CC - Item 2A - Public Hearing Resolution 2002-39 Certification Of Compliance With The Los Angeles County Congestion Management Plan9'/
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR
AND MEMBERS
ROSEM D CITY COUNCIL
FROM: BILL CRCITY MANAGER
DATE: AUGUST 20, 2002
RE: PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION 2002-39 - CERTIFICATION OF
COMPLIANCE WITH THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CONGESTION,
MANAGEMENT PLAN
The Congestion Management Program (CMP) requires each city to annually adopt a
resolution, following a public hearing, stating its compliance with the CMP. The attached
resolution attests to the fact that the City of Rosemead has met all requirements of the
CMP.
The City of Rosemead,has previously adopted a transportation demand management
ordinance as well as a land use analysis program consistent with the requirements of the
CMP.
The CMP deficiency plan requires all cities to monitor new development and compare the
corresponding increase in trips with mitigation projects that increase highway traffic
capacity. The attached 2001 Deficiency Plan Status Summary indicates new development
resulted in 504 debits; there were no offsetting credits. The resulting debits are applied to
the City's credit bank, which will leave a credit balance of 4,338.
COON CH
AU G 2 7 2002
ITEM No. =.4,
August 20, 2002
Page 2
0
As was the case last year, no credits were provided for transit subsidies (RTD Bus Pass
Program) or Rosemead transit (Dial-A-Ride and Shuttle) because the average daily
ridership remained constant or declined from previous years and credit is only provided for
an increase in usage over the highest previously report levels. In 2001/02, the total
number of participants for the bus pass program was 955/month, Rosemead Shuttle
ridership was 229/average weekday, and Rosemead Dial-A-Ride ridership was 41/average
weekday. These numbers compare to peak numbers of 1,194 (in 1999), 244 (in 1999) and
52 (in 1997), respectively
Last year it was reported that 130 credits would be provided for the construction of the
Garvey Senior Housing/Community Center Complex, with anticipation that additional
credits would be awarded this year upon completion of the project. Unfortunately the MTA
did not accept this project as a qualifying transportation improvement strategy for CMP
credits as a mixed-use development because the Senior Housing/Community Center
Complex did not meet the minimum 24 dwelling units/acre density requirement nor was it
within one quarter of a mile from a transit corridor as defined by the CMP.
Upon adoption of Resolution 2002-39, staff will forward the self-certification to the Los
Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for review and adoption.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2002-39.
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-39
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA,
FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND
ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT, .
IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 65089
WHEREAS, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("MTA"),
acting as the Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County, adopted the 2002
Congestion Management Program in June 2002; and
WHEREAS, the adopted CMP requires that MTA annually determine that the
County and cities within the County are conforming to all CMP requirements; and
WHEREAS, the adopted CMP requires submittal to the MTA of the CMP local
implementation report.by September 1 of each year; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a noticed public hearing on August 27, 2002.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of the City of Rosemead
does hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1. That the City has taken all of the following actions, and that the City is
in conformance with all applicable requirements of the 2002 CMP.
By June 15, of odd-numbered years, the City will conduct annual traffic counts and
calculated levels of service for selected arterial intersections, consistent with the
requirements identified in the CMP Highway and Roadway System Chapter.
The City has locally adopted and continues to implement a transportation demand
management ordinance, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP
Transportation Demand Management Chapter.
The City has locally adopted and continues to implement a land use analysis
program, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Land Use
Analysis Program Chapter.
The City has adopted a Local Implementation Report, attached hereto and made a
part hereof, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP. This report balances
traffic congestion impacts due to growth within the City with transportation improvements,
and demonstrates that the City is meeting its responsibilities under the Countywide
Deficiency Plan.
Section 2. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and
shall forward a copy of this Resolution to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority.
PASSED, APPROVED and AD OPTED this 27th day of August, 2002.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
Date Prepared:
22-Aug-02
2002 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2001 - MAY 31, 2002
Contact: KEN RUKAVINA
Phone Number: (626) 569-2151
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY
00 DEFICIENCY PLAN STATUS S
UMMARY
1. Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal
[from Section 1]
(504)
Exempted Dwelling Units
0
Exempted Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1,000s)
0
2. Transportation Improvements Credit Claims
[from Section II]
0
Land Use Strategy Claims
0
Capital Improvement Claims
0
Transit Claims
0
TDM Claims
0
Total Strategies Claimed
0
Subtotal Current Credit (Goal)
504
3. Carryover Credit from Last Year's (2001)
Local Implementation Report
4,842
Net Deficiency Plan Credit Balance:
4,338
2002 CMP LIR (1. Def Plan Sum) Section I, Page 1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 22-Aug-02
2002 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2001 - MAY 31, 2002
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT
DEVELOPMENT PART 1: NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category
Dwelling
Units
Debit Debits
Value/DU
Single Family Residential
27.00
x 6.80 = 184
Multi-Family Residential
0.00
x 4.76 = 0
Grou Quarters
0.00
x 1.98 = 0
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category
1000 Gross
Square Feet
Debit Debits
Value/1000SF
Commercial (less than 300,000 s .ft.
