TC - Agenda - 03-07-02,
AGENDA
ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSION
8838 East Valley Boulevard
Rosemead, California 91770
Regular Meeting
MARCH 7, 2002
CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m.
Roll Call: Chairman Baffo, Vice - Chairman Quintainilla
Commissioners Matsdorf, Knapp, Ruiz
Pledge of Allegiance: Commissioner Matsdorf
Invocation: Vice - Chairman Quintanilla
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - February, 2002
2. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE - This is the time
reserved for members of the audience to address the Commission on
items not listed on the agenda. (Maximum time per speaker is three (3)
minutes; total time allocated is fifteen (15) minutes)
3. OLD BUSINESS
A. ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC CONTROLS IN THE VICINITY OF
JANSON SCHOOL - CONTINUED
4. NEW BUSINESS - None
5. STAFF REPORTS
6. COMMISSIONER REPORTS
7. ADJOURNMENT - To the next regular meeting of the Traffic Commission
on Thursday, April 4, 2002, at 7:00 p.m., Rosemead City Council
Chambers, 8838 East Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, CA, 91770.
Posted 72 hours in advance of the meeting at: Rosemead City Hall, 8838 East Valley
Boulevard, Rosemead; the L.A. County Library, Rosemead Branch, 8800 E. Valley
Boulevard, Rosemead; and at other locations pursuant to RMC Section 1.08.
ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSION MEETING
FEBRUARY 7,200
A regular meeting of the Rosemead Traffic Commission was called to order by
Chairman Ruiz at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers, 8838 East Valley Boulevard,
Rosemead.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chairman Ruiz, Commissioner Knapp, Commissioner Baffo &
Commissioner Matsdorf
Absent: Commissioner Quintanilla
Ex Officio: Administrative Assistant: Jessica Wilkinson
Traffic Engineering Deputy: Joanne Itagaki
CALL TO ORDER
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Baffo
The Invocation was delivered by Commissioner Knapp
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was moved by Commissioner Matsdorf, seconded by Commissioner Baffo and
carried unanimously to approve the minutes for December 6, 2001.
It was moved by Commissioner Knapp, seconded by Commissioner Matsdorf, to
approve the minutes for January 3, 2002, with the corrections below:
Commissioner Knapp stated that she had a correction under "Commissioner Reports ".
She would like it to read: Commissioner Knapp would like staff to look at the study to
see if green curb could be painted on the south side across from the Post Office.
Traffic Engineering Deputy Itagaki stated that Bill Crowe was present at the meeting,
not Donald Wagner.
Traffic Commission Minutes
February 7, 2002
II. COMMISSION REORGANIZATION FOR 2002
Chairman Ruiz turned the meeting over to Administrative Assistant Wilkinson for
nominations and election of the new Chairman.
Administrative Assistant Wilkinson called for nominations.
Chairman Ruiz nominated Commissioner Baffo. There being no further nominations,
Administrative Assistant Wilkinson declared nominations closed, and named
Commissioner Baffo the new Chairman for the Traffic Commission for the year 2002.
Commissioner Baffo assumed the chair and opened nominations for Vice - Chairperson.
Commissioner Knapp nominated Commissioner Quintanilla. There being no further
nominations. Chairman Baffo declared nominations closed, and named Commissioner
Quintanilla the Vice - Chairman for the Traffic Commission for the year 2002.
III. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE
Speaking before the Commission was:
Chuck Bolding
8612 Olney Street
Rosemead, California 91770
Mr. Bolding stated that he and the other residents of Olney Street were never informed
of the construction being done [at Janson School] on Olney Street.
IV. OLD BUSINESS - NONE
V. NEW BUSINESS
A. ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC CONTROLS IN THE VICINITY OF JANSON
SCHOOL
Traffic Engineering Deputy Itagaki presented the staff report.
Recommendations:
1. Install Stop controls with limit line and "STOP" legend on Bartlett Avenue
on Olney Street and on Olney Street at Bartlett Avenue (3 -way stop
intersection).
