Loading...
2010 RRA Financial ReportI 1 I 1 1 1 1 J ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010 ' ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ' Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010 I � I L� TABLE OF CONTENTS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ' Government -wide Financial Statements Statement of Net Assets ' Statement of Activities Fund Financial Statements Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds ' Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Net Assets Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund ' Balances - Governmental Funds Reconciliation of Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the ' Statement of Activities Notes to the Basic Financial Statements ' REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ' Notes to Required Supplementary Information Low - Moderate Income Housing Set -Aside Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances — Budget and Actual Rosemead Housing Development Corporation Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances — Budget and Actual Supplementary Information: Computation of Low /Moderate Housing Fund — Excess Surplus ' Report on Compliance and Other Matters and on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards ' Schedule of Findings and Recommendations 0 Page 25 26 27 28 29 31 ' Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. 1 Board of Directors ' Rosemead Community Development Commission Rosemead, California INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ' We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities and each major fund of the Rosemead Community Development Commission (the Commission), a component unit of the City of Rosemead, California, as of and for the year ended June 30, 2010, which collectively comprise of the Commission's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Commission's ' management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United ' States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit _ also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by ' management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions. ' In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities and each major fund of the Commission as of June 30, 2010, and the respective changes in financial position thereof for ' the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. ' The Commission has not presented management's discussion and analysis which according to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America is necessary to supplement, although not required to be part of, the basic financial statements. ' The information identified in the accompanying table of contents as required supplementary information is not a required part of the basic financial statements but is supplementary information required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of ' America. We have applied certain limited procedures, which consisted principally of inquiries of management regarding the methods of measurement and presentation of the required supplementary information. However, we did not audit the information and express no opinion on it An Independent CPA Firm 2301 Dupont Drive, Suite 200 t Irvine, California 92612 949- 474 -2020 ph 949 - 263 -5520 fx ' www.mhm- pc.com INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ' We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities and each major fund of the Rosemead Community Development Commission (the Commission), a component unit of the City of Rosemead, California, as of and for the year ended June 30, 2010, which collectively comprise of the Commission's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Commission's ' management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United ' States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit _ also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by ' management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions. ' In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities and each major fund of the Commission as of June 30, 2010, and the respective changes in financial position thereof for ' the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. ' The Commission has not presented management's discussion and analysis which according to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America is necessary to supplement, although not required to be part of, the basic financial statements. ' The information identified in the accompanying table of contents as required supplementary information is not a required part of the basic financial statements but is supplementary information required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of ' America. We have applied certain limited procedures, which consisted principally of inquiries of management regarding the methods of measurement and presentation of the required supplementary information. However, we did not audit the information and express no opinion on it I Board of Directors Rosemead Community Development Commission Page Two Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that ' collectively comprise the Rosemead Community Development Commission's basic financial statements. The supplementary information is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplementary information has ' been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, are fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated December 20, 2010 on our consideration of the Commission's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, ' grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be considered in assessing the results of our audit. �p 6f h °� 4 W.0 AC 1 I' (. ' Irvine, California December 20, 2010 1 1 ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Statement of Net Assets June 30, 2010 1 1 l 1 Assets Cash and investments (note 2) Receivables: Accounts Accrued interest Due from City of Rosemead Land held for resale Deferred charges Capital assets, net (note 5) Land Other capital assets, net Total assets Liabilities and Net Assets Liabilities: Accounts payable Deposits payable Due to City of Rosemead Accrued interest payable Noncurrent liabilities (note 6): Due within one year Due in more than one year Total liabilities Net assets: Restricted for: Low - moderate income housing Unrestricted Total net assets See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements. 3 $ 10,986,838 539,293 27,740 728,728 4,407,616 420,835 2,425,898 13,222,983 32,759,931 446,913 36,180 1,309,283 595,826 994,802 36,230,740 39,613,744 6,462,434 (13,316,247) $ (6,853,813) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Statement of Activities Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2010 General revenues: Program Revenues Property taxes 4,806,091 Operating Capital 121,136 Other general revenues 18,746 Charges for _ Contributions Contributions Governmental Change in net assets Expenses Services and Grants and Grants Activities Governmental activities: $ (6,853,813) Community development $ 4,603,129 , 420,006` (4,183,123) Interest expense 1,491,717 - (1,491,717) Total governmental activities $ 6,094,846 420,006 (5,674,840) General revenues: Taxes: Property taxes 4,806,091 Investment income 121,136 Other general revenues 18,746 Total general revenues 4,945,973 Change in net assets (728,867) Net assets at beginning of year (6,124,946) Net assets at end of year $ (6,853,813) See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements. E I ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds June 30, 2010 Low - Moderate Rosemead 1,984,489 78,416 - 2,062,905 - Income Housing - - 1,092,150 1.092 150 6,462,434 78,416 2,803,908 