5.12
x 22.23 = 114
Commercial (300,000 s .ft. or more
0.00
x 17.80 = 0
Freestanding Eating & Drinking
7.11
x 66.99 = 476
NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Category
1000 Gross
Square Feet
Debit Debits
Value/1000SF
Lodging
0.00
x 7.21 = 0
Industrial
0.00
x 6.08 = 0
Office (less than 50,000 s .ft.
0.00
x 16.16 = 0
Office (50,000-299,999 s .ft.
0.00
x 10.50 = 0
Office (300,000 s .ft. or more
0.00
x 7.35 = 0
Medical
7.33
x 16.90 = 124
Government
0.00
x 20.95 = 0
Institutional/Educational
0.00
x 7.68 = 0
University
0.00
x 1.66 = 0
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
Description
(Attach additional sheets if necessary)
Daily Trips
Enter "0" if none
Debit Debits
Valuerrri
Water Well Plant
1.00
x 0.71 = 1
ENTER IF APPLICABLE
0.00
x 0.71 = 0
Subtotal New Development Activity 898
Adjustments (Optional) - Complete Part 2 = 395
Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal (Points) _ (504)
2002 CMP LIR (2. New Dev Act) Section I, Page 2
CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 22-Aug-02
2002 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2001 - MAY 31, 2002
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT (Continued)
Enter information where it says "Enter." If not applicable, enter "0" so it will total.
DEVELOPMENT PART 2: NEW IMPORTANT: Adjustments may be claimed only for 1) development permits that were both issued and
revoked, expired or withdrawn during the reporting period, and 2) demolition of any structure within the
reporting period.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category
Dwelling
Units
Adjustment Subtotal
Value/DU
Single Family Residential
24.00
x 6.80 = 163
Multi-Family Residential
0.00
x 4.76 = 0
Group Quarters
0.00
x 1.98 = 0
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category
1000 Gross
Square Feet
Adjustment Subtotal
Value/1000SF
Commercial less than 300,000 s .ft.
8.00
x 22.23 = 178
Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more
0.00
x 17.80 = 0
Freestanding Eating & Drinking
0.80
x 66.99 = 54
NON-RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Category
1000 Gross
Square Feet
Adjustment Subtotal
Value/1000SF
Lodging
0.00
x 7.21 = 0
Industrial
0.00
x 6.08 = 0
Office (less than 50,000 s .ft.
0.00
x 16.16 = 0
Office (50,000-299,999 s .ft.
0.00
x 10.50 = 0
Office 300,000 sq.ft. or more
0.00
x 7.35 = 0
Medical
0.00
x 16.90 = 0
Government
0.00
x 20.95 = 0
Institutional/Educational
0.00
x 7.68 = 0
University
0.00
x 1.66 = 0
OTHER DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS
Description
(Attach additional sheets if necessary)
Daily Trips Adjustment Subtotal
(Enter "0" if None) Value/Trip
ENTER HERE IF APPLICABLE
0.00
x 0.71 = 0
ENTER HERE IF APPLICABLE
0.00
x 0.71 = 0
Total Mitigation Goal Adjustments (Points) = 395
2002 CMP LIR (3. New Dev Adj) Section I, Page 3
CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 22-Aug-02
2002 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2001 - MAY 31, 2002
SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT (Continued)
Low/Very Low Income Housing
High Density Residential
near Rail Stations
Mixed Use Developments
near Rail Stations
Development Agreements entered
into Prior to July 10, 1989
Reconstruction of Buildings
damaged in April 1992 Civil Unrest
Reconstruction of Buildings
damaged in Jan 1994 Earthquake
Total Dwelling Units
Total Non-residential sq. ft. (in 1,000s)
Dwelling Units
Dwelling Units
0 1000 Gross Square Feet
Dwelling Units
0 1000 Gross Square Feet
0 Dwelling Dwelling Units
0 1000 Gross Square Feet
Dwelling Units
0 1000 Gross Square Feet
Dwelling Units
Exempted Development Definitions:
1. Lowery Low Income Housing: as defined by the California Department of Housing and Community
Development as follows:
Low-Income: equal to or less than 80% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size.
