Loading...
PC - 04-07-08 i - CITY OF ROSEMEAD PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES April 7, 2008 CALL TO ORDER: The regular meeting of the City of Rosemead Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Lopez at 7:00 p.m. in Room 8 of Rosemead Community Recreation Center at 3936 N. Muscatel Avenue, Rosemead. Chairman Lopez led the Pledge of Allegiance. Vice - Chairman Kunioka delivered the invocation. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Commissioner Bevington, Vice - Chairman Kunioka, and Chairman Lopez ABSENT: Commissioner Cam and Commissioner Vuu EX OFFICIO: Agaba, Everling, Gonzalez, Trinh and Yin 1. EXPLANATION OF HEARING PROCEDURES AND APPEAL RIGHTS: Attorney Yin explained the public hearing process and the right to appeal Planning Commission decisions to the City Council. He then stated staff has informed him that Item 3B on the consent calendar will be removed. He stated it was inadvertently put on the agenda. He said that project has already been approved by the Planning Commission and is not subject for further review or action at this time. 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS Chairman Lopez asked if anyone would like to speak on any items not on the agenda, to step forward. Chairman Lopez stated Item 6 is not for public comment. Ms. Marlene Shinen, residing at 8447 Drayer Lane, in South San Gabriel handed the Commissioners pictures of Wal -Mart shopping carts deserted on her residential street and expressed her concerns. Mr. Jim Flournoy residing at 8655 Landis View, a resident, stated the Citizen Review Action Panel also known as C.R.A.P. submitted comments to the City regarding items like what Ms. Shinen was discussing. He stated they wrote notes on each of the conditions of approval and mitigation measures and gave it to staff. He questioned if the binder with these comments was given to the Planning Commission for review and stated that this was turned Rosemead Planning Commission Meeting: Monday, April 7, 2008 Page 1 of 13 in quite a while ago. He stated they think it very well raises the issue so someone doesn't have to come up here and talk about them all the time. He said quite a few people placed input into that. Mr. Flournoy stated that he would like to go over the request for admissions he filed today with the City Clerk. He said they wanted to get the Geo -tech reports reviewed a long time ago so that when this came up for the review of Wal -Mart, they would have some answers back. Unfortunately, at that time they had the Valley Vision Plan Workshop. He said the Assistant City Manager told City Planner Everling to get these reports in the mail. That was on a Wednesday and on the following Monday, evidently Jim Guerra had spoken to the Assistant City Manager and said not to do it. He doesn't know why City Planner Everling didn't send it, but staff tends to listen to other staff and it didn't get sent out. He questioned why the City should listen to him or Jim Guerra because neither one of them is a professional geologists; they rely on what they are told. He stated it is not on the agenda this time, but next time he'd like someone to move that they ask that City Planner Everling have the authority to send these reports out, that way the request for admissions could be answered. He stated send these reports out and get a professional view on them. If you go to Appendix B and read the report yourselves where it states this is a grading parking lot subsidence report, then you will see how they misused it to say a liquefaction report when most of their holes are only ten to twenty feet. He stated that report isn't what the Building Official is claiming it to be. Chairman Lopez questioned if the City hired a contractor to take care of these reports. Mr. Flournoy stated they have not sent this report or the ones for the projects under the power lines although they asked them to send the reports since October of 2007. Chairman Lopez stated we have to wait for Tanya Gonzalez to get the reports and come back with an answer, so the City is doing what they're supposed to. Mr. Flournoy said they haven't sent them to her and we asked them to do it back in October of 2007, but they finally got approval whenever that meeting was and then I think the reason these reports weren't sent is basically because he thinks the Building Official doesn't want anyone to know how badly he screwed up on this. He stated it's all going to come out in the wash sooner or later. Attorney Yin questioned if the document that was served to the City Clerk today was related to the litigation or to something else. Mr. Flournoy stated they've filed the same thing about three times on these reports and for different procedural reasons, they have been quashed. He said it has to do with the reports in the EIR, which both go to Wal -Mart in your review as well as the Panda project, which is also relying on those same reports. Attorney Yin stated if it's related to the litigation, we'll forward it along to the City Attorney who's handling the litigation, but if it is something