TC - Minutes - 11-03-05ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSION
ILI [UI /tIkVj IaM1tie VZIIIbI
The regular meeting of the Rosemead Traffic Commission was called to order by
Chairman Quintanilla at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers, 8838 East Valley
Boulevard, Rosemead.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chairman Quintanilla, Vice - Chairperson Matsdorf and
Commissioner Knapp
Absent: None
Pledge of Allegiance: Chairman Quintanilla
Invocation: Commissioner Knapp
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - October 6, 2005
II. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE
III. OLD BUSINESS - NONE
IV. NEW BUSINESS
A. REQUEST FOR STOP SIGNS AT THE INTERSECTION OF
STEELE STREET AND RIO HONDO AVENUE
B. REQUEST FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT RUSH STREET AND
ANGELUS AVENUE
V. STAFF REPORTS
VI. COMMISSIONER REPORTS
VII. ADJOURNMENT
ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSION
OCTOBER 6, 2005
The regular meeting of the Rosemead Traffic Commission was called to order by
Chairman Quintanilla at 7:OO pm, in the Council Chambers, 8838 East Valley Boulevard,
Rosemead
ROLL CALL
Present: Chairman Quintanilla, Vice - Chairperson Matsdorf
and Commissioner Knapp
Absent: None
Pledge of Allegiance: I Commissioner Knapp
Invocation: Commissioner Quintanilla
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — August 4, 2005 & September 1, 2005
It was moved by Commissioner Matsdorf, seconded by Commissioner Knapp and
carried unanimously to approve the minutes for August 4, 2005 and September 1,
2005 meetings.
II. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE — None
III. OLD BUSINESS
A. REQUEST FOR PARKING RESTRICTION ADJACENT TO A FIRE
HYDRANT BE REDUCED — 7665 GRAVES AVENUE
Deputy Traffic Engineer Itagaki presented the staff report.
Recommendation:
Deputy Traffic Engineer Itagaki noted that this item had been continued from the
August 4, 2005, meeting at the request of Ms. Dolly Leong to allow her adequate
time for preparation for the hearing. She also noted that the recommendation
remains unchanged, i.e., based on the field observation and measurements.
It was recommended the request to reduce the distance a vehicle can park next to
the fire hydrant in front of 7665 Graves Avenue be denied. There are no
recommended changes to the parking restrictions on Graves Avenue between
7651 and 7715 Graves Avenue.
Speaking before the Commission was:
Dolly Leong (Property Owner)
8455 Mission Drive
Rosemead, CA 91770
Ms. Leong asked if the Commissioners had received a letter she sent them on this subject.
She also expressed disappointment that staff is again recommending denial. Ms. Leong
stated that she had been in contact with Dean Robinson, a water company executive, and
that he told her the water company has no objection to moving the fire hydrant which she
hoped would provide additional parking at this location. Ms. Leong said she cannot
understand why there are eight parking spaces in front of the other properties on Graves
Avenue and only one parking space in front of her property at 7665 Graves Avenue.
Deputy Traffic Engineer Itagaki explained that even if the fire hydrant were relocated a
few feet, there would still not be enough space for a second parking space in front of
7665 Graves Avenue. She noted that an automobile must be parked at least fifteen feet
from a fire hydrant according to Traffic Code 225143.
Commissioner Knapp said that she feels the item should be continued to allow the
Commissioners to speak with Dean Robinson about moving the fire hydrant.
Commissioner Matsdorf pointed out that the matter will be referred to the City Council
anyway and, in the interests of progress, suggested that the Commission make a decision
tonight.
It was moved by Commissioner Matsdorf, seconded by Commissioner Knapp, and
carried unanimously to accept the recommendation of the Deputy Traffic Engineer and
deny this request.
IV. NEW BUSINESS
A. REQUEST FOR CURB MARKINGS AT 3953 MUSCATEL AVENUE
Deputy Traffic Engineer Itagaki presented the staff report.
Recommendation:
It was recommended that the Traffic Commission receive comment from the
Chamber to determine which curb marking would best meet their needs. Staff has
no objection to the installation of curb markings except for red or blue as stated
previously.
