The URL can be used to link to this page

CC - Item 9D - Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion - Award of Contract for Architectural Servicesa . 1: TO: THE CHAIRMAN AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION/ HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: JEFF ALLRED, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR /CITY MANAGE DATE: FEBRUARY 22, 2011 SUBJECT: ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER EXPANSION — AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES SUMMARY As part of the City's Fiscal Year 2010 -11 Capital Improvement Program, the City Council approved funding to renovate and expand the Rosemead Community Recreation Center (RCRC). The existing facility was built in 1975 and is approximately 17,000 square feet in size. The RCRC serves as a major community recreation facility that houses senior programs, recreation classes, special functions, and community events. Proposed improvements include fagade /beautification improvements, improved disabled access, building /safety improvements, heating /ventilation system upgrades, and a building expansion to house a computer lab, small teen center, and recreation staff offices. It is the intent that these improvements will incorporate energy conservation features to help achieve the US Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) at a silver equivalent rating. Request for Proposals (RFPs) were mailed out and on February 2, 2011, eight (8) proposals were received by the City Clerk's office. Staff reviewed the proposals for completeness, understanding of scope of work, methodology, experience, and proposed cost. Interviews were subsequently conducted with the top four (4) architectural firms. Staff Recommendation It is recommended that the Community Development Commission authorize the expenditure of redevelopment bond proceeds in the amount of $208,500; and It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into a professional services agreement with Carde Ten Architects in an amount not to exceed $208,500 from existing redevelopment bond proceeds to develop schematic designs, construction documents and provide construction support services for the Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Building Improvement Project. APPROVED FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA: City Council Meeting February 22, 2011 Page 2 of 4 DISCUSSION Over the last year, the City completed the Parks and Facilities Master Plan to help serve as a guide for future capital improvements. As such, the City, with significant public input, identified a need to rehabilitate and expand the Rosemead Community Recreation Center (RCRC). Together with proposed improvements to the existing parking /public plaza area adjacent to the building, this modernization work will help to create a well - used public space for the community. Project Description The RCRC Expansion and Building Improvement Project will include the following elements: • Fagade /Beautification Improvements • Improved Disabled Access • Building /Safety Improvements — fire safety, electrical equipment upgrades, structural reinforcement, roof repairs • Energy Efficiency Improvements — heating, ventilation, air conditioning system modernization; efficient lighting fixtures, drought tolerant landscaping, sustainable building materials • Interior Improvements — furniture, fixtures, and equipment for expansion area and adjoining areas to existing building • Building Expansion — the addition of approximately 3,000 square feet to include additional classroom space, a computer lab facility, small teen center, exterior plaza and staff offices. The scope of work in the attached draft contract includes architectural services for site assessment, project outreach, design, and construction observation for the RCRC Expansion and Fagade Improvement Project. The scope is more fully detailed in the City's Request for Proposal (RFP) that was sent to architectural services firms (Attachment 1). On February 2, 2011, the City Clerk received eight (8) proposals in response to the RFP. Staff carefully evaluated the proposals and ranked firms using the evaluation criteria outlined below. Evaluation Criteria • Qualifications and experience • Understanding of project scope and objectives • Project team qualifications and experience • References given for similar clients and projects Quality of proposal Ability to complete work in a timely and efficient manner Cost Proposal City Council Meeting February 22, 2011 Page 3 of 4 Following the evaluation, interviews and reference checks were conducted with four (4) firms. As indicated in the RFP, the evaluation of proposals was qualifications -based and cost was only one factor in the evaluation. Following the City Council's consideration of this item, staff will enter into negotiations and execute a professional services agreement with one firm to complete this project. After completing this interview /review process, the top 4 architectural firms have been ranked in the following order: Rankine Firm 1. Carde Ten Architects 2. Meyer and Associates 3. Onyx Architects 4. MDM Architects Recommendation Based on the evaluation of bids using the criteria above, City staff has determined that the most qualified firm to perform this work is Carde Ten Architects. Carde Ten has significant experience with public agencies including the City of Duarte, the County of Los Angeles, California State University at Los Angeles, and California State University at Fullerton, among others. During the RFP interview process, Carde Ten's project team demonstrated a high level of project experience in completing similar projects on schedule and budget. Subsequent reference checks with other public agencies confirmed Carde Ten's demonstrated success in designing public facilities. Upon approval by the City Council, staff will open negotiations with Carde Ten to develop a contract scope of work, schedule, and fees in an amount not -to- exceed $208,500. Barring any unforeseen events, an agreement will be executed and Carde Ten will start design work in March 2011. Below is a summary of design fees related to this project. Service Estimated Cost Base Fee (Design Development, Construction Documents, Construction Observation ) $183,500 Allowances Acoustical, LEED Assistance, FF &E) $ 25,000 To tal (Not-to-Exceed) _ $208,500 City Council Meeting February 22, 2011 Page 4 of 4 Project Schedule It is anticipated that the design process will take approximately six (6) months to complete as follows: I. Schematic Design /Community Input: March — May 11. City Council Consideration of Design: June III. Design Development: June — August Following the completion of the design and outreach process, it is expected that construction will begin in September 2011 and take approximately nine (9) months to complete. FINANCIAL REVIEW The total appropriation needed to proceed with this project is $208,500 (from existing redevelopment bond proceeds). Funding for this project has been approved in the City's FY 2010 -11 Capital Improvement Program budget as the "Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Improvements." The funding source of this project is entirely redevelopment bond proceeds. Submitted by: 0� Chris Marcarello Director of Public Works Attachments :m (1) Request For Proposal for Architectural Services (2) Bid Proposals — Carole Ten, Meyer and Associates, Onyx Architects, MDM Architects, Rayane, Gonzales Goodale Architects, RMCA Architects, BOA Architects (3) Proposal Cost Summary (4) Sample Professional Services Agreement i i .. a - . c WeTi MW MiPA OT4 Mg. • - Submittal Deadline: February 2, 2011 11:00 A.M. City of Rosemead Request for Proposals Rosemead Community Center Expansion and Facade Improvement Program The City of Rosemead invites your firm to submit Proposals for plans to expand and complete fapade improvements of the City's Rosemead Community Recreation Center (RCRC) and its surrounding parkland areas. 1. Project Description Over the last year, the City completed a Parks and Facilities Master Plan to help serve as a guide for future capital improvements. As such, the City, with significant public input, identified a need to rehabilitate and expand a major community recreation facility located in the City's Civic Center area. This project includes the building expansion of the Rosemead Community Recreation Center (RCRC) and Facade improvements. RCRC is located at 3936 Muscatel Avenue. The overall City site includes the existing Rosemead Community Recreation Center, County Library Facility, and City Hall. City efforts are currently underway with developing conceptual designs for a redesign of the existing parking facility and public plaza area at this site. Designs will be completed in March and construction is scheduled for late spring /early summer 2011. Following the completion of the parking facility /public plaza area, it is expected that work will begin on the RCRC expansion and facade improvements, The Project will need to help integrate existing facilities and proposed improvements (including the ongoing parking /plaza project) into one cohesive space. It is hoped that improvements will help create a synergy and well -used public space for City residents when complete. The Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Facade Improvement Project will include the expansion of the existing facility building size by approximately 2,500 —3,000 square feet to include City administrative offices, a small teen center, and a computer lab facility. The project will include interior /exterior finishes and furniture, fixtures, and equipment for the new facility expansion. Additionally, the project will include interior /exterior improvements to the existing facility to help complement the proposed building expansion. The City also desires to replace the existing HVAC equipment at the facility and to design a new HVAC system for the entire facility (existing area and expansion area). II. Scope of Services This work includes professional design services for the project from schematic design, design development, and construction documents. The successful firm will provide all design services including building, structural design, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, site improvements, utilities coordination, aesthetic designs, and building landscaping. Work includes: 1 PHASE 1 —SITE ASSESSMENT AND SCHEMATIC DESIGN • Analyze site conditions, survey area, and determine specific site requirements needed to provide the best functional use of the site including access and pedestrian traffic flow, ADA requirements, and security considerations; • Verify utility constraints (Note: asbestos assessment reports, geotechnical investigations, topographic and boundary land surveys shall be provided by the City); • Analyze aesthetic considerations, maintenance options, and provide recommendations to City; • Coordinate with City staff to prepare up to three (3) layout /design options to include schematic floor plans based on the selected site plan; possibly utilizing a design study of the City Plaza and Parking Improvement Project that is currently underway. • Complete an accurate, preliminary cost estimate based on the selected site and schematic floor plan (including square footage measurements for each area); • Submit conceptual design to City for review and make up to five (5) formal presentations to the City, including evening meetings. PHASE II— DESIGN DEVELOPMENT /CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS • Coordinate with the City in the delivery of architectural and engineering services during pre - construction (conceptual, schematic, design development, and construction document phases); • Prepare all conceptual, schematic, and design development plans for the Project; • Coordinate with the City regarding CEQA compliance and environmental approvals; • Integrate all applicable local and state codes and design standards into the Project design; • Incorporate energy conservation features and the US Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEER) to a level of least a "Silver" Rating; • Provide structural engineering, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and landscape architect design services for the project; • Coordinate with the City's specialty consultants such as geotechnical, traffic, noise, civil engineering, and other elements; • Design all aspects of the design development including all on -site improvements, all on -site and off -site utilities, and any other related improvements resulting from new design aspects; • Develop cost estimates throughout the design process; • Assist the City with value engineering as required to meet budget constraints; • Assist with the development of Project schedule; • Prepare construction document plans and specification for submittal to the appropriate City departments and all necessary entities for review, approval, and permitting by local, state and county entities required; • Assist with selection of furniture, fixtures, and equipment; • Respond to and incorporate building official /permitting agency comments into Project design. • Present 60% and 90% design drawings to staff for review and approval (including electronic copies in CAD format and five (5) bard copies); • Prepare final bid -ready design and specification documents for construction bid; complete bid site walk with potential contractors. 0J PHASE III —CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES • Assist City in public bidding and award process; • Provide construction observation and support services during construction — including but not limited to: • Periodic job site visits of construction activities; • Attend bi- weekly construction coordination meetings; • Submittal and shop drawing review; • Respond to requests for information (RFI); • Assist City in change order review and negotiations; • Coordinate the production of as -built drawings; o Conduct a final project inspection with the City to ensure quality of work and compliance with project specifications, drawings, and contract documents (including sub - consultants). Ill. Deadline to Submit Proposals and Bid Submittal Each firm must submit one (1) original signed copy and five (5) duplicate copies of the complete proposal in a sealed envelope marked "Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Facade Improvements" and the name of the firm. Proposal submissions must contain page numbers. Please note that proposals are limited to a total of twenty -five (25) pages (including appendices). To be considered, all proposals shall be completely responsive to the RFP. "Completely responsive" is hereby defined as meeting all requirements as outlined in Section IV, Proposal Content and Format Proposals will be received by the City of Rosemead until Wednesday, February 2, 2011 at 11:00 a.m. If mailing, proposals shall be sent to: City of Rosemead Attn: City Clerk 8838 Valley Blvd. Rosemead, CA 91770 All proposals received after the deadline will be rejected and returned unopened. All proposals will become the property of the City and will be made available for public inspection after an award is made or all proposals are rejected. Rejection All proposals will be reviewed to determine conformance with the RFP requirements. Any proposal that the City deems incomplete, conditional, or non - responsive to the requirements of the RFP may be rejected. The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals as well. 3 IV. Proposal Content and Format The proposal shall include the following: 1. Understanding Scope of Services Describe your understanding of the services to be performed and /or the product to be provided. 2. Methodology and Work Plan — Provide a brief description of the proposed work program and techniques to complete the scope of services. The work program should demonstrate your firm's ability to conduct these services in a professional and efficient manner. 3. Experience and Qualification of Firm — Provide evidence that the proposing firm and its personnel and project team have expertise and experience in architecture, landscape architecture, project scheduling, cost - benefit analysis, value engineering, LEED and sustainable design, and general administration of all design construction components of the project. 4. Key Personnel — Please provide the names and qualifications of the key personnel assigned to this project. 5. List Sub - Consultants — Provide all sub - consultants that would be involved in this project. 6. References — Include similar experience with at least three (3) recent projects of similar scope (preferably with a public agency), including references with contact persons. 7. Time Schedule — A time schedule for the completion of services including your firm's estimate for the duration of the construction period for the project. B. Fee Proposal - Costs will be evaluated by the City if firm meets all other criteria listed in Section IV. A detailed fee schedule for the above - mentioned task schedule shall be provided for the proposed services. It is recommended that the consultants use their Best - Judgment to include other necessary tasks (with cost) that may not have been included in the listed scope of services. In addition, the consultant hourly rates should be included as part of the proposal. V. Screening, Selection, and Award Screening and selection will take place through the process described below. Contract award will be made to the firm that meets the requirements outlined in this RFP and submits the proposal considered to be most advantageous to City. Negotiations may or may not be conducted with selected Firm; hence, the proposal should include the Firm's most favorable terms and conditions since selection may be made without discussion with any Firm. The screening and selection process shall include the following: • Sealed proposals will be opened and evaluated to determine compliance with Section IV, Proposal Content and Format. Proposals meeting specified requirements will be considered responsive. • Responsive proposals will be further evaluated and reviewed by City staff. A recommendation will be made to the City Council to award the contract to the selected firm. • City Council approval is expected in February 2011. The City reserves the right to withdraw this RFP at any time without prior notice. Further, the City reserves the right to modify the RFP schedule described below. The City also makes no representations that any contract will be awarded to any Firm responding to this RFP. The City expressly reserves the right to reject any and all proposals without indicating any reasons for such rejection(s), to waive any irregularity or informality in any proposal or in the RFP procedure, and to be the sole judge of the responsiveness of any Firm and of the suitability of the materials and /or services to be rendered. VI. Evaluation Criteria After review for compliance with required qualifications, the City will evaluate proposals based on the following criteria. Cost will not be the sole criteria for which an award is made. General Quality and Responsiveness of the Proposal • Presentation, completeness, and thoroughness of the proposal • Responsiveness to the terms, conditions, and items of performance. • Grasp of the scope and services to be performed Qualifications and Experience of Firm and Key Personnel • Qualification and experience of key personnel • Experience and past performance for similar scope and services • Verifications of references Cost and Schedule Compatibility with the City's Needs If the firm is selected to provide design and construction support services listed in Section II, the following applies: Because the Firm will only be providing professional services for the benefit of the City, based on a fixed fee for such services, this procurement will be made in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 10 of the California Government Code, Sections 4526 and 4529.5, which requires that firms qualified to provide such services be selected on the basis of demonstrated competence and qualifications for the type of professional services required without regard to fees and, thereafter, may have to negotiate a contract with the City for those services at a fair and reasonable fee. The City will pay the firm on a time and materials basis with a fixed, not -to- exceed professional services fee for the project. Such fee shall include all costs associated incidentals and reproduction costs. VII. Tentative Schedule The tentative schedule and description of events for this RFP are given below: Date: Activity: January 12, 2011 Issue Request for Proposal (RFP) February 2, 2011 -11 A.M. Proposals due to the City Week of February 7, 2011 Interviews with City Staff February 22, 2011 Selection recommendation made to City Council for award of contract February 28, 2011 Agreement executed and issuance of Notice to Proceed March 14, 2011 Expected Start of Services 5 Chris Marcarello, Director of Public Works (626) 569 -2118 City of Rosemead 8838 E. Valley Blvd. Rosemead, California, 91770. Contract Terms /General Information Professional Services Agreement No agreement shall be binding upon the City until a Professional Services Agreement is completely executed by the Consultant, City Council, and approved by the City Attorney. Failure to execute and return the contract agreement and acceptable insurance documentations in a timely manner may be just cause for the City to rescind the contract offer. A sample professional services agreement (including insurance requirements) has been attached as a reference. Minimum Insurance Requirements The Consultant shall, at its own expense, procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Agreement by the Consultants, its agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors. Consultants shall also require all of its subcontractors assigned to the project to procure and maintain the same insurance requirement for the duration of Agreement. Conflict of Interest It shall be the duty of the Consultant to comply with all applicable State and Federal laws relating to prohibited conflicts of interest. As part of its response to this RFP, the Consultant shall disclose in writing any financial, business, employment, or other relationships with the City or with any of its officers, employees, or agents that are or were in existence during the twelve (12) calendar months immediately preceding, and including, the date the Consultant's response to the RFP is filed. In addition, the Consultant shall disclosed in writing any financial, business, employment or other relationships with any contractor or engineering who may have a financial in securing design and /or construction contracts for the project. The Consultant shall have a continuing obligation to keep the foregoing disclosures current and up -to -date during the term of this contract, and the Contractor's failure to timely disclose the existence of such a relationship shall be grounds for immediate termination of the contract. Permits and Local Licenses The Consultant shall obtain all applicable permits as necessitated for doing work within the City of Rosemead. Valid licensure shall be in place for life of the contract as stipulated in the executed Professional Services Agreement. H w u_ O' N J G a v. N O Z O F- J J ¢ O a O K a C 0 V_ c O 0 U O C j E m 0 0 a � a O a m_ E V So .� 0 L 3 Y C a E a a c °p O N � a a m 2 N a \ N C — O N C N O (0 N 1 W a o O O. a a o a L � a Y E x a a v C a 10 Y N o m C 10 N 3 $ u � 9 O c '^ m c v 'r a 00 0 c c a p • V C $r • L - a •� C D' a a A 3 N c 0 Y N � E m a a a N o: LL w p V L 10 3 a a 'N V C C p a V a _ Q ' V C V J a O C u a V o c N o i p O a o a LL i CITY OF ROSEMEAD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT 1. PARTIES AND DATE. This Agreement is made and entered into this NNth day of February, 2010 by and between the City of Rosemead, a municipal organization organized under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 8838 E. Valley Blvd., Rosemead, California 91770 ( "City ") and [insert Name of Company], a [insert type of business; corporation; limited liability company; etc.] with its principal place of business at [insert address] ( "Consultant "). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as "Party" and collectively as "Parties." ` 2. RECITALS. 2.1 Consultant. Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain professional services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing [insert type of services] services to public clients, is licensed in the State of California, and is familiar with the plans of City. 2.2 Project. City desires to engage` Consultant to render such services for the [insert Name of Project] project ( "Project ") asset forth in this Agreement. 3. TERMS. 3. 3.1.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional [insert type of services] consulting services necessary for the Project ("Services"). The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations. 3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from [insert start date] to [insert ending date], unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines. 3.2 Responsibilities of Consultant. [insert Name of Company] Page 2 of [insert last page of agreement] 3.2.1 Control and Payment of Subordinates; Independent Contractor. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. 3.2.2 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Schedule of Services set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant's conformance with the Schedule, City shall respond to Consultant's submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of City, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services. 3.2.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City. 3.2.4 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to City that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval of City. In the event that City and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause. As discussed below, any personnel who fail or refuse to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, or who are determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project or a threat to the safety of persons or property, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant at the request of the City. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows: [insert Names]. 3.2.5 City's Representative. The City hereby designates [insert Name or Title], or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ( "City's Representative "). City's Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for all purposes under this Contract. Consultant shall not accept [insert Name of Company] Page 3 of [insert last page of agreement] direction or orders from any person other than the City's Representative or his or her designee. 3.2.6 Consultant's Representative. Consultant hereby designates [insert Name or Title], or his /her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ( "Consultant's Representative "). Consultant's Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant's Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his /her best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement. 3.2.7 Coordination of Services. Consultant agrees to work closely with City staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City's staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times. 3.2.8 Standard of Care; Performance of Employees. Consultant shall perform all Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. Consultant warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services, including a City Business License, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant's failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. Any employee of the Consultant or its sub - consultants who is determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant and shall not be re- employed to perform any of the Services or to work on the Project. 3.2.9 Laws and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal /OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the City, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its officials, [insert Name of Company] Page 4 of [insert last page of agreement] directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations. 3.2.10 Insurance. 3.2.10.1 Time for Compliance. Architect shall maintain prior to the beginning of and for the direction of this Agreement insurance coverage as specified in Exhibit D attached to and part of this agreement. 3.2.11 Safety. Contractor shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Contractor shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and life saving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. 3.3 Fees and Payments. 3.3.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation shall not exceed [insert written dollar amount] ($[insert numerical dollar amount]) without advance written approval of the city manager's [replace 'city manager' with 'City Council' for amounts over $25,000] project manager. Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement. 3.3.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to City a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. City shall, within 45 days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon. 3.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City. [insert Name of Company] Page 5 of [insert last page of agreement] 3.3.4 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from City's Representative. 3.3.5 Prevailing Wages. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 1600, et seq., ( "Prevailing Wage Laws "), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall provide Consultant with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant's principal place of business and at the project site. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 3.4 Accounting Records. 3.4.1 Maintenance and Inspection. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement. 3.5 General Provisions. 3.5.1 Termination of Agreement. 3.5.1.1 Grounds for Termination. City may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those services [insert Name of Company] Page 6 of [insert last page of agreement] which have been adequately rendered to City, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 3.5.1.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request. 3.5.1.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated. 3.5.2 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose: CONSULTANT: [Insert Name] [Insert Address] [Insert City, State zip] Attn: [Contact Person] CITY: City of Rosemead P.O. Box 399 Rosemead, CA 91770 Attn: [Insert Name & Department] Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty -eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. 3.5.3 Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality. 3.5.3.1 Documents & Data; Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a non - exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on [insert Name of Company] Page 7 of [insert last page of agreement] computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ( "Documents & Data "). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non - exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. 3.5.3.2 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City. 3.5.4 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement. 3.5.5 Attorney's Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney's fees and all other costs of such action. 3.5.6 Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any alleged acts, omissions or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants and contractors arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all consequential damages and attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant shall defend, at Consultant's own cost, expense and risk, any and all such aforesaid suits, actions or [insert Name of Company] Page 8 of [insert last page of agreement] other legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers. Consultant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers, in any such suit, action or other legal proceeding. Consultant shall reimburse City and its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and /or volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the City, its directors, officials officers, employees, agents or volunteers. [IF FOR DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, ENGINEER OR LAND SURVEYOR), USE THE FOLLOWING ALTERNATIVE LANGUAGE AND DELETE THE ABOVE LANGUAGE. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers, and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or relating to any negligence, errors or omissions, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Contractor, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants, and contractors arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Contractor's Services, including without limitation the payment of all consequential damages, expert witness fees, and attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses. Contractor shall defend, at Contractor's own cost, expense and risk, any and all such aforesaid suits, actions or other legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers. Contractor shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers, in any such suit, action or other legal proceeding. Contractor shall reimburse City and its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and /or volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Contractor's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the City, its directors, officials officers, employees, agents, or volunteers.] 3.5.7 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties. 3.5.8 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Los Angeles County. 3.5.9 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 3.5.10 City's Right to Employ Other Consultants. City reserves right to [insert Name of Company] Page 9 of [insert last page of agreement] employ other consultants in connection with this Project. 3.5.11 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties. 3.5.12 Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. 3.5.13 Construction; References; Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days. All references to Consultant include all personnel, employees, agents, and subcontractors of Consultant, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement. 3.5.14 Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties. 3.5.15 Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise. 3.5.16 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties. 3.5.17 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. 3.5.18 Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or [insert Name of Company] Page 10 of [insert last page of agreement] making of this Agreement. Consultant further agrees to file, or shall cause its employees or subconsultants to file, a Statement of Economic Interest with the City's Filing Officer as required under state law in the performance of the Services. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 3.5.19 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non - discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City's Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted. 3.5.20 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self- insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 3.5.21 Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party. 3.5.22 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. 3.6 Subcontracting. 3.6.1 Prior Approval Required. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. [signatures on next page] [insert Name of Company] Page 11 of [insert last page of agreement] CITY OF ROSEMEAD [INSERT NAME OF CONSULTANT] 0 0 City Manager [UNDER $25,000] OR Mayor [OVER $25,000] Attest: Gloria Molleda City Clerk Name: [If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES, President OR Vice President AND Secretary, AND CORPORATE SEAL OF CONTRACTOR REQUIRED] Approved as to Form: Joseph M. Montes M City Attorney Name: Title: 02/08 Document4 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES [insert scope] m EXHIBIT B SCHEDULE OF SERVICES [insert schedule] m EXHIBIT C COMPENSATION [insert rates & authorized reimbursable expenses] C -1 *AnoI W 1191] INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Prior to the beginning of and throughout the duration of the Work, Consultant will maintain insurance in conformance with the requirements set forth below. Consultant will use existing coverage to comply with these requirements. If that existing coverage does not meet the requirements set forth here, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage to do so. Consultant acknowledges that the insurance coverage and policy limits set forth in this section constitute the minimum amount of coverage required. Any insurance proceeds available to City in excess of the limits and coverage required in this agreement and which is applicable to a given loss, will be available to City. Consultant shall provide the following types and amounts of insurance: [Note: verify minimum limit for each coverage with Risk Manager] Commercial General Liability Insurance using Insurance Services Office "Commercial General Liability" policy form CG 00 01 or the exact equivalent. Defense costs must be paid in addition to limits. There shall be no cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another. Limits are subject to review but in no event less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Business Auto Coverage on ISO Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 including symbol 1 (Any Auto) or the exact equivalent. Limits are subject to review, but in no event to be less that $1,000,000 per accident. If Consultant owns no vehicles, this requirement may be satisfied by a non -owned auto endorsement to the general liability policy described above. If Consultant or Consultant's employees will use personal autos in any way on this project, Consultant shall provide evidence of personal auto liability coverage for each such person. [Note: may need to delete workers' compensation and employer's liability insurance requirements for certain sole proprietorships, partnerships, or corporations without employees] Workers Compensation on a state - approved policy form providing statutory benefits as required by law with employer's liability limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident or disease. [Note: If the required limits for general liability, auto and employer's liability are $1 million or less, the following paragraph may be omitted.] Excess or Umbrella Liability Insurance (Over Primary) if used to meet limit requirements, shall provide coverage at least as broad as specified for the underlying coverages. Any such coverage provided under an umbrella liability policy shall include a drop down provision providing primary coverage above a maximum $25,000 self - insured retention for liability not covered by primary but covered by the umbrella. W Coverage shall be provided on a "pay on behalf' basis, with defense costs payable in addition to policy limits. Policy shall contain a provision obligating insurer at the time insured's liability is determined, not requiring actual payment by the insured first. There shall be no cross liability exclusion precluding coverage for claims or suits by one insured against another. Coverage shall be applicable to City for injury to employees of Consultant, subconsultants or others involved in the Work. The scope of coverage provided is subject to approval of City following receipt of proof of insurance as required herein. Limits are subject to review but in no event less than $ per occurrence. Professional Liability or Errors and Omissions Insurance as appropriate shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors or omissions of the consultant and "Covered Professional Services' as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this agreement. The policy limit shall be no less than $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. The policy must "pay on behalf of the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend. The policy retroactive date shall be on or before the effective date of this agreement. Insurance procured pursuant to these requirements shall be written by insurers that are admitted carriers in the state of California and with an A.M. Bests rating of A- or better and a minimum financial size VIL General conditions pertaining to provision of insurance coverage by Consultant. Consultant and City agree to the following with respect to insurance provided by Consultant: 1. Consultant agrees to have its insurer endorse the third party general liability coverage required herein to include as additional insureds City, its officials, employees and agents, using standard ISO endorsement No. CG 2010 with an edition prior to 1992. Consultant also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise. 2. No liability insurance coverage provided to comply with this Agreement shall prohibit Consultant, or Consultant's employees, or agents, from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Consultant agrees to waive subrogation rights against City regardless of the applicability of any insurance proceeds, and to require all contractors and subcontractors to do likewise. 3. All insurance coverage and limits provided by Contractor and available or applicable to this agreement are intended to apply to the full extent of the policies. Nothing contained in this Agreement or any other agreement relating to the City or its operations limits the application of such insurance coverage. 4. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing. D -2 5. No liability policy shall contain any provision or definition that would serve to eliminate so- called "third party action over" claims, including any exclusion for bodily injury to an employee of the insured or of any contractor or subcontractor. 6. All coverage types and limits required are subject to approval, modification and additional requirements by the City, as the need arises. Consultant shall not make any reductions in scope of coverage (e.g. elimination of contractual liability or reduction of discovery period) that may affect City's protection without City's prior written consent. 7. Proof of compliance with these insurance requirements, consisting of certificates of insurance evidencing all of the coverages required and an additional insured endorsement to Consultant's general liability policy, shall be delivered to City at or prior to the execution of this Agreement. In the event such proof of any insurance is not delivered as required, or in the event such insurance is canceled at any time and no replacement coverage is provided, City has the right, but not the duty, to obtain any insurance it deems necessary to protect its interests under this or any other agreement and to pay the premium. Any premium so paid by City shall be charged to and promptly paid by Consultant or deducted from sums due Consultant, at City option. 8. Certificate(s) are to reflect that the insurer will provide 30 days notice to City of any cancellation of coverage. Consultant agrees to require its insurer to modify such certificates to delete any exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation imposes no obligation, or that any party will "endeavor' (as opposed to being required) to comply with the requirements of the certificate. 9. It is acknowledged by the parties of this agreement that all insurance coverage required to be provided by Consultant or any subcontractor, is intended to apply first and on a primary, noncontributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self insurance available to City. 10. Consultant agrees to ensure that subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project who is brought onto or involved in the project by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance coverage required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with subcontractors and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review. 11. Consultant agrees not to self- insure or to use any self- insured retentions or deductibles on any portion of the insurance required herein and further agrees that it will not allow any contractor, subcontractor, Architect, Engineer or other entity or person in any way involved in the performance of work on the project contemplated by this agreement to self- insure its obligations to City. If Consultant's existing coverage includes a deductible or self- insured retention, the D -3 deductible or self- insured retention must be declared to the City. At that time the City shall review options with the Consultant, which may include reduction or elimination of the deductible or selfinsured retention, substitution of other coverage, or other solutions. 12. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of the contract to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the City will negotiate additional compensation proportional to the increased benefit to City. 13. For purposes of applying insurance coverage only, this Agreement will be deemed to have been executed immediately upon any party hereto taking any steps that can be deemed to be in furtherance of or towards performance of this Agreement. 14. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of City to inform Consultant of non - compliance with any insurance requirement in no way imposes any additional obligations on City nor does it waive any rights hereunder in this or any other regard. 15. Consultant will renew the required coverage annually as long as City, or its employees or agents face an exposure from operations of any type pursuant to this agreement. This obligation applies whether or not the agreement is canceled or terminated for any reason. Termination of this obligation is not effective until City executes a written statement to that effect. 16. Consultant shall provide proof that policies of insurance required herein expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Proof that such coverage has been ordered shall be submitted prior to expiration. A coverage binder or letter from Consultant's insurance agent to this effect is acceptable. A certificate of insurance and /or additional insured endorsement as required in these specifications applicable to the renewing or new coverage must be provided to City within five days of the expiration of the coverages. 17. The provisions of any workers' compensation or similar act will not limit the obligations of Consultant under this agreement. Consultant expressly agrees not to use any statutory immunity defenses under such laws with respect to City, its employees, officials and agents. 18. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this section are not intended as limitations on coverage, limits or other requirements nor as a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any given policy. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue, and is not intended by any party or insured to be limiting or all - inclusive. M , 19.These insurance requirements are intended to be separate and distinct from any other provision in this agreement and are intended by the parties here to be interpreted as such. 20. The requirements in this Section supersede all other sections and provisions of this Agreement to the extent that any other section or provision conflicts with or impairs the provisions of this Section. 21. Consultant agrees to be responsible for ensuring that no contract used by any party involved in any way with the project reserves the right to charge City or Consultant for the cost of additional insurance coverage required by this agreement. Any such provisions are to be deleted with reference to City. It is not the intent of City to reimburse any third party for the cost of complying with these requirements. There shall be no recourse against City for payment of premiums or other amounts with respect thereto. Consultant agrees to provide immediate notice to City of any claim or loss against Consultant arising out of the work performed under this agreement. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve City. MR CARDE TENIARCHirECTs 1638 19th street, santa monica, ca 90404 ph: 310.453.4427 /tax: 310.453.5515 www. card eten. com TABLE OF CONTENTS Canoga park library 1 CARDE TEN 1 1 ARCHITKTS PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 COVER LETTER 2 1. UNDERSTANDING SCOPE OF SERVICE 3 2. METHODOLOGY & WORK PLAN 4 - 5 3. EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATION OF FIRM 6 - 10 4. KEY PERSONNEL 11 5. LIST SUB - CONSULTANTS & ORGANIZATIONAL CHART 12 6, REFERENCES 13 7. TIME SCHEDULE 14 8. FEE PROPOSAL 15 9. EXHIBITS I PROJECTS PROFILES 16 - 23 Canoga park library 1 CARDE TEN 1 1 ARCHITKTS COVER LETTER o January 31, 2011 Chris Marcarello, Director of Public Works U City of Rosemead L_ z 8838 E. Valley Blvd. Rosemead, CA 91770 RE: ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER = EXPANSION & FACADE IMPROVEMENTS U Dear Mr. Marcarello: Q Carle Ten Architects (CTA) is a service - oriented firm specializing in the design and renovation of buildings that o enhance local communities. Recent projects include community centers, childcare centers, libraries, schools, and recreation centers. Given the nature of our focus, it is no surprise that most of our clients are municipalities LLJ a (e.g. Los Angeles (City and County), Pasadena, Covina, Duarte), institutions (e.g, The Getty Center, UC Irvine, Cal y State LA, LAUSD), and non - profit organizations (e.g. The Salvation Army, Little Tokyo Service Center, American Cancer Society). LL, _ I would like point out several aspect of our office that are particularly relevant to your projects: Q q PUBLIC AGENCY EXPERIENCE: We are comfortable working within the rigors of public scrutiny and public dollars that are attached with Public Agencies. Our clients include: Cities of Los Angeles, Covina, San Fernando. Santa Clarita, Burbank, Duarte, Pasadena, Covina & Santa Monica, County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Q Housing Authority City of Los Angeles, Cal State University campuses at Los Angeles & Fullerton, Pierce College, UC Irvine, LA Valley College, LAUSD, Mono County Board of Education, etc. U PRINCIPAL INVOLVEMENT: At CTA, all projects are produced under the direct supervision of both partners. One serves as the overall Principal in Charge, the other, as the Back -up Principal. SUSTAINABLE DESIGN / LEED: We have several projects that have, or are targeted for, LEED certification. All of our project architects (including both principals) are LEED certified professionals. HANDS -ON CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE: CTA started out as a design and construction firm. As such, the princi- pals and staff are trained with extensive site construction experience. This hands -on training constantly hones our skills in the practical matter of construction management, cost estimating, scheduling, and construction feasibility. COMMUNITY OUTREACH: Because of our focus, we design in a collaborative spirit. We encourage community participation and believe it enhances the final product. ON -TIME AND ON- BUDGET PROJECTS: We take pride in seeking the best design solution within the financial reach of our clients. Perhaps our proudest accomplishment is that over 80% of our work comes from previously satisfied clients. In short, this project is precisely the kind of job we relish. It springs from, and has a direct impact upon, a local community. We would enjoy being a part of this public, shared resource. Sincerely, /yr-1 Brian Ten, AIA, LEED Al Principal, Team Leader CARDE TEN ARCHITECTS brian @cardeten.com 310.453.4427 X22 1. UNDERSTANDING SCOPE OF SERVICE • Keep on Budget during design and throughout construction • Maintain Schedule during design and throughout construction CARDE TEN' ARCRi>FCrs The Rosemead Community Recreation Center is an extremely popular and heavily used facility for both adults and for children. Careful planning and location of the expansion is of paramount importance in the continuing success of this facility. It is our understanding that phasing plans will need to be developed in the early design stages to minimize disruption to on -going activities, minimize downtime and at the same time provide for health, safety and security for children and adults who are using the Center during construction activities. The final design solution should minimize staffing requirements for supervision, provide for security and separation for the Pre - school & Community Center functions, provide acoustical privacy for the many different activities and programs and accommodate the different hours of operation and nature of the Center's activities. For instance, the City Offices, Teen Center & Pre - school have very different users, hours of operation, security needs and circulation, yet all these areas need to function under one roof. PROJECT OBJECTIVES INCLUDE: CONTENT Integrate the Center Expansion and blend with the Public Plaza & Parking Project Build Community Support & Consensus for the Improvements & Expansion Understand Pedestrian, Pre - school & Vehicular circulation patterns Create a vibrant and well used public space for residents FUNCTIONAL Design Phasing Plans to minimize disruption to on -going Community Center activities Provide for Security Needs- Pre - school, Teen, City Staff & Seniors Design to minimize staffing requirements Provide acoustical separation of activities PRACTICAL • Design MEP Systems to incorporate energy conservation and sustainable features canga park library 2. METHODOLOGY & WORK PLAN Our approach is to wrap the Facade and Expansion Improvements (City Offices, Teen Center, Computer Lab) into our standard project phasing. PHASE I SITE ASSESSMENT AND SCHEMATIC DESIGN SITE ASSESSMENT. Here, we review the site conditions, the underlying reports /investiga- tions relevant to the project, and the City / objectives / program. We will look at the traffic patterns, the new City Plaza and parking improvements, and verify utility constraints. SCHEMATIC DESIGN: During this stage, we generate 3 layout/ design options that includes site plan, floor plan, key sections, and building elevations. We will establish the main materials and select the appropriate building systems (e.g. HVAC, etc.) Project Phasing, budget, cost estimates, schedule and LEED checklist are established in this phase. During this stage, we would present this scheme to the relevant stakeholders. PHASE II DESIGN DEVELOPMENT / CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS DESIGN DEVELOPMENT: With an approved Schematic Design, advance the design to in- clude detailed decisions concerning elevations/ massing, ADA access, building systems (structural, mechanical, electrical, fire /life safety, energy. LEED), landscape, and other features that comprise the developed design. We will meet with all applicable regulatory agencies having jurisdiction over the project; e.g. building department, fire departments, utility companies, etc. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: Here we convert the design into the language of the con- struction industry with detailed drawings, and calculations that enable review agencies to issue permits and contractors to execute the design. We will provide a fully coordinated set of drawings including architectural, engineer- ing (structural, mechanical, LEED Silver, electrical, energy) with calculations, landscape design, specifications, and signage. We will coordinate with the City's specialty consultants and coordinate with the new City Plaza and Parking Improvement Project. PLAN CHECK REVIEW: We will submit the project for Plan Check review and incorporate comments and corrections into the project documents. Cost estimates, assistance with selection of FF &E and value engineering are included in this phase. 