Traffic Commission Minutes
February 7, 2002
2. Install Stop control with limit line and "STOP" legend on Loftus Drive at
Bartlett Avenue ( "T" stop intersection).
3. Install 15 feet of red curb from the new Stop controls "back" (against
traffic) at each location (4 sets of red curb).
4. Install "25 mph" speed limit signs on Olney Street west of Bartlett Avenue
and on Olney Street east of the west cul -de -sac (2 signs).
5. Install 50 feet of red curb on the west side of Bartlett Avenue from the new
driveway access to the north.
6. Install 10 feet of red curb on the west side of Bartlett Avenue from the new
driveway access to the south.
7. Install "Loftus Drive" and "Bartlett Avenue" street name signs on the
existing street light pole on the southeast corner of the intersection.
8. Remove the existing "Not A Through Streer' sign on Bartlett Avenue
south of Loftus Drive and replace with a "No Outlet' sign.
Traffic Engineering Deputy Itagaki demonstrated the vicinity on the map to the
audience on the board.
Speaking before the Commission was:
Helen Gunther
3644 Dubonnet Street
Rosemead, California 91770
Ms. Gunther stated that she sympathizes with the people living on Olney Street,
because they only have one way in and one way out, and the people driving on that
street do not go 25 mph as they should. She also feels the residents on that street
should have been notified of the school district' s plans before proceeding.
Speaking before the Commission was:
Resident
8725 Loftus Drive
Rosemead, California 91770
Traffic Commission Minutes
February 7, 2002
This resident asked if anyone ever checked the counts on traffic going down on Loftus,
because people go down Loftus Drive to get out of Dubonnet. He feels there should be
Sheriff's patrolling this area and ticketing people to alert some of the parents dropping
off their kids that are not observing the speed limit.
Speaking before the Commission was:
Veronica Pena
8648 Olney Street
Rosemead, California 91770
Ms. Pena asked if the new entrance coming in from the back, is going to be a one -way
all the way out on Olney through the Pre - School, and asked what was going to happen
to the traffic going into the Pre - School. Ms. Pena feels the traffic goes through this
location really fast, and was upset that one of the City's workers almost ran over her
son by speeding on this street.
Speaking before the Commission was:
Maria Romero
Rosemead School District
Ms. Romero was there on behalf of Ms. Amy Enomoto- Perez, Superintendent of the
Rosemead School District. One of the 1st concerns the district is for the safety of the
students. There was a lot of problems with kids being dropped off on Marshall Street
and crossing the street and there have been too many close calls. There are 820 students
enrolled at Janson School, with a large percentage of those children being dropped off
by parents/ caretakers. The idea behind this project was for an area for parents to stop,
drop their kids off and not have to cross the street.
The location of the parking was driven by the fact that the front of the school is not
conducive [to being a drop -off area]. The side of the school has a small drop -off area
that is used by parents to drop off their children and after 8:15 a.m., the gates at this
location will remain closed in the new parking area to avoid on -going traffic.
Ms. Romero feels a lot will depend on how the education of the staff members and the
parents on how this [project] is going to work.
Commissioner Ruiz asked specifically, what the school district is doing to educate the
staff members and parents.
Traffic Commission Minutes
February 7, 2002
Ms. Romero stated that [the school district had] the Architect contact the City, and the
City [informed the architect] to notify the parents and neighbors. The school district
had a meeting with the staff, we asked the Principal to send out flyers out to the
immediate neighbors, there was time when they were available for questions and
answers.
Commissioner Knapp suggested that someone be out there handing out flyers to each
and every parent /caretaker that drops off a child.
Commissioner Ruiz apologized to the citizens in the audience for not being informed of
the construction going on and feels the City made a mistake. In the future at any site
within our City where traffic is involved, he is requesting that our staff notify the
citizens in a two -block radius.
Someone in the audience stated that there is no flagman on the job site and it is very
dangerous.
