CC - Item 4B - "Do Not Block Intersection" Sign At Various Streetsf { u
•
staf f epor
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR
AND MEMBERS
ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL
FROM: FRANK G. TRIPEPI, CITY MANAGER 74�
DATE: OCTOBER 2, 2000 cam/ vv
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR "DO NOT BLOCK INTERSECTION" SIGNS AT VALLEY
BOULEVARD /GERNERT AVENUE, GARVEY AVENUE/PINE STREET, AND
HELLMAN AVENUE /ALANREED AVENUE
DISCUSSION
Staff has received several requests for "Do Not block Intersection" signs at the aforementioned
intersections. Based on a field inspection, staff recommends the installation of "Do Not Block
Intersection" signs at Valley Boulevard/Gernert Avenue, Garvey Avenue /Pine Street, and Hellman
Avenue /Alanreed Avenue.
At the September 7, 2000 Traffic Commission meeting, staff presented the findings of the study. At
the meeting, the Commission voted 5 -0 to approve the staff recommendation.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Rosemead City Council approve the installation of "Do Not Block
Intersection" signs at Valley Boulevard/Gemert Avenue, Garvey Avenue/Pine Street, and Hellman
Avenue /Alanreed Avenue.
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A — Staff report, dated August 28, 2000
Exhibit B — Draft Minutes, dated September 7, 2000
0 CT 10 2000
FEM No.
Y
. Staff Report
Rosemead Traffic Commission
TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN
AND MEMBERS
ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSSION
FROM: JOANNE ITAGAKI, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPUTY
DATE: August 28, 2000
RE: Request for "Do Not Block Intersection" Signs at
Valley /Gernert, Garvey /Pine and Hellman /Allanreed
REQUEST
Several requests have been received from citizens and City Council regarding
intersections experiencing blockage, especially during peak periods. This
blockage has resulted in the request for "Do Not Block Intersection" signs at
Valley Boulevard /Gernert Avenue,. Garvey Avenue /Pine Street and Hellman
Avenue /Al Ian reed Avenue. Exhibit A shows the general location of each of these
intersections.
CONDITIONS
Exhibits B — D indicate the general. striping conditions at each subject
intersection. Each intersection is stop controlled on the minor street. The
intersections are in the vicinity, within 300 feet, of signalized intersections.
DISCUSSION
Field review of the intersections was conducted in the early afternoon hours,
before peak periods of the roadways. Of course, during this time, no blockage of
the intersections was observed. However, due to the proximity of the subject
intersections to signalized intersections, blockage through the intersections is
definitely conceivable.
The intersection of Valley Boulevard /Gernert Avenue was discussed at the
November 4, 1999 Traffic Commission meeting. At that time, the discussion was
regarding allowing eastbound left turn access from Valley Boulevard to the
development directly across Gernert Avenue (on the north side of the street).
The Commission approved the removal of the median nose and continuation of
the two -way left turn lane. This removal, however, did not occur and appears to
have been incorrectly completed at the intersection of Valley Boulevard and
Bartlett Avenue.
EXAMBIT "A"
Request for "Do Not Block Intersection" Signs at
Valley /Gernert, Garvey /Pine and HeilmanlAllanreed
Page 2
Therefore, at the intersection of Valley Boulevard /Gernert Avenue, the removal of
the median nose for eastbound Valley Boulevard and the continuation of the two -
way left turn lane and the installation of "Do Not Block Intersection" signs is
recommended. See Exhibit B.
The installation of "Do Not Block Intersection" signs at the intersections of Garvey
Avenue /Pine Street and Hellman Avenue /Allanreed Avenue are also
recommended. This recommendation is based on each intersection's proximity
to signalized intersections.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The installation of "Do Not Block Intersection" signs is recommended at the
following intersections:
1. Westbound Valley Boulevard at Gernert Avenue (Exhibit B)
2. Eastbound Garvey Avenue at Pine Street (Exhibit C)
3. Eastbound Hellman Avenue at Allanreed Avenue (Exhibit D)
It is further recommended that the eastbound median nose on Valley Boulevard
at Gernert Avenue be removed and the existing two -way left turn lane be
continued (Exhibit B).
