PC - Item 4A - Deisgn Review 10-06 at 9711 Valley BlvdROSEMEAD PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
TO: THE HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE ROSEMEAD
PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DIVISION
DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 2011
SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW 10-06
9711 VALLEY BOULEVARD
Summary
A & F United, LLC has submitted an application proposing to remodel the fagade of an
existing 1,872 square foot commercial building, reconfigure the parking area and install
landscaping throughout the site. The applicant also proposes to demolish 939 square
feet of warehouse area located at 9711 East Valley Boulevard in the C- 3D /RC -MUDO
(Medium Commercial with a Design Overlay and Commercial /Residential Mixed -Use 0-
30 du /ac Development Overlay) zone.
Environmental Determination:
Section 15301 of the California. Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exempts projects
that consist of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or
minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment,
or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that
existing at the time of the lead agency's determination. Accordingly, Design Review 10-
06 is classified as a Class 1 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 of the
CEQA guidelines.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission APPROVE Design Review 10 -06 and
ADOPT Resolution No. 11 -01 with findings (Exhibit "A "), and subject to thirty -two (32)
conditions outlined in Exhibit "B" attached hereto.
Property History and Description
The subject property is located on Valley Boulevard just east of Temple City Boulevard.
The site consists of one parcel, totaling approximately 21,340 square feet.
According to Building and Safety Division records, the property is currently developed
with two buildings, one commercial building totaling 1,872 square feet, and one
warehouse building totaling 6,253 square foot.
Planning Commission Meeting
February 7, 2011
Paoe 2 of 17
Front
Site & Surrounding Land Uses
The project site is designated in the
(Residential /Commercial; 30 du /ac) and on the
MUDO (Medium Commercial with a Design C
Mixed -Use 0 -30 du /ac Development Overlay)
following land uses:
North:
General Plan:
Mixed Use: Resider
Zoning:
C- 3D /RC -MUDO (N
Overlay and a Resii
du /ac Development
Land Use:
Manufacturing /Indus
South:
General Plan: Commercial
Zoning: C -3D (Medium
Land Use: Commercial
East:
General Plan: Mixed Use:
General Plan as Mixed Use
ning map it is designated C- 3D /RC-
�rlay and a Residential /Commercial
ie. The site is surrounded by the
ommercial (0 -30 du /ac)
i Commercial with a Design
I /Commercial Mixed -Use 0 -30
ay)
with a Design Overlay)
(0 -30 du /ac)
Planning Commission Meeting
February 7, 2011
Page 3 of 17
Zoning: C- 3D /RC -MUDO (Medium Commercial with a Design
Overlay and a Residential /Commercial Mixed -Use 0 -30
du /ac Development Overlay)
Land Use: Vacant land
West:
General Plan: Mixed Use: Residential /Commercial (0 -30 du /ac)
Zoning: C- 3D /RC -MUDO (Medium Commercial with a Design
Overlay and a Residential /Commercial Mixed -Use 0 -30
du /ac Development Overlay)
Land Use: Commercial
Administrative Analysis
Site Plan
As illustrated in "Exhibit C ", the applicant is proposing to reconfigure the parking lot,
install new landscaping throughout the site, and to construct a new trash enclosure and
a new patio with a trellis cover. The applicant is also proposing to demolish 939 square
feet of the warehouse building. Two driveways along Valley Boulevard provide
vehicular access to this property. A total of seventeen parking spaces are shown on the
existing site plan, however these spaces are not striped consistent with Rosemead
Municipal Code Section 17.84 Off - Street Parking Requirements. The applicant is
proposing to improve the parking spaces located along the southwest corner of the site
and to create new parking spaces along the northeast corner of the site.
A new trash enclosure and a new patio with a trellis cover have been proposed with this
project. The trash enclosure has been designed to complement the new building
architecture. Staff has added a condition of approval requiring that the trash enclosure
doors be self - closing and self - latching, and that the trash area be routinely, maintained
free of trash and debris.
The new trellis covered patio will be located along the east property line, adjacent to the
commercial building. Because the patio is located adjacent to the property line, staff
has added a condition of approval requiring the patio and trellis cover to be constructed
out of non - combustible materials subject to the approval of the Building Official.
