - VALLEY TO NEVADA: Since. there are deep lots in this area, it is the recommendation of the consultants to%zone this area R-1. It is also recommended that the development of private streets be encouraged. AREA NO. 5 - ROSEMEAD:BOULEVARD - VALLEY TO MARSHALL: Presently this area is zoned R-3 and it is the recommendation of the consultants that this area re- main as-such, due to the high density residential character of the area. AREA NO. 6 - ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD - MARSHALL TO GLENDON WAY: Present zoning is C-3; however, due to the existing residential character of the area, the recommendation is to rezone this area R-3. There was also a discussion regarding the feasibility of zoning this area as R-3D to allow the Planning Commission to retain control of the type of develop- ments proposed for this area. The Planning Director was directed to supply the Commission with an example of an ordinance that requires design,,review of a multiplezresidential project. The Commission also scheduled the next study session for August 18, 1980, immediately following the regular meeting. 4. ADJOURNMENT- There being no further business to come before the Commission, Chairman Cleveland adjourned the meeting at 9:40 p.m.