Loading...
PC - 2010-24 - Adopt Municipal Code Amendment 10-05 Amending section 17.04.020 and 17.16.140 PC RESOLUTION 10-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT 10-05 AMENDING SECTION 17.04.020 AND 17.16.140 OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO FLAG LOT DEVELOPMENT. WHEREAS, Section 17.116.020 of the Rosemead Municipal Code sets forth procedures and requirements for municipal code amendments; and WHEREAS, the City of Rosemead has adopted. the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, including specific development standards, to control development; and WHEREAS, Section 17.116.010 of the Rosemead Municipal Code authorize the Planning Commission to consider and recommend proposed municipal code amendments to the City Council; and WHEREAS, Municipal Code Amendment 10-05 revises regulations for the development of flag lots to clarify inconsistencies between flag lot text and graphics in the Rosemead Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, on July 9, 2010, a notice was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune specifying the public comment period and the time and place for a public hearing pursuant to California Government Code Section 65091(a)(3); and WHEREAS, on July 19, 2010, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed and advertised public hearing to receive oral and written testimony relative to Municipal Code Amendment 10-05; and WHEREAS, the Rosemead Planning Commission has sufficiently considered all testimony presented to them in order to make the following determination. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemead as follows: SECTION 1. The Planning Commission HEREBY DETERMINES that Municipal Code Amendment 10-05 is consistent with the General Plan Program EIR and Addendum, and pursuant to Public Resources Code 21083.3 and California Environmental Quality Act CEQA Guidelines sections 15162, 15168 and 15183 is exempt from the requirement that additional environmental documentation be prepared. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES that Municipal Code Amendment 10-05 is in the best interest of the public necessity and general welfare, and good city planning practice dictates and supports the proposed 1 municipal code amendment, in that the change to the Rosemead Municipal Code will provide a superior level of planning and. protection to the quality and character of the city. The revised flag lot regulations are consistent with General Plan Land Use Policy 1.2, to provide guidelines and standards to prevent land use conflicts. The revised flag lot regulations will ensure that flag lots are consistent with the density limits established in the General Plan and ensure that flag lot subdivision:are designed to be compatible with neighborhood development patterns in the City. The revised flag lot regulations include provisions designed to protect the privacy of adjacent residential properties and the quality of establish neighborhoods, as required by Land Use Policy 1.5 by granting the Planning Commission the authority to review flag lot subdivisions for consistency with neighborhood development patterns. SECTION 3. The Planning Commission does HEREBY RECOMMEND that the definition of Lot Depth in Section 17.04.020 (Definitions) of the Rosemead Municipal Code be amended to read as follows: "Lot depth" means the length of a straight line drawn from the midpoint of the front lot line and at right angles to such line connecting with the line intersecting the midpoint of the rear lot line; provided, however, that for the purpose of measurement, methods of measurement shall be applicable as per the following described circumstances: 1. In the case of lot having a curved front line, the front lot line, for the purposes of this section, shall be deemed to be a line tangent to the curve and parallel to a straight line connecting the points of intersection of the side lot lines of the lot with the front lot line. 2. In the case of a flag lot, for the purposes of this section, the front lot line shall be that property line which extends across the width of the lot, which is exclusive of and is not to be confused with, those property lines contained within the flag lot vehicle access leg to the public street. The front lot line may be parallel or perpendicular to the street which abuts the property. SECTION 4. The Planning Commission does HEREBY RECOMMEND that Section 17.16.140 (Flag Lot Development) of the Rosemead Municipal Code be amended to read as follows In order to provide the opportunity for single-family residential flag lot development, and to maintain the integrity of existing single-family areas, the following regulations and criteria of evaluating flag lot development are established. However, in no case shall more than three (3) flag lots and one non-flag (conventional) lot be allowed within any subdivision. 