Speaking before the Commission was:
Leann Dalessio
1030 W. Crumbly Street
West Covina, California 91790
Ms. Dalessio explained that cars often block the driveway and also park very
close to the driveway making exiting dangerous. Therefore, they are asking for
some type of parking restriction.
Deputy Traffic Engineer Itagaki explained the different colored curb markings
and suggested restricting parking within five feet of the driveway.
Traffic Commissioner Knapp suggested a green curb and also suggested
restricting parking within three feet of the driveway which would still. allow two
parking spaces in front of the building.
It was moved by Commissioner Knapp, seconded by Commissioner Matsdorf,
and carried unanimously to paint the curb in front of the Chamber of Commerce
building green and to restrict parking within three feet of the driveway.
B. REQUEST FOR STOP SIGNS AT THE INTERSECTION OF ROSE
STREET AND RIO HONDO AVENUE
Deputy Traffic Engineer Itagaki presented the staff report.
Speaking before the Commission was:
Douglas Janeke
9418 Rose Street
Rosemead, CA 91770
Mr. Janeke said that Rose Street is used like a drag strip both night and day. He
asked if speed bumps could be installed to discourage this practice.
Commissioner Knapp asked if a motorcycle officer could be sent to this
intersection to write tickets. The Sheriff's Representative described the Sheriffs
Department's selected'enforcement program. He said that Deputies visit drivers
who are reported by residents to have been speeding in an effort to reduce the
incidents.
It was moved by Commissioner Knapp, seconded by Commissioner Matsdorf,
and carried unanimously to accept the recommendation for selected enforcement
by the Sheriffs Department.
C. REQUEST FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT GRAVES AVENUE AND
JACKSON AVENUE
Deputy Traffic Engineer Itagaki presented the staff report.
Recommendation:
Based on the satisfaction of three traffic signal warrants, the installation of a
traffic signal at the intersection of Graves Avenue and Jackson Avenue is
recommended.
Speaking before the Commission was:
John C. Davidson
7542 Melrose Avenue
Rosemead, CA 91770
Mr. Davidson said that he had been in an accident at this intersection and was
gratified to know that the Traffic Commission was considering this course of
action.
Speaking before the Commission was:
Michael Jerome
Associate Director of Maryvale
7600 E. Graves Avenue
Rosemead, CA 91770
Mr. Jerome stated his support for a traffic signal at this intersection for safety
purposes.
It was moved by Commissioner Knapp, seconded by Commissioner Matsdorf,
and carried unanimously to accept the recommendation for installation of a traffic
signal at the intersection of Graves Avenue and Jackson Avenue.
V. STAFF REPORTS
A. UPDATE ON CITY COUNCIL'S ACTIONS
Deputy Traffic Engineer Itagaki said that the City Council had approved
the Traffic Commission recommendation for left turn signal phasing on
Del Mar Avenue at Graves Avenue and also the recommendation for a
Stop sign at Del Mar Avenue and Highclif£ Street..
VI. COMMISSIONER REPORTS
Commissioner Knapp reported that People for People will be holding a Pancake
Breakfast on Saturday, November 13, at the Methodist Church. She reminded
everyone about the Adopt -a- Family for Christmas program and thanked all
participants for making the Golf Tournament a success.
Commissioner Matsdorf said that when the bomb scare occurred at Shuey School,
the fence was cut but it has not been repaired, creating a safety hazard. Planning
Director Johnson agreed to investigate the matter.
VII. ADOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was
adjourned at 8:30 pm.
Staff Report
Rosemead Traffic Commission
TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN
AND MEMBERS
ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSION
FROM: JOANNE ITAGAKI, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPUTY
DATE: October 24, 2005
SUBJECT: Request for Stop Signs at the Intersection of Steele Street and
Rio Hondo Avenue'
REQUEST
A request from Mr. Tam Le was received for the installation of stop signs at the
intersection of Steele Street and Rio Hondo Avenue. Mr. Le indicated that the
speeds on Rio Hondo Avenue are high and a stop sign at this location would.
slow vehicles.