Floor Plan
The commercial building is comprised of two (2) units, one proposed office unit and one
existing restaurant. No changes are proposed to the existing restaurant unit. However,
interior improvements are proposed for the office unit. The applicant is proposing a new
ADA compliant restroom, new interior walls, and a break room as shown on the
proposed floor plan illustrated in "Exhibit C ".
The warehouse building is separated into five (5) units. The applicant is proposing to
demolish unit number four (4). However, no interior changes are proposed to the
remaining units. The Zoning Code no longer permits warehousing and storage uses in
Planning Commission Meeting
February 7, 2011
Paae 4 of 17
the C -3 (Medium Commercial) Zone. Becat
utilize the rear building entirely for future retail
Elevations
The applicant is proposing to modernize the
purpose of the proposed improvement is to
provide necessary improvements to the site. l
installation of stucco over the existing pair
construction a new 9' -6" high parapet wall aloe
applicant is proposing to install new exter
storefronts and new canvas awnings located
and the rear elevation of the commercial buildi
The rear building's brick exterior walls are
contains a metal rollup entry door. The only it
an exterior repainting. The rear building is curt
be occupied for retail or office uses, new store
new application for a Design Review will be
building.
of this, the applicant is requesting to
I office.
ade of the commercial building. The
date the look of the building and to
renovation of the building includes the
brick veneer exterior wall and the
ie front elevation of the building. The
doors and windows, including new
ve the new storefronts along the front
rrently painted white and each unit
-ovement proposed for this building is
tly vacant. In order for this building to
nts will be required to be installed. A
quired for improvements to the rear
According to the colored renderings, the colors and materials proposed for the
commercial building include white stucco color (Omega Akroflex Sandtex), red colored
canvas awning (Velvet Red) and a brown colored patio trellis cover. The rear building
will be painted white to match the front building.
Parking and Circulation
The site is accessed via two (2) existing drivew<
The 14' -0" foot wide driveway adjacent to the e
approach will be removed. The driveway and
building will be realigned to provide better acce
new approach will measure 29' -0" wide and the
The existing parking lot surface is severely cra
applicant is proposing to re -slurry the parking lot
proposed to reconfigure the parking lot in order
additional landscaping and a vehicular backup
(16) parking spaces will be provided on site, whi
and one (1) handicapped parking space.
Rosemead Municipal Code (RMC) Section 17.E
provide one parking space for every 250 square
provide one parking space for every 100 square
floor area of retail /office totals 6,396 square fee
The restaurant totals 794 square feet of floor are
total of 33.52 or 34 parking spaces are required
17.84 Off - Street Parking Regulations. The site p
;/approaches along Valley Boulevard.
st property line will be closed and the
pproach just west of the commercial
to the reconfigured parking lot. The
w driveway will measure 25' -4" wide.
ced and requires improvements. The
urface. Additionally, the applicant has
provide double striped parking stalls,
imension of 25' -0 ". A total of sixteen
i includes fifteen (15) standard spaces
I states that retail or office use must
feet of floor area and restaurant must
eet of floor area. Since the combined
25.58 parking spaces are required.
7.94 parking spaces are required. A
in order to comply with RMC Section
an illustrates that the subject site does
Planning Commission Meeting
February 7, 2011
Page 5 of 17
not meet this requirement, as only sixteen (16) parking stalls are provided. RMC
Section 17.12.060(E) provides a list of specific land uses for legal non - conforming
buildings that are non - conforming due to lack of required on site parking stalls.
Landscaping and Fencing
The applicant is proposing to add approximately 1,257 square feet of landscaping'
distributed throughout the site. A condition of approval has been added requiring a
landscape and irrigation plan to be submitted for review and approval to the Planning
Division. The landscape and irrigation plan shall include a wide variety of plant
materials which are drought tolerant and an 'irrigation plan that includes a moisture
sensor.
The property is currently enclosed with perimeter fencing (chain link and block wall).
However, the applicant is proposing to demolish all existing perimeter fencing and to
construct a new six (6' -0 ") tall split -face perimeter block wall. A new sliding wrought iron
gate will be installed adjacent to the front commercial building to secure the property
while businesses are closed.
Lighting
According to the elevation plan, no new lighting is proposed with this application.
However, it is recommended that the decorative wall mounted light fixtures be
incorporated into the project. A condition of approval has been added to ensure that all
lighting will be fully shielded and directed downwards to mitigate glare on adjacent
properties.