5,499,766 14,844,524 Housing Development Debt Capital Set -Aside Corporation Service Projects Total $ 1,289,449 101,396 7,187,527 2,408,466 10,986,838 - 13,777 468,654 56,862 539,293 2,474 - 16,626 8,640 27,740 718,929 - 9,799 726,728 - 4,407,616 4,407,616 4,477,945 - 4,477,945 $ 6,488,797 115,173 7,672,807 6,891,383 21,168,160 1 Assets: Cash and investments Receivables: Accounts Accrued interest ' Due from City of Rosemead Land held for resale Advances to other funds (note 4) ' Total assets ' Liabilities and Fund Balance Liabilities: Accounts payable ' Deposits payable Due to City of Rosemead Deferred revenue ' Advances from other funds (note 4) Total liabilities ' Fund balance: Reserved for: Land held for resale ' Advances to other funds Unreserved, reported in: Special revenue funds Debt service funds Capital projects funds Total fund balance t Total liabilities and fund balance 1 I 1 $ 2,696 577 390,954 52,686 446,913 - 36,180 - - 36,180 23,667 - 1,285,616 1,309,283 - - 53,315 53,315 4,477,945 - 4,477,945 26,363 36,757 4,868,899 1,391,617 6,323,636 4,407,616 4,407,616 4,477,945 - 4,477,945 1,984,489 78,416 - 2,062,905 - - 2,803,908 - 2,803,908 - - - 1,092,150 1.092 150 6,462,434 78,416 2,803,908 5,499,766 14,844,524 $ 6,488,797 115,173 7,672,807 6,891,383 21,168,160 See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements. 5 I ' ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Governmental Funds ' Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Net Assets ' June 30, 2010 I Fund balances of governmental funds $ 14,844,524 t Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of net assets are different because: ' Capital assets, net of depreciation, have not been included as financial resources in governmental fund activity. Capital assets 22,246,786 ' Accumulated depreciation (6,597,905) Long -term debt has not been included in the governmental fund activity. ' Advances from City (2,497,920) Bonds payable (34,490,000) Unamortized bond premiums (237,622) ' Cost associated with the issuance of debt are capitalized and amortized in the statement of net assets and expensed in the governmental funds. ' Deferred charges 420,835 Accrued interest payable for the current portion of interest due on t bonds payable has not been reported in the governmental funds. (595,826) Revenues that are measurable but not available. Amounts are recorded as deferred revenue under the modified accrual basis of accounting. 53,315 Net assets of governmental activities t 11 1 ' See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements. 6 I 1 11 1 1 1 ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Governmental Funds Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2010 Revenues: Taxes Rental income Investment income Other Total revenues Expenditures: Current: General government Public safety Public works Community development Debt service: Principal Interest and fiscal charges Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in (note 4) Transfers out (note 4) Transfers to City of Rosemead Total other financing sources (uses) Change in fund balances Fund balances at beginning of year Fund balances at end of year Low - Moderate Rosemead 1,857,285 3,032,766 Income Housing (2,782,766) - (3,032,766)' Housing Development Debt Capital (245,260) Set -Aside Corporation Service Projects Total $ - 6,243,948 1,612,025 6,243,948 - 420,006 - - 420,006 10,308 66 67,878 42,884 121,136 - - 78,416 18,746 18,746 10,308 420,072 6,311,826 61,630 6,803,836 731,839 106,884 1,452,328 2,291,051 - 975,509 - 975,509 - 1,687,774 1,687,774 189,359 - 189,359 945,000 945,000 - - 1,501,667 - 1,501,667 189,359 731,839 3,529,060 3,140,102 7,590,360 (179,051) (311,767) 2,782,766 (3,078,472) (786,524) 925,481 250,000 1,857,285 3,032,766 (250,000) - (2,782,766) - (3,032,766)' - (245,260) (245,260) 675,481 250,000 (2,782,766) 1,612,025 (245,260) 496,430 (61,767) - (1,466,447) (1,031,784) 5,966,004 140,183 2,803,908 6,966,213 15,876,308 $ 6,462,434 78,416 2,803,908 5,499,766 14,844,524 See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements. 7 Net changes in fund balances of governmental funds $ (1,031,784) Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of ' activities is different because: Governmental funds report capital outlay as expenditures. However, in ' the statement of activities, the cost of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives as depreciation expense. This is the amount by which ' capital outlays exceeded depreciation in the current period. Depreciation expense (705,348) Bond issuance costs, premiums, discounts, and similar items are recorded as expenditures in governmental funds when debt is first issued, whereas ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION these amounts are deferred and amortized in the statement of activities. Governmental Funds ' Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, ' and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds Repayment of bond principal is an expenditure in the governmental funds, to the Statement of Activities ' Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2010 Net changes in fund balances of governmental funds $ (1,031,784) Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of ' activities is different because: Governmental funds report capital outlay as expenditures. However, in ' the statement of activities, the cost of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives as depreciation expense. This is the amount by which ' capital outlays exceeded depreciation in the current period. Depreciation expense (705,348) 1 ' See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements. Bond issuance costs, premiums, discounts, and similar items are recorded as expenditures in governmental funds when debt is first issued, whereas 8 these amounts are deferred and amortized in the statement of activities. ' This amount is the net offset of the differences. 32,372 Repayment of bond principal is an expenditure in the governmental funds, ' but the repayment reduces long -term liabilities in the statement of net assets. 945,000 The statement of net assets includes accrued interest on long term debt. (22,422) ' Revenues that are measurable but not available. Amounts are not recorded as revenue under the modified accrual basis of accounting. 53,315 Change in net assets of governmental activities 1 1 ' See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements. 8 I ' ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Notes to the Basic Financial Statements ' Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2010 t (1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (a) Reporting Entity The Rosemead Redevelopment Agency was established in June 1972 pursuant ' to State of California Health and Safety Code Section 33000 entitled Community Redevelopment Law. The Agency's name was changed to the Rosemead Community Development Commission (the Commission) in January 2002. Its ' purpose is to finance street, park and utility improvements. It also acquires and constructs major capital facilities all within the Rosemead Project Area No. 1. The Commission is a blended component unit of the City of Rosemead, California, (the City) and is included in the basic financial statements of the City. The financial statements contain information for the Commission only. The City's financial statements can be obtained from the Finance Department of the City. ' Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 14. The Financial Reporting Entity, defines the reporting entity as the primary government ' and those component units for which the primary government is, or has the potential to be, financially accountable. Financial accountability is defined as appointment of