4 CARDS TEN i AnrHlrccrs anna bing arnold children center 2. METHODOLOGY & WORK PLAN PHASE III- CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES BIDDING: We will coordinate with the City in the preparation of the bid documents. We will participate in the pre -bid job walk to describe the design and answer questions from the bidders. We will issue bid addenda as necessary CONSTRUCTION: We will attend job site meetings, expedite all Requests for Information, assist in the review of Change Order Proposals, review contractor Payment Applications, incorporate all change orders and as -built documents (from contractor) into a final Re- cord Set of Documents, secure, review and deliver all Submittals and Manuals to the City upon project completion, assist the City in expediting Punch List completion. GARDE TEN 1 ARCHiTCCTs harbor gateway library 3. EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS OF FIRM STRENGTH AND STABILITY OF FIRM CTA was founded in 1990 by Scott Carde and Brian Ten who remain the sole owners and principals of the firm. They are committed to a focus on community oriented design with colleges, municipalities, non - profits organizations, and institutions as their client base. LEGAL The firm is financially stable and the firm has never been the subject of any legal action or claim. Most of the firm's work comes from previously satisfied clients. FOCUS The firm focuses on buildings that will enhance the quality of life in specific communities. SERVICES Architectural Design Master Planning Feasibility Studies Renovation Conceptual Design Programming Design -Build Scoping Documents Fund- raising Assistance Specifications Construction Management Graphics Cost Estimating Value Engineering Building Evaluations Troubleshooting Construction Support Services STAFFING This project will be produced under the direct supervision of both partners. One serves as the overall Principal In Charge, the other, as the Quality Control Officer. Brian Ten will be the principal in charge. STRENGTH Finally the strength of our design comes from our ability to accurately reflect our clients' vision in the built environment. We work with the client and the end user of the space to ensure a full understanding of their philosophy, identity, and needs. SAMPLE LIST OF PROJECTS Here are a sampling of our projects for public clients whose work involves both public FOR PUBLIC AGENCIES agency construction and documents preparation. Burbank Creative Arts Center Aliso Pico Park Educational & Cultural Center Family Resource Center Duarte Teen Center Anna Bing Children's Center Hope VI Community Center Hammack Community Center Pamela Park Gym Jackie Robinson Park Gym. IS Senior Center Harbor City Library Washington Park Recreation Center/ Gym, Fire Station 436 Loma Alta Park Community Center/ Gym Delano Park Recreation Center 51 City of Burbank City of Los Angeles Community Dev. Commission City of Duarte California State University, Los Angeles Housing Authority, City of Los Angeles City of Palmdale LA County DPW LA County DPW City of Los Angeles LA County DPW City of Pasadena LA County DPW City of Los Angeles GARDE TEN I ARCHITECTS burbank creative art center 3. EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS OF FIRM Algin Sutton Park Child Care Center ADA Survey of 288 LA City Parks Sorensen Library Hooper Primary Center East Valley Animal Care Center LaCrescenta Library Wingate Park Las Palmas Park Pierce College Child Development Center Miramonte School Addition California State Fullerton Children's Center Mammoth Child Care Center County of LA Fire Department Womens Opportunities Center East Rancho Dominguez Library Canoga Park Library Chinatown Branch Library Animal Spay 6 Neuter Clinics Pico Rivera Library East Rancho Dominguez Library LA County DPW City of Los Angeles LA County DPW LAUSD City of Los Angeles LA County DPW City of Covina City of San Fernando Piece College LAUSD California State University, Fullerton Mono County Board of Education LA County DPW University of California, Irvine LA County DPW City of Los Angeles City of Los Angeles LA County DPW Community Dev. Commission LA County DPW paseo sanla tiara apartments GARDE TEN i AncHnECrs 3. EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS OF FIRM EXPERIENCE WITH LEED BUILDING CERTIFICATION The majority of our institutional clients have mandated that all new buildings must achieve a LEED certification by the U.S. Green Building Council. Our Project Team is familiar with the tenets and guidelines of this program and fully sup- ports the intent of these mandates. CTA is a member of the US Green Building Council. Both partners are certified as LEED accredited professionals, he firm has been a member of the US Green Building Council for many years and the following senior staff are LEED accredited professionals: Scott Carde LEED AP Daniela Rechtzaid LEED AP Brian Ten LEED AP Perry Cortell LEED AP Erik Mar LEED AP Manny Iglesias LEED AP Angela Perez LEED AP We do not believe that sustainable design features are 'parked' onto a building. Rather, we are strong advocates of fully integrating sustainability into both the design process and product. As a matter of course, CTA incorporates many sustainable design features in its designs. For example, in the temperate climate of Ventura, there could be great energy conserva- tion from basic design moves such as solar orientation, daylighting, high - performance glazing, and natural ventilation. The simple act of selecting a 'cool roof' material can significantly reduce the tenants energy bills. LEED Projects: Harbor Library Certified East Valley Animal Care Center Certified Working Artists of Ventura (mixed use) Silver Northwest Area Police Station Gold Sorensen Park Library Silver (possible Gold) Pierce College: Child Development Center Certified (possible Silver) LA Valley College: Child Development Center Certified Cal State, Fullerton: Child Care Silver equivalent Sorensen Park Gymnasium Silver S GARDE TEN' AnrHn[crs chinatown library 3, EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS OF FIRM VALUE ENGINEERING We conduct in -house cost estimates and cost benefit analysis throughout the process. In addition, there will be several professional estimates by independent cost estimators at key project points. If at any point, we believe the job is running over budget, we work with the entire team (architects, consultants, cost estimator, client, etc.) to adjust the design sufficiently to bring the project back within budget. In addition, both Scott Carde and Brian Ten are general contractors and maintain strong relationships with other contractors. When needed, we get feedback from specific sub- contractors about specific issues. This has proven valuable when looking to reduce costs prudently. One evidence of our success with adhering to budgets is our track record for bids received, Our most recent projects include: Cal State, Fullerton Budget: $7.1 M 7 Bids 6 Within Budget Child Care tenter Sorensen Park Library Budget: $6.OM 9 Bids 7 Within Budget LA Valley College Budget: $12.1M 8 Bids ' 6 Within Budget Child Development Center Pierce College Budget: $7M 15 Buds 9 Within Budget Child Development Center TEAM MANAGEMENT PLAN The project will be well served with senior staff members from Carde Ten and from each of the consultant firms. We insist that all our consultants assign principals (as CTA does) to ensure priority for our projects. Other staff will join the project as needed. All senior level staff will remain with the job from design through occupancy. We do not pass the project from one department to another; i.e. design to construction documents to construction administration. This means the project history is continuous and impor- tant project information is not lost. wes[land school 9 CARDE TEN'. Aamnrcrs 3. EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS OF FIRM QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL Our quality control is a result of several components. PRINCIPAL INVOLVEMENT: Our insistence on significant principal involvement throughout is crucial. No project is trumped by another. While one principal is in charge of the day - to -day aspects of the project, the other principal serves as the Quality Control Officer. In that role, Scott Carde will only insert himself on specific occasions to review in detail the project documents and correspondence. These experienced 'fresh eyes' help identify weak areas in the design and documentation. We expect the same of our consultants. For this project, we expect those detailed reviews to occur at each significant submittal required by the City. CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE: Both Scott Carde and Brian Ten have significant experience as builders. We maintain good relationships with other builders, and as necessary, we seek feedback from specialty sub- contractors about costs and construction feasibility. BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING (BIM): Finally, some of our documents will be de- veloped under a Building Information Model (Revit), a sophisticated software that helps identify conflicts in the documents. Again, evidence for our quality control program can be seen in the change order history of recent projects. Below, we identify the construction changes that resulted from the documents. La Crescenta Library Total Change Orders 5% Documents` 1.4% Topanga Area Police Station Total Change Orders 5% Documents 2,4% Cesar Chavez Gardens Apart Total Change Orders 1.5% Documents .85% Palm Village° Senior Housing Total Change Orders 2.1616 Documents ' -f.01% harbor gateway library 10 CARDE TENI, ARCHITECTS 4. KEY PERSONNEL EDUCATION Bachelor of Science University of California, Los Angeles, CA Master of Architecture University of California, Los Angeles, CA REGISTRATION Licensed Architect - California LEED Accredited Professional AFFILIATIONS American Institute of Architects Asian American Architects /Engineers Association Member BRIAN TEN, AIA, LEED AP PRINCIPAL Founding partner of Carde Ten Architects, Brian Ten has been designing buildings in the Southern California area for over 25 years. He is well versed in working with green /sus- tainable technologies, public sector projects and understands the challenges, constraints and opportunities that come with working with public money and public participation. SELECTED PROJECTS The Creative Arts Center Washington Park Gymnasium East Valley Animal Shelter Anna Bing Arnold Child Care Center Pierce College LA Valley College Cesar Chavez Apartmens & CCC Rainbow Housing Algin Sutton Child Care Center Loma Alta Gymnasium Kids City Leadership Center Pamela Park Gymnasium Cal State Fullerton Mono County Palm Village Housing LA Boys & Girls Club SCOTT CARDE, FAIA, LEED AP PRINCIPAL EDUCATION Founding partner of Carde Ten Architects Scott Carde has been designing buildings in Bachelor of Arts the Southern California area for over 35 years. Because of his strong construction back - Yale University, New Haven, CT ground, he is involved in the construction administration of the project. Master of Architecture University of California, Los Angeles, CA REGISTRATION Licensed Architect - California Licensed Architect - Nevada LEED Accredited Professional AFFILIATIONS American Institute of Architects Historic Preservation Committee Los Angeles Conservancyr SELECTED PROJECTS UC Irvine: The Learning Center UC Irvine: Women's Opportunities Ctr. Moorpark College: Library Renovation Chinatown Branch Library Creative Arts Center South Central community Center Delano Recreational Center Canoga Park Library Harbor Gateway Library Village School Aliso Pico Cultural Center Hope VI Development Center East LA Resource Center archer school for girls 11 CARDE TEN i ARCHITECTS 5. LIST OF SUB - CONSULTANTS & ORGANIZATIONAL CHART Each Sub Consulting firm has experience with similar structures, has been in business for over 10 years, and is fully licensed and insured. The firms proposed below have already worked with CTA on projects, and we recommend them because of their proven accuracy and alacrity. WORKING TOGETHER ME ENGINEERS LAWRENCE M05S ASSOCIATES GENERAL CONTRACTOR CARDE TEN ARCHITECTS BRIAN TEN, AIA , LEEDAP SCOTT CARDE, FAIA , LEED AP z J z O V I m L.L O I— J 15 PROJECTS 8 PROJECTS 14 PROJECTS MEP ENGINEER ME ENGINEERS PH:310.842.8700 CONTACT: FRANK STEFAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WEIDLINGER ASSOCIATES PH: 310.315.8430 CONTACT: BRIAN COCHRAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LAWRENCE MOSS ASSOCIATES PH: 818.248.5200 CONTACT: LARRY MOSS 12 REGULATORY AGENCIES CARDE TEN 1 ARCHITECTS chinalown library 6. REFERENCES village school Contact: loan Maltese, Executive Director Phone: 818 888.4559 Email: 1 Malt ese @childdevelopmentinstitute.org Client: Child Development Institute Project: Child Development Institute Early Learning Center Contact: Pamela Kisor (Former Director) Email: pamelak @dslextreme.com Phone: 626.622.1615 Client: California State University, Los Angeles CA Project: Anna Bing Arnold Child Care Center Contact: Vince Yu Email: VYU @dpw.lacounty.gov Phone: 626.458.2580 Client: Los Angeles Department of Public Works Project: Colonel Leon Washington Gymnasium Loma Alta Gymnasium Sorenson Gymnasium La Crescenta Library Contact: Evi Alpert Email: ealpert @templeetzchaim.org Phone: 80 5.497,6891 Client: Temple Etz Chaim Project: Temple Etz Chaim 13 CARDE TEN i AecxnECrs 7. TIME SCHEDULE village school PHASE I: SITE ASSESSMENT AND SCHEMATIC DESIGN ITEM DURATION Notice to Proceed Pre - Design 10 Calendar Days Set Project Objectives Confirm Site & Site Boundaries Review/ Evaluate Existing Conditions Context / Adjacencies Analyze Site Gather Site Info. & As- builts Prelim. Utility Information Pedestrian & Vehicular Circulation Fire Department Access Review Soils Report Initiate Survey Reconcile Budget & Program Concept Site Plans Schematic Plan & Elevations 21 Calendar Days Schematic Plan Presentation Client Review & Comment 10 Calendar Days PHASE II: DESIGN DEVELOPMENTICONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ITEM DURATION Design Dev. Plans & Elevations 30 Calendar Days Design Development Presentation Client Review & Comment 10 Calendar Days Finalize Base Plans 60% & 90% Review Submission 45 Calendar Days Client Review & Comment 10 Calendar Days 100% Construction Documents 15 Calendar Days Consultant Engineers Coordination/ Check sets Plan Check Corrections & Bid Docs 21 Calendar Days PHASE III: CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES ITEM DURATION (Exclusive Of City Review) Bidding & Award 60 Calendar Days Construction & Occupancy 10 Months Completion of Record Drawings 30 Calendar Days 14 CARDE TEN' AmmITrcrs 8, FEE PROPOSAL PROPOSED FEES AND COSTS BASE FEE CALCULATIONS Based upon our understanding of the work, we will use our base fee schedule below for small, remodel & additions. This fee will include: Architec- tural, Structural, MEP and Landscape Architecture, Cost estimates, Phasing Diagrams, Specifications, and Coordination with City Consultants. We are assuming $1,600,000 in constructions costs for the expansion, fa4ade improvements & mechanical systems replacement. REMODEL / MODERNIZATION FEE SCHEDULE 1.12% of the first five hundred thousand ($500,000) of construction cost. 2. 11.5% of the next five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) of construction cost 3. 11% of the next one million dollars ($1,000,000) of construction cost. 4. 10% of the next four million dollars ($4,000,000) of construction cost. 5. 9% of the next four million dollars ($4,000,000) of construction cost. 6 8% of construction costs in excess of ten million dollars Total Base Fee - ADDITIONAL SERVICES TO BE ADDED TO BASE FEES $60,000 $57,500 $66,000 0 0 0 $183,500 1. Security Systems $8,000 2. Formal Presentations ($1,000 per meeting- Note 2 meeting included in base fees above) $3,000 3. FF &E Assistance (allowance) $10,000 4. Acoustical Engineering (allowance) $5,000 Total Additional Services to be added to base fees $36,000 TOTAL BASE FEE $219,500 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES (Note: All reimbursable expenses are subject to a 10% mark -up.) Reprographics In -house Large Plots (24 "00" or larger) Large Plots (24:00" or larger) Small Plots Small Plots Xerox Copies: 8.5x11 Commercial Travel Postage / Messengers / Deliveries Other Standard Reimbursable Expenses Renderings /Models As -Built Documentation Audio - Visual Consultant Programming Consultants: (as approved by client) Fees Advanced on Behalf of the Client / Project HOURLY RATES Color $40 per sheet B &W $20 per sheet Color $20 per sheet B &W $10 per sheet B &W $0.15 per sheet Invoice CONSULTANTS $0.45 / mile Invoice Principals Invoice Project Engineers Invoice /Hourly Staff Engineers Invoice CADD Staff Invoice Support Staff Invoice /Hourly Invoice Invoice Here are our hourly rates. We prefer to work on a fixed fee basis to avoid the misunderstandings about hours worked. Nevertheless, hourly rates are helpful for small, urgent work tasks that can pop up on any job. GARDE TEN ARCHITECTS Principals $190 / hour Project Architects / Managers $150 / hour Staff Architects / Managers $125 / hour Technical Staff $100 / hour Support Staff $ 65 / hour CONSULTANTS Principals $150 / hour Project Engineers $100 / hour Staff Engineers $ 85 / hour CADD Staff $ 65 / hour Support Staff $ 45 / hour 15 CARDE TEN; ARCHUECrs 9. EXHIBITS PROJECT PROFILES ANNA BING ARNOLD CHILDREN CENTER- EXPANSION Integrating the natural terrain with three small buildings creates a child - scaled central and secure courtyard. Through a combination of ceiling heights, natural and artificial illumination, materials and colors, a rich palette of experi- ences are available for children. Client: California State University, Los Angeles Principal - in - Charge: Brian Ten, AIA, LEED AP 16 CAME TEN ARCHITECTS The Los Angeles City Board of Education's Facilities Committee has proposed the construction of new schools, as well as classroom additions and playground expansions, to alleviate overcrowding at multitrack school. These projects are funded under the State's Escutia legislation, which provides monies to districts specifically for relief of overcrowding situations. Hooper Primary Center #1 is a K -2 school it is a 33,000 sf facility situated on a 1.85 acre site directly across the street from Hooper Avenue Elementary School. The primary center shall provide 380 total new seals, comprised of 16 classrooms (3 kindergarten, 13 regular), administrative offices, multipurpose component, a food service building with support spaces and a lunch shelter. Client: Los Angeles Unified School District Principal -in- Charge: Brian Ten, AIA, LEED AP 9. EXHIBITS PROJECT PROFILES HOOPER PRIMARY CENTER 17 CARDE TENT ARCHITECTS A new Library for the City of Los Angeles, located on Harbor City, the new 15,000 SF features a children /teen /adult sections, chil- dren's story time area, separate community room w/ warming kitchen, staff work area/ lounge, public art component, visual control from two desks: circulation and reference, interne[ connections at each chair; approx. 36, computer stations, Conference room, separate computer classroom, for a shared program w /nearby Narbone High School, etc. It was feature in The Library Journal (Dec. 2007) issue on Green Libraries. Client: City of Los Angeles, Library Department Principal -in -Charge: Scott Carrie, FAIA, LEED AP 9. EXHIBITS PROJECT PROFILES 18 CARDE TEN! ARCHITECTS HARBOR GATEWAY LIBRARY Process: Full A/E services, Com- munity Process (5 meetings /presentations), 3 -D Physical Model and Digital Renderings) Program: Children /teen /adult sections, children's story time area, separate community room w/ warming kitchen, staff work area /lounge, public art component, visual control from two desks: circulation and reference, internet connections at each chair; approx. 36, computer stations, conference room, etc. Sustainable Features: Light shelves to reflect natural light to the interior spaces; photo -vol- taic cells on the root to generate electricity for the library. The roof slope is specifically designed to maximize the effectiveness of the cells. Client: County of Los Angeles Principal -in- Charge: Scott Carde, FAIA, LEED AP Project Manager: Erik Mar, LEED AP 9. EXHIBITS PROJECT PROFILES CANOGA PARK LIBRARY 19 CARDE TEN ARCnnECrs 9. EXHIBITS PROJECT PROFILES HOPE VI DEVELOPMENT & CHILD CARE CENTER The Housing Authority for the City of Los Angeles ( HACLA) received a HUD grant to replace over 400 units of post -WWII housing in East LA that had fallen into disrepair. As part of that grant, HACLA hired CTA to design a facility to house the housing management office, a child care center, and a youth building. The design is organized by two key principles: First, the buildings and the courtyard are visually permeable. Instead of turning its back to the street as the knee -jerk response to gang violence, the design is open and accessible. A two -story glazed lobby to the Management Building faces the busy 4th Street and is a stark contrast to the bunker - like public buildings in the area. It boldly asserts its public role. Second, the three functions are each given a separate structure, partially in response to their distinct uses and partially to create a much needed community outdoor space. While each facility has a secured, private outdoor area (e.g, child care playground, management staff outdoor patio), the public side is emphasized. The shared court has multiple entries and exits and is visually accessible to passers-by, including patrol cars. The complex is a mix of masonry, stucco, and glass. There are bright colors, both indoors and out, to liven up the experience. Client: Housing Authority City of Los Angeles Principal -in- Charge: Scott Carde, FAIA, LEED AP Project Manager: Erik Mar, AIA, LEED AP 20 CARDS TEN'. ARCHITECTS 9. EXHIBITS PROJECT PROFILES LOMA ALTA PARK GYMNASIUM & RECREATIONAL CENTER Loma Alta Park is located on a seven -acre site a new 13,500 sq. ft. gymnasium and com- munity building . Renovation and expantion of two parking lots; new walkways; new security lighting; landscaping and irrigation. Client: County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works Principal - in - Charge: Brian Ten, AIA, LEED AP Project Manager: Erik Mar, AIA, LEED AP Angela Perez, LEED AP 21 CARDE TEN ARCHITECTS This 34,000 st building was also for a specific 'community', the members of a Temple congregation. This was a more difficult process, and it fell to us to build consensus within a fractured membership that had tried for 10 years to build this center, We met with individuals, with factions, and with staff to reach an amenable solution. The project was universally praised by the entire congregation upon completion. The project has: Classes, Meeting Rooms, Art Room, Library, Lobby, Rotunda Lobby, Assembly Room, Commercial Kitchen, Offices, and Outside Play Areas. Client: Temple Etz Chaim Principal - in - Charge: Scott Carde, FAIA, LEED AP 9. EXHIBITS PROJECT PROFILES 22 CARDE TEN ARCRaKTs TEMPLE ETZ CHAIM 9. EXHIBITS PROJECT PROFILES This 40,000 sf building. The LA City council woman in charge of this project only wanted to have one public meeting. In addition, we went door -to -door to solicit the feedback and support from resident adjacent to the project. It was not a tough sell since this disadvantaged neighborhood overwhelmingly supported the new center. The Project Includes: Gymnasium, Multipurpose Room, Offices, Public Lobby, Class Rooms, Game Rooms, Computer Classroom, Dance /Aerobics Room, Weight Room, Photography /Art Room and Commercial Kitchen. Client: The Salvation Army Principal -in - Charge: Scott Carde, FAIA, LEED AP SOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY CENTER 23 GARDE TEN'' ARCHITECTS EXPANSION AND FACADE IMPROVEMENTS ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER 3936 MUSCATEL AVENUE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA. - Pas FOR THE PROVISION OF PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES. FEBRUARY 2011. p meyer and associates architecture landscape architecture park and recreation planning meyer and associates architecture, landscape architecture, park and recreation planning February 1, 2011 Chris Marcarello Director of Public Works City of Rosemead 8838 E. Valley Boulevard Suite 300 Rosemead, CA 91770 SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES EXPANSION AND FACADE IMPROVEMENTS ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA Dear Mr. Marcarello: We are pleased to submit the following Proposal for the provision of professional architectural design services for the proposed Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Facade Improvement Project. This statement is presented in accordance with information provided in the City's RFP received by Meyer and Associates on January 15, 2011. Located in Laguna Hills, Meyer and Associates is a specialized architectural and landscape architectural firm providing recreation planning and design services to governmental agencies throughout Central and Southern California. Since its establishment in 1985, Meyer and Associates has successfully completed recreation improvement projects from the Atkinson Park Center in Santa Maria to the La Colonia Park Center in Solana Beach to the Senior Center Facade Improvements in Perris. The Management of Meyer and Associates is dedicated to the principles of technical excellence and professional quality. Members of the firm apply the strength and knowledge obtained from years of experience to achieve the most practical and effective solution to each project. Meyer and Associates maintains the highest professional quality in architecture and landscape architecture, while attaining its goals of completing projects within the budget and on time. Key members of the Meyer and Associates project team have carefully reviewed the information obtained from the City of Rosemead. We feel this would be an excellent opportunity for a creative and sustainable design approach for the Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Facade Improvements. Our organization reflects the combination of talent, expertise and experience that is dedicated to both the effective coverage of Client needs and successful development of public recreation facilities. These professionals include individuals with specialized training and expertise in park facility programming and design, architecture, landscape architecture and the related engineering disciplines. The team has an established reputation for quality and 23265 south pointe drive, suite 102, lguno hills, collfornio 92653 (tel) 949/380-1151 (fax) 9/19/380 -8117 randall k, meyer architect 014364 landscape architect 3082 budget- sensitive design, thorough and on- schedule preparation of contract documents, and prompt responsiveness to Clients' needs. Thank you for the opportunity to state our interest in this project and to submit this Proposal. We hope that this document communicates the strengths of our firm, project team, and approach. We are enthusiastic about this opportunity to work with the City of Rosemead on the Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Facade Improvement Project. Firm member designated to negotiate on behalf of Meyer and Associates and contractually bind the firm: - Randall K. Meyer Meyer and Associates 23265 South Pointe Drive, Suite 102 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 tel: 949/380-1151 fax: 949/380 -8117 email: meyerarch @earthlink.net Architect No. C14364 (California) Landscape Architect No. 3082 (California) Meyer and Associates is a sole proprietorship date of submittal. &Bnascape Arcmtect JUdZ Architect C14364 contents UNDERSTANDING THE SCOPE OF SERVICES. PAGE 1. (Our understanding of the services to be performed). PROJECT UNDERSTANDING. METHODOLOGY AND WORK PLAN. PAGE 2. (Brief description of the proposed work program and techniques to complete the scope of services). PROJECT APPROACH. WORK PROGRAM. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS. PAGE 8. (Our expertise and experience in related projects). RELATED EXPERIENCE. PUBLIC AGENCY CLIENTS. KEY PERSONNEL. PAGE 13. (Name and qualifications of the Project Manager and Key Contact Person). RESUME. SUBCONSULTANTS. PAGE 15. (Project participants and firm resumes). PROJECT TEAM. RESUMES. REFERENCES. PAGE 21. (Public agency references for related projects). REFERENCES. TIME SCHEDULE. PAGE 22. (Our estimated time schedule for completion of the scope of services). TIME SCHEDULE. FEE PROPOSAL. PAGE 23. (Our detailed fee schedule for completion of the scope of services.) FEE PROPOSAL. STANDARD HOURLY RATES. FEE NOTES. understanding the scope of services project understanding Meyer and Associates understands this project includes the building expansion of the existing 17,000± square foot Rosemead Community Recreation Center (1976) and facade improvements to the existing building exterior. The RCRC is located at 3936 Muscatel Avenue adjacent to the City's Civic Center, which includes the County Library Facility and City Hall. The development of conceptual designs for the redesign of the existing Civic Center parking facility and public plaza area are currently in progress by others. Designs will be completed in March and construction is scheduled for late spring /early summer 2011. It is expected that work will begin on the RCRC expansion and facade improvements after completion of the site improvements. The Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Facade Improvement Project will include the expansion of the existing facility building size by approximately maximum 3,000 square feet and shall include 2 enclosed City administrative offices, open office spaces, a small teen center, a computer lab facility, a small work room area, and accessible restrooms to serve the new addition. The project will also include modification and repair of existing interior /exterior finishes, and selection of fixtures and equipment for the new facility expansion. The City also desires to replace the existing HVAC equipment at the facility with new equipment (retaining existing duct distribution system) and to design a new HVAC system for the expansion area. This work includes schematic design, design development (60% construction documents), and construction documents. The work includes building design, structural engineering, mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, plumbing design, site improvements (landscaping /irrigation), and utilities coordination. Work includes: SITE ASSESSMENT AND SCHEMATIC DESIGN A. Review site conditions and determine specific site requirements needed to provide the best functional use of the site including access and pedestrian traffic flow, ADA requirements, and security considerations. (Note: asbestos assessment reports, geotechnical investigations, topographic and boundary land surveys shall be provided by the City). B. Review utility constraints. This Proposal assumes on -site points -of- connection for sewer, water, gas, and storm drain. C. Consider aesthetic options, control /supervision, security, maintenance, and vandal resistance. Provide recommendations to City. D. Coordinate with City Staff and prepare maximum three (3) /design options to include schematic floor plans utilizing the approved design for the City Plaza and Parking Improvement Project prepared by others and furnished by the City. E. Complete a preliminary cost opinion based on the selected schematic floor plan (including square footage measurements for each area). F. Submit schematic design to City for review and attend maximum five (5) formal presentations to the City, including evening meetings. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT (60 %) /CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS (95 %) A. Coordinate with the City for the delivery of architectural and engineering services. B. Prepare design development plans for the Project (60% construction documents). C. Provide limited assistance to the City for CEQA compliance and environmental approvals. D. Integrate applicable local and state codes and design standards into the Project design. E. Incorporate energy conservation features so as to be equivalent to the US Green 1. Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) level of "Silver" Rating. LEED Certification and other formal energy conservation or 'Green' programs are not included. F. Provide structural engineering, mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, plumbing design, and landscape architectural design services for the Project. G. Coordinate with the City's specialty Consultants such as geotechnical, traffic, noise, civil, and landscape architectural. H. Provide complete design development including local on -site improvements, on -site utilities, and other related improvements resulting from the approved design. I. Develop detailed cost opinions throughout the design process. J. Assist the City with reasonable value engineering to meet budget constraints. Formal valve engineering Consultants or processes are not included. K. Assist with the development and updating of the overall Project Schedule. L. Prepare construction documents (plans and specifications) for submittal to the appropriate City departments and necessary agencies for review, approval, and permitting. Present 60% (design development) and 95% design drawings to City Staff for review and approval (including electronic copies in CAD format and 5 hard copies. M. Assist the City with selection of furniture, fixtures, and equipment. N. Respond to and incorporate Building Official /permitting agency comments into Project design. O. Attend bid site walk with potential contractors. CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERV A. Assist City in the public bidding and award process. B. Provide construction observation and support services during construction as follows: 1. Provide periodic job site visits. 2. Attend bi- weekly construction coordination meetings. 3. Provide submittal and shop drawing review. 4. Respond to requests for information (RFI). 5. Assist City in change order review and negotiations. 6. Coordinate the production of as -built drawings by the Contractor. 7. Conduct a final project observation with the City to review quality of work and compliance with Project contract documents. methodology and work plan Project Approach Meyer and Associates offers the City of Rosemead an organized approach to the planning process that makes full use of a team of professionals who are carefully selected to meet the special requirements of this particular project. By merging the disciplines, we have enhanced our understanding of function and arrangement of physical elements to achieve budget control, efficiency, supervisory control, design aesthetics, vandal resistance, and ease of maintenance, all important factors in any public facility development. An important service of Meyer and Associates is the initial evaluation of project requirements. The first phase of our program will be to evaluate objectives and establish both limitations and opportunities. This initial process involves the establishment of functional objectives and the arrangement of project elements to achieve aesthetic impact, effective utilization of space, overall security, proper maintenance opportunities, accessibility for the disabled, and resolution of safety concerns. Meyer and Associates will work closely with City Staff throughout the project design. Our knowledge of the functional requirements of anticipated users, coupled with extensive design va experience, will allow for the development of confidence and credibility with the public and City representatives. General direction will be provided by the Project Coordinator, Randall K. Meyer, who establishes work schedules, maintains work quality, coordinates disciplines and is responsible for presentations. Special areas of technical expertise will form sections of wort: production with supervisory individuals from each discipline forming the basic team. These areas would include planning and program development, limited site planning, architectural design, mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, and structural engineering. Work Program - Scope of Services The following Scope of Services reflects our interpretation of required work tasks necessary to achieve the desired design and construction documents for Expansion and Facade Improvements at the Rosemead Community Recreation Center. It is the intent to produce conceptual documents and construction documents that meet the objectives of the City of Rosemead in terms of work scope, budget limitations, accessibility, design quality, innovation, and established schedules. To assure achievement of this goal, adjustments to this program can be made. The proposed scope of work will include, but is not limited to, the following: A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Meet with the City Staff to coordinate project design. We propose to attend maximum 6 design or coordination meetings with City Staff as required for normal design and processing of the work. Maximum 5 Public, Commission level, or City Council meetings to perform presentations are also included in this Proposal. Internal Project Team meetings will be conducted as necessary to maintain proper work flow. 2. Provide design services that will be generally consistent with information presented in the City's RFP received January 15, 2011 as outlined or modified in this Proposal. 3. Provide informal Subconsultant management and coordination for design equivalency to LEED "Silver" level. 4. Provide design services limited by the Project Understanding as presented in this Proposal. The City's overall combined budget for the Community Center Improvements plus the Civic Center Site Improvements is $3,500,000. The anticipated construction cost for the building improvements is about $1,750,000 - $2,000,000. B. PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION 1. Obtain Available reports, maps, data, utility information, previous studies, and as -built building plans from City Staff and review. Provide site visit to observe existing site and building conditions. Obtain Civic Center site design plans and review. 2. Contact the City and obtain available as -built information describing existing on -site utilities. Review documents. C. SCHEMATIC DESIGN 1. Prepare site base sheet. Prepare floor plan and elevation base sheets representing the existing building. K0 2. Prepare maximum 3 schematic (conceptual) building floor plans for the building expansion. Submit to Staff for review and comment. 3. Refine preferred floor plan concept for the building expansion within project scope as required to be responsive to City comments. Prepare final schematic floor plan. 4. Prepare maximum 2 schematic building elevations for the new building expansion and facade improvements. Submit to Staff for review and comment. 5. Refine preferred elevation concept as directed. Submit revised schematic elevation to Staff for review and comment. 6. Prepare schematic opinion of probable construction cost. 7. Prepare final schematic elevations. B. Color final schematic floor plan and elevations for presentation. Furnish to City Staff. D. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Prepare 60% final plans (design development) to illustrate actual scope of improvements. Plans will be limited to improvements listed in our Project Description. Organization of plans shall be in a single package (project phasing is not included). Submit maximum 5 review sets to Staff as required. 2. Prepare preliminary opinion of probable construction cost for improvements. 3. Prepare 95% final plans, specifications, opinion of probable construction cost, required calculations, and specifications in sufficient detail to obtain competitive bids. Plans shall incorporate City standards and meet Federal, State and Local requirements, as necessary. Allow for single document package only (project phasing is not included). 4. Submit maximum 5 sets of plans for final review. 5. Correct plans, as necessary (final plan check). 6. Resubmit maximum 5 sets (wet - signed) of 100% final plans for final City approval. 7. Assist City in the bidding process. E. CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT Provide answers to pertinent pre -bid questions. 2. Attend pre- construction meeting (Architect only). 3. Provide maximum 24 site visitations by Architect to observe construction progress and quality. Provide report on observations. 4. Review shop drawings, samples and other submittals. Shop drawings will be reviewed for general compliance with project construction drawings and project intent. For each required submittal, review initial submittal and 1 resubmittal only. Additional submittals and substitution requests will be handled as extra services. 5. Provide assistance to the City during construction to clarify the intent of the plans and specifications. Respond to reasonable RFI's prepared by the Contractor (maximum 30 RFI's). '3 6. Assist in determining and processing change orders caused by errors and omissions in the plans. 7. Provide maximum 2 site visits by the Mechanical Engineer, maximum 2 site visits by the Electrical Engineer, and maximum 2 site visits by the Structural Engineer during construction. Provide 1 final review each by the Mechanical Engineer, Electrical Engineer, and Irrigation Designer. 8. Participate in Architect's and Landscape Architect's final review at the completion of construction. Furnish final "punch list" to City Staff. F. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES 1. Provide copy of new Civic Center site improvement plans. Provide copy of existing site improvement plans including site utilities. Plans shall include existing water, electrical, plumbing, and irrigation utility locations. Provide street improvement plans for adjacent streets. Provide "as- built" copy of plans for the existing building and building additions. 2. Process the approval of plans by governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the project. Coordinate submittals and plan check as necessary. Pay all fees. Provide and coordinate plan check submissions to City, County, State, or Federal Agencies as necessary. 3. Reproduce final bid documents and plans. Basic reproduction costs prior to bid documents are the responsibility of the Consultant. 4. Provide and pay for all construction management, construction administration, and construction inspection services. 5. Provide final bid documents and other City "boiler plate" for insertion into project specifications, including bid form. 6. Provide any required environmental surveys, documents, or reports. 7. Prior to start of work, provide City's standard electronic format for plan sheets or title sheets if required. S. Provide any additional information required by the Consultant for proper performance of the work. 9. Provide operational or maintenance studies or plans. 10. Coordinate and advertise public meetings if required. 11. Provide City's utility mailing list, if required. 12. Provide asbestos, lead, or other hazardous material investigations and reports if necessary. 13. Provide advertisement and administration of the bidding process. 14. Provide project soils report and project survey as necessary. 15. Provide related Civil Engineering services. 16. Attach this complete Proposal to any design services contract. G. EXCLUSIONS BY MEYER AND ASSOCIATES 1. All Consultant or Sub - Consultant services that are not listed as services to be included in our Scope of Services. We are proposing to furnish normal architectural, mechanical engineering (HVAC and plumbing), electrical engineering, structural engineering, and estimating services only. 2. All Sub - Consultants and disciplines that are not listed as participants on our project team. Our project team is Meyer and Associates, Reedcorp, F.T. Andrews, R.F. Daniels, and O'Connor Construction Management. 3. Excluded services include but may not be limited to the following: a. Improvement plans for improvements other than those listed in the Project Description. Future phased improvements of any kind. b. Artist's renderings or 3 -D illustrations other than 2 -D colored floor plans, or colored restroom elevations. c. Environmental impact reports or similar documents. d. Plan check, permit or similar tees to governmental agencies. e. Preparation or modification of drawings or documents due to City changes to previously approved documents or changes to previous City direction. f. Printing or reproduction of documents for project bidding or construction. g. Traffic studies or analysis. Other studies or analyses not specifically listed as included. Any off -site studies or analysis. ADA studies or evaluation of incomplete reports or studies previously prepared. h. Consultation concerning replacement of any work damaged by fire or other cause during the course of the Consultant's or Contractor's work, and furnishing services as may be required in connection with the replacement of such work. i. Services made necessary by the default of the Contractor, or by major defects or deficiencies in work by the Contractor. Consultation for correction of Contractor errors or omissions. j. Boundary or topographic surveys. Field utility investigations. Similar surveys or investigations. (All existing sub -grade and utility information shall be as shown on documents furnished by the City). k. Off -site improvements including off -site utility connections, studies or research. This Proposal assumes hookups to existing on -site water, sewer, gas, and storm drain. I. Consulting of any kind with respect to hazardous materials such as asbestos or lead paint. m. Acoustic analysis reports, design, or consultation by an Acoustical Consultant. n. Kitchen design or hiring of Kitchen Consultant, or hiring of other specialty Consultants. o. On -going facility maintenance analysis or reports. p. Grading plan. (Hydrology calculations, erosion control plans, and storm water management plans (SUSMP / WQMP or similar) or reports are not a part of the proposed work). Civil Engineering services. q. Soils reports for agricultural suitability or similar. Foundation investigations or reports. r. Site improvement design services other than hardscape, landscape, and irrigation improvements adjacent to the new addition. s. Phasing plans or organization of alternate bid items. t. Compliance with any prevailing wage requirements for design professionals. u. Fire alarm design, fire sprinkler design, or similar design services. These services are typically design /build services provided by the Contractor. v. Parking lot design. w. LEED certification related services or services for similar energy conservation programs. Energy conservation improvements to the existing building. Formal LEED documentation or presentations. x. Improvements or upgrades to existing restrooms. y. ADA or Title 24 accessibility upgrades to existing portions of the building outside the affected project area. z. Building code upgrades to existing portions of the building outside the affected project area. aa. Upgrading existing electrical panels except for service upgrades for new addition. bb. Specialty electrical systems such as security, public address, communications, or similar. cc. Pile and grade beam foundation design. dd. Pre - stressed concrete design. ee. Full building lateral analysis of the existing building. ff. Construction documents for improvements in addition to the scope of work as limited by our Project Understanding. FA experience Related Experience and qualifications HVAC REPLACEMENT PROJECTS (Randall K. Meyer, Project Manager) City of Lakewood: Weingart Senior Center City of Lakewood: Centre at Sycamore Plaza* City of Lakewood: Burns Center City of Lakewood: Biscailuz Park Recreation Center City of Lakewood: Bloomfield Park Community Center City of Lakewood: City Hall City of Lakewood: Youth Center City of Norwalk: Cultural Arts Center City of Norwalk: Social Services Center* City of Norwalk: - Senior Center Office Conversion City of Norwalk: Alondra Library* City of Perris: Maintenance Garage Facility* 2. PUBLIC BUILDING ADDITIONS /EXPANSIONS (Randall K. Meyer, Project Manager) City of Norwalk: City of Anaheim: City of El Monte: City of Cudahy: City of Moorpark: City of Santa Clarita: City of Santa Clarita: City of Hawaiian Gardens: Social Services Center Expansion * ** Dad Miller Clubhouse Expansion * ** Community Center Expansion /Remodel * ** Clara Street Senior Center Addition * ** Senior Center Addition /Remodel Phase I Gymnasium Expansion /Remodel * ** Phase IV Gymnasium Addition ** Community Center Computer Lab Addition 3. FACADE IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS (Randall K. Meyer, Project Manager) City of Santa Clarita: City of Perris: City of Perris: City of South Gate: City of Lakewood: City of Lakewood: City of Lakewood: City of Inglewood: City of Hawaiian Gardens: City of Paramount: City of Norwalk: Phase I Gymnasium Facade Improvements * ** Maintenance Garage Facility Senior Center Facade Improvements* Senior Center Facade Improvements * ** Bloomfield Park Community Center * ** McCormick Pool Building * ** Centre at Sycamore Plaza Vincent Park Pool Building * ** Carson St. Facade Improvements (3 Bldgs) Somerset Facade Improvements (12 Bldgs) Senior Center Office Conversion 4. TEEN CENTER PROJECTS (Randall K. Meyer, Project Manager) City of Perris: City of Oceanside: City of Lakewood: City of Bell Gardens: City of Artesia: City of Anaheim: Teen Center Addition to Senior Center* Teen Center Addition to Balderrama Comm. Center Youth Center Remodel * ** Youth Center Complex (Master Plan) * ** Little Community Center (Master Plan) * ** West Side Youth Center (Master Plan) * Under Construction ** LEED "Silver" Certification. * ** Services include landscape architecture. E3 experience and qualifications Related Experience Project: Albert 0. Little Recreation Center and Gymnasium Artesia. California Architect: Meyer and Associates Project Manager: Randall K. Meyer Client: City of Artesia Project Description: Meyer and Associates has recently completed master plan design services to the City of Artesia for this 40,000 square foot multi - purpose recreation center and gymnasium. The Center plan includes YMCA day care room (licensed child care), pre - school room (licensed child care), homework room, crafts room, teen center lobby with reception /control office, conference room, public restrooms, local TV station, multi - purpose community hall rooms, gymnasium, gymnasium lobby /office, gymnasium restrooms, and combination catering and full- service preparation commercial kitchen. The master plan has been prepared for a future LEED "Silver" Level Certification Contact: Community Services Department City of Artesia 18747 Clarkdale Avenue Artesia, CA 90701 562/865 -6262 91 W Albert O. Little Community Center 4 Artesia Perk focu a o 0 11111- 'Id x165 iale5 nmmm—I 1I. n- v., ni��on City of Artesia, CA .. experience and qualifications Related Experience Project: Canyon Country Recreation Center and Gymnasium Santa Clarita, California Architect: Meyer and Associates Project Manager: Randall K. Meyer Client: City of Santa Clarita Project Description: Meyer and Associates completed design and construction documents for this 22,000 square foot gymnasium facility conversion of an existing warehouse building. The remodeled building included complete facade redesign and building addition. The facility contains lobby, men /women public restrooms, office, gymnasium (2 basketball courts), ample storage rooms, equipment lofts, four (4) racquetball courts, men /women showers, men /women locker rooms, and men /women user restrooms. Of special note was the City's accelerated schedule for preparation of construction documents. Project design and construction documents were completed in four (4) weeks. Plan check and project bidding went smoothly, and the low bid was well within the final estimate. The construction was completed on schedule and within budget. Contact: Curtis Nay, P.E. Engineering Department Santa Clarita, CA 805/286 -4135 10. experience and qualifications Related Experience Project: Senior Citizen's Center Rehabilitation South Gate, California Architect: Meyer and Associates Project Manager: Randall K. Meyer Client: City of South Gate Project Description: The existing Senior Center at Recreation Park is the City's only Senior Citizen's Center, and, at the onset of the project, was worn out and no longer functioned to serve the City's programming requirements. The rehabilitation project and facade improvements provided a fresh exterior appearance and sense of entry. The interior was gutted and entirely re -built to meet the City's current programming needs. Improvements included additional storage rooms, reconfigured meeting /activity rooms, removal of barriers to the disabled, new plumbing and electrical systems, new office, new commercial catering kitchen, new toilet rooms, new lobby /lounge, window upgrades, new roofing, facility painting, and adjacent Azalea Garden redesign. Improvements were completed on schedule and within budget Contact: Parks and Recreation Department South Gate, CA 323/563 -5443 11. experience and qualifications Public Agency Clients During his 35 years of providing design services for parks and recreation related projects, Mr. Meyer has been involved with public facility planning for the following California agencies: City of Alhambra Mission Viejo Company City of Agoura Hills City of Modesto City of Anaheim City of Montebello City of Bell City of Moorpark City of Bellflower City of Moreno Valley City of Brea City of Norwalk City of Bell Gardens City of Oceanside City of Blythe City of Ontario City of Burbank County of Orange City of Carpinteria City of Orange City of Carson City of Oxnard City of Cerritos City of Paramount City of Coachella City of Perris Coalinga -Huron Recreation City of Pico Rivera & Park District City of Porterville City of Commerce City of Rancho Cucamonga Conejo Recreation City of Rialto & Park District City of Riverside City of Cudahy City of Salinas City of Culver City City of San Clemente Cypress Recreation City of Santa Ana & Park District City of Santa Clarita City of Diamond Bar City of Santa Fe Springs City of El Monte City of Santa Maria City of Fountain Valley City of Santa Monica City of Fullerton City of Seal Beach City of Garden Grove City of Sierra Madre City of Glendora City of Solana Beach City of Hawaiian Gardens City of South Gate City of Inglewood City of Temecula County of Inyo City of Temple City City of Irvine City of Torrance City of La Canada Flintridge City of Tustin City of Laguna Beach U.S. Army -Corps of Engineers City of Lake Elsinore City of Upland City of Lakewood County of Ventura City of La Mirada City of Walnut City of Laverne City of West Hollywood County of Los Angeles City of Westminster City of Manhattan Beach West Side Recreation District City of Mission Viejo City of Whittier 12. key personnel Resume Randall K. Meyer, Contact Person and Project Manager Owner, Meyer and Associates Principal contact person, project manager /coordinator. education The Ohio State University - B.S., Architecture, 1971, with special emphasis in Fine Arts and Landscape Architecture. responsibilities Client relations and public presentation. Preparation of conceptual studies, master plans, and construction plans for architectural projects. On -site construction observation. professional experience Prior to coming to California in 1974, Mr. Meyer was a project designer with the architectural firm of SEM Partners, Columbus, Ohio, where he was a building design and interior graphic systems team member for school projects. Formerly a Vice President with a southern California park planning firm where he obtained a strong foundation in parks and recreation related design, Mr. Meyer master planned over 50 California Park projects ranging in size from the 3 -acre Guirado Park in Whittier, to the 20 -acre Northwood Community Park in Irvine, to the 197 -acre Carr Lake project in Salinas. His master planning experience included architectural recreation elements for over 25 park projects, including the 20,000 square foot community center for Triunfo Community Park in Thousand Oaks and the 18,000 square foot Community Center /Gymnasium for Adam Park in Santa Maria. He supervised plan preparation for over $80,000,000 of park developments, including the Minami community Center /Gymnasium and Mussell Senior's Center in Santa Maria; the 20 acre Northwood Community Park in Irvine; the Almansor Park and Golf Course in Alhambra; and the Community Center at Coalinga. Serving as Designer for the O'Neill Park Community Pool (Orange County) and Santa Fe Springs Aquatic Center, he was also responsible for plan preparation for the two aquatic projects. He served as architectural representative during 13. the construction phase of over 15 park and recreation construction projects (including the aquatic centers), observing the architectural and landscape architectural construction. During this period in Mr. Meyer's parks and recreation planning career, he had the privilege of working with over 45 southern and central California public agencies while providing planning services, architectural design and landscape architectural design. Since forming the firm of Meyer and Associates in January, 1985, Mr. Meyer has provided architectural design or construction documentation for recreation and public facilities for 50 southern California cities. These architectural facilities range in size from the 4,500 square foot Community Building in Solana Beach to the 23,000 square foot Senior's Center /Gymnasium Complex in Cudahy to the 40,000 square foot Little Community Center in the City of Artesia. Also included is his design of over 40 vandal resistant park restroom or park snack bar facilities of various sizes. With Meyer and Associates, Mr. Meyer has master planned or supervised plan preparation for over $170,000,000 of parks and recreation or other public architectural projects. These projects include rehabilitation to existing facilities (such as the recreation center gymnasium rehabilitation at Scott Park in the City of Carson, and the renovation of the Recreation Park Senior Center in the City of South Gate), as well as new recreation projects (such as the architectural improvement package for the 22,000 square foot gymnasium building in the City of Santa Clarita, the Max Berg Park and Rancho San Clemente Park architecture projects in the City of San Clemente, and the Marine Avenue Sports Park architecture in Manhattan Beach). registration Architect, State of California, #C -14364 Landscape Architect, State of California, #3082 professional memberships National Trust for Historic Preservation Society of American Registered Architects 14. subconsultants Project Team Effective organization of the total planning effort is the key to successful accomplishment of our intended objectives. Meyer and Associates presents the following project team, based on our interpretation of the planning requirements. Actual assignments can be amended under City direction where project scope dictates. As primary design Consultant, Meyer and Associates will assume full responsibility for coordination of the project. Services will include assignment of planning responsibilities, Client and community contact, participating as a member of the Project Team, accomplishment scheduling, the evaluation and interpretation of project requirements, and recreation planning, as outlined in our Scope of Services and the RFP. Meyer and Associates will analyze existing facility conditions and data, analyze program requirements, prepare design documents, prepare construction documents, assemble and analyze cost projections and coordinate input and documents from Consultants as necessary. Randall K. Meyer will serve as the Representative to the City of Rosemead and Project Coordinator for Meyer and Associates. Input and expertise will be furnished by the following firms: Architecture: Landscape Architecture: Site Design: Mechanical Engineering: Electrical Engineering: Structural Engineering: Estimating: Irrigation Design: Meyer and Associates Meyer and Associates Meyer and Associates F.T. Andrews Reedcorp R.F. Daniels O'Connor Construction Management Landscape Irrigation Consulting We believe in the concept of team planning and the need for the inclusion of comprehensive coverage of planning needs with individuals or firms that have recognized expertise in each area of concern. It shall be our intent to augment our services with other talents and experience, where desirable. 