CC - Item 4B - Request For Speed Control On Steele Streetstaf epor
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR
AND MEMBERS
ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL
FROM: FRANK G. TRIPEPI, CITY MANAGF,~--;Z-
DATE: APRIL 4, 2000
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR SPEED CONTROL ON STEELE STREET BETWEEN
ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD AND ELLIS LANE
DISCUSSION
At the February Traffic Commission meeting, Ms. Acosta, 9230 Steele Street, requested
the installation of speed controls on Steele Street between Rosemead Boulevard and Ellis
Lane and was interested in the installation of speed humps. Staff informed Ms. Acosta of
the City's current policy not to install speed humps due to lack of approved standard
designs. Based on data from the reported accident history and field review and
observations of the subject site, staff recommended the installation of 25 mph speed limit
signs on Steele Street, in addition to Guess Street and Ralph Street. The installation of
rumble strips on Steele Street was considered, however, such controls are designed
primarily to advise motorists in advance of a specific situation, such as a crosswalk.
At the February meeting, the Traffic Commission voted 5-0 to approve the staff
recommendation to install 25 mph speed limit signs on Steele Street, Guess Street, and
Ralph Street.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Rosemead City Council approve the installation of 25 mph
speed limit signs on Steele Street, Guess Street, and Ralph Street. In addition, it is also
recommended that the speed trailer be placed on Steele Street to be followed by selective
enforcement.
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A - Staff report, dated January 25, 2000.
Exhibit B - Figure 1
Exhibit C - Draft Minutes, dated February 3, 2000
COUNCIL AGENDA
AFR 1 12000
REM No. ~C_
TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN
AND MEMBERS
ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSION
FROM: JOANNE ITAGAKI, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPUTY
DATE: JANUARY 25, 2000
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR SPEED CONTROL ON STEELE STREET
BETWEEN ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD AND ELLIS LANE
REQUEST
During last month's Traffic Commission meeting, Ms. Suzanna Costa requested
some sort of speed control on Steele Street. Commissioner Ruiz requested staff
to review Steele Street for additional traffic controls.
Ms. Costa did not specify her concerns. She expressed an interest in installing
speed humps on Steele Street to slow vehicles. Staff indicated to Ms. Costa that
the City's current policy is not to install speed humps due to exposure to
additional liability.
CONDITIONS
Steele Street is a 36-foot wide residential roadway from Rosemead Boulevard to
Rio Hondo Avenue. Between Rio Hondo Avenue and Ellis Lane, Steele Street is
40 feet wide. There is no striping on the street. Parking is allowed on both sides
of the street except during street sweeping times. Steele Street is stop controlled
at its intersection with Rosemead Boulevard, Hart Avenue, Rio Hondo Avenue
and Ellis Lane. The prima facie speed limit on Steele Street is 25 mph.
DATA
The reported accident history on. Steele Street between Rosemead Boulevard
and Ellis Lane was reviewed for the period from January 1, 1996 through June
30, 1999. This review identified 5 reported accidents summarized on the
following page.
EXHIBIT A"
Request for Speed Control on Steele Street
Between Rosemead Boulevard and Ellis Lane
Page 2
Location and Description Time and Date
421 feet east of Rosemead Boulevard 2:20 a.m. Wed. 3/17/99
Eastbound vehicle backing collided with
an eastbound parked vehicle
(PCF=starting/backing and inattention).
500 feet east of Rosemead Boulevard 7:35 p.m. Sat. 1/25/97
Eastbound vehicle proceeding straight
collided head-on with two westbound
parked vehicles (PCF=driver alcohol/drugs
and wrong side).
191 feet west of Ellis Lane 12:55 a.m. Mon. 11/18/96
Eastbound vehicle ran off the road and
collided with a northbound parked vehicle
and 3 westbound parked vehicles
(PCF=unsafe speed and other).
33 feet east of Rio Hondo Avenue 7:45 a.m. Fri. 3/15/96
Westbound vehicle proceeding straight
rearended two westbound stopped
vehicles (PCF=unsafe speed and inattention).
538 feet east of Rosemead Boulevard (Rt. 19) 8:30 a.m. Wed. 6/26/96
Eastbound vehicle proceeding straight
sideswiped an eastbound parked vehicle _
(PCF=not driver and brakes, other equipment).
NOTE: PCF = primary collision factor
The estimated 24-hour traffic volume on Steele Street is approximately 2,000
vehicles per day. This is generally considered the average volume of a
residential roadway.
DISCUSSION
Field review identified no parking street sweeping signs and stop signs along
Steele Street. A few vehicles were observed traveling on Steele Street. It is
estimated their speed was approximately 25-30 mph. These observations were
made during off-peak hours.