a voting majority of the component unit's Board and either (a) the ' primary government has the ability to impose its will or (b) the possibility that the component unit will provide a financial benefit to, or impose a financial burden on, the primary government. ' Based upon the above criteria, the Rosemead Housing Development Corporation (the Corporation), is a blended component unit of the Commission as the Commission's governing board serves as the governing board of the ' Corporation. Since the City Council of the City also serves as the Board of Directors of the ' Commission, the City, in effect, has the ability to influence and control operations. Therefore, the City has oversight responsibility for the Commission. Accordingly, the Commission is a blended component unit of the City. ' (b) Basis of Accounting and Measurement Focus The basic financial statements of the Commission are composed of the following: Government -wide financial statements Fund financial statements ' . Notes to the basic financial statements 1 ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Notes to the Basic Financial Statements ' (Continued) ' (1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, (Continued) ' (b) Basis of Accounting and Measurement Focus, (Continued) Government -wide Financial Statements ' Government -wide financial statements display information about the reporting government as a whole, except for its fiduciary activities. These statements ' include separate columns for the governmental and business -type activities of the primary government (including its blended component units), as well as its discreetly presented component units. The Community Development ' Commission of the City of Rosemead has no business -type activities or discretely presented component units. Eliminations have been made in the Statement of Activities so that certain allocated expenses are recorded only once (by the function to which they were allocated). However, general government expenses have not been allocated as indirect expenses to the various functions of the Commission. ' Government -wide financial statements are presented using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Under the economic resources measurement focus, all (both current and long -term) ' economic resources and obligations of the reporting government are reported in the government -wide financial statements. Basis of accounting refers to when revenues and expenditures are recognized in the accounts and reported in the ' financial statements. Under the accrual basis of accounting, revenues, expenses, gains, losses, assets, and liabilities resulting from exchange and exchange -like transactions are recognized when the exchange takes place. Revenues, expenses, gains, losses, assets, and liabilities resulting from nonexchange ' transaction are recognized in accordance with the requirements of GASB Statement No. 33. ' Program revenues include charges for services and payments made by parties outside of the reporting government's citizenry if that money is restricted to a particular program. Program revenues are netted with program expenses in the ' statement of activities to present the net cost of each program. Amounts paid to acquire capital assets are capitalized as assets in the government -wide financial statements, rather than reported as expenditure. ' Proceeds of long -term debt are recorded as a liability in the government -wide financial statements, rather than as other financing source. Amounts paid to reduce long -term indebtedness of the reporting government are reported as a I reduction of the related liability, rather than as an expenditure 1 10 I 1 ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Notes to the Basic Financial Statements 1 (Continued) 1 (1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, (Continued) 1 (b) Basis of Accounting and Measurement Focus, (Continued) Fund Financial Statements 1 The underlying accounting system of the Commission is organized and operated on the basis of separate funds, each of which is considered to be a separate 1 accounting entity. The operations of each fund are accounted for with a separate set of self - balancing accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenues and expenditures or expenses, as appropriate. Governmental 1 resources are allocated to and accounted for in individual funds based upon the purposes for which they are to be spent and the means by which spending activities are controlled. 1 Fund financial statements for the primary government's governmental, proprietary, and fiduciary funds are presented after the government -wide financial statements. These statements display information about major funds 1 individually and nonmajor funds in the aggregate for governmental and enterprise funds. Fiduciary statements include financial information for fiduciary funds and similar component units. Fiduciary funds primarily represent assets held by the 1 Commission in a custodial capacity for other individuals or organizations. The Commission has no enterprise funds or fiduciary funds. Governmental Funds 1 In the fund financial statements, governmental funds and agency funds are presented using the modified - accrual basis of accounting. Their revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available as net current assets. Measurable means that the amounts can be estimated, or otherwise determined. Available means that the amounts were collected during the reporting period or 1 soon enough thereafter to be available to finance the expenditures accrued for the reporting period. The Commission uses a sixty day availability period. Revenue recognition is subject to the measurable and available criteria for the 1 governmental funds in the fund financial statements. Exchange transactions are recognized as revenues in the period in which they are earned (i.e., the related goods or services are provided). Locally imposed derived tax revenues are 1 recognized as revenues in the period in which the underlying exchange transaction upon which they are based takes place. Imposed non - exchange transactions are recognized as revenues in the period for which they were imposed. If the period of use is not specified, they are recognized as revenues 1 when an enforceable legal claim to the revenues arises or when they are received, whichever occurs first. Government - mandated and voluntary non - exchange transactions are recognized as revenues when all applicable eligibility i requirements have been met 1 11 1 t 1 (1) 1 1 1 ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. (Continued) (b) Basis of Accounting and Measurement Focus, (Continued) Governmental Funds, (Continued) In the fund financial statements, governmental funds are presented using the current financial resources measurement focus. This means that only current assets and current liabilities are generally included on their balance sheets. The reported fund balance (net current assets) is considered to be a measure of "available spendable resources." Governmental fund operating statements present increases (revenues and other financing sources) and decreases (expenditures and other financing uses) in net current assets. Accordingly, they are said to present a summary of sources and uses of "available spendable resources' during a period. Non- current portions of long -term receivables due to governmental funds are reported on their balance sheets in spite of their spending measurement focus. Special reporting treatments are used to indicate, however, that they should not be considered "available spendable resources," since they do not represent net current assets. Recognition of governmental fund type revenues represented by noncurrent receivables are deferred until they become current receivables. Noncurrent portions of other long -term receivables are offset by fund balance reserve accounts. Because of their spending measurement focus, expenditure recognition for governmental fund types excludes amounts represented by noncurrent liabilities. Since they do not affect net current assets, such long -term amounts are not recognized as governmental fund type expenditures or fund liabilities. Amounts expended to acquire capital assets are recorded as expenditures in the year that resources were expended, rather than as fund assets. The proceeds of long -term debt are recorded as an other financing source rather than as a fund liability. Amounts paid to reduce long -term indebtedness are reported as fund expenditures. When both restricted and unrestricted resources are combined in a fund, expenses are considered to be paid first from restricted resources, and then from unrestricted resources. 