2 A. All development standards and definitions contained within this title shall continue to be applicable and in force unless otherwise specifically addressed within this section. Particular reference is made to Section 17.16.090 pertaining to a minimum fifty (50) foot street frontage. The applicability of this requirement to non-flag lot (conventional) parcels, which may be part of the land division under consideration, is emphasized for clarity. B. Front Yard. For the purposes of this section, a "front yard" is defined as that area which extends across the width of the lot, or as otherwise defined within Section 17.04.020 and is immediately adjacent to the flag. lot vehicular access leg, which connects to the public street. Such vehicular access leg is exclusive of a front yard setback area, as set out in Appendix A, attached to the ordinance codified in this title. C. Front Yard Setback. Those front yard setback requirements contained within Section 17.16.050 shall apply; provided, however, that for the purposes of measurement, the following methods shall be applicable, and as set out in Appendix A attached to the ordinance codified in this title. 1. When a single (one) flag lot is to be served by a driveway which is solely devoted to the exclusive use of such single flag lot, measurements shall be initiated from the front property line, as defined under subsection B of this section. 2. When two or more flag lots are to be serviced by a common driveway obtained through fee, easement, or in combination thereof, and when such lots lie partially within such common driveway, no setback measurements shall include any portion of such common driveway. 3. The Planning Commission may establish a new point of measurement for front yards; providing, however, that common driveways or vehicular access easements shall not be counted toward satisfying front yard setback requirements. D. Side Yard. Those side yard setback requirements contained within the underlying zone shall apply; provided, however, that for the purposes of measurement, the following methods shall be applicable as per described circumstances, and as set out in Appendix A attached to the ordinance codified in this title. 1. When a single (one) flag lot is to be served by a driveway which is solely devoted to the exclusive use of such single flag lot, measurements shall be initiated from the side property line. 2. When two or more flag lots are to be served by a common driveway obtained through fee, easement, or in combination thereof, and when such 3 lots lie partially within such common driveway, no setback measurements shall include any portion of such common driveway. E. Rear Yard. Those side yard setback requirements contained within the underlying zone shall apply. F. Lot Area. The minimum gross lot area shall be six thousand (6,000) square feet. For the purposes of this section, gross lot area shall mean the total area within the boundary lines of a lot or parcel, and the following shall also be applicable: The minimum developable lot area (net area), exclusive of vehicle access leg or common driveway access easements, shall be five thousand (5,000) square feet, and as set out in Appendix A attached to the ordinance codified in this title. G. Lot Width. The minimum lot width for a flag lot developable area as described in subsection E of this section shall be fifty (50) feet and shall be determined per the method described under Section 17.04.020, "Lot width," contained within this title. H. Lot Width-Street Frontage. .The minimum street frontage for a flag lot development is directly dependent on the number of flag lots. The following requirements shall be applicable as per described circumstances, and as set out in Appendix A attached to the ordinance codified in this title. 1. The minimum street frontage for a single (one) flag lot shall be fifteen (15) feet. 2. The minimum street frontage for two flag lots which are so designed to provide a common vehicular access leg by way of fee, easement or combination thereof, shall be a minimum of three (3) feet of real property street frontage for each flag lot; provided, however, that the total street frontage for the two flag lots shall be a minimum of eighteen (18) feet. Such requirement may be achieved by a combined contribution of individual lot street frontage which equals the required access driveway width. 