Loading...
PC - Minutes - 06-04-62CITY OF ROSEMEAD ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of June 4, 1962 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rosemead was held in the Council Chambers, 8815 East Valley Boulevard. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Wilt at 7:45 o'clock p.m. 1. The.Pledge of Alleg.iance.was led by Advisor Flanery. 2. Present: Commissioners: Taylor, Kunz, Wilt, McCaffree, Crabtree. Absent: Commissioners: Buchanan, Casares. Ex officio: Boyko, Farrel), Flanery, Mansur, Phillips. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 21, 1962 (MO) It was moved by Crabtree, second by Kunz, and unanimously carried that the minutes of May 21, 1962, be approved as printed. ADMINISTRATION: 3A. PLOT PLAN NO. 97 - 4320 NORTH RIO HONDO AVENUE - PFISTER Secretary Farrell explained that this plot plan should have been on the agenda tonight for final action. Attorney Boyko stated that approval of this plot plan was voted down at the meeting of May 7, 1962, therefore, this matter is still on the floor and some action should be taken. If there is a denial a reason should be given for such action. Advisor Flanery resubmitted the factual data regarding this plot plan. Commissioner Casares arrived at 7:55 o'clock p.m. Mr. Pfister, applicant and owner, 4320 North Rio Hondo Avenue, addressed the commission in regard to this plan. Commissioner Crabtree stated that the house in the back was too close to the house in the middle and there is no view. (MO) it was moved by Crabtree, second by Kunz, that Plot Plan No. 97 be denied according to Section 729A of the Rosemead Zoning Ordinance. Attorney Boyko read Section 729A of the ordinance in full. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Taylor, Kunz, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: Buchanan. Commissioner Casares abstained from voting. Attorney Boyko stated that the applicant has the right to appeal this decision to the City Council within 15 days after written notice of this action. Commissioner Casares stated that on page 2, third from last paragraph should read as follows: "Commissioner Casares stated that just because Mr. Santino owns both parcels is no reason to deny. The owner has agreed to meet all conditions set to this plan by the Commission and that while we should plan for the future we should not use dictatorial methods." OLD BUSINESS 4. PLOT PLAN NO. 82 - RELOCATION - 8834 MARSHALL STREET - HELEN KRATOVIL Secretary Farrell stated that this plan was approved December 18, 6 -4 -62 0 1961, and the applicant now wished to rearrange the plan. Advisor Flanery presented the factual data regarding this plot plan. This plan was on the agenda of May 7, 1962, and was postponed for this meeting. Mr. Johnson, developer, Post Office Box 93, Temple City, stated that he is not the owner and does not live on the property. To date he has not talked with anyone in regard to making this a larger development. Attorney Boyko stated that this is an approved plot plan and can be developed under the original approval. However, it seems to be the general feeling that this is a much better plan then the original. (MO) It was moved by Crabtree, second by Casares, that Plot Plan No. 82, relocation be approved subject to the Planning Commission's standard requirements. Attorney Boyko stated that Section 649(b) Revocation of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Rosemead -that this use is not being exercised. After further discussion Crabtree withdrew his motion with agreement of second. (MO) It was moved by McCaffree, second by Crabtree, that Plot Plan No. 82, relocation, be postponed until the meeting of June 18, 1962, pending the contacting of the owner. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: Buchanan. 5. PLOT PLAN NO. 94, RELOCATION - 3603 NORTH TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD - C. H. STRACK Secretary Farrell stated this plan had been approved on May 7, 1962, and that the applicant and owner wished to relocate buildings different from the original approval. Advisor Flanery presented the factual data regarding this relocation. Gerald Strack, 3611 North Temple City Boulevard, owner and Larry McCann, 10114 Scott, Whittier, developer, addressed the Commission in regard to the size of the garage on parcel A. Attorney Boyko stated it would be well to adopt a standard stating the size of a 2 car garage. Advisor Flanery stated that the two front parcels will be under sized when 10 foot is dedicated for right -of -way. He suggested that the rear lot line of parcels A and B be moved back to provide sufficient square footage. (MO) It was moved by Casares, second by Taylor, that Plot Plan No. 94 for relocation be approved subject to the Planning Commission's standard requirements and that the rear lot lines on parcel A and B be moved to provide the minimum, or more, square footage due to the 10 foot dedication of right -of -way on Temple City Boulevard. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: Buchanan. NEW BUSINESS 6. PLOT PLAN NO. 100 - 4549 NORTH IVAR AVENUE - E. A. ROLLINS - 2 - 6 -4 -62 0 0 Advisor Flanery presented the factual data regarding this plot plan. This property has 3 existing and 3 proposed homes. Mr. E. A. Rollins, present owner, stated that the property is in escrow now subject to Planning Commission approval. The new owner would be Mr. Edward Poore, 312 West Garvey, El Monte. (MO) After general discussion it was Wilt, that Plot Plan No. 100 be June 18, 1962 at which time.the present. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: None. abstained from votingi moved by Casares, second by postponed until the meeting of owner and purchaser should be Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, 4bsent: Buchanan. .McCaffree LEGISLATIVE: OLD BUSINESS 7. INDUSTRIAL SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Secretary Farrell stated that the City Council by its action of May 22, 1962, referred this proposed ordinance back to the Planning Commission for further study. Attorney Boyko stated that Sections 274.7 and 274.8 could read "adjacent to any street or highway ". He also referred to a letter from the County Counsel in regard to this matter. (MO) After further discussion it was moved by McCaffree, second by Kunz, that the proposed Industrial Setback Requirement Ordinance be recommended to the City Council for approval with the follow- ing revisions: 1. That Sections 274.7, 274.8, 466.7 and 466.8, fourth line read "adjacent to any street or highway ". 2. That Sections 274.7 and 466.7 read "setback of not less than 40 feet ". (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Taylor, Kunz, McCaffree, Crabtree. Noes: Casares, Wilt. Absent: Buchanan. NEW BUSINESS 8. None. COMMUNICATIONS 9. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PLANNING CONGRESS Secretary Farrell announced the next meeting of the Southern California Planning Congress will be Thursday, June 14, 1962, at the Lakewood Country Club. Planning Consultant Mansur stated that this would be a most enlightening meeting. Chairman Wilt stated if there were no objections the Commission would make 3 reservations. There were no objections and it was so ordered. Attorney Boyko and Advisor Flanery were excused at 10 :12 o'clock p.m. 10. MATTERS FROM COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF A. STANDARD REQUIREMENTS Chairman Wilt stated that the Planning Commission's standard - 3 - • s 6 -4 -62 requirements should be revised to include No. 11 covering House Move -ins. Secretary Farrell stated that the second paragraph of Item No. 10 should read 12 months instead of 18 months. (MO) After short discussion it was moved by Casares, second by Kunz, that the Planning Commission's Standard Requirements be amended by adding No. 12 to read as follows: That the minimum exterior size of a two car garage or carport shall not be less than 20 feet x 20 feet. Planning Consultant Mansur stated that in the proposed Zoning Ordinance a parking space is defined as 10 feet x 20 feet. (RC) Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes: Casares, Taylor, Kunz, McCaffree, Crabtree, Wilt. Noes: None. Absent: Buchanan. (MO) It was moved by Casares, second by Kunz, and unanimously carried that the meeting adjourn to a study session. Meeting adjourned at 10:35 o'clock p.m. Next regular meeting will be June 18, 1962, at 7 :30 o'clock p.m. CHAIRMAN SECRETARY - 4 -