Loading...
PC - Minutes - 06-05-610 CITY OF ROSEMEAD ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of June 5, 1961 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemead was held in the Council Chambers, 3954 North Rosemead Boulevard. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Wilt at 8 :03 o'clock p.m. 1. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Kunz. 2. Present: Commissioners: Buchanan, Kunz, Lieberg, McCaffree, Wearden, Wilt. Absent: Commissioner Casares. Ex officio: Boyko, Flanery, Pederson,. Phillips. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 15, 1961. Commissioner Lieberg stated that on page 3, second motion should read as follows "It was moved by Lieberg, second by Casares, that all plot plans and other approvals granted by the Rosemead Planning Commission shall be considered revoked one year from approval date unless otherwise specified in the approval or unless the owner or applicant can show con- tinuous progress towards completion over the twelve (12) month period.. A request for extension of time by the applicant in writing will be considered by the Commission at any time within 18 months of the approval date.." (MO) It was moved by Kunz, second by Buchanan, and unanimously carried that the minutes of May 15, 1961, be approved as corrected. ADMINISTRATIVE: NEW BUSINESS 4. ZEC N0. 11 - RINKER DEVELOPMENT - Rosemead Blvd. & Glendon Way. PUBLIC HEARING 8:07 p.m. Advisor Flanery presented the factual data zone exception. He explained that this is Shell Service Station to be located at the of Glendon Way and Rosemead Blvd, which is showing location, zoning, and land use, pl plan) were described in full. regarding this a request for a northeast corner zoned.R -3. Maps .is Exhibit A (plot Chairman Wilt declared the Public Hearing open at 8 :15 o' clock p.m: Chairman Wilt asked that anyyone desiring to be heard concerning this matter stand and be sworn in. The oath was administered by Advisor F)anery. Mr. Edward Till, 145 N. Painter Ave., Whittier, representing Harker Development, stated that they have attempted to util- ize this location for multiple development but it has been impossible to obtain any interested parties for this purpose. Mr. Till further stated that he realized this is not an ideal site for a service station but that it would utilize this location most productively. The building will be 1,235 sq. feet with a 50 foot setback on Rosemead Blvd. and a 52 foot setback on Glendon Way, the level of the lot will be dropped down lI to 2 feet and a retaining wall and fence will be con- structed around this property thus creating a sound and sight buffer. w w Mr. Channing LeFebvre, 1085 N. Harbor, Anaheim, representing Shell Oil Company, stated that there will be 3 storage tanks, 2 holding 4,000 gallons and 1 - 6,000 gallon tank of which they estimate 30,000 gallons will be pumped a month. The truck rig which fills these tanks holds 6,000 gallons which means there would be approximately 5 fillings a month, and these are sometimes done at night. Commissioner Buchanan asked what services this station would provide? Mr. LeFebvre answered the usual gas tank filling, lubrications, tire changes, etc., but no major repairing. Commissioner Wearden asked how many attendants i-. be em- ployed and what parking problems would be encountered. Mr. LeFebvre stated that 3 or 4 attendants would be employed for a normal operation and that the dealer will have to exer- cise'control over the parking situation to prevent unauthor- ized parking. Mr. Lloyd Long, 3609 N. Rosemead Blvd., owner for 52 years, stated that this is a very poor location as far as residential use is concerned. Mr. George Vercelli, 8839 E. Las Tunas Drive, Temple City, Realtor stated that he has held title to this corner property for two years and during this time it has been very difficult to keep a permanent rentor of this property. The rent is $50.00 a month and the only interested rentors are transients and single girls which create a problem. Attorney Boyko stated that both owners bought this property knowing it was zoned R -3 and have made no attempts to develop it as a multiple unit. Mr. Loren Rightmeir, 8730 E. Valley Blvd., Rosemead,stated that he felt this zone exception should be granted. Chairman Wilt stated that the Commission has the right to place any conditions on this zone exception that they may feel necessary in regard to parking, lighting, signs, etc. He further asked if there were any persons present who wished to speak in opposition to this zone exception. Chairman Wilt stated that there being no opposition in writ- ing or in person the Public Hearing would be declared closed at 9:32 o'clock p.m. (MO) It was moved by Lieberg, second by Kunz, that the Planning Commission request the following: 1. That a report from the Traffic Commission regarding a traffic count on Rosemead Blvd, going south and Glendon Way going west, also a report on how the Traffic Dept.. feels the effect of such a development at this intersection would have on the current traffic pattern. 2. That the Traffic Commission advise the Planning Commission of any plans they may have to alleviate the traffic conges- tion at this location. 3. That the Secretary be requested to obtain from a Fire Insurance Underwriter the effect of the fire insurance rate on the adjacent residential properties. 4. That the Planning Consultant, Mr. Mansur, be requested to supply a report with his recommendation regarding this zone exception. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Buchanan, Kunz, Lieberg, McCaffree, Wearden, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: Casares. Secretary Pederson stated that the next Traffic Commission meeting would be July 6, so their report would be ready for the Planning Commission meeting of July 17, 1961. - 2 - 11 5. PLOT PLAN NO. 58 - E.W. HICKEY - Corner Loftus Drive and Strang Avenue - 9:50 p.m. Advisor Flanery presented the factual data regarding this plot plan. Commissioner Wearden stated that the shrubbery on this corner is a serious obstruction. Chairman Wilt asked if there was anyone present to represent this plot plan and was advised that Mr. Hickey had been in- formed to attend this meeting. There was no one present to represent this plot plan this evening. (MO) It was moved by Buchanan, second by Lieberg, that the Plan- ning Commission hold this plot plan over until the next meeting and advise the owner and applicant by mail that the plan is not sufficiently complete as to the location of the sewer lines. Also this Commission will proceed with action at the next meeting even if the applicant is not present. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Buchanan, Kunz, Lieberg, McCaffree, Wearden, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: Casares. 6. PLOT PLAN NO. 59 - WALLEN NOVELL - 4553 N. Delta Avenue HOWARD TAWNEY, Applicant - 10 :07 p.m. Advisor Flanery presented the factual data regarding this plot plan and stated that the applicant may be asked about the possibility of widening the driveway. Attorney Boyko asked if the record indicates whether the property owners are joining in this application. Howard Tawney, 5107 N. Rosemead Blvd., Temple City, applicant, stated that this property is in escrow subject to lot split approval and he will develop the rear and live in the front house. He further stated he has an affidavit from the owner stating their interest in this property. (MO) It was moved by Lieberg, second by McCaffree, that Plot Plan No. 59 be approved as presented subject to the following conditions as outlined in the Planning Commission's policies: Items 3, 4A, 5B & C, and 6 through 10; also that the driveway on the south side of the property serving parcels B & C be a minimum of 16 feet in width and that all other existing structures be removed excluding the house. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Buchanan, Kunz, Lieberg, McCaffree, Wearden, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: Casares. 7. PLOT PLAN NO. 61 - C.K. MILLER - 9230 East Marshall Street - SANTA ANITA CONSTRUCTION CO. - 10:23 p.m. Advisor Flanery presented the factual data regarding this plot plan, and stated that they are meeting the 20' setback requirement. He further explained the guest parking dimen- sions as follows: Parcel 1 - 26' X 20 Parcel 2 - 26' X 34' and Parcel 3 - 22' north and south extending back about 45'. Mr. Miller, 5923 N. Willard, San Gabriel, stated that this property is in escrow pending approval of this lot split. He further explained that this property had not been surveyed to show the fall of the land. - 3 - • L (MO) It was moved by Lieber§; second by Kunz, that Plot Plan No. 61 be approved as presented subject to the following conditions as listed in the Planning Commission policies: Items 4A and 6 through 10, also the applicant should be so advised with the plot plan approval of the drainage problem involved with the property. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Buchanan, Kunz, Lieberg, McCaffree; Wearden, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: Casares. 8. PLOT PLAN NO. 62 - JOHN PAGE - 8443 E. Grand Avenue - 10:50 p.m. Advisor Flanery presented the factual data regarding this plot plan and that this is a house move -in and requires Planning Commission approval. Mr. John Page, 8443 E. Grand Avenue, applicant and owner, stated he needed this additional house for retired relatives and that the store room could easily be moved behind the garage. Mr. Page presented photos of the house to be moved in for the Commission to review. (MO) It was moved by Lieberg, second by Buchanan, that Plot Plan No. 62 be approved as presented subject to the following conditions as set forth in the Planning Commission policies: Items 3, 4A and 6 through 10. In addition all existing structures on the property are to be removed with the excep- tion of the garage, store room and house on Parcel A. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Buchanan, Kunz, Lieberg, McCaffree, Wearden, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: Casares. Chairman Wilt declared a recess at 11 :10 o'clock p.m. Meeting reconvened at 11 :20 o'clock p.m. LEGISLATIVE: OLD BUSINESS 9. BUFFER ZONE REPORT - EVERETT MANSUR, PLANNING CONSULTANT Secretary Pederson read Mr. Mansur'sreport in full regarding buffer zones. Chairman Wilt stated that this is a good framework and gives the Commission something to work with. Attorney Boyko stated that it would be wise to request Mr. Mansur to prepare an emergency interim ordinance for action at the next meeting to have something to govern the new annexation areas. Commissioner Lieberg stated that he would like to point out from experience the noise problem resulting from M zones and how noises reflect off of these buildings and block walls. The ordinance should include provisions for this type of prob- lem. Advisor Flanery pointed out that this ordinance should include a requirement for paving or oiling of parking areas and also to specify the type of trees or shrubs that should be used in the planting areas. Attorney