The installation of a westbound median nose on Valley Boulevard at Bartlett
Avenue is recommended. This requires the removal of part of the existing two -
way left turn lane (Exhibit E).
Attachments
Rsd\2000 Agenda \Valley - Gemert, Garvey -Pine, Hellman - Allanreed — Do Not...
M
Exhibit A
JI \Rsd\Exh FigOo Not Block Intersection - Map
Not to Scale
n
Fe CLEAR"
arkings
travel
In
Install "DO NOT
BLOCK
INTERSECTION"
sign on existing
street light pole.
Remove painted
median nose.
Install with two -
way left turn
lane.
Paint 12-
inch limit
line.
Exhibit B
JI\Rsd\Exh Fig \Valley & Gernert-Do Not Block Intersection
GernertAvenue
Not to SCa /e
n
En
Paint 12-
inch limit
line.
j
R .
Q
C�
Install "DO NOT BLOCK
INTERSECTION" sign on
existing street light pole.
M
a
Exhibit C
JI \Rsd \Ezh Fig \Garvey and Pine -Do Not Block Intersection
IM
Not to Scale
Paint 12- `
inch limit
line.
Paint "KEEP CLEAR"
pavement marking.
Paint 12-
inch limit
line.
a
Existing street
sweeping sign and
existing power pole.
Install "DO NOT BLOCK
INTERSECTION" sign on
new post. If this is not
possible, locate sign west
of intersection shown as
location
A
Allanreed Avenue
Exhibit D
:1
\�
JIV2sdtExh FigWllanreed and Hellman -Do Not Block Intersection
Not to Scale
�O
m
Remove two -way
left turn lane.
Install median
nose.
Exhibit E
JI\Rsd\Exh Fig \Valley & Bartlett - Median Nose
Bartlett A venue
ROSENTEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 7, 2000
A regular meeting of the Rosemead Traffic Commission was called to order by Chairman
Quintanilla at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers, 8838 East Valiey Boulevard, Rosemead,
ROLL CALL
Present Chairman Quintartilla
Commissioners: Knapp, Ruiz, Baf c, B Herrera
Absent None
Ex Officio: Administrative Assistant: Jessica Wilkinson
Deputy Traffic Engineer: Joanne Itagaki
CALL TO ORDER
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Baffo
The Invocation was delivered by Cornmissioner Herrera
L APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes for the August meeting were deferred to October. ,
U. ORAL COMM UNICATIONS PROM THE .AUDIENCE - NONE
III. OLD BUSINESS - NONE
/ TV. NEW BUSINESS
A. REQUEST FOR "DO NOT BLOCK INTERSECTTON" SIGNS AT
VALLEY /GERNERT, GARVEY /PTNE AND TMLLM.AN /ALLANREED
Deputy Traffic Engineer ltagaki stated that several requests were made received from
citizens and City Council regarding intersections experiencing blockage, especially
during peak periods. This blockage has resulted in the request for "Do Not Block
Intersection' signs at Valley Boulevard /Gernert Avenue, Garvey Avenue/Pine Street and
Hellman Avenue/.Allanreed Avenue.
Each intersection is stop controlled on the minor street. The imersections are in the
vicinity, within 300 feet, of signalized intersections.
Field review of the intersection was conducted in the early afternoon hours, before peak
periods of the roadways. Of course, during this time, no blockage of tite Intersections
was observed. However, due to the proximity of the subject intersections to signalized
intersections, blockage through the intersections is definitely conceivable.
The intersection of Valley Bouelvard /Gernert Avenue was discussed at the November 5,
7999 Traffic Commission meeting: At that time, the discussion was regarding allowing
eastbound left turn access from Valley Boulevard to the development directly across
Gernen .Avenue (on the north side of the street). The Commission approved the removal
of the median nose and continuation of the two -way left turn lane, This removal,
however, did not occur and appears to have been incorrectly completed at the intersection
o Valley Boulevard and Bartlett Avenue.
