Loading...
CC - 12-17-85 - Adjourned MeetingCITAPPROVED Y OF ROSEAIEAD DATE - a P _206 MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED MEETING ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 17, 1985 AT 8:30 P. M. The Adjourned Meeting of the Rosemead City Council was called to order by Mayor Tury at 8:30 p. m., in the Conference Room of City Hall, 8838 E. Valley Blvd., Rosemead, California. The Pledge to the Flag was led by Councilman Taylor.- The Invocation was delivered by Councilman Cleveland. ROLL CALL OF OFFICERS: Present: Councilmen Bruesch, Cleveland, Imperial, Taylor and Mayor Tury Absent: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES: DECEMBER 10, 1985 - REGULAR MEETING MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN BRUESCH that the Minutes of the City Council Meeting of December 10, 1985 be approved. Vote resulted: UPON ROLL CALL ALL COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT VOTED AYE. The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. 1. ORDINANCE NO. 585 - MORATORIUM ON BILLIARD PARLORS Frank G. Tripepi, City Manager, stated that this ordinance is being presented in order to see what licensing procedures could_be-changed or perhaps, upgraded to assist in the licensing of billiard parlors. He recommended that an urgency ordinance be adopted so that the two pending license applications for billiard halls can be put on hold, so that they can be licensed in a tighter fashion with better controls. Mayor Tury stated that he had no objection to getting better controls on billiard parlors, however, he did not want to abolish pool halls in Rosemead. He did not have a problem with putting a moratorium on billiard parlors, but he did not want the mora- torium extended over and over again. Councilman Taylor stated that he felt that there should be tighter and stricter regulations. Frank G. Tripepi, City Manager, stated that possibly a billiard parlor could be licensed under the Conditional Use Permit process instead of a straight business license process. A list of condi- tions could be attached before a billiard parlor is allowed to open. Mayor Tury stated that would be fine. Councilman Imperial stated that he felt that before any deci- sions are made on whether a certain type of business is desired in this City, a lot of research should be put into this subject. He was in favor of a moratorium immediately, and he felt that the type of element that this business draws should be looked. into by'.checking with other cities and see what elements are drawn by them. Councilman Bruesch stated that in the past the owners ran a clean place, and people were playing pinocle or shooting pool. He did not want to see that type of operation disallowed. Mayor Tury again reiterated his feelings that he did not oppose the moratorium ordinance as it was presented; however, he did not want an ordinance that would be extended over and over again until that kind of business is eliminated in the City. He felt that playing pool can be a.wholesome sport. CM 12-17-85 Page N1 1 Councilman Imperial requested that the Sheriff's Department check with the Santa Ana Police Department regarding billiard parlors and he felt that much of the police problems have stemmed from this type of establishment. Commissioner Bruesch inquired of Robert Kress, City Attorney, if he would be working on a new ordinance to replace the one in effect now. Robert Kress, City Attorney, stated that it would be difficult at best to come up with regulations that would prevent these pro- blems again since these are people problems and really does not have to do with a specific business. Commissioner Bruesch requested conditions such as visibility, lighting and loitering be placed in an ordinance to have better control. The-following Ordinance No. 585 was presented for adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 585 AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD SUSPENDING SECTIONS 7.18.010 THOROUGH 7.18.120 OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY BUSINESS LICENSE ORDINANCE AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD AND ESTABLISHING AN INTERIM PROHIBITION ON THE ESTABLISH- MENT OF BILLIARD ROOMS IN THE CITY MOTION BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CLEVELAND that Ordinance No. 585 be adopted. Vote resulted: UPON ROLL CALL ALL COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT VOTED AYE. The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CLAREMONT-McKENNA TAX LITIGATION Frank G. Tripepi, City Manager, stated that at the City Managers/Administrators Committee of the California Contract Cities Association, one of the items discussed was the dis- tribution of assessments to each City for funding the legal proceedings challenging the constitutionality of California property tax allocation. An allocation of $15,000 was made to the Claremont-McKenna College Center for the Study of Law Structures to perform a study as to the constitutionality of the present method of distribution of property taxes by the County of Los Angeles. That study seems to make an excellent case for challenging present property tax distribution; but in order to do that it is necessary to collect fair share con- tributions from each City. It was decided by the Executive Board that the assessment would be left at $100 per $10,000 needed, with a maximum to be contributed by each City of $3,500 for the establishment of legal funds. This payment could be made