CC - Item 6A - Minutes 7-27-10Community Development Commission,
Housing Development Corporation,
and
City Council
Regular Meeting
July 27, 2010
The regular meeting of the Rosemead Community Development Commission, , -Housing
Development Corporation and City Council was called to order by May or'Taylor at 6:10 p.m. in the
Rosemead City Council Chamber located at 8838 East Valley Boulevard; Rosemead, California.
FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner /Council Member Sandra
INVOCATION: Commissioner /Council Member Margaret Clark
PRESENT: Chair/ PresidenU Mayor Taylor, Vice - Chair/ Vice- P,resident/;Mayor Pro Tem:Ly,
Commissioner/ Directors/ Council Members Armenta, Clark
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Allred,'City�Attomey Montes, Community Development Director
Wong, Director of Finance Brisco, Director of Parks *d Recreation Montgomery-Scott, Economic
Development Administrator Ramirez, Public'lnformation Officer Flores Public Works
Director Marcarello, and City Clerk Molleda
1. ORDINANCES READ BYwT17LE ONLY
By motion, unanimously adopted, the City Attorney shall be instructed to read by title only
all resolutions and,ordinences appearing on}this agenda which are required by law to be
Member SandreArmenta niade.a motion, seconded by Council Member Polly Low,
ve ordinances4ead by title Vote resulted in:
Yes: Armenta, Clark, Low, Ly, Taylor
No: None Y
Abstain:,None
Absent: "None
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE- None
3. COMMISSION /CORPORATION CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Claims and Demands
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 1 of 29
Resolution No. 2010 — 26
Recommendation: to approve Resolution No. 2010 — 26, entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2010 — 26 FOR PAYMENT OF COMMISSION
EXPENDITURES IN THE AMOUNT OF $13,274.84 DEMAND NOS. 11304
THROUGH 11310. r ,
Resolution No. 2010 — 27
Recommendation: to approve Resolution No.•2010 — 27; entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2010 — 27 FOR PAYMENT OF COMMISSION'\
EXPENDITURES IN THE AM6UNT.OF'$79,817,28 DEMAND NOS. 11311
THROUGH 11315. \� ; IV
B. Update on Status of Exclusive Negotiation Agreement (ENA) for the Sale of
the Glendon Hotel
On May 25, 2010, the Commission an Exclusive: Negotiating Agreement
with the Qiao Garden Group,Real Estate Company, Ltd: for the development of a
Purchase and Sale Agreement of 8832 Glena6n-Way`. ' The term of the ENA
provided an initial negotiation peri6d`6f 90 calerida� days, subject to one (1) 90
calendar days exjension, within which the Commission and the Qiao Garden
Groupmould work to develop a Purchase and Sale Agreement setting forth the
specific terms related to the sale of 6e Glendon Hotel. The ENA is set to expire
on August 22,261b
Recommendation: That the Community Development Commission extend the
Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with Ciao Garden Group Real Estate Company,
' Ltd. for the development of a Purchase and Sale Agreement of the Glendon Hotel
for ninety'(90) calendar days beginning from August 23, 2010.
+a
C. `. -Y Commission Treasurer's Report for the Quarter
-Ended June 30, 2010
In accordance with Government Code Section 53646 the Rosemead Community
Development Commission Treasurer's Report for the fourth quarter of FY 2009 -10
is before the Commission for review.
Recommendation: That the Community Development Commission receive and
file the "Rosemead Community Development Commission Treasurer's Report" for
the month ending June 30, 2010.
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 2 of 29
D.. Housing Development Corporation Treasurer's Report for the Quarter Ended
' June 30, 2010
In accordance with Government Code Section 53646 the Rosemead Housing
Development Corporation Treasurer's Report for the fourth quarter of FY 2009 -10
is before the board for review.
Recommendation: That the Housing Development Corporation receive and file
the "Rosemead Housing Development Corporation Treasurer's Report" for the
month ending June 30, 2010.
Mayor Pro Tern Steven Ly made a motion, seconded by Council Member Sandra Armenta, to
approve Commission /Corporation Consent Calendar',Vote resulted in
Yes: Armenta, Clark, Low, Ly, Taylor ~ \
None: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
4. MATTERS FROM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.,
A. Solar Power System for An' pi Garvey "Senior Housing
Levine Management Group (LMG) management company of the two senior
complexes owned by the Rosemead ,Housing Development Corporation recently
contacted staff in about the possibility of installing solar panels at the
Angelus SeniorComplez and the.Garvey Senior Complex. This issue has come to
,, the forefront due•to the availability of significant rebates offered by Southern
California Edison(SCE). SCE is a participant in the Multifamily Affordable Solar
Housing (MASH) Program provides up to 60% of the cost of solar systems.
The MASH Program has been designed specifically to facilitate the acceleration of
solar power in the affordable housing sector in California.
�\ Recommendation: That the Housing Development Corporation Board take the
following actions:
\ j-
1. , Authorize the Executive Director to negotiate a Power Purchase
Agreement with Solar City for the installation of solar panels at Angelus
Senior Complex and Garvey Senior Complex.
2. Allocate an amount not to exceed $5,000 for the inspection of the roofs at
each complex to ensure that they are in proper condition to accept the
solar panels.
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 3 of 29
President Taylor asked that item 4A be deferred to the next meeting and requested the electric
bills for the past two years for each of the facilities.
Community Development Manager Michelle Ramirez reviewed the staff report.
Tom Folan — representative of Solar City gave a PowerPoint presentation.
President Taylor inquired about some figures that are not in the staff repot: Mr- Taylor asked to
look at page 48 of the booklet. X
Mrs. Ramirez clarified that the program on page 48 is not in Solar City's program; that is an
example of what it would be if the City would buy the system. His presentation;begins on page 64
stating Power Purchase Agreement.
Mr. Folan - continued with his presentation
President Taylor stated that he did not see any letters
regards to the competitor Absolute Solar�Electric.
Mr. Folan replied that they are a
of the reasons why Levine contacted Solar City. N
they reserve the rebate Solar City is able to get,ai
providers with the rebate
President Taylorasked why they „would send out
down of what
Mr.
be in the pr(
to Solar City and asked in
not able tofund;the P.P.A, which is one
a•position to�fund these projects and
onfrom Edison and switch service
referred on page 37; they give a break
Facility.
Taylor
and basically it gives the details of that
do the project.