Very Low-Income: equal to or less than 50% of the County median income, with adjustments for family si
2. High Density Residential Near Rail Stations: development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenge
station and that is equal to or greater than 120 percent of the maximum residential density allowed under
the local general plan and zoning ordinance. A project providing a minimum of 75 dwelling units per acre
is automatically considered high density.
3. Mixed Uses Near Rail Stations: mixed use development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger
station, if more than half of the land area, or floor area, of the mixed use development is used for high
density residential housing.
4. Development Agreements: projects that entered into a development agreement (as specified under Secti
65864 of the California Government Code) with a local jurisdiction prior to July 10, 1989.
5. Reconstruction or replacement of any residential or non-residential structure which is damaged or destro,
to the extent of not less than 50% of its reasonable value, by fire, flood, earthquake or other similar calan'
6. Any project of a federal, state or county agency that is exempt from local jurisdiction zoning regulations a
where the local jurisdiction is precluded from exercising any approval/disapproval authority. These locallt
precluded projects do not have to be reported in the LIR.
2002 CMP LIR (4. Exempt Dev Act) Section I, Page 4
CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 22-Aug-02
2002 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2001 - MAY 31, 2002
SECTION Il.a - LAND USE CREDIT CLAIMS
Total Land Use Projects: 0 Total Land Use Credits (Points): 0
2002 CMP LIR (5. Land Use Claims) Section Il.a, Page 5
CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 22-Aug-02
2002 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2001 - MAY 31, 2002
SECTION II.b - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CREDIT CLAIMS
Total Can. Imo. Projects: 0 Total Cap. Imp. Credit (Points): o
2002 CMP LIR (7. Capital Improvement Claims) Section Il.b, Page 6
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
2002 CMP Local Implementation Report
Date Prepared: 22-Aug-02
SECTION Ilx:
Multi-Modal Transportation Centers Credit Claims - No. 223
2002 CMP LIR (8. MMTC Claims) Section Il.c, Page 7
CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 22-Aug-02
2002 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2001 - MAY 31, 2002
SECTION Il.d - TRANSIT CREDIT CLAIMS
Total Transit Projects: 0 Total Transit Credit (Points): 0
2002 CMP LIR (9. Transit Claims) Section Il.d, Page 8
CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 22-Aug-02
2002 CMP Local Implementation Report
Report Period: JUNE 1, 2001 - MAY 31, 2002
SECTION Il.e - TDM CREDIT CLAIMS
Total TDM Projects: o Total TDMCredit (Points): o
2002 CMP LIR (10. TDM Claims) Section Il.e, Page 9
Mr. White stated that when a resident sells their property, they have to inform any potential buyer of
that particular facility in their neighborhood.
Mr. Kress replied that it is the Attorney General's opinion that you cannot disclose that information.
Councilman Taylor requested that the Attorney General's opinion be included in the status report.
Mr. Crowe stated that he has such a facility on his street, and it is one of the best kept properties
there. Mr. Crowe stated that several of the clients work at fast-food restaurants, and that the facility also
allows people living in the neighborhood to move into the facility when they can no longer take care of
themselves.
Dolores Sanchez, District Director for State Senator Gloria Romero, introduced herself and thanked
the Council for their support on SB 928, the medical emergency bill that would have funded the trauma
centers throughout Los Angeles County. However, the bill was defeated, but the Senator is committed to
work on legislation that will help produce funding for those centers. Ms. Sanchez stated that the Senator
will continue to work with the Council on every area that she can.
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
An explanation of the procedures for the conduct of the public hearing was presented by the City
Attorney.
PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION NO. 2002-39 - CERTIFICATION OF
COMPLIANCE WITH THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CONGESTION
MANAGEMENT PLAN
The City Manager presented the staff report.
The Mayor opened the public hearing for those in the audience wishing to speak for or against this
item.
There being no one wishing to speak, the Mayor closed the public hearing.
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER CLARK, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM VASQUEZ that
the Council adopt Resolution No. 2002-39. Vote resulted:
Yes: Imperial, Taylor, Bruesch, Clark, Vasquez
No: None
Absent: None
Abstain: None
ftmipe Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered.
ccMnN:8-27-02
Page #3