in two installments, $1,750 this fiscal year, and $1,750 next fiscal year. The City of Rosemead would stand to gain $1,535,057, if the distribution were re-done, based on equity and according to the study completed. Councilman Bruesch inquired about the status of SB1091. Frank G. Tripepi, City Manager, stated that it was pro- bably going to get a new number, and they were not sure how far to proceed with that particular bill. MOTION BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN BRUESCH that a payment of $3,500 be authorized as our fair share assessment for the Claremont-McKenna Tax Litigation. Vote resulted: UPON ROLL CALL ALL COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT VOTED AYE. The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. CM 12-17-85 Page k2 Councilman Taylor requested a copy of the Claremont-McKenna Study, and he stated that he agreed with the figures and he felt that it was better than SB 1091. 3. DISCUSSION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT COMMERCIAL REVITALIZATION Mayor Tury stated that the entire Community Development Block Grant Program would be discussed starting from the beginning, and go through all the programs. He felt that this could be the way to resolve any of the questions that have been coming up lately. Councilman Bruesch inquired how often the HUD Guidelines change, and requested that when the eligibility requirements do change he would like to have a copy of the changes. Councilman Taylor stated that he also was interested in the HUD Guidelines and requested that they be included in the CDBG booklet of the City of Rosemead. He felt that by including HUD Guidelines, anyone can read through it and know what the current federal.regulations are. Councilman Imperial questioned if anyone had received more than two grants in a one.year period. Jim Guerra stated that only if there was a haz-ardousr: code violation, and time did not permit a change order. Councilman Taylor stated that he felt that the allowable grants should be limited to one grant in the maximum,arnount of $3,500. He stated with two grants per year a qualified. individual can receive as much as $7,000. He requested that the 12 month period be changed to 24 months. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Councilman Bruesch commented that many of the elderly do not have heat in their homes because of the expensiveness of gas, and he wondered why there wasn't caulking and weather- stripping done more frequently in the handyman projects than they are now instead of facade improvements. Mayor Tury stated that could possibly be stressed as a policy. Jim Guerra stated that the weather-stripping is done when new windows or doors are installed. Mayor Tury stated that he understood that it was the con- census of the Council that there was something wrong with the commercial rebate program, and inquired what could be done to resolve whatever problems there are. Councilman Taylor commented that he had noted that anyone could qualify for this rebate program. Jim Guerra stated that the City has targeted areas within the City that qualify, basically, they are the main arteries, Valley, Garvey and San Gabriel. He stated that Walnut Grove and certain portions of Rosemead Boulevard and Del Mar are left out. Mayor Tury stated that for practical purposes the majority of the commercial property is eligible property. Councilman Taylor stated that on page 15 it says "see attached map", and there is no map included. Frank G. Tripepi, City Manager, stated that the map will be placed in the book. Councilman Taylor stated that his basic question was that there was no restriction either on the individual or the property. CM 12-17-85 Page #3 l.~ LJ Councilman Bruesch commented about the fact that a lease holder on a commercial property could solicit funds; however, a renter of residential property cannot. Jim Guerra stated that the lease holder is well recognized in business standards as a viable person who can enter into an arrangement encumbering his business under that lease, whereas, a renter of residential property cannot encumber the property. Councilman Taylor stated that he felt that there was a dis- parity in the policy when a millionaire commercial landlord can receive funds from the rebate program and a poor owner of a run- down residential unit cannot. Mayor Tury stated that the City is not only trying to help the owner of property to improve his property, but are trying to increase the sales tax revenue of this City, and the visual image of this City. Councilman~Bruesch stated that' he has always felt that absentee landlords were businessmen, and he could not understand why a per- son who owns three or four pieces of residential property in this City and rents them out cannot be considered a business and apply for commercial assistance under this program. He stated that in the rehabilitation program there have been apartment houses and duplexes that the Appeals Board is going after, and he wished that the owners could apply to improve the appearance of his bus- iness. Mayor Tury stated that this was aimed at the commercial busi- nesses in the City. Frank•G. Tripepi, City Manager, stated that this program is a partnership between the City and the business districts, and in return for that partnership, the City gets added sales tax dollars. If the Council decides that they want to expand that partnership to include residential landlords, they can do that. Councilman