15. subconsultants Resume F.T. Andrews, Inc. Mechanical Engineers (8 Years of team experience with Meyer and Associates) F.T. Andrews, Inc. is committed to serving clients with the most effective and efficient service possible with the highest quality work, performed cost efficiently, within the designated time frame. Principals and Project Engineers maintain close contact with clients during the design and construction phases of the project to assure proper coordination, to answer inquiries, and to fulfill requests. F.T. Andrews -does not consider a project complete until the customer is completely satisfied. The principal of F.T. Andrews, Inc. is I. Ray Cranston, Jr., P.E., President. Mr. Cranston is registered in the states of California, Nevada, and Arizona. Their Staff of twenty -six includes three professional engineers, nine graduate engineers, one Microsoft Certified Information Systems Administrator, seven designers, and three CADD Operators who are experts in the fields of heating, ventilating, air conditioning, plumbing, piping, and fire protection. F.T. Andrews, Inc. has designed the mechanical systems for numerous recreation centers, sports complexes, high school and college Physical Education Departments and YMCAs. Many of them have included swimming pools. Following is a partial list of these projects. City of South Gate: City of Norwalk: City of Perris: City of Perris: City of Norwalk: City of Norwalk: City of Norwalk: City of Norwalk: City of Lakewood: City of Lakewood: City of Lakewood: City of Artesia: City of Temecula: City of San Clemente: City of !_akewood: City of Irvine: City of Pico Rivera: Mt. San Antonio College: Capistrano Unified School District: California State University Fullerton: California State University San Marcos Santa Ana Unified School District: Senior Center Renovation Social Services Center Addition Bob Glass Exercise Room and Showers City Garage Renovation /HVAC Replacement CAC I HVAC Replacement CAC II HVAC Replacement Alondra Library HVAC Replacement Social Services Center HVAC Replacement Weingart Senior Center HVAC Replacement Bloomfield Activity Building HVAC Replacement Weingart Senior Center Renovation Little Center Restroom Remodel Community Center Expansion San Gorgonio Park Restroom Building Boyar Park Activity Euilding Woodbridge Community Center Smith Park Swimming Pool Complex Swimming Pool Equipment Renovation Tesoro High School Locker Building Sports Center Shower /Locker Building Clark Field House Armstrong Ranch High School Mechanical Engineer, State of California, 14,001 (12/31/11) 16. subconsultants Resume Reedcorp Engineering Electrical Engineers (20 Years of team experience with Meyer and Associates) Reedcorp offers a full range of Consulting Electrical and Control Systems Engineering services to the building design and construction industry. A Staff comprised of licensed Electrical Engineers provides the technical direction required to minimize energy consumption and installed cost while assuring the Client of a functionally sound electrical system. Twenty years of engineering experience designing recreational, commercial, industrial, instructional, and institutional facilities for Architects, Cities, Counties, Developers, and the Federal Government has prepared Reedcorp for the technical challenges of the future. Reedcorp's related recreation experience includes the following projects: City of South Gate: Senior Center Renovation City of Norwalk: Social Services Center Addition City of Temecula: Community Center Expansion City of Perris: Teen Center City of Orange: Senior Center Renovation City of Lakewood: Boyar Park Recreation Center City of El Monte Community Center Remodel City of Lakewood: Bloomfield Community Center Remodel City of Brea: Craig Park City of Santa Ana: Santiago Park City of Paramount: - Banana Park City of Paramount: Paramount Park City of Cudahy: Lugo Park City of Cerritos: Heritage Park City of Montebello: Rodriguez Park City of West Covina: Cortez Park City of West Covina: Palm View Park City of West Covina: Cameron Park City of Oxnard: North Community Park City of Chino: Villa Park City of Pasadena: Rosebowl Lighting Rehabi;itation City of Long Beach: Shoreline Park City of Long Beach: Veterans Memorial Stadium City of Long Beach: Blair Field Contact: Ron Reed Electrical Engineer 949/752 -1278 17. subconsultants Resume R.F. Daniels and Associates Structural Engineer (25 Years of team experience with Meyer and Associates) The staff of R.F. Daniels and Associates has provided Structural Design services for Meyer and Associates for a number of public projects. This experience is extensive and includes: City of Moorpark: Moorpark Senior Center Addition /Renovation City of Orange: Senior Center ADA Renovation City of Norwalk: Social Services Center Addition City of Santa Clarita: Phase I Gymnasium Remodel /Facade Redesign City of Santa Clarita: Phase IV Gymnasium Addition City of El Monte: El Monte Community Center City of Perris: Senior Center Facade Improvements City of Perris: Bob Glass Exercise Room City of Perris: City Garage Renovation /HVAC Replacement City of Norwalk: Alondra Library HVAC Replacement City of Norwalk: Social Services Center HVAC Replacement City of Norwalk: Social Services Center Addition City of Lakewood: Weingart Senior Center HVAC Replacement City of Lakewood: Bloomfield Activity Building HVAC Replacement City of South Gate: Senior Center Renovation City of Cudahy: Clara Street Park Senior Center City of Pico Rivera: Basketball Gymnasium /Pavilion City of Carson: Scott Park Community Center /Gymnasium City of Orange: Handy Park Center City of Carson: Calas Community Park Rec. Center City of Rancho Cucamonga: Redhill Community Park Buildings City of Rialto: Flores Neighborhood Park Building City of Rialto: Andreson Neighborhood Park Building City of Rancho Cucamonga: Heritage Community Park Center City of Santa Maria: Atkinson Community Park Center City of San Clemente: Max Berg Neighborhood Park Restroom City of San Clemente: Rancho San Clemente Park Restroom City of Ontario: Oaks Avenue Park Restroom City of Fountain Valley: Regional Recreation Center City of Solana Beach: La Colonia Park Recreation Center City of Santa Ana: Jerome Park Building City of Anaheim: Modjeska Park and Ponderosa Park Centers City of Pico Rivera: Rio Hondo Community Park City of Lakewood: Youth Center at Del Valle Park City of Lakewood: McCormick Pool Facility Structural Engineer, State of California, 5 -2419 (03/31/12) W3 subconsultants Resume O'Connor Construction Management Estimating Consultant O'Connor Construction Management, Inc, was established in 1982 to provide Owners, Public Authorities, Architects, Engineers, and Contractors with expert, independent estimating and construction management services. Headquarters are located in Irvine, California. Additional offices are located in San Diego, Las Vegas, and Pleasanton. O'Connor is a certified Woman Business Enterprise (WBE) and Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE). From concept through completion, O'Connor offers a full range of construction consulting services including cost estimating, scheduling, value engineering, constructability analysis, project management, inspection, and claims /litigation support. O'Connor has worked on more than 2,000 projects worldwide, including every facet of commercial, industrial, and civil construction. Previous or current Clients include the nation's top engineering and design firms, public agencies, Contractors, Attorneys, and private owners. O'Connor recognizes the importance of accurate cost information at each stage of design, and throughout construction. Accurate estimates are provided by adhering to strict principles of precise measurement, accurate quantity take -off, and thoroughly researched prices. O'Connor also pays close attention to the unique factors that prevail on each project, and looks for the non- standard cost issues. O'Connor works with Clients to anticipate possible problems and identify potential exposures and expenses. Construction market conditions are ever changing and current knowledge of these conditions help keep projects running smoothly and within budget. Regional and field offices share local market information to ensure that Clients are provided with, accurate, up -to -date conditions. Estimating Manager Name: John E. Mauk, CPE Qualifications: B.S. Construction Management California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, California Certified Professional Estimator American Society of Professional Estimators Licensed General Contractor, California #B-731127 ICBO Certified Building Inspector #1022430 -10 Professional Affiliations: Member, American Society of Professional Estimators Member, Construction Management Association of America Member, International Conference of Building Officials Contact: John Mauk 949/476 -2094 19. subconsultants Resume Landscape Irrigation Consulting Irrigation Designer Landscape Irrigation Consulting is a Southern California based firm, specializing in irrigation design projects ranging from 1/2 -acre residential sites to 850 acres of streetscapes and development projects. During the past twenty years LIC has completed many diversified projects such as resort hotels, public schools, parks (both regional and community), slope stabilization, highway beautification, streetscapes, and a variety of projects involving renovation of existing systems. The design philosophy of Landscape Irrigation Consulting is to produce designs that will accommodate the landscape design most effectively and economically. Concern is stressed in conservation by proper application of water through well designed systems to maintain operational control to eliminate wasted water. PUBLIC PARK EXPERIENCE: Bloomfield Park Remodel — Lakewood, California. Argonaut Park - Aliso Viejo, California. Glenbrook Park - Aliso Viejo, California. Pinebrook Park - Aliso Viejo, California. Sheep Hills Park - Aliso Viejo, California. Wingspan Park - Aliso Viejo, California. Woodfield Sports Complex - Aliso Viejo, California. Windrow Park - Irvine, California. Dodger Stadium - Los Angeles, California. Anaheim Stadium Platform -Anaheim, California. Big League Dreams - Chino Hills, California. Big League Dreams - Redding, California. Big League Dreams - Redlands, California. STREETSCAPES EXPERIENCE. Harvard Blvd - Irvine, California. Pecolle Ranch Village - Las Vegas, Nevada. Las Vegas Blvd "The Strip' - Las Vegas, Nevada. La Band Village - Chino, California. Redbridge Village - Tracy, California. Pacific Coast Highway Improvements - Corona del Mar, California. Seven Oaks Community Streets - Bakersfield, California. Jamboree Rd Extension - Irvine, California. Fremont Street Experience - Las Vegas, Nevada. CIVIC EXPERIENCE, The Fremont Street Experience - Las Vegas, Nevada. Nixon Archives & Library - Yorba Linda, California. Pacific Federal Plaza - Costa Mesa, California. San Macros Civic Center - San Macros, California. Contact: Frank Simon 949/661 -0905 20. references Our goal as design professionals is to provide the highest quality services, excellence in design and the best possible communication between our office and City Staff. We believe our reputation reflects our success in this endeavor and we invite your representative to contact any of the following references regarding our qualifications and past performance. Additional references are available upon request. Boyar Park Community Center City of Lakewood June Anderson Public Works Department 5050 N. Clark Avenue Lakewood, CA 90712 562/866 -9771 Social Services Center Addition City of Norwalk Randy Hillman City of Norwalk 12700 Norwalk Boulevard Norwalk, CA 90650 562/929 -5719 Centre HVAC Replacement BDA Associates Construction Management City of Lakewood Bruce Du Amarell P.O. Box 1721 Sunset Beach, CA 90742 310/701 -7226 Teen Center /Facade Redesign City of Perris Darren Madkin Deputy City Manager City Hall 101 N. 'D' Street Perris, CA 92570 951/943 -6100 Misc. Architectural Support Willdan Bill Pagett Cities of Paramount /Bell Gardens 13191 Crossroads Pkwy. North Suite 405 Industry, CA 91746 562/908 -6246 Gymnasium Addition City of Santa Clarita Tara Concepcion Project Development Coordinator 23920 Valencia Boulevard Suite 300 Santa Clarita, CA 91355 661/255 -4342 21. time schedule Subject to alterations in the best interest of the City of Rosemead, we propose to schedule this project as follows (please reference Scope of Services) based upon our previous scheduling experience and track record. Task Work Weeks (06/27/11) Notice -To- Proceed 17 00 (02/28/111 Start of Services Per RFP (07/05/11) 02 (03/14/11) Preliminary Investigation Final Cost Opinion and Specifications. 23 (08/08/11) Review Documents /Site Visit. 01 -02 (03/14/11) Schematic Design (08/15/11) Submit Final Plans (100 %). 25 Base Sheet Preparation. 02-03 (03/21/11) Site Visit /Review. 25 03 (03/21/11) Kickoff Meeting. (09/12/11) 02 (03/14/11) Initial Floor Plan Concepts. 03-04 33 (03/28/11) City Review. 60 05 (04/04/11) Refine Preferred Floor Plan. 06 (04/11/11) City Review. 07 (04/18/11) Final Floor Plan. 08 (04/25/11) Initial Elevations. 06-08 (04/25/11) City Review. 09 (05/02/11) Refine Preferred Elevations. 10 (05/09/11) City Review. 11 (05/16/11) Cost Opinion. 11 (05/16/11) Final Elevations. 12 (05/23/11) Color Final Conceptual Plan /Elevations. 12 (05/23/11) City Review /Presentations. 13- 14 (06/06/11) Design Development /Construction Documents Construction Documents (60 %). Design Development. 13- 17 (06/27/11) Cost Opinion. 17 (06/27/11) City Review. 18 (07/05/11) Construction Documents (95 %). 18- 23 (08/08/11) Final Cost Opinion and Specifications. 23 (08/08/11) Submit to City Review (First Plan Check)- 23 (08/08/11) Correct Plans. 24 (08/15/11) Submit Final Plans (100 %). 25 (08/22/11) Construction Advertising. 25 (08/22/11) Bid Opening. 28 (09/12/11) Award. 32 00/10/11) Start Construction. 33 (10/17/11) End Construction. 60 (04/23/12) Schedule Clarification The time during which the Consultant is delayed in its work by the acts of neglect of the City or its employees or those under it by contract or otherwise, or by Act of God which the Consultant could not have foreseen and provided for and which is not due to any fault or negligence on the part of the Consultant, shall be added to the time of completion of the work and the Consultant shall not be liable for any damages on account of such delay. Scheduling Commitment Meyer and Associates will proceed with the project immediately upon receipt of approval and Notice to Proceed from the City. This project will be given a high priority for the duration of the work. Our office is committed to meeting the deadlines set forth in the schedule presented above. 22. fee proposal Meyer and Associates proposes to complete the Scope of Work for the following not -to- exceed lump sum fee: City Business License Allowance (Architect): General Requirements: Maximum 6 Project Meetings (Architect). Maximum 5 Presentation Meetings (Architect). LEED Equivalency Management. 200.00 2,400.00 3,000.00 4,200.00 _ P y Conceptual Design: Existing Building Base Drawings. $ 2,500.00 Initial Site Visit (Architect). $ 500.00 Initial Site Visit (Electrical Engineer). S 700.00 Code Analysis. $ 500.00 Review Existing Building Plans and Site Improvements Plans. $ 200.00 Mechanical Design Input. $ 800.00 Structural Design Input. $ - 800.00 Architectural Floor Plan /Elevations. $ 4,400.00 City Coordination and Status Reporting. $ 500.00 Cost Opinion (Architect). $ 1,500.00 Construction Documents: 60% Final Plans (Design Development): Demolition Plans. $ 2,500.00 City Coordination and Status Reporting. S 500.00 Architectural Drawings. $ 16,250.00 Structural Engineering. $ 7,130.00 Mechanical Engineering (Plumbing and HVACI." Electrical Engineering.' $ $ 15,525.00 5,750.00 Landscape Architectural Drawings. $ 2,500.00 Irrigation Drawings. $ 1,840.00 Detailed, Itemized Cost Opinion (O'Connor). $ 5,400.00 'Add for LEED "Silver" Equivalency. $ 2,150.00 95% Final Plans: Demolition Plans. $ 2,500.00 City Coordination and Status Reporting. Architectural Drawings. $ 3 500.00 I I r 16,250.00 y Structural Engineering. $ 7,130.00 / Mechanical Engineering (Plumbing and HVAC).' $ 15,525.00 Electrical Engineering.* 5 5,750.00 Landscape Architectural Drawings. $ 2,500.00 Irrigation Drawings. $ 1,840.00 Detailed, Itemized Cost Opinion (O'Connod. $ 5,000.00 'Add for LEED "Silver" Equivalency. $ 2,150.00 q t� 0 Specifications. $ 3,500.00 0 7 7 Plan Check. $ 5,000.00 • Construction Support: Pre - Construction Meeting (Architect). $ 400.00 Shop Drawings /Submittal Review (Architect /Structural Engineer). $ 2,500.00 Shop Drawings /Submittal Review (Mechanical Engineer). $ 500.00 Shop Drawings /Submittal Review (Electrical Engineer). S 500.00 Clarification Allowance. $ 1,500.00 Site Visits: Maximum 24 (Architect). $ 9,600.00 Site Visits: Maximum 2 (Structural Engineer). $ 1,500.00 Site Visits: Maximum 2 (Mechanical Engineer). $ 1,500.00 Site Visits: Maximum 2 (Electrical Engineer). $ 1,500.00 Final Review /Report (Architect). 5 750.00 Final Review /Report (Mechanical Engineer). $ 900.00 Final Review /Report (Electrical Engineer). $ 900.00 Sub- Consultant Reimbursable Allowance: $ 800.00 Printing /Reproduction Allowance: Review Plans (Maximum 15 sets). NOT -TO- EXCEED FEE 2,025.00 174,265.00 01:11 The above fees include costs for transportation, telephone interim submittals, and normal insurance coverage. Meyer and Associates understands the City will furnish information and services listed after our Scope of Services. These fees have been based on the Project Description and Scope of Services. Meyer and Associates will provide construction documents for improvements within the limits of the Project Description and Scope of Services. Documents for improvements exceeding the Project Description and Scope of Services are not included. Should the Project Description or Scope of Services be altered, the fee may be adjusted accordingly. Services will be billed on an hourly basis for actual work performed up to the total not -to- exceed fee. The breakdown of fees above is a guideline only to illustrate fee components of overall services. Actual work performed will be responsive to specific job requirements and may vary significantly from the itemized listing above. standard hourly rates 1. MEYER AND ASSOCIATES will provide services, as may be required and authorized by the City, for hourly fees in accordance with the following schedule: Principal $ 150.00 Project Coordinator $ 135.00 Project Architect $ 125.00 Architectural Designer $ 100.00 Landscape Architectural Designer $ 100.00 AutoCAD Operator $ 75.00 Word Processor $ 40.00 Clerical $ 40.00 (Site Visit or Meeting) $ 750.00 2. F.T. ANDREWS will provide services as may be required and authorized by the City, for hourly fees in accordance with the following schedule: Principal $ 175.00 Project Manager $ 145.00 Project Engineer $ 135.00 Senior Engineer $ 125.00 Engineer /CM $ 115.00 Senior Designer $ 105.00 Designer $ 85.00 AutoCAD Draftsperson $ 70.00 Clerical $ 60.00 3. REEDCORP ENGINEERING will provide services, as may be required and authorized by the City, for hourly fees in accordance with the following schedule: Electrical Engineer $ 140.00 Project Engineer $ 95.00 Designer $ 80.00 CAD Draftsperson $ 70.00 Clerical $ 50.00 24. 4. R.F. DANIELS AND ASSOCIATES will provide services, as may be required and authorized by the City, for hourly fees in accordance with the following schedule: Project Manager $ 150.00 Engineer $ 110.00 Designer $ 75.00 Clerical $ 30.00 5. O'CONNOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT will provide services, as may be required and authorized by the City, for hourly fees in accordance with the following schedule: Principal $ 180.00 Senior Estimator $ 135.00 Senior Scheduler $ 135.00 Project Manager $ 135.00 Estimator $ 120.00 Scheduler $ 120.00 Computer Consultant $ 120.00 6. LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION CONSULTING will provide services, as may be required and authorized by the City, for hourly fees in accordance with the following schedule: Project Manager Designer Clerical $ 100.00 $ 85.00 $ 50.00 fee notes 1. Consultation in connection with Contractor disputes, arbitration, litigation, court appearances and additional consultants will be quoted separately and is not a part of this proposal. 2. Services of outside consultants not listed in this Proposal and reimbursable items shall be billed at our direct cost, plus 15% of the actual cost of their services for coordination and administration. 3. If the City requests that work be completed earlier than originally scheduled, requiring overtime, the fees shall be adjusted to cover the increased costs incurred by Meyer and Associates. The hourly rates for overtime will be one and one -half (1 %) times the standard hourly rates except for Sundays and holidays, which will be two (2) times the standard hourly rates. 4. Payment terms: Payment for all services shall occur within 30 days of City's receipt of monthly invoice prepared in accordance with City requirements. Meyer and Associates has the right to suspend services for payments not received within 60 days after City's receipt of invoice. 25. M Architects, LLP REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Facade Improvements Architectural Services Submitted to: City of Rosemead Attention: City Clerk 8838 Valley Boulevard Rosemead, CA 91770 Submitted by: The MDM Architects, LLP Team 3436 N. Verdugo Road, Suite 200 Glendale, CA 91208 (818) 957 -7765 rdell@mdm-architects.com February 2, 2011 MIftV Architects. LLP TABLE OF CONTENTS Description Page Cover Letter ....................... ............................... 1 Section 1. Understanding Scope of Services . ............................... 2 Section 2. Methodology and Work Plan ..... ............................... 3 Section 3. Experience and Qualification of Firm .............................. 5 Section 4. Key Personnel ................. .............................11 Section 5. List of Sub - Consultants ........ ............................... 16 Section 6. References ................... .............................17 Section 7. Time Schedule ............... ............................... 19 Section 8. Fee Proposal .................. .............................20 Hourly Fee Schedule ............ .............................25 City of Rosemead Request for Proposal - Table of Contents Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Facade Improvements Architectural Services February 2, 2011 Request for Proposal Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Facade Improvements Architectural Services KANA Architects, LLP February 2, 2011 Mr. Chris Marcarello Director of Public Works City of Rosemead 8838 E. Valley Boulevard Rosemead, CA 91770 RE: ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER EXPANSION AND FACADE IMPROVEMENTS - Request for Proposal Dear Mr. Marcarello and Selection Committee: Renovation and modernization projects such a the one proposed for your community recreation center are often challenging and full of surprises. One of the challenges is to identity and select a professional team with the right skill sets, an encompassing approach and community attitude. We believe we have assembled such a team. All of the team members are well - established small firms who relish working with the diverse communities within our area. Some have worked on our design teams forwell over 20 years! MDM views the Rosemead Community Center project as a puzzle, with many pieces that need to be looked at, their position in the overall puzzle identified and evaluated, and then puttogether into a logical and successfully finished community asset. We have been doing this type of work since our inception in 1981. From the 100,000+ s.f., multi - building Diagnostic Products LAX production facilities in the 1990's to the 26,000 s.f. Weingart Lakewood YMCA and the renown Long Beach Belmont Olympic Aquatic Facility today, MDM and its consultantteams have successfully completed dozens of puzzles. Our team will utilize a full range of tools working with the City of Rosemead in orderto meet your budget, provide the facility expansion, meet the community needs while maintaining the early 2012 opening date. It will essentially be a community effort for a community project. With all current projects, LEED and "Green" building materials, sustainable components and systems are often sought after. Upon further review and refinement of your program and the opportunities that can be executed successfully on the center, LEED "certifiable" will be examined and our services modified to respond to your selected "Green" goals. The undersigned is authorized to bind MDM and the Recreation Center Design Team and is also the main contact person for this proposal. MDM and its Design Team are well suited for your project and will work hand in hand with the City of Rosemead Team to assist you in clarifying the scope of services necessary, aligned with value driven fees and estimated construction costs, to bring the Rosemead Community Recreation Center project to fruition. Thank you for allowing us to present the MDM Team for your consideration. We would relish working with the City of Rosemead Richard E. Dell, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP Partner MDMARCHITECTS, LLP 3436 N. Verdugo Road, Suite 200,Glendale, CA 91208 818 957 -7765 m 818 957 -7767 FAX Page 1 Glendale ■ Walnut Creek M Architects, LLP SECTION 1: UNDERSTANDING SCOPE OF SERVICES After MDM's review of the site and our indepth meeting with Larry Moss of Lawrence R. Moss & Associates, on the potential /proposed City Civic Center Plaza, the MDM Team is excited about the opportunities of this project. We know each projecUopportunity is unique and different and responds to the specific needs of the community, the planning guidelines and programs adopted into a city's General and Specific Plans. Specific project understanding will be realized with completion of the Phase I services. Phase I allows for all information to be obtained, deciphered, prioritized and implemented using various tools, techniques, including outreach programs, design charrettes (internal and external), assessments, proformas, (if required) etc. At the completion of Phase I, informed, quantified, and respective decisions can be made based on the results along with current, historical and verifiable data. MDM's understanding of the services to be provided is as follows: The City of Rosemead desires the Architect to lead the team of professional consultants through a comprehensive "Process" of developing a "Project Program" that responds to the needs of the City, the Community and the Users of the facility. Upon defining the "Program ", using tools and methodic processes listed under the Methodology section, and, through a series of specific tasks, the Architect is entrusted with developing the required documents to bring the facility to fruition within the pre- described programming, budget and time schedule. The Architect is to be responsible for orchestrating and parenting the process to ensure all information is collected, transmitted, communicated and processed throughout the duration of the project. Most importantly, the Architect is to keep the City appraised, informed and made aware of the options, alternatives, project progress, budget changes, etc., to assist the City in making informed, timely, quantifiable and pragmatic decisions. From the Programming in Phase I, to occupancy and the subsequent operation of the facility the Architect shall remain the clearing house and point of contact for any and all parts the project. One of the important architectural responsibilities with projects of this nature is developing a potential strategic plan on how the proposed work can be physically executed while the existing building remains open and operational, with limited impact on the project schedule, budget and ri irrpnt r scars City of Rosemead Request for Proposal — P a g e 12 - Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Fagade Improvements Architectural services February 2, 2011 U SECTION 2: METHODOLOGY AND WORK PLAN Our objective is to attain a comprehensive understanding of the parameters and details. required to achieve the City's stated goals and objectives, including the input from various organizations, environmental considerations, neighborhood interfacing, site conditions and budgetary constraints. Budgetary implications due to prevailing wage will be taken into consideration. PHASE I: SITE ASSESSMENT AND SCHEMATIC DESIGN Phase I includes review of existing site and structure, existing documents of the facility including existing mechanical, plumbing, electrical and ADA. Information will be generated from the following resources. 1. Architect's review of: A. On -site conditions byway of a site observation B. City existing programs and initial expectations /demands of the facility C. City Civic Center Plan D. Existing building plans for expansion and fagade improvement options 2. Structural Engineer's review of existing building plans for building shell expansion and fagade recommendations 3. Mechanical /Plumbing /Electrical Engineers' review of existing conditions and utility capacity 4. Green Consultant's development of base line "Green" components 5. Combined Design Team review of as -built and on -site conditions 6. Develop computer generated existing floor plans and exterior elevations of the area(s) under consideration 7. Work with City to develop presentations, options and information to present at City Council and /or public outreach meetings 8. Assist City in efforts for notification, scheduling, orchestrating and preparing for presentation /information gathering meetings 9. Meeting to introduce City's general information, efforts to date and obtain input from representative groups designated by City 10. Work with City Team to assimilate outreach information into achievable objectives and goals. Implement those which coincide with City's direction into the developing concept site plans (if requested to do so) 11. Develop 3 initial concept site layouts and floor plans for City review and input 12. Present initial concept floor plans for City review and input 13. Design Team and City to revise projects' concepts, options, etc., into one strategic plan 14. Outline major /minor areas of concerns and action item issues 15. Develop initial estimated project schedule /time line, critical path matrix 16. Refine concept site plans and selected, preferred concept options 17. Review LEEDTM /Green information, options, etc. 18. Conduct code search and code due diligence, ADA compliance review (Should ADA Compliance be required for the existing building, Additional Services will be required to survey and act upon those deficiencies) 19. Design Team and Cost Estimator to develop estimated concept "Order of Magnitude" / "Opinion of Probable Cost' construction budgets, providing major line item budgets 20. Review budgets with City 21. Review and evaluate budgets, options /concepts and time line to refine projectlplan preferred by city 22. Revise budgets and time line 23. Revise and update reports and findings 24. Review concept plans for potential value engineering modifications 25. Refine conceptual design 26. Confirm decisions and directions approved in concept phase and programming 27. Confirm opinion of probable construction cost PHASE II: DESIGN DEVELOPMENT /CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 1. Coordinate CEQA compliance with City" 2. Refine design from Phase I Schematic 3. Refine project schedule 4. Integrate all additional input from Design Team and City 5. Prepare draft specifications /project manual in CSI format 6. Coordinate with City's specialty consultants City of Rosemead Request for Proposal - P a g e 13 Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Facade Improvements Architectural Services February 2, 2011 UNNA 7. Interface and coordinate work provided by Structural Engineer, MEP Engineers, Landscape Architect, Green Consultant 8. Interface Green /LEED components 9. Revise opinion of probable construction cost 10. Refine mechanical / electrical / plumbing systems 11. Refine cost estimates, assist with value engineering 12. Prepare Design Development plans for the project and submit to City for review and approvals 13. Prepare Construction Documents based on approved Design Devlopment plans 14. Submit 60% and 90% Construction Documents for City review 15. Incorporate energy conservation features and USGBC compliances 16. Assist with selection of furniture, fixtures and equipment * ** 17. Refine Green /LEED model for goal compliance and impact on environment 18. Submit to City plan check for initial review 19. Implement City corrections and ready documents for bidding 20. Second submission to City for review and approvals 21. Prepare documents for selected General Contractor to retrieve approved documents 22. Coordinate with Design Build sub - contractors for security, low voltage /data, fire sprinkler and alarm systems No EIR is required /anticipated. Only minor Environmental Assessment Form completion form is included. * Assistance in FF &E selection is for new 3000 S.F. building addition. Additional services will be required for FF &E selection for existing building areas PHASE III:CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES 1. Assist city in preparing invitations to bid for pre - qualified, prevailing wage contractors 2. Orchestrate bidding process 3. Work with City on staging plan to allow facility to remain open and operational 4. Proceed through bidding with pre - qualified contractors at prevailing wage 5. Review with bidders' proposals and make recommendations to City for best suited contractor 6. Prepare for construction commencement 7. Respond to Requests for Information (RFI's) 8. Assist in substitution review* 9. Review contractor payment request applications 10. Review Shop Drawings 11. Review and process Change Orders* 12. Provide Site Observation /Field Reports* 13. Monitor project schedule 14. Review schedule of values 15. Coordinate as -built documents with contractor 16. Conduct final project review with City to ensure quality, work and compliance with project expectations and construction documents, etc. 17. Provide construction item punch list 18. Assist in warranty, operating instructions assembly 19. Assist in obtaining occupancy permit 20. Assist in Substantial completion issuance 21. Assist City in orchestrating their local providers with data, telephone, computer, and low- voltage equipment set up 22. Conduct Post occupancy evaluations *Change orders, field observations and substitution review and /or implementation are provided as Additional Services on an "as requested" basis QUALITY ASSURANCE /CONTROL GUIDELINES MDM Quality Assurance Platforms: • In -house peer review between MDM Architects' offices • Consultant to consultant peer review • Use of AIA Document D200 Project Checklist • Use of internal document checklists • USGBC Check lists and protocols City of Rosemead Request for Proposal - P a g e 14 Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Facade Improvements Architectural services February 2, 2011 M" LLP MDM Firm Profile Richard Dell founded his original firm in 1980. In 1999 the opportunity to join forces with two long -time architects and friends resulted in the formation of Maple Dell + McClelland Architects, LLP (now known as MDM Architects, LLP). Today, Richard Dell and James McClelland lead the firm with shared visions and approaches to architecture; each understands that client expectations are opportunities to innovate and design in a fresh light with each new project. With this approach they have been successful in meeting client expectations and enhancing lives through the built environment. Viewing architecture as a collaborative process, with service to our clients as a fundamental commitment, MDM brings experience in a variety of project types and skills to our clients through this process. Project types embrace recreational /aquatic facilities, retail centers, commercial and medical office buildings, multi - family housing (both affordable and market rate), manufacturing plants and government facilities. Our goal, whatever the project or delivery type, is to assist our clients in improving both their business and operational performance through the built environment. Each of our capable and creative staff professionals are selected to work on projects where they can contribute to the project's success and grow professionally. For client convenience, MDM has offices in Glendale and Walnut Creek and holds architectural licenses in 12 states. PARTNERS Richard E. Dell, AIA, NCARB LEED AP, REB James P. McClelland. RA LICENSES Arizona California Colorado Florida Hawaii Missouri Nebraska Nevada Oregon South Dakota Utah Washington OFFICES Glendale Walnut Creek STAFF 10 Team Members 3 Licensed Architects 4 LEED AP PROJECT TYPES ADA Compliance Aquatic Facilities Design /Build Educational Entitlements Food Service Forensic Manufacturing Medical Municipal Multi - Family Housing Office Buildings Recreational Religious Retail Senior Living Space Planning Sustainable /Green Tenant Improvements MEMBERS American Institute of Architects (AIA) California Park & Recreation Society (CPRS) International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) ;emead Request for Proposal — P a g e 15 Rosemead Community Recreation Center Fagade Improvements Architectural services February 2, 2011 M*LV Ar hired s. LLP The following represent a general cross section of MDM projects relative to the Rosemead Community Center project. Due to limited space project details are not provided; however, MDM was Project Architect for all projects listed. MUNICIPAL PROJECTS City of Long Beach Belmont Plaza Olympic Pool Facility Renovation Complete revitalization of 1960's Olympic aquatic venue. Landmark aquatic /sport facilities with community rooms and support functionalities to serve as an international athletic venue Long Beach, CA City of San Buenaventura 1. Westside Pool Facility & Community Center 2. Community Pool Co- Generation Facility 3. Community Pool Restrooms City of San Fernando New Regional Aquatic Facility with Commi Support Building on 3 acres City of Glendale, CA 1. Radio Dispatch Remodel 2. Environmental Management Offices Remodel Tenant Improvement 3. Renovation / Space planning of City Management offices 4. Armory Building renovation study 5. Fagade Renovations with the Glendale Redevelopment Agency for private companies • Whyte Companies • Accurate Manufacturing City of Pico Rivera • Housing Department Space Planning • Senior Center Expansion /Renovation Planning • Cultural Center Expansion /Renovation Planning • City Hall Interim Departmental Plan • City Hall West Expansion • Long Term City Hall Planning Study • Business Park Study & Recommendations • City Facility Yard - Four Acre renovation and addition • Beverly Boulevard 4 -unit Residential Development • Whittier Boulevard Facade Renovation • City Hall Main Public Counters Renovation /Remodel COMMUNITY t RECREATIONAL PROJECTS Weingart- Lakewood Family YMCA Phased renovation of gymnasium with basketball court, offices, pool, locker and exercise areas for the YMCA of Greater Long Beach Long Beach, CA City of Rosemead Request for Proposal — P a g e 16 Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Fagade Improvements Architectural Services February 2, 2011 Mimi Salvation Army, Glendale Corps Gymnasium Complete renovation of gymnasium / basketball court, multipurpose room, chapel, offices, classrooms, kitchen and community areas Glendale, CA Navy Youth Sports /Activity Center New Youth activity building /gymnasium, baseball field, basketball courts and community spaces Monterey, CA Glendale YWCA Space planning, design and documents for upgrades to the historical main building, gymnasium and pool areas in order to better serve the community. Includes ADA upgrades and elevator installation Glendale, CA FACADE RENOVATIONS Family Crisis Center— 1736 Teen Transitional Housing and Teen Center Renovation Complete renovation and fagade makeover of 1970's large family residence Featuring computer learning areas, activity and Recreational areas, communal living spaces LA County m 9 ^b�i�i, - nmrtc,i Kolln Hardware Building Renovation Complete renovation of historical 2 -story hardware building into a downtown mixed use building, including ADA upgrades: Pleasanton, CA Seraplex Corporation Complete exterior and interior renovation of existing 2 -story, 16,000 s.f. office building for international blood product company headquarters Pasadena, CA City of Rosemead Request for Proposal — P a g e 17 Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Fagade Improvements Architectural Services February 2, 2011 Msf►v AMhilecl . LLP MDM TEAM MEMBER FIRMS B & B ASSOCIATES, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS — Team Structural Engineers B & B Associates, Inc., Structural Engineers, was organized in 1979 and provides consulting engineering services throughout the United States. B & B Associates, Inc. provides design engineering for more than 100 projects each year. It has designed many different kinds of structures from underground facilities to high -rise buildings. In the retail sector, projects range from small shopping centers to large retail malls. It performs services for light industrial (tilt -up buildings) to large warehouse facilities. It has performed consulting structural engineering services on hospitals, schools, commissaries, public storage facilities, office buildings, research, and sport facilities. Our basic philosophy is to build a successful and continuing business relationship by providing practical and economic structural systems. We like to be involved in the project early and work closely with our clients, so that better communications are developed. This process permits us to contribute our structural design experience to the project and ensures that a functional and economical structural system is implemented. B &B provided services for MDM on the San Fernando Regional Aquatic Center and the Westside Pool in Ventura. We have worked with MDM since the 1990's on a wide variety of project types. The professionals at B & B Associates, Inc. combine over seventy -five years of structural /seismic design experience using concrete, steel, masonry, wood and other complex structural systems NAI CONSULTING ENGINEERS - Team Electrical Engineers NAI Consulting Engineers is dedicated to providing the most quality service. We endeavor to deliver the best solution to every problem. It is this intent, coupled with our technical expertise that creates extended value for our clients. In a service oriented profession, the goal of NAI Consulting Engineers is to provide exceptional engineering services. We are committed to uphold and honor integrity and dignity of the Engineering Profession. We are committed and sensitive to our clients' needs. Our staff has thorough knowledge of the latest building codes and standards, and has dealt personally with different regulatory agencies, such as DSA, OSHPD, Various location city Building & Safety, Fire Departments and other Authorities Having Jurisdiction. Also we coordinated well with different utility companies like Southern California Edison (SCE), Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power (LADWP) Verizon, Charter Communications and Time - Warner Cable TV. NAI Consulting Engineers provides clients with single source professional electrical engineering services. The firm performs master planning, programming, construction documentation. We had been proudly. involved in the following projects that were similar to Rosemead community Center Expansion and Facade Improvement Program: ❑ OC Fair & Event Center Administration Building, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 ❑ KCLU Radio Station, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 ❑ Northrop Grumman Offices, Oxnard, CA 93030 ❑ Calabasas Civic Center, Calabasas, CA 91302 ❑ Port of Long Beach Pier T, Long Beach, CA 90802 City of Rosemead Request for Proposal — P a g e 18 Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Fagade Improvements Architectural services February 2, 2011 MIM1 Nc Itecls. LLP MDM TEAM MEMBER FIRMS KEVIN A SMOLA AND ASSOCIATES. INC. — Team Mechanical Engineers Established in 1983, Kevin A. Smola and Associates, Inc provides mechanical engineering for schools, multipurpose rooms, gymnasiums, healthcare, and LEED projects. KASA and MDM have worked together since the 1990's on a wide range of project types. The services provided include design of: Heating, ventilating, air conditioning Domestic plumbing Fire sprinkler design (including hydraulic calculations) Energy management systems Forensic Engineering Community Related Projects: YMCA Lakewood — with MDM YWCA Glendale —with MDM Lancaster Senior Center San Fernando Regional Pool and Community Center Complex — with MDM USA Youth Center Gymnasium Telfair School Multipurpose Room (used for community meetings also) Stage 23, Warner Bros. Studios LEED Gold Office Bldg, Burbank Water and Power LEED Platinum Designed to LEED, but not Submitted to USGBC 100 Villa St. Pasadena, Ca Telfair School, Los Angeles, Ca VERDE CONCEPTS. INC. — Team LEED Consultant Verde Concepts was founded to answer a growing demand for environmentally sensitive building and community design among building owners, contractors and architects. Verde Concepts offers a whole- systems approach to planning and design and aims to provide clients with environmentally - friendly solutions for all their building construction and operation challenges. Verde Concepts, Inc. is a certified Women Business Enterprise (WBE) and Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) in the State of California. Certified LEED TM Project Experience Beachbody, LEED Cl, Gold Certified San Gabriel Valley Water District, Fontana Water Company Headquarters LEED NC (v2.2) Certified MGM Tower, LEED EB, Silver Certified 2008 and LEED EBO &M Gold Recertification 2010 Bond Companies Office, LEED Cl, Gold Certified Tustin Centre Office Tower II, LEED CS Gold Certified LEED New Construction (LEED -NC) East Los Angeles Community College Student Services Building LEED NC (v2.1) Pursuing Silver Certification West LA Angeles Community College Student Services Building (v2.2), Pursuing Silver Certification YWCA Job Corps Building (v2.2), Pursuing Silver Certification Sorenson Library (v2.2), Pursuing Silver Certification LA Valley College Child Development Center (v2.2), Pursuing Silver Certification CCA -San Diego Detention Facility (v2.2), Pursuing Silver Certification South Los Angeles Animal Services Center (v2.2), Pursuing Gold Certification City of Rosemead Request for Proposal — P a g e 19 Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Fayade Improvements Architectural Services February 2, 2011 !�re!�►!! MDM TEAM MEMBER FIRMS LAWRENCE R. MOSS & ASSOCIATES — Team Landscape Architect No firm info on LRM is included in this proposal as they are already on the project with the City of Rosemead. MDM and LRM have worked together since the 1990's and enjoy a successful and productive working relationship. Most recent projects together include the San Fernando Regional Aquatic Facility and the San Buenaventura Westside Pool and Community Center project. MORLEY SIMON, AIA. CSI — Team Specifications Writer MORLEY S. SIMON, AIA, CSI 1991 - Present Consulting practice utilizing extensive experience to benefit and aid Architects, Developers, Contractors, Construction Managers and Building Owners. Specializing in specifications preparation and construction documents quality assurance. Over 50 years of diversified experience in quality control and the production of Construction Documents and Contract Administration for low and high rise office buildings, multi - family residential and condominium buildings, and institutional buildings. MDM and Morley Simon began their working relationship in early 2000 and have worked together on a number of projects requiring project manual specifications. WIEDER CONSTRUCTION — Team Cost Estimator CSL #351241 Wieder Construction has been professionally contacting in the local construction industry for 33 years. Instrumental to the successful completion of hundreds of commercial projects are his skills in accurately estimating costs of construction. These are skills that are based upon current knowledge of construction materials and labor prices, as well as experience and good, judgment about the construction process. Utilizing CSI format for estimating, the firm has provided cost analysis services for many clients, owners, architects and designers. Current and relevant cost estimating projects include: Family Crisis Center Housing Teen SheltedCenter Los Angeles, CA 4,500 S.F. Building Renovation (with MDM) Fagade improvements Salvation Army Renovation of gymnasium, toilets, chapel, classrooms, Glendale, CA Corp computer lab, conference rooms, offices and sitework (with MDM) 20,000 S.F. Montessori School Classrooms, computer lab addition Northridge, CA Seraplex Corporation Headquarters for Biotech plasma collection (with MDM) firm. Full building and Fagade renovation, including tenant Improvements and parking garage. 