CC - Item II.A - Development Block GrantTO: HONORABLE MAYOR
AND MEMBERS
ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL
FROM: FRANK. G. TRIPEPI, CITY MANAGER ~
DATE: APRIL 3. 2000
RE' PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE PROPOSED COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) AND HOME
ALLOCATION FOR FY 2000-2001
As part of the requirements of the federal Consolidated Plan process, the City is
required to hold a public hearing regarding the projected use of funds, as well as
a public hearing to adopt the. final- Consolidated ,PIan. In order to receive the FY
2000-2001 allocation, the City must comply with the following requirements of the
Consolidated Plan Final Rule regarding presubmission requirements:
1. Fulfill citizen participation requirements by conducting a public hearing to
receive citizen input regarding projected use of funds;
2. Publish a draft Consolidated Plan for a 30-day comment period in order to
receive citizen input regarding the final document;
3. Hold a second public hearing to receive citizen input regarding the final
Plan and to adopt the Consolidated Plan.
COUNCIL AGENDA
APR 11 2000
i ITEM No.
staf epor
CDBG and HOME Allocation, page 2
The Consolidated Plan takes all HUD requirements regarding planning, needs
analysis, reporting, budgeting, citizen input and certifications and incorporates
them into one document. The full Consolidated Plan must be completed once
every five (5) years, while the One Year Action Plan must be done annually.
The City anticipates that it will receive $1,513,000 in CDBG funds and will
reprogram carryover allocation from prior years. Based on this amount, the City
estimates that it will have $3,983,812 available for projects in FY 2000. The City
anticipates that it will receive $504,000 in HOME funds and will reprogram
carryover allocation from prior years. Based on this amount, the City estimates
that it will have $955,150 in regular HOME funds and $353,850 in required
Community Housing Development Organization funds (CHDO). Currently, there
is no CHDO operating in the City of Rosemead.
For your review and approval are the attached budget and projects for FY
2000. Please note that in the area of public service grants, there is less funding
available in FY 2000 than there was in FY 1999, due to the 15% cap based on
full grant amount. The amount available for public service grants for FY 2000 is
$226,950. The amount that was available in FY 1999 was $229,126.
The following attachments are included: Table: Resources-CDBG; Table:
Resources-HOME; Table: Projected vs. Actual Funds Available (includes
budgeting); Table: Proposed Budget 2000-2001, CDBG; Table: Proposed Budget
2000-2001, HOME; Table: Public Service Grant Applications; the public service
agencies grant applications; FY 2000 requests from Engineering.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Staff recommends, after public testimony, review and after any amendments,
that the City Council approve the City's proposed CDBG and HOME
programs and projected use of funds for FY 2000-2001 and authorize staff to
include this in the Consolidated Plan.
CDBG and HOME Allocation, page 3
Staff recommends budget amounts as follows:
CDBG
Administration
$178,000
Fair Housing (an admin. expense)
$23,000
Code Enforcement
$97,500
Housing Code Compliance
$54,756
Rehab. Activities
$58,968
Res. Rehabilitation
$250,000
Commercial Rehabilitation
$250,000
Public Services
$226,950
Garvey Community Center
$900,000
Grand Avenue Storm Drain
$235,000
Ralph/Olney/Hart
$800,000
Street Lighting Project
$425,000
St. Resurfacing
$450,000
TOTAL $3,983,812
HOME
Administration $25,200
Res. Rehab (low interest loans) - $409,750
15` Time Home Buyer $520,200
TOTAL $955,150
2. That the Council consider the public service applications and award funding,
within the 15% cap amount available, to public service agencies that have
submitted applications (see table: Public Service Grant Applications)
3. That the City Council authorize the City Manager, or designee, to act as the
official representative of the City to submit the Consolidated Plan and all
understanding and assurances contained therein, and directing and
authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to act in connection with the
submission of the Consolidated Plan and to provide such additional
information as may be required.