Bruesch stated that he felt that there should be some way that an absentee landlord can get assistance to improve his property. Mayor Tury stated that there were two things that bothered him in the program. He wanted to see a tie-in that on parking lot improvements that some committment be made to upgrade the building visually. Mark Fullerton stated that item 7 on page 21 could have added "shall be done only in conjuction with facade improvements" Councilman Bruesch inquired about grandfathered-in signs, and inquired if a statement could be added to reflect that if there are code violations regarding old signs that they must be abated in order to receive loans. Mark Fullerton stated that if they are approached for assis- tance, an inspection is made to see what their needs are and that includes code violations, parking lots, signs or new facade. A package is prepared to assist them with their immediate needs and what they can do with their own financing. Mayor Tury stated that the program really boils down to philosophies, and he felt that the health of this program and the on-going success of this program really depends on the philo- sophy of the majority of this Council. Some thing can be changed; however, the general program cannot be changed. Councilman Taylor stated that he was correct as far as the difference of philosophy, and his philosophy is spending the taxpayer's money proportionately. He wanted to spread the money back to all the taxpayers and that everyone would get a fair shot at getting a portion of it. His problem with the program is the disparity of some of the programs. He realized that it did take more money to improve commercial property. CM 12-17-85 Page #4 0 0 Councilman Taylor stated that he felt that a clarification should be made on page 3, item D-l.regarding interior inspections. Jim Guerra stated that the second sentence could read: An interior inspection will be required to determine Code compli- ance except for rebate-.programs. Councilman Taylor also commented on page 16, item D-1, which he felt stated that there would be no interior inspection unless there is interior work done. Jim Guerra stated that was correct, that inspections of all properties are required that are applying under thee,commercial programs. He added that it was not required to go inside the building unless interior work is being done, and he stated that this policy applies to loans and to rebates. Under the residen- tial loans and handyman an interior inspection is required. Councilman Taylor stated that there is a definite distinction that the commercial property is exempt from interior inspection. Jim Guerra stated that was correct. Councilman Taylor inquired why it was required for residen- tial property and not for commercial. Jim Guerra stated that money cannot be lent or invested in residential property even under a grant that has any life safety violations of any kind. There are no similar guidelines on commercial property. Councilman Bruesch inquired why that was the case. Jim Guerra stated the Federal Government has generated guide- lines applying to life-safety, residential property, and there are no guidelines applying to commercial property using the same language. Mayor Tury stated that the Fire Department goes through all commercial buildings annually and checks them out. Jim Guerra stated that there should be a clarification on page 27 similar to clarification made on page 21, item 7, which would tie in parking lots with general facade improvements. Item A-2 on page 27 be changed by adding: "shall be done only in con- junction with facade improvements". Frank G. Tripepi, City Manager, stated that the changes that were reflected at this meeting will be made, and the map will be placed in the booklet and the Federal Guidelines will be included. Mayor Tury inquired if there was anything else to be discussed on the guidelines. Councilman Bruesch stated that he still felt that something should be done for people who do not qualify for these programs but are in dire straights and don't know where to turn for assis- tance. There being no other business to handle, the Council Meeting was adjourned to the next regular meeting on December 24, 1985 at 8:00 p. m. Respectfully submitted: APP VED: City Cl9rk MAYOR CM 12-17-85 Page #5 APP ROVED .'L CITY O 1 O;?' IEAD I➢ATL MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 10, 1985 AT 8:00 P. M. The Regular Meeting of the Rosemead City Council was called to order by Mayor Tury at 8:00 p. m., in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 8838 E. Valley Blvd., Rosemead, California. The Pledge to the Flag was led by Councilman Bruesch. The Invocation was delivered by Reverend Tom Phillips. ROLL CALL OF OFFICERS: Present: Councilman Bruesch, Cleveland, Imperial, Taylor, and Mayor Tury Absent: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES: November 26, 1985 - Regular Meeting MOTION BY COUNCILMAN CLEVELAND, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN BRUESCH that the Minutes of the November 26, 1985 Council Meeting be approved. Vote resulted: UPON ROLL CALL ALL COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT VOTED AYE. The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. PRESENTATIONS: BILL OF RIGHTS WEEKS - COAST FEDERAL SAVINGS Mayor Tury presented a proclamation designating December 9th through the 15th as Bill of Rights Week to the representative from Coast Federal Savings, Norma.Fer.r,ales, and she