20,000 S.F. MDM and Wieder Construction began their working relationship in the 1990's, working together on a new car dealership in Glendale and have continued to work successfully together since that time. City of Rosemead Request for Proposal — P a g e 110 Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Fagade Improvements Architectural Services February 2, 2011 MDAV A hilec s. LLP Richard E. Dell, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP, REB Project Principal - Rosemead Community Center Project PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND Richard Dell's career ,spans more than 3 decades of designing, securing entitlements and developing major architectural projects. Mr. Dell's experience in numerous public agency presentations augments his architecture and development expertise for producing projects proven to be aesthetically, functionally and financially rewarding. As Partner in charge of MDM's Pasadena Studio, he directs feasibility studies, strategic and master planning and architectural solutions for city, county and state approvals. He also leads the critical design and site planning process for the commercial / medical / multi - family housing / recreational projects of the firm. Richard Dell brings to his clients the unique combination of a creative, design- oriented Principal well versed in the complex entitlement processes of today's projects and with the ability to set and meet realistic budgets and schedules. Mr. Dell is the Executive Architect leading the Belmont Plaza Olympic Pool Revitalization, including extensive community outreach and programming; he was designer /principal -in- charge on the San Fernando Regional Aquatic Facility and the City of San Buenaventura's Westside Pool Facility. He lead the design team for the Green Valley Medical Office Building and the programming/ renovation team for Alpha Therapeutics Corp. Blood Plasma facility. His expertise in planning and entitlements successfully assisted Bob Hope Enterprises through the city of Burbank's development process for the Bob Hope Center. Through MDM's many clients requiring governmental interfacing, and as former Chairman of the City of Glendale's Historical Preservation Commission, Mr. Dell has networked and developed close professional relationships within numerous City and County governments and agencies. Mr. Dell has made numerous presentations to City Councils, Homeowners Groups, Business Groups and other project related entities. Notable among these presentations were those made to hostile Malibu homeowner groups for the Pepperdine University Senior Retirement Project and the many presentations made for the Bob Hope Center, which was ultimately not built due to Mr. Hope's passing. Richard regards community service as an important part of his life and volunteers for numerous local charities and service organizations. He currently is actively involved on the LA County Workforce Investment Board and is assigned to their Marketing and Strategic Planning Committees. Representative Clients City of Long Beach City of San Buenaventura City of San Fernando City of Glendale City of Oceanside City of Montebello City of Pico Rivera Bob Hope Enterprises LA Pierce Community College Rip Curl Alpha Therapeutics Corp. Seraplex Inc. Occidental College Weingart- Lakewood YMCA Wave Properties, Pepperdine University Salvation Army, Glendale Corps Holy Cross Medical Center, Granada Hills Glendale YWCA/Shelter Housing Urban Housing Corporation Stor It All Self Storage EDUCATION California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo & Florence, Italy LICENSES NCARB Certification No.28,739 California No. C11,985 Arizona Colorado Florida Hawaii Missouri Nebraska Nevada Oregon South Dakota Utah California Real Estate Broker AFFILIATIONS American Institute of Architects US Green Building Council California Parks & Recreation Society International Council of Shopping Centers Glendale Kiwanis, President, 2000 -2001 LA County Workforce Investment Board, Board MembedTreasurer City of Glendale Cultural Heritage Commissioner /Board Chair Salvation Army Glendale Corps, Chairman, Board of Directors State of California Office of Emergency Services Certified for Disaster Assessment City of Rosemead Request for Proposal - P a g e 111 Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and FaFade Improvements Architectural Services February 2, 2011 MI&VA I h tecl . LLP Marc C. Hauck, Associate AIA Project Manager PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND Mr. Hauck began his architectural career during his sophomore year at ASU when he was appointed to the university's 10 -Year Projection Planning Board as a student planner /designer. Now with over 20 years of experience, Mr. Hauck has managed a variety of projects inclusive of public aquatic facilities, medical office buildings, multi - residential projects, hospital renovations, tenant improvement projects, and retail chain developments within various malls around the country including The Westfield Group, General Growth Properties, Inc., Robertson Properties Group, and The Irvine Company. Marc has been project manager on a broad scope of projects since joining MDM. His responsibilities as Project Manager involve all phases of project delivery including contracts, budgeting, scheduling, client's point -of- contact, team management, document production, construction administration, as well as city, consultant and general contractor coordination. As Project Manager for the Pasadena office, Marc handles all DSA processing. Additionally, Marc oversees the AutoCAD quality control for the Glendale Studio. Representative Projects City of Long Beach Belmont Plaza Olympic Pool Revitalization Weingart Lakewood Family YMCA City of San Fernando Regional Aquatic Facility City of San Buenaventura Westside Pool Facility and Community Pool Co -Gen Facility Rip Curl Retail Stores, California, Hawaii and Florida Salvation Army, Glendale Corps Green Valley Medical Office Building Pierce College Physical Therapy Early Beginnings Pre - School LA Christian School Bob Hope Center Hope Enterprises Office Renovation Alpha Therapeutic Plasma Donor Centers, Various Main Entrance Renovation Departmental Relocations Electrical Substation New Parking Layout Stoneridge at Elk Grove Affordable Housing Crossings at Elk Grove Affordable Housing City of Pico Rivera Maintenance Yard Feasibility Study Cultural Center Feasibility Study City Hall West Conversion Senior Center Remodel EDUCATION Arizona State University BS Architecture AFFILIATIONS Associate Member, American Institute of Architects AWARDS Consumer Products Design Award: Universal Remote Control, Harmonic Design, Inc. CRC Press Chemistry Achievement Award: Front Range Community College Quality Achievement Award: Continental Graphics Interdisciplinary Design Project- First Place: Arizona State University City of Rosemead Request for Proposal — P a g e 112 Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Fayade Improvements Architectural Services February 2, 2011 me� SECTION 4: KEY CONSULTANT RESUMES B & B Associates, Inc. Dr. Armen Baroonian, Principal In Charge Project Assignment: Education: Active Registration: Experience /Qualifications: Principal -in- Charge BSCE /1979 Civil Engineering London University, London (England) MSSE /1980 Structural Engineering Surrey University, Guildford (England) PhD/1984 Structural Engineering Surrey University, Guildford (England) Licensed Structural Engineer, State of California (# 4227) Licensed Civil Engineer, State of California (# 50016) Licensed Civil and Structural Engineer in the following States: Dr. Baroonian is a principal with B & B Associates, Inc. and is in charge of research, supervision, co- ordination and production of projects. Prior to joining B & B Associates, Inc., he was Project Manager with Brandow & Johnston & Associates Structural Engineer in Los Angeles. He received a Doctor of Philosophy in Structural Engineering in Reinforced Concrete structures using finite elements analysis. He has a Master of Science degree in Structural Engineering with distinction with emphasis on dynamic analysis, space structures and prestressed concrete structures. He has several published papers in professional journals. Dr. Baroonian has several years of experience in steel, wood, masonry, and concrete specifically prestressed concrete structures including multi -story parking garages for commercial and medical buildings both in the United States and in the United Kingdom. His structural analysis experience includes static and dynamic seismic analysis of a variety of structural systems utilizing geotechnical information and response spectra. He has been responsible for structural and seismic upgrade, evaluation and technical review of structural systems, assembling field information and evaluating existing structures, in particular, historical buildings, assessing site seismicity, evaluating potential economic loss expected from postulated seismic events, developing damage control criteria based upon ductility and capacities of various lateral load resisting structural materials, elements, assemblies, and systems. He has significant experience in developing lateral load resisting systems for upgrading existing structures, has performed numerous field observations and prepared seismic reports for various types of buildings and developed structural system for major expansions. City of Rosemead Request for Proposal — P a g e 113 Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Fagade Improvements Architectural services February 2, 2011 M f►L Ar ita [S. LL NAI Consulting Engineers Sam Nakhla, P.E., President Graduated with B.S. in Electrical Engineering. Has more than twenty five years experience in the design of electrical systems including power, lighting and low voltage systems such as public address (indoor and outdoor), autonomous, fire alarm, CATV, security, etc. Registered Professional Electrical Engineer in the State of California. License number: E -16631 Tony Lacanilao, Electrical Engineering Director Graduated with B.S. in Electrical Engineering. Has more than thirty years experience in construction and design of electrical systems including power, lighting and low voltage systems such as public address (indoor and outdoor), autonomous, fire alarm, CATV, security, clock systems, etc. Contractor License Board in the State of California (License number B- 914385) Membership in Professional Organizations: NFPA, IEEE Brand Park Community Building, Mission Hills, CA 91345 Dept. of Public Works -City of Los Angeles The project involves the design of power and lighting for a one - storey community building, 2400 SF multi- purpose assembly room for community activities and meetings, an entrance lobby, a serving /warming kitchen, storage and utilities. The project also includes code required parking, courtyard, a trellis and gazebo and other outdoor amenities KEVIN A. SMOLA AND ASSOCIATES Kevin A. Smola, P.E. California License M 21106 President Education: Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana Bachelor of Science (BS) in Engineering Professional Registration: Mechanical Engineer - California M 21106 Mechanical Engineer - Nevada M 9855 Mechanical Engineer - Arizona M 26192 Mechanical Engineer - Maryland 21535 Mechanical Engineer - No. Carolina 021338 Mechanical Engineer - Pennsylvania 050084 Mechanical Engineer - Hawaii PE -8732 Mechanical Engineer - Virginia 0402- 026511 Mechanical Engineer- Colorado 30888 Mechanical Engineer - Oregon 18382PE Professional Affiliations: American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) American Society of Plumbing Engineers (ASPE) National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Publications: Indoor Air Quality Symposium (IAQ), Atlanta 1988 Removing Environmental Tobacco Smoke: A Practical Solution for the City of Beverly Hills, California. Smoke Control: Is it Really Required: A discussion of Smoke Smoke control verses the benefits of fire sprinklers in high -rise Office buildings. March 2003, PM Engineer Magazine City of Rosemead Request for Proposal — P a g e 114 Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Fagade Improvements Architectural Services February 2, 2011 MWOV Ar hitec . LLP VERDE CONCEPTS, INC. V. Blair Seibert, AIA, LEED AP, GPR, CSBA Biography The principal and founder of Verde Concepts Inc. in Los Angeles, California, Blair Seibert has more than 25 years' architectural experience in commercial, multi - family residential, master planning and institutional projects, including a dozen U.S. Green Building Council LEEDTM projects. Clients include city agencies, architects, developers, building owners, building managers and general contractors. As a LEEDTM- accredited professional, GreenPoint Rater, Certified Sustainable Building Advisor and architect, she has participated in all aspects of sustainable building and community design and brings the communication and organizational skills needed to complete highly complex projects. Currently Verde Concepts is the sustainable design and LEEDTM certification consultant for numerous LEED projects including a 320,000 square foot detention center in San Diego County and a seven -story job training facility in downtown Los Angeles. Having hands -on knowledge with LEEDTM New Construction, Commercial Interiors, Core & Shell and Existing Building: Operations and Maintenance, GreenPoint Rated and the Living Building Challenge afford Verde Concepts the ability to see beyond the limits of a particular system and utilize a broad base of knowledge to bring projects to a successful conclusion.- Two years ago Verde Concepts coordinated the LEED EBTM Silver certification of the MGM Tower, a million square foot high -rise in Century City. It was the first LEED EB office building in Los Angeles. The owners contracted with Verde Concepts again to recertify MGM Tower through the LEED EB O &M rating system at a higher level. Gold was achieved in October 2010. Verde worked for the architect to obtain LEED Cl Gold level certification for a 60,000 s.f. entertainment studio /office tenant in Santa Monica. Two years before Verde had worked for the general contractor for Los Angeles' first LEED CITM Gold office space. Morley S. Simon, AIA, CSI - Specifications EDUCATION University of Chicago, 1948 - 1950 Illinois Institute of Technology, 1950 - 1955 Bachelor of Architecture Dean's List LICENSE State of California, C -3355, 1961 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Institute of Architects (AIA) Emeritus - Los Angeles Chapter, 1969: Member, Building Performance and Regulations Committee. Construction Specifications Institute (CSI) Emeritus - Los Angeles Chapter, 1969: Past Member of the Board of Directors; Past Vice President, Professional; Past Chairman, Building Code Committee. Specifications Consultants in Private Practice (SCIP), 1993: Professional Member. Ceramic Tile Institute of America, Inc.: Past Member, Slip Resistance Committee; City of Rosemead Request for Proposal — P a g e 115 Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Fagade Improvements Architectural Services February 2, 2011 SECTIONS: SUB - CONSULTANT LIST MDM Architects, LLP has assembled a qualified and experienced Design Team for the Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Facade Improvements RFP. MDM has worked with several of these consultants for over 20 years. Each team member is client- focused and brings the spirit of team work to the table 1. 2. ARCHITECTITEAM LEAD Project Architect/Principal Project Manager STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Project Principal MDM Architects, LLP Richard E. Dell, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP, REB 3436 N. Verdugo Road, Suite 200 Glendale, CA 91208 (818) 957 -7765 (818) 957 -7767 FAX rdell@mdm-architects.com Marc C. Hauck, Associate AIA B & B Associates, Structural Engineers Armen Baroonian PhD., SE 1111 S. Arroyo Parkway, Suite 450 Pasadena, CA 91105 3. 4. 5. 6. 7 8. ELECTRICAL ENGINEER Principal Engineer Professional Engineer MECHANICAL ENGINEER Project Engineer /Principal NAI Consulting Engineers Sam Nakhla, PE 28145 Avenue Crocker, Floor 2 Valencia, CA 91355 Tony Lacanilao Kevin A. Smola and Associates, Inc. Kevin A. Smola, PE 145 Vista Avenue, Suite 110 Pasadena, CA 91106 LEED CONSULTANT Verde Concepts, Inc. Project Principal V. Blair Seibert, AIA, NCARB; LEED AP, CSBA, GPR 10215 Santa Monica Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90067 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Lawrence R. Moss & Associates Project Principal Lawrence R. Moss, ASLA Project Manager Jaime Yamashita, LA 3458 Ocean View Boulevard Glendale, CA 91208 SPECIFICATIONS Morley Simon, AIA, CSI Project Specifier Morley Simon, AIA, CSI 1631 Sixteenth Street Santa Monica, CA 90404 COST ESTIMATOR Wieder Construction Project Principal Jonathan Wieder 5146 Greencrest Road La Canada, CA 91011 City of Rosemead Request for Proposal — P a g e 116 Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Fagade Improvements Architectural Services February 2, 2011 M *A SECTION 6: REFERENCES MDM Architects, LLP's relevant references include the following: City of Long Beach Mr. Phil T. Hester, retired Director, Parks, Recreation & Marine Department of Parks, Ms. Sandra Gonzalez, Planning & Development Manager Recreation & Marine 2760 N. Studebaker Road Project: Long Beach, CA 90815 Belmont Olympic Plaza Revitalization (562) 570 -3170 2. City of San Fernando Mr. Ron Ruiz, Director of Public Works 117 Macneil Street Projects: San Fernando, CA 91340 Project. (818) 898 -1201 San Fernando Regional Aquatic and Community Center 3. City of Temple City Mr. Jose Pulido, City Manager 9701 Los Tunas Drive Captain Rio Ray Temple City, CA 91780 Projects while formerly City Manager. - (626) 285 -2171 City of San Fernando Regional Aquatic Center Glendale, CA 91204 City of Montebello Pool Renovation Study 4. City of Glendale Mr. Emil Tatevosian, Glendale Redevelopment Agency 633 E. Broadway Mr. Jay Platt, Planner Historical Preservation Room 201 Projects: Glendale, CA 91203 Various private fagade improvements through GRA (818) 548 -2005 5. City of San Buenaventura Ms. Betsy Cooper, Project Coordinator, Utility Engineer 501 Poli Street, Room 120 Ventura, CA 93002 Project: (805) 654 -7848 San Buenaventura Community Aquatic Center 6. City of Pico Rivera 6615 Passon Blvd Pico Rivera, CA 90660 Ms. Ann Negendank (562) 498 -9294 PRIVATE PROJECT REFERENCES Ms. Ann Negendank, former Assistant City Manager Projects: City Hall West Conversion and Fagade Upgrade City Hall space planning and department(s) growth studies Community Center upgrade studies and budgets analysis City maintenance yard building renovations /fagade studies 1. Family Crisis Center Ms. Carol Adelkoff, Executive Director 2116 Arlington Ave. Projects: Suite 200 Teen Shelter and Teen Center complete building renovation Los Angeles, CA 90018 and facade upgrade (323) 737 -3900 Area service office renovation and fagade upgrade 2. Salvation Army Captain Rio Ray Glendale CA Corp Majors Jim and Barbara Sloan presiding over projects listed 320 W. Windsor Rd (520) 624 -1741 Glendale, CA 91204 Projects: (818) 246 -5586 Renovation /Remodel of facility included classrooms, computer Lab, Chapel, Gymnasium, offices, toilets, conference rooms. City of Rosemead Request for Proposal — P a g e 117 Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Fagade Improvements Architectural Services February 2, 2011 MWLV 3. US Navy Teen Center Chamblin Landes, Contractor (Design Build) Monterey, CA Mr. Martin Landes 805 239 -0490 1334 Riverside Avenue Paso Robles, CA 93446 Project: New Teen /Community Center 4. YMCA of Greater Long Beach Mr. Jason Hagensick, COO 3605 Long Beach Boulevard Suite 201 Projects: Long Beach, CA 90807 Weingart Lakewood Family YMCA Interior Renovation (562) 279 -1738 and Fagade Upgrade City of Rosemead Request for Proposal —P a g e 118 Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Fapade Improvements Architectural Services February 2, 2011 MWOV CITY OF ROSEMEAD MDM Team Proposal for the ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER EXPANSION AND FACADE IMPROVEMENTS PHASE I: Site Assessment and Schematic Design .................................... ............................... $38,080 PHASE II: DesignDevelopment .................................................................. ............................... $31,140 Construction Documents ............................................................ ............................... $90,900 BiddingServices ........................................................................... ............................... $4,200 PHASE III: Construction Support Services ................................................... ............................... $23,100 Total ......................................................................................... ............................... $187,420 Estimated Reimbursable Budget .............................................. ............................... $4,700 Additional Cost for Added Site Visit(s) or Meeting (s) ........................... $90 to $175 /hr /person (As noted on Hourly Rate Schedule) MDM TEAM SCOPE AND DELIVERABLES PHASE I- SITE ASSESSMENT AND SCHEMATIC DESIGN SERVICES: 1. Review site conditions with Client. Team site review to include Architect, Mechanical /Plumbing Engineer, Electrical Engineer, Landscape Architect, Interior Designer and LEED Consultant. Areas of review to include the following: A. Site review to note existing conditions, traffic flow, pedestrian access, ADA requirements, security issues and aesthetics B. Existing utility service locations and sizes C. Existing HVAC unit, ducting, distribution and controls D. Existing plumbing service control locations, sizes, types and load demands E. Existing electrical service panel locations, sizes, types and load demands 2. Prepare existing /demolition site plan and floor plan of community recreation center site and facility 3. Prepare up to three (3) preliminary proposed building floor plans including proposed interior spacial arrangements and preliminary elevations (it is assumed that the city plaza and parking layout design currently underway will be available for the community recreation center site design) 4. One (1) meeting with the client to review the three (3) preliminary building design options for input and direction 5. Preliminary studies of structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing systems from the respective design professional 6. Up to five (5) formal presentations to the public and /or council to determine the most appropriate design option for the facility 7. Provide one (1) final approved site plan, floor plan inclusive of proposed spacial arrangements within the building addition, and elevations. (A signed approval from the client will be requested prior to the start of the Design Development phase) City of Rosemead Request for Proposal — P a g e 120 Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Facade Improvements Architectural Services February 2, 2011 M.Navy 8. Prepare one (1) preliminary budget cost estimate in CSI format to match the final selected option (will include provided square footage measurements) 9. Provide contact and program information for green incentive programs available 10. Revise the preliminary design and construction schedule if necessary to meet current time lines 11. Coordination of all consultants and administrative services Schematic Design Deliverables: 1. One (1) site observation by all consultants listed in "Schematic Design Scope" No 1 above to review existing conditions and to confirm the City's proposed scope of work for all disciplines 2. One (1) existing /demolition site plan and floor plan of community recreation center (it is assumed that an accurate set of as -built plans will be provided to the commissioned team) 3. One (1) meeting with the client to review space planning options. Documented meeting minutes will be provided by MDM 4. Preliminary systems review from structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing engineers 5. Up to five (5) client, City Council and /or public meetings to review the latest options, receive direction, and implement the suggested modification into the plans 6. Provide one (1) final approved facility addition with indicated spacial arrangements and proposed elevations for client sign -off (approvals will be requested prior to the start of the Design Development phase) 7. Provide a list of incentive programs and rebates available for potential systems suggested for the facility B. One (1) preliminary budget cost estimate of the selected scheme 9. One (1) revised preliminary design and construction schedule PHASE II - DESIGN DEVELOPMENT, CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND BIDDING SERVICES: DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SCOPE: 1. Coordination with the City and MDM design consultants during the preparation of the design and construction documents including required paperwork for CEQA compliance 2. Coordination with the City's selected consultants including Geotechnical, Civil, traffic and noise engineers to incorporate their pertinent findings and information into the design team's documents 3. Continued development of proposed architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, and landscape systems with supporting on -site and off site utility systems into the documents based on client, city, and public input, site constraints, LEED qualification (up to a silver equivalent rating) and budget constraints 4. Create "Green" checklist modeled after the LEED NC version 3 rating system to track rating system 5. One (1) meeting with the client to review interior finish materials, furniture, fixtures and equipment for proposed addition 6. Assist the city with value engineering as required to meet budget constraints incorporating minor changes to the design 7. Prepare initial set of outline specifications 8. Assemble one (1) color materials board outlining proposed color scheme 9. Revise one (1) preliminary design schedule 10. Administrative services Design Development Deliverables: 1. One (1) revised preliminary proposed site plan 2. One (1) revised preliminary demolition floor plan 3. Design Development documents indicating preliminary architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical, plumbing and landscape systems (approvals will be requested prior to the start of the Construction Documentation phase) 4. Preliminary "Green" list of sustainable systems and associated points 5. Outline specifications City of Rosemead Request for Proposal — P a g e 121 Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Fayade Improvements Architectural Services February 2, 2011 MDRVA 6. One (1) revised preliminary design schedule 7. One (1) color material board outlining preferred color scheme, furniture, fixtures and equipment (FF &E) CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT SCOPE: 1. Design Team to prepare drawing sets inclusive of but not limited to: A. Architectural plans including site plan (demolition and proposed,) floor plan, elevations, reflected ceiling plan, building sections, schedules, general notes, building details, waterproofing details and specifications as required for the addition. Plans to meet ADA requirements and, if applicable, show systems to achieve LEED Silver equivalent rating B. Structural plans including design, details, general notes, calculations and specifications as required for city approval C. Electrical plans including electrical design per code requirements, schedules, general notes, associated details and specifications as required for city approval D. Mechanical and plumbing plans including M/P design per code requirements, new roof area drainage, schedules, general notes, associated details, Title 24 calculations for the new and existing facility, and specifications for city approval E. Landscape and irrigation plans including miscellaneous details, general notes, calculations and specifications as required for city approval F. Finish material plans of revised interior spaces including selection of furniture, fixtures and equipment of the addition only 2. Prepare two (2) preliminary budget cost estimates in CSI format for client review; One (1) at 60% CD completion, and one(1) at 90% completion during the Construction Documentation phase 3. Prepare two (2) preliminary design and construction schedules; One (1) at 60% CD completion, and one (1) at 90% completion during the Construction Documentation phase 4. Provide progress set, schedule and preliminary budget estimate with client at 60% completion and 90% completion of construction documents for direction and /or approvals (includes disk with one (1) electronic copy and five (5) full size hard copies with specifications) 5. Incorporate all minor modifications provided by the client during their 60% and 90% review 6 Prepare the construction documentation package and submit all required documents, forms, specifications and applications to the City of Rosemont Building and Safety Division for initial plan check, and to other state or federal agencies requiring their review. 7. Provide all corrections and modifications as listed by plan check governing agencies until approval is retained and plans are signed off 8. Coordination of all MDM design consultants, and; 9. Administrative services Construction Document Deliverables: 1. Provide one (1) electronic set on disk and five (5) full size hard copies of the progress design package at 60% and 90% inclusive of drawings, calculations and specifications for client review and approvals 2. Two (2) preliminary budget cost estimates; One (1) at 60% completion and one at 90% completion for client review and approvals 3. Two (2) revised preliminary project schedules; One (1) at 60% completion and one at 90% completion for client review and approvals 4. One approved construction documentation package with all required drawings, forms, specifications and applications signed off by the City of Rosemont Building and Safety Division and any other state or federal agencies requiring their approvals BIDDING SERVICES: 1. Prepare final bid -ready design and specification documents for up to five (5) contractor bids 2. Participate in one (1) bid site walk with client and qualified bidding contractors to answer any questions and provide clarifications 3. Answer written RFI's and provide clarifications provided by the bidding General Contractors through the bidding phase Bidding Deliverables: City of Rosemead Request for Proposal— P a g e 122 Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion andFayade Improvements Architectural Services February 2, 2011 M *qvj 1. Attendance to one (1) site observation meeting during the bidding phase with client and prequalified bidding contractors to provide clarifications and input 2. Provide copies of all RFI's and clarifications generated during the bidding process PHASE III CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES: 1. Attend bid opening meeting with client and provide input to help determine the most qualified General Contractor 2. Provide bi- weekly construction coordination meetings (up to 8) 3. Provide periodic site observations with associated reports by design team as requested by client on a time and materials basis 4. Design team to conduct a final site observation (punch list) upon substantial completion (includes Architectural, Structural, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Landscape, interior design and LEED'S representatives with associated reports) 5. Review shop drawings, RFI's and process clarifications and interpretations during the construction phase 6. Review contractor's change orders and payment requests with client and provide input 7. Coordinate final "record drawing" as- builts with the General Contractor 8. Coordination of all consultants and administrative services Construction Support Deliverables: 1. Attendance at one (1) bid opening meeting 2. Five (5) architectural site observation reports 2. One (1) architectural site meeting and associated punch list/observation report 3. One (1) structural site observation report 4. Two (2) electrical site observation report 5. Two (2) mechanical /plumbing site observation report 6. Copies of all RFI's, shop drawings and clarifications generated during the construction process 7. Copies of all change orders and payment draw requests during the construction process 8. Close -out documents and warranty information as applicable (by contractor) FEE CLARIFICATIONS: 1. Professional consultants, coordination or services to provide environmental reports including asbestos or an EIR, geotechnical reports, civil engineering, fire alarm and /or fire sprinkler design, and low voltage design are excluded from this scope of work but can be provided as an additional service 2. Coordination, filling -out or review of LEED associated templates for certification, energy simulations /calculations, and /or design for ASHRAE outside air intake are excluded from this scope of work but can be included as an additional service 3. Fee includes design approval through City Council and construction documents through the City of Rosemead. All other design review or plan approval process(es) can be done as an additional service 4. Fee excludes design, coordination or required documentation of temporary facilities or systems 5. Plan check fees are the responsibility of the client; Permit fees are the responsibility of the General Contractor and both have been excluded from this scope of services 6. Fee assumes design -build drawings are available in electronic or hard copy format and are accurate enough to be used to create base drawings. If the as -built drawings are not available or found to be incorrect and /or require on -site verification, the fee will be modified to include an additional estimated adjusted fixed fee using the hourly rate schedule 7. Fee assumes replacement of the existing HVAC unit(s) only. Should a different HVAC system be required to meet the T -24 minimums for a LEED Silver rating, an additional SD, DD and CD fee of $1,050, $3,150 and $6,290 respectively will be added to the base fee. Note: it is the understanding of this team that should package units be used, a LEED Silver rating will not be obtainable as it will not meet the energy conservation requirements needed for the theoretical points. City of Rosemead Request for Proposal — P a g e 123 Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Fayade Improvements Architectural Services February 2, 2011 WIMA. 8. The fee reflects the replacement of any loads being placed on the roof being equal or lighter than the existing loads. Any reports /analysis requested by the City in verifying the buildings existing structural stability can be done as an additional service 9. Should the Asbestos report indicate presence of any hazardous materials, services and /or documents to coordinate abatement of such materials can be provided as an additional service 10. Architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical, plumbing and landscape /irrigation engineering design services and documents for any areas outside the limit of construction are excluded from this scope of services but can be included as an additional service (see aerial for limits of construction) 11. As -built plans will be provided by the General Contractor and coordinated by the Architect 12. Fee assumes review and coordination of up to five (5) contractor bids 13. Any major changes to scope of work after initial SD, DD or CD sign -off can be done as an additional service 14. A structural dynamic analysis has been excluded from the scope of work but can be included for an additional fee 15. All drawings will be done in AutoCAD 2007 or later 16. All furniture, fixture and equipment selection for the existing facility is excluded from this scope of work as is the procurement or storage of any furniture, fixtures or equipment and /or development of window treatments for the new facility, but can be included as an additional service 17. All other coordination services, studies, reviews, details, drawings, meetings or oversight to items not expressly listed in the above scope of services was not made part of the listed fee, but can be reviewed and negotiated into the scope with an associated modified fee at the clients request 18. Proposal excludes destructive testing of the existing facility 19. Roof replacement or modifications to the roof to support additional features such as photovoltaic panels are excluded from the scope of services 20. A photometric plan has been excluded from this scope of work but can be included as an additional service City of Rosemead Request for Proposal — P a g e 124 Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Fagade Improvements Architectural Services February 2, 2011 M!kyv� SECTION 8: MDM Team Hourly Rate Schedules MDM Architects, LLP Project Architect Principal Project Manager /Project Architect Interior Designer Senior Drafter /Designer Intermediate Drafter /Designer Junior Drafter /Designer Office Administration B & B Associates, Inc. Structural Engineer Principal Project Manager Design Engineer Drafter Office Administration NAI Consulting Engineers Electrical Engineer Principal Professional Engineer Project Engineer Design Engineer CAD Operator Office Administration Kevin A. Smola & Associates. Inc. Mechanical / Plumbing Engineer Principal Supervising Engineer Project Engineer Designer /Drafter /Ad min istation Verde Concepts, Inc. LEED Consultant Principal /Senior LEED Consultant LEED AP Consultant LEED Administration CADD Drafter Administrative Support Lawrence R. Moss & Associates Landscape / Irrigation Architect Principal Senior Associate Associate Support Morley Simon, AIA, CSI Specifications Principal /Senior Technical Office Administration $165.00 $130.00 $115.00 $95.00 $75.00 $65.00 $85.00 $175.00 $110.00 $100.00 $85.00 $55.00 $170.00 $165.00 $130.00 $105.00 $80.00 $70.00 $140.00 $120.00 $90.00 $60.00 $ 175.00 $ 120.00 $ 85.00 $ 95.00 $ 65.00 $150.00 $135.00 $115.00 $95.00 $165.00 $50.00 Weider Construction Cost Estimator Principal Estimator $125.00 City of Rosemead Request for Proposal - P a g e. 125 Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Fagade Improvements Architectural Services February 2, 2011 M p - re s J ... R 1V } � ��P�P�►. s 2e m a - in I RAYANE dba of zarin•afsar & assoc., inc. • architecture • engineering • urban design & planning February 2, 2011 City of Rosemead 8838 E. Valley Blvd. Rosemead, California, 91770 Attn: Mr. Chris Marcarello, Director of Public Works Re: Request for Proposal for Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and facade improvements Architectural Services. Dear Mr. Chris Marcarello, On behalf of Rayane, I am excited to submit our project team's qualifications and proposal for Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Facade Improvements Architectural Services. Rayane is an architectural, engineering firm with twenty five years of experience in Southern California. Rayane design team are highly qualified professionals and consultants who possess the necessary skill and expertise to complete this project on time and on budget. Enclosed, we have prepared our team's qualifications which includes our team member resumes, project experience, subconsultant qualifications and finally our scope of work and fee exhibit. Leading the project team, I possess over twenty -five years of architecture and engineering experience and will act as your day -to -day contact and also oversee the design and planning process. Thank you for taking the time to review our team's proposal and qualifications. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions. We look forward to the opportunity of working with you in order to bring your development vision and goals for Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Facade Improvements to a reality. Thank you for your consideration, T / 44W 6Z James Bahram Zarin - afsar, AIA,P.E. President 1820 E. Garry Avenue, Suite 214 • Santa Ana, CA 92705 • T: 949.261.6988 • Fax: 949.251.8727 • b @1zai.com M RAYANE dba <�I rarin- nlsartL nssoc..lnc. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Firm Profile 2. Sustainable Design 3. Project Team 4. Project Experience 5. Subconsultants Landscape Architects a. Closson & Closson Mechanical & Plumbing Engineers b. Curesh Engineering Electrical Engineers c. Sedaghat & Associates Gevork Consulting Civil Engineers d. K &A Engineering, Inc. Cost Estimating e. Project Control Associates 6. Methodology and Scope of Work 7. Compensation architecture • engineering • urban design & planning �ME RAYANE ciln <i(zaYirr�fSlr 'H assoc.. inc�. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Firm Profile 2. Sustainable Design 3. Project Team 4. Project Experience 5. Subconsultant Qualifications Landscape Architects a. Closson & Closson Mechanical & Plumbing Engineers b. Curesh Engineering Electrical Engineers c. Sedaghat &Associates Gevork Consulting Civil Engineers d. K&A Engineering, Inc. Cost Estimating e. Project Control Associates 6. Methodology and Scope of Work 7. Compensation architecture • engineering • urban design & planning Inn RAYANE clLia orzonnalsarR assu�'_ inc . FIRM PROFILE Rayane DBA of Zarin -afsar & Associates, Inc. (ZAI) was founded and incorporated in 1985, by Bahram Zarin - afsar, AIA, P.E. a life member of USC Architectural Guild and licensed architect in the State of California and a registered professional engineer in states of Arizona, California and Texas. Rayane encompasses a highly qualified and experienced team of professionals. The firm is active in the areas of architecture, engineering and renovation of public and private projects, including commercial industrial, historic preservation and residential projects and provides the following design, engineering services: • Sustainable Design • Site Planning • Master Planning • Design Development • Schematic Design • Construction Administration • Construction Documents • Structural Engineering • Construction Management • Forensic Engineering architecture • engineering • urban design & planning I RAYANE SUSTAINABLE DESIGN Bahram Zarin - afsar's point of view and architectural philosophy of self - sustainable architecture was published in INFOCUS: Architectural Review of AIA Orange County publication titled Self- sustainable Architecture Fall of 1996 issue. It is this Design approach that has been renamed to Green Architecture today. Bahram's architecture has been utilizing this philosophy of architecture since the establishing his firm in 1985. self - sustainable architecture Mechanical Systems, equipment and their conduits work hard to bring life to an unhealthy building, similar to what a pace -maker does for a patient with heart trouble;in other words, we have neglected our buildings to the point that only mechanical equipment can keep them in operation This neglect is not only in relation to our abuse of our technical abilities in term of creating an artificial environment, but also our ignoring the natural resources that are abundant. Our disregard of alternatives for a quick and unhealthy solution affects us not only at the level of individual architectural project, but also at the level of towns, cities, and ultimately urban settings. Self - sustainability in architecture, is not an idea but a philosophy of a culture which could be reflected in one's architectural theory based on the philosophy of life of a society. With this in mind, practicing architecture means obtaining a balance between philosophy and art in such a way that philosophy deals with the "truth" and art deals with "feeling and intuition ". The artistic abilities of the architecture then aids in defining and redefining what is not the truth at the time of creation, but the architect's perception of what could have been a philosophy. It is this philosophy that deals with the natural forces, local resources, materials and climate that produces an element that lives with nature and accommodates the needs of nature's beings and humankind. If globally accepted can become the sole international style that we have been striving to achieve. architecture • engineering • urban design & planning RAYANE dlRl U�]_ll "IRilIS11 "$ F155(HL. IIAL SUSTAINABLE DESIGN Many Societies have realized that they must become more in harmony with nature and join past cultures that have historically chosen the philosophy of nature. By studying the architectural responses of various cultures to a variety of environmental issues we can begin to lay the foundation for our own solution to self - sustainable architecture. For example, through case studies of people and culture that have survived the harsh climate of hot and and regions, one can investigate their approach as precedent. One such people, with over 7000 years of experience in such an environment is the ancient Iranian culture in the city of Yazed in the central part of today's Persia. The People of this city learned to introduce and test self - sustainable elements , such as " Ivan ". (south Pacing patios to control the summer and winter sun). "Wind - Catchers" (the local name is "Bud- Gier ", and the use of shade of tall slender walls to make ice in the hot and and region. Bahram undertook a thesis to create prototype of such buildings for use as a multi - family dwelling complying with current zoning codes. The task was to maximize natural resources and minimize the use of mechanical equipment in order to reduce mechanical noise, pollution, and energy waste. Through the proper placement of windows and utilization of glazes and bud - giers, reliance upon equipment was significantly reduced. The following steps were taken in the pre- design stage: 1. Local site was chosen 2. Climatic data was prepared 3. Sun light and movement were studied 4. Temperature, normal degree days, percentage of possible sunshine, mean sky cover, relative humidity, precipitation, winds data was obtained. 5. Model were built and tested with smoke experiments performed 6. Building system integration was considered 7. Based on the test result, theoretical air movements were studied. 8. The architectural program in conjunction with the above analysis was used to design and build a model. 9. The model was put through the wind tunnel test and the sun machine. 10. The model's performance was compared to the predicted response. An architectural design was completed; presentation drawings and model were prepared. architecture • engineering • urban design & planning RAYANE � Iba of nirin-a fsor R assor_ ini . PROJECT TEAM organizational chart RAYANE James B. Zarin- Afsar, AIA, PE Principal -in- Charge Cynthia Mabus, AIA, LEED AP RAYANE Design Team STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Masoud Sodaify Maziar Bastani Saber! & Associates, Inc. Design Team Project Team Cost Estimating Project Control Associates GEOTHECNICAL ENGINEERING Provided by the City I CURESH ENGINEERING ELECTRICAL K &A ENGINEERING CLOSSON & CLOSSON Mechanical &Plumbing ENGINEERING Civil Engineer Landscape Architecture Engineers Sedaghat & Associates Gevork Consulting architecture • engineering • urban design & planning I RAYANE c 14�fl of z�irin -a fsir & ❑sSUC._ iu��. PROJECT TEAM BAHRAM ZARIN- AFSAR, AIA, PE Principal -in- Charge education Master of Science in Structural Engineering, May 1997. California State University, Northridge Master of Architecture, May 1996. University of Southern California Bachelor of Architecture, December 1995. University of Southern California Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering (Building Science), 1977 -81. University of Southern California thesis topics Bachelor of Architecture Thesis: Sustainable Housing, an architecture that follows the principles of Sustainable environment. Master of Architecture Thesis: Downtown- University Park strategic plan through Figueroa flower Corridor, with proposed public and private catalytic projects. An Urban Analysis, Design and Revitalization Proposal. professional affiliations Life Member of University of Southern California Architectural Guild. Member of American Institute of Architects, since 2001. Member of Structural Engineers Assoc. of Southern California, since 1984. Member of International Code Council 2008. Member of the Construction Specification Institute, 2001. Member of American Institute of Steel Construction, 2002. Member of Institute of Timber Construction, 2001. Member of Light Gauge Steel Engineers Association, 2000. Member of American Society of Civil Engineers 1994. Member of the National Society of Professional Engineers 1986. Member of California Society of Professional Engineers 1986. Member of International Conference of Building Officials 1985. professional registrations Architect License : California, Lie. C28553 Professional Engineer License: California, P.E., Lic.C39000 Arizona, P.E., Lic.30830 Texas, P.E., Lie. 82293 international competitions City of Samarkand Revitalization : 1990 Diomede international bridge competition : 1989 Astronauts Memorial foundation : 1988 architecture - engineering • urban design & planning RAYANE dLn o(zririn -rlsar R asso��.. lnr. PROJECT TEAM BAHRAM ZARIN- AFSAR, AIA, PE (cont.) Principal -in- Charge project experience NAME OF PROJECT: Bellflower Town Plaza Center LOCATION 16411 Bellflower Blvd., Bellflower CA 90706 OWNER/CLIENT Bellflower Investment Group, LLC YEAR 2008 SQUARE FOOTAGE: 22, 342 Sq.Ft. NAME OF PROJECT: Olive Center Fagade LOCATION 643 S. Olive St., Los Angeles CA 90014 OWNER /CLIENT 5 SITES Inc. YEAR 2010 SQUARE FOOTAGE : Ten stories, Foot Print 7432 Sq.Ft. NAME OF PROJECT: First Street Market Place LOCATION 3640 -3648 & 3650 East First Street, Los Angeles, CA OWNER/CLIENT KZMB, LLC YEAR 2007 SQUARE FOOTAGE: 36,742 sq. Ft. TI NAME OF PROJECT: El Faro Plaza Renovation LOCATION 4433 S. Alameda St., Los Angeles, CA OWNER/CLIENT EL FARO DISCOUNT CENTER, LLC YEAR 2007 - SQUARE FOOTAGE: 124,626 Sq.Ft./ 460 Parking Stalls NAME OF PROJECT: Perris Market Place LOCATION Hwy 74 & Navajo Road, Perris CA OWNER/CLIENT Dar. Yamtoobian YEAR 2007 SQUARE FOOTAGE: 111,000 Sq.Ft. Shopping Center NAME OF PROJECT: Vincent Center Plaza LOCATION 501 Vincent Blvd, West Covina, CA OWNER/CLIENT 501 Vincent Plaza YEAR 2005 SQUARE FOOTAGE: 66,256 Sq. Ft. Renovation Plus 16,000 addition NAME OF PROJECT : City of La Puente Community Center Project LOCATION 501 Glendora, Ave. La Puente, CA 92806 OWNER/CLIENT City of La Puente YEAR 2005 SQUARE FOOTAGE : 35, 240 Sq.Ft. architecture • engineering • urban design & planning RAYANE �II>a of ciYirrafsar K. Assoc_ ini�- PROJECT TEAM BAHRAM ZARIN- AFSAR, AIA, PE (cont.) Principal -in- Charge project experience NAME OF PROJECT: Allen Gorenberg, MD Medical Suite LOCATION 8506 E, Chapman Ave, Orange, CA 92869 OWNER /CLIENT Allen Gorenberg, MD Medical Suite YEAR 2004 SQUARE FOOTAGE: 12,477 Sq.Ft. NAME OF PROJECT: Broadway O.T. Johnson Building LOCATION 510 -514 South Broadway Los Angeles ,CA 90013 OWNER/CLIENT Best United Investment, LLC. YEAR 2004 SQUARE FOOTAGE : Six stories with basement 29, 127 Sq. Ft. NAME OF PROJECT: Holt Medical Center LOCATION 5153 Holt Medical Blvd. Montclair, CA 91763 OWNER/CLIENT A.S.H.A. Properties YEAR 2003 SQUARE FOOTAGE : 12,477 Sq.Ft. NAME OF PROJECT: Ballona Creek Center LOCATION 5965 Washington Blvd„ Culver City CA OWNER/CLIENT Salar Investment YEAR 2000 SQUARE FOOTAGE: 13,390 Sq.Ft. NAME OF PROJECT: Down Town Main Street Center LOCATION 3849 Main Street, Culver City, CA OWNER/CLIENT Daniel Rafalian YEAR 1996 SQUARE FOOTAGE: 17,929 Sq.Ft. NAME OF PROJECT: Elat Market LOCATION 8724 -8730 W. Pico Blvd. Los Angeles, CA OWNERICLIENT Elat Market YEAR 1990 SQUARE FOOTAGE: 10,829 Sq.Ft. architecture • engineering • urban design & planning RAYANE <IL>a f>I rarirxdsrir x, asso<�.. inc. PROJECT TEAM CYNTHIA MABUS, AIA, LEED AP Project Manager awards AIA Design Award Dupont Antron Design Award affiliations Past President of Orange County AIA Past Director on the Los Angeles AIA Board Cynthia Mabus is dedicated to innovative design solutions in architecture, interior design, and planning. Her portfolio includes work in commercial, institutional, science and technology and residential architecture. She is committed to developing creative and innovative design solutions in a collaborative environment. Cynthia has 20 years of design experience in Los Angeles and Orange County. She has designed a variety of projects from large commercial and institutional projects to custom residences. She is committed to providing greate service and partnering with clients to implement their vision. Cynthia is dedicated to creative innovative buildings and spaces that are both functional and beautiful. Cynthia specializes in the following: • Sustainability Consultation • Facilitate LEED Certification Process Architectural and Interior Design Consultation • Construction Documents for Permitting & Construction • 3D Project Visualization • Project Feasibility Studies • Consultation with City /County Planning & Design Review • Preparation of Exhibits for Review Agencies • Coordination with Contractor and Other Design Consultants • Select Architectural and Interior Materials and Finishes project experience Gonda Laboratory Expansion Project, City of Hope, Duarte CA Cancer Center, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda CA Vista Del Oro Building, Oceanside Museum Square, Long Beach CA Pediatric Inpatient Tower, Miller Children's Hospital, Long Beach CA Women's Pavilion, Hoag Memorial Hospital, Newport Beach CA Replacement Hospital, White Memorial Medical Center, Los Angeles architecture • engineering • urban design & planning M RAYANE dha of zeriirdsiu w osso .. im PROJECT TEAM MASOUD SODAIFY Design Team education Master of Architecture University of Southern California Bachelor and Master of Architecture and Urban Design Tehran University Hawthorne High School Performing Arts and Gymnasium, Hawthorne, CA Lawndale High School Cafeteria, Lawndale, CA 4D Basketball complex and 10,000 seat Gym concept, Los Angeles, CA Summer's Olympic Natatorium Concept, Philadelphia, PA Blair Presbyterian church new addition, Los Angeles, CA Beverly Hills City Hall expansion, Beverly Hills, CA Cedars -Sinai Board Room, Los Angeles, CA Warner Brothers Movie World, Madrid, Spain Harrah's Casino new entry and Mrquee, Las Vegas, Nevada Universal Japan Restaurant and Food Carts theme, Osaka, Japan project experience University Corporate Center office park, Pomona , CA Armenian Elementary School Expansions, Encino, CA FAA Visualization and Simulation Laboratory, Atlantic City FAA Control Tower Building, Spokane Gulf Port Shipyard Services, Avondale, CA Santa Monica Post Office Carrier Annex expansion, Santa Monica, CA Inglewood High school, Inglewood, CA Brookside Elementary School, Oak Park, CA Oak Park High School, Oak Park, CA 140 Lasky hotel new addition, Beverly Hills, CA Grace Church Master Plan, Cerritos, CA Burbank High School, Burbank, CA Cerritos Elementary School, Glendale, CA EL Camino Creek Elementary School, Encinitas, CA Discovery World 500 Acre Resort, Taiching, Taiwan Discovery world 42 Acre Theme Park, Taiching, Taiwan Discovery world Themed Shopping Mall, Taiching, Taiwan 77th and Broadway Police Station, Los Angeles, CA Crenshaw - Olympic and Pico -San Vicente Metro Station, Los Angeles, CA Lanzit Industrial Park, Los Angeles, CA architecture • engineering • urban design & planning RAYANE dLri of rarina [sor x, assuc . inc PROJECT TEAM MAZIAR BASTANI Project Team education Bachelor of Architecture, 2005. School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran awards & affiliations Collaboration with Iranian Architecture Magazine First place design award for Sazegan Co. project experience Private Villa: a 610 square meter villa in Lavasan, adjacent to Tehran which includes a guest suite, living room with kitchen, study room and piano salon on the main floor with main bedroom, glass bathroom anc open air swimming pool on the second floor. Ghazvin Laboratory: a 1,200 square meter laboratory in Ghazvin, Iran for a Veterinary Medicine Center Aftab Sports- Commercial Complex: an 11,000 square meter multi- functional complex which will house different recreational and sports facilities Hakimie Youth Club: a proposal to design a 6,000 square meter recreationspace which are situated in the context of an old garden House of Toys: a proposal to design a 50 square meter open area playground for children Office Building in Pardis Technology Park: a 1,300 square meter program including open offices, workshops, library, managers office, and private meeting room architecture • engineering • urban design & planning r ui - RAYANE �Ibfl of z.vinals�ir & assur_. inc.. PROJECT EXPERIENCE client City of La Puente description Improvements of facilities and activities at La Puente Park. The center will offer a variety of artistic, cultural and intramural activities, including basketball, softball, tennis, dance, judo, piano, and tumbling. This facility will target intervention and diversion of at -risk youth from gangs, drugs, and other illegal activity. Budgets and Source of Funds to include Local Funds, State Funds, Federal Funds and Grants, Funding Credits and Incentives from Organizations for Environmentally Sound and Sustainable Design. LA PUENTE MASTER PLAN REVIEW La Puente, California architecture • engineering • urban design & planning NUA RAYANE clba of zarin �ils��r & assuc... in��- PROJECT EXPERIENCE client City of La Puente description Community Center Renovation including gymnasium, multi- purpose room, offices, daycare totalling 35,240 sf LA PUENTE COMMUNITY CENTER RENOVATION P La Puente, California rJ In . _ RAYANE �Ilxl of zaYirr�d[slrk assoc..inc PROJECT EXPERIENCE client City of La Puente description Community Center Renovation including gymnasium, multi- purpose room, offices, daycare totalling 35,240 sf LA PUENTE COMMUNITY CENTER RENOVATION PROJECT La Puente, California City of La Puente Community Center Renovation Project j ZARIN AFSAR &ASSOCIATES, INC C ��L� Mmxir .Ma PE h l ® --✓ ,wnss am ,;..j 1 RtpmPmrPm w� Rm ~ W: uY ' Y "� All FvapualPMaMGNp M.l PmdPmlPbn 9 Fb Ela T.—Al P11° Pm I , m �WWe tt -: E M.ICM[ l� FnRF[ 0.W m wlrz mat WM acrucm.sm•rvi_AA - mM e .w. M.l c.w ®I.•ar`a:w.�m -_ E �•TUbl tta FgpnmlEMreIM• Fm6v ABAL 4 fEF Maa oemammm PROJECT: 598 -E -05 _ Murnw. PBOJE TNPOEMn K' E•wn n a n u.n Rew I Ewua• � nvoR �o.MP�mwL �otlr. I"1- �`roxnl Al,, M = . tt -: E E' S vR.. Pm:mm %timer Al. FaE — M:.e. .. xs nm w'a._ 1 wmn:gi 1MS'epna """"e'mxm. xmmn •..arxunm s:,:trnnn. c' 1 ' vtl B " ,m " 1° Al. tta FgpnmlEMreIM• B Rgwoi FMntlnE�wn v.5 wmN:gwwww.m _ Murnw. PBOJE TNPOEMn K' E•wn n a n u.n Rew I Ewua• � G �e Renwx - L.e leM p, m::Ymwmrt FP. Eels Rm GmN� All rerl rAVrta Mde Rl" Prrvll nMn • x .—I—M1 .... Al oxix EIECI L E F M ' All otrmWSme•XamYMWrm All All All. S m ALn nENeu• FP.e Al l quEM.m••Xam JmµNhgwn 1 �eN 9u Nnm Repve84Plm All. zl,Adli Ughe""wn - ErAVtl Fp p1 .w s ��.- ..- a.....7... ..... FnMBFb�PY: %e PeMmEfe OWne Al ] Ptli O&b BMy IMCynme6blb &�OlA Blenw�mY•. v e ' MWY•6 N6 FP -03 Flm Nim4Mr Wn •.......aa °....