PC - Minutes - 02-06-12Minutes of the
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
February 6, 2012
The regular meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order by Chair Eng at 7:00 p.m., in the
Council Chambers, 8838 E. Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Commissioner Saccaro
INVOCATION - Vice -Chair Ruiz
ROLL CALL - Commissioners Herrera, Hunter, Saccaro, Vice -Chair Ruiz, and Chair Eng
ROLL CALL OF OFFICERS PRESENT: City Attorney Murphy, Acting Community Development Director
Ramirez, Assistant Planner Trinh, Planning Intern Joaquin, and Commission Secretary Lockwood
1. EXPLANATION OF HEARING PROCEDURES AND APPEAL RIGHTS
Greg Murphy, City Attorney, presented the procedures and appeal rights of the meeting.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE
None
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of Minutes - January 17, 2012
Commissioner Herrera made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Hunter, to APPROVE the
Minutes of January 17, 2012 as presented.
Vote resulted in:
Yes:
Herrera, Hunter, Ruiz, Saccaro
No:
None
Abstain:
Eng
Absent:
None
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. MODIFICATION 11.06 - UFC Gym has submitted an application requesting to modify the
conditions of approval for Planned Development Review (PDR) 09 -01, to allow UFC Gym to
operate 24 -hours and to host televised events. The business is currently operating from 5:00
a.m. to 11:00 p.m. The subject site is located at 8920 Glendon Way, in the P -D (Planned
Development) zone.
Staff Recommendation - It is recommended that the Planning Commission CONTINUE the
1
public hearing for Modification 11 -06. The applicant has indicated that they would like to
make changes to their original modification request.
Assistant Planner Trinh stated that UFC Gym has requested to continue this item so they can make
modifications to their original request.
Chair Eng asked staff if public hearing notices had been mailed out.
Assistant Planner Trinh replied yes.
Chair Eng asked Greg Murphy, City Attorney, if this item is Continued will public hearing notices need to be
mailed.
Greg Murphy, City Attorney, stated that there are two (2) options, (1) the Planning Commission may
Continue the item until a date certain; or (2) the Planning Commission may Continue the item until a date
uncertain and new public hearing notices can be mailed. He stated staff can have a preference in that
regard.
Acting Community Development Director Ramirez stated that staff recommends that new public hearing
notices be mailed out since staff is unsure what the new conditions will be. She stated staff would like to
ensure that the notice has all the correct conditions that the applicant is applying for.
Chair Eng stated so it is recommended that this item be Continued to a date uncertain and asked the
Planning Commission if they agree with this recommendation.
The Planning Commission stated yes, they agree.
Chair Eng then asked for a motion.
Vice -Chair Ruiz made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Herrera to Continue the public hearing
for Modification 11.06 to a date uncertain.
Vote resulted in:
Yes:
Eng, Herrera, Hunter, Ruiz, Saccaro
No:
None
Abstain:
None
Absent:
None
B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 11 -13 - Anh Vo has submitted a Conditional Use Permit
application requesting to operate a tutoring center for children in the 6th through 12th
grades, located at 4213 Rosemead Boulevard, Unit B in the C -1 (Neighborhood Commercial)
zone.
PC RESOLUTION 12 -02 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 11 -13, FOR THE OPERATION OF ROSEMEAD TUTORING
2
CENTER LOCATED AT 4213 ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD, UNIT B.
Staff Recommendation - Based on the analysis and findings contained in this report, it is
recommended that the Planning Commission APPROVE Conditional Use Permit 11 -13 and
adopt Resolution 12 -02, subject to the conditions.
Planning Intern Joaquin presented staff report
Chair Eng stated that a revised Staff Report has been given to the Planning Commission tonight. She
asked staff to clarify what corrections have been made to the Staff Report.
Acting Community Development Director Ramirez replied the correction in the Staff Report is on page four
(4) item B, the findings were not printed in the Staff Report as it was written. She stated, in addition, you
will find that in the Resolution the findings were left off.
Vice -Chair Ruiz confirmed with staff that they were just typos
Acting Development Director Ramirez replied yes.
Chair Eng asked Greg Murphy, City Attorney, if the Staff Report will need to be re- posted due to the
changes.
Greg Murphy, City Attorney, replied that there is no need to re -post this and explained why.
Chair Eng asked staff if there is a new Condition of Approval being added or is one being revised.
Planning Intern Joaquin replied that one Condition of Approval is being added.
Chair Eng asked Planning Intern Joaquin for clarification of what is being added.
Acting Community Development Director Ramirez explained that this is a new Condition of Approval that is
being added because the original site plan had some errors on it. She stated staff is adding the new
Condition of Approval so that before the project gets signed off, their site plan will accurately reflect what
was originally proposed.
Chair Eng asked staff if the applicant is in agreement with the change and the added Condition of Approval.
Planning Intern Joaquin replied yes.
Greg Murphy, City Attorney, stated he recommends that an additional sentence to Condition of Approval
number eleven (11) read "Prior to submittal to the Planning, Building, Fire, Sheriff, and Health Departments
for any approvals related to this Conditional Use Permit, the applicant shall submit a revised and correct
site plan to the Planning Division, which will be subject to Division review and approval."
Acting Community Development Director Ramirez stated that the applicant is present tonight if the Planning
Commission would like to confirm that he understands this request.
Chair Eng asked the Planning Commission if they had any questions or comments for staff.
Vice -Chair Ruiz asked staff what is the time limit for the instructional period.
Planning Intern Joaquin replied the project narrative states the instructional period will be approximately
twenty (20) to forty (40) minutes.
Vice -Chair Ruiz confirmed with staff if there will be a break in between instructional periods to allow
students to leave and new students to enter.
Planning Intern Joaquin replied yes.
Vice -Chair Ruiz requested that this is made clear in the Conditions of Approval that there is a break time.
Acting Community Development Director Ramirez recommended that we confirm with the applicant to
make sure we understand their time limits.
Chair Eng requested clarification for the required parking configuration for this site
Assistant Planner Trinh replied according to this commercial center it was parked at one (1) per two
hundred and fifty (250) square feet. She explained if you total the square footage of the
building and divide it by 250 they meet the required parking spaces.
Chair Eng confirmed with staff that according to the City's Municipal Code the parking requirement is based
on square footage and not by use.
Assistant Planner Trinh replied that sometimes use is considered and the parking requirement would be
different for restaurant use. She explained that this commercial center is office and retail so it is parked as
one (1) per two hundred and fifty (250) square feet.
Chair Eng asked staff if the applicant will be taking over the insurance of the two units that were vacated by
the insurance company.
Planning Intern Joaquin replied yes.
Chair Eng asked staff if all the units in this commercial center are leased.
Planning Intern Joaquin replied yes, and read a list of each business occupying a unit.
Chair Eng referred to Condition of Approval number twenty -two (22) and asked staff if the tutoring school le
would be able to keep a business vehicle onsite during business hours if they had one.
Assistant Planner Trinh replied that the applicant has indicated he will not have any business vehicles. She
stated that if there was a business vehicle it would require another parking space and the applicant has
chosen not to have any business vehicles.
Chair Eng asked staff what is being changed on the site plan
0
Assistant Planner Trinh replied there was an error regarding Fire Department occupancy load number,
which does not pertain to this type of business. She stated the applicant is limited to the number of
students in the staff report.
Chair Eng asked staff if there will be a separate men's and women's restroom.
Planning Intern Joaquin replied yes and the applicant is currently in the process of acquiring permits from
the Building Department.
Chair Eng stated according to the site plan it states that the maximum occupancy load will exceed ten (10)
and that is why it is required to have a separate men's and women's restroom.
Assistant Planner Trinh stated that the applicant may address how that came about.
Chair Eng recommended that applications regarding this type of use be reviewed at a staff level. She
explained that it could save time, money, and streamline the procedure for this type of use and would not
need to go to the Planning Commission.
Vice -Chair Ruiz stated that it is important that the Planning Commission oversee the Conditions of Approval
because it is the conditions that the City is putting on the applicant. He also stated it is important that
the Planning Commission make the decision whether it is a yes or no and to be aware of what is going on.
He stated if decisions are to be made at staff level then why would there be a need for a Planning
Commission.
Chair Eng stated that she agrees there is a need for a Planning Commission and expressed that parking
requirements need to be updated and addressed.
Commissioner Hunter commented in the Findings paragraph it states there will be one (1) instructor, eight
(8) students, and five (5) parking spaces. She asked if it will always stay this way.
Chair Eng stated that question can be addressed to the applicant. She asked if there were any other
questions for staff.
None
Chair Eng opened the Public Hearing and invited the applicant to the podium.
Anh Vo, applicant, stated he is available to answer any questions.
Vice -Chair Ruiz asked Anh Vo how long the classroom instruction sessions will be and if there will be a
break in- between sessions to give students time to exit the classroom and for new students to enter.
Anh Vo replied that he will be open Monday through Friday from 3:00 pm to 7:00 pm. He stated each
session will be from forty (40) minutes to one (1) hour with a maximum of eight (8) students. He stated they
will have five (5) to ten (10) minutes to exist and enter from classroom. He stated the students will be sixth
(6th) to twelve (12th) graders and the subjects he focuses on are math, chemistry, and physics.
5
Vice -Chair Ruiz confirmed with the applicant that there will be break in- between sessions for students to
leave the premises and for the new students to come in.
Anh Vo replied that is correct.
Vice -Chair Ruiz asked Anh Vo if he would agree to a condition being added that required for a five minute
period break for students to leave the premises and for new students to enter. He explained that this
will help with parking concerns and will create a smooth transition of students entering and exiting the
premises.