Signage
The applicant is proposing to remove the existing pole sign located adjacent to the front
property line directly in front of the commercial building. The applicant is proposing new
signage_ on the front elevation of the commercial building. A condition of approval has
been added requiring that the applicant submit a detailed master sign program for
review and approval to the Planning Division prior to finalization of building permits for
the project.
Municipal Code Requirements
Section 17.72.030 of the Rosemead Municipal Code (RMC) states that design review
procedures shall be followed for all improvements requiring a building permit or visible
changes in form, texture, color, exterior fagade, or landscaping.
Section 17.72.050 provides the criteria by which the Planning Commission may
approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application:
• The plans indicate proper consideration for the relationship between the
proposed structure and site developments that exist or have been approved for
the general neighborhood;
The proposed building and site renovation is located within an established
Planning Commission Meeting
February 7, 2011
Page 6 of 17
commercial district of the City. The applicant has provided an aesthetically
complementary design and the proposed improvements will vastly improve the
existing commercial building and its relationship to the commercial district. The
proposed project is consistent with the Goal 2, Policy 2.5 of the Land Use
Element of the City's General Plan in that it calls for the upgrading of commercial
uses by implementing architectural, and design reviews of proposals for remodel
of existing buildings. t
The plan for the proposed structure and
in which the proposed development an
against noise, vibrations, and other facto
the environment, and the manner of s
storage and loading areas.
All lighting will be fully shielded and dir
adjacent properties. Conditions of appro,
any adverse effects on the environment a
fagade remodel will not generate any pei
surrounding area. All construction wor
timeframe, and decibel levels indicated in
478 and 541). Conditions of approval v
noise, construction hours, screening of
lighting, and the overall maintenance of th
to development indicates the manner
surrounding properties are protected
which may have an adverse effect on
Bening mechanical equipment, trash,
ated downwards to mitigate glare on
it have been incorporated to eliminate
a result of the proposed project. This
ianent impacts to noise levels for the
will be required to comply with the
he City's Noise Ordinance (Ordinance
I specifically address factors such as
mechanical equipment, landscaping,
property.
• The proposed structure or site development is not, in its exterior design and
appearance, so at variance with the appearance of other existing building or site
developments in the neighborhood asi to cause the nature of the local
environment to materially depreciate in appearance and value.
The proposed project will improve the
commercial building and the overall site.
of new landscaping and pavement treat
marked improvement over the appearani
Valley Boulevard.
• The proposed building or structure
developments on land in the general
buildings are within or adjacent to land
of the Civic Center or in public or educ
adjacent to land included within any pre
size, or style.
The property is not part of the Civic Cent
for public or educational use, so there is n
the general area. Notwithstanding this
development that is aesthetically comple
hysical appearance of the existing
'ie improvements to the site in terms
ants in the parking lot will provide a
of other neighboring buildings along
in harmony with the proposed
especially those instances where
n on the General Plan as being part
al use, or are within or immediately
plan which indicates building shape,
Plan, precise plan or land reserved
special need to create harmony with
the approved design will create a
entary to the surrounding area and
Planning Commission Meeting
February 7, 2011
Page 7 of 17
which has the potential to enhance land values in the general area. This is due
to the proposed upgrade of the existing building fagade with higher quality
materials, a design that blends better with the area, and greatly improved
landscaping.
• The proposed development is in, conformity with the standards of this code and
other applicable ordinances in so far as the location and appearance of the
buildings and structures are involved; and
This proposed development meets all of the minimum code requirements for the
C- 3D /RC -MUDO (Medium Commercial with Design Overlay and Residential
Commercial Mixed -Use Development Overlay) zone, and all applicable
referenced code sections of the Rosemead Municipal Code.
• The site plan and the design of the buildings, parking areas, signs, landscaping,
luminaries, and other site features indicates that proper consideration has been
given to both the functional aspects of the site development, such as automobile
and pedestrian circulation, and the visual effect of the development from the view
of public streets.
Access to the site is located on Valley Boulevard via a 25'-4" wide driveway for
ingress and egress. The closure of a second existing driveway on Valley
Boulevard will improve traffic circulation by removing a driveway that is too close
to the east property line. The parking lot is conveniently located along the side
and rear of the front commercial building. All parking lot lighting will be fully
shielded and directed downwards to mitigate glare on adjacent properties.