As you are aware, the City's current policy is to deny the installation of speed
humps on public streets. This is primarily due to the lack of approved standard
designs for the speed humps. Other cities have installed speed humps on a "trial
Request for Speed Control on Steele Street
Between Rosemead Boulevard and Ellis Lane
Page 3
or study" basis and have determined, under their own legal advice, whether their
city is taking on additional liability.
The installation of rumble strips was considered for Steele Street. However, the
installation of rumble strips in the City has been primarily to advise motorists in
advance of a specific situation. For example, on Encinitas Avenue the rumble
strips were installed to warn motorists of the yellow school crosswalk at Pitkin
Street. The installation of rumble strips on Steele Street would be inappropriate,
at this time. In addition, the noise from the rumble strips would be a concern on
this residential street.
There were no speed limit signs posted on Steele Street. Such a posting may
serve as a reminder to motorists of the prima. facie speed limit of 25 mph on a
residential street. It is recommended that 25 mph speed limit signs be installed
on Steele Street. Due to the similar roadway characteristics, it is further
recommended that 25 mph speed limit signs be installed on Guess Street and
Ralph Street.
De Adelena Street is not included in this recommendation. De Adelena Street is
currently being surveyed as an addendum to the City's Engineering and Traffic
Speed Survey.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The installation of 25 mph signs on Steele Street, Guess Street and Ralph Street
is recommended as shown on Figure 1. It is further recommended that the
speed trailer be placed on Steele Street followed by selective enforcement.
Attachment
JI%Rsd%Steele Street
~7 s!113
s
s
z
'any opuoH ON
77- N
0
Q
3
a~
c
m 0
N N L c C
N d m
(U
N
U.) (0 N
d
0 v C%j
Z N N
W O>
J J w
a C)
v
v
N
m
v
v
s
x
W
a
7
F
10 peawasoH
EXHIBIT "B"
Figure 1
RO.SEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 3. 2000
DRAFT
A regular meeting of the Rosemead Traffic Commission was called to order by Chairman
Quintanilla at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers, 8838 East Valley Blvd, Rosemead.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chairman Quintanilla
Commissioners: Ruiz, Knapp, Baffa, Herrera
Absent: None
Ex Officio: Administrative Aide: Jessica Wilkinson
Deputy Traffic Engineer: Joanne Itagaki
CALL TO ORDER
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairman Quintanilla
The Invocation was delivered by Commissioner Ruiz
There was a moment of silence for the departing victims of Flight #261.
L APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was moved by Commissioner Knapp, seconded by Commissioner Herrera and carried
unanimously to approve the minutes for January 6, 2000. .
H. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE
Speaking before the Commission was:
Helen Gunthrie
1754 Dubonnet _
Rosemead, CA 91770
Ms. Gunthrie stated that the residents need more patrolling on Marshall Street.
M. OLD BUSINESS - None
IV. A. REOUF-ST FOR SPEED RUMPS ON MUSCATEL AVENUE IN THE
VICINITY OF SCOTT STREET
Deputy Traffic Engineer Itagaki stated that staff received a letter from Mr. William Boyd
of 8712 Scott Street. Mr. Boyd is requesting speed bumps or "white button road caps" on
Muscatel Avenue to slow down traffic in the vicinity of Scott Street. He indicates that
vehicles are speeding through the crosswalk.
Muscatel Avenue is a 40-foot wide norih/south secondary arterial. There is one lane of
traffic in each direction separated by single yellow skip striping. On-street parking is
allowed on both sides of the street except during street sweeping times. The posted speed
limit on Muscatel Avenue is 30 mph. There is a 25 mph school speed limit sign for
northbound Muscatel Avenue north of Valley Boulevard.
Scott Street is a 36-foot wide east/west local street. There is no striping on the street.
Parking is allowed on both sides of the street except during street sweeping times. Scott
Street is stop controlled at its T-intersection with Muscatel Avenue. The prima facie
speed limit on Scott Street is 25 mph.
EXHIBIT "C"
At the intersection of Muscatel Avenue and Scott Street, a yellow crosswalk coasts on the
south leg. School crossing signs and markings exist on Muscatel Avenue in advance of
this crosswalk.
The reported accident history in the vicinity of Muscatel Avenue and Scott Street was
reviewed for the period from January I, 1996 through June 30, 1999.
Field review of Muscatel Avenue in the vicinity of Scott Street revealed a yellow
crosswalk on the south leg of the intersection. This crosswalk was identified v ith
warning signs and pavement markings. The field observations were made during school
hours but not during the beginning of release periods. However, approximately 10
pedestrians, during the field observation, used the ciosswalk
Mr. Boyd has requested the installation of speed humps or rumble strips to slow down
traffic in the vicinity of the crosswalk. Since the City's policy is not to install speed
humps, the installation of rumble strips was considered.