® .e architecture F engineering • urban design & planning RAYANE PROJECT EXPERIENCE client City of La Puente description Community Center Renovation including gymnasium, multi- purpose room, offices, daycare totalling 35,240 sf NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVAI ION I I I I I j WEST ELEVATION - a O _ 6, �$1 T TT T T I It IL -H�I�_._ I I ®� L_ IL ® �1 ®I ll � i architecture • engineering • urban design & planning 1� 40* 1• �� fl �j 4 I 2 �'I LP tl ti' _ _ 1= —Y O � O p i .... NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVAI ION I I I I I j WEST ELEVATION - a O _ 6, �$1 T TT T T I It IL -H�I�_._ I I ®� L_ IL ® �1 ®I ll � i architecture • engineering • urban design & planning 1� RAYANE cl�a ul rariiTals�rh assoc..lnr. PROJECT EXPERIENCE client 501 Vincent, LLC. scope New stores and social security administration office proposed addition program First Floor - 33,128 sf Second Floor - 33,128 sf addition - 16,000 sf VINCENT CENTER West Covina, California urban design & planning RAYANE �� n u[ z:,rin.afsr,r R asst a - .. inr. PROJECT EXPERIENCE client Daniel Rafalian description 13,390 sf office The gateway to Culver City was celebrated with four towers and banners as a welcoming sign to the City of Culver City. Our client acquired a two story stucco building with a program to move his business to this location. The goal was to unite this structure with the entrance to Culver City and present a more significant expression to this important node of the Culver City fabric. Uniting existing structures with the city fabric and to allow individual proposals to act as a catalyst for future projects to heal the city is a continuous challenge of all architects. In this proposal a future visitor center over the creek was envisioned to promote increased pedestrian activity and interest at this node. BALLONA CREEK CENTER Culver City, California "r I 4 ,f ' Ballopa gateway: Demogstratiop Prea 7, 0009 B i 5--WA 5-* -ao architecture • engineering • urban design & planning (omr pry 4r�m.v Plrr, (moyna�sq lub{I¢�s 6�1mmYCS, b I RAYANE dlri of zfli irra[SarK asscu'.. inc. PROJECT EXPERIENCE client Bellflower Investment Group LLC scope Renovation project program Day Spa - 7,372 sf Passage - 1,410 sf Restaurant - 7,110 sf 2nd Floor - 5,082 sf Common Area - 2,232 sf Passage Tenant A - 396 sf Passage Tenant B - 150 sf TOTAL - 22,342 sf BELLFLOWER TOWN PLAZA CENTER Bellflower, California architecture • engineering • urban design & planning r RAYANE dba ul zerirrrfsar h ass x..Inc'. PROJECT TEAM organizational chart RAYANE James B. Zarin- Afsar, AIA, PE Principal -in- Charge Cynthia Mabus, AIA, LEED AP Project Manager RAYANE Design Team Masoud Sodaify Maziar Bastani Design Team Project Team STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Saber! & Associates, Inc. Cost Estimating Project Control Associates GEOTHECNICAL ENGINEERING ` - Provided by the City CURESH ENGINEERING ELECTRICAL K &A ENGINEERING CLOSSON & CLOSSON Mechanical &Plumbing ENGINEERING Civil Engineer Landscape Architecture Engineers Sedaghat & Associates Gevork Consulting architecture • engineering • urban design & planning I RAYANE (II)c U�'' /.Fll'IIT�ISFIr &HSti U(1._Illy_ 6. Methodology Scope of Work We are pleased to have the opportunity of submitting the following methodol- ogy of design and scope of Architectural services: 1- Review of the proposed new parking /plaza facility and public area. 2- Review Current facilities ability to become a more energy efficient complex, study of the current HVAC system for entire complex, fenestration study and solar energy evaluation. 3 -Meet with City staff for input. 4- Please see scope of work Phase I 5- Prepare preliminary space planning for the new expansion including City Administrator, small teen center and computer lab facility including proposed interior /exterior finishes and furniture and equipment. 6- Prepare schematic drawings for the proposed addition with preliminary cost estimates prepared by our consultant Project Control Associates 7- Prepare a computer generated animation of the facility and three dimen- sional model of the proposed expansion. 8- Please see scope of work Phase II & III PHASE I - SITE ASSESSMENT AND SCHEMATIC DESIGN This work includes professional design services for the project from schematic design, design development, and construction documents. Rayane is pleased to provide all design services including building, structural design, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, site improvements, utilities coordination, aesthetic designs, and building landscaping. Work including: • Analyze site conditions, survey area, and determine specific site requirements needed to provide the b functional use of the site including access and pedestrian traffic flow, ADA requirements, and security considerations; Verify utility constraints (Note: asbestos assessment reports, geotechnical investiga- tions, topographic and boundary land surveys shall be provided by the City); Analyze aesthetic considerations, maintenance options, and provide recom- mendations to City; Coordinate with City staff to prepare up to three (3) layout /design options to Include schematic floor plans based on the selected site plan; possibly utilizing a design study of the City Plaza and Parking Improvement Project that is cur- rently underway. Complete an accurate, preliminary cost estimate based on the selected site and schematic floor plan (including square footage measurements for each area); • Submit conceptual design to City for review and make up to five (5) formal presentations to the City, including evening meetings. architecture • engineering • urban design & planning ZFA Mi k" . .- I RAYANE � Iba of Geu9Rafseif & as5� ��- -. inc�_ PHASE II - DESIGN DEVELOPMENT/CONSTRUC- TION DOCUMENTS Coordinate with the City in the delivery of architectural and engineering ser- vices during pre - construction (conceptual, schematic, design development, and construction document phases); • Prepare all conceptual, schematic, and design development plans for the Proj- ect; Coordinate with the City regarding CEQA compliance and environmental ap- provals; Integrate all applicable local and state codes and design standards into the Project design; Incorporate energy conservation features and the us Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) to a level of least a "Silver" Rating; Provide structural engineering, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and land- scape architect design services for the project; Coordinate with the City's specialty consultants such as geotechnical, traffic, noise, civil engineering, and other elements; Design all aspects of the design development including all on -site improve- ments, all on -site and off -site utilities, and any other related improvements re- sulting from new design aspects; Develop cost estimates throughout the design process; Assist the City with value engineering as required to meet budget constraints; Assist with the development of Project schedule; Prepare construction document plans and specification for submittal to the ap- propriate City departments and all necessary entities for review, approval, and permitting by local, state and county entities required; Assist with selection of furniture, fixtures, and equipment; Respond to and incorporate building official /permitting agency comments into Project design. Present 60% and 90% design drawings to staff for review and approval (includ- ing electronic copies in CAD format and five (5) hard copies); Prepare final bid -ready design and specification documents for construction bid; complete bid site walk with potential contractors. architecture • engineering • urban design & planning -._._ _ I RAYANE � II is u[ z.idn ��fstir & assoc_ inr. PHASE III - CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES Assist City in public bidding and award process; Provide construction observation and support services during construction — in- cluding but not limited to: o Periodic job site visits of construction activities; o Attend bi- weekly construction coordination meetings; o Submittal and shop drawing review; o Respond to requests for information (RFI); o Assist City in change order review and negotiations; o Coordinate the production of as -built drawings; o Conduct a final project inspection with the City to ensure quality of work compliance with project specifications, drawings, and contract documents (includ- ing sub - consultants) architecture • engineering • urban design & planning RAYANE �Iba ul' zarii�alsv w nssor_ inC. 7. Compensation Architect Fee Schedule: principle Architect $150 /hour kssociates Architect $140/hour Senior Designer $130 /hour Droject Designer $100/hour )esigner $130 /hour :ADD Technician $ 95/hour IR CADD Technician $ 85/hour Nord and Data Processing $ 75/hour Word and Data Processing $ 35/hour B. Landscape Architect Fee Schedule: Principle Landscape Architect $150/hour Project Manager $120/hour Assistant Project Manager $ 95/hour Landscape Designer $ 70/hour Sr. Draftsman $130 /hour Draftsman $ 65/hour Clerical $ 50/hour Mileage $ 24/hour Word and Data Processing $ 00.55 C. Engineering and Cost Estimating Fee Schedula : Principle Engineer $150 /hour Associates Engineer Senior Designer $140/hour Project Designer $130 /hour Designer $100 /hour CADD Technician $ 95/hour JR CADD Technician $ 85/hour Word and Data Processing $ 75/hour $ 35/hour Based on estimated construction cost of $3,000,000 the design fee should be Maximum of $350,000 to $450,000. architecture • engineering • urban design & planning CITY OF ROSEMEAD ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER EXPANSION AND FAQADE IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSAL AND QUALIFICATIONS Architectural Services Prepared for: Mr. Chris Marcarello Director of Public Works CITY OF ROSEMEAD 8838 E. Valley Blvd. Rosemead, CA 91770 Prepared by: RMCA ARCHITECTURE DESIGN PLANNING, INC. 1541 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 110 Los Angeles, CA 90017 www.rmcaarchitects.com February 2, 2011 Paul S. Robich, AIA President RMCA ARCHITECTURE DESIGN PLANNING Loren Carlson Vice President 1541 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 110 LOS ANGELES CALIF 90017 TEL(213)483-0530 FAX(213)483-0533 www.rmcaarchitects.com February 2, 2011 Mr. Chris Marcarello, Director of Public Works CITYOF ROSEMEAD 8838 E. Valley Blvd Rosemead, CA 91770 RE: ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER EXPANSION AND FACADE IMPROVEMENTS ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Dear Chris After carefully reviewing the above RFP, meeting with you and Recreation Supervisor Kimberly Palmer -Boris to both tour the community center and adjacent civic center and to discuss the proposed community center improvements as well as the City's concurrent project to enhance the civic center with a new public plaza and redesigned parking, and holding several follow -up conversations with you to better still understand the RFP and the City's goals, we believe that RMCA is uniquely qualified and experienced to carry out this important community project. RMCA, a certified Small Business Enterprise (SBE), is an award - winning, full service architecture design planning firm established in 1983 and located in downtown Los Angeles. Our diverse and talented staff of 10 professionals, including two registered architects and three LEED Accredited Professionals, consists of 8 men and 2 women fluent in a variety of languages, including Spanish, Chinese, Tagalog, and German. We strive to integrate architecture, landscape and urbanism to create physical environments with a sense of place that provide an appropriate setting for living, working, learning and playing. Our approach to design places the needs of the users first and our buildings exist so that their users can give them meaning and life. As sustainability has always been a core value of our practice, we understand the importance of maintaining existing resources and restoring a building's and neighborhood's architectural character. At the same time, RMCA is a detail - oriented firm with great technical expertise gained in over 35 years of professional experience. We are committed to and have a proven track record of meeting our clients' architectural needs, budgets and schedules. For Catholic Charities of Los Angeles, we have completed the Guadalupe Community Center in Canoga Park and the Glendale Community Center. For the to County Dept. of Public Works and Dept. of Parks and Recreation, our renovation of the Loma Alta Park Community Building is nearing completion of construction, while the new Helen Keller Community Building has completed schematic design. As On -Call Architect for the City of Palmdale, we have successfully completed City department office tenant improvements, an addition to the Palmdale Playhouse, and are currently working on relocating the City's emergency services /food bank facility into a recently vacated senior center. Lastly, we have designed fapade improvements to existing buildings ranging from the $35 million Rolex Building in Beverly Hills to storefront improvements with budgets as low as $5,000 for the Los Angeles County Community Development Commission. We are pleased to submit our Proposal and Qualifications (1 original and 5 copies) for Architectural Services for the Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Fagade Improvements. RMCA has the experience, skill, and desire to work with the City and its citizens to improve this vital facility so that it can even better serve the community, be revitalized in appearance, be more sustainable, and be better integrated with the adjacent civic center. If given this opportunity, either Paul Robich, our firm's President, or myself will serve as the primary contact/project manager. We have no conflicts of interest that would preclude our involvement with this very worthwhile endeavor and we will be able to begin work immediately. Thank you for this opportunity. Yours truly, RMCA ARCHITECTURE DESIGN PLANNING, INC. Stephen A. Rittner, RA, LEED AP Design Principal www.rmcaarchitects.com TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION SECTION TITLE 1 UNDERSTANDING OF SCOPE OF SERVICES 2 METHODOLOGY AND WORK PLAN 3 EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRM 4 KEY PERSONNEL 5 SUB- CONSULTANTS 6 REFERENCES 7 TIME SCHEDULE 8 FEE PROPOSAL Section 1 UNDERSTANDING OF SCOPE OF SERVICES 1 UNDERSTANDING OF SCOPE OF SERVICES RMCA works hard at listening to our clients and the users of our buildings as well as conducting extensive research so that we can gain a thorough understanding of the desired services to be performed and /or the product to be provided. For the Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Fagade Improvement Project, we have carefully reviewed the RFP and asked questions via telephone and email to clarify our understanding of the City's goals and objectives. We also met with the City's Director of Public Works and the Center's Recreation Director to tour the community center and adjacent civic center and to discuss the proposed community center improvements as well as the City's concurrent project to enhance the civic center with a new public plaza and redesigned parking. The work includes professional design services for the project from schematic design, design development, and construction documents, including building, structural design, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, site improvements, utilities coordination, aesthetic designs, and building landscaping. RMCA has provided these types of professional services for over 27 years on a wide array of building types, including community centers, involving renovation/ additions to existing buildings and new ground -up construction. For this project, predesign will involve fine tuning the program and assessing the site. Schematic design will first involve the development of three alternative schemes that will be reviewed with City staff with the goal of reaching accord on the one scheme that will be pursued further. The next part of schematic design involves community meetings with the public and the City Council to present the preliminary design and gain further input to refine this design so that it can approved. During design development, RMCA's team of architects, landscape architects, and engineers will start to develop more detailed drawings that will again be submitted to the City for review. Construction documents consisting of plans and specifications will follow with submittals for City review again occurring at 60% and 90% completion. Construction cost estimates will be prepared during schematic, design development, and construction document phases either by the Architect or, if the City desires, by a Cost Estimating Consultant, to make sure that the design is staying within the established budget. At around 90 -95% completion, we will submit our plans to the Building Department and other governmental agencies and utility companies as required. We will address any comments and work with the plan checkers so that the necessary permits can be cleared. After Building Department sign -off, we will work with the City to prepare the Bid Sets that will be issued to qualified Contractors. During bidding, we will attend a bid site walk, answer bidder questions as required with addenda, and assist the City as needed through the award process. Once construction begins, RMCA will conduct periodic site visits, answer RFI's, review Contractor submittals and shop drawings, assist the City with change orders, if any, and, together with our consultants, conduct a final project inspection to ensure quality of work and compliance with the contract documents. After project closeout, our entire team will prepare as -built drawings based upon the Contractor's field mark -ups. The Rosemead Community Recreation Center is a busy and very well used facility that is open 7 days a week during the day and evening with programs for seniors, adults, teens, and childcare. The users are diverse not only in age but also in ethnicity. During our short tour of the center, we observed a senior exercise program, a senior meal program, an adult painting class, and the childcare program. We were told that the center is used for wedding receptions and other formal events and gatherings on the weekends. The center has a number of dividable multipurpose rooms of various sizes that can accommodate a host of functions. The proposed project consists of adding approximately 2,500 to 3,000 sq.ft. for offices, small teen center, computer lab, and restrooms to the existing 17,000 sq. ft. single story building opened in 1976. The addition could occur on the west or east sides of the existing structure. There are many fine, mature trees around the building which we feel should be worked around as much as possible. Also, the project will include interior /exterior improvements to the existing facility to help complement the proposed building expansion. The existing full kitchen is not a part of the scope. There may be some disabled access - related upgrades required. The existing men's and women's restrooms off of the Lobby are not disabled access compliant but the newer restrooms off of the large south multipurpose room appear to be compliant. The existing HVAC equipment will be replaced with a new HVAC system servicing the entire building. The electrical service will also probably need to be upgraded. The City is asking that the renovation /expansion be designed as LEED Silver equivalent but actual certification will not be pursued at this time. The center is to remain open as much as possible during the course of construction. Our aim is to use our experience, skill, and desire to work with the City and its citizens to creatively improve this vital facility so that it can even better serve the community, be revitalized in appearance, be more sustainable, and be better integrated with the adjacent civic center. Our Landscape Architect is Lawrence Moss and Associates, who are currently working on conceptual designs to enhance the civic center with a new public plaza and redesigned parking. We see the community center project as an opportunity to help integrate City Hall and the Library with the community center into one cohesive campus connected by a series of well -used public outdoor spaces on a common axis. Section 2 METHODOLOGY AND WORK PLAN 2 METHODOLOGY AND WORK PLAN RMCA has over twenty seven (27) years of experience in working with governmental agencies to accomplish and meet the established goals of a project. Our experience from similar past projects will allow us to move efficiently from schematic design through construction administration. Communication and Management Technical Approach Our goal for each project is to keep the process streamlined and cost effective. During the course of a project we will: • Communicate with the Client and agencies on a regular basis and bring to this effort clear and concise work plans for interaction with team members • Schedule project meetings, milestones and reviews that keep the project on track. We schedule projects based on years of experience working with large, complex organizations and institutions • Create concise presentation materials so that a diverse audience can understand the subject matter • Value input and feedback about our work by holding design phase(s) workshops and ideas impact/streamlining and technical /operations- oriented sessions with Design, Client and Construction team members; • Monitor project management reports, project schedules and project costs on a regular basis • Fine -tune our project management system to meet specific client and agency needs. CAD Capability RMCA has drawn on CAD for the last sixteen (16) years. All production documents are prepared in either AutoCad or MicroStation (sometimes preferred by governmental agencies and large corporations). RMCA has eleven (11) CAD stations with the capacity to bring on line five (5) additional stations when production needs warrant. All written specifications are produced in Microsoft Word. Throughout the design development and actual production of Contract Documents, RMCA will e -mail drawings back and forth to the Design Project Architects, our consultants and the City for coordination. RMCA has always been on the cutting edge of technological breakthroughs in our industry and remains committed to staying ahead of the curve. Cost Estimate History Our Cost Estimator, if requested by the City, will be Construction Cost Consultants. This is a women and minority owned and operated consulting firm that has been in business since 1992 and has an excellent track record. RMCA also has an in -house Construction Administrator who has 36 years of field and construction estimating experience. Quality Control Quality control for any RMCA project begins with code research. Often, it is the interpretation of our extensive code knowledge that allows RMCA to convince governmental agencies, as well as field inspectors, what is really meant by a particular code passage. Once the major research is complete, design will begin. RMCA will work closely with the City, other interested parties, and our Consultant Team during the entire process. Our plans are reviewed for cost estimating from preliminary design to construction documents so that the design stays in line with the Owner's budget. RMCA's Contract Document expert, Mr. Carlson, will guide actual preparation of the Contract Documents. With over thirty (36) years of detailing experience, he will direct the CAD production staff. The consultants are e- mailed electronic sets of the "base plans" to work from. Their plans are reviewed by Mr. Carlson and the Project Architect at fifty percent (50 %) completion, and again at eighty percent (80 %). At ninety percent (90 %) complete, the plans will be ready for review by the Building Department. The specifications are prepared, starting about the time plans are fifty (50) percent complete, and continuing throughout the remainder of Contract Document production. Finally, before the plans and specifications are ready to be released for bid they will again be reviewed by the Project Architect for conformance with the design and program requirements. The Construction Administrator who will work with the bidding contractors and the contractor selected to build the project, will also review the final plans and specifications. Section 3 EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRM 3 RMCA ARCHITECTURE DESIGN PLANNING FIRM PROFILE RMCA is a full service architecture, design and planning firm established in 1983 and located in Los Angeles. Our staff consists of eleven professionals, including two registered architects and three LEED Accredited Professionals. The firm is a member of the American Institute of Architects and, in addition to California, is licensed and active in 9 western states. Our work includes new ground -up construction, renovation /expansion, space planning, tenant improvements, and site/master planning. Our Principals have over 35 years of experience in commercial, residential and public works architecture and have received both local and national recognition. RMCA is committed to providing the highest standards in architectural services for a wide range of projects, including municipal facilities, corporate headquarters, community centers, religious buildings, and educational facilities ranging from community college to preschool. We specialize in renovation work and have used our skills to successfully bring outdated, neglected and underused buildings, including registered historical buildings, back to life. Our work has garnered both local and national awards. Clients for current projects in our office include the City of Palmdale, and the Los Angeles County Department of Parks and Recreation and Public Works Department. We have also served as a consultant to the County of Los Angeles Community Development Commission. Our continuing relationship with the Archdiocese of Los Angeles spans over 25 years. RMCA's diverse practice also encompasses mixed use projects, office buildings, and small to large retail buildings, including projects for national retail chains. It is our firm's diversity that allows us to broaden our areas of interest, knowledge, and expertise. Because of this fact, we are better equipped to provide professional architectural services on all of our varied projects. RMCA's commitment to our clients' architectural needs, budgets and schedules has earned us a solid reputation among our clients for quality design and service. We are detail oriented, and through our years of experience have gained great technical expertise. We employ the latest in digital and CAD technology to realize our work, and utilize electronic communication to quickly and constantly share and coordinate our work with our clients, consultants and contractors. Our firm's steady growth and continued success is a reflection of our technical and design experience, and commitment to the service of our clients' needs. 4 EXPERIENCE IN PROVIDING ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES TO GOVERNMENT ENTITIES: Federal — Quality Control Agent and Construction Project Manager for NASA for the construction of the space shuttle Orbiter Mating Device on Edwards Air Force Base, Edwards, California. Key personnel involved. Paul Robich. County Prepared feasibility report, budgets, and design layout for a Los Angeles County Public Works Department internal television broadcasting studio located within the LA County Public Works facility at 900 South Fremont Ave., Alhambra, California. Key personnel involved: Paul Robich and Loren Carlson — 50 LA County Community Development Commission Storefront Revitalization Projects utilizing CDBG funding. Key personnel involved. Stephen A. Rittner — Helen Keller County Park Master Plan and General Improvements for LA County Public Works Dept. Key personnel involved: Paul Robich and Stephen A. Rittner. — Loma Alta County Park Community Building Renovations and General Improvements for L.A. County Public Works Dept. Key personnel involved: Paul Robich and Stephen A. Rittner. City of Palmdale - Downtown Commercial Fagade Rehabilitation and Improvements. - City of Palmdale Playhouse Addition and Site Fencing /Gates - City of Palmdale Public Services Dept Office Tenant Improvements - City of Palmdale Public Safety & Community Relations Office Tenant Improvements and Renovation - City of Palmdale SAVES Department Tenant Improvements Key personnel involved: Stephen A. Rittner and Paul Robich. City of Glendale - Glendale Community Center, Glendale, CA Renovation project funded through the City using CDBG funds. RMCA's contract for architectural services was with Catholic Charities of Los Angeles. Key personnel involved: Stephen A. Rittner. Community Development Agency of the City of Los Angeles (CRA / LA) - Guadalupe Community Center, Canoga Park, CA Primarily publicly funded. RMCA's Contract for architectural services was with Catholic Charities of Los Angeles. Key personnel involved: Stephen A. Rittner. Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) — Andasol Elementary School Modernizations, Northridge. Key personnel involved: Paul Robich and Loren Carlson. _Los Angeles Community College District (LACCD) - Library/Learning Resource Center Modernizations, Mission College (Sylmar). Key personnel involved: Paul Robich and Loren Carlson. - Temporary Classrooms Mission College (Sylmar). Key personnel involved: Paul Robich and Stephen A. Rittner RELATIONSHIP WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES RMCA Architecture Design Planning, Inc. is a full service firm that has for over 27 years always secured governmental agency approvals, from entitlements to building permits, for all of our clients' projects. We are a detail oriented firm whose technical expertise includes extensive understanding of building codes. Our team approach to project realization extends to working closely with governmental agency staff, utility providers, plan checkers and building inspectors. With over 36 years of experience, RMCA has successfully worked with governmental agencies throughout California and within 9 additional western states. As a Los Angeles based firm, we are proud that a significant volume of work remains within the City and County of Los Angeles. With hundreds of completed projects, we know what it takes to obtain Los Angeles City and County approvals. We have worked with local governmental agencies, including the City of Los Angeles Planning Department, Department of Building and Safety, and Department of Public Works in all stages of the development process: feasibility, entitlements, design, value engineering, permits, bidding and construction. Through our public school projects, we have also gained experience working with the Division of the State Architect (DSA). Finally, RMCA has successfully worked with nearly every municipality within Los Angeles County, including the communities of: Alhambra Arcadia Baldwin Park Bell Bell Gardens Beverly Hills Burbank Carson Cerritos Chino City of Industry Compton Culver City Diamond Bar Downey El Monte Glendale Hawaiian Gardens Hawthorne Huntington Park Inglewood La Canada / Flintridge La Habra La Mirada La Puente La Verne Lakewood Lomita Lynwood Long Beach Manhattan Beach Montclair Montebello Monterey Park Norwalk Paramount Pasadena Pomona Redondo Beach Rolling Hills Estates Santa Monica Signal Hill Simi Valley South Pasadena Torrance West Covina Whittier C� EXPERIENCE Project Scheduling RMCA has twenty seven (27) years of experience in working with governmental agencies to accomplish and meet the established goals of a project. This means our "team" has a success track record of project delivery for repeat clients that spans the last two decades. Our experience from similar past projects will allow us to move efficiently to secure the required approval to get the construction process started within the earliest possible time frame. In addition to our public sector work, our principals have over 36 years experience working on retail projects where schedules are nearly always very demanding. We have the capability of systematically designing and producing a large volume of projects or work on a specific project(s) in a short time frame. As an example of such systematic efficiency and quality, between 1992 and 1995, RMCA produced 85 renovation projects for the Pic 'N' Save Corporation Cost Benefit Analysis For clients who own, operate, and maintain their own buildings, initial investment versus material longevity is of great interest and importance. For these types of clients, therefore, we may suggest certain products that may have a higher initial cost but prove to be more durable and less expensive to maintain in the long run. We also assist Owners in analyzing certain building components or features whose initial cost might be outweighed by future savings. In our Loma Alta Park Community Building renovation, it was determined that the nominal cost for installing a tubular daylighting system in the main Activity Room would be easily recouped by electrical bill savings realized by virtually never needing electrical lighting during daylight hours. In the same project, on the other hand, we found that the cost for installing rooftop photovoltaics, even with some government rebates and subsidies, was still more than the limited budget could allow, and the payback time was not short enough. Value Engineering In our 27 years of experience, RMCA has never had a project that did not need value engineering of some degree or another. Even our $35 million renovation of the Rolex Building in Beverly Hills had to be value engineered. In this project, for example, we substituted a slightly different color of glass than originally desired to be able to use a thinner and less expensive pane of glass in the ribbon window system on two sides of the building. RMCA has also for many years partnered with Contractors on design -build projects. On a good design -build team, the Contractor and Architect work together to find ways to meet the design intent while still maintaining the bottom line. General Administration of All Design /Construction Components For the past 26 years, RMCA has offered full professional architectural services. We take nearly all of our projects, covering a wide array of building types in both renovation /expansion and new ground -up construction, from predesign and schematic design through construction administration. We are both creative and practical, with the know -how gained through many years of practice, to get the job done on time and on budget. 7 SUSTAINABILITY Sustainability has long been a core value of RMCA's architectural practice. RMCA is the Architect for a recently completed ground -up Walgreens Drugstore in San Diego, CA that has attained LEED Gold Certification. It is the first project in the nation to receive LEED certification for this major retailer that opens 600 stores a year. We are currently working on the construction documents of another Walgreens in Goodyear, AZ that will be seeking LEED certification. Our renovation of the Loma Alta County Park Community Building, currently nearing completion of construction, incorporates maximum beneficial sustainable design features allowed within a limited budget, but our client, LA County Public Works, chose not to pursue LEED certification. Our other current LA County park project, however, the new Helen Keller Park Community Building, where we have completed schematic design, will be seeking LEED Silver certification. RMCA presently has three LEED Accredited Professionals on its staff, including two Principals. Not only do we qualify to provide professional service on a project that is to be LEED certified, we have had the unique opportunity of working with and learning from a national LEED expert, Mr. Hernando Miranda, P. E., LEED AP. Mr. Miranda has provided assistance to the USGBC in the development of the LEED System and has also served on the AIA's Committee on the Environment's Top 10 Green Buildings Committee. RMCA's experience as a firm: a) Walgreens Drugstore (LEED) San Diego, CA Type: LEED Gold Certified Budget: $2.3 M Owner: Evergreen Devco Kayman Wong/ Project Manager 602/808 -8600 The nation's first, ground -on -up Certified LEED store for this major retailer. RMCA was guided in our efforts by a National LEED expert and consultant. Sustainable materials were incorporated into both building and site design. b) Loma Alta Park Community Building Altadena, CA Type: Use of Sustainable Materials/ Systems Budget: $1.8 M Owner: Los Angeles County Parks & Rec. (Design & Construction by LA County Public Works) Mohamed Sultan/Project Manager 626/300 -2349 Incorporating as many sustainable materials and systems as the budget would allow, this updating of the entire park facility, including activity spaces (indoors and out), meeting rooms, daycare rooms, restrooms, kitchen, offices and play areas, is nearing completion of construction. Although designed as a LEED project by RMCA, the County elected not to seek certification. V' L011AALTAMRIf �uumxx N��WNCYVgIRU o nw RRYROSOMORIR4o•i @OR E t- , R- v `Y iF RMCA ARCHITECTURE DESIGN PLANNING " The Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency provided the catalyst for the renovation oFthe 53 year old Guadalupe Community Center in Canoga Park. Because of the CR4's help, the West Valley community now bas a beautiful, safe, state -of -the -art center where local families can receive assistance witb food and clothing, and can gather to learn and play. " , t `'N` 4 w y� _ &mmu EITY CBNhR... - v CANO6 s i ! � I 9 Margaret T. Pontius DIRECTOR, GUADALUPE COMMUNITY CENTER, CANOGA PARR R M C A ARCHITECTURE DESIGN PLANNING BUILDING LEGEND L New Community Center ? New Shade Structure 3. Existing Dressing Room Budding 4. Existing Pool Equipment Building 5. Existing Maintenance$uildiug 6. Future Community Center Addition OPEN SPACE LEGEND A. New Events/Sports Lawn E, New Enclosed Courtyard wi trellis C. Existing Busehall Diamond D. New Relocated nnskeatell Court E. New Playga'ound (younger children) P. Grass Picnic /Passive Recreation Area (i. Existing Pool 11. Ncw Playground ('older children) J. New Buds Amphitheater K. New Baseball Diamond Picnic Alva L. New Sycmnore En Iry Courtyard HELEN KELLER COUNTY PARK MASTER PLAN/RENOVATION/ NEW CONSTRUCTION Location: 1045 West 126th St. Los Angeles, CA Design Scope: New master plan of existing 6.6 acre Los Angeles County park first opened in 1962. Phase 1: new picnic /shade shelter, basketball court & walkways. Phase 2: new parking lot with drop - off /mmarotuid for existing pool complex. Phase 3: demolition of existing Rec Building and parking lot and construction of new 4,500 sq. tl. Community Building with enclosed, trellised courtyard, adjacent parking lot with drop -of nirnaromld, mid new children's playgrounds. Phase 4: new anphitheatre and lawn for outdoor movie screening and other events/activities. Plarming/design issues included poor soils conditions and on -site earthquake fault, and work also includes all new site lighting and extensive new landscaping and irrigation. Completion: 2008 (Phases l and 2) 2010 (Phases 3 and 4) Construction Cost: $5.300,000.00 R M C A ARCHITECTURE DESIGN PLANNING HELEN KELLER PARK LOS ANGELES, CA J - Ll ILJ 10 i A r F . AL -. R M CA ARCHITECTURE DESIGN PLANNING RENOVATION Location: Design Scope: Completion: Construction Cost: 330 N. Lincoln Ave. Altadena, CA Renovation of existing 5,000 sq.ft. one story community building with 3,000 sq.ft, courtyard constructed in 1959 which will be one of the first LA County park improvement projects to incorporate sustainable design features to reduce energy and water consumption. Green design strategies include new cool roof, skylights, operable windows for natural ventilation, ceiling fans, energy efficient lighting and HVAC systems, low water use plumbing fixtures, removal/replacement of impervious paving with pervious paving, planting of new trees around building for shading and tempering of microclimate along with native /drought tolerant planting, and microirrigation system. Other improvements include bringing building and site into conformance with current disabled access requirements, seismic /structural upgrades, and providing additional Code - required parking. 2010 $1,800,000.00 11 LOMA ALTA COUNTY PARK BLILDNGLEC>EVU 1. Evstins Conuntuntp Building to le Renovated 4.100 sq. ft _' EmstuiaPool Builckne -1.390 s£ - -- 3, e-crsina G}mnasimn Cotinnurnty Center— 13 0o s.f e 4. Es( slinEReotoorns- 320s,f. t _ OPEN SPACE LEGEND ' A. EYr sin Q Cotntmd t o be Renovated I B. ECIstin2FOrecoail to lx Reuo,ated C. Evisiue Pla%ayound j ��I E. ExisineBasetnll Held F. Exisn2Piciric Area �� r G. E-d sin ePassive Re creation Picini u rea I _ ^n H. Native Bshlalyd nv �. I. Ev9ineadjacentRetentiou Basin ' 1 RENOVATION Location: Design Scope: Completion: Construction Cost: 330 N. Lincoln Ave. Altadena, CA Renovation of existing 5,000 sq.ft. one story community building with 3,000 sq.ft, courtyard constructed in 1959 which will be one of the first LA County park improvement projects to incorporate sustainable design features to reduce energy and water consumption. Green design strategies include new cool roof, skylights, operable windows for natural ventilation, ceiling fans, energy efficient lighting and HVAC systems, low water use plumbing fixtures, removal/replacement of impervious paving with pervious paving, planting of new trees around building for shading and tempering of microclimate along with native /drought tolerant planting, and microirrigation system. Other improvements include bringing building and site into conformance with current disabled access requirements, seismic /structural upgrades, and providing additional Code - required parking. 2010 $1,800,000.00 11 LOMA ALTA COUNTY PARK i qglmbb _ _ a P� .a I U 11*44,,. R M C A ARCHITECTURE DESIGN PLANNING L) - c/ I y -YeLLer � I AL ^ �I CITY OF PALMDALE PUBLIC SAFETY & COMMUNITY RELATIONS BUILDING Exterior Renovations & Office Tenant Improvements Location: 827 E. Ave. Q -9 Palmdale, CA Design Scope: Exterior renovations of existing 5,000 sq. ft, building, including completely rebuilt front facade, and more limited renovations to the rear. T.1. involved gutting interior and completely new interior layout housing several City Departments. Project also included seismic upgrades and new roofing system. Completion: 2008 Construction Cost: $800,000.00 12 BEFORE R M CA ARCHITECTURE DESIGN PLANNING PUBLIC SAFETY & COMMUNITY RELATIONS BUILDING CITY OF PALMDALE Section 4 KEY PERSONNEL 0 RMCA KEY PERSONNEL RMCA Architecture Design Planning, Inc. is headed by three principals. Paul S. Robich, AIA, President, is the Construction Administrator, Project Manager, and is in charge of the overall activities of the firm. Loren Carlson, LEED AP, Vice President, holds the overall responsibility for production of RMCA contract documents. Stephen A. Rittner, RA, LEED AP, Design Principal, serves as the firm's lead designer and will be the principal contact for this project. As a smaller firm, each of RMCA's principals are hands -on architects who will all be actively involved in this work for the City of Rosemead. PAUL S. ROBICH, A.I.A. President License No. C13724 Mr. Robich is a graduate architect from the School of Architectural and Urban Design of the University of Kansas with a Bachelor's of Architecture Degree, 1971, as well as a Bachelor's of Arts Degree in Sociology, 1971. He is a founding partner of RMCA and has been with the firm for 26 years. Prior to establishing the firm of RMCA, Mr. Robich worked in the dual capacity of field Project Manager and Quality Control Agent in NASA's Space Shuttle Program. He has 36 years of experience in the areas of commercial design and construction management. His experience includes Federal & County Public Works as well as direction of a multi -level regional shopping center, 250 + community and neighborhood projects, retail and office buildings. In addition to being licensed in California and a total of nine western states, he is a member of the Los Angeles, State and National chapters of the American Institute of Architects (A.LA.), holds national certification by the National Council of Registration Boards (N.C.A.R.B.) and is a member of the International Council of Shopping Centers (I.C.S.C.) and the Los Angeles Chapter of the American Institute of Architects (LA/AIA) Healthcare Committee. Mr. Robich is active in his local community, serving on the City Council District's panel for the creation and adoption of a Specific Plan for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor, and has completed the Valley Economic Development Center's Entrepreneur's Series. He is also active in our Lady of Lourdes Church, participating in their annual Community Carnival Weekend. Mr. Robich is in charge of the overall activities of the firm. (He was the Construction Manager for the multi -level Regional Center, Peoria, Illinois. Project Manager/ Construction Administrator for the Rolex Building, Beverly Hills, CA; Christian Preschool, La Mirada, CA; Andasol Elementary School, Northridge, CA; Mission College Library /Learning Center, Sylmar, CA; numerous Albertson's Markets, Sav -on and Walgreens Drugstores; and design build auto dealerships for Pontiac, Toyota, Ford, Chevrolet and G.M. Currently, he is the Project Manager for 2 major Supermarket renovations for Superior Grocers, one in Palmdale and the other in Lancaster) 13 RMCA KEY PERSONNEL LOREN CARLSON, LEED AP Vice President Mr. Carlson is a graduate architect from the School of Architecture, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, with a Bachelor's of Architecture Degree, 1967. Prior to this, Mr. Carslon was employed as a Job Captain/ Project Architect at Haugaard —Elrod for 4 '/z years, and at Mackel Associates for 6 years as a Senior Project Architect responsible for construction documents on major retail shopping centers. He is a founding partner of RMCA and has been with the firm for 26 years. He has 36 years of experience in the production of commercial and institutional contract documents. He holds the overall responsibility for the production of the RMCA contract documents. Mr. Carlson is also active in his community and has over 20 years of experience with church youth guidance programs, as well as participation in community clean-up programs. (He was the lead Contract Document Project Manager for Wilshire Union Center, a three level structure housing a Home Depot and Food 4 Less at Wilshire & Union, Los Angeles, CA; a Six Level Mixed Use structure at 6rh & Burlington, Los Angeles, CA; a 5 Level Mixed Use Registered Historical Building at 7` & Union, Los Angeles, CA; and numerous Office Depot stores, and Sav -on and Walgreens drugstores. Project Architect on the Rolex Building, Beverly Hills, CA; Christian Preschool, La Mirada, CA; Andasol Elementary School, Northridge, CA; Mission College Library /Learning Center, Sylmar, CA. Currently, he is leading the production of contract documents for 2 major Supermarket renovations for Superior Grocers, one in Palmdale and the other in Lancaster). STEPHEN A. RITTNER, RA, LEED AP Design Principal License No. C23404 Mr. Rittner was educated at the School of Architecture, Cal Poly Pomona. He joined RMCA as a Project Architect in 1992 and became a partner in 2001. Prior to this, Mr. Rittner was a Project Architect/ Designer with Scheurer Architects from 1990 — 1991 and a Project Architect/ Designer/ Draftsman with Cain Architectural Group from 1983 — 1990. He is a licensed California Architect with 21 years of experience in commercial, retail, institutional and residential architecture. Mr. Rittner is the firth's lead designer and a major contributor to the firm's recognized achievement level in retail/commercial and renovation awards. He has assisted local Boy Scout troops in realizing their community service construction/improvement projects and is also active in his local youth athletic programs as well as YMCA youth activities. (He was Design Principal for the Rolex Building, Beverly Hills, CA; Project Designer /Architect /Manager for the Guadalupe and Glendale Community Centers; 46 storefront improvements for Los Angeles County Community Development Commission; La Habra Ranch Market; for Various projects for the City of Palmdale including the Downtown Commercial Fagade Rehabilitation and Improvement Program, City Playhouse Addition and Public Services Dept. Office Tenant Improvements; Project Designer /Architect on the Cooper Point Marketplace, Olympia, WA; JG Corporate Headquarters, Chino, CA., Priority Mailing Systems Office T.I. and Helen Keller County Park and Loma Alta County Park 14 Section 5 SUB - CONSULTANTS 5 SUBCONSULTANTS DISCIPLINE FIRM ROLE CONTACT 1. Landscape Architect Lawrence R. Moss Landscape & Irrigation Lawrence R. Moss 3458 Ocean View Blvd. Design larry@lrmassoc.com Glendale, CA 91208 (Resume follows) (818) 248 -5200 Irmassoc.com 2. Structural Engineer B &B Associates Structural Engineering Armen Baroonian, PhD, SE 1111 S. Arroyo Prkwy. Ste. 450 armen @bnbstructural.com Pasadena, CA 91105 (Resume follows) (626) 204 -1088 bnbstructural.com 3. Mechanical Engineer Kevin Smola HVAC & Plumbing Kevin Smola 145 Vista Ave. Ste. 110 Engineering kevin @kasai.com Pasadena, CA 91107 (Resume follows) (626) 585 -9338 kasai.com 4. Electrical Engineer Silver Engineering Electrical Engineering Michael J. Silver, PE 7543 Woodley Ave. Ste. 100 michael @silver - Van Nuys, CA 91406 engineering.com (818) 786 -6900 (Resume follows) silver -eng ineering.com 5. Cost Consultant Construction Cost Consultants Cost Consultant Gurdeep Kaur - Dailey 2007 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. 908 cccestimators @sbcglobal.net Los Angeles, CA 90057 (Resume follows (213) 483 -5568 15 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Lawrence R. Moss & Associates, Inc. is a full service Landscape Architectural firm with over 40 years experience in all aspects of landscape design. Principal and owner of the turn, Mr. Moss has been a California Licensed Landscape Architect since 1968. LRM's experience includes streetscapes and urban spaces, parks and recreational facilities, commercial /industrial projects, as well as schools, colleges, and other institutional projects. Currently, we are working with the City of Santa Clarita Department of Planning and Economic Development as their Plan Check Review Landscape Architect. We have also provided construction documents for drought tolerant demonstration gardens at the Glendale City Hall 'Perkins Building' Plaza and the cities of Paramount, Gardena, and La Canada Flintridge. We have also prepared design guidelines, landscaping and tree preservation ordinances, and developed signage and identity programs. Our services range from master planning, preliminary design and design development, through preparation of construction documents, bidding assistance, and construction management. Our recent work in Rosemead includes the Interstate 10 Offramp Slopes, the Garvey Park Master Plan, City Street Tree Master Plan, San Gabriel Boulevard Linear Park, Marshall Street Medians, Walnut Grove Underpass, Ramona Boulevard Street Greening, and Triangle Park. LRM provides clients with unique and creative long -tern solutions, which address not only issues of aesthetics and functionality, but also long and short term budgetary constraints, maintenance issues, and social concerns, such as physical accessibility and cultural diversity. RESUME LARRY MOSS, Principal and President Lary Moss has over 46 years' experience in the field of landscape architecture. As Principal and President of Lawrence R. Moss & Associates, Inc., Larry involves himself in every project. He provides principal management for all design while he directs design concepts and oversees all phases of design development, including time frames and budget reviews. His municipal work spans thirty- five years, and includes on -going relationships with Community Development and Redevelopment Departments of various cities. Larry's experience includes master plan administration and coordination, design and landscaping of prominent municipal facilities, consulting assistance and active participation with community review boards. 