Commissioner Hunter asked if five (5) minutes will be enough time to get students in and out.
Anh Vo replied that there is a waiting room for students waiting for their parents to pick them up, so he does
feel five (5) minutes will be enough time.
Vice -Chair Ruiz commented to Anh Vo if there is a waiting room with eight (8) students in it and there are
only five (5) parking spaces, where will the other three (3) parents park. He stated this is how parking
issues are created.
Chair Eng asked Anh Vo if parking becomes a problem, does he have any other alternatives to address it.
Anh Vo replied right now he is allowed five (5) parking spaces and he plans to require parents to drop
students off rather than using the parking spaces. He also stated his location is five (5) minutes away from
Muscatel School and expects some students will walk to the tutoring center.
Chair Eng asked Anh Vo how many students are in a tutoring session and how many subjects are taught at
one time.
Anh Vo replied it will depend on the student, but usually all three subjects are taught
Chair Eng asked Anh Vo if he has one tutor for all three subjects.
Anh Vo replied yes.
Chair Eng asked Anh Vo how many students are in one session.
An Vo did not reply to the question but explained that when students go to his center he plans on checking
their homework, going over their lessons, and spending a few minutes with each student.
Chair Eng asked Anh Vo if he is currently running a tutoring service or if he is relocating from a previous
location.
Anh Vo replied no this is his first time running a tutoring service.
Commissioner Hunter inquired about possible parking issues if parents plan to wait for their children
instead of just dropping them off.
ri
Commissioner Herrera asked Anh Vo if students will need to be signed in by a parent or will students be
able to just walk in from Muscatel Intermediate School or Rosemead High School. She also asked what the
maximum number of students allowed at a time is.
Anh Vo replied that students can walk in and that they do not need to be signed -in by a parent. He stated
parents will required to leave once their child is dropped off. He also replied that eight (8) students is the
maximum amount allowed.
Commissioner Herrera asked Ahn Vo if there will ever be twelve (12) or more sitting in the classroom at the
same time.
Anh Vo replied no and explained that there is only one (1) classroom with space for only eight (8) students.
He stated there is a waiting room for students being picked up.
Vice -Chair Ruiz asked Anh Vo if he will be giving instructions to the students in the waiting room.
Anh Vo replied no and that the waiting room is just for students or parents to wait.
Vice -Chair Ruiz asked Anh Vo how long will parents or students wait in the waiting room.
Anh Vo replied the maximum time limit will be ten (10) minutes.
Vice -Chair Ruiz asked Anh Vo if he would agree to have that time frame put into a Condition of Approval.
Anh Vo replied yes.
Greg Murphy, City Attorney, stated if that Condition of Approval is put in, it will have to be crafted very
carefully because it can create some public safety concerns and explained why. He also stated that it
could create some potential liability for the City if the applicant complies with the cities demands and then
there is an unfortunate incident. He stated if the Planning Commission would like to go in that direction a
Condition can be written that is appropriate, but not while this meeting is going on and it would have to be
brought back at a later date. He also explained that there is nothing in the Conditions of Approval that
limits the number of parking spaces that can be allocated to the applicant within the shopping center. He
stated that is a private issue between the applicant and landlord, so long there are sufficient spaces to meet
the City standards for the use, which there are. He stated whether the applicant is allocated five (5) spaces
by his landlord or the applicant in his private lease agreement with the landlord is able to obtain more
spaces is strictly up to him. He stated that some modifications can probably be done to Condition of
Approval number twenty -one (21) regarding not allowing too many people to be on the site, but that could
lead to a problem with people sitting in their cars instead of going into the applicant's unit. He stated this
could potentially end up with a landlord /tenant issue and the City does not want to get involved with that.
He stated that the wording can be changed in Condition of Approval number twenty-one (21) but then it
would have to come back to the next Planning Commission meeting.
Vice -Chair Ruiz recommended that it should be added but worded very cautiously so there is no liability for
the City. He stated as long as the site plan is being revised that the Fire Department be contacted to
confirm all regulations are being met.
7
Chair Eng asked Anh Vo, if eight (8) students and one (1) instructor is practical and makes business
sense for him and would he be able to cover his expenses with only eight (8) students per session. She
expressed that she would like him to agree to Conditions of Approval that will work for him.
Anh Vo replied yes it will work for him.
Chair Eng stated that she agrees with Commissioner Herrera that some students at a certain age may just
walk in and not come in a car. She stated we would like to make sure parking should make some sort of
sense.
Commissioner Hunter stated that under student pick up and drop off, it states you are required to escort the
child in and out of the classroom.
Chair Eng asked Greg Murphy, City Attorney, if this should be a Condition of Approval and would this go
back to the concern of imposing a time limit on how long a parent can wait.
Greg Murphy, City Attorney, replied this would be different in terms of waiting. He stated escorting a
student from a parked car to the center would avoid problems in the parking lot such as cars idling and
having students running across the parking lot into the center. He stated that this condition has been
used for other educational facilities and he understands how it came into being, but does not know how
enforceable this can be under rainy day situations.
Chair Eng expressed to Anh Vo that to meet his parking requirement it is important that he only has eight
(8) students and one (1) instructor per session. She also asked staff if there are more than eight (8)
students and one (1) instructor will it require additional parking spaces.
Assistant Planner Trinh replied that is correct, it is required to have one (1) parking space per every two
(2) students. She explained if there are ten (10) students then it will require six (6) parking spaces.
Chair Eng confirmed with the applicant that he understands the importance of the parking requirement and
that it all makes business sense to him and that he is agreeable.
Anh Vo replied yes he agrees.
Vice -Chair Ruiz asked Anh Vo if he is the instructor.
Anh Vo replied yes.
Chair Eng asked if there were anymore questions.
Commissioner Hunter asked if the applicant understands the consequences if he has more than eight (8)
students.
Vice -Chair Ruiz replied that staff will be able to instruct the applicant with that concern. He thanked
the applicant and explained that the City Attorney will draft up the revised Conditions of Approval and his
Conditional Use Permit will be approved at the next Planning Commission meeting.
3
Greg Murphy, City Attorney, stated for clarification, this item will come back to the Planning Commission for
final vote at the next meeting.
Chair Eng asked if there was anyone else wishing to speak on this item.
None
Chair Eng closed the Public Hearing. She clarified with the Planning Commission that this item may need
to come back to the next Planning Commission meeting.
Vice -Chair Ruiz stated the language in Condition of Approval number twenty-two (22) needs to be revised.
Greg Murphy, City Attorney, stated if changes are going to be made based on comments of the Planning
Commissioners and applicant tonight, staff and the City Attorneys office would like a motion directing us to
modify Conditions of Approval numbers twenty -one (21) and twenty -six (26) and any other applicable
conditions to respond to the Commissions concerns about students waiting before or after their study
sessions and with respect to parking issues with parents or students waiting.
Commissioner Herrera asked staff if there is a two year time limit for a Conditional Use Permit application.
Assistant Planner Trinh replied that a Conditional Use Permit runs with the land and as long as the
business is operating the Conditional Use Permit is active.
Chair Eng asked staff that as long as the business is operating and if it ceases, is six (6) months
the threshold.
Assistant Planner Trinh replied yes it is six (6) months.
Commissioner Herrera asked staff if the applicant does not comply with all the Conditions of Approval in the
future or if there is parking concerns, what recourse the City would have.
Acting Community Development Director Ramirez, replied if a complaint is received staff will contact the
applicant and discuss the issue. She stated the applicant will be given a time frame to make the needed
corrections. If they do not make the corrections, then staff will start the Revocation process of the
Conditional Use Permit.
Commissioner Herrera confirmed with staff that the applicant would then be jeopardizing his Conditional
Use Permit to do business.
Acting Community Development Director Ramirez stated that is correct. She stated if the applicant came
back at a later date requesting to expand his business staff would deny his request.
Commissioner Herrera recommended that this application be approved tonight and that it does not need
to be brought back to the next Planning Commission meeting.
Chair Eng stated that she agrees with Commissioner Herrera and explained why.
0
Acting Development Director Ramirez stated that the community is a very active community and when an
applicant violates their Conditional Use permit, the city finds out very quickly. She stated then staff calls that
applicant to try and resolve the issue. She stated that staff has made it very clear to the applicant and that
he understands he is limited to eight (8) students and one instructor (1).
Chair Eng asked Vice -Chair Ruiz if he would like to keep his request of this application coming to the next
Planning Commission.
Vice -Chair Ruiz replied that he would like to keep the five (5) minute transitional period in- between class
sessions.
Greg Murphy, City Attorney, stated that will be an easier change to make and it would not be forcing people
in or out. He stated that an added sentence to Condition of Approval number twenty -one (21) stating that
the applicant shall provide a five (5) minute transition period between classes to allow for passages of
students into and out of the site. He explained this will provide for a little flow time so students will not
have to wait in the waiting room.
Vice -Chair Ruiz stated that he agrees with this transitional period to allow constant movement.
Chair Eng stated staff will revise Condition of Approval number twenty -one (21).
Greg Murphy, City Attorney, stated that he has directed staff on how to revise Condition of Approval
number twenty -one (21). He stated if the Planning Commission wishes to approve what was made tonight
it would be to make a motion to approve the Resolution amended by staff with the additional amendments
to Conditions of Approval numbers eleven (11) and twenty -one (21).
Vice -Chair Ruiz made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Herrera, to APPROVE Conditional Use
Permit 11.13 and adopt Resolution 12.02, subject to the conditions.