like a Public Records Act Request, then they'll handle it themselves. Mr. Flournoy stated we'll talk about that and clarify it, but unfortunately these reports are involved with both the new project and the old project and this should have been cleared up a long time before the new project came along. Rosemead Planning Commission Meeting: Monday, April 7, 2008 Page 2 of 13 Attorney Yin stated feel free to contact me on the matter to get clarification on that so that the proper clock starts running because there are different clocks as far as litigations go. Mr. Brian Lewin residing at 9501 Ralph Street, a resident, stated his comment was supposed to be on Item 3B. He questioned if there was a chance of this potentially coming back or at this point, will it just be going to City Council. He stated it has to go to City Council, because after the Planning Commission approves it, the City Council takes the final vote. Attorney Yin stated the approval is final unless it's appealed. Mr. Flournoy questioned if the Rosemead Municipal Code could be reviewed on that. Attorney Yin stated he believes it's correct, but he'll double check. Mr. Lewin stated he had information that members of the Traffic Commission wanted to comment on this issue and the traffic study. City Planner Everling stated he talked to Traffic Commissioner Holly Knapp this afternoon and with the advice the City Attorney gave, he told her since the appeal periods have expired the City no longer has discretionary power over the project. City Planner Everling and Mr. Flournoy discussed the procedure for approving conditions of approval. City Planner Everling stated staff makes the changes to the conditions of approval per the minutes. Attorney Yin stated his understanding is that the approval comes at the time of the .meeting and then the changes in modifications to the conditions that are suggested by the Planning Commission, Council and himself get recorded in the minutes and are approved at the next meeting. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR — These items are considered to be routine actions that may be considered in one motion by the Planning Commission. Any interested party may request an item from the consent calendar to be discussed separately. A. Approval of Minutes — March 17, 2008 Chairman Lopez asked for a motion for approval of the other items on the Consent Calendar. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BEVINGTON, SECONDED BY VICE- CHAIRMAN KUNIOKA, TO WAIVE FURTHER READING AND ADOPT CONSENT CALENDAR. Vote results: YES: BEVINGTON, KUNIOKA, AND LOPEZ NO: NONE ABSENT: CAM, VUU ABSTAIN: NONE Rosemead Planning Commission Meeting: Monday, April 7, 2008 Page 3 of 13 Chairman Lopez declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. irN PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Conditional Use Permit 08 -01— 8966 Garvey Avenue Presentation: Senior Planner Agaba Staff Recommendation: Approve, subject to conditions, for six (6) months and ADOPT Resolution 08 -01. Senior Planner Agaba made his presentation and then stated the applicant was present and asked the Commissioners if they had any questions. Commissioner Bevington questioned if the only thing the applicant would sell at this liquor store is beer and wine. Senior Planner Agaba stated correct. Commissioner Bevington questioned if hard liquor would be sold. Senior Planner Agaba stated he does not think this type of license allows liquor sale. Mr. Hamid Sayari stated they do sell hard liquor; they have a Type 21 liquor license. Senior Planner Agaba stated if staff verifies that the Type 21 license allows hard liquor, then staff will recommend modification of that condition to allow the sale of liquor as well. He stated that condition is to allow the applicant sale of only what is permitted by the ABC license. Senior Planner Agaba then continued with his presentation. Chairman Lopez opened the public hearing to the public. Mr. Hamid Sayari residing at 4822 Aqueduct Avenue, Encino, CA 91436, questioned why the hours of operation staff recommended are between 8:00 am through 10:00 pm. He stated he couldn't follow up on the reasons behind those hours of operation that staff has recommended and would just like to know. Senior Planner Agaba stated that after meeting with the applicant's representative, the Sheriff's Department and Public Safety Department, they felt the hours of operation between 8:00 am through 10:00 pm were adequate hours for this liquor store. They felt this liquor store should not be permitted to operate after 10:00 pm. He stated this is a condition which is recommended and can be modified at the discretion of the Planning Commission. Chairman Lopez questioned around the city, if other liquor stores are under the same hours of operation and restrictions. Senior Planner Agaba stated he thinks this will be a policy and if any other liquor store comes Rosemead Planning Commission Meeting: Monday, April 7, 2008 Page 4 of 13 in, they would probably be limited to the same hours of operation. He said this was also based on the fact