Rio Hondo Avenue is a 40 foot wide north /south roadway with one lane of traffic
in each direction.. Opposing lanes of traffic are generally separated by a single
yellow skip centerline. On the approaches to Steele Street, double yellow
centerlines exist for a distance of approximately 50 feet. Parking is allowed on
both sides of the street except during street sweeping days. The posted speed
limit on Rio Hondo Avenue is 30 mph.
Steele Street is 36 feet wide west of Rio Hondo Avenue and 40 feet wide east of
Rio Hondo Avenue. There is no striping on the street. Steele Street is stop
controlled at its intersection with Rio Hondo Avenue. Parking is allowed on both
sides of the street except during street sweeping days. The prima facie speed
limit on Steele Street is 25 mph and is posted east and west of Rio Hondo
Avenue.
Exhibit A will be available at the Traffic Commission meeting and will depict
existing conditions at this intersection.
DATA I ,
The reported accident history at the intersection of Steele Street and Rio Hondo
Avenue was reviewed for the period from January 1, 2000 through July 31, 2005.
Three accidents were reported during this period. These accidents are
summarized below:
November 3. 2005 Traffic Commission Meeting
Request for Stop Signs at the Intersection of
Steele Street and Rio Hondo Avenue
Page 2 of 3
Location & Description
1. 50 feet west of, Northbound vehicle
collided with southbound vehicle (no
details provided).
2. At intersection, Southbound passing
Vehicle broadsided a southbound
Vehicle turning left (Wrong side of
Road).
3. At intersection, Northbound vehicle
Collided with an eastbound vehicle
(no details provided).
Time & Date
10:00 AM, 09/19/02
12:30 PM, 05/18/02
10:15 AM, 10/31/00
Twenty -four hour traffic volumes were obtained for the intersection of Steele
Street and Rio Hondo Avenue in October 2005. These counts revealed the
following:
DISCUSSION
Field observations of the intersection of Steele Street and Rio Hondo Avenue
were made during the afternoon hours. There did not appear to be a lot of traffic
traveling on Steele Street during the hours observed. The speeds on Rio Hondo
Avenue appeared to be slightly higher than the 30 mph speed limit.
"Stop" control is intended to assign positive right -of -way at intersections. The
control is usually established on the street with the least volume of traffic:
Additional control, beyond the basic right -of -way assignment, is usually reserved
for those locations where the volume of traffic exceeds 300 vehicles per hour for
any eight hours of an average day and where both streets having about the same
amount of traffic, lends credibility to the higher level of intersection control.
24 -hour Traffic Volume
Volumes
Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Steele Street
—
- --
369
552
Rio Hondo Avenue
3,620
2,524
- --
--
DISCUSSION
Field observations of the intersection of Steele Street and Rio Hondo Avenue
were made during the afternoon hours. There did not appear to be a lot of traffic
traveling on Steele Street during the hours observed. The speeds on Rio Hondo
Avenue appeared to be slightly higher than the 30 mph speed limit.
"Stop" control is intended to assign positive right -of -way at intersections. The
control is usually established on the street with the least volume of traffic:
Additional control, beyond the basic right -of -way assignment, is usually reserved
for those locations where the volume of traffic exceeds 300 vehicles per hour for
any eight hours of an average day and where both streets having about the same
amount of traffic, lends credibility to the higher level of intersection control.
Peak Hour Traffic
Volumes
Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Steele Street
- --
- --
41 (7:30 AM)
86 (7:15 AM)
- --
- --
36 (5:45 PM)
47 (5:45 PM)
Rio Hondo Avenue
264 (7:30 AM)
251 (7:45 AM)
- --
- --
353 (5:15 PM)
231 (5:30 PM)
- --
- --
DISCUSSION
Field observations of the intersection of Steele Street and Rio Hondo Avenue
were made during the afternoon hours. There did not appear to be a lot of traffic
traveling on Steele Street during the hours observed. The speeds on Rio Hondo
Avenue appeared to be slightly higher than the 30 mph speed limit.
