CC - Item 2B - Certificate of Complience With The L.A. County Congestion Management Planstaf epor
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR
AND MEMBERS
ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL
FROM: V"RIANK G. TRIPEPI, CITY MANAGER
DATE: AUGUST 1, 2000
RE: PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION 2000-43 - CERTIFICATE OF
COMPLIANCE WITH THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CONGESTION
MANAGEMENT PLAN
The Congestion Management Program (CMP) requires each city to annually adopt a
resolution during a public hearing stating its compliance with the CMP. The attached
resolution attests to the fact that the City of Rosemead has met all requirements of the
CMP.
The City of Rosemead has previously adopted a transportation demand management
ordinance as well as a land use analysis program consistent with the requirements of the
CMP.
The CMP deficiency plan requires all cities to monitor new development and compare the
corresponding increase in trips with mitigation projects that increase highway traffic
capacity. The attached 2000 Deficiency Plan Status Summary indicates new development
resulted in 717 debits that were offset by 13 transportation improvement credits. The
resulting credits are added to the City's credit bank from last year's submittal, which will
leave a credit balance of 5,169.
COUNCIL AGENDA
AUG 0 8 2000
ITEM No. =,,6-
1/9
2/9
August 1, 2000
Page 2
For this reporting year, there were no credits provided from City CIP because none of the
projects completed resulted in improving traffic management; all projects were
maintenance related only. Additionally, no credits were provided for transit subsidies (RTD
Bus Pass Program) or Rosemead transit (Dial-A-Ride and Shuttle) because the average
daily ridership went down from previous years and credit is only provided for increase in
usage. The total number of participants for the bus pass program declined from
1,194/month in 1998/99 to 1,053/month in 1999/2000. Rosemead Shuttle ridership
declined from 244/average weekday in 1998/99 to 242/average weekday in 1999/2000.
Rosemead Dial-A-Ride ridership declined from 49/average weekday in 1998/99 to
43/average weekday in 1999/2000
Upon adoption of Resolution 2000-43, staff will forward the self-certification to the Los
Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2000-43.
3/9
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-43
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA,
FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND
ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT,
IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 65089
WHEREAS, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("MTA"),
acting as the Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County, adopted the 1995
Congestion Management Program in November, 1995; and
WHEREAS, the adopted CMP requires that MTA annually determine that the
County and cities within the County are conforming to all CMP requirements; and
WHEREAS, the adopted CMP requires submittal to the MTA of the CMP local
implementation report by September 1 of each year; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a noticed public hearing on August 8, 2000.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of the City Of Rosemead
does hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1. That the City has taken all of the following actions, and that the City
is in conformance with all applicable requirements of the 1995 CMP.
By June 15, of odd-numbered years, the City will conduct annual traffic counts and
calculated levels of service for selected arterial intersections, consistent with the
requirements identified in the CMP Highway and Roadway System Chapter.
The City has locally adopted and continues to implement a transportation demand
management ordinance, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP
Transportation Demand Management Chapter.
The City has locally adopted and continues to implement a land use analysis
program, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Land Use
Analysis Program Chapter.
The City has adopted a Local Implementation Report, attached hereto and made
a part hereof, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP. This report balances
traffic congestion impacts due to growth within the City with transportation improvements,
and demonstrates that the City is meeting its responsibilities under the Countywide
Deficiency Plan.
4/9
Section 2. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and
shall forward a copy of this Resolution to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 8th day of August, 2000.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
5/9
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
Date Prepared:
01-Aug-00
2000 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1,1999 - MAY 31, 2000
Contact: MR. KEN RUKAVINA, P.E.
Phone Number: 626-569-2151
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY
DEFICIENCY PLAN STATUS SU
MMARY
1. Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal
[from Section I]
(717)
Exempted Dwelling Units
0
Exempted Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1,000s)
0
2. Transportation Improvements Credit Claims
[from Section III
13
Land Use Strategy Claims
0
Capital Improvement Claims
2
Transit Claims
0
TDM Claims
1
Total Strategies Claimed
3
Subtotal Current Credit (Goal)
(704)
3. - Carryover Credit from Last Year's (1997)
Local Implementation Report
5,873
Net Deficiency Plan Credit Balance:
5,169
Section I, Page 1
sus
CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared:
2000 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1,1999 - MAY 31,2000
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT
PART 1: , NEW DEVELOPMENT
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
01-Aug-00
Category
Dwelling
Units
Debit
Value/DU
Debits
Single Family Residential
18.00
x
6.80 =
122
Multi-Family Residential
2.00
x
4.76 -
10
Group Quarters
0.00
x
1.98 -
0
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVI
TY
Category
1000 Gross
Square Feet
Debit
Value/1000SF
Debits
Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.)
30.00
x
22.23 -
667
Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more)
00
0.
x
17.80 -
0
Freestanding Eating & Drinking
0.00
x
66.99 =
0
NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category
1000 Gross
Square Feet
Debit
Value/1000SF
Debits
Lodging
0.00
x
7.21 =
0
Industrial
12.94
x
6.08 -
79
Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.)
0.00
x
16.16 -
0
Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.)
