PC - 1982-03 - Denying Conditional Use Permit 81-234 At 9432 Valley Blvd0
PC RESOLUTION 82-3
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD DENYING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 81-234 FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONVENIENCE
MARKET TO BE OPERATED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A NEW SERVICE STATION ON
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9423 VALLEY BOULEVARD, ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Rosemead does hereby
find and determine that an application was duly filed by Min Seong Kang and Mi Yong
Kang, requesting the establishment of a new convenience market and service station,
to be known as , "K.S. Market", and to be located at:
9423 Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California;
and that a public hearing was duly scheduled for December 21, 1981, at 7:30 p.m., in
the Council Chambers of Rosemead City Hall, 8838 Valley Boulevard, Rosemead,
California; and that notice of the time, date, place and purpose of the aforesaid
hearing was duly given; and that a public hearing was duly conducted at the afore-
mentioned time and place.
Section 2. The Planning Commission further finds and determines that facts
do not exist as required by Section 9180., et. seq., of the Ordinances of the City
of Rosemead, justifying the granting of a conditional use permit.
Section 3. The Planning Commission further finds:
1. The Planning Commission generally found that the project did not
satisfy the minimum lot size for a service station; that the proposed
mixed uses would lead to overcrowding on a non-conforming lot., and the
proposed project would not be more beneficial than what presently
exists on the property.
2. The project is not in harmony with the elements and objectives of the
General Plan.
3. The project will be detrimental to the surrounding properties, as the
property is not of suitable size to support the number of proposed
uses.
4. The project is not desirable to the public convenience.
5. On the basis of evaluation, this project has been determined to be a
Class Nine categorical exemption under the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act. A Notice of Exemption was filed with the
County Clerk.
Section 4. Based on the aforementioned findings, the Commission hereby
denies a conditional use permit with respect to the property described in Section 1
of this Resolution.
Section 5. This action shall become final and effective ten (10) days
after this decision by the Planning Commission, unless within such time, a written
appeal is filed with the City Clerk for consideration by the Rosemead City Council,
as provided in the Zoning Ordinance.
Section 6. This resolution is the result of an action taken by the Planning
Commission on December 21, 1981;_by the following vote:
AYES: De Cocker, Schymos, Lowrey, Ritchie, Mattern
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Section 7. The secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution
and shall transmit copies of same to the applicant and Rosemead City Clerk.
PC Resolution 82-3
Page Two
1
ADOPTED this 18th day of January 1982.
MARVIN H. LOWREY, CHAIRMAN
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a resolution adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rosemead at it's regular meeting held on the
18th day of January , 1982, by the following vote:
AYES: De Cocker, Schymos, Lowrey, Ritchie, Mattern
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
'Robert 'T-. Di key, S cretary