"Stop" control is intended to assign positive right -of -way at intersections. The
control is usually established on the street with the least volume of traffic:
Additional control, beyond the basic right -of -way assignment, is usually reserved
for those locations where the volume of traffic exceeds 300 vehicles per hour for
any eight hours of an average day and where both streets having about the same
amount of traffic, lends credibility to the higher level of intersection control.
November 3. 2005 Traffic Commission Meeting
Request for Stop Signs at the Intersection of
Steele Street and Rio Hondo Avenue
Page 3 of 3
Without credibility, . voluntary compliance is poor and without voluntay
compliance, traffic safety is severely compromised.
Furthermore, numerous studies have concluded that "Stop' signs are ineffective
as a speed deterrent. These studies found that slowing only occurred within 150
to 200 feet of the actual "Stop" location. Those motorists who slow for the
controls at unjustified locations often reach higher speeds between controls to
make up the time lost at the "Stop" sign. As previously indicated, many drivers
fail to stop and others do not bother to slow due to the perception on nonexistent
,potential cross conflict.
The 24 -hour traffic volumes and collision history were applied to the guidelines
presented in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) for the
installation of multi -way stop controlled intersections. Exhibit B depicts how the
intersection of Steele Street and Rio Hondo Avenue compares to the MUTCD
guidelines.
As shown in Exhibit B, the four guidelines presented in the MUTCD are not
satisfied for the intersection of Steele Street and Rio Hondo Avenue.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the guidelines of the MUTCD, the intersection of Steele Street and Rio
Hondo Avenue does not satisfy any of the warrants for the installation of a multi -
way stop controlled intersection. Therefore, the installation of stop signs on Rio
Hondo Avenue at Steele Street is not recommended at this time.
Attachments
oCf.2612005 07:02
City of Rosemead
Rio Hondo Avenue & Steele Street
Traffic Commission - November 3, 2005
Study Name:
..... Study bate.: lor15W6'�.
Multi -Way Stop warrant Reporr
._;Major Street Approaches Minor Street Approaches
Nortnemald: RIO Monde Avenue
Total Approach volume: 3.CM
Approach Speed: 34
9ouf dxwIrd Rio Hondo AV~
Tote) Approach Volume: 2.524
AWown Speed: 34
Warrant Summary
EastOOrad: steeleshvet
Total Approach Volume: 369
Wad6ound: Steele Sheet
Total Approach Volume: 552
Criteria A - Interim MmurB ._..«.... .. ».,.r..... »__.......«. «._.... ...__».. «.._.___....... «. «.._..
.... ._.........._.....__.........._ Not Evaluated
it traffic Signals are Justified, stop signs Can be Installed as an Interim measure.
Minor
Total
Criteria B- Crash Experience
Not Soilstled
Number of crashes (0) is less than the minenuM required (5).
07:00 - 09:00
Criteria C - 3Nnhnum Volumes and Delays ..._...._...._ ..................__.__....._..._.. .......... .....
_....._..__..... «....._........_... Not Satistled
Delay data not evaluated
-
Average of 6 highest noura does not meet volume Criteria. .
240-Yea 160-NO Major
Criteria b • 00% at volumaw Down, and Crashes
trot Ssllaned
DoW data not evaluated
?7
Average 016 ttigtwat hours does not meet volume criteria
Ar re�alyela Of &Hour volume wsmmo:
10:00 - 10:00
nme
new
Total
Major
Avg
Minor
Total
Minor
Avg
CrIt C
Mayor Crh Mlnor Crlt MOMS?
Cr110
Major Crh Mtnm era Moots•
07:00 - 09:00
410
414A
114_
"a
300 -Yea 206•N6 Major.
240-Yea 160-NO Major
os:o0 - 00:00
440
?7
10:00 - 10:00
536
70
17:00 - 1&oo
552
so
09:00 - 1o!W
21"
W
11:00 - 12:00
263
s0
10:00 - 17:00
469
S
12:00.13..0
- no
94
13:00 - 14.00
349
62
law - 15:00
452
51
10:00 - tt:0o
266
49
19.00- 20:00
4as
46
15:00 - le:oo
305
42
.
2000 - 21:00
291
36
06:00 -07-00
132
23
21,00 - 22:00
211
21
22:00 - 23:00.