16 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER B & B ASSOCIATES, INC. 1111 S. Arroyo Parkway, Suite 450, Pasadena, CA 91105 Tel (626) 204 -1088 — Fax (626) 204 -1099 — E -mail: armen@bnbstructural.com COMPANY PROFILE B & B Associates, Inc. has been providing structural engineering services for architectural firms throughout the United States since 1979. Our experience includes engineering services for commercial, institutional, medical and industrial buildings. The Project Managers at B & B Associates, Inc. have advance degrees, multiple professional licenses and an excess of twenty years of structural/seismic design experience using concrete, steel, masonry, wood and other structural materials. B & B Associates, Inc. provides structural design engineering for more than 200 projects each year. We have designed many different kinds of structures including underground facilities, hospitals, schools, commissaries, public storage facilities, office buildings, research and development facilities, hotels, exhibits, halls, and sport facilities. Many of these projects involve renovations, modernizations and facility additions. PROFESSIONAL RESUME - Dr. Armen Baroonian, Principal in Charge Education: BSCE /1979 Civil Engineering - London University, London (England) MSSE /1980 Structural Engineering - Surrey University, Guildford (England) PhD /1984 Structural Engineering- Surrey University, Guildford (England) Active Registration: Licensed Civil & Structural Engineer, State of California (PE# 50016) & (SE# 4227) Licensed Civil and Structural Engineer in the following States: Arizona (SE# 45590) Hawaii (PE# 12279) Idaho (SE# 14212) Nevada (SE# 14368) New Mexico (PE# 12931) Oregon (PE# 79989) Utah (SE# 6447417) Washington (PE# 43019 Experience /Qualifications: Dr. Baroonian is the principal in charge of B & B Associates, Inc. and is responsible for research, supervision, co- ordination and production of projects. He has several years of experience in steel, wood, masonry, and concrete especially pre - stressed concrete structures. He has been responsible for structural designs and seismic upgrades, evaluation and technical review of structural systems, assembling field information and evaluating existing structures including historical buildings. He has also assessed site seismicity, evaluating potential economic loss expected from postulated seismic events, developed damage control criteria based upon ductility and capacities of various lateral load resisting structural materials, elements, assemblies, and systems. He has significant experience in developing lateral load resisting systems for upgrading or expanding existing structures. PUBLIC FUNDED PROJECTS (with RMCA Architects): Loma Alta Community Building Renovation Guadalupe Community Center (CRA/LA) Glendale Community Center Helen Keller County Park Palmdale Playhouse Pahndale Public Safety Offices Palmdale Blvd. Commercial Fagade Improvement - Phase II San Fernando Regional Pool Facility Westside Community Pool Altadena, California Canoga Park, California Glendale, California Los Angeles, California Pahndale, California Palmdale, California Palmdale, California San Fernando, California City of San Buenaventura, California PROJECTS FOR CITY OF LOS ANGELES: • Department of Recreation & Parks: • Alpine Recreation Center New Gymnasium Addition * Anderson Memorial Building * Eagle Rock Recreation Center • Echo Park Recreation Center • Elysian Park Recreation Center • Exposition Park Clubhouse • Glassell Recreation Center * Los Angeles Zoo - Major renovation and site development of Elephant Barn, Chimpanzee Exhibit, Aviary enclosure, Holding Area for Lions, Polar Bears, & etc. CITY OF ROSEMEAD: * Wahnart, 1827 Walnut Grove Ave. 2006 17 MECHANICAL ENGINEER KEMN A. SMDLA AND Assoc., INC. CONSULTING MECHANICAL ENGINEERS 145 VISTA AVENUE, SUITE 110 PASADENA CA 91107 (626) 585 -9338 FAX (626) 585 -0864 Kevin A. Smola, P.E. kevin @kasai.com Established in 1983, Kevin A. Smola and Associates, Inc provides mechanical engineering for schools, multipurpose rooms, gymnasiums, healthcare, and LEED projects. Education: Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana Bachelor of Science (BS) in Engineering Licensed: California 1981 (Also licensed in 14 other states) Professional Affiliations: ASHRAE, ASPE, NFPA Publications: Indoor Air Quality Symposium (IAQ), Atlanta 1988 "Removing Environmental Tobacco Smoke: A Practical Solution for the City of Beverly Hills, CA" "Smoke Control: Is it Really Required ": A discussion of smoke control versus the benefits of fire sprinklers in high -rise office buildings. March 2003, PM Engineer Magazine The services provided include design of: Heating, ventilating, air conditioning Domestic plumbing Fire sprinkler design (including hydraulic calculations) Energy management systems Forensic Engineering Community Related Projects: YMCA Lakewood YWCA Glendale Lancaster Senior Center San Fernando Regional Pool and Community Center Complex USA Youth Center Gymnasium Telfair School Multipurpose Room (used for community meetings also) LEED Projects: Stage 23, Warner Bros. Studios LEED Gold Office Bldg, Burbank Water and Power LEED Platinum Designed to LEED, but not Submitted to USGBC 100 Villa St. Pasadena, Ca Telfair School, Los Angeles, Ca 18 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER SILVER ENGINEERING CONSULTING ENGINEERS 7543 WOODLEY AVENUE, SUITE 100, VAN NUYS, CA 91406 ■TEL: (B1 B) 7B6 -6900 ■ FAX: (B1 B) 786-4400 Silver Engineering is a Consulting Electrical Engineering firm which has provided quality, professional service to the Construction Industry since 1962. The firm was started by Harry Y. Silver, who came from a background in Electrical Construction with his father. Since 1979, the firm has been headed by Michael J. Silver. He is a graduate of the University of California and a Registered Professional Engineer in the States of California, Nevada, Arizona, Washington and Oregon. For nearly half a century, the company and staff have received numerous awards and acknowledgements for their innovative design in a wide variety of projects, from large single family homes to regional shopping centers to massive data processing centers, and everything in between. Emphasis of design is on cost of construction, energy savings and aesthetics, as well as function. The following is a partial list of public sector projects completed by Silver Engineering which are similar to the proposed project. All of these projects were designed by or directly supervised by Michael Silver. Loma Alta Park (RMCA Architects) Community Building Renovation Altadena, CA Helen Keller Park (RMCA Architects) Basketball, Parking Lot, and Walkway Lighting Los Angeles, California Guadalupe Community Center (RMCA Architects) Canoga Park, California Palmdale Playhouse Addition (RMCA Architects) For the City of Palmdale Cooper Point Marketplace (RMCA Architects) Olympia, Washington Camps Scott and Scudder Power Upgrade For the LA County Probation Department The McFly Building Historical Renovation Los Angeles, California Van Ness Avenue Elementary School Renovation For the Los Angeles Unified School District Santa Clarita Temporary Homeless Shelters For the County of Los Angeles Goldstar Rehabilitation Center Lobby & Exterior Renovation of Mid -rise Senior Rehab Center Santa Monica, CA Public Safety / Community Relations Offices (RMCA Architects) For the City of Palmdale, California Mission College Library Remodel (RMCA Architects) For the LA Community College District Ronald Reagan Library "South Lawn" and Parking Lot Lighting Simi Valley, California Stephen S. Wise Temple Lighting Control Upgrade Los Angeles, California Sierra Vista Medical Center, Simi Valley For the County of Ventura, California Vine Street Elementary New Classroom Building For the Los Angeles Unified School District LA County Museum of the Arts Gallery Remodel Los Angeles, California Chet Holifreld Federal Building Parking Lot Renovation (LED Lighting) Laguna Niguel, CA Additional information about the firm, including a more complete project list, is available on our website at www.silver-engincering.com. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION SERVING THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY SINCE 1962 19 COST CONSULTANT CONSTRUCTION COST CONSULTANTS is an organization dedicated to providing the full spectrum of construction estimating and cost control services. We provide expertise in the areas of estimating, value engineering, claims analysis and change order evaluation and have extensive experience in publicly funded projects. Ms. Gurdeep Kaur- Dailey, the principal of CONSTRUCTION COST CONSULTANTS, has a Bachelors of Science in Quantity Surveying from the Glasgow College of Building in Scotland and a Masters of Science in Construction Management from Loughborough University in England. She has twenty five years of experience serving as a Chief /Senior Estimator on large scale, medium sized and small projects. RELATED PROJECTS - PUBLIC WORKS/RENOVATION • Loma Alta County Park, Altadena, CA Client: RMCA Architects Project Cost: $1.8 Million Project Description: Community Building renovation and general park improvements Services Provided: Preparation of Schematic and Construction Document Estimates • Enadia Way Elementary School Client: Miralles Associates /Kennard Design Group Project Cost: $8 Million Project Description: Renovation to 23,000 sf of buildings (kindergartens, classrooms & multipurpose) and 271,000 sf sitework Services Provided: Preparation of Schematic, Design Development & Construction Document Estimates • Riverside Drive Elementary School Client: Kennard Design School Project Cost: $2 Million Project Description: Modernization to 3 buildings Services Provided: Preparation of Construction Document Estimates • LA City College, Franklin & Jefferson Hall Modernization Client: DMJM /JGM Project Cost: $23 Million Project Description: Modernization to 155,000 sf of existing halls Services Provided: Preparation of Construction Document Estimates • Cost estimates for 4 Edison Substations prepared for Kennard Design Group • Helen Keller County Park, Los Angeles, CA Client: RMCA Architects Project Cost: $5.3 Million Project Description: Community Building, shade shelter, basketball court, amphitheatre and parking lots Services Provided: Preparation of Schematic Cost Estimates • LA Criminal Court, TI work to Jury Assembly Room Client: Howard Laks Architects Project Cost: $1.7 Million Project Description: TI & haz mat abatement to 8,700 sf jury assembly room Services provided: Preparation of Preliminary & Schematic Cost Estimates • Antelope Valley Courthouse, Build -out work Client: LA Dept of Public Works, PM Division Project Cost: $2.2 Million Project Description: Build -out work to vending, kitchen/servery, judges dining and cafeteria & dishwashing areas Services provided: Preparation of Construction Documents Estimate • Fire Station #136, Palmdale, CA (LEED Certified) Client: LA County Public Works Dept Project Cost: $6.5 Million Project Description: New gound -up 10,800 sf fire station and sitework Services Provided: 90% Construction Document Estimate 20 Section 6 REFERENCES IR04 W3" 4MI Lynn A. Glidden, P.E. City of Palmdale Public Works Project Management 38250 Sierra Highway Palmdale, CA 93550 (661) 267 -5300 Email: lglidden@cityofpalmdale.org Projects: Downtown Commercial Facade Rehabilitation and Improvements (CDBG Project), Personnel /Public Safety /Community Relation: Office T.I. /Renovations Services: Programming, Schematic Design, Entitlement Construction Documents, Bidding Assistance, Construction Administration Anne V. Ambrose, Manager City of Palmdale Public Safety Department 827 East Avenue Q -9 Palmdale, CA 93550 (661) 267 -5181 Email: aambrose @cityofpalmdale.org Moeed Khan, Regional Director Catholic Charities of Los Angeles 1531 James M. Wood Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90015 (818) 883 -6015 Email: mkhan @ccharities.org Moises Carrillo, Senior Supervisor City of Glendale Community Development and Housing 141 North Glendale Ave., Room 202 Glendale, CA 91206 -4996 (818) 548 -2060 Email: mcarrillo @ci.glendale.ca.us Dan Mitchell, Project Manager Superior Grocers 15510 Carmenita Rd. Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 (562) 345 -9000 Email: Daniel Mitdmitchell @superiorgrocers.com Fred Leeds, President Fred Leeds Properties 1900 Sepulveda Blvd. Suite 212 Los Angeles, CA 90025 (310) 405 -7600 Email: fredleeds @fredleedsproperties.com Project: City of Palmdale Public Safety /Community Relations Building Exterior Renovation /Office T. /. Services: Programming, Schematic Design, Entitlements, Construction Documents, Bidding Assistance, Construction Administration Project: Guadalupe Community Center Canoga Park, CA Services: Schematic Design, Entitlements, Construction Documents, Bidding Assistance, Construction Administration Project. Glendale Community Center Services: Schematic Design, Construction Documents, Bidding Assistance, Construction Administration Projects: Superior Store, Palmdale, CA (Renovation) Superior Store, Lancaster, CA (Renovation) Services: Schematic Design, Entitlements, Construction Documents, Bidding, Construction Administration Project. Wilshire Union Center, L.A. 7' Union Mixed Use, L.A. Services: Schematic Design, Entitlements, Construction Documents, Bidding Assistance, Construction Administration 21 Section 7 TIME SCHEDULE N � a � i � �� i �� 9 3` � � III i. � �I ii ii i � t t I I � � i '� e �,, .s I � I �II I_ _ -_— — I �, �, � ' I �� S I, ,t E '.. �. � Y i 5 �$ �. ii 'i I � � E i _ � �� L T i * i ` p j p A - 35�� z 2 �4 i i, - �� -�� Section 8 FEE PROPOSAL Paul S. Robich, AIA President Loren Carlson Vice President RMCA ARCHITECTURE DESIGN PLANNING 1541 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 110 LOS ANGELES CALIF 90017 TEL(213)483-0530 FAX(213)483-0533 mcaaia @earthlink.net 7601.160 January 31, 2011 Mr. Chris Marcarello, Director of Public Works City of Rosemead 8838 E. Valley Blvd. Rosemead, CA 91770 RE: ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER EXPANSION AND FACADE IMPROVEMENTS 3936 Muscatel Ave. Rosemead, CA 91770 Dear Chris, We are pleased to have the opportunity to provide you with a proposal for professional architectural services for the above project. Our fee is broken down into three (3) Phases and is as follows: Phase $28,000.00 Phase ll $162,500.00 Phase III $23,000.00 Included in our Basic Architectural Services: Phase I — SITE ASSESSMENT AND SCHEMATIC DESIGN a) Analyze site conditions, survey area, and determine specific site requirements needed to provide the best functional use of the site including access and pedestrian traffic flow, ADA requirements, and security considerations; b) Verify utility constraints (Note: asbestos assessment reports, geotechnical investigations, topographic and boundary land surveys shall be provided by the City); c) Analyze aesthetic considerations, maintenance options, and provide recommendations to the City; d) Coordinate with City staff to prepare up to three (3) layout/design options to include schematic floor plans based on the selected site plan; possibly utilizing a design study of the City Plaza and Parking Improvement Project that is currently underway. e) Complete and accurate, preliminary Architect's cost estimate based on the selected site and schematic floor plan (including square footage measurements of each area); f) Submit conceptual design to City for review and make up to five (5) formal presentations to the City, including evening meetings. - g) All costs associated with incidentals and reproduction costs. Phase II — DESIGN DEVELOPMENT / CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS a) Coordinate with the City in the delivery of architectural and engineering services during preconslruction (conceptual, schematic, design development, and construction document phases); b) Prepare all conceptual, schematic, and design development plans for the Project; c) Coordinate with the City regarding CEQA compliance and environmental approvals; d) Integrate all applicable local and state codes and design standards into the Project design; e) Incorporate energy conservation features and the US Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) to a level of least a "Silver" Rating; f) Provide structural engineering, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and landscape architect design services for the project; g) Coordinate with the City's specialty consultants such as geotechnical, traffic, noise, civil engineering, and other elements; h) Design all aspects of the design development including all on -site improvements, all on -site dry utilities, and any other related improvements resulting from new design aspects; i) Develop Architect's cost estimates throughout the design process; j) Assist the City with value engineering as required to meet budget constraints k) Assist with the development of Project schedule; 1) Prepare construction document plans and specification for the submittal to the appropriate City departments and all necessary entities for review, approval, and permitting by local, state and county entities required; m) Assist with selection of furniture, fixtures, and equipment; (we have budgeted 20 hours) n) Respond to incorporate building official/ permitting agency comments into Project design. 23 o) Present 60% and 90% design drawings to staff for review and approval (including electronic copies in CAD format and five (5) hard copies); p) Prepare final bid -ready design and specification documents for construction bid; complete bid site walk with potential contractors. q) All costs associated with incidentals and reproduction costs. Phase III — CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES a) Assist City in public bidding and award process; b) Provide construction observation and support services during construction — including but not limited to: • Periodic job visits of construction activities; • Attend bi- weekly construction coordination meetings; (every other week). We have budgeted 18 Construction meetings. • Submittal and shop drawing review; • Respond to requests for information (RFI); • Assist City in change order review and negotiations; • Coordinate the production of as -built drawings; • Conduct a final project inspection with the City to ensure quality of work and compliance with project specifications, drawings, and contract documents (including sub - consultants). c) All costs associated with incidentals and reproduction costs. Not Included in our Basic Architectural Services: 1) All items mentions as by the City in their RFP, including surveys, Civil Engineering, asbestos survey, soil & traffic reports, and as -built drawings of the existing conditions. 2) Seismic upgrade of existing structure (this can be done at added cost) 3) Meetings or site visits beyond those included above. (Any requested additional meetings will be done at Time and Materials). 4) Major revisions to the existing building not specifically included in the City RFP. 5) Off site work 6) Major revisions to the exterior of the existing building that involves structure. 7) Significant changes to the project scope, including major revisions once Contract Documents have begun. 8) Construction Estimates by an outside Estimator. If this service is desired add the following: Schematic $2,000.00 Design Development $4,500.00 100% CDs $5,700.00 9) Government fees 10) Fire Sprinkler & Alarm Plans Our fee will be payable in proportion to the percentage of work completed. We will bill monthly. When extra services are needed, or requested, they will be billed based on the Schedule of Fees in effect at time of services. This agreement can be terminated by either party with a written seven (7) day notice. One and one -half percent (1.5 %) interest will be charged each month on all amounts not paid within thirty (30) days of the invoice date, eighteen percent (18 %) annually. The proposal is based on a start date within sixty (60) days of the above date. If this meets with your approval, please signify your acceptance by returning one signed copy for our file. It is our intent that when executed, this proposal letter will serve as an Exhibit to a Contract and Agreement between Owner and Architect. Yours truly, RMCA ARCHITECTURE DESIGN PLANNING, INC ��_! V, Paul S. Robich, A.I.A. President License #C13724 Accepted By: Date: Mr. Chris Marcarello, Director of Public Works Attachment: RMCA Schedule of Fees 24 Paul S. Robich, AIA President Loren Carlson Vice President RMCA ARCHITECTURE DESIGN PLANNING 1541 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 110 LOS ANGELES CALIF 90017 TEL(213)483-0530 FAX(213)483-0533 mcaaia @earthlink.net SCHEDULE OF FEES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2008 1. Staff Hourly Rate Principal in Charge $165.00 Project Manager $115.00 Project Architect $ 95.00 Draftsman /CADD Draftsmen $ 80.00 Technical Aid $ 55.00 Overtime is available for critical deadlines at 1 Y2 times normal rate. 2. Consultants When we hire consultants (with client's approval), we will pay their fees and will in turn bill these to the client at cost, plus fifteen per cent (15 %). Consultant's bills will be provided to the client. 3. Mileage and Subsistence Auto Mileage: 52.2¢ per mile. Air Travel and Auto Rental: Actual Cost plus fifteen per cent (15 %). Subsistence: $110.00 per day (where actual work requires that employee stay over night away from home.) 4. Materials, Supplies and Fees Office and drafting supplies are included in the hourly rates in Paragraph 1. Costs of plotting and reproductions are charged at cost, plus fifteen per cent (15 %) handling. Black line or blue line prints are charged at 12¢ per square foot, and 50¢ per square foot for sepias on in -house machine. FAXes will be charged at $1.00 per sheet. Long distance phone charges will be billed at cost + 15 %. Copies of phone bills will be provided at client's request at $5 handling fee. Photocopies will be charged at: 8'Y2 X 11 15¢ copy 8'/z X 14 20¢ copy 11X17 30¢ copy When we pay permit fees, plan check fees, etc., required by governing agencies (with the approval of the client), we will in turn bill these fees to the client at cost, plus fifteen per cent (15 %). Receipts and /or copies of checks will be provided to the client. Shipping, messenger service are billed at cost + 15% with $8 handling. 25 R O S E M E A D C O M M U N I T Y R E C R E A T 1 0 N C E N T E R EXPANSION & FACADE I M P R O V E M E N T S C I T Y O F R O S E M E A D FEBRUARY 2011 GONZALEZ GOODALE ARCHITECTS g onzale z c 0 0 D A LE I35 WEST GREEN STREET 91JITE 2GG PA S A G ENA .A 911 D5 February 2, 2011 Chris Marcarello Director of Public Works City of Rosemead 8838 Valley Boulevard Rosemead, CA 91770 Dear Mr. Marcorello: Recognizing the importance of the Rosemead Community Recreation Center renovation project to the Center and the entire City, the focus of our design process will be communication, listening, and consensus - building leadership that includes deeply engaged stakeholder participation. As an initial exercise in evaluating and understanding the fagade, public areas, and linkage to the surrounding civic services, we will analyze the site in relation to the plaza and ensure the design is sensitive to the existing structures, plaza project, and surrounding parkland. Our proposed key personnel have extensive experience in the design of recreation and community facility projects; renovation and expansion projects; public and civic facilities; and a myriad of experience in the City of Rosemead. The team's qualifications include renovation and expansion projects at Rosemead High School, Arroyo High School and Simi Valley Senior Center, and new construction of community buildings for the City of Diamond Bar and the County of Los Angeles. Our firm's founding principal, Armando L. Gonzalez, was the project architect for the original Rosemead Community Recreation Center in 1976 —his hands -on knowledge will provide a distinct value for the project. The proposed project architect /manager, Tom Afschar, AIA, CASp, provided design services for Rosemead's Garvey Community Center while at another firm. Alison Spicer, LEED AP, will provide coordination with the design team as the project sustainability coordinator. Her knowledge base and experience will facilitate the project's LEED Silver equivalent rating. Gerda Buss will serve as interior designer and provide FFBE selection. As a firm focused on public architecture, we can provide the leadership and experience required to design community facilities within stringent budgets and schedules. The large number of quality built projects over the life of the firm is testament to our ability to deliver this renovation and expansion project with quality and professionalism. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal to the City of Rosemead and look forward to continuing our discussion. Sincerely, Gonzalez Goodale Architects www.gonzalezgoo ale.com Harry R . Drake, AIA Principal T 626 56e 1 429 F 626 56B 9.26 AR✓ANDO L GONZALEZ EAIA DAVID L GOODALE AIA JOHN FERGUSON AA HARRY R DRAKE AIA ALI 9ARAR AIA gonzalezgoodale.com TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER LETTER page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. UNDERSTANDING SCOPE OF SERVICES page 2 2. METHODOLOGY & WORK PLAN pages 3 -5 3. EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS EXPERTISE AND EXPERIENCE LEED AND SUSTAINABLE DESIGN GENERAL ADMINISTRATION OF DESIGN pages 6-11 4. KEY PERSONNEL pages 12 -14 5. LIST OF SUB - CONSULTANTS page 15 6. REFERENCES pages 16 -22 7. TIME SCHEDULE page 23 8. FEE PROPOSAL pages 24 -25 GONZALEZ GOODALE ARCHITECTS l . UNDERSTANDING SCOPE OF SERVICES The Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Facade Improvement Project includes the addition of approximately 3,000 square feet of space. The space will accommodate new City administrative offices, a small teen center, and a computer lab facility. In addition, the project will include interior /exterior improvements, and furniture, fixtures, and equipment consultation for the new facility expansion. The City also desires to replace the existing HVAC equipment at the facility and to design a new HVAC system for the entire facility (existing area and expansion area). The project is slated for LEED Silver and includes three phases of work: -Phase I consists of Site Assessment and Schematic Design, which includes three schematic design options and up to five meetings with City staff and /or personnel. -Phase II consists of Design Development and Construction Documents preparation; LEED Silver documentation; coordination with all engineering disciplines and City staff; 60% and 90% document deliverables; furniture, fixtures, and equipment selection; cost of construction estimates; and preconstruction services. • Phase III, Construction Support Services includes typical construction administration services. In addition to your scope of services briefly summarized above, we have provided, in Section 8, a detailed work plan fee chart that reflects each service and deliverable requested. In our experience, clients find this chart very helpful in discerning work plan tasks, scope of services, and the level of effort associated with each task. We also recommend the inclusion of preconstruction CM services during design. This approach was successfully implemented in our design process with Bernards Construction Management for the Monrovia City Library. Bernards CM, a seasoned construction management team, provided early 'from the trenches' construction cost estimating and management of the bid process with resultant delivery of the library on time and under budget. We can provide qualifications and references for Bernards CM at the City's request. GONZALEZ GOODALE ARCHITECTS I Your project guiding principles and facility program parameters will be used to evaluate the success of the design in subsequent client team design review meetings. 2. METHODOLOGY & WORK PLAN METHODOLOGY —A PARTICIPATORY PROCESS We will begin the design process with open, effective communication of design solutions based on the City of Rosemead's needs, the assessment of the existing Community Recreation Center facility, and the proposed project budget. In this section we outline our Client Team strategy, guiding principles method, and overall project management system that, when combined with strong process and design leadership, leads to quality built work, delivered on time and on budget. Moreover, we encourage the public works department to make budgeting and scheduling decisions based on these guiding principles and design solutions. CLIENT TEAM We recommend that the City establish a Client Team to provide decision - making leadership through the programming and design review process. We have successfully worked with Client Teams on hundreds of past projects and have found this participatory team approach to be a tremendous asset in facilitating client, regulatory, and community input review processes. We further recommend an initial workshop with the City's Client Team to formulate project guiding principles and establish program goals and parameters. These guiding principles and program parameters will be used to evaluate the success of the design in subsequent design review meetings. By understanding your goals before design begins, we propose to eliminate the "moving" target that occurs when values and goals are not communicated, understood, and agreed upon among the design team members and project stakeholders. Listening and working closely with the Client Team, we will confirm the proposed building program and overall financial budget considerations. GONZALEZ GOODALE ARCHITECTS 3 Simi /alley Senior Center 2. METHODOLOGY & WORK PLAN WORK PLAN — PROVEN PROJECT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER PROJECT PROGRAM AND DESIGN PHASES * *IN ADDITION TO THIS WORK PLAN BY PHASE, WE HAVE ALSO INCLUDED A DETAILED LEVEL OF EFFORT TASK PLAN AS PART OF OUR FEE PROPOSAL IN SECTION 8. During the site assessment and design phases, our project approach will include regularly scheduled progress meetings with the Client Team and City of Rosemead regulatory agency representatives. Progress design prints and CADD- generated alternative design options will be reviewed to ensure that functional and operational requirements are met and that overall massing and character evolves with mutual understanding and agreement. Client Team meetings will also be scheduled with our engineering sub - consultants so that Client Team members can discuss specific requirements directly with the consultant design team. Specific functions that will be performed during each phase of design and construction are defined below. CLIENT TEAM KICK -OFF MEETING Design Guiding Principles and Work Plan The success of your project depends on the preparation of design guiding principles, a detailed work plan, and a critical path schedule. The work plan will have parallel and overlapped tasks to ensure timely and productive progress. Meet with the client to: • Introduce A/E team to the Client Team, forming design team • Confirm and validate facility programming criteria and The success of your project client priorities depends on the preparation . Review construction budget of design guiding principles, . Assemble /review engineering data i.e. soils geology, g g 9 gy, survey, etc. a detailed work plan, and a critical path schedule. Establish key target dates for the project • Review and issue schedule with Client Team and revise as necessary GONZALEZ GOODALE ARCHITECTS 4 Culver City City Hall We provide schematic design options and coordinate design information with consultants, and provide analysis of comparative systems with recommendations. 2. METHODOLOGY & WORK PLAN PHASE I -SITE ASSESSMENT AND SCHEMATIC DESIGN • Review all pertinent codes and ordinances • Prepare functional space adjacencies diagram • Study maximizing usable floor space and optimize operational efficiency • Up to 5 client presentations • Up to 3 design options • Coordinate design information with consultants and provide analysis of comparative systems with recommendations • Establish engineering space needs • Define project scope and character • Verify project schedule and construction cost estimate PHASE 11- DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS DESIGN DEVELOPMENT • Develop detailed mechanical, electrical, and structural systems to satisfy functional needs • Select building materials, interior finishes and FF &E • Produce outline specifications • Review schedule and update as necessary • Resolve all architectural and engineering design issues • Update construction cost estimate CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS • Finalize detailed drawings and specifications • Coordinate with all engineering consultants • Update cost estimate • Update schedule • Submit construction documents to agencies for review and approval • Revise construction documents to comply with agency review and receive agency approval PHASE III BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION • Issue bid package to contractors • Evaluate bids and recommend contractor to client • Attend biweekly construction meetings • Assist client in contract negotiations and award as requested • Perform construction administration as described in AIA contract B102 and B201 GONZALEz GOODALE ARCHITECTS 5 City of Arcadia Fire Station 105 3. EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS EXPERTISE AND EXPERIENCE PROJECT SCHEDULING EXPERTISE AND EXPERIENCE IN ARCHITECTURE Over 30 years of practice, Gonzalez Goodole Architects has provided design services for more than 200 built projects including community recreation centers, civic facilities, and public buildings. Although this proposal focuses on recent projects, our depth of experience includes the original Rosemead Community Recreation Center and Zopopon Community Center. We have provided consistent, REPEAT services for many civic clients, including the cities of Rosemead, Pasadena, Simi Valley, El Monte, Arcadia, Rancho Palos Verdes, and Long Beach. The firm has provided design services for community facilities such as the Simi Valley Boys' and Girls' Club, the Pasadena YMCA, and the Westside YMCA. The firm also designed a new City Library for the cities of Monrovia and Westlake Village Our expertise and experience will bring a distinct added value to the Rosemead Community Recreation Center expansion and renovation project. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE The firm has engaged the services of Lawrence R. Moss and Associates as landscape architects. His current work on your plaza project will provide in -depth expertise for this renovation project. Mr. Moss' background includes many civic clients in the San Gabriel Valley and we have previously collaborated with Mr. Moss on the City of Monrovia Public Library project. As most of our projects are publicly funded, we understand the need for accurate and appropriate project scheduling. This chart demonstrates three projects that our firm delivered on -time and on- budget: PROJECT ON -TIME ON- BUDGET DATE OF CONTACT PERSON PROJECT DELIVERY PROJECT DELIVERY COMPLETION MONROVIA CITY LIBRARY X X June 2009 Scott OChoo City Manager - 626.932.5500 UNIVERSITY OF LA VERNE X Within 1% July 2009 Philip Hawkey ABRAHAM CAMPUS CENTER Exec. Vice President - 909.593.3511 RFK Comm. SCHOOLS: K -5 X Within 3% July 2009 Eugene Aguirre, Former Ambassador Hotel Site Sen. Design Manager - 213.480.8863 GONZALEz GOODALE ARCHITECTS 6 Simi Valley Boys' and Girls' Club Westlake Village Library Westside YMCA 3. EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS EXPERTISE AND EXPERIENCE COST- BENEFIT ANALYSIS Our approach to evaluating benefits and costs includes analysis and research of durable materials, environmental qualities, finishes, sustainable products, and project budget. Through a wide array of resources, consultant recommendations, and prior direct experience, we evaluate the benefits versus costs, including first costs and life - cycle assessments to determine the relative value of a given product, material, or service. For example, as detailed specifications are developed we will work directly with the City's project manager to ensure that materials are not only within the project budget but are also durable materials adequate for use in a well visited facility. Our proven track record of success with public schools and institutions is a testament to our strength in the evaluation and use of durable materials that meet a high level of both quality and value for our clients' projects. VALUE ENGINEERING We approach value engineering holistically, designing alternatives and making recommendations for both the overall design approach and materials selections. Several aspects characterize our approach to value engineering: • We are constantly alert to emerging materials and technologies and how they might be efficiently, resourcefully applied. • We build a value- engineering sensibility into our architecture and engineering design process so that we can avoid deleterious post- design cost cutting. • We consistently stage in -house design critiques to evaluate not only quality but quality -to -value relationships and design appropriateness to both project budget and project goals. By objectively examining first costs versus long -term maintenance costs with the client team, we will help to instill a pride of quality in the entire team (through construction) with the recognition that we are constructing a building to service stakeholders well into the future. GONZALEZ GOODALE ARCHITECTS 7 City of Monrovia Library Westlake Village City Hall Administrative Offices 3. EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS LEED AND SUSTAINABLE DESIGN LEED DESIGN PROJECTS GOLD LEVEL PROJECTS City of Pasadena City of Long Beach Department of Water & Power Leeway Sailing Center Office Building & Warehouse SILVER LEVEL PROJECTS SILVER LEVEL PROJECTS LA Family Housing Glenoaks Gardens Community Development Commission sights Community Center ............................................................................................................................... ............................... . SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SAVINGS BY DESIGN PROJECTS LAUSD City of Simi Valley Robert F. Kennedy Community Schools Senior Center Addition Former Ambassador Hotel Site ......................................................................................... ............................... COLLABORATIVE FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE SCHOOLS (CHPS) PROJECTS City of El Monte Transit Village Preview Center ...... ............................... LAUSD LAUSD Robert F. Kennedy Community Schools Glassell Park Early Childhood Education Center & Former Ambassador Hotel Site Housing Project GONZALEZ GoODALE ARCHITECTS 8 University of La Verne City of Monrovia Abraham Campus Center Public Library City of El Monte Public Works Maintenance Facility 3. EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS GENERAL ADMINISTRATION OF DESIGN BIM CAPABILITIES Gonzalez Goodale Architects, and our consultants, are committed to working with Building Information '' m :� • Model (BIM) technology and has been doing so for the past four years. BIM allows the firm to create an intelligent building model linked to a central project database that integrates all the information architectural, structural, and MEP —and automatically disseminates any changes to design, documentation, scope, or schedule throughout the project. LINC Housing Three - Dimensional Visualization also holds many benefits for the client. Through automatically generated massing models, stakeholders can see their project as it will appear on the site and gauge it's contextual appropriateness to the surrounding architecture. Interior modeling allows a client to share the project with potential donors to help them identify spaces for which their funding can be used. A virtual building in the early phases of design also ensures that the clients vision is aligned with the realities of the project. Unlike AutoCad technology, where much of an architect's problem - solving takes place in development of construction documents, BIM technology allows for much of the problem solving process to occur in earlier phases of the work. This shift results in a pronounced reduction of Change Orders and RFIs. G ONZALEZ GOODALE ARCHITECTS 9 Department of Water & Power Office Building and Warehouse 3 We strongly believe the quality of our collective knowledge directly and positively influences the quality of our documents. EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS GENERAL ADMINISTRATION OF DESIGN QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Our Quality Assurance program is built on layers of document cross checking and diversity of technical capabilities that together form an effective system that ensures our projects are delivered with a high level of completeness, clarity, and coordination. The major components of our program are: 1. INDEPENDENT CHECKING Our Quality Assurance Principal, John Fergsuon, AIA, LEED AP, is responsible for checking the documentation at various milestones such as completion of design development and construction documents, and, most extensively, prior to bidding. His reviews are thorough, they vary based on project size and complexity, and schedules typically include several weeks to complete final reviews. 2. FORMAL QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES Our Quality Control standards are based on our firm principal's collective technical expertise, broad -based project experience, and day -to -day review of building codes and regulations for current work. We use an extensive, formal, check list -based program to guarantee compliance with these standards. The entire project team participates in quality control practices throughout the life of our projects. Our engineering consultants are required to participate in this process, completing the some checklists and certifying they have coordinated their work with all other disciplines. 3. CONTINUING EDUCATION EFFORTS We have an internal committee, Professional Services Implementation Team, responsible foroversight of our Quality Assurance program. This team sponsors seminars, field trips, post- occupancy evaluations, and related educational functions designed to further develop our abilities to produce quality construction documents. We have a tracking process to analyze prior projects and target learning opportunities in areas that have proven challenging. Our efforts toward professional development includes an annual budget allowance for individual participation in off -site educational venues. GONZALEZ GOODALE ARCHITECTS a Simi Valley Senior Center Entry 3. EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS GENERAL ADMINISTRATION OF DESIGN The chart below outlines our quality assurance procedure. At the center of the program is our Quality Assurance Principal who oversees and reviews the entire program. Reviews are conducted at the end of design development, at 50% construction documents, and prior to bidding. DAVID L. GOODALE AIA LEED AP DESIGN PRINCIPAL JOHN FERGUSON PROJECT AIA LEED AP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARCHITECT QUALITY ASSURANCE IMPLEMENTATION TEAM PRINCIPAL PROJECT TEAM FORMAL QUALITY CHECKING AT DD COMPLETION, CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS IMPLEMENTATION 50% CID AND PRE -BID R F V I F W C 4. INSPIRATION TO EXCEL We are convinced that the best policies and procedures for quality assurance are only as good as the people who implement them. With that guiding belief, we are constantly evaluating our staff, not only for technical and design excellence, but for the desire to achieve outstanding results. We work to instill a sense of ownership and pride in our projects with each studio member. GONZALEZ GOODALE ARCHITECTS 11 CONCEPT SD DD CD BID CONSTRUCTION 4 . K E Y P E R S O N N E L GONZALEZ GOODALE ARCHITECTS HARRY R. DRAKE, AIA PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE Mr. Drake will provide leadership and direction in the areas of project management, consultant coordination, client service, and overall architectural process. His expertise in public architecture includes civic projects, educational projects, and community based facilities. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE (PARTIAL LISTING) • City of Simi Valley: City Hall and Senior Center Addition and Renovation • City of Azusa: New Library /Evaluation of the Existing Library Building • City of Arcadia: New City Hall & Fire Department Headquarters Expansion; evaluation of existing historic city hall • El Monte Union High School District: Modernization of Arroyo, Mountain View, Rosemead and El Monte High Schools • El Monte City School District: Modernization of 10 elementary schools • City of Monrovia: Public Library —LEED SILVER • Pasadena Water & Power Department: Evaluation to preserve or structurally upgrade 1930s office building and warehouse • LAUSD: Robert F Kennedy Community Schools (former Ambassador Hotel Site) ................................................................................................................................. ............................... GONZALEZ GOODALE ARCHITECTS DAVID L. GOODALE, AIA, LEED AP DESIGN PRINCIPAL As the Design Principal, Mr. Goodole will oversee the design from programming through construction, and act directly as design principal for the Rosemead Community Recreation Center. His leadership and expertise in design of community facilities includes programming, planning, and alternative design options. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE (PARTIAL LISTING) • City of Simi Valley: Senior Center Renovation and Expansion • City of Rosemead: Zopopon Community Center /Rosemead Community Center • El Monte Union High School District: Modernization of Arroyo, Mountain View Rosemead and El Monte High Schools • El Monte City School District: Modernization of 10 elementary schools • Pasadena City College: Physical Education Complex • City of Diamond Bar: Community /Senior Center • City of Pasadena Water & Power: Administrative Office Facility —LEED SILVER • City of Monrovia: Public Library —LEED SILVER • Pasadena YMCA: Family Recreation & Health Facility • City of Simi Valley: Boys' and Girls' Club GONZALEz GOODALE ARCHITECTS 12 4 . K E Y P E R S O N N E L GONZALEZ GOODALE ARCHITECTS TOM AFSCHAR, AIA, GASP PROJECT ARCHITECT /MANAGER Mr. Afschar will be the primary point of contact; provide overall management of A/E services; ensure efficient project organization; and oversee project budget and schedule, as well as all other aspects of project delivery for the Rosemead Community Recreation Center expansion project. As a Certified Access Specialist (CASp), Tom is authorized to provide the following services: • Review facility plans and specifications for compliance with state and federal accessibility laws, codes and regulations. • Investigate a facility for compliance with state and federal accessibility codes and regulations. • Conduct accessibility research, prepare accessibility reports, and /or conduct accessibility inspections, as authorized. PROJECT EXPERIENCE • El Monte Union High School District: Mt. View High School Multi- Purpose Facility • El Monte City School District: Headquarters Entry • City of Monrovia: Public Library —LEED SILVER • Pasadena YMCA: New Facility • LA Family Housing: Glenoaks Gardens —LEED SILVER • Los Angeles Unified School District: Glassell Park Joint -Use Mixed -Use Project EXPERIENCE PRIOR TO GONZALEZ GOODALE ARCHITECTS • City of Rosemead: Garvey Community Center • YWCA of Greater Los Angeles: Urban Campus • CDPC Mariposa Manor: Senior Housing • University Village Riverside: Student Housing GONZALEz GOODALE ARCHITECTS 13 4. KEY PERSONNEL GONZALEZ GOODALE ARCHITECTS G E R D A B U S S ASSOCIATE/INTERIOR DESIGNER Ms. Buss is responsible for the implementation and coordination of interior design services and works directly with the design principal on interiors projects. She will be responsible for the selection of finishes, furniture, fixtures, and equipment. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE (PARTIAL LISTING) • City of Simi Valley: Senior Center Renovation and Expansion • City of Monrovia: Public Library —LEED SILVER • City of Pasadena: Water and Power Administration Building —LEED SILVER • EI Monte Union High School District: Maintenance Facility • El Monte Union High School District: Arroyo High School, New Classrooms and Laboratories • El Monte Union High School District: Rosemead High School, New Classrooms • LAUSD: Robert F Kennedy Community Schools (former Ambassador Hotel Site) • LAUSD: Glassell Park Early Education Center and Housing Project • University of La Verne: Abraham Campus Center • Long Beach Community College: Educational, Administrative & District Office Complex GONZALEZ GOODALE ARCHITECTS ALISON SPICER, LEED AP SUSTAINABILITY COORDINATOR Ms. Spicer currently works as the firm's sustainability coordinator, responsible for research and documentation of LEED building certification. She will work directly with the City, and the mechanical engineers to ensure that the project achieves a minimum LEED Silver equivalent rating. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE (PARTIAL LISTING) LEED RATED DESIGN PROJECTS: • City of Monrovia: Public Library —LEED SILVER • City of Long Beach: Leeway Sailing Center —LEED GOLD • City of Long Beach: El Dorado Nature Center —LEED GOLD • City of Pasadena: Water and Power Administration Building —LEED GOLD • City of El Monte: Public Works Maintenance Facility —LEED SILVER • LA Family Housing: Glenoaks Gardens, Family Housing —LEED SILVER • University of Lo Verne, Abraham Campus Center —LEED SILVER • Build LACCD: Green Product Research and Evaluation GONZALEZ GOODALE ARCHITECTS 14 5. LIST OF SUB - CONSULTANTS STRUCTURAL ENGINEER BRANDOW & JOHNSTON, INC. 444 South Flower Street, Suite 400, Los Angeles, CA 90071 213 596 4526 tel 1 213 596 4599 fax Isao Kawasaki, S.E. Experience: • Hallenbeck Replacement Police Station: New two -story police station and renovation of the historic Vladek Community Center in Boyle Heights, CA. MECHANICAL & PLUMBING ENGINEER KHALIFEH & ASSOCIATES, INC. 13465 Beach Ave., Suite B, Marina Del Rey, CA 90292 310.305.1555 tel 1 310.305.1550 fax Jack Khalifeh, PE, LEED AP Experience: Washington Park Pool Renovation: Mechanical design for remodeling of three buildings in an existing public parks swimming pool locker rooms, public toilets and two additional public restroom facilities in Los Angeles, CA. ELECTRICAL ENGINEER OMB ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS, INC. 8825 Research Drive, Irvine, CA 92618 949.753.1553 tel 1 949.753.1992 fax Jeffrey C. Overmyer, P.E. Experience: • Dos Lagos Central Park: Electrical design for a new recreation center, two lakes, amphitheater and monument bridge in Corona, CA. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LAWRENCE R. MOSS & ASSOCIATES 3458 Ocean View Boulevard, Glendale, CA 91208 818.248.5200 tel 1 818.248.6574 fax Larry Moss, ASLA Experience: • Garvey Park Master Plan: The goals for the park master plan are to integrate community and City wishes /visions for the park into a cohesive park design in Rosemead, CA. GONZALEZ GOODALE ARCHITECTS 15 6. R E F E R E N C E S Context: The Simi Valley Senior Center is indicative of our firm's sustained performance: We designed the Master Plan in the early 1980's, and subsequently were retained, in sequence, to design the City Hall, the DMV Building, and a first addition to the original Senior Center (1992). We were recently re -hired to renovate and further add to the Senior Center. CITY OF SIMI VALLEY SENIOR CENTER EXPANSION 900 ► \ 0 0 SIMI VALLEY CA DATA 25,000 SF ORIGINAL 17,000 SF AND ADDITION 9,000 SF) Challenge: Response: In addition to the need for expanding program and population, the City sought to appeal to an increasingly younger and more independent senior population. At the some time, the existing center required new finishes, new spatial reconfigurations, and cover over its internal courtyard. The design is anchored by a dramatic top -lit rotunda, whose form has also become an iconic beacon in the civic center and the city. The interior of this rotunda serves as the radial hub for new functions, including administration, classrooms, and exercise rooms. It also serves as a new social hub, cafe, and living room for independent seniors. With the accrual of additions and construction types, close interpretation of both building codes and compatible constructability methods was required for a successful project. GONZALEZ GOODALE ARCHITECTS 16 Reference: Brian Gabler, Director of Economic Development /805.583.6701 6. R E F E R E N C E S Context: We designed the Master Plan in the early 1980's, and subsequently were retained in sequence to design the City Hall, the DMV Building, and a first addition to the original Senior Center. CITY OF SIMI VALLEY CITY HALL RENOVATION AND EXPANSION SIMI VALLEY CA DATA RENOVATION OF 26,000 SF ADDITION OF 9,000 SF Challenge: Response: Similar to the Rosemead Community Recreation Center, this project called for exterior facade enhancements, interior renovations, and the expansion of new city offices. The architecture of the City Hall addition draws from the existing palette of materials in the civic center, while bringing a renewed civic cadence and gravity in the expression of its form. The project encompassed a new entry to the City Hall, and a re- shaping /completion of the City's grandly scaled civic grounds. Designed with intense interaction between city staff and architects, the departmental planning emphasized skylighting and daylighting to bring maximum natural light to internal working areas. GONZALEZ Go ODALE ARCHITECTS 17 Reference: Brian Gabler, Director of Economic Development 1805.583.6701 6. R E F E R E N C E S Context: The context for this project Summitridge Park —is atop a rugged bluff, with park and city to the south, and a rugged canyon trail system to the north. One ascends to the site, primarily by car, with the master plan diverting car traffic and parking to the ends of the site, leaving a pair of major facilities at the center, dramatic canyon views from the small park that separates them. CITY OF DIAMOND BAR COMMUNITY/SENIOR CENTER DATA 22,500 SF COMMUNITY /SENIOR CENTER (COMPLETED) 25,000 SF LOS ANGELES COUNTY LIBRARY (DESIGNED) Challenge: Response: While a relatively remote site, the design team was charged with capitalizing on the compelling views to the canyon and to downtown Los Angeles; to provide a facility that both have high patronage and provide rental income (via a 500 -seat banquet hall); and to provide a facility design that would richly engage the landscape and make an iconic statement to the city below. Breaking down the architectural components, library, pre- function, banquet hall, senior meeting, teen area, and reception, and stringing them as a series of pavilions in concert with the movement of the land and the canyon edge, the project both responds sensitively to the mountains and provides a warm and dramatic venue for community and culture. Its success is measure by the banquet hall being consistently booked over a year in advance. GONZALEz GOODALE ARCHITECTS 0 Reference: David Doyle, Deputy City Manager /909.839.7012 6. R E F E R E N C E S Context: The site is on the low terrace of Pathfinder Park, a zone of the park that is highly constrained by a variety of utility and drainage easements. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION ROWLAND HEIGHTS COMMUNITY CENTER ROWLAND HEIGHTS CA DATA 15,000 SQUARE FEET MULTI - PURPOSE HALL WITH FULL KITCHEN TENNIS /BASKETBALL COURTS HEED MINIMUM RATING: SILVER Challenge: Response: The principal challenge of the extremely linear site is footprint- constraining boundaries of the utility easements. Founded in a deeply engaged community process, the expectations of varying community and park interests present a parallel challenge to be met. The project is currently in design phase. The initial response to community has been the development of consensus through establishment of shared Guiding Principles, and a collaborative prioritizing of program needs. The response to the easements is to work towards a landscape- formed building mass that reinforces the linear nature of the site. GONZALEz GOODALE ARCHITECTS 19 Reference: DeAnn Johnson, Director /323.260.3428 Grace Bon, AW323.260.2444 Context: The context was an aging campus that lacked coherence and usable central social space. A diverse program included renovation and addition to the campus library, a new classroom complex, renovated administrative offices, and re- design of covered circulation and open space throughout the campus. Challenge: The challenge was to effect the diverse program of additions and renovations in a way that would both provide enhanced, technologically equipped function, and re -shape the social spaces of the campus at the same time. 6. R E F E R E N C E S EMUHSD (EL MONTE UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT ROSEMEAD HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSION & RENOVATION ROSEMEAD CA DATA RENOVATION OF 27 ACRE CAMPUS CIRCULATION 8 LANDSCAPE 3,1400 SQUARE FOOT 2 -STORY CLASSROOM BUILDING 18 CLASSROOMS REPURPOSING OF SEVERAL OF CLASSROOMS AS CAREER TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION MEDIA LAB, SMART CLASSROOMS, AND LEARNING WALLS Response: In using new building form, in concert with re- shaped campus circulation routes and judicious use of mature landscape, we were able to create a for more socially cohesive campus, centered on a re- designed main quad. Philosophically, virtually all outdoor campus space should —and will— become usable social space. The buildings are both contextual with the original modernist campus, and bold/ contemporary in their fresh use of color accent. GONZALEZ GOODALE ARCHITECTS 20 Reference: Anthony M. Ortega, Assistant Superintendent Business Services 1626.333.9005 Context: The existing campus is an early 1960's predominately one-story 'finger plan' campus, with an architecture of brick veneer and plaster buildings. The landscape of the central campus has reached significant maturity. 6. R E F E R E N C E S EMUHSD (EL MONTE UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT) ARROYO HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSION & RENOVATION EL MONTE CA DATA RENOVATION OF 41 ACRE CAMPUS CIRCULATION & LANDSCAPE 34,028 SQUARE FOOT 2 -STORY CLASSROOM BUILDING 20 CLASSROOMS EXPANSION /RENOVATION OF EXISTING LIBRARY REPURPOSING OF SEVERAL OF CLASSROOMS AS CAREER TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION Challenge: As many 'finger plan' campuses, Arroyo High School lacked cohesive outdoor social spaces, with the exception of its central quad area, which was spacious and well- treed, albeit not conducive to student gathering. The architecture was generally without accent and the interiors without adequate natural light. Response: The new classroom building responded to a lack of campus social space with U- shaped courtyard, addressing the entry of the existing library. Ringed by a 2 -story arcade, with sculptural stairs on each end, this courtyard will be consistently activated by student circulation. The arcade piers and stair -walls reprise the brick architecture of the campus without mimicking it. The CTE projects each engaged career - specific technologies. These additions, along with new landscape design, elevated the character of the campus to a collegiate level. GONZALEZ GOODALE ARCHITECTS 21 Reference: Anthony M. Ortega, Assistant Superintendent Business Services /626.333.9005 6. R E F E R E N C E S CITY OF LONG BEACH 2760 Studebaker Rd. Long Beach, CA 90815 Sandra J. Gonzalez, Manager, Planning & Development Bureau Parks, Recreation & Marine - 562. 570. 3210 /Sandro.Gonzalez @longbeach.gov Anna Mendiola, Park Development Officer, Department of Parks, Recreation & Marine - 562.570.3165 CITY OF ARCADIA 240 W. Huntington Dr. Arcadia, CA 91066 Don Penman, City Manager - 626. 