12 ' ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY- DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued) (1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, (Continued) (c) Property Taxes Real property taxes are levied for the period from July 1 to June 30 against ' property owners of record on March 1. The taxes are due in two installments, on December 10 and April 10, and become delinquent after December 10 and April 10, respectively. Under the provisions of NCGA Interpretation 3, property tax t revenue is recognized in the fiscal year for which the taxes have been levied, provided it is collected within sixty days of the end of the fiscal year in the fund financial statements. t (d) Major Funds ' The Commission reports the following major governmental funds: Low- Moderate Income Housing Set -Aside Fund — Accounts for the 20% of gross ' property tax increment revenue received by the Commission to fund future projects involving the replacement or rehabilitation of low- and moderate - income housing within City limits. ' Rosemead Housing Development Corporation (the Corporation) — Accounts for the construction and financing of low- and moderate - income housing. ' Debt Service Fund — Accounts for the accumulation of resources for the payment of principal, interest and related costs associated with all long -term debt of the Commission. ' Capital Projects Fund — Accounts for the financial resources to be used for the improvement and rehabilitation of the community redevelopment project areas ' and acquisition or construction of major capital facilities within the Commission. (e) Cash and Investments ' Cash includes amounts in demand and time deposits. Investments are reported in the accompanying balance sheet at fair value, except for certain money market ' contracts that are reported at cost because they are not transferable and they have terms that are not affected by changes in market interest rates. Changes in fair value that occur during a fiscal year are recognized as ' investment income reported for that fiscal year. Investment income includes interest earnings, changes in fair value and any gains or losses realized upon the liquidation, maturity or sale of investments. 1 13 ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Notes to the Basic Financial Statements ' (Continued) (1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) ' (f) Capital Assets ' Capital assets, which include land, buildings, equipment and infrastructure assets (e.g., roads, bridges, traffic signals and similar items), are reported in the government -wide financial statements. Capital assets are defined by the Commission as assets with an initial individual cost of more than $10,000 and an estimated useful life in excess of one year. Such assets are recorded at historical cost or estimated historical cost if purchased or constructed. Donated capital assets are recorded at estimated fair market value at the date of donation. ' The cost of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of an asset or materially extend an asset's useful life are not capitalized. Construction ' in progress costs are transferred to their respective fixed asset category upon completion. ' Depreciation is charged to operations using the straight -line method based on the estimated useful life of an asset. The estimated useful lives of depreciable assets are as follows: ' Buildings 50 years Improvements other than buildings 15 years ' Furniture and office equipment 7 years Streets 30 years Sidewalks 40 years Vehicles 5 years (g) Long -term Obligations ' Long -term debt and other long -term obligations are reported as liabilities in the applicable governmental activities statement of net assets. Bond premiums, discounts and issuance costs are deferred and amortized over the life of the ' bonds. Bonds payable are reported net of the applicable bond premium or discount. Bond issuance costs are reported as deferred charges and amortized over the term of the related debt. ' In the fund financial statements, governmental fund types recognize bond premiums, discounts and issuance costs during the current period, the face ' amount of debt issued is reported as other financing sources. Premiums received on debt issuances are reported as other financing sources, while discounts on debt issuances are reported as other financing uses. Issuance costs, whether or not withheld from the actual debt proceeds received, are reported as debt service ' expenditures. 1 14 I ' ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued) (1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, (Continued (h) Fund Equity t In the fund financial statements, governmental funds report reservations of fund balances for amounts that are not available for appropriation or are legally ' restricted by outside parties for use for a specific purpose. Designations of fund balances represent tentative management plans and are subject to change. ' (i) Low - Moderate Income Housing Set -Aside On October 9, 1991 the Commission prepaid its housing obligation in the amount of $6,813,850 from proceeds from its 1987 tax allocation notes. This pre- ' payment was restructured in 1993 along with the 1993 series tax allocation bonds. As a result, the Commission's housing obligation has been reduced by $469,142 per year until the 2021 -22 fiscal year. ' (j) Use of Estimates ' The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates. (k) Land Held for Resale ' Land acquired by the Commission for future development and sale is valued at the lower of cost or net realizable- value and is offset by a reservation of fund balance to indicate that the assets do not constitute available spendable resources. (2) Cash and Investments ' Cash and investments as of June 30, 2010 are classified in the accompanying financial statements as follows: Statement of net assets: Cash and investments $10,986,838 ' Total cash and investments $10 986 838 Cash and investments as of June 30, 2010 consist of the following: ' Deposits with financial institutions $ 423,860 Investments 10,562,978 ' Total cash and investments $10 986 838 ' 15 I [� 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued) (2) Cash and Investments, (Continued) Investments Authorized by the California Government Code and the Citv's Investment Policy The table below identifies the investment types that are authorized for the City by the California Government Code and the City's investment policy. The table also identifies certain provisions of the California Government Code (or the City's investment policy, if more restrictive) that address interest rate risk, credit risk, and concentration of credit risk. This table does not address investments of debt proceeds held by bond trustee that are governed by the provisions of debt agreements of the City, rather than the general provisions of the California Government Code or the City's investment policy. * Based on state law requirements or investment policy requirements, whichever is more restrictive. 