expressed her appreciation to the Council. III. LEGISLATIVE A. RESOLUTION NO. 85-55 - CLAIMS & DEMANDS RESOLUTION NO. 85-55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS & DEMANDS IN THE SUM OF $230,384.25 NUMBERED 9711-9724/15403 THROUGH 15515 INCLUSIVELY MOTION BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR that Resolution No. 85-55 be adopted. Vote resulted: UPON ROLL CALL ALL COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT VOTED AYE. The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. B. RESOLUTION NO. 85-56 - CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD APRIL 8, 1985 RESOLUTION NO. 85-56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD CALIFORNIA CALLING & GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 1986 FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF SAID CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES MOTION BY COUNCILMAN CLEVELAND, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN BRUESCH that Resolution No. 85-56 be adopted. Vote resulted: UPON ROLL CALL ALL COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT VOTED AYE. The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. C. RESOLUTION NO. 85-57 - REQUESTING SPECIFIED SERVICES BY THE L. A. COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RELATING TO GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD APRIL 8, 1986 CM 12-10-85 Page M1 ~I i • RESOLUTION NO. 85-57 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFROSEMEAD CALIFORNIA REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TO RENDER SPECIFIED SERVICES TO SAID CITY RELATING TO CONDUCT OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY,APRIL 8, 1986 MOTION BY COUNCILMAN CLEVELAND, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL that Resolution No. 85-57 be adopted. Vote resulted: UPON ROLL CALL ALL COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT VOTED AYE. The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. D. RESOLUTION NO. 85-58 - ADOPTION OF REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES' PERTAINING TO MATERIALS AND COSTS OF CAN- DIDATES STATEMENT FOR GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON APRIL 8, 1986 RESOLUTION NO. 85-58 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE, PERTAINING TO MATERIALS SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTORATE AND THE COSTS OF CANDIDATES STATEMENT FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 1986 MOTION BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CLEVELAND that Resolution No. 85-58 be adopted. Vote resulted: UPON ROLL CALL ALL COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT VOTED AYE. The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. E. RESOLUTION NO. 85-59 - DEEP POCKETS INITIATIVE Councilman Bruesch commented that the Resolution did not have a statement of support in it. Robert Kress, City Attorney, stated that a paragraph had been inadvertently left out in the retyping of it, and read into the record the following: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Rosemead hereby supports the Fair Responsibility Act of 1986 and urges the voters of the State to give this measure their serious consideration and support, and change the last paragraph to Section 2. The following Resolution was presented for adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 85-59 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD SUPPORTING THE "DEEP POCKETS INITIATIVE" MOTION BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN BRUESCH that Resolution No. 85-59 be adopted. Vote resulted: UPON ROLL CALL ALL COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT VOTED AYE. The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. Councilman Bruesch requested copies of the petitions. relating to this initiative so that he could circulate them himself. F. RESOLUTION NO. 85-60 - GRANTING CUP AT 9019 GARVEY/TOP HAT Councilman Taylor stated that he had reservations regarding Section 5, (a) and he requested that the hours be changed from 9:00 a.m. to Midnight to 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. He stated that he felt that he could not vote for this item as it is being pre- sented. Mayor Tury stated that he agreed with Councilman Taylor's statement and since he had not been present at the meeting he was surprised that the Council approved the CUP requested. CM 12-10-85 Page #2 i • Councilman Bruesch stated that he was in favor of the approval of the CUP; however, he would agree to a compromise in the time, 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 p. m. on week nights, and 9:00 a. m. to midnight on Friday and Saturday. Councilman Taylor stated that if someone makes that motion he would vote "no" on it. He felt that it was somewhat of a paradox since the neighbors did not want a church in that area and now a beer and wine permit is being issued there. MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECONDED BY MAYOR TURY that Section 5. (a) be amended to read from 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 P.M. Vote resulted: AYES: Councilman Taylor and Mayor Tury NAYES: Councilmen Bruesch, Cleveland, and Imperial ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Whereupon the Mayor declared said motion was not approved. Alternate Motion: MOTION BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN BRUESCH that Section 5 (a) be amended to read from 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday, and 