Commissioner Ruiz asked if this job was being subbed -out [subcontracted]. The
Architect responded "yes'. Commissioner Ruiz went on to request that a Code
Enforcement Office be at the job location the very next morning.
Someone in the audience asked how this whole issue came to be.
Ms. Maria Romero stated that the school district is regulated by a State Agency, and in
most cases any project needs to be submitted for their approval, in addition to some
interaction with the City. Letters were sent out to the residents directly behind the
school only!
Traffic Sergeant Bob Izell informed the commission and audience that there were motor
units at the school that day [February 7, 2002]. He also indicated that they will have
their motorcycle officers monitor this location and start citing people to get them to
slow down. Sergeant Izell cited also that there are only four motor units for the city
limiting availability.
Commissioner Knapp suggested that the School and School District offer a meeting
with the local residents to discuss these and any other concerns they may have before
the deadline date of March 18 in order to clear the air and allow the residents to voice
their opinions.
Traffic Commission Minutes
February 7, 2002
Commissioner Knapp made the motion to:
1. That we have a crossing guard at Bartlett, and three (3) "Keep Cleat" signs
painted on the street. One at Bartlett and Marshall, one at Loftus &
Bartlett & one at Dubonnet and have them policed.
2. To place a yellow /green sign west of the bridge on Marshall Street.
3. To have the sign on Loftus attached to the stop ahead sign on the east side
of the street, along side the Church building.
4. To cut down the 15 ft. of red curb on Loftus and narrow it down 10 ft.
5. Have the School District look at bringing back the bus service at this
school.
Chairman Baffo thanked everyone in the audience for attending.
Commissioner Knapp rescinded her initial motion and recommended that a full
decision not be made and to continue the item to the next meeting to allow the
School District and the residents to meet and resolve some of these issues.
Commissioner Ruiz recommended to the residents that they address the
speeders in their neighborhood with Community organization.
VI. STAFF REPORTS
Traffic Engineering Deputy Itagaki stated that at the January 22 City Council
Meeting, the Council approved the removal of the red curb at the City of Angels
Hospital.
VII. COMMISSIONER REPORTS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was
adjourned at 8:51 p.m. There were 26 people in the audience.
Staff Report
Rosemead Traffic Commission
TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN
AND MEMBERS
ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSSION
FROM: JOANNE ITAGAKI, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPUTY
DATE: February 26, 2002
RE: Additional Traffic Controls in the Vicinity of Janson School —
Continued Item
BACKGROUND
At it's last regular meeting, the Traffic Commission continued this item regarding
traffic controls in the vicinity of Janson School. Commissioner Knapp had made
several suggestions that needed to be addressed before the Traffic Commission felt
they could make a motion. Commissioner Knapp further suggested the School
District and residents meet together to discuss issues of concern by the residents.
This report has been prepared to address the suggestions of Commissioner Knapp.
DISCUSSION
1. Crossing Guard at Bartlett Avenue /Marshall Street
Commissioner Knapp's first suggestion was the assignment of a crossing guard
to the intersection of Bartlett Avenue and Marshall Street. There are two
crosswalks at this intersection (west leg and south leg). A crossing guard is
assigned to the signalized intersection of Walnut Grove Avenue and Marshall
Street.
Due to the future changes in the traffic and pedestrian patterns surrounding
Janson School, staff recommends analysis of the need for a crossing guard at
Bartlett Avenue and Marshall Street some time after ( -1 -2 months) the new
driveway entrance is in operation. There is likely to be a change in the
pedestrian pattern with the new driveway entrance.
2. "KEEP CLEAR" at Bartlett/Marshall, Marshall /Dubonnet, and Bartlett/Loftus
The use of "KEEP CLEAR" markings was suggested due to the queue of
vehicles in the westbound direction especially during school begin /release times.
Often time vehicles on Marshall Street block access for vehicles on the side
streets causing congestion and delay.