16 Authorized by Maximum Maximum Investment Types Investment Maximum Percentage Investment Authorized by State Law Policy Maturity* of Portfolio* In One Issuer* Local Agency Bonds No 5 years None None U.S. Treasury Obligations Yes 5 years None None U.S. Agency Securities Yes 5 years None None Banker's Acceptances Yes 180 days 40% 30% Commercial Paper Yes 270 days 25% 10% Negotiable Certificates of Deposit Yes 1 year 30% None Repurchase Agreements No 1 year None None Reverse Repurchase Agreements No 92 days 20% of base value None Medium -Term Notes Yes 5 years 10% None Mutual Funds Yes N/A 20% 10% Money Market Mutual Funds Yes N/A 20% 10% Mortgage Pass- Through Securities No 5 years 20% None County Pooled Investment Funds No N/A None None Local Agency Investment Fund Yes N/A None None JPA Pools (other investment pools) No N/A None None * Based on state law requirements or investment policy requirements, whichever is more restrictive. 16 I ' (2) Cash and Investments, (Continued) ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Notes to the Basic Financial Statements ' (Continued) ' (2) Cash and Investments, (Continued) 1 I 11 17 Investments Authorized by Debt Agreements Investment of debt proceeds held by bond trustee are governed by provisions of the debt agreements, rather than the general provisions of the California Government Code or the ' City's investment policy. The table below identifies the investment types that are authorized for investments held by bond trustee. The table also identifies certain provisions of these debt agreements that address interest rate risk, credit risk, and ' concentration of credit risk. Maximum Maximum Authorized Maximum Percentage Investment ' Investment Type Maturity Allowed In One Issuer Local Agency Bonds None None None ' U.S. Treasury Obligations None None None U.S. Agency Securities None None None Banker's Acceptances 1 year None None Commercial Paper 1 year None 10% Repurchase Agreements 30 days None None Money Market Mutual Funds N/A 20% 10% Local Agency Investment Fund N/A None None ' Investment Agreements N/A None None Certificates of Deposits 1 year None None ' Disclosures Relating to Interest Rate Risk ' Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates will adversely affect the fair value of an investment. Generally, the longer the maturity of an investment, the greater the sensitivity of its fair value to changes in market interest rates. One of the ways that the Agency manages its exposure to interest rate risk is by purchasing a combination of ' shorter term and longer term investments and by timing cash flows from maturities so that a portion of the portfolio is maturing or coming close to maturity evenly over time as ' necessary to provide the cash flow and liquidity needed for operations. 1 I 11 17 I ' ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Notes to the Basic Financial Statements ' (Continued) 1 (2) Cash and Investments, (Continued) ' Disclosures Relating to Interest Rate Risk, (Continued) ' Information about the sensitivity of the fair values of the Agency's investments (including investments held by bond trustee) to market interest rate fluctuations is provided by the following table that shows the distribution of the Agency's investments by maturity: ' Remaining Maturing (in Months) 12 Months 13 to 24 25 to 60 More Than ' Investment Type Or Less Months Months 60 Months State investment pool $ 9,419,924 9,419,924 - Held by bond trustee: ' Investment agreement 1,143,054 - 1,143,054 Total $10,562 4�1 92 1 4 ' Disclosures Relating to Credit Risk ' Generally, credit risk is the risk that an issuer of an investment will not fulfill its obligation to the holder of the investment. This is measured by the assignment of a rating by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization. Presented below is the minimum rating ' required by (where applicable) the California Government Code, the City's investment policy, or debt agreements, and the actual rating as of year end for each investment type. ' Minimum Exempt Rating as of Year End Legal From Not ' Investment Type Rating Disclosure AAA Rated State investment pool $ 9,419,924 N/A 9,419,924 Held by bond trustee: ' Investment agreement 1,143,054 N/A 1,143,054 Total $10 10.562.978 1 1 1 1 18 I ' ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Notes to the Basic Financial Statements 1 (Continued) ' (2) Cash and Investments (Continued) ' Concentration of Credit Risk The investment policy contains no limitations on the amount that can be invested in any ' one issuer beyond that stipulated by the California Government Code. Investments in any one issuer (other than U.S. Treasury securities, mutual funds, and external investment pools) that represent 5% or more of total Agency investments are as follows: ' Issuer Investment Type Reported Amount AIG Match Funding Corp Investment agreement $ 1,143,054 Custodial Credit Risk ' Custodial credit risk for deposits is the risk that, in the event of the failure of a depository financial institution, a government will not be able to recover its deposits or will not be able to recover collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The custodial t credit risk for investments is the risk that, in the event of the failure of the counterparty (e.g., broker - dealer) to a transaction, a government will not be able to recover the value of its investment or collateral securities that are in the possession of another party. The California Government Code and the City's investment policy do not contain legal or policy ' requirements that would limit the exposure to custodial credit risk for deposits or investments, other than the following provision for deposits: The California Government Code requires that a financial institution secure deposits made by state or local ' governmental units by pledging securities in an undivided collateral pool held by a depository regulated under state law (unless so waived by the governmental unit). The market value of the pledged securities in the collateral pool must equal at least 110% of the total amount deposited by the public agencies. California law also allows financial ' institutions to secure Agency deposits by pledging first trust deed mortgage notes having a value of 150% of the secured public deposits. As of June 30, 2010, the Commission had no deposits with financial institutions in excess of federal depository insurance limits. ' For investments identified herein as held by bond trustee, the bond trustee selects the investment under the terms of the applicable trust agreement, acquires the investment, ' and holds the investment on behalf of the reporting government. Investment in State Investment Pool ' The Agency is a voluntary participant in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) that is regulated by the California Government Code under the oversight of the Treasurer of the State of California. The fair value of the Agency's investment in this pool is reported in the ' accompanying financial statements at amounts based upon the Agency's pro -rata share of the fair value provided by LAIF for the entire LAIF portfolio (in relation to the amortized cost of that portfolio). The balance available for withdrawal is based on the accounting ' records maintained by LAIF, which are recorded on an amortized cost basis. 