that there were so many significant impacts that occurred at this liquor store, so they were trying to limit the store to certain hours so that it's not operated late night, which could affect the neighborhood. Vice - Chairman Kunioka questioned if the other businesses in the shopping center were open beyond 10:00 pm. Senior Planner Agaba stated he's not sure about the hours, but most of the businesses that are located there are retail and office types, which he presumes close early, except for Crabulous Restaurant. He said he'd double check on their hours of operation if they'd like. Chairman Lopez questioned what the hours of operation for Roy's Liquor were before. Mr. Hamid Sayari stated they were pretty much the same hours of operation staff was recommending, but they chose those hours themselves. He said they never had these restrictions before. Mr. Masu Sayari, residing at 3220 Melon Drive #15, Torrance, CA, stated they always close before 10:00 pm. He said on holidays such as Thanksgiving, they close no later than 8:30 pm. Chairman Lopez stated if all goes well and there are no incidents, they can reapply and ask for longer hours. Mr. Hamid Sayari stated his personal concern is safety. Mr. Masu Sayari stated most of our morning customers are kids. He stated during the morning, he doesn't really sell beer or wine. Chairman Lopez opened the public hearing to those IN FAVOR of this application: Mr. Jim Flournoy, residing at 8655 Landis View, a resident, stated he went down to visit this site after the last Planning Commission Meeting. He stated this building has been there a long time, but the store is clean and he used to go in and buy stuff. He questioned the hours of operation for the liquor store at the corner of Walnut Grove Avenue and Garvey Avenue. He wants to make sure that they step up their observation of other stores in the area, he said. Chairman Lopez opened the public hearing to those who wished to OPPOSE the application: None. Chairman Lopez closed the public hearing to the public and opened the public hearing to the Commissioners. Commissioner Bevington said condition 4 states that the business owners are prohibited from selling alcohol to habitual drunk patrons and questioned where they get the list of the drunken Rosemead Planning Commission Meeting: Monday, April 7, 2008 Page 5 of 13 patrons. Chairman Lopez stated the Sheriff's Department provides this information. Commissioner Bevington stated he thinks there should be an escape clause on condition 13. He stated he thinks this should be subject to a six month review. If other liquor stores in that area stay open till 11:00 pm, he said, and they want to stay open longer too, then they should be able to go through a simple process. The Commissioners agreed. Chairman Lopez agrees if they prove themselves then they have the right to, although they are fine with their hours of operation. Vice - Chairman Kunioka stated they have a right to ask. City Planner Everting stated he believes the Zoning Code allows the Planning Commission to make very minor modifications to a Conditional Use Permit without reopening a public hearing. Commissioner Bevington stated he thinks these hours of operation are subject to further review. Chairman Lopez stated we'll leave it up to the owners and like we told them, they can come in and ask and we'll get back to them as long as we have the option to make minor changes. Senior Planner Agaba stated with condition 3, if the changes are minor then the Planning Division can make the modifications. Commissioner Bevington stated he would like to thank staff and the applicant for doing a good job in answering all the questions that they had. Chairman Lopez stated he's happy to see the outcome of this project. Commissioner Bevington stated the summary for Resolution 08 -11 should be corrected to read "transfer." instead of "new." Vice - Chairman Kunioka stated he'd like to thank staff for working with the applicants in coming up with solutions. He then stated the numbering for the conditions are incorrect. He also questioned if condition 8 and condition 29 should be combined, since they both discuss about revocation. Attorney Yin stated condition 8 relates to the Conditional Use Permit and condition 29 relates to citations. Vice - Chairman Kunioka discussed the sign ordinance and questioned the language of the signs. Rosemead Planning Commission Meeting: Monday, April 7, 2008 Page 6 of 13 City Planner Everling stated the City's sign ordinance restricts the amount of window signage a business can have. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BEVINGTON, SECONDED BY VICE - CHAIRMAN KUNIOKA TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 08 -01. Vote results: YES: BEVINGTON, KUNIOKA, AND LOPEZ NO: NONE ABSENT: CAM, VUU ABSTAIN: NONE Chairman Lopez declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. B. Conditional Use Permit 06 -1068 — 9322 E. Valley Boulevard Presentation: Senior Planner Agaba Staff Recommendation: Approve, subject to conditions, for six (6) months and ADOPT Resolution 06 -1068. Senior Planner Agaba made his presentation and then stated the applicant was present and asked the Commissioners if they had any questions. Chairman Lopez opened the public hearing to the public Ms. Irma Garcia residing at 2526 W. Via Verde Drive, Rialto, CA 92377 stated that Senior Planner Agaba said everything that needed to be said. Chairman Lopez questioned if food would be served till 1:00 am or if the food would stop at a specific time and if just the bar would stay open. Ms. Garcia stated they will be serving food till 1:00 am. Commissioner Bevington stated he hopes he went and saw the correct place because right now that place is an absolute dump. There are weeds all over the place, it isn't well painted, there are potholes in the parking area, and there is no trash enclosure. He stated that he had questioned City Planner Everling what conditions of approval were on this location before, because they are not being followed or we just haven't looked at this place in months. He stated he thinks it's an absolute insult to the area. He stated he doesn't want this applicant thinking that six months from now they are going to have the property the way it is now or he'll be sorry he ever approved this project. He wanted to make sure that they understand this, he said. Chairman Lopez questioned if Ms. Garcia would be doing everything the conditions require Ms. Garcia stated yes. Rosemead Planning Commission Meeting.: Monday, April 7, 2008 Page 7 of 13 Chairman Lopez stated he's seen the pictures and it looks like it's going to be very nice. Vice - Chairman Kunioka questioned if they were going to have glass doors. He then stated it looks like it's a dangerous place. City Planner Everling stated it's going to be replaced with a typical store front. Vice- Chairman Kunioka stated if it looks scary, you'll only get scary people. Chairman Lopez stated it's hard to look at right now and it is a lot of work, but he thinks when they get ready to open it, he'll definitely stop by there. Vice - Chairman Kunioka questioned in condition 1 where it states Conditional Use Permit 07- 1093, if that had anything to do with this project. City Planner Everling stated no, that is a typo. Senior Planner Agaba apologized and stated that he would correct that. Chairman Lopez opened the public hearing to those IN FAVOR of this application: Mr. Brian Lewin, residing at 9501 Ralph Street, a resident, stated the place as it has been has looked like crap for years. He stated he would welcome anything, particularly an establishment with a food element, to give people whose purpose isn't solely to get hammered a reason to go. He said that alone should improve the environment. The proposed changes that he's heard sounded good so given its history, he'd hope that the area will be well policed to ensure that the conditions of approval will be kept up. When you have a place that has traditionally attracted a bad element, he said, even a new facility that isn't necessarily targeting that element may tend to come back, so he's hoping they'll ensure that it doesn't happen. If it does, he's hoping that these people are made to not feel welcomed. Mr. Jim Flournoy residing at 8655 Landis View, a resident, questioned if this building is subject to a building inspection. He stated his concerns since the place has been vacant for a year. He stated certainly any improvement will be a lot better than what is there now. Chairman Lopez stated there is an inspection that will be done. Chairman Lopez opened the public hearing to those who wished to OPPOSE the application: None. Chairman Lopez closed the public hearing to the public and opened the item to the Commissioners. Vice - Chairman Kunioka questioned if opening the bar at 8:00 am was typical. He stated this time seems odd. He also questioned if there is potential for reciprocal parking adjacent to the location. Rosemead Planning Commission Meeting: Monday, April 7, 2008 Page 8 of 13 Senior Planner Agaba stated based on the staff analysis, there could be substantial parking spaces off -site to where the restaurant goers can actually park off -site and just walk to the restaurant without causing significant impact. Vice - Chairman Kunioka questioned if there would be something for the patrons to know it's safe to park down there. Senior Planner Agaba stated this restaurant operates late at night by which most of the existing businesses are closed. Vice - Chairman Kunioka stated the restaurant will be open till late, but is open in the morning as well. Senior Planner Agaba replied, they do not anticipate that there will be significant business for the restaurant early in the morning. He stated if it gets crowded, then the Conditional Use Permit will come back for the Planning Commission to review and the applicant will have to come up with additional parking spaces. Commissioner Bevington stated he's concerned with the third and fourth paragraphs on page six of the staff report. He stated this will cause an undue concentration for on -sale liquor license and they're excusing it because there's a new owner now. He