CC - Item 4E - Request For Speed Limit On Muscatel Ave Bewteen Klingherman St And Fern AvenueTO: HONORABLE MAYOR
AND MEMBERS
ROSEMEAD~CITY COUNCIL
FROM: BILL CROWD, CITY MANAGER
DATE: AUGUST 7, 2002
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR SPEED LIMITS ON MUSCATEL AVENUE BETWEEN
KLINGERMAN STREET AND FERN AVENUE
A resident of the subject site is requesting traffic controls on Muscatel Avenue between Klingerman
Street and Fern Avenue due to concerns about speeding vehicles. Based on a field review of the site
and its reported accident history, staff reported back to the Traffic Commission and recommended
the installation of speed limit signs and the placement ofa radar trailer (Exhibit A). At the July l l °i
meeting, the Traffic Commission unanimously approved and recommended for City Council
adoption and action.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Rosemead City Council approve the staff recommendation as approved
by the Traffic Commission on July 11, 2002.
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A - Traffic Commission Staff report, dated June 25, 2002
Exhibit B - Traffic Commission Minutes, dated July 11, 2002
AUG 13 2002
Staff Report
Rosemead Traffic Commission
TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN
AND MEMBERS
ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSSION
FROM: JOANNE ITAGAKI, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPUTY
DATE: June 25, 2002
RE: Request for Speed Bumps on Muscatel Avenue between
Klingerman Street and Fern Avenue
REQUEST
A letter (attached) requesting speed bumps on Muscatel Avenue from Mr. Scott
Steadman, 2450 Muscatel Avenue, has been received. Mr. Steadman indicates
especially during the afternoon hours, 4:00 to 6:00 PM, traffic from the Edison
facility is driving faster than the speed limit of 25 mph on Muscatel Avenue. He is
requesting the installation of speed bumps or stop signs on Muscatel Avenue to
prevent this speeding.
CONDITIONS
Muscatel Avenue between Klingerman Street and Fern Avenue is a 36-foot wide
north-south roadway. Single family residential homes front Muscatel Avenue.
There is on-street parking allowed on both sides of the roadway except on
Fridays between 8:00 AM and 12:00 PM for street sweeping. There are no
centerline stripes or speed limit signs on Muscatel Avenue.
Muscatel Avenue intersects Klingerman Avenue to form a "T" intersection.
Muscatel Avenue is stop controlled at this intersection. The intersection of
Muscatel Avenue and Fern Avenue is stop controlled in all four directions of the
intersection.
Dubonnet Avenue intersects Muscatel Avenue to form a "T intersection.
Dubonnet Avenue is stop controlled at this intersection.
Exhibit 1 depicts the general conditions of Muscatel Avenue between Klingerman
Street and Fern Avenue.
DATA
The reported accident history on Muscatel Avenue between Klingerman Street
and Fern Avenue was reviewed for the period from January 1, 1999 through
EXHIBIT A
July 11, 2002 Traffic Commission Meeting
Request for Speed Bumps on Muscatel Avenue
Between Klingerman Street and Fern Avenue
Page 2 of 3
December 31, 2001. The review of the reported accident history revealed two
reported accidents summarized below:
Location and Description PCF' Day. Date & Time
1. 503 feet south of Fern Pedestrian Violation Friday, 3/16/01 &
Westbound pedestrian was 5:30 PM
struck by a northbound
vehicle proceeding straight.
2. 100 feet north of Dubonnet None Stated Wed., 7/14/99 &
Northbound vehicle making 11:00 PM
an unsafe turn rearended
a northbound parked vehicle.
PCF' = Primary Collision Factor
The estimated 24-hour traffic volume on Muscatel Avenue is approximately 2,500
vehicles per day. This is slightly higher than expected on a residential street
because of the added affect of vehicles from the Edison facility. However, it is
still within an acceptable range on a residential roadway.
DISCUSSION
Field observation of Muscatel Avenue between Klingerman Street and Fern
Avenue was made during off peak hours. At that time, less than 5 vehicles were
observed. The vehicle speeds observed during this period was estimated at 25
to 30 mph. On-street parking during this time was light to moderate throughout
the block. ,
The favorable reported accident history indicates motorists appear to travel on
Muscatel Avenue in sensible manner.
The City's current policy is to deny the installation of speed humps on public
streets. This is primarily due to the lack of approved standard designs for the
speed humps. Other cities have installed speed humps on a "trial" or "study"
basis and have determined, under their own legal advice, whether their city is
taking on additional liability.
Through numerous studies, traffic engineers have concluded that "stop" controls
are not necessarily effective as a speed deterrent or useful as a means to
displace unwanted. traffic volumes. These studies found that speeds resume
within a few hundred feet of the actual "Stop" location and that compliance to
unjustified "Stop" controls is poor. For these reasons, "Stop" controls for the sole
purpose of controlling the speed and volume of traffic is not recommended at this
time.