1 19 1 Amount 1 1 $ 925,481 (A) 1 Debt Service Fund (3) Low - Moderate Income Housing Set -Aside 250,000 1 $ 3.032.766 ' (4) 1 1 1 t ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued) Operating Lease The Corporation entered into a 55 -year lease agreement with the City for the use of the Angelus Senior Housing facility for $60,000 annually, expiring June 2047. Total lease commitments remaining are $2,220,000 for the Angelus Senior Housing facility at June 30, 2010. The Corporation also entered into a 55 -year lease agreement with the City for use of the Garvey Senior Housing facility for $72,000 annually, expiring November 2057. Total lease commitments remaining are $3,414,000 for the Garvey Senior Housing facility at June 30, 2010. The Corporation paid $60,000 and $72,000 in lease payments to the City during the year ended June 30, 2010 for the Angelus and Garvey Senior Housing facilities, respectively. Interfund Activity Noncurrent Interfund Receivable and Payable Balances Under State law, the Commission is required to set aside a portion of its property tax increment revenue for low -and moderate - income housing. The Commission has made findings that, for the years ended June 30, 1986 through 1991, it was allowed to defer funding of the set - aside. The set -aside amounts incurred during the fiscal years ended June 30, 1994, 1995 and 1996 were also deferred until the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023, as provided by the Commission's adoption of the housing deficit repayment plan. As of June 30, 2010, the accumulated set -aside amount not yet funded was approximately $4,477,945. As required by law, the Commission devised a plan to fund the accumulating amount. Interfund transfers were as follows for the year ended June 30, 2010: Transferin Low - Moderate Income Housing Set -Aside Redevelopment Agency Capital Projects Fund Rosemead Housing Development Corporation Transfer Out Amount Redevelopment Agency Debt Service Fund $ 925,481 (A) Redevelopment Agency Debt Service Fund 1,857,285 (B) Low - Moderate Income Housing Set -Aside 250,000 Total $ 3.032.766 The following describes the significant transfers in and transfers out included in the financial statements: (A) To record the low and moderate income housing set -aside for the year ended June 30, 2010. (B) To transfer remaining tax increment net of pass through payments, 20% set aside and debt service payments to the Capital Projects Fund. 20 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued) (5) Capital Assets Capital asset activity for the year ended June 30, 2010 is as follows: Balance at Balance at June 30, 2009 Increases Decreases June 30, 2010 Governmental activities: Capital assets not being depreciated: Land $ 2,425,898 2,425,898 Total capital assets, not being depreciated 2,425,898 2,425,898 Capital assets being depreciated: Buildings and improvements 18,273,719 18,273,719 Vehicles 93,280 93,280 Furniture and office equipment 1,453.889 1,453,889 Total capital assets being depreciated 19,820,888 19,820,888 Less accumulated depreciation for: Buildings and improvements (4,415,776) (655,397) (5,071,173) Vehicles (89,076) (4,204) (93,280) Furniture and office equipment (1,387,705 4( 5,747 (1,433,452 Total accumulated depreciation (5.892,557 (705,348) (6,597.905 Total capital assets being depreciated, net 13.928,331 (705,348) 13,222,983 Governmental activities capital assets, net $16.354.229 70 34) 15.648.881 Depreciation expense was charged entirely to the community development function of the Commission for the year ended June 30, 2010. 21 I ' ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Notes to the Basic Financial Statements ' (Continued) (6) Long -Term Debt ' Long -term debt consists of the following at June 30, 2010: Balance at Balance at Due within Due Beyond June 30, 2009 Additions Reductions June 30. 2010 One Year One Year Governmental activities: ' Advances from City $ 2,497,920 - - 2,497,920 - 2,497,920 Tax allocation bonds, Series 2006A 11,570,000 870,000 10,700,000 900,000 9,800,000 Tax allocation bonds, ' Series 2006B 23,865,000 - 75,000 23,790,000 75,000 23,715,000 Unamortized bond premiums 257,424 - 19,802 237,622 19.802 217,820 838 190 344 —96A&0-2 37 225 542 994,802 36 230 740 Advances from City In November 2007 the City of Rosemead's General Fund advanced to the Rosemead Community Development Commission $2,497,920 at an interest rate of 5.25% to be ' paid back over 20 years. Accrued interest is payable in annual installments of $131,141 beginning on September 28, 2008, and continuing until September 28, 2027, at which time the remaining principal and interest shall be due in full. The amount ' outstanding at June 30, 2010 is $2,497,920. Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2006A ' On March 9, 2006, the Commission issued tax allocation bonds in the amount of $14,005,000 (Series 2006A) to: (1) refund a portion of the Commission's outstanding Series 1993A bonds and (2) to finance redevelopment activity in Redevelopment ' Project Area No.1. The bonds bear interest ranging from 3.25% to 5.00% and mature in annual installments of $780,000 to $1,250,000 on various dates through October 1, 2022. The Commission purchased a surety bond in lieu of cash reserve in the amount of $1,323,238. Portions of the bonds are subject to early redemption, at the option of ' the Commission, beginning October 1, 2017. Bond premiums are amortized over the life of the bonds. The unamortized balance as of June 30, 2010 was $237,622. A surety bond has been acquired to satisfy the reserve requirements. As of June 30, ' 2010 the outstanding balance was $10,700,000. Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2006B ' In December 2006, the Commission issued $24,230,000 in Project Area No. 1 Tax Allocation Bonds. The bonds mature in amounts ranging from $70,000 to $1,430,000 with interest rates ranging from 3.25% to 4.25% through October 1, 2025. The net ' proceeds were used to refund the remaining $23,095,000 amount outstanding on the 1993 Tax Allocation Bonds. The securities were deposited in an irrevocable trust with an escrow agent to provide for all future debt service payments on the 1993 Bonds. As ' a result, the entire 1993 Bonds are considered to be defeased and the liability for those bonds has been removed from the government -wide financial statements. 22 1 1 ' (6) 1 1 1 ' (8) ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued) Long -Term Debt (Continued) A surety bond has been acquired to satisfy the reserve requirements. As of June 30, 2010, $23,790,000 of the bonds are outstanding. At June 30, 2010, debt service requirements to maturity for governmental activities long- term debt are as follows: Risk Management The Commission is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts; thefts of, damage to and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; and natural disasters. The Commission, through the City, carries commercial liability insurance coverage. The Commission carries no insurance coverage for natural disasters. Since the Commission does not have any employees (it uses employees from the City), it is not liable for injury to employees, workers' compensation, or employee health and accident insurance. The City has had no reductions in insurance coverage, nor did the City have any settlements that were in excess of insurance coverage in any of the three preceding years. Subsequent Event In July 2010 the Commission issued tax allocation bonds in the amount of $11,230,000. The bonds were issued to provide funds to finance the costs of certain redevelopment projects within the Merged Project Area including infrastructure improvements, and the acquisition of land. Principal and interest payments are due on June 1 and December 1 each year until the bonds mature in 2023. 