Loading...
CC - Item 2J - Radar Speed Surveyi • ~ S~~ ~~, /, j ~~ Q o ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL ~.~_ ~' ~ ~~ ~ '. ~~ ~' ' STAFF REPORT ., , , \;';. !~, ~~°~~~~a,~.a, ~~5 TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: OLIVER CHI, CITY MANAGER ~~~"-`+.~-: DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 2008 SUBJECT: RADAR SPEED SURVEY - ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD SUMMARY The California Vehicle Code requires that the City conduct a citywide speed analysis (Radar Speed Survey) of local streets every 7 years in order to allow the use of radar in speed enforcement of local streets. For state-owned highways the City must complete the analysis every 10 years for speed limits to be enforceable. To meet this requirement, staff has coordinated an analysis to evaluate the existing speed zones within the City of Rosemead. Staff Recommendation Staff. recommends that the City Council introduce Ordinance No. 869 establishing the speed limit zones contained in the Rosemead Municipal Code. DISCUSSION The California Vehicle Code (CVC) establishes certain speed limits -based on specific criteria. These are called prima facie speed limits. A blanket speed limit of 15 mph is established on all alleys, blind intersections, and at blind railroad crossings. The 25 mph speed limit may be established under the following conditions: 1) On any business or residential district; 2) At school zones, when children are present, and; 3) In senior zones. The California Department of Transportation requires that the criteria set forth in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) be utilized in the establishment of speed limits. This manual requires that a speed limit should be set at or as close to the 85th percentile of existing speeds as possible. However, the MUTCD allows for certain conditions to warrant lower speeds, if necessary. In reviewing speed zones and making recommendations, staff considers several criteria including the 85th percentile of existing speed conditions, accident history, roadway conditions, pedestrian activity, and speed limits in neighboring jurisdictions. The existing speed zones in the City of Rosemead were approved by the City Council on March 20, 2006. 42 City Street segments were included in the analysis, not Z~ APPROVED FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA: ~ ~ C City Council Meeting November 18, 2008 Page 2 of 2 including Rosemead Blvd. Since Rosemead Blvd. is a state owned highway, the City, has historically completed Radar Speed Surveys every 10 years, as required .by the California Vehicle Code. The City contracted with Willdan, Inc. in July 2007 to complete an updated Radar Speed Survey for Rosemead Blvd. This survey was received by the City on September 29, 2008 and has been reviewed with City staff. There are no recommended speed limit changes within the survey. FINANCIAL REVIEW Funding for this work is included. in the Fiscal Year 2008-09 budget. Pre aced by: Chris Marcarello Deputy Public Works Director Submit by: Brian eki Assistant City Manager Attachments: 1- Ordinance No. 869 2- Rosemead Boulevard Radar Speed Survey 3- 2006 Citywide Radar Speed Survey ORDINANCE NO. 869 AN ORDINANCE. OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, SETTING SPEED LIMITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE .WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code sections 22357 and 22358 authorize local agencies to change speed limits on local streets by ordinance, which ordinance need not be made a part of the Municipal Code but which must be based on findings made in an engineering and traffic survey; and WHEREAS, in 2006, the City's traffic engineering consultant completed a citywide engineering and traffic survey on various streets throughout the :City, which survey was adopted by the City Council on March 20, 2006; and WHEREAS, on September 29, 2008, the City received from Willdan Engineering an engineering and traffic survey on Rosemead Boulevard within the City limits; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt the speed limits suggested by the two. engineering and traffic surveys and, where applicable, to revise .current speed limits to conform to the engineering and traffic surveys so as to regulate traffic in a safe and efficient manner. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Modified Speed Limit for Rosemead Boulevard. Based on the engineering and traffic survey completed by Willdan Engineering for Rosemead Boulevard (State Route 19) in 2007 and transmitted to the City on September 29, 2008, the speed limits for those portions of Rosemead Boulevard are hereby set to conform. to the recommendations made in the Willdan survey, a copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment "A." SECTION 2. Modified Speed L'omit for Other Streets. Based on the engineering and traffic survey completed by the City in 2006 and adopted by the City Council on March 20, 2006, the speed limits for various streets and highways in the City are hereby set to conform to the recommendations made in the City survey, a copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment "B." SECTION 3. Unmodified Speed Limits. With respect to any speed limit for any street or highway in the City not modified by .Section 1 or Section 2, the speed limit in effect prior to the adoption of this ordinance shall remain in effect. SECTION 4. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the 1 LA #4818-9534-5922 v3 provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. SECTION 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. SECTION 6. Notice. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. Within fifteen (15) days after adoption of this Ordinance, this Ordinance shall be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Rosemead. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF , 2008. John Tran, Mayor ATTEST: Gloria Molleda, City Clerk APPROVE AS TO FORM:: City Attorney 2 LA #4818-9539-5922 v3 • • STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF ROSEMEAD ) I, Gloria Molleda, City Clerk of the City of Rosemead, do hereby certify that the _ foregoing Ordinance was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of ~ ,and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Gloria Molleda, City Clerk LA #9852-8983-2963 vl September 29, 2008 Mr. Oliver Chi Interim City Manager City of Rosemead 8838 Valley Boulevard Rosemead, CA 91770 ~~ ~ WI LLDAN Engineering Subject: 2007 Engineering and Traffic Survey on Rosemead Boulevard within Rosemead City Limits Dear Mr. Chi: extending your reach As requested, Willdan has completed an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&T Survey) to justify and update the posted speed limits along three street segments in the City of Rosemead. These segments were last surveyed in April 1997 and require an update to comply with the 10-year limitation set forth in the California Vehicle Code (CVC). The enclosed report has been approved by California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) District 7. A letter from Caltrans is attached. The enclosed report describes the E&T survey procedures and contains recommendations for posted speed limits on Rosemead Boulevard in the City. A summary of these recommendations is included in the Analysis. Supporting documentation for the speed zone recommendation is provided in the Appendices. The report was conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC, following procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated September 2006 and as required by Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code. The report is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 40802 of the CVC to enable the continued use of radar for traffic speed enforcement. We appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of Rosemead and the assistance and cooperation afforded to us during the course of this study. Very truly yours, WILL AN Vanes Munoz, T.E. Traffic ngineer Enclosure /c,SA l~j~j~O~G X0.2344 !6 ~ !o •3D . r~Ra~E~> JL:Iss (06160) 16760/0307/L01 Engineering ~ Geotechnical ~ Environmental ~ Financial ~ Homeland Security 562.908.6200 1800.499.4484 I fax: 562.695.2120 I 13191 Crossroads Parkway North, Suite 405, City of Industry, CA 91746-3443 I www.willdan.com \. • ST4TE OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS~SPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY ~ ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER. Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 7 100 S. Main Street, Suite 100, MS-15 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Phone: (213) 897-0362 Flexyoarpower.~ Fax: (213) 897-0360 Be energy effrcient! TTY: (213) 897-4937 September 24; 2008 Mr. Jeff Lau Traffic Engineer WILLDAN 13191 Crossroads Parkway North, Suite 405 Industry, CA 1746 Dear Mr. Lau: Subject: Rosemead Boulevard Engineering and Traffic Survey We have reviewed the Engineering and Traffic Survey conducted on Rosemead Boulevard from 200' north of De Adalene Street to Rudell Railroad Underpass. Based on the information provided in the report, the Department concurs with the recommended speed limit of 40 mph within the study limits. Concurrent with the submittal of the approved Engineering and Traffic Survey to the appropriate enforcement agency, it is important to convey the need to review the criteria under California Vehicle Code (CVC), Section 40802, Subdivision (c), and make sure that all provisions are met. Failure to have the documented training or radar/laser equipment calibration certification could mean that the electronic enforcement of speed along this highway segment will not be legally enforceable. The Department kindly requests a copy of the subject survey for our records. Thank you for the opportunity to review the report. If you have any questions, please contact Patricia Shaw at (213) 897-0223. Sincerely, .YO Office of °Caltrans improves mobility across California" • • BACKGROUND This Speed Zone Survey was conducted for the City of Rosemead on Rosemead Boulevard (Route 164) between De Adalene Street and the Rudell Railroad Under Pass. The purpose of this survey was to update the previous Speed Zone Survey that was completed back on April 7, 1997 and has since expired. II. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT They City of Rosemead and Caltrans are the only jurisdictions involved in this study section. III. EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Area Rosemead Boulevard between De Adalene Street and the north city limits of Rosemead is an urban area with a mix of shopping centers and small mixed-use developments, office, retail, restaurant and commercial areas, and single and multi- family residential areas situated on relatively flat terrain. B. Type of Facility Rosemead Boulevard, from De Adalene Street to Rudell Railroad Under Pass is a 4-lane highway with raised median islands for its entire length. From Mission Drive to Lower Azusa Avenue, there are 3 northbound lanes and 2 southbound lanes. C. Traffic The highway carries a mix of residential, commercial, commuter, and recreational traffic. 2007 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) Postmile Location AADT 6.040 - 6.115 200' north of De Adalene St. to 100' north of Ralph St. 53,852 6.115 - 6.380 100' north of Ralph St. to 400' south of Mission Dr. 50,739 6.380 - 6.880 400' south of Mission Dr. to Rudell Railroad U.P. 50,719 • • D. Existing Speed Zone Location 200' north of De Adalene St. to 100' north of Ralph St. 100' north of Ralph St. to 400' south of Mission Dr 400' south of Mission Dr. to Rudell Railroad U.P. E. Accident Rate Postmile Speed 6.040 - 6.115 40 MPH 6.115 - 6.380 40 MPH 6.380 - 6.880 40 MPH The three-year (1/1/2004 to 12/31/2006) accident rates were obtained from Caltrans' Table B -Selective Accident Rate Calculation data that was provided to the City. The accident rates for the segments surveyed compared to the statewide average accident rates for similar type highways are as follows: Postmile Section Actual* Average* 6.040 - 6.115 0.82 2.10 6.115 - 6.380 2.36 2.10 6.380 - 6.880 2.18 2.10 *Accidents per million vehicle-mile F. Enforcement Jurisdiction The City of Rosemead contracts the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department for traffic and law enforcement. G. Speed Zone Field Data Speed checks were taken on July 10, 2007. The results are noted in Table 1. The radar equipment used to collect speed measurements for this survey was a Genesis VersaPak Hand-Held traffic Radar manufactured by Decatur Electronics, of Decatur, Illinois. The calibration of the unit was checked before each series of measurements were taken. Tests of the unit were conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. The Genesis VersaPak Hand Held Traffic Radar was last calibrated on October 5, 2006 by R.H. F., Inc. IV. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS From 200' north of De Adalene Street (PM 6.040) to 100' north of Ralph Street (PM 6.115), the critical speed is 42 mph and would justify a 40 mph posted speed limit per Section 26.13 of the California MUTCD. The actual accident rate for this section of • • highway is 0.82 accidents per million vehicle mile, which is below the expected accident rate of 2.10 accidents per million vehicle mile for a similar type highway. It is recommended to keep the existing posted speed limit of 40 mph. From 100' north of Ralph Street (PM 6.115) to 400' south of Mission Drive (PM 6.380), the critical speed is 39 mph and would justify a 40 mph posted speed limit per Section 26.13 of the California MUTCD. The actual accident rate for this section of highway is 2.36 accidents per million vehicle mile (MVM), which has decreased from 3.52 accidents per MVM since the last Engineering and Traffic Survey was conducted in 1997. Although the actual accident rate is higher than the expected accident rate of 2.10 accidents per million vehicle mile for a similar type highway, the difference between the two rates is not significant. It is therefore recommended to keep the existing posted speed limit of 40 mph. From 400' south of Mission Drive (PM 6.380) to Rudell Railroad U.P. (PM 6.880), the critical speed is 42 mph and would justify a 40 mph posted speed limit per Section 26.13 of the California MUTCD. The actual accident rate for this section of highway is 2.18 accidents per million vehicle mile (MVM), which has decreased from 3.52 accidents per MVM since the last Engineering and Traffic Survey was conducted in 1997. Although the actual accident rate is higher than the expected accident rate of 2.10 accidents per million vehicle mile for a similar type highway, the difference between the two rates is not significant. It is therefore recommended to keep the existing posted speed limit of 40 mph. • • APPENDIX A Radar Data • CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street Rosemead Boulevard Date 7/10/2007 50th Limits 200' N/O De Adalene to 100' N/O Ralph Begin 11:00 End 11:23 85th Surveyed at 3830 Rosemead Blvd. Weather Clear 10MPH Direction North & South Recorded by Jeffrey Lau % in Pace 38 MPH 42 MPH 32 41 81% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percenta e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% O 1 1% 100.0% 0 0% 99.1 0 0% 99.1 0 0% 99.1 50 X 1 1 % 99.1 x 1 1 % 98.1 O 1 1 % 97.2% x O 2 2% 96.2% p 1 1 % 94.3% 45 x 1 1 % 93.4% 0 0% 92.5% x O O X O 5 5% 92.5% X O X O 4 4% 87.7% O O X x X 0 0 0 8 8% 84.0% 40 X x O O x X O 7 7% 76.4% O O X X X X O O O O O X O X O 15 14% 69.8% x O X o O X X O X o 0 0 X X 14 13% 55.7% O O O X O X 0 0 0 9 8% 42.5% X x x O X O x 7 7% 34.0% 35 x O X O x O X x x 9 8% 27.4% X O O X X 5 5% 18.9% x X O O X X 6 6% 14.2% x x O O x x 6 6% 8.5% O 1 1 % 2.8% 30 x x 2 2% 1.9% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 25 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X -North bound 0 -South Bound Total Observed 106 100 CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street Rosemead Boulevard Date 7/10/2007 50th Limits 100' N/O Ralph to 400' S/O Mission Begin 11:30 End 11:54 85th Surveyed at 4020 Rosemead Blvd. Weather Clear 10MPH Direction North & South Recorded by Jeffrey Lau % in Pace 34 MPH 39 MPH 31 40 77% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% X X 2 2% 100.0% X X O 3 3% 98.2% x O O X 4 4% 95.5% 40 X X O O X O O X 8 7% 91.8% X X x O X x 6 5% 84.5% X O X 3 3% 79.1 0 0 0 x O x 6 5% 76.4% x O X x O O x O 8 7% 70.9% 35 x O X o O X O O x X X O 12 11 % 63.6% X X O X X O X O x O O X 12 11 % 52.7% X x X O x O O X O O x O 12 11% 41.8% x X O o O X O X x x 0 11 10% 30.9% X O O X X O O 7 6% 20.9% 30 X X O O O O X 7 6% 14.5% O X x 0 4 4% 8.2% X O O 3 3% 4.5% O X 2 2% 1.8% 0 0% 0.0% 25 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X -North bound 0 -South Bound Total Observed 110 100 ' ® • CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street Rosemead Boulevard Date 7/10/2007 Limits 400' S/O Mission to Rudell U.P. Begin 1:28 End _ Surveyed at 4500 Rosemead Blvd. Weather Clear Direction North & South Recorded by Jeffrey Lau 50th % 38 MPH 85th % 42 MPH 10MPH 34 43 in Pace 74% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES ~ 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 X 1 1 % 100.0% 0 0% 99.1 0 1 1 % 99.1 X O 2 2% 98.3% x X O 3 3% 96.6% 45 X X 2 2% 94.0% X O O 3 3% 92.3% X X X X X O 6 5% 89.7% x X X x 0 0 0 7 6% 84.6% X X X X X X X O O 9 8% 78.6% 40 x X x X x x o 0 0 0 10 9% 70.9% X x X X 0 0 0 0 8 7% 62.4% X X X X X O O O O 9 8% 55.6% X X X X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 9% 47.9% X X x X X 0 0 0 0 9 8% 38.5% 35 X X X X 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 9% 30.8% x X 0 0 0 0 0 7 6% 22.2% x x x O o 0 6 5% 16.2% X 0 0 0 0 5 4% 11.1% x 0 0 0 4 3% 6.8% 30 O O 2 2% 3.4% X X 2 2% 1.7% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 25 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 ~ 0 0% 0.0% X -North bound 0 -South Bound Total Observed 117 100 2:14 ~ ~ APPENDIX B Traffic Counts . Volumes for: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 City: Rosemead Project #: 07-2347-001 Location: Rosemead Blvd btwn Adalena St & Ratph St 00:00 96 64 12:00 412 402 00:15 62 36 12:15 463 381 00:30 72 27 12:30 438 452 00:45 60 290 14 141 431 12:45 416 1729 478 1713 3442 01:00 40 41 13:00 389 481 01:15 39 46 13:15 415 405 01:30 49 46 13:30 407 414 01:45 42 170 26 159 329 13:45 404 1615 413 1713 3328 02:00 46 44 14:00 348 439 02:15 36 23 14:15 373 397 02:30 24 39 14:30 317 408 02:45 34 140 42 148 288 14:45 380 1418 392 1636 3054 03:00 39 23 15:00 388 430 03:15 28 21 15:15 376 435 03:30 31 20 15:30 380 424 03:45 42 140 25 89 229 15:45 472 1616 420 1709 3325 04:00 30 36 16:00 396 424 04:15 27 43 16:15 462 399 04:30 29 69 16:30 436 427 04:45 63 149 100 248 397 16:45 516 1810 410 1660 3470 05:00 67 114 17:00 470 436 05:15 71 130 17:15 497 413 05:30 112 187 17:30 488 416 05:45 146 396 219 650 1046 17:45 484 1939 426 1691 3630 06:00 182 233 18:00 460 397 06:15 197 247 18:15 454 413 06:30 288 265 18:30 491 376 06:45 285 952 295 1040 1992 18:45 472 1877 334 1520 3397 07:00 316 371 19:00 425 332 07:15 362 410 19:15 385 292 07:30 424 463 19:30 370 304 07:45 386 1488 456 1700 3188 19:45 330 1510 302 1230 2740 08:00 362 406 20:00 315 332 08:15 408 445 20:15 329 298 08:30 398 390 20:30 284 261 08:45 415 1583 428 1669 3252 20:45 316 1244 265 1156 2400 09:00 354 413 21:00 313 277 09:15 373 404 21:15 339 326 09:30 336 405 21:30 276 268 09:45 416 1479 395 1617 3096 21:45 281 1209 210 1081 2290 10:00 385 400 22:00 246 269 10:15 340 389 22:15 235 204 10:30 347 344 22:30 205 166 10:45 373 1445 372 1505 2950 22:45 183 869 153 792 1661 11:00 371 330 23:00 132 139 11:15 370 321 23:15 179 98 11:30 367 350 23:30 137 114 11:45 432 1540 393 1394 2934 23:45 107 555 77 428 983 Total Vol. 9772 10360 20132 17391 16329 33720 AM Daily Totals NB SB EB WB Combined 27163 26689 53852 PM Split % 48 5% 515% 37.4% 51.6% - 48.4% 62.6% Peak HOUr 11:45 07:30 11:45 16:45 12:30 16:45 Volume 1745 1770 3373 1971 1816 3646 P.H.F. 0.94 0.96 0.95 0.96 0.94 0.98 . Volumes for: Wednesday, July il, 2007 City: Rosemead Project #: 07-2347-002 Location: Rosemead Blvd btwn Ralph St & Mission Dr 00:00 90 62 12:00 381 374 00:15 58 36 12:15 413 369 00:30 64 24 12:30 457 413 00:45 63 275 15 137 412 12:45 355 1606 447 1603 3209 01:00 36 39 13:00 385 433 01:15 36 44 13:15 389 395 01:30 48 43 13:30 403 388 01:45 39 159 26 152 311 13:45 348 1525 386 1602 3127 02:00 43 43 14:00 374 400 02:15 31 23 14:15 331 376 02:30 22 33 14:30 319 391 02:45 34 130 41 140 270 14:45 348._ 1372 374 1541 2913 03:00 36 21 15:00 380 390 03:15 27 19 15:15 348 407 03:30 29 22 15:30 383 393 03:45 41 133 21 83 216 15:45 416 1527 396 1586 3113 04:00 29 38 16:00 404 392 04:15 27 40 16:15 407 395 04:30 28 65 16:30 438 401 04:45 60 144 97 240 384 16:45 447 1696__396 1584 3280 05:00 65 113 17:00 446 404 05:15 71 114 17:15 442 398 05:30 121 183 17:30 451 376 05:45 137 394 196 606 1000 17:45 449 1788 387 1565 3353 06:00 180 204 18:00 459 371 06:15 190 231 18:15 400 390 06:30 273 248 18:30 476 345 06:45 298 941 269 952 1893 18:45 414 1749 339 1445 3194 07:00 287 365 19:00 435 322 07:15 368 368 19:15 339 290 07:30 417 425 19:30 374 282 07:45 377 1449 388 1546 2995 19:45 297 1445 295 1189 2634 08:00 358 380 20:00 335 306 08:15 373 395 20:15 291 292 08:30 386 368 20:30 274 244 08:45 376 1493 405 1548 3041 20:45 289 1189 269 1111 2300 09:00 360 377 21:00 313 256 09:15 328 368 21:15 289 321 09:30 323 384 21:30 272 246 09:45 389 1400 367 1496 2896 21:45 270 1144 217 1040 2184 10:00 364 380 22:00 239 252 10:15 335 357 22:15 224 200 10:30 304 325 22:30 184 162 10:45 372 1375 335 1397 2772 22:45 177 824 145 759 1583 11:00 326 302 23:00 139 134 11:15 362 300 23:15 164 99 11:30 352 310 23:30 130 110 11:45 399 1439 362 1274 2713 23:45 98 531 72 415 946 Total Vol. 9332 9571 18903 AM PM 16396 15440 Daily Totals NB SB EB WB Combined 25728 25011 50739 31836 Split % 49 4% 50.6% 37.3% 51.5% 48.5% 6Z.7% Peak Hour 11:45 07:30 11:45 17:15 12:30 16:30 Volume 1650 1588 3168 1801 1688 3372 P.H.F. 0.90 0.93 0.91 0.99 0.94 0.99 1 , , r Volumes fo r: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 City: Rosemead Project #: 07-2347-003 Location: AM Period Rose NB mead Blvd SB btwn Mission Dr & EB W RR Tracks B PM Period NB SB EB WB 00:00 85 65 12:00 373 429 00:15 96 59 12:15 326 382 00:30 75 41 12:30 395 452 00:45 61 317 36 201 518 12:45 387 1481 446 1709 3190 01:00 52 35 13:00 339 459 01:15 33 48 13:15 350 372 01:30 40 42 13:30 356 394 01:45 38 163 25 150 313 13:45 329 1374 385 1610 2984 02:00 42 33 14:00 353 390 02:15 31 31 14:15 352 392 02:30 21 33 14:30 317 403 02:45 33 127 38 135 262 14:45 364. 1386 382 1567 2953 03:00 31 18 15:00 343 426 03:15 30 20 15:15 346 378 03:30 25 18 15:30 365 400 03:45 28 114 22 78 192 15:45 419. 1473 409 1613 3086 04:00 29 27 16:00 371 357 04:15 26 43 16:15 376 378 04:30 24 62 16:30 421 456 04:45 50 129 93 225 354 16:45 422 1590 430 1621 3211 05:00 52 90 17:00 443 444 05:15 56 119 17:15 444 434 05:30 90 167 17:30 459 439 05:45 130 328 240 616 944 17:45 429 1775 417 1734 3509 06:00 167 247 18:00 432 428 06:15 150 245 18:15 422 398 06:30 219 282 18:30 425 372 06:45 231 767 297 1071 1838 18:45 409 1688 338 1536 3224 07:00 246 443 19:00 418 361 07:15 304 425 19:15 376 334 07:30 373 391 19:30 371 306 07:45 363 1286 409 1668 2954 19:45 319 1484 312 1313 2797 08:00 320 405 20:00 352 304 08:15 328 413 20:15 283 309 08:30 332 400 20:30 299 266 08:45 313 1293 441 1659 2952 20:45 309 1243 274 1153 2396 09:00 305 451 21:00 297 296 09:15 267 438 21:15 290 287 09:30 299 420 21:30 308 247 09:45 346 1217 427 1736 2953 21:45 255 1150 255 1085 2235 10:00 337 375 22:00 221 259 10:15 305 365 22:15 218 180 10:30 275 384 22:30 172 160 10:45 331 1248 352 1476 2724 22:45 170 781 143 742 1523 11:00 339 338 23:00 145 120 11:15 314 314 23:15 155 106 11:30 307 351 23:30 117 104 11:45 337 1297 383 1386 2683 23:45 93 510 84 414 924 Total Vol. 8286 10401 18687 15935 16097 32032 Daily Totals NB SB EB WB Combined 24221 26498 50719 AM PM Split % 44 3% 55.7% 36.8% 49.7% 50.3% 63.2% Peak Hour 11:45 08:45 11:45 17:00 16:30 16:45 Volume 1431 -1750 3077 1775 1764 3515 P.H.F. 