July 11, 2002 Traffic Commission Meeting
Request for Speed Bumps on Muscatel Avenue
Between Klingerman Street and Fern Avenue
Page 3 of 3
For Muscatel Avenue, a stop control at Dubonnet Avenue is not recommended.
This is due to the amount traffic on both Muscatel Avenue and Dubonnet
Avenue. Motorists on Muscatel Avenue might begin to violate such a stop
control because they feel it is unreasonable to stop when there is little or no
cross traffic from Dubonnet Avenue. Most drivers are reasonable and prudent
with no intention of maliciously violating traffic regulations; however, when an
unreasonable restriction is imposed, it may result in flagrant violations.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that 25 mph signs be installed on Muscatel Avenue north of
Klingerman Street (northbound) and south of Fern Avenue (southbound). Figure
1 depicts this recommendation. It is also recommended that the radar trailer be
placed on Muscatel Avenue (northbound) during its next available assignment in
the City.
Attachments
P:\06-160UI1\RSDQ002 Agendas 8 DocumentsUuly-Muscatel Speed Bumps.doc
)O or pcf,ec "eA
d")
5/o ~~,z
~KSS A
w~i~ ~G1 IYuG(~
jl?u$
~ ~7Ci.J 2 ~ee .l ~iNJ j~t7 u~
/t 3 y e,4r OLC( Ckjc1
~n7
, Ctwe.e.J U J C4,,-.S dN'wNuScAjel
Vav-k JI&'d W4s J{PVC.I~
a~
11.Q '4U'vcie.
.SLR 1 el haq
a i~ rb ck.e,.~ ~2j={-
1(
DvvS-R Ul(( Uvxr
h,:s PAC Scr14p U J
F,5 ^ GQN(~ Lel-~ Wr ,
Gd(so.,j 1S0 k;LNQ-V- ,1 3 9,1W,v. _13orn.,
T~ 1( q ra 4ke C, raw
~ ~ OF tel;So.j e< ti--Le .2..5
-A . +o fie ~J SA L.ec( 4o
~'allcJI'Aj 0 ✓\1 01VSCI)ez- Nam 1
icoi-4 S~<~~mn~.1
vS-o {~~s~w+te~ lAU~ ~~sc~e~d ~t1770
26 ~ ~o- ! az y
~s y
la rQ N o S Peed L, vn 1 F
i NCJ O N gym. su~K tq + Ail
m
KL,`r~o•~r ,ri.~A
~~,(.U m~scwc~ wv¢
~y~o lmv5c~leL IaV--e
?ose 171 1?/7 ; CO
Fern Avenue
Install:
SPEED
LIMIT
25
sign on
R1-Stop Lp
R1-Stop r
R1-Stop
J
10,
'3
P,X
9L
Z
~v
Q
T
Q
yv
J
/ Install:
SPEED
LIMIT
25
sign on existing
street light pole.
Not to Scale
Klingerman Street
ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSION MEETING
JULY 11, 2002
A regular meeting of the Rosemead Traffic Commission was called to order by Vice-
Chairman Quintanilla at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers, 8838 East Valley
Boulevard, Rosemead.
ROLL CALL
Present: Vice-Chairman Quintanilla
Commissioners Knapp, Ruiz & Matsdorf
Absent: Commissioner Baffo
Ex Officio: Administrative Assistant:
Traffic Engineering Deputy:
Sheriff's Department:
CALL TO ORDER
Pledge of Allegiance: Commissioner Knapp
Invocation: Vice-Chairman Quintanilla
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Jessica Wilkinson
Joanne Itagaki
Deputy Paine
It was moved by Commissioner Matsdorf, seconded by Commissioner Knapp, to
approve the minutes for June 6, 2002.
Vote Results:
YES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN
ABSENT:
07-11-02/sb
Commissioner Knapp, Baffo & Ruiz
None
Commissioner Quintanilla
Commissioner Baffo
EXHIBIT "B"
II. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE - NONE
Speaking before the Commission was:
Jim Flano
8655 Landisview Lane
Rosemead, California 91770
Mr. Flano stated that he would like to see the [traffic signal] light fixed at San Gabriel
Boulevard and Walnut Grove so that Landisview and Walnut Grove is green and
doesn't cause [traffic] problems.
Mr. Flano also stated that the proposed expansion of Rush Street over Whittier Narrows
should be pushed as part of the new development at Walnut Grove and Rush.
III. OLD BUSINESS - NONE
IV. NEW BUSINESS
A. REQUEST FOR LOADINGIUNLOADING ZONE IN FRONT OF 4405
ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD
Traffic Engineering Deputy Itagaki presented the staff report.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on field observations and favorable reported accident history, the
installation of a 30-foot passenger loading/ unloading zone is recommended
immediately south of the northerly driveway of 4405 Rosemead Boulevard. The
loading/ unloading zone shall be identified with white curb and one sign reading
"Loading Zone 7:30 to 8:00 a.m. and 2:30 to 3:00 p.m. Monday - Friday" (green
on white).