said he remembered when ABC was one of the real powerful commissions in the State of California. He said the City wants to ignore what ABC says and issue these permits. Attorney Yin stated the City has no jurisdiction over the licensing of alcohol, but we do have jurisdiction over granting a conditional use permit against the land use. He stated that is what we are regulating here. He said as long as they can meet the findings and agree with the conditions that are attached then we should feel comfortable approving this. Commissioner Bevington questioned at which point they are not supposed to feel comfortable approving these Conditional Use Permits in an undue concentration of a census tract. He asked if there was any standard where it says to cut it off. Attorney Yin stated he hates to say it, but it stops here with the members of this Planning Commission. He said if you feel strongly that these businesses should not come in, that's when you deicide. City Planner Everling stated it's not just a bar, but a restaurant. Commissioner Bevington questioned where the money is in this business. City Planner Everling stated it's in the alcohol. Commissioner Bevington stated he thinks there's a point where we need to say no more. Senior Planner Agaba stated this is like a guideline for undue concentration to see how many existing licenses there are within a census tract. He stated if you have restaurants next to Rosemead Planning Commission Meeting: Monday, April 7, 2008 Page 9 of 13 each other ten to twenty feet apart, it's up to Planning Commission to decide. Commissioner Bevington stated what it really comes down to is that if you get too many there, one or more are going to fail. He stated it's just leading people to failure to come into an area that is crowded with too many bars and restaurants associated with them. He stated maybe that's not our job since the applicant has a right to look at the situation and fail if she wants to. Chairman Lopez stated there was a prior ABC license there. Really, he said, it's not adding more than what's it's already been; they're adding food, not just a bar. City Planner Everling stated usually most ABC licenses for beer and wine require that more sales for food be made than for alcohol. He stated at least 51 % of sales have to be for food. Vice - Chairman Kunioka questioned why the staff report did not have the grid which geographically indicated which ABC licenses were nearby. Senior Planner Agaba stated he will be sure to include it next time. MOTION BY VICE- CHAIRMAN KUNIOKA, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BEVINGTON TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 06 -1068. Vote results: YES: BEVINGTON, KUNIOKA, AND LOPEZ NO: NONE ABSENT: CAM, VUU ABSTAIN: NONE Chairman Lopez declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. C. Tentative Parcel Map 069266 — 4118 Arica Avenue Presentation: Assistant Planner Trinh Staff Recommendation: Approve, subject to conditions, for six (6) months and ADOPT Resolution 08 -12. Assistant Planner Trinh made her presentation and then stated the applicant was present and asked the Commissioners if they had any questions. Chairman Lopez opened up the public hearing to the public. Mr. Simon Chan, the architect, residing at 3056 Potrero Avenue, El Monte, CA 91733, stated he was representing the property owner if the Planning Commissioners had any questions. Vice - Chairman Kunioka questioned if there were any fire issues with the access in the rear and if fifteen feet is good enough Rosemead Planning Commission Meeting: Monday, April 7, 2008 Page 10 of 13 Assistant Planner Trinh stated the Fire Department has approved the plans. Commissioner Bevington questioned if there was an alley to the south of the property. Assistant Planner Trinh stated yes. Commissioner Bevington questioned if they were using it for access to the property. Assistant Planner Trinh stated no, not at all. Chairman Lopez opened the public hearing to those IN FAVOR of this application: None. Chairman Lopez opened the public hearing to those who wished to OPPOSE the application: None. Chairman Lopez closed the public hearing and opened the item to the Commissioners. Vice - Chairman Kunioka questioned that between the old and new design guidelines, the rear set back would not change; it would still be 10 %. Assistant Planner Trinh stated yes. Vice - Chairman Kunioka stated looking at the site plans, he likes the idea that there is driveway access on the north side of the lot which means there is a 20 foot setback from the property line. He stated he was concerned about the rear side, but apparently seventeen feet is sufficient. Senior Planner Agaba stated basically, it is what the old code required. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BEVINGTON, SECONDED BY VICE - CHAIRMAN KUNIOKA TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 069266. Vote results: YES: BEVINGTON, KUNIOKA, AND LOPEZ NO: NONE ABSENT: CAM, VUU ABSTAIN: NONE Chairman Lopez declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. 