The intersection of Bartlett Avenue /Marshall Street is a 4 -way Stop controlled
location. The Stop controls provide a rotation of right -of -way that should not
March 7, 2002 Traffic Commission Agenda
Additional Traffic Controls in the Vicinity of Janson School — Continued Item
Page 2 of 3
delay the side street (Bartlett Avenue) traffic. There may be times when the
intersection is congested however staff believes the "KEEP CLEAR" markings at
this intersection is not necessary.
For the intersection of Marshall Street/Dubonnet Avenue, Dubonnet Avenue is
stop controlled at this T intersection. As such, queued westbound vehicles on
Marshall Street are not always willing to allow vehicles into the flow of traffic from
Dubonnet Avenue. Therefore, the installation of "KEEP CLEAR" markings at the
intersection of Marshall Street/Dubonnet Avenue is recommended.
The intersection of Bartlett Avenue /Loftus Drive is a T intersection. Bartlett
Avenue experiences queues of traffic due to vehicles trying to access Marshall
Street. This queue sometimes blocks traffic on Loftus trying to access Bartlett
Avenue. Therefore, the installation of "KEEP CLEAR" markings at the
intersection of Bartlett Avenue /Loftus Drive is recommended.
3. Reduction of Length of Red Curb
Commissioner Knapp inquired as to if the recommended red curb could be
reduced in length. She felt parking space was an issue and that less red curb
should be considered.
The 50 feet of red curb recommended immediately north of the new driveway
entrance could be reduced. However, with the 50 feet of red curb, there is over
150 feet of available parking area. The 50 feet of red curb allows for a better
turning area for vehicles entering the school.
Staff has also recommended 15 feet of red curb be installed in conjunction with
the recommended Stop sign installations. This red curb provides a clear visibility
of the recommended Stop signs. Often times, Stop signs are blocked from view
when vehicles park directly adjacent to the sign. In all but one location, there is
sufficient parking available for the affected property. The one location, 8648
Olney Street, with the 15 feet of red curb has -17 feet of remaining parking area.
At 8648 Olney Street, staff has no objection to reducing the red curb to 10 feet
( -22 feet of parking area). Staff does not feel a reduction in the length of red
curb in other areas is necessary.
4. Relocation of Fluorescent Yellow Green (FYG) school signs.
Commissioner Knapp suggested several FYG school signs be relocated.
However, the location of school signs follows the guidelines provided by
Caltrans. In addition, the City currently has a project that is installing /replacing
school signs with FYG school signs. Therefore, the relocation of FYG school
signs is not recommended at this time. After the current City project is completed
surrounding Janson School, staff will contact Commissioner Knapp to discuss
possible adjustments to the school sign locations.
March 7, 2002 Traffic Commission Agenda
Additional Traffic Controls in the Vicinity of Janson School — Continued Item
Page 3 of 3
RECOMMENDATIONS
Exhibit 2 depicts the recommendations to install "KEEP CLEAR" pavement markings
at Marshall Street/Dubonnet Avenue and Bartlett Avenue /Loftus Drive.
Attached is the staff report from last month's meeting regarding this item. Staff
recommendations remain unchanged except for the red curb at 8648 Olney Street
being reduced to 10 feet. The following recommendations are made and depicted in
Exhibit 1 "Revised ".
1. Install Stop controls with limit line and "STOP" legend on Bartlett Avenue at
Olney Street and on Olney Street at Bartlett Avenue (3 -way stop intersection).
2. Install Stop control with limit line and "STOP" legend on Loftus Drive at
Bartlett Avenue ( "T" stop intersection).
3. Install 15 feet of red curb from the new Stop controls "back" (against traffic) at
each location except at 8648 Olney Street where red curb shall be 10 feet
(4 sets of red curb).
4. Install "25 mph" speed limit signs on Olney Street west of Bartlett Avenue and
on Olney Street east of the west cul -de -sac (2 signs).
5. Install 50 feet of red curb on the west side of Bartlett Avenue from the new
driveway access to the north.
