Loading...
PC - Minutes - 07-18-60CITY OF ROSEMEAD ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA Planning Commission Minutes of July 18, 1960 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemead was held in the City Hall, 3954 North Rosemead Boulevard. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Wilt at 8:00 o'clock p.m. 1. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Advisor Flanery. 2. Present: Commissioners: Casares, Kunz, Lieberg, McCaffree, Rightmeier, Sam, Wilt. Absent: Commissioners: None. Ex officio: Boyke, Flanery, Farrell,,Pederson, Armstrong. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. It was moved by Casares, second by McCaffree that the minutes of July 5, 1960 be approved as printed. Commissioner Rightmeier stated there was a typographical error on page 2, Item 5 the last paragraph, line 2, the first word should read "by" instead of "be ". It was moved by Casares, second by McCaffree, and unanimously carried that the minutes of July 5, 1960 be approved as corrected. 4. OLD BUSINESS. SPECIAL PERMIT CASE NO. :1. ;; CHILD NURSERY SCHOOL, 8756 MISSION DR. Advisor Flanery presented the factual data regarding this case and stated that no additional plot plan had been submitted since the•,las.trmeeting. It:was necessary for Chairman Wilt to remind ±persons in the: audience several. times that the Public Hearing was closed. After considerable discussion, it was moved by McCaffree that this Special Permit be granted with the provision that a six foot.cement block wall be built around the property and ions for ample parking be provided. Commissioner McCaffree altered his motion that there should be one parking space for each employee provided,�in. such a manner that it is-unnecessary to back onto a main thoroughfare. Motion died for lack of second. It was moved by Casares, second by Lieberg, that this Special Permit -be granted on. the following basis: that there be one parking space per employee, two parking spaces per ten children or portion thereof and adequate turn around facilities within the property'so it A s unnecessary to back onto Mission Drive; a;six foot high.chain link or equivalent to be provided with proper necessary openings, and other requirements as laid down by ordinance requirements. After short discussion, the following was included in the fore- going motion by unanimous consent. That planting not less than five feet in depth, with a height of four and one -half feet to be provided on.the east,.south and west boundaries, no higher than the fence ritself, where cement block will is located no- planting is , required;- that all areas to be used by automobiles to have an asphaltic topping; that all signs conform to C -1 zone; hours of operation to be from 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.; and the q)eration conform with all city regulations including Building and:.Safety, Fire and Sanitation. 0 0 Roll call vote as follows: Ayes: Casares, Lieberg, Rightmeier, Wilt. Noes: McCaffree. Absent: None. Kunz and Sam abstained from voting. Attorney Boyko advised the audience that any one dissatisfied with the decesion rendered by the Commission may appeal to the City Council. It was moved by Casares, second by Lieberg, that the previous motion to approve Special Permit Case No. 1 be rescinded. Roll call vote as follows: Ayes: Casares, Lieberg, McCaffree, Wilt. Noes: Rightmeier. Absent: None. Kunz and Sam abstained from voting.. It was moved by Casares, second by Lieberg that Special Permit Case No. 1 be approved subject to the conditions formerly stated and maximum number of children to be not more than 60. It was moved by McCaffree that the motion be amended that the cement block wall be extended the length of the property on the east border. Motion to amend died for lack of second. Roll call vote on the motion was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Lieberg, Wilt. Noes: McCaffree, Rightmeier. Absent: None. Kunz and Sam abstained from voting. 5. NEW BUSINESS. PLOT PLAN NO. 20. LLOYD A. CAYWOOD, 8779 RALPH STREET. Advisor Flanery stated that a title search would be necessary to determine ownership of that area shown on the plot plan which had been offered for street dedication. It.was moved by Casares that since applicant cannot prove ownership that this plot plan be disapproved. Motion died for lack of second. :It was moved by Lieberg, second by Casares, that Plot Plan No. 20 be referred back to the staff; that the Commission waive action at:this'time pending research of the status of the.title :to 'that portion previously offered for dedication as a street. Roll call 'vote was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Kunz, Lieberg, McCaffree, Rightmeier, Sam; Wilt. Noes:..Noee. Absent: None. 6. CITY COUNCIL REQUEST. Secretary Farrell advised the.Commission that the City had requested the Planning Commission to consider the possibility of an amendment to the zoning ordinance concerning the limiting or restricting the number of animals on any one owners property. Several members of the audience wished to address the Commission and were advised by Cha.irman Wilt.that the City Council had heard this matter and had referred it to the Planning Commission for study.. After discussion by the Commission as to the method'by which this study would be conducted it was moved by Rightmeier, second by Sam that at this time the Commission hear from members of•the audience. Rol. I I call vote as follows: Ayes: Rightmeier, Sam. Noes: L.i.eberg., McCaffree, Wilt. Absent: None.. Casares and Kunz abstained from voting. 2 Chairman Wilt appointed a committee consisting of Commissioners McCaffree, Rightmeier, and himself to study this request from the Council and report at the next meeting. 7. Advisor Flanery advised the Commission that he would like to bring a matter before tham concerning a street proposed for dedication. It was moved by McCaffree, second by Lieberg and unanimously carried that this item be considered at this time. Mr. Flanery advised the Commission that a Mr. C. A. Kloster, 3800 Walnut Grove Avenue, had submitted preliminary indication of a road acquisition, and requested the Commission to give en indication if they wished him to proceed. It was moved y Casares, second by McCaffree, and unanimously carried that permission be granted to proceed. 8. GENERAL PLAN DISCUSSION. After a short discussion by the Commission regarding the time required for this discussion, it was moved by Casares, second by Lieberg, and unanimously carried that the Commission meet on Friday, July 22, 1960 at 7:30 p.m. for this discussion. It was moved by Casares, second by Lieberg, and unanimously carried that the meeting adjourn: Meeting adjourned at 10:18p.m. CHAIRMAN - 3 -