3. The minimum street frontage for three flag lots which are so designed to provide a common vehicular access leg by way of fee, easement or combination thereof, shall be a minimum of three (3) feet of real property street frontage for each flag lot; provided, however, that the total street frontage for the three flag lots shall be a minimum of twenty-six (26) feet. Such requirement may be achieved by a combined contribution of individual lot street frontage which equals the required access driveway. 4 4. The minimum street frontage width for non-flag lot (conventional) parcels which face a public street, regardless of the number of flag lots in the development, shall be fifty (50) feet as prescribed in Section 17.16.090. 5. The street frontage access width may be increased beyond those requirements contained within this subsection, based on the recommendations or requirements of the City Engineer or Fire Department. I. Driveway. The interior lot driveway requirements shall be the same dimensions and shall occur under the same circumstances as contained within the subsection H of this section. J. Application and Procedural Provisions Pertaining to Flag Lot Developments. 1. The requirements contained within this subsection shall only apply in conjunction with the consideration of a division of land which contains a flag lot. 2. A site plan, drawn to scale, which accurately depicts all proposed structures and required setbacks and vehicle driveways, shall be submitted in conjunction with any application for a division of land which contains a flag lot. The site plan will become a permanent formal record of reference within the city's subdivision files after the approval or denial of such plan. The surrounding areas and land uses shall be shown for a distance of at least three hundred (300) feet. 3. The Planning Commission will review the merits of each flag lot proposal in relationship to the immediate property and the surrounding area. 4. Vehicle access easements for reciprocal use or otherwise shall be shown on the tentative maps, together with a statement identifying which lots are subservient and which lots are to benefit from such easements. 5. Should the Planning Commission choose to approve a subdivision of land, reasonable conditions related to on- and off-site improvements may be required. Such conditions may include, but not be limited to, the following: a. Where three or more lots are created by a subdivision, all utilities shall be placed underground; b. Correct all building code violations that exist on the remaining structures; C. Correct all zoning violations; 5 d. Parcel maps splits are required to install street improvements; e. Residential driveway pavement requirements for two lot divisions are two inches of AC over three-inch base material crushed aggregate; all other divisions are four inches of AC over four-inch base material crushed aggregate, or six inches of concrete; f. New fencing and/or walls may be required along existing and proposed property lines; g. Where vehicle access easements are to be used, a covenant shall be prepared by the applicant for review and approval of the City Attorney. The covenant shall assure that private common driveways shall be continually maintained and that cost associated with such maintenance shall be equally shared by all future property owners, whose properties benefit within the division, and shall include the following provisions: i. They shall have the right to cause such repair to be accomplished, and to place liens on the involved properties, if in the estimation of the City Engineer, the subject common driveway has reached a state of disrepair which renders it a hazard, unsightly, or a public nuisance; and that the property owners involved have failed to act within a responsible period, thirty (30) days, after notification. ii. No parking shall be allowed within the private common driveway obtained by easement and signs restricting same shall be posted at conspicuous locations. The ability to cite violations of such parking restrictions shall be granted to the city. K. Public Hearing. A public hearing is required to be conducted on all divisions of land. This requirement applies to the creation of flag lots. The public will be notified in the manner prescribed by state and local regulations. L. Necessary Findings for Approval. The Planning Commission may approve the platting of flag lots where all of the following conditions are found to exist: 1. That the design is justified by topographic conditions or the size and shape of the property prohibits conventional lot division practices; 2. That proposed flag lot division is not so at variance with the existing neighborhood pattern or development as to create detrimental visual or privacy impacts. 