1991 City Compliance ReportsH
1
I
CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
COMPLIANCE AND FINANCIAL REPORT
JUNE 30, 1991
I
CONTENTS
I SECTION I - GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON THE
GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F
I
1
GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Combined balance sheet, all fund types and account groups
2
Combined statement of revenues, expenditures and changes
in fund balances, all governmental fund types
3
Combined statement of revenues, expenditures and changes
in fund balances - budget and actual - general, special
revenue and debt service fund types
4
Statement of revenues, expenses and changes in fund balance,
pension trust fund
5
Statement of cash flows, pension trust fund
6
Notes to financial statements
7-20
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON THE
SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
21
SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
22
I
'
C O N T E N T S, Continued
SECTION II - COMPLIANCE MATTERS AND INTERNAL ACCOUNTING
AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS
REPORTS REQUIRED BY THE GOVERNMENTAL
'
AUDITING STANDARDS
Independent auditors' report on:
'
Compliance with applicable laws and regulations based on
an audit of the general purpose financial statements
23 and 24
Internal control structure
25 and 26
'
REPORTS REQUIRED BY THE SINGLE AUDIT ACT AND
OMB CIRCULAR A-128
'
'
report on:
Independent auditors
Specific compliance requirements applicable to major federal
financial assistance programs
27 and 28
Compliance with the general requirements applicable to
'
federal financial assistance programs
Internal accounting and administrative control systems
29 and 30
used to administer federal financial assistance programs
31 - 33
1
SECTION I - GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
I 1
L
u
LNNI
McGLADREY & PULLEN
Certified Public Accountants and Consultants
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON THE
GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
To the Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
City of Rosemead
Rosemead, California
We have audited the accompanying general purpose financial statements of the City of
Rosemead, California, as of and for the year ended June 30, 1991, as listed in the table of
contents. These general purpose financial statements are the responsibility of the City's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these general purpose financial
statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the general purpose financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of the City of Rosemead, California, as of June
30, 1991, and the results of its operations and cash flows of its pension trust fund for the
year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
u p C
6 )Y-A~ " tea~
Pasadena, California
September 13, 1991
- 1 -
CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
ALL FUND TYPES AND ACCOUNT GROUPS
June 30, 1991
ASSETS
Cash and cash investments
Cash and investments with fiscal agent
Other investments
investments in deferred compensation plans
Investments in annuity contracts
Receivables
Due from other funds
Property and equipment
Amount available in debt service fund
Amount to be provided for retirement of
general long-term debt
Total assets
LIABILITIES AND MUNICIPAL EQUITY
LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Due to other funds
Due to other governmental agencies
Refundable deposits
Deferred compensation
Tax allocation notes
Accrued vacation pay and compensatory time
Total liabilities
MUNICIPAL EQUITY
Investment in general fixed assets
Fund balance:
Reserved:
Long-term receivable
Debt service
Employees retirement
Unreserved:
Designated for capital projects
Undesignated
Total municipal equity and other credits
Total liabilities, municipal equity and
other credits
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Governmental Fund Types
Special Capital
General Revenue Proiects
$ 1,663,683 $ 1,443,850 $ 3,157,519
4,685,872 7,123,147
1,459,626 382,454 320,810
419,920 - -
8,229,101 $ 1,826,304 $ 10.601476
$ 1,294,279 $ 185,330 $ 992,225
- 249,986 169,934
243,836 -
10.911
$ 1.305.190 $ 679.152 $ 1.162.159
626,008
- 9,439,317
6.297.903 1.147.152
$ 6.921911 $ 1.147.152 $ 9.439317
$ 8.229.101 $ 1.826304 $ 10.601.476
2-
I
Governmental
Fiduciary
Total
Fund Types
Fund Types
Account Groups
(Memorandum Only)
'
Trust
General
General
Debt
and
Fixed
Long-Term
Service
Agency
Assets
Debt
1991
1990
'
$
$ 101,243
$
$
$ 6366.295 $
8,651,658
2,668,179
-
-
2,668,179
2,973,099
'
_
_
145,016
-
11,809,019
145,016
13,264,580
98,963
894,927
-
894,927
720,335
106,027
-
-
2,268,917
2,495,868
419,920
355,868
8,356,624
8,356,624
7,588,261
-
2,774,206
2,774,206
3,079,126
_
_
-
7.678.283
7,678.283
8.983303
$ 2.774.206
$ 1,141,186
$ 8,356,624
$ 10,452,489
$ 43,381,386 $
48211.061
I
$ $
$ $ $ 2,471,834
$ 1,664,595
419,920
355,868
243,836
324,867
78,204
78,204
78,209
168,055