Mr. Folan stated that they cantdo the project on a purchase basis; the reasons why Levine, the
City, and Solar City are talking, is because we are able to fund it a little bit different and are able to
offer this Power Pu�chase'Agreement which Absolute Solar Electric is not able to do.
Mrs. Ramirez clarified'that the City would be getting the rebate not Solar City if we purchase the
system through them and we would get the rebate directly from SCE (Southern California Edison).
They would only be providing the system to the RHDC; and we would be responsible for operating
and maintaining the system.
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 4 of 29
Mr. Folan explained that with the existing rebate under the power purchase agreement Solar City is
going to take that rebate and that is how we are able to give you that five -cent fixed kilowatt hour
price and no up front investment.
President Taylor referred to the cost that was not correct in the staff report.
Mrs. Ramirez stated the figures on the staff report needed corrections; the figure $174,866 should
have been $117,423 and under fiscal analysis, where it states $251,100,it'should be $193,658.
President Taylor asked about the fiscal analysis under the system`.puIrchase options; he asked
what the two systems cost and what they add up to.
..
Mrs. Ramirez replied they are for Garvey and Angelus a4they add up to $188 657'instead of
$246,100 as listed on the staff report. 't
President Taylor inquired that on a previous page the p ru chase.sy is em,for Angelus Senior
Complex would be around $150,000.
Mrs. Ramirez replied that with the rebate the cost would be brought down to $71,234.
President Taylor asked if the same thing
Mrs. Ramirez replied it
$117,423.
President
Mrs.
Taylor stated that instil
at cuts the cost down to
,100 and
fiscal an
at $117,000.
the re6;afe of $128, 677 and it leaves the
100 the original cost was $401,000 before the
half.
Executiv6 DiiectorAllred stated that it's under the purchase option that is not being recommended
because unde�,'.option 1, it would require the city to make a significant cash outlay to install the
solar. Staff believes optionf2`is better under the power purchase agreement because it requires no
outlay of cash of eerthanthe inspection of the roof which will be around $5,000.
Y
Mrs. Ramirez stated that it would be the total for both roofs and under the power purchase
agreement Solar City has said they would waive that fee and will not charge the city.
Executive Director Allred stated that staffs recommendation is option 2 because it requires no up
front capital investment and the City would be free from maintaining that system over the years and
would be the responsibility of the vendor.
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 5 of 29
President Taylor asked what happens at the end of the 18 years.
Mr. Folan stated that the city has several options; you can extend the PPA, upgrade to the latest
technology, or have the system removed or purchase the system for fair market value. The
expected life span of the panels is about 30 years.
President Taylor stated the rate being charged would be starting at a h
of the time that the City would have the panels.
Mr. Folan responded it was hard to predict 18 years, its 1
to Solar City after the 18 years. There are specific terms
at the end of the PPA and one of them is to offer fair mai
President Taylor inquired about the time
24th.
of
and the
for the balance
will be little value
on what happens
ne
Mr. Folan stated there have been several extensions filed so.now`he City has until the middle of
11 November with Southern California Edison. Levine Management has filed for several extensions
and now SoCal Edison is asking for a proof of project milestone; meaning that the project is going
forward and the way of meeting that is by ha3ing.a signed contract
`F
Executive Director Allred stated there was some time before:making the final decision.
President Taylor stated he just wanted reassurance and wanted to see the utility bills of both
facilities. /
City Attorney Montes stated he,hac riot'had a.chanc,&to verify with staff but in order to approve the
contract..Council'will.have to have a public hearing; per section 4610 of the government code,
which fs ora power.purchase agreements with sole source vendors. He stated that the most
you can do is authorize staff to move forward with the vendor to make sure the contract terms are
acceptable and then bring °it back for `a,public hearing. At that time Council can consider the
contrect'if you want to have_ tl A e project move forward.
President Taylor asked the City Attorney Montes to explain "sole source vendor"
City Attorney Montes explained that you have a building that is owned by the Housing
Development Corporation and we are talking about installing a solar system in a publicly owned
building. We are not talking about bidding the project; we are talking about awarding a contract for
a power purchase with Solar City. That is specifically authorize under the government code, it's
because of all of these alternative energy sources that are proliferating that the California
legislature wants to encourage, use of those in public building. They have this section 4610 in the
government code that says before you award that contract you have to hold a public hearing.
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 6 of 29
President Taylor asked why we did not put this out for competitive bid to get various bidders.
Executive Director Allred stated that atone point there was urgency, given the fact that there was
some deadlines which were then extended. The reason why the legislator has allows for sole
sourcing for high -tech projects like this is because of the height of technical expertise that is
required.
City Attorney Montes stated part of the issue is when you are going to have these PPA's usually,
whoever is the proposing vendor, has to spend a fair amount of resources to do the energy audit
and come up with the information in terms of cost savings and design such as the preliminary
design. There is a significant outlay on these companies before they can even`submit a proposal
worth looking at and that is why the legislature contemplates that you are going to be working with
only one company. Once you talked to a number of companies and it sounds that.the company that
manages these buildings for you has worked with a couple of companies and has ultimately
selected Solar City as the preferred vendor based.upon their experience and also their ability to
fund the PPA Solar City is carrying the financing on these,for the city. This is specifically what
sections of the government code contemplates; the vendor is.going to finance this installation and
power generator and the city is going to'go.with that vendor after a�public hearing.
President Taylor expressed concerned whether..its$400 thousand of $200 thousand; and asked if
there are several companies out there.
Mr. Folan replied yes there are but we are in a position where we can fund systems this size. Most
companies won't look that are less than-,100 kilowatts, 200 or 300 kilowatts; we are very
aggressive in targeting this MASH rebate fund thdw� a were one of the first one's to offer the five -
centfxed PPA. "
President Taylor stated Solar City's proposal .was very good from the five -cent kilowatt. Mr. Taylor
asked what the procedure was if the City decided not to continue with the solar system after the 18
years.
Mr Folan`replied that the dity)`as mentioned in the agreement, can have the system removed at no
cost. .
President Taylor reiterated'so we'll have an option at that time to keep the system and maintain it
through you or another;company or remove the system.
Mr. Folan stated there would be an extension of a five year increment, removal of the system, or a
fair market value offer to Solar City, but you would be responsible for maintenance after that.
President Taylor stated he knew there were some systems installed and then removed; he didn't
understand why they were removed.
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 7 of 29
Director Clark asked him what panels he was referring to.
President Taylor explained the solar systems in the Huntington Library that had a large water tank
area with solar panels and about 200 were removed.
Director Clark asked how long ago that was because technology has come along way.