As we have found on Encinita Avenue, the installation of rumble strips has been helpful - .i
in alerting motorists in advance of the crosswalk. A similar rumble strip installation is .
recommended for the crosswalk on Muscatel Avenue at Scott Street.
After review of the Caltrans guidelines, the warning signs for the crosswalk need to be
relocated.
RECOMMENDATION:
The installation of rumble strips north and south of Scott Street on Muscatel Avenue is
recommended. It was further recommended that the school signing on Muscatel Avenue
be revised. All these school signs shall be the new "chartreuse" color.
Commissioner Ruiz stated that on the north/west corner of Edmond Drive there are some
brush that are up to the curb and are restricting the view of people making a right hand
turn.
It was moved by Commissioner Ruiz, seconded by Commissioner Baffo, and carried
unanimously to approve the Traffic Engineer's recommendation. .
B. REOUEST FOR SPEED CONTROL ON STEELE STREET BETWEEN '
ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD AND ELLTS LANE
Deputy Traffic Engineer Itagaki stated that during last months Traffic Commission -
meeting, Ms. Suzanna Costa requested some sort of speed control on Steele Street. - -
Commissioner Ruiz requested staff to review Steele Street for additional traffic controls. -
Ms. Costa did not specify her concerns. She expressed an interest in installing speed
humps on Steele Street to slow vehicles. Staff indicated to Ms. Costa that the City's
current policy is not to install speed humps due to exposure to additional liability.
Steele Street is a 36-foot wide residential roadway from Rosemead Boulevard to Rio -
Hondo Avenue. Between Rio Hondo Avenue and Ellis Lane, Steele Street is 40 feet - -
wide. There is no striping on the street. Parking is allowed on both sides of the street
except during street sweeping times. Steele Street is stop controlled at its intersection
with Rosemead Boulevard. Hart Avenue, Rio Hondo Avenue and Ellis Lane. The prima -
facie speed limit on Steele Street is 25 mph. -
The reported accident history on Steele Street between Rosemead Boulevard and Ellis
Lane was reviewed for the period from January 1, 1996 through June 30, 1999.
The estimated 24-hour traffic volume on Steele Street is approximately 2,000 vehicles.
per day. This is generally considered the average volume of a residential roadway.
Field review identified no parking street sweeping signs and stop signs along Steele
Street. A few vehicles were observed traveling on Steele Street. It is estimated their
speed was approximately 25-30 mph. These observations were made during oft-peak
hours.
As you are aware, the City's current policy is to deny the installation of speed humps on
public streets. This is primarily due to the lack of approved standard designs for the
speed humps. Other cities have installed speed humps on a "trial or study" basis and
have determined, under their own legal advice, whether their city.is taking on additional
liability.
The installation of rumble strips was considered for'Steele Street. However, the
installation of rumble strips in the City has been primarily to advise motorists in advance
of a specific situation. For example, on Encinitas Avenue the rumble strips were installed
to warn motorists of the yellow school crosswalk-at Pitkin Street. The installation of
rumble strips on Steele Street would be inappropriate, at this time. In addition, the noise
from the rumble strips would be a concern on this residential street.
There were no speed limit signs posted on Steele Street. Such a posting may serve as a
reminder to motorists of the prima facie speed limit of 25 mph on a residential street. It
is recommended that 25 mph speed limit signs be installed on Steele Street. Due to the
similar roadway characteristics, it is further recommended that 25 mph speed limit signs
be installed on Guess Street and Ralph Street.
De Adalena Street is not included in this recommendation. De Adelena Street is
currently being surveyed as an addendum to the City's Engineering and Traffic Speed
Survey.
RECOMMENDATION:
The installation of 25 mph signs on Steele Street, Guess Street and Ralph Street was
recommended. It was further recommended that the speed trailer be placed on Steele
Street followed by selective enforcement.
It was moved by Commissioner Knapp, seconded by Commissioner Herrera, and carried _
unanimously to approve the Traffic Engineer's recommendation.
V. STAFF REPORTS
Administrative Aide Wilkinson stated that at the last City Council meeting of January 25,
2000, the traffic request for parking restrictions on 3319 San Gabriel Boulevard and
Hidden Pine and Valley Boulevard were approved by the City Council and have already .
been installed.
VT. COMMTSSIONER RFPORTS
Commissioner Knapp inquired as to the school bus on Graves Avenue. Administrative
Aide Wilkinson stated that she placed a parking control officer at this location, but didn't . .
see anything.
Chairman Quintanilla inquired about the school signage behind Savannah School.
NFU. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was
adjourned.