Boyko stated he would be very happy to go over any drafting of this ordinance with Mr. Mansur. Chairman Wilt requested Commissioner Lieberg-to get in touch with Mr. Mansur to prepare a draft buffer zone ordinance along the lines of his report and the discussion tonight. - 4 - 10. MATTERS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF A. Southern California Planning Congress Secretary Pederson announce that the Southern California Planning Congress will meet Thursday, June 8, 1961, at the Mission Inn i,n Riverside, at 7:00 P.M. The subject for this meeting is "The Impact of the Freeway on the Community ". B. Consolidated Floor Covering m Copany Secretary Pederson report e tat the City Council at their last meeting adopted an emergency ordinance for the rezoning of Consolidated Floor Covering property which had been des- troyed by fire. C. Sacheli Pro ert - 9253 Rose Street Rosemead: Secretary Pe erson state tat t e Sac e i property on Rose Street which had the sidewalk requirement waived had changed ownership prior to Planning Commission action and the action therefore was null and void. D. City Beaut ification: Chairman Wi t asked Commissioner Lieberg to serve as a member of the Committee for City Beautification Program. E. Billboard Ordinances: Attorney Boy o stated that CA Farrell had asked him to prepare a draft of two ordinances for the regulation of billboards. The State plans on landscaping the Freeway in the City of Rose- mead, however, funds will not be made available until this ordinance is adopted. Under 'this ordinance and present zoning there will be no billboards permitted: He further stated that there were a few necessary changes to be made on this draft. CA Farrell stated that the Commission might appoint a commit- tee of two or three members to study these proposed ordinances and incorporate any general ideas they may have or possibly the administrative staff could prepare a report from the data collected by Mr. Lieberg. F. Meeting Time: Chair -- man Wilt stated that the next agenda should have an item pertaining to the meetings starting at 7:30 p.m. (MO) It was moved by McCaffree, second by Wilt, that the next regular Rosemead Planning Commission meeting will be called to order at 7:30 o'clock p.m. and adjourn not later than 11:30 o'clock p.m. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Buchanan, Kunz, McCaffree, Wearden, Wilt. Noes: Lieberg. Absent: Casares. (MO) It was moved by Chairman Wilt, second by Lieberg, and unani- mously carried that the meeting adjourn. Meeting adjourned at 12:08 o'clock a.m. Next regular meeting will be June 19, 1961, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. CHAIRMAN SECRETARY - 5 - r I CITY OF 3964 North Rosemead, AT 0 -0181 ROSEMEAD Rosemead Blvd. California - CU 3 -4371 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STANDARD REQUIREh1EN.T5 FOR APPROVAL OF PLOT PLANS The Rosemead Planning Commission, pursuant to the Rosemead Interim Zoning Ordinance and all amendments thereto, has established the policies listed herein. These are general policies which shall be adhered to, although modifications will be possible lii special cases, 1. When a portion of the accessway is shown as a pg}t of the minimum area, not less than 80% of the minimum area shall be building area and yard. 2. Driveways must be a minimum of 10 feet in width. 3. Community driveways must be a minimum of 16 feet in width where the driveway serves or has the potential of serving three dwellings or more. 4. All driveways serving more than one residence, must be surfaced in accordance with the following minimum standards: (a) 2 premix over 4" aggregate base Type A, for those areas north of the Freeway and, (b) 4" premix over 4 aggregate base Type A, for those areas south of the Freeway. 5. In cases where more than one dwelling per lot or parcel of land exists or is to be constructed, the following minimum paved guest parking area will be required. (a) Dwellings of two bedrooms or.les,s must have a minimum of one 10 X 20 (minimum size) guest parking space. (b) Dwellings of three or more bedrooms must have a mini- mum of one 20 X 20 (minimum size) guest parking space. (c) In lieu of items (a) and (b) above, guest parking space may be provided by locating the garage a mini- mum of 25 feet from the nearest edge of driveway, such space to be a minimum of 20 feet wide. 0 6. Each single family dwelling unit (R -1, must be serviced by separate sewer, ga 7. On parcels of land where drainage is a way must be so constructed as to drain from the lot as possible to the street is located. Ll R -A, or A -1 5i000) s, and water lines. problem the drive= as much run off on which the property 8. Where two or more lots share a common driveway, mutual easements and maintenance covenants shall be recorded. A form with recommended wording is available at City Hall. 9. Plot plans must be submitted as finished copies with no added markings, and must contain all dimensions, plus the signature of the owner and applicant. If the owner will not appear before the Planning Commission his signature should be notarized. 10. All plot plans and other approvals granted by the Rosemead Planning Commission shall be considered revoked one year from approval date unless otherwise specified in the approval or unless the owner or applicant can show continuous progress towards completion over the twelve (12) month period. A request for extension of time by the.applicant in writing will be considered by the Commission at any time within 18 months of the approval date.