168,055
123,539
10,365,000 10,365,000
11,995,000
87.489 98,400
77587
t
$ $ 246,259
$ - $ 10.452.489 $ 13,845.249
$ 14.619.665
$ $ -
$ 8,356,624 $ - $ 8,356,624
$ 7,588,261
_ 626,008
626,486
2,774,206
2,774,206
3,079,126
894,927
- 894,927
720,335
' _ _ _ 9,439,317 12,623,923
7.445.055 8.953.265
$ 2,774,206 $ 894 927 $ 8,356-624 $ - $ 29536.137 $ 33.591.396
$ 2.774.206 $ 1,141 186 $ 8 356 624 $ 10,452,489 $ 43381386 $ 48.211.061
CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES
AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
ALL GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES
Year Ended June 30, 1991
REVENUE
Property tax increment and special assessments
Other taxes
Licenses and permits
Intergovernmental
Charges for services
Fines, forfeitures and penalties
Use of money and property
Other
EXPENDITURES
Current:
General government
Public safety
Public works
Public health
Public recreation
Community service
Capital outlay
Debt service:
Principal
Interest
Revenue over (under) expenditures
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Operating transfers:
From other funds
(To) other funds
Revenue and other financing sources over
(under) expenditures and other financing uses
FUND BALANCE, BEGINNING
FUND BALANCE, ENDING
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Governmental Fund Types
Special Capital
General Revenue Projects
$ -
$ 347,061
$ 3,059,892
4,245,201
-
-
479,084
-
2,763,673
1,793,837
228,615
-
270,466
84,581
-
679,484
79,681
817,037
56,605
95,169
$ 8,723,128
$ 2305.160
$ 3972,098
$ 1,579,042
$ 80,845 $ 556,025
3,659,871
334,350 -
1,033,173
756,734 4,585,062
1,014,349
- -
1,804,330
34,163 -
1,230,417
849,305 -
127,984
32,413 -
$ 10,449,166
$ 2,087,810 $ 5,141,087
$ (1,726,038) $ 217,350 $ (1,168,989)
$ 87,816 $ 20,209 $
(20,209) (87,816) (2,015,617)
$ 67,607 $ (67,607) $ (2,015,617)
$ (1,658,431) $ 149,743 $ (3,184,606)
8,582,342 997,409 12,623,923
$ 6,923,911 $ 1,147,152 $ 9,439.317
-3-
I
Governmental Total
Fund Tvoes (Memorandum Only)
Debt
Service 1991 1990
$ $ 3,406,953
$ 3,507,606
- 4,245,201
4,176,257
- 479,084
533,050
- 4,557,510
3,725,299
- 228,615
284,851
355,047
524,001
268,350 1,844,552
2,389,057
13,463 165,237
191,389
281,813 $ 15,282,199
$ 15,331510
$ $ 2,215,912 $ 1,712,102
3,994,221 3,809,631
6,374,969 8,536,328
1,014,349 856,298
' 1,838,493 1,775,194
2,079,722 1,510,545
160,397 123,443
1
I
1,630,000 1,630,000 1,516,728
972,350 972,350 U01,811
$ 2,602,350 $ 20,280,413 $ 20,942,080
$ (2,320,537) $ (4 998114) $ (5,610,570)
$ 2,015,617 $ 2,123,642 $ 2,540,339
- (2,123,642) (2,540339)
$ 2,015,617 $ $
$ (304,920) $ (4,998,214) $ (5,610,570)
3,079,126 25,282,800 30,893,370
$ 2,774,206 $ 20,284,586 $ 25,282,800
CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL -
GENERAL, SPECIAL REVENUE AND DEBT SERVICE FUND TYPES
Year Ended June 30, 1991
REVENUE
Property taxes and special assessments
Other taxes
Licenses and permits
intergovernmental
Charges for services
Fines, forfeitures and penalties
Use of money and property
Other
EXPENDITURES
Current:
General government
Public safety
Public works
Public health
Public recreation
Community service
Capital outlay
Debt service:
Principal
Interest
Revenue over (under) expenditures
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Operating transfers:
From other funds
(To) other funds
Revenue and other financing sources over
(under) expenditures
FUND BALANCE, BEGINNING
FUND BALANCE, ENDING
See Notes to Financial Statements.
General Fund
Over
(Under)
Budget Actual Budget
4,077,000
4,245,201
168,201
551,500
479,084
(72,416)
3,654,100
2,763,673
(890,427)
349,075
228,615
(120,460)
300,000
270,466
(29,534)
730,800
679,484
(51,316)
26.500
56.605
30.105
$ 9,688,975
$ 8.721128
$ (965.847)
$ 1,672,057 $ 1,579,042 $ (93,015)
3,634,430
3,659,871
25,441
2,003,210
1,033,173
(970,037)
1,044,480
1,014,349
(30,131)
1,788,317
1,804,330
16,013
1,174,950
1,230,417
55,467
129,955
127,984
(1,971)
$ 11,447,399 $10,449,166 . $ (998,233)
$(1.758.424) $ (1.726.038) $ 32.386
$ 296,200 $ 87,816 $ (208,384)
- (20,209) (20,209)
$ 296,200 $ 67,607 $ (228.593)
1 462 224 $ (1,658,431) $ (196.2071
8.582.342
$ 6.923.911
-4-
L
1
J
1
Special Revenue
Debt Service
Over
Over
(Under)
(Under)
Budget
Actual
Bud et
Budget
Actual
Budget
$ 311,200
$ 347,061
$ 35,861
$
$
$
2,402,740
1,793,837
(608,903)
180,000
84,581
(95,419)
60,000
79,681
19,681
241,000
268,350
27,350
13.463
13.463
$ 2,953940
$ 2,305,160
$ (648,780)
$ 241,000
$ 281,813
$ 40,813
$ 130,290
$ 80,845
$ (49,445)
$ -
$ -
$ -
475,000
334,350
(140,650)
-
894,910
756,734
(138,176)
-
175,300
34,163
(141,137)
1,295,030
849,305
(445,725)
26,250
32,413
6,163
-
-
-
-
-
1,630,000
1,630,000
972,350
972,350
$ 2.996380
$ 2,087.810
$ (908,970)
$ 2,602,350
$ 2,602,350
$
$ (42,840)
$ 217,350
$ 260,190
$ (2,361,350)
$ (2,320,537)
$ 40,813
$
$ 20,209
$ 20,209
$ 2,602,350
$ 2,015,617
$ (586,733)
8)7,816)
(87,816)
-
$
$ (67,607)
$ (67,607)
$ 2602350
$ 2,015,617
$ (586333)
$ (42,8401
$ 149,743
$ 192583
$ 241,000
$ (304,920)
(545.9201.
997,409
3,079,126
1147152
$ 2,774.206
1
' CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
' STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENSES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
' PENSION TRUST FUND
Year Ended June 30, 1991
Operating revenue:
Contributions
Interest and other investment income
Operating expenses:
Administrative fees
Pension benefits
Net income
FUND BALANCE, BEGINNING
FUND BALANCE, ENDING
See Notes to Financial Statements.
1
$ 137,411
61.493
$ 198.904
$ 4,866
19.446
$ 24.312
$ 174,592
720.335
894.927
1 -5-
1
CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
PENSION TRUST FUND
Year Ended June 30, 1991
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Interest income
Net cash provided by operating activities
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of annuity contracts
Proceeds from the sale and maturity of annuity contracts
Interest received on annuity contracts
Net cash (used in) investing activities
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, ending
See Notes to Financial Statements.
-6-
$ 174,592
(61.4
$ 113.099
$ (198,904)
24,312
61.493
$ (113.099)
I CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
I NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note L Reporting Entity, Nature of Operations, Description of Funds and Account Groups and
Significant Accounting Policies
' Reporting entity
The criteria of oversight responsibility, special financing relationships and scope of public
service was used in determining the agencies or entities which comprise the City of
' Rosemead, California (the City) for financial reporting purposes. Oversight responsibility
is determined by the extent of financial interdependency, control over the selection of the
governing authority and management, ability to significantly influence operations, and
accountability for fiscal matters. Based on these criteria, the Rosemead Redevelopment
Agency (the Agency) is included in the combined financial statements of the City.
Nature of operations
City of Rosemead
' The City provides a broad range of services to its citizens, including general government,
public safety, streets, sanitation and health, cultural and park facilities and social services.
' Many of the functions often provided by municipal government are, in the City provided by
special districts. Examples of some of these special districts, which usually encompass areas
larger than the City itself, are the Fire Protection District, the Library District and the
County Flood Control District. Certain other governmental functions are paid for by the
City but performed by Los Angeles County departments under contract. Some of the
contracts now in effect are for police, street maintenance and animal control.
Rosemead Redevelopment Agency
The Agency finances street, park and utility improvements within the Rosemead Project
Area No. 1.
Description of funds and account groups
The accounts of the reporting entity are organized on the basis of funds or groups of
accounts, each of which is considered to be a separate accounting entity. The operations
of each fund are accounted for by providing a separate set of self-balancing accounts which
comprise its assets, liabilities, equity, revenue and expenditures. The various funds and
account groups are presented as follows:
1
7
1
I NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
' Note 1. Reporting Entity, Nature of Operations Description of Funds and Account Groups and
Significant Accounting Policies, Continued
' Governmental Fund Types
The General Fund accounts for all financial resources except those required to be accounted
for in another fund. These resources are devoted to financing the general services that the
City performs for its citizens.
' Special Revenue Funds account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources (other than
special assessments, expendable trusts and major capital projects) that are legally restricted
to expenditures for specified purposes. The Special Revenue Funds and their purposes are
' as follows:
The Tn7jTw Safety Fund accounts for the receipt of vehicle code fines which are expended
' for traffic safety enforcement.
The State Gas Tax Fund accounts for funds collected from the State of California which
' are used for street construction, street maintenance, engineering and administrative costs.
The County Aid to Cities Fund accounts for funds received from the County of Los
' Angeles for street construction and maintenance projects.
' The Local Transportation Fund accounts for state grants used to finance the construction
of bikeways and sidewalks.
The Public Transportation Fund accounts for the City's share of additional sales tax
collected in the County of Los Angeles as a result of Proposition A. The funds are used
to finance public transportation projects.
The Community Development Block Grant Fund accounts for Community Development
Block Grants received from the United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development.
The 1976 Community Parklands Grant Fund accounts for funds to be used for park
' projects.
The Street Lighting Fund accounts for the operation of street lights within the City.
' The Narcotics Seizure Fund accounts for the funds received from the County of Los
Angeles from the confiscation of cash and other valuables seized during drug related
' police raids. The funds are used to further enhance the City's drug related crime
prevention and detection programs.
1 8
I NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Reporting Entity, Nature of Operations, Description of Funds and Account Groups and
SWn*ant Accounting Policies, Continued
The R. Z'Berg/Harrir Grant Fund accounts for a state grant for preapproved park projects.
The California Wildlife Grant Fund accounts for a state grant for preapproved specified
' park projects.
Capital Projects Fund (Redevelopment Fund) accounts for financial resources to be used for
' the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities within the Agency.
The Debt Service Fund accounts for the accumulation of resources for the payment of
' general long-term debt principal, interest and related costs.
Fiduciary Fund Types
The Pension Trust Fund accounts for the activity of the retirement plan for employees of the
City.
The Agency Fund accounts for the assets held in a trustee capacity or as an agent. The cash
being held primarily represents amounts placed on deposit for refundable permits and
' performance bonds and deferred compensation plans for qualified employees.
Account Groups
' The General Fixed Assets Account Group accounts for all property and equipment except for
public domain fixed assets (e.g., streets, bridges, sidewalks, curbs, gutters and storm drainage
systems).
The General Long-Term Debt Account Group accounts for the outstanding principal balances
of all long-term debt expected to be financed from governmental fund types.
Significant accounting policies
Basis of accounting
Governmental fund types, the expendable trust fund (Pension Trust Fund) and agency funds
are accounted for using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenue is recognized
in the accounting period in which it becomes both available and measurable. Available
' means collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay current
liabilities.
1 -9-
I
1
I
I
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note L Reporting Entity, Nature of Operations, Description of Funds and Account Groups and
Significant Accounting Poticie; Continued
Property taxes that have been levied and are due on or before year end are recognized as
revenue if they have been collected within sixty days after year end. Sales taxes are
considered to be measurable when they have been collected by the City and are recognized
as revenue at that time. Special assessments are recognized as revenue at the time
individual installments come due.
In determining when to recognize intergovernmental revenues (grants, subsidies and shared
revenues), the legal and contractual requirements of the individual programs are used as
guidance. There are, however, essentially two bases for this revenue recognition. In one,
monies must be expended on the specific purpose or project before any amounts will be
paid to the City; therefore, revenues are recognized based upon the expenditures recorded.
In the other, monies are virtually unrestricted as to purpose of expenditure and nearly
irrevocable, i.e., revocable only for failure to comply with prescribed compliance
requirements, e.g., equal employment opportunity. These resources are reflected as
revenues at the time of receipt or earlier if they meet the criterion of availability. Other
major revenues that are determined to be susceptible of accrual include taxes and interest.
Major revenues that are determined to not be susceptible of accrual because they are either
not available soon enough to pay liabilities of the current period or are not objectively
measurable include hotel occupancy taxes, licenses, permits, fines and forfeitures.
Expenditures are recorded when the liability is incurred, except for interest on long-term
debt and sick pay, which are recorded when paid. Vacation pay is recorded as an
expenditure in the year it is earned to the extent it is paid in that year or within ninety days
after year end; otherwise, it is recorded as an expenditure when it is paid.
The accrual basis of accounting is used for the Pension Trust Fund. Under the accrual basis
of accounting, revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are recorded when
incurred. Investment earnings are accrued.
Cash investments and other investments
The City pools cash and investment resources of its various funds in order to facilitate the
management of cash. Cash applicable to a particular fund is readily identifiable. The
balance in the pooled cash accounts is available to meet current operating requirements.
All investments are stated at cost or amortized cost except those of the Deferred
Compensation Plan which are stated at market value. No loss is recognized when market
values decline below costs since it is generally the policy of the City to hold such
investments until they mature. Investment earnings are allocated based on the source of
funds.
-10-
i
1
I
I
1
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Reporting Entity, Nature of Operations, Description of Funds and Account Groups and
Sigrditcant Accounting Policies, Continued
Receivables
Property taxes receivable represent the uncollected March 1, 1991 levy which is due to the
City at June 30, 1991. Property taxes attach as an enforceable lien on property as of March
1, and are due and payable in two equal installments on the following November 1 and
February 1. Unpaid taxes become delinquent on December 10 and April 10. An allowance
based on historical collection experience is provided for uncollectible taxes.
All other receivables are reported at their gross value and, where appropriate, are reduced
by the estimated portion that is expected to be uncollectible.
Property and equipment
All property and equipment of the City are accounted for in the general fixed assets account
group. Public domain (infrastructure) general fixed assets consisting of certain
improvements other than buildings, such as roads, sidewalks and bridges, are not capitalized.
Property and equipment acquired or constructed for general governmental operations are
recorded as expenditures in the fund making the expenditure and capitalized in the general
fixed assets account group.
All general fixed assets which were purchased or constructed are stated at cost. Assets
' acquired by gift or bequest are recorded at their fair market value at the date of transfer.
No depreciation is recorded on general fixed assets.
Fund balances
I
The reserved portion of the fund balances represents that amount which has been legally
identified for the specific purpose or it represents that amount which is not available to
liquidate current liabilities. The unreserved portion represents the amount available for
budgeting future operations.
Vacation pay and compensatory time
City employees accumulate vacation hours which may be paid upon termination, death or
retirement. Employees can accumulate up to three weeks of accrued vacation per year
depending on the length of employment. Employees can accumulate up to 160 hours of sick
leave. Any hours in excess of 160 are considered to be vested and are paid to the employee
based on a vesting schedule. In addition, employees can accrue up to 240 hours of
compensatory time. Any hours in excess of 240 are paid to the employee.
- 11 -
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note L Reporting Entity, Nature of Operations, Description of Funds and Account Groups and
Significant Accounting Policies, Continued
The vested portion of vacation and sick leave by employees at June 30, 1991 that is expected
to be paid within one year is included in accrued liabilities in the General Fund. The
amount not expected to be repaid within one year is included in the General Long-Term
Debt Account Group.
Memorandum totals
Total columns on the combined financial statements are captioned "Memorandum Only" to
indicate that they are presented only to facilitate financial analysis. Data in these columns
do not present financial position or results of operations in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles. Interfund transactions have not been eliminated in arriving
at these amounts.
Note 2 Budget Matters
The annual budget adopted by the City Council provides for the general operation of the
City. It includes proposed expenditures and estimated revenues for all governmental fund
types except the Capital Projects Fund. Actual expenditures may not exceed appropriations
at the department level.
The City Manager is authorized to transfer budgeted amounts between funds. Budget
amendments were nominal for the year.
Budget-to-actual comparisons are not presented for the Capital Projects Fund since the
budget relates to all future appropriations as well as current appropriations.
Budgets presented in this report for comparison to actual amounts are presented in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The modified accrual basis of
accounting is employed in the preparation of the budget. Reported budget amounts
represent the original adopted budget as amended.
In all budgeted funds, unexpended budgeted amounts lapse at the end of the budget year.
1 -12-
i NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 3. Cash and Investments
The components of cash and cash investments at June 30, 1991 are as follows:
t Cash in bank $ 976,295
Time certificates of deposit 5.390.000
6.366.295
' The City and the Agency maintain cash and investment pools that are available for use by
all funds. Each fund's or fund type's share of the pool balance is reported in the financial
statements as "cash and cash investments." Earnings from the pooled investments are
' allocated monthly to each participating fund based on a formula that takes into
consideration each fund's average investment in the pool.
At year end, the carrying amount of the City and the Agency's deposits were $6,366,295
(cash in bank above) and the bank balance was $6,745,367.
A summary of collateralization of the bank balances is presented below:
Insured or collateralized with securities held by the City
or its agent in the City's name $ 976,044
Uncollateralized (in accordance with GASB 3), this category
includes any bank balance that is collateralized with
securities held by the pledging financial institution or by
its trust department or agent but not in the City's name
although balances so collateralized meet the requirements
of state law 5.769.323
6,745.367
' Annuity contracts and cash in bank include $145,016 and $23,039, respectively, in the City's
deferred compensation plan as of June 30, 1991. The annuity contracts are recorded at
market value.
' State statutes authorize the City and the Agency to invest any available funds in securities
issued or guaranteed by the United States Treasury or agencies of the United States, bank
' certificates of deposit, bankers acceptances, negotiable certificates of deposit, the State
Treasurer's Investment Pool, repurchase agreements, commercial paper and bonds,
registered warrants or treasury notes of the State of California and its local agencies.
-13-
I
I
I
11
1
I
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 3. Cash and Investment., Confirmed
Other investments are categorized in the following schedule to give an indication of the
level of risk assumed by the entity at year end.
Catmorv Carrying Market
Investment Type 1 2 3 Amount Value
U.S. government and
government agency
securities
State and municipal bonds
Corporate bonds
Investment in mutual fund
Investment in State Treasurer's
Investment Pool
Total other investments
$ 420,940 $ - $ $ 420,940 $ 430,783
193,300 - 193,300 200,680
- 6,764374 6,764,774 6370,409
$ 614,240 $ - $ 6,764,774 $ 7,379,014 $ 7,401,872
450,005 417,166
3.980.000 3.980.000
111.809.019 $11.799.038
The three preceding risk description categories are defined as follows:
Category Description
1 Investments that are insured, registered or for which the securities are held by the
City or its agent in the City's name
2 Uninsured and unregistered investments for which the securities are held by the
financial institution or by its trust department or agent in the City's name
3 Uninsured and unregistered investments for which the securities are held by the
financial institution, broker or dealer, or by its trust department or agent but not
in the City's name
-14-
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 4. Receivables
' Receivables as of June 30, 1991 consist of the following:
' Special Capital Debt
General Revenue Proiects Service Total
' Property tax increment $ - $ _ $ 200,217 $ - $ 200,217
Accrued interest 89,591 120,593 106,027 316,211
Due from local utility companies (A) 626,008 - 626,008
Due from other governmental
agencies 547,000 382,454 929,454
Transient occupancy tax 142,109 142,109
Other 54-918 - - 54.918
St 459.626 $ 382,454 1 320.810 $ 106,027 $2.268,917
(A) During the year ended June 30, 1990, the Agency approved a reimbursement
agreement with a local utility company, advancing the utility company funds required
to replace various water mains. The total amount advanced under this agreement was
$334,705. The Agency then contributed this receivable to the City. The City is to
collect this receivable from the utility company in fifteen noninterest-bearing annual
installments of $35,987, with the final installment due June 30, 2005.
Also, during the year ended June 30, 1987, the Agency approved a similar
reimbursement agreement with a local utility company, advancing the utility company
funds required to install a water line and a water main extension. The total amount
advanced was $493,801. The Agency then contributed the receivable to the City at
the present valued amount. The City is to collect this receivable from the utility
company in forty annual installments of $12,345, with the final installment due June
30, 2027.
I
' 15-
I NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
I
Note 5 Interfund Receivables and Payables
Interfund receivables and payables as of June 30, 1991 are as follows:
Funds
General Fund
Special Revenue Funds:
'
Traffic Safety
Community Development Block Grant
I
Capital Projects Fund
Interfund
Receivables Payables
$ 429.294 $
$ $ 6,423
252.937
$ $ 259.360
$ $ 169.934
$ 429.294 $ 429.294
I
I
I
I
Note 6 Property and Equipment
Changes in property and equipment during the year ended June 30, 1991 were as follows:
Balance Balance
June 30, June 30,
1990 Acquisitions 1991
Land
$ 2,715,734 $
177,500
$ 2,893,234
Buildings and improvements
2,955,316
466,051
3,421,367
Vehicles
253,872
7,219
2619091
Furniture and office equipment
473,133
94,493
567,626
Special equipment and machinery
447,107
17,707
464,814
Other improvements
743,099
5.393
748,492
$ 7,588,261 $ 768,363 $ 8,356,624
1 -16-
I NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 7. Pension Plan and Deferred Compensation Agreements
The City has a defined contribution pension plan. The plan covers substantially all
employees and is funded by a group annuity insurance contract. Employees eligible for the
plan are vested 100% upon completion of five years of full-time employment. Employees
are not vested before five years. The contributions to the plan are at the discretion of the
' City Council. This plan does not allow for employee contributions. The total payroll for
employees covered by this plan for the calendar year ended December 31, 1990 was
$957,249. The total payroll for all employees for the calendar year ended December 31,
' 1990 was $1,507,396. The total pension contribution for the year ended fiscal June 30, 1991
was $137,411. The value of the annuity contract was $894,927 as of June 30, 1991.
The City has a deferred compensation plan which is organized under Internal Revenue Code
457. The plan allows eligible employees to tax defer a portion of their gross income to
future years not to exceed the lesser of $7,500 or 25% of the participant's includible
compensation. The deferred compensation is not available to employees until termination,
retirement, death or unforeseeable emergency. The deferred compensation and
accumulated earnings thereon totaled $242,262 at June 30, 1991.
The deferred compensation plan is fully funded by the City as the deferred compensation
is earned by the employees. Plan assets and the related liability to employees are accounted
for in an agency fund at the current market value of the annuity contracts and time
certificates of deposits.
All amounts of compensation deferred under the plan, all property and rights purchased
with those amounts, and all income attributable to those amounts, property, or rights are
(until paid or made available to the employee or other beneficiary) solely the property and
rights of the City (without being restricted to the provisions of benefits under the plan),
subject only to the claims of the City's general creditors. Participants' rights under the plan
' are equal to those of general creditors of the City in an amount equal to the fair market
value of the deferred account for each participant.
I Note & Long Term Debt
Tax Allocation Notes Series 1987
In August 1987, $14,930,000 of bonds were issued by the Agency to finance public
improvements within the Agency's Project Area No. 1. The bonds outstanding bear interest
from 7.75% to 9.20% with interest payable semiannually on September 1 and March 1.
Principal matures annually on September 1 through 1995. Payment of the bonds is
I collateralized by a pledge of tax revenues to be received by the Agency.
1 -17-
' NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note & Long-Term Debt, Continued
Compensated absences
t
That portion of the liability for the vested compensated abs
ences totalling
$87,489 which is
not expected to be paid from available resources is reporte
d in the genera
l long-term debt
'
account group.
The following is a summary of the general long-term debt
transactions for the year ended
'
June 30, 1991.
Tax
Accrued
'
Allocation
Notes
Vacation
and Sick
Series 1987
Leave
Total
Balance, June 30, 1990
$ 11,995,000
$ 67,429
$ 12,062,429
Increase
-
20,060
20,060
Decrease
(1630000)
-
(1,630,000)
Balance, June 30, 1991
$ 10,365,000
$ 87,489
$ 10.452,489
The annual requirements, principal and i
nterest, to amortize the outstanding debt as of June
30, 1991 are as follows:
Tax
Years
Allocation
Ending
Notes
June 30,
Series 1987
Interest
Total
1992
$ 1,760,000
$ 828,617
$ 2,588,617
1993
1,900,000
669,813
2,569,813
1994
2,055,000
496,781
2,551,781
1995
2,230,000
309,312
2,539,312
1996
2,420,000
105,875
2,525,875
$10,365,000
$ 2,410,398
$12,775,398
I
1
' -18-
' NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 9 Budget OvereWenditures
Expenditures exceeded appropriations for the year ended June 30, 1991 in the following
special revenue fund:
Amount of
Over-
Appropriation Expenditures expenditures
Narcotics Seizure Fund $ - $ 2,121 $ 2,121
r The budget overexpenditures were due to the margin of error in estimating appropriations
based on the best known facts at the time the budgets were adopted. The effect on the
1 financial statements caused by these overexpenditures was not considered material as the
actual revenue of these funds was also more than the estimated revenue used in preparing
the budgets.
Note 10. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
Under state law, the Agency is required to set aside a portion of its property tax increment
revenue for low and moderate income housing. The Agency has made findings that, for the
year ended June 30, 1991, it was allowed to defer funding of the set aside. As of June 30,
1991, the accumulated set aside amount not yet funded was approximately $3,650,000. The
law requires the Agency to devise a plan to fund the accumulating amount and to begin
funding it by 1996.
The City is a defendant in a lawsuit along with 26 other cities for reimbursement of landfill
cleanup costs of hazardous waste dumped between 1948 and 1984. The plaintiffs claim that
the cities either accepted for transport or arranged for disposal or treatment municipal waste
which contained hazardous materials. The plaintiffs also claim that these materials have
been released from the landfill into the environment. A trial date has been set for February
4, 1992. The City intends to defend the case vigorously and may assert claims for indemnity
against other third-party defendants which, if successfully litigated, would offset, at least
partially, any recovery against the City. The parties have engaged in settlement negotiations
but no agreement has yet been reached.
r In a separate action, the City has been named as a defendant along with 80 other
governmental entities in Southern California for a variety of damages resulting from the
release of hazardous substances into the ocean waters around Los Angeles. The amount
of damages to be claimed is unknown at this time.
0
1
B - 19 -
I
1
1
L
1
1
1
I
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note IL Subsequent Event
The City is expected to issue $11,725,000 of Subordinate Lien Tax Allocation Bonds, during
October 1991. These bonds are being issued to provide funds for the acquisition,
construction, improvement and financing of improvements contemplated by the
Redevelopment Plan for the Agency's Redevelopment Project Area No. 1. The principal
amount is expected to be repaid starting October 1996 through October 2002. The bonds
would be subordinated to the payment of the Tax Allocation Notes as explained in Note 8
to the financial statements.
20-
MCGLADREY & PULLEN
Certified Public Accountants and Consultants
' INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON THE
' SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
' To the Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
1 City of Rosemead
Rosemead, California
We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the City of Rosemead,
California as of and for the year ended June 30, 1991 and have issued our report thereon
dated September 13, 1991. These general purpose financial statements are the responsibility
of the City's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these general
purpose financial statements based on our audit.
e We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the
standards for financial audits contained in the "Government Auditing Standards," issued by
the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the general purpose financial
statements of the City of Rosemead, California taken as a whole. The accompanying
schedule of federal financial assistance is presented for purposes of additional analysis and
is not a required part of the general purpose financial statements. The information in that
' schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the general
purpose financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly presented in all material respects
in relation to the general purpose financial statements taken as a whole.
Pasadena, California
1 September 13, 1991
' -21-
'
1
'
CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
Year Ended June 30, 1991
Catalog of
Federal
Domestic
Assistance
Federal Grantor /Pass-Through Grantor /Program Title Number
penditures
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development:
'
Passed through Los Angeles County Community
Development Commission - Community Development
Block Grant Program - Entitlement Grants
14.218
$ 518,683
'
U.S. Department of Transportation:
Passed through the State of California Department of
'
Transportation - Federal Aid Highway Program
20.205
711.642
1.230.325
t
-22-
r
1
SECTION II - COMPLIANCE MATTERS AND INTERNAL ACCOUNTING AND
'
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS
1_]
I
1
McGLADREY & PULLEN
Certified Public Accountants and Consultants
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
ON COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
' BASED ON AN AUDIT OF THE GENERAL PURPOSE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
To the Honorable Mayor and
' Members of the City Council
City of Rosemead
Rosemead, California
We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the City of Rosemead,
' California, as of and for the year ended June 30, 1991, and have issued our report thereon
dated September 13, 1991.
' We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and
"Government Auditing Standards;" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.
Compliance with laws, regulations, contracts, and grants applicable to the City of Rosemead,
' California, is the responsibility of the City's management. As part of obtaining reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, we
performed tests of the City's compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations,
' contracts and grants. However, our objective was not to provide an opinion on overall
compliance with such provisions.
' The results of our tests indicate that, with respect to the items tested, the City of Rosemead,
California, complied, in all material respects, with the provisions referred to in the preceding
paragraph. With respect to items not tested, nothing came to our attention that caused us
to believe that the City had not complied, in all material respects, with those provisions.
1 -23-
l\
This report is intended for the information of management of the City of Rosemead,
California, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development via the Los
' Angeles County Community Development Commission, the United States Department of
Transportation via the State of California Department of Transportation, and California
State Controller's Office (Division of Audits and Division of Local Government Fiscal
Affairs). This restriction is not intended to limit the distribution of this report, which is a
matter of public record.
LIP
I
' Pasadena, California
September 13, 1991
F
I
24-
MCGLADREY & PULLEN
Certified Public Accountants and Consultants
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
ON INTERNAL CONTROL STRUCTURE
I
To the Honorable Mayor and
' Members of the City Council
City of Rosemead
Rosemead, California
We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the City of Rosemead,
' California, as of and for the year ended June 30, 1991, and have issued our report thereon
dated September 13, 1991.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and
"Government Auditing Standards," issued by the Comptroller General of the United States.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.
In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of the City of Rosemead,
California for the year ended June 30, 1991, we considered its internal control structure in
order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on
the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control structure.
The management of the City of Rosemead, California is responsible for establishing and
maintaining an internal control structure. In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and
judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of
internal control structure policies and procedures. The objectives of an internal control
structure are to provide management with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that assets
are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition, and that transactions are
executed in accordance with management's authorization and recorded properly to permit
the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. Because of inherent limitations in any internal control structure, errors or
irregularities may nevertheless occur and not be detected. Also, projection of any evaluation
' of the structure to future periods is subject to the risk that procedures may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and
operation of policies and procedures may deteriorate.
-25-
' For the purpose of this report, we have classified the significant internal control structure
policies and procedures in'the following categories:
• Revenue; fee, service and miscellaneous sources
• Receipts
• Expenditures/expenses
- Purchasing
- Acquisition and disposal of fixed assets
' - Cash disbursements
Payroll
• Financing
Investments
Debt issuance
• Financial Reporting
' For all of the internal control structure categories listed above, we obtained an
understanding of the design of relevant policies and procedures and whether they have been
placed in operation, and we assessed control risk.
Our consideration of the internal control structure would not necessarily disclose all matters
in the internal control structure that might be material weaknesses under standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A material weakness
is a reportable condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the specific
internal control structure elements does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that
errors or irregularities in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by
employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no
matters involving the internal control structure and its operation that we consider to be
material weaknesses as defined above.
This report is intended for the information of management of the City of Rosemead,
' California, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development via the Los
Angeles County Community Development Commission, the United States Department of
Transportation via the State of California Department of Transportation, and California
State Controller's Office (Division of Audits and Division of Local Government Fiscal
Affairs). This restriction is not intended to limit the distribution of this report, which is a
matter of public record.
' Pasadena, California
September 13, 1991
-26-
McGLADREY & PULLEN
Certified Public Accountants and Consultants
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
ON SPECIFIC COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO
MAJOR FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
To the Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
' City of Rosemead
Rosemead, California
We have audited the City of Rosemead, California, compliance with the requirements
governing types of services allowed or unallowed; matching, level of effort, and/or
earmarking; reporting; special tests and provisions for 14.218 - Community Development
Block Grant Program and for 20.205 - Federal Aid Highway Program; claims for advances
and reimbursements; and amounts claimed or used for matching that are applicable to both
major federal financial assistance programs, which are identified in the accompanying
schedule of federal financial assistance, for the year ended June 30, 1991. The management
of the City is responsible for the City's compliance with those requirements. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance with those requirements based on our
audit.
' We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards,
"Government Auditing Standards" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States,
and OMB Circular A-128, "Audits of State and Local Governments." Those standards and
OMB Circular A-128 require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether material noncompliance with the requirements referred to above
occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the City's compliance
with those requirements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
The results of our audit procedures disclosed no instances of noncompliance with the
requirements referred to above.
In our opinion, the City of Rosemead, California complied in all material respects with the
requirements governing types of services allowed or unallowed; matching, level of effort,
and/or earmarking; reporting; special tests and provisions for 14.218 - Community
Development Block Grant Program and for 20.205 - Federal Aid Highway Program; claims
for advances and reimbursements; and amounts claimed or used for matching that are
applicable to both major federal financial assistance programs for the year ended June 30,
1991.