Vote resulted in:
Yes:
Eng, Herrera, Hunter, Ruiz, Saccaro
No:
None
Abstain:
None
Absent:
None
Greg Murphy, City Attorney, stated there is a ten (10) day appeal period where anyone wishing to take
action against the decision made tonight by the Planning Commission may do so. He let the applicant
know that staff will contact him to let him know when he can proceed with his business.
5. MATTERS FROM THE CHAIR & COMMISSIONERS
Commissioner Hunter asked staff why the Baby Toy -Town sign is still up.
Acting Community Development Director replied staff will check on that and report back to the Planning
Commission.
10
Chair Eng stated she would like staff to look into have tutoring centers of this matter possibly being
approved at staff level. She also stated it is important that we look into a solution for lack of parking in the
city and that it needs to be addressed.
6. MATTERS FROM STAFF
Acting Community Development Director Ramirez reminded the Planning Commission that the next
Planning Commission meeting for Monday, February 20, 2012 is on the President's Day Holiday and City
Hall will be closed. She stated that when a holiday falls on a Monday, and City Hall is closed it is usually
moved to the following Tuesday. Unfortunately, due to schedule conflicts it cannot be scheduled for that
Tuesday. Therefore, staff would like to recommend that the next Planning Commission meeting be held on
Monday, March 5, 2012 at 7:00 pm.
Chair Eng asked the Planning Commissioners if they are available to attend the meeting on Monday, March
5, 2012.
Planning Commissioners replied yes, they are available.
7. ADJOURNMENT
The next regular Planning Commission meeting will be held on Tuesday, February 21, 2012, at
7:00 p.m., due to City Hall being closed on Monday, February 20, 2012 for the President's Day
Holiday.
ATTEST:
� -d"
Rachel Lockwood
Commission Secretary
vl AWVx 'I1 A
Nancy Eng VU
Chair
11
PC RESOLUTION 12 -03
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
APPROVING MODIFICATION 11 -06 FOR THE MODIFICATION OF THE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
(PDR) 09 -01 TO ALLOW UFC GYM TO OPERATE 24- HOURS, HOST
FAMILY EVENT NIGHTS, AND ALLOW SPARRING AS A FORM OF
TRAINING IN THE GYM. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT 8920
GLENDON WAY, IN THE PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) ZONE (APN:
5390 - 018 -036).
WHEREAS, on December 19, 2011, UFC Gym submitted a modification
application to modify the Conditions of Approval of Planned Development Review 09 -01
to allow UFC Gym to operate 24- hours, host family event nights, and allow sparring as a
form of training in the gym, located at 8920 Glendon Way; and
WHEREAS, 8920 Glendon Way is located in the PD (Planned Development)
Zone; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 17.76 of the Rosemead Municipal Code specifies the
criteria by which the aforementioned permit may be granted; and
WHEREAS, on February 23, 2012, fourteen (14) notices were sent to property
owners within a 300 -foot radius from the subject property, in addition to notices posted
in six (6) public locations and on -site, specifying the availability of the application, plus
the date, time and location of the public hearing for Modification 11 -06; and
WHEREAS, on March 5, 2012, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed and
advertised public hearing to receive oral and written testimony relative to Modification
11 -06; and
WHEREAS, the Rosemead Planning Commission has sufficiently considered all
testimony presented to them in order to make the following determination.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City
of Rosemead as follows:
SECTION 1 . The Planning Commission HEREBY DETERMINES that
Modification 11 -06 is Categorically Exempt under Section 15301 of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and local environmental guidelines, where projects
consist of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor
alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or
topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing
at the time of the lead agency's determination. Accordingly, Planned Modification 11 -06
is classified as a Class 1 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 of CEQA.
SECTION 2 . The Planning Commission HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES
that facts do exist to justify approving Modification 11 -06 according to the Criteria of
Chapter 17.76 of the Rosemead Municipal Code as follows:
A. That the proceedings to alter the development plan for this Planned
Development zoned property is justified in that it is in the public's necessity,
convenience and general welfare and is good zoning practices for such action;
FINDING: UFC Gym's proposal to operate 24- hours, host family event nights,
and allow sparring as a form of training in the gym will not alter the development plan for
the Planned Development and is in the public's necessity, convenience, and general
welfare, and is good zoning practice. The 24 -hour request will serve members within
the surrounding neighborhoods with both traditional and nontraditional schedules,
allowing access to the fitness gym to be convenient for their individual needs. Staff's
inspection determined that the gym's existing parking lot lighting and extensive security
plan, which was approved by the Chief of Police, would be adequate for the proposed
24 -hour operation.
Staff has contacted the Police Departments in Concord, Torrance, and Corona
regarding UFC Gym's family event nights and all three Police Departments have
indicated that they have not had any problems with UFC Gym, and that their business
has cooperated wonderfully in their cities. Conditions of approval have been added to
ensure that the hosting of family event nights will not create any negative impacts.
These conditions include permitting only UFC Gym members to attend the family event
nights and permitting UFC Gym to host one family event night per month.
Lastly, the use of sparring as part of UFC Gym's instructional training is intended
not to inflict pain or injury. Sparring is used as a form of consensual training, only
performed under the supervision of a professionally trained instructor, and to prevent
such activity from becoming a combative.
B. The Planning Commission may approve or conditionally approve minor
modifications or development in the Planned Development zone if compliant with the
General Plan and compatible with existing and future developments in surrounding
areas.
FINDING: The site is designated in the General Plan for Commercial and on the
Zoning Map it is designated for PD (Planned Development). Modification 11 -06 will be
consistent with Policy 2.3 of the General Plan, as it encourages continued development
of self- sustaining commercial uses at strategic intersections. UFC Gym's proposal to
operate 24- hours, host family event nights, and allow sparring as a form of training in
the gym may have potential benefits to the business and the community. Furthermore,
conditions have been added to ensure that the expansion of use will be compatible with
existing and future development.
Lastly, the proposed use is in conformity with the General Plan, in that P -D
(Planned Development) zoning is a corresponding zone district with the Commercial
land use category.
SECTION 3 . The Planning Commission HEREBY APPROVES Planned
Development Review 09 -01, to convert an existing 39,703 square foot commercial
building into a fitness center, located at 8920 Glendon Way, subject to conditions listed
in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 4 . This resolution is the result of an action taken by the Planning
Commission on March 5, 2012, by the following vote:
YES: ENG, HERRERA, HUNTER, RUIZ AND SACCARO
NO: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
SECTION 5 . The secretary shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and
shall transmit copies of same to the applicant and the Rosemead City Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 5th day of March, 2012.
Na y E hair
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a resolution adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rosemead at its regular meeting, held on the 5 day of
March, 2012, by the following vote:
YES: ENG, HERRERA, HUNTER, RUIZ AND SACCARO
NO: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
Michelle Ramirez, Seldtary
TO FORI%f�/7
Gregory M. MLI(phy, Planning Corpfnission Attorney
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LL
EXHIBIT "W
MODIFICATION 11 -06
(APN: 5390 - 018 -036)
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
March 5, 2012
1. The following conditions of approval must be complied with to the satisfaction of
the Planning Division prior to final approval of the associated plans, building
permits, occupancy permits, or any other appropriate request.
2. Conditions of approval listed on Exhibit "B" shall be copied directly onto final
development plans submitted to the Planning and Building Division for review.
3. Planned Development Review 09 -01 is approved to convert an existing 39,703
square foot commercial building into a fitness center, to be developed in
accordance with the architectural plans marked Exhibit "C ", dated September 28,
2009. Any revisions to the approved plans must be resubmitted for review and
approval by the City of Rosemead Planning Division.
4. Approval of Planned Development Review 09 -01 shall not take effect for any
purpose until the applicant has filed with the City of Rosemead a notarized
affidavit stating that he /she is aware of and accepts all of the conditions of
approval as set forth in the letter of approval and this list of conditions, within ten
(10) days from the Planning Commission approval date.
5. Planned Development Review 09 -01 is approved for a period of six (6) months.
The applicant shall commence the proposed use or request an extension within
30- calendar days prior to expiration. The six (6) months initial approval period
shall be effective from the Planning Commission approval date. For the purpose
of this petition, project commencement shall be defined as beginning the
permitting process with the Planning and Building Divisions, so long as the
project is not abandoned. If the Planned Development Review has been unused,
abandoned or discontinued for a period of six (6) months it shall become null and
void (Modified by the Planning Commission on October 19, 2009).
6. Planned Development Review 09 -01 is granted or approved with the City and its
Planning Commission and City Council retaining and reserving the right and
jurisdiction to review and to modify the permit, including the conditions of
approval based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but
are not limited to, the modification of the use, a change in scope, emphasis, size,
or nature of the use, or the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration, or change of
use. This reservation of right to review is in addition to, and not in lieu of, the right
of the City, its Planning Commission, and City Council to review and revoke or
modify any permit granted or approved under the Rosemead Municipal Code for
any violations of the conditions imposed on Planned Development Review 09 -01.
7. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Rosemead
or its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding
against the City of Rosemead or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set
aside, void, or annul, an approval of the Planning Commission and /or City
Council concerning the project, which action is brought within the time period
provided by law.
8. The Planning Commission hereby authorizes the Planning Division to make
and /or approve minor modifications to the approved plans.
9. The applicant shall comply with all Federal, State and local laws relative to the
approved use including the requirements of the Planning, Building, Fire, Sheriff
and Health Departments.
10. Building permits will not be issued in connection with any project until such time
as all plan check fees, and all other applicable fees are paid in full.
11. Prior to the issuance of building permits, all school fees shall be paid. The
applicant shall provide the City with written verification of compliance from the
School District.