TABLES
E
7
O
O
o
o
N
C.
O
O
O
O
0
m
o
0
o
r
m
LO
a)
m
LO
LO
a
m
m
Q N
fA 61) fA
N N
Cl)
V
N
Ei
C
O
~
O
N L
m
d O
(D
X V
N
W
N
(0
d
U
V
co
U
w
U
O
CO
W
C
¢ <H
A
A
N CO
m u~
0 u~
o
~ N
m
'O (D
O
C
C~
CL
w
c
0
E
v o0
0o
m
¢
z
o
E v
o
E G
Lc
_
o
U (D
N
^
o
E
¢ »
n
v~
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
~
0
o
m
v
rn
~
0
o
0
0
0
r
m
.
.
¢ (D
U
m
v
(fl
64
fA
fA
O
O
O)
O
Z o>
rn
m
O
co
[D
co
m
C
N_
W
Cl)
co
W
m
(f)
W
LO
L6
co
N
co
O
v
0
0
v
Lo
O
m
J
Q
F-
0
F
w
0
S
LU
U
ry
D
0
U)
LL
w
E
0
0
0
0
E
0
O
0
O
0
O
o
en
o
N
o
o
0
N
N
I
O
m
r-
co
m
N
N
a)
(n
V
d
CO
r»
f0
cu
Q
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
fR
O
O
EA
C
N
O
O
N
A
U
W
Q
N
m
o_
U
C
Q
O O
O
O
O
Q
(p O
O
O
O
Z
O
O
O
O
O O
N
N
(A
o
r
m
m
M
C7
N
N
C to
fA
fA
N
O
x
w
C
O
E
Q
R
a o
o
Y
O
O
O
O
O
o
o
0
N
0
Q O
O
O
O
O O
N N
Lni
0
V
(0D
O
t-
N
O
N
_
.
N' V
O (D
(D
EA
fA
N C
0
0
0
0
0
aa) 0
0
0
0
Z
O
E °
O
v
O
m
O
m
E
o 0
m
U ~
r
m
N
M
M
f~]
V
A
H
A
A
Q
0
0
o
O
CD
O
0
O
O
0
O
O
O
O
O U
O
O
0
00
O Q
Q v
co
(o
O
O .U
V
V
V
N
N C
e»
VT
to
w
e»
o N m m o
Z m m m m o
m m m m m
C
0
0
O
N
r
O
O
O
C
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
O ~
A m
E
ro
N
O
`o
Z,
U
o
o ~
O O
N
m 0
(h =
N U
fA f6
U
0
o
0
O
N ~
N T
r ~
N
A ~
a
m
aa)
0 0
U
n a)
h
v ~
n ;n
09 pO CO
0
0 0 o ao 0 o ro
O O O m N (O O O M
O N f~ m O O (O
O co ^ W O M V
~ O N N N N N
OI N N
C
a
C
a
N
O
CL
O
d
fA fA fR fA fA fA fA Vi
C Q Q O
W Z Z p
0
a o
m o
> o
N
75 N
m
f0
Q
(0
0 N to E9 EA fA N
N Q O
O
1 U O
Q C O
N E O
N
❑ O)
~ O
LL-
O. fA fA fA fA fA fA
y O O O Q _Q O O O
O O O O O O O O
O O O O Z
Z
U O O O
a m
Q o N o 0 0 0
C
(5 cli O
s m O N
(n Xa
N
W E
N N
O_ N N to fA kA fA
~ O O O O Q Q O O O
O O O O O O O
a O O O O Z Z O O O
O O O O O O O