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.98 0.97 0.98 V V LDAN 13191 Crossroads Parkway North, Suite 405 Industry, California 91746-3497 Serving Public Agencies 562/908-6200 tax 562/695-2120 www.willdan.com March 7, 2006 Mr. Andy Lazarretto City Manager City of Rosemead 8838 Valley Boulevard Rosemead, CA 91770 ~~ Subject: 2006 Engineering and Traffic Survey Dear Mr. Lazarretto: As requested, Willdan has completed an Engineering and Traffic Survey to justify and update the posted speed limits along 42 street segments in the City of Rosemead. These segments were last surveyed in July 1999,. and require an update to complywith the 7-year limitation set forth in the California Vehicle Code (CVC). ~ We are pleased to submit the enclosed Report that describes the E&T survey procedures and contains recommendations for posted speed limits on the 42 selected street segments in the City. A summary of these recommendations is included in the Analysis. Supporting documentation for each speed zone recommendation is provided in the Appendices. The Report was conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC, following procedures outlined in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) dated 2003, the MUTCD California Supplement dated May 2004 and as required by Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code.. The Report is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 40802 of the CVC to enable the continued use of radar. for traffic speed enforcement. We appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of Rosemead and the assistance and cooperation afforded to us during the course of this study. Very truly yours, WILLD N ~- ES Q~ ~gSA ~j~ ~~ o QROF S/ONgI ~ ~ ~ 'yO ~ ~~ c~ -~ N ~ ~`v~ ~~gSA M~ti E c; JP ~ ' Vane a Munoz P.E,T.E. , ~ No. 67563 ~. ~ No 2341 Traffic Engineer ~r ~•6'~•~~ * . ~ Exp.b•~•06 ~~ EZ:jmk (06-160) 15707/0307/R01 ~'9 CM1. ~eP ~~CAUF~ cS' T C, x ~~ ~y~ ~ A FE \ ~~ F C A1- l • ,~ TABLE OF CONTENTS 1- Page ...................... ....................... ..... .... 1-2 INTRODUCTION .................................... Elements of the Engineering and Traffic Survey .....:................:...................:....... 2-3 SURVEY CONDITIONS ...................::..................................................................... 4 Survey Locations .....................................................:.........................:.................. 4 Data Collection ..............:............:..........:.........................:...:................................ 4 Speed Data ................:...............................::..................................................... 4 Collision Data .......................................................:............................................ 4 Field Review Data ..........................................:.....................:.......:.............:...... 5 ANALYSIS ......................................................................................:........:.............. 6 Criteria ................................................................................................:.....:........... 6 Results and Recommendations ........:.:....................................::.....:..................... 6-7 Table 1-Summary of Recommendations .....................................................:........ 8-10 ........... 11 16 Segments with Special Conditions :..........:................................................. - ~ LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES ..................: ............... 17 Applicable Sections of California Vehicle Code .................................... .. 17-22 APPENDIX A -Segment Data heets Street Segment S Radar Speed Distribution Forms APPENDIX B -Collision Rates APPENDIX C -Survey Equipment Used 1 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rosemead 1 • ~ ~- INTRODUCTION This Engineering and Traffic Survey is intended to be the basis for the establishment, ~, revision, and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of Rosemead. This Engineering and Traffic Survey presents. recommended speed limits for'42 street segments in the City of Rosemead. Engineering and Traffic Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on local streets and to enforce ,~ those limits using radar or other speed measuring. devices. These surveys must be updated every 5, 7 or 10 years to ensure the speeds reflect current conditions as dictated by the California Vehicle Code (CVC).The CVC ,also requires that the surveys be ~' conducted based on the methodology required by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) dated 2003 and the MUTCD California Supplement dated May 2004. ^ The survey was requested by the City for the proper posting of speed limits and to enable the Sheriff's Department to utilize radar or other electronic speed measuring devices for speed enforcement.. CVC Sections 40801 and 40802 require Engineering and Traffic Surveys that verify the prima facie speed limit before enforcement by such a device is legal.. The law further specifies that these surveys be conducted every 5 years. The surveys can be extended to 7 years provided the City's police officer(s) have completed a 24-hour radar operator course [CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(I)J. Additionally, some surveys may be extended to 10 years if a traffic engineer certifies that no changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred [CVC 40802 (c)(2)(B)(i)(II)]. These provisions assure that posted speed limits are kept reasonably current. The Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City were conducted in accordance with procedures outlined in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) dated 2003; the MUTCD California Supplement dated May 2004 and as required by Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code. The Code further describes three elements of an engineering and traffic survey: 1. Measurement of prevailing speed; 2. Accident history; and 3. Roadway characteristics not readily apparent to the motorist. Posted speed- limits are established primarily to protect the general public from the reckless and unpredictable behavior of dangerous drivers. They provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method to identify and apprehend violators of the basic speed law (CVC ' Section 22350). This law states "No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard. for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers _ the safety of persons or property." The posted speed limit gives motorists a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions. Engineering and Traffic Survey 1 City of Rosemead .. 1 1 ~` ,1~` 1 1 1 • • The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority-of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and therefore,. the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on these fundamentals conform. to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgment of one or a few individuals. A radar speed study is usually used to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers. Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, accident history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics, and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits. Speed limit changes are usually made in coordination with physical changes in roadway conditions or roadside developments. Unusually short zones of less than one-half mile in length should be avoided to reduce driver confusion. Additionally, it is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal. flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement. ELEMENTS OF THE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) dated 2003 and the MUTCD California Supplement dated .May 2004 .specifies the -methodology to. be used for completing Engineering and Traffic Surveys. This methodology includes an evaluation of current vehicle speeds, accident history and conditions not readily apparent to motorists. The basic elements of the Engineering and Traffic Survey are discussed in more detail as follows: Speed Sampling Existing vehicle speeds are surveyed by a certified radar operator with a calibrated radar unit in an unmarked vehicle. Speed samples are taken for each segment representing a statistically significant sample of current traffic. This data is then evaluated to identify the distribution of speeds. A key element in the evaluation is the identification of the 85th percentile speed. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic travels. This threshold represents what. is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions. Therefore, a "basic speed limit" is established at the nearest 5-mile per hour (mph) increment to the 85th percentile speed. For example, if the 85th percentile speed is 48 mph, the basic speed limit is 50 mph. If the 85th percentile speed is 47 mph, the basic speed limit is 45 mph. Engineering and Traffic Survey. 2 City of Rosemead t • • ~' Collision History Reported collisions are reviewed for-each street segment to determine if there is a higher than average rate of collisions. A segment that has an above-average collision rate typically suggests conditions that are not readily apparent to motorists. ~ A:, summary of the collision rates for the 42 surveyed street segments is provided in Appendix B. '~ Conditions Not Readil A arent To Motorists Y PP Each street segment is field inspected to identify roadway conditions that may not be readily apparent to motorists. A determination is made whether any conditions are significant and warrant the recommendation of the speed limit 5 mph or more below the ,~ basic speed limit. It is important to note that the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) dated 2003 and. the MUTCD California Supplement dated May 2004 recommends exercising great care when establishing speed limits 5 mph or more below ~~ the basic speed limit. 1 1 1 ,~ Engineering and Traffic Survey 3 City of Rosemead ~ • • SURVEY CONDITIONS SURVEY LOCATIONS The procedures described below describe the criteria and methods used to survey selected streets within the City of Rosemead. The specific location of the radar speed survey for ~ each street segment was selected after considering the following: 1. Minimum stop sign and traffic signal influence. 2. Minimum visibility restrictions. 3. Non-congested traffic flow away from intersections and driveways. ,_ 4. Minimum influence from curves or other roadway conditions that would affect the normal operation of a vehicle.. DATA COLLECTION Data of existing conditions was obtained including prevailing speed of vehicles, traffic collisions, visibility restrictions, and roadway conditions within the community. Speed data and field reviews were conducted at 42 locations during the. months of November. and December 2005 Speed Data Radar speed measurements were conducted at 42 locations during November and '~ December 2005. All surveys were conducted in good weather conditions, during off-peak hours on weekdays. The radar unit was operated from an unmarked vehicle to minimize any influence on driver behavior. Typically, a minimum sample size of 100 vehicles or the '~ total .samples during a maximum period of 2 hours were obtained for each segment. Traffic speeds in both directions were recorded. for individual segments and separate surveys were made for. divided roadways. ~ Collision Data `, Collision data was obtained from the City's SWITRS electronic collision database obtained from the Temple City Sheriff's station (responsible for the City of Rosemead). For this study, collision data was used from the latest 3 years of reported accidents from ~,, September 1, 2002 to September 1, 2005.. The collision rates for the 42 segments are expressed in accidents per million vehicle miles (A/MVM). To calculate these rates, 24- hour traffic volumes were collected for each street segment. This information was then ,~ entered into the following formula to determine the collision rate: _ Ax1,000,000 R rx365 days xlxv year ,~ Engineering and Traffic Survey 4 City of Rosemead 0 t 1 1 1 • • A =Number of midblock collisions over time period R =Collision Rate (accidents/million vehicle miles) t =Time. Period Covered (in years) / =Length of Segment (miles) v =Traffic Volume (average-daily traffic) The segment collision rate was then compared to the average statewide collision rate. The average statewide collision rate was obtained from the 2002 Collision Data on California State Highways. Field Review Data A field review was conducted for each of the selected street segments in the City with consideration for the following factors: 1. Street width and alignment (design speed); 2. Pedestrian activity and traffic flow characteristics; 3. Number of lanes and other channelization and striping patterns; 4. Frequency of intersections, driveways, and on-street parking; 5. Location of stop signs and other regulatory traffic control devices; 6. Visibility obstructions; 7. Land use and proximity to schools; 8. Pedestrian and bicycle usage; 9. .Uniformity with existing. speed zones and those in adjacent jurisdictions; and 10. Any other unusual condition not readily apparent to the driver. . Engineering and Traffic Survey 5 City of Rosemead ~ • • ~~` ~ ~ ANALYSIS CRITERIA Survey data was compiled and analyzed to determine the recommended speed limit in accordance with several criteria contained in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) dated 2003 and the MUTCD California Supplement dated May 2004.. Some of the criteria used are: A. The critical speed or 85th percentile speed is that speed at or below which 85 -~ percent of the traffic is moving. This speed is the baseline value in determining what the majority of drivers believe is safe and reasonable. Speed limits set higher ~~ than the critical speed are not considered reasonable and safe. Speed limits set lower than the critical speed make a large number of reasonable drivers "unlawful," and do not facilitate the orderly flow of traffic. The "basic speed limit" is the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed. B. The 10 mile per hour (mph) pace speed is the 10 mph increment that contains the highest percentage of vehicles. It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds across the range of the samples surveyed. An accepted practice is to keep the speed limit within the 10 mph pace while considering the critical speed and other factors that might require a speed lower than the critical speed. C. The collision rate for each street segment is compared to average collision rates that can. be reasonably expected to occur on streets and highways in other jurisdictions, in proportion to the volume of traffic per lane mile. These average collision rates have been developed by the State of California and are considered reasonable for use in the City of Rosemead. RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ~' The Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms, presented in Appendix A, illustrate results of a thorough evaluation of the available data and recommend a speed limit for each street segment surveyed. A complete summary of all recommendations is shown in Table 1. In each case, the recommended speed limit was consistent with the prevailing behavior as demonstrated by the radar speed measurements. Typically; a speed limit-in-the upper range of the 10-mile pace was selected unless an collision rate significantly higher than expected was discovered or roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver were identified. Any segments with recommended speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit are fully explained later in this report. The Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC), has ' made it clear that physical conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other r Engineering and Tragic Survey 6 City of Rosemead ~ ~ • ~' factors, would not be the basis for special downward speed zoning. In these cases, the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350) is sufficient to regulate .such conditions. '~ The recommendations contained in this Report are intended to establish prima facie speed limits. They are not intended to be absolute for all prevailing conditions. All prima facie speed violations are actually violations of the basic speed law (Section 22350 of California Vehicle Code). This statute states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is safe having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions. A prima facie limit is intended to establish a maximum safe speed under normal conditions. Table 1 summarizes the recommendations for all surveyed segments. ~~ The osted s eed limits on the 42 street se ments surve ed are recommended to p P 9 Y .remain unchanged. r 1 1 1 1 Engineering and Traffic Survey 7 City of Rosemead 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • ',, x t x r _ r = r x r x r E ^ , F o0 QO 00 W a0 QO ' '- ~ O O O. O O O =? ~Y__ w w W w w w ~ ,~. {~;? W ~ W W W W W • s • s « a s ' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a a ~: ~ c n c n ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. i n ' O O O O O O ...~ J J J j ,~ • • 1'' i ~y ~~~ ~' ,. ~ } ~ ~' ` J L `' F~ q 1 i ~ ~ u ~- _ M N O O O N N ~ in ~ l!7 ~ O N . ` `~t M M M M M M M M O ~"~ o~. ~ M O M O M M i i s ~ ~ , ~- r ~ ~ ' I ~' x ~ - ~ '~ F .'.w i ~-~ • 8 ~~~ , ~ N o0 N O N N N aO Q~ OO rn cO M ~ r ~ M M ~ M M M M M M M M M. M M 5 ~ ; }= ( _ ' ~ ~ + ' M N O ~ O M O M N N ~ ~ M ~ M ~ M t!7 M ~ M O M N 0 ~ ~ O ~~ ~ ' M M M M # , t~ `qtr. ~ 2. _ ` + ~ ~ ; . h' ' Y ~ ~"~, y' ` Q ~ Z Q m o0 ~ .~ ,kr w W a ~ J ai w J O ~ m O w `'~ ~` ~ `` ~ ~ z g z w w ~ '4 w ~ w g ~ z w > `' c n > ~ a z F- zz ~ r J Q O Q Q r dw ` Q W O W Q O W ~ Q ( > ~ Q Q W ~ > ~ Q C~ 4 ~,~ F, W U 2 ~ H (n J n i.: ~ i \ 7, 1 ~~ r, W. <;y Y~. k- ~ W W 1- W J W W W ~ Q ~.. ~ m W w ? w ? o > J w O ~ . w w ~ w ~ ~ ' - F" Q ¢ Q z ~ z ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ z ¢- ~ y T ~ ~ w (n ~ ~ v> > z V ~ m ~ w O ~ to r~ ~~~ W > > Q ~ W Q O ~ ~ O ZZ ~ Q ~ ` .~~. O Q Z W ~ W Q ~ ~ j r~ ~ ~ O Q C7 > O z ~ ~ W o Q c~ ~ ~ Q 2 U W Z 1 C~ $ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ W W W W. ~ ~ 1 - q - 1 L ~ ~' ~ ~ U Z ~ ~ ~ ~ W Z Z ~ v„ x- ,4 ~ Q ~ Q O Z Z Q Q Q Q Q ; Q Q W Q Q. Z Z j~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ Q ~ ~=:' W Q Q ~ W W W W D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z Q J J Q' J W U ~ W' ~' ~ Q' J U ( W W W Q J ~ Z Q Q Q Q ~ W - ~; D D O W W W W C~ U` C7 U' C7 2 ~ ~ y i ~ ~ r r ~ r- v .i v 0 A y C 7 ~ ~ ~ ~. 0 ~ u co 1 C ~~ L '> U ~ ~ ur n~ )~ ~ N II ``^^ VI U ~ ~~ ~ O c ~U .~ a~i .~ W 1 1 1 1 l ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ a o - O O O O O , ` ' r w w w w w ' s ~ s ~ s ~ s e s ~ + ~ s ~ °' ~ U U U U U -o Z Z Z Z Z - W W W W W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ,F .; U U U U U 1~ ? t. ` `M ~ .~~ ,; ° ~ M N ~ M N Ln M ~ M O ~' O ~ N N ~ M O M N ~ M ~r'~.=~ - ~ p ~ O M 0 ~ O M O M ?- . ~~ ~~r Y a- 4 . -}~r . ~_ 6 ' .~ '- ~. .~ ,. O N 0 ~ 0 ~ M ~ ' N O N ~ i ~= ~~ ¢ M ~ M M M M ~ ~f ~ M M M M M - ~i ' ~ r ~ N ~ N ~ Lf) O O N N to O N ~ ; ~ ;~~ ,a- M ~ M ~ M c'~ ~ tt O O M M ~ M r-~. ~ ~ ~ M ~ M M 7-" ~~~ ~ ; - } ~ { ~ Y,G ~ ~ W W W ~~ i c~ _ ~_ Z W ~ O ~ m ~ Q O ~ m ~ Z = W W 0 ~ 0 ;'~ J Q (~ Q W ~ C7 Q J > Q Z J O `~ U ~ W W } ~ } ~;vl _, ~ Z ~ Z Z ~ W Q H Q 2 ~ Z Z ~ W J O Z W ~ Q J J '~ (/) w U w Q W Q fn ~ 0' _ O Q W Q ~ ~ J > ~ Q Q > J > d' w ~ ~ ~ c~ c7 _ _ F- ~ m 0 W ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ W W W ~ ~ J ~ J W ~ J ~ Z W ~ Z ~~~ V Q W W Q H Q W W ~ 1"_ ~ H Q W J Q Q ~ ~ ~ Q ?' , W W U W fn Lll = } W 1 ~ N J W (n ~ F- . Z W (n ~ Q Q W Z ~ , H ~ ~ Q ~ Q ~ _ W ~ Q ~ Q ~ ~ C7 ~Q O C7 O W W W W W j U t ` Z Z i ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ > > > Q ~ p ¢ a ~ N c n J c n J c n J v i J ~ ~ 0 J Z m O ~ ~ d Z Z Z Q ~ Z Z ~ s ~ ~ 2 ~ 2 ~ 2 ~ 2 ~ O O O U Q O p = W _~ p p Q Q Q Q ~ ~ cii ~ w Q O ~ ~ J J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z Q' ~ ~ . ~ to O ~ O O O s- N M ~ ~ cD t~ 00 I r i- ~- ~ r' N N N N N N N N N .~+ c E 0 `o C 0 U N C D ~, c _~ N ~ ~ ~ Q O ~ v ~ 2 ~ ~ U D L ~ L ~~ » ~ U N Q II s a~i coo m ~ N U ~ W ~ ~ O a .~ ~U .~ i N N >; W 1 1 1 r i 1 1 1 l ~ • ~, ~_: x x ~ ~ 4` a a 0' ~ - ~ f 4. r ~.. ~ . F ~_'J Z Z 1 ~ . ! . ~+ } cc G c G { - ~~ # # ~ # W ~ W # # # # # # f # f ~ " ~ `: r r f -` ~ >_ Z Z ,, /^~ ~ /^~ F T W W ~~ rt j ~ ~ ~ ' ~; - O O ;,,, ~ = r ' 'i` ~ ~ ~i 1t'Y~ ~^v _~ ~' 1 fc ~ ~ ~.~ 4 ~` ~. } ~ # ~ # ~ # ~ ~ a ~~-" `` N O O O O ~ ~ ~ O N O O • O ^ ~, s r ~. N ~Y' ~' R ~ M M ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~t ~ ~ FL i _ 11 1 Z L ° ~~ ~ 01 M ~ ~ ~' ~ V o0 ~ N N M O ~ g- i 1 m ,_;. >- r 1 x t.~._~. " a ' . ~ ~ Y. °~ ~ ~ ~ O O O O to to to O O O O O ~' ~ ~ ~ M M ~ 'ct ~ ~ ~ ~ • .. ° O iC ~r ` - ~ sg~p ~,, 1 ' ~ ~ ..~~ -~ F f 6 I; 4 V L, - ~ .. ciy =r 0 , , ~ r .k '~ w ~ ~ _ ~ p w w w F- f ,~ t- o~ w > F- p Z ~ > J > > p Z ~ J e < ~ t ~ LWU Z W ~ j ...i } m Z W f- W . Z W uJ > > p J } 5 y ' ~ S I _4 $. ~ /y 1 L ~ ~ Q /y Q m ~_ 7 . L r ' L ~ V ~ w LL ~ ~ V w Q C~ ~ } Q } ~ J ~ ,~ r A r , W Q> J w ~ Q ! ~ w J Q ~ O fn O ~ ~ (n p ~ Q J w J Q ~ O x, z f ' p r ~ ~ ,. ~ .. H Z W _' W ~- f- W W ~ W Q' ~ W H m p W W w > Q > J J J Q' ~ Q m ~ ,~ ~ C7 w c7 ~ w O Z Q J ~' = O Z p Q w J O ~ > a > ~' ~ ~ ~ ca v i ~ C~ O U ~ c ~ C~ _ ~ , `~j ~~ N J J J J J ` ~~ k - r °' W W W W W W . ,. ... m m m m m > > > > > > ~' , ~ ~ w J J L ~ } p p 0 O O O O O j .F w w _W _W ~ 1- J ~ C~ C~ U' C7 C~ C~ s F- m m m w. W m m ~W ~W ~W ~W ~W ~W - (n Q Q Q ~- ?- ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ a d J J JZ JZ JZ ZZ JZ JZ „ -`_ ~ Q Q Q w w Q Q Q> Q> Q> Q> Q> Q> ,~ ~, ~ c4 cn . - cn F- ~ > > ~Q ~Q ~Q ~Q ~Q ~Q i :?r O O r N M ~ ~ CO I~ 00 O O ' r- N I ' N M M M M M M M M M M ~i ~ V -~+ C 0 0 C O U C ~..~ .= c n m ~ a~i ~° a~ n ~' ~~ 3 ~ ~ ~ C L a~ 3 O ~ a nE y~ N ~u # # ~~ ~~ ~ ~ U_ ~ 0 a :.?, ~U .~ ^~ .'^ W O 1 fl 1 1 1 1 SEGMENTS WITH SPECIAL CONDITIONS The following segments surveyed had recommended speed limits that were 5 miles per hour (mph) or more below the critical speed due to conditions not readily apparent to the driver. Each segment is discussed below. Segment #2 -Del Mar Avenue.- Graves Avenue to Garvey Avenue This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction south of Wasola Street and 1 through lane in each direction north of Wasola Street with an ADT of 16,595 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and within the vicinity of a school. The critical speed is 38 mph and would normally justify a 40 -mph posted speed limit. However, due to various hidden driveways, merging lanes, moderate pedestrian traffic, and an uncontrolled school crossing that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons. In addition, 25 mph school zones are recommended per Section 22352 of the California Vehicle Code. Segment #8 -Garvey Avenue -West City Limit to Del Mar Avenue .This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 26,874 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is heavily commercial. The critical speed is 38 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to the various hidden driveways, heavy curb parking, and moderate truck traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons. Segment #9 -Garvey Avenue -Del Mar Avenue to San Gabriel Boulevard This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 26,980 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is heavily commercial. The critical speed is 39 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to the various hidden driveways, heavy curb parking, and moderate truck traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons. Segment #10 -Garvey Avenue -San Gabriel Boulevard to Walnut Grove Avenue This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 27;431 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is heavily commercial. The critical speed is 38 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to the various hidden driveways, heavy curb parking, moderate truck traffic, and moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons. Segment #11 -Garvey Avenue -Walnut Grove Avenue to East City Limit This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 28,277 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is heavily commercial. The critical speed is 39 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to the various hidden driveways, heavy curb parking, and moderate.truck traffic that Engineering and Traffic Survey 11 Cify of Rosemead • of iliar drivers and to maintain a consistent s eed limit with the may not be apparent to u am p adjacent segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons. Segment #12 -Grand. Avenue -Charlotte Avenue to Rosemead Boulevard. This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with an ADT of 3,487 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and commercial. The critical speed is 38 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to the various hidden driveways, horizontal curve, and high left turn volumes without left turn lanes that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons. Segment #13 -Hellman Avenue -New Avenue to Walnut Grove Avenue `~ This segment is currently posted at 30 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with an ADT of 4,946 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and commercial. The critical speed is 33 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, due to the various hidden driveways, high left turn volumes without left turn lanes, and a vertical curve that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 30 mph for the above ~ reasons. Segment #14 -Jackson Avenue -.Graves Avenue to Garvey Avenue This segment is currently posted at 30 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with an ADT of 3,315 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and within the vicinity of a school. The critical speed is 35 mph and would normally justify a .35 mph 1 posted speed limit. However, due to the various hidden driveways, moderate pedestrian traffic, and a vertical curve that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudenf. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 30 mph for the above reasons. In addition, 25 mph school zones are recommended per Section 22352 of the California Vehicle Code. ' Segment #15 -Loftus Street -Temple City Boulevard to East City Limit This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 14,283 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential. The critical speed is 39 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to the posted speed in the adjacent agency, various hidden driveways, and a vertical curve that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers and to maintain a consistent speed limit with the adjacent segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons. I Segment #17 -Marshall Street -Delta Avenue to Walnut Grove Avenue This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with an ADT of 6,030 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential: The critical speed is 38 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However to maintain a consistent speed limit with the adjacent segments and due to various hidden driveways, and high left turn volumes without left turn lanes that may not be apparent to unfamiliar Engineering and Traffic Survey 1 12 City of Rosemead ~ • • drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons. Se ment #18 -Marshall Street -Walnut Grove Avenue to Rosemead Boulevard g This segment is currently posted at 30 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with ' an ADT of 9,337 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and within the vicinity of a school. The critical -speed is 34 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, due to the various hidden driveways, horizontal curve and high left turn volumes without left turn lanes that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons. In addition, 25 mph school zones are recommended per Section 22352 ,~ of the California Vehicle Code.. Segment #19 -Marshall Street -Rosemead Boulevard to Hart Avenue This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 11,515 vehicles per day. The adjacert land use is residential. The critical speed is 38 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However to maintain a consistent speed limit with the adjacent segments and due to various hidden driveways, high collision rate, and variation of street width that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons. Segment #21 -Mission Drive -West City Limit to Walnut Grove Avenue This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 16,015 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential. The critical speed is 43 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However to maintain a consistent speed limit with the adjacent segments and due to various hidden driveways, high left turn volumes without left turn lanes, and uncontrolled crosswalks that may not be ~~ apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons. ' Segment #22 -Mission Drive -Walnut Grove Avenue to Rosemead Boulevard This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 17,175 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential. The critical speed is 44 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However to maintain a consistent speed limit with the adjacent segments and due to various hidden driveways, high left turn volumes without left turn lanes, and an uncontrolled crosswalk that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the-above reasons. ' Segment #23 -Mission Drive -Rosemead Boulevard to Valley Boulevard This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 12,857 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential, commercial, and within the vicinity of a school: The critical speed is 44 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit.. However, to maintain a consistent speed limit with the adjacent segments and due to various hidden driveways, horizontal curve, high left turn volumes without left turn lanes, and an uncontrolled crosswalk, that may note be apparent to Engineering and Traffic Survey 13 City of Rosemead 1 1 u i [7 1 ~ • unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons. In addition, 25 mph school zones .are recommended per Section 22352 of the California Vehicle Code. Segment #25 -New Avenue -Graves Avenue to Garvey Avenue This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction with are ADT of 8,725 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is multi-family residential and some commercial. The- critical speed is 38 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to the various hidden driveways, heavy curb parking and a vertical curve that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons. Segment #27 -Rio Hondo Avenue -Olney Street to Valley Boulevard This segment is currently posted at 30 mph and has 1 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 7,906 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and within the vicinity of a school: The critical speed is 35 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, due to various hidden driveways and the occurrence of vertical and horizontal curves that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 30 mph for the above reasons. In addition, 25 mph school zones are recommended per Section 22352 of the California Vehicle Code. ' Segment #29 -Rush Street -San Gabriel Boulevard to Walnut Grove Avenue This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 8,929 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and within the vicinity of a school. The critical speed is 44 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, due to various hidden driveways,. a vertical curve, and moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed -limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons. In addition, 25 mph school zones are recommended per Section 22352 of the California Vehicle Code. 1 1 1 Segment #30 -San Gabriel Boulevard -South City Limit to Delta Street This segment is currently posted at 45 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 20,521 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and commercial. The critical speed is 48 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit. .. __ ..However o. maintain a consistent speed. limit with the adjacent segments and due to the moderate truck traffic and horizontal curve that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reasons. In addition, 25 mph school zones are recommended per Section 22352 of the California Vehicle Code. Segment #31 -San Gabriel Boulevard -Rush Street to Garvey Avenue. This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through. lanes in each direction with an ADT of 24,022 vehicles per day.. The adjacent land use is commercial. The critical speed is 44 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However to maintain a consistent speed limit with the adjacent segments and. due to various hidden Engineering and Traffic Survey 14 City of Rosemead ~ • • driveways, vertical curve, and heavy curb parking that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons. Segment #34 -Temple City Boulevard -Valley Boulevard to North City Limits This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with a;n ADT of 19,880-vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and commercial. The critical speed is 43 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However to maintain a consistent speed limit with the adjacent segments and due to various hidden driveways and moderate truck traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons. Segment #35 -Valley Boulevard -Charlotte Avenue to Rosemead Boulevard r This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 29,289 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is commercial. The critical speed is 40 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However to maintain a consistent speed limit with the adjacent segments and due to moderate pedestrian activity and various hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 ' mph for the above reasons. Segment #36 -Valley Boulevard -Rosemead Boulevard to Strang Avenue This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 26,357 vehicles. per day. The adjacent land use is commercial. The critical speed is 41 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted .speed limit. However, due to .the adjacent segment posted speed limit, various hidden driveways, and moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is ~ prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons. Segment #37 -Walnut Grove Avenue -San Gabriel Boulevard to Rush Street This segment is currently posted at 45 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 17,241 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is commercial and fronted by a golf course and university. The critical speed is 49 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit. However, due to the adjacent posted speed limit, steep vertical curve, and moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is pru_d_ent.__It_is_reco_m_ m_en__d_ed t__hat the speed limit remain at 45 mph for the above reasons. Segment #38 -Walnut Grove Avenue -Rush Street to Garvey Avenue This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 16,253 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential. The critical speed is 43 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, due to the various hidden driveways and heavy curb parking that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons. Engineering and Traffic Survey 15 City of Rosemead ~ • • ' Segment #39 -Walnut Grove Avenue -Garvey Avenue to Hellman Avenue .This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 25,495 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and within the vicinity of a school. The critical speed is 44 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph _ posted speed limit. However to maintain a consistent speed limit with the adjacent segments and due to various hidden driveways, and moderate pedestrian traffic that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons. In addition, 25 mph school zones are recommended per Section 22352 of the California Vehicle .Code. Segment #40 -Walnut Grove Avenue -Hellman Avenue to Valley Boulevard This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 23,293 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential and commercial. ' The critical speed is 45 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However to maintain a consistent speed limit with the adjacent segments and due to various hidden driveways, and both vertical and horizontal curves that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons. Segment #41 -Walnut Grove Avenue -Valley Boulevard to Mission Boulevard This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 18,561 vehicles per day. The adjacent land use is residential. The critical speed is 44 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However to maintain a consistent speed limit with the adjacent segments and due to various hidden driveways, and high left turn volumes without left turn lanes that may not be apparent to unfamiliar ' drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons. Segment #42 -Walnut Grove Avenue -Mission Boulevard to North City Limit This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 14,061 vehicles per day. The adjacenYland use is residential. The critical speed is 45 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However to maintain a consistent speed limit with the adjacent segments and due to various hidden driveways, and horizontal curves that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the, above reasons. Engineering and Traffic Survey 16 City of Rosemead 1 t i 1 ® • LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTION 1. Section 627 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read: Section 627. (a) "Engineering and traffic survey, "as used in this code; means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities. (b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following: (1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Accident records: (3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily, apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following: (1) Residential density. (2) Pedestrian and bicyclist safety. Basic Speed Law 22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having 'due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. Speed Law Violations ' Section 22351. (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is. lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law. (b) The-speed of any vehicle upon a-highway-in<excess of the prima facie-speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing. Prima Facie Speed Limits Section 22352. (a) The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof: 1 Engineering and Traffic Survey 17 City of Rosemead (1) Fifteen mph A) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the ' approach to the crossing the driver does not have clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or ., mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car. B) When traversing any intersection of highways, if during the last 100 feet of his approach to the intersection, the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection ' for a distance of 100 feet along all such highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals. C) On any alley. (2) Twenty-five mph A) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code. (B) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the ' highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign. For purposes of this subparagraph, standard "SCHOOL" warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds. (C) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard "SENIOR" warning sign. A local authority is not required to erect any sign pursuant to this paragraph until donations from private sources covering those costs are received and the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may, however, utilize any other funds available to it to ' pay for the erection of those signs. (3) Thirty-five miles per hour on any highway, other than a state highway, in any moderate density residential district, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 22352.1, when posted with a sign giving notice of that speed limit, unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code. (applies to Town of Apple Valley only) Increase of Local Limits Section 22357. (a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey ' that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour (mph) would facilitate the orderly movement of Engineering and Traffic Survey 18 City of Rosemead vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe u on any street other than a state P highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 mph, the local authority may by ' ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55 or 60 mph or a maximum speed limit of 65 mph, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an ~, engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25 mph prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing ' a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens. (b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366. 1 If over 55 mph Maximum Speed for Designated Vehicles ' Section 22406. (a) No person may drive any of the following vehicles on a highway at a speed in excess of 55 mph: (1) A motortruck or truck tractor having three or more axles or any motortruck or truck tractor drawing any other vehicle. (2) A passenger vehicle or bus drawing any other vehicle. (3) A school bus transporting any school pupil. (4) A farm labor vehicle when transporting passengers. (5) A vehicle transporting explosives. . (6) A trailer bus, as defined in Section 636. t (b) Any person who operates a commercial motor vehicle, as defined in Section 15210, upon a highway at a speed exceeding a maximum speed limit established under this code by 15 mph or more, is guilty of a misdemeanor. A violation of this subdivision shall be considered a "serious traffic violation," as defined in subdivision (i) of Section 15210, and shall be subject to the sanctions provided under Section 15306 or 15308, in addition to any other penalty provided by law. Downward Speed Zoning Section 22358.5. It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface - conditions,-or-any other-condition-readily-apparent to a driver, in the absence of.otherfactors, would. ' not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is .sufficient regulation as to such conditions. Boundary Line Streets Section 22359. With respect to boundary .line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have Engineering and Traffic Survey 19 City of Rosemead ~ • • ' approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions. 1 i~ Speedtrap Prohibition Section 40801. No peace officer or other person shall use a speedtrap in arresting, oi• participating or assisting in the arrest. of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speedtrap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code.' ' Speedtrap Section 40802. ' (a) A "speedtrap" is either of the following: (1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries ' marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357; 22358, or 22358.3, ' if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within. 5 years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving object. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone. (b)(1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is defined by the latest functional usage ' and federal-aid system maps submitted to the federal Highway Administration, except that when these maps have not been submitted, or when the street or road is not shown on the maps, a "local. street or road" means a street or road that primarily provides access to ' abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:.. (A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet. (B) Not more than one-half mile of a uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control devices as defined in Section 445. ' (C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction: (2) For purposes of this section School Zone means that area of road contiguous to a school building or the grounds thereof, and on which is posted a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school wither during school hours or during the noon recess period. (c)(1) When all the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable: Engineering and Traffic Survey 2p City of Rosemead ~ • • (A) When radar is used; the officer issuing the citation has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training: (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving ~ ' objects, the officer issuing the notice to appear has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than 2 hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards ' and Training. (C)(i) The prosecution proved that the officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B)and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in .accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, priorto the officer issuing the notice to appear, the officer establish that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D). (ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the condition present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406. (D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the 3 years priorto the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility. ' " " (2) A speedtrap is either of the following: ' (A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (B)(i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed.limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, priorto the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects: - --- - (I) ---Except as-specified in subclause (II), 7 years. - (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than 7 years priorto the date of the alleged violation, and a registered. engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic condition have occurred including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 10 years. (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone. 1 Engineering and Traffic Survey 21 City of Rosemead • speedtrap Evidence Section 40803. . (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speedtrap. ' (b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speedtrap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802. (c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within 5 years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802 shall ' constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speedtrap as defined in paragraph (2) subdivision (a) of Section 40802. Engineering and Traffic Survey 22 City of Rosemead n i ~~ I n 1 1 • CITY OF ROSEMEAD Di ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET DE ADELENA STREET CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006_.- FROM ROSEMEAD BLVD '~Q ELLIS LANE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/3/2005 Posted Speed Limit 30 mph Time of Speed Survey 1:OOPM Speed Justification 50th Percentile.Speed (Mean Speed) __30.- mph CLOSEST T0.85TH 85th Percentile Speed 32 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 26-35 Recommended Speed Limit 30 mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 91 Number of Survey Samples 47 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 4 Annual Collision Rate 1.333 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 4.439 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 1,112 Date Counted 11%8/2005 Number of Lanes TWO LANES,UNSTRIPED Type of Traffic Control STOP @ELLIS, ROSEMEAD BLVD, RIO HONDO Crosswalks? C~ ALL STOPS Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES -RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.740 miles Width 40 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, MOST ON SOUTH SIDE Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL field Study By JA Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). 3 7 TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz ate State Registration Number u 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CITY OF ROSEM EAD 0 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET DEL MAR AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006 FROM GRAVES AVENUE TQ GARVEY AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/3/2005 Posted Speed. Limit 35/25** mph Time of Speed Survey 9:OOAM Speed Justification 50th. Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 35 mph HIDDEN DWYS.,CHG. IN LNS, PEDS, 85th Percentile Speed 38 mph SCHOOL XWALK 10 mph Pace Speed 30-39 Recommended Speed Limit 35/25** mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace- 85 Number of Survey Samples 121 COLLISION HISTORY . Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 5 Annual Collision Rate 1.667 accidents/year . Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.550 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 16,595 Date Counted 11/10/2005 Number of Lanes 4 LANES-UNDIV., 2 LANES UNDIV. N. OF WASOLA Type of Traffic Control T.S. C~3 GRAVES, GARVEY Crosswalks? C~3 ALL T.S. ,HIGHCLIFF Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.500 miles Width 64 feet Vertical Curve? SLIGHT Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions FAIR Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL ,SCHOOL Field Study By ST Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of alifornia as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). -' 3 7 f p(o TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz _ Date State Registration Number • CITY OF ROSEMEAD ~ e ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET DEL MAR AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE - 3/7/2oos . FROM, GARVEY AVENUE '~'Q HELLMAN AVENUE SPEED FACTORS ' Date of Speed Survey 11/3/2005 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 10:OOAM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 38 mph . CLOSEST TO 85TH 85th Percentile Speed 42 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 33-42 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace. 78 Number of Survey Samples 209 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 4 ' Annual Collision Rate 1.333 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.320 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 22,803 Date Counted 11/10/2005 1 Number of Lanes Type of Traffic Control 4 LANES -UNDIVIDED T.S. @ GARVEY, EMERSON, HELLMAN Crosswalks? C~3 ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT ' Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES .Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ' ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.500 miles Width 64 feet Vertical .Curve? YES Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS ' Roadway Conditions FAIR Lighting SOME ON EAST SIDE Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL Field Study By ST Checked By VM ' CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. 1 am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). ~o TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Da a State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET EARLSwooD DRIVE. CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006 ' FROM IVAR AVENUE 1'Q ROSEMEAD PLACE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/10/2005 Posted Speed Limit 30 mph Time of Speed Survey 10:OOAM Speed Justification ' 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 85th Percentile Speed 27 mph 30 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH 10 mph Pace Speed 23-32 Recommended Speed Limit 30 mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace. 89 Number of Survey Samples 72 1 u r~ ~~~ COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied ~3 years Total Collisions 0 Annual Collision Rate 0 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.000 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 2,372 Date Counted 11/10/2005 Number of Lanes 2 LANES -UNDIVIDED Type of Traffic Control STOP C IVAR Crosswalks? NONE Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES- RESTRICTED Sidewalks? NONE Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.260 miles Width 36 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? YES ,NORTH AND SOUTH END Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL __Field Study By JA Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State ~ California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). A '/ ~~ Vanessa State Registration Number 1 • CITY OF ROSEMEAD ~ ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET ELLIS LANE CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006 FROM OLNEY STREET -~O TEMPLE CITY BLVD SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 1/10/2006 Posted Speed Limit 30 mph Time of Speed Survey 2:OOPM . Speed Justification 1 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 85th Percentile Speed 29 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH 32 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 23-32 Recommended Speed Limit 30 mph t Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 83 Number of Survey Samples 131 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 0 Annual Collision Rate 0 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.000 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 1,814 Date Counted 11/17/2005 Number of Lanes 2 LANES -UNDIVIDED Type of Traffic Control STOPS @ TEMPLE CITY, OLNEY ,MARSHALL Crosswalks? C~ MARSHALL Pedestrian Traffic Truck Traffic LIGHT LIGHT On-Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES -RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.510 miles Width 40 feet 1 Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? YES, AT RALPH AVE ' Visibility Roadway Conditions GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS GOOD Lighting WEST SIDE ONLY Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL Field-.Study. By JA -Checked By VM ' CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State o California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). ' 3 7 b ~ TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD ENGINEERIN G AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET EMERSON PLACE CERTIFICATION DATE 3n/loos ' FROM NEW AVENUE ~'Q SAN GABRIEL BLVD SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/2/2005. Posted Speed Limit 30/25** mph Time of Speed Survey 9:OOAM Speed Justification 60th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 30 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH 85th Percentile Speed 32 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 25-34 Recommended Speed Limit 30/25** mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 90 Number of Survey Samples 71 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 0 Annual Collision Rate 0 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles . 0.000 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 5,507 Date Counted 11/17/2005 ' Number of Lanes Type of Traffic Control 2 LANES -UNDIVIDED T.S. @ NEW AVE, DEL MAR, SAN GABRIEL Crosswalks? ALL T.S. ,STOPS , PROSPECT;EVELYN Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? BOTH SIDES, MANY ROADWAY FACTORS . Length of Segment 1.000 miles Width 37 feet Vertical Curve? YES,BET DEL MAR,KELBURN Horizontal Curve? YES, SLIGHT AT JACKSON Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT.AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions FAIR Lighting NORTH SIDE ONLY Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL,SCHOOL,PARK Field Study By ST Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do.hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the S to of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). ~~ TE 2341 Vanessa Muno Date State Registration Number 1 1 t 1 1 t n • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD 0 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET ENCINITA AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006 . FROM- MISSION ROAD TQ LOWER AZUSA ROAD SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/2/2005 Posted Speed Limit 30/25" mph Time of Speed Survey 2:OOPM Speed Justification. 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 29 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH 85th Percentile Speed 32 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 24-33 Recommended Speed Limit 30/25" mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace. 89 Number of Survey Samples 66 COLLISION HISTORY . Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 3 Annual Collision Rate 1 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.919 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic Number of Lanes Type of Traffic Control Crosswalks? Pedestrian Traffic Truck Traffic On-Street Parking Sidewalks? Driveways? 7,842 Date Counted 11/8/2005 2 LANES -UNDIVIDED T.S. @ LOWER AZUSA, MISSION ; STOP C RIO DELL C ALL T.S.,STOPS, PITKIN, ROSE HEAVY LIGHT BOTH SIDES YES, .BOTH SIDES YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment . Width Vertical -Curve? Horizontal Curve? Visibility Roadway Conditions Lighting Adjacent Land Use- 0.380 miles 45 feet NONE NONE GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS FAIR YES, BOTH SIDES RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL 1 - -Field Study By ST -Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of alifornia as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). . _ ~ _ Vanessa Munoz State Registration Number '1 !. • CITY OF ROSEMEAD ENGINEERIN G AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET GARVEY AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006 ~~ FROM WEST CITY LIMIT TO DEL MAR AVENUE SPEED FACTORS ~~~ Date of Speed Survey 11/10/2005 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 3:OOPM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 34 mph HIDDEN DWYS., CURB PKG.; TRUCK ~' 85th Percentile Speed 38 mph TRAFFIC 10 mph Pace Speed 30-39 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72 Number of Survey Samples 204 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years .Total Collisions 4 ~ Annual Collision Rate 1.333 accidents/year ' Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.277 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 26,874 Date Counted 11/10/2005 Number of Lanes 4 LANES -DIVIDED Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ DEL MAR, JACKSON Crosswalks? Cd1 ALL T.S. ~~, Pedestrian Traffic Truck Traffic LIGHT MODERATE On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES -RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES .Driveways? BOTH SIDES, MANY ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.490 miles Width 76 feet Vertical Curve? . YES ~ Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions BOTH SIDES Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use HEAVY COMMERCIAL __Field_Study By ST :Checked By VM ~ CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly , registered in the State f California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). ~~ ~~ TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET GARVEY AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE ...3/7/2006 FROM DEL MAR AVENUE TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/10/2005 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 2:OOPM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 35 mph HIDDEN DWYS., CURB PKG.; TRUCK 85th Percentile Speed 39, mph TRAFFIC 10 mph Pace Speed 30-39 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75 Number of Survey Samples 210 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3. years Total Collisions 10 Annual Collision Rate 3.333 .accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.664 1 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 26,980 Date Counted 11/10/2005 Number of Lanes 4 LANES -DIVIDED Type of Traffic Control T.S. C~3 SAN GABRIEL, KELBURN, DEL MAR Crosswalks? C~? ALL T.S. , Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT ~, Truck Traffic MODERATE On-Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES- RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? BOTH SIDES, MANY ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment Width Vertical Curve? Horizontal Curve? Visibility Roadway Conditions Lighting Adjacent Land Use 0.510 miles 76 feet YES NONE GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS GOOD YES, BOTH SIDES HEAVY COMMERCIAL _ -Field Study By ST Checked ey VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within ~~ the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the S ate of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). ;~ 7 ~~ TE 2341 Vanessa Muno Date State Registration Number r CITY OF ROSEMEAD 10 ENGINEERING .AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET GARVEY AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006 ' . FROM SAN GABRIEL BLVD 1'Q WALNUT GROVE AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/10/2005 'Posted Speed Limit 35 mph T'tme of Speed Survey. 1:OOPM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 85th Percentile Speed 34 mph HIDDEN DWYS., CURB PKG., TRUCK 38 mph TRAFFIC, PEDS. 10 mph Pace Speed 29-38 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76 Number of Survey Samples 205 '~ COLLISION HISTORY 3 .Number of Years Studied -years Total Collisions - 12 , Annual Collision Rate 4 accidents/year ~ Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.815 1 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 27,431 Date Counted 11/17/2005 Number of Lanes 4 LANES -DIVIDED, 2WY LT LANES, LT POCKETS Type of Traffic Control T.S. C~3 WALNUT GROVE, DELTA, SAN GABRIEL Crosswalks? C~3 ALL T.S. ~, Pedestrian Traffic Truck Traffic MODERATE MODERATE On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES -RESTRICTED .Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES ' Driveways? BOTH SIDES, MANY ,~ ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.490 miles Width 76 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS '~, Roadway Conditions FAIR Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES j Adjacent Land Use HEAVY COMMERCIAL i Field Study By ST Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State f California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). ~~ 3/~ /~ TE 2341 Va State Registration Number 1 J r 1 n u 1 'I ~~ ® • CITY OF ROSEMEAD ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY ..STREET GARVEY AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE- 3/7/2006: FROM . WALNUT GROVE AVENUE T'Q EAST CITY LIMIT 11 SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/9/2005 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 3:OOPM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 35 mph. HIDDEN DWYS., CURB PKG., TRUCK 85th Percentile Speed 39 mph TRAFFIC,ADJ SEG SPEED 10 mph Pace Speed 29-38 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71 Number of Survey Samples 204 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 13 Annual Collision Rate 4.333 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.712 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 28,277 Date Counted 11/10/2005 Number of Lanes 4 LANES -DIVIDED W/LT POCKETS Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ LEE,COMM. CTR,ROSEMEAD PL,MUSCATEL,WAL GRV Crosswalks? C~ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic MODERATE On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES -RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? BOTH SIDES, MANY ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.590 miles Width 76 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? .NONE Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions FAIR . Lighting ~ YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use HEAVY COMMERCIAL - - --Field Study By ST ---Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the Stat of California as a Professiona-l~Engineer (Traffic). " / i2Z~ti 1 ~// /~YJ TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz / D~fte ` State Registration Number • .. CITY OF ROSEMEAD 12 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET GRAND AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006 i FROM CHARLOTTE AVENUE TQ ROSEMEAD BLVD SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/9/2005 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 11:OOAM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 34 mph HIDDEN DWYS, HORIZ. CURVE, NO LT. 85th Percentile Speed 38 mph LANES 10 mph Pace Speed 29-38 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 81 Number of Survey Samples 62 '~ COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 2 Annual Collision Rate 0.667 accidents/year . Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.519 ~~ TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 3,487 Date Counted 11/8/2005 Number of Lanes 2 LANES -UNDIVIDED Type of Traffic Control STOP @ ROSEMEAD, WALNUT GROVE Crosswalks? @ ALL. STOPS Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? MAINLY ON SOUTH SIDE ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 1.010 miles ,~ Width Vertical Curve? 40 feet NONE Horizontal Curve? YES, AT MUSKATEL,ROSEMEAD Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions FAIR, NO LEFT TURN LANES Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL -Field-Study By ST Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within ,~' the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of alifornia as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). - v ~-/ TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Da State Registration Number • CITY OF ROSEMEAD 13 `, ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET HELLMAN AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006 FROM. NEW AVENUE 'TQ WALNUT GROVE AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/2/2005 Posted Speed Limit 30 mph Time of Speed Survey 1:OOPM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 29 mph HIDDEN DWYS., NO LT. LANES, VERT. ,~ 85th Percentile Speed 33 mph CURVE 10 mph Pace Speed 25-34 Recommended Speed Limit 30 mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 86 Number of Survey Samples 102 ;~ COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 15 Annual Collision Rate 5 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 1.846 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 4,946 Date Counted 11/10/2005 ,I Number of Lanes Type of Traffic Control 2 LANES -UNDIVIDED T.S. @WALNUT GRV.,SAN GABRIEL,DEL MAR,JACKSON,NEW Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. ~ Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT ~ Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ~~~ ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 1.500 miles Width 38 feet Vertical Curve? YES,AT KELBURN Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS . Roadway Conditions FAIR, NO LEFT TURN LANES Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL ~- -Field-Study By ST Checked By VM CERTIFICATION:.I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State California as ~- a Professional Engineer (Traffic). `~ ~~ TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz D e State Registration Number • CITY OF ROSEM EAD 14 ENGINEERIN G AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET JACKSON AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE 3n/2oo6 FROM GRAVES AVENUE 'rQ GARVEY AVENUE SPEED FACTORS . Date of Speed Survey 11/2/2005 Posted Speed Limit 30/25** mph Time of Speed Survey 3:OOPM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 30 mph HIDDEN DWYS., PEDS., VERT. CURVE 85th Percentile Speed 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 26-35 Recommended Speed Limit 30/25** mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace. 79 Number of Survey Samples 72 COLLISION HISTORY ~~ Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 1 Annual Collision Rate 0.333 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.551 .~ TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 3,315 Date Counted 11/10/2005 Number of Lanes Type of Traffic Control 2 LANES -UNDIVIDED T.S. Cif GRAVES ;STOP @ FERN, GRAVES Crosswalks? C~ ALL T.S.,STOPS, EGLEY ~ Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE ~ Truck Traffic NONE On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES -RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES - Driveways? BOTH SIDES, MANY ~~ ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.500 miles Width 36 feet Vertical Curve? YES,AT NORTH OF GRAVES AV Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions FAIR Lighting WEST SIDE ONLY Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL ----Field Study By ST ,Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the t of California as ' a Professional Engineer (Traffic). ~ ~ (/ TE 2341 Vanessa Muno Dat State Registration Number • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD 15 ENGINEERING .AND TRAFFIC SURVEY .STREET LOFTUS STREET CERTIFICATION DATE - 3n/loos FROM TEMPLE CITY BLVD TQ EAST CITY LIMIT SPEED- FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/2/2005 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 1:OOPM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 35 mph ADJ. AGENCY SPEED, HIDDEN DWYS., 85th Percentile Speed 39 mph VERT. CURVE, 10 mph Pace Speed 30-39 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75 Number of Survey Samples 138 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 1 ' Annual Collision Rate 0.333 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.492 r TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic Number of Lanes Type of Traffic Control Crosswalks? Pedestrian Traffic 14,283 Date Counted 4 LANES -UNDIVIDED T.S. C~ TEMPLE CITY BLVD C~1 ALL T.S.. LIGHT 11 /8/2005 Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES-RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment Width Vertical Curve? Horizontal Curve? Visibility 0.130 miles 60 feet YES,AT EAST END NONE GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions GOOD , Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use- RESIDENTIAL ...Field Study By JA _Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). i i Vanessa Munoz State Registration Number 1 1 I s o CITY OF ROSEMEAD 1s ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET LowER AzusA ROAD CERTIFICATION DATE 3n/2oos FROM ROSEMEAD BLVD 'T'Q ENCINITA AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey . 11/2/2005 'Posted Speed Limit 40/25"" mph Time of Speed Survey 3:OOPM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 39 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH 85th Percentile Speed 42 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 34-43 Recommended Speed Limit 40/25'" mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace. 79 Number of Survey Samples 145 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 0 Annual Collision Rate 0 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.000 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 14,542 Date Counted 11/8/2005 Number of Lanes 4 LANES -UNDIVIDED Type of Traffic Control T.S. C~ ROSMEAD, ENCINITA Crosswalks? C~ ALL T.S: Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking NO PARKING Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, NORTH SIDE MANY ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.330 miles Width 56 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL Field Study By JA Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the.City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. 1 am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). /~ r--- i 06 Vanessa M State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD 17 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY. STREET MARSHALL sTREET CERTIFICATION DATE - 3n/loos -FROM DELTA AVENUE TQ WALNUT GROVE AVENUE . SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/8/2005 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 10:OOAM Speed Justification 5.Oth Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 35 mph ADJ. SEG SPEED., HIDDEN DWYS., NO LT. 85th Percentile Speed 38 mph LANES 10 mph Pace Speed 29-38 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 88 Number of Survey Samples 89 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 0 Annual Collision Rate 0 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.000 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 6,030 Date Counted 11/8/2005 Number of Lanes 2 LANES -UNDIVIDED Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ WALNUT GROVE Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking .BOTH SIDES -RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES - Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.250 miles Width Vertical- Curve? 40 feet NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions GOOD, NO LEFT TURN LANES Lighting NORTH SIDE ONLY Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL -~- -Field Study By JA -Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within . the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. 1 am duly registered in the State o California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). ~lo TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number n i~l r fl L • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD 1s ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET MARSHALL STREET CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006 FROM WALNUT GROVE AVENUE 'rO ROSEMEAD BLVD SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/8/2005 Posted Speed Limit 30/25** mph Time of Speed Survey 9:OOAM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 30 mph HIDDEN DWYS., NO LT. LANES,HORIZ. 