President Taylor stated it was several years ago about 8 to 10 years. Hdjask`i d,what the average
output on a 2 foot by 4 foot panel was. A
Mr. Folan stated that now they're about 3 by 5; you are looking atabout 190,watts up to 240 watts.
President Taylorstated that it's a big difference from 75'watts; but then again it's':foureach square
feet compared to; it's almost double the size if you are saying 3 by 5 would put it in'15 feet square
feet. That was the program when they were first putting'tliem out, it,was a good deal, and there
were some other schools that had them put on and later taken out t'h'ese were 22 by 48 panels
and you are talking about doubling in size from 75 to 150 watts`'
Economic Development Administrator
Management can speak on how Solar
that Mr. Jeffrey Levine of Levine
Jeffrey Levine —of Levine
being purchasing a system
the ability to do the power I
selected to propose?t�ti�i`s�
purchase model. �,''
ere were two "different approaches; one
no one else other than Solar City that had
That was the reason why Solar City was
asthe vendor that was proposing the
-`Directo�Allred explaired that 66'StAter Legislature allows for sole sourcing only in
in of th fact ihat in this case there are a few entities that are able to do the financing. In
there is a unique understanding of the industry and also the investment they have made
y's facilities; those three items allow s for a sole source arrangement per State law.
asked what;hours of operation the panel would be generating energy.
Mr. Folan stated°ifwoulclj 'ically be from 9 o'clock to sundown depending on the orientation
where one building iS,going to have a west side.
President Taylor inquired about the panels facing west; is 9 o'clock appropriate for the full
generation.
Mr. Folan replied that it would be a bit later on the west side but it would get all the afternoon sun.
He added that the good thing about solar was that when the summer bills were at its highest, solar
production was also at its highest.
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 8 of 29
President Taylor asked where the other building was facing.
Mr. Folan replied that the other building was facing southwest about 240 degreed which is fantastic
for solar production.
The City Council recesses to closed session at 6:48 p.m.
5. CLOSED SESSION
A. Conference with Legal Counsel
1. Pursuant to Government Code Section'54957.
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT
Title: City Attorney and Assistant City Attorney _
B. Public Employee Performance Evaluation
Government Code Section 54957; Council; Appointed Official (City Manager)
' City.Council
Meeting Agenda
The regular meeting of the Rosemead City Council was called to order by Mayor Taylor at 7:07
p.m. in the Rosemead City Council Chamber located at 8838 East Valley Boulevard, Rosemead,
California.
FLAG SALUTE: Council Member Sandra Armenta
INVOCATION' Member Margaret Clark
PRESENT: Mayor Taylor, Mayor Pro Tem,Ly, Council Members Armenta, Clark and Low
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Allred, City Attorney Richman, Community Development Director
Wong, Director ofFinance Brisco, Director of Parks and Recreation Montgomery-Scott, Economic
Development Administrator Ramirez, Public Affairs Manager Flores, Deputy Public Works Director
Marcarello, and City Clerk Molleda
City Council reconvened back from closed session at 7:07 p.m. City Attorney Montes reported that
Rachel Richman was unanimously appointed as the new City Attorney and he had been appointed
Assistant City Attorney for the City.
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 9 of 29
6. PRESENTATION
• National Night Out Proclamation
Chief of Police Murakami read the proclamation for the 27th Annual National Night Out.
Nick Nevarez:
The Rosemead Public Safety CONNECTIONS forum has arranged foirthis young Rosemead
resident to present information about his traffic accident in an effort makeayoung people, parents
and other caregivers aware of the destructive' impacts of alcohokand drug abuse.- Also, the
CONNECTIONS forum is preparing to host a community -w de meeting on the`dangers of alcohol
and drug abuse on October 21 at the Rosemead High,Scl ool Auditorium featuring Nick Nevarez
as a speaker. A ¢�
Nick Nevarez - presented a PowerPoint presentation orrfi'is vehicle "accident and stated'he hoped
young people and parents of the con e
to raise awareness to u races of alcohol and drug Y 9P P P 9.. „, 9 abuse.
Mayor Taylor asked if he was going to speak,to Rosemead
story was relatable. N,
Ms. Navarez - (Nick's m
recuperation of her sons
Council Membe�(Armier,
Rosemead Public Safety
CounciLMem6 rere L ow th
7% COMMENT
Juan Nunez asked if the
Mayor Taylor respondec
spoke on the
it was an
for
because his
through and the
Nick Navarez speak at the
story and speaking to other young students.
were made on the Glendon Way Hotel.
City Manager Allred stated that the demands for the funds had been made to the party; however,
they have not paid their obligations.
Mayor Pro Tem Ly explained that sending the party to litigation would cost more than collecting
the amount they actually owe.
Mr. Nunez asked who was in charge of overseeing and checking that the hotel was paying their
bills.
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 10 of 29
Mayor Taylor stated that there was negligence on the city side and now staff is working on
recouping what is owed.
City Manager Allred stated that the Commission is owed about $55,000.
Sharon Esquiviel — asked why Council Members are not aware of what
coming in the city. /
City Manager Allred explained that the Planning Department is ink
businesses in the city; also it's included on a green sheet publicatil
Commissioners, and Council Members,
Mayor Pro Tem Ly stated that since not every busine s quire
such as, a business license, occupancy permits and/or conditions
require a different type of procedure depending on the type of,busi
some businesses are processed at the staff level and others,that`
presented to the Commissions and Council. Members for approval
Mayor Taylorcommented that there were two m
staff took notice the city got involved; Mr. Taylor
developments such as the Glendon Hotel and`UF
businesses applying go thr gh•an
- f' . .� -1
Marlene Shinen stated that she had submitted
and had received a response the'same day. Ms.
not require answers to
not answered: -� :' --.
Taylor asked Ms. Shinen to.read.her request.
businesses are
g illegally and one
;ses like new
and most of the
records request on January 13, 2010
noted from the response letter, "it does
?rated', and she added her question was
Ms. Shineh.stated that sh0clid receive documents to her request but did not receive an answer to a
question she` ,had and therefore, issued another request on January 13 ?h.
City Attorney Richman explained that under the Public Records Act it is a records response statute;
under the records act liey are not required to answer a question. Staff is required to provide
documents that are responsive to the request for information. Under the California Public Records
Act that would be a correct statement
Mayor Taylor asked what was the question Ms. Shinen asked on the letter.