23 2006A Tax Allocation Bonds 2006B Tax Allocation Bonds Year Ending June 30 Principal Interest Principal Interest 2011 $ 900,000 449,856 75,000 1,035,049 2012 930,000 419,481 80,000 1,032,336 2013 965,000 386,931 80,000 1,029,536 2014 1,000,000 353,156 85,000 1,026,649 2015 1,035,000 313,156 85,000 1,023,674 2016 -2020 4,965,000 768,155 1,500,000 5,046,903 2021 -2023 905,000 75,694 6,360,000 4,181,211 2025 -2029 - - 7,850,000 2,646,266 2030 -2034 - 7,675,000 701,955 X10.700.000 2.766 429 23 790.000 17,723 579 Risk Management The Commission is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts; thefts of, damage to and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; and natural disasters. The Commission, through the City, carries commercial liability insurance coverage. The Commission carries no insurance coverage for natural disasters. Since the Commission does not have any employees (it uses employees from the City), it is not liable for injury to employees, workers' compensation, or employee health and accident insurance. The City has had no reductions in insurance coverage, nor did the City have any settlements that were in excess of insurance coverage in any of the three preceding years. Subsequent Event In July 2010 the Commission issued tax allocation bonds in the amount of $11,230,000. The bonds were issued to provide funds to finance the costs of certain redevelopment projects within the Merged Project Area including infrastructure improvements, and the acquisition of land. Principal and interest payments are due on June 1 and December 1 each year until the bonds mature in 2023. 23 I i 1 Required Supplementary Information 1 I LJ 11 1 I 1 24 11 1 1 1 rl ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Notes to Required Supplementary Information Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010 (1) Budgetary Information Annual budgets are adopted on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for the governmental fund. All annual appropriations lapse at fiscal year end. On or before the last day in March of each year, the Commission submits a request for appropriations to the City Manager so that a budget may be prepared. Before the first Thursday of June 30, the proposed budget is presented to the Commission's governing board for review. The governing board holds public hearings and a final budget must be prepared and adopted no later than June 30. The appropriated budget is prepared by fund, function and department. The Commission's department heads, with approval of the Finance Director and City Manager, may make transfers of appropriations within a department and between departments within a fund. Transfers of appropriations between funds must be approved by the governing board. The legal level of budgetary control (i.e., the level at which expenditures may not legally exceed appropriations) is the fund level. The governing board made several supplemental budgetary appropriations throughout the year. The supplemental budgetary appropriations made in the governmental funds are detailed in the required supplementary information. Encumbrance accounting is employed in the governmental funds. Encumbrances (e.g., purchase orders, contracts) outstanding at each year end are reported as reservations of fund balances and do not constitute expenditures or liabilities because the commitments will be re- appropriated and honored during the subsequent year. 25 ' ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Low- Moderate Income Housing Set -Aside ' Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2010 11 11 I Revenues: Investment income Total revenues Expenditures: Current: Community development Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in Transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) Change in fund balances Fund balance at beginning of year Fund balance at end of year Variance Final Positive Budget Actual (Negative) $ 10,308 10,308 10,308 10,308 354,339 189,359 164,980 354,339 189,359 164,980 (354,339) (179,051) 175,288 925,481 925,481 (250,000) (250,000) - (250,000) 675,481 925,481 (604,339) 496,430 1,100,769 5,966,004 5,966,004 $ 5,361,665 6,462,434 1,100,769 26 ' ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Rosemead Housing Development Corporation ' Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2010 1 ' Revenues: (88,900) Intergovernmental 140,183 Interest income ' Total revenues Expenditures: ' Current: General government ' Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of ' revenues over (under) expenditures ' Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in E 1 1 Total other financing sources (uses) Change in fund balances Fund balance at beginning of year Fund balance at end of year Variance Final Positive Budget Actual (Negative $,422,300 420,006 (2,294) 66 66 422,300 420,072 (2,228) 761,200 731,839 29,361 761,200 731,839 29,361 (338,900) (311,767) 27,133 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 - (88,900) (61,767) 27,133 140,183 140,183 - $ 51,283 78,416 27,133 27 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Computation of Low /Moderate Housing Fund - Excess Surplus June 30, 2010 Fund Balance - June 30, 2010 $ 6,462,434 Less Unavailable Amounts: Advances to Other Funds (4,477,945) Available Low /Moderate Income Housing Funds 1,984,489 Limitation (Greater of $1,000,000 or Four Years Set - Aside): Set -aside for last four years 2009-2010 925,481 2008-2009 928,000 2007-2008 985,195 2006-2007 1,019,082 Total set -aside for last four years 3,857,758 Base limitation 1,000,000 Greater Amount 3,857,758 Computed Excess Surplus - June 30, 2010 $ 28 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. An Independent CPA Firm 2301 Dupont Drive, Suite 200 Irvine, California 92612 949- 474 -2020 ph 949 - 263 -5520 fx www.mhm- pc.conn Board of Directors Community Development Commission of the City of Rosemead Rosemead, California REPORT ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS AND ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS We have audited the financial statements of the Community Development Commission of the City of Rosemead (Commission), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2010, which collectively comprise the Commission's basic financial statements and have issued our report thereon dated December 20, 2010. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Commission's financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. Such provisions included those provisions of laws and regulations identified in the Guidelines for Comptroller Audits of California Redevelopment Agencies, issued by the State Controller and as interpreted in the Suggested Auditing Procedures for Accomplishing Compliance Audits of California Redevelopment Agencies, issued by the Governmental Accounting and Auditing Committee of the California Society of Certified Public Accountants. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The result of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. However, we noted an other matter involving compliance with respect to the items tested, the Commission complied, in all material respects, with the provisions referred to in the preceding paragraph, except for the instance that is described as follows: Health & Safety Code §33080.1 requires Agencies to annually report on their Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund and housing activities. During our review of this annual report it was noted that certain amounts being reported for fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 materially did not agree to the Commissions' audited financial statements. 