85th Percentile Speed 34 mph CURVE 10 mph Pace Speed 26-35 Recommended Speed Limit 30/25"" mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 88 Number of Survey Samples 93 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 2 Annual Collision Rate 0.667 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.369 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 9,337 Date Counted 11/8/2005 Number of Lanes 2 LANES -UNDIVIDED Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ ROSEMEAD, WALNUT GRV.;STOPC MUSCATEL,BARLET Crosswalks? C~ ALL T.S..AND STOPS Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES- RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment Width . Vertical Curve? Horizontal Curve? Visibility Roadway Conditions 0.530 miles 40 feet NONE YES , EAST OF BARTLETT GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS GOOD, NO LEFT TURN LANES Lighting NORTH SIDE ONLY Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL Field Study By JA Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the St to f California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). ~.1,~.1/~ X7/7 /~~ TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number 0 CITY OF ROSEMEAD is ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET MARSHALL sTREET CERTIFICATION DATE 3n/loos FROM ROSEMEAD BLVD TQ HART AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/3/2005 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 3:OOPM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 35 mph ADJ.SEG.SPEED,HIDDEN DWYS., GOLLIS. 85th Percentile Speed 38 mph RATE, CHG. IN ST. WIDTH 10 mph Pace Speed 30-39 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph .Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79 Number of Survey Samples 137 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 14 1 Annual Collision Rate 4.667 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 4.626 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 11,515 Date Counted 11/8/2005 Number of Lanes 4 LANES -DIVIDED Type of Traffic Control T.S. C~3 ROSEMEAD ; STOP C HART Crosswalks? C~ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking NORTH SIDE ONLY -RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? .YES, MANY ON NORTHSIDE t ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.240 miles Width Vertical Curve? 71 feet NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL. -Field Study By JA - -Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State f California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). . ~ ~ ~~ TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Dat State Registration Number • • .CITY OF ROSEMEAD 20 r ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET MARSHALL STREET CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006 FROM HART AVENUE TQ RIO RONDO AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/3/2005 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 2:OOPM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 34 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH 85th Percentile Speed 37 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 29-38 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 84 Number of Survey Samples 88 COLLISION' HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 1 Annual Collision Rate 0.333 accidents/year .Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.569 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 6,418 Date Counted 11/8/2005 Number of Lanes Type of Traffic Control 2 LANES -UNDIVIDED STOP C~ HART, RIO RONDO Crosswalks? @ RIO RONDO Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT ' Truck Traffic NONE On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES -RESTRICTED ' Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.250 miles Width 40 feet ' Vertical Curve?. NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS i Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting SOUTH-SIDES ONLY 1 Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL Field Study By JA Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). ' r- / ~ L/ TE 2341 Vanessa Mun z Dat State Registration Number • CITY OF ROSEMEAD 21 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET MISSION DRIVE CERTIFICATION DATE - 3/7/2006 FROM WEST CITY LIMIT- 1'O WALNUT GROVE AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/9/2005 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 10:OOAM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 85th Percentile Speed 39 mph ADJ. SEG SPEED,HIDDEN DWYS., NO LT. 43 mph LANES, UNC. XWALK 10 mph Pace Speed 34-43 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74 - Number of Survey Samples 169 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 2 Annual Collision Rate 0.667 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.407 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 16,015 Date Counted 11/17/2005 Number of Lanes 4 LANES -UNDIVIDED Type of Traffic Control T.S. C~ WALNUT GROVE Crosswalks? C~ ALL T.S., EARLE, DELTA Pedestrian Traffic Truck Traffic LIGHT LIGHT On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES- RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES L ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.280 miles Width 65 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions FAIR, NO LEFT TURN LANES Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL- . _f=field Study. By ST Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. 1 am duly registered in the St to of California a s a Professional Engineer (Traffic). 3 ~~~1~~ TE 2341 Vanessa Munoi State Registration Number • CITY OF ROSEMEAD 22 ENGINEERIN G AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET MISSION DRIVE , CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006 FROM WALNUT GROVE AVENUE TO ROSEMEAD BLVD SPEED FACTORS 1 Date of Speed Survey 11/8/2005 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 3:OOPM Speed Justification i 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 85th Percentile Speed 39 mph ADJ. SEG SPEED., HIDDEN DWYS., NO LT. 44 mph LANES, UNC. XWALK, 10 mph Pace Speed 36-45 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 68 Number of Survey Samples 179 COLLISION HISTORY N f Y b i S 3 um er o ears tud ed years Total Collisions 6 Annual Collision Rate 2 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.570 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 17,175 Date Counted 11/8/2005 Number of Lanes 4 LANES -UNDIVIDED Type of Traffic Control T.S. Ca3 ROSEMEAD, MUSKATEL, WALNUT GROVE Crosswalks? C~ ALL T.S:, IVAR . 1 Pedestrian Traffic .Truck Traffic LIGHT LIGHT On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES .Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ' ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.560 miles Width 65 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility Roadway Conditions GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS FAIR, NO LEFT TURN LANES Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL Field Study By ST .Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). ~- ~ vv 1 TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number L' u n • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET MISSION DRIVE CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006 FROM ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD TQ VALLEY BLVD SPEED FACTORS 23 Date of Speed Survey 11/3/2005 Posted Speed Limit 40/25" mph Time of Speed Survey 9:OOAM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 40 mph ADJ. SEG SPEED, HIDDEN DWYS., HORIZ. 85th Percentile Speed 44 mph CURVE, UNC. XWALK, NO LT. LANE 10 mph Pace Speed 35-~ Recommended Speed Limit 40/25"' mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73 Number of Survey Samples 176 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 7 Annual Collision Rate 2.333 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.956 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic Number of Lanes Type of Traffic Control Crosswalks?. Pedestrian Traffic 12,857 Date Counted 4 LANES -UNDIVIDED T.S. @ VALLEY, ROSEMEAD, ENCINITA ALL T.S., NEW BY MODERATE 11 /17/2005. Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.520 miles Width 65 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? YES, EAST OF ENCINITA Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions FAIR, NO LEFT TURN LANES Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL ,SCHOOL Field Study By ST Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision-and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State f California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). --1.7/ ~/~ 3 / T ~~ TE 2341 VanessA'Munoz Date State Registration Number 1 'J [l • CITY OF ROSEMEAD 24 ENGINEERING-AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET MUSCATEL AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006 FROM MARSHALL STREET TQ GRAND AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/8/2005 Posted Speed Limit 30/25*' mph Time of Speed Survey 2:OOPM Speed Justification 50th.Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 30 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH 85th Percentile Speed 32 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 25-34 Recommended Speed Limit 30/25" mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 95 Number of Survey Samples 63 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 5 Annual Collision Rate 1.667 accidents/year . Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.567 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 5,754 Date Counted 2/8/2006 Number of Lanes 2 LANES -UNDIVIDED Type of Traffic Control T.S. C~ MISSION, VALLEY; STOP @ MARSHALL, GRAND Crosswalks? C~ ALL T.S., AND STOPS,SCOTT Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES-RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment . 1.400 miles Width 40 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL,CIVIC CENTER,PARK,SCHOOL -Field Study By JA Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the Sta#~e o#, California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). ~ / ~ ~ i Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD 25 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET NEw AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE 3n/loos ' FROM GRAVES AVENUE TQ GARVEY AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/2/2005 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 2:OOPM Speed Justification -50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 35 mph . HIDDEN DWYS., CURB PARKING,VERT. ' 85th Percentile Speed 38 mph CURVE 10 mph Pace Speed 31-40 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph ' Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79 Number of Survey Samples 104 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 2 ' Annual Collision Rate 0.667 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.419 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 8,725 Date Counted 11/10/2005 Number of Lanes 2 LANES -UNDIVIDED Type of Traffic Control T.S. Ci? GARVEY, NEWMARK ; STOP@ GRAVES Crosswalks? C~ ALL T.S. AND STOPS Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES-RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.500 miles Width 56 feet Vertical Curve? YES,AT NORTH OF GRAVES AV Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions FAIR Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL,COMMERCIAL AT GARVEY -_ _ -field-Study-By ST - -Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the~tat~of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). . 3/~/b~ Munoz State Registration Number ,~ • CITY OF ROSEMEAD 2s ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY. .STREET RAMONA BouLEVARD CERTIFICATION DATE 3n/2oos FROM . WALNUT GROVE AVENUE TO IVAR AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/10/2005 Posted Speed Limit 30 mph Time of Speed Survey 11:OOAM Speed Justification 50th Percentile_Speed (Mean-Speed) 30 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH 85th Percentile Speed 32 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 25-34. Recommended Speed Limit 30 mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace. 93 Number of Survey Samples 73 ' COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 4 Annual Collision Rate 1.333 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 1.662 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 4,777 Date Counted 11/10/2005 1 Number of Lanes Type of Traffic Control 2 LANES -UNDIVIDED T.S. @ WALNUT GROVE; STOP@BURTON Crosswalks? C~3 ALL T.S. AND STOPS Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking EAST SIDE ONLY-RESTRICTED Sidewalks? SOUTH SIDE ONLY Driveways? SOUTH SIDE ONLY ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.460 miles Width 33 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? YES, WEST OF BURTON Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS ' Roadway Conditions GOOD . Lighting SOUTH SIDE ONLY Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL' -Field-Study By JA - Checked- By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed u nder my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). 0~ TE 2341 Vanessa Muno Date State Registration Number ® . CITY OF ROSEMEAD 27 ' ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET RIO RONDO AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006 FROM OLNEY STREET TO VALLEY BLVD SPEED FACTORS ' Date of Speed Survey 11/3/2005 Posted Speed Limit 30/25"' mph Time of Speed Survey 11:OOAM Speed Justification ' 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 85th Percentile Speed 30 mph HIDDEN DWYS., VERT. & HORIZ. CURVES 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 24-33 Recommended Speed Limit 30/25" mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78 Number of Survey Samples 82 COLLISION HISTORY . ' Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 0 Annual Collision Rate 0 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles. 0.000 ' TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 7,906 Date Counted 11/8/2005 Number of Lanes 2 LANES -UNDIVIDED ' Type of Traffic Control T.S. C~3 VALLEY BLVD;STOP ~ DE ADELANE, MARSHALL Crosswalks? ~ ALL T.S. AND STOPS Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT- Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking YES BOTH SIDES-RESTRICTED Sidewalks? - YES, BOTH SIDES ' Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS . Length of Segment 0.550 miles Width 40 feet ' Vertical Curve? YES, NORTH OF DE ADELENA Horizontal Curve? YES, NORTH OF DE ADELENA Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS ' Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting WEST SIDE ONLY Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL Field Study By JA Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). ' ~- TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number I r 1 1 • CITY OF ROSEMEAD 2s ENGINEERING AND TRAFI=IC SURVEY. STREET ROSEMEAD PLACE CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006 FROM GARVEY AVENUE TQ EARLSWOOD DRIVE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/10/2005 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:OOAM Speed Justification 50th.Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 34 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH 85th Percentile Speed 37 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 29-38 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 88 . Number of Survey Samples 81 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 1 Annual Collision Rate 0.333 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.945 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 2,300 Date Counted 11/10/2005 Number of Lanes 2 LANES -UNDIVIDED Type of Traffic Control T.S @GARVEY Crosswalks? C~2 ALL T.S.. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES-RESTRICTED Sidewalks? NONE Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment Width Vertical Curve? Horizontal Curve? Visibility Roadway Conditions Lighting Adjacent Land Use- 0.420 miles 55 feet NONE NONE GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS GOOD. MAINLY ON EAST SIDE RESIDENTIAL . __._F_ield_Study By JA _.Checked_By VM CERTIFICATION: 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the St to of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). /~~~ 3 TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number 1 CITY OF ROSEMEAD 2s ' ENGINEERIN G AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET RUSH STREET CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006 FROM SAN GABRIEL BLVD TQ WALNUT GROVE AVENUE SPEED FACTORS . ' Date of Speed Survey 11/3/2005 Posted Speed Limit 40/25** mph Time of Speed Survey- 1:OOPM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 39 mph HIDDEN DWYS., VERT. CURVE, PEDS. 85th Percentile Speed 44 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 35-44 Recommended Speed Limit 40/25** mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74 Number of Survey Samples 133 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years -Total Collisions 1 ' Annual Collision Rate' 0.333 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.209 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 8,929 Date Counted 11/10/2005 ' Number of Lanes Type of Traffic Control 4 LANES -DIVIDED T.S. C SAN GABRIEL, WALNUT GROVE Crosswalks? ~ ALL T.S., ANGELUS Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES ' Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.490 miles Width 87 feet Vertical Curve? YES,WEST OF WALNUT GROVE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS ' Roadway Conditions FAIR Lighting YES, ON MEDIAN Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL --Field Study By ST Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was penformed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). TE 2341 Vanessa Mun Date State Registration Number 1 CITY OF ROSEM EAD 30 ENGINEERING, AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET sAN GABRIEL BLVD CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/loos 1 FROM SOUTH CITY LIMIT TO DELTA STREET SPEED FACTORS ' Date of Speed Survey 11/3/2005 Posted Speed Limit 45/25** mph Time of Speed Survey 3:OOPM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 44 mph HORIZ. CURVE, ADJ SEG SPEED ,TRUCK . 85th Percentile Speed 48 mph TRAFFIC 10 mph Pace Speed 39-48 Recommended Speed Limit 45/25** .mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70 Number of Survey Samples 197 COLLISION HISTORY ' Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 5 ' Annual Collision Rate 1.667 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.337 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 20,521 Date Counted 11/10/2005 ' Number of Lanes Type of Traffic Control 4 LANES -DIVIDED WITH LT LANES T.S.@TOWN CENTER ,WALNUT GROVE, DELTA , 60 FWY Crosswalks? C~ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic MODERATE On-Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES ' Sidewalks? SOME,BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES,BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.660 miles Width 84 feet ' Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? YES ,NORTH OF 60 FWY Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES ' Adjacent Land Use MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, SCHOOL Field Study By JA -Checked By VM ' CERTIFICATION: (,.Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). ~~ 3 ( TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD 3i ENGINEERIN G .AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET SAN GABRIEL BLVD CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006 FROM RUSH STREET TQ GARVEY AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/3/2005 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 10:OOAM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 39 mph HIDDEN DWYS., VERT. CURVE, CURB 85th Percentile Speed 44 mph PKG.,ADJ SEG SPEED 10 mph Pace Speed 35-44 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph ' Percentage of Vehicles in Pace. 70 Number of Survey Samples 181 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 -years Total Collisions 11 ' Annual Collision Rate 3.667 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.558 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 24,022 Date Counted 11/10/2005 Number of Lanes Type of Traffic Control 4 LANES -UNDIVIDED WITH CENTER LT LANES T.S. C~ RUSH, GRAVES, GARVEY, KLINGERMAN Crosswalks? CQ? ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ' ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.750 miles Width Vertical Curve? 84 feet YES, N OF KLINGERMAN Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS ' Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL -Field Study By JA Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within ' the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). ~! ~~ TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number ~. 1 v 1 J J III CITY OF ROSEMEAD 32 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY. STREET SAN GABRIEL BLVD CERTIFICATION DATE 3n/loos FROM. GARVEY AVENUE TQ HELLMAN AVENUE SPEED. FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/3/2005 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 11:OOAM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 39 mph .. CLOSEST TO 85TH 85th Percentile Speed 42 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 34-43 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76 Number of Survey Samples 203 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 21 Annual Collision Rate 7 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 1.170 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 32,793 Date Counted 11/10/2005 Number of Lanes 4 LANES -UNDIVIDED WITH LT LANES Type of Traffic Control T.S. C~ GARVEY, EMERSON, HELLMAN Crosswalks? C~ ALL T.S.. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic MODERATE On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES-RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.500 miles Width 76 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions GOOD, Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL,COMMERCIAL - -Field Study By JA - -Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the. State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa M State Registration Number 1 n ii 1 ~ • CITY OF ROSEMEAD 33 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET TEMPLE CITY BLVD CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006 FROM OLNEY STREET _ TQ VALLEY BLVD SPEED. FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/2/2005 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 10:OOAM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 39 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH 85th Percentile Speed 42 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 35-44 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace. 81 Number of Survey Samples 205 COLLISION HISTORY Number ofYears Studied 3 years Total Collisions 3 Annual Collision Rate 1 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.276 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 17,711 Date Counted 11/8/2005 Number of Lanes 4 LANES -UNDIVIDED Type of Traffic Control T.S. C~ LOFTUS, MARSHALL, VALLEY Crosswalks? C~3 ALL T.S:. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic MODERATE On-Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES -.RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.560 miles Width 64 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? YES, AT ELLIS Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL - -Field Study By JA .Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). 3 ~ ~ TE 2341 Vanessa.Muno Date State Registration Number 1 1 CITY OF ROSEMEAD 3a ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY. STREET TEMPLE CITY BLVD CERTIFICATION DATE - 3/7/2006- ' FROM VALLEY BLVD 'T'O NORTH CITY LIMITS SPEED FACTORS ' Date of Speed Survey 11/2/2005 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph T.,ime of Speed Survey 9:OOAM Speed Justification 1 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 85th Percentile Speed 39 mph HIDDEN DWYS., TRUCK TRAFFIC, ADJ SEG 43 mph SPEED 10 mph Pace Speed 35-44 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74 Number of Survey Samples 204 COLLISION HISTORY N 3 umber of Years Studied years Total Collisions 1 ' Annual Collision Rate 0.333 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.418 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 19,880 Date Counted 11/8/2005 Number of Lanes 4 LANES + 2WY LT LANE ' Type of Traffic Control T.S. C~ VALLEY Crosswalks? C~ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic Truck Traffic LIGHT MODERATE On-Street Parking NO PARKING Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES r Driveways? YES, BOTH SDIES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.110 miles Width 64 feet 1 Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE ' Visibility Roadway Conditions GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS GOOD Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL Feld_Study By JA .Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within ' the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the Stat o California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). ~._ 3 ~ dto TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD 35 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET VALLEY BLVD CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006 FROM CHARLOTTE AVENUE TQ ROSEMEAD BLVD SPEED FACTORS . Date of Speed Survey 11/8/2005 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 1:OOPM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 35 mph ADJ. SEG SPEED, HIDDEN DWYS,PEDS 85th Percentile Speed 40 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 29-38 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 63 Number of Survey Samples 206 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 25 Annual Collision Rate 8.333 accidents/year ' Collisions per Million Vehicle.Miles 0.917 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 29,289 Date Counted 11/8/2005 Number of Lanes Type of Traffic Control 4 LANES + 2WY LT LANE T.S. @DELTA,WALNUT GROVE,MUSCATEL,IVAR,ROSEMEAD Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE ,~ Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES-RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? BOTH SIDES,MANY ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.850 miles Width 77 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility FAIR, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions FAIR Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL,CIVIC CENTER -Field Study By ST Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). ~, TE 2341 Vanessa Muno Date State Registration Number • • CITY OF ROSEM EAD 36 r ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY . STREET VALLEY BLVD CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006.. FROM ROSEMEAD BLVD TQ STRANG AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/3/2005 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 10:OOAM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 36 mph . ADJ. SEG SPEED, HIDDEN DWYS., PEDS. 85th Percentile Speed 41 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 33-42 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph ' Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69 Number of Survey Samples 203 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 13. Annual Collision Rate 4.333 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.450 1 s f 0 t TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 26,357. Date Counted 11/8/2005 Number of Lanes 4 LANES AND LT LANES Type of Traffic Control T.S.@ROSEMEAD,HART,MISSION,RIO HONDO,TEMPLE CITY Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE . Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES-RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? BOTH SIDES, MANY ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment. 1.000 miles Width 77 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility FAIR, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions FAIR Lighting . YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL - field Study By ST Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. 1 am duly registered in the S~te,of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). ~- Munoz Date State Registration Number ~ ~: CITY OF ROSEMEAD s~ ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET WALNUT GROVE AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006 SAN GABRIEL BLVD 'rQ RUSH STREET FROM SPEED FACTORS h it 45 d Li /2 0 P d S / Date of Speed Survey mp m 11 oste pee 3 0 5 ,time of Speed Survey 2:OOPM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 44 mph.. ADJ. SEG SPEED, VERT. CURVE.,PEDS. 85th Percentile Speed 49 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 39-48 Recommended Speed Limit 45 mph . ' Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 68 Number of Survey Samples 138 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 4 1 Annual Collision Rate 1.333 accidents/year . Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.286 ,~ TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 17,241 Date Counted 11/10/2005 Number of Lanes 4 LANES + 2WY LT LANE ' Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ SAN GABRIEL, RUSH Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S: Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking NO PARKING (MOST OF SEGMENT) Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? BOTH SIDES, FEW I~1 ~J ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment Width . Vertical Curve? Horizontal Curve? Visibility Roadway Conditions Lighting Adjacent Land Use - - --Field -Study By ST Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. i am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). 0.740 miles 65 feet YES, UPHILL NORTHBOUND SLIGHT, SOUTH OF VILLAGE FAIR, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS FAIR YES, BOTH SIDES UNIVERSITY, GOLF COURSE, COMMERCIAL DSO Vanessa Mu Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD 38 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY WALNUT GROVE AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006. STREET . FROM RUSH STREET TQ GARVEY AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/3/2005 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 11:OOAM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 39 -mph. HIDDEN DWYS., CURB PKG. 85th Percentile Speed 43 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 36-45 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75 Number of Survey Samples 187 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 8 Annual Collision Rate 2.667 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.591 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 16,253_ Date Counted 11/10/2005 ' Number of Lanes Type of Traffic Control 4 LANES UNDIVIDED,DIVIDED S/O EDISON T.S.@ RUSH,EDISON,KLINGERMAN,FERN,GARVEY Crosswalks? C~ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES-HEAVY-RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? BOTH SIDES, FEW ~I I~ ~~ ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.760 miles Width 65 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions FAIR . Lighting . YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL -Field-Study By ST Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California a s a Professional Engineer (Traffic). 6 ~ ~- Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number ~ ~ CITY OF ROSEMEAD ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY J t 39 STREET WALNUT GROVE AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006 FROM GARVEY AVENUE TQ HELLMAN AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/9/2005 `Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 2:OOPM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed_(Mean Speed) 39 mph ADJ. SEG_SPEED, HIDDEN DWYS., PEDS. 85th Percentile-Speed 44 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 35-44 Recommended Speed Limit .40/25'" mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70 Number of Survey Samples 172 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 17 Annual Collision Rate 5.667 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 1.218 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 25,495 Date Counted 11/17/2005 Number of Lanes 4 LANES -UNDIVIDED Type of Traffic Control T..S. C~ GARVEY, HELLMAN Crosswalks? ~ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.500 miles Width 65 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT.AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions FAIR Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL -- _ _.Field.Study By ST Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State~f California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number ~~ I~ i~ ~I t ~ ~ CITY OF ROSEMEAD ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY' STREET WALNUT GROVE AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE - 3n/2oos FROM HELLMAN AVENUE '~'Q .VALLEY BLVD SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 11/8/2005 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 11:OOAM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 40 mph ADJ. SEG SPEED, HIDDEN DWYS.,VERT. & 85th Percentile Speed 45 mph HORIZ. CURVE 10 mph Pace Speed 35-44 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69 Number of Survey Samples 207 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 9 Annual Collision Rate 3 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.483 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 23,293 Date Counted 11/8/2005 Number of Lanes - 4 LANES -UNDIVIDED, DIVIDED SOUTH OF MARSHALL Type of Traffic Control T.S., CQ? HELLMAN, MARSHALL, VALLEY Crosswalks? Cd1 ALL T.S.. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking NO PKG SOUTH 1/2, NORTH 1/2 OK Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES ,Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.730 miles Width 65 feet Vertical Curve? YES ,AT I-10 Horizontal Curve? YES, AT 1-10 Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions FAIR Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL Field_Study_By ST Checked_By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). 3 P~ Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number 1 ~~ t ® • CITY OF ROSEMEAD 41 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET WALNUT GROVE AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE 3n/2oos FROM VALLEY BLVD TO MISSION BLVD SPEED FACTORS . Date of Speed Survey 11/9/2005 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:OOAM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 39 mph ADJ..SEG SPEED, HIDDEN DWYS., NO LT. 85th Percentile Speed 44 mph LANES 10 mph Pace Speed 35-44 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Percentage of Vehicles in Pace. 69 Number of Survey Samples 207 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 -years Total Collisions 5 Annual Collision Rate 1.667 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.492 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 18,561 Date Counted 11/8/2005 Number of Lanes 4 LANES -UNDIVIDED Type of Traffic Control T.S.@ VALLEY, MISSION,WELLS/EDMOND Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.500 miles Width 65 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS Roadway Conditions FAIR, NO LEFT TURN LANES Lighting MAINLY ON WEST SIDE Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL Field Study By ST Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in tt State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). ~ /~ ~- Vanessa M State; Registration Number ~. • CITY OF ROSEMEAD 42 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY .STREET WALNUT GROVE AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE 3/7/2006 FROM MISSION BLVD '~Q NORTH CITY LIMIT SPEED FACTORS ' Date of Speed Survey 11/9/2005 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 1:OOPM Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 40 mph ADJ. SEG SPEED, HIDDEN DWYS., HORIZ. 85th Percentile Speed 45 mph CURVE 10 mph Pace Speed 37-46 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph ' Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75 Number of Survey Samples 154 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 0 Annual Collision Rate 0 accidents/year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.000 ' TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 14,061 Date Counted 11/8/2005 Number of Lanes Type of Traffic Control 4 LANES -UNDIVIDED T.S.C~3 MISSION ;STOP C~3 GRAND Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S..AND STOPS Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT ' Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES ' Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ' ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.290 miles ' Width Vertical Curve? 56 feet NONE Horizontal Curve? YES , N. AND S. OF RACKET Visibility GOOD, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS ' Roadway Conditions FAIR Lighting WEST SIDE ONLY ' Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL;COMMERCIAL NORTH OF GRAND --Field~Study By ST -Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, d o hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within ' the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). 1 TE 2341 Va essa Mu z Da State Registration Number .. • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street DE ADELENA STREET Date 11/3/2005 50th % 30 MPH Location Begin 1:OOPM End 2:OOPM 85th % 32 MPH Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 10MPH 26 35 Remarks ROSEMEAD TO ELLIS Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 91% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percenta e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 40 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 1 2% 100.0% 0 0% 97.9% 35 x x o 0 0 5 11 % 97.9% 0 1 2% 87.2% 0 0% 85.1% x x x x x o 0 0 0 9 19% 85.1 x o 2 4% 66.0% 30 x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 13 28% 61 7% x x o 3 6% 34.0% x x o 0 0 5 11 % 27.7% x x 2 4% 17.0% x x o 3 6% 12.8% 25 0 0 0 3 6% 6.4% 0 0% 0.0% -- . .. - - ---- -- - -- -- 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - East/North bound t) - West/South Bound Total Observed 47 100 • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street DEL MAR AVENUE Date 11/3/2005 -50th % 35 .MPH Location Begin 9:OOAM End 10:OOAN 85th % 38 MPH Direction N-S Weather CLEAR 10MPH 30 39 Remarks GRAVES AVE TO GARVEY AVE Recorded by TSI - S.W. % in Pace 85% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% x o 2 2% 100.0% 0 0% '98.3% 40 x x '0 0 4 3% 98.3% x x x x x o 0 0 8 7% 95.0% x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 8% 88.4% x x x o 0 0 0 7 6% 80.2% x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 17% 74.4% 35 x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 11 9% 57.9% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 11 9% 48.8% x x x x o 0 6 5% 39.7% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 11 9% 34 7% x x x x o 0 0 0 8 7% 25.6% 30 x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 11 9% 19.0% x x x x x x o 0 8 7% 9.9% x x x o 4 3% 3.3% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 25 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 121 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Street DEL MAR AVENUE Location Direction N-S Remarks GARVEY TO HELLMAN LJ CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Date 11 /2/2005 50th . Begin 10:OOAM End 11:OOAM 85th Weather CLEAR -10MPH Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 38 MPH 42 MPH 33 42 78% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES ` 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 .0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0.% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% x o a 3 1% 100.0% 45 x x x x x x 6 3% .98.6% x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 6% 95.7% x x x x o 0 6 3% 90.0% x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 8% 87.1 x x x x x o 0 0 0 9 4% 79.4% 40 x x X x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 11 % 75.1 x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 10% 63.6% x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 9% 53.6% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 9% 45.0% x x x x x x 'x 0 0 0 0 0 12 6% 36.4% 35 x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 7% 30.6% x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 9% 23.4% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 10 5% 14.4% x x x x o 0 0 o g 4% g.6% x x o 3 1% 5.7% 30 x x o 0 0 5 2% 4.3% x x o 3 1% 1.9% x 1 0% 0.5% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 25 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% - -- - - 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0:0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 209 100 Street EARLSWOOD DRIVE Location Direction N-S Remarks IVAR AVE TO ROSEMEAD PL • CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Date 11/10/2005 50th % 27 MPH . Begin 10:OOAN End 1:OOAM 85th % 30 MPH Weather CLEAR 10MPH 23 32 Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 89% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 . 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 0 0% .100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 40 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0.% 0 0% 100.0% 35 0 0% 100.0% ° 1 1 % 100.0% 0 1 1 % 98.6% x o 2 3% 97.2% x x o 3 4% 94.4% 30 x x x x x x x o 0 0 10 14% 90.3% x x x o 0 0 6 8% 76.4% x x o 0 0 0 0 7 10% 68.1 x x x x x o 0 7 10% 58.3% x z x x x o 0 7 10% 48.6% 25 x x x x z x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 19% 38.9% x o o x 4 6% 19.4% x o 0 0 4 6% 13.9% - ~~- 0 1 1% 8.3% x x 2 3% 6.9% 20 x o 0 3 4% 4.2% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 72 100 1 1 • CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street ELLIS LANE Date 1!10/2006 50th % 29 MPH Location Begin 2:OOPM End 3:OOPM 85th % 32 MPH Direction N-S Weather CLEAR 10MPH 23 32 Remarks OLNEY ST TO TEMPLE CITY BLVD Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 83% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES ' S 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0.% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 40 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% X 1 1% 100.0% X O O 3 2% 99.2% 35 x x o 0 0 5 4% 96.9% x x x o 4 3% 93.1 x x o 0 4 3% 90.1 x x x x x. x o 0 0 0 0 0 12 9% 87.0% x x x x o 0 0 0 8 6% 77 9% 30 x x x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 19% 71.8% x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 8% 52:7% x x x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 11 8% 45.0% x x x x o 0 0 0 8 6% 36.6% x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 11 8% 30.5% 25 x x x x x x o 0 0. o 0 0 12 9% 22 1 X X X 0 0 0 0 7 5% 13.0% X X O O O 5 4% 7.6% - O O 2 2% 3.8% X O 2 2% 2.3% 20 X 1 1% 0.8% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 131 100 1 n 1 CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street EMERSON PLACE Date 11/2/2005 50th % 30 MPH Location Begin 9:OOAM End 10:OOAN 85th % 32 MPH Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 10MPH 25 34 Remarks NEW AVE TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD Recorded by TSI - S.W. % in Pace 90% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 40 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% x 1 1% 100.0% 0 0% 98.6% ° 1 1 % 98.6% 35 0 0 0 3 4% 97.2% x x x 3 4% 93.0% x o 2 3% 88.7% x x x o 0 0 0 7 10% 85.9% x x x o 0 5 7% 76.1% 30 x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 14 20% 69.0% x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 15% 49.3% x x x x o 0 0 7 10% 33.8% x x o 0 0 5 7% 23.9% x x o 0 0 5 7% 16.9% 25 x x x o .0 5 7% 9.9% 0 0 2 3.% 2.8% _ 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0.% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - East/North bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed 71 100 1 1 1 e • CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street ENCIN/TAAVENUE Date 11/2/2005 50th % 29 MPH Location Begin 2:OOPM End 3:OOPM 85th % 32 MPH Direction N-S Weather CLEAR 10MPH 24 33 Remarks MISSION RD TO LOWER AZUSA RD Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 89% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percenta e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% .100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 . 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% _100.0% 0 0% 100.0% -0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 40 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 35 x o 0 3 5% 100.0% 0 0% 95.5% x o 0 3 5% 95.5% x o 0 0 0 5 8% 90.9% x x x o 0 0 0 7 11 % 83.3% 30 x x x x x o 0 0 8 12% 72.7% x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 14% 60.6% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 9 14% 47.0% x x x o 0 5 8% 33.3% x x o 3 5% 25.8% 25 x x x x x o 0 0 8 12% 21.2% x o 2 3% 9.1% ° 1 2% 6.1% 0 0% 4.5% x 1 2% 4.5% 20 0 ° 2 3% 3.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - East/North bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed 66 100 1 1 • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street GARVEYAVENUE Date 11/10/2005 50th Location Begin 3:OOPM End 4:OOPM 85th Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 10MPH Remarks WEST CITY LIMIT TO DEL MAR AVE Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 34 MPH 38 MPH 30 39 72% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES '~ ` 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% ° 1 0% 100.0% 45 0 1 0% 99.5% 0 0% 99.0% 0 0% 99.0% x x x x o 0 6 3% 99.0% x o 0 3 1% 96.1% 40 x o 0 0 0 0 0 7 3% 94.6% . x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 9 4% 912% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 8% 86.8% x x x o 0 0 0 0 8 4% 78.9% x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 6% 75.0% 35 x x x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 12% 68.6% x x x x x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 10% 56.4% x x x z x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 7% 46.1 x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 8% 38.7% x x x x x o 0 0 0 9 4% 30.9% 30 x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 15 7% 26.5% x x x x x o 0 0 o g 4% 19.1% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 11 5% 14.7% x x x o 4 2% 9.3% x x x x x o 0 o g 4% 7.4% 25 x x x x o 5 2% 3.4% 0 1 0% 1.0% 0 1 0% 0.5% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 204 100 e i a 1 7 • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street GARVEYAVENUE Date 11/10/2005 50th % 35 MPH Location Begin 2:OOPM End 3:OOPM 85th % 39 MPH Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 10MPH 30 39 Remarks DEL MAR AVE TO SAN GABRIEL Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 75% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 0 1 0% 100.0% x o 2 1% 99.5% 0 0 2 1 % 98.6% x x o 0 0 0 0 7 3% 97.6% x x o 0 0 0 0 7 3% 94.3% 40 x x x o 0 0 6 3% 91.0% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 6% 88.1% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 6% 81.9% x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 13 6% 76.2% x x x x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 10% 70.0% 35 x x x x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 24 11 % 60.5% x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 10% 49.0% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 7% 39.0% x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 8% 31.9% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 11 5% 24.3% 30 x x x z x x x o 0 0 0 0 12 6% 19.0% x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 10 5% 13.3% x x x o 0 0 6 3% 8.6% x o 2 1 % 5.7% x x x o 4 2% 4.8% 25 x x x o 0 5 2% 2.9% x 1 0% 0.5% 0 0% 0.0% _ 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 210 100 ILJ C t S • CITY OF ROSEMEAD . SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street GARVEY AVENUE Date 11 /10/2005 50th Location Begin 1:OOPM End 2:OOPM 85th Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 10MPH Remarks SAN GABRIEL TO WALNUT GROVE Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 34 MPH 38 MPH 29 38 76% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES ' 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% x 1 0% 100.0% x x x o 0 5 2% 99.5% x x o 0 4 2% 97.1% 40 x x x o 0 0 0 0 8 4% 95.1 x x x o 0 0 6 3% 91.2% x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 8% 88.3% x x x x x o 0 0 0 9 4% 80.5% x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 7% 76.1% 35 x x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 o b o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 13% 69.3% x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 9% 56.6% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 6% 47.8% x x x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 11% 41.5% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 6% 30.7% 30 x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 13 6% 24.9% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 13 6% 18.5% x x x x o 0 0 7 3% 12.2% x x x x o 0 6 3% 8.8% x o 0 0 4 2% 5.9% 25 x x x x x o 0 0 8 4% 3.9% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% _ _ 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 .0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed 205 100 1 i • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street GARVEYAVENUE Date 11/9/2005 50th % 35 MPH Location Begin 3:OOPM End 4:OOPM 85th % 39 MPH Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 10MPH 29 38 Remarks WALNUT GROVE TO EAST CITY LIM Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 71% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% ° 1 0% 100.0% 45 0 0 0 0 4 2% 99.5% x o 0 3 1% 97.5% 0 0 2 1% 96.1% x o 0 0 0 0 6 3% 95.1% x x o 0 4 20/6 92 2% 40 x x x x x x o 0 0 9 4% 90.2% x x x x o 0 0 0 8 4% 85.8% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 7% 819% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 11 5% 75.0% x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 10% 69.6% 35 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 13% 59.8% x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ $% 471% x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 6% 38 7% x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 9% 32 8% x x x x o 0 0 -7 3% 24.0% 30 x x x x x x o 0 0 0 10 5% 20.6% x x x x x x o 0 0 ° 10 -5% 15:7% x x x x o 0 6 3% 10.8% x x o 0 0 5 2% 7.8% x x x o 4 2% 5.4% 25 x x x x o 0 0 7 3% 3.4% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 , 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - East/North bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 204 100 e 1 • • Street Location Direction Remarks CITY OF - .SPOT SPEED SURVEY Date Begin End Weather Recorded by 50th % #DIV/0! MPH 85th % #DIV/0! MPH 10MPH 56 65 in Pace #DIV/0! MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percenta e 65 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 60 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 55 ~ o #DIVIO! #DIV/0! 