12. City staff shall have access to the subject property at any time during
construction to monitor progress and after construction to monitor compliance.
13.Occupancy will not be granted until all improvements required by this approval
have been approved, completed and inspected by the appropriate department(s).
14.The hours of construction shall be limited from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday to
Saturday. No construction shall take place on Sundays or on any legal holidays
without prior City approval.
15.Applicant shall obtain a public works permit for all work in or adjacent to the
public right -of -way.
16.The numbers of the address signs shall be at least six (6) inches tall with a
minimum character width of % inches, contrasting in color and easily visible at
driver's level from the street. The location, color and size of such sign shall be
subject to the approval of the Planning Division.
17.Gym patrons and employees shall be prohibited from parking in the parking area
on the adjacent Parcel A (APN: 5390 - 018 -037). Unless such permission is
granted by the owners of Parcel A (APN: 5390 -018 -037), the gym management
shall advise its patrons and employees not to park within Parcel A (APN: 5390-
018 -037) at any time. The gym shall post a written notice in the gym reception
area and parking lot informing customers of this condition.
18.The parking area within Parcel B, as indicated on the site plan in Exhibit "C,"
shall be re- striped.
19.The parking area within Parcel B, as indicated on the site plan in Exhibit "C ",
including handicapped spaces, shall be paved and re- painted periodically to City
standards to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. In accordance with
Chapter 17.84 of the Rosemead Municipal Code, all designated parking stalls
shall be double striped. Such striping shall be maintained in a clear, visible, and
orderly manner.
20.The parking space markers shall be re- painted periodically to City standards to
the satisfaction of the Planning Division, including double striping, wheel stops
and handicapped parking /markings.
21.At least two percent of. the required parking shall be designated for handicap
space pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 22511.8. A letter by the
property owner shall be given to the City for authorizing enforcement.
22.The developer shall comply with the City's storm water ordinance and Los
Angeles County's SUSMP requirements with respect to planning and
development of the site.
23.The site shall be maintained in a graffiti -free state. Any new graffiti shall be
removed within twenty-four (24) hours. A 24 -hour, Graffiti Hotline can be called
at (626) 569 -2345 for assistance.
24.The onsite public hearing notice posting shall be removed within 30 days from
the end of the 10 -day appeal period of Planned Development Review 09 -01.
25. The site shall be maintained in a clean, weed and litter free state in accordance
with Sections 8.32.010 - 8.32.040 of the Rosemead Municipal Code, which
pertains to the storage, accumulation, collection, and disposal of garbage,
rubbish, trash, and debris. All trash containers shall be stored in the appropriate
trash enclosure at all times. All trash, rubbish, and garbage receptacles shall be
regularly cleaned, inspected, and maintained in a clean, safe, and sanitary
condition. The trash enclosure doors shall be closed at all times.
26.The applicant shall keep the electrical and mechanical equipment and /or
emergency exits free of any debris, storage, furniture, etc., and maintain a
minimum clearance of five (5) feet.
27.AII roof top appurtenances and equipment shall adequately be screened from
view to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. There shall be no mechanical
equipment located on the sides of the building. Such equipment shall not exceed
the height of the parapet wall. All ground level mechanical /utility equipment
(including meters, back flow preservation devices, fire valves, A/C condensers,
furnaces, utility cabinets and other equipment) shall be located away from public
view or adequately screened by landscaping or screening walls so as not to be
seen from the public right of way or other public space within the development.
The Planning Division shall approve said screening prior to installation.
28.A landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and
approval prior to the issuance of building permits. All existing landscape planters
onsite and in the public right -of -way, adjacent to the lot, shall be renovated with
new drought tolerant landscape materials.
29.The landscaped areas shall be maintained with adequate landscaping on a
regular basis, including the removal of trash and litter, the replanting of dead or
missing shrubs and plants as shown on the aforementioned plans, as well as the
periodic pruning of dead limbs and branches as necessary. A new automatic
irrigation system, with moisture sensors, will also be required in any planter that
is not being adequately maintained by the existing system.
30.All open area not covered by concrete, asphalt, or structures shall be landscaped
and maintained on a regular basis.
31.The existing trash enclosure located along the west property line shall be fully
enclosed with a solid cover and have opaque steel self - closing and self - latching
doors.
32.Adequate lighting shall be provided in the vehicle parking area. A lighting plan
shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of
building permits.
33.The hours of operation shall be posted in the front window or door. Hours of
operation shall be up to 24 -hours per day, or such lesser operation hours as the
applicant desires (Modified by the Planning Commission on March 5, 2012).
34.Applicant shall not publicize, hold, host, authorize, or allow to be held or hosted
on the subject property any live, onsite mixed martial arts events or
demonstrations that include as any part of the event two (2) or more individuals
engaging in physical competition or contest between or among them in which the
individuals strike each other in any way. This condition of approval does not
prohibit the gym from hosting televised events as part of their family event night.
Only UFC Gym members and their guests are permitted to attend the family
event nights. The areas designated for the family event night shall be consistent
with the event layout, attached as Exhibit "E." UFC Gym shall host no more than
two (2) family event nights per month within the gym facility and all such events
shall end no later than 10:00 p.m. No outside food or beverages shall be brought
into the gym by gym members and their guests for any family event night
(Modified by the Planning Commission on March 5, 2012).
35. In connection with the mixed martial arts training and other training provided on
the subject property, applicant shall not allow any individuals to engage in direct
uncontrolled contact or real physical combat in which the individuals directly
strike each other. Limited controlled contact, such as sparring between not more
than two (2) patrons is permitted for instructional use, but controlled contact shall
require a professionally trained instructor to be in the training area with the
patrons and at no time shall patrons engage in unsupervised and /or uncontrolled
contact (Modified by the Planning Commission on March 5, 2012).
36. No exterior vending machines shall be permitted.
37.A security plan shall be submitted to the City of Rosemead Chief of Police for
review and approval, prior to the issuance of building permits. The security plan
shall include a surveillance camera system, the presence of a security guard
during night time hours of operation, a parking lot lighting plan, and picture ID
Membership control system. If warranted on the basis of the City of Rosemead
Public Safety or Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department incident reports, the
City shall have the right to require additional security measures.
38.A final sign plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and
approval, prior to Planning Final Inspection. The exterior building wall signs shall
consist of internally illuminated channel letters and logos with bronze returns and
trim caps. The background on the double -sided pylon signs shall be opaque, so
that only the letters illuminate during night -time illumination. The pylon signs
shall be re- painted. All signage proposed shall comply with RMC Section
17.76.120.
39.The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy Permit and any applicable
City of Rosemead Business License prior to beginning business operations.
40.Additional services, which include chiropractic services, tanning, therapeutic
massage, sports, rehabilitation therapy, babysitting, etc. shall not be allowed,
unless and until the applicant receives approval of a Planned Development
Review from the Planning Commission for such services and all applicable
permits are obtained (Modified by the Planning Commission on October 19,
2009).
41.The applicant shall remove the existing loading dock which extends beyond the
property line to the satisfaction of the Rosemead Building Official and Rosemead
City Engineer, prior to Planning Final Inspection.
42. All openings along the west property line shall be closed to the satisfaction of the
Rosemead Building Official, prior to Planning Final Inspection.
43.All bent or broken bollards or wheel stops in the parking lot area shall be
removed and replaced.
44. All dilapidated block walls surrounding the property shall be replaced.
45.All portions of the building affected by graffiti shall be re- painted to match the
base color of the building.
46.All light fixtures shall be re- painted.
47.All "Levitz Furniture" signs in the parking lot area shall be removed.
48.Violation of the conditions of approval may result in a citation and /or initiation of
revocation proceedings.
49.Closed Quarter Combat (CQC) training provided to law enforcement personnel
shall be provided in conjunction with the applicable Chief of Police or
Commander of the Law Enforcement and the training will take place in a closed
room. The training will only be available to individuals designated by the Chief of
Commander and a plan for the training will be provided to the city prior to any
such training taking place (Added by the Planning Commission on October
19, 2009).
50.AII unpermitted signage along the south elevation shall be removed.
PC RESOLUTION 12 -04
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 11 -10 FOR CONVERSION
OF AN EXISTING 7,547 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT INTO A
MEDITATION TEMPLE, LOCATED AT 8752 VALLEY BOULEVARD IN
THE C -3D (MEDIUM COMMERCIAL WITH A DESIGN OVERLAY) ZONE
(APN: 5390 - 010 -081).
WHEREAS, on July 6, 2011, Hari Alipuria submitted an application to convert an
existing 7,547 square foot restaurant into a meditation temple located at 8752 Valley
Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, 8752 Valley Boulevard is located in the C -3D (Medium Commercial
with a Design Overlay) zoning district; and
WHEREAS, Section 17.112.020 (2) of the Rosemead Municipal Code (RMC) allows
churches or other places used exclusively for religious worship, upon the granting of a
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) by the Planning Commission. Section 17.112.010 sets
the following findings required for granting such a permit:
A. The granting of such conditional use permit will be in harmony with the
elements or objectives of the General Plan.
B. The establishment, maintenance or conduct of the use for which the
conditional use permit is sought will not be detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons
residing or working in the neighborhood thereof; and
C. The granting of such conditional use permit will not be detrimental or
injurious to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or the
general welfare.