132
17
06:00 - 06:00
46
11
04:00. 05:00
1s
a
01:00 - 02:00
16
6
23-0 -00:00
so
4
00:00 - oe:00
6
3
0000 - 01:00
27
3
02:0 - 03:00
4
1
Staff Report
Rosemead Traffic Commission
TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN
AND MEMBERS
ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSSION
FROM: JOANNE ITAGAKI, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPUTY
DATE: October 24, 2005
RE: Request for Traffic Signal at Rush Street and Angelus Avenue
REQUEST
Councilmember Taylor has requested staff analyze the intersection of Rush Street and
Angelus Avenue for the installation of a traffic signal. Councilmember Taylor indicated
that recent indications of an increase in traffic volumes around the City may result in
traffic volumes at this intersection that would warrant a traffic signal.
Rush Street is a 90 -foot wide east -west roadway with two lanes of traffic in each
direction. A raised center median separates opposing lanes .of traffic. There are
dedicated left turn lanes on Rush Street at its intersection with Angelus Avenue. There
is a yellow crosswalk on the east leg of the intersection. School pedestrian warning
signs exist at and in advance of this crossing. "Slow School Xing" pavement markings
also exist in advance of this crossing. Parking is generally allowed on both sides of the
street except during street sweeping days. The posted speed limit on Rush Street is 40
mph.
Angelus Avenue is a 40 -foot wide north -south roadway with one lane of traffic in each
direction. There is no striping separating opposing lanes of traffic. Street sweeping
parking restrictions are posted on Angelus Avenue. Rice School is located on the east
side of Angelus Avenue north of Rush Street. There are school area signs on Angelus
Avenue. The prima facie speed limit on Angelus Avenue is 25 mph.
Exhibit A depicts existing conditions at the intersection of Rush Street and Angelus
Avenue and will be available at the Traffic Commission meeting.
DATA
The reported collision history at the intersection of Rush Street and Angelus Avenue
was reviewed for the period from January 1, 2000 to July 31, 2005. There were 3
reported collisions during this period. They are summarized below:
Location & Description Time & Date
1. At intersection, Northbound vehicle 10:15 AM, 02/08/05
broadsided a westbound vehicle
(Auto right -of -way violation, no
injuries).
November 3, 2005 Traffic Commission Meeting
Request for Traffic Signal at Rush Street and Angelus Avenue
Page 2 of 3
2. At intersection, Eastbound vehicle 8:10 AM, 06/11/02
Slowing /stopping rearended an
Eastbound vehicle stopped in the
Road (Following too close, no
Injuries).
3. 28 feet east of, Northbound pedestrian 7:30 AM, 03/21 /00
collided with an eastbound vehicle
(Unknown factor, 1 injury).
Twenty -four hour traffic volumes were obtained for the intersection of Rush Street and
Angelus Avenue in October 2005. The traffic counts on Angelus Avenue reflect traffic
on Angelus Avenue north of Rush Street. These counts revealed the following:
Turning movement counts including pedestrian crossing volumes were taken on
Thursday October 13, 2005. These counts revealed the following_
24 -hour Traffic Volume
Peds Xing
East Leg
Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
I Westbound
Rush Street
- --
- --
3,473
4,266
Angelus Avenue
791
703
- --
--
Turning movement counts including pedestrian crossing volumes were taken on
Thursday October 13, 2005. These counts revealed the following_
Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
Peds Xing
East Leg
Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Rush Street
- --
- --
408 (7:45 AM)
499 (7:15 AM)
7:45 - 8:30 AM
- --
- --
372 (4:45 PM)
380 (5:15 PM)
Angelus Avenue
169 (7:30 AM)
132 (7:30 AM)
- --
- --
1
116 (12:45 PM)
85 (1:00 PM)
- --
- --
Turning movement counts including pedestrian crossing volumes were taken on
Thursday October 13, 2005. These counts revealed the following_
Northbound
Peds Xing
East Leg
Southbound
Peds Xing
West Le
Left
Thru
Ri ht
Left
Thru
Right
7:45 - 8:30 AM
0
0
3
14
80
1
25
6
2:00 - 3:00 PM
1
0
2
3
59
0
108
12
Eastbound
Peds Xing
South Leg.