0 . #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 50 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 45 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIVlO! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 40 0 #DIV/0! ~ #DIV/O! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 35 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! o #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 30 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 25 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! _ _ 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 20 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 15 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 0 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • CITY OF ROSEMEAD . SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street GRAND AVENUE Date 11 /9/2005 50th Location Begin 11:OOAN. End 12:OOPN. 85th Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 10MPH Remarks CHARLOTTE TO ROSEMEAD Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 34 MPH 38 -MPH 29 38 81% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percenta e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 x 1 2% 100.0% 0 0% 98.4% x 1 2% 98.4% x x 2 3% 96.8% 0 0% 93.5% 40 0 1 2% 93.5% 0 0 2 3% 91.9% x x x o 4 6% 88.7% x o 0 0 0 0 6 10% 82.3% x o 0 3 5% 72.6% 35 x x x x x o 0 0 0 9 0 15 /0 0 67.7 /o x o 0 0 0 0 0 7 11% 53.2% x x x o 4 6% 41.9% x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 9 15% 35.5% x 1 2% 21.0% 30 x o 0 3 5% 19.4% x o 0 0 4 6% 14.5% x o 2 3% 8.1 x 1 2% 4.8% x 1 2% 3.2% 25 x 1 2% 1.6% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - East/North bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed 62 100 ~~ ~~ '~.~ ~~ J • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street HELLMAN AVENUE Date 11/2/2005 Location Begin . 1:OOPM End 2:OOPM Direction E-W Weather CLEAR Remarks NEW TO WALNUT GROVE Recorded by TSI - S.W. 50th % 29 MPH 85th % 33 MPH 10MPH 25 34 in Pace. 86% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES ~~ 5 10 15 20. 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percenta e 65 0 0% 100.0% _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ ._ - 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 0 0% .100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 40 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% ° 1 1% 100.0% 35 x x o 0 0 o s 6% 99.0% x x x x o 0 0 7 7% 93.1 x x x x o 0 0 7 7% 86.3% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 12 12% 79.4% x x o 0 0 5 5% 67.6% 30 x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 11 11 % 62.7% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 - 13% 52.0% x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 10 10% 39.2% x x o 0 0 0 6 6% 29.4% x x x x o 0 0 0 8 8% 23.5% 25 x x x x x o 0 0 0 9 9% 15.7% x o 2 2% 6.9% x 1 1 % 4.9% x -- - - - -- -- _ -- --- -- - -- - 1 1% 3.9% x x 2 2% 2.9% 20 x 1 1% 1.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 102 100 i 1 • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street JACKSON AVENUE Date 11 /2/2005 50th Location Begin 3:OOPM End 4:OOPM 85th Direction N-S Weather CLEAR 10MPH Remarks GRAVES TO GARVEY Recorded by TSI - S.W. % in Pace 30 MPH 35 MPH 26 35 79% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Numberof Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 1 1% 100.0% 0 0% 98.6% 40 ~ 1 1 % 98.6% 0 1 1 % 97.2% x o 0 0 4 6% 95.8% 0 0% 90.3% x o 0 3 4% 90.3% 35 x .x x o 0 0 0 0 8 11 % 86.1 x o o 3 4% 75.0% x o 2 3% 70.8% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 9 13% 68.1 x x 2 3% 55.6% 30 x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 18% 52.8% x o 0 0 4 6% 34.7% x x x x o 0 0 0 8 11% 29.2% x o 2 3% 18.1 x z o 0 0 0 6 8% 15.3% 25 x x x x o 5 7% 6.9% 0 0% 0.0% 0 ~ 0% 0.0% -- ... - - - 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 ()% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 72 100 1 1 1 Street LOFTUS STREET Location Direction E-W Remarks TEMPLE_ CITY TO EAST CITY LIMIT CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Date 11 /2/2005 50th Begin 1:OOPM End 2:OOPM 85th Weather CLEAR 10MPH Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 35 MPH 39 MPH 30 39 75% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percenta e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 ° ° 2 1 % 100.0% 0 0% 98.6% x 1 1 % 98.6% x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 9 7% 97 8% x ° 2 1% 91.3% 40 x x o 0 0 0 6 4% 89.9% x x x x o 0 0 0 8 6% 85.5% x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 9% 79.7% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 10 7% 71.0% x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 9% 63.8% 35 x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 13% 55.1 x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 10% 42.0% x x x x x o 6 4% 31.9% x x x x x o 0 0 0 9 7% 27 5% x x x x o 5 4% 21.0% 30 x x x x x o 0 0 0 9 7% 17 4% _ x x o 0 0 0 0 0 8 6% 10.9% x x o 3 2% 5.1% x 1 1 % 2.9% x 1 1% 2.2% 25 x x 2 1% 1.4% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0:0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - East/North bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed 138 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • Street LOWER AZUSA ROAD Location Direction E-W Remarks ROSEMEAD TO ENCINITA CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Date 11/2/2005 50th % 39 MPH Begin 3:OOPM End 4:OOPM 85th % 42 MPH Weather CLEAR 10MPH 34 43 Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 79% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES ` 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 _ 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 . 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 x o 2 1 % 100.0% x 1 1 % 98.6% 0 0% 97.9% 0 0% 97.9% x o 2 1 % 97.9% 45 x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 9 6% 96.6% 0 0 0 3 2% 90.3% x x 'x o 0 5 3% 88.3% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 10% 84.8% x x x x x x o o' 0 0 10 7% 75.2% 40 x x 'x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 15% 68.3% x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 12% 53.1% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 12% 40.7% x x x o 0 0 6 4% 28.3% x o 0 0 0 5 3% 24.1 35 x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 9% 20.7% x x o 0 4 3% 11.7% P 1 1 % 9.0% x x o 0 0 5 3% 8.3% x o 2 1 % 4.8% 30 x x o 0 4 3% 3.4% x 1 1 % 0.7% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 25 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% _ 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 145 100 '~ i~ I~ LJ • e CITY OF ROSEMEAD . SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street MARSHALL STREET Date 11/8/2005 50th % 35 .MPH Location Begin 10:OOAIU End 11:OOAN 85th % 38 MPH Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 10MPH 29 38 Remarks DELTA TO WALNUT GROVE Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 88% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 1 1% 100.0% 0 0% 98.9% 40 x x x o 4 4% 98.9% x o 0 0 4 4% 94.4% x x x x x x x o 0 0 10 11% 899% x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 9 10% 78 7% x x x x x x o o S 9% 68.5% 35 x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 17% 59.6% x o 0 0 0 0 6 7% 42.7% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 9 10% 36.0% x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 9 10% 25.8% 1 1% 15.7% 30 x x o 0 0 0 6 7% 14.6% x x o 0 0 5 6% 7.9% x ° 2 2% 2.2% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 25 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 89 100 fl r 1 1 CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street MARSHALL STREET Date 11/8/2005 50th % 30 MPH Location Begin 9:OOAM End 10:OOAN 85th % 34 MPH Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 10MPH 26 35 Remarks WALNUT GROVE TO ROSEMEAD Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 88% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES " 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 40 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% x x 2 2% 100.0% x x 2 2% 97.8% 35 x x x x x o 0 7 8% 95.7% x x o 0 4 4% 88.2% x x x x o 0 6 6% 83.9% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 13 14% 77.4% x x x x o 0 0 7 8% 63.4% 30 x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 14% 55.9% x x x x x x x o 0 0 10 11% 41.9% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 10 11% 31.2% 0 0 0 3 3% 20.4% x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 9 10% 17.2% 25 x x x o 0 0 6 6% 7.5% ° 1 1% 1.1% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - East /North bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed 93 100 0 s 1 1 1 1 CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street MARSHALL STREET Date 11/3/2005 50th % 35 MPH Location Begin 3:OOPM End 4:OOPM 85th % 38 MPH Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 10MPH 30 39 Remarks ROSEMEAD TO HART Recorded. by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 79% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% - _ - - - - 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 x 1 1 % 100.0% x 1 1 % 99.3% x 1 1 % 98.5% x x x o o x 6 4% 97.8% x o 2 1 % 93.4% 40 ° 1 1 % 92.0% . x x x x o 0 0 7 5% 91.2% x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 8% 86.1% x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 9 7% 781% x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 11% 71.5% 35 x x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 "0 0 0 0 0 0 21 15% 60.6% x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 10 7% 45.3% x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 10 7% 38.0% x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 14 10% 30.7% x x o 0 0 5 4% 20.4% 30 x x x o 0 0 _ s 4% 16.8% x x x x o 0 0 7 5% 12.4% x x x o 0 0 6 4% 7.3% x 1 1 % 2.9% x 1 1 % 2.2% 25 x x 2 1% 1.5% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 137 100 s 1 CITY OF ROSEMEAD . SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street MARSHALL STREET Date 11 /3/2005 50th Location Begin 2:OOPM End 3:OOPM 85th Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 10MPH Remarks HART TO RIO HONDO Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 34 MPH 37 MPH 29 38 84% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percenta e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% x 1 1% 100.0% 0 0% 98.9% 40 x o 2 2% 98.9% x x x 3 3% 96.6% x x x o 0 0 0 7 8% 93.2% x x x x x x o 0 8 9% 85.2% x o 0 0 0 0 0 7 8% 76.1% 35 .x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 13 15% 68.2% x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 10% 53.4% x x x o 0 0 6 7% 43.2% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 15% 36.4% 0 0 2 2% 21.6% 30 x x o 3 3% 19.3% x x x o 0 0 6 7% 15.9% 0 0 2 2% 9.1 0 1 1 % 6.8% x x 2 2% 5.7% 25 x x o 3 3% 3.4% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 88 100 i • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD . SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street MISSIONDRNE Date 11/9/2005 50th % 39 MPH Location Begin 10:OOAN End 11:OOAN 85th % 43 MPH Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 10MPH 34 43 Remarks WEST CITY LIM TO'WALNUT GROVE Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 74% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES `" 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of behicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percenta e 65 0 0% 100.0% ' 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% x x o 0 0 5 3% 100.0% x x 2 1 % 97.0% x x x x o 0 0 7 4% 95.g% 45 x x o 0 0 5 3% 91.7% x x x o 4 2% 88.8% x x x x x x x o 8 5% 86.4% x x x x x x x' x x o 0 0 0 0 0 15 9% 81.7% x x x x x x o 0 0 9 5% 72.8% 40 x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 12% 67.5% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 13 8% 55.6% x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 12% 47.9% x x x o 0 0 6 4% 35.5% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 12 7% 32.0% 35 x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 12 7% 24.9% x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 5% 17.8% 1 1% 12.4% x x o 0 0 0 0 0 8 5% 11.8% x x o 0 4 2% 7.1% 30 x o 0 0 0 5 3% 4.7% x x o 3 2% 1.8% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 25 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 169 100 1 1 • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street MISSION DRNE Date 11/8/2005 50th % 39 MPH Location Begin 3:OOPM End 4:OOPM 85th % 44 MPH Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 10MPH 36 45 Remarks WALNUT GROVE TO ROSEMEAD Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 68% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0°/a 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% x ~ 1 1% 100.0% x x x 3 2% 99.4% x o 2 1 % 9Z.8% x x x o 0 0 6 3% 96.6% 45 x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 14 8% .93.3% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 10 6% 85.5% x x x o 0 0 0 7 q% 7g,g% x x x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 18 10% 76.0% x x x x x o 0 0 0 9 5% 65.9% 40 x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 9% 60.9% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 8% 51.4% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 8% 43.6% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 10 6% 35.8% x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 9 5% 30.2% 35 x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 7% 25.1 x x x o 0 0' o 0 8 4% 18.4% x x o 0 0 5 3% 14.0% x x x x o 0 0 0 8 4% 11.2% x x o 0 4 2% 6.7% 30 x o 0 0 4 2% 4.5% 0 0 0 3 2% 2:2% 0 1 1 % 0.6% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 25 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 179 100 1 1 • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD ..SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street MISSION DR/VE Date 11/3/2005 50th % 40 MPH Location Begin 9:OOAM End 10:OOAN 85th % 44 MPH Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 10MPH 35 44 Remarks ROSEMEAD TO VALLEY Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 73% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES " 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percenta e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% ~ 0% , 00.0% 0 o°io , 00.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 1 1 % 100.0% x o 2 1 % 99.4% x x x o 0 0 6 3% 98.3% x o 2 1 % 94.9% x x x x o 5 3% 93.8% 45 x x x x x o 0 0 8 5% 90.9% x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 6% 86.4% x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 12 7% 80.1% x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 9% 73.3% x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 10 6% 642% 40 x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 11 % 58.5% x x x x" x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 12% 47.7% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 12 7% 35.8% x x x o 0 0 0 0 8 5% 29.0% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 9 5% 24.4% 35 x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 10 6% 19.3% x x x o 0 5 3% 13.6% x x x o 0 5 3% 10.8% x x x o 0 0 6 3% 8.0% 0 0% 4.5% 30 x o 0 3 2% 4.5% x x x o 4 2% 2.8% x 1 1 % 0.6% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 25 0 0% 0.0°/a 0 0% 0.0% _ 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% o 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 -0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - East/North bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed 176 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD 'SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street MUSCATEL AVENUE Date 11 /8/2005 50th % 30 MPH Location Begin 2:OOPM End 3:OOPM 85th % 32 MPH Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 10MPH 25 34 Remarks MARSHALL TO GRAND Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 95% . MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 _ _ 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 40 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 1 2% 100.0% 35 x o 2 3% 98.4% x x x o 4 6% 95.2% x o 2 3% 88.9% x x o 0 0 0 6 10% 85.7% x x x x x o 6 10% 76.2% 30 x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 12 19% 66.7% - x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 12 19% 47.6% x x x o 0 0 0 7 11% 28.6% 0 0 0 3 5% 17.5% x o. x 3 5% 12.7% 25 x x x o 0 5 8% 7.9% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 63 100 0 u J 1 1 CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street NEW AVENUE Date 11 /2/2005 50th Location Begin 2:OOPM End 3:OOPM 85th Direction N-S Weather CLEAR 10MPH Remarks GRAVES TO GARVEY Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 35 MPH 38 MPH 31 40 79% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20. 25 3 Number of 0 Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 D% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% • 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% x o 0 3 3% 100.0% 1 1% 97.1% 40 x x x o 0 0 0 7 7% 96.2% x x o 0 0 5 5% 89.4% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 10 10% 84.6% x x o 0 0 0 6 6% 75.0% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11 % 69.2% 35 x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 16% 58.7% x x x x o 0 0 0 8 8% 42.3% x x x o 0 0 6 6% 34.6% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 10 10% 28.8% x o 2 2% 19.2% 30 x x x o 0 0 6 6% 17.3% x x o 0 4 4% 11.5% x x x o 4 ' 4% 7.7% 0 0% 3.8% x 1 1 % 3.8% 25 x x x 3 3% 2.9% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 104 100 u t i 1 J • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street RAMONA BOULEVARD Date 11 /10/2005 50th Location Begin 11:OOAN End 12:OOPN 85th Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 10MPH Remarks, WALNUT GROVE TO IVAR Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 30. MPH 32 MPH 25 34 93% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 40 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% x 1 1% 100.0% x 1 1 % 98.6% 0 0% 97.3% 35 x o 2 3% 97.3% x o 0 0 4 5% 94.5% x 1 1 % 89.0% x x x o 0 0 6 8% 87 7% x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 9 12% 79.5% 30 x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 19% 67.1 x x o 0 0 0 0 7 10% 47.9% x x x x x o 0 0 8 11% 38.4% x x o 0 4 5% 27.4% x x o 0 0 0 6 8% 21.9% 25 x x x x x o 0 0 0 9 12% 13.7% 1 1% 1.4% 0 0% 0.0% - - -- - - - - ---.._ 0 . - 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0°l0 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 o°io o.o°,° 0 o°io o.o°i° 0 o°io o.o°i° 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 73 100 s L C • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street RIO HONDO AVENUE Date 11/3/2005 -50th % 30 MPH Location Begin 11:OOAM End 12:OOPN 85th % 35 MPH Direction N-S Weather CLEAR 10MPH 24 33 Remarks OLNEY TO VALLEY Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 78% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percenta e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 0 0% .100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 40 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% x x o 0 0 5 6% 100.0% 1 1 % 93.9% x x x 3 4% 92.7% 35 0 0 0 0 a 5% 89.0% ° ~ 1% 84.1% x x o 0 0 5 6% 82.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 9% 76.8% x x x x o 5 6% 68.3% 30 x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 13 16% 62.2% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 12 15% 46.3% x x x o 0 0 6 7% 31.7% 0 0 2 2% 24.4% x o 0 0 0 5 6% 22.0% 25 x x x o 0 0 0 7 9% 15.9% x o 2 2% 7.3% x 1 1 % 4.9% 0 0% 3.7% x x 2 2% 3.7% 20 x 1 1 % 1.2% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - East/North bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed 82 100 i w i . • CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street ROSEMEAD PLACE Date 11 /10/2005 50th Location Begin 9:OOAM End 10:OOAN 85th Direction N-S Weather CLEAR 10MPH Remarks GARVEY TO EARLSWOOD Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 34 MPH 37 MPH 29 38 88% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 0 . 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% x 1 1% 100.0% 0 0% 98.8% 40 x o 2 2% 98.8% x o 2 2% 96.3% x x x o 0 0 6 7% 93.8% x x x x o 5 6% 86.4% x x x x o 5 6% 80.2% 35 x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 19% 74.1 x x x x o 0 6 7% 55.6% x x x x o 0 6 7% 48 1 x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 11 14% 40.7% x x o 0 4 5% 27.2% 30 x x o 0 0 0 0 0 8 10% 22.2% x x o 0 0 5 6% 12.3% x o 0 3 4% 6.2% 0 0% 2.5% 0 0% 2.5% 25 0 0 2 2% 2.5% 0 0% 0.0% _. 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 .. 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 81 100 t 1 1 1 s • CITY OF ROSEMEAD - SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street RUSH STREET Date 11 /3/2005 50th Location Begin 1:OOPM End 2:OOPM 85th Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 10MPH Remarks SAN GABRIEL TO WALNUT GROVE Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 39 -MPH 44 MPH 35 44 74% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 _ 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0 0 3 2% 100.0% x o o . 3 2% 97.7% 0 0 2 2°/a 95.5% x o 2 2% 94.0% x o 2 2% 92.5% 45 x x x o 0 0 6 5% 91.0% x x x x x o 0 7 5% 86.5% 0 0 2 2% 81.2% x x x x o 0 0 7 5% 79.7% x x x x x x x o 0 9 7% 74.4% 40 x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 15% 67.7% x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 11 8% 52.6% x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 11% 44.4% x x x x x o 0 0 0 9 7% 33.1% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 11 8% 26.3% 35 x x x o 0 0 0 7 5% 18.0% ° 1 1 % 12.8% x x 2 2% 12.0% x x x o 0 0 0 7 5% 10.5% x 1 1 % 5.3% 30 x x o 0 0 5 4% 4.5% x 1 1 % 0.8% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 25 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 133 100 1 s • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street SAN GABRIEL BOULEVARD Date 11/3/2005 50th % 44 MPH Location Begin 3:OOPM End 4:OOPM 85th % 48 MPH Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 10MPH 39 48 Remarks SOUTH CITY LIMIT TO DELTA Recorded by TSI - S.W. % in Pace 70% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% x x o 3 2% 100.0% x 0 0 0 4 2% 98.5% 50 x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 9 5% 96.4% x x x x x x x x o 0 10 5% 91.9% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 10 5% 86.8% x x x x o 0 0 7 4% 81.7% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 13 7% 78 2% 45 x x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 12% 71.6% x x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 11 % 59.9% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 6% 48.7% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 8% 43.1% x x x o 0 0 0 0 8 4% 35.0% 40 x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 8% 31.0% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 12 6% 23.4% x x x x x x o 0 0 9 5% 17.3% x x x o 0 0 6 3% 12.7% x x x o 0 0 0 7 4% 9.6% 35 x x x x x o 0 0 0 9 5% 6.1 x x o 3 2% 1.5% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 30 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% _-0.0% 0 o°i° o.o°i° 0 o°i° o.o°i° 0 o°io o.o°io 25 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% -- - -- -- - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - East/North bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 197 100 1 CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street SAN GABRIEL BOULEVARD Date 11/3/2005 50th Location Begin 10:OOAN -End 11:OOAN 85th Direction N-S Weather CLEAR 10MPH Remarks RUSH TO GARVEY' Recorded by TSI - S.W. % in Pace 39 MPH 44 MPH 35 44 70% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 . 