Therefore, ai the intersection of Valley Boulevard / Gernen Avenue, the removal of the
median nose for eastbound Valley Boulevard and the continuation of the two -way left
turn lane and the installation of "Do Not Block Intersection" signs was recommended.
EXHIBIT "B"
The installation of "Do Not Block Intersection" signs at the intersection of Garvey
Avenue/Pine Street and Hellman AvenuclAJlanreed Avenue are also recommended. This
recommendation is based on each intersection's proximity to signalized intersections.
RECOMMENDATION
The installation of "Do Not Block Intersection" signs was recommended at the following
intersections:
I. westbound Valley Boulevard at Gernert Avenue
21 Eastbound Garvey Avenue a! Pine Street
3. Eastbound Hellmand Avenue at Allanreed Avenue
It was further recommended that the eastbound median nose on Valley Boulevard at
Gernert Avenue be removed and the existing two -way left turn lane be continued.
The installation of a westbound median nose on Valley Boulevard at Bartlett Avenue was
recommended. This requires the removal of pan of the existing two -way left turn lane.
It was moved by Commissioner Knapp, seconded by Commissioner BaRo, and carried
unanimously to approve the Traffic Engineer's recommendation.
B. REQUEST FOR "RICFIT TURN ONLY" SIGN AT SNY 0P
BELLMAN/R'ALNUT GROVE -
Deputy Traffic Engineer Itagaki stated that the City. Council has requested staff review
the driveway to the development on the southwest comer of Hellman Avenue and Walnut
Grove Avenue. The concern expressed was the vehicles turning left out of the driveway
are causing congestion at tine intersection.
The development on the southwest comer of Hellman Avenue ad Walnut Grove Avenue
has only one access point. This driveway, on Walnut Grove Avenue, is less than 100 feet
from Hellman Avenue and accesses northbound Walnut Grove .Avenue within the left
turn lane.
The reported accident history on Walnut Grove Avenue south of Hellman Avenue was
reviewed for the period from January 1, 1997 through December 31, 1999. There were
two reported accidents that appear to involve the driveway to the development on the
southwest corner,
Field observation of the southwest comer of Hellman Avenue and Walnut Grove Avenue
was made in the early afternoon. Parkine within the development was at 85% capacity.
Of the 5 vehicles observed exiting the development, 2 vehicles turned left and 3 turned
right
The three year re accident ftistory does not identify a continuing pattern of
accidents associated with the development of the southwest comer. However, the two
accidents reported occurred within the past year. This may be an indication that there are
more vehicles accessing the development and increasing the potential for accidents.
RECO.MAIENDATION
Therefore, it is recommended that a "Right Turn Only' sign be installed for vehicles
exiting the development on the southwest comer of Hellman Avenue and Walnut Grove
Avenue,
Commissioner Knapp feels this recommendation is needed and feels that we should talk
to the developer regarding puring a white arrow in the driveway.
It was moved by Commissioner Baffo, seconded by Commissioner Knapp, and carried
unanimously to approve the Traffic Engineer's recommendation.
C. R E013EST FOR "NO TRUCK" SIGNS ON LA PRESA O BARTLETT
Staff received a request from a resident regarding trucks on La Press Avenue and Bartlett
Avenue south of Garvey Avenue. The concern was regarding trucks traveling
southbound on these.streets after deliveries have, been made to the businesses fronting on
Garvey. Avenue. Many trucks park on La Presa or Bartlett Avenue to make their
deliveries then travel down the block, traveling through the residential neighborhood to
continue on their route. The residents are requesting trucks be prohibited from traveling
on La Presa Avenue and Bartlett Avenue south of Garvev Avenue.
La Press Avenue and Bartlett Avenue are generally residential streets. However, from
Garvey Avenue, to the public alley south of Garvey .Avenue, the land use is business.