574 .5401 /dpenman @ci.arcadia.ca.us CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE 4373 Park Terrace Dr. Westlake Village, CA 91361 Raymond Taylor, City Manager - 818./06.1613 /ray @wlv.org CITY OF PASADENA 1360 East Del Mar Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91 105 Segun Abegunrin, City Architect - 626.744.6784/818.437.8452 ( cell) /s beg unrin @cityofposadeno. net Cynthia Kurtz, former City Manager, now President & CEO of San Gabriel Valley Economic Partnership 626.856.3400/CKurtz@valleyconnect.com CITY OF MONROVIA 415 S. Ivy Ave. Monrovia, CA 91016 Scott Ochoo, City Manager - 626.932.5500 Tito Hoes, former Deputy City Manager, now with City of Azusa, Public Works Director/ Assistant City Manager - 626 .812.5254 /thaes@ci.azusa.ca.us CITY OF ROSEMEAD 8838 E. Valley Blvd. Rosemead, CA 91770 Frank Tripepi, former City Manager, now President & CEO of Willdan Financial Services 951.587.3500 CITY OF EL MONTE 11333 Valley Blvd. El Monte, CA 91731 Rene Bobadilla, City Manager - 626.580.2089 Juan Mireles, former City Manager - 626.945.9696 Dave Gondek, Senior Deputy City Attorney - 626.580.2013 CITY OF CULVER CITY 9696 Culver Blvd. Culver City, CA 90232 Mark Winogrand FAICP, formerly City Manager, now Principal of Planmark Associates - 310.915.0001 / venicehome @dslextreme.com GONZALEz GOODALE ARCHITECTS 22 z7l Y � .� � z� -z �, "�nF zn H / / § \ � _ } EL . «,! � .� � z� -z �, "�nF zn H / / § \ � _ } . «,! 2� }{ � \\ :- � .� � z� -z �, "�nF zn H / / § \ � _ n R ➢"e 3 �5 YP.8'Ym P.vo o4'S . S•$` -` F°.m.afc• ^ `� ° 2@ m nLi Cc� ° �� v �Ec °� Y aff. ^ '@-uxEmf .. S8?a3m ^'s z m= 53- xs z ' 2 ••E "�Q 5 °oeSq�a °v a-'c SS �s EaRY .•-, "3 _ _pRa•38$ 8 v� a ° E c �'�A m E • � mpEg m o� z �'RZ _ _e 5 " a° a- ° z o= $ ' @ ao S ^S ai .fo3ei D oo9 -SE c S a- a42`Fz m2 ¢ @_q.`'.: - `y Peq o'� E csd° °s RS _ R. i v g 2 i�B? � -HW ma .. 5 3 „ c3 � s e 6Cnna cYmo 5^�e ��o §d = a ac xgtom'<P 3E 338 =T_ - �. °P _3 � a�E� "�o�e F �� 8 uv�c ^� �m _ ` fig=„ • � os' sa �' � €mss 1 fR aiSY 80 yt3 ia R3 ° ' a 3 $- R 5 eo see 's 3n ° s g C = Ea'a m 3 'oa R =E _sue o 3 - a _ - a° ., gym -_ S - v a v v ° m � m° • _ v n w m s� d w 3 6 c 1 F W T m T T D 8 . F E E P R O P O S A L HOURLY RATES GONZALEZ GOODALE ARCHITECTS Principal $235.00 Project Manager $170.00 Project Designer $170.00 Project Architect $170.00 Project Captain $120.00 Senior Concept Designer $120.00 Interior Designer $175.00 ........................................ ............................... BRANDOW $I JOHNSTON, INC. (STRUCTURAL) Principal $200.00- $240.00 Associate Principal $150.00 - $180.00 Project Manager $130.00- $170.00 Project Engineer $110.00 - $120.00 KHALIFEH 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. (MECHANICAL) Principal $195.00 Senior Engineer $150.00 Engineer $125.00 ........................................... ............................... OMB ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS, INC. (ELECTRICAL) Principal $195.00 Senior Engineer $150.00 Engineer $125.00 ........................................... ............................... LAWRENCE R. Moss & ASSOCIATES (LANDSCAPE) Principal $150.00 Senior Associate $135.00 Sustainability Coordinator $150.00 Senior Implementation Designer $115.00 Architectural Designer $100.00 Architectural Designer 1 $95.00 Architectural Intern $85.00 Secretarial /Clerical $80.00 ....................................... ............................... Design Engineer $90.00 - $120.00 REVIT /CAD Designer $120.00 - $130.00 REVIT /CAD Lead Tech. $100.00 - $105.00 REVIT /CAD Technician $70.00 - $90.00 Designer /Drafter Secretarial $110.00 $58.00 Designer /Drafter Secretarial Associate Office Support $110.00 $58.00 $115.00 $ 95.00 * These hourly rates would be utilized to determine fees for additional services that would be performed on an hourly basis. GONZALEZ GOODALE ARCHITECTS 25 a ll -^ - fi�i ; RAW �„ Archite 279 West Seventh Street Telephone: 310-832-2681 Government Services San Pedro, CA 90731 -3321 Facsimile: 310 - 831 -4656 www, boaarchitectu re.com February 2, 2011 Chris Marcarello, Deputy Director of Public Works City of Rosemead 8838 E. Valley Blvd. Rosemead, CA 91770 SUBJECT. RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER EXPANSION AND FAPADE IMPROVEMENTS ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES Dear Chris Marcarello: BOA Architecture/ Government Services is a California S- Corporation and an architecture firm that is pleased to submit its statement of qualifications for ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER EXPANSION AND FAPADE IMPROVEMENTS ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES. BOA is an expert on public projects as well as the process and procedures to expedite municipal projects. With our 20 years of project experience with the City of Rosemead, we feel BOA Architecture and its design team are most qualified for this contract. We believe our project team can best provide the City the requested services for the following reasons: ■ We Understand the Project Our experience in the community center facilities, especially with this particular building, coupled with our existing knowledge of working on similar projects, will be a definite asset in professional architectural services to the City of Rosemead. ■ We Will Give Your Project the Highest Priority BOA will commit its staff and resources, to complete the project to your schedule. BOA offers personal and direct involvement by the firm's principals throughout the design process. We consider our team an "extension of your staff." It is only by working together as a "Team" that schedules can be met and quality of documents assured. ■ Our Approach is Proven Our goal is that your projects will be "on time" and "on budget," and that the constructed facilities exceed your expectations for function, durability, ease of construction, efficiency, and accessibility. We have provided a detailed written methodology of our quality control systems and project management systems for your review. Our two decade relationship with the City of Rosemead is a testament to our high quality services and fair fees. ■ We Have Extensive Experience in Similar Municipal Projects We have provided an extensive list of similar projects successfully completed by BOA. Many of these projects are directly related to aspects of your current Rosemead Community Recreation Center project. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this statement of qualifications. We hope that our proposal communicates our enthusiasm and the strengths of our firm, project team, and approach. We are excited about the opportunity to work with the City of Rosemead again on this important assignment, which will continue to be a source of pride for your community. Respectfully submitted, t4 _ City • • • Rosemead Community Center Expansion & Facade Improvement Program February 2, 2011 Table of Contents Cover Letter 1 Table of Contents 1. Understanding Scope of Services 2 2. Methodology and Work Plan 2 3. Experience and Qualification of Firm 12 4. Key Personnel 23 S. List of Sub - consultants 24 6. References 24 7. Time Schedule 24 B. Fee Proposal 25 Submitted by: LO�p Architecture Archi eef Services 279 West Seventh Street San Pedro, CA 90731 � o / Architecture LJOLr�1 Gov ernaient5ervrces 1. Understanding Scope of Services 2. Methodology and Work Plan Rosemead Community Recreation Center BOA Architecture Expansion and Fagade Improvements 1. Understanding Scope of Work City of Rosemead 2. Methodology and Work Plan BOA Architecture /Government Services, one of Southern California's leading and most innovative government design firms, is a full service architectural firm located in San Pedro, California. With 50 years of continuous practice, the firm's professional staff of architects, planners, and design specialist has designed and master planned over 1, 900 projects for over 50 different municipalities / public agencies. BOA is proud of its role in the evolution of municipal/ public works building type design. BOA has designed numerous new public facilities and major additions / renovations to existing public facilities. The staff of BOA has designed over 2,900 projects within our five decades of architectural practice. BOA also has extensive experience in renovation projects for the purpose of repair and maintenance for government clients. We have a comprehensive and time- tested in -house program to evaluate client needs and generate concept / feasibility studies. Since 1961, BOA has been designing civic /government facilities for a variety of public clients, including the federal, military, state, county, municipal governments and school districts. While deadlines, budgets, and quality control are of primary concern to the client and the architect, each project affords BOA another opportunity to improve the synthesis of function, space, and aesthetics. Understanding that all government facilities must balance individuality and function, BOA strives to provide innovative, specialized solutions to the design issues facing the clients and user groups, architects and engineers. We pride ourselves on being problem solvers and helping to resolve the design problems unique to each project. The principals and staff at BOA each take a responsive, active part in every project designed. BOA is small enough to offer a direct, personalized service to our clients yet large enough to undertake any sized project. Two principals participate in each phase of every BOA project, constantly contributing their own special skills, special talents and experience. Consistent with our philosophy of personalized service, the principals are directly responsible for all phases of the project. The entire technical staff at BOA (personnel that will be involved in the design and production of your project) have been employed and working together for a minimum of 5 years. Senior project architects have been employed at BOA for a minimum of 20 years. The resultant teamwork has increased production efficiency, and an excellent record for meeting schedules and budget parameters. 1. Understanding the Scope of Services BOA Architecture / Government Services is a California S -Corp. architecture firm started in 1961. The majority of the clients we have are from the public sector, ranging from local municipalities, counties, state, Federal and the US military. Our 50 -year experience and longevity is a testament to the excellent service we provide to our clients. The City of Rosemead has been a valued client of BOA since 1990. In the past two decades, we have provided quality services for various projects located in the City. Our first project with the City was the new concession stand /restrooms at Garvey Park and the last project was repair work at Garvey Senior Center and RCRC. We completed approximately a dozen projects for the City throughout the years. BOA completed two additions at the Rosemead Community Recreation Center. The first project completed in 1993 was a new men /women restroom and storage on the southeast side of the center for senior citizens. The second project completed in 2003 was a boy /girls restroom at the daycare section of the center. By virtue of our familiarity with uniquely positioned to provide design and construction services in a cost - effective, efficient manner. Mr. Anthony Wu, Principal Architect will be involved in this proposed project. He was closely involved in all City of the facility, BOA is Rosemead Community Recreation Center E Expansion and Fagade Improvements City of Rosemead Rosemead projects and will lead the design and construction team for this project. He also has a familiar and close working knowledge of this particular building. We understand that there will be an addition of 2,500 — 3,000 SF to be added to the RCRC. This building has a generous amount of open space on the south and the west side. This addition would be one -story in height and of wood construction. The architecture style would match the existing yellow face brick and wood parapet paneling, unless a new fagade for the entire building were to be done. 2. Methodology and Work Plan BOA Architecture 1. Understanding Scope of Work 2. Methodology and Work Plan Methodology BOA's methodology and work plan are based upon our extensive past experience in preparing comprehensive construction documents for municipal projects using a Multi- Discipline Design Team. In addition to full architectural services, including Site Assessment, Schematic Design, Design Development, Construction Documents, and Construction Support, the Multi- Discipline Design Team comprises of specialists in the following fields: • Topographic/Land Surveys • Structural Engineering • Mechanical and Plumbing Engineering • Electrical Engineering • Lighting Design • Landscape Architecture • Geotechnical Investigations • Environmental Services • Water Resources Management • LEED Design • Traffic Flow • ADA Compliance • Security • Cost Estimating • Needs /Feasibility Analysis • Space Planning • Value Engineering /Cost Controls • Occupational & Env. Health & Safety Each discipline will be led by its respective project manager. BOA's project manager will be the liaison between the design team and the City of Rosemead. The goal of our management philosophy is to accomplish a well - designed project that exceeds client expectations, while matching the budget and delivering on time. Our techniques of management encompass the ideals by which professional and efficient services are achieved. Our project management approach is characterized by the following considerations: Design /Management Integration Successful projects require the fusion of the design disciplines with those of management; they must have common goals and an integrated process. This is best achieved by appointing leaders with mutual respect and extensive relevant experience on similar projects. BOA will have Mr. Anthony J. Wu, Principal Architect, as the Project Manager -in- Charge on a full -time basis. His extensive 21 years of government facility project experience, understanding and relationship with the City of Rosemead makes him the natural selection. It is his task to help establish the appropriate vision and see through its successful realization. Client Participation Design goals cannot be realized without the thorough understanding of the Client's needs. The early involvement of the Client, users and the consultants will be continued throughout the construction process. The Project Manager will ensure that the efforts of the team are always addressed to the specific Client. The understanding and involvement of the Client will extend to appointed representatives from the City of Rosemead in a mutually productive partnership. The Design Team is familiar with municipal type projects. Teamwork and close coordination among our staff, consultants, and the Client are essential to a successful project. In the case of the City of Rosemead, the timely 1993 Rosemead Community Recreation Center Restroom & Storage Addition Rosemead Community Recreation Center BOA Architecture Expansion and Fagade Improvements 1. Understanding Scope of Work City of Rosemead 2. Methodology and Work Plan participation and response of the A/E team are critical for a successful project. The Design Team will be responsible for ensuring a high degree of coordination and high standards of construction quality. A major priority of the A/E Team will be to establish a continuing dialogue with the users, government plan check/inspection, and representatives of interested parties, so that our products reflect community goals. Specialist Expertise In order for a project is to be designed and constructed to exceed conventional standards and to meet the needs of the future, the involvement of specialists, as either permanent members of the team such as engineering consultants or intermittent specialty advisors is essential. Our consultants have extensive and most up- to -date resources. The management of the design process encourages the participation of such specialists and plans for the appropriate timing of their contribution Conlinulty The understanding of the project needs and the resultant design goals must be maintained throughout the project's duration. In the construction phase, it is necessary to make certain that the original intent of the Client and designer are realized in the final built product. The key members of the team, under the leadership of the Project Manager will be responsible for the direction of the project throughout the construction phase. Similarly, programming and planning members will participate in construction administration to ensure continuity of design intent. Quality Assurance BOA and its consultants are collectively dedicated to the concept of personalized Client service professionalism, excellence in design, cost - effectiveness, and timely delivery. All personnel at BOA possess many specialties in the complexities of the individual phases of the design and construction processes. The quality assurance program for the project will draw on these skills to assist the team in attaining its goals for a design of vision that delivers the maximum functional solution to the user that addresses the needs of the Client and does so with the most efficient construction process. In addition to the team's internal quality control process, peer specialists will review the construction design solution to ensure an optimum solution that also addresses applicable codes and standards. The following describes the quality control and coordination methods utilized by BOA and related consultants to ensure project success: BOA has an established Quality Control and Coordination program that is based on three mechanisms: The Quality Control Manual The manual documents, activities, tasks, and deliverables are to be achieved in each phase of work. Checklists are included and, at the completion of each phase, are approved by the Project Manager. The manual also includes exemplary forecasts for meetings, programs, schedules and agendas. Quality Control Reviews t Mt Quality Control Reviews occur prior to submittals and at keypoints in the project schedule. During these reviews, documents (e.g., construction detail, clarifications sketches) are checked by an experienced, a licensed architect who has had major experience in the design of similar projects to ensure a "questioning character" in _ this process. Major emphasis is placed on constructability and on satisfying the operational requirements of the user. As a part of _ this project, BOA will commit Mr. Anthony Wu as quality control e officer. Mr. Wu will be ideal for this role because of his extensive construction document / construction experience and his vast, City of Rosemead and municipal experience. This involvement is formalized as part of the quality control manual procedures. We are committed to providing quality design and construction administration services and trust that our past work is indicative of that commitment. Rosemead Community Recreation Center BOA Architecture Expansion and Fagade Improvements 1. Understanding Scope of Work City of Rosemead 2. Methodology and Work Plan Process BOA will utilize computerized documents throughout the design phase. Currently, 100% of the firm's construction documents, including consultant drawings, are electronically generated by using Autocad 2011 and Revit. We demand the same level of dedication and proficiency from our consultants. This has resulted in new and higher standards of coordination and document quality. The development has also evolved simultaneously with a management/design process that exploits video - documentation's great potential. The result is the precise documentation of existing field conditions at an early stage, providing greater opportunity for quality control involvement. The Quality Control program has resulted in a high quality set of documentation for projects being at or under budget, meeting the original project schedules and having a record of excellent construction success that reflects our document quality and understanding of the construction process. Proiect Documentation Project Documentation is a result of systems set up in BOA's Project Management Manual. This guide on how to run a construction project effectively and efficiently, developed from more than forty years of architectural practice, is firm but flexible; responsive to the specific dynamics of specific projects, but unyielding in its insistence on full documentation, responsiveness, and performance. Key elements include: Meeting Minutes Regular meetings (scheduled bi- weekly) with all members of the team including the client, are essential to good communications. Full meeting minutes document the result of those meetings and are used to keep all Construction Team members and the Client Team posted regarding decisions. Project Checklist This is initiated at the beginning of each project, before the start of construction and serves as a guide of all elements of the project to be completed, and as a central index for all project related material. It is continually updated and reviewed during regular project audits. Product File and Technical Project Checklist Initiated at the commencement of design and before the start of construction, this checklist serves to record all considerations and decisions regarding building materials and methods to be used in construction. It also becomes a comprehensive guide for construction administration. Consultant Coordination The consultants play a very critical and active role in all phases of the work. The Project Manager leads in coordinating the efforts of consultants with the help of: • Frequent coordination meetings or phone conversation. • Clearly defined scopes of work which define separation of responsibilities and eliminate gray areas. • Milestone Outline, prepared specifically for each project which clearly defines consultant performance expectations for the construction phase. • Project Schedule coordinated with a milestone outline, reviewed and signed off by all consultants. • Frequent use of photos and videos in construction with subconsultants. Construction Administration Our fifth component in our approach is the most important. BOA understands the importance of efficient construction administration. To ensure that the design and technical intent are conveyed to the contractor and that the project knowledge is available throughout this phase, the construction administration is led by the Project Manager. For the City of Rosemead, Project Manager, Ms. Sun Jung will personally review RFIs, change orders, shop drawings as well as attend all job site meetings. Her extensive experience on past Los Angeles County and City of Rosemead projects makes her a natural selection. A Senior Project Manager from each of our consultants will be assigned to assist the Project Manager and ensure that the highest standard, procedures and methods of construction are employed. Special emphasis will be placed on details and methodology. BOA will assist the City of Rosemead in the development of a Construction Phasing Plan to ensure that on -going Rosemead Community Recreation Center BOA Architecture Expansion and Facade Improvements 1. Understanding Scope of Work City of Rosemead 2. Methodology and Work Plan operations of community center facilities will have minimal disruptions. We anticipate that as many as possible functions will be open during construction. BOA is well aware of the need for the City's need to remain operational during construction. We have had good results recently assisting the Cities of Rosemead, Long Beach and Torrance, the County of Los Angeles, and other Clients on renovation projects that require facilities to remain open and operational during construction. The primary reason for BOA's success is that on -going operations of the building was an important goal initiated prior to the start of construction. The following pages is our Work Plan, which outlines how the six components in our approach are applied into the design /construction phase for the City of Rosemead project. Value Engineerino Value engineering is defined as a systematic approach to analyzing capital projects to obtain maximum value through a reduction of cost and or increased functionality of facility /structure design. Value engineering can also be defined as an approach to identifying methods of reducing life cycle costs without sacrificing reliability and or efficiency. In simple language, value engineering is an independent conceptual review of a project design. The cornerstone of effective value engineering is the generation of a large number of ideas that may be developed into feasible changes. For large, complex projects, one of the best methods of obtaining a wide spectrum of ideas is to utilize an interdisciplinary team of specialists as well as a key member of the original design team and a representative of the Owner. During the pre- design and early design phases (i.e. 30 %) of the Work, alternative designs and their relative costs are developed and subjected to comparative analyses to determine cost effectiveness life -cycle costs, safety, ease of maintenance, and quality standards. It is important to note that the value engineering review process is not restricted to economic savings and often results in significant improvements in function, reliability, maintainability, as well as reduction in complexity of design and other attributes. Early implementation of value engineering tends to produce greater results, but opportunities for improvement can occur at any stage of the Work. Changes are more readily adopted before detailed design work has taken place. BOA has an established approach used in making value engineering reviews. BOA has completed numerous design projects for LA County and for many other public entities. For a complex project requiring a thorough value engineering review process, such as your project, the following phases will be used: Information Phase During this phase, the Value Engineering Team reviews the proposed design to familiarize them with the available factual information related to function, design, construction techniques and costs. The Value Engineering Team can use a variety of techniques to target elements of the project that have a high potential for cost savings or improvement including fast diagramming and functional analysis. Creative Phase Following the identification of project elements with a high potential for cost savings and /or improvement, the Value Engineering Team begins the creative effort which is sometimes referred to as "brainstorming', to develop alternate methods of providing the basic function. Defined criteria and requirements are challenged and the broadest range of alternatives is considered. Evaluation Phase During the evaluation phase, alternatives that are unsuitable are rejected. The remaining alternatives are ranked and the advantages /disadvantages of each are identified. The most promising alternatives are selected for further study and refinement. Development Phase The most promising alternatives, identified during the Evaluation Phase, are developed into more complete Rosemead Community Recreation Center BOA Architecture Expansion and Fagade Improvements 1. Understanding Scope of Work City of Rosemead 2. Methodology and Work Plan proposals with detailed costs and a summary of relevant information. Cost comparisons, as estimates of savings, are made on a total life -cycle cost basis which includes both construction cost and maintenance /operation costs. Presentation A presentation of the alternatives developed by the Value Engineering Team is made to the Client, End User, Consultant Team /Original Designers, other decision makers and /or concerned parties. Input from the original designer is considered prior to a final decision by the Client as to the actual design to be used for the project. Report At the Client's request, a formal report of the Value Engineering Study can be prepared. This report generally contains a complete listing of the alternatives developed, study background information, and a basis for the recommended changes. The report may also summarize the life -cycle cost savings that would be achieved through use of the recommended change(s) as well as any other suggestions developed by the Value Engineering Team during the value review process. Our Team will use established VE Study concepts as guidelines to provide an organized team effort to analyze the functions of systems, structures, equipment, facilities services, and supplies. Our goal will be to achieve the essential functions desired by the Client at the lowest life cycle cost together with the required performance, reliability, quality and safety. Work Plan 1. PRE - DESIGN PHASE Prior to any design work, BOA will meet with the City of Rosemead project managers that will be involved in the project along with other City of Rosemead staff. We will seek information on proposed programs, design parameters, scope of work, etc. BOA demands a greater emphasis on the Pre - Design Phase to allow greater Client and User input. We want the Client and User to be the "driving force" for architectural design in this project. It is only through these meetings and personal contact that we can know and expect what the Client wants. One can anticipate numerous Client and User meetings with the Design Team during the Pre - Design Phase. We will also collect available data on Planning and Building Code restrictions, future expansion issues, easements, utilities, structures, safety hazards, programs, maintenance issues, access, paths of travel and information relevant to existing conditions of the existing facility. Perform field investigation for site opportunities, building addition /expansion opportunities, constraints, and potential construction problems. We will also review all existing drawings, as- builts and project requirements for plan check and approvals as well as obtain current building code standards, goals for ongoing operations during the construction phase preferred materials and equipment. Evaluate existing structures, conditions, programs, maintenance practices, appurtenances, etc. at the existing site. Upon completion of the Pre - Design Phase, BOA will compile its findings into a written Work Plan/Scope of Work from which the project will be designed and design evaluations will be based. The following is an outline of the Pre - Design Phase. Initial Meeting with Client • Establish protocol and lines of communication • Statements of Goals and Objectives • Review schedule & establish significant milestone dates Program Appraisal • Review Assessments of Facilities Report. Review functional program Verify functional relationships Confirm area allowances • Update program changes • Interview user groups & Client staff • Program Appraisal Report Site Appraisal • Review site information • Walk site and document observations • Photograph and document site conditions and adjacent areas • Establish survey, soil reports, as -built drawings, asbestos /hazardous materials and other Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Facade Improvements City of Rosemead BOA Architecture 1. Understanding Scope of Work 2. Methodology and Work Plan environmental reports. • Study planning /context constraints • Document zoning requirements Appraise and document connections /access • Document expansion requirements modifications. Accessibility Compliance Audit Cost Plan • Assessment of programmed needs • Budget review and analysis • Resolution of scope in relation to budget Develop cost plan and estimate Work P /anIScope of Work • Compile Client and User input • Compile materials and equipment list Contract Negotiation and Approval • Ascertain Client's requirements • Determine form of contract and review • Review possible modification to Client's standard contract form. • Define Architect's scope of work Client Meetings • Establish frequency and pattern of attendance with an emphasis to meet as often as necessary. 2. SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE Based on the approved Work Plan /Scope of Work, schematic layouts of the proposed improvements will be prepared for the City of Rosemead with associated cost. Input will be received from the Client and Consultant Design Team. Upon design refinements, consensus will be reached as to the preferred schematic layout. BOA would again, emphasize the importance of Client and User input in this phase of the project. The following is an outline of the Schematic Design Phase. Issue Project Documents • Program • Budget & Cost Models • Scheduling • Project Directory • Protocol • Work Plan Initial Meeting with Consultant Team • Review project documents • Establish consultants' goals • Establish CAD format and files standards Initial Meeting with Client • Review Schematic Design Schedule • Establish important dates and participants • Establish design goals • Review scope of work Concept Studies • Field measure of existing building(s) /site • Prepare CAD as -built drawings, if there are none or minimal • Schematic Design options for site plan, floor plan, exterior elevations • Design options, include "green" options • Study connections /access • Review construction methods • Check concepts against cost plan • Compile consultant input • Compile on -site findings • Develop project directory • Establish quality control procedures and . Establish project numbers and accounts • Review legal and agency requirements Inter -Team Interviews • Establish space planning goals • Refine selected options Phase Development & Documentation • Establish building plans • Proceed with internal and interteam QC review • Establish building sections and elevations • Establish building systems • Develop overall site design • Address "special" issues, e.g., accessibility code & design for stomVroof water drainage • Develop preliminary room/space criteria • Develop preliminary equipment layouts • Outline Specifications Issues Backgrounds to Consultants • Provide translations where necessary • Review options with Client G Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Fagade Improvements City of Rosemead BOA Architecture 1. Understanding Scope of Work 2. Methodology and Work Plan Complete Phase Documentation • Preliminary Quality Control (QC) review • Coordinate all disciplines Cost Analysis Review options with Client Preliminary Review • Obtain schedule commitment Review areas of concern Quality Control Review • Final review by Quality Control Officer • Sign off by Project Manager Formal Acceptance by Client • Notice to proceed with Design Development Value Engineering • Review all options with Client • Issue agreed changes to all consultants Client Meetings • Scheduled every week or as needed 3. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE BOA will further develop and refine the approved schematic design site plan, floor plan, and exterior elevations, structural, lighting, HVAC, and plumbing will be further researched and established. An outline of the Design Development Phase is as follows: • Internal and inter -team QC review • Establish building sections and elevations • Develop room plans at 1/4" scale • Establish building systems • Address accessibility compliance issues • Coordinate room /space criteria and equipment Review Schematic Design • Reconcile budget vs. scope • Incorporate value engineering review changes • Issue any new directives Initial Client Meeting • Review Design Development schedule • Establish "key" dates and participants • Confirm work plan • Review consultant performance and coordination Develop Design • Final detail planning • Develop building systems • Select key materials and products • Develop typical construction methods and details • Research materials and specifications Finalize site, and utilities Prepare LEED documentation Phase Documentation Establish building plans Issue Backgrounds to Consultants • Provide translations where necessary Complete Phase Documentation • Preliminary QC review • Coordinate all disciplines Cost Analysis • Review options with Client Quality Control Review • Final review by Quality Control Officer • Sign off by Project Architect Formal Acceptance by Client • Notice to proceed with Construction Documents Constructability Review • Interteam review • Project Manager sign -off Value Engineering • Review all options with Client • Issue agreed changes to all consultants Client Meetings • Scheduled every week or as needed Rosemead Community Recreation Center BOA Architecture Expansion and Fagade Improvements 1. Understanding Scope of Work City of Rosemead 2. Methodology and Work Plan 4. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PHASE Once all proceeding phases of design have been approved by the Client and the project cost has been reconciled, BOA and its consultants will develop and prepare construction documents and specifications for implementation. All construction documents will be developed on AutoCAD 2011. The following is an outline of the Construction Document Phase. Review Design Development • Reconcile budget vs. scope • Incorporate value engineering changes • Issue any new directives Initial Team Meeting • Review Construction Documents schedule • Establish review dates and participants • Confirm work plan • Review consultant performance & coordination Develop Work Plan • Confirm critical path Review consultant issues and coordination • Determine deliverables • Cartoon all drawings • Confirm construction contract type and procedures • Research specific issues and materials • Confirm CADD files and sequence • Establish coordination procedures Phase Documentation • Check final drawing list against QC manual • Review final drawing list • Schedule final CAD effort with CAD coordinator • Coordinate room /space criteria and equipment Issue Backgrounds to Consultants • Check all translations before proceeding with consultant work Cost Analysis • Review options with Client • Estimates at 50% and 90% Client Reviews • 30 -day Client and local agency reviews Quality Control Review • Final review by Quality Control Officer • Sign off by Project Manager Final Coordination • Check completeness of all discipline documents • Consultant coordination • Code compliance • Check all equipment requirements Value Engineering Options • Review all options with Client • Pick up changes on all documents Client Review and Acceptance • Scope and budget • Value engineering items Client Meetings • Scheduled every two weeks • Meetings at 50% and 90% 5. BIDDING ASSISTANCE PHASE BOA will provide bidding assistance for our Clients. A meeting will be held at the proposed construction site with potential general contractors. A review of the project requirements will be communicated to the participants. Prebid Meeting • Establish project parameters • Review design and proposed construction work • Provide plan clarifications if needed through issued addend ums 10 Resolve any outstanding issues Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Fagade Improvements City of Rosemead BOA Architecture 1. Understanding Scope of Work 2. Methodology and Work Plan 6. CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION PHASE BOA will provide construction administration including regularly reviewing the progress and quality of the contractor's work, preparing punch lists, and recommending final acceptance of the project. Based on known working relationships, BOA will work with the construction manager to coordinate a timely construction schedule and construction phasing. The following is an outline of the Construction Administration Phase. Preconstruction Meeting • Establish protocol • Review construction procedure and safety protocol. • Review general contractor schedule • Assist in testing and inspection appointments • Establish submittal schedule and procedures • Establish observation procedures • Schedule meetings and site visits • Confirm procedures regarding field orders, clarifications, instruction bulletins, change directions, and change orders. • Prepare sketches and cost for change orders • Shop drawing review - Architect / Engineer to review shop drawings and product data submitted by the contractor to verify that the proposed item will be in conformance of the design drawings. • Substitutions • Legal procedures • Labor issues Bonds, insurance, etc. • Drawing updates, record documents • Payment requests and certification • Construction schedule and update • Quality and standards • Samples Delays and defects • Agency procedures • "Green" or LEED Compliance Issues Site Meetings • Agenda and minutes • Compile progress photo /video of construction progress. • Provide site observations of field conditions and materials in support of the Client • Action list • Bi- Weekly meeting scheduled Administrative Procedures • Review RFIs, change orders, submittals, payment requests • Assist in plan interpretations Punch List • Preliminary and ongoing • Final Beneficial Occupancy • Verify conditions are allowable for phased occupancy of the project • Verify safe conditions for all users Final Completion and Inspection • Initiate review of equipment start -up, and facility power -up. • Provide punchlist of incompleted items and follow -up on the completion of the deficient items. Manuals, Warranties and Record Drawings • Review submitted manuals, warranties, and contractor as -built drawings. • Provide as -built drawings to City of Rosemead on AutoCAD format and /or PDF format. Maintenance and Operational Instructions • The general contractor will provide training to City of Rosemead maintenance personnel in the maintenance and operation of the newly installed equipment. • Training will be conducted with the approved operations manuals. • Final acceptance by the City of Rosemead 11 o p Architecture L J a Government Services 3. Experience and Qualification of Firm Garvey Park Sheriff Substation & Community Center Client: City of Rosemead, CA Date completed: 2000 Architect Team: Anthony J. Wu, Edward Lok Ng Construction Cost: $430,000 Project Description: BOAArchitecture provided professional design servicesto renovate an existing community center building into new facilities for; a daycare center, multi - purpose room, conference rooms for community and police use, and a sheriff substation to service the local community. The Police facility included public reception desk, STAR office, a police report writing office, deputy training and instruction room, suspect interview room, probation office, gun lockers, and site security, and secure vehicle storage. The existing interior of the building was totally demolished and new spaces were created. Existing HVAC /electrical systems were modified and enhanced for a new use. ADA- compliant upgrades included parking spaces, accessible parking spaces, and accessible restrooms. Scored split -faced concrete block and bullet -proof Lexan acrylic glazing were used to deter possible vandalism, yet provide visual access. Architecture — Renovation 12 BOA Architecture Relevant Experience BOA Architecture L Construction of public reception Relevant Experience Los Angeles County Sheriff Substation & Rosemead Public Safety Center Client: City of Rosemead Date completed: 2006 Architect Team: Anthony J. Wu Construction Cost: $750,000 Project Description: BOA Architecture provided professional tenant improvement design services to renovate and convert an existing community center building into a Police function. It became a Los Angeles County Sheriff Substation and a Public Emergency Response Headquarters for the City of Rosemead. The facility included public front desk, STAR office, a police report writing office, deputy training and instruction room, suspect interview room, probation office, gun lockers, and site security. No jail facilities were provided at this facility. Mechanical/electrical systems were renovated and emergency generator was installed. Architecture — Renovation 13 't vuuiUMUxo as2=111 AAW.M . i `•� i73ilc'W��' MK T IM `v oou Y L Construction of public reception Relevant Experience Los Angeles County Sheriff Substation & Rosemead Public Safety Center Client: City of Rosemead Date completed: 2006 Architect Team: Anthony J. Wu Construction Cost: $750,000 Project Description: BOA Architecture provided professional tenant improvement design services to renovate and convert an existing community center building into a Police function. It became a Los Angeles County Sheriff Substation and a Public Emergency Response Headquarters for the City of Rosemead. The facility included public front desk, STAR office, a police report writing office, deputy training and instruction room, suspect interview room, probation office, gun lockers, and site security. No jail facilities were provided at this facility. Mechanical/electrical systems were renovated and emergency generator was installed. Architecture — Renovation 13 Garvey Park Pool Renovation City of Rosemead, California The City of Rosemead, Garvey Park Swimming Pool Facility was in a state of disrepair. BOA Architecture / Government Services was asked modernize the pool and facility. The Olympic -sized swimming pool had been empty for years; the pumps, filtration and chlorination systems were not functioning. A total overhaul of all of the systems was done, and new automatic pool filler valve system was installed. The locker / restroom building was also completely modernized. ADA access from the street to restrooms to pool was incorporated into the design. New benches, showers, toilet facilities, lavatories were installed, and a new space heating and water heating systems were installed. Project Name Garvey Park Pool Renovation # eldle f(i)0, 00 Description of Contract A/E Design for renovating an existing swimming pool facility Contract Start Date 2004 Contract Completion Date 2006 Description of Services Provided BOA provided full A/E services Subconsultants involved ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: Edward Rhee Engineering; Los Angeles, Calif. MECHANICAL ENGINEER: Albert Chu & Associates; Los Angeles, Calif. li a City of Roseme d Client Project Coordinator Michael Burbank, Director of Parks & Recreation (retired) Phone ( 626) 298-6671 (Sandy Benicia — Parks & Rec.) Address 8838 E. Valley Blvd. Rosemead, CA 91770 Members tlfprojed team who Anthony Wu werked tin these projects Jerry Sturm Edward fig Architecture — Renovation 14 Project: Bartlett Senior Center, Torrance, CA Client: City of Torrance, 3031 Torrance Blvd., Torrance, CA 90509 Contact: Gene Barnett, Director - Recreation & Parks (310) 618 -2938 Architect Team: Edward Lok Ng; project manager /project designer Project Description: This new two -story, 13,000 square foot facility provides both recreational and social needs of senior citizens in Old Downtown Torrance. It was designed specifically for seniors with limited mobility, and exceeds ADA code requirements. Accessibility features included; an elevator, automatic opening doors, liberal use of handrails /grab bars, and an open plan to facilitate accessibility. An entry courtyard shaded by trees welcomes visitors and seniors. A full commercial kitchen serves over 300 hot meals per day. To bring the project within a tight budget, the 5000 sf multi - purpose room was constructed over 6 existing championship quality shuffleboard courts. Great effort was made to preserve the shuffleboard courts in both the design and construction phases. CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) features include, CCTV, access controls, and natural courtyard surveillance. The building exterior was designed to be architecturally compatible with the adjacent "Art Deco" style museum. A Senior Advisory Committee was organized to formulate security and accessibility goals, and provide user input in the design process. The courtyard allowed seniors to participate in recreational activities or "people watching" in a secured lush /shaded outdoor space. Architecture — Renovation 15 BOA Architecture Relevant Experience Sierra Madre Recreation Center ADA Uparade — Sierra Madre, CA 19a(1) RELEVANT PROJECT -TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State): Sierra Madre Recreation Center ADA Upgrade 611 E. Sierra Madre Blvd Sierra Madre, CA 91204 Project Owner's Name & Address and Project Manager's Name & Phone Number: City of Sierra Madre 232 W. Sierra Madre Blvd. Sierra Madre, CA 91204 Contact: Bruce Inman Tel: (626) 355 -7135 19a(2) RELEVANT PROJECT -YEAR COMPLETED -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: 2003 19a(3) RELEVANT PROJECT -BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE: PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE: PROJECT MANAGER: PROJECT DESIGNER: STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MECHANICAL ENGINEER: ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: Project Description: Thomas P. Black, R.A Anthony J. Wu, R.A. Edward Lok Ng, R.A. DKM Engineers Albert Chu & Associates Applied Engineering Services BOA Architecture was commissioned by the City of Sierra Madre to provide ADA upgrade design services to the Sierra Madre Recreation Center. The City is contemplating constructing a second floor over the existing ground floor. Therefore, the renovation on the ground floor needs to anticipate a new second floor. A redesigned women's restroom can function as a future elevator shaft. New walls are strategically located to accept future floor joists. Also, on a separate project, BOA Architecture studied the facility to determine the feasibility of a second floor addition and provided a feasibility study report. Cost - benefit Analysis Architecture — Renovation i[d Banning Park Senior Center - Wilmington, CA I - I I 19a(1) RELEVANT PROJECT -TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State): Banning Park Senior Center Pacific Coast Highway & Eubanks Avenue Wilmington, CA 90744 Project Owner's Name & Address and Project Manager's Name & Phone Number: City of Los Angeles Department of Recreation & Parks 200 N. Main Street, Room 709 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Contact: Mr. Paul Tsang Tel: (213) 647.9435 Fax: (213) 617 -0439 1 ga(2) RELEVANT PROJECT - YEAR COMPLETED - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: 2001 19a(2) RELEVANT PROJECT - YEAR COMPLETED - CONSTRUCTION (If applicable): 2002 19a(3) RELEVANT PROJECT - BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE: PROJECT MANAGER: PROJECT DESIGNER: STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MECHANICAL ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: Project Description: Thomas P. Black, R.A. Anthony J. Wu, R.A. Edward Lok Ng, R.A. DKM Engineers Albert Chu & Associates Applied Engineering Services BOA Architecture was retained by the City of Los Angeles to design a new 12,000 sJ. one -story facility near Banning Park, adjacent to the historic 120 -year old Banning House. The new facility addresses recreational and social needs of senior citizens. BOA worked closely with the local District Council office, park user groups, and park preservation groups to resolve competing programmatic goals and to develop solutions, including appropriate design alternatives. Alternate exterior designs were proposed for client and Department review. BOA participated in public outreach meetings to gain community input and consensus. The final, approved design includes elements that are compatible with the adjacent historic Banning House and park landscape. The new building's scaling and massing differentiate it from original structures on -site and help it avoid taking on a false historical appearance. Vandal resistant measures have been incorporated into the design of the building which includes arts & crafts rooms, a large multipurpose room, billiards room, kitchen, administrative offices and accessible restrooms. An enclosed private courtyard was included in the design. Tall ceilings provide an open feeling to the facility. Architecture — Renovation GIN After- new Theater entry structure Project: Stage 2 Theater Client: City of Torrance Date completed: 2004 Architect Team: Edward Lok Ng, Anthony J. Wu Construction Cost: $400,000 Project Description: BOA Architecture was commissioned to design a Tenant Improvement renovation project to transform an existing storage warehouse building into a new "Black Box'type theater that would have a seating capacity of 100 people and flexible stage options. It became a cozy environment for small stage productions. Since this project had a very tight budget, it design in such a way that it incorporated as much of the existing structure as possible. The new front entry fagade was designed to mimic and recall the adjacent Cultural Arts Center, but also articulated sensitively to be a unique entry statement. New theater lighting and acoustic engineering and other architectural treatment enhanced the theater experience. The existing electrical and HVAC systems were salvaged and reconfigured to save on cost. This project was "on time" & "on budget." Architecture — Renovation 18 BOA Architecture Relevant Experience After- Grand Opening Day — Stage Two Theater Befoi 19a(1) RELEVANT PROJECT -TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) ILWU (International Longshore and Warehouse Union) Local 13 - New Dispatch Hall Los Angeles City Harbor Department 1500 E. Anaheim Street, Wilmington, CA 90744 Project Owner's Name & Address and Project Manager's Name & Phone Number: Los Angeles City Harbor Department 320 Golden Shore Drive, Suite 300, Long Beach, CA 90802 Frank Ponce De Leon, Tel: (310) 544 -1942 19a(2) RELEVANT PROJECT -YEAR COMPLETED -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: 2007 19a(2) RELEVANT PROJECT -YEAR COMPLETED -CONSTRUCTION (If applicab /e): 2009 19a(3) RELEVANT PROJECT - BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE: PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE: Edward Lok Ng, Architect PROJECT MANAGER: Jerry Sturm, Architect STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Johnson & Nielsen Associates MECH, PLUMBING, ELECT ENGINEER: DYNE Electric Project Description This $15,000,000 (construction cost), 35,000 sq. ft. Dispatch Hall /Auditorium project will provide a new administration and dispatch center /meeting hall for the ILWU Local 13's 15,000 membership. The exterior and interior design will be compatible with the PMA's corporate image and "harbor and nautical" theme of the ILWU. This will be achieved by use of colors and shapes and textures common to the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles. The front of the building will look like an ocean going ship. Project scope also includes a 3000 occupant dispatch /meeting hall with a "state of the art", large screen computer display of Port job assignments and computer dispatching of Union Workers. The Dispatch Hall will have wall mounted folding bleachers, folding stage and loft seating to accommodate very large union meetings. Also included; dispatch offices/workrooms, full commercial kitchen, restrooms, and conference rooms. Unique to this project, is that the property lines straddle both the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. BOA assisted the ILWU with the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) process and expedited plancheck approval through both the City of Los Angeles and City of Long Beach. The new Offices, with views to the nearby marina and channel, will include, executive offices, labor library, administrative offices, staff kitchen, and executive conference rooms. An extensive user audit was completed to ensure proper functional relationships of each Union service and the Dispatch Center the fastest dispatch of available union workers. Sustainable Design includes, natural ventilation with high- efficiency HVAC, recycled building materials, Photovotiac renewable energy, and extremely low water usage. Our innovative sustainable design will lead to a LEED Gold Certification. Architecture — Renovation LEED /Sustainable Design Value Engineering 19 ILWU Local 13 New Dispatch Hall - LEED Gold Certification AFTER— transformed a parking lot into central courtyard AFTER — Main Street Entry Project: Sa -Rang Kingdom Dream Center, Anaheim, CA Client: Sa -Rang Community Church Contact: Michael Kim 714 - 797 -4601 Completed: 2009 Architect Team: Edward Lok Ng Cost: $10 million Project Description: BOA Architecture was commissioned to provide architecture