Lastly, this building renovation will greatly improve the visual effect of the site
from the view, of the public streets, primarily Valley Boulevard.
Public Notice Process
This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process, which
includes a 300' radius public hearing notice to twenty -four (24) property owners,
publication in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune on January 28, 2011, and postings of the
notice at the six (6) public locations and on the subject site.
�Prepared by:
Gina Casillas
Planning Technician
Submitted by:
Stan Wong r r
Community Development Director
Planning Commission Meeting
February 7, 2011
Page 8 of 17
EXHIBITS:
A. Resolution 11 -01
B. Conditions of Approval
C. Site Plan /Floor Plan /Elevations
D. Assessor Parcel Map (8577- 009 -028)
Planning Commission Meeting
February 7, 2011
Page 9 of 17
EXHIBIT "A"
PC RESOLUTION 11 -01
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, 'COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW 10 -06, FOR BUILDING AND SITE
IMPROVEMENTS TO AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING,
LOCATED AT 9711 VALLEY BOULEVARD IN THE C- 3131RC -MUDO
(MEDIUM COMMERCIAL WITH A DESIGN OVERLAY AND
RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENT
OVERLAY) ZONE (APN: 8577 - 009 - 028). .
WHEREAS, on December 10, 2010, A & F United LLC submitted an application
to remodel the exterior fagade of an existing 1,872 square foot commercial building,
resurface the parking area and install new landscaping, and to demolish a portion of an
existing warehouse located at 9711 East Valley Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, 9711 Valley Boulevard is located in the C- 3D /RC -MUDO (Medium
Commercial with a Design Overlay and Residential /Commercial Mixed -Use
Development Overlay) zoning district; and
WHEREAS, Section 17.72.050 of the Rosemead Municipal Code (RMC)
provides the purpose and criteria for a design review; and
WHEREAS, Sections 65800 & 65900 of the California Government Code and
Section 17.72.050 of the Rosemead Municipal Code authorize the Planning
Commission to approve, conditionally approve, or deny design review applications; and
WHEREAS, on January 27, 2011, twenty -four (24) notices were sent to property
owners within a 300 -foot radius from the subject property, in addition to notices posted
in six (6) public locations and on -site, specifying the availability of the application, plus
the date, time, and location of the public hearing for Design Review 10 -06, and on
January 28, 2010, the notice was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune; and
WHEREAS, on February 7, 2011, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed
and advertised public hearing to receive oral and written testimony relative to Design
Review 10 -06; and
WHEREAS, the Rosemead Planning Commission has sufficiently considered all
testimony presented to them in order to make the following determination.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City
of Rosemead as follows:
Planning Commission Meeting
February 7, 2011
Pape 10 of 17
SECTION 1. The Planning Commis:
Review 10 -06 is classified as a Class 1 C<
15301 of the California Environmental Qual
CEQA exempts projects that consist of the c
leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of exis
mechanical equipment, or topographical featu
t HEREBY DETERMINES that Design
3orical Exemption pursuant to Section
Act guidelines. Section 15301 of the
ration, repair, maintenance, permitting,
3 public or private structures, facilities,
involving negligible or no expansion.
SECTION 2. The Planning Commissiori HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES
that facts do exist to justify approving Design Review 10 -06 in accordance with Section
17.72.030 et seq., of the Rosemead Municipal Code as follows:
A. The plans indicate, proper con!
proposed building and site developments
general neighborhood;
Jon for the relationship between the
exist or have been approved for the
FINDING: The proposed building and site renovation is located within an
established commercial district of the City. The applicant has provided an aesthetically
complementary design and the proposed improvements will vastly improve the existing
commercial building and its relationship to the commercial district. The proposed
project is consistent with the Goal 2, Policy 2.5 of the Land Use Element of the City's
General Plan in that it calls for the upgrading of commercial uses by implementing
architectural and design reviews of proposals for remodeling of existing buildings.
B. The plan for the proposed building and site development indicates the
manner in which the proposed development and surrounding properties are protected
against noise, vibrations and other factors which may have an adverse effect on the
environment and the manner of screening mechanical equipment, trash, storage, and
loading areas.