6. Install 10 feet of red curb on the west side of Bartlett Avenue from the new
driveway access to the south.
7. Install "Loftus Drive" and "Bartlett Avenue" street name signs on the existing
street light pole on the southeast corner of the intersection.
8. Remove the existing "Not A Through Street" sign on Bartlett Avenue south of
Loftus Drive and replace with a "No Outlet" sign.
9. Install "Stop Ahead" symbol signs and "STOP AHEAD" pavement markings
on Olney Street east of and west of Bartlett Avenue.
Attachments
P: \06- 160UI1 \RSD\2002 Agendas & Documents Velar- Janson School Add'I Controls- Cont'd.doc
Marshall5treet
I
d I
c
Install "KEEP CLEAR"
> pavement markings.
Q �
d
t Q
d
}
L �
o �
CO
0
D
F stall "KEEP CLEAR" vement markings.
C.IC.t'.I/A 10
Loftus Drive
Olney Street
MEN
P: \06- 160 \J11 \Rsd \Exh Fig \2002 \Mar - Janson School KEEP CLEAR
Staff Report
Rosemead Traffic Commission
TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN
AND MEMBERS
ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSSION
FROM: JOANNE ITAGAKI, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPUTY
DATE: January 29, 2002
RE: Additional Traffic Controls in the Vicinity of Janson School
REQUEST
Janson School is currently undergoing construction to install new parking and
circulation on school grounds. As part of this construction, School District
officials met with City staff to discuss general concerns regarding the new
circulation pattern. During this meeting, City staff identified concerns regarding
the intersection of Bartlett Avenue /Olney Street and Bartlett Avenue /Loftus Drive.
This report will address the concerns at these two intersections.
CONDITIONS
Janson School is located on Marshall Street between Bartlett Avenue and Walnut
Grove Avenue. There is also access to the school on Olney Street.
Bartlett Avenue is a 36 -foot wide north /south residential roadway with parking
allowed on both sides of the street. Bartlett Avenue is stop controlled at its
intersection with Marshall Street. There is no traffic striping on the street.
Bartlett Avenue "T's" into Olney Street at its southern terminus. There is a
. 'School 25 mph When Children are Present" sign for northbound Bartlett Avenue
north of Olney Street.
Olney Street is a 36 -foot wide east/west residential roadway with parking allowed
on both sides of the street. There is no traffic striping on the street. The prima
facie speed limit is 25 mph.
Loftus Drive is a 30 -foot wide east/west residential roadway with parking allowed
on both sides of the street. Loftus Drive "T's" into Bartlett Avenue at its western
terminus. There is no traffic striping on the street. The prima facie speed limit is
25 mph.
Exhibit 1 depicts the existing conditions of the subject streets. (The Exhibit will
be available at the Traffic Commission meeting.)
February 7, 2002 Traffic Commission Agenda
Additional Traffic Controls in the Vicinity of Janson School
Page 2 of 4
DATA
The reported accident history on Bartlett Avenue, Olney Street and Loftus Drive
was reviewed for the period from January 1, 1998 through June 30, 2001. The
accident history revealed one reported accident summarized as follows:
Location & Description PCF* Date, Day & Time
Bartlett Avenue at Marshall Street Right -of -way 01/22/98, Thurs. &
Westbound vehicle proceeding automobile 10:05 AM
straight broadsided a southbound
vehicle turning left.
PCF* = Primary Collision Factor
Traffic volume counts taken at the intersection of Bartlett Avenue /Olney Street
approximately one year ago revealed the following:
24 hour Volume Peak Hour Volume
Southbound Bartlett Avenue 804 93 (7:00 AM)
Eastbound Olney Street - 373 69 (2:00 PM)
Westbound Olney Street 257 32 (7:00 AM)
DISCUSSION
As the Traffic Commission is already aware, the traffic circulation in the vicinity of
Janson School has been an ongoing issue for many years. This school,
unfortunately, was built fronting a collector street (Marshall Street) in the City. As
population has increased, so has traffic volumes resulting in increased traffic
volumes on Marshall Street.