These businesses front onto Garvey .Avenue with some access on La Presa Avenue,
Bartlett Avenue and the public alley.
Field observation of the subject area was conducted in the early afternoon hours. During
this time, no trucks were observed delivering to the Garvey Avenue businesses.
However, there were some vehicles parked on La Press Avenue and Bartlett Avenue
between Garvey Avenue and the public alley.
Based on the street configuration and the access to the fronting businesses on Garvey
Avenue, it is possible that trucks travel on the residential portions of the La Press
.Avenue. If trucks are parked on La Presa Avenue or Bartlett .Avenue while deliveries,
they may be inclined to travel down the residential portions of these streets to continue on
their routes.
To prevent the trucks from traveling southbound on La Presa .Avenue and Bartlett
Avenue, "No Trucks Over 3 Tons" signs are recommended. The trucks will likely travel
on the public alley or perform a U -turn to return to Garvey .Avenue. The tntcks traveling
on the public alley may cause some conflict with vehicles traveling in the alley.
However, the calls volume of the alley is random and is estimated at less than 500 -
vehicles per day. Therefore, it is likely that only one vel icle travels on the public alley at
an one time and trucks would experience this as well.
A specific concern was also expressed regarding the fire hydrant on the east side of
Bartlett Avenue. Residents have indicated that vehicles part. in front of this fire hydrant
regularly and have requested the installation of red curb- The location of the fire hydrant
generally prohibits parking from the existing driveway south to the public alley. Though
the California Vehicle Code (CVC) prolubits parking within 15 feet of a fire hydrant, the
red curb will serve as a reminder to motorists of this regulation.
RECOMTfENDATIOT
The installation of "No Trucks Over 3 Tons" signs was recommended on La Presa
Avenue and Bartlett, Avenue south or Garvey Avenue. It is recommended that red curb
be installed on the east side of Bartlett Avenue south of Garvey .Avenue.
Contnussimner Ruiz stated that this is the same issue that was brought up before within
the boundaries of Temple City/Baldwin and Loftus. .According to the City Manager, he
is not going to put deputies out there if the judge is going to iluough them out of court.
Commissioner Ruiz feels that until there is a good law by the City Council, then it would
be a good idea to continue issues as such and only then will something be done at the Rio
Hondo Courthouse.
Ii was moved by Commissioner Knapp, seconded by Commission Herrera to approve the
Traffic Engineer's recommendation.
Vote results
YES: Chairman Quimanilla, Commissioners Knapp, Baffo & Herrera
NOES: Commissioner Ruiz
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None.
Commissioner Ruiz wanted his "No" vote to reflect he feels the judge at Rio Hondo
Courthouse will not do anydning to enforce this. He feels it's a waste of Taxpayer's
money to put tip a sign that is not going to be enforced. Commissioner Ruiz stated that
he asked the City Council to look into changing the Rosemead Municipal Law and to this
date, nothing has been done.
D.. REQUEST FOR PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON TEMPLE CITY
BOULEVARD SOUTH OF ELLIS LANE
Deputy Traffic Engineer ltagaki stated that during the Julv, 2000 Traffic Cotnnvssion
meeting, bls. Barbara Larson requested staff review the parking situation on Temple City
Boulevard behind her home. Ms. Larson has indicated that large trucks park behind her
home with the engines running causing her content for the exhaust fumes drifting into
her yard. She has requested that parking be restricted behind her home.
Temple City Boulevard is a four lane secondary north /south arterial extending from the
San Bernardino Freeway north to the City limits. There are fronting residential uses on
Temple City Boulevard. The posted speed limit is 40 mph.
On the west side of Temple City Boulevard south of Ellis Lane, there are fronting
residential uses. However, there is a portion along Temple City Boulevard that is the
back yards to residents with Ellis Lane addresses.