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 ' 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% x o 0 3 2% 100.0% x 1 1 % 98.3% x o 0 0 0 5 3% 97.8% 45 x x x x x o 0 7 4% 95.0% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 8% 91.2% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 9 5% 83.4% x x x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 12% 78.5% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 12 7% 66.9% 40 x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 8% 60.2% x x x x x x x x x x o o .o 0 0 0 0 0 18 10% 51.9% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 10 6% 42.0% x x o 0 0 5 3% 36.5% x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 11 6% 33.7% 35 x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 12 7% 27.6% x x x o 0 0 6 3% 21.0% x x x o 0 5 3% 17.7% x x x x x x o o 8 4% 14.9% x x x o 0 5 3% 10.5% 30 x x x x o 0 0 0 8 4% 7.7% x o 0 0 4 2% 3.3% x o 2 1% 1.1% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 25 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% _ 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 o°io o.o°i° 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 o°i° o.o°i° 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 o°io o.o°io 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 181 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD • SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street SAN GABRIEL BOULEVARD Date 11/3/2005 50th % 39 MPH Location Begin 11:OOAtJ End 12:OOPN 85th % 42 MPH Direction N-S Weather CLEAR 10MPH 34 43 Remarks GARVEY TO HELLMAN Recorded by TSI - S:W. % in Pace 76% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percenta e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 o°io 1oo.o°io 0 o°io 1oo.o°io 0 o°io 1oo.o°io 0 o°io 1 oo.o°io 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% x o 0 3 1% 100.0% 45 x x x o 0 0 0 0 8 4% .98.5% x x x x x o 0 7 3% 94.6% x x x o 0 0 0 0 8 4% 91.1% x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 9% 87.2% x x x x x x o 0 0 9 4% 77.8% 40 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 11 % 73.4% x x x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 13% 62.6% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 "0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 10% 49.3% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 7% 39.4% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 10 5% 32.0% 35 x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 7% 27.1 x x x x x x x o 0 0 10 5% 20.2% x x x x o 0 6 3% 15.3% x x x x x o 0 7 3% 12.3% x x x x x o 0 0 8 4% 8.9% 30 x x x o 0 0 6 3% 4.9% x o - 2 1 % 2.0% x x 2 1% 1.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 25 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% -0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 203 100 • CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD Date 11 /2/2005 50th Location Begin 10:OOAtJ End 11:OOAN. 85th Direction N-S Weather CLEAR 10MPH Remarks OLNEY TO VALLEY ' Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 39 MPH 42 MPH 35 44 81% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES.. ~~ 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percenta e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 _ 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100:0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% x o 0 0 4 2% 100.0% 45 x x x x x o 0 0 8 4% 98.0% x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 11 5% 94.1% x x x o 0 0 0 0 8 4% 88.8% x x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 10% 84.9% x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 8% 74.6% 40 x x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 21 10% 66.3% x x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 12% 56.1 x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 20 10% 43.9% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 13 6% 34.1% x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 14 7% 27.8% 35 x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 8% 21.0% x x x x o 0 0 7 3% 12.7% x x o 0 0 0 0 7 3% 9.3% x x x x x o 0 7 3% 5.9% x x x 3 1% 2.4% 30 x x 2 1 °/a 1.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 25 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% _ 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 205 100 CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD Date 11/2/2005 50th % 39 -MPH Location Begin 9:OOAM End 10:OOAN 85th % 43 MPH Direction N-S Weather CLEAR 10MPH 35 44 ® Remarks VALLEY TO NORTH CITY LIMITS Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 74% 1 1 MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% x o 2 1 % 100.0% x x x x o 0 0 7 3% 99.0% 45 x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 11 5% .95.6% x x x x o 0 0 0 8 4% 90.2% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 11 5% 86.3% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 6% 80.9% x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 7% 74.5% 40 x x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 12% 67.2% x x x x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 10% 54.9% x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 9% 44.6% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 8% 35.8% x x x x x o 0 0 o g 4% 27.9% 35 x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 14 7% 23.5% x x x o 0 0 0 0 8 4% 16.7% x x o 0 4 2% 12.7% x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 10 5% 10.8% x x x o 0 0 6 3% 5.9% 30 x o 0 o a 2% 2.9% - x x 2 1 % 1.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 25 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% a o°i° o.o°io 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 o°io o.o°io 0 o°io o.o°io 0 o°io o.o°io 0 o°io o.o°io 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 204 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD . SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street VALLEY BOULEVARD Date 11/8/2005 50th % 35 MPH' Location Begin 1:OOPM End 2:OOPM 85th % 40 MPH Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 10MPH 29 38 Remarks CHARLOTTE TO ROSEMEAD ~ Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 63% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 45 x x x x x o 6 3% 100.0% x x x o 4 2% 97.1% x x o 0 4 2% 95.1% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 10 5% 93.2% x x x o 0 5 2% 88.3% 40 x x x x o 0 0 0 0 9 4% 85.9% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 9 4% 81.6% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o i6 8% 77.2% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 9 4% 69.4% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 8% 65.0% 35 x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 9% 57.3% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 7% 48.5% x x x x x o 0 0 8 4% 41.7% x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 16 8% 37.9% x x x o 0 0 6 3% 30.1% 30 x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 13 6% 27.2% x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 13 6% 20.9% x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 5% 14.6% 0 0 0 0 4 2% 9.7% x x o 0 0 0 0 7 3% 7.8% 25 x x o 0 0 0 0 7 3% 4.4% 0 0 2 1 % 1.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed 206 100 1 1 1 1 • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street VALLEY BOULEVARD Date 11 /3/2005 50th Location Begin 10:OOAN End 11:OOAM 85th Direction E-W Weather CLEAR 10MPH Remarks ROSEMEAD TO STRANG Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 36 MPH 41 MPH 33 42 69% .MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 ~0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% x 1 0% 100.0% 45 x x x x o 0 6 3% 99.5% x x o o 4 2% 96.6% x x o o 4 2% 94.6% x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 14 7% 92.6% x x x x x o 0 0 8 4% 85.7% 40 x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 7% 81.8% x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 11 % 74.9% x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 9% 64.0% x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 9 4% 55.2% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 6% 50.7% 35 x x x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 12% 44.3% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 10 5% 32.0% x x x x x o 0 0 8 4% 27.1 x x x x x x x x x x 10 5% 23.2% x x o 0 0 0 6 3% 18.2% 30 x x x x o 0 0 0 0 9 4% 15.3% x x x x x o 0 0 8 4% '10.8% x x o o 4 2% 6.9% x 1 0% 4.9% 5 2% 4.4% 25 x x x o a 2% 2.0% 0 0% 0.0% - - -- - - - - - - - -- - 0 - - 0% - 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 . 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed 203 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD . SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street WALNUT GROVE AVENUE Date 11/3/2005 50th Location Begin 2:OOPM End 3:OOPM 85th Direction N-S Weather CLEAR 10MPH Remarks SAN GABRIEL TO RUSH Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 44 MPH 49 MPH 39 48 68% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES ' 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percenta e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% ° 1 1% 100.0% 55 0 0 0 3 2% 99.3% 0 0% 97.1 0 1 1% 97.1% x o 0 0 0 0 0 7 5% 96:4% x o 2 1% 91:3% 50 x x x o 0 5 4% 89.9% x x x x x o 0 0 8 6% 86.2% x x o 0 0 0 0 7 5% 80.4% x x o 0 4 3% 75.4% x x x x o 0 0 7 5% 72.5% 45 x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 15 11 % .67.4% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 12% 56.5% x x x o 0 0 0 7 5% 44.9% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 12 9% 39.9% x o 0 0 0 5 4% 31.2% 40 x x k x x o 0 0 0 0 10 7% 27.5% x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 11 8% 20.3% x x x o 0 0 0 7 5% 12.3% ° 1 1 % 7.2% x x x 3 2% 6.5% 35 x x x o 0 5 4% 4.3% 0 0% 0.7% 0 0% 0.7% x 1 1 % 0.7% 0 0% 0.0% 30 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 25 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - East/North bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed 138 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street WALNUT GROVE AVENUE Date 11 /3/2005 50th Location Begin 11:OOAfV End 12:OOPN 85th Direction- N-S Weather CLEAR 10MPH Remarks RUSH TO GARVEY Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 39 MPH 43 MPH 36 45 75% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES ' 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0 2 1 % 100.0% 45 x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 14 7% gg.g% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 10 5% 91.4% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 6% 86.1 x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 11% 80.2% x x x x x o o. 0 0 0 0 0 12 6% 69.0% 40 x x x x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 12% 62.6% x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 9% 50.3% x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 14 7% 41.7% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 6% 34.2% x x x x x x o 0 8 4% 27.8% 35 x x o 0 0 5 3% 23.5% x o 0 o a 2% 20.9% x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 10 5% 18.7% x x x x x x o 7 4% 13.4% x x x x x x o 0 0 9 5% 9.6% 30 x x x x o 0 0 7 4% 4.8% - x -x - - - - - - -- -- - - - 2 1% 1.1% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 25 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 o°io o.o°io 0 o°io o.o°ro 0 o°i° o:o°io 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 o°io o.o°io 0 o°io o.o°ro 0 o°i° o.o°io 0 o°io o.o°io 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 187 100 e • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street WALNUT GROVE AVENUE Date 11 /9/2005 50th Location Begin 2:OOPM End 3:OOPM 85th Direction N-S Weather CLEAR 10MPH Remarks. GARVEY TO HELLMAN Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 39 MPH 44 MPH 35 44 70% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 _. - 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 0 0% 100.0% x 1 1% 100.0% x x o 0 0 5 3% 99.4% x 1 1 % 96.5% x o 2 1 % 95.9% 45 x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 14 8% 94.8% x x x x x o 0 0 8 5% 86.6% x x x x o 0 6 3% 82.0% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 9% 78.5% x x x x o 0 0 0 8 5% 69.2% 40 x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 12% 64.5% x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 14 8% 52.9% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 9% 44.8% x x x x o 0 0 0 8 5% 36.0% x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 11 6% 31.4% 35 x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 9% 25.0% x o 0 3 2% 16.3% x x x o 4 2% 14.5% x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 9 5% 12.2% x o 0 3 2% 7.0% 30 x x x o 0 5 3% 5.2% x o 0 3 2°/a 2.3% x 1 1 % 0.6% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 25 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 172 100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street WALNUT GROVE AVENUE Date 11 /8/2005 50th Location Begin 11:OOAN End 12:OOPN 85th Direction N-S Weather CLEAR 10MPH Remarks HELLMAN TO VALLEY Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 40 MPH 45 MPH 35. 44 69% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% x 1 0% 100.0% 0 0% 99.5% 50 x x x 3 1% '99.5% x x x x o 5 2% 98.1 x x x x x x x x o 9 4% 95.7% x x x 3 1% 91.3% x x x x o 0 6 3% 89.9% 45 x x x x x o 0 0 0 9 4% 87.0% x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 9 4% 82.6% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 9 4% 78.3% x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 10% 73.9% x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 6% 64.3% 40 x x x x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' o 0 0 24 12% 58.5% x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 8% 46.9% x x x x x x x •x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 10% 39.1% x x x o 0 0 0 0 8 4% 29.0% x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 13 6% 25.1% 35 x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 5% 18.8% x x o 0 0 0 6 3% 13.5% x x o 0 0 5 2% 10.6% x x o 0 0 0 0 0 8 4% 8.2% 0 0 0 3 1% 4.3% 30 x o 0 0 4 2% 2.9% 0 1 0% 1.0% 0 1 0% 0.5% 0 0.% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 25 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- 0 - - 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - East/North bound 0 - West/South Bound Total Observed 207 100 l 1 o - CITY OF ROSEMEAD .SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street WALNUT GROVE AVENUE Date 11/9/2005 50th % 39 MPH Location Begin 9:OOAM End 10:OOAN 85th % 44 MPH Direction N-S Weather CLEAR 10MPH 35 44 Remarks VALLEY TO MISSION Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 69% MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percents e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100:0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% x 1 0% 100.0% 0 0% 99:5% 50 x 1 0% 99.5% x x x 3 1% 99.0% x x x o 4 2% 97.6% 0 0 0 3 1% 95.7% x x o 0 0 5 2% 94.2% 45 x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 11 5% 91.8% x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 6% 86.5% x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 9 4% 80.7% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 6% 76.3% x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 6% 70.0% 40 x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 10% 64.3% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 12 6% 54.6% x x x x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 11 % 48.8% x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 13 6% 38.2% x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 6% 31.9% 35 x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 8% 25.6% x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 10 5% 17.4% x x x x x x o 0 0 9 4% 12.6% x x x o 0 0 0 7 3% 8 2% 0 1 0% 4.8% 30 x x x o 0 5 2% 4.3% x x o 3 1% 1.9% x 1 0% 0.5% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 25 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 207 100 ® • CITY OF ROSEMEAD SPOT SPEED SURVEY Street WALNUT GROVE AVENUE Date 11/9/2005 50th % 40 MPH Location Begin 1:OOPM End 2:OOPM 85th % 45 MPH Direction N-S Weather CLEAR 10MPH 37 46 ~ Remarks, MISSION TO NORTH CITY LIMIT Recorded by TSI - K.W. % in Pace 75% 1 i 1 ~J MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES ~~ 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of Vehicles Percent of Total Cumulative Percenta e 65 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 60 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 55 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 0 0% 100.0% 50 x 1 1 % 100.0% x 1 1 % 99.4% x o 2 1 % 98.7% 0 1 1 % 97.4% x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 7% 96.8% 45 x x x x x o 0 0 8 5% 89.6% x x x x o 0 0 0 0 9 6% 84.4% x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 12 8% 78.6% x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 15 10% 70.8% x x x x x o 0 0 0 9 6% 61.0% 40 x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 10% 55.2% x x x x x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 12% 45.5% x x x x x o 0 0 0 0 10 6% 33.1 x x x x x o 0 0 8 5% 26.6% x x x o 0 0 0 0 0 9 6% 21.4% 35 x o 0 0 0 5 3% 15.6% x x x o 0 5 3% 12.3% x x x o 4 3% 9.1% x x o 0 0 0 6 4% 6.5% x o 2 1 % 2.6% 30 x ° 2 1% 1.3% - - - -- - 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 25 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% _ 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 20 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 15 0 0% 0.0% X - EasUNorth bound 0 - WesUSouth Bound Total Observed 154 100 APPENDIX B Collision Rates Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rosemead 1 1 1 • . ~r - ~` ` - ~ ~n ~n ~n ~n ~n ~n ui ~n ~n -n ~n ~n ~ ~ ~ ~ O O O O O O O M M M _M O O O O O }'r M d' ~ M M M M M M M M M M M st ~ r`I ~ r ~,~ , `= l~. r 'rx 'r -7 ~ u ,b '~`'~ ~ ~ , ' _[~~ ~ 7 ; - ~ ~ .. t- ?' y ~t ~ - --i. , ~; aY ~ O O O O O O O ~ ~ ~ N O. CO ~ N O '? _ M cr to tL~ N M O O O O O O ~ O I~ N t0 (O ~-- OD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ O ~ O O a 4 ct O O O O O O O O O O O r O O O ` ,r ~ 1 t ~ ; r "' 2; ~ , ~_ 1~: "d f, i } ~=; ~~.{ a L ' ~ ~t O O C~ ~ O O O ~ O O ~ O O M M , ~ ~ ~ N ~ O M s! M ~ ~ O to ~ r M r'~'r n O O O- O O ~ O O O O O ~ r- O O O ~ " ~ t: ~; L " ,~ ~~ 1 4'„ ~~ N ~ O N ~ f~ N ~ 000 M ~ ~ ~ ~ oM0 ~ r 'c ~+ ~ ~ M M _ ao ~ ~ (O cO ~ ONO ~ O M ~ ct ~ 7 , ` I . ' a r: x s '~ ,, r ~ ~ ~ O O O M ~ ~ r r N ~ ~ r O Yv~ •~ ~ ~ ~ k I 3~ ~~~ ~ s ti ~ ~;~ 0 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ s w o w w ` ~ w > a ~ ! > > w ~ ~ m ~ w ~ w , t a ~ ~ } Q o ¢ ~" a ~~~ , ~ a Q a ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~- ~ w ~ J a ~ a a > j ~ ~ > > w ~ '~' ~ ~ > ~ w a p w g C~ zz ~ w zz > ~ z .~. 1 rJ~ ~ J a' J fn ~ Z > > Q U) O Q > ~' Q Q Z ~::° ~ _ ~ J Q W O W Q O W ~ Q A > ~ Q Q W ~ ~ Q U' W W _, ~. ~~ . W C7 = ~ F- fA J f i "` ~~F ', W i ; ~~ , ~ Z 0 r ;. ~ ~ c Z m > > Z. m J r ~ > > ~ z ~ = z O ~ ~, > a W ~ ~ p H Z > a ~ U ~ Q ~ ~ a a a ~ f- ~, w cn a ~ ~ z ~ ~ w J z Qw a ~ a ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~~ ~ C7 C7 >_ . O z ~ ~ o cn ~ Q U z C7 H ~ ~~1 r ~ t p the ~r H _ Q rs , _ W W Q , ~ i a a ~ ~ , F `;; ~ W W ~ W ~ W W W W ~ ~ F- ~ ,., r t~, ~ ° ~ ~ z z o ~- - Q z Z~~- -Z - -Z Z W ~~ -w- - W-- --w_ --a- ~ _ ~ ~ ~ W W Z (n r s ~ ~, , ~ .t: z W > > ~ p w -J a- Q W > W > W > W > W Q Q ~ ~ r: ~ ~ ,' ~ w ~ ~ ° z z Q a a a Q a z z ~ ~ 4.~h.. Q J Q' J W V Q' Q' Q' ~' Q J (~ L.L ..s ~~ ~ ;~~' W J W W Q J ~ Z Q Q Q Q ~ W ~ O O :, p ~ ~ w w w W U C7 C~ (~ C7 2 ~ ~, ~~ ° r N M ~ l!') (D I~ CO O O r r r N r M r ~ r In r CO r '`_ r 7t'. Z U a G 03 .~ N .~ W a ~o Q~ Q~ O 0 ;~' U 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • r._ K ~~' !: ~ t G~ < ~ . _ ~:'. ~ ' In O In O l!7 M l!7 O In O In O In O lLy O In O ~ O In O l!') O In M O r lf') O In O ~ M M C'M M '~ M ~ (") M M M M M N ~ ~7 ~'~ ~ .;~; w li ~ ~~4~~~ ~ , ~ ~' ~ . ~' ' , O O (O O ~ O (O I~ ~ O r N Cp O O ~ C O O ~ M O ~ O I~ O M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CO O O N M ~ r ~., 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 0 -3. .. ~ - ~7 .f ~,: - . - ~~ ~ ~ ~' ~ >~+ ~ r b i ~ his ~ M ~ d' N ~ N 00 N (D tc~ N to O ~ O ~ CD ~ to to N ~t O ~ (D (O ~ I~ O ~ ~: ~ -.;-a~,~: ~`,'' ' N p O O O O O O r O O O O O O O O ~ti , ~ ~. ~,, T t - ~} ~ i ~' , O ~ ~ O O N _ N N O . ~ ~ '# ~ v Q ~ ~ ~ ~ A r O ~ ~ tL) ~ N ~ ti O M O t1) O 1~ ti '! ~ : CO ~ ~ C D ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 V' ~ N O N N M . ~ ~ I _ _ ,t ,- Y "~i a O N ~ ~- N CO f~ t1') N C O r r ~ ~ N ~. _ .'I 4, ~ . ~ ~ ~~ ~! . 7 F._: . t -.~ W W O ~ O ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ z _ ^ w > W w ~ ~ ~ " w ~ W ~ J ^ ^ ^ > ~ H ~ Z ~~ O m ~. Q O m ^ Z w W ^ ~ ^ ~ W w > " k, ~`Y, ~ Q W o ~ Q > Q > m O ~ ~ Q Z 4 },.~ y ;= ~ Hw w > Q Z Hw w m Q ^ ~. w > } 2 rw fn r Q ~ ~ ~' >> ~ p ~~ Z ~ W Z w > Q W cn Z~ Q > g ~- ~ ~_ Z Z Q w W (n ~ ~ = O Z Q W W ~ J J ~ Q J J J Z Q ~.- W Q J W ~ Q Q Q > ~3i` '~ m '~''- ~ O" m w ~ O m ~ Z O W Z J W w 1 " .t .S ~:~. ~ Z W ~ ^ Z J ~ ^ (~ > ~ ('~ ~ > W ~ fir.. w ~ > Q ~a ,'° ~ (~ Q W ~ (~ Q J Q ~ Q . S ` ~ ' ~iF Z Z Z V x F- (A ~ ~ J W (A ~ Q W Z ~ Z ~ Cn ~ ^ ~ Q ~ _ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ C7 ~ Q O C7 c~ cn ~ (~ ' ' ~: ~ } w ~ w ^ ^ ^ `. ~ - y ~'" w w w w ~ Z j z U > J > J > J . ~ > > > Q ~ Q a '~,r; ~ '•:5 ~ ~ ~ c~n w w w w w ' ~ ' J ^ ^ ^ W Z m 0 Q Q' _ Q' _ Q' _ Q. ¢ ~ . ~ J Q J Q J Q Q z z z F- j Z Z w !n Q Q Q ,x ~ O O O , U Q O ~ W = C~ C7 C~ (4 (n (A fn ~ ' ' ,~ . r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z d' Q' ~ R N fn (n 4~ ~ t: `- i ~ Y w f~ 00 O O r N ' M ~ ~ CO I~ 00 N O N O M r M N M ,~ ., ~. ,~ r r r N N N N N N N N ~, Z /~ VJ U a c m .~ Q~ Q) .C G W a m a~ E NN~ ~l ;~% U 1 1 1 1 O O O O M O O O O O ~' ~ rl '7 M ~ tt '~ d' ~ Cp l 0 I ~ I~ I O I O I O I O I O I O I N ~ O ~ N ~ N ~ ~ O O O O O O O ~ O O O ~ o v cfl o M o rn ~ ~ O O ~ ~ O ti ~ N O O O ~ O O O O O O ;J r F .~ ,~ _ : ~; ~ O O I~ ~ M ~ M. r- ~ > t •=b ~ ti o00 N M N N ~ N ~ O ~r ~ ~ N N ~ (~O N N ~ r ~ , ~ p+; - = - ~ ~ ~ M r N ~ 'CC 00 ~ O t1~ O >:~~' • ', ~[ ~~~ r ,~ ~ ~ ~ r, 1. o ~; © ~ ~k (n W H .~ ~ `;`~ p J m W W W w p p J. rr ~ ;,i > ~- p ~ W ~ Q ~ ~ _ m V W Q ~ Q Z m. Z U f w = ~ z cn w ~ w O ~ ~ Z ~ (n ~ C7 = ~ ~ Z .. Z ~ W r u ~, ~ ~ J m ~ p ~ ~ Z W p p •', r '~ W p w m W W w > > J ~' '~, ~ > p W ~ Q J -~ ~ u-~ ~- } O ~ Q ~ W ~ W ~ - ,, ~ W C7 If',t "'-~~-~' i J J W W W >. . ,_ ~ } p p 0 O O O O O ._~ ~< U U m m ~ C7 ~ C7 C7 ~ ~- w ~-- w f- w o w E- w ~- w al >~`' J J W W pp pp pp pp pp >> `?r. ~_ _,,~.~`' . a d - J J Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ~ ~ J J Q W Q W Q W Q W Q W Q W ~' r N o M ~ tD CO I~ O O O ,-~ M M M M M M M '~' d' ~ z U N F~ G N C L lLl a m a~ E a~ 0 0 U 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • APPENDIX C Survey Equipment Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rosemead 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 s • SURVEY EQUIPMENT USED The radar equipment used to collect speed measurements for. this survey include two Model K15-K Hand-Held Traffic Radar manufactured by MPH Industries; Inc., of Chanute, Kansas. The calibration of the unit was checked before each series of measurements were taken. Tests of the unit were conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. The Model K15-K Hand-Held Traffic Radar's were last calibrated on July 29, 2005 and July 31, 2005 by R.H.F, Inc.- .Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rosemead