5. MATTERS FROM THE CHAIRMAN & COMMISSIONERS Rosemead Planning Commission Meeting.: Monday, April 7, 2008 Page 11 of 13 Chairman Lopez discussed his concern about the trash that is accumulating at the Universal Bank site and also stated that Ramona Avenue has been cleaned up. Vice - Chairman Kunioka stated Doug's Liquor sign is missing a letter. 6. MATTERS FROM THE CITY PLANNER AND STAFF City Planner Everling stated he's been working on direction that was given by the Planning Commission to staff through Commissioner Bevington and Vice - Chairman Kunioka's letters regarding the conditions of approval for Wal -Mart. He stated he will be meeting with the Wal- Mart Representatives within the next week and a half and will hopefully be able to report back to the Commission as to status of mitigation measures and conditions of approval. He stated he believes the Planning Commission is also concerned on the items that Ms. Shinen discussed in public comment. One of the issues he is going to bring up, he said, will be for Wal -Mart to conduct a sweep of the area on a daily basis and establish that as a policy. Commissioner Bevington stated they're cart locking system seems inadequate. Chairman Lopez stated he doesn't think they have a locking system. City Planner Everling stated hopefully they can have something formalized that he can discuss at the Planning Commission on April 21, 2008. He stated he received a letter from Edison which he will attach to the report. He questioned if this is something the Commissioners would like to see as a hearing item or matters from the City Planner and Staff. Commissioner Bevington stated that the Commission and staff should make this study. He stated they should review what the report is and at that point, if they feel it's still controversial or not, then they'll determine to set up a public hearing. City Planner Everling stated we'll take it as direction, but place it on under matters from the City Planner and staff. If the Commissioners feel that public input is warranted, they can discuss it then, but will schedule a public hearing for it at a later date. Vice - Chairman Kunioka questioned if the noise issue would be addressed. City Planner Everling stated they definitely need to speak to the Wal -Mart representative about amending their study, basically having the study taken from the second floor of the condominiums across the street. He stated he also wants to discuss with them possibly putting up some type of screening on the roof, that way if there is a sound issue, it will bounce that sound off. He stated it will not be a big expense for them and it seems like a reasonable request. Mr. Brian Lewin, speaking as Traffic Commissioner, stated basically what they recommended are dual synchronized traffic signals, basically functioning similar to the ones over here. He stated they are too far apart to have one traffic signal so they're coordinated in such a way that they function more or less as one traffic signal. He stated they ruled that a yellow Rosemead Planning Commission Meeting: Monday, April 7, 2008 Page 12 of 13 flashing light was insufficient, given the circumstances, so we sent that to City Council. They also stated some of their objections to the traffic study he said, and they disagreed with going for staff recommendation. The City Council chose to have a brand new traffic study done which is supposed to be done later this month or next month, in which the results will go back directly to the City Council. Attorney Yin stated for clarification on the question earlier regarding the finality of Conditional Use Permits, the answer he gave earlier was correct. He read Rosemead Municipal Code 17.124.070. Mr. Flournoy questioned if the approval is final without verifying the revised conditions of approval. Attorney Yin stated since we're doing the procedure where we're voting on basically what the resolution will be, as opposed to the past where we could come back and finalize it, he would like to ask that the minutes match up with the revised resolution. City Planner Everling stated once the minutes are drafted, we revise the conditions to match up with the Planning Commissions modifications, if any. Mr. Flournoy questioned condition 34. Attorney Yin stated for Mr. Flournoy to send him an e -mail of what he thinks the problem with this condition is and he will look at it. Commissioner Bevington stated he will be moving within the next couple of months, but will continue to be a part of the Planning Commission until told otherwise. Attorney Yin stated he will check the residency requirements to see what is permitted. Chairman Lopez questioned where Commissioner Bevington would be moving to. Commissioner Bevington stated Arcadia. 7. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Lopez adjourned the Planning Commission Meeting at 8:24 p.m. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BEVINGTON, SECONDED BY VICE - CHAIRMAN KUNIOKA TO ADJOURN UNTIL THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. M E /AG Rosemead Planning Commission Meeting: Monday, April 7, 2008 Page 13 of 13