FINDING: All lighting will be fully shield
glare on adjacent properties. Conditions of
eliminate any adverse effects on the environmr
This fagade remodel will not generate any per
surrounding area. All construction work will be
and decibel levels indicated in the City's Nois<
Conditions of approval will specifically addres
hours, screening of mechanical equipment,
maintenance of the property.
J and directed downwards to mitigate
approval have been incorporated to
it as a result of the proposed project.
anent impacts to noise levels for the
equired to comply with the timeframe,
Ordinance (Ordinance 478 and 541).
factors such as noise, construction
ndscaping, lighting, and the overall
C. The proposed building or site development is not, in its exterior design and
appearance, so at variance with the appearance of other existing buildings or site
developments in the neighborhood as to cause the nature of the local environment to
materially depreciate in appearance and value;
FINDING: The proposed project will improve the physical appearance of the
existing commercial building and the overall site. I The improvements to the site in terms
Planning Commission Meefing
February 7, 2011
Page 11 of 17
of new landscaping and pavement treatments in the parking lot will provide a marked
improvement over the appearance of other neighboring buildings along Valley
Boulevard.
D. The proposed building or structure is in harmony with the proposed
developments on land in the general area, especially in those instances where buildings
are within or adjacent to land shown on the General Plan as being part of the Civic
Center or in public or educational use, or are within or immediately adjacent to land
included within any precise plan which indicates building shape, size, or style.
FINDING: The property is not part of the Civic Center Plan, precise plan or land
reserved for public or educational use, so there is no special need to create harmony
with the general area. Notwithstanding this, the approved design will create a
development that is aesthetically complementary to the surrounding area and which has
the potential to enhance land values in the general area. This is due to the proposed
upgrade of the existing building fagade with higher quality materials, a design that
blends better with the area, and greatly improved landscaping.
E. The proposed development is in conformity with the standards of this code
and other applicable ordinances in so far as the location and appearance of the
buildings and structures are involved.
FINDING: This proposed development meets all of the minimum code
requirements for the C- 3D /RC -MUDO (Medium Commercial with Design Overlay and
Residential Commercial Mixed -Use Development Overlay) zone, and all applicable
referenced code sections of the Rosemead Municipal Code.
F. The site plan and the design of the buildings, parking areas, signs,
landscaping, luminaries, and other site feature indicates that proper consideration has
been given to both the functional aspects of the site development, such as automobile
and pedestrian circulation, and the visual effect of the development from the view of
public streets.
FINDING: Access to the site is located on Valley Boulevard via a 25'-4" wide
driveway for ingress and egress. The closure of a second existing driveway on Valley
Boulevard, will improve traffic circulation by removing a driveway that is too close to the
east property line. The parking lot is conveniently located to the side and rear of the
front commercial building. All parking lot lighting will be fully shielded and directed
downwards to mitigate glare on adjacent properties. Lastly, this building renovation will
greatly improve the visual effect of the site from the view of the public streets, primarily
Valley Boulevard.
SECTION 3. The Planning Commission HEREBY APPROVES Design Review
10 -06, for the remodel of the exterior fagade of an existing 1,872 square foot
commercial building, resurface the parking area and install new landscaping, and to
demolish a portion of an existing warehouse located at 9711 Valley Boulevard, and
Planning Commission Meeting
February 7, 2011
Page 12 of 17
subject to conditions listed in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference.
SECTION 4. This action shall become filial and effective ten (10) days after this
decision by the Planning Commission, unless within such time a written appeal is filed
with the City Clerk for consideration by the Rosemead City Council as provided in
Article IX - Planning and Zoning of the Rosemead Municipal Code.
SECTION 5. This resolution is the
Commission on February 7, 2011, by the fol
YES:
NO:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
of an action taken by the Planning
vote:
SECTION 6. The secretary shall certify1to the adoption of this resolution and
shall transmit copies of same to the applicant and the Rosemead City Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 7th day of February, 2011.
William Alarcon, Chairman
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a resolution adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rosemead at its regular meeting, held on the 7th day of
February, 2011 by the following vote:
YES:
NO:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Stan Wong, Secretary
Planning Commission Meeting
February 7, 2011
Page 13 of 17
EXHIBIT "B"
DESIGN REVIEW 10 -06
9711 VALLEY BOULEVARD
(APN: 8577 - 009 -028)
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
February 7, 2011
1. Design Review 10 -06 is approved for the remodel of the exterior fagade of an
existing 1,872 square foot commercial building, resurface the parking area and
install new landscaping, and to demolish a portion of an existing warehouse, in
accordance with the plans marked Exhibit "C ", dated January 27, 2011. Any
revisions to the approved plans must be resubmitted for the review and approval
of the Planning Division.