~ O N O O O O
C co < O O M O
O N N N
C N N
U
N
O
N 1]
C C ~
N N ~ ~ U L ~
C N U U Q N
F o o a U m
m `o m m m m c co
N C -O L - NU
A C O N C =
rn W O O O
aE v L m w E
Q U _ K wcao
N
C N
O U
L ~ N
U L U
- O Z c c d
U
O
U
T
N
f0
U
0
m
N
0
0
0
0
N
m
N
N
N
fA
fA
fA
EA
E9
fA
fR
fA
O
O
O
R
M
fA
EA
fA
Fp
fA
to
to
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
6
6
6
M
M
6
O
O
O
C')
t
0
(O
O
O
O
~
~
N
V
O
C6
N
rn
ro
N
IT
V
C\l
to
E9
kA
to
fA
fA
fA
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
V
M
D
O
O
O
O
M
M
N
(D
O
O
O
~
~
N
O
m
rl
N
m
m
N
V
V
N
F»
»
E»
v>
~n
w
N
~
U
C7
C6
01
C
~
0
o
U
E
m
-
Q
o
-
Z
a
❑
L
n
a
N
a
U
~
N
~
a
Q
-
co
LL
U)
or
Q
Q
0
0
o
O
O
r
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
°
°
0
p
C-i
0
0
o
o
0
o
0
O
o
0
0
o
co
O
O
m
O
N
'r
m
O
N
m
v
V
m
O)
C
~
C
LL
N
0
a
O
a
A
b9
V)
H
A
»
69
A
(H
c
0
00
0
O
W
o
o
o
O
O
0
0
y
o
ui
LO
O
M
h
UI
M
Q
m
F
m
fA
69
611
60
Ni
60
(A
(A
N
O
E
O
O
O
U
p
C
p
E
M
m
O
a
fA
fA
(A
fA
fR
fA
(9
w
(p
N O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
m
O
O
O
O
O
O
-
0
O
O
O
N
'O
O
O
O
(
O
C a
N
O
N
N
O
N
O
M
N
N
N
M
(D
N
I~
`
lL ~
r
U N
a) W
°
°
°
°
o
°
°
°
°
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
0
m
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
rn
o
o
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
O
N
O
O
~
N
O
t0
O
U7
c'l
O
N
~
fh
O
N
C
I~
N
m
~
-
LL
U
N
O
m
E
C O)
d o
Ea
O
C
CL
E
m N
n
¢ E
m
U Z
a
U
E
U
N
C7
E
°
Q
-O
ca
(7
m
S
T
N
c
O
L
ma
~
T
U
m
c
U
m
't
y
N
U)
>
o
0
w
o
U
m
-
J
>
0
m
w
o
U
T
>
0
0
U)
r
Ol
m
c
a
m
U
S
o
a
m
, c
m
u)
O1
U
m
'C
N
N
U)
3 3
c m
C C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
O
O
r"
N
N
O
O
O
O
N
N
~
C
C
J
w
Ul
0
O
O
`
IL
v~
»
~
°
a
c
w
o
o
Z
c
~
c
0
r
r
r
(3
tf.