-27-
1
i
i
1
1
1
1
1
1 Pasadena, California
September 13, 1991
1
1
i
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
This report is intended for the information of management of the City of Rosemead,
California, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development via the Los
Angeles County Community Development Commission, the United States Department of
Transportation via the State of California Department of Transportation, and California
State Controller's Office (Division of Audits and Division of Local Government Fiscal
Affairs). This restriction is not intended to limit the distribution of this report, which is a
matter of public record.
~'le 0"
1 -28-
MCGLADREY & PULLEN
Certified Public Accountants and Consultants
' INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
ON COMPLIANCE WITH THE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
APPLICABLE TO FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
To the Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
City of Rosemead
Rosemead, California
We have applied procedures to test the City of Rosemead, California compliance with the
' following requirements applicable to its federal financial assistance programs, which are
identified in the schedule of federal financial assistance, for the year ended June 30, 1991:
Political activity
Davis-Bacon Act
• Civil rights
• Cash management
• Relocation assistance and real property management
• Federal financial reports
• Allowable costs/costs principles
• Drug-free workplace
• Administrative requirements
Our procedures were limited to the applicable procedures described in the Office of
' Management and Budget's "Compliance Supplement for Single Audits of State and Local
Governments." Our procedures were substantially less in scope than an audit, the objective
of which is the expression of an opinion on the City of Rosemead, California's compliance
' with the requirements listed in the preceding paragraph. Accordingly, we do not express
such an opinion.
' With respect to the items tested, the results of those procedures disclosed no instances of
noncompliance with the requirements listed in the first paragraph of this report. With
respect to items not tested, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the
City of Rosemead, California had not complied, in all material respects, with those
requirements.
L
1 -29-
' This report is intended for the information of management of the City of Rosemead,
California, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development via the Los
Angeles County Community Development Commission, the United States Department of
Transportation via the State of California Department of Transportation, and California
State Controller's Office (Division of Audits and Division of Local Government Fiscal
Affairs). This restriction is not intended to limit the distribution of this report, which is a
matter of public record.
F
Pasadena, California
I September 13, 1991
1
11
I
I
' -30-
McGLADREY & PULLEN
Certified Public Accountants and Consultants
' INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON INTERNAL ACCOUNTING
AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS USED TO ADMINISTER
FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
To the Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
City of Rosemead
Rosemead, California
We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the City of Rosemead,
California as of and for the year ended June 30, 1991, and have issued our report thereon
' dated September 13, 1991. As part of our audit, we made a study and evaluation of the
internal control systems, including applicable internal administrative controls, used in
administering federal financial assistance programs to the extent we considered necessary
to evaluate the systems as required by generally accepted auditing standards, "Government
Auditing Standards," issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the Single
Audit Act of 1984, and the provisions of the Office of Management and Budget Circular A-
128, "Audits of State and Local Governments." For the purpose of this report, we have
classified the significant internal accounting and administrative controls used in
' administering federal financial assistance programs in the following categories:
Internal Accounting Controls
'
• Revenue; fee, service and miscellaneous sources
• Receipts
• Expenditures/expenses
- Purchasing
- Acquisition and disposal of fixed assets
- Cash disbursements
- Payroll
• Financing
Investments
Debt issuance
• Financial Reporting
' -31-
I
Admi
Gene
I
nistrative Controls
ral requirements:
Political activity
Davis-Bacon Act
Civil rights
Cash management
Relocation assistance and real property management
Federal financial reports
Allowable costs/costs principles
Drug-free workplace
Administrative requirements
Specific requirements:
Types of services allowed and unallowed
Eligibility
Reporting
• Cost allocation
The management of the City of Rosemead, California is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control systems used in administering federal financial assistance of
programs. In fulfilling that responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are
required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of control procedures. The
objectives of internal control systems used in administering federal financial assistance
programs are to provide management with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that, with
respect to federal financial assistance programs, resource use is consistent with laws,
regulations and policies; resources are safeguarded against waste, loss and misuse; and
reliable data are obtained, maintained and fairly disclosed in reports.
Because of inherent limitations in any system of internal accounting and administrative
controls used in administering federal financial assistance programs, errors or irregularities
may nevertheless occur and not be detected. Also, projection of any evaluation of the
systems to future periods is subject to the risk that procedures may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the procedures may
deteriorate.
Our study included all of the applicable control categories listed above. During the year
ended June 30, 1991, the City of Rosemead, California expended its total federal financial
assistance under two major federal financial assistance programs. With respect to internal
control systems used in administering these major federal financial assistance programs, our
study and evaluation included considering the types of errors and irregularities that could
occur, determining the internal control procedures that should prevent or detect such errors
and irregularities, determining whether the necessary procedures are prescribed and are
being followed satisfactorily, and evaluating any weaknesses.
-32-
I
1 Our study and evaluation was more limited than would be necessary to express an opinion
on the internal control systems used in administering the federal financial assistance
1 program of the City of Rosemead, California. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion
on the internal control systems used in administering the federal financial assistance
program of the City.
1 However, our study and evaluation and our audit disclosed no condition that we believe to
be a material weakness in relation to the federal financial assistance program of the City
of Rosemead, California.
This report is intended for the information of management of the City of Rosemead,
1 California, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development via the Los
Angeles County Community Development Commission, the United States Department of
Transportation via the State of California Department of Transportation, and California
1 State Controller's Office (Division of Audits and Division of Local Government Fiscal
Affairs). This restriction is not intended to limit the distribution of this report, which is a
matter of public record.
1 ~.GUC~.~c,
i
1 Pasadena, California
September 13, 1991
1
i
1
i
1
1
1 -33-