Ms. Shinen replied that it had to do with Oliver Chi receiving unemployment benefits. She stated
the question was if it was with or without city council's knowledge and or approval and when.
that
to obtain the sam
approval permits
new
to Staff,
bigger may need to be
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 11 of 29
Mayor Taylor replied that it was a direct question with a simple answer and Ms. Shinen did not get
a response back.
Ms. Shinen stated that she received a letter back from the city stating that "it did not require
answers to questions or for documents to be generated'. Ms. Shinen stated that she did receive
documents before but the questions asked did not have anything to do with the documents.
/- \
Mayor Taylor stated he was concern about the question not being answered.
Ms. Shinen asked for clarification because she, is left with the impression, that is not good.
Council Member Clark asked for clarification on Ms. Shine n'§ response letter: \\
City Attorney Richman clarified Ms. Shinen's response letter, in which staff stated 64 it did not
required answering questions under the pubic records,request or cleating documents that don't 1.
already exist. But documents would have to be provided thatare,responsive to her request.
Mayor Pro Tem Ly asked Ms. Shinen if there were any records received that would have
reference to that question. \ �,
Ms. Shinen replied no.
t , ,,.
Assistant City Manager Matt Hawkesworth stated that staff provided council with copies of Ms.
Shinen's response letter and documents that wer'eprovided to her. One of the questions was a
time line of typically on'what happen` date and what took place; that time line would identify what
took place including whemthe council found out about it During this time we were in and out of
closed session with the city attorney.onhow -to pursue it and when the request was received, staff
conferred with theCity Attorney and was directed -to provide what legally staff could because this
was l egal issue; staff not voluntarily provide documents or create documents.
Council.Member Clark read "CPRA; authorizes members of the public to view documents
responsive to request for infor`mation�'ii does not require answers to questions or for documents to
be generated " cannot make up documents but you can look at what's there.
Ms. Shinen commented on the amount given to Mr. Chi upon his departure from the City;
severance pay $196 lump sum $98,186.40; vacation pay $23,519.42; sick pay
$29,846.78; administrative leave $7,552.80; legal fees $1,000; 2008 Toyota Highlander $29,375;
medical $16,000; tgtal "of $401,853.20; and he still applied and received unemployment. She added
that Mr. Chi did pay back the money because the city manager informed him it was going to be in
the Tribune.
Council Member Armenta stated that Council did not know about the unemployment until the City
was billed by EDD (Employment Development Department).
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 12 of 29
Mayor Taylor stated that the $400,000 was in his contract.
Ms. Shinen reiterated that staff by- passed council or council knew and allowed it leaving no one
accountable and keeping the issue quiet and no disclosure; if there were any restraints in place
John Nunez would have been exposed and prohibited; Oliver, a self acclaimed man of principal
would not want to have his actions become public and to prevent it he quickly reimbursed the
$9,000 to the City. Ms. Shinen expressed that Mr. Chi was able to collect the maximum
unemployment from April 5th through December 24, 2009 in addition to,the severance pay of
$401,853.20.
Council MemberArmenta clarified that in order to receive unem_ployment,you.have to be fired
and not resign. x
Mayor Pro Tern Ly stated that the biggest impedimenkwas that EDD stated that they "did
wrong, The State delayed in billing the unemployment feer the City, no one knew that4r.
Nunez was collecting unemployment until six months later Mr. Ly added.that the fact that people
" Mr
do ask questions makes Rosemead different from the City ofBell because they do not have a local
paper. C?,• ";
Mayor Taylor stated that the City of Bell hao adopted:a city charter.
8. CITY COUNCIL CONSENT
A.
0 — Regular Meeting
approve Resolution No. 2010 — 52, entitled:
2010 — 52, FOR PAYMENT OF CITY EXPENDITURES IN
$263,567.96 NUMBERED 70394 THROUGH 70481,
Resolution No. 2010 — 53
Recommendation: to approve Resolution No. 2010 — 53, entitled:
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 13 of 29
RESOLUTION NO. 2010 - 53, FOR PAYMENT OF CITY EXPENDITURES IN
THE AMOUNT OF $694,869.57 NUMBERED 100909 THROUGH 100932, AND
70482 THROUGH 70571 INCLUSIVELY.
C. Approval of Undertaking Agreement for Parcel Map No. 69946.3139 Burton
Avenue
/�,
Parcel Map No. 69946 is being submitted for consideration and approval along
with an Undertaking Agreement to guarantee construclion of public improvements
subsequent to the recordation of the parcel map., (,
i
Recommendation: That the City Council aporove� arcel Map No. 69946 and the
Undertaking Agreement.
D. Approval of Undertaking Agreement for Parc0ft No. 66501.2512 Earle
Avenue
Parcel Map No. 66501 is.being submitted forconsideration and approval along
with an Undertaking Agreement to guarantee construction of public improvements
subsequent to the recordation of the parcel map.
f ,
Recommendation: That the City Council approve Parcel Map No. 66501 and the
Undertaking Agreement.
,?,
E. Whitmore Street Road Resurfacing Project, Phase II - Authorization to
Solicit Bids
l
- As part of the, City's Fiscal Year 2010 -11 Capital Improvement Program, the City
Council,has approved the "Whitmore Street Resurfacing Project ", which consists
of the•rehabilitation of Whitmore Street from San Gabriel Boulevard to Alhambra
Wash. Funding for this.project is available through the Community Development
Block Grant program` which requires that funds be spent on specific project types
and in specific target areas.
' That the City Council authorize staff to advertise and solicit
bids to'complete the improvement project.
G. Treasurer's Report for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2010
In accordance with Government Code Section 53646 the City of Rosemead
Treasurer's Report for the fourth quarter of FY 2009 -10 is before Council for
review.
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 14 of 29
Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file the "City of Rosemead
Treasurer's Report" for the month ending June 30, 2010.
Mayor Pro Tern Steven Ly made a motion, seconded by Council Member Polly Low, to
approve the Consent Calendar. Vote resulted in:
Yes: Armenta, Clark, Low, Ly, Taylor '
No: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None ,
Bridge Painting Project at San Bernardino Freeway — Contract Award
As part of the City's Capital Improvement Program, the City Council approved
funding to enhance the aesthetic]' - 6f'City entry; points from the Sari'Bernardino %
Interstate 10 Freeway. This project is included in'these efforts and consists of
painting three (3) freeway bridges at Rosemead Boulevard., San Gabriel
Boulevard and Del Mar - Avenge.