Should the Traffic Commission approve this recommendation, this request will
be forwarded to Caltrans for their approval. The approval by Caltrans is
necessary because Rosemead Boulevard is under their jurisdiction. After
Caltrans approval is received, this item will be forwarded to City Council.
It was moved by Commissioner Knapp, seconded by Commissioner Matsdorf,
and carried unanimously to approve the Traffic Engineer's recommendation
07-11-02/sb
B. REQUEST FOR SPEED BUMPS ON MUSCATEL AVENUE BETWEEN
KLINGERMAN STREET AND FERN AVENUE
Traffic Engineering Deputy Itagaki presented the staff report.
RECOMMENDATION:
It was recommended that 25 mph signs be installed on Muscatel Avenue north of
Klingerman Street (northbound) and south of Fern Avenue (southbound). It was
also recommended that the radar trailer be placed on Muscatel Avenue
(northbound) during its next available assignment in the City.
It was moved by Commissioner Matsdorf, seconded by Commissioner Knapp,
and carried unanimously to approve the Traffic Engineer's recommendation.
V. STAFF REPORTS
Traffic Engineering Deputy Itagaki updated the Commission on the Janson
School issue. She attended a meeting at the district office, at which time they
decided to allow pick-up-and drop-off of pre-school daycare children through
the new parking lot, and they've also allowed teachers to park there. This will be
considered phase I, and the neighbors seem to be happy with this decision.
In addition, the school will continue to allow pick-up and drop-off all around
Janson, in order to reduce traffic.
VI. COMMISSIONER REPORTS
Commissioner Knapp stated that she has received request from residents in the
area of Ramona Boulevard and Ivar Avenue, to look into a stop sign on
Ramona/ Ivar.
Commissioner Knapp thanked everyone for all their help with the Parade, and
encouraged everyone to watch it on cable (Charter Communications).
Vice-Chairman Quintanilla stated that the sensor at Valley and Mission/ Rio
Hondo needs to be looked at.
Vice-Chairman Quintanilla thanked Commissioner Knapp for all her hard work
on the Parade.
07-11-02/sb
VI. COMMISSIONER REPORTS - Con 't
Commissioner Knapp requested that the August meeting be moved from August
P1 to August 81h.
It was moved by Commissioner Knapp, seconded by Commissioner Matsdorf,
and carried unanimously to move the August meeting to August 8th
VII. ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Knapp asked that the meeting be adjourned in memory of
Commissioner Baffo's mother, who passed away this past weekend.
There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was
adjourned at 7:38 p.m., with 13 people in the audience.
07-1]-02/sb
CC-D AUTHORIZATION TO ATTEND THE CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES 22"n
ANNUAL FALL SEMINAR, SEPTEMBER 27-29,2002, DANA POINT
"'tt~-E REQUEST FOR SPEED LIMIT SIGNS ON MUSCATEL AVENUE BETWEEN
KLINGERMAN STREET AND FERN AVENUE
CC-F AUTHORIZATION TO REJECT CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY FROM
KASRH2ARAT PORNSAWAN
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR SECOND BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL that the
Council approve the aforementioned items on the Consent Calendar. Vote resulted:
Yes: Imperial, Taylor, Bruesch, Clark, Vasquez
No: None
Absent: None
Abstain: None
t1e Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered.
CC-B CONSIDERATION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF LOS
ANGELES AND THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD FOR CONVEYANCE OF COUNTY-
OWNED REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN CIVIC CENTER PLAZA AND
ADJACENT TO CITY HALL
Juan Nunez, 2702 Del Mar, Rosemead, asked how the City is going to acquire that piece of
property?
Mayor Bruesch replied that through negotiations, the County has agreed to quitclaim the property
to the City at no cost.
Mr. Nunez stated that the County should not be giving property away.
Mayor Bruesch stated that since City Hall was built in 1968, it was assumed that that piece of
property belonged to the City and was utilized as such. Mr. Bruesch continued that recent surveys taken
in preparation for City Hall expansion revealed that the property belonged to L.A. County. Through
negotiations with the County, the County agreed to transfer the County-owned property to the City.
Bill Crowe, City Manager, explained that the County originally appraised the property at
$203,000, at which time the City requested that we negotiate the value with them. Subsequently, the
Board of Supervisors approved conveying the property to the City at no cost.
MOTION BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM VASQUEZ that
the Council approve the conveyance agreement with the County of Los Angeles that provides for the
transfer of County-owned property to the City and the continued joint use and maintenance of civic center
facilities. Vote resulted:
CCAIIN:8-13-02
Page a5