WHEREAS, Sections 65800 & 65900 of the California Government Code and
Section 17.112.010 of the Rosemead Municipal Code authorize the Planning
Commission to approve, conditionally approve, or deny Conditional Use Permits; and
WHEREAS, on February 23, 2012, forty-three (43) notices were sent to property
owners within a 300 -foot radius from the subject property, in addition to notices posted
in six (6) public locations and on -site, specifying the availability of the application, plus
the date, time and location of the public hearing for Conditional Use Permit 11 -10; and
on February 24, 2012, the notice was published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune; and
WHEREAS, on March 5, 2012, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed and
advertised public hearing to receive oral and written testimony relative to Conditional
Use Permit 11 -10; and
WHEREAS, the Rosemead Planning Commission has sufficiently considered all
testimony presented to them in order to make the following determination.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City
of Rosemead as follows:
SECTION 1 . The Planning Commission HEREBY DETERMINES that Conditional
Use Permit 11 -10 is Categorically Exempt from environmental review as a Class 32
Exemption pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA).
SECTION 2 . The Planning Commission HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES
that facts do exist to justify approving Conditional Use Permit 11 -10 according to the
findings of Chapter 17.112.010 of the Rosemead Municipal Code as follows:
A. The granting of such Conditional Use Permit will be in harmony with the
elements or objectives of the General Plan.
FINDING: The site is designated in the General Plan for Commercial, and on
the zoning map it is designated for C -3D (Medium Commercial with a Design Overlay)
zone. The proposed use is in conformity with the General Plan in that the C -3D zoning
is a corresponding zone district with the Commercial General Plan land use category.
B. The establishment, maintenance or conduct of the use for which the
Conditional Use Permit is sought will not, under the particular case, be detrimental to
the health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience or welfare of persons residing or
working in the neighborhood.
FINDING: The proposed project includes a request for a Conditional Use
Permit for the conversion of an existing 7,547 square foot restaurant into a meditation
temple. Due to the small worship area proposed within the temple, the operation
impacts are anticipated to be minimal. Although the first floor totals approximately
4,500 square feet, only 359 square feet will be used for worship area. Staff has worked
closely with the applicant to ensure that the floor plan design limits the occupancy to
that regulated by the Building Code. The remaining square footage will consist of a
religious gift shop, walkways, physical elements (such as water features and guard
rails), the kitchen, and restrooms. The physical elements will be used to clearly define
walkways and the designated worship area in the building.
The applicant is proposing to maintain all existing light standards, landscaping
and fencing onsite. The existing 6' -0" block walls surround the parking lot area, which
provides a buffering between the parking lot area and the adjacent residential
properties. The existing lighting, which will be maintained, is fully shielded and
downward facing. Therefore,. no new source of light glare will be generated by the
project.
Lastly, several conditions of approval have been added to ensure that all
property maintenance issues are corrected, such as landscape rehabilitation, parking lot
rehabilitation, repainting of the building, and cleaning the storefront windows.
C. The Conditional Use Permit applied for is authorized by the provisions of this
title and that the granting of such conditional use permit will not be injurious to the
property or improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the city.
FINDING: The proposed project consists of the conversion of an existing
7,547 square foot restaurant into a meditation temple known as the Gita Meditation
Temple. No exterior renovation is proposed. The proposed meditation temple will
be conducted entirely within the enclosed building.
The applicant is proposing to maintain all existing light standards, landscaping
and fencing onsite. The existing 6' -0" block walls surround the parking lot area, which
provides a buffering between the parking lot area and the adjacent residential
properties. The existing lighting, which will be maintained, is fully shielded and
downward facing. Therefore, no new source of light glare will be generated by the
project.
Lastly, several conditions of approval have been added to ensure that all
property maintenance issues are corrected, such as landscape rehabilitation, parking lot
rehabilitation, repainting of the building, and cleaning the storefront windows.
SECTION 3 . The Planning Commission HEREBY APPROVES Conditional Use
Permit 11 -10 to convert an existing 7,547 square foot restaurant into a meditation
temple, subject to conditions listed in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated
herein by reference.
SECTION 4 . This action shall become final and effective ten (10) days after the
Planning Commission decision, unless within such time a written appeal is filed with the
City Clerk for consideration by the Rosemead City Council as provided in Section
17.124.070 of the Rosemead Municipal Code.
SECTION 5 . This resolution is the result of an action taken by the Planning
Commission on March 5, 2012, by the following vote:
YES: ENG, HERRERA, HUNTER, RUIZ AND SACCARO
NO: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
SECTION 6 . The secretary shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and
shall transmit copies of same to the applicant and the Rosemead City Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 5 th day of March, 2012.
N
Nana g, C a r
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a resolution adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rosemead at its regular meeting, held on the 5 th day of
March, 2011 by the following vote:
YES: ENG, HERRERA, HUNTER, RUIZ AND SACCARO
NO: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: NONE n
Michelle Ramirez, Seclry
TO FORM:
Grego".)Kurph lanning Commis n Attorney
Burke, WilliamsA Sorensen, LLP
EXHIBIT " B"
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 11 -10
8752 VALLEY BOULEVARD
(APN: 5390 - 010 -081)
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
March 5, 2012
1. Conditional Use Permit 11 -10 is approved for the conversion of a 7,547 square
foot restaurant into a meditation temple, in accordance with the plans marked
Exhibit "C ", dated January 25, 2012. Any revisions to the approved plans must
be resubmitted for the review and approval of the Planning Division.
2. Approval of Conditional Use Permit 11 -10 shall not take effect for any purpose
until the applicant has filed with the City of Rosemead a notarized affidavit stating
that he /she is aware of and accepts all of the conditions of approval as set forth
in the letter of approval and this list of conditions, within ten (10) days from the
Planning Commission approval date.
3. Conditional Use Permit 11 -10 is approved for a period of six (6) months from the
Planning Commission approval date. The applicant shall initiate the proposed
use, or request an extension within 30- calendar days before the expiration of the
six (6) month approval period. Otherwise, Conditional Use Permit 11 -10 shall
become null and void
4. The Planning Commission hereby authorizes the Planning Division to make or
approve minor modifications to the approved plans where necessary.
5. Conditional Use Permit 11 -10 is granted or approved with the City and its
Planning Commission and City Council retaining and reserving the right and
jurisdiction to review and to modify the permit, including the conditions of
approval based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but
are not limited to, the modification of the use, a change in scope, emphasis, size,
or nature of the use, or the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration, or change of
use. This reservation of right to review is in addition to,.and not in lieu of, the right
of the City, its Planning Commission, and City Council to review and revoke or
modify any permit granted or approved under the Rosemead Municipal Code for
any violations of the conditions imposed on Conditional Use Permit 11 -10.
6. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Rosemead
or its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding
against the City of Rosemead or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set
side, void, or annul, an approval of the Planning Commission and /or City Council
concerning the project, which action is brought within the time period provided by
law.
7. The following conditions must be complied with to the satisfaction of the Planning
Division prior to final approval of the associated plans, building permits,
occupancy permits, or any other appropriate request.
8. The conditions listed on this exhibit shall be copied directly onto any
development plans subsequently submitted to the Planning and Building
divisions for review.
9. The hours of operation shall be limited to 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., daily. The
hours of operation shall be posted on the front window or door.
10. The applicant shall comply with all Federal, State, and local laws relative to the
approved use including the requirements of the Planning, Building, Fire, Sheriff,
and Health Departments. Prior to submittal to the Planning, Building, Fire,
Sheriff, and Health Departments for any approvals related to this Conditional Use
Permit, the applicant shall submit a revised and correct site plan to the Planning
Division, which shall be subject to Division review and approval.
11. No portion of the lot, outside of the building, shall be used for storage of any type,
unless designated and approved by the Planning Division. All trash and debris
shall be contained within approved trash enclosure(s).
12. The numbers of the address sign shall be at least 6" tall with a minimum
character width of 1/4 ", contrasting in color and easily visible at driver's level from
the street. Materials, colors, location, and size of such address numbers shall be
approved by the City Planner, or his or her designee, prior to installation.
13. Occupancy will not be granted until all improvements required by this approval
have been completed, inspected, and approved by the appropriate
department(s).
14. The site shall be maintained in a graffiti -free state. Any new graffiti shall be
removed within twenty -four (24) hours. A 24 -hour Graffiti Hotline can be called at
(626) 569 -2345 for assistance.
15. The applicant shall maintain a minimum clearance of five (5) feet (free of any
debris, storage, furniture, etc.) from any electrical /mechanical equipment and /or
emergency exits.
16. The site shall be maintained in a clean, weed and litter free state in accordance
with Sections 8.32.010 - 8.32.040 of the Rosemead Municipal Code, which
pertains to the storage, accumulation, collection, and disposal of garbage,
rubbish, trash, and debris. All trash containers shall be stored in the appropriate
trash enclosure at all times. All trash, rubbish, and garbage receptacles shall be
regularly cleaned, inspected, and maintained in a clean, safe, and sanitary
condition. The trash enclosure doors shall be closed at all times.
17. Conditions of approval listed on Exhibit "B" shall be copied directly onto final
development plans submitted to the Planning and Building Division for review.
18. The parking area, including handicapped spaces, shall be paved and re- painted
periodically to City standards to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. In
accordance with Chapter 17.84 of the Rosemead Municipal Code, all designated
parking stalls shall be double striped and have wheel stops. Such striping shall
be maintained in a clear, visible, and orderly manner.
19. Adequate lighting shall be provided in the parking area where deemed
appropriate by the Planning Division. All exterior lighting shall be directed away
from adjacent properties.
20. The landscaped areas shall be maintained with adequate landscaping on a
regular basis, including the removal of trash and litter, the replanting of dead or
missing shrubs and plants as shown on the aforementioned plans, as well as the
periodic pruning of dead limbs and branches as necessary.
21. Any exterior signage shall be subject to the requirements of the Rosemead
Municipal Code and the review and approval of the Planning Division prior to
installation.