29 I ' Board of Directors Community Development Commission of the City of Rosemead Rosemead, California ' Page Two ' Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit, we considered the Commission's internal control over ' financial reporting as a basis for designing our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Commission's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Commission's internal ' control over financial reporting. Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the preceding ' paragraph and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be deficiencies, significant deficiencies, or material weaknesses and therefore there can be no assurance that all such deficiencies have been identified. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a ' deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity's financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal ' control that we consider to be material weaknesses. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is ' less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. We consider the items that have been described in the accompanying schedule of findings and recommendations to be significant deficiencies in internal control over ' financial reporting. The City's written responses to the matters communicated herein have not subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and, accordingly, we express ' no opinion on it. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of Directors, management, and the State Controller and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. IVct4gnn /_? 1 (7 . Irvine, California ' December 20, 2010 I 1 30 I ' ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION ' Schedule of Findings and Recommendations Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010 ' (2010 -01) Establishment of System Access Rights During our review of the internal control structure of the City, we noted that all finance personnel have the ability to perform the following functions: • Establish vendors and process invoices for payment 1 • Make changes to the payroll master file (adding and deleting employees, making pay rate changes, etc.) • Process payroll ' • Post adjustments to the general ledger Recommendation ' We recommend that the City restrict system access rights for each individual in the Finance Department with respect to that individual's capability to process invoices, make changes to payroll and post adjustments to the general ledger, in order to adequately ' safeguard City assets. Management's Corrective Actions Planned ' In January 2011 the City will begin implementing a new finance software system. Defining access rights, along with work -flow authorizations is an integral part of the overall finance system implementation; it has been in the planning stage for the past ' year and is a high priority with staff. Full implementation, including the auditor's recommendations, is expected to be complete by July 2011. ' (2010 -02) Adjustments Detected Through the Audit Process Auditing standards require that the auditor include in the report of deficiencies any ' material adjustments detected by the audit process. For the year ended June 30, 2010, material adjustments detected by the audit process were as follows: t • An adjustment to properly record a new capital lease agreement entered into by the City during the current year. ' • An adjustment to remove an interfund borrowing established between two special revenue funds that had not been approved by the City Council. ' • An adjustment to record construction in progress for the year ended June 30, 2010. • An adjustment to correct accumulated depreciation. ' • An adjustment to move CDBG activity recorded in a capital projects fund into the City's CDBG fund. 1 1 31 ' ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION ' Schedule of Findings and Recommendations (Continued) 1 (2010 -02) Adjustments Detected Through the Audit Process, (Continued) Recommendation ' We recommend that the City develop and implement procedures to assist Finance Department staff in the process of closing the accounting records at the end of each fiscal year to ensure all material accounting entries have been prepared prior to the ' auditors conducting the audit. These procedures could involve checklists of processes to be completed and accounts to be reviewed and /or analyzed. Management's Corrective Actions Planned ' Staff will increase the comprehensiveness of existing checklists and exercise greater ' diligence at following them. Errors to accumulated depreciation will be resolved by the use of the capital asset module in the new finance system. ' (2010 -03) Need for Improved Accounting Over Capital Assets During our testwork over the City's capital asset records for the year ended June 30, ' 2010, the following discrepancies were noted: Construction in progress in the amount of $383,536 was not recorded by the City in the capital asset spreadsheet. This amount reflects capital projects that were in progress and not yet completed as of June 30, 2010. • Additions to the City's infrastructure in the amount of $125,670 were not recorded ' by the City in the capital asset spreadsheet. This amount represents capital projects that had been completed during fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, but had not been recorded by the City. ' • The City's schedule to track accumulated depreciation contained several errors within the formulas that included over depreciating City assets. Recommendation ' We recommend that the Finance Department review all capital outlay expenditures each year to determine if any of the projects should be capitalized. ' Management's Corrective Actions Planned The City's new financial software, which will be implemented in January 2011, includes a capital asset module. Capital assets are flagged as a capital asset at the time they are ' purchased and that information flows to the capital asset module. This reduces the likelihood of not posting a capital asset in the capital assets module. Further, proven depreciation formulas are hardcoded into the capital asset module and will be tested for ' accuracy at the time of implementation. 32 I 1 1 ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Schedule of Findings and Recommendations (Continued) (2010 -04) Community Development Commission Allocations Total Community Development Commission (CDC) expenditures are approximately 20% of total City expenditures. However, administrative salaries charged for certain individuals are up to 55% of those individual's total salary. The City provided explanation of duties performed to justify these charges; however these allocations were based on estimates of time spent working on CDC activities, not actual time spent. Recommendation 1 1 1 1 1 1 Health & Safety Code §33334.6 states "The Agency shall determine annually that the planning and administrative expenses are necessary for the production, improvement or preservation of low -and moderate - income housing." The code also says "Planning and general administrative costs which may be paid with moneys from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund are those expenses incurred by the Agency which are directly related to the programs and activities authorized under the Code." We recommend that the City personnel perform employees that charge time directly to the CDC employees to track their time on timesheets and time incurred. Management's Corrective Actions Planned a time study of those administrative to support future charges or require record direct charges based on actual During the next budget preparation cycle staff will take into consideration the time worked to be allocated to the CDC. Also, included with the new financial software is an employee self service feature which will permit staff to input hours worked to the appropriate cost center. 33