Several different traffic controls have been implemented to improve traffic flow in
the vicinity of Janson School. Some of these include: parking restrictions on
Marshall Street, addition of a crossing guard, and a change in traffic signal
phasing at Walnut Grove Avenue /Marshall Street.
The new circulation pattern the School District. is constructing will provide a
parking lot on the south end of the property with access from Bartlett Avenue.
This new parking lot will be a one -way circulation pattern (westbound) that
connects to the existing parking lot at the northwest side of the property. The
School District has also requested the installation of "no parking" areas at and
across from the new entrance. A full size plan of the new construction will be
presented at the Traffic Commission meeting.
The intersections of Bartlett Avenue /Olney Street and Bartlett Avenue /Loftus
Drive are 3- legged intersections with no traffic controls. Therefore, the California
Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 21800 (b) (1) governs the right -of -way for vehicles
at this type of intersection. This Section states, in part, "any vehicle on a
February 7, 2002 Traffic Commission Agenda
Additional Traffic Controls in the Vicinity of Janson School
Page 3 of 4
terminating highway shall yield the right -of -way to any vehicle on the intersection
continuing highway." This means that southbound vehicles on Bartlett Avenue
would yield the right -of -way to vehicles on Olney Street and that westbound
vehicles on Loftus Drive would yield the right -of -way to vehicles on Bartlett
Avenue.
Caltrans guidelines indicate Stop control is usually established on the street with
the least volume of traffic. Additional control, beyond the basic right -of -way
assignment, is usually reserved for those locations where the volume of traffic
exceeds 500 vehicles per hour for any eight hours of an average day and where.
both streets having about the same amount of traffic, lends credibility to the
higher level of intersection control. Without credibility, voluntary compliance is
poor and without voluntary compliance, traffic safety is severely compromised.
With the change in Janson School's circulation pattern, it is anticipated that
additional traffic will travel through the intersections of Bartlett Avenue /Olney
Street and Bartlett Avenue /Loftus Drive. Exhibits 2 and 3 (available at the Traffic
Commission meeting) show the estimated traffic volumes for Bartlett
Avenue /Olney Street and Bartlett Avenue /Loftus Drive. Though the estimated
increase in traffic volumes may not meet Caltrans guidelines for the installation of
Stop signs, it is recommended that a 3 -way Stop be installed at Bartlett
Avenue /Olney Street and that a Stop be installed on Loftus Drive at Bartlett
Avenue. This recommendation is based on previous experience with traffic
circulation around Janson School and the need to control traffic especially during
school start and release times. I
The School District's request for "no parking" areas was analyzed. The new
driveway entrance is approximately 25 feet wide and is a one -way (inbound)
circulation. The installation of red curb or no parking signs north of this driveway
will help access to the driveway. South of the driveway, .a "no parking" area
would provide some additional clearance for northbound vehicles turning left into
the driveway. However, very few vehicles are anticipated to make that left turn.
As for "no parking" areas across the street, there is no reason with regards to
traffic flow that such an area is needed.
Field review of the subject intersections also identified needed changes /additions
in traffic controls. These recommendations are included below.
February 7, 2002 Traffic Commission Agenda
Additional Traffic Controls in the Vicinity of Janson School
Page 4 of 4
RECOMMENDATION
The following recommendations are made and are depicted in. Exhibit 1:
1. Install Stop controls with limit line and "STOP" legend on Bartlett Avenue
at Olney Street and on Olney Street at Bartlett Avenue (3 -way stop
intersection).
2. Install Stop control with limit line and "STOP" legend on Loftus Drive at
Bartlett Avenue ( "T" stop intersection).
3. Install 15 feet of red curb from the new Stop controls "back" (against
traffic) at each location (4 sets of red curb).