22. The onsite public hearing notice posting shall be removed within 30 days from
the end of the 10 -day appeal period of Conditional Use Permit 11 -10.
23. All driveway entrances and exits shall remain open and unobstructed at all times.
24. Prior to the issuance of Building permits, the existing building shall be repainted.
The applicant shall work with Planning Division staff on the selection of the paint
color.
25. Prior to the issuance of Building permits, all exterior Christmas lights shall be
removed from the building.
26. Prior to the issuance of Building permits, the storefront windows shall be cleaned
and maintained. All neon lighting on the storefront windows shall be removed.
27. Prior to the issuance of Building permits, all existing landscape planters onsite
shall be rehabilitated and improved with new landscaping. All existing and
proposed landscaping shall comply with the City's Water Efficient Landscape
regulations.
28. Prior to the issuance of Building permits, the existing trash enclosure onsite shall
be upgraded with a solid roof cover.
29. Prior to the issuance of Building permits, the parking lot area shall be
rehabilitated (pavement repair, restriping of parking spaces, etc.). All broken
wheel stops shall be removed and replaced. Circulation patterns shall be painted
along the driveways and parking lot area.
30. All components of the previously used restaurant within the area designated as a
"religious gift shop" shall be removed.
31. The second floor shall be closed off to the public and limited to office and storage
use only. At no time, shall the open hallways on the second floor be used as
assembly area at any time.
32. Any special events, other than regular temple activities, shall require the review
and approval of a Special Event Permit by the Community Development
Department.
33. All temple activities shall be conducted within the enclosed building.
34. The total occupant load permitted within the meditation area is 52 people.
35. The temple shall not be utilized as living quarters.
36. No classes, seminars, conferences, etc. shall be conducted within the building.
37. Violations of the conditions of approval may result in citation and /or initiation of
revocation proceedings.
CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
Public Works/ Engineering: 8838 East Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California 91770 (626) 569 -2150 FAX: (626) 307 -9218
Date: March 12, 2012 Contract Number: C11613
Project: RCRC & Library Parking Lot- Geotechnical Services Change Order Number: 1
Spec No.:
To: Willdan Geotechnical
1515 S. Sunkist Street, Suite E
Anaheim, CA 92806 Contractor Telephone: (714) 634 -3318
Attention: Mr. Ross Khiabani, PE, GE, President/CEO Contractor Fax: (714) 634 -3372
Description of Change (additional sheet attached)
• Revised Scope of Work for Civic Center Parking Lot Project ............................ ......................$1,650.00
• Geotechnical Services for Proposed Additional Building at RCRC ....................... .....................$9,500.00
(Per Attached Proposals )
Total Contract Change Order No. 1 $ 11,150.00
Reason for Change (additional sheets attached) ❑
The above described changes are outside the original scope of work for this project.
Distribution
Contractor M Consultant ❑ Division M Project Manager ® Project File ® Other: ❑
Form PWE (Revised 5/09) Page 1 of 2
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
The change results in the following adjustment of Contract Price and /or Time:
Demotion Amount
% Chancre
Original Contract Price , - -,, _______________________ __ _______________ ____ ____ _ _ __ __ $ 12,720.00
Net Change by Previously Authorized Change Orders/ Contract Amendment „- „, ,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,, $ 0.00
This Change Order., „, ,,,,,,,,, , , , ,, ------------ - ,--- ,,,,,- ,,,,- -,,___ . $ 11,150.00 (87.6 %)
Total Change Order Amount including this Change Order,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,, ,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,,, ,„ $ 11,150.00 (87.6 %)
Contract Price after Change Order ------ ---------- $ 23,870.00
Account/Program Numbers -------- _------------ ____ ........................... -.................... 301- 6005- 5245 - 31004 -305 4 $ 11,150.00
Contract Time prior to Change Order .................... _------------------------ _______ .... _ ... N/A
Net Increase in Days Authorized by this Change Order,
N/A
Current Contract Time including this Change Order _ - -,_„ N/A
Project Completion Date Including Net Increase in Days by Change Order__ -
Contractor is hereby directed to make the herein - described changes and /or perform said herein - described work in
connection with above reference project. All new work shall conform to the applicable provisions of the plans and
specifications, except as specifically modified by the Contract Change Order.
This Change Order No. 1 to Contract No. C 11613 constitutes full and complete compensation for all costs associated with
the above changes inclusive of insurance, contractors profit, direct and indirect overhead, extended office overhead,
bonds, supervision, labor, materials and equipment. All other costs are non - compensable.
All other provisions, requirements, terms and conditions contained in the above referenced Agreement remain in full force
and effect. This Change Order is not valid until signed by both City and Contractor.
Attachments: (List attached documents that support Change Order)
Contractor's Change Order Requests
City of Rosemead
Prepared / Approved
O roject Manager Date
City Engineer Date
Contractor/ Consultant
Accepted By:
Willdan Geotechnical
Name of Contr
Contractor Representative Signature Date
r� Dt *� �ss Pr y
Director of Public Works [wh en required] Printed Name, Title
Additional City Approvals:
Date
Date
Form PWE (Revised 5/09) Page 2 of 2
40/ WILLDAN I y t e r nding
Geotechnical reach
Revised March 8, 2012
(December 23, 2011)
Mr. Rafael Fajardo
City of Rosemead
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
8838 E Valley Boulevard
Rosemead, California 91770
Subject: Revised Scope of Work & Cost Estimate for Concrete Observation, Sampling
& Testing Services, Rosemead Community Recreation Center/Library
Parking Lot Project, City of Rosemead, California
Reference: City of Rosemead Professional Services Agreement with Willdan
Geotechnical for Geotechnical Services /Material Testing, Rosemead
Community Recreation Center/Library Parking Lot, dated August 10, 2011,
Contract No. C11613, Willdan Project No. 100853
Dear Mr. Fajardo:
This proposal is revised to reflect actual extra charges accrued for providing concrete sampling
and testing for this project.
Willdan Geotechnical is pleased to present this Scope of Work and Cost Estimate per your verbal
request to provide quality assurance (QA) testing for approximately 1,100 cubic yards of
concrete to be placed for the parking lot and driveway pavement at the'subject project.
We propose the following scope of work. This work replaces the originally proposed asphalt
concrete observation and testing per the referenced contract.
Scope of Work
1. Provide a qualified technician on a full -time basis to perform slump tests on the concrete be-
ing delivered to the site, observe concrete placement, and cast one set of four (4) concrete cy-
linders for each 150 cubic yards of concrete placed.
2. Pick -up concrete cylinders after field- curing period and deliver to Willdan's material testing
laboratory in Anaheim for curing under controlled moisture and temperature conditions.
3. Perform and report on -going compression test results (7 -day and 14 -day breaks).
4. Perform and report completed compression test results (28 -day breaks).
Based on compression and slump testing results, provide on -going reports indicating com-
pliance or non- compliance of concrete mix with project documents and applicable codes.
Engineering I Geotechnical I Environmental I Sustainabilily I Financial I Homeland Security
Phone 714.634.3318 1 fax: 714.634.3372 11515 South Sunkist Street, Suite E, Anaheim, CA 92806 1 w .willdan.com
Mr. Rafael Fajardo
City of Rosemead Public Works Engineering Department
Revised March S. 2012 (December 23, 2011)
Page 2
6. Provide final report to the City.
7. Provide engineering support, technician coordination, dispatch, material engineering review,
test reporting, QA/QC, and administrative support services
Cost Estimate
Our estimated costs for the proposed services are One Thousand Six Hundred Fifty Dollars
($1,650). Please note that these costs are approximately the same as the costs estimated for
asphalt concrete placement observation, sampling and testing services in the referenced contract.
As such, no additional budget is being requested by us In preparing this estimate we have
assumed that prevailing wage rates are applicable. These fees are based on the scope outlined
above and an estimated six (6) days of field work at eight (8) hours each day, including travel
time. An itemized breakdown is provided below. The actual fees will be charged on a time -and-
material basis. Weekends, holidays, and overtime hours are not included in this estimate.
This is a Prevailing Wage Rate project.
Estimated Fees For Concrete Observation, Sampling and Testing Services
Field Observation & Testin
Observe Placement of Concrete, Sample Concrete Hours $ 75 16 $ 1,200
& Perform Slump Tests, and Cast Cylinders
for Compression Testing
Cylinder Pick -Up — No Charge
Laboratory Testing
Compressive Strength — Concrete Cylinders Each $ 20 20 $ 400
(ASTM C39 /AASHTO T22)
Test Reports Each $ 10 5 $ 50
On behalf of the principals and staff of Willdan Geotechnical we thank you for your consideration.
We look forward to the opportunity to be of service. Please call me if you have any questions or
need additional information.
Respectfully Submitted,
WILL GEOTE CHNICAL
GirishAgrawal, PhD, PE, GE
Principal Engineer
Distribution: Addressee (via e -mail only)
40/ WI LLDAN I yeo#endng
Geotechnical readi'
March 6, 2012
Mr. Rafael Fajardo
City of Rosemead
8838 E. Valley Boulevard
Rosemead, CA 91770
Subject: PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION SERVICES FOR
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED NEW BUILDING (Building B) AT
ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER,
CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
Dear Mr. Fajardo:
Willdan Geotechnical is pleased to present our Scope of Work, and Cost for your consideration to provide
geotechnical engineering investigation for the proposed new building at Rosemead Community
Recreation Center.
It is our understanding that the proposed building is a 3,296 square feet, One Story, Type V.B.,
Occupancy A-3 structure. The project site is located in El Monte Quadrangle, Seismic Hazard Zones, per
State of California, designated as having potential for liquefaction.