The project consists of initial water blasting, sealing and priming all surfaces,
followed by applying graffiti - resistant paint to ensure quick and easy removal if
surfaces are tagged. In addition, the 'project calls fof the installation of large City
seals on the liridge walls, indicating entry into City of Rosemead, as appropriate.
The.color and logo design will be similar to the recently painted Walnut Grove
AJenue.bridge. `
The Cityof San�Gabriel'has expressed a desire to participate as a funding partner
' r
for the brid'ge,painting work on.the northern side of San Gabriel Boulevard and Del
Mar Avenue. The City of El Monte has indicated its inability to provide funding for
painting work on the southern side of Rosemead Boulevard.
Recommendationsi'That the Council:
:,. 1. )-Authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with Painting and
' ; f Decor, LTD for the Bridge Painting Project at San Bernardino
Freeway in the amount of $152,200.
2. Establish an amount of 10% of the contract amount ($15,220), as a
contingency, to cover the potential cost of unforeseen site conditions.
3. Authorize the City Manager to execute any agreement documents
with the City of San Gabriel for its potential contribution towards the
completion of this project.
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 15 of 29
Marissa Salvati — representative of Southern California Edison updated staff and Council on the
Tehachapi Renewal Transmission Project. There will be a quarterly newsletter to keep everyone
updated on projects.
Mayor Pro Tem Ly asked if there is any more discussion as to how the Stallo parcel would be
used.
Ms. Salvati stated that there have been discussions and would meet with inAerms of inclusive
with the RNC and the Stallo. She added their corporate real estate department is looking into it.
Council Member Armenta stated that the city has been working hard in bea the city and
was concerned about some right -of -ways that Edison ownsfatat need weed abatement. Ms.
Armenta asked if it could be taken care of or if Edison could work with staff to correctAhe issue.
Ms. Salvati stated that there have been meetings in'regards to theJacant parcels thafdo.ha`ve
some necessary weed abatement and there is a schedule'time to,try to' +weed abates the areas that are vacant.
Council Member Low stated that the cityof ;San Gabriel has expressed interest in joining the city
in regards to the project. Ms. Low asked if ttie'allocation of $152,200'willbover the project for all
three bridges in the case that they do not par cipate:
City Manager Jeff Allred.stated1hat any money that -the city receives from the City of San Gabriel
will offset that total amount. He-added they have expressed interest and they are currently
searching for some funding but the City has not re`ce'ived an exact dollar amount. The City of El
Monte expressed thahthey would,not be able to participate due to lack of funding.
Public WorksDirector Chr
The color used`will;be mor
Greve Bridge color. ..
Council Member Low asl
Bridge
Mr. Marcarell ro eplied that
Mayor Taylor asked why
tatedJhat proposed there will be a two tone color used.
color and the top of the color will be similar to the Walnut
the t'rridge was going to be painted the same as the Walnut Grove
not included in the contract.
maroon was recently added.
Mr. Marcarello stated that with the strategic plan adoption one of the components was to create a
unique brand for the City of Rosemead including the color that is commonly displayed around the
city.
Council Member Low stated that she would like to keep the colors consistent.
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 16 of 29
Mayor Taylor stated that he had reservations between the Walnut Grove Bridge colors and the
new proposed colors because it's a quarter of a million dollars between the two of them. When
Walnut Grove Bridge was proposed it started at $24,000 and it ended up at $100,000 with the
landscaping.
City Manager Allred stated that project included some traffic congestion modifications, including
expanding the turn pocket and a landscaping beautification project.
Mayor Taylor asked if there was additional work to be done.
City Manager Allred replied that currently it is only for the
bridges.
Mr. Marcarello stated that staff had been working onplans for bE
the median in conjunction with the Caltrans project +fhat , urren
put landscaping and staff has been working with its landscape a
flair to the landscaping, use their contractor and the city would jr
Mayor Taylor reiterated that Mr. Allred sta et d that currently and
incremental cost.
City Manager Allred stated that they were
bridge project and what Mr. is
r P
improvement programer :-
Mayor Taylorstated'th<
worked out between the
Mr. Marcarello Ilo ezpla` e(
State:is in regards to pe.
Council Member Low
would thenhave to go b
is a
underpass
g. Caltrans is..looking to
develop the Rosemead
I the cost.
is saying
�6rought to Council is the
project in our capital
on thelstaff report that something is going to be
the landscapes aspects.
contract the only element that staff has worked with the
of the bridge.
would like the three bridges to look similar; therefore, staff
the Walnut Grove to a two tone color.
Mayor Pro Tem Ly`state&that he liked the idea of the maroon color along the stripping of San
Gabriel and Del Mar.i4lso, Caltrans has been upgrading some on and off -ramps along Walnut
Grove and the 10- freeway. Mr. Ly asked if staff was going to coordinate with Caltrans when
working on Del Mar and San Gabriel.
Mr. Marcarello stated that they will work with Caltrans and added that Caltrans is done with the
southbound off -ramp at Del Mar and 10- freeway.
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 17 of 29
Mayor Taylor asked when the north side will be done.
I
Mr. Marcarello replied that he did not have the schedule with him.
Mayor Taylorstated that his preference would be to not do any painting until Caltrans is done with
their work on both sides of the off - ramps.
Council Member Armenta inquired about the lettering with two dill
Mar bridge had a bold font and the Walnut Grove bridge had a rose
Also, the bottom should say incorporated similar to the Walnut Grm'
Council Member Clark agreed with Council Member
City Manager Allred stated that the "swoosh" of the
Garvey Bridge. d
Mayor Pro Tern Steven Ly made a motion, seconded
award the contract as part of the City's Imprc
recommendations: Vote resulted in:
Yes: Armenta, Clark, Low,
No: Tavlor
Mayor Taylor stated ttiat h
City Matiager Allred stated
+' .' '7y "'
9�MATTERS FROM ~ Cif
\ A._\ ,, d
the
ihts }she stated the Del
the word Rosemead.
fonts
logo is
A Member Sandra Armenta, to
Irogram and approve staff's
�1�
wants to add the entire cost step.
ust 24« meeting will include an item on the design.
2<& STAFF
Use of Dinsmoor Heritage House Gardens
During its,(egular meeting of May 25, 2010, City Council directed staff to assess
rental us of the Dinsmoor Heritage House grounds by the community as with
other,City facilities. Given its aesthetic appeal, it is believed that the facility could
generate revenue through such use for weddings, receptions, and other events.
Those revenues could offset ongoing maintenance and repair costs of the
Dinsmoor House and adjoining grounds.