9:00 a.m. to Midnight on Friday and Saturday. Vote resulted: AYES: Councilmen Bruesch, Cleveland, Imperial and Mayor Tury NAYES: Councilman Taylor ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Whereupon the Mayor declared said motion was carried and,!so ordered. The following Resolution was presented for adoption as amended. RESOLUTION NO. 85-60 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85-334 FOR THE SALE OF BEER AND WINE AT 9019 GARVEY AVENUE MOTION BY.COUNCILMAN BRUESCH, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL that Resolution No. 85-60 be adopted as amended. Vote resulted: AYES: Councilmen Bruesch, Cleveland, and Imperial NAYES: Councilman Taylor and Mayor Tury ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Whereupon the Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. Councilman Taylor requested a clarification of Councilman Cleveland's vote. Councilman Cleveland stated that he had voted against the CUP at the last meeting because he felt that is was inconsistent with the General Plan. Mayor Tury stated that he voted for the second amendment be- cause he felt that it was better than the original resolution. Councilman Taylor stated that he had no problem with those explanations; however, he just wanted a clarification. G. RESOLUTION NO. 85-61 - DENYING ZONE CHANGE AT 4433-3921 WALNUT GROVE RESOLUTION NO. 85-61 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD DENYING A REQUESTED ZONE CHANGE AND UPHOLDING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION (4433-44392 WALNUT GROVE AVENUE) MOTION BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN BRUESCH that Resolution No. 85-61 be adopted. Vote resulted: UPON ROLL CALL ALL COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT VOTED AYE. The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. CM 12-10-85 Page #3 0 • H. RESOLUTION NO. 85-62 - APPROVING PARCEL MAP #17240 AT 3037 N. PROSPECT RESOLUTION NO. 85-62 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 17240 AND UPHOLDING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION (3037 PROSPECT AVENUE) MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL that Resolution No. 85-62 be adopted. Vote resulted: UPON ROLL CALL ALL COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT VOTED AYE. The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR (CC-B, CC-G and CC-I Deferred) CC-A APPROVAL OF JOINT USE AGREEMENT/ROSEMEAD HIGH SCHOOL CC-C ACCEPTANCE OF ROAD DEEDS/PINE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CC-D ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM SO. CAL.EDISON/KLINGEP.MAN BRIDGE CC-E AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PLANNING CONFERENCE IN SOLVANG, JANUARY 16-18, 1986 CC-F CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY ON BEHALF OF ADELINA RIVAS CC-H AWARD OF BIDS FOR 18TH HOME HANDYMAN PACKAGE CC-J AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND CONFERENCE OF MAYORS MEETING IN WASHINGTON, D. C., JANUARY 22-24, 1986 MOTION BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CLEVELAND that the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar be approved. Vote resulted: UPON ROLL CALL ALL COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT VOTED AYE. The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. CC-B ACCEPTANCE OF ROAD DEEDS/ANGELUS AVENUE Councilman Taylor requested a clarification on the parcel maps regarding which parcel is being referred to on this item. The number circled is not the same as the parcel numbered in- dicated on the deed. He also felt that addresses could be included to better clarify which parcel is being considered. Councilman Bruesch also agreed that the numbering was more confusing than helpful. Mayor Tury stated that now that staff is aware of what is needed, they would make every effort to do it more clearly. MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN BRUESCH that the Road Deeds for Angelus Avenue be accepted. Vote resulted: UPON ROLL CALL ALL COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT VOTED AYE. The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. CC-G AWARD OF BIDS FOR HOME IMPROVEMENTS/DEFERRED & LOW INTEREST LOANS Councilman Taylor stated that he was opposed to the funding but not the individual. MOTION BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN BRUESCH that the contract be awarded to the low bidder for the home im- provements with deferred and low interest loans. Vote resulted: AYES: Councilmen Bruesch, Cleveland, Imperial, and Mayor Tury NAYES: Councilman Taylor ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Whereupon the Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. CM 12-10-85 Page #4 CC-I. APPROVAL OF MODERN SERVICE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT Frank G. Tripepi, City Manager, stated that a request from Modern Service was received requesting that this item be deferred to the January 28, 1986 Council Meeting. There being no objection, it was so ordered. VII.MATTERS FROM OFFICIALS A. Councilman Taylor requested that a couple of properties on Lafayette be placed on the Rehabilitation Appeals Board Agenda. Frank G. Tripepi, City Manager, stated that it was the Max- field property. Councilman Taylor stated that the addresses are 3418 and 3421 Lafayette. The Council Meeting was adjourned to December 17, 1985 at 8:30 p. m. . Respectfully submitted: 60. ~i-aGl . City Clerk APPROVED: MAYOR CM 12-10-85 Page #5