2. The following conditions must be complied with to the satisfaction of the Planning
Division prior to final approval of the associated plans, building permits,
occupancy permits, or any other appropriate request.
3. The conditions listed on this exhibit shall be copied directly onto any
development plans subsequently submitted to the Planning and Building
Divisions for review.
4. Approval of Design Review 10 -06 shall not take effect for any purpose until the
applicant has filed with the City of Rosemead a notarized affidavit stating that
he /she is aware of and accepts all of the conditions of approval as set forth in the
letter of approval and this list of conditions, within ten (10) days from the Planning
Commission approval date.
5. Design Review 10 -06 is approved for a period of one (1) year. The applicant
shall commence the proposed project or request an extension within 30- calendar
days prior to expiration. The one (1) year initial approval period shall be effective
from the Planning Commission approval date. For the purpose of this petition,
project commencement shall be defined as beginning the permitting process with
the Planning and Building Divisions, so long as the project is not abandoned. If
the Design Review 10 -06 has been unused, abandoned or discontinued for a
period of one (1) year it shall become null and void.
6. The Planning Commission hereby authorizes the Planning Division to make
and /or approve minor modifications.
7. Design Review 10 -06 is granted or approved with the City and. its Planning
Commission and City Council retaining and reserving the right and jurisdiction to
review and to modify the permit, including the conditions of approval based on
changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to,
Planning Commission Meeting
February 7, 2011
Page 14 of 17
E
a
11
12
13
14
15
16
the modification of the use, a change in
use, or the expansion, alteration, rec
reservation of right to review is in additi
City, its Planning Commission, and City
any permit granted or approved under
violations of the conditions imposed on C
The applicant shall defend, indemnify, a
or its agents, officers, and employees
against the City of Rosemead or its age
side, void, or annul, an approval of the F
concerning the project, which action is b
law.
The applicant shall comply with all F
approved use including the requirem(
and Health Departments.
Building permits will not be issued in
as all plan check fees, and all other a
The numbers of the address signs s
character width of 1/4 ", contrasting in a
the street. Materials, colors, location, a
approved by the City Planner, or his or
Prior to issuance of building permits, any
applicant shall provide the City with wri
applicable school districts.
The hours of construction shall be lim
Saturday. No construction shall take
holidays without prior approval by the Cii
The Planning staff shall have access to
construction to monitor progress.
The site shall be maintained in a graffi
removed within twenty -four (24) hours. A
(626) 569 -2345 for assistance.
The site shall be maintained in a clean,
with Sections 8.32.010 - 8.32.040 of tF
pertains to the storage, accumulation,
rubbish, trash, and debris. All trash cont
trash enclosure at all times. All trash, ru
-ope, emphasis, size, or nature of the
figuration, or change of use. This
to, and not in lieu of, the right of the
ouncil to review and revoke or. modify
e Rosemead Municipal Code for any
>ian Review 10 -06.
I hold harmless the City of Rosemead
om any claim, action, or proceeding
>, officers, or employees to attack, set
nning Commission and /or City Council
fight within the time period provided by
al, State and local laws relative to the
of the Planning, Building, Fire, Sheriff,
on with any project until such time
fees are paid in full.
I be at least 6" tall with a minimum
and easily visible at driver's level from
size of such address numbers shall be
designee, prior to installation.
tired school fees shall be paid. The
verification of compliance from the
from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday to
;e on Sundays or on any federal
subject property at any time during
state. Any new graffiti shall be
ir, Graffiti Hotline can be called at
=d and litter free state in accordance
Rosemead Municipal Code, which
Aection, and disposal of garbage,
ers shall be stored in the appropriate
sh, and garbage receptacles shall be
Planning Commission Meeting
February 7, 2011
Paoe 15 of 17
regularly cleaned, inspected, and maintained in a clean, safe, and sanitary
condition.
17. The new trash enclosure shall be designed to complement the building
architecture. The trash enclosure shall have opaque steal self - closing and self
latching doors.
18. The new patio and trellis cover shall be constructed out of Type IV Construction
"Heavy Timber" to comply with property line fire protection subject to the review
and approval of the Building Official.