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 18 of 29
As no policies exist for the use of the facility, it is necessary to establish rules to
govern its use and to set appropriate fees that cover the costs of such use and
generate additional funds that would be set aside for Dinsmoor House
maintenance.
Recommendation: That the City Council approve the proposed Dinsmoor
Heritage House Gardens application including rules and regulations, fee schedule,
and cancellation policy to be effective October 1, 2010.; ,
Director of Parks and Recreation David Montgomery-Scott reviewed the staff report
Mayor Taylorasked if there were many wedding receptions' "at the community.centers and how
many a year.
f
Mr. Montgomery-Scott replied yes; regularly about:a dozen wedd i no- receptions are held in;each
facility.
Mayor Taylor inquired about the electrical in the heritage house and asked if the public will use the
building at all.
Mr. Montgomery-Scott replied no, the public will have no access to the, building at all and the rules
and regulations regulate that. t, '
Mayor Taylor asked what about bathrooms.
Council Member Armen'ta.stated there is a restroom 'facility next to the garage.
L
Mr. Montgomery - - Scoff stated yes, there is 'a bathroom accessible directly from the garden area and
was upgraded not too long ago in preparation for an event hosted by the Heritage House Museum.
.Council Member Low asked who maintains the garden.
/i
Mr. Montgomery - Scott replied City staff with the assistance of the City's landscape contractor.
Mayor Taylor asked.if there'should be any concerns with the electrical.
Mr. Montgomery-Scott replied none whatsoever.
Mayor Taylor asked if during winter time when it gets dark at five o'clock if there's outside lighting.
Mr. Montgomery - Scott replied there is electrical in the exterior of the facility; there is no need to
access the inside of the house.
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 19 of 29
Mayor Taylor expressed concern with the electrical because he felt the system is obsolete and
there might be a possibility of injury.
Mr. Montgomery -Scott stated some areas of the electrical of the garage have been updated.
Mayor Taylor asked if people will be able to put coffee pots under the trees.
Mr. Montgomery -Scott stated there is no exclusions of minor appliances, staff will make sure that
all is in good service order and operational.
Mayor Taylor reiterated there will be no kitchen use, refrigeration or cooking within the building.
^ X
Mr. Montgomery -Scott re- affirmed there will be no access,to the building at all.
Mayor Taylor stated that regarding the parking that'would.be determined at a later tim6.if it -will be
abused or not. �' ,r'
..
Mr. Montgomery -Scott stated it will be a4rial balloon because there is noway to determine the kind
of impact that will be to the community. However, the Dinsmoor Heritage Museum group has
conducted a number of outdoor events a4has;&wn.large crowds'and'the parking is absorbed by
the community.
Mayor Taylor asked if this'is up to 60 people oc cupancy
Mr. Montgomery- Scotfreplied yes.
Council Member Clark asked if pu chasing.tables was necessary or if they could be brought over
from otherfacility>
Mr!Montgomery-Scott replied that was feasible for a short time. The tables are not meant to be -
moved frequently, it will increase the damage on the tables and the tables in the facility are more
expensive,
Council MemberArmenta�stated when she was working at the community facility, wedding
receptions were nofallowed'because of the risk of alcoholic beverages being served. Ms. Armenta
requested that staff make sure that the applicants understand there are no alcoholic beverages
allowed.
Mr. Montgomery -Scott stated there is no tobacco and no alcohol allowed. He added that it will be
staffs responsibility to supervise the events and at the time the application is submitted all the rules
and regulations will be run through.
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 20 of 29
Council MemberArmenta asked what the consequences are if alcoholic beverages are found on
the premises.
Mr. Montgomery -Scott replied that if staff thought the severity of the infraction necessitates the
event will be shut down and there are laws and deposit fees.
Mayor Taylor what is the severity of the infraction when there is alcohol.
Mr. Montgomery -Scott stated if it's an individual that person is asked.to leave the event. He
explained that a staff member will be there from the moment of set up the.clean up stages and
I will make sure the applicant signs the facility condition report to'ensure that alt of the rules and
regulations were followed through. tf
Mayor Taylor stated he is hesitant on the liability
Council Member Margaret Clark made a motion, seconded,by'Mayor Pro Tern Steven Ly, to
approve the proposed Dinsmoor Heritage House Gardens application including rules and
regulations, fee schedule, and cancellation policy to be effective October 1, 2010. Vote
resulted in: V `° \, .o
Yes: Armenta, Clark, Low, Ly, Taylor
No: None
Abstain: None � Z, ..
Absent: None 1
Julie Gentry — representing�the Dins`moor.Mu eurn Board of Directors spoke in regards to
preservation'of culture and museums. She commended staff for a job well done and the exposure
the Dinsmoor House has received`Mrs. Gentry added that since 2003, the Board expressed
intetes`t in assisting ih� rep; airs' however,, the board never received a business agreement with
Jean Half stated they were'pleased to be allowed to use the gardens. Mrs. Hall stated that the
one thin heatd'from the Johes's, who are connected with the Dinsmoor legacy, was that the
hoped no weddings receptions would be permitted. Mrs. Hall mentioned there should be no
problems with parking and that loud music was also a fear of the neighbors. She complemented
Mr. Montgomery -Scott and his staff for the attention given to the Dinsmoor House.
Council Member Clark asked if some funds of the rental could go for repairs.
Mr. Montgomery -Scoff stated yes and that part of the policy explained that half of the rental fee will
go into repairs for the Dinsmoor House.
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 21 of 29
Council Member Clark asked how soon staff would be able to paint the outside.
Mr. Montgomery -Scott stated a contractor was coming out this week; part of the sensitivity of the
house is that it is a historical house. Staff is trying to deal with contractors who deal specifically with
historical facilities and staff is working with the consultant who handled the City's preservation plan.
He added the consultant will be giving the City a timeline and estimated cost then staff will have to
go out and request bids. / I
Council Member Clark stated there were repairs that had to be done in`some windows and that
Z tR . ."
some people, including herself, had offered to volunteer to do the painting.
Mr. Montgomery -Scoff replied that in addition to the windowg thete`was stuccb.around the
windows, doors, and other areas that had to be repaired °He stated that staff could include
volunteer assistance on the request for bids. Z '.
Council MemberArmenta commented that when dealirig with old ;paitit.there was a way to treat
the lead paint.
B. Non-Resident Fee for Senior Meals Program
At its regular meeting on May25, 2010,?CityCouncil authorized an increase in
non - resident fees for recreati'oniprogra s Ho a er', fees related to the senior
lunch program,were not adjusted because patrons`are asked to pay a donation.