4. Install "25 mph" speed limit signs on Olney Street west of Bartlett Avenue
and on Olney Street east of the west cul -de -sac (2 signs).
5. Install 50 feet of red curb on the west side of Bartlett Avenue from the new
driveway access to the north.
6. Install 10 feet of red curb on the west side of Bartlett Avenue from the new
driveway access to the south.
7. Install "Loftus Drive" and "Bartlett Avenue" street name signs on the
existing street light pole on the southeast corner of the intersection.
8. Remove the existing "Not A Through Street" sign on Bartlett Avenue south
of Loftus Drive and replace with a "No Outlet" sign.
Attachments available at Traffic Commission meeting
P: \06- 160WI1 \RSD\2002 Agendas & Documents \Feb- Janson School Add'I Controls.doc
aim
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
MULTI -WAY STOP SIGN WARRANTS
(FROM CALTRANS TRAFFIC MANUAL)
LOCATION:
DATE: Z
The installation of multi -way STOP signs are based on the following:
1. Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multi -way
STOP may be an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control
traffic while arrangements are being made for the signal installation.
Satisfied. Yes . No
2. An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported accidents within
a 12 month period of a type susceptible to correction by a multi -way STOP
installation. Such accidents include right- and left -turn collisions as well as
right -angle collisions.
Satisfied: Yes No
3. Minimum traffic volumes:
(a) The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all
approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any 8
hours of an average day, and
Satisfied: Yes No
(b) The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor
street or highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the
same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular
traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour,
but
Satisfied. Yes
(c) When the 85- percentile approach speed of the major street traffic
exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant
is 70 percent of the above requirements. 13o+ q�P�tccb�c
Satisfied: Yes No
VOLUME WORKSHEET - Co"Nio Jon• 20 I
Guideline fit` �e �� Q� rjs �Q� 2� 2�
A f I V �p � ti 1i
(a) Total Volume 500 (350) 1 46 I Ill 1 4S 1 II4 I Ibl I Ilq 1 66 1 5L I
(b) Combined Volume 200 (140) 1 Z5 1 ?g 1 Zb 147. 1 $l 1 36 124 1 Z3 I
wo PeA.
01196
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
MULTI -WAY STOP SIGN WARRANTS
(FROM CALTRANS TRAFFIC MANUAL)
LOCATION:
DATE: 1 O Z
The installation of multi -way STOP signs are based on the following:
1. Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multi -way
STOP may be an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control
traffic while arrangements are being made for the signal installation.
Satisfied: Yes No
2. An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported accidents within
a 12 month period of a type susceptible to correction by a multi -way STOP
installation. Such accidents include right- and left -turn collisions as well as
right -angle collisions.
Satisfied: Yes No
3. Minimum traffic volumes:
(a) The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all
approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any 8
hours of an average day, and
Satisfied: Yes No
(b) The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor
street or highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the
same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular
traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum' hour,
but
Satisfied. Yes No
(c) When the 85- percentile approach speed of the major street traffic
exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant
is 70 percent of the above requirements. l)C>* 'nT�'h 0"(t
Satisfied._ Yes No
VOLUME WORKSHEET- Et,4VNo� eouv��
Guideline v�ro�e lee,5 #fi IOO�hour
(a) Total Volume 500 (350) 1 I I I 1 I I I I
(b) Combined Volume 200 (140) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
A\JerCX%y_ IesS ` avt 50AC'ur
E'Aho 'Rq �
r9
15 "
JE
O� 8,0
cp
3
6 '
i
Bart /etrAuer�ue
- E'
AHEAD
OF
00
0
O
O
= N
n
n
to
N
n
3 v
3
c
N 4
us
i11V1
�
3
ON
—
fD
0
Od3Htl
�'�
o
'dam
=o
=o
"
gig,°
yam
0
m
co 9
®
T- h
S
N
0
r9
15 "
JE
O� 8,0
cp
3
6 '
i
Bart /etrAuer�ue
- E'
AHEAD