Westbound
Peds Xing
North Le
Left
Thru
Right
Left
Thru
Right
7:45 - 8:30 AM
38
316
0
0
1
318
119
19
2:00 - 3:00 PM
1 19
183
1
0
1
176
108
12
November 3, 2005 Traffic Commission Meeting
Request for Traffic Signal at Rush Street and Angelus Avenue
Page 3 of 3
DISCUSSION
Field observations were made of the intersection during the mid - morning hours. Few
pedestrians were observed because observations were made after school start times.
Most vehicles on Angelus Avenue were able to turn into or out of the street to access
Rush Street with little or no delay.
Traffic signals are traffic control devices used to determine right -of -way at intersections.
They are not speed control devices and, when not properly installed, can increase
speeds. The installation of signals is based on guidelines provided by Caltrans. These
guidelines are based on years of study and are the standard used by the City.
The data collected were compared to the Caltrans guidelines found in the Manual of
Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). These guidelines analyzed the traffic
volume, pedestrian volume and reported collision history at the subject intersection.
Exhibit B depicts how the intersection of Rush Street and Angelus Avenue measures up
to the Caltrans guidelines. None of the 8 warrants are satisfied. This indicates that the
right -of -way assignment at the intersection of Rush Street and Angelus Avenue
provides the appropriate level traffic control at this time.
The above - stated conclusions of this current study correspond to those of Endo
Engineering, the Traffic Engineering consultant who analyzed the Rush/Angelus
intersection as part of the Traffic Element of the Environmental Impact Report for the
proposed Wal -Mart at Walnut Grove Avenue and Rush Street. The Endo Engineering
report found that a traffic signal at the subject location was not warranted now nor with
the Wal -Mart built and open for business.
Staff was concerned that in the future there may be a future need for traffic safety
measures to be put in place at Rush Street and Angelus Avenue. Therefore, as part of
the Conditions of Approval for the Wal -Mart site, the developer is required to deposit
sufficient funds to fund the installation a flashing beacon and a crossing guard program
for a minimum of 20 years.
RECOMMENDATION
The installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Rush Street and Angelus Avenue
is not recommended at this time based on current levels of traffic volumes, pedestrian
volumes and reported collision *history. ,
Attachments
OCT.2612005 01:02
City of Rosemead
Rush Street & Angelus Avenue
Traffic Commission - November 3, 2005
Study Name: Nomember-Rush & Angelus Signal
Warred Study Date :10/25M
Signal Warrants - Summary Page No. :.I
Major Street Approaches
Eaelbe0rry Rush Street
Number of Lanes: 2
Approach Spelt 41
Total Approach Volume: 3,473
WsslbOtmd: Rush Sired
Number of Lanes: 2
Approach Speed: 44
Total Approach Volume: 4,288
Minor Street Approaches
Mwvft . Driveway
Number of lanes: t
Total Approach Volume: 0
SOumaourmk Angelus Avenw
Number of Lanes: 1
Total Approach Volume. 703
Warrant Summary lRwalvalweappfy.l
wertadl- Eight Neur VMkuler Volumes _.... Y..—..--•••-- .____— ..�.._.— .�..— .-- •- - - - - -.
Warrant IA- Minithum Vehicular VoMns ........«......» ................................. ._........._......_...... » «.. —. Not sonalled
ROWh d volumes reached for 0 hours, a are needed
Warted 113. Itdanupdon of Continuous Traffic ..— ........ ................ «..,... » °..."'....'... Not SP119fle0
Required volumes reached for 3 hours. 8 are needed
Warted 7 AAB - Cernl1ro110n or WartsnM
Net Satisfied
Required wiumas reached for -t hour, a we needed
War and 2 - Four Nour Volumes _..»«_...._»..._»..._»..._..«..««««.« ................««.,.........«....«.........,. «.. «................. «..,... «..
Number of hours (1) volumes exceed minimum 4 minimum required (4).