Currently, 6N6o of the program budget is comprised of Community Development
,f'J i
Bloc k Grant (CDBG) funding, which is limited to resident services unless a specific
than half of senior lunch program participants are non-
e em ad•is.subsiKing a portion of non - resident meals with
h efore, recommended that, while donations will continue to
lent patrons, non - residents would be charged a flat fee for a
That the City Council provide direction in establishing fees for
of the senior lunch program:
a non - resident senior meal fee of $3 per meal effective
iirect staff to assess fees annually in accordance with their
Option B: Establish a non - resident senior meal fee of $2 per meal effective
August 2, 2010 and increase the fee to $3 effective July 1, 2011, and direct staff to
assess fees annually in accordance with their actual cost.
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 22 of 29
Director of Parks and Recreation Montgomery -Scott reviewed the staff report
Council MemberArmenta asked if residents were going be told the amount is $1.25 and how
staff was going to make sure that non - residents pay the $3 fee.
Mr. Montgomery-Scoff stated that participants complete an annual application form that provides
basic information and staff will revise those forms to include the new and updated information. He
added that the card system may be used in the future.
Mayor Taylor asked if the seniors were making donations.
Mr. Montgomery -Scott replied that the majority are donating:,;.', ' '
Mayor Pro Tem Ly made a motion to approve
Council Member Low asked if Council approved Optioh B- would sth&6e be any
CDBG money.
Economic Development Administrator Ramirez stated CDBG moheq'could not be utilized for this
and that general fund money would have to"coverithe difference
Council Member low asked if Council approved the!$3 change'could CDBG money be utilized.
Mrs. Ramirez replied,that CDBG money is for any:Jresident that applies to the program but that the
program cannot cover, any non - resident. She explained that if the $3 change was approved then
general fund would Have to additional $1 hT
Mayor
and
them
day.
the two centers, approximately 160 seniors attend the
Mayor Taylor- stated that if the city pays the extra dollar; at $80 a day times five is $400 a week;
and times 10'`weeks its $4,000 a year.
Mayor Pro Tem Ly`stated when Council was trying to consolidate the senior programs to one
location he receivedVa lot of calls. He added that a lot of the senior program attendees are from
outside the city and Rosemead seniors do use other city's facilities as well. He added that it is
$21,000 for senior programs for one year and the cost might decrease as the prices rise.
Council Member Armenta stated that she became aware of a Rosemead resident who goes to
South El Monte because he feels the food is better there. She added that people will be willing to
pay more if the quality of the food is better.
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 23 of 29
Council Member Low stated she did not want Rosemead residents to subsidize the cost and she
thought Option A was better.
Mayor Taylorstated the seniors might be a shock the fees increase; Mr. Taylor added that he has
received calls about the $1.25 fee being too much.
Mayor Pro Tem Ly stated people do live in fixed incomes or it might be
budgeted the new fee.
Mayor Taylorstated that he thought it was a reasonable
Council Member Armenta supported Option B because
some people and it should be done in phases for them
Mayor Pro Tern Steven Ly made a motion, seconded
approve Option B: Establish a non - resident senior meal
2, 2010 and increase the fee to $3 effective July 1, 2019;
annually in accordance with their actual cost. Vote resu
Yes: Armenta, Clark,
No: None
Abstain: None
C.
,issue that they have not
ith month period.
;hawas hard for
ber Margaret!Clak, to
meal effective August
rect staff to assess fees
and Consumption Accountability"
, he, of the man "y goals of'the'Rosemead Public Safety CONNECTIONS forum is
to'educate parerts grandparents, and other caregivers of their responsibilities to
help young,people to the negative consequences associated with alcohol
and drA use. The CONNECTIONS forum is recommending that the City Council
adopt a I'Sdcial Host'Underage Drinking and Consumption Accountability'
Ordinance,Iwhich prohibits gatherings where alcohol is served to, consumed by or
in,the possession of underage persons. The purpose of the ordinance is to send a
clear,message to parents and others that have a responsibility not to allow
e _!
underage drinking on their properties. The proposed ordinance will be a valuable
resource and "tool" to assist Sheriff Deputies in the enforcement of underage
drinking laws.
Recommendation: That the City Council introduce for first reading Ordinance
No. 899, entitled:
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 24 of 29
Chief of Police Lieutenant Murakami reviewed the staff report
Council MemberArmenta stated this ordinance surfaced because of the Public Connections
Forum in which Council Member Low serves as Chair and she as Vice - Chair; she explained they
were both trying to figure out a way to get the youth off the streets, off drugs, and alcohol and find
other alternatives for them. Ms. Armenta stated she thought this was a great way to make parents
accountable for their children when they are cited and maybe it will serve as'a reality check. She
explained there are different severities of fines ranging from parenting classes to,jail time. She
added that there are currently 40 cities that have these social host ordinances and the City was not
trying to receive additional revenues as the blogs in the Tribune statted�This ordinance will make
parents accountable for their children. {
Council Member Low asked City Manager Allred to
where parents are involved in underage drinking. ,
Jean Hall — stated the ordinance makes sense but expressed .
language in the ordinance. She asked what if this happens on
sports events? Can residents be sited for-allowing underage f<
reiterated that she was concerned with th'e vaque_lanquage of
Mayor Taylor stated that sheriffs would be called fordisturbin
getting out of control. He stated that other than that he.did not
there was a peace disturbance'.for peace officersto come into
City Manager Allred
prohibition of parties c
intent of this is to deal
read thefollowwRg
or event "at his or l
hls'oi her control where, t
beverages are in the poss
prohib"itiomshall not apply
w .fr
protected 6tiy Arrticle 1, S
prohibition apply to the coi
the public when =the.minoi
W
parent wants to allow tlei
dealt with in this ordinance
being supervised by their
violation of this ordinance.
this ordinance affects parties
�
ern regarding some the
to property while watching
members at their home. She
the peade or a guest seeing a party
ae-any intrusion of privacy unless
lat'prwate property.
i if we look at sectioriti9.1.8.030 of the ordinance it emphasizes the
hering`s of young people that are drinking or are permitted to drink. The
these`types of parties that occur on regular basis nation wide. Mr. Allred
No person shatl;k
it;� nowingly suffer, permit, or host a party, gathering
of residence or other private or public property, place or premises under
vo or more, persons under the age of 21 are present, where alcoholic
?sslon of, being consumed by, or served to any underage person. This
orparties,�' gatherings or events where religious services and /or activities
Jction 4, of the California Constitution, are exercised, nor shall the
sumption of an alcoholic beverage by a minor at any place not open to
ais being supervised by his or her own parent or legal guardian." If a
child to consume a glass of wine, under their supervision that is not
This ordinance deals with people coming to a home where they are not
own parents and. are allowed to consume alcohol that would be a
This will only occurred when the sheriffs are called to a party and they
discover that underage people are consuming,alcohol. If people get belligerent with the sheriff and
the provision of the ordinance may get invoked.