and engineering services to totally renovate six existing buildings totaling 80,000 s.f. BOA converted 6 office buildings into church use. Sitework includes new driveway entries and landscape/ hardscape design for a new central courtyard for outdoor gatherings. The renovated buildings will house the church's Youth Ministry functions, with classroom and worship facilities for pre -K through high school, as well as food service facilities; snack cafe, dining, and full commercial kitchen. Three main Worship Halls accommodate 1600 worshippers. Design work to convert the campus to serve these functions included new mechanical systems, significant upgrades to the existing plumbing /electrical systems, acoustics, and lighting systems, upgrades to provide ADA compliance, significant reconfiguration of partitions and interior layout of spaces, new roof screens, upgrades to fire rated corridorstfire sprinklers, and all new enhanced finishes throughout. BOA worked closely with the church's building council and other members of the community to ensure that the project satisfies the long term needs and goals of this large and rapidly growing church community. SaRang Community Church is the largest Korean church outside of Korea and has a membership of 12,000 people. Architecture — Renovation 20 BOA Architecture Relevant Experience County of Los Angeles Second District Supervisor Field Office Exposition Park, Los Angeles, CA - - - -- I g� � 1 I \I — Qo o we. �e l L °I 'lJ It W -7 b -.Wm W I W I - „.. m°Pf • W n --- ---- --- --- --- ----- - - - --- --.o--________________-__---_- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 19a(1) RELEVANT PROJECT -TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State): County of Los Angeles Second District Supervisor Field Office — Exposition Park Office Renovation 700 Exposition Park Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90017 Project Owner's Name & Address and Project Manager's Name & Phone Number County of Los Angeles / Internal Services Department 1100 N. Eastern Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90063 John Thompson, Project Manager Office: (323) 267-2244 Email: JThompson @isd.lacounty.gov 19a(2) RELEVANT PROJECT -YEAR COMPLETED -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: Current (2011) 19a(2) RELEVANT PROJECT -YEAR COMPLETED -CONSTRUCTION (if applicable): Current(2011) 19a(3) RELEVANT PROJECT - BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE: PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE: Anthony Wu, Architect, LEED AP PROJECT MANAGER: Sun Jung Construction Cost (Est.): $900,000 Project Description: BOA was contracted to provide design and construction administration services to renovate an existing State of California building for the new field office of County of Los Angeles, Second District Supervisor Mark Ridley Thomas. The rough layout of the new offices was prepared by the Real Estate Division of the Chief Executive Office, County of Los Angeles. BOA refined the designs and prepared the construction documents in a very short six weeks, due to the very tight schedule, at the same time, maintaining a. high quality of work. All construction documents were completed on time and the Los Angeles County project managers were very appreciative of the effort. The project is currently moving into construction February 2011. Architecture — Renovation Project Scheduling Construction Administration 21 o //�� Archit OOI Government Services 4. Key Personnel Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Fagade Improvements City of Rosemead BOA Architecture 4. Key Personnel NAME: Anthony J. Wu, LEED AP, Executive Vice President ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT: Principal Architect YEARS EXPERIENCE - TOTAL: 23 (2011) YEARS EXPERIENCE - WTH CURRENT FIRM: 21 (2011) FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State): BOA Architecture I Government Services - 279 West 7' Street, San Pedro, CA 90731 EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION): Bachelor of Architecture / Calif. State Polytechnic University, Pomona -1989 CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATEAND DISCIPLINE): 19921 Licensed Architect, #C23485, State of California 20071 Licensed B- Contractor, #892378 State of California 2009 / USGBC LEED -AP Certification OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.): Mr. Wu has considerable experience in coordination and management of projects from schematics to construction. His experience includes a variety of projects such as government facilities, schools, single and multi - family residences, tract homes, commercial office buildings, shopping centers, theaters, ecclesiastical buildings, seismic damage assessment and repairs. Mr. Wu maintains constant communications with clients, consultants, contractors, and others involved in the project. He is excellent in project management, building /site surveys, design, construction documents, specifications writing, construction administration, and cost estimating. He has also worked with large institutions, such as the U.S. Postal Service, school districts, state, municipal and county governments, and the U.S. military. Mr. Wu has extensive hands-on experience with seismic retrofitting / repair projects with the Los Angeles Unified School District, United States Postal Service, and other clients. He is also certified as a State of California, Office of Emergency Services (DES) Earthquake Damage Assessment Building Inspector and is LEED AP certified. Recent Project Exoerience (partial): City of Rosemead (since 1990): Garvey Park — New concession stand & restrooms Garvey Park - Renovate Community Center and new Sheriff Substation Garvey Park — Renovate Pool Building and Swimming Pool Rosemead Com. Rec. Com. Ctr — New restrooms & storage at senior center Rosemead Com. Rec. Ctr. — New BIG restrooms at daycare Rosemead City Hall — New public restrooms Rosemead Park — New concession & Restrooms Rosemead Park— Renovate Pool Building and Swimming Pool Zapopan Center — New Public Safety Center & Sheriff Substation Garvey Senior Center — Renovations & Repairs County of Los Angeles, CA: Supervisor Mark Ridley Thomas, LA County, Office Renovation Fire Station #71, New fire station, Malibu, CA Jesse Owens Rec. & Swim. Facility, Los Angeles, CA El Monte Airport Admin. Building — El Monte, CA Rancho Los Amigos Medical Ctr, Parking Struct. — Downey, CA Fire Station #44, Renovation, Duarte, CA Los Angeles Unified School Dist. — City of Los Angeles: Olive Vista Middle School - Earthquake Repairs & Retrofitting Topeka Elementary School - Earthquake Repairs & Retrofitting Cohasset Middle School - Earthquake Repairs 15+ Modular Classrooms, Various campuses City of Torrance, CA: Stage Two Theatre — New 100 seat performing arts theater Torrance Police Department— New TPD ancillary services building, renovated upper management floor, security upgrade to public lobby Torrance Airport — New General Aviation Center, Two new executive hangars and renovated 133 existing hangars Torrance Fire Department — Renovation and addition of two fire stations Torrance City Hall — Renovation of East W ng and City Managers floor, new city engineering department, renovation in city services yard 22 Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Facade Improvements +- City of Rosemead BOA Architecture 4. Key Personnel NAME / ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT: Arammaru Kim / Project Manager YEARS EXPERIENCE — TOTALANITH CURRENT FIRM: 4.5 (2011)13.5 (2011) FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State): Same as Anthony Wu EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION): Bachelor of Architecture — California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 2007 CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATEAND DISCIPLINE): NCARB — progressing toward architect's license OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc): 2007 - DSA Certification for access compliance plan check 2009 - Received certification of completion for 3 -day training course for Autodesk Revit Architecture 2010 2010 - AutoCAD 2010 Certified Professional Mr. Kim has vast experience in a variety of different projects including military-based facilities, schools, ADA renovations, facade improvements, government facilities, and residences. He has a well- rounded knowledge in all aspects of design, and construction. He is also very proficient in the use of AutoCAD for the design and development of construction documents, and is currently using AutoCAD 2011. He is also very proficient in the use of SketchUp, a 3D modeling /sketching program, and is also proficient in the use of 3D Studio Max and AutoCAD's 3D modeling tool. Recent Project Experience (partial): Military Projects: Vandenburg Air Force Base — Fall Protection Beale Air Force Base Shoppette — New Retail Beale Air Force Base Car Care Center — Renovation U.S. Embassy, Jamaica — Expansion Ft. Campbell — New Dormitory Bunker Air Force Base study design County of Riverside, CA: Facade Renovation for 5 commercial buildings NAME / ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT: Sun Jung / Project Manager YEARS EXPERIENCE — TOTALNMTH CURRENT FIRM: 3 (2011) 13 (2011) FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State): Same as Anthony Wu EDUCATION (DEGREEANDSPECIALIZAT / ON): Bachelor of Architecture — California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 2008 CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE): ADA Related Projects: County of San Bernardino — Site Accessibility Improvements 5 San Bernardino Courthouses — ADA Survey 10 DMV's — ADA Survey County of Los Angeles, CA: LA County 2 n Dist. Supervisor Field Office Renovation Olive View Hospital — Radiographic Installation World Famous Dog House — Facade Improvement ISD HQ — Abatement & Renovation NCARB — progressing toward architect's license OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.): Miss Jung has vast range of experience in all parts of the architecture profession from proposals to final punchlist on a project closeout. Her experience is mostly in the government sector, from local cities to federal government. She maintains constant communications with clients, consultants, contractors and others involved in the project. She is excellent in project management, building /site surveys, design, construction documents, specifications writing, construction administration, cost estimating, and CAD production using AutoCAD 2011 for construction documents. Recent Project Experience (partial):: United States Postal Service: Moorpark MPO — New Post Office Design /Build LA Bulk Mail Center- Interior Renovation Industry P &DC — Restroom Renovation West LA VMF — Structural Investigation San Luis Obispo MPO — Facade & Parking Upgrade City of Torrance, CA: Fire Station #3 — Addition and Renovation Communication Info. Tech. Shop — Renovation Wilson Park Warehouse — Renovation County of Los Angeles, CA: LA County 2" Dist. Supervisor Field Office — Renovation Fire Station #17, Whittier — Renovation Fire Station #71, Malibu — New Fire Station USC Medical Ctr. Coffee /Gift Shop — Renovation Other Projects: Sarang Community Church — Campus Expansion Beale Air Force Base Shoppette — New Retail ILWU Local 13 — New Dispatch Hall Construction 23 ma Ar chitecture Government Servr'ces 5. List of Sub - consultants 6. References 7. Time Schedule Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Fagade Improvements City of Rosemead BOA Architecture 5. Sub - consultants 6. References 7. Time Schedule List of Sub - consultants Johnson & Nielsen Associates Structural Engineering 911 South Primrose Avenue Monrovia, CA 91016 Graham Stanley & Associates Landscape Architecture 3601 Serpentine Drive Los Alamitos, CA 90720 PBS Engineers Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Engineering 2100 East Route 66, Suite 101 Glendora, CA 91740 References Converse Consultants Geotechnical/ Environmental 222 East Huntington Drive, Suite 211 Monrovia, CA 91016 CLIENT CONTACT PHONE/EMAIL: Los Angeles County Mr. John Thompson (323) 493 -6382 Internal Services Dept. Project Manager JThompson @isd.lacounty.gov Los Angeles County Mr. Robert Powell (213) 974 -4243 Chief Executive Office Senior Architect bpowell @ceo.lacounty.gov City of Rosemead Mr. Michael Burbank (ret.) (626) 569 -2163 Dept. of Parks & Rec. Director of Parks & Rec. Contact Sandy Bernica U.S. Postal Service Mr. Amit Bhatia, Architect (650) 615 -7207 Pacific FSO Administrative Services amit.bhatia @usps.gov U.S. Postal Service Mr. Ho Won Suh, Architect (619) 758 -7422 San Diego District Administrative Services howon.suh @usps.gov Time Schedule We anticipate the design phase will take four months and construction 10 months. Any unanticipated event, extra services, review by other entities, or additional requirements beyond our control will increase the schedule at no fault of the Consultant. 24 ma o / Arc Government Services 8. Fee Proposal BOA Architecture Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Facade improvements City of Rosemead 8. Fee Proposal 2011 Fee Proposal f calculating fees for any project fixed fee based on percentage of BOA Architecture implements two methods o construction, or hourly rates for staffing positionsnn d agreement with clients, one of the two methods is utilized for billing. a pplicable for a period of 90 o which this schedule is attached. We reserve the right to modify these rates upon based The fee for our services will be basea d on the charges listed below. All fee quotations are days from the date of the proposal 30 days advance notice. often BOA Fe w times Often, BOA is m me an estimate of AIE fees, cc renlovationsland additions, onsf fees can Therefore, 1.5 mes the am re, the schedule below is used to determine below. proposals and lexi consideration may Upon agreement, aoee ate just fi at on based on onu n s al a schedule. The a schedulor do t include allowances for fees. With the app p be given to negotiate up to the maximum and FF &E. planning/ programming, value engineering, CCF CONSTRUCTION COST 10.0% $ 0 _ $ 200,000 $ 20,000 plus 9.00% in excess of $ 200,00 $ 200,001 $ 500,000 $ 47,000 plus 8.5/0 % in exin excess of $ 500,000 $ 500,001 - $ 1,000,0 $ gg,500 plus 8.00c ess Of $ 1,000,00 $ 1,000,001 - $ 2,000,00 $169,500 plus 7.5 /° in excess of $ 2,000,0 $ 5,000,0 $394,500 plus 7.0% in excess of $ 5,000,00 $ 2,000,00 - $10,000,000 ................. $ 5,000,00 - $744,500 plus 6.5 %in excess of $10,000,0 $10,000,001 and over personnel Hour Rates These rates are for extra services: ARCHITECT RATE $185 Principal Architect $150 Associate Architect $130 Project Manager $125 Project Designer $110 Senior Designer $100 Senior Technical $85 Intermediate Teff nical $80 Other Tech. Sta $70 Clerical These rates a pply I to time in excess if required in the interest of the project, will be charged at the above rates I to regular time and travel time in the continental United States. A maximum travel time of erg hours will be charged in any day. Overtime, Su a of four hours p nda s and holidays. er the weekday event of I be made o d for professional personnel and and dime on Saturdays, es for other personnel. Overtime will apply of eight hours per weekday char conditions or other factors beyond our control, a standby 9 personnel. Reimbursable expenses are in addition to personmea meals cost of travel (airline tickets or mileage costs at Trove per mile), car rental, etc. Such expenses to be reimbursed at cost by Client. Travel expenses to include, but not limited to hotel, lodging, 25 RATE ENGINEER $175 Principal Engineer $145 Project Manager Designer$135 Project/ Senior $125 Engineer $110 Designer $85 CADD Operator Construction Administrator $ Word Processor/ Clerical $770 0 Other Tech. Sta $70 Clerical These rates a pply I to time in excess if required in the interest of the project, will be charged at the above rates I to regular time and travel time in the continental United States. A maximum travel time of erg hours will be charged in any day. Overtime, Su a of four hours p nda s and holidays. er the weekday event of I be made o d for professional personnel and and dime on Saturdays, es for other personnel. Overtime will apply of eight hours per weekday char conditions or other factors beyond our control, a standby 9 personnel. Reimbursable expenses are in addition to personmea meals cost of travel (airline tickets or mileage costs at Trove per mile), car rental, etc. Such expenses to be reimbursed at cost by Client. Travel expenses to include, but not limited to hotel, lodging, 25 COPY NO 00 Cover Letter Onyx Architects, Inc. February 2, 2011 96 N. Sunnyslope Ave., Suite 100 Pasadena, CA 91107 Dale Brown,AIA Chris Marcarello Principal Director of Public Works City of Rosemead �� V (626) 405 -8001 x102 8838 E.Valley Blvd. F (626) 405 -8150 Rosemead, CA 91770 ©© dbrown0onyxorchitects com re: Rosemead Community Recreation Center Expansion and Fa4ade Improvements Architectural Services www.onyxorchitects.com Dear Chris: The city of Rosemead is a community that is served well by its government. The city has always proactively provided resources that can be used by its citizens. Onyx Architects has appreciated our past opportunities to provide community resources and hope to continue the legacy. Thank you for the opportunity to submit our qualifications and proposal. The ONYX team has endeavored to provide you a thoughtful and thorough proposal. The Onyx team provides the city: • Significant experience with the city of Rosemead • A proven I experienced team who have worked together on numerous projects • Team approach I Willingness for the project to dictate project delivery • A team member I Larry Moss the Civic Center Plaza landscape architect which facilitates the coordination between projects • A creative and practical design philosophy • THREE DIMENSIONAL MODELING CAPABILITIES from conceptual design thru project completion using RFVIT I ACAD The ONYX team has included all of the requested services and work product as well as other recommended or optional services. The scope and fee: • Includes / recommends other services we believe are likely required based on our past experience • Is NEGOTIABLE I Design has not started and we do not yet know how the scope will manifest on the site and in relationship to the existing structure • However - can be refined with further discussions during an interview process • Will be able to be tailored to meet the goals of the city budget and the project We look forward to an interview when we can discuss the project and how we can work together in more detail. Please do not hesitate to call or email with any questions. Sincer D n,AIA Prncipal Our Mission is to collaborate in improving the quality of life through architectural and environmental design. Page I SECTION Understanding Scope of Services Below is a summary of the services and work product for all phases. In addition the Onyx team is suggesting a pre- design / project initiation phase to define the project elements prior to beginning work and to study the possibility of how this project and the civic center plaza can efficiently be executed together. Refer to SCOPE OF SERVICES I METHODOLOGY I WORK PLAN for detailed descriptions and schedule of each of the Phases. PHASES ONE +TWO +THREE Services to be performed The Onyx team will complete ALL of the services required in the RFP. In addition — we believe there are additional services that would benefit the project. Specifically these services involve: I The LEED / Sustainable design work should begin in Phase One and be confirmed in each of the subsequent phases. We have included a DRAFT/ PRELIMINARY LEED checklist for the project. �� 2 Provide more detailed site plan and floor plans for the initial site assessment in order to fully understand options, ©© 3 Provide a conceptual cost estimate in Phase One Site Assessment. 4 Verify funding sources in Phase One in order to understand any potential constraints, 5 Closely coordinate and execute design in conjunction with the current civic center plaza effort, The Onyx team includes Lawrence Moss +Associates, the same landscape architect. We envision the ability, together with the city, to execute a thoughtful and appropriate redesign of the civic center. Work Product I Deliverables The Onyx team will provide ALL of the work product required in the RFP. In addition — we believe there is additional work product that would benefit the project. Specifically this work product includes: I Provide a conceptual cost estimate in Phase One I Site Assessment, 2 Coordinated community recreation / civic center plaza documents during each phase of the projects, 3 Phases One and Two I Value engineering and bid alternate recommendations. 4 Site Visits to coordinate the work and installation procedures of various trades. In particular trades which have a high degree of interface with other trades and trades related to waterproofing. Our Mission is to collaborate in improving the quality of life through architectural and environmental design. Page 2 O LL 0 33" — « « - -- 0 V o 0 02 W N N N N i O E O O _ E 'F ._ N 0 0 u a ao`i o_ n `a Y m W g M m« o a w e = o= o O E u ° o m a o a O ° u u m 0 V ° a a� N S Y C C C W 5 W C q Y T O O d d .� C O O j vi L W- u V 0 N O 7 V� g q H u u H d y N YW 'C O q > L N N N N N bl N W W W W W d m m m a w �� w . d . j crvn a Q F� = `O `o Y ww w w w� o a ' c 8 y u A « ° ° >> w o 0 0 0 o u '^ u° o d a G a °^ °^ °^ °^ .E E E a a p S c c E c 9 T o o a o K w Y i E E °' < o o « «« .«. t 'a 42 o o o o ° o : o ° o „? .°�. w w w w u o o E J L on m N m m m m< o m m m o En En En En W N q C O O S S S S a O O N N O C C C C W a d W W d B O V U V J J J � O O •> ' VI V L c a e a ° ee a ° e c ° e ° e ' YYV N C Q P n m N N O O O - - - - - - - - r• - - - - W O N ° i y c E a c c c 'p o > 'p 'p p w a s a a a a 0 m •� N U N W N N a N a i o � Q r o 0 0 �° 0 C o u c c n x 0° ++ `> D Fin E no > ° w E m o o_ w d O W Y w d O C m dl V m C E Ti o O u o o' `o A E i.. o a C j U« L N J 1 p N Y T O C V C q C q y N W o 0 0 o u .5 5 o ° o .n r E E E m c w `o c m u a m a m m m m o K p. d o o H H M o 's w n n °°. n < c z z o a m o d o. 9 4 tr W w c y V j J V L O T N T g E dIC O O N N T i O Q p a A A A A W N w w C a C $ a U w � 3 E C Z y O O L N O C K F f f f Q d W W 0 1' T i K O N C N C C O N ry N U J O C W O m ° 0 a d d a' a' o o v a a a i w w w « w « W v u v 3 N w w o z E v�> >> w w m ry m m C ` E `w `v N c a a E o 6' z a 'c T w w 3 3= a d w Q E E °1 v ° V w c c 2 p u d h N w o o E E a E �n n m' v c m a a m an w ° c c n r r w :' N N o m ' = ry u m u � `aa as �„ xx W 3 3 w F w 0 w` w`�t� "'m' 'u� O v m c Lij LU -H- ° N Y V >� Y N V Y Y Y m �n ° N V Y N Page 3 SECTION Methodology + Work Plan WORK PROGRAM A complete WORK PROGRAM is best illustrated by bringing together the following in a single document: I PROCESS of the project I Illustrate how the community recreation center project will be managed and executed. Include the process of possibly integrating the project with the civic center plaza project. 2 SCHEDULE of the project I Illustrate the individual tasks and the critical path order for each task in order to accomplish the project goals. 3 TASKS I Show each task required. 4 WORK PRODUCT/ DELIVERABLES I List each deliverable for all RFP project phases and other recommended or optional phases / tasks. Onyx has provided a detailed PROCESS / SCHEDULE /WORK PRODUCT forthe project. Refer to SECTION 7 1 Schedule. TECHNIQUES The TECHNIQUES can best be expressed by PLANTHEWORK +WORKTHE PLAN. Onyx believes strongly in getting all team members together to plan the work at the outset of the project. Refer to Project Initiation Phase in SECTION 7 Schedule. Items to clarify at project initiation include but not limited to: I. Schedule I Milestones 2. Funding Source Requirements 3. Tasks 4. Deliverables 5. Project Program I Spaces I Relationships I Expectations 6. Coordination with site utilities / city staff and departments / civic center plaza design Our Mission is to collaborate in improving the quality of life through architectural and environmental design. page 4 SECTION Methodology + Work Plan Onyx recommends the city consider bringing the civic center plaza and community recreation center projects together. The GOAL of this tactic is to: I Create a dynamic yet functional civic center I appropriate to the City of Rosemead. 2 Create a civic center where the whole is greater than the individual parts. 3 Determine the possibility of bidding the project together with two coordinated phases. This should reduce project construction costs and improve the overall design quality and coordination. 4 Onyx believes that the community recreation center project can be designed and ready for biding in the same time -frame as the civic center plaza. Onyx suggests integrating the projects creates efficiency by: 1. Time I schedule overlapping meetings — which saves time for consultants and city staff. 2. Cohesiveness I Allowing for design integration + coordination. 3. Cost I Opportunity to bid as single package with coordinated phasing The measure of our ability to perform is our consistent past work. We encourage contacting our references regarding our performance on similar civic projects. Our Mission is to collaborate in improving the quality of life through architectural and environmental design. page 5 SECTION Experience + Qualification of Firm The Onyx team includes architecture, landscape architecture, structural engineering, mechanical, plumbing and electrical engineering and audio visual / sound control consultant. It is our understanding the City of Rosemead will be supplying the civil engineering services required for the project. Each of the Onyx team firms have personnel and project team expertise and experience in the required disciplines. We are proposing a senior team with significant experience. Onyx has worked with all of the team members on similar projects as well as many other projects over many years. The team members are excellent at maintaining project schedules, providing cost- benefit analysis, value engineering and bid alternate documents. LEED / sustainable design is an integrated function of all the firms. Onyx will work with all of our team consultants and directly with city staff and consultants in the general administration for all design and construction components of the project. Refer to the following experience matrix, project information, and resumes for more detailed firm and individual experience and qualifications. In addition, we recommend contacting our references. Our Mission is to collaborate in improving the quality of life through architectural and environmental design. Page 6 =I £ 3 € x "g a a m ' I¢ gSa 8 I• ag 3 z � mF� e i S9 I • u -; LI -- -- I •i' i F� y x _L.I_ • .II. I: ipa.ww.rm — I r I , _ I I a • •. _ �� 1 .. j JI ,a A.• s I � - I I ' I I, I I .I•L. I � , I li ,. L .I. . I I,c•.,u.u,.em 1 I III I_ I I _• _ I I T I T • • i • • •I I I • I• , � � SECTION Experience + Qualification of Firm Garvey Senior Housing + Community Center Client City of Rosemead Rosemead, CA Redevelopment Agency Onyx designed two separate buildings around a shared, socially interactive courtyard containing fountains, benches and gardens. A four -story structure provides 72 one - bedroom apartments for senia Each floor has a common lounge and the complex has a larger, community room and library on the main floor, A separate building houses a community center with a variety of multipurpose rooms and a daycare center A commercial kitchen and dining space is also part of the program.These rooms are used for adult education, special seminars, community and civic meetings, and family banquets. Rosemead City Hall Rosemead, CA Onyx worked with the City Council to understand present and future space requirements and logical departmental configurations and adjacencies. Working in council and staff study sessions, the design team collaborated with city officials to create a new addition that met the crtys design aesthetic, promoted easy access for citizens to do business and enhanced the entire City Hall complex. The design of the addition complements the original architecture and rationalizes the complexs relationship to existing parking, entry plaza and a veteran's memorial garden and monument. Key objectives that were met include the creation of a new citizen's welcome desk improved office facilities for city departments and the provision of new council offices with moms for meeting with constituents. As well, new facilities were provided to house an emergency operations center. Approximate Project Cost: $12 million Square Feet Community center - 11,000 Senior housing — 45,000 Scope ofMrk; Full architectural Completion Date: 2003 Functions: Senior housing, community center„ day care, parlang Client City of Rosemead Approximate Project Cost $1.4 million Square Feet 12,000 Scope ofWork: Full Architectural Completion Date: TBA Our Mission is to collaborate in improving the quality of life through architectural and environmental design. Page 8 SECTION Experience + Qualification of Firm Sierra Madre Recreation Center client Sierra Madre, CA City of Serra Madre There is anew 400 SF entry addition to the east side, consisting of an Approximate Project Cost entry lobby and two single accommodation restrooms.The facade $950.000 of the new addition has been designed to match characteristics Square Feet of the existing architecture. The scope of work involved several finishes -4,000 renovations, among them: replacement of the ceiling; replacement addition — 390 of light fixtures with compact fluorescents; new roofing system; new Scope of Work mechanical equipment for the kitchen, bathrooms and entry; ADA Full architectural modifications; fascia replacement; and refinishing of gym floor. building houses a community center with a variety of multipurpose Completion Date: moms and a daycare center. A commercial kitchen and dining 2009 Functions: Community recreation center Sierra Madre Hart Senior Center client City of Sierra Madre Sierra Madre, CA Onyx designed two separate buildings around a shared, socially Approximate Project Cost interactive courtyard containing fountains, benches and gardens. $425,455 A four -story structure provides 72 one - bedroom apartments for Square Feet seniors. Each floor has a common lounge and the complex has a 2,955 larger, community room and library on the main floor. A separate building houses a community center with a variety of multipurpose Scope of Work moms and a daycare center. A commercial kitchen and dining Full architectural space is also part of the program. These rooms are used for adult Completion Dare: education, special seminars, community and civic meetings, and 2010 family banquets. Functions: Senior/ community center Sierra Madre Memorial Park Restrooms Client City of Sierra Madre Sierra Madre, CA Onyx designed a new restroom facility for use in Sierra Madre Approximate Project Cost Memorial Park The design was compatible with the adjacent $120,000 historic senior center building, and located to minimize intrusion Square Feet into the park open space. After completion of design, the City 700 Council engaged Onyx to renovate the existing Hart Senior Center restrooms in lieu of the new structure. scope orwork Full architectural Initiation Date: 2001 Functions: Parka and Recreation facil Our Mission is to collaborate in improving the quality of life through architectural and environmental design. Page 9 SECTION Experience + Qualification of Firm Washington Park Improvements Client Troller- Mayer Associates Pasadena, CA for City of Pasadena A historic park was being renovated to reflect renewed interest in client native landscaping. Onyx Architects provided the design of picnic Approximate Cost $626558 trellises and informative display areas, and proposed a series of dressed -log shade ramadas. The native plant information display Scope oli area replaced a dark and unsafe former bathroom facility with an Full architecwral open and airy wood, stone and steel ramada.The displays were Historicalrehabllitation turned inside -out, so that visitors could face both the park and the Completion Date displays at the same time, while enjoying the shaded comfort of the 2007 log ramada. Careful grading preserved the historic river rock walls, Functions while providing alternate paths for accessibility. Recreation, outdoor education Heritage Square client Pasadena Housing Authority Pasadena, CA Onyx created schematic designs for a mixed -use affordable housing Approximate Project Cost development. NA California ranch buildings that once comprised the McNally Ranch. Scope of Work Onyx documented the condition of the structures remaining on the Master Planning 1890s ranch, prepared a Master Plan for the park and developed Conceptual Design Completion Date: TBA Functions: Affordable housing Neff Park Community Center Client City of La Mirada La Mirada, CA The City of La Mirada wanted a cohesive park with community Approximate Project Cost and youth centers, to be developed from the collection of historic $1.5 million California ranch buildings that once comprised the McNally Ranch. Scope o(Work Onyx documented the condition of the structures remaining on the Full architectural 1890s ranch, prepared a Master Plan for the park and developed Research I documentation construction documents for the complete restoration of the three Preservation services remaining structures and two residences. Onyx also completed HABS documentation Adaptive reuse HABS documentation for the bam. Seismic upgrades, new building Historic preservation systems and interior restoration were part of the building program. Master plan The barn, which had been severely damaged, was fully restored and Completion Date: adaptively reused as a city recreation facility and youth center. It was 1994 then added to the National Register District Functions: House museums, exhibit areas, arboieWm, multi -purpose space, kitchen Our Mission is to collaborate in improving the quality of life through architectural and environmental design. Page 10 SECTION Experience + Qualification of Firm San Gabriel Redevelopment Agency Client San Gabriel, CA City of San Gabriel The City needed some dedicated offices for its redevelopment agency. The City already owned some 1950s commercial /industrial buildings, and was hoping to transform part of the asset into attractive offices for the agency cost effectively. Onyx has had considerable experience on adaptive reuse within a tight budget It was essential to understand the character and available resources of the existing building. Features like the existing brick walls, the industrial skylights, and the old loading area canopy were brought into the design as key elements. New elements were designed to take advantage of these existing features while providing functional and sophisticated office space for the agency. San Gabriel Economic Development Consultant San Gabriel, CA Various projects for the San Gabriel Redevelopment Agency include specific project planning, design reviews, project area planning documents, and site specific design for development plans. This particular study examined proposed improvements on the site along with suggested alternative plans. The alternative plans provided as a means of expressing the City's design goals for the Redevelopment Area while addressing the specific needs of this particular site and business. O'Donnell Chevrolet site review San Gabriel Architecture + Preservation Consultant San Gabriel, CA Onyx Architects is working with the City of San Gabriel as its architecure and historic preservation consultant and assists the City the following: • Review project planning submittals for conformance to the City's design guidelines • Review renovation proposals for historic structures • Participate in public hearings • Participate in neighborhood design guidelines • Participate in review of new design ordinances • Assist City with small architectural projects — tenant improvements, etc. Approximate Project Cost $90,000 Square Feet 1,718 Scope ofWork Full architectural Completion Dote: 7011 Functions: Offices. conference area Client. Sari Gabriel Community Development Department Contact Jennifer Davis (626) 308 -2806 x4630 Scope ofwork: Design and site reviews Completion Date: Ongoing Client City of San Gabriel Comae' Carol Barrett. FAICP (626) 308 -2806 x4624 Scope ofWork Full Architectural Our Mission is to collaborate in improving the quality of life through architectural and environmental design. Page I I SECTION Experience + Qualification of Firm Edwin T. Powell Senior Center Renovation client Placentia, CA City or Placentia The former public library now being used as a senior center was Approximate Pmjea Cost in need of renovation, including ADA ramps and accessibility $445,000 upgrades, Additionally, the scope of work includes: new flooring, _ Square Feet electrical upgrades, phone line and internet accessibility to support 4,732 multiple computer work stations, upgrade of building electrical APProxrmateP$3million system including electrical outlets, interior lighting, and capacity to scope of%%rk support learning center, interior flooring for building, replacement Full architectural Historic preservation of all windows in the building, kitchen renovation and expansion, 45,000 expansion of the patio area creating an extended courtyard area Completion Date- for recreational activities, and replacement of roof and rain gutters, 2010 Functions: Senior/ community center Sierra Madre Congregational Church Client: Recreation Center I Multipurpose Building Sierra Madre Congregational Church Sierra Madre, CA Onyx worked with the church for entitlements related to the Master APProxrmateP$3million Plan and four initial phases of design and construction. Entitlements included site development, new gymnasium /muki- purphosebuilding, square Feet: two new meeting/classroom buildings, restoration of historic multi- 45,000 purpose and worship buildings, an outdoor courtyard, and activity Scope ofWork spaces. Master planning Full architectural Completion Date 2008 Ontario Redevelopment Agency Client Ontario Redevelopment Ontario, CA Agency Onyx Architects, as a consultant to the City of Ontario's RedevelopmentAgency, designed a new exteriorfora local appliance Approximate Project Cost NA store.The agency aims to increase the economic output of specific projects through facade enhancement and other incentives. The Square Feet exterior renovation includes facade material renovation, lighting, 8,000 storefronts, awning /eyebrow and signage. Limited site work and Scope ofWork landscaping was provided. Design consultant Completion Date: 2011 NO ©© Our Mission is to collaborate in improving the quality of life through architectural and environmental design. Page 12 SECTION Experience + Qualification of Firm LEED I CHPS I Sustainable Projects Central Region Elementary School No. 16 Owner. Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA unified School District The new two -story classroom building sits over a78-space parking garage. The classroom building will include an Early Education Square Feet Classroom Building 57.000 SF Center and a K -5 Elementary School with 675 children, four Fading Garage 27,000 SF Idndergarten classrooms, 23 classrooms for grades 1 -5, library, Multipurpose Bldg 9,300 SF administration offices, small group and special resource rooms, toilet rooms and an elevator. The single story Multipurpose Completion Dote: 2010 Building houses a multipurpose room, kitchen, faculty dining and lunch shelter. The project also includes site improvements, Approximate Project cost playground and landscaping. $34 million The school was designed to meet the Collaborative for High Performance Scope Work Schools criteria, which evaluate a school's energy efficiency as well as Full architectural its design, construction and operation. Fair Oaks at Walnut Mixed Use client Box Consulting Group, Inc. Pasadena, CA The project, on a 2.6 -acre urban site, involves the demolition of two Approximate Project Cost existing structures for a total 72,000 square feet for the creation of Withheld a mixed -use building site.The irregularly shaped site borders three Square Feet streets. Organized aground a spacious triangular-shaped courtyard, 200 Hotel Rooms 206,000 the building is U- shaped in plan.The primary entrance is an angled BO Residential Units I OO,OD) Restaurant/ Retail 7,500 six -story element set beneath an overhanging canopy and oriented Parking 344.000 to the intersection at Fair Oaks at Walnut. A major feature of the planning, design, entitlements, consti nabn dommerrF% building is the courtyard atthe ground floor. ..Accessibleto the entire Scope ofwork: Full architectural, entitlements, development, the courtyard functions as an inviting and intriguing project management design semi - public space. In addition, the second floor pool deck is open review services to sky. Designed to meet LEED Certification. Fast track project Certification, Completion Date: NA Fillmore + Raymond Mixed Use client Fillmore Raymond MOB, LLC Pasadena, CA Onyx designed a Mediterranean style three -stay building in the Approximate Pmject Cost tradition of the nearby Caltech university campus. The 70,000 $13.2 million square-foot medical building will have a complete orthopedic Square Feet surgery center. The project is also adjacent to a light -rail transit 110,000 stop, providing park- and -ride spaces for 160 transit users plus Scope of Work an additional 340 parking spaces. The site is about 1.5 acres in Full architectural, programming, an extended rectangular shape, providing design challenges and planning, design, entitlements, consti nabn dommerrF% opportunities.The parking garage that must serve the medical construction administration building as well as the transit users is transformed by the use of street level retail spaces culminating in a transit plaza at the side Compleuon Dote: 2009 of the site adjacent to the transit stop. Designed to meet LEED Certification, r_l Our Mission is to collaborate in improving the quality of life through architectural and environmertal design. Page 13 a z \\ � > x. . @ . {® \ / ® J C)© Zn\ / j \ \ \ \�\ �(x\\z\ Z : Ec >:E ME 9310 %0 -z §\ \ //\ ;)/ >Z1 �^/ / �� ! ;\ }(a) / zn §: .j;4,% ƒ§0 -M ®; ® M \;) /// \\ ) § a z \\ � > x. . @ . {® \ / ® J C)© Zn\ / j \ \ \ \�\ �(x\\z\ Z : Ec >:E ME 9310 %0 -z §\ \ //\ ;)/ >Z1 �^/ / �� SECTION Key Personnel Onyx has assembled a senior architectural and consultant team, with 25 years average experience. The Onyx / Consultant team members have worked together for many years. The architectural team as a part of Onyx or while with other firms have completed numerous civic I community center projects. Please refer to the RESUMES in THIS SECTION of each person for more detailed experience summary. In addition please refer to SECTION 3 j Experience as well. Dale Brown AIA j Project Principal / Manager Years with Firm I 10 1 Founding Partner. Dale will be a continuous point of contract for the duration of the project. As project principal / manager he is responsible for project quality and delivery. Assuring appropriate and adequate resources are provided to the project are a primary responsibility. Dale is very familiar with the city of Rosemead and the project site. Doug Joyce AIA j Project Designer Years with Firm I 10. Doug is the primary designer for the project. Doug is very familiar with the city of Rosemead and the project site. Doug will provide creativity in the pursuit of the best solution while working closely with the civic plaza landscape. architect. The goal is to provide a cohesive civic center. Mary Wu AIA j Project Architect Years with Firm 16. Mary is the project architect for the project. Mary has completed a number of community centers while a principal / partner of other firms. Mary is extremely detailed oriented and is responsible for the detailed content of the construction documents. Hrag Derhovagimian I Project job Captain Years with Firm 14. Hrag will be primarily responsible for the REVIT ACAD documents. Hrag is an expert in the use of REVIT for both design and construction documents, REVIT I ACAD allows the city to view three - dimensional modeling of the building from the beginning of design thru construction documents. Our Mission is to collaborate in improving the quality of life through architectural and environmental design. Page 15 Dale Brown,AIA Principal I Project Manager Our Mission is to collaborate in improving the quality of life through architectural and environmental design. Page 16 Project Experience • Rosemead Garvey Avenue + Community Center, Rosemead, CA — design of affordable housing project for seniors, built by the City of Rosemead • Rosemead Civic Center Master Plan, Rosemead, CA • Rosemead City Hall Addition & Renovation, Rosemead, CA — addition, interior reconfiguration and general renovation of the existing city hall • Rosemead Council Chamber + City Manager Office Renovation, Rosemead, CA • Sierra Madre Recreation Center, Sierra Madre, CA • Sierra Madre Hart Senior Center, Sierra Madre, CA • Siena Madre City Hall + Police Accessibility Entrances, Sierra Madre, CA • Sierra Madre Memorial Park, Sierra Madre, CA — design of new public facilities • Pasadena Washington Park Improvements, Pasadena, CA — new lunch shelters • Pasadena Heritage Square, Pasadena, CA — schematic design for Registration: mixed -use affordable housing California C -17744 • City of San Gabriel Alameda Corridor Extension Mission + Del Mar bridges, San Nevada 4049 Gabriel, CA — design of lower right -of -way tracks Nebraska A -1929 NCARB • San Gabriel Redevelopment Agency McGroarty office renovation, San Gabriel, Education: CA University of Nebraska, • San Gabriel Community Development Design Review Consultant, San Gabriel, Bachelor of Science in CA Architectural Studies, 1978 . San Gabriel City Hall Space Planning, San Gabriel, CA Professional Organizations: Los Angeles Conservancy, CaliforniaTowers, City of Riverside, Riverside, CA — conversion of a regional bank member headquarters into a mixed -use retail, commercial and govemmental offices Pasadena Heritage, member • Bobby Bonds Community Center, Riverside, CA — adaptation of a vacated, California Redevelopment historic junior high school to a community center in Riverside Association, member • Edwin T. Powell Senior Center renovation, City of Placentia, Placentia, CA Urban Land Institute, member Dale Brown is a founding partner of Onyx Architects. An award - winning designer, he Rancho Santa Anita Residents is actively involved in the firm's projects through his leadership of the Civic Practice Association Architectural Group. He is the Principal -in- Charge on all Civic Projects, providing guidance, Review Board resources and coordinating client communications. His diverse portfolio includes a wide array of civic buildings, large mixed -use projects, unique preservation plans, affordable housing and for public and not - for -profit entities. Dale's particular areas of expertise are in design, project management and project financing. He is active in civic affairs and stays current on the changing conditions impacting local government and development. He is a creative, "out of the box" thinker with a strong entrepreneurial mind set. Our Mission is to collaborate in improving the quality of life through architectural and environmental design. Page 16 Douglas D. Joyce 111, AIA Associate Principal I Project Designer Our Mission is to collaborate in improving the quality of life through architectural and environmental design. Page 17 Project Experience • Rosemead Garvey Avenue + Community Center, Rosemead, CA — design of affordable housing project for seniors, built by the City of Rosemead • Rosemead Civic Center Master Plan, Rosemead, CA • Rosemead City Hall Addition & Renovation, Rosemead, CA — addition, interior reconfiguration and general renovation of the existing city hall • Rosemead Council Chamber + City Manager Office Renovation, Rosemead, CA • Sierra Madre Recreation Center, Sierra Madre, CA • Sierra Madre Hart Senior Center, Sierra Madre, CA • Pasadena Washington Park Improvements, Pasadena, CA — new lunch Ni shelters ©! • Pasadena Heritage Square, Pasadena, CA — schematic design for mixed -use affordable housing • City of San Gabriel Alameda Corridor Extension Mission + Del Mar bridges, San Gabriel, CA — design of lower right -of -way tracks Registration: • San Gabriel Redevelopment Agency McGroarty office renovation, San Gabriel, California C -20132 CA Louisiana 2577 • San Gabriel Community Development Design Review Consultant, San Gabriel, Education: CA Bachelor of Science, Architectural Studies, 1977 . California Towers, City of Riverside, Riverside, CA — conversion of a regional bank Tulare University School of headquarters into a mixed -use retail, commercial and governmental offices Architecture • Edwin T. Powell Senior Center renovation, City of Placentia, Placentia, CA Professional Organizations: American Institute of Architects, member Society of American Doug is an Associate Principal at Onyx. He is a member of the firm's Urban Practice Registered Architects, Past Group, typically serving as Project Manager or Designer for this group's projects.The President California Council, combination of Doug's compassion for people and his commitment to urban design member make him a perrect fit for the firm's urban practice. His ability to craft innovative and distinctive solutions for tight spaces is also of great value to the firm's other practice groups, including urban campus environments. Doug has more than 25 years' experience in the practice of architecture. He has spent the vast majority of his professional career designing buildings and managing projects in Southern California. His includes a diverse set of projects from intimate cafes to urban day -care centers to complex multiuse developments that combine housing, retail and office space with inviting gathering places, both formal and informal. Doug is a thoughtful and creative architect with a passion for designing buildings and open spaces that fully and carefully utilize our urban environment. In addition to his strong design skills, Doug is a confident professional, an experienced team player and a strong communicator. Our Mission is to collaborate in improving the quality of life through architectural and environmental design. Page 17 Mary Wu, AIA Associate j Project Architect Registration: Project Experience Architect in California Administration C24058 • Child Care Center*, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, Los Angeles, Toronto, St. George Campus, CA — Project Manager, $6 million Education: • San Gabriel Redevelopment Agency remodel, San Gabriel, CA — Construction University of California San Dimas Nature Center't, Los Angeles County Parks and Recreation, San Berkeley, Bachelor of Dimas, CA — Project Manager, $1 million Architecture • CityTerrace Park Gymnasium *, Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA — Project Professional Organizations: Manager, $1.5 million American Institute of • Bristow Park Community Center*, City of Commerce, Commerce, CA — Project Architects (AIA) Architect, $1.6 million Pasadena- Foothill Chapter • Asian Youth Center*, San Gabriel, CA — Project Manager, $5 million • Boys and Girls Scouts Historic Rehabilitation', San Marino, City of San Marino, Project Manager * Work done for another firm Hrag Derhovagimian Designer j Project Job Captain Education: • Edwin T. Powell Senior Center renovation, Placentia, CA — Construction Honours Bachelor of Arts, Administration Architectural Specialist Program, University of Sierra Madre Recreation Center renovation and addition. Sierra Madre, CA Toronto, St. George Campus, — Construction Administration Toronto, Canada • San Gabriel Redevelopment Agency remodel, San Gabriel, CA — Construction Management, Construction Administration • Loma Linda University Chapel, Loma Linda, CA — 21,000 SF currently in design development / construction stages with full use of REVIT software • People Coordinated Services (PCS) Youth and family Services Center — 25,000 SF gymnasium, office and mixed program use building currently in design development/construction document stages with full use of REVIT software • Fillmore Raymond, MOB, LLC — Medical Office Building I & II / Parking Structure —Two medical office buildings currently in design development/construction document stages with mixed use of AutoCAD and REVIT software Our Mission is to collaborate In improving the quality of life through architectural and environmental design. Page 18 SECTION Consultants Following are the proposed consultants for the project. Refer to Project Experience Section 3, which illustrates consultants' related project experience and the projects the teammembers have executed together. Structural Engineering — Les Schulz, PE, Wheeler & Gray 650 Sierra Madre Villa, Suite 300 Pasadena, CA 91 107 (626) 432 -5850 x117 Mechanical I Electrical I Plumbing Engineering— Gene Vanderford, PE, Lewis Ross & Associates 9401 Reseda Blvd., # 200 Northridge, CA 91324 (818) 886 -2190 Landscape Architectural Design — Larry Moss, Lawrence R. Moss & Associates 3458 Ocean View Blvd. Glendale, CA 91208 (818) 248 -5200 x12 Audiovisual Design I Sound Control —Jerry Christhoff, Veneklasen & Associates 1711 Sixteenth Street Santa Monica, CA 90404 (3 10) 450 -1733 NO ©© Our Mission is to collaborate in improving the quality of life through architectural and environmental design. pa 19 SECTION References San Gabriel Redevelopment Agency Offices Renovation I Multiple Projects Jennifer Davis, Community Development Director— (626) 308 -2806 x4630 P.O. Box 130 San Gabriel, CA 91778-0130 City of San Gabriel Steven A. Preston, City Manager— (626) 308 -2803 P.O. Box 130 San Gabriel, CA 91778-0130 Sierra Madre Recreation Center I Hart Memorial Senior Center j Police Station ADA Entrances Bruce Inman, Director of Public Works, City of Siena Madre — (626) 355 -7135 232 W. Sierra Madre Blvd. Sierra Madre, CA 91024 Edwin T Powell Senior Center Renovation j City Hall Remodel Jon Nicks, Neighborhood Services Manager, Administration Department, City of Placentia — (714) 986 -2338 401 E. Chapman Avenue Placentia, CA 92870 Ontario Redevelopment Agency Charity Hernandez, Project Manager, Economic Development/Redevelopment — (909) 395 -2397 City of Ontario 303 E. B Street Ontario, CA 91764 Our Mission is to collaborate In improving the quality of life through architectural and environmental design. Page 20 ° '�F�FE •.P� n�n= ^ g a � 4 3n° °L°Y€ Fd'n g °SRpe^ g sc� 3 e4 _° B a�..$. � §��m A�n'x EC °Y.gS<a S� @Yo � ^ :9�8�i��F��9 q e�a� :e 3°� €.g 'e ° �e 3 €:- ��Z333 @ °b��`n` -> a � 74'ser � "�[ 5 e _ � 6 Ii 55555 44 a s a §} F g o S r z � c 9 s .. 83933 ?? 53i 3z 339999 [.g Fx eke g . eg s 3 e % - `333333 9i"33$g 3 9 3933 is£ is ♦ ° am: - :FF`iFY i�4 F( §FeF�YS EP33P334� " �3 5n39 B�9 Z f�i[Z Z:z Ya - - - - - - - _ ;s :fF sF @_ ° s_?$z s ' • _ : _ -- - - - 3_ - 1 3 3 3 x: NC _ a a 0 z ry ry D A v x ° a n ? ON a j a n v F w 2 -A� n a R c •_ O I S - v O -_ 0 3 s s g a SECTION Fee Proposal Onyx has provided a detailed fee / work product PROPOSAL for the project. The PROPOSAL includes the following: I All services / work product requested in the RFP including consultant / engineering fees. 2 Additional services / work product which Onyx believes will be required Not requested in the RFP. 3 Optional services / work product which the city may want to include I Not requested in the RFP. 4 The services / work product in the PROPOSAL is identical to the PROPOSED SCHEDULE in Section 7 except for areas where additional information is provided. 5 Standard Hourly Billing Rates for Onyx Architects and proposed consultants is provided. Nof ©© Our Mission is to collaborate in improving the quality of life through architectural and environmental design. page 22 8 e' d L F n a ec 's s B < 3 3 E $ P° S � 8 e P _e n 5 s 4 � O 3 a r 8: • D � fi a S z ° Y a e 8 « & a 8 _ t e -e - $ S a' S $ e 3 5 i Q F ' E 4 e � 1 y S ° z= c � ° o 9 C 6 s 3 A 6 "s i O D y } a S z c � ° o 9 C 6 s 3 A 6 "s i O � a i z ° a e « & a -e - ° p $ 3 Q F ' E 4 e � S ° z= 0 c= a D O �e 3 S yYw // � « � Ee ��. ; !| !!I|!! •- !� ! �! , \ ! | !} : f| I! ,. Ee ��. ; | [ §. [ � k \ {\ !} N � {\ ƒ ! !{;) k \ {\ !} N � {\ ƒ