6 M. Effective Date of Order Granting or Denying the Platting of Flag Lots-Time for Appeal. The resolution of the Planning Commission granting or denying the platting of flag lots shall become effective and final on the fourteenth day following its adoption unless within such period of time, an appeal in writing is filed with the City Clerk by the applicant or any other interested person. Any such appeal shall be accepted by the City Council. The timely filing of an appeal shall stay the effective date of the Planning Commission's resolution pending action by the City Council N. Attached to the ordinance codified in this title, and incorporated herein by this reference, is that certain document entitled "Appendix A-Rosemead Municipal Code-Flag Lot Development," which contains drawings that depict typical flag lot measurements and layouts. SECTION 5. The Planning Commission HEREBY RECOMMENDS TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL of Municipal Code Amendment 10-05, revising standards for flag lot developments within the City of Rosemead. SECTION 6. This resolution is the result of an action taken by the Planning Commission on July 19, 2010 by the following vote: YES: ALARCON, ENG, HERRERA, HUNTER, AND RUIZ NO: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE SECTION 7. The secretary shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall transmit copies of same to the applicant and the Rosemead City Clerk. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 19th day of July, 2010. William Alarcon, Chairman 7 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a resolution adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemead at its regular meeting, held on 19th day of July, 2010, by the following vote: YES: ALARCON, ENG, HERRERA, HUNTER, AND RUIZ NO: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE i Stan Wong, cretary 8 APPENDIX "A" ROSEMEAD MUNICIPAL CODE LOT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS: SECTION 17.04.020 - LOT DEPTH I wl zl w J I Z I J H 1 Z ~O LOT DEPTH LINE i o MID-POINT 0 ~ I w I 0 I FRONT LOT LINE ACCESS LEG ACCESS LEG STREET R/W ACCESS LEG I I w I LOT DEPTH LINE FRONT LOT LINE z J - I MID-POINT z I I I O z D ACCESS LEG ~ I z i rI O OJi a a q, o I o i " Q~ I I oi. Er i I R/W NOT TO SCALE DATE APPROVED CITY OF ROSEMEAD STANDARD LOT DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. DIRECTOR of COMMUNITY LOT DEPTH REQUIREMENTS P-5 DEVELOPMENT APPENDIX "A" ROSEMEAD MUNICIPAL CODE FLAG LOT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS: SECTION 17.16.140 (8); (C), (D) & (E) - YARDS REAR YARD r______ i I Ip I is SIDE YARD r I ~I STRUCTURE I wl / FRONTI REAR STRUCTURE YARD I YARD L__ J I _____l 4$° SIDE YARD ACCESS LEG 15' 15' ACCESS LEG STREET R/W 15' ACCESS LEG 15' ACCESS LEG FRONT YARD FRONT YARD r_______________ r I I pl Ip I I ~I I~ I of ,o L'.li STRUCTURE <I I< w <i I< wj STRUCTURE Iw _ol I p I~ L------_-_______ REAR YARD J L__ J REAR YARD NOT TO SCALE NOTE: THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY ESTABLISH THE MOST APPROPRIATE LOT ORIENTATION FOR CONSISTENCY WITH NEIGHBORHOOD PATTERNS AND TO MINIMIZE VISION OR PRIVACY IMPACTS DATE APPROVED CITY OF ROSEMEAD STANDARD FLAG LOT DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO.. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY YARD REQUIREMENTS - ALTERNATES P-6 DEVELOPMENT APPENDIX "A" ROSEMEAD MUNICIPAL CODE FLAG LOT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS: SECTION 17.16.140 (E) & (G) - LOT AREA & WIDTH TWO LOT SUBDIVISION THREE LOT SUBDIVISION - FOUR LOT SUBDIVISION 65' 68' 76' 2 3 4 FLAG LOT FLAG LOT FLAG LOT v 6000 SO. FT. 6000 SO. FT. 6000 SQ. FT. I~ GROSS GROSS GROSS I 5000 SQ. FT. 5000 SQ. FT. I 5000 SQ. FT. NET NET NET ACCESS LEG 15' ACCESS LEG & EASEMENT 'I V MIN •I V I& EASEMENT I Z H~ I N~ 3 1 vi w 2 FLAG LOT o CONVENTIONAL a FLAG LOT o < w ° 1 1 ° 6000 SO. FT. a LOT o a,w ,6000 SQ. FT. ; GROSS 6000 SO. FT. GROSS 5000 SO. FT. I NET ,5000 SO. FT. I NET NET I ACCESS LEG ACCESS LEG & EASEMENT 50' MIN. & EASEMENT 2 - J z STREET 1 w w FLAG LOT o V N O -47 R/W CONVENTIONAL < w 6000 S0. FT. LOT o ' GROSS 6000 SO. FT. 5000 SQ. FT. 18' MIN. NET NET 3' MIN. 3' MIN. Access LEG 50 MIN. & EASEMENT STREET 1 R/W CONVENTIONAL 26' MIN. LOT ° _ N 3' MIN. 6000 SO. FT. NET 3' MIN. 3' MIN. ~50' MIN. STREET NOT TO SCALE -RAW NOTE: GROSS LOT AREA INCLUDES THE ACCESS LEG NET LOT AREA EXCLUDES THE ACCESS LEG AND/OR EASEMENT DATE APPROVED CITY OF ROSEMEAD STANDARD FLAG LOT DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY LOT AREA & WIDTH REQUIREMENTS P-7 DEVELOPMENT