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 25 of 29
Council Member Polly Low made a motion, seconded by Council Member Sandra Armenta,
to introduce Ordinance No. 899 for first reading: Vote resulted in:
Yes: Armenta, Clark, Low, Ly, Taylor
No: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None % °`•
D. Street Name Sign Design and Replacement ProgramN,
As part of the City's Capital Improvement Program the City \ Cbuncil approved
funding to implement a signage replacement program. This program is aimed at
meeting new Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requirements for signage
reflectivity on all City -owned signs (regulatory signs, warning signs, and street
name signs). According to these requirements, the City's current street name sign
background color of yellow will also not be.in compliance. Prior to developing a
replacement program for street name signs }the,Traffic Commission developed a
new design to meet thenew,reflectivity requirements
Recommendation: That this City,Council concur with the Traffic Commission's
recommendation for a new street name sign design and authorize the replacement
of signs in conjunction with street resurfacing.projedts and as funding allows.
Public Works Director Marcarello reviewed the staff report and had a PowerPoint presentation.
Mayor Taylor expressed concern' with regards to the font size being too small on the proposed
signs. f%
Mayor Pro Tem Lysuggested that taking out' The City" and just leaving the name "Rosemead" on
the street sign would help keep the`larger,font.
Mayor Taylorstated that staff recommends resurfacing projects as funding allows and asked what
the prices for the new signs`were and how many signs would the City acquire.
Mr. Marcarello stated =the City has an existing inventory that is being worked on; staff hasn't
developed an exac.tcost estimate for the street name signs or the regulatory signs, and warning
signs. He explain4that staffs tentative plan was to get a conceptual approval of the design and
then start working more on a replacement plan.
City Manager Allred stated that the cost would be absorbed by the capital improvement projects.
Mayor Taylor asked what funding source the City would have for those.
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 26 of 29
Mr. Marcarello replied that with the street resurfacing project when Garvey is resurfaced, staff will
be able to include the curb ramps, signage and striping in one lump. That will come before the
Council when considering a bid specifications and plans. He added that there is a line item in the
bid document stating "x" number of signs and so forth.
Mayor Pro Tem Ly asked how much the signs cost as well as the signs on Valley Boulevard next
to the signal lights.
Mr. Marcarello stated the estimated cost on those are $80 to $90 plus tax.and the signs next to the
traffic lights are about $650 each.
Mayor Taylor asked Mr. Marcarello if he knew how many , signs,were going to be replaced.
Mr. Marcarello stated it will be substantial, in the thousands. There are approximately 43,.,
intersections that are shared with Caltrans. Some,will require two to•four signs at intersections and
it varies with each intersection.
Council MemberArmenta commentedAhat the City will be saving some revenue without the
lighted signs that are in the major corridors. �`"�,
Mayor Taylor asked if Ms. Armenta's statement was correct...
Mr. Marcarello stated the existing signs illuminate and the proposed signs that were hung in the
pilot program do not need tobe.powered.
Mayor Pro Tem`Ly asked if Measure R funding could' be utilized for the signs.
Mr. Marcarello ieplied,yes
Mayoi Taylor expressed concern' ove'r the;possibility of spending over $100,000 for the signs.
City Manager Allred stated'that this was another State or Federal unfunded mandate that the City
would ha've!to assume over' years and gradually. phase into it.
Council Member. ' Low stated she supports the project and added that the current signs are old
and the new signs willbrighten up the city.
J : -
Mayor Taylor reiterated that the intersection signs are $650 each and that will be about $2,500 per
intersection; there are 43 intersections and 4 of those intersections will be $10,000.
Council Member Armenta asked if there was any possible way residents could buy the old signs
to subsidize the cost.
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 27 of 29
Mr. Marcarello replied that could be considered.
Jean Hall — thanked staff and the Traffic Commission for being involved with the street sign
project. She stated the new signs are easier on the eyes and will make the residential area signs
feasible to view.
Brian Lewin — stated that on page 1 or 2 of the.packet it did indicate some.modifications, such as,
adding directional and increasing the fonts. He stated this will be an improvement in the city.
Juan Nunez — asked that two street light bulbs that are out in Valley'Boulevard be repaired and
spoke to staff and Caltrans to check the lights and the street signs
Mayor Taylor asked if the cost included installation for
Mr. Marcarello replied it included the total cost. 0`
City Manager Allred stated that the funding allows for the
staff to use capital improvement projectsifunding and not
Council Member Low stated she was v
updated as she had hoped when getting
Council Member P
to concur with the
and authorize thefi
as funding allows.
a motion,
in
10. MA
A.
& CITY COUNCIL
be done gradually; it allows
that street signs were going to be
by Council Member Sandra Armenta,
ion for a new street name sign design
with street resurfacing projects and
n to Cancel the August 10, 2010 Community Development
and City Council Meetings
Due to upcoming scheduling conflicts and a lack of scheduled business items, the
City Council will consider action to cancel the August 10, 2010, Community
Development Commission and City Council Meetings. Meeting cancellations will
result in cost savings of city attorney's fees. The next regular scheduled meeting
date will be August 24, 2010. ..
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 28 of 29
Recommendation: That the City Council provide direction.
City Manager Allred reviewed the staff report.
Council Member Sandra Armenta made a motion, seconded by Council Member Polly Low,
to cancel the August 10, 2010 meeting. Vote resulted in:
Yes: Armenta, Clark, Low, Ly
No: None
Abstain: Taylor'
Absent: None
Council MemberArmenta thanked Rosemead residents for voting no on Measure CC — Charter City.
11. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:38 P.M. The next regular joint Community,_Develc
Rosemead Financing Authority, and City Council meeting is scheduled to.takE
6:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m., respectively. �..
)Gary Taylor, Mayor
ATTEST:°`•
Gloria Molleda `..
City Clerk
� F
ment Commission, the
place on August 24, 2010 at
Rosemead City Council, Community Development Commission, and Housing Development Corporation Joint Meeting
Minutes of July 27, 2010
Page 29 of 29