I am the president of Willdan Geotechnical and designated contact person for this project. Following is my
contact information:
Ross Khiabani
President/CEO
Office: 714.634.3318 ext. 1782
Cell: 714 - 309 -9326
Email: rkhiabani(a)willdan.com
This is to confirm that this proposal shall remain valid for a period of not less than 30 days from date of
submittal and all information submitted with this proposal is true and correct.'
On behalf of the principals and staff of Willdan Geotechnical we thank you for your consideration. We look
forward to the opportunity to be of service. Please call me personally if you have any questions or need
additional information.
Respectfully Submitted,
WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL
Ross Khiabani, PE, GE
President/CEO
Distribution: Addressee
Engineering I Geotechnical I EnAmmental I Sustainability l Financial 1 . Homeland Security
714.634.3316 1 fax 714.634.3372 1 1515 South Sunkist Street, Suite E, Anaheim, CA 92806 1 w .willdan.com
Scope of Work
Our proposed approach and methodology to meet the objectives for the subject project is out-
lined below. The tasks in the following work plan are to be performed in the order they are enu-
merated. Willdan Geotechnical will provide all personnel, material, and equipment to perform
the requested services.
Task 1 — Research and Review
We have done a preliminary review of available subsurface data, including information available
in our files as well as published geologic and geotechnical maps and documents to determine the
regional geology and subsurface conditions in the general area of the project site. Prior to con-
ducting field investigations, we will revisit and update this information.
Task 2 — Permitting and Utility Clearance
Prior to field exploration, we will mark the boring locations and obtain a ticket number from Un-
derground Services Alert ( "Dig Alert"). We will meet with utility company locators on site, if
they so request. If drilling/encroachment permit required by the City of Rosemead, we assume
that this will be a no -fee permit.
Task 3 — Field Investigation
The proposed field investigation is based on the available information, our experience with the
type of development proposed, a preliminary review of published geotechnical and geologic in-
formation, and our knowledge of the subsurface conditions in the general vicinity of the site.
We propose to conduct the field investigation using soil borings. Two (2) soil borings will be
drilled using a truck - mounted drill rig equipped with hollow -stem and /or solid -flight augers. One
of the borings will be drilled to a minimum depth of 50 feet or refusal, whichever comes first to
address the liquefaction potential and resulting dynamic and liquefaction settlements.
Relatively undisturbed ring samples and disturbed Standard Penetration Test (SPT) samples will
be collected at frequent intervals from the borings. An experienced member of our engineering /
technical staff will log earth materials in the field in accordance with the Unified Soil Classifica-
tion System — Visual/ Manual Procedure. The samples will be transported to Willdan's geotech-
nical laboratory for testing.
The boreholes will be backfilled with the excavated spoils and tamped. The surface in paved
areas will be restored with cold -patch asphalt, as appropriate.
City of Rosemead
PROPOSAL FOR BUILDING ADDITION,
Rosemead Community Recreation Center
Task 4 — Geotechnical Laboratory Testing
Geotechnical laboratory testing will be performed on representative samples of soil to evaluate
the engineering characteristics of these materials. Testing will include a combination of the fol-
lowing:
• In situ moisture and density
• Gradation
• Atterberg limits and/or Expansion Index tests, only if clays are encountered
• One - Dimensional Consolidation tests, only if clays are encountered
• Direct Shear tests
• Corrosion tests (Minimum Resistivity, pH, Sulfate Content and Chloride Content)
Task 6 — Geotechnical Engineering Analyses
Data obtained from subsurface exploration and laboratory testing will be evaluated to develop
idealized subsurface profiles and define soil parameters for engineering analyses. The following
analyses are anticipated for the project:
• A seismic investigation that includes: (1) identification of known active and potentially active
faults near the site as well as the nearby inactive faults, (2) Probabilistic Seismic Hazard
Analysis (PSHA) to determine the peak horizontal acceleration (PHGA) and design spectra
for 2 percent probability of exceedance in 50 years (the Maximum Considered Earthquake,
MCE) per CBC 2010, and (3) Spectral response coefficients and site coefficients per the re-
quirements of the 2010 CBC (Ss, S SD, SDI, Cs, F and F
• Evaluation of the potential for liquefaction, earthquake - induced settlement, and lateral
spreading based on DBE event, if applicable, for the site.
• Assessment of general subsurface conditions;
• Analysis of bearing capacities of foundation soils, friction coefficient and adhesion at the
base of the footings, and total and differential settlement criteria;
• Grading and fill compaction criteria; and
• Determination of subgrade soil expansion/collapse potential and potential for chemical corro-
sion of reinforced concrete and metal in contact with soil in the foundation zone.
Task 7 — Geotechnical Report Preparation
Upon completion of the above tasks, Willdan Geotechnical will prepare a geotechnical investiga-
tion report which will be signed and stamped by a California Registered Geotechnical Engineer
(GE). The report will contain our findings, conclusions, and recommendations for the proposed
improvements. The report is envisioned to include the following:
City of Rosemead
PROPOSAL FOR BUILDING ADDITION,
Rosemead Community Recreation Center
• Figures showing the site location and the final location of subsurface exploration;
• A description of the field and laboratory procedures used in the investigation;
• A discussion of the materials encountered in the borings and measured engineering properties
including soil strata, and present and historical ground water levels;
• Logs of exploratory borings detailing the soil conditions encountered and results of the geo-
technical laboratory testing;
• A description of the site geology, including information obtained from the soil borings;
• A discussion of site - specific geologic hazards, including detailed description of the location
and characteristics of known faults near the site and the potential for fault rupture through the
site, liquefaction, seismic - induced landslide, and earthquake - induced ground subsidence
and/or flooding;
• The peak horizontal acceleration for 2 percent probability of exceedance in 50 years (Maxi-
mum Considered Earthquake, MCE);
• The site seismic - Resistance Design parameters per CBC (2010);
• Recommendations for foundation design, vertical and lateral (passive and friction) load ca-
pacities, and minimum embedment depth of various types of footings;
• Information on total and differential settlements, both short term and long term, based on the
recommended foundation system;
• A discussion of the corrosivity and sulfate and/or chloride attack potential of onsite soils; and
• Recommendations for general site grading, including removal and/or treatment of compress-
ible, liquefiable, expansive /collapsible, or otherwise unsuitable soils. Recommendations for
use of on -site material as fill, placement and compaction of engineered fill and backfill ma-
terial.
The report will be delivered as an electronic copy in PDF format. If requested, we will also de-
liver the report in printed, bound form.
ESTIMATED COST
We propose to perform the above scope of work for an estimated cost of Nine Thousand Five
Hundred Dollars ($ 9,500).
City of Rosemead
PROPOSAL FOR BUILDING ADDITION,
Rosemead Community Recreation Center
Ca1PM
„
California
Public Employees' Retirement System
tyI AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT
Between the
Board of Administration
California Public Employees' Retirement System
and the
City Council
City of Rosemead
The Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System,
hereinafter referred to as Board, and the governing body of the above public agency,
hereinafter referred to as Public Agency, having entered into a contract effective
October 12, 1992, and witnessed September 8, 1992, and as amended effective April 9,
1993, July 27, 1998, November 5, 2007, April 24, 2009 and December 13, 2010 which
provides for participation of Public Agency in said System, Board and Public Agency
hereby agree as follows:
A. Paragraphs 1 through 14 are hereby stricken from said contract as executed
effective December 13, 2010, and hereby replaced by the following paragraphs
numbered 1 through 14 inclusive:
1. All words and terms used herein which are defined in the Public
Employees' Retirement Law shall have the meaning as defined therein
unless otherwise specifically provided. "Normal retirement age" shall
mean age 55 for local miscellaneous members.
2. Public Agency shall participate in the Public Employees' Retirement
System from and after October 12, 1992 making its employees as
hereinafter provided, members of said System subject to all provisions of
the Public Employees' Retirement Law except such as apply only on
election of a contracting agency and are not provided for herein and to all
amendments to said Law hereafter enacted except those, which by
express provisions thereof, apply only on the election of a contracting
agency.
F.,.a
h -!
da.
3.;' Public Agency agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the
California Public Employees' Retirement System CalPERS
a , Y (CalPERS) and its
trustees, agents and employees, the CalPERS Board of Administration,
and the California Public Employees' Retirement Fund from any claims,
demands, actions, losses, liabilities, damages, judgments, expenses and
costs, including but not limited to interest, penalties and attorneys fees
P..J
that may arise as a result of any of the following:
h:
(a) Public Agency's election to provide retirement benefits,
provisions or formulas under this Contract that are different than
the retirement benefits, provisions or formulas provided under
the Public Agency's prior non- CaIPERS retirement program.
(b) Public Agency's election to amend this Contract to provide
retirement benefits, provisions or formulas that are different than
existing retirement benefits, provisions or formulas.
(c) Public Agency's agreement with a third party other than
CalPERS to provide retirement benefits, provisions, or formulas
that are different than the retirement benefits, provisions or
formulas provided under this Contract and provided for under
the California Public Employees' Retirement Law.
(d) Public Agency's election to file for bankruptcy under Chapter 9
(commencing with section 901) of Title 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code and /or Public Agency's election to reject this
Contract with the CalPERS Board of Administration pursuant to
section 365, of Title 11, of the United States Bankruptcy Code
or any similar provision of law.
(e) Public Agency's election to assign this Contract without the prior
written consent of the CalPERS' Board of Administration.
(f) The termination of this Contract either voluntarily by request of
Public Agency or involuntarily pursuant to the Public Employees'
Retirement Law.