19. All roof top appurtenances and equipment shall adequately be screened from
view to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. There shall be no mechanical
equipment located on the sides of the building. Such equipment shall not exceed
the height of the parapet wall. All ground level mechanical /utility equipment
(including meters, back flow preservation devices, fire valves, A/C condensers,
furnaces, utility cabinets, and other equipment) shall be located away from public
view or adequately screened by landscaping or screening walls so as not to be
seen from the public right of way or other public space within the development.
The Planning Division shall approve said screening prior to installation.
20. The parking area, including handicapped spaces, shall be paved and re- painted
periodically to City standards to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. In
accordance with Chapter 17.84 of the Rosemead Municipal Code, all designated
parking stalls shall be double striped. Such striping shall be maintained in a
clear, visible, and orderly manner.
21. At least two percent of the required parking shall be designated for handicap
space pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 22511.8. A letter by the
property owner shall be given to the City for authorizing enforcement.
22. A detailed master sign program shall be submitted for review and approval to the
Planning Division prior to finalization of building permits for the project. Such
master sign program shall comply with Chapter 17.104 of the Rosemead
Municipal Code and the City's Commercial Revitalization Design Guidelines.
Exterior wall signage shall be limited to a maximum of two (2) square feet for
each linear feet of building frontage. The signs shall consist of internally
illuminated, individual channel letters. No "canned" or box signs shall be
permitted on this site. Window signage shall be limited to no more than 15% of
all window and glass door areas.
23. All lighting shall be fully shielded and directed downwards as to not project over
property lines.
24. All open areas not covered by concrete, asphalt, or structures shall be
landscaped and maintained on a regular basis.
Planning Commission Meeting
February 7, 2011
Pape 16 of 17
ON
26.
0A
The applicant shall submit a landscap
Division prior to the issuance of buildir
include a wide variety of plant materia
irrigation system that includes a sprink
moisture sensors.
All driveways that are not used or
development shall be removed and rer
and gutter all to the satisfaction of the C
One 24 -inch size street tree matching
Valley Boulevard shall be planted in a
Valley Boulevard) within the sidewalk ai
frontage along Valley Boulevard.
and irrigation plan to the Planning
permits. The landscape plan shall
which are drought tolerant and an
system with automatic timers and
iartially not used by the proposed
;ed to construct a new sidewalk, curb
Engineer.
species of existing street trees on
well (with a matching tree grate for
at the northwest end of the property's
28. All work in the Public right of way shall I be performed by a contractor with a
current "A" License. A Public Works permit shall be obtained from the City
Engineer "s office prior to the start of any work in the public right of way.
29. Violations of the conditions of approval may result in citation and /or initiation of
revocation proceedings. I
30. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall provide a courtesy
notice of the start of construction to theloccupants of abutting properties and
provide a copy of the notice to the Planning Division
31
All requirements of the Building and
shall be complied with prior to the final
Division and the Planning Division
al of the proposed construction.
32. The onsite public hearing notice posting shall be removed within 30 days from
the end of the 10 -day appeal period of Design Review 10 -06.
Planning Commission Meeting
February 7, 2011
Page 17 of 17
EXHIBIT "D"
a $ a•9�o
gh
a a .�
o$e Ov i 3 3<lb
S Z y
Ba6�ly
X 7
Y�r S / �. /t o,�
a
i _
o SUBJECT SITE
r w
' c
/
°W
4
4 3N ��Ib
� m N
J n
P
we
� J
Hz
�o
ao
�Nb
8
0 14 '�4�
4 i
ryiQ m NI
M M
� 1
Ni a ry
c cd. m
si
i
Y
gz
JI
ma
nEc
a�
4
q
�'�io�'✓ tJ �
oJ� �Id
YP
QDR
W
'C Omb.m�
dVn
Otu
a AOe
Y m
8
p
min
m
N
o SUBJECT SITE
r w
' c
/
°W
4
4 3N ��Ib
� m N
J n
P
we
� J
Hz
�o
ao
�Nb
8
0 14 '�4�
4 i
ryiQ m NI
M M
� 1
Ni a ry
c cd. m
si
i
Y
gz
JI
ma
nEc
a�
-aE �
YP
W
'C Omb.m�
dVn
Otu
a AOe