As you are aware, the City has been struggling wit the issue of trucks traveling on
Temple City Boulevard for some time During the Traffic Commission's last discussion
on this issue, Ms. Larson brought up the specific concern regarding trucks parked behind
her property with the engines running. Ms. Larson stated she. was concerned with the
exhaust from these trucks drLRinc into her yard.
Field observation of Temple City Boulevard south of Ellis Lane was made during the
early afternoon. One truck, similar in size to a UPS truck, did park at the subject location
with its engine running approximately 5 minutes. There were also two vehicles parked
on the street that appeared to be associated with the residents of Temple City Boulevard.
There is a property fronting on Ellis Lane that has access to Temple City Boulevard.
This property has a large block wall along the Temple City Boulevard frontage. This
block wall extends to the south then travels in an easterly direction. At that point, the
property fronting Temple City Boulevard is evident.
There does not appear to be a heavy desire for on -street parking on the west side of
Temple City Boulevard. The sueet condition did not reveal a large amount of oil or _
engine fluids dropped on the street that might be evidence of continued or heavy on- street
parking, Therefore, it appears that the removal of parking would not significantly. affect
parking availability . However, the specific concern was with regards to large trucks
parking in the subject area
The City has an ordinance regarding parking on large trucks on City- streets. The
ordinance reads:
"Rosemead Municipal Code Section 3313
A. Whenever the City Council, upon recontmendation of the Traffic Commission,
determines that traffic safety requires the prohibition of the parking of wide
vehicles, no person shall park or leave standing any vehicle having a maximum
width in excess of eighty (80) inches upon any street, except when necessary for
the purpose of makin¢ pickups and deliveries of goods, wares and merchandise
from or to any building or structure fronting upon any street,, or for the delivery O
building materials to a building site fronting on any street, only while actual
loading or unloading operations are in progress ".
Therefore, trucks over 80 inches in width are prohibited from parking on City streets.
Signs prohibiting this parking are generally posted at the entrances of truck routes in the
Cirv. However, because this location has been identified as having large trucks parking
on a regular basis, it was recommended that the "No Parking Vehicles Over 80 inches in
Width on Any Street" signs be posted.
RECOMMENDATION:
Tt was recommended that "No Puking Vehicles Over 80 inches in Width on Any Street"
signs be installed on the west side of Temple City Boulevard from Ellis Lane to Guess
Street.
Speal:inc before the Commission was
Barbara Larson
IvLs. Larson stated if there is going to be no enforcement, than she will conduct her own
survey via her video camera. She stated that she had to take out higher propeny
insurance since they put a pool in, because he, insurance told her that truck or car could
cone through the block wall.
It was moved by Commissioner Knapp, seconded by Commissioner Herrera, and carried
unanimously to approve the Traffic Engineer's recommendation, with the following
amendment: To extend the existing red curb to 20 feet and to add red curb 100' stretch of
the block, between the two driveways.
V. STAFF REPORTS
Deputy Traffic Engineer Itagaki reminded the Commission of the Traffic
Commissioner's Workshop on Saturday, November 4 a' , at Cal -Poly Pomona.
VI. COMMISSIONER REPORTS
Coounissiona Herrera inquired about weed growth R ordinances /standards
Commissioner Knapp inquired about the striping maintenance at Garvey. Deputy Traffic
Engineer Itagaki stated that she will talk with Ken Rukavina regarding the status.
Conmtissioner Baffo stated that the exit from the Pomona Freeway going onto San
Gabriel Boulevard as you make a right hand turn there are 4 lanes. When the traffic starts
to back up coning out-of the freeway, he feels thews going to be a collision at this
location.
Cotmtissioner Ruiz inquired as to the status of the "Olney Street' sign. Deputy Traffic
Engineer Itagaki stated that she will look into the situation.
Commissioner Ruiz stated that at the southeast comer of Brookline and Loftus, there is
no handicap wheelchair ramp, one of this neighbors cannot access the street.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to cone before the Commission, the meeting was
adjourned in memory o.`Hugh Foutz.