(g) Changes sponsored by Public Agency in existing retirement
benefits, provisions or formulas made as a result of
amendments, additions or deletions to California statute or to
the California Constitution.
Xu
Employees of Public Agency in the following classes shall become
members of said Retirement System except such in each such class as
are excluded by law or this agreement:
a. Employees other than local safety members (herein referred to as
n.a
local miscellaneous members).
5. In addition to the classes of employees excluded from membership by
said Retirement Law, the following classes of employees shall not become
members of said Retirement System:
a. SAFETY EMPLOYEES;
b. "PLANNING AND TRAFFIC COMMISSION ";
C. ADMINISTRATIVE INTERNS HIRED ON OR AFTER APRIL 24,
2009; AND
d. LIFEGUARD -SWIM INSTRUCTOR, LIFEGUARD AND
RECREATION LEADER HIRED ON OR AFTER THE EFFECTIVE
DATE OF THIS AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT.
6. Assets heretofore accumulated with respect to members in the local
retirement system have been transferred to the Public Employees'
Retirement System and applied against the liability for prior service
incurred thereunder.
7. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of
credited prior and current service as a local miscellaneous member in
employment before and not on or after November 5, 2007 shall be
determined in accordance with Section 21354 of said Retirement Law (2%
at age 55 Supplemental to Federal Social Security).
8. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of
credited prior and current service as a local miscellaneous member in
employment on or after November 5, 2007 and not entering membership
for the first time in the miscellaneous classification after December 13,
2010 shall be determined in accordance with Section 21354.5 of said
Retirement Law (2.7 % at age 55 Supplemental to Federal Social
Security).
9. The percentage of final compensation
to be provided for each
year of
credited current service as a
local
miscellaneous member
entering
membership for the first time
in the
miscellaneous classification
after
December 13, 2010 shall be
determined
in accordance with
Section
21354 of said Retirement Law
(2% at
age 55 Supplemental to
Federal
Social Security).
r.a
Xa
1k, Public Agency elected and elects to be subject to the following optional
provisions:
a. Section 20938 (Limit Prior Service to Members Employed on
Contract Date).
b. Section 21536 (Local System Service Credit Included in Basic
Death Benefit).
h.�
h_
c. Section 21031 (Public Service Credit for Limited Prior Service).
d. Section 21024 (Military Service Credit as Public Service).
e. Section 20042 (One -Year Final Compensation).
f. Section 20475 (Different Level of Benefits). Section 21354 (2% @
55 Supplemental formula) is applicable to local miscellaneous
members entering membership for the first time in the
miscellaneous classification after December 13, 2010.
11. Public Agency shall contribute to said Retirement System the contributions
determined by actuarial valuations of prior and future service liability with
respect to local miscellaneous members of said Retirement System.
12. Public Agency shall also contribute to said Retirement System as follows:
a. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one
installment within 60 days of date of contract to cover the costs of
administering said System as it affects the employees of Public
Agency, not including the costs of special valuations or of the
periodic investigation and valuations required by law.
b. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one
installment as the occasions arise, to cover the costs of special
valuations on account of employees of Public Agency, and costs of
the periodic investigation and valuations required by law.
13. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be
subject to adjustment by Board on account of amendments to the Public
Employees' Retirement Law, and on account of the experience under the
Retirement System as determined by the periodic investigation and
valuation required by said Retirement Law.
1¢; Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be paid
by Public Agency to the Retirement System within fifteen days after the
end of the period to which said contributions refer or as may be prescribed
by Board regulation. If more or less than the correct amount of
contributions is paid for any period, proper adjustment shall be made in
connection with subsequent remittances. Adjustments on account of
errors in contributions required of any employee may be made by direct
payments between the employee and the Board. !E5 -
B. This amendment shall be effective on the day ofZ.
BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
BY Vl-
KAREN DE FRANK, CHIEF
CUSTOMER ACCOUNT SERVICES DIVISION
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
BY
PRE8ffING OFFI ER
—1c,y C1vAn_ \\ i q-00,
Witness Date
Attest:
AMENDMENT CaIPERS ID #3461671991
PERS- CON -702A
Amo� Actuarial & Employer Services Branch
P.O. Box 942709
Sacramento, CA 94229 -2709
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf - (916) 795 -3240
CaIPERS (888) CalPERS (225 -7377) FAX (916) 795 -3005
March 13, 2012
Mr. Matthew E. Hawkesworth
Assistant City Manager
City of Rosemead
8838 E. Valley Blvd.
Rosemead, CA 91770
Dear Mr. Hawkesworth:
CalPERS ID# 3461671991
The contract amendment has been executed by CalPERS. The effective date of the
contract amendment is February 10, 2012.
If you have any questions regarding your contract, please do not hesitate to contact our
office at (888) CalPERS (225- 7377).
Sincerely,
Retirement Contract Services
Enclosure
California Public Employees' Retirement System
www.calpers.ca.gov
y
CITY OF ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
Public Works/ Engineering: 8838 East Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California 91770 (626) 569 -2150 FAX: (626) 307 -9218
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
Date: March 7, 2012 Contract Number: C 11601
Sylmar, CA 91342 -1631 Contractor Telephone: (818) 362 -8886
Mark R. Danielson Contractor Fax: (818) 362 -8000
Description of Change (additional sheet attached)
Project: City Hall Complex Rehabilitation - Surveying Change Order Number: 5
Spec No.:
To: Danielson Surveying
13916 Tyler Street
Replace Boundary Monuments after Construction ..................... ............................... $ 2,250.00
(as per Attached Proposal)
Total Contract Change Order No. 5 $2,250.00
Reason for Change (additional sheets attached) ❑
The above described changes were outside the original scope of work of project.
Distribution
Contractor ® Consultant ❑ Division ® Project Manager ® Project File ® Other: ❑
Form PWE (Revised 5/09)
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
The change results in the following adjustment of Contract Price and /or Time:
Description Amount (% Change)
Original Contract Price ....... ...................................................... -............................................. $ 4,830.00
Net Change by Previously Authorized Change Orders/ Contract Amendment ..................... _------ $ 11,717.50 (242.6 %)
This Change Order ................................. _- -................ ................ -- .................................. _ - $ 2,250.00 (46.5 %)
Total Change Order Amount including this Change Order ........................... ......................... . . . ... $ 13,967.50 (289.1 %)
Contract Price after Change Order ............................. _.................. _................. --- .................... $ 18,797.50
Account/Program Numbers
Contract Time prior to Change
Net Increase in Days Authorized by this Change Order
Current Contract Time including this Change Order__________ _______________________________
Project Completion Date Including Net Increase in Days by Change Order..- - -....
N/A
N/A
N/A
Contractor is hereby directed to make the herein - described changes and /or perform said herein - described work in connection
with above reference project. All new work shall conform to the applicable provisions of the plans and specifications, except as
specifically modified by the Contract Change Order.
This Change Order No. 5 to Contract No. C 11601 constitutes full and complete compensation for all costs associated with the
above changes inclusive of insurance, contractors profit, direct and indirect overhead, extended office overhead, bonds,
supervision, labor, materials and equipment. All other costs are non - compensable.
All other provisions, requirements, terms and conditions contained in the above referenced Agreement remain in full force and
effect. This Change Order is not valid until signed by both City and Contractor.
Attachments: (List attached documents that support Change Order)
Consultant's Change Order Request
301 - 6005 - 5225 - 31004 -201 — $ 2,250.00
.......... (Old No. 4760-101-4905-P45501)
City of Rosemead Contractor/ Consultant
Prepared By: Accepted By:
®r. ,. 5; 2 /` � Danielson Surveying
o /ect Maneiger Date N o ontractor
C r
City Engineer
Date
tractor Representative Signature
P rinted Name, Title
Approved B :
Public Works Director (when required) Da
Additional City Approvals:
Date
Date
Date
Form PWE (Revised 5/09) Page 2 of 2
Danielson Surveying
Professional Land Surveyors
"Where Quality is Paramount'
Main office (mailing): 13916 Tyler St., Sylmar, CA 91342
X Satellite office: Irwindale, CA 91706
(818) 362 -8886 (626) 337 -6854 Fax: (818) 362 -8000
Website: www.danielsonsurveying.com Email: info @danielsonsurveying.cem
Change Order Request
City of Rosemead
Public Works Department /Attention Rafael Fajardo
rfajardo@cityofrosemead.org
Project: Civic Center — 8838 E. Valley Blvd., Rosemead 91770 Contract # C11601
Date:
March 7, 2012
Work Order Number:
6120 -0001 D
DS Contract Number:
DS P -6880
Rosemead Contract
Number:
C111601
We will perform the following survey services ...
O Re- monument boundary lines after construction including temporary control and punching of discs of any well
monuments where deemed appropriate (as discussed on March 6, 2012)
Total Cost: $2,250
Work requested by: client
Change Order Expires: 7 days from above date
In order to begin your project, we will need ...
O Approval Signature
O Retainer - - waived
> Invoice will be provided upon completion
O Receipt of the above mentioned items will be taken as acceptance and initiation of this change order.
Work will commence upon written authorization. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate
to contact us.
Sincerely, �3 7// Z
Mark R. Danielson, PLS 7882 Approval Signature I Date
This contract may be cancelled] at any time by either party for any reason within 7 days of written notice. This CO 6120 -0001 D
Will cause all work performed to date to be payable per current fee schedule, not b exceed] the amount or the
lump sum of the task currently in progress.
If eddlgonel services of any kind] related] to this project are required], such as additional work, legal proceeding.
m site meetings, said services shall be performed according to the current Fee Schedule with an approved]
change order.