O
N
~
V
O
M
(0
V N
t0
J
a
m
0
H
v~
v3
E
0
U
C
E
m
0
0
`
a
F»
fn
F»
o
Q
°
a) 0
o
Z
o
0
J
o
o
0
0
~ rn
o
0
a
r
N
~
W ~
E
U
N t/1
p^ W
v
_
a
E»
Ev
0
0
o
Q
o
~
0
Z
0
o
o
m
~
o
r
M
c
m
o
r
~
~n
C
J
LL
U
N
O
a` e» F»
m
v
m
E
-
0
F-
m
2
t
v
o
E
c
~
o
y
E
`
c
IL
0
0
0
N
N
D)
0
0
0
N
oc~
M
m
m
0
0
0
N
co
r
N
49
0
0
0
0
0
0
F»
O
0
0
N
C6
N
fA
0
Z
w
O
Q
x
U
W
O m
S c
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
Proposed Budget, FY 2000-2001, CDBG
z 5 T' trier fvr L r
=,PROGRAM, s
i- <
;,1999 2000
f, i
1
200022200 PRORO~SED'L
Administration
178,000
178,000
Fair Housing
23,000
23,000
Rehabilitation Inspections
100,000
0
Code Enforcement
97,500
97,500
Housing Code Compliance
(formerly Rehab. Inspections)
54,756.00
Rehabilitation Activities
(formerly Rehab. Inspections
58,968.00
Residential Rehabilitation
250,000
250,000
Commercial Rehabilitation
250,000
284,638.17
Public Services
229,126
226,950
Garvey Community Center
750,000
900,000
Grand Avenue Storm Drain
235,000
235,000
Ralph/Olney/Hart
800,000
800,000
Water Quality (Adams Mutual)
150,000
0
St. Resurfacing '98
55,000
0
Valley Close Out
60,000
0
Lorica Close Out
32,000
0
Rosemead High School
25,000
0
Handicapped Access Ramp
10,000
0
Street Lighting Project
0
- 425,000
St. Resurfacing '01
0
450,000
TOTALS
3,244,626
3,983,812.17
CITY OF ROSMEAD
Proposed Budget, FY 2000-2001, HOME
PROGRAMu
X1999 2000"=BUDGET,e
2000E20011PROPQSED;
Administration
50,300
25,200
Res. Rehab (low interest)
479,750
409,750
1 Time Home Buyer
N/A
520,200
Does not include required CHDO (Community Housing Development
Organization) set-aside.
Current CHDO set-aside: $278,250; anticipated addition of $75,600, for a total
required set-aside of $353,850.
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
Public Service Grant Applications
_Pub ie ServicertAgency
99 00) Budget4{S
00 01#Reguesff0
t;Coun61 Allocation ;
Boys and Girls Club
24,600
24,600
Family Counseling
40,000
40,000
Juvenile Diversion
Program
48,000
78,487
Senior Nutrition
87,000
87,000
Rosemead School
District
12,134
12,134
A & R Childcare
9,133
47,971
People for People
8,259
8,259
WYCA of San Gabriel
Valley
N/A
20,000
TOTALS
229,126
318,451
Total available for Public Services: 226,950. Public Service grant amounts
capped at 15% of current CDBG grant.
REQUESTS
1
DESCRIPTION OF NEEDS
FY 2000-2009 NEW PROJECTS
DEPARTMENT:
NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT/: /
TYPE OF POPULATION TO BE ASSISTED (e.g. +51% low/mod income,
handicapped/disabled, homeless, low/mod income youth, business,
microenterprise, etc.):
lcw / rn~-.4
ANTICIPATED PROJECT START DATE: h d-L
ANTICIPATED PROJECT END DATE: /,u 3 / , Yo uv
PROPOSED FUNDING BY (circle or CDBG,~ R HOME:
Community Development Only:
National Objective to be met: 1) low/mod_, 2) Slum/blight-, 3) Urgent Need (if
URGENT NEED, Define why it meets this criteria)
Consistent with Consolidated Plan? Y N
Does Plan need to be amended? Y N
What are quantifiable objectives:
Other comments:
DESCRIPTION OF NEEDS
FY 2000-2001 NEW PROJECTS
DEPARTMENT:
NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT:
D
TYPE OF POPULATION TO BE ASSISTED (e.g. +51% low/mod income,
handicapped/disabled, homeless, low/mod income youth, business,
microenterprise, etc.): / ' _ .
Gi= w rv~-mac
ANTICIPATED PROJECT START DATE: r /
ANTICIPATED PROJECT END DATE: G ' /aG o l
PROPOSED IF BY (circle on ~DD R HOME: `s0 vvv
Community Development Only:
National Objective to be met: 1) low/mod_, 2) Slum/blight 3) Urgent Need (if
URGENT NEED, Define why it meets this criteria)
Consistent with Consolidated Plan? Y N
Does Plan need to be amended? Y .N
What are quantifiable objectives:
Other comments: