Loading...
CC - Item 9A - Minutes for 7-27-10Community Development Commission, Housing Development Corporation, and City Council Regular Meeting July 27, 2010 The regular meeting of the Rosemead Community Development Development Corporation and City Council was called to order b Rosemead City Council Chamber located at 8838 East Valley Bi FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner/Council Member INVOCATION: Commissioner/Council Member PRESENT: Chair/ President/ Mayor Taylor, Vice-Chair/ Vic( Commissioner/ Directors/ Council Members Armenta, Clark STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Allred, Cil Wong, Director of Finance Brisco, Director C Development Administrator Ramirez, Public Director Marcarello, and City:Clerk Molleda 1. ORDINANCES READ, BY TITLE ONLY Housing r at 6:10 p.m. in the ;mead. California. Mayor Pro Tern Ly, relopment Director y-Scott, Economic Public Works ed;the_Qity1Attorney shall be instructed to read by title only appearing on this agenda which are required by law to be read in their Council 'Member Sandra Armenta made a motion, seconded by Council Member Polly Low, to approve ordinances reatdTby title only. Vote resulted in: N~ es:,Armi nta, Clark, Low, Ly, Taylor N, , / No: None Abstain: None Absent: None 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE - None Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 1 of 30 FTEM NO. ~ 3. COMMISSION/CORPORATION CONSENT CALENDAR A. Claims and Demands Resolution No. 2010 - 26 Recommendation: to approve Resolution No. 2010 - 26,.entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2010 - 26 FOR PAYMENT OF COMMISSION EXPENDITURES IN THE AMOUNT OF $13,274.84 DEMAND NOS. 11304 THROUGH 11310. q Resolution No.2010-27 Recommendation: to approve Resolution No. 20101- 27, entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2010 - 27 FOR PAYMENT OF COMMISSION EXPENDITURES IN THE AMOUNT OF $79,817.28 DEMAND NOS. 11311 THROUGH 11315. B. Update on Status of Exclusive Negotiation Agreement (ENA) for the Sale of the Glendon Hotel f..^" On May 25, 2010;'the Commission approved an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement witti tlie, Qiao Garden Group Rea( Estate Company, Ltd. for the development of a Purchase•and Sale'Agreement of 883ZGlendon Way. The term of the ENA provide6an initial negotiation_period'of 90 calendar days, subject to one (1) 90 calendar days extension, within which the Commission and the Qiao Garden ' G=04 ould work to develop a Purchase and Sale Agreement setting forth the ' specific terms related'to the sale of the Glendon Hotel. The ENA is set to expire on August 22, 2010. , Recommendation: That the Community Development Commission extend the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with Qiao Garden Group Real Estate Company, Ltd., for the development of a Purchase and Sale Agreement of the Glendon Hotel for ninety(90) calendar days beginning from August 23, 2010. l' C. Community Development Commission Treasurer's Report for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2010 In accordance with Government Code Section 53646 the Rosemead Community Development Commission Treasurer's Report for the fourth quarter of FY 2009-10 is before the Commission for review. Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 2 of 30 Recommendation: That the Community Development Commission receive and file the "Rosemead Community Development Commission Treasurer's Report" for the month ending June 30, 2010. D. Housing Development Corporation Treasurer's Report for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2010 In accordance with Government Code Section 53646 the Ro emead Housing Development Corporation Treasurer's Report for the.fourth quarter of FY 2009-10 is before the board for review: Recommendation: That the Housing Development Corporation receive and file the "Rosemead Housing Development Corporation Treasurer's Report" for the month ending June 30, 2010. Mayor Pro Tern Steven Ly made a motion, seconded by CouncilVMember Sandra Armenta, to approve Commission/Corporation Consent Calendar. Vote7esulted in: Yes: Armenta, Clark, Low, Ly, Taylor None: None Abstain: None Absent: None 4. MATTERS FROMEXECUTIVE DIRECTOR' , A. Solar Power System for Angelus `and Garvey Senior Housing Levine Management Group (LMG), the management company of the two senior complexes owned by the Rosemead Housing Development Corporation recently contacted staff inquiring about the possibility of installing solar panels at the ' Angelus Senior Complex and the Garvey Senior Complex. This issue has come to the forefront due to the availability of significant rebates offered by Southern California Edison (SCE). SCE is a participant in the Multifamily Affordable Solar Housing (MASH) Program that provides up to 60% of the cost of solar systems. The MASH Program has been designed specifically to facilitate the acceleration of solar power in the affordable housing sector in California. Recommendation: That the Housing Development Corporation Board take the following actions: 1. Authorize the Executive Director to negotiate a Power Purchase Agreement with Solar. City for the installation of solar panels at Angelus Senior Complex and Garvey Senior Complex. Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 3 of 30 2. Allocate an amount not to exceed $5,000 for the inspection of the roofs at each complex to ensure that they are in proper condition to accept the solar panels. President Taylor asked that item 4A be deferred to the next meeting and requested the electric bills for the past two years for each of the facilities. Community Development Manager Michelle Ramirez reviewed the Tom Folan - representative of Solar City gave a PowerPoint President Taylor inquired about some figures that are look at page 48 of the booklet. Mrs. Ramirez clarified that the program on page 48~i! example of what it would be if the City would buy the stating Power Purchase Agreement. reporCM .ITaylor asked to Solar City's program; that'is an/` 1 11 i,,His presentation begins on'page 64 Mr. Folan - continued with his President Taylor stated that he did not see'any regards to the competitor Absolute Solar Electr I Mr. Folan replied that-they area competitor and of the reasons whyLa`vine contacted Solar City. they reserve the rebate; Solar City is able to get providers with the rebate\.\\-,~-`-- City and asked in were not able to fund the P.P.A, which is one are in a position to fund these projects and orization from Edison and switch service President Taylor asked.why they would send out a letter, referred on page 37; they give a break down ofwhat more o? less is going,to b».l:the program. Mr. Folan.replied that Absolute Solar~applied for a rebate and basically it gives the details of that rebate tl 6t is'in,place for the Angelus Facility. President Taylor asked why they couldn't do the project. Mr. Folan stated that-they can do the project on a purchase basis; the reason why Levine, the City, and Solar City are talking , is because we are able to fund it a little bit different and are able to offer this Power Purchase Agreement which Absolute Solar Electric is not able to do. Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 4 of 30 Mrs. Ramirez clarified that the City would be getting the rebate not Solar City if we purchase the system through them and we would get the rebate directly from SCE (Southern California Edison). They would only be providing the system to the RHDC; and we would be responsible for operating and maintaining the system. Mr. Folan explained that with the existing rebate under the power purchase agreement Solar City is going to take that rebate and that is how we are able to give you that five-cent fixed kilowatt hour price and no up front investment. President Taylor referred to the cost that was not correct in the Mrs. Ramirez stated the figures on the staff report needed have been $117,423 and under fiscal analysis, where itst President Taylor asked about the fiscal analysis & what the two systems cost and what they add up to. Mrs. Ramirez replied they are for Gar $246,100 as listed on the staff report. President Taylor inquired that on a I Complex would be around $150,000. Mrs. Ramirez repl President Taylor Mrs. Ramire rr, aw $117, 23. President Taylor Mrs Ramrrearepl President Taylor rebates; that cuts Angelus and bate the cost 'would be % thing would be, 106'% ins; the fig6te$,174,866 should 11100 it shouldbet$193,658. purchase options; h> asked d,up to $188,657 instead of system for Angelus Senior ht down to $71,234. the Garvey facility at $117,000. away the rebate of $128, 677 and it leaves the the totalwfiscal analysis is now. both systems cost is $188,657. ik instead of $246,100 the original cost was $401,000 before the down to less than half. Executive Director Allred stated that it's under the purchase option that is not being recommended because under option 1, it would required the city to make a significant cash outlay to install the. solar. Staff believes option 2 is better under the power purchase agreement because it requires no outlay of cash other than the inspection of the roof which will be around $5,000. Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 5 of 30 Mrs. Ramirez stated that it would be the total for both roofs and under the power purchase agreement Solar City has said they would waive that fee and will not charge the city. Executive Director Allred stated that staff's recommendation is option 2 because it requires no up front capital investment and the City would be free from maintaining that system over the years and would be the responsibility of the vendor. President Taylor asked what happens at the end of the 18 years. Mr. Folan stated that the city has several options; you can technology, or have the system removed or purchase the expected life span of the panels is about 30 years. i PPA`upgrade to the latest fair market value. The President Taylor stated the rate being charged of the time that the City would have the panels. Mr. Folan responded it was hard to predict 18 years, its five- to Solar City after the 18 years. There are,specific terms writ at the end of the PPA and one of them is to `offerfair market President Taylor inquired about the time 24th. a higher rate for., and the system will be little value 'the agreement on what happens the extension to June Mr. Folan stated there'have been several extensions fled so now the City has until the middle of November with Southern California ;Edison. LavineManagement has filed for several extensions and now SoCal Edison,is asking forfa proof of project milestone; meaning that the project is going forward and the way of meeting Jhat Js by haying a signed contract. was some time before making the final decision. Taylor stated'he,just wanted.reassurance and wanted to see the utility bills of both City AttornekMntes stated he had not had a change to verify with staff but in order to approve the contract. Council*ll,have to have a public hearing, per section 4610 of the government code, which allows for a power'purchase agreements with sole source vendors. He stated that the most you can do is authorize staff to move forward with the vendor to make sure the contract terms are acceptable and then bring it back for a public hearing. At that time Council can consider the contract if you want to have the project move forward. President Taylor asked the City Attorney Mor tes to explain "sole source vendor". Rosemead City Coundt, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 6 of 30 City Attorney Montes explained that you have a building that is owned by the Housing Development Corporation and we are talking about installing a solar system in a publicly owned building. We are not talking about bidding the project; we are talking about awarding a contract for a power purchase with Solar City. That is specifically authorize under the government code, it's because of all of these alternative energy sources that are proliferating that the California Legislator wants to encourage, use of those in public building. They have this section 4610 in the government code that says before you award that contract you have to hold a public hearing. ;.t President Taylor asked why we did not put this out for competitive bid to,get variouls bidders. Executive Director Allred stated that at one point there was urgency, givemlhe fact that there was some deadlines which were then extended. The reason why'the.legislator has.ailows for sole sourcing for high-tech projects like this is because of the height of technical expertise-that is required. City Attorney Montes stated part of the issue is when you are going to have these PPA's'usually, whoever is the proposing vendor, has to spend a fair amount of resources to do the energy audit and come up with the information in terms of cost savings and design such as the preliminary design. There is a significant outlay on these companies before they can even submit a proposal worth looking at and that is why the legislator. contemplates that you are going to be working with only one company. Once you talked to a number of companies and it sounds that the company that manages these buildings for you has worked with a couple of companies and has ultimately selected Solar City as the preferred vendor basedupon their experience and also their ability to fund the PPA Solar City is carrying the financing on,these for the city. This is specifically what sections of the government code contemplates; the,vendor is going to finance this installation and power generator and'the city is going to go with that vendor after a public hearing. President Taylor express concerned whether its,$400 thousand of $200 thousand; and asked if 11 there are several companies out.there. Mr.,Folan replied yes there are but we are in a position where we can fund systems this size. Most companies•won't look at systems that are less than 100 kilowatts, 200 or 300 kilowatts; we are very aggressive,in targeting this MASH rebate fund that we were one of the first one's to offer the five- centfixed PPA. President Taylor stated Solar City's proposal was very good from the five-cent kilowatt. Mr. Taylor asked what was the.procedure if the City decided not to continue with the solar system after the 18 years. Mr. Folan replied that the city, as mentioned in the agreement, can have the system removed at no cost. Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 7 of 30 President Taylor reiterated so we'll have an option at that time to keep the system and maintain it through you or another company or remove the system. Mr. Folan stated there would be an extension of a five year increment, removal of the system, or a fair market value offer to Solar City, but you would be responsible for maintenance after that. President Taylor stated he knew there were some systems installed and then removed; he didn't understand why they were removed. r, Director Clark asked him what panels he was referring to. President Taylorexplained the solar systems in the Huntington Library that had'a large water tank area with solar panels and about 200 were removed. r / Director Clark asked how long was that because<techriology has come along way. ~r President Taylor stated it was several years ago about 8 to 10"years. He asked what the average output on a 2 foot by 4 foot panel was. C~ Mr. Folan stated that now there're about 3 are looking at abouf190 watts up to 240 watts. President Taylor stated that it's a big differencefi feet compared to; it's almost double the size if you feet. That was the program when they were first pi were some other schools that had them put on an and you are talking aboiif doubling in size from 75 75 watts; but then again it's four each square saying 3'by'5 would put it in 15 feet square j them out, it was a good deal, and there ~r taken out. These were 22 by 48 panels Ramirezstated that Mr. Jeffrey Levine of Levine City was selected. Jeffey Levine - of Levine Management'stated that there were two different approaches; one being purchasing a system6d it was discovered that no one else other than Solar City that had the ability to dothe power purchase agreement model. That was the reason why Solar City was selected to propose this model and Absolutely Solar was the vendor that was proposing the purchase model`w,\:.~ Executive Director Allred explained that the State Legislator allows for sole sourcing only in recognition of the fact that in this case there are a few entities that are able to do the financing. In addition, there is a unique understanding of the industry and also the investment they have made in the City's facilities; those three items allow s for a sole source arrangement per State law. President Taylor asked what hours of operation the panel would be generating energy. Rosemead City Coundi, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 8 of 30 Mr. Folan stated it would typically be from 9 o'clock to sundown depending on the orientation where one building is going to have a west side. President Taylor inquired about the panels facing west; is 9 o'clock appropriate for the full generation. Mr. Folan replied that it would be a bit later on the west side but it would get all the afternoon sun. He added that the good thing about solar was that when the summer bills were at its highest, solar production was also at its highest. President Taylor asked where the other building was facing. Mr. Folan replied that the other building was facing southwest about 240 degreed which is fantastic for solar production. The City Council recesses to closed session at 6:48 p.m: 5. CLOSED SESSION A. Conference with Legal Counsel % 1. Pursuant to Govern ment'Code Section•54957:,-? PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT ,,Title: City Attorney and Assistant City Attorney B. Public Employee Performance Evaluation Governriient Code Section. 54957;-Council Appointed Official (City Manager) City Council 1 Meeting Agenda The regular,meeting of the'Rosemead City Council was called to order by Mayor Taylor at 7:07 p.m. in the,Rosemead City Council Chamber located at 8838 East Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California. FLAG SALUTE: Council Member Sandra Armenta INVOCATION: Council Member Margaret Clark PRESENT: Mayor Taylor, Mayor Pro Tern Ly, Council Members Armenta, Clark and Low Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 9 of 30 STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Allred, City Attorney Richman, Community Development Director Wong, Director of Finance Brisco, Director of Parks and Recreation Montgomery-Scott, Economic Development Administrator Ramirez, Public Affairs Manager Flores, Deputy Public Works Director Marcarello, and City Clerk Molleda City Council reconvened back from closed session at 7:07 p.m. City Attorney Montes reported that Rachel Richman was unanimously appointed as the new City Attorney and.he had been appointed Assistant City Attorney for the City. 6. PRESENTATION • National Night Out Proclamation Chief of Police Murakami read the proclamation for • Nick Nevarez: The Rosemead Public Safety CONNECTION resident to present information about his traffi and other caregivers aware of the destructive CONNECTIONS forum is preparing to host a, and drug abuse on October 21St at the Rosen as a speaker. Z Nick Nevarez - pres( to raise awareness to Mayor, to Rosemead High School students because his Ms:NaVarez - (Nick's mother) spoke"ori the experience their family went through and the recuperation of her sons accident. h, {j Council MemberArmentastated that it was an honor to have Nick Navarez speak at the Rosemead Publ 6.&ety,Connections meeting. Council Member Low' thanked Nick for sharing his story and speaking to other young students. 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE Juan Nunez asked if the back payments were made on the Glendon Way Hotel Mayor Taylor responded no. Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27. 2010 Page 10 of 30 An forum has arr. accident in an National Night ed for this young Rosemead D~t,to make young people, parents and drug.abuse. Also, the eeting)on the dangers of alcohol uditiirium featuring Nick Nevarez ation on his vehicle accident and stated he hoped of the,consequences of alcohol and drug abuse. City Manager Allred stated that the demands for the funds had been made to the party; however, they have not paid their obligations. Mayor Pro Tem Ly explained that sending the party to litigation would cost more than collecting the amount they actually owe Mr. Nunez asked who was in charge of overseen and checking thattwt as paying their bills. Mayor Taylorstated that there was negligence on the city side and,now staff is working on recuperating what is owed. < City Manager Allred stated that the Commission is ow~ed2b65,000. Sharon Esquiviel - asked why Council Members;are.ndt-aware of what type of busty sses'are coming in the city. City Manager Allred explained that the Planning Department ism charge of processing new businesses in the city; also it's included on a`green sheet publication that is distributed to Staff, Commissioners, and Council Members. Mayor Pro Tem Ly stated that since not eve ,bush ess is requiredlo obtain the same permits, such as, a business license, occupancy permits,and/or conditions of approval permits which would require a different type,of procedure depending on'the type of business applying. Sometimes, some businesses a. re processed at the staff level and others that are bigger may need to be presented to the Commissions an'd Council Members for approval. Mayor Tayidreommented that there were two,marijuana businesses operating illegally and until staff took notice thecify got involved; Mr. Taylor also stated that many businesses like new developments such as the GlendonAcitel.and UFC Gym do required a hearing and most of the lusinesses applying go through an administrative procedure. Marlene Shinen - stated that "she had submitted a public records request on January 13, 2010 and had received•a responsbJthe same day. Ms. Shinen quoted from the response letter, "it does not require answersto questions or documents to be generated", and she added her question was not answered. Mayor Taylor asked Ms. Shinen to read her request. Ms. Shinen stated that she did receive documents to her request but did not receive an answer to a question she had and therefore, issued another request on January 131h. Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 11 of 30 City Attorney Richman explained that under the Public Records Act it is a records response statue; under the records act they are not required to answer a question. Staff is required to provide documents that are responsive to the request for information. Under the California Public Records Act that would be a correct statement. Mayor Taylor asked what was the question Ms. Shinen asked on the letter. Ms. Shinen replied that it had to do with Oliver Chi receiving unemployment benefits. She stated the question was if it was with or without city council's knowledge and or approval and when. Mayor Taylor replied that it was a direct question with a simple`answer and Ms. Shinen did not get a response back. , Ms. Shinen stated that she received a letter back from thercity stating that "it did not require answers to questions or for documents to be generated'.'Ms. Shinen stated that she did received documents before but the questions asked did not have'to do.anything'with the documents. Mayor Taylor stated he was concern about the question not being answered. Ms. Shinen asked for clarification because she is left with the impression` that is not good. Council Member Clark asked for clarification on W-Shinen's`response letter. City Attorney Richmanclarified Ms'~Shinen's response letter, in'which staff stated that it did not required answering`questions underlthe pubic records request or creating documents that don't already exist. But documents would'have to be provided that are responsive to her request. Mayor Pro m Ly asked Ms. Shinen if there were any records received that would have reference to that question, • Ms: Shinen replied no. Assistant City Manager Matt Hawkesworth stated that staff provided council with copies of Ms. Shinen's response,letter and documents that were provided to her. One of the questions was a time line of typically on what happen date and what took place; that time line would identify what took place including,v✓hen the council found out about it. During this time we were in and out of closed session with the city attorney on how to pursue it and when the request was received, staff conferred with the City Attorney and was directed to provide what legally staff could because this was a legal issue; staff could not voluntarily provide documents or create documents. Council Member Clark read, "CPRA, authorizes members of the public to view documents responsive to request for information, it does not require answers to questions or for documents to be generated" you cannot make up documents but you can look at what's there. Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 12 of 30 Ms. Shinen commented on the amount given to Mr. Chi upon his departure from the City; severance pay $196,370.80; additional lump sum $98,186.40; vacation pay $23,519.42; sick pay $29,846.78; administrative leave $7,552.80; legal fees $1,000; 2008 Toyota Highlander $29,375; medical $16,000; total of $401,853.20; and he still applied and received unemployment. She added that Mr. Chi did pay back the money because the city manager informed him it was going to be on the Tribune. Council MemberArmenta stated that Council did not know about the unemployment until the City was billed by EDD (Employment Development Department). j Mayor Taylor stated that the $400,000 was in his contract. `f { Ms. Shinen reiterated that staff by-passed council or council and allowed it leaving no one accountable and keeping the issue quite and no disclosure; if there were any restrains in.place John Nunez would have been exposed and prohibited; Oliver, a self -acclaimed man of principal would not want to have his actions become public and to prevent it he quickly reimburse the $9,000 to the City. Ms. Shinen expressed that Mr. Chi was able to collect"the maximum unemployment from April 5th through December 24, 2009,in addition to the severance pay of $401,853.20. Council Member Armenta clarified that in'ord to receive unemployye t, ou have to be fired and not resigned. Mayor Pro Tem Ly stated'thatthe biggest impediment was that'EDD stated that they did nothing wrong. The State delayed In billing the unemployment fee to the City and no one knew that Mr. Nunez was collecting unemployment until six months,,Iater. Mr. Ly added that the fact that people do ask questions makes Rosemead different from the City of Bell because they do not have a local paper. Bell had adopted a city charter. COUNCIL Minutes 0 - Regular Meeting B. Claims and Demands Resolution No.2010-52 Recommendation: to approve Resolution No. 2010 - 52, entitled: Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 13 of 30 RESOLUTION NO. 2010 - 52, FOR PAYMENT OF CITY EXPENDITURES IN THE AMOUNT OF $263,567.96 NUMBERED 70394 THROUGH 70481, INCLUSIVELY. Resolution No. 2010 - 53 Recommendation: to approve Resolution No. 2010 - 53, entitled: i RESOLUTION NO. 2010 - 53, FOR PAYMENT OF/CITY EXPENDITURES IN THE AMOUNT OF $694,869.57 NUMBERED 100909 THROUGH 100932, AND 70482 THROUGH 70571 INCLUSIVELY. C. Approval of Undertaking Agreement for Parcel Map No. 699463139 Burton Avenue ~ rs Parcel Map No. 69946 is being submitted for,consideration and approval along with an Undertaking Agreement to guarantee construction of public improvements subsequent to the recordation-of the parcel map.`` Recommendation: That the CitiCouncil approve Parcel Map No. 69946 and the Undertaking Agreement. D. Approval of Undertaking Agreement for Parcel Map No. 66501-2512 Earle Avenue Parcel Map No. 66501 is being submitted for consideration and approval along with an'Undertaking Agreement to guarantee construction of public improvements - subsequent to the recordation-of the parcel map. Recommendation:, That the City Council approve Parcel Map No. 66501 and the f Undertaking,Agreementi E:, Whitmore Street Road Resurfacing Project, Phase II - Authorization to 'Solicit Bids As,part,of the City's Fiscal Year 2010-11 Capital Improvement Program, the City Council has approved the "Whitmore Street Resurfacing Project", which consists of the rehabilitation of Whitmore Street from San Gabriel Boulevard to Alhambra Wash. Funding for this project is available through the Community Development Block Grant program, which requires that funds be spent on specific project types and in specific target areas. Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 14 of 30 Recommendation: That the City Council authorize staff to advertise and solicit bids to complete the improvement project. G. Treasurer's Report for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2010 In accordance with Government Code Section 53646 the City of Rosemead Treasurer's Report for the fourth quarter of FY 2009-10 is before Council for review. Recommendation: That the City Council rec Mayor appro, A! I rdino if if ;ity ate. The'City'of San Gabriel has expressed a desire to participate as a funding partner for,the bridge painting work on the northern side of San Gabriel Boulevard and Del Mar Avenue. The City of El Monte has indicated its inability to provide funding for painting work on the southern side.of Rosemead Boulevard. "City of Rosemead Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 15 of 30 Recommendations' That the City Council: Authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with Painting and Decor, LTD for the Bridge Painting Project at San Bernardino Freeway in the amount of $152,200. 2. Establish an amount of 10% of the contract amount ($15,220), as a contingency, to cover the potential cost of unforeseen site conditions. 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute any. agreement documents with the City of San Gabriel for its potential contribution towards the completion of this project. 4 Marissa Salvati - representative of Southern California-Edison updated staff and Council_ on.the Tehachapi Renewal Transmission Project. There will'be a quarterly newsletter to keep everyone updated on projects. Mayor Pro Tem Ly asked if there is any more discussion as to how.the Stallo parcel would be used. Ms. Salvati stated that there have been discussions and'would meet with staff in terms of inclusive with the RNC and the Stallo. She added theircorporate real estate department is looking into it. Council MemberArmenta stated"Nthat the city .has-been working hard in beautifying the city and was concerned about some right-a-ways that Edison•own that need wheat abatement. Ms. Armenta asked if it could be taken care of or if Edison could work with staff to correct the issue. Jam. Ms. Salvati stated that there have been meetings in regards to the vacant parcels that do have some necessary wheat abatement and there is a schedule time to try to wheat abates the areas that are vacant. Council Member Low stated'that the city of San Gabriel has expressed interest in joining the city in regards to'the project. Ms. L"ow asked if the allocation of $152,200 will cover the project for all three bridges in the case that they do not participate. City Manager Jeff' Allred, stated that any money that the city receives from the City of San Gabriel will offset that total amount. He added they have expressed interest and they are currently searching for some funding but the City has not received an exact dollar amount. The City of El Monte expressed that they would not be able to participate due to lack of funding. Public Works Director Chris Marcarello stated that as proposed there will be a two tone color used. The color used will be more of a maroon color and the top of the color will be similar to the Walnut Grove Bridge color. Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 16 of 30 Council Member Low asked if the bridge was going to be painted the same as the Walnut Grove Bridge. Mr. Marcarello replied that was not included in the contract. Mayor Taylor asked why the maroon was recently added. Mr. Marcarello stated that with the strategic plan adoption one of the components was to create a unique brand for the City of Rosemead including the color that is commonly displayed around the city., Y.v X- Council Member Low stated that she would like to keep thecoldsoconsisten Z7 ~ N , Mayor Taylor stated that he had reservations betweOthe Walnut Grove Bridge colors and,the new proposed colors because it's a quarter of a million,dollars between the two of them] Men Walnut Grove Bridge was proposed it started at $24,000'andIt Add up at $100,000 with the landscaping. N 'z City Manager Allred stated that project expanding the turn pocket and a lands traffic conga; ation project. including Mayor Taylor asked ifftheerre was additional wort City Manager Allred:replied that•curI ntly it is on bridges. 4r4--\ ~ i the bridge painting for the three underpass Mr. Marcarello stated that staff•had been working.on plans for beautification improvements along the median,in:contunction with the Caltrans project that is currently ongoing. Caltrans is looking to put landscaping andsteff•has been working with its landscape architect to develop the Rosemead flair to/ 11 ,,the landscaping\us`eAheir contractor and the city would incremental the cost. reiterated that Mr. Allred stated that currently and Mr. Marcarello is saying City Manager Allred stated that they were separate projects. What is brought to Council is the bridge project and what-Or. Marcarello is talking about is a separate project in our capital improvement program'. Mayor Taylorstated that there is a reference on the staff report that something is going to be worked out between the State and the City on the landscapes aspects. Rosemead City Coundl, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 17 of 30 Mr. Marcarello explained that in this current contract the only element that staff has worked with the State is in regards to permitting the painting of the bridge. Council Member Low stated that she would like the three bridges to look similar; therefore, staff would then have to go back to change the Walnut Grove to a two tone color. Mayor Pro Tern Ly stated that he liked the idea of the maroon color along Gabriel and Del Mar. Also, Caltrans has been upgrading some on and off-1 Grove and the 10-freeway. Mr. Ly asked if staff was going to coordinate'wi working on Del Mar and San Gabriel. e ti Mr. Marcarello stated that they will work with Caltrans southbound off-ramp at Del Mar and 10-freeway. Mayor Taylor asked when the north side will be e~stripping of San ipstalong Walnut Caltrans when with the Mr. Marcarello replied that he did not have the schedule with Mayor Taylor stated that his preference would t their work on both sides of the off-ramps. Council Member Armenta.inquired about the e Mar bridge had a bold,font and,thepalnut Grov; Also, the bottom should say incorporated similar do any Caltrans is done with Council Member city with two different fonts; she stated the Del e had a r'o`se within the word Rosemead. Walnut Grove bridge. on the fonts for the bridge. rose in the Rosemead logo is also on the Mayo P o Tern Steven Ly ode a motion, seconded by Council Member Sandra Armenta, to award the 'contract as part.of the City's Capital Improvement Program and approve staff's recommendations: Vote resulted in: nta, Clark, Low, Ly Abstain: None Absent: None Mayor Taylor stated that he is in favor of the project but wants to add the entire cost step. City Manager Allred stated that the August 24th meeting will include an item on the design. Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 18 of 30 9. MATTERS FROM CITY MANAGER & STAFF A. Proposed Community Use of Dinsmoor Heritage House Gardens During its regular meeting of May 25, 2010, City Council directed staff to assess rental use of the Dinsmoor Heritage House grounds by the community as with other City facilities. Given its aesthetic appeal, it is believed that the facility could generate revenue through such use for weddings, receptions, and other events. Those revenues could offset ongoing maintenance and repair costs of the Dinsmoor House and adjoining grounds. As no policies exist for the use of the facility; it.is necessary` toy establish rules to govern its use and to set appropriate fees that cover the costs of such use and generate additional funds that would-be'set aside for Dinsmoor House'", maintenance. Recommendation: That the City Council approve the proposed Dinsmoor Heritage House Gardens.application including rules and regulations, fee schedule, and cancellation policy tii; be effective October 1 2010. Director of Parks and Recreation David Montgomery-Scott reviewed the`staff report Mayor Taylorasked if there-were many wedding receptions atthe`community centers and how many a year. Mr. Montgomery Scott replied yes regularly about a dozen wedding receptions are held in each facility. ` Mayor Taylor inquired'about the electrical in the heritage house and asked if the public will use the building at all. Mr. Montgomery-Scott replied`no, the'public will have no access to the building at all and the rules and regulations regulate that: " Council MemtierArmenta asked if there is a bathroom facility next to the garage. Mr. Montgomery-Scoff stated yes, there is a bathroom accessible directly from the garden area and was upgraded not too long ago in preparation for an event hosted by the Heritage House Museum. Council Member Low asked who maintains the garden. Mr. Montgomery-Scott replied City staff with the assistance of the City's landscape contractor. Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 19 of 30 Mayor Taylor asked if there should be any concerns with the electrical. Mr. Montgomery-Scott replied none whatsoever. Mayor Taylor asked if during winter time when it gets dark at five o'clock if there's outside lighting. Mr. Montgomery-Scoff replied there is electrical in the exterior of the facility; there is no need to access the inside of the house. Mayor Taylor expressed concern with the electrical because he felt the system is obsolete and there might be a possibility of injury. Mr. Montgomery-Scott stated some areas of the electrical .of the garage have been updated. Mayor Taylor asked if people will be able to put coffee pots under the trees. Mr. Montgomery-Scoff stated there is no exclusions of minor. appliances; staff will make sure that all is in good service order and operational., Mayor Taylor reiterated there will be no kitcheh.use refrigeration or"'cooking within the building. Mr. Montgomery-Scoff re-affirmed there will be no access to the building at all. Mayor Taylor stated that regarding,the parking that would be determined at a later time if it will be abused or not. , Mr. Montgomery-Scoff stated•it,will.be a triatballoon?because there is no way to determine the kind of impact•thafwilfbe to the, community. However,.the Dinsmoor Heritage Museum group has conducted a number of outdoor events and has drawn large crowds and the parking is absorbed by the community. Mayor Taylor asked if this is up to 60 people occupancy. Mr. Montgomery-S,coffreplied yes. Council Member Clai asked if purchasing tables was necessary or if they could be brought over from other facility. Mr. Montgomery-Scott replied that was feasible for a short time. The tables are not meant to be moved frequently, it will increase the damage on the tables and the tables in the facility are more expensive. Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 20 of 30 Council MemberArmenta stated when she was working at the community facility, wedding receptions were not allowed because of the risk of alcoholic beverages being served. Ms. Armenta requested that staff make sure that the applicants understand there are no alcoholic beverages allowed. Mr. Montgomery-Scott stated there is no tobacco and no alcohol allowed. He added that it will be staffs responsibility to supervise the events and at the time the application is~submitted all the rules and regulations will be run through. r > Council MemberArmenta asked what the consequences are if the premises. - Mr. Montgomery-Scoff replied that if staff thought the event will be shut down and there are laws and depot Mayor Taylorwhat is the severity of the infraction wheri'thereJ! Mr. Montgomery-Scoff stated if it's an individual that person is 2 explained that a staff member will be therelfrom.the moment of will make sure the applicant signs the facility condition report to regulations were followed through. k~ r Mayor Taylor stated he is,hesitant on the are found on infraction the to leave the event. He Nill the clean up stages and e'that all of the rules and Council Member•'Margaret Clark made a motion; seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Steven Ly, to approve the proposed,Dihsmoor Heritage HouselGa(dens application including rules and regulations,.fee.schedule,And, cancellafiow policy' to be effective October 1, 2010. Vote 1 r Yes: Armenta, Clark, Low, Ly, Taylor o None L 1`W ~tAbstain: None Julie Gentry - representing the Dinsmoor Museum Board of Directors spoke in regards to preservation of culture and museums. She commended staff for a job well done and the exposure the Dinsmoor House has received. Mrs. Gentry added that since 2003, the Board expressed interest in assisting in the repairs; however, the board never received a business agreement with the city. Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 21 of 30 Jean Hall - stated they were pleased to be allowed to use the gardens. Mrs. Hall stated that the one thing heard from the John's, who are connected with the Dinsmoor legacy, was that they hoped no weddings and receptions would be permitted. Mrs. Hall mentioned there should be no problems with parking and that loud music was also a fear of the neighbors. She complemented Mr. Montgomery-Scott and his staff for the attention given to the Dinsmoor House. Council Member Clark asked if some funds of the rental could go for Mr. Montgomery-Scott stated yes and that part of the policy go into repairs for the Dinsmoor House. Council Member Clark asked how soon staff would be Mr. Montgomery-Scott stated a contractor was house is that it is a historical house. Staff is trv historical facilities and staff is working with the consultant He added the consultant will be giving the City a timeline go out and request bids. .r Council Member Clark stated there were repai some people, including herself, had offered to,.vl Mr. Montgomery-Scott repli t.in addition to windows, doors, and' o. er areas,that had to be volunteer assistE Council the lead B. or bids. alf of the rental fee will the this week; part of the sen`sitivity.oYthe ith contr`actors who deal specifically with rtio handled the City's preservation plan. ndesbmated cost then staff will have to to be doneinsome windows and that was stucco around the He stated that staff could include with old paint there was a way to treat for Meals Program At its regular meeting on May 25, 2010, City Council authorized an increase in non-resident fees for recreation programs. However, fees related to the senior i6rich program were not adjusted because patrons are asked to pay a donation. Currently; 60% of the program budget is comprised of Community Development Blo'ck,Grant (CDBG) funding, which is limited to resident services unless a specific finding is made. More than half of senior lunch program participants are non- residents. Thus, Rosemead is subsidizing a portion of non-resident meals with CDBG funding. It is, therefore, recommended that, while donations will continue to be requested of resident patrons, non-residents would be charged a flat fee for a meal to avoid continued subsidies. Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27. 2010 Page 22 of 30 Recommendation: That the City Council provide direction in establishing fees for non-resident patrons of the senior lunch program: Option A: Establish a non-resident senior meal fee of $3 per meal effective August 2, 2010 and direct staff to assess fees annually in accordance with their actual cost; or Option B: Establish a non-resident senior meal fee of $2,per meal effective August 2, 2010 and increase the fee to $3 effective July.1, 2011, and direct staff to assess fees annually in accordance with their actual cost.` i Director of Parks and Recreation Montgomery-Scott reviewed the staff report , Council Member Armenta asked if residents were going be told the amount is $1.25 and how staff was going to make sure that non-residents paythe'$3 fee. Mr. Montgomery-Scott stated that participants complete an annual application form that provides basic information and staff will revise those forms to include the new and updated information. He added that the card system may be used in the future. Mayor Taylor asked if the seniors were Mr. Montgomery-Scott replied that the majority Mayor Pro Tem Ly made a motion to approve Council Member Low asked if Council approv B. m B would there be any violations with CDBG money. Economic Development Administrator Ramirez stated CDBG money could not be utilized for this and that general fund money would have to cover the difference. Council Member Low asked if Council approved the $3 change could CDBG money be utilized. Mrs. Ramirez replied that CDBG money is for any resident that applies to the program but that the program cannot cover any non-resident. She explained that if the $3 change was approved then general fund would have to cover that additional $1. Mayor Taylor asked how many seniors attend each day. Mr. Montgomery-Scott replied that between the two centers, approximately 160 seniors attend the lunch program and about 80 of them are non-residents. Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 23 of 30 MayorTaylorstated that if the city pays the extra dollar; at $80 a day times five is $400 a week; and times 10 weeks its $4,000 a year. Mayor Pro Tem Ly stated when Council was trying to consolidate the senior programs to one location he received a lot of calls. He added that a lot of the senior program attendees are from outside the city and Rosemead seniors do use other city's facilities as well. He added that it is $21,000 for senior programs for one year and the cost might decrease as the,prices rise. Council Member Armenta stated that she became aware of Rosemead.resident who goes to South El Monte because he feels the food is better there. She added thatpeople will be willing to pay more if the quality of the food is better.' Council Member Low stated she did not want Rosemead, residents to subsidize•the cost and she thought Option A was better. Al Mayor Taylor stated the seniors might be a shock the fees increase; Mr, Taylor added..that he has received calls about the $1.25 fee being too much. Cam. Mayor Pro Tem Ly stated people do lidin fifixed incomes or it might be an issue that they have not budgeted the new fee. Mayor Taylor stated that he thought it was a reasonable solidon forthe 11 m month period. Council Member Armenta supported Option B•because she understood change was hard for some people and,lt should be done in phases for them. 41 1 Mayor Pro Tern Steven Ly made a, motion,.secondd by Council Member Margaret Clark, to approve,Optioh6:-Establish a non-resident senior meal fee of $2 per meal effective August 2, 204,66d-increase the fee to $3 effective July 1, 2011, and direct staff to assess fees annually in accordance.with theirtactual cost. Vote resulted in: l -A Yes: Arm ne ta, Clark', Low, Ly, Taylor No: None Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 24 of 30 C. Proposed "Social Host Underage Drinking and Consumption Accountability" Ordinance One of the many goals of the Rosemead Public Safety CONNECTIONS forum is to educate parents, grandparents, and other caregivers of their responsibilities to help young people to avoid the negative consequences associated with alcohol and drug use. The CONNECTIONS forum is recommending that the City Council adopt a "Social Host Underage Drinking and Consumption Accountability" Ordinance, which prohibits gatherings where alcohol is served to, consumed by or in the possession of underage persons. The purpose of the, ordinance is to send a clear message to parents and others that have~a responsibility.not to allow underage drinking on their properties. The.proposed ordinance will be a valuable resource and "tool" to assist Sheriff Deputies in the enforcement of underage drinking laws. Recommendation: That the City Council introduce for,first reading Ordinance No. 899, entitled: Chief of Police Lieutenant Murakami reviewed the staff report Council Member Armenta stated this ordinance came about because'of the Public Connections Program; she explained that Council was trying`to figure out a way to get the youth off the streets off drugs and alcohol and find'other alternatives for,tfiem. Ms. Armenta stated she thought this was a great way to make parents accountable for their ;children when they are sited and maybe it will serve as a reality, check.,She explained there are different severities of fines ranging from parenting classes to jail time. She, added that there are currently 40 cities that have these social host ordinances and the City was''not trying to receive-additional revenues as the blogs in the Tribune stated. ThisordEbrice will make`parents accountable for their children. Council Member Low asked City Manager Allred to clarify on how this ordinance affects party's .where parents are involve Wunderage drinking. Jean Hall stated the ordinance makes sense and expressed concern regarding some of the language in the ordinance. She asked what if this happens on private property while watching sports events can residents be sited for allowing underage family members at their home. She reiterated that she was-concerned with the vague language of the ordinance. Mayor Taylor stated that sheriffs would be called for disturbing the peace or a guest seeing a party getting out of control. He stated that other than that he did not see any intrusion of privacy unless there was a peace disturbance for peace officers to come into that private property. Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 25 of 30 City Manager Allred stated if we look at section 9.1.8.030 of the ordinance it emphasizes the prohibition of parties or gatherings of young people that are drinking or are permitted to drink. The intend of this, is to deal with these types of parties that occur on regular basis nation wide. Mr. Allred read the following statement, "No person shall knowingly suffer, permit, or host a party, gathering or event at his or her place of residence or other private or public property, place or premises under his or her control where two or more persons under the age of 21 are present, where alcoholic beverages are in the possession of, being consumed-by, or served to any underage person. This prohibition shall not apply to parties, gatherings/or-events where religious services and/or activities protected by Article 1, Section 4, of the California Constitution, are exercised, nor shall the prohibition apply to the consumption of an alcoholic beverage by a minor at any place not open to the public when the minor is being supervised by his or her own parent or legal guardian." If a parent wants to allow their child to consume a glass of"wine, under their supervision that is not dealt with in this ordinance. This ordinance deals with people coming to a home where they are not being supervised by their own parents and are allowedNto consume alcohol that would be a violation of this ordinance. This;will onlyroccurred when the sheriffs are called to a party and they discover that underage peoplle~are~consuming alcohol. Iflpeople get belligerent with the sheriff and the provision of the ordinance';may get invoked. Council Member Polly Low made a motl to introduce Ordinance No. 899 for first by CodricilMember Sandra Armenta, iresulted in:-,- Yes: , Armenta, Clark, Low, No: None~ None D. Street Name Stgn Des igrrand.Replacement Program Aspart o fthe City s Capital Improvement Program, the City Council approved funding'to implement a-signage replacement program. This program is aimed at meeting`rie Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requirements for signage + reflectwdy"on'all City owned signs (regulatory signs, warning signs, and street name signs), According to these requirements, the City's current street name sign ;background color of yellow will also not be in compliance. Prior to developing a replacement program for street name signs, the Traffic Commission developed a news design to meet the new reflectivity requirements. Recommendation: That the City Council concur with the Traffic Commission's recommendation for a new street name sign design and authorize the replacement of signs in conjunction with street resurfacing projects and as funding allows. Public Works Director Marcarello reviewed the staff report and had a PowerPoint presentation. Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 26 of 30 Mayor Taylorexpressed concern with regards to the font size being too small on the proposed signs. Mayor Pro Tem Ly suggested that taking out" The City" and just leaving the name "Rosemead' on the street sign would help keep the larger font. Mayor Taylorstated that staff recommends resurfacing projects as funding allows and asked what the prices for the new signs were and how many signs would the City acquire` Mr. Marcarello stated the City has an existing inventory that is being worked,on; staff hasn't developed an exact cost estimate for the street name signs or the regulatory signs, and warning signs. He explained that staffs tentative plan was to get a conceptual approval ofthe design and then start working more on a replacement plan. City Manager Allred stated that the cost would be absorbed by the capital improvement projects. Mayor Taylor asked what funding source the City would have for those. Mr. Marcarello replied that with the street resurfacing project when Garvey is resurfaced, staff will be able to include the curb ramps, signage and striping in one lump.`Thatwill come before the Council when considering a bid specifications"and plans. He.added that there is a line item in the bid document stating 'x' number of signs ands forth/'- Mayor Pro Tem Ly asked how much the signs cost as well as the signs on Valley Boulevard next to the signal lights,/, `ti \ "N I Mr. Marcarello stated the'estimated,cosfon.those are, $80 to $90 plus tax and the signs next to the traffic lights are about $656'eac6 Mayor Taylor asked Mr. Marcarello if he.knew how many signs were going to be replaced. Mr. Marcarello stated it will be substantial, in the thousands. There are approximately 43 intersections that are shared with Caltrans. Some will require two to four signs at intersections and it varies with each,intersection. Council MemberArmenta commented that the City will be saving some revenue without the lighted signs that are in the major corridors. Mayor Taylor asked if Ms. Armenta's statement was correct. Mr. Marcarello stated the existing sings illuminate and the proposed signs that were hung in the pilot program do not need to be powered. Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 27 of 30 Mayor Pro Tern Ly asked if Measure R funding could be utilized for the signs. Mr. Marcarello replied yes. Mayor Taylor expressed concern over the possibility of spending over $100,000 for the signs. City Manager Allred stated that this was another State or Federal unfu would have to assume over the years and gradually phase into it. Council Member Low stated she supports the project and and the new signs will brighten up the city. Mayor Taylor reiterated that the intersection signs are intersection; there are 43 intersections and 4 of those-il Council Member Armenta asked if there was any to subsidize the cost. Mr. Marcarello replied that could be Jean Hall - thanked staff and the Traffic Cc project. She stated the new signs are easier feasible to view. Brian Lewin - stated that on adding directional a4inc'rea, Juan Nunez ° asked that -C spoke JIo s11 taff and Callrans to Mayo~rTaylor asked if the co Mr. Marco Ilo.replied it in I City Manager Afire d stated,th staff to use canitalimorovemE or 2 of the fonts. He ite that the City signs are old about $2,500 per could buy the old signs t,with the street sign the residential area signs d indicate some modifications, such as, will be an improvement in the city. t'bulbs that are out in Valley Boulevard be repaired and lights and the street signs. for the signs. the total cost. the funding allows for the project to be done gradually; it allows t projects funding and not general funds. Council Member Low stated she was very happy to see that street signs were going to be updated as she had hoped when getting elected. and that will will be $10. Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 28 of 30 Council Member Polly Low made a motion, seconded by Council Member Sandra Armenta, to concur with the Traffic Commission's recommendation for a new street name sign design and authorize the replacement of signs in conjunction with street resurfacing projects and as funding allows. Vote resulted in: Yes: Armenta, Clark, Low, Ly, Taylor No: None r Abstain: None Absent: None 10. MATTERS FROM MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL A. Consideration to Cancel the August 10, 2010 Community Development Commission and City Council Meetings Due to upcoming scheduling conflicts and,a lack,'of scheduled business items, the City Council will consider action to cancel the August 10, 2010, Community Development Commission and City Council Meetings. Meeting cancellations will result in cost savings of city attorney's fees. The next regular scheduled meeting date will be August 24, 2010, Recommendation: That the City Council provide direction. City Manager AllredreViewed the staff report. Council Member Sandra`Armenta'made a motion,*, seconded by Council Member Polly Low, to cancel the August 10, 2010'meeting. Vote resulted in: ' Yes: Armenta, Clark, Low, Ly No: None Abstain: Taylor`, ; v;-Absent: Noney j Council Mem6erArmenta thanked Rosemead residents for voting on Measure C - Charter City. 11. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:38 P.M. The next regular joint Community Development Commission, the Rosemead Financing Authority, and City Council meeting is scheduled to take place on August 24, 2010 at 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m., respectively. Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 Page 29 of 30 Gary Taylor, Mayor ATTEST: Gloria Molleda City Clerk Page 2 of 30