0.00
x
10.50 =
0
Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more)
0.00
x
7.35 -
0
Medical
0.00
x
16.90 -
0
Government
0.00
x
20.95 =
0
Institutional/Educational
0.00
x
7.68 =
0
University
0.00
x
1.66 =
0
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Description
(Attach additional sheets if necessary)
Daily Trips
(Enter' if none)
Debit
Value/Trip
Debits
ENTER IF APPLICABLE
0.00
x
0.71 -
0
ENTER IF APPLICABLE
0.00
x
0.71 -
0
Subtotal New Development Activity
-
877
Adjustments (Optional) - Complete Part 2
0 =
160
ITotal Current Congestion Mitigation Goal (Points)
_
(717)
Section I, Page 2
7/9
CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 01-Aug-00
2000 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1,1999 - MAY 31,2000
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT (Continued)
Enter information where it says "Enter." If not applicable, enter "0" so it will total.
PART 2: NEW •
IMPORTANT: Adjustments may be claimed only for 1) development permits that
were both issued and revoked, expired or withdrawn during the reporting period, and
2) demolition of any structure within the reporting period.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category
Dwelling
I
Units
Adjustment Subtotal
Value/DU
Single Family Residential
18.00
x 6.80 = 122
Multi-Family Residential
0.00
x 4.76 - 0
Group Quarters
0.00
x 1.98 = 0
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category
1000 Gross
Square Feet
Adjustment Subtotal
Value/1000SF
Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.)
1.71 x 22.23 - 38
Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more)
0.00 x 17.80 - 0
Freestanding Eating & Drinking
0.00 x 66.99 = 0
NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category
1000 Gross
Square Feet
Adjustment Subtotal
Value/1000SF
Lodging
0.00
x 7.21 = 0
Industrial
0.00
x 6.08 - 0
Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.)
0.00
x 16.16 = 0
Office (50,000-299,999 sq.ft.)
0.00
x 10.50 - 0
Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more)
0.00
x 7.35 - 0
Medical
0.00
x 16.90 - 0
Government
0.00
x 20.95 - 0
Institutional/Educational -
0.00
x' 7.68 = 0
University
0.00
x 1.66 = 0
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Description -
(Attach additional sheets if necessary)
Daily Trips
(Enter "0" if None)
Adjustment Subtotal
Value/Trip
ENTER HERE IF APPLICABLE
0.00
x 0.71 = 0
ENTER HERE IF APPLICABLE
0.00
x 0.71 = 0
Total Mitigation Goal Adjustments (Points) = 160
Section I, Page 3
CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 01-Aug-00
2000 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1,1999 - MAY 31,2000
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT (Continued)
(NOT INCLUDED IN NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY TOTALS)
Low/Very Low Income Housing
High Density Residential
near Rail Stations
Mixed Use Developments
near Rail Stations
Development Agreements entered
into Prior to July 10, 1989
Reconstruction of Buildings
damaged in April 1992 Civil Unrest
Reconstruction of Buildings
damaged in Jan 1994 Earthquake
Total Dwelling Units
Total Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1,000s)
1 01 Dwelling Units
1 01 Dwelling Units
1000 Gross Square Feet
0
0 Dwelling Units
1000 Gross Square Feet
0
0 Dwelling Units
01 1000 Gross Square Feet
0 Dwelling Units
01 1000 Gross Square Feet
0
0 Dwelling Units
8/9
Exempted Development Definitions-
1. Low/Very Low Income Housing: as defined by the California Department of Housing and
Community Development as follows: -
Low-Income: equal to or less than 80% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size.
Very Low-Income: equal to or less than 50% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size.
2. High Density Residential Near Rail Stations: development located within 1 /4 mile of a fixed rail
passenger station and that is equal to or greater than 120 percent of the maximum residential
density allowed under the local general plan and zoning ordinance. A project providing a
minimum of 75 dwelling units per acre is automatically considered high density.
3. Mixed Uses Near Rail Stations: mixed use development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail
passenger station, if more than half of the land area, or floor area, of the mixed use development
is used for high density residential housing.
4. Development Agreements: projects that entered into a development agreement (as specified under
Section 65864 of the California Government Code) with a local jurisdiction prior to July 10, 1989.
5. Reconstruction or replacement of any residential or non-residential structure which is damaged or
destroyed, to the extent of not less than 50% of its reasonable value, by fire, flood, earthquake
or other similar calamity.
6. Any project of a federal, state or county agency that is exempt from local jurisdiction zoning
regulations and where the local jurisdiction is precluded from exercising any approval/disapproval
authority. These locally precluded projects do not have to be reported in the LIR.
Section I, Page 4
9/9
CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 01-Aug-00
2000 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1,1999 - MAY 31,2000
SECTION II.e - TDM CREDIT CLAIMS
Total TDM Projects: 1 Total TDMCredit (Points): 13
1
321.0
CMP TOM Ordinance 42.94 1000 gsf
Non-Residential building permits issued, as reported in Section I
No other description/entries required for this strategy. This is already done for you.
16
17 18
19
20 21 22
23 24
0.30
13 n/a
n/a
100°h 3 n/a
10046 13
'.E:i«~_:-_.- a-.-...~.,..~Y~:Yxr _.a.im~ a,~. :_~.sh=:.~Y. a:. zE.~ .'~F•._.ex_.-'
Section Il.e, Page 1