The URL can be used to link to this page

CC - Item II.B - PH - CMP97 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL FROM: ANK G. TRIPEPI, CITY MANAGER DATE: AUGUST 1, 2000 RE: PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION 2000 -43 — CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PLAN The Congestion Management Program (CMP) requires each city to annually adopt a resolution during a public hearing stating its compliance with the CMP. The attached resolution attests to the fact that the City of Rosemead has met all requirements of the CMP. The City of Rosemead has previously adopted a transportation demand management ordinance as well as a land use analysis program consistent with the requirements of the CMP. The CMP deficiency plan requires all cities to monitor new development and compare the corresponding increase in trips with mitigation projects that increase highway traffic capacity. The attached 2000 Deficiency Plan Status Summary indicates new development resulted in 717 debits that were offset by 13 transportation improvement credits. The resulting credits are added to the City's credit bank from last year's submittal, which will leave a credit balance of 5,169. COUNCIL AG AUG p 8 2000 ITEM No. ZL t� August 1, 2000 Page 2 For this reporting year, there were no credits provided from City CIP because none of the projects completed resulted in improving traffic management; all projects were maintenance related only. Additionally, no credits were provided for transit subsidies (RTD Bus Pass Program) or Rosemead transit (Dial -A -Ride and Shuttle) because the average daily ridership went down from previous years and credit is only provided for increase in usage. The total number of participants for the bus pass program declined from 1,194 /month in 1998/99 to 1,053 /month in 1999/2000. Rosemead Shuttle ridership declined from 244 /average weekday in 1998/99 to 242 /average weekday in 1999/2000. Rosemead Dial -A -Ride ridership declined from 49 /average weekday in 1998/99 to 43 /average weekday in 1999/2000 Upon adoption of Resolution 2000 -43, staff will forward the self - certification to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2000 -43. RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -43 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65089 WHEREAS, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ( "MTA "), acting as the Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County, adopted the 1995 Congestion Management Program in November, 1995; and WHEREAS, the adopted CMP requires that MTA annually determine that the County and cities within the County are conforming to all CMP requirements; and WHEREAS, the adopted CMP requires submittal to the MTA of the CMP local implementation report by September 1 of each year; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a noticed public hearing on August 8, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of the City Of Rosemead does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1 . That the City has taken all of the following actions, and that the City is in conformance with all applicable requirements of the 1995 CMP. By June 15, of odd - numbered years, the City will conduct annual traffic counts and calculated levels of service for selected arterial intersections, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP Highway and Roadway System Chapter. The City has locally adopted and continues to implement a transportation demand management ordinance, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Transportation Demand Management Chapter. The City has locally adopted and continues to implement a land use analysis program, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Land Use Analysis Program Chapter. The City has adopted a Local Implementation Report, attached hereto and made a part hereof, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP. This report balances traffic congestion impacts due to growth within the City with transportation improvements, and demonstrates that the City is meeting its responsibilities under the Countywide Deficiency Plan. Section 2 . That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall forward a copy of this Resolution to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 8th day of August, 2000. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 01- Aug -00 2000 CMP Local Implementation Report Report Period: JUNE 1, 1999 - MAY 31, 2000 Contact: MR. KEN RUKAVINA, P.E. Phone Number: 626 - 569 -2151 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY ... DEFICIENCY PLAN STATUS SUMMARY 1. Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal [from Section 11 .................... (717) Exempted Dwelling Units 0 Exempted Non - residential sq. ft. (in 1,000s) 0 2. Transportation Improvements Credit Claims [from Section III .................... 13 Land Use Strategy Claims 0 Capital Improvement Claims 2 Transit Claims 0 TDM Claims 1 Total Strategies Claimed 3 Subtotal Current Credit (Goal) .......... ..I....... (704) 3. Carryover Credit from Last Year's (1997) Local Implementation Report .................... 5,873 Net Deficiency Plan Credit Balance: .................... 5,169 Section I, Page 1 CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 01- Aug -00 2000 CMP Local Implementation Report Report Period: JUNE 1,1999 - MAY 31,2000 SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT DEVELOPMENT PART 1: NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category Dwelling Units Debit Debits I Value /DU Single Family Residential 18.00 x 6.80 - 122 Multi - Family Residential 2.00 x 4.76 - 10 Group Quarters 0.001 x 1.98 = 0 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1000 Gross Square Feet Debit Debits Value /1000SF Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.) 30.00 x 22.23 = 667 Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 x 17.80 - 0 Freestanding Eating & Drinking 0.001 x 66.99 = 0 NON - RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category 1000 Gross Square Feet Debit Debits Value /1000SF Lodging 0.00 x 7.21 - 0 Industrial 12.94 x 6.08 - 79 Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.) 0.00 x 16.16 - 0 Office (50,000- 299,999 sq.ft.) 0.00 x 10.50 - 0 Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 x 7.35 - 0 Medical 0.00 x 16.90 - 0 Government 0.00 x 20.95 = 0 Institutional /Educational 0.00 x 7.68 - 0 University 0.00 x 1.66 - 0 OTHER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Description (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Daily Trips (Enter "0" if none) Debit Debits Value /Trip ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 x 0.71 = 0 ENTER IF APPLICABLE 0.00 x 0.71 = 0 Subtotal New Development Activity - 877 Adjustments (Optional) - Complete Part 2 0 = 160 Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal (Points) _ (717) Section I, Page 2 CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 01- Aug -00 2000 CMP Local Implementation Report Report Period: JUNE 1,1999 - MAY 31,2000 SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT (Continued) Enter information where it says "Enter." If not applicable, enter "0" so it will total. PART DEVELOPMENT IMPORTANT: Adjustments may be claimed only for 1) development permits that were both issued and revoked, expired or withdrawn during the reporting period, and 2) demolition of any structure within the reporting period. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Category Dwelling Units Adjustment Subtotal Value /DU Single Family Residential 18.00 x 6.80 - 122 Multi - Family Residential 0.00 x 4.76 - 0 Group Quarters 0.00 x 1.98 - 0 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Category 1000 Gross Square Feet Adjustment Subtotal Value /1000SF Commercial (less than 300,000 sq.ft.) 1.71 x 22.23 - 38 Commercial (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 x 17.80 - 0 Freestanding Eating & Drinking 0.00 x 66.99 - 0 NON- RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Category 1000 Gross Square Feet Adjustment Subtotal Value /1000SF Lodging 0.00 x 7.21 = 0 Industrial 0.00 x 6.08 = 0 Office (less than 50,000 sq.ft.) 0.00 x 16.16 = 0 Office (50,000- 299,999 sq.ft.) 0.00 x 10.50 - 0 Office (300,000 sq.ft. or more) 0.00 x 7.35 - 0 Medical 1 0.001 x 16.90 - 0 Government 0.00 x 20.95 - 0 Institutional /Educational 0.00 x' 7.68 = 0 University 0.001 x 1.66 - 0 OTHER DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Description (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Daily Trips (Enter "0" if None) Adjustment Subtotal Value /Trip ENTER HERE IF APPLICABLE 0.00 x 0.71 - 0 ENTER HERE IF APPLICABLE 0.00 x 0.71 - 0 Total Mitigation Goal Adjustments (Points) = 160 Section I, Page 3 CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 01- Aug -00 2000 CMP Local Implementation Report Report Period: JUNE 1,1999 - MAY 31,2000 SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT (Continued) (NOT INCLUDED IN NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY TOTALS) Low /Very Low Income Housing High Density Residential near Rail Stations �0 Dwelling Units �0 Dwelling Units Mixed Use Developments near Rail Stations Development Agreements entered into Prior to July 10, 1989 Reconstruction of Buildings damaged in April 1992 Civil Unrest Reconstruction of Buildings damaged in Jan 1994 Earthquake Total Dwelling Units 01 0 1000 Gross Square Feet Dwelling Units 01 0 1000 Gross Square Feet Dwelling Units 01 0 1000 Gross Square Feet Dwelling Units 01 0 1000 Gross Square Feet Dwelling Units Exempted Development Definitions: 1 . Low /Very Low Income Housing: as defined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development as follows: Low- Income: equal to or less than 80% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size. Very Low- Income: equal to or less than 50% of the County median income, with adjustments for family size. 2. High Density Residential Near Rail Stations: development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger station and that is equal to or greater than 120 percent of the maximum residential density allowed under the local general plan and zoning ordinance. A project providing a minimum of 75 dwelling units per acre is automatically considered high density. 3. Mixed Uses Near Rail Stations: mixed use development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger station, if more than half of the land area, or floor area, of the mixed use development is used for high density residential housing. 4. Development Agreements: projects that entered into a development agreement (as specified under Section 65864 of the California Government Code) with a local jurisdiction prior to July 10, 1989. 5. Reconstruction or replacement of any residential or non - residential structure which is damaged or destroyed, to the extent of not less than 50% of its reasonable value, by fire, flood, earthquake or other similar calamity. 6. Any project of a federal, state or county agency that is exempt from local jurisdiction zoning regulations and where the local jurisdiction is precluded from exercising any approval /disapproval authority. These locally precluded projects do not have to be reported in the LIR. Section I, Page 4 CITY OF ROSEMEAD Date Prepared: 01-Aug-00 2000 CMP Local Implementation Report Report Period: JUNE 1,1999 - MAY 31,2000 SECTION II.e - TDM CREDIT CLAIMS Total TDM Projects: 11 ITotal TIDIVICredit (Points►: 13 T " NFPI 1 321.0 CMP TDM Ordinance 1 42.9411000 gsf Non-Residential building permits issued, as reported in Section I No other description /entries required for this strategy. This is already done for you. 16 17 18 19 21 22 23 24 0.3 0 13 n/a n/a 1 20 0 0 3 n/a 100% 13 Section 11.e, Page 1 Vote resulted: Yes: Bruesch, Taylor, Clark, Vasquez, Imperial No: None Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered.. Councilman Bruesch asked for a staff report on the two properties that were left off of the moratorium — Walnut Grove and Valley, and Valley and Rosemead. 0007B. PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -43 — A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65089 Frank Tripepi, City Manager, presented the staff report. The Mayor opened the Public Hearing for those in the audience wishing to speak. There being no one wishing to speak, the Mayor closed the Public Hearing. MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM IMPERIAL, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN VASQUEZ that the Council adopt Resolution No. 2000 -43. Before vote could result, more discussion ensued. Councilman Bruesch asked if the City will receive mitigation credits for changing the shuttle bus routes to accommodate the new senior housing. Mr. Bruesch requested that efforts be made in urging seniors to use the shuttles and the bus pass program. In conclusion, Mr. Bruesch requested information on what the TDM Credit Claims represent. At this time, the question was called for. Vote resulted: Yes: Bruesch, Taylor, Clark, Vasquez, Imperial No: None Absent: None Abstain: None ® /'1 he Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. III. LEGISLATIVE A. RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -42 - CLAIMS AND DEMANDS The following Resolution was presented to the Council for adoption. RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -42 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS IN THE SUM OF $167,507.28 NUMBERED 31329 THROUGH 31367 MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM IMPERIAL, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN VASQUEZ that the Council adopt Resolution No. 2000 -42. Vote resulted: CCMIN:8 -8 -00 Page #3