Werrent 3 -Peak Hour .
wan 11". 3A - Peek Noun DOMY ---- —. _— .— ..— __._ »..�.. _ »_._.... »._..._. Not Satisfied
Total approach Volumes Who delays on minor street do not exceed minhnUm9 for any hour.
we, lot 39 - Peak "our Volumes .»««.....« ..............._._....._..___..._ ........ ...._...._..»._.._..... —_. Not Satisfied
Volumes 00 not exceed minimums for any hour.'
Warrant 4 - Pedestrlen Volumes «....._« ... »..._.. .....
...._......__.._
Required 4 Mr pedoetdan wlume reached for o hour(s) and the single hour volume for 0 hOur(S)
Warrant S - School Crossing .«.._ ...... .- .. .......
.._....__.._......_.
Nmnber of gape 122.0 seconds 020) exceeds 11x9 number of mhnute9 in the crossing period (120).
wa.a,d 9 - coordinated Signal System
No adjacent Coordinated signals we Present .
..................._.._._..... ...__�.._._...........»...�._v.
Warrant 7 -Crash ExpNbllcO ..._._..__.___ �..__. ..«........ ... ..............«. . .
Number of accidents (1) is "a than minlmuin (5). Volume minimums are hot met
Warrant 8- Roadway Network __._»_.._...._ ..... ................__........»..«. .....,......««....._ ..........._...«»..._..««». «,_„
Major Route conditions not mat. NO volume requirement met.
Net Satisfied
Not Salialted
Not Satisfied
Not Satisfied
Not Satisfied
Not SotlsFed
Not Satisfied
Not Satisfied
OOT.26'2005 07:03
City of Rosemead
Rush Street & Angelus Avenue
Traffic Commission - November 3, 2005
Study Name: Nownb it -Rush 8 Angelo Signal
WaRAM - Study Date ; 109SM
Signal Warrants - Summary Page No. : 2
700
_ Warrant curve
Goo
� 500
E 400
v 200
N
too
266
400 8o0
Major Smear -Total of Both Directions (VPH)
-. s . Vm,. Wansrdf:
D
�
war -/A
—
War -1Ais
- -.__.
- - - -__
I
— __..1.__._
40ghdr
_- _
Peak How Wam'ar8
Four Moor warrant
Minor CYR
Medal
I
Miner Cr0
I
Major Crit
Miller Cr8
IR%raL 24 major lanes and 1 minor tame dunes used)
9OOIn
Total
Val
—
"4-"0
a4NO
—
0 0:00
38
2
so"
426"0.
i0sw
—
536Ne
55-"o
i
31
I
89
420140
105440
11
'
I �
T
—
50440
44-NO
I
lIL
I
21
4
10 g
al
L
105-No
—
630-NO.
- SS40
—
504140
84-N6
--
03.00
. 15
1
SO
426410
105410,
—
all-No
53-to
—
506-No
64-NO
.ann 1NP
266
400 8o0
Major Smear -Total of Both Directions (VPH)
-. s . Vm,. Wansrdf:
D
war -/A
WaMB
War -1Ais
"our
Mall
40ghdr
Minor
Dtr
Major Crk
Minor CYR
Medal
Major Cru
Miner Cr0
Meeb7
Major Crit
Miller Cr8
Modal
9OOIn
Total
Val
—
"4-"0
a4NO
—
0 0:00
38
2
so"
426"0.
i0sw
—
536Ne
55-"o
01:00
31
3
89
420140
105440
—
5311-Me
53-fe
—
50440
44-NO
—
02:00
21
4
SO
420-40
105-No
—
630-NO.
- SS40
—
504140
84-N6
--
03.00
. 15
1
SO
426410
105410,
—
all-No
53-to
—
506-No
64-NO
—
04:00
20
4
Sal
420.140
tos-NO
—
630-No
$*No
—
90410
84"0
—
09.00
67
11
9B
426410
10s-He
—
676Mo
57-1O
—
SO4-M
- 64-HO
—
o6:00
229
19
s0
420-No
106-M
—
57610
$3^10
—
506-40
OWN&
—
07:00
065
67
so
426488
10510
Major
a36yea
53-Y88
Beth
S0140111
64140
Malec
0990
794
97
se
426YM
10610
maw
6a6YM
53-YM
- Bulb
a04-T"
84448
Both
09.00
361
30
80
420-No
105-40
—
6704M
53-40
—
$0410
84N0
10'.00
316
35
so
426NO
105.No
—
57610
03410
—
5114410
84-No
—
1/:00
377
25
88
420-ft
105-10
—
876"0
03-NO
—
SO4-NO
84-NO
—
12:00
453
33
90
426-TM
105110
Malmo
676MO
53-40
—
504440
8410,
—
13:00
400
05
90
420-Yes
/OS-NO
Mater
036M0
SS-Yes,
Minor
5WHID
Wyse
Minor
14:00
404
40
98
4264J0
105-40
—
636106
3340
—
S64-10
15.00
486
25
95
426YM
• 105-Mo
Major
076"0
5300
—
504-NO
84-fb
—
18:00
660
50
99
4211-yes,
105-811
Major
ao-No
53-ft
—
SO4Yes
64NO
Major
17•.00
726
S6
SO
426YM
10x'+"0
Major
636YM
Wyss'
Both
SO4yea
64-No
Major
659
$2
SB
426YM
106440,
Major
636YM
SYIYO
Maw
504488
/4No
Major
10:00
504-NO
114-46
—
1800
377
13
SO
42616
100140
—
876"6
531'10
20:00
278
19
SB
420-ND
- 1056"0
—
636No
S3-b
—
504440
04-40
—
21-M
ISO
12
SB
420-NO
105410
—
836MO
53-40
506-"0
"-ft
—
22:111111
22:66
177
7
$B
4204b
1054ft
—
630NO
63140
—
504-No
04-No
—
23:00
63
1 4
89
1 420-40
105.00
—
630-No
53-40
—
504!40
01-10
—
ON 14<ld -!HS i jo i 'iHs 09,
31135
00 C) 01
Lj is s
CI'V' I/Xl S 0 \ o l 0 lj,, I:D
--77777--- .ea rfl533
O
----------- ------------------------
C)
> IG
<
z
rn
z
I
0
Z_
d i
LU
N 3 N
Qro }w
LU
w
D (3 U_d)
F w
N T
VOA W
��w
Q —�
�0U_ t ■
i>
al
I
to
I N
I
I ran
.a ".0
I
)OV: VVI
LU
LU
J
m
_ F—
w
no
z
Z
W :inN:3nd dl-120
3
�Qw
< D
>
r
W
Q
a
Ww
WRw
_
Ln
(L�fV
;�d
W
w
IM
Y
Jly
,-i
W
Q
J
W
U1
Uf
W
W
0
z
0
�
�
Q
m_
4J 1
Q
-
_
_
U-)
W
X
0
D
Q
Ll
LU
�—
J
U
o
v '
V�
�WIU�
N
M
v
2
�L
■
it •.
Z
W
.
■
N
QO
<w
I
Q�U_ N
I
■
■
■
�„
N
ry
N N
. ■
0
Z_
d i
LU
N 3 N
Qro }w
LU
w
D (3 U_d)
F w
N T
VOA W
��w
Q —�
�0U_ t ■
i>
al
I
to
I N
I
I ran
.a ".0
I
)OV: VVI
LU
LU
J
m
_ F—
w
no
z
Z
W :inN:3nd dl-120
3
�Qw
< D
w
J
Q M
LLI J Oz J i
�
L L
>
r
W
Q
H
Ww
WRw
_
Ln
(L�fV
;�d
W
w
IM
Y
Jly
,-i
W
Q
w
J
Q M
LLI J Oz J i
�
L L
y
>
W
Q
m
m
W
w
IM
Y
N
,-i
W
J
W
U1
Uf
W
W
0
z
0
�
�
Q
m_
4J 1
Q
-
_
_
U-)
w
X
0
D
Q
Ll
Q
�—
J
U
o
y
>
Q
m